 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 16, Number 21,
Issue of November 1, 1996
pp. 6687-6694
Copyright ©1996 Society for Neuroscience
Cloning and Functional Expression of a Drosophila
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Expressed in the Embryonic CNS
Marie-Laure Parmentier,
Jean-Philippe Pin,
Joël Bockaert, and
Yves Grau
Unité Propre de Recherche-Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique 9023, Mécanismes Moléculaires des
Communications Cellulaires, Centre de Pharmacologie-Endrocrinologie,
34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate plays important roles in
the mammalian brain, ranging from synaptic plasticity to memory. To
mediate these functions, glutamate activates two types of receptors:
ligand-gated channels and metabotropic receptors coupled to G-proteins.
Both families of glutamate receptors share no sequence homology and
possess original structural features compared with other ligand-gated
channels and G-protein-coupled receptors, respectively. Glutamate-gated
receptor-channel subunits have already been characterized in
invertebrates. Here we report the cloning and functional
characterization of an invertebrate metabotropic glutamate receptor
(DmGluRA) isolated from Drosophila melanogaster. This
receptor displays 45 and 43% amino acid sequence identity with its
mammalian homologs mGluR3 and mGluR2, respectively. Moreover, its
pharmacology and transduction mechanisms are surprisingly similar to
those of mGluR2 and mGluR3. DmGluRA is expressed in the CNS of the late
embryo. These results indicate that the original structural features of
both glutamate receptor types are conserved from insects to mammals and
suggest that the functions of these receptors have been highly
conserved during evolution.
Key words:
CNS;
Drosophila melanogaster;
glutamate;
G-protein coupling;
metabotropic glutamate receptor;
embryogenesis;
adenylyl cyclase inhibition
INTRODUCTION
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter
in the vertebrate CNS. To mediate fast synaptic transmission, it
activates AMPA- and NMDA-selective ionotropic receptors (Hollmann and
Heinemann, 1994 ), the latter playing important roles in synaptic
plasticity, neurotoxicity, development, and memory formation. In
addition, glutamate activates G-protein-coupled metabotropic receptors
(mGluRs), which can modulate or mediate neurotransmission and play a
role in long-term changes in synaptic efficacy (Pin and Duvoisin,
1995 ). This makes them essential for functions as diverse and important
as developmental plasticity (Dudek and Bear, 1989 ; Catania et al.,
1994 ), vision (Masu et al., 1995 ), olfactory memory (Hayashi et al.,
1993 ; Kaba et al., 1994 ), spatial memory, and motor control (Aiba et
al., 1994 ; Conquet et al., 1994 ). Eight mGluRs (mGluR1-8) have been
cloned in vertebrates (Nakanishi, 1994 ; Pin and Duvoisin, 1995 ). They
can be classified into three groups based on their amino acid sequence
identity, pharmacology, and transduction mechanism. mGluR1 and mGluR5
are coupled to phospholipase C (PLC) and constitute the first group.
mGluR2/3 and mGluR4, -6, -7, and -8 inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC) and
constitute the second and third groups, respectively.
Both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors share no sequence
and structural homology with the other ligand-gated channels and
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), respectively (Hollmann and
Heinemann, 1994 ). Indeed, metabotropic glutamate receptors constitute,
with the calcium-sensing receptor (Brown et al., 1993 ), a new family of
GPCRs. Their ligand binding site is located in a large N-terminal
extracellular domain homologous to bacterial periplasmic binding
proteins (O'Hara et al., 1993 ), whereas for most other GPCRs it is
located in a cavity formed by the seven transmembrane domains.
Moreover, the specificity of interaction with G-proteins is determined
by the second intracellular loop in mGluRs (Pin et al., 1994 ; Gomeza et
al., 1996a ) and by the third intracellular loop in most other GPCRs
(Liu et al., 1995 ).
In arthropods, glutamate is well known as the transmitter at the
neuromuscular junction (Jan and Jan, 1976 ; Delgado et al., 1989 ). It is
also recognized as a transmitter in the invertebrate CNS (Bicker et
al., 1988 ), where it has both excitatory and inhibitory actions
(Bolshakov et al., 1991 ; Kehoe, 1994 ; Parker, 1994 ). Indeed, subunits
of glutamate-gated cationic channel receptors have been cloned in
nematodes (Hart et al., 1995 ; Maricq et al., 1995 ), in
Lymnea (Hutton et al., 1991 ; Stühmer et al., 1996 ),
and in Drosophila (Schuster et al., 1991 ; Ultsch et al.,
1992 , 1993 ). These cationic receptor subunits are homologous to the
mammalian ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits. In contrast, an
anionic glutamate-gated receptor cloned from Caenorhabditis
elegans (Cully et al., 1994 ) is homologous to the mammalian
GABA/glycine receptor subunits. The Drosophila subunit
DGluRI, the molluscan kainate-type receptor, and the nematode AMPA-type
receptor GLR-1 are expressed in the CNS, whereas the
Drosophila receptor subunit DGluRII is expressed in muscle
cells. Mutations in GLR-1 lead to abnormal mechanosensory signaling
(Hart et al., 1995 ; Maricq et al., 1995 ). Moreover, a sequence
homologous to mammalian mGluRs has been found by systematic sequencing
of C. elegans genome (Wilson et al., 1994 ). Taken together,
these data suggest important functions for glutamate in
invertebrates.
Here we report the isolation of a cDNA encoding a Drosophila
metabotropic glutamate receptor, called DmGluRA, homologous to the
mammalian mGluR family and especially to group II mGluRs. In
mammalian-transfected cells, DmGluRA behaves as a functional glutamate
receptor negatively coupled to AC. Its pharmacology is very close to
that of mGluR2. It is expressed in the adult and in the CNS of the
Drosophila late embryo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials. AMPA, L-quisqualate,
(2S,3S,4S)- -(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine (L-CCG-I),
(2S, 3S, 4S)-2-methyl-2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine (MCCG-I),
(S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine (4C3HPG),
(S)-3-hydroxyphenylglycine (3HPG),
(RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG),
L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutanoate (L-AP4),
(S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-phosphonobutyrate (MAP4),
L-serine-o-phosphate (L-SOP),
(RS)- -methyl-4-phosphonophenylglycine (MPPG),
(RS)- -methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG),
(RS)- -methyl-4-tetrazolylphenylglycine (MTPG), and
(RS)- -methyl-4-sulfonophenylglycine (MSPG) were obtained from Tocris
Cookson (Essex, UK). The two isomers
1S,3S-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentanedicarboxylate (1S,3S-ACPD) and
1S,3R-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentanedicarboxylate (1S,3R-ACPD) were a
generous gift of Dr. K. Curry (Vancouver, Canada). NMDA, glutamate, and
kainic acid were from Sigma-Aldrich (L'isle d'Abeau, France).
Cloning of DmGluRA. A set of primers was used to amplify the
cDNA fragments coding for the transmembrane region. The sense primer
aMDM55 (5 -TA(C/T) AG(C/T) GT(G/A/T/C) CT(A/G) CTI AC(G/A/T/C) AA(A/G)
AC-3 ) and the antisense primer aMDM43 (5 -CC(A/G) AT(G/A/T/C) AT(A/G)
CAI GTI GT(A/G) TAC AT-3 ) correspond to the consensus sequences found
in transmembrane domains III and VI. A cDNA library (gift from L. Jan,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) prepared
from heads of wild-type Oregon R Drosophila was used as a
template. A band of 480 bp was obtained after 40 cycles of
amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 52°C
for 45 sec, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min). After subcloning into
the pBluescript vector, the PCR fragments were sequenced using the
dideoxy technique. One clone homologous to mGluRs was obtained and
random prime-labeled to screen the cDNA library at high stringency
(42°C, 50% formamide, 5× SSC, 5× PAF, 0.5% SDS, and 20 µg/ml
salmon sperm DNA).
Sequence of the 3358 bp DmGluRA cDNA was performed on both strands by
the dideoxy technique using successive synthetic oligonucleotides.
Construction of DmGluRA expression vector. The
BamHI-Asn I fragment of DmGluRA was inserted
into the expression vector pRK7 digested with BamHI, with
SmaI giving the pRKDGAs clone.
DmGluRA Kosak sequence was modified by PCR to fit the mammalian
consensus sequence (Cavener, 1987 ). Sense primer was (5 -CGG GGA
TCC ACC ATG AAA CAG AAA AAT AAT AAC-3 ) with a
BamHI restriction site, and antisense primer was (5 -CGT AAA
AAG AAC AAC GCC G-3 ). The PCR product and the pRKDGAs clone were
digested with BamHI and PpuM I, gel-purified, and
ligated. The resulting recombinant was called KosDMGRAs.
Culture and transfection of HEK 293 cells. Cells were
cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg MD) supplemented with
10% fetal calf serum and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin, 100 U/ml final). Electroporation was performed in a total volume of 300 µl with 12.5 µg of carrier DNA (plasmid DNA without insert), 5 µg
of KosDMGRAs with 6 µg of Gqi9, Gqi5, or Gqwt (in pCDNAI,
Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), or with 600 ng luteinizing hormone (LH)
receptor (in pRK8) for 1 × 107 cells in
electroporation buffer (K2HPO4, 50 mM; CH3COOK, 20 mM; KOH, 20 mM).
After electroporation (270 V, 950 µF, Biorad gene pulser
electroporator), cells were resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10%
FCS and antibiotics and split into 12-well clusters (5 × 106 cells per cluster) precoated with
poly-L-ornithine [15 µg/ml; molecular weight (MW)
40,000; Sigma-Aldrich].
Determination of cAMP accumulation. The cellular cAMP
production was measured using the prelabeling technique. Four hours
after being electroporated, cells were washed and incubated for 14 hr
in DMEM glutamax I (Life Technologies, Cergy Pontoise, France)
containing 1 µCi/ml [3H] adenine (27 Ci/mmol) and
pertussis toxin (PTX) (100 ng/ml) when indicated. Cells were then
washed three times and incubated for 1.5 hr at 37°C in 1 ml of HEPES
buffer saline (in mM): 146 NaCl, 4.2 KCl, 0.5 MgCl2, 20 HEPES, and glucose 0.1%, pH 7.4. Cells were then
washed again twice with the same medium, incubated for 8 min with 0.75 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine (Sigma), and stimulated for
10 min with 100 ng/ml LH (Sigma) or 1 mM Glu or both. The
reaction was stopped by aspiration of the media and addition of 1 ml of
ice-cold 5% trichloroacetic acid. Cells were scraped, and 100 µl of
10 mM ATP and 10 mM cAMP were added to the
mixture. Cellular proteins were removed by centrifugation at 5000 × g, and [3H]-ATP and [3H]-cAMP
were separated by sequential chromatography on Dowex and alumina
columns. cAMP formation is expressed as percentage conversion of
[3H]-ATP to [3H]-cAMP:
([3H]-cAMP × 100)/([3H]-cAMP + [3H]-ATP).
Determination of inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation.
Determination of IP accumulation in transfected cells was performed as
described previously (Joly et al., 1995 ). Four hours after
electroporation, cells were washed and incubated for 14 hr in
DMEM-glutamax I containing 1 µCi/ml
myo-[3H]inositol (22.9 Ci/mmol). Cells were
then washed three times and incubated in HEPES saline buffer for 1 hr
with 3 µg/ml glutamate pyruvate transaminase (Boehringer Mannheim,
Meylan, France) and 2 mM pyruvate. Cells were then washed
twice and incubated for 5 min in medium containing 10 mM
LiCl. Agonists were then added for a period of 30 min. Antagonists were
added just before agonists during the LiCl preincubation. The reaction
was stopped by replacing the incubation medium with 1 ml 5% perchloric
acid. The total IP was then extracted and purified on Dowex columns as
described previously (Joly et al., 1995 ). Total radioactivity remaining
in the membrane fraction was counted after solubilization in 10%
Triton 0.1N NaOH and used as standard. Results are expressed as the
amount of IP produced over the radioactivity present in the
membranes.
RT-PCR of DmGluRA. Total RNA was extracted from
Drosophila by the guanidium isothiocyanate method
(Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987 ). PolyA RNA was obtained with the RNA
Flash Kit (Bioprobe Systems, Montreuil, France). One microgram of polyA
RNA was reverse-transcribed with 50 µ M-MLV reverse transcriptase
(Life Technologies) in a 20 µl reaction containing 100 pmol of
nonamer random primers (Bioprobe Systems, Montreuil, France), 1 mM dNTPs, and 10 mM DTT in the reaction buffer
supplied by the manufacturer. The PCR reaction was performed using 2 µl of the RT reaction with the sense primer dec 8s (5 -ATG CGA CGA
TAG TTA CCG G-3 ) and the antisense primer dec 18r (5 -ACC TAC TTC GGC
CTG TTC A-3 ). Reaction was as follows: 30 cycles of denaturation at
94°C for 1 min, annealing at 56°C for 45 sec, and elongation at
72°C for 1 min. The PCR products were subcloned into pGEM-T vector
(Promega, Charbonnières, France) and sequenced. A Southern blot
of these PCR products was realized at high stringency (42°C, 50%
formamide, 5× SSC, 5× PAF, 0.5% SDS, and 20 µg/ml salmon sperm
DNA) using a radiolabeled DmGluRA probe.
Whole-mount embryo in situ hybridization. DmGluRA
transcripts were localized by whole-mount in situ
hybridization with a digoxygenin-labeled probe (Lehmann and Tautz,
1994 ). Two hundred nanograms of the EcoRI fragment of
DmGluRA were amplified with 0.6 mM of a mix of 6 sense or 6 antisense oligos dispersed on the whole sequence, with DIG DNA labeling
mix (Boehringer Mannheim) diluted 5×, and with 1 U of Vent DNA
polymerase. The amplification was performed using 30 cycles: 94°C for
1 min, 52°C for 45 sec, and 72°C for 1 min. The probe was then
boiled for 30 min to reduce the DNA size. Dechorionated and
devitelinized embryos were incubated overnight at 46°C in 50%
formamide, 5× SSC, 0.1% Tween 20, 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and
50 µg/ml heparin solution, with the probe diluted 60 times. Embryos
were then washed progressively in 1× PBS, 0.1% Tween 20 at 46°C,
incubated with anti-digoxygenine antibody conjugated with alkaline
phosphatase for 1 hr at room temperature, washed again, and incubated
with alkaline phosphatase substrates.
In situ hybridization to polytene chromosome.
Drosophila salivary gland polytene chromosome squashes were
hybridized with biotinylated DNA probes obtained by nick-translation.
Hybridizations were performed as described (Pardue, 1994 ) at 37°C
with 50% formamide and 4× SSC.
RESULTS
Cloning and analysis of DmGluRA
Cloning of Drosophila mGluRs homologs was performed
through a PCR approach using degenerated oligonucleotides corresponding
to the transmembrane domains III and VI highly conserved in the mGluR
family. From all PCR products obtained using Drosophila head
cDNAs as template, one sequence was found to be homologous to rat
mGluRs. This fragment was used to screen a -Zap
Drosophila head cDNA library to get the corresponding cDNA,
which was called DmGluRA. It contains a 2.9-kb-long open reading frame
with 5 and 3 untranslated regions but no polyadenylation signal.
The deduced amino acid sequence of DmGluRA contains 977 amino acid
residues corresponding to a protein of a predicted MW of 108 kDa. This
protein sequence reveals that all of the structural features
characteristic of the mammalian mGluRs are conserved in DmGluRA: a
putative N-terminal signal peptide, a large extracellular domain with a
cysteine-rich region, seven putative transmembrane segments that give
rise to three short intracellular loops (i1, i2, i3), and a C-terminal
tail (Fig. 1). All of the cysteines conserved in the
mammalian mGluRs are also conserved in DmGluRA.
Fig. 1.
Multiple alignment of DmGluRA with one rat mGluR
from each group and with the bovine calcium-sensing receptor. Residues
conserved in the entire mGluR family (including those not represented
in the figure) and in the calcium-sensing receptor are
highlighted in black. Residues conserved
only in the entire mGluR family are highlighted in
gray. Conserved cysteines are indicated by an
asterisk, and potential N-glycosylation
sites in DmGluRA by . Leucine 730 of DmGluRA is indicated by ,
and potential phosphorylation sites of this receptor (by protein kinase
A and casein kinase II) are indicated by . The sequence of the
second intracellular loop is bordered in
black. The position of transmembrane domains I-VII is
underlined in black. The sequence of the
cDNA, from which the DmGluRA protein was deduced, has been given the
EMBL accession number X99675[GenBank].
[View Larger Version of this Image (95K GIF file)]
DmGluRA is most homologous to group II mGluRs (45% amino acid identity
with mGluR3 and 43% with mGluR2). A dendrogram constructed with the
percentages of identity between DmGluRA and rat mGluRs and the bovine
parathyroid calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) shows that DmGluRA belongs
to the subgroup formed by groups II and III mammalian mGluRs (Fig.
2). DmGluRA branches with group II rather than group
III, although this relies only on a slight difference in the percentage
of identity (5%).
Fig. 2.
UPGMA dendrogram using pairwise amino acid
identities (indicated in percentages) between all members of the mGluR
family and bovine parathyroid CaR as an outgroup. Cophenetic
correlation coefficient was 0.99, indicating an overall very good
fit.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Transduction mechanism of DmGluRA
To determine its transduction pathway, DmGluRA was transiently
expressed into human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells. Glutamate
elicited neither cAMP nor IP formation in cells expressing DmGluRA
(Fig. 3A,B). In cells coexpressing DmGluRA
and the LH receptor, glutamate induced a strong inhibition of the
LH-stimulated cAMP production (Fig. 3A). No such inhibition
was observed after pretreatment of the cells with Bordetella
PTX (Fig. 3A) or in cells expressing the LH receptor alone
(data not shown). PTX is known to prevent the activation of
Gi and Go G-proteins, the Gi
proteins often being involved in the negative coupling of receptors to
AC. This indicates that DmGluRA is negatively coupled to AC like the
group II and III mammalian mGluRs.
Fig. 3.
Transduction mechanism and pharmacology of
DmGluRA. A, Cotransfection of DmGluRA and LH receptor
(LHR). Percentage of conversion of ATP in cAMP is
estimated in the presence of either 1 mM glutamate or 100 ng/ml LH or in the presence of both agonists. The same experiment is
repeated on cells pretreated with 100 ng/ml PTX. B,
Measure of IP production after application of 1 mM
glutamate on cells expressing DmGluRA alone or DmGluRA with wild-type
G q (G qwt) or G qi9 or
G qo5. C, Dose-response curves of
agonist-induced IP stimulation (expressed in percent of maximal
glutamate stimulation) when DmGluRA was cotransfected with
G qi9. D, Activation of IP production by 3 µM glutamate in the presence of variable concentrations
of antagonists. In C and D, curve
fittings were realized using Kaleidagraph software [fitting equation:
y = (m1 m2)/(1 + (x/m4) m3) + m2; m1= response when x = 0; m2 = response
when x = ; m3 = slope; m4 = EC50 or IC50]. Values are means ± SEM of
triplicate determinations from typical experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]
To further define the G-protein-coupling specificity of DmGluRA,
its coupling to chimeric G-proteins was analyzed. The -subunit of
Gq (G q) is known to couple GPCRs to PLC,
whereas the G i subunits negatively couple GPCRs to AC,
the coupling to K+ and Ca2+ channels being
mediated by either the Gi or Go type of
G-proteins (Birnbaumer and Birnbaumer, 1995 ). The few last C-terminal
residues of these -subunits are known to be involved in the
specificity of interaction between the G-protein and the receptor
(Conklin and Bourne, 1993 ). Accordingly, the chimeric
G q-proteins in which the five or nine C-terminal
residues have been replaced by those of G i
(G qi5 or G qi9) or G o
(G qo5) allow many Gi/o-coupled
receptors to activate PLC (Conklin et al., 1993 ). In cells coexpressing
DmGluRA and these chimeric G proteins, glutamate
elicited a threefold stimulation of IP production (Fig. 3B).
No such stimulation was observed when DmGluRA was coexpressed with the
wild-type G q protein, indicating that the C-terminal
sequence of G i or G o is necessary for the
coupling of the G-protein to DmGluRA.
Pharmacology of DmGluRA
The measurement of IP production after coexpression of DmGluRA
and G qi9 was more sensitive and accurate than the
measurement of the inhibition of LH-stimulated cAMP production.
Moreover, the pharmacological profiles of the Gi-coupled
mGluR2 and mGluR4 determined by this IP assay were found to be similar
to those reported previously by measuring AC inhibition in cell lines
stably expressing these receptors (Gomeza et al., 1996b ). This assay
therefore was used to establish the pharmacology of DmGluRA. None of
the ionotropic receptor agonists AMPA, kainate, and NMDA had any
activity at 300 µM. The specific and potent group I
mGluRs agonists 3HPG and DHPG (Ito et al., 1992 ) were inactive at a
concentration up to 100 µM; however, group II and III
agonists 1S,3S-ACPD and L-CCG-I (Hayashi et al., 1992 ;
Cartmell et al., 1993 ) were active. Among group III-specific agonists
(Pin and Duvoisin, 1995 ), L-AP4 gave a small response and
L-SOP was inactive at 1 mM. 4C3HPG, which is a
group I antagonist and a group II agonist (Hayashi et al., 1994 ), was
found to be an agonist of DmGluRA. The order of potency of the
different agonists of DmGluRA was Glu > L-CCG-I > 4C3HPG > quisqualate > 1S,3S-ACPD 1S,3R-ACPD > L-AP4 (Fig. 3C, Table
1). Among these, Glu had the best efficacy followed by
4C3HPG, 1S,3S-ACPD, 1S,3R-ACPD, and L-CCG-I.
Table 1.
Pharmacological characterization of
DmGluRA
| Agonists |
EC50
SEM |
Antagonists |
IC50
SEM |
|
| Glu |
1.2
± 0.05 |
(±)MCPG |
>1000 |
| 1S,3S-ACPD |
41
± 6 |
MCCG-I |
201 ± 45 |
| 1S,3R-ACPD |
65
± 2 |
(RS)-MPPG |
513 ± 125 |
| L-CCG-I |
11
± 1 |
(RS)-MSPG |
>1000 |
| (S)-4C3HPG |
20
± 3 |
(RS)-MTPG |
348 ± 32 |
| L-Quis |
28
± 9 |
(S)-MAP4 |
>1000 |
| L-AP4 |
>1000 |
|
|
|
|
Values are EC50 and IC50 (in
µM), determined as described in Materials and Methods,
and are means ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in
triplicates. For agonists, >1000 means the molecule at 1 mM induced a response <50% of the maximal effect of
glutamate. For antagonists, >1000 means the molecule at 1 mM induced <50% inhibition of the 3µM
glutamate effect.
|
|
Among the antagonists tested, the group II-specific antagonist MCCG-I,
as well as MPPG and MTPG (group II and group III antagonists) (Roberts,
1995 ), totally inhibited the glutamate response in a dose-dependent
manner (Fig. 3D). Their order of potency was MCCG-I > MPPG MTPG. MAP4, a group III antagonist (Roberts, 1995 ), and
MCPG, more potent on group I mGluRs, reduced the glutamate response to
50 and 32% of the maximum at 1 mM, respectively.
Localization of DmGluRA mRNAs
Embryonic expression of DmGluRA was studied by in situ
hybridization with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense probe. No signal was
detected until stage 10, where a transient labeling was observed in the
cephalic region (Fig. 4A). No such
labeling was observed when the sense probe was used (data not shown).
At this stage, stomodeal invagination takes place, giving rise to
the anterior and posterior labia. In the posterior labium, two
symmetrical clusters of two or three epithelial cells were labeled. In
the anterior labium, two clusters of 5-10 cells were also labeled. The
anterior and posterior clusters were close to the median plane in the
early stage 10, but the anterior ones moved to the lateral ends of the
labium in the late stage 10. Moreover, the cells of these anterior
clusters were not only epithelial but were also subepithelial. This
labeling completely disappeared at stage 11. Later in development, at
stage 14, we observed a weak labeling restricted to the CNS (Fig.
4B). This labeling became stronger until stage 17 (Fig. 4C). At this stage, DmGluRA RNAs were expressed in
many of the ventrolateral cells of the abdominal CNS as well as in
6-10 median cells of every abdominal segment (Fig.
4D). The expression in the thoracic segments and in
sub- and supraesophageal ganglions was high and difficult to resolve at
the cellular level.
Fig. 4.
In situ hybridization on
whole-mount embryos with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense DmGluRA probe.
In A-D, anterior is on the left, and
when the view is lateral, dorsal is on the top.
A, Stage 10 embryo, lateral view. B,
Stage 14 embryo, lateral view, same scale as A.
C, stage 16 embryo, lateral view. D,
Stage 16 embryo, ventral view, same scale as C. Scale
bar, 100 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (99K GIF file)]
The expression of DmGluRA in the adult was detected by RT-PCR (Fig.
5), in both the head (including the brain) and the rest
of the body of the animal (including the thoracic and abdominal
ganglia).
Fig. 5.
PCR analysis of the expression pattern of DmGluRA
in the adult. PCR products of 485 bp length, hybridizing with a
radiolabeled DmGluRA probe, were obtained from heads (lane
1) and the remaining body fraction (lane 2) as
well as from the positive control performed on the DmGluRA cDNA
(lane 5). Lanes 3 and 4
are negative controls of RT (PCR reaction realized on the product of RT
made without RNAs) and PCR (PCR reaction realized without any
substrate), respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)]
Mapping of the gene encoding DmGluRA
The location of the gene encoding DmGluRA was identified by
in situ hybridization of biotin-labeled DmGluRA probes to
Drosophila salivary gland chromosomes. Hybridization was
observed at position 102 CD of the fourth chromosome (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
We report here the cloning and functional characterization of an
invertebrate mGluR: DmGluRA. Its deduced primary sequence reveals that
all of the characteristics of mammalian mGluRs are conserved in
DmGluRA. Moreover, the 19 cysteine residues conserved in the mammalian
mGluR-CaR receptor family are also conserved in DmGluRA. These residues
are therefore likely to play important roles in the functioning of
these receptor proteins, possibly being involved in intramolecular
transduction (O'Hara et al., 1993 ). DmGluRA is more related to group
II mammalian mGluRs, as shown by the unweighted pair-group method of
arithmetic averages (UPGMA) analysis. It shares ~45 and 43% amino
acid identity with mGluR3 and mGluR2, respectively. Similar percentages
of identity were reported between two Drosophila ionotropic
GluRs and their mammalian homologs (44% for DGluR I with GluR3, 46%
for DNMDAR-I with NMDARI) (Ultsch et al., 1992 , 1993 ). These
observations suggest that the group II mGluR existed in the common
ancestor of arthropods and vertebrates. Consequently, we can suppose
that mGluRs corresponding to the other subgroups are also present in
Drosophila.
When expressed in HEK 293 cells, DmGluRA activates neither AC nor PLC
but is negatively coupled to AC in a PTX-sensitive manner, like its
mammalian homologs. Because G o is absent in HEK 293 cells (Law et al., 1993 ), our results indicate that DmGluRAs do
couple to human G i-type G-proteins. Other
Drosophila receptors, tyramine/octopamine receptor (Arakawa
et al., 1990 ; Saudou et al., 1990 ) and 5HT1ADro and
5HT1BDro receptors (Saudou et al., 1992 ; Colas et al.,
1995 ), also couple to mammalian Gi/o
proteins.
DmGluRA coupling to G-proteins was examined further using
G qi/o chimeric G-proteins. Like other
Gi/o-coupled GPCRs (Conklin et al., 1993 ),
DmGluRA is able to activate these chimeric
G qi/o subunits but does not activate the
wild-type G q. Similar results were obtained with the rat
mGluR2 and mGluR4 (Gomeza et al., 1996b ). Therefore, the C-terminal
region of the -subunit is also critical for the specific coupling of
G-proteins to mGluRs. Moreover, these results suggest that DmGluRA can
couple to Drosophila G i and G o
proteins (Provost et al., 1988 ; Thambi et al., 1989 ). Interestingly,
like DmGluRA, G o protein is expressed in the embryonic
CNS. Therefore, in its native environment, DmGluRA may not only inhibit
AC activity but may also regulate the activity of K+ and
Ca2+ channels (Harris-Warrick et al., 1988 ; Birnbaumer and
Birnbaumer, 1995 ).
Taken together, these results indicate that DmGluRA shares a similar
G-protein-coupling specificity with its mammalian homologs. We recently
reported that i2 of mGluRs plays a critical role in defining the
G-protein-coupling specificity of these receptors (Gomeza et al.,
1996a ). This is in contrast to most other GPCRs in which i3 plays such
a role (Liu et al., 1995 ). In agreement with this proposal, the
residues conserved in the second intracellular loop of
Gi-coupled rat mGluRs, but not in PLC-coupled ones, are
also conserved in DmGluRA (Fig. 1). Interestingly, a proline residue
found in the C-terminal part of i2 in all mammalian mGluRs is not
conserved in DmGluRA (Fig. 1, position 730 of DmGluRA). Although a
proline residue is likely to be important for the secondary structure
of this loop, our observation that DmGluRA has the same
G-protein-coupling specificity as group II and III rat mGluRs suggests
that this residue is not critical for a functional and specific
coupling of these receptors to G-proteins.
The pharmacology of DmGluRA is similar to that of group II mammalian
mGluRs (Tanabe et al., 1992 , 1993 ; Pin and Duvoisin, 1995 ). This is
remarkable because the amino acid identity of DmGluRA with mGluR2/3 in
the supposed glutamate binding domain, i.e., the region homologous to
bacterial periplasmic proteins, is only 45%. This means that the
critical amino acids that determine the pharmacophore of mGluR2/3 are
conserved in DmGluRA. Such a pharmacological profile conservation for
G-protein-coupled receptors is seldom observed through evolution.
Drosophila peptide receptors (Li et al., 1991 , 1992 ; Monnier
et al., 1992 ), cloned Drosophila serotonin receptors
5-HT1ADro, 5-HT1BDro, and 5-HT7Dro (Witz et
al., 1990 ; Saudou et al., 1992 ; Colas et al., 1995 ), the cloned
Drosophila dopamine receptor (Gotzes et al., 1994 ), and the
invertebrate octopamine and tyramine receptors (Arakawa et al., 1990 ;
Saudou et al., 1990 ; Roeder, 1995 ), considered to be noradrenergic
receptor homologs, display important pharmacological differences with
their mammalian homologs; however, the recently cloned 5-HT2
Drosophila receptor is clearly pharmacologically
related to the mammalian homolog 5-HT2B (Colas et al., 1995 ).
A first transient expression of DmGluRA revealed by in situ
hybridization takes place at stage 10. From the comparison with the
fate map established at this stage (Jürgens et al., 1986 ), we
suppose that the posterior labial labeling is situated within the
hypopharyngeal presumptive territory, whereas the anterior labial
labeling is situated within the clypeolabrum presumptive territory.
More work is necessary, however, to determine which cell types express
this mRNA and whether this is of any physiological relevance. A second
period of expression of DmGluRA starts at stage 14 in the CNS and
culminates at stage 17 when the larval CNS is formed. This expression
is nearly synchronous with the expression of glutamate in motoneurones,
which is first observed at 12.5-13.0 hr after egg laying (stage 15)
(Broadie and Bate, 1993 ). Moreover, DmGluRA transcription appears at a
period of neuronal differentiation and synaptogenesis. Indeed, the
contact between motoneurones and their muscle target occurs at
12.5-13.0 hr AEL, and synaptic proteins begin to be expressed at stage
14 (DiAntonio et al., 1993 ). It is therefore likely that DmGluRA plays
a role in embryonic glutamatergic synapses and is possibly involved in
CNS development. Interestingly, mGluR5 and the mammalian DmGluRA
homolog mGluR3 are expressed at a high level during the first postnatal
weeks when synaptogenesis occurs (Catania et al., 1994 ; Romano et al.,
1996 ). A role for these receptors in CNS development has therefore been
proposed.
Taken together, these results indicate that in addition to ionotropic
receptors, metabotropic glutamate receptors are also present in
Drosophila, suggesting major roles for glutamate in the CNS
of insects. The functions of these receptors, in either the development
or physiology of the adult nervous system, will be approached further
using genetic analysis.
FOOTNOTES
Received June 26, 1996; revised Aug. 7, 1996; accepted Aug. 12, 1996.
This work was supported by grants from the Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique, European Community (BIOMED2-BMH4-CT96-0228),
Direction des Recherches et Etudes Techniques (95075), the French
Ministry of Education, Research and Professional Insertion (ACC-SV5,
9505077), and Bayer Company (France and Germany). We thank Drs. C. Dambly-Chaudière and A. Ghysen for critical reading of this
manuscript and for constructive discussions. We thank Drs. B. Conklin
and H. Bourne (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
CA) for the gift of the wild-type and chimeric G q
subunit cDNAs. We thank Dr. F. Lemeunier for her assistance with
in situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes, J. Britton-Davidian for access to microscopic equipment, and P. David for
his help with the UPGMA analysis. We also gratefully acknowledge V. Brand for stimulating discussions, C. Joly for technical assistance, L. Charvet for the iconography, and M. Passama for the bibliographic
searches.
Correspondence should be addressed to Y. Grau, Centre de Pharmacologie,
141 Rue de la Cardonille, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
REFERENCES
-
Aiba A,
Kano M,
Chen C,
Stanton ME,
Fox GD,
Herrup K,
Zwingman TA,
Tonegawa S
(1994)
Deficient cerebellar long-term depression and impaired motor learning in mGluR1 mutant mice.
Cell
79:377-388 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Arakawa S,
Gocayne JD,
McCombie WR,
Urquhart DA,
Hall LM,
Fraser CM,
Venter JC
(1990)
Cloning, localization and permanent expression of a Drosophila octopamine receptor.
Neuron
2:343-354.
-
Bicker G,
Schaefer S,
Ottersen OP,
Storm-Mathisen J
(1988)
Glutamate-like immunoreactivity in identified neuronal populations of insect nervous systems.
J Neurosci
8:2108-2122 .
[Abstract]
-
Birnbaumer L,
Birnbaumer M
(1995)
Signal transduction by G proteins: 1994 edition.
J Recept Signal Transduct Res
15:213-252.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Bolshakov VY,
Gapon SA,
Magazanik LG
(1991)
Different types of glutamate receptors in isolated and identified neurones of the mollusc Planorbarius Corneus.
J Physiol (Lond)
439:15-35 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Broadie KS,
Bate M
(1993)
Development of the embryonic neuromuscular synapse of Drosophila melanogaster.
J Neurosci
13:144-166 .
[Abstract]
-
Brown EM,
Gamba G,
Riccardi D,
Lombardi M,
Butters R,
Kifor O,
Sun A,
Hediger MA,
Lytton J,
Hebert SC
(1993)
Cloning and characterization of an extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor from bovine parathyroid.
Nature
366:575-580 .
[Medline]
-
Cartmell J,
Curtis AR,
Kemp JA,
Kendall DA,
Alexander SPH
(1993)
Subtypes of metabotropic excitatory amino acid receptor distinguished by stereoisomers of the rigid glutamate analogue, 1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylate.
Neurosci Lett
153:107-110 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Catania MV,
Landwehrmeyer GB,
Testa CM,
Standeart DG,
Penney JB,
Young AB
(1994)
Metabotropic glutamate receptors are differentially regulated during development.
Neuroscience
61:481-495 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Cavener DR
(1987)
Comparison of the consensus sequences flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates.
Nucleic Acids Res
15:1353-1361 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chomczynski P,
Sacchi N
(1987)
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:156-159 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Colas JF,
Launay JM,
Kellermann O,
Rosay P,
Maroteaux L
(1995)
Drosophila 5-HT2 serotonin receptor: coexpression with fushi-tarazu during segmentation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:5441-5445 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Conklin BR,
Bourne HR
(1993)
Structural elements of G
subunits that interact with G , receptors, and effectors.
Cell
73:631-641 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Conklin BR,
Farfel Z,
Lustig KD,
Julius D,
Bourne HR
(1993)
Substitution of three amino acids switches receptor specificity of Gq
to that of Gi .
Nature
363:274-276 .
[Medline]
-
Conquet F,
Bashir ZI,
Davies CH,
Daniel H,
Ferraguti F,
Bordi F,
Franz-Bacon K,
Reggiani A,
Matarese V,
Condé F,
Colingridge GL,
Crépel F
(1994)
Motor deficit and impairment of synaptic plasticity in mice lacking mGluR1.
Nature
372:237-243 .
[Medline]
-
Cully DF,
Vassilatis DK,
Liu KK,
Paress PS,
Van der Ploeg LHT,
Schaeffer JM,
Arena JP
(1994)
Cloning of an avermectin-sensitive glutamate-gated chloride channel from Caenorhabditis elegans.
Nature
371:707-711 .
[Medline]
-
Delgado R,
Barla R,
Latorre R,
Labarca P
(1989)
L-glutamate activates excitatory and inhibitory channels in Drosophila larval muscle.
FEBS Lett
243:337-342 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
DiAntonio A,
Burgess RW,
Chin AC,
Deitcher DL,
Scheller RH,
Schwarz TL
(1993)
Identification and characterization of Drosophila genes for synaptic vesicle proteins.
J Neurosci
13:4924-4935 .
[Abstract]
-
Dudek SM,
Bear MF
(1989)
A biochemical correlate of the critical period for synaptic modification in the visual cortex.
Science
246:673-675 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gomeza J,
Joly C,
Kühn R,
Knöpfel T,
Bockaert J,
Pin J-P
(1996a)
The second intracellular loop of mGluR1 cooperates with the other intracellular domains to control coupling to G-protein.
J Biol Chem
271:2199-2205 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gomeza J, Mary S, Brabet I, Parmentier M-L, Restituito S, Bockaert J,
Pin J-P (1996b) Coupling of mGluR2 and mGluR4 to G
15,
G 16 and chimeric G q/i proteins: characterization of new
antagonists. Mol Pharmacol, in press. -
Gotzes F,
Balfanz S,
Baumann A
(1994)
Primary structure and functional characterization of a Drosophila dopamine receptor with high homology to human D1/5 receptors.
Receptors Channels
2:131-141 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Harris-Warrick R,
Hammond C,
Paupardin-Tritsch D,
Homburger V,
Rouot B,
Bockaert J,
Gerschenfeld HM
(1988)
The
subunit of a GTP binding protein homologous to mammalian Go mediates a dopamine-induced decrease of calcium current in snail neurons.
Neuron
1:27-32 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hart AC,
Sims S,
Kaplan JM
(1995)
Synaptic code for sensory modalities revealed by C. elegans GLR-1 glutamate receptor.
Nature
378:82-85 .
[Medline]
-
Hayashi Y,
Tanabe Y,
Aramori I,
Masu M,
Shimamoto K,
Ohfune Y,
Nakanishi S
(1992)
Agonist analysis of 2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine isomers for cloned metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Br J Pharmacol
107:539-543 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hayashi Y,
Momiyama A,
Takahashi T,
Ohishi H,
Ogawa-Meguro R,
Shigemoto R,
Mizuno N,
Nakanishi S
(1993)
Role of a metabotropic receptor in synaptic modulation in the accessory olfactory bulb.
Nature
366:687-690 .
[Medline]
-
Hayashi Y,
Sekiyama N,
Nakanishi S,
Jane DE,
Sunter DC,
Birse EF,
Udvarhelyi PM,
Watkins JC
(1994)
Analysis of agonist and antagonist activities of phenylglycine derivatives for different cloned metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes.
J Neurosci
14:3370-3377 .
[Abstract]
-
Hollmann M,
Heinemann S
(1994)
Cloned glutamate receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
17:31-108 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hutton ML,
Harvey RJ,
Barnard EA,
Darlison MG
(1991)
Cloning of a cDNA that encodes an invertebrate glutamate receptor subunit.
FEBS Lett
292:111-114 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Ito I,
Kohda A,
Tanabe S,
Hirose E,
Hayashi M,
Mitsunaga S,
Sugiyama H
(1992)
3,5-dihydroxyphenyl-glycine: a potent agonist of metabotropic glutamate receptors.
NeuroReport
3:1013-1016 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Jan LY,
Jan YN
(1976)
L-glutamate as a neurotransmitter at the neuromuscular junction.
J Physiol (Lond)
262:215-236 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Joly C,
Gomeza J,
Brabet I,
Curry K,
Bockaert J,
Pin JP
(1995)
Molecular, functional, and pharmacological characterization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 splice variants: comparison with mGluR1.
J Neurosci
15:3970-3981 .
[Abstract]
-
Jürgens G, Lehmann R, Schardin M, Nûsslein-Volhard
C (1986) Segmental organization of the head in the embryo of
Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol
195:359-377.
-
Kaba H,
Hayashi Y,
Higuchi T,
Nakanishi S
(1994)
Induction of an olfactory memory by the activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor.
Science
265:262-264 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kehoe J
(1994)
Glutamate activates a K+ conductance increase in Aplysia neurons that appears to be independent of G proteins.
Neuron
13:691-702 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Law SF,
Yasuda K,
Bell GI,
Reisine T
(1993)
Gi
3 and Go selectively associate with the cloned somatostatine receptor subtype SSTR2.
J Biol Chem
268:10721-10727 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lehmann R,
Tautz D
(1994)
In situ hybridization to RNA.
In: Drosophila melanogaster: practical uses in cell and molecular biology
(Goldstein, LSB,
Fyrberg, EA,
eds)
, p. 576. San Diego: Academic.
-
Li XJ,
Wolfgang W,
Wu YN,
North RA,
Forte M
(1991)
Cloning, heterologous expression and developmental regulation of a Drosophila receptor for tachykinin-like peptides.
EMBO J
10:3221-3229 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Li XJ,
Wu YN,
North RA,
Forte M
(1992)
Cloning, functional expression and developmental regulation of a neuropeptide Y receptor from Drosophila melanogaster.
J Biol Chem
267:9-12 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu J,
Conklin BR,
Blin N,
Yun J,
Wess J
(1995)
Identification of a receptor/G-protein contact site critical for signaling specificity and G-protein activation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:11642-11646 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maricq AV,
Peckol E,
Driscoll M,
Bargmann CI
(1995)
Mechanosensory signalling in C. elegans mediated by the GLR-1 glutamate receptor.
Nature
378:78-81 .
[Medline]
-
Masu M,
Iwakabe H,
Tagawa Y,
Miyoshi T,
Yamashita M,
Fukuda Y,
Sasaki H,
Hiroi K,
Nakamura Y,
Shigemoto R,
Takada M,
Nakamura K,
Nakao K,
Katsuki M,
Nakanishi S
(1995)
Specific deficit of the ON response in visual transmission by targeted disruption of the mGluR6 gene.
Cell
80:757-765 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Monnier D,
Colas JF,
Rosay P,
Hen R,
Borelli E,
Maroteaux L
(1992)
NKD, a developmentally regulated tachykinin receptor in Drosophila.
J Biol Chem
267:1298-1302 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nakanishi S
(1994)
Metabotropic glutamate receptors: synaptic transmission, modulation, and plasticity.
Neuron
13:1031-1037 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
O'Hara PJ,
Sheppard PO,
Thøgersen H,
Venezia D,
Haldeman BA,
McGrane V,
Houamed KM,
Thomsen C,
Gilbert TL,
Mulvihill ER
(1993)
The ligand-binding domain in metabotropic glutamate receptors is related to bacterial periplasmic binding proteins.
Neuron
11:41-52.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Pardue M-L
(1994)
Looking at polytene chromosomes.
In: Drosophila melanogaster: practical uses in cell and molecular biology
(Goldstein, LSB,
Fyrberg, EA,
eds)
, p. 334. San Diego: Academic.
-
Parker D
(1994)
Glutamatergic transmission between antagonistic motor neurones in the locust.
J Comp Physiol [A]
175:737-748.
-
Pin J-P,
Duvoisin R
(1995)
The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure and functions.
Neuropharmacology
34:1-26 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Pin J-P,
Joly C,
Heinemann SF,
Bockaert J
(1994)
Domains involved in the specificity of G protein activation in phospholipase C coupled metabotropic glutamate receptor.
EMBO J
13:342-348 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Provost NM,
Somers DE,
Hurley JB
(1988)
A Drosophila melanogaster G protein alpha subunit gene is expressed primarily in embryos and pupae.
J Biol Chem
263:12070-12076 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roberts PJ
(1995)
Pharmacological tools for the investigation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs): phenylglycine derivatives and other selective antagonists
an update.
Neuropharmacology
34:813-819 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Roeder T
(1995)
Pharmacology of the octopamine receptor from locust central nervous tissue (OAR 3).
Br J Pharmacol
114:210-216 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Romano C,
Van Den Pol AN,
O'Malley KL
(1996)
Enhanced early developmental expression of the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 in rat brain: protein, mRNA splice variants, and regional distribution.
J Comp Neurol
367:403-412 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Saudou F,
Amlaiky N,
Plassat JL,
Borelli E,
Hen R
(1990)
Cloning and characterization of a Drosophila tyramine receptor.
EMBO J
9:3611-3617 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Saudou F,
Boschert U,
Amlaiky N,
Plassat J-L,
Hen R
(1992)
A family of Drosophila serotonin receptors with distinct intracellular signalling properties and expression pattern.
EMBO J
11:7-17 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Schuster CM,
Ultsch A,
Schloss P,
Cox JA,
Schmitt B,
Betz H
(1991)
Molecular cloning of an invertebrate glutamate receptor subunit expressed in Drosophila muscle.
Science
254:112-114 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stühmer T,
Amar M,
Harvey RJ,
Bermudez I,
Van Minnen J,
Darlison MG
(1996)
Structure and pharmacological properties of a molluscan glutamate-gated cation channel and its likely role in feeding behavior.
J Neurosci
16:2869-2880 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tanabe Y,
Masu M,
Ishii T,
Shigemoto R,
Nakanishi S
(1992)
A family of metabotropic glutamate receptors.
Neuron
8:169-179 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Tanabe Y,
Nomura A,
Masu M,
Shigemoto R,
Mizuno N,
Nakanishi S
(1993)
Signal transduction, pharmacological properties, and expression patterns of two rat metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR3 and mGluR4.
J Neurosci
13:1372-1378 .
[Abstract]
-
Thambi NC,
Quan F,
Wolfgang WJ,
Spiegel A,
Forte M
(1989)
Immunological and molecular characterization of Go
-like proteins in the Drosophila central nervous system.
J Biol Chem
264:18552-18560 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ultsch A,
Schuster CM,
Laube B,
Schloss P,
Schmitt B,
Betz H
(1992)
Glutamate receptors of Drosophila melanogaster: cloning of a kainate-selective subunit expressed in the central nervous system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:10484-10488 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ultsch A,
Schuster CM,
Laube B,
Betz H,
Schmitt B
(1993)
Glutamate receptors of Drosophila melanogaster: primary structure of a putative NMDA receptor protein expressed in the head of the adult fly.
FEBS Lett
324:171-177 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Wilson R,
Ainscough R,
Anderson K,
Baynes C,
Berks M,
Bonfield J,
Burton J,
Connell M,
Copsey T,
Cooper J,
Coulson A,
Craxton M,
Dear S,
Du Z,
Durbin R,
Favello A,
Fraser A,
Fulton L,
Gardner A,
Green P,
Hawkins T,
Hillier L,
Jier M,
Johnston L,
Jones M,
Kershaw J,
Kirsten J,
Laisster N,
Latreille P,
Lightning J,
Lloyd C,
Mortimore B,
O'Callaghan M,
Parsons J,
Percy C,
Rifken L,
Roopra A,
Saunders D,
Shownkeen R,
Sims M,
Smaldon N,
Smith A,
Smith M,
Sonnhammer E,
Staden R,
Sulston J,
Thierry-Mieg J,
Thomas K,
Vaudin M,
Vaughan K,
Waterston R,
Watson A,
Weinstock L,
Wilkinson-Sproat J,
Wohldman P
(1994)
2.2 Mb of contiguous nucleotide sequence from chromosome III of C. elegans.
Nature
368:32-38 .
[Medline]
-
Witz P,
Amlaiky N,
Plassat J-L,
Maroteaux L,
Borelli E,
Hen R
(1990)
Cloning and characterization of a Drosophila serotonin receptor that activates adenylate cyclase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:8940-8944 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Repicky and K. Broadie
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Use-Dependent Down-Regulation of Synaptic Excitability Involves the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2009;
101(2):
672 - 687.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Scannell, C. A. Dell'Ova, E. M. Quinlan, A. D. Murphy, and N. W. Kleckner
Pharmacology of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors on neurons involved in feeding behavior in the pond snail, Helisoma trivolvis
J. Exp. Biol.,
March 1, 2008;
211(5):
824 - 833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pan and K. S. Broadie
Drosophila Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor A Convergently Regulate the Synaptic Ratio of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Subclasses
J. Neurosci.,
November 7, 2007;
27(45):
12378 - 12389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lavialle-Defaix, H. Gautier, A. Defaix, B. Lapied, and F. Grolleau
Differential Regulation of Two Distinct Voltage-Dependent Sodium Currents by Group III Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Activation in Insect Pacemaker Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2006;
96(5):
2437 - 2450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Taniura, N. Sanada, N. Kuramoto, and Y. Yoneda
A Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Family Gene in Dictyostelium discoideum
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 5, 2006;
281(18):
12336 - 12343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Dulcis and R. B. Levine
Glutamatergic Innervation of the Heart Initiates Retrograde Contractions in Adult Drosophila melanogaster
J. Neurosci.,
January 12, 2005;
25(2):
271 - 280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Bogdanik, R. Mohrmann, A. Ramaekers, J. Bockaert, Y. Grau, K. Broadie, and M.-L. Parmentier
The Drosophila Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor DmGluRA Regulates Activity-Dependent Synaptic Facilitation and Fine Synaptic Morphology
J. Neurosci.,
October 13, 2004;
24(41):
9105 - 9116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Mitri, M.-L. Parmentier, J.-P. Pin, J. Bockaert, and Y. Grau
Divergent Evolution in Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: A NEW RECEPTOR ACTIVATED BY AN ENDOGENOUS LIGAND DIFFERENT FROM GLUTAMATE IN INSECTS
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 5, 2004;
279(10):
9313 - 9320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Kettunen, D. Hess, and A. E. Manira
mGluR1, But Not mGluR5, Mediates Depolarization of Spinal Cord Neurons by Blocking a Leak Current
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2003;
90(4):
2341 - 2348.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Eroglu, B. Brugger, F. Wieland, and I. Sinning
Glutamate-binding affinity of Drosophila metabotropic glutamate receptor is modulated by association with lipid rafts
PNAS,
September 2, 2003;
100(18):
10219 - 10224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Fagni, P. F. Worley, and F. Ango
Homer as Both a Scaffold and Transduction Molecule
Sci. Signal.,
June 18, 2002;
2002(137):
re8 - re8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Diagana, U. Thomas, S. N. Prokopenko, B. Xiao, P. F. Worley, and J. B. Thomas
Mutation of Drosophila homer Disrupts Control of Locomotor Activity and Behavioral Plasticity
J. Neurosci.,
January 15, 2002;
22(2):
428 - 436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Brody and A. Cravchik
Drosophila melanogasterG Protein-Coupled Receptors
J. Cell Biol.,
July 24, 2000;
150(2):
83 - 88.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. D. Krenz, D. Nguyen, N. L. Perez-Acevedo, and A. I. Selverston
Group I, II, and III mGluR Compounds Affect Rhythm Generation in the Gastric Circuit of the Crustacean Stomatogastric Ganglion
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2000;
83(3):
1188 - 1201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Le Ray and D. Cattaert
Active Motor Neurons Potentiate Their Own Sensory Inputs via Glutamate-Induced Long-Term Potentiation
J. Neurosci.,
February 15, 1999;
19(4):
1473 - 1483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. van den Pol, X.-B. Gao, P. R. Patrylo, P. K. Ghosh, and K. Obrietan
Glutamate Inhibits GABA Excitatory Activity in Developing Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
December 15, 1998;
18(24):
10749 - 10761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-L. Parmentier, C. Joly, S. Restituito, J. Bockaert, Y. Grau, and J.-P. Pin
The G Protein-Coupling Profile of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors, as Determined with Exogenous G Proteins, Is Independent of Their Ligand Recognition Domain
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 1998;
53(4):
778 - 786.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|

|