WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (70)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*LIDOCAINE

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Volume 17, Number 10, Issue of May 15, 1997 pp. 3913-3919
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience

The Role of an Amygdalo-Nigrostriatal Pathway in Associative Learning

Jung-Soo Han1, Robert W. McMahan1, Peter Holland2, and Michela Gallagher1

1 Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, and 2 Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the role of an amygdalo-nigrostriatal pathway in associative learning. An asymmetrical lesion model was used to test whether a circuit from the amygdala central nucleus to the dorsolateral striatum, via the substantia nigra, is critical for mediating conditioned orienting responses. Rats with an asymmetrical lesion, consisting of neurotoxic removal of central nucleus neurons in one hemisphere and depletion of the dopamine innervation of the dorsolateral striatum in the contralateral hemisphere, failed to acquire conditioned orienting responses. In contrast, the asymmetrical lesion had no effect on spontaneous orienting or learning another response directed to the source of the food unconditioned stimulus in the same task. A second experiment tested the effect of reversible inactivation of the dorsolateral striatum contralateral to a neurotoxic central nucleus lesion on acquisition of the conditioned orienting response. Although inactivation did not affect spontaneous orienting, rats failed to acquire the conditioned orienting response during sessions in which inactivation occurred. Immediately after the inactivation procedure was terminated, however, a significant increase in orienting to the conditioned stimulus was evident. These data support the interpretation that the dorsolateral striatum provides a route for the expression of the conditioned orienting response but is not essential for acquisition of this learned behavior.

Key words: learning and memory; pavlovian conditioning; conditioned orienting behavior; amygdala; striatum; asymmetrical lesion; ibotenic acid; lidocaine 6-OHDA

INTRODUCTION

The amygdala central nucleus (CN) is important for the modulation of orienting/attentional responses to signals for biologically significant events (Gallagher and Holland, 1994). In an appetitive conditioning procedure that permits evaluation of two types of learned behavior, normal rats acquire conditioned orienting responses to cues (stimuli such as lights or tones) that signal food delivery and learn to approach the site where food will be delivered (Holland, 1984). Rats with bilateral neurotoxic lesions of CN are unaffected in acquisition of behavior directed to the food delivery site but fail to acquire conditioned orienting responses to cues in both visual and auditory modalities (Gallagher et al., 1990). Notably, those same lesions have no effect on spontaneous orienting to cues presented as novel stimuli before conditioning (Sananes and Campbell, 1989; Gallagher et al., 1990).

Damage to the dorsolateral striatum in rats is known to impair orienting to sensory cues in rats. Unilateral damage to the nigrostriatal dopamine (DA) system (at its origin or in the striatum) produces a deficit in orienting to stimuli presented contralateral to the site of the lesion (Ljungberg and Ungerstedt, 1976). This deficit has been described as an inability to integrate sensory information with the performance of the orienting response, so-called intentional neglect (Carli et al., 1985), and depends on lateral but not medial striatum (Carli et al., 1989; Fairley and Marshall, 1989).

The present study examined the possibility that orienting responses based on associative learning critically depend on an amygdalo-nigrostriatal pathway. The amygdala CN projects to many targets in the midbrain and brainstem; some of these targets provide direct somatomotor or autonomic output, whereas others provide widespread ascending innervation of forebrain systems. Among its targets, the amygdala CN has a substantial projection to a division of the substantia nigra compacta (SNC) that provides dopaminergic innervation of the dorsolateral striatum (Gonzales and Chesselet, 1990). Because the CN projection to SNC is ipsilateral and the output from SNC to the dorsolateral striatum (ST) is also largely ipsilateral, the function of this circuitry in conditioned orienting was examined using an asymmetrical lesion, illustrated in the schematic shown in Figure 1. This preparation, which combines a lesion of amygdala CN on one side of the brain (unilateral) with a contralateral removal of the dopaminergic innervation of the dorsolateral striatum, tests whether the amygdala-striatal pathway is critical for conditioned orienting. In a second study, the dorsolateral striatum was transiently inactivated during conditioning sessions to determine whether only the expression of conditioned responses was prevented by this reversible lesion. This was tested by monitoring the appearance of conditioned orienting responses immediately after cessation of the inactivation procedure. Both studies support a role for an amygdalo-striatal pathway in this simple form of associative learning, and further indicate that intact function of the dorsolateral striatum is not essential for acquisition of the conditioned response.

Fig. 1. The combination of a unilateral lesion of CN in one hemisphere (indicated by the X on the top right in the schematic) with a contralateral lesion of the dorsolateral striatum (X on the lower left) prevents output dependent on the amygdalo-nigrostriatal circuitry shown in the schematic.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

Experiment 1

The asymmetrical lesion preparation is illustrated in Figure 1. Because a CN projection to the subset of DA neurons that innervate the dorsolateral striatum is confined to the ipsilateral hemisphere (Gonzales and Chesselet, 1990), a CN lesion in one hemisphere combined with a 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesion of the dorsolateral striatum on the other side of the brain would effectively eliminate CN regulation of striatal function. This asymmetrical lesion preparation was used to assess whether conditioned orienting depends on CN regulation of the ascending nigrostriatal system. If so, the asymmetrical lesion, like bilateral lesions of the amygdala CN, should abolish the acquisition of conditioned orienting responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects. For the initial experiment, 46 male Long-Evans rats (Charles River Laboratories, Raleigh, NC) were housed in a climate-controlled vivarium (lights on 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.).

Surgery. Under anesthesia (Nembutal 50 mg/kg), 300-325 gm rats received unilateral lesions of amygdala CN produced by ibotenic acid (Regis Chemical), unilateral lesions of the ST made with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, obtained from RBI), or control surgical procedures for those sites. Injection coordinates are given with reference to bregma according to the Paxinos and Watson (1986) rat brain atlas. The CN lesion was produced at a single injection site (anterior-posterior, -2.3 mm; medial-lateral, ±4.2 mm; dorsal-ventral, -7.7 mm). The ST lesion was produced at two injection sites (anterior-posterior, +2.0 mm and + 0.5 mm; medial-lateral, ±3.0 mm; dorsal-ventral, -5.5 mm). Ibotenic acid (10 mg/ml) was dissolved in PBS; 6-OHDA (4 mg/ml) was dissolved in physiological saline. Drug or appropriate vehicle was delivered using a Hamilton microsyringe at a volume of 0.2 µl/site in CN and 1.0 µl/site in ST. Rats in the asymmetrical lesion group (CN/ST) underwent a CN lesion in one hemisphere (side counterbalanced within the group) and a lesion of ST in the contralateral hemisphere. Rats in the unilateral lesion groups underwent either a CN or an ST lesion in one hemisphere and injection of the appropriate vehicle into the unlesioned target on the contralateral side.

Apparatus. The testing apparatus consisted of four individual chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown, PA), each 27.9 × 25.4 × 30.5 cm3. The food-cup was recessed in the center of one end wall 2 cm above the floor; a 6 W light, which was the source of the visual conditioned stimulus (CS), was located 19 cm above the recessed food-cup. A 4 W house light placed in the center on the top of the chamber and a 25 W red bulb placed 2.1 m from the chambers provided continuous dim background illumination. A low-light television camera was placed 2.0 m from the experimental chambers. Videocassette recorders were programmed to record behaviors that occurred during the 10 sec intervals before, during, and after presentation.

Behavioral procedures. After postoperative recovery for 1 week, rats were gradually reduced to 85% of their free-feeding body weights and maintained at that weight by receiving a premeasured amount of rat chow given each day in the late afternoon.

Ten deliveries of two 45 mg food pellets (Noyes) were given on a variable-time 2 min schedule in a single session to acclimate rats to food delivery. Next, the occurrence and habituation of orienting behavior before conditioning was examined in 2 d of sessions consisting of four 10 sec light-only trials, with intertrial intervals that averaged 8 min. Then rats received 10 d of sessions in which five 10 sec presentations of the light were followed immediately by the food unconditioned stimulus (US), with variable intertrial intervals that averaged 8 min. These procedures support the development of associatively conditioned orienting and food-cup responses that are not observed with unpaired presentations of the CS and US (Gallagher et al., 1990).

All observations were made from videotapes and paced by auditory signals recorded on the tapes. For each rat, observations were made at 1.25 sec intervals during the 5 sec period immediately before CS presentations and during CS presentations. At each observation, one and only one behavior was recorded. Two broad categories of behavior are reported. Rear behavior (standing on the hind legs with both front legs off the floor, but not grooming) occurs initially as an unconditioned orienting response to visual CSs, similar to those used in these experiments, but it is also acquired by pairings of the CS with the unconditioned stimulus. Food-cup behavior, the unconditioned behavior (short, rapid horizontal, and/or vertical movements of the head oriented toward the food-cup), initially occurs in response to delivery of the food US, but is rapidly acquired to CSs paired with food. Because previous data (Holland, 1977, 1984) showed that rear behavior occurs primarily during the first 5 sec period of a 10 sec CS, and food-cup behavior occurs primarily during the last 5 sec of the CS, we report the frequencies of rear behavior during the first half of the 10 sec CS intervals and the frequencies of food-cup behavior during the last half of the CS intervals. It is worth noting that because these two behaviors occur primarily at different times, there is little competition between them in performance.

The index of behavioral frequency used was percentage total behavior, obtained by dividing the frequency of the target behavior in any observation interval by the total number of observations made in that interval. Note that because the number of observations was constant within each observation interval, this measure is an absolute frequency measure, not a relative one.

Histology. After completion of behavioral testing, the rats were deeply anesthetized with chloral hydrate (30%) and perfused transcardially with 0.9% cold saline. The brains were rapidly removed and cut coronally into two blocks at the optic chiasm. The posterior block was stored in 10% formalin for 1 week and then sectioned (50 µm) coronally on a freezing microtome, mounted on slides, and Nissl-stained to verify the neurotoxic lesion of CN. The anterior block was stored at -70°C until processing. For autoradiography, coronal sections (15 µm) were cut in a cryostat at -15°C and thaw-mounted onto gelatin-coated slides. The slides were refrigerated for 2 hr in a vacuum-sealed desiccator and then stored at -70°C until assays were performed. To define the lesion produced by 6-OHDA, autoradiograms were generated from sections through the striatum using 15 nM [3H]Mazindol (15 Ci/nmol, New England Nuclear), a ligand for DA uptake sites. Methods were identical to those described in a previous published report from this lab (Burwell and Gallagher, 1993). Sections for total binding were done in the presence of 300 nM desipramine, which selectively inhibits Mazindol binding to norepinephrine uptake sites. To define density of [3H]Mazindol labeling of DA uptake sites, nonspecific binding was defined by incubation of adjacent sections in the presence of 30 µM benztropine. Subtraction of binding in the presence of 30 µM benztropine from total [3H]Mazindol binding provided a measure of DA innervation of the dorsolateral striatum in control and ST lesion brains. Densitometry was done on an Imaging system (MCID, St. Catherine, Ontario, Canada) using tritium standards (Amersham).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Histology

Histological analysis revealed that unilateral neurotoxic lesions of CN were appropriately placed in 9 rats in the asymmetrical (CN/ST) group and 10 rats in the CN group. The CN lesions ranged in size from 30 to 100%, with the average lesion encompassing approximately 55% of the nucleus, and medial CN was damaged in all cases. The placement and size of the 6-OHDA lesion of dorsolateral striatum was also comparable between the asymmetrical group and the unilateral ST group. See Figure 2 for representative lesions.
Fig. 2. a, Diagram of the amygdala complex with the position of the photomicrograph (shown in b) demarcated by the enclosed box and the area of the lesion identified by broken lines. b, Heavy gliosis marks the site of the lesion in the CN surrounding the stria terminalis. c, Autoradiogram shows DA uptake sites labeled with [3H]Mazindol. High levels of binding (dark area) are evident throughout the intact striatum on the right. The site of 6-OHDA administration on the left exhibits low binding, indicative of a loss of DA innervation. Average lesion area was 3.03 mm2, and radioactive density averaged 1.88 nCi/mg relative to 8.35 nCi/mg on the contralateral side. ABL, Basolateral nucleus; CN, central nucleus; ME, medial nucleus; st, stria terminalis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (50K GIF file)]

Behavioral data

Figure 3 shows the occurrence of unconditioned orienting responses to the visual cue. All groups oriented to the light at relatively high levels initially, and comparable habituation was observed for all groups both within and across sessions of light-alone presentations. Although unilateral ST damage typically produces contralateral neglect, a syndrome in which behavioral responses directed contralateral to the lesion are impaired (Carli et al., 1985, 1989; Fairley and Marshall, 1986), the presentation of diffuse illumination as the visual stimulus in the present study elicited an orienting behavior that was not constrained by the location of the stimulus or the direction of the response.
Fig. 3. Responses to the visual cue during two sessions of light-alone presentations. All groups showed comparable orienting and habituation during these trials.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]

The primary behavioral data for this study are shown in Figure 4. Statistical analysis indicated that the conditioned OR (shown in Fig. 4a) was increased in all groups over the course of training (Friedman test, chi 2(4) >=  13.8, p < 0.01), except in the asymmetrical lesion group. Responses in the latter group did not change significantly (Friedman test, chi 2(4) = 2.31, not significant). Independent tests (Mann-Whitney, two-tailed) showed that the asymmetrical lesion group differed from each of the other groups (p < 0.05), which did not differ from one another. Statistical analysis of the data in Figure 4b showed that conditioned food-cup responses were not reliably affected by any lesion treatment. Rats in all groups showed increased conditioned food-cup responses over sessions (Friedman test, chi 2(4) >=  31.8, p < 0.01), and there was no significant difference among the groups (Kruskal-Wallis, chi 2(3) < 5.19, not significant).

Fig. 4. Conditioned orienting behavior (a) and conditioned food-cup behavior (b) during 10 sessions in which the light CS was paired with the food US. Rats with the asymmetrical lesion (group CN/ST) failed to acquire conditioned orienting behavior relative to the acquisition displayed by all other comparison groups. All groups showed comparable acquisition of the conditioned food-cup response.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]

Rats with the asymmetrical (CN/ST) lesion failed to acquire the conditioned orienting response, but readily acquired conditioned food-cup behavior. The selective impairment of conditioned orienting was not because of an inability to integrate sensory information with performance of the orienting response; rats with the CN/ST lesion showed normal spontaneous orienting. The behavioral profile of rats in the asymmetrical lesion group resembles that of rats with bilateral CN lesions described in previous studies (Gallagher et al., 1990). These results are consistent with the interpretation that conditioned orienting depends on amgydalo-nigrostriatal circuitry.

Experiment 2

Experiment 2 was conducted to examine the effect of reversible inactivation of the dorsolateral striatum during conditioning. Lidocaine infusion into the dorsolateral striatum was made unilaterally immediately before conditioning sessions, similar to those used in experiment 1. Rats were monitored during these and subsequent sessions when no lidocaine infusion was made to assess whether intact function of the dorsolateral striatum is essential for the development of conditioned orienting behavior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects. Male Long-Evans rats (n = 32) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Raleigh, NC) and housed in the same manner as in Experiment 1. The apparatus and behavioral observation procedures were the same as those described in experiment 1.

Surgery. Surgery was done under Nembutal anesthesia (50 mg/kg). All rats received a unilateral neurotoxic lesion of the amygdala CN as described in experiment 1. Rats also received a cannula (26 gauge) implanted to target either the striatum (n = 10) in the same hemisphere as the CN lesion or the dorsolateral striatum contralateral to the CN lesion (n = 22). Rats with asymmetrical placements were divided equally into two training conditions to receive either paired or unpaired presentations of the CS and US. The coordinates for cannula implantation were anterior-posterior, +0.5 mm; medial-lateral, ±3.0 mm; dorsal-ventral, -3.5 mm.

Training procedure. After postoperative recovery for 1 week and reduction to 85% of free-feeding body weight, behavioral procedures were implemented as described in the previous experiment. Separate tests for effects of lidocaine infusion into the dorsolateral striatum on rotation induced by amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) showed that an effective inactivation occurred for 25-30 min. On this basis, the session length for behavioral testing was adjusted to approximately 20 min by using an intertrial interval of 4 min. All groups initially received CS-alone presentations for two sessions of four light presentations alone to measure spontaneous orienting and habituation. Thereafter, each session in the conditioning procedure was comprised of four trials consisting of a 10 sec light (CS) followed by two food pellets. For rats in a control group, the same number of lights and food pellets were pseudorandomly presented using an unpaired procedure in which the CS and US were noncontingent, with the provision that the identical stimulus did not appear three consecutive times. The dorsolateral striatum was inactivated with lidocaine before each CS-alone session and the initial 8 d of conditioning sessions. No infusions were made before six subsequent daily conditioning sessions. The lidocaine solution (2%) was delivered at a rate of 1 µl/3 min through a 33 gauge injection cannula connected to a Hamilton microliter syringe. The injection cannula was left inside the guide cannula for an additional 2 min.

Histology. At the completion of behavioral testing, the rats were deeply anesthetized with chloral hydrate (30%) and perfused transcardially with 0.9% PBS followed by 10% formal saline. Brains were removed and stored in 10% formalin for 1 week. The brains were then sectioned (50 µm) coronally on a freezing microtome, and every other section was mounted on slides for Nissl-stain to verify the neurotoxic lesion of CN. The other sections were myelin-stained (Schmued, 1990) to verify whether the neurotoxic ibotenic acid produced fiber damage at the lesion site in CN. These sections were rinsed in 0.02 M phosphate buffer with 0.6% NaCl three times for 10 min and then incubated for 1 hr in 0.2% gold chloride trihydrate (Sigma) dissolved in the PBS with 0.012% H2O2. Reaction was terminated by rinsing the sections for 10 min in normal saline. Sections were then fixed for 5 min in 5% sodium thiosulfate, rinsed 3 times for 5 min in PBS, and mounted on slides.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Histology

The photomicrographs displayed in Figure 5 show Nissl- and myelin-stained sections for a control rat (left) and a rat with a CN lesion (right). The top right shows gliosis in the CN. Myelin staining at the lesion site, however, is intact (bottom right). Histological analysis revealed that unilateral neurotoxic lesions of CN were appropriately placed in 10 rats in the symmetrical CN/ST lidocaine group (SYM-paired), 11 rats in the asymmetrical CN/ST lidocaine-paired group (ASYM-paired), and 9 rats in the asymmetrical CN/ST lidocaine-unpaired group (ASYM-unpaired). The CN lesions ranged in size from 35 to 100%, with the average lesion encompassing approximately 60% of the nucleus. In all cases, the medial CN was damaged. Injection sites were confirmed in the dorsolateral striatum. Placements had a similar distribution across the three groups of rats with a cannula implant.
Fig. 5. Photomicrographs show Nissl-stained sections (top) and gold chloride myelin-stained sections (bottom) taken in the coronal plane through the amygdala central nucleus. a and c are from a control brain. The neurotoxic lesion brain in b shows heavy gliosis in the CN. Spared neurons are evident in the far lateral CN. However, d shows intact myelin in the lesion area (shown in b). ABL, Basolateral nucleus; CN, central nucleus; st, stria terminalis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (191K GIF file)]

Behavioral results

Comparable spontaneous orienting and habituation were evident in all groups of rats (Fig. 6). The primary data of interest in this experiment are shown in Figure 7a. The occurrence of conditioned orienting to the light differed for the unpaired group and the group with symmetrical CN/ST lidocaine treatment (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05). In contrast, the rats with asymmetrical CN/ST lidocaine did not differ from the unpaired group during the sessions of training under lidocaine treatment. Note, however, that conditioned orienting was evident in rats with asymmetrical CN/ST treatment when lidocaine infusion was terminated (Friedman test, chi 2(1) >=  7.36, p < 0.01 comparing block 5 with block 4) but did not increase further with subsequent training (Friedman test, chi 2(2) = 0.17, not significant), indicating that dorsal striatum is essential for the expression of the conditioned orienting response. These results further support the conclusion of experiment 1 that conditioned orienting depends on an amygdalo-nigrostriatal pathway. Also in agreement with the results of experiment 1, inactivation did not affect the development of another conditioned response that was concurrently monitored. Whereas unpaired presentations of the CS and US did not support the development of conditioned food-cup responses (Friedman test, chi 2(6) = 3.48, not significant), this conditioned behavior emerged equivalently in the groups that received paired CS/US trials (Friedman test, chi 2(6) >=  48.3, p < 0.01; see Figure 7b), regardless of lidocaine treatment.
Fig. 6. Rats in all groups showed initial orienting and comparable habituation to the visual CS.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

Fig. 7. a, Graph shows the orienting response during conditioning sessions. During the inactivation sessions (1-4), the ASYM-paired did not differ from the ASYM-unpaired, where as the SYM-paired exhibited significantly greater conditioned ORs than each of the other groups. In addition, in the first session without inactivation (session 5), the ASYM-paired exhibited greater conditioned ORs than in the previous inactivation session (session 4). b, Rats in the conditioning groups that received paired light/food trials developed conditioned food-cup responses that were unaffected by STR inactivation. Compare SYM-paired and ASYM-paired groups with the ASYM-unpaired group.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]

The results of this experiment are consistent with the interpretation that the dorsolateral striatum is essential for the expression of the conditioned orienting response. During inactivation sessions, the occurrence of this behavior in the ASYM-paired group did not differ from the unpaired group. The results also indicate that the intact function of the dorsolateral striatum is not essential for the acquisition of the conditioned orienting response, which appeared in the ASYM-paired group when lidocaine infusion was terminated. Because this response in the ASYM-paired group did not achieve the same magnitude as that observed in the SYM-paired group, the role of the striatum and its dopamine innervation may not be entirely limited to the expression of the conditioned response but may also modulate this form of learning.

General Discussion

Much research has shown that targets of CN in the brainstem exert control over autonomic and behavioral responses used in the expression of associative learning. Conditioned freezing, heart rate, potentiation of startle, and eyeblink reflexes all appear to depend on output from brainstem systems, which are innervated by CN (Kapp et al., 1984; Hitchcock and Davis, 1991; Whalen and Kapp, 1991; Kim et al., 1993). For example, the acoustic reflex circuit for startle is organized at the level of the brainstem and includes the nucleus pontis caudali (RPC). The CN provides a substantial projection to RPC that is critical for conditioned potentiation of the startle reflex, as demonstrated by the use of asymmetrical lesions (Hitchcock and Davis, 1991). A number of those measures that are amenable to conditioning (e.g., heart rate and startle) resemble orienting responses to novel stimuli. In all cases, CN lesions that impair conditioning do not affect the normal occurrence or habituation of spontaneous orienting to novel stimuli (Kapp et al., 1979; Gallagher et al., 1980, 1981; Hitchcock and Davis, 1986, 1987). Similarly, the conditioned orienting behavior studied in this research is abolished by bilateral lesions of the CN, which spare unconditioned orienting to novel cues (Gallagher et al., 1990). The results of the current experiments indicate that, along with the direct CN innervation of brainstem systems that control other CRs, the expression of conditioned orienting appears to be mediated by the CN through dopamine input to the striatum.

Considerable evidence from other research indicates that the striatum is important for stimulus-response learning and orientation to sensory cues (Carli et al., 1985; Fairley and Marshall, 1989; McDonald and White, 1993). Unilateral damage to the nigrostriatal dopamine system produces a deficit in orienting to stimuli presented contralateral to the site of the lesion, a function that depends on a lateral but not medial region of the striatum (Fairley and Marshall, 1986). Gonzalez and Chesselet (1990) demonstrated that the dorsal tier of dopaminergic neurons in the lateral substantia nigra compacta, which project to the dorsolateral striatum, are innervated by neurons in the medial division of the CN. These amygdala projection neurons are located in a circumscribed anterior and dorsal region of the medial CN, which was the target of the unilateral CN lesion in the current investigation. Although lesion size within the CN varied, in all cases substantial damage to the medial CN at anterior levels was produced. This circumscribed lesion, in combination with an asymmetrical DA lesion or transient inactivation of the dorsolateral striatum, was sufficient to prevent the occurrence of conditioned orienting responses. Thus, the present studies indicate that conditioned orienting behavior depends on connections of the amygdala CN with the forebrain via the substantia nigra.

In the experiment using transient inactivation of the striatum, orienting responses that were not evident in the ASYM-paired group during inactivation sessions emerged when the inactivation produced by lidocaine infusion was terminated. This result indicates that the intact function of the dorsolateral striatum is not essential for development of this form of associative learning. Rather, the associative basis for conditioned orienting would appear to occur in circuitry afferent to the striatum. This finding is consistent with electrophysiological data indicating that substantia nigra neurons are responsive to conditioned stimuli (Miller et al., 1981; Steinfels et al., 1983; Ljungberg et al., 1992; Mirenowicz and Schultz, 1996) and further suggests that CN innervation of the substantia nigra may contribute to the conditioned neural activity of those neurons. By this view, conditioned neural activity in the nigrostriatal pathway might be eliminated or severely attenuated by lesions of the amygdala CN.

The current work extends the study of neural systems that provide a substrate for simple classical conditioning in the mammalian brain. Although much current research is focused on the study of the amygdala complex in animal models of fear conditioning, the amygdala is involved more broadly in the associative learning through which animals learn that originally neutral cues are predictors of other significant events. This associative function of the amygdala gains widespread access to both brainstem and forebrain circuitry, as indicated by anatomical and functional studies of the projections of the central nucleus.

FOOTNOTES

Received Jan. 7, 1997; revised Feb. 24, 1997; accepted Feb. 27, 1997.

  

This research was supported by grants from a Research Scientist Award (KO5-MH01149), the Human Frontier Science Program, and Grant RO1-MH53667 to P.C.H. and M.G.

Correspondence should be addressed to Michela Gallagher, Department of Psychology, Davie Hall, CB#3270, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.


REFERENCES

  • Burwell RD, Gallagher M (1993) A longitudinal study of reaction time performance in Long-Evans rats. Neurobiol Aging 14:57-64[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Carli M, Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1985) Depletion of unilateral striatal dopamine impairs initiation of contralateral actions and not sensory attention. Nature 313:679-682[Medline].
  • Carli M, Jones GH, Robbins TW (1989) Effects of unilateral dorsal and ventral striatal dopamine depletion on visual neglect in the rat: a neural and behavioral analysis. Neuroscience 29:309-327[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Fairley PC, Marshall JF (1986) Dopamine in the lateral caudate-putamen of the rat is essential for somatosensory orientation. Behav Neurosci 100:652-663[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Fallon JH, Moore RY (1990) Catecholamine innervation of the basal forebrain. IV. Topography of the dopamine projection to the basal forebrain and neostriatum. J Comp Neurol 180:545-580.
  • Gallagher M, Holland PC (1994) The amygdala complex: multiple roles in associative learning and attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11771-11776[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Gallagher M, Kapp BS, Frysinger RC, Rapp PR (1980) Beta-adrenergic manipulation in amygdala central nucleus alters rabbit heart rate conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:419-426[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Gallagher M, Kapp BS, McNall CL, Pascoe JP (1981) Opiate effects in the amygdala central nucleus on heart rate conditioning in rabbits. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:497-505[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Gallagher M, Graham PW, Holland PC (1990) The amygdala central nucleus and appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: lesions impair one class of conditioned behavior. J Neurosci 10:1906-1911[Abstract].
  • Gonzales C, Chesselet MF (1990) Amygdalonigral pathway: an anterograde study in the rat with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). J Comp Neurol 297:182-200[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Hitchcock JM, Davis M (1986) Lesions of the amygdala, but not of the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm. Behav Neurosci 100:11-22[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Hitchcock JM, Davis M (1987) Fear-potentiated startle using an auditory conditioned stimulus: effects of lesions of the amygdala. Physiol Behav 39:403-408[Medline].
  • Hitchcock JM, Davis M (1991) Efferent pathway of the amygdala involved in conditioned fear as measured with the fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Behav Neurosci 105:826-842[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Holland PC (1977) Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 3:77-104[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Holland PC (1984) The origins of Pavlovian conditioned behavior. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol 18 (Bower G, ed), pp 129-173. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kapp BS, Frysinger RC, Gallagher M, Haselton JB (1979) Amygdala central nucleus lesion: effects on heart rate conditioning in the rabbit. Physiol Behav 23:1109-1117[Medline].
  • Kapp BS, Pascoe JP, Bixler MA (1984) The amygdala: a neuroanatomical systems approach to its contribution to aversive conditioning. In: Neuropsychology of memory (Squire LR, Butters N, eds), pp 473-488. New York: Guilford.
  • Kim JJ, Rison RA, Fanselow MS (1993) Effects of amygdala, hippocampus and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term context fear. Behav Neurosci 107:1093-1098[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Ljungberg T, Ungerstedt U (1976) Sensory inattention produced by 6-hydroxydopamine-induced degeneration of ascending dopamine neurons in the brain. Exp Neurol 53:585-600[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Ljungberg T, Apicella P, Schultz W (1992) Responses of monkey midbrain dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. J Neurophysiol 67:145-163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • McDonald RJ, White NM (1993) A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behav Neurosci 107:3-22[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Miller JD, Sanghera MK, German DC (1981) Mesencephalic dopaminergic unit activity in the behaviorally conditioned rat. Life Sci 29:1255-1263[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Mirenowicz J, Schultz W (1996) Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli. Nature 379:449-451[Medline].
  • Paxinos G, Watson C (1986) In: The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. New York: Academic.
  • Sananes CB, Campbell BA (1989) Role of the central nucleus of the amygdala in olfactory heart rate conditioning. Behav Neurosci 103:519-525[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Schmued LC (1990) A rapid, sensitive histochemical stain for myelin in frozen brain sections. J Histochem Cytochem 38:717-720[Abstract].
  • Steinfels GF, Heym J, Strecker RE, Jacobs BL (1983) Behavioral correlates of dopaminergic unit activity in freely moving cats. Brain Res 258:217-228[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Whalen PJ, Kapp BS (1991) Contributions of the amygdaloid central nucleus to the modulation of the nictitating membrane reflex in the rabbit. Behav Neurosci 105:141-153[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience   0270-6474/1997/173913-07$05.00/0



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. L. Reekie, K. Braesicke, M. S. Man, and A. C. Roberts
Uncoupling of behavioral and autonomic responses after lesions of the primate orbitofrontal cortex
PNAS, July 15, 2008; 105(28): 9787 - 9792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
L. H. Corbit and P. H. Janak
Inactivation of the Lateral But Not Medial Dorsal Striatum Eliminates the Excitatory Impact of Pavlovian Stimuli on Instrumental Responding
J. Neurosci., December 19, 2007; 27(51): 13977 - 13981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. Knapska, K. Radwanska, T. Werka, and L. Kaczmarek
Functional Internal Complexity of Amygdala: Focus on Gene Activity Mapping After Behavioral Training and Drugs of Abuse
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1113 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeuroscientistHome page
J. J. Day and R. M. Carelli
The Nucleus Accumbens and Pavlovian Reward Learning
Neuroscientist, April 1, 2007; 13(2): 148 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
H. J. Lee, J. M. Youn, M. J. O, M. Gallagher, and P. C. Holland
Role of substantia nigra-amygdala connections in surprise-induced enhancement of attention.
J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 6077 - 6081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
P. C. Holland and M. Gallagher
Different roles for amygdala central nucleus and substantia innominata in the surprise-induced enhancement of learning.
J. Neurosci., April 5, 2006; 26(14): 3791 - 3797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
H. J. Lee, F. Groshek, G. D. Petrovich, J. P. Cantalini, M. Gallagher, and P. C. Holland
Role of Amygdalo-Nigral Circuitry in Conditioning of a Visual Stimulus Paired with Food
J. Neurosci., April 13, 2005; 25(15): 3881 - 3888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. W. Koo, J.-S. Han, and J. J. Kim
Selective Neurotoxic Lesions of Basolateral and Central Nuclei of the Amygdala Produce Differential Effects on Fear Conditioning
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 24(35): 7654 - 7662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Di Ciano and B. J. Everitt
Direct Interactions between the Basolateral Amygdala and Nucleus Accumbens Core Underlie Cocaine-Seeking Behavior by Rats
J. Neurosci., August 11, 2004; 24(32): 7167 - 7173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
R. Adolphs
Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 21 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
P. C. Holland, J.-S. Han, and M. Gallagher
Lesions of the Amygdala Central Nucleus Alter Performance on a Selective Attention Task
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6701 - 6706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
B. D. Devan and N. M. White
Parallel Information Processing in the Dorsal Striatum: Relation to Hippocampal Function
J. Neurosci., April 1, 1999; 19(7): 2789 - 2798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Parkinson, M. C. Olmstead, L. H. Burns, T. W. Robbins, and B. J. Everitt
Dissociation in Effects of Lesions of the Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell on Appetitive Pavlovian Approach Behavior and the Potentiation of Conditioned Reinforcement and Locomotor Activity by D-Amphetamine
J. Neurosci., March 15, 1999; 19(6): 2401 - 2411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (70)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*LIDOCAINE

 -
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help
-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-