 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 16, Number 22,
Issue of November 15, 1996
pp. 7240-7252
Copyright ©1996 Society for Neuroscience
A Role in Migration for the v 1 Integrin Expressed on
Oligodendrocyte Precursors
Richard Milner1,
Gwynneth Edwards2,
Charles Streuli2, and
Charles ffrench-Constant1, 3
1 Wellcome/Cancer Research Campaign Institute of
Developmental Biology and Cancer, Cambridge CB2 1QR, United Kingdom,
and Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
CB2 1QR, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Cell and
Structural Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of
Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom, and
3 Medical Research Council Cambridge Center for Brain
Repair, University Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Myelination of the CNS requires the migration of oligodendrocyte
precursors throughout the CNS from restricted regions within the
ventricular and subventricular zones. In light of the significant
effects of cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions on cell
migration in other developing systems, we have analyzed the role of
integrins in oligodendrocyte precursor migration. We have shown
previously that oligodendrocyte precursors in vitro
express a limited repertoire of integrins, including 6 1,
v 1, and v 3, and that differentiation is associated with
downregulation of v 1 and upregulation of v 5. Using a
migration assay based on the movement of cells away from an agarose
drop containing a high-density cell suspension, we find that RGD
peptides (that block v but not 6 integrins) and anti- 1
antibodies block migration on an astrocyte-derived ECM, whereas
anti- 3 antibodies have little effect. These re- sults
suggest that v 1 but not 6 1 plays a role in oligodendrocyte
precursor migration, and this is confirmed by the use of blocking
monoclonal antibodies that distinguish these two integrins. In keeping
with the results of others, we find that differentiated
oligodendrocytes lose migratory potential and that the timing of this
loss correlates with downregulation of v 1. Taken together with
the work of others showing that ECM ligands for v 1 are expressed
within the CNS, we propose that this integrin plays a significant role
in the migration of oligodendrocyte precursors in vivo
and that its downregulation during differentiation could be an
important factor regulating the migratory phenotype of these cells.
Key words:
oligodendrocyte;
integrin;
extracellular matrix;
platelet-derived growth factor;
differentiation;
migration;
astroglial
matrix;
vitronectin
INTRODUCTION
The importance of cell migration during
development is well illustrated in the CNS, where neurons arise in the
ventricular zone and then migrate away to their final destinations
(Rakic, 1972 ). Another cell type that shows extensive migration is the
oligodendrocyte precursor, or O-2A progenitor cell. This cell type
arises in the ventricular and subventricular zones of the developing
CNS (Paterson et al., 1973 ) and migrates during development to produce
the widespread distribution of differentiated oligodendrocytes seen in
the mature animal. Direct evidence for this migration has come from two
sets of in vivo studies. First, cells labeled with a
lac-Z reporter gene while in the subventricular zone
subsequently migrate into the developing cortex and subcortical white
matter and form oligodendrocytes (Levison and Goldman, 1993 ). Second,
migration is seen when oligodendrocyte precursors are transplanted into
myelin-deficient or normal mice (Lachapelle et al., 1984 , 1994 ).
Previous studies examining the molecular mechanisms regulating
oligodendroglial migration have focused on the role of growth factors.
These studies have demonstrated that platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF) promotes oligodendrocyte precursor migration in culture and that
withdrawal of PDGF is accompanied by differentiation and loss of
migratory activity (Small et al., 1987 ; Noble et al., 1988 ; Armstrong
et al., 1990 ). Interactions between cells and the extracellular matrix
(ECM), however, can also provide instructive signals for many aspects
of cell behavior, including survival, proliferation, differentiation,
and migration (Streuli et al., 1991 ; Adams and Watt, 1993 ), and may
therefore play a role in regulating oligodendrocyte precursor
migration. Integrins are one important family of ECM receptors. These
are cell-surface heterodimeric molecules consisting of and subunits made from at least 14 and 9 mammalian integrin
subunits, which may combine in various ways to confer distinct ligand
binding and cell signaling properties (Hemler, 1990 ; Ruoslahti, 1991 ;
Hynes, 1992 ; Hynes and Lander, 1992 ; Diamond and Springer, 1994 ).
Within the nervous system, integrins play a role in the migration of
both neural crest cells (Bronner-Fraser, 1986 ) and neuroblasts in the
developing chick tectum (Galileo et al., 1992 ), but their role in glial
migration remains unknown.
To investigate the roles of cell-ECM interactions in regulating
oligodendrocyte behavior, we characterized the integrins expressed by
oligodendrocytes and their precursors in vitro. These
studies show that oligodendroglial cells express a limited repertoire
of integrins comprising 6 1 and several v integrins (Milner and
ffrench-Constant, 1994 ; Shaw et al., 1996 ). v integrin expression is
developmentally regulated: v 1 is lost and v 5 upregulated
with differentiation (Milner and ffrench-Constant, 1994 ). In the
current study, we have investigated the function of these integrins in
oligodendrocyte precursor migration. We show that ECM substrates
recognized by oligodendroglial integrins, including laminin,
fibronectin, and vitronectin, promote migration. whereas collagen, not
recognized by oligodendroglial integrins, does not. In addition, we
find that blocking integrin function inhibits migration on an
astrocyte-derived ECM and that the v 1 integrin, but not 6 1
or v 3, plays the dominant role in integrin-mediated migration of
oligodendrocyte precursor cells on this substrate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture. Purified oligodendrocyte precursors
were obtained as described previously (Milner and ffrench-Constant,
1994 ), using a technique modified from McCarthy and De Vellis (1980) .
Briefly, primary cultures were established from rat or mouse neonatal
forebrain cells obtained by dissociating cortices in papain, and they
were grown for ~10 d in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(FCS) (Globepharm) before being shaken overnight to separate the
loosely attached oligodendrocyte precursors (``top cells''). The
cells were purified further by removing contaminating microglia using
selective adhesion to nontissue culture-treated plastic. The remaining
cell suspension was then centrifuged and resuspended in Sato media
[DMEM supplemented with bovine insulin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) (5 µg/ml), human transferrin (Sigma) (50 µg/ml), BSA V (Sigma) (100 µg/ml), progesterone (Sigma) (6.2 ng/ml), putrescine (Sigma) (16 µg/ml), sodium selenite (Sigma) (5 ng/ml), T3 (Sigma) (400 ng/ml), T4
(Sigma) (400 ng/ml), L-glutamine (Sigma) (4 mM), penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma)] containing 0.5%
FCS, and secondary cultures were established by plating the cells onto
poly-ornithine-coated six-well plates (Nunc, Naperville, IL) or 100 mm
petri dishes (Nunc). The purity of the resulting cell suspension was
assessed by morphology, with process-bearing oligodendroglia
distinguished from fibroblast-like astrocytes and microglia, and was
>95% oligodendroglial cells (oligodendrocytes and precursors) at day
1. In these secondary cultures, precursor cells constitutively
differentiate into oligodendrocytes. This was confirmed by
immunostaining with a monoclonal antibody (Ranscht et al., 1982 )
against the oligodendrocyte-specific marker galactocerebroside (GalC)
(Raff et al., 1978 ). By immunocytochemistry, the oligodendroglial cells
in these cultures were <10% GalC+ after 4 hr (i.e., >90% precursor
cells) but >80% GalC+ at day 7 and >95% GalC+ by day 10. Astrocytes
were obtained by removing all top cells from a wholebrain flask and
using the basal layer of astrocytes left behind. Mouse fibroblasts were
obtained from meninges, as described previously (Milner and
ffrench-Constant, 1994 ), and then cultured in DMEM supplemented with
10% FCS and L-glutamine (Sigma)(4 mM) and
penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma).
Antibodies. The antibodies used in immunoprecipitations and
adhesion and migration assays were generous gifts of the following: (1)
monoclonals: GoH3 (rat IgG1, anti- 6) from Dr. Arnoud Sonnenberg,
Amsterdam, Holland (Sonnenberg et al., 1987 ), 9EG7 (rat IgG2a,
anti- 1) from Dr. Dietmar Vestweber, Freiburg, Germany (Lenter et
al., 1993 ), and F11 (mouse IgG1, anti- 3) from Dr. Michael Horton,
University College London, London, UK (Helfrich et al., 1992b ); and (2)
polyclonals: anti-ECMR (GP140) from Dr. Caroline Damsky, San Francisco,
CA (Knudsen et al., 1981 ; Damsky et al., 1982 ), and anti- v from Dr.
Guido Tarone, Torino, Italy (Hirsch et al., 1994 ). The anti- v 3
antiserum and RGD and RGE peptides were obtained from Life Technologies
(Paisley, Scotland). Additional purified GoH3 was obtained from Serotec
(Oxford, UK), and 9EG7 was obtained from PharMingen (San Diego,
CA).
The preparation and characterization of the function-blocking anti- 1
antibody will be described elsewhere (G. Edwards and C. Streuli,
unpublished observations) and is summarized briefly here. 4 1
integrin was affinity-purified under nondenaturing conditions from
whole mouse embryos using sepharose-conjugated PS/2, a rat monoclonal
antibody specific for mouse 4 integrin. The purified integrin was
used to immunize rabbits, and IgG was isolated from the resulting sera.
This antibody specifically recognized both 4 and 1 integrin
subunits in Western blotting and immunoprecipitation experiments.
Cell-surface labeling and immunoprecipitation. Cell-surface
molecules were labeled with biotin by removing growth media, washing
the cell layer twice with PBS, and then labeling with 0.1 mg/ml
NHS-LC-Biotin in PBS (Pierce, Rockford, IL) at 37°C in 7.5%
CO2 for 30 min. Cell monolayers were then washed three
times with cell wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2) and harvested with a cell scraper
before being washed twice more in suspension. Cells were then lysed in
1% NP40 extraction buffer (cell wash buffer plus 300 µg/ml PMSF, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 4 µg/ml leupeptin) for
30 min on ice, followed by trituration and centrifugation at 14,000 rpm
at 4°C to remove the insoluble fraction. The supernatants then were
precleared by two sequential 2 hr incubations with 30 µl of protein
A-sepharose (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and 4 µl of nonimmune rabbit
serum/ml of cell lysate. Immunoprecipitations were carried out
overnight at 4°C on a rotating platform using 1 µl of rabbit
antisera/250 µl of cell lysate. Where rat monoclonal antibodies were
used (GoH3 and 9EG7), rabbit anti-rat antisera (Nordic, Capistrano
Beach, CA) was also added at 1:250 to the tube. The immune complexes
were collected by incubation with 30 µl of protein A-sepharose beads
for 2 hr, after which time the beads were washed five times in
immunoprecipitation wash buffer [identical to the cell wash buffer
except for a higher salt concentration (0.5 M NaCl) and the
addition of 0.1% Tween 20]. Integrins then were separated from the
beads by boiling in nonreducing SDS sample buffer for 5 min before
being analyzed by SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% resolving gel and 4% stacking
gel under nonreducing conditions. Proteins were then electroblotted for
3 hr onto nitrocellulose (Hybond-C, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL),
blocked overnight with 3% BSA in TBS (10 mM Tris-HCL, 0.15 NaCl, pH 8.0) containing 0.1% Tween 20, and detected with
streptavidin-HRP (ECL detection system, Amersham) for 1 hr according to
manufacturer's instructions.
Adhesion assays. All substrates were prepared by coating
small areas of a 90 mm bacteriological grade plastic petri dish with 50 µl of ECM solution (10 µg/ml) or poly-DL-ornithine (5 µg/ml) for 2 hr at 37°C. Before the addition of cells, all
substrates were blocked with 50 µl of heat-inactivated (5 min at
80°C) 0.3% BSA (BSA-fraction V, Sigma) for 30 min to prevent
nonspecific binding to substrates. Substrates were then washed twice
with Sato media immediately before addition of the cells.
Oligodendrocyte precursors, freshly isolated from rat or mouse primary
forebrain cultures as described above, were centrifuged, resuspended in
Sato media, and applied to the substrates in a 50 µl drop for 30 min
at 37°C. The adhesion assay was stopped by adding 10 ml of DMEM to
the petri dish and washing off loosely attached cells. The attached
cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min.
Adhesion was quantified by counting all attached cells under phase
microscopy. Murine laminin, bovine fibronectin, and bovine vitronectin
were all obtained from Sigma and diluted to the required concentration
in PBS. In antibody-blocking experiments, the antibody was added to the
medium used to resuspend the cells after their final wash and therefore
was present when the cells were added to the substrate and throughout
the experiment. The polyclonal anti-ECMR antibody was used at a
dilution of 1:400. The monoclonal 9EG7 antibody was used at a
concentration of 5 µg/ml, and GoH3 was used at a range of
concentrations from 0 to 10 µg/ml.
Cell migration assay. Cell migration was quantified by
measuring the extent of migration from agarose drops using a
modification of the method described by Varani et al. (1978) .
Oligodendrocyte precursors were obtained as described above and
resuspended at 40 × 106 cells/ml in Sato media
containing 10% FCS and 0.3% low melting point agarose (Sigma)
maintained at 37°C to prevent setting of the agarose; 1.5 µl drops
of the cell suspension were applied to the center of wells within a
24-well tissue culture dish (Nunc), which was then placed at 4°C for
15 min to allow the agarose to solidify. Three different sets of
substrates were used in these experiments. For experiments using
astroglial matrix (AGM), the matrix was prepared in 24-well plates
before the addition of the drop by removing growth media from mixed
glial cultures and adding 1 ml of water per well for 2 hr at 37°C.
The lysed cell material was then removed with three washes of PBS,
before the AGM was stored in PBS at 37°C. Agarose drops were placed
onto this matrix after removal of the PBS and covered with 0.4 ml of
serum-free Sato media after cooling. For experiments using
poly-DL-ornithine substrates, the plastic was coated as
described above, washed with water, and dried, after which the agarose
drop was added and covered with 0.4 ml of serum-free Sato media after
cooling. For purified ECM substrates, drops were plated directly onto
tissue-culture plastic, and the cooled drop was surrounded by 50 µl
of Sato media containing 10 µg/ml of the chosen ECM molecule and
incubated for 2 hr at 37°C. After this incubation, 0.35 ml of media
was added. With the exception of the first set of experiments to
examine the effect of PDGF on oligodendrocyte precursor migration, PDGF
was always present at 5 ng/ml. Cell migration was measured at daily
intervals for 1-5 d using a phase microscope with a calibrated
graticule in the eyepiece, in which the width of one grid square
represented 100 µm actual distance at a magnification of 10×. Cells
migrate out to form a uniform corona around the drop. At any one time
point, the distance between the edge of the drop and the leading edge
of migrating cells within the corona was recorded on four sides of the
drop. The few individual cells that had migrated ahead of the corona
were not included in the measurement. Within single experiments, each
condition was tested in duplicate or triplicate. The mean migration was
calculated for each experiment, and results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by using the Students
paired t test, in which p < 0.05 was
defined as statistically significant. Blocking antibodies and peptides
were added to the wells immediately after addition of the surrounding
media. Antibodies were added only once, whereas RGE and RGD peptides
were added at daily intervals. Antibodies were used at the following
dilutions/concentrations: anti-ECMR antiserum, 1:400; anti- v 3
antiserum, 1:100; anti- 1 antisera, 60 µg/ml; 9EG7, 5 µg/ml; and
GoH3, 5 µg/ml. RGE and RGD peptides were used at a concentration of
0.1 mg/ml. Photomicrographs of the agarose drop assays were taken on a
Nikon Diaphot inverted microscope using phase optics.
RESULTS
Oligodendrocyte precursors migrate radially from an agarose drop in
response to PDGF
To measure the migration of oligodendrocyte precursors, we have
modified the technique described by Varani et al. (1978) . This assay
measures cell migration away from a high-density population of cells
contained in an agarose drop. Purified populations of oligodendrocyte
precursor cells were resuspended in a 1.5 µl drop containing 0.3%
low melting point agarose and plated onto a
poly-DL-ornithine substrate, as described in Materials and
Methods. A defined media of serum-free Sato medium (see Materials and
Methods) was then added to the culture. Within 2 hr of plating,
oligodendrocyte precursors had begun to migrate out of the drop, and
they continued to migrate radially for a number of days, producing a
uniform corona of cells (Fig. 1.). Migration was
quantified daily by measuring the distance between the leading edge of
the corona and the edge of the agarose drop. As expected from previous
studies using different assays (Noble et al., 1988 ; Armstrong et al.,
1990 ), PDGF promoted oligodendrocyte precursor migration in this assay.
Indeed PDGF seemed to be required for migration; in the presence of
PDGF, oligodendrocyte precursors migrated distances in excess of 1 mm
during a 5 d period, whereas in the absence of PDGF there was no
migration (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
The effect of PDGF on the migration of
oligodendrocyte precursors. Cells were resuspended at high density in
agarose, as described in Materials and Methods, and then plated as
small drops onto poly-DL-ornithine-coated plastic and
cultured in the absence (A) or presence
(B) of PDGF (5 ng/ml). Note that PDGF promotes the
migration of oligodendrocyte precursors, with no migration observed in
the absence of this growth factor.
[View Larger Version of this Image (100K GIF file)]
PDGF also acts as a mitogen for oligodendrocyte precursor cells (Noble
et al., 1988 ; Raff et al., 1988 ), and time-lapse analyses showed cell
division as oligodendrocyte precursors migrated away from the drop,
confirming that PDGF has both mitogenic and migration-enhancing
properties. This raises the possibility that the movement of
oligodendrocyte precursors away from the drop may be a consequence of
cell division, with increasing cell density causing passive movement,
rather than being attributable to active cell migration. To separate
these two effects of PDGF, migration assays were performed in the
presence of the mitotic inhibitor aphidicholin, which inhibits
oligodendroglial cell division (McKinnon et al., 1993 ). The maximal
extent of oligodendrocyte precursor migration under these conditions
was the same as that seen in the absence of aphidicholin (data not
shown). This confirms that the dispersal of oligodendrocyte precursors
in the agarose drop assay reflects cell migration.
Differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursors reduces
migratory potential
Previous studies show that the oligodendrocyte precursor is a
migratory cell, whereas differentiated oligodendrocytes possess no
migratory potential (Small et al., 1987 ; Noble et al., 1988 ). To
examine the timing of this loss of migratory ability, we took advantage
of the observation that oligodendrocyte precursors grown in defined
medium without added mitogens differentiate constitutively into
oligodendrocytes (Temple and Raff, 1985 ). This differentiation occurred
over a 7 d period in our cultures, after which the majority of
cells in our cultures have stopped dividing and have differentiated
into GalC+ oligodendrocytes (Milner and ffrench-Constant, 1994 ).
Populations of oligodendrocyte precursors in agarose drops were allowed
to differentiate for various times before the addition of PDGF. On
successive days after plating, PDGF was then added to the media to
stimulate migration, and the extent of migration was measured for the
following 5 d. As shown in Figure 2,
oligodendrocyte precursors maintained from the start (day 0) in PDGF
show a high level of migration throughout the 5 d period. Cell
populations cultured in defined medium alone without PDGF for 3 d
(day 3) showed reduced migratory ability once PDGF was added. Cell
populations cultured in defined medium alone without PDGF for 7 d
(day 7), allowing almost complete differentiation, showed virtually no
migration on addition of PDGF. Therefore, as expected from previous
studies (Small et al., 1987 ; Noble et al., 1988 ), there was an inverse
correlation between the extent of differentiation within the population
and the ability to migrate, with no migration seen in differentiated
oligodendrocytes. PDGF was included in all further studies at the time
of plating so that the assay could be used to measure migration of
undifferentiated oligodendrocyte precursors.
Fig. 2.
The relationship between differentiation and
migration in oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Cells were resuspended at
high density in agarose, as described in Materials and Methods, and
then plated as small drops onto poly-DL-ornithine-coated
plastic and grown in defined medium alone, without PDGF. Cells were
then allowed to differentiate for 0-7 d before PDGF was added to
promote migration, and migration was measured for the following 5 d. Data from three experiments are shown. Note that the more the cell
populations are allowed to differentiate before the addition of PDGF
(most differentiated at day 7, least at day 0), the less they migrate
in response to PDGF.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
ECM molecules promote oligodendrocyte precursor migration by
integrin-dependent mechanisms
To assess the ability of oligodendrocyte precursor integrins to
promote migration, we examined migration on three ECM ligands laminin,
fibronectin, and vitronectin recognized by these integrins (Cheresh
and Spiro, 1987 ; Cheresh et al., 1989 ; Bodary and McLean, 1990 ), and on
one ECM ligand, type-1 collagen, for which oligodendrocyte precursors
lack any recognized integrin receptors. An example of these assays is
shown in Figure 3, which shows that laminin and
fibronectin promote migration after 2 d, whereas collagen inhibits
migration relative to the tissue-culture plastic control. Combined data
from four separate experiments demonstrate that laminin, fibronectin,
and vitronectin all increased the rate of migration as compared with
uncoated plastic. Laminin and fibronectin were the most effective,
promoting the extent of migration after 2 d to 191.9 ± 18.4% (p < 0.002) and 188.5 ± 23.6%
(p < 0.02) of the uncoated plastic control,
respectively, with vitronectin promoting migration to 132.2 ± 12.6% of the uncoated plastic control. In contrast, migration on a
collagen substrate was reduced to 48.4 ± 4.8%
(p < 0.002) of the control. On uncoated
tissue-culture plastic, migration of cells is initially slower than on
laminin or fibronectin, but the cells then increase speed and migrate
at a constant rate for the duration of the assay.
Fig. 3.
The migration of oligodendrocyte precursors on
different ECM substrates. Cells were resuspended at high density in
agarose, as described in Materials and Methods, and then plated as
small drops onto uncoated tissue-culture plastic. The ECM substrate was
then added, as described in Materials and Methods. A,
Control with no ECM; B, laminin; C,
fibronectin; D, collagen. Note that after 2 d,
cells on laminin and fibronectin had migrated further than the uncoated
plastic control. Cells on collagen, in contrast, had migrated less than
the control and have lined up around the periphery of the agarose
drop.
[View Larger Version of this Image (123K GIF file)]
Having established that ECM molecules recognized by oligodendroglial
integrins promote migration, we next confirmed the role of integrins in
this migration by blocking the function of all oligodendroglial
integrins using the anti- v and anti- 1 function-blocking antibody
anti-ECMR (Knudsen et al., 1981 ; Damsky et al., 1982 ).
Immunoprecipitations performed with this antibody on oligodendrocyte
precursors grown in secondary culture for 2 d show that anti-ECMR
immunoprecipitates the same pattern of bands as a combined v and
1 immmunoprecipitation, with bands running at 150 ( 6), 140 ( v), 110 ( 1), and 80 kDa ( 3/ 80k) (Fig.
4A). This confirms that the anti-ECMR
antibody recognizes all of the integrins expressed by oligodendrocyte
precursors (Milner and ffrench-Constant, 1994 ). As shown in Figure
5, the anti-ECMR antibody significantly inhibited
oligodendrocyte precursor migration on all substrates tested, including
laminin (36.7 ± 1.93% of control), fibronectin (25.26 ± 6.00% of control), and vitronectin (11.78 ± 9.20% of control)
(n = 3; p < 0.001 for all substrates).
Fig. 4.
Immunoprecipitations of integrins from rat
oligodendrocyte precursors to illustrate the specificity of the
polyclonal antibodies used. Immunoprecipitations of biotin-labeled
cell-surface proteins were performed, as described in Materials and
Methods, with the anti-ECMR antiserum (A), anti- 1
antiserum (B, lane 1), or anti- v antisera (B,
lane 2). After this, the proteins were separated on nonreducing
gels. Note that the anti-ECMR antiserum immunoprecipitates a repertoire
of bands corresponding to all of the integrins expressed by
oligodendrocyte precursors ( 6 1, v 1, and v 80k). The
anti- 1 antiserum recognizes the 1 subunit in association with two
subunits corresponding to 6 and v, but it does not
cross-react with 80k.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Effect of the anti-ECMR antiserum on
oligodendrocyte precursor migration on different substrates. Cell
migration away from agarose drops (prepared as described in Materials
and Methods) after 2 d on poly-DL-ornithine (A,
B), laminin (C, D), fibronectin (E,
F), or vitronectin (G, H) is shown
in the presence of either normal goat serum (A, C, E, G)
or anti-ECMR antiserum (B, D, F, H), both at
1:400. Note that the anti-ECMR antiserum reduces oligodendrocyte
precursor migration on all substrates tested but does not alter the
bipolar morphology of the cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (134K GIF file)]
An astrocyte-derived ECM promotes oligodendrocyte
precursor migration
In addition to examining migration on purified ECM substrates,
oligodendrocyte precursor migration was also examined on astroglial
matrix (AGM), an ECM secreted by cortical astrocytes that may mimic the
physiological ECM within CNS white matter (Cardwell and Rome, 1988b ;
Malek-Hedayat and Rome, 1994 ). This substrate provides a model of that
encountered by migrating oligodendrocyte precursors in vivo
because astrocytes form the normal neighbors of the precursors and
axons within white matter tracts. In this assay, the AGM substrate also
promoted extensive migration of oligodendrocyte precursors (Fig.
6). All subsequent experiments examining integrin
function in oligodendrocyte precursor migration over ECM substrates
were therefore performed on this substrate.
Fig. 6.
The effect of integrin inhibitors on
oligodendrocyte precursor migration on AGM. Cell migration away from
agarose drops (prepared as described in Materials and Methods) after
2 d on AGM is shown in the presence of normal rabbit serum
(A), RGE peptide (B), RGD peptide
(C), anti- 1 antiserum (D),
anti- v 3 antiserum (E), or anti- 1 and
anti- v 3 antiserum (F). The peptides were
present at 0.1 mg/ml. Note that cell migration was
inhibited both by RGD peptides and anti- 1 antiserum without any
change to the morphology of the cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (147K GIF file)]
RGD peptides and anti- 1 antibodies inhibit oligodendrocyte
precursor migration
To establish whether any one of the integrins expressed by
oligodendrocyte precursors plays a dominant role in the migration on
AGM, we performed function-blocking experiments using RGD peptides,
anti- 1 antiserum, and two different anti- 3 antibodies. As
discussed in Materials and Methods, the anti- 1 antiserum was raised
against purified 4 1 and recognizes both the 4 and 1
subunits. The 4 integrin is not expressed on oligodendroglial cells,
and so the antiserum will only recognize 1-containing integrins on
these cells. The specificity of the anti- 1 antiserum is shown in
Figure 4B, which demonstrates that it
immunoprecipitates the 1 subunit and the two associated subunits
( v and 6) from oligodendrocyte precursor cells, but not 5 or
3/ 80k.
For these blocking experiments, migration assays were carried out for
2 d. As shown in Figures 6 and 7, the control RGE
peptide had no effect on the extent of migration, whereas the RGD
peptide reduced migration to ~55% of the control
(p < 0.002). The anti- 1 antiserum reduced
the extent of migration to ~45% (p < 0.001).
Two different antibodies against the 3 integrin subunit were used:
an anti- v 3 antisera (Suzuki et al., 1986 ; Tawil et al., 1994 ),
which had no significant effect on migration, and the function-blocking
monoclonal antibody F11 (Helfrich et al., 1992a ), which also had no
effect. When both anti- 1 and anti- v 3 antisera were included,
cell migration was reduced to ~35% of the control
(p < 0.01), which was not significantly greater
than the blockade mediated by anti- 1 antiserum alone.
Fig. 7.
Quantification of the effect of integrin
inhibitors on oligodendrocyte precursor migration on AGM. Cell
migration away from agarose drops (prepared as described in Materials
and Methods) after 2 d on AGM was measured in the presence of
either normal rabbit serum, RGE peptide, RGD peptide, anti- 1
antiserum, anti- v 3 antiserum, F11 (monoclonal anti- 3), or
anti- 1 and anti- v 3 antiserum in combination. The peptides were
present at 0.1 mg/ml. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. Note that cell migration was
inhibited only by RGD peptides and anti- 1 antiserum.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
Inhibition of migration by the RGD peptide or anti- 1 antiserum was
not associated with any change in morphology of the oligodendrocyte
precursors. This suggests that the block to migration is not a
consequence of differentiation, which is associated with a loss of
migratory potential, as shown earlier. To confirm this, cells were
allowed to migrate from the agarose drops for 1 d without any
blocking agent present and then blocked with either anti- 1 antiserum
or RGD peptide for 2 d, after which time the block was removed
(Fig. 8). The subsequent rate of migration (as assessed
by the slope of the graph showing distance traveled vs time) of these
cells was compared with cells under control conditions that had not
been exposed to blocking agents. If differentiation was induced by the
blocking agents, then migration after removal of the block would be
slower than that under control conditions. As shown in Figure 8,
however, cells whose migration is blocked with either RGD peptides or
1 antiserum migrate at a rate equal to the control cells once the
block has been removed, showing them to be at equivalent stages of
differentiation.
Fig. 8.
Migration of oligodendrocyte precursor cells after
removal of integrin blockade. Cells were allowed to migrate away from
agarose drops (prepared as described in Materials and Methods)
for 1 d before the following reagents were introduced: RGE peptide
(control), RGD peptide, or anti- 1 antiserum. After incubation for
2 d, the reagents were removed and cell migration was measured for
an additional 3 d. Note that cells whose migration was blocked
with either the RGD peptide or anti- 1 antiserum migrate at equal
rates to the control cells once the blockade is removed.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
The v 1 but not the 6 1 integrin is involved in
oligodendrocyte precursor migration on AGM
The preceding experiments show that oligodendrocyte precursor
migration on AGM is blocked by both RGD peptides and anti- 1 integrin
antibodies. Oligodendrocyte precursors express two different 1
integrins, 6 1 and v 1, either of which could be playing a
role in precursor migration. Because the 6 1 integrin is not
RGD-dependent (Hall et al., 1990 ), but all v integrins presently
characterized are RGD-dependent (Koivunen et al., 1993 ), the inhibition
of cell migration by RGD peptides would favor a role for v 1
rather than 6 1 in the migratory process. We addressed this
question directly by using blocking antibodies directed specifically
against 6 1 or v 1 on oligodendrocyte precursors, GoH3 and
9EG7, respectively. To perform these experiments, it was necessary to
use mouse rather than rat oligodendrocyte precursor cells because of
the species specificity of these antibodies. GoH3 is a well
characterized function-blocking anti- 6 monoclonal antibody
(Sonnenberg et al., 1987 ) that we have used previously to
immunoprecipitate 6 1 from mouse oligodendrocytes and their
precursors (Milner and ffrench-Constant, 1994 ). Before the migration
experiments, we performed adhesion assays confirming that GoH3
inhibited the function of 6 1 on mouse oligodendrocyte precursors.
This showed that GoH3 inhibited cell adhesion to laminin in a
dose-dependent manner (0-10 µg/ml) but had no effect on adhesion to
fibronectin (not shown). In addition, longer-term assays in which
blocking antibodies were introduced after oligodendrocyte precursors
had been allowed to attach for 30 min showed that GoH3 inhibited
process extension during a 3 hr time course on laminin but not
fibronectin (R. Milner and C. ffrench-Constant, unpublished
observations). 9EG7 is a monoclonal antibody directed against the 1
subunit and has been shown to recognize this subunit only in certain
conformations thought to be related to activation state. As a result,
it can be classified as a ``reporter'' antibody (Lenter et al.,
1993 ). Two lines of evidence show that 9EG7 recognizes v 1 but not
6 1 on oligodendrocyte precursors. First, as shown in Figure
9, 9EG7 immunoprecipitates the 1 subunit (running at
110 kDa) in association with an subunit whose molecular weight
corresponds to the dominant lower form of the v subunit but not the
6 subunit immunoprecipitated by GoH3. We consistently see two v
subunits in these immunoprecipitation experiments on mouse but not rat
oligodendroglia, as has also been described in Pleurodeles
cells (Alfandari et al., 1995 ). Second, when used as a blocking
antibody in oligodendrocyte precursor adhesion assays, 9EG7
significantly reduced the extent of sprouting on fibronectin (a
recognized ligand for v 1) but not on laminin (the 6 1
ligand) (Fig. 10). We conclude from this that 9EG7
specifically recognizes the v 1 integrin on oligodendrocyte
precursors.
Fig. 9.
Specificity of the 9EG7 monoclonal antibody for
oligodendroglial v 1 integrin. Immunoprecipitations of
biotin-labeled cell-surface proteins from mouse oligodendrocyte
precursors were performed as described in Materials and Methods, with
either anti- v antiserum (lane 1), the 9EG7 monoclonal
antibody (lane 2), or the anti- 6-specific GoH3
monoclonal antibody (lane 3). The proteins were
separated on a nonreducing gel. Lanes 1-3 represent
three adjacent lanes on the gel that have been exposed for equal
lengths of time, whereas lane 4 represents a longer
exposure of lane 2. Note that the 9EG7 antibody
immunoprecipitates the 1 subunit associated with an subunit that
comigrates with the dominant v subunit but not the 6
subunit.
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]
Fig. 10.
Specific function-blocking effect of the
anti- v 1 9EG7 monoclonal antibody. Mouse oligodendrocyte
precursors were plated onto either laminin (A, B) or
fibronectin (C, D) in the absence (A, C)
or presence (B, D) of the 9EG7 monoclonal antibody, and
allowed to adhere and process for 1 hr. Note that 9EG7 inhibits process
outgrowth on fibronectin but not laminin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (105K GIF file)]
Migration assays with mouse oligodendrocyte precursor cells were
carried out on the AGM substrate. Unlike the experiments with rat
cells, which were performed in serum-free conditions, the experiments
with mouse cells were carried out in the presence of 1% horse serum to
promote survival of mouse oligodendrocyte precursor cells. As shown in
Figure 11, the anti- 1 antiserum inhibited the
migration of mouse oligodendrocyte precursor cells on AGM, as it had on
rat, reducing migration after 2 d to 33.13 ± 10.4% of the
control (p < 0.01). The anti- v 1
monoclonal antibody 9EG7 also inhibited migration, reducing migration
to 58.4 ± 17.6% of the control (p < 0.05). In contrast, the anti- 6 blocking antibody GoH3 did not reduce
the extent of migration. As before, no changes in morphology were seen
in association with these changes in migration, although the mouse
oligodendrocyte precursors grown under these conditions do not show the
characteristic bipolar morphology seen in the rat cells, being rather
less polarized and with a greater number of short processes (Fig. 11).
Fig. 11.
The effect of integrin inhibitors on
oligodendrocyte precursor migration on AGM. Mouse oligodendrocyte
precursor cell migration away from agarose drops (prepared as
described in Materials and Methods) after 2 d on AGM was measured
under control conditions (A) or in the presence of
anti- 1 antiserum (B), the anti- 6 GoH3 monoclonal
antibody (C), or the anti- v 1 9EG7 monoclonal
antibody (D). Note that cell migration was inhibited by
the anti- 1 antiserum and the anti- v 1 9EG7 monoclonal antibody
but not by the anti- 6 GoH3 antibody.
[View Larger Version of this Image (144K GIF file)]
v 1 but not 6 1 promotes oligodendrocyte precursor
migration on a laminin/fibronectin/vitronectin composite substrate
The results with the anti- v 1 9EG7 and anti- 6 GoH3
monoclonal antibodies suggest that the v 1 but not the 6 1
integrin plays the dominant role in promoting oligodendrocyte precursor
migration on AGM. This result might be expected, however, if the
6 1 ligand laminin was either masked or not present in the AGM. To
address this issue, experiments were carried out both on laminin
substrates (which promote adhesion, outgrowth, and migration, as
described above) and on a composite ECM substrate coated with a
solution containing 10 µg/ml of laminin, fibronectin, and
vitronectin. As shown in Figure 12, the anti- 6
monoclonal antibody GoH3 did not significantly reduce oligodendrocyte
precursor migration on either laminin substrates or the composite
matrix of fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin
(p > 0.05). In contrast, anti- 1 antiserum
reduced the extent of migration on the composite substrate to
46.03 ± 1.98% of the control (p < 0.001). This result shows that 6 1 is not playing a significant
role in oligodendrocyte precursor migration, even when the 6 1
ligand laminin is present within the substrate.
Fig. 12.
The effect of v 1 and 6 1 inhibition on
oligodendrocyte precursor migration over ECM substrates. The extent of
mouse oligodendrocyte precursor cell migration away from agarose drops
(prepared as described in Materials and Methods) after 2 d
on either laminin or a composite laminin/fibronectin/vitronectin
substrate was measured in the presence of the anti- 6 GoH3 monoclonal
antibody or anti- 1 antiserum. The extent of migration is presented
as a percentage of migration observed under control conditions, with no
antibody present. Note that the anti- 6 GoH3 antibody had no
significant inhibitory effect on either laminin or the composite
substrate (p > 0.05), whereas the anti- 1
antiserum significantly inhibited migration on the composite substrate
(p < 0.001).
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
In this study we have used the Varani migration assay to
investigate the role of ECM/integrin interactions in oligodendrocyte
precursor migration. Two major conclusions have emerged. First, the
purified ECM substrates laminin, fibronectin, and vitronectin, as well
as an ECM secreted by astrocytes, are effective at promoting cell
migration, whereas collagen is not. Second, oligodendrocyte precursor
migration on AGM is inhibited by blocking v 1 but not 6 1,
suggesting a dominant role for the v 1 integrin in the migration
process.
The agarose drop assay as a method of investigating oligodendrocyte
precursor migration on ECM substrates
The mechanisms regulating the migration of oligodendrocyte
precursor cells has been addressed by in vitro studies using
both time-lapse microscopy (Small et al., 1987 ; Noble et al., 1988 ;
Kiernan and ffrench-Constant, 1993 ) and chemotactic chamber assays
(Armstrong et al., 1990 ; Frost et al., 1996 ). In the current study we
have used a novel method based on the Varani agarose drop assay. In the
presence of PDGF, oligodendrocyte precursor cells at the periphery of
the drop start to migrate away within hours and continue their
migration for at least 7 d. Unlike time lapse, this method permits
the simultaneous analysis of different experimental conditions. It also
has advantages over the use of the chemotaxis chamber, including the
ability to monitor cell migration at intermediate time points, to
change experimental conditions within an experiment, and to examine
cell morphology during the experiment. A potential problem is that
these experiments continue for several days, and the extent of cell
dispersal from the drop will reflect both cell migration and
proliferation. Time-lapse analysis, however, shows that there is
consistent migration of precursors at all time points examined.
Furthermore, migration of precursors still occurs in the presence of
the mitotic inhibitor aphidicholin, showing that cell division is not a
major factor in the extent of dispersal in the assay.
Involvement of ECM and integrins in oligodendrocyte
precursor migration
The ECM molecules laminin, fibronectin, and vitronectin, and a
complex ECM mixture derived from astrocytes (AGM) all promote cell
migration. These results are in agreement with parallel experiments
performed in our laboratory showing that both fibronectin and merosin,
a member of the laminin family, promote oligodendrocyte precursor
migration within a modified chemotaxis chamber assay (Frost et al.,
1996 ). Our findings also show that integrins are involved in
oligodendrocyte precursor migration on these ECM substrates. The
anti-ECMR antibody, which recognizes all oligodendroglial integrins,
blocked cell migration. Having shown previously that oligodendroglial
cells express 6 1 and several v integrins, we targeted these
specific integrins with RGD peptides and function-blocking antibodies.
The RGD peptides and anti- 1 antiserum both reduced migration on AGM
to ~50% of the control value. As argued in the results, the RGD
effect pointed to the involvement of v 1 integrin in migration.
This was confirmed directly by using two monoclonal antibodies: G0H3,
specific to 6 1 (Sonnenberg et al., 1987 ), and 9EG7, which we find
is specific for the v 1 integrin expressed by oligodendrocyte
precursors, despite the fact that they also express other 1
integrins. The specificity of this antibody for a subset of expressed
1 integrins was shown on lymphocytes in the original paper
describing 9EG7 (Lenter et al., 1993 ), and we have also observed this
selectivity on fibroblasts, where 9EG7 immunoprecipitated only
1 1, despite the expression of higher levels of 5 1 (R. Milner and C. ffrench-Constant, unpublished observations). As such,
9EG7 represents a reporter antibody that recognizes a subset of the
1 integrins expressed on different cell types, presumably reflecting
different conformations of these integrins relating to activation state
(Lenter et al., 1993 ).
The observation that 6 1 seems to play only a limited role in
migration on AGM raises the question as to why the 6 1 ligand
laminin is so effective at promoting precursor migration. One
possibility is that the uncharacterized v 80k integrin expressed
by oligodendrocyte precursors (Milner and ffrench-Constant, 1994 ) may
bind laminin and would not be blocked by GoH3. Alternatively,
oligodendrocyte precursor cells may also express nonintegrin laminin
receptors.
An interesting conclusion from our results is that blocking
oligodendrocyte precursor migration is not associated with any changes
in differentiation. This follows from the observation that precursors
maintain the bipolar morphology of undifferentiated cells during
migration blockade. Moreover, precursor cells released from migration
blockade resume migration at the same speed as control cells. Taken
together, these experiments show that the signaling pathways regulating
migration and differentiation can be separated. This is in contrast to
the situation with proliferation and differentiation, because cells
cultured in the absence of mitogenic factors differentiate
constitutively into oligodendrocytes once they drop out of division
(Temple and Raff, 1985 , 1986 ).
A role for the v 1 integrin in cell migration
Our finding that v 1 is a migration-promoting integrin for
oligodendrocyte precursors is consistent with previous studies showing
that 1 integrins promote migration in other cell types. This has
been shown in the neural crest cell lineage using 1 integrin
function-blocking antibodies (Bronner-Fraser, 1986 ) and in neuronal
precursors of the developing tectum using antisense cDNA to reduce
levels of 1 (Galileo et al., 1992 ). More recently, the 1 integrin
gene has been knocked out in F9 teratocarcinoma cells and in embryonic
stem (ES) cells. The ES cells were then unable to migrate toward a
chemotactic source in Boyden chambers (Fassler et al., 1995 ), whereas
1-deficient F9 teratocarcinoma cells lost their ability to migrate
on fibronectin and vitronectin substrates, despite expressing at least
two other vitronectin receptors, v 3 and v 5 (Stephens et
al., 1993 ). As in the F9 cells, our data indicate that v 3 is not
playing a major role in promoting oligodendrocyte precursor cell
migration. This is in contrast to other studies in different cell types
supporting a role for v 3 in migration both in vitro
(Leavesley et al., 1992 ; Delannet et al., 1994 ) and during metastatic
invasion in vivo (Albelda et al., 1990 ; Gehlsen et al.,
1992 ; Seftor et al., 1992 ). To our knowledge, the present study
provides the first evidence for a role of v 1 in migration.
This work raises the question as to the nature of the v 1 ligand
in vivo. Several ligands have been described, including
fibronectin (Vogel et al., 1990 ), vitronectin (Bodary and McLean,
1990 ), and fibrinogen and osteopontin (Liaw et al., 1995 ). Both
fibronectin and vitronectin are present within white matter tracts
early in development (Chun and Shatz., 1988; Neugebauer et al., 1991 ;
Sheppard et al., 1991 ). Although the precise distribution of
fibronectin during the process of myelination has not yet been
established, recent evidence shows vitronectin to be a candidate ligand
for interaction with oligodendroglial integrins during myelination.
Immunocytochemical studies in adult rat brain show that vitronectin is
expressed within several different myelinated tracts (Einheber et al.,
1996 ). The presence of a known ECM ligand for v 1 in myelinated
tracts suggests that interactions between oligodendroglial integrins
and ECM will occur in vivo, although immunocytochemical
studies in earlier developmental stages are required. Based on our cell
culture data, it is likely that any such interactions will play
important instructive roles in regulating oligodendroglial
migration.
Two other possibilities exist for the v 1 ligand. First, Cardwell
and Rome (1988a) identified an RGD-blockable component within AGM that
was not recognized by antibodies against fibronectin or vitronectin,
raising the possibility that a novel v 1 ligand might be secreted
by astrocytes. Second, the ligand in vivo may be a
cell-surface molecule rather than an ECM molecule. Other 1 and v
integrins recognize cell surface ligands: 4 1 binds VCAM (Elices
et al., 1990 ), whereas 6 1 binds fertilin (Almeida et al., 1995 ),
a member of the ADAM family of cell-surface molecules (Wolfsberg et
al., 1995 ). More recently, both 5 1 and v 3 have been shown
to interact with L1 (Ruppert et al., 1995 ; Montgomery et al., 1996 ). It
is possible, therefore, that v 1 binds an unidentified
cell-surface molecule within axonal tracts, such as L1, and that this
provides a mechanism for guidance of migrating oligodendroglia.
These observations complement previous work showing a role for growth
factors in the control of oligodendrocyte precursor migration (Small et
al., 1987 ; Noble et al., 1988 ; Armstrong et al., 1990 ; Kiernan and
ffrench-Constant, 1993 ; Frost et al., 1996 ). They emphasize that the
control of migration in vivo will be regulated by both
integrin- and growth factor-mediated signaling pathways and as such add
significantly to our understanding of oligodendrocyte precursor cell
biology. Our results also suggest a model by which integrins might
regulate oligodendrocyte precursor migration. Oligodendroglia lose
migratory potential on differentiation, and in this study we have shown
that this occurs over 7 d. During the same time scale, there is a
loss of v 1 from the cell surface and expression of v 5
(Milner and ffrench-Constant, 1994 ). Given that the v 1 integrin
promotes migration, the developmental switch of v-associated subunits may play a key role in regulating the timing of
oligodendroglial migration. A prediction of this model is that
overexpression of the v 1 heterodimer may enhance the migration of
oligodendroglial cells in vivo. If so, this might have
useful implications for future therapeutic strategies using
transplanted oligodendrocyte precursors to repair widespread
demyelinated lesions.
FOOTNOTES
Received July 29, 1996; revised Aug. 29, 1996; accepted Sept. 4, 1996.
This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust. R.M. held a Wellcome prize
fellowship, C.S. is a Wellcome Trust senior fellow in basic biomedical
science, and C.ff-C. was a Wellcome Trust senior clinical fellow. We
are grateful to Drs. J. Salzer and S. Einheber for sharing results
before publication.
Correspondence should be addressed to Charles ffrench-Constant,
Wellcome/Cancer Research Campaign Institute of Developmental Biology
and Cancer, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR,
UK.
REFERENCES
-
Adams JC,
Watt FM
(1993)
Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix.
Development
117:1183-1198 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Albelda SM,
Mette SA,
Elder DE,
Stewart R,
Damjanovich L,
Herlyn M,
Buck C
(1990)
Integrin distribution in malignant melanoma: association of the beta 3 subunit with tumour progression.
Cancer Res
50:6757-6764 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Alfandari D,
Whittaker CA,
DeSimone DW,
Darribere T
(1995)
Integrin
v subunit is expressed on mesodermal cell surfaces during amphibian gastrulation.
Dev Biol
170:249-261 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Almeida EAC,
Huovila A-PJ,
Sutherland AE,
Stephens LE,
Calarco PG,
Shaw LM,
Mercurio AM,
Sonnenberg A,
Primakoff P,
Myles DG,
White JM
(1995)
Mouse egg integrin
6 1 functions as a sperm receptor.
Cell
81:1095-1104.
[ISI][Medline]
-
Armstrong RC,
Harvath L,
Dubois-Dalcq ME
(1990)
Type 1 astrocytes and oligodendrocyte-type 2 astrocyte glial progenitors migrate toward distinct molecules.
J Neurosci Res
27:400-407 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Bodary SC,
McLean JW
(1990)
The integrin
1 subunit associates with the vitronectin receptor v subunit to form a novel vitronectin receptor in a human embryonic kidney cell line.
J Biol Chem
265:5938-5941 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bronner-Fraser M
(1986)
An antibody to a receptor for fibronectin and laminin perturbs cranial neural crest development in vivo.
Dev Biol
117:528-536 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Cardwell MC,
Rome LH
(1988a)
Evidence that an RGD-dependent receptor mediates the binding of oligodendrocytes to a novel ligand in a glial-derived matrix.
J Cell Biol
107:1541-1549 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cardwell MC,
Rome LH
(1988b)
RGD-containing peptides inhibit the synthesis of myelin-like membrane by cultured oligodendrocytes.
J Cell Biol
107:1551-1559 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheresh DA,
Spiro RC
(1987)
Biosynthetic and functional properties of an Arg-Gly-Asp-directed receptor involved in human melanoma cell adhesion to vitronectin, fibrinogen and Von Willebrand factor.
J Biol Chem
262:17703-17711 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheresh DA,
Smith JW,
Cooper HM,
Quaranta V
(1989)
A novel vitronectin receptor integrin (
v x) is responsible for distinct adhesive properties of carcinoma cells.
Cell
57:59-69 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Chun JJM,
Shatz CJ
(1988)
A fibronectin-like molecule is present in the developing cat cerebral cortex and is correlated with subplate neurons.
J Cell Biol
106:857-872.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Damsky CH,
Knudsen KA,
Buck CA
(1982)
Integral membrane glycoproteins related to cell-substratum adhesion in mammalian cells.
J Cell Biochem
18:1-13 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Delannet M,
Martin F,
Bossy B,
Cheresh DA,
Reichardt LF
(1994)
Specific roles of the
v 1, v 3 and v 5 integrins in avian neural crest cell adhesion and migration on vitronectin.
Development
120:2687-2702 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Diamond MS,
Springer TA
(1994)
The dynamic regulation of integrin adhesiveness.
Curr Biol
4:506-517 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Einheber S, Milner TA, Preissner KT, Salzer
JL (1996) Vitronectin is associated with myelin sheaths in
the adult rat brain. Soc Neurosci Abstr, in press.
-
Elices MJ,
Osborn L,
Takada Y,
Crouse C,
Luhowskyj S,
Hemler ME,
Lobb RR
(1990)
VCAM-1 on activated endothelium interacts with the leucocyte integrin VLA-4 at a site distinct from the VLA-4/fibronectin binding site.
Cell
60:577-584 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Fassler R,
Pfaff M,
Murphy J,
Noegel AA,
Johansson S,
Timpl R,
Albrecht R
(1995)
Lack of
1 integrin gene in embryonic stem cells affects morphology, adhesion and migration but not integration into the inner cell mass of blastocysts.
J Cell Biol
128:979-988 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Frost E, Kiernan BW, Faissner A, ffrench-Constant
C (1996) Regulation of oligodendrocyte precursor migration by
extracellular matrix: evidence for substrate-specific inhibition of
migration by tenascin-C. Dev Neurosci, in press.
-
Galileo DS,
Majors J,
Horwitz AF,
Sanes JR
(1992)
Retrovirally introduced antisense integrin RNA inhibits neuroblast migration in vivo.
Neuron
9:1117-1131 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Gehlsen KR,
Davis GE,
Sriramarao CA
(1992)
Integrin expression in human melanoma cells with differing invasive and metastatic properties.
Clin Exp Metastasis
10:111-120 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hall DE,
Reichardt LF,
Crowley E,
Holley B,
Moezzi H,
Sonnenberg A,
Damsky CH
(1990)
The
1 1 and 6 1 integrin heterodimers mediate cell attachment to distinct sites on laminin.
J Cell Biol
110:2175-2184 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Helfrich MH,
Nesbitt SA,
Dorey EL,
Horton MA
(1992a)
Rat osteoclasts adhere to a wide range of RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptide-containing proteins, including the bone sialoproteins and fibronectin via a
3 integrin.
J Bone Miner Res
7:335-343 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Helfrich MH,
Nesbitt SA,
Horton MA
(1992b)
Integrins on rat osteoclasts: characterization of two monoclonal antibodies (F4 and F11) to rat
3.
J Bone Miner Res
7:345-351 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hemler ME
(1990)
VLA proteins in the integrin family: structures, functions, and their role on leucocytes.
Annu Rev Immunol
8:365-400 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hirsch E,
Gullberg D,
Balzac F,
Altruda F,
Silengo L,
Tarone G
(1994)
v integrin subunit is predominantly located in nervous tissue and skeletal muscle during mouse development.
Dev Dynamics
20:108-120.
-
Hynes RO
(1992)
Integrins: versatility, modulation and signaling in cell adhesion.
Cell
69:11-25 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hynes RO,
Lander AD
(1992)
Contact and adhesive specificities in the associations, migrations, and targeting of cells and axons.
Cell
68:303-322 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Kiernan BW, ffrench-Constant C (1993) Oligodendrocyte
precursor (O-2A progenitor cell) migration: a model system for the
study of cell migration in the developing central nervous system.
Development [Suppl]:219-225.
-
Knudsen KA,
Rao PE,
Damsky CH,
Buck CA
(1981)
Membrane glycoproteins involved in cell-substratum adhesion.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
78:6071-6073 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koivunen E,
Gay DA,
Ruoslahti E
(1993)
Selection of peptides binding to the
5 1 integrin from phage display library.
J Biol Chem
268:20205-20210 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lachapelle F,
Gumpel M,
Baulac M,
Jacque C,
Duc P,
Baumann N
(1984)
Transplantation of CNS fragments into the brain of shiverer mutant mice: extensive myelination by implanted oligodendrocytes. I. Immunohistochemical studies.
Dev Neurosci
6:325-334.
-
Lachapelle F,
Duhamel-Clerin E,
Gansmüller A,
Baron-Van Erercooren A,
Villarroya H,
Gumpel M
(1994)
Transplanted transgenically marked oligodendrocytes survive, migrate and myelinate in the normal mouse brain as they do in the shiverer mouse brain.
Eur J Neurosci
6:814-824 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Leavesley DI,
Ferguson GD,
Wayner EA,
Cheresh DA
(1992)
Requirement of the integrin
3 subunit for carcinoma cell spreading or migration on vitronectin and fibrinogen.
J Cell Biol
117:1101-1107 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lenter M,
Uhlig H,
Hamann A,
Jeno P,
Imnof B,
Vestweber D
(1993)
A monoclonal antibody against an activation epitope on mouse integrin chain
1 blocks adhesion of lymphocytes to the endothelial integrin 6 1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:9051-9055 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Levison SW,
Goldman JE
(1993)
Both oligodendrocytes and astrocytes develop from progenitors in the subventricular zone of postnatal rat forebrain.
Neuron
10:201-212 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Liaw L,
Skinner MP,
Raines EW,
Ross R,
Cheresh DA,
Schwartz MA,
Giachelli CM
(1995)
The adhesive and migratory effects of osteopontin are mediated via distinct cell surface integrins. Role of alpha v beta 3 in smooth muscle cell migration to osteopontin in vitro.
J Clin Invest
95:713-724 .
-
Malek-Hedayat S,
Rome LH
(1994)
Expression of a
1-related integrin by oligodendroglia in primary culture: evidence for a functional role in myelination.
J Cell Biol
124:1039-1046 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McCarthy KD,
De Vellis J
(1980)
Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglia cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue.
J Cell Biol
85:890-902 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McKinnon RD,
Smith C,
Behar T,
Smith T,
Dubois-Dalcq M
(1993)
Distinct effects of bFGF and PDGF on oligodendrocyte progenitor cells.
Glia
7:245-254 .
[ISI][Medline]
|