 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 16, Number 23,
Issue of December 1, 1996
pp. 7610-7618
Copyright ©1996 Society for Neuroscience
Metaphase Spindles Rotate in the Neuroepithelium of Rat
Cerebral Cortex
Richard J. Adams
University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1
3PT, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Time-lapse confocal microscopy has been used to image cells in
mitosis at the apical surface of neuroepithelium from the rat cerebral
cortex during the period of neurogenesis. Staining with vital chromatin
dyes reveals that mitotic spindles that are aligned parallel to the
surface of the tissue are highly motile, rotating within the plane of
the epithelium throughout metaphase, and come to rest only as anaphase
begins. Spindles may make several complete turns, parallel to the
epithelium, but only rarely tumble into an orientation perpendicular to
the epithelial sheet. Analysis shows that spindles do not rotate
randomly; rather, they spend most of their time aligned parallel or
antiparallel to the direction in which they will later enter anaphase
and undergo cell division. This conclusion is strongly supported by
statistical analyses of the data. Stereotyped movements of this kind
show that the direction of division is determined early in mitosis.
This suggests the existence of intracellular and perhaps intercellular
signals that define the polarity of the cell both in the apico-basal
direction and within the plane of the epithelium. Such mechanisms may
be important for maintaining the structure of the epithelium and cell-cell communication during development and may also provide a
mechanism for the precise distribution of cytoplasmic determinants that
might influence the fate of the daughter cells at a time when neuronal
fate is being determined.
Key words:
mitosis;
neurogenesis;
neuroepithelium;
confocal
microscopy;
time-lapse;
development;
cerebral cortex;
cell polarity;
epithelium
INTRODUCTION
The cerebral cortex, like other regions of the
mammalian CNS, develops from a simple, pseudostratified
neuroepithelium. The adult structure contains many specialized cell
types within distinct architectonic areas, making specific connections
both within the cortex and to the rest of the brain to perform the
highest of mental activities. How these specialized populations of
cells are generated from a simple, proliferating epithelium remains a
mystery, but it is now becoming clear that important decisions in the
developmental process are made at the time of neurogenesis (for review,
see Barbe, 1996 ). The work of Sauer and others has shown that the
neuroepithelium is a pseudostratified epithelium in which the location
of each nucleus follows an interkinetic motion in the depth of the
epithelium over the period of the cell cycle (Sauer, 1935 , 1936 ;
Fujita, 1960 ). Mitosis takes place at the apical or ventricular surface
of the tissue. Through G1, nuclei descend to the basal-most extent of
the proliferative zone, where DNA is replicated, and then rise again to
complete the cycle adjacent to the ventricular wall in G2 and early
prophase. Each cell maintains both an apical and a basal process that
together span the extent of the neuroepithelium at all stages except
mitosis, when the basal process is retracted and the cell rounds at the
apical surface (Hinds and Ruffet, 1971 ; Seymour and Berry, 1975 ). In
most cases, the cell then divides with its mitotic axis aligned
parallel to the apical surface of the epithelium to produce two
radially symmetrical cells (Hinds and Ruffet, 1971 ; Smart, 1973 ).
It is known that the location of the mitotic spindle will direct
the plane of cell division to be perpendicular to the axis of
the spindle (Rappaport, 1961 ). However, we know very little of
how the orientation of mitosis and cell division is spatially controlled within the three-dimensional structure of tissues
(Reinsch and Karsenti, 1994 ). Studies within the developing
nervous system (Langman et al., 1966 ; Smart, 1973 ; Zamenhof, 1978 ;
Landrieu and Goffinet, 1979 ; Zieba et al., 1986 ; Chenn and McConnell,
1995 ) and in other tissues (Smart, 1970 ; Fristrom, 1988 ; Lamprecht, 1990 ) show a tissue-specific, stereotypic arrangement of mitotic figures, implying that there are control mechanisms that determine their organization. Cells within many epithelia divide within the plane
of that sheet, maintaining cell contacts during the process (Hinds and
Ruffet, 1971 ; Sandig and Kalnins, 1990 ; Reinsch and Karsenti, 1994 ),
but the mechanisms and dynamics of these events are largely unexplored.
Despite the importance of cell division to development of the nervous
system, very few studies have investigated this process in
situ, especially during the later stages of organogenesis (Chenn
and McConnell, 1995 ). In this study, I have used time-lapse confocal
microscopy to follow mitosis at the apical surface of neuroepithelium
of the rat cerebral cortex. I show that mitotic spindles rotate
extensively during metaphase but that these motions respect the
direction in which the cell will later divide, showing that this
orientation is specified early in mitosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (Poole, UK) unless
otherwise stated.
Tissue culture. Patches of cortex were dissected from the
lateral cerebral wall of Sprague Dawley rat embryos between embryonic day 12 (E12) and E20 (the day of conception is E0). Patches were cultured in Petriperm dishes (petri dishes with a base constructed from a thin, gas-permeable membrane; Bachofer GmbH) in serum-free DMEM
plus N2 culture medium supplement (Life Technologies) (Bottenstein and
Sato, 1979 ). Cultures were maintained at 37°C and in an atmosphere of
95% air/5% CO2. Proliferation, as seen by cells entering
mitosis, continues for 24-48 hr under these conditions, but all
observations in this study were made within 36 hr of tissue
explantation. To visualize mitosis, dishes were kept at 37°C in a
purpose-built stage heater mounted on an inverted, laser-scanning
confocal microscope (Leica Lasertechnik GmbH). The surface of the
medium was covered with a thin layer of silicone oil (BDH) to prevent
evaporation and changes in pH of the culture medium during the
experiment. Slices were stained immediately before imaging by addition
of 3.3 µM acridine orange (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR)
into the culture medium for 10 min, replaced with fresh culture medium, and subsequently imaged for no more than 2 hr on the microscope. The
488 nm line of an argon-krypton laser was used to excite acridine orange; emitted light was passed through an 80% transmission mirror and a 515 nm long-pass filter. Images were collected in a single scan
or line 2× or 4× line averaging. Excitation was kept to a minimum by
using the lowest possible laser intensities, minimal averaging, and
collecting images in a single plane in most instances. The process of
mitosis is highly temperature-sensitive; for this reason, either
long-working-distance objectives [10×, 0.3 numerical aperture (NA)
and 20× 0.4 NA (Olympus)] or a 25×, 0.75 NA, water-immersion lens
(Leica) with custom-made lens heater was used for imaging living
preparations.
Analysis. Mitosis was followed in living preparations using
time-lapse confocal microscopy. Sequences of images of dividing cells
were taken at 30 or 60 sec intervals. In most instances, images at a
single image plane were collected, but some data were collected at
multiple planes at each time point. A custom computer program was
written using LabView (National Instruments) running on a Macintosh
computer to control, via a serial connection, the collection and
storage of images by the confocal microscope system. Sequences of
images were analyzed on a Macintosh computer using the public domain
National Institutes of Health Image program (developed at National
Institutes of Health and available from the Internet by anonymous FTP
from zippy.nimh.nih.gov or on floppy disk from the National Technical
Information Service, Springfield, VA, part number PB95-500195GEI).
Quantitative analysis of the orientation of the fluorescently stained
chromatin of 24 cells dividing within the plane of E19 tissue was
calculated for each frame of the movies collected at 30 sec intervals.
The orientations of mitotic spindles before the onset of anaphase were
calculated as the perpendicular to a line drawn through the bar of
stained chromatin at the center of the spindle (i.e., a line drawn
perpendicular to the axis of the spindle). The orientation of the
spindle from anaphase through cytokinesis was measured by drawing a
line between the two parting clusters of chromatin, parallel to the
mitotic spindle. Individual measurements were reproducible to within
4°. An average of all data points after the clear onset of anaphase through to cytokinesis was calculated for each cell. All measured angles for the entire sequence from each cell were then normalized relative to this mean angle. 0° corresponds to parallel and 180° antiparallel to the mean direction of anaphase and cytokinesis. Time
sequences are presented as polar plots of orientation versus time.
Orientation distributions grouped from a population of cells were
binned at 10° intervals and plotted as rose diagrams for which the
area of each sector is proportional to its relative frequency (radius
is proportional to the square root of frequency) such that the total
area of each diagram is equal. Customized plotting procedures were
written to present to data.
Statistical tests of the data against models of circular distributions
were programmed within the numerical analysis package HiQ (National
Instruments) using the methods described in Mardia (1972) and Fisher
(1993) . Briefly, a goodness-of-fit measure for a uniform (random)
distribution of angles was established by calculating the Watson
U2 statistic (Mardia, 1972 ). A
U2 fit-statistic for a unimodal von Mises
distribution (a circular analog of the linear Normal distribution) was
calculated using the cumulative frequency values of the data against
the maximum-likelihood estimates of the data mean direction and parameters (the latter found by solving the first- to zero-order
modified Bessel function ratio equal to the mean resultant vector of
the data) (Fisher, 1993 ). Parameter estimation for a bimodal mixture of
two von Mises distributions was found by the method of moments (using
Nelder-Mead minimization) to find the five parameters: mean of
distribution 1, of distribution 1, mean of distribution 2, of
distribution 2, and p, the proportion of the first
distribution to the total (Fisher, 1993 ). A
U2 fit-statistic was calculated, as
above, using the cumulative frequency values of the weighted mixture of
the two distributions.
RESULTS
Mitotic cells in the ventricular zone of the cerebral cortex
Sheets of developing neuroepithelium from the lateral wall of the
cerebral cortex of rat embryos were cultured for up to 36 hr. Tissue
was taken between the ages of E12 and E20, spanning the entire period
of neurogenesis (Bayer and Altman, 1991 ; Ignacio et al., 1995 ).
Proliferation in the ventricular zone is much diminished by E20; only
about half of the preparations from this age showed cells in mitosis at
the ventricular surface, when imaged as described below. The nuclei of
cells located at the ventricular (apical) surface of the tissue were
visualized by staining with the vital dye acridine orange and imaging
the living preparation by confocal microscopy. In this preparation,
acridine orange stained chromatin almost exclusively, with very little
cytoplasmic staining, making mitotic figures at the apical surface of
the intact, living tissue very clear (Fig.
1a). Nuclei of cells in prophase rise to the apical surface where their chromatin condenses as the chromosomes collect at the center of the cell to form the metaphase plate. In the
experiments described here, the tissue was viewed from the ventricular
surface in a plane parallel to the plane of the epithelial sheet. The
mitotic spindles formed parallel to the plane of the tissue, and the
plane of division was radial, parallel to the apico-basal axis of the
cell. These divisions gave rise to two daughter cells that were
adjacent within the sheet, each presumably maintaining apical contacts
(Hinds and Ruffet, 1971 ). All of the mitotic figures directly visible
by this technique and described in this paper were oriented in this
way. We would expect, however, that at least 10% of cells will be
dividing perpendicular to this, with their mitotic spindle parallel to
the apico-basal axis of the cell and cleavage plane horizontal within
the epithelium (Smart, 1973 ; Chenn and McConnell, 1995 ) (R. Adams and
J. Nangla, unpublished observations). In some instances, a small number
of nuclei, which may have been dividing in a perpendicular direction, could be distinguished from adjacent interphase nuclei by using image-processing methods, on time-lapse movies, to detect the arrival
or loss of nuclei with no clear metaphase bar. It is likely that they
are rarely seen because the perpendicular disk of chromatin is not
readily distinguishable from adjacent interphase cells. Because they
could not be unambiguously detected in this preparation, they will not
be described further.
Fig. 1.
Confocal microscopy of mitotic cells at the
ventricular surface of living neuroepithelium from the rat cerebral
cortex. Explants from the lateral wall of the neocortical
neuroepithelium of embryonic rat between the ages of E12 and E20 were
cultured in vitro. The chromatin dye acridine orange
(3.3 µM) was used to visualize mitotic figures at the
ventricular surface of the tissue imaged by confocal microscopy.
a, Single optical section taken parallel to the surface of a sheet of tissue from an E14 rat embryo. Mitotic nuclei in prophase
(p), metaphase (m), and
anaphase/telophase (t) can be seen. b,
c, Two-dimensional extended-focus images generated from thirty-two 1 µm optical sections through a single metaphase cell dividing parallel to the surface of the epithelium. Projected along the
apico-basal axis, the image appears as a bright bar (b)
but rotated 90° to project along the axis of the spindle shows this
to be a disk of chromatin within the depth of the tissue (c). Scale bars: a, 10 µm;
b, c, 5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (115K GIF file)]
Viewed from the apical surface, the discoid metaphase plate appeared as
a bar of chromatin in the center of the cell. The alignment of the bar
indicating the orientation of the mitotic spindle within the plane of
the epithelium. Three-dimensional reconstruction of optical sections
through cells in metaphase confirmed that these bars were disk-shaped
in the z-direction (Fig. 1b,c). Cells
in anaphase had two smaller, parallel bars of chromatin (Fig.
1a) that will have become more rounded by telophase and
cytokinesis. It should be noted that individual chromosomes could not
be resolved, so the stages of prometaphase and metaphase are not easily
distinguishable (Rieder et al., 1994 ); for the sake of brevity,
therefore, I shall refer to this entire period as metaphase.
Time-lapse imaging of mitosis
Time-lapse confocal microscopy of the ventricular surface of
sheets of neuroepithelium shows that the process of mitosis is highly
dynamic. No qualitative difference has been found in the behavior of
mitoses in tissue taken over the entire period of E12-E20. Nuclei in
prophase became visible as they rose to the apical surface. Their
chromatin was in constant rotational motion, probably caused by both
chromosomal condensation and alignment and to rotation of the entire
nucleus. The nuclei of adjacent cells in interphase did not rotate.
Within a short time, the chromosomes collected to the bar-like
metaphase plate at the center of the cell. In many cases, the metaphase
plate continued to display persistent and substantial rotational motion
within a plane parallel with the plane of the tissue (Fig.
2). The extent of rotation may range from a few degrees
about a mean position to large excursions encompassing complete 360°
rotations. Many rotations were of 180° or more. The total angular
displacement, within the plane, may encompass one or more complete
rotations; this suggests that this was a movement of the entire mitotic
spindle rather than a realignment of the chromatin within the spindle
complex. Importantly, the metaphase plate is recognizable as a bar very
early in mitosis, indicating that the alignment of the spindle
perpendicular to the apico-basal axis was relatively fast (and
presumable the same for cells dividing perpendicular to the sheet) but
that rotation within that plane continues for much longer. On
occasions, however, the bar-like appearance of the metaphase plate may
transform briefly into a disk, interpreted as a tumbling motion of the
spindle into an orientation perpendicular to the plane of the
epithelium. This orientation is short-lived, and the spindle rapidly
returns to a parallel attitude. Smaller changes in shape of the
metaphase plate could also be detected while the spindle is rotating
(Fig. 3). These probably reflect the movements of
individual chromosomes as they align to complete bipolar connections
within the spindle, equivalent to the oscillations of chromosomes seen
in some cultured cells (Rieder et al., 1994 ).
Fig. 2.
Time-lapse sequence of a single mitotic cell in
the neuroepithelium of an E19 rat embryo. Neuroepithelium from an E19
embryo was stained with acridine orange and then imaged at 30 sec
intervals for 1 hr by time-lapse confocal microscopy. Frames proceed by rows from left to right starting at the
top left. The metaphase plate of the cell seen in the
center of frame 1 is in constant motion until frame 61 (row 8, column 5), 30 min into the sequence, when it enters anaphase.
The two sets of daughter chromatids separate over the remainder of the
frames with little change in the orientation of the spindle. Each frame
is 40 µm wide.
[View Larger Version of this Image (145K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Chromosomal movements within the metaphase plate
during rotation. Four frames from a sequence of high-magnification
images taken at 60 sec intervals during metaphase showing the changes in shape of the metaphase plate, consistent with the oscillatory behaviors of individual chromosomes described by others (Rieder et al.,
1994 ). These movements are superimposed on the larger scale rotation of
the entire spindle within the dividing cell. Scale bar, 5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (146K GIF file)]
Movement was continuous through metaphase but abruptly ceased as cells
entered anaphase. Cells then proceeded through chromatin separation
(anaphase and telophase) and cytokinesis with relatively little change
in orientation of the spindle relative to the tissue. On passage from
metaphase into anaphase, the central disk of chromatin split into two
smaller masses that slowly moved to opposite poles of the cell. After
the completion of anaphase, and presumably cytokinesis, some daughter
nuclei descended again into the depth of the epithelial sheet and were
lost from the narrow depth of field of the confocal microscope, but
others remained longer at the apical surface. The cessation of movement
at the onset of anaphase suggests a change in the activity of
force-generating elements, possibly involving interactions of astral
microtubules with the cell cortex (Hyman and White, 1987 ).
Quantitative analysis of movement
Quantitative analysis of the movements of mitotic spindles
revealed more of the underlying behavior. The orientation of the spindle was constantly changing throughout metaphase, but this movement
was not random. When the orientation over time of individual spindles
was plotted as a polar graph, with angle depicting orientation relative
to the mean anaphase direction and radius proportional to time, it was
evident that for many cells angular excursions were large, encompassing
rotations of 180° or even 360° (Fig. 4). Polar plots
of movements and rose diagrams of the distributions of angles occupied
during metaphase (Fig. 4) showed that not all orientations were
equivalent; rather, the spindle, for many cells, spent most of its time
restricted to one or both of two diagonally opposed quadrants parallel
and antiparallel to the direction it will later enter anaphase, stop
rotating, and divide (Fig. 4). For these cells, the time spent
perpendicular to the orientation of entry into anaphase was always
short. Cells with this behavior constituted about half of those
studied. Most of the remaining cells showed a predominantly unimodal
preference of orientation, close to the direction of anaphase. A
smaller population of cells showed more extensive movements, in which
their axial preferences were less clear.
Fig. 4.
Paths of spindle rotation during mitosis in the
ventricular zone. Time course of orientation of eight representative
mitotic spindles measured at 30 sec intervals through metaphase
(open symbols) and anaphase through cytokinesis
(filled symbols). Cells in movies of the kind
shown in Figure 3 were analyzed frame by frame to measure the
orientation of mitotic spindle over time. Results are presented as
polar plots with increasing radius representing the progression of time
and orientation normalized to the mean angle of all anaphase
measurements for each cell (0°). To the left of each
polar plot is a rose diagram showing the relative frequency
distribution of orientations during metaphase. The top four examples show distinct bipolar preferences relative the
direction of anaphase. The bottom four show either a
unimodal preference or more extensive movements with no clear
preference. This selection is representative of the total population
measured.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
To investigate quantitatively the behavior of mitotic spindles for a
population of cells, the combined frequency distribution of orientation
for those cells that could be followed from metaphase through to
cytokinesis was calculated. Measurements, taken from movies collected
at 30 sec intervals, were separated into two groups, before and after
the detectable onset of anaphase. Each group was normalized by angle,
on a cell-by-cell basis, so that the mean orientation of the spindle
through anaphase is 0° and then plotted as a rose diagram in which
the area of each 10° bin is proportional to its relative frequency
(Fig. 5). The distribution of orientations measured
after the onset of anaphase showed a very restricted variation about
the mean angle (0° ± 0.6°, mean ± 95% confidence limits).
This clearly confirmed the impression that there was very little net
rotation once the sister chromatids had begun their separation.
However, the distribution of orientations of spindles during metaphase
was very much broader with prominent peaks at 0° and 180°, parallel
and antiparallel to the angle of karyokinesis and cytokinesis. In
Figure 5, the metaphase distribution is compared to a graphical
representation of an uniform (random) distribution, which clearly shows
that the metaphase data are concentrated in the regions of 0° and
180° relative to 90° and 270°. If the data are grouped about the
four cardinal directions, they spend 39 and 27% of their time in the
quadrants 0° ± 45° and 180° ± 45°, respectively (together
comprising two-thirds of the total time), compared to an average of
17% of the time in each of the perpendicular quadrants.
Fig. 5.
Frequency distributions of orientations of
spindles in anaphase and metaphase relative to the orientation of
division. The orientations measured over time for a population of 24 dividing cells were individually normalized to their mean orientation
during anaphase. Measurements were separated into two groups
corresponding to those after the onset of anaphase and those preceding
them, during metaphase. Each data set was binned at 10° intervals and presented as a rose diagram. The area of each sector is proportional to
its frequency (radius proportional to the square root of frequency) such that the total areas of the two plots are equal. The distribution of 591 measurements of spindles in anaphase shows very little rotational movement. The distribution of orientations during metaphase (1051 measurements) is much broader, reflecting the extensive motion of
the metaphase spindle. There are two major peaks in this distribution,
one at 2.7°, parallel to the mean angle after the cessation of
rotation, and the other at 179.6°. This shows that the spindles spend
significantly more time aligned in this axis within the plane of the
tissue than at angles perpendicular to it. The metaphase distribution
is superimposed on the distribution (gray) that
would be expected for a uniform (random) distribution of
orientation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
The data for the distribution of orientations of metaphase spindles
relative to their anaphase direction have been analyzed more rigorously
by comparing them to statistical models of circular data. Calculation
of the Watson U2 statistic allows us to reject
confidently a random (uniform) model (U2 = 1.54, p < 0.005) in which a spindle spends equal time in all orientations irrespective of the direction of division. A unimodal von
Mises model of the metaphase data, a circular analog of a normal
distribution, in which the data are clustered about a single mean
direction, can also be strongly rejected (U2 = 0.84, p < 0.005). A plausible fit of the metaphase
data may be found with a bimodal mixture of two von Mises distributions (U2 = 0.038, p > 0.25) with
peaks centered at 2.7° ± 4.1° and 179.6° ± 5.5° (mean ± approximate 95% confidence limits). The contributions of the two
distributions are weighted at 0.55 and 0.45, with coefficients of
1.9 and 1.5, respectively. This finding strongly supports the
hypothesis that there is an axial preference for alignment of the
metaphase spindle parallel with the axis of anaphase and division,
about which it will tend to align, parallel or antiparallel, before its
arrest at anaphase.
An alternative way to analyze these data is to ask to what extent the
mean axial direction for each cell will predict the direction in which
it will enter anaphase. The direction data of each metaphase
measurement were converted to axial data by doubling the angle modulo
360, the mean direction determined and divided by two. For each cell,
the mean axial direction was found and divided by two. The axial
predictions for all cells analyzed have a mean orientation of
359.2° ± 13.7° (mean ± 95% confidence of the
mean).
This behavior shows that there exists a physical basis for the
determination of direction of cell division in both the
apico-basolateral axis, which determines whether the cell will divide
parallel or perpendicular to the tissue, and within the plane of the
neuroepithelium for those cells dividing parallel to the surface. This
polarity is defined at or before the time that the spindle forms, and
the motion of the highly motile metaphase spindle is strongly biased to
keep it aligned to this orientation.
DISCUSSION
Cells of the neuroepithelium divide at the ventricular surface of
the tissue. This has permitted the use of time-lapse confocal microscopy to image mitosis during the period of neurogenesis in the
cerebral cortex of the rodent. The major finding of this study is that
metaphase mitotic spindles are in constant rotational motion within a
plane parallel with that of the epithelium. Rotation arrests at the
onset of anaphase, and the orientation of the spindle then remains
essentially constant through cytokinesis. Analysis of the rotation of
the metaphase spindle shows that although it can make large angular
displacements encompassing complete 360° rotations, it will spend
significantly more of its time aligned to the direction in which it
will enter anaphase or 180° opposed to it. This behavior indicates
that the direction in which a cell will divide must be determined early
in mitosis and that the motion of the spindle during metaphase is to
ensure that mitosis (and therefore cytokinesis) becomes aligned
correctly in this direction.
In studies of the orientation of cell division within neuroepithelia,
most cells are reported to divide within the plane of the tissue (Hinds
and Ruffet, 1971 ; Smart, 1973 ), although there may be regional or
developmental variation in this pattern (Zamenhof, 1978 ; Chenn and
McConnell, 1995 ). It follows, therefore, that there must be a mechanism
within the cell to orient the mitotic spindle relative to its
apico-basal axis, determining whether a cell will divide parallel or
perpendicular to the epithelium. We do not know whether the mechanism
that aligns the mitotic spindle relative to the apico-basal axis is
the same as that responsible for orientation within the plane. It is
entirely possible that a single cortical cytoplasmic element acts to
direct the spindle in both of these axes. We do know, however, that
alignment must take place on different time scales in neuroepithelial
cells (although specification may not); only occasionally do we see the
"bar" of chromatin of the metaphase plate transform into a disk as
the spindle flips into a vertical position and then rapidly revert back
to a bar. Therefore, although the spindle spends almost all of
metaphase correctly aligned in the apico-basal axis, it spends longer
searching for its orientation within the plane of the tissue. (Presumably, any cells dividing horizontally must also spend most of
their time in their preferred orientation because they are rarely as
transient bars in this study.) Rotation stops as cells enter anaphase,
implying that there is a change in the location of net force
generation, as there is for movements within the spindle itself to
begin the separation of sister chromatids and spindle poles. In a
cultured epithelial cell line (Reinsch and Karsenti, 1994 ), the
position of the centrioles has been described to align during
prometaphase as the spindle becomes horizontal within the cell.
There are examples in which the direction the spindle is specifically
controlled to produce an asymmetric division (Strome, 1993 ; Rhyu and
Knoblich, 1995 ; White and Strome, 1996 ). Astral microtubules may
interact with elements of the cortical actin cytoskeleton to instigate
this positioning (Hyman and White, 1987 ; Waddle et al., 1994 ), and a
number of the other genes involved, in Caenorhabditis
elegans, are being found (White and Strome, 1996 ). Cells
dividing within epithelia may also need to coordinate their plane of
division with neighboring cells so as to maintain the integrity of
cell-cell contacts during cytokinesis (Hinds and Ruffet, 1971 ; Sandig
and Kalnins, 1990 ; Schoenwolf and Alvarez, 1992 ; Reinsch and Karsenti,
1994 ). Polarized cell divisions referenced to a neighboring cell have
also been seen in early C. elegans development
(Goldstein, 1995 ). Studies on living material will be needed to show
whether the behavior reported here is common to all epithelia.
No pattern is seen to the directions with which neighboring cells
divide within the explant. The orientations of divisions appear to be
random, but we do not yet know whether they are aligned locally to
neighboring cells; alignment to radial glial cell processes, for
instance, might guide daughter cells from the ventricular zone after
division. There are instances in the literature in which significant
alignments have been found within the neural plate (Tuckett and
Morriss-Kay, 1985 ). These have been correlated with a polarized growth
of the epithelium, but whether cell division is responding to or
contributing to mechanical or directional forces is still unknown. That
no pattern has yet been discerned in the preparation reported here may
be, in part, because the tissue is removed from the mechanical context
of the rapidly expanding lateral ventricles. The sheets themselves are
highly contractile and change shape while in culture.
There are several published examples in which the alignment of the
mitotic spindle has been associated with a subsequent determination of
cell fate as a consequence of the segregation of cytoplasmic factors
from the mother cell (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992 ; Strome, 1993 ; White
and Strome, 1996 ). In these examples, the mitotic spindle is rotated to
locate cortical cytoplasmic factors at one pole so that just one
daughter cell will inherit them. This behavior is of particular
interest given the nature of the developmental decisions that are
taking place in the neuroepithelium at this time (McConnell and
Kaznowski, 1991 ; Barbe, 1996 ). Throughout the developmental period of
this study, divisions are giving rise to daughters that include further
progenitor cells perhaps with diminishing potential and postmitotic
neurons. Significantly, in the development of the central and
peripheral nervous systems of Drosophila, the determination
of cell fate depends on a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic
signals (Posakony, 1994 ; Rhyu et al., 1994 ; Doe and Spana, 1995 ; Jan
and Jan, 1995). The asymmetric inheritance of two intracellular
proteins, a membrane-associated protein, Numb, and a transcription
factor, Prospero, is necessary for the correct specification of sibling
cell fate (Rhyu et al., 1994 ; Hirata et al., 1995 ; Knoblich et al.,
1995 ; Spana and Doe, 1995 ). Early in mitosis, these proteins are
segregated to one side of the dividing precursor cell, and the mitotic
spindle then aligns such that only one daughter cell will inherit them.
The behavior reported here for the rat neuroepithelium is entirely consistent with (but not proof of) an asymmetric division of
this kind. Active spindle alignment relative to a predefined cellular axis, as reported here, is an absolute prerequisite for mechanisms involving the segregation of cytoplasmic determinants and is similar to
other reported cases (Strome, 1993 ; White and Strome, 1996 ). Intriguingly, Numb and Prospero have both been reported to be expressed
in vertebrates (Oliver et al., 1993 ; Zhong et al., 1996 ). Mammalian
Numb protein is localized to the apical or apico-lateral domains of
cells dividing in the neuroepithelium. The relationship between the
movements reported here and the inheritance of this protein will be
important to establish.
It has been reported recently that there is an asymmetric distribution
of Notch1 protein between daughters of those neuroepithelial cells that
divide horizontally within in vitro preparations of ferret
cerebral cortex (Chenn and McConnell, 1995 ) (perpendicular to those
described in this report). The basal-most daughter of this division
also displays a different behavioral phenotype, migrating more rapidly
from the ventricular surface of the tissue than its apical sister.
Whether the divisions that I describe here produce cells with
asymmetric fates is unknown. Certainly not all asymmetric divisions
necessarily produce postmitotic cells, as in the cascade of stem cells
in the hematopoietic system; neither is this inconsistent with the
observations of differing fate for cells of horizontal divisions (Chenn
and McConnell, 1995 ). If it is argued that the cell must already have a
mechanism to align divisions parallel or perpendicular to the
apico-basal axis and within the plane of the tissue, it is quite
possible that this same mechanism may be used to segregate factors
asymmetrically, in either direction.
The relative contributions of perpendicular and horizontal divisions to
the neuronal complement of the cerebral cortex are still not known; the
final fates of the cells produced by divisions in either plane must
still be established. We do know that the biology of the mammalian
neuroepithelium is complex. It is likely that cell divisions within the
neuroepithelium are producing not only proliferative progenitor cells
and postmitotic neurons but that some must generate the cells of the
subventricular zone and others may involve radial glial cells (Misson
et al., 1988 ; Bayer and Altman, 1991 ; Takahashi et al., 1995 ). A number
of proliferative progenitor cells may leave the neuroepithelium to
migrate tangentially (Fishell et al., 1993 ), possibly to divide again
elsewhere in the cortex (Kornack and Rakic, 1995 ; Reid et al., 1995 ).
How they leave or reestablish connections at the ventricular wall is
unknown, but this may resemble behavior seen in the chick otic anlage, where proliferative cells may delaminate by a horizontal division from
the epithelium (Alvarez et al., 1989 ). The events taking place at the
time of neurogenesis are clearly of great importance, making these and
other studies on the behaviors of cells within the neuroepithelium
vital for our elucidation of this fascinating process.
FOOTNOTES
Received May 6, 1996; revised Sept. 11, 1996; accepted Sept. 16, 1996.
This work was supported by The Medical Research Council Research Centre
for Brain and Behavior, Oxford University. I thank Mr. William Hinkes
for his expert technical assistance with this project. I am also
indebted to Professor Colin Blakemore, Iain Smart, John Scholes, Aurora
Lombardo, Miguel Concha, Zoltán Molnár, and Jyoti Nangla
for critically reading versions of this manuscript, and to Dr. Mario
Cortina-Borja.
Correspondence should be addressed to Richard J. Adams, University
Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford OX1
3PT, UK.
REFERENCES
-
Alvarez IS,
Martín-Patido G,
Rodríguez-Gallardo L,
González-Ramos C,
Navasués J
(1989)
Cell proliferation during early development of the chick otic anlage: quantitative comparison of migratory and nonmigratory regions of the otic epithelium.
J Comp Neurol
290:278-288 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Barbe MF
(1996)
Tempting fate and commitment in the developing forebrain.
Neuron
16:1-16 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Bayer SA,
Altman J
(1991)
In: Neocortical development.
. New York: Raven.
-
Bottenstein JE,
Sato GH
(1979)
Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
83:514-517.
-
Chenn A,
McConnell SK
(1995)
Cleavage orientation and the asymmetric inheritance of notch1 immunoreactivity in mammalian neurogenesis.
Cell
82:631-641 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Doe CQ,
Spana EP
(1995)
A collection of cortical crescents: asymmetric protein localization in CNS precursor cells.
Neuron
15:991-995 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Fishell G,
Mason CA,
Hatten ME
(1993)
Dispersion of neural progenitors within the germinal zones of the forebrain.
Nature
362:636-638 .
[Medline]
-
Fisher NI
(1993)
In: Statistics of directional data.
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
-
Fristrom D
(1988)
The cellular basis of epithelial morphogenesis: a review.
Tissue Cell
20:645-690 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Fujita S
(1960)
Mitotic pattern and histogenesis of the central nervous system.
Nature
185:702-703.
[Medline]
-
Goldstein B
(1995)
Cell contacts orient some cell-division axes in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.
J Cell Biol
129:1071-1080 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hinds JW,
Ruffet TL
(1971)
Cell proliferation in the neural tube: an electron microscopic and Golgi analysis in the mouse cerebral vesicle.
Z Zellforsch
115:226-264.[ISI][Medline]
-
Hirata J,
Nakagoshi H,
Nabeshima Y-I,
Matsuzaki F
(1995)
Asymmetric segregation of the homeodomain protein Prospero during Drosophila development.
Nature
377:627-630 .
[Medline]
-
Horvitz HR,
Herskowitz I
(1992)
Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question.
Cell
68:237-255 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hyman AA
(1989)
Centrosome movement in the early divisions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a cortical site determining centrosome position.
J Cell Biol
109:1185-1193 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hyman AA,
White JG
(1987)
Determination of cell-division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans.
J Cell Biol
105:2123-2135 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ignacio MPD,
Kimm EJ,
Kageyama GH,
Yu J,
Robertson RT
(1995)
Postnatal migration of neurons and formation of laminae in rat cerebral cortex.
Anat Embryol
191:89-100.
[Medline]
-
Knoblich JA, Jan LY, Jan YN (1995) Asymmetric segregation of
numb and prospero during cell-division. 377:624-627.
-
Kornack DR,
Rakic P
(1995)
Radial and horizontal deployment of clonally related cells in the primate neocortex: relationship to distinct mitotic lineages.
Neuron
15:311-321 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Lamprecht J
(1990)
Symmetric and asymmetric cell division in rat corneal epithelium.
Cell Tissue Kinet
23:203-216 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Landrieu P,
Goffinet A
(1979)
Mitotic spindle orientation in relation to cell migration in the neo-cortex of normal and reeler mouse.
Neurosci Lett
13:69-72 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Langman J,
Guerrant RL,
Freeman BG
(1966)
Behavior of neuro-epithelial cells during closure of the neural tube.
J Comp Neurol
127:399-412 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Mardia KV
(1972)
In: Statistics of directional data.
. London: Academic.
-
McConnell SK,
Kaznowski CE
(1991)
Cell-cycle dependence of laminar determination in developing neocortex.
Science
254:282-285 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Misson JP,
Edwards MA,
Yamamoto M,
Caviness VS
(1988)
Mitotic cycling of radial glial-cells of the fetal murine cerebral wall: a combined autoradiographic and immunohistochemical study.
Dev Brain Res
38:183-190.
-
Oliver G,
Sosapineda B,
Geisendorf S,
Spana EP,
Doe CQ,
Gruss P
(1993)
Prox-1, a prospero-related homeobox gene expressed during mouse development.
Mech Dev
44:3-16 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Posakony JW
(1994)
Nature versus nurture: asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila bristle development.
Cell
76:415-418 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Rappaport R
(1961)
Experiments concerning cleavage stimulus in sand dollar eggs.
J Exp Zool
148:81-89.
[ISI][Medline]
-
Reid CB,
Liang I,
Walsh C
(1995)
Systematic widespread clonal organization in cerebral-cortex.
Neuron
15:299-310 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Reinsch S,
Karsenti E
(1994)
Orientation of spindle axis and distribution of plasma membrane proteins during cell division in polarised MDCKII cells.
J Cell Biol
126:1509-1526 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rhyu MS,
Knoblich JA
(1995)
Spindle orientation and asymmetric cell fate.
Cell
82:523-526 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Rhyu MS,
Jan LY,
Jan YN
(1994)
Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells.
Cell
76:477-491 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Rieder CL,
Schultz A,
Cole R,
Sluder G
(1994)
Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic-cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle.
J Cell Biol
127:1301-1310 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sandig M,
Kalnins VI
(1990)
Reorganization of circumferential microfilament bundles in retinal epithelial-cells during mitosis.
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton
17:133-141 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Sauer FC
(1935)
Mitosis in the neural tube.
J Comp Neurol
62:377-405.
-
Sauer FC
(1936)
The interkinetic migration of embryonic epithelial nuclei.
J Morphol
60:1-11.
-
Schliwa M,
Vanblerkom J
(1981)
Structural interaction of cytoskeletal components.
J Cell Biol
90:222-235 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schoenwolf GC,
Alvarez IS
(1992)
Role of cell rearrangement in axial morphogenesis.
Curr Top Dev Biol
27:129-173 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Seymour RM,
Berry M
(1975)
Scanning and transmission electron microscope studies of interkinetic nuclear migration in the cerebral vesicles of the rat.
J Comp Neurol
160:105-126 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Smart IHM
(1970)
Variation in the plane of cell cleavage during the process of stratification in the mouse epidermis.
Br J Dermatol
82:276-282.
[ISI][Medline]
-
Smart IHM
(1973)
Proliferative characteristics of the ependymal layer during the early development of the mouse neocortex: a pilot study based on the number, location and plane of cleavage of mitotic figures.
J Anat
116:67-91.
[ISI][Medline]
-
Spana EP, Doe CQ (1995) The prospero transcription factor is
asymmetrically localized to the cell cortex during neuroblast mitosis
in Drosophila. 121:3187-3195.
-
Strome S
(1993)
Determination of cleavage planes.
Cell
72:3-6 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Takahashi T,
Nowakowski RS,
Caviness VS
(1995)
Early ontogeny of the secondary proliferative population of the embryonic murine cerebral wall.
J Neurosci
15:6058-6068 .
[Abstract]
-
Tuckett F,
Morriss-Kay GM
(1985)
The kinetic behavior of the cranial neural epithelium during neurulation in the rat.
J Embryol Exp Morphol
85:111-119 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Waddle JA,
Cooper JA,
Waterston RH
(1994)
Transient localized accumulation of actin in Caenorhabditis elegans blastomeres with oriented asymmetric divisions.
Development
120:2317-2328 .
[Abstract]
-
White J,
Strome S
(1996)
Cleavage plane specification in C. elegans: how to divide the spoils.
Cell
84:195-198 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Zamenhof S
(1978)
Quantitative studies of mitoses in fetal rat brain: orientations of the spindles.
Dev Brain Res
31:143-146.
-
Zhong W,
Feder JN,
Jiang M-M,
Jan LY,
Jan YN
(1996)
Asymmetric localisation of a mammalian numb homolog during mouse cortical neurogenesis.
Neuron
17:43-53 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Zieba P,
Strojny P,
Lamprecht J
(1986)
Positioning and stability of mitotic spindle orientation in the neuroepithelial cell.
Cell Biol Int
10:91-100.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Lagos-Cabre and R. D Moreno
Mitotic, but not meiotic, oriented cell divisions in rat spermatogenesis
Reproduction,
April 1, 2008;
135(4):
471 - 478.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Woodhead, C. A. Mutch, E. C. Olson, and A. Chenn
Cell-Autonomous beta-Catenin Signaling Regulates Cortical Precursor Proliferation
J. Neurosci.,
November 29, 2006;
26(48):
12620 - 12630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Strauss, R. J. Adams, and N. Papalopulu
A default mechanism of spindle orientation based on cell shape is sufficient to generate cell fate diversity in polarised Xenopus blastomeres
Development,
October 1, 2006;
133(19):
3883 - 3893.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Poggi, M. Vitorino, I. Masai, and W. A. Harris
Influences on neural lineage and mode of division in the zebrafish retina in vivo
J. Cell Biol.,
December 19, 2005;
171(6):
991 - 999.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Yang, D. Kaushal, S. K. Rehen, K. Kriedt, M. A. Kingsbury, M. J. McConnell, and J. Chun
Chromosome Segregation Defects Contribute to Aneuploidy in Normal Neural Progenitor Cells
J. Neurosci.,
November 12, 2003;
23(32):
10454 - 10462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Geldmacher-Voss, A. M. Reugels, S. Pauls, and J. A. Campos-Ortega
A 90{degrees} rotation of the mitotic spindle changes the orientation of mitoses of zebrafish neuroepithelial cells
Development,
August 15, 2003;
130(16):
3767 - 3780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. LoTurco, M. R. Sarkisian, L. Cosker, and J. Bai
Citron Kinase is a Regulator of Mitosis and Neurogenic Cytokinesis in the Neocortical Ventricular Zone
Cereb Cortex,
June 1, 2003;
13(6):
588 - 591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. F. Haydar, E. Ang Jr., and P. Rakic
Mitotic spindle rotation and mode of cell division in the developing telencephalon
PNAS,
March 4, 2003;
100(5):
2890 - 2895.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Estivill-Torrus, H. Pearson, V. van Heyningen, D. J. Price, and P. Rashbass
Pax6 is required to regulate the cell cycle and the rate of progression from symmetrical to asymmetrical division in mammalian cortical progenitors
Development,
March 3, 2003;
129(2):
455 - 466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Yu, L. E. O'Brien, F. Wang, H. Bourne, K. E. Mostov, and M. M.P. Zegers
Hepatocyte Growth Factor Switches Orientation of Polarity and Mode of Movement during Morphogenesis of Multicellular Epithelial Structures
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2003;
14(2):
748 - 763.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Link
Evidence for Directed Mitotic Cleavage Plane Reorientations During Retinal Development within the Zebrafish
Biol. Bull.,
October 1, 2001;
201(2):
254 - 255.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Zhao, J. V. Forrester, and C. D. McCaig
A small, physiological electric field orients cell division
PNAS,
April 27, 1999;
96(9):
4942 - 4946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. S. Roy, J. E. Andrews, F. J. Seidler, and T. A. Slotkin
Nicotine Evokes Cell Death in Embryonic Rat Brain during Neurulation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 1998;
287(3):
1136 - 1144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F. Owens and A. R. Kriegstein
Patterns of Intracellular Calcium Fluctuation in Precursor Cells of the Neocortical Ventricular Zone
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 1998;
18(14):
5374 - 5388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Concha and R. Adams
Oriented cell divisions and cellular morphogenesis in the zebrafish gastrula and neurula: a time-lapse analysis
Development,
January 3, 1998;
125(6):
983 - 994.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|