 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 11,
Issue of June 1, 1997
pp. 4121-4128
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Neuritic Outgrowth Associated with Astroglial Phenotypic Changes
Induced by Antisense Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) mRNA in
Injured Neuron-Astrocyte Cocultures
Thierry Lefrançois1, 2,
Christiane Fages1,
Marc Peschanski1, and
Marcienne Tardy1
1 Institut National de la Santé et de la
Recherche Médicale U421, IM3, Faculté de Médecine,
94010 Créteil, France, and 2 Ecole Nationale
Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Physiologie Thérapeutique,
Laboratoire de Neurobiologie, 94704 Maisons-Alfort, France
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
In the adult CNS, axons fail to regenerate after injury. Among the
cell interactions that lead to this failure are those developed with
astrocytes. In an effort to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these
negative interactions, we have used astrocytes treated with antisense
glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) mRNA to inhibit the formation of
gliofilaments, indispensable for the astroglial morphological response
to injury, and have studied their permissivity for neuritic outgrowth.
In a neuron-astrocyte coculture, a mechanical lesion led to
hypertrophy of astrocytes neighboring the lesion. Neuronal cell bodies
and neurites were absent both from the area of lesion and from its
surroundings. Reactive astrocytes appeared, therefore, to be a
nonpermissive substrate. Transfection that used antisense GFAP mRNA
blocked astroglial morphological changes and was characterized by both
a persistence of neuronal cell bodies in the vicinity of the lesion
site and a growth of neurites into the same region. These morphological
differences were associated with a 46% decrease in the GFAP
translation capacity and a 50% increase in the concentration of GAP-43
in the treated cultures. Neurons were associated mainly with an
extracellular laminin network, which was predominant at the lesion site
in treated cocultures. In contrast, those astrocytes highly
laminin-immunoreactive appeared to be a nonpermissive substrate for
neurons. These results show that inhibition in GFAP synthesis, leading
to a reduction of astroglial hypertrophy, relieves the blockade of
neuritic outgrowth that normally is observed after a lesion. The
mechanisms may involve changes in the secretion of extracellular matrix
molecules by astrocytes.
Key words:
GFAP;
antisense mRNA;
astrocyte;
astroglial hypertrophy;
gliosis;
regeneration;
CNS injury;
laminin
INTRODUCTION
Phenotypic changes in astrocytes during maturation
or in a state of reactivity may be one factor, among many, that could
account for the failure of regeneration of axotomized neurons in the
mammalian CNS. It has been well established that, in the injured as
well as in the intact developing brain, the growth of axons occurs in
the presence of astrocytes that may serve as guides (Schmechel and
Rakic, 1979 ; Silver and Sidman, 1980 ; Silver et al., 1993 ). In
contrast, regrowth of axotomized axons does not occur in the adult
brain, and in this regard the inhibitory role of the astroglial scar
has been well documented (for review, see Reier, 1986 ; Reier and Houle,
1988 ). Experiments of nitrocellulose filters coated with either
embryonic or adult astrocytes (Smith et al., 1986 ; Rudge and Silver,
1990 ), in which axonal growth was compared after implantation into a
lesioned CNS area, have provided confirmation of this role.
Among the multiple phenotypic changes observed during astroglial
maturation, those involved in the functional shift occurring during the
maturation time course have been sought actively. It has been shown
that astroglial maturation is accompanied by a decrease in molecules
such as laminin, NCAM, L1, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) (Ard
and Bunge, 1988 ; Smith et al., 1990 ; McKeon et al., 1995 ), which are
known to promote axonal outgrowth. In favor of a promoting role for
those molecules is the fact that the addition of antibodies to L1 and
NCAM significantly reduces neurite outgrowth in neuron-astrocyte
cocultures (Smith et al., 1990 ). In parallel, the maturation of
astrocytes is accompanied by an increase in the synthesis of molecules
known to inhibit neurite outgrowth, such as CSPG (chondroitin sulfate
proteoglycan) and tenascin (McKeon et al., 1991 ; Faissner and
Steindler, 1995 ).
One conspicuous phenotypic change occurring in astrocytes during
maturation and activation is the major increase seen in the synthesis
of intermediate filament proteins, especially the glial fibrillary
acidic protein (GFAP) (Eng, 1985 ; Condorelli et al., 1990 ; Eng and
Ghirnikar, 1994 ). This major alteration in maturing astrocytes,
directly associated with morphological changes, faces us with the
possibility of their role in the functional shift from
neurite-promoting to neurite-inhibiting elements, something that is
still unknown.
The present study has, therefore, been undertaken to determine whether
an imposed decrease in GFAP synthesis would affect neurite outgrowth in
a neuron-astrocyte coculture under experimental conditions in which
astrogliosis has been elicited by a mechanical lesion (Yu et al.,
1993 ). Using antisense GFAP mRNA (Yu et al., 1991 ), we indeed have
observed that phenotypic changes, consecutive to the decrease in GFAP
synthesis, induced a functional shift to neurite-promoting
elements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study astrocyte-neuron cocultures were lesioned
mechanically to induce astrocyte reactivity. Morphological
observations, immunocytochemistry, and biochemistry were used to
analyze neuronal and glial changes after addition of either antisense
GFAP mRNA/lipofectin complex or lipofectin alone.
Neuron-astrocyte coculture and antisense treatment. Highly
enriched astroglial primary cultures were obtained from cerebral hemispheres of neonatal Swiss mice (Iffa Credo) by a modification previously described (Andres-Barquin et al., 1994 ) of the procedure of
Mc Carthy and De Vellis (1980) . At day 15 the cell population was
composed of ~95% GFAP-positive cells (astrocytes) and 5%
anti-galactocerebroside-positive cells (oligodendrocytes) and
anti-Mac1-positive cells (microglia). Neuronal primary cultures were
obtained from cerebral hemispheres of 15-d-old mouse embryos via the
procedure of Hertz et al. (1989) . The meninges were removed, and
cortical cells were dissociated by trituration in DMEM and filtered
through two 80 µm filters. The cell suspension was centrifuged
(300 × g for 5 min) and resuspended in DMEM containing
20% fetal calf serum (FCS). Neurons were seeded onto the astroglial
monolayer at a density of 5 × 105 cells/ml in the
presence of 20% FCS for 3 hr. The medium was removed, and cocultures
were incubated with N2 defined medium, i.e., DMEM supplemented with
penicillin-streptomycin, 5 µg/ml bovine insulin, 100 µg/ml human
transferrin, 20 nM progesterone, 100 µM
putrescine, 30 nM sodium selenite (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and glucose, as described by Bottenstein (1984) . The neurons were allowed to elaborate neurites for 3 d, and then mechanical lesions were performed with the tip of a plastic pipette. In each 35 mm Petri
dish a series of five parallel lesions was performed, followed by a
second series, this time perpendicular to the first.
Antisense, lipofectin, and medium were mixed for 10 min. Thirty minutes
after the lesion, the cocultures were incubated for 3 hr with or
without 8 µg of antisense GFAP mRNA, with 16 µg of lipofectin (BRL,
Bethesda, MD) and 500 µl of DMEM and 25 mM HEPES (Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Then defined medium (1.5 ml) was
added. The medium was changed 19 hr after antisense addition. Antisense
GFAP mRNA was produced according to Yu et al. (1991) . A 1.25 kb
HindIII restriction fragment was obtained from the 5 coding
end of a 2.5 kb cDNA clone encoding GFAP (generous gift from Dr N. J. Cowan, New York University) and subcloned into PGEM 3z, a SP6/T7
riboprobe vector system (Promega, Madison, WI). The cDNA was linearized
by BamHI and used as a template in an in vitro run-off transcription reaction (Promega kit). Fifty units of SP6 polymerase were used for 1 µg of template. As a control, antisense globin RNA was synthesized in the same manner (the human -globin cDNA was kindly donated by Dr B. Chami, INSERM U91, Créteil, France).
Neurite outgrowth was quantified by image analysis in antisense-treated
cocultures and controls 48 hr after lipofection. Both the number of
neurites and their maximal length at 5 µm of the astrocytic border
into the empty area were quantified in 10 randomized areas 150 µm
wide in diameter (in each condition for five separate experiments).
Immunocytochemical analysis. Two types of protocol were used
to identify different immunoreactions. In the first, cells were fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde/0.2% picric acid for 1 hr and post-fixed with cold methanol for 3 min. After a 30 min permeabilization with PBS
and 0.1% Triton X-100, cells were incubated for 1 hr at room
temperature and for 24 hr at 4°C with the primary antibodies in PBS
plus 0.1% BSA. This protocol was used for the detection of GFAP
(rabbit GFAP antiserum 1:25; Dakopatts, Copenhagen, Denmark), Hu (human
Hu antiserum, 1:50; gift of Dr. J. Honorat, INSERM U443, Lyon,
France) a human autoantibody that stains specifically neuronal perikarya (Marusich and Weston, 1992 ) laminin (rabbit laminin antiserum, 1:10; Sigma), and fibronectin (rabbit fibronectin antiserum, 1:50; Biomakor). In the second protocol, used for the detection of GFAP
(1:50; Dakopatts), MAP5 (1:10; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany)
and GAP-43 (1:10; Boehringer Mannheim) cells were fixed with cold
methanol ( 20°C) for 5 min and incubated for 45 min at room
temperature with the appropriate antibodies in PBS. In both protocols
cells subsequently were washed extensively and reincubated with the
appropriate secondary antibodies (sheep anti-rabbit antibodies/TRITC, 1:50, Cappel, West Chester, PA; goat
anti-human antibodies/FITC, 1:25, Biomakor; sheep anti-mouse
antibodies/FITC, 1:50, Boehringer Mannheim) in PBS for 45 min at room
temperature. Finally, dishes were washed thoroughly and cut out. The
plates were fixed on slides, coverslipped with Immunomount, and
observed through a Nikon fluorescence microscope. All results were
controlled for specificity by omitting the primary antibody.
Biochemical analysis. To control the uptake of antisense
mRNA in the cells, we synthesized an antisense GFAP mRNA in the
presence of 33P CTP (200 µCi, 37 × 106 cpm
for 1 µg of cDNA, Isotopchim). At 3, 10, and 19 hr after treatment
with this labeled antisense, cells were washed extensively with HBSS
(Seromed, Berlin, Germany) and then collected by scraping in 0.1%
sodium dodecylsulfate. The radioactivity of the cell extract was
determined in a liquid scintillation counter (Searle) as a percentage
of the total radioactivity added to the culture. For in situ
visualization one dish was washed with PBS, brought into contact with
an emulsion (LM1; Amersham, Les Ulis, France), and developed 3 d
later. Cells were counterstained with cresyl violet.
For Western blot analysis the medium was removed, and each dish was
rinsed three times with HBSS. The cells were collected by scraping into
62.5 mM Tris HCl, pH 6.8, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.5% Triton
X-100, and 2.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Total protein content was
determined by the method of Lowry et al. (1951) with bovine serum
albumin as a standard. Total protein (4 µg) was boiled for 5 min
after addition of 10% glycerol/5% mercaptoethanol. The proteins were
analyzed by Western blotting (SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
followed by electrophoretic transfer of proteins to nitrocellulose
sheets) under the conditions described by Laemmli (1970) . The sheets
were incubated either with polyclonal anti-GFAP (1:100; Dakopatts) or
monoclonal anti-GAP-43 or anti-vimentin (1:50; Boehringer Mannheim) and
revealed with anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG coupled to
125I, as previously described (Andres-Barquin et al.,
1994 ).
To analyze specifically the impairment in the neosynthesis of GFAP
induced by the application of GFAP antisense mRNA, we used in
vitro translation of GFAP mRNA. RNA extraction was performed from
six pooled Petri dishes, according to Chomczynsky and Sacchi (1987),
with guanidine thiocyanate (4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate, 0.5% w/v sodium
N-laurylsarcosine, and 0.1 M
-mercaptoethanol, pH 7) in two separate experiments. Cells were
homogenized by using an ultra Turax homogenizer for 30 sec at minimal
speed and then mixed with 0.1 vol of sodium acetate, pH 4, 0.5 vol
phenol, and 0.1 vol chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (49:1) and centrifuged
for 15 min at 3500 × g at 4°C. The supernatants were
decanted and mixed with 0.9 vol of isopropyl alcohol and then placed at
20°C for 1 hr to precipitate the nucleic acids, which were
collected by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellets were rinsed with 70% ethanol, dried, and finally dissolved in sterile water. RNA concentrations were evaluated by
spectroscopy at 260 nm, and their quality was examined by minigel analysis. Translation was performed at 30°C for 90 min in aliquots of
50 µl containing 200 µg/ml RNA, 1 µCi/µl
[35S]methionine, 1 mM amino acid mixture
excluding methionine, 700 µl/ml rabbit reticulocyte lysate treated
with nuclease (Promega), and 40 U RNAsine (Promega). The incorporation
of methionine into total translated proteins was determined by
trichloroacetic acid precipitation on a 2 µl translation assay
sample. GFAP was immunoisolated from the translation mixture containing
at least 0.5 × 106 cpm, according to Smith and Campbell
(1983) . The mixture was diluted to 1 ml with 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% SDS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM
PMSF. This solution was precleared with 20 µl of 10%
Staphylococcus aureus cells (Life Technologies) and
incubated at 4°C for 30 min. Cells subsequently were removed by
centrifugation.
GFAP antiserum (5 µl) was added to the supernatant solution, and the
mixture was incubated for 1 hr at room temperature and overnight at
4°C. Fifty microliters of 10% Staphylococcus aureus cells were added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for
1 hr. The cells were washed with the dilution buffer and boiled for 3 min. The proteins were separated by electrophoresis in 10% SDS-polyacryamide, and the gels were fluorographed, dried, and analyzed.
RESULTS
The neuron-astrocyte cocultures showed cortical neurons
homogeneously distributed over the astrocyte monolayer. Neurons
extended many neurites after 3 d (Fig.
1a). Astrocytes were large and flattened; neuron cell bodies appeared rounder and denser than astrocytes under
phase-contrast microscopy. This morphological identification of the
cell types was fully confirmed by immunolabeling with GFAP for
astrocytes and with Hu or MAPs for neurons. Mechanical lesions provoked
changes in morphology, immunocytochemistry, and biochemistry that
differed depending on the presence or the absence of antisense GFAP
mRNA.
Fig. 1.
Phase-contrast micrographs of transfected
cocultures. a, The cocultures before lesion. Lesioned
cocultures were treated with 16 µg of lipofectin for 24 (b) or 48 hr (c) or with 16 µg of
lipofectin associated with 8 µg of antisense GFAP mRNA for 24 (d), 48 (e), or 72 hr
(f). Asterisks correspond
to the initial lesion site. All pictures are recorded at the same
magnification. Scale bar, 10 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (194K GIF file)]
Morphological and immunocytochemical analysis of untreated
neuron-astrocyte cocultures
Mechanical lesions were visualized easily as empty lines
with no apparent cellular structure. After injury, morphological changes in both astrocytes and overlying neurons were visible at a
distance up to 200-400 µm around the lesions. No change was observed
in remote areas. These changes were progressive over time. At 24 hr
after injury the size of astrocytic cell bodies was increased.
Astrocytes extended large and thick processes perpendicular to the
lesion, some of them entering the acellular area (Fig. 1b).
GFAP immunolabeling confirmed the presence of large astrocytes that
displayed hypertrophic processes entering the lesion site (Fig.
2a). Few neurons were seen in the vicinity of
the lesion (Figs. 1b, 2a). At 48 hr postlesion
giant astrocytes began to fill the lesion site (Fig. 1c).
Neurons were not observed in the reoccupied zone (Figs. 1c,
2b). Moreover, these few neurons presented few, if any,
neurites labeled with the use of MAP5 antibodies (Fig. 2b).
In the vicinity of the lesion neuritic staining was also less dense
than in remote areas (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2.
Immunostaining for GFAP (in red)
and Hu (in green) or GFAP (in red) and
MAP5 (in green) in cocultures. Immunocytochemistry was
performed with rabbit GFAP antiserum (1:50), human autoantibody Hu
(1:100) (a-d), and mouse MAP5 antiserum (1:10)
(e, f). Lesioned cocultures were
treated with 16 µg of lipofectin for 24 (a) or 48 hr
(b) or with 16 µg of lipofectin associated with 8 µg
of antisense GFAP mRNA for 24 (c), 48 (d,
e), or 72 hr (f).
Asterisks correspond to the initial lesion site.
Pictures are recorded at the same magnification (400×). Scale bar, 10 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (139K GIF file)]
At all times studied, two different patterns of laminin staining
were observed: an astroglial perinuclear immunolabeling, mostly present
in large and flat astrocytes of the lesion border, with little, if any,
extracellular staining (Fig. 3a); and an immunolabeled network mostly, if not exclusively, extracellular, present all over the coculture, excluding the lesion border (Fig. 3b). Hu-labeled neurons were observed predominantly in
contact with the laminin extracellular network (Fig. 3b) but
not over laminin-immunoreactive astrocytes (Fig. 3a,b).
Fibronectin staining was observed merely extracellularly (data not
shown); it also was organized into a complex network. Distribution of
Hu-labeled neurons was not related specifically to the fibronectin
network.
Fig. 3.
Hu (in green) and laminin (in
red) immunolabeling in injured cocultures.
Immunocytochemistry was performed with Hu antiserum (1:100) and mouse
laminin antiserum (1:10). a and b are
control cocultures; c and d are
antisense-treated cocultures. Laminin immunoreactivity is observed in
astrocytes and as an extracellular filamentous network. Scale bar, 10 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (117K GIF file)]
Similar results were observed when lipofectin or lipofectin with
antisense -globin mRNA was added to the coculture (data not
shown).
Morphological and immunocytochemical analysis of neuron-astrocyte
cocultures treated with antisense GFAP mRNA
After treatment with antisense GFAP mRNA, 30 min after injury,
morphological changes around the lesion sites were different from those
described above. At 24 hr after injury the border of the acellular
zones was straight, and hypertrophic astrocytes with large GFAP-labeled
processes were not apparent (Figs. 1d, 2c). Many neuronal cell bodies were observed on the
astrocytes bordering the lesion (Figs. 1d,
2c). Hu immunostaining was heavy (Fig.
2c). At 48 hr postlesion some neuronal cell bodies
had entered the lesion site accompanying a thin astrocytic process
(Fig. 2d). Phase-contrast microscopy (Fig.
1e), MAP5 immunolabeling (Fig. 2e), and
GAP-43 immunolabeling (see Fig. 6) showed neurons extending neurites
and growth cones into the lesion site. At 72 hr after injury neuronal
cell bodies and neurites had filled the lesion border, as seen with
phase-contrast microscopy (Fig. 1f) or with MAP 5 immunolabeling (Fig. 2f). The number of neurites
extending >5 µm away from the astrocytic border into the previously
lesioned area was 14.0 ± 2.0 (mean ± SEM) in
antisense-treated cultures versus 0.08 ± 0.05 in controls, and
the maximal length of these neurites was 54.6 µm ± 4.1 (mean ± SEM) versus 0.63 µm ± 0.39 in controls.
Fig. 6.
GAP-43 (in green) and GFAP (in
red) immunolabeling of injured antisense-treated
cocultures. Lesioned cocultures were treated with antisense GFAP mRNA
for 48 hr. Immunocytochemistry was performed with mouse GAP-43
antiserum (1:10) and rabbit GFAP antiserum (1:50). Arrow
points to a GAP-43-labeled growth cone in the lesion border (magnification, 400×).
[View Larger Version of this Image (145K GIF file)]
Laminin-immunostained astrocytes were scarce. In contrast, the network
of laminin immunostaining, mostly extracellular, was prominent (Fig.
3c,d). Hu immunoreactive neurons were in contact with this
laminin network (Fig. 3c,d).
Biochemical analysis
Control of the uptake of antisense GFAP mRNA with the use of
radiolabeling revealed the presence of staining in the cytoplasm, close
to the nucleus, of approximately one-half of the cell population (Fig.
4). The uptake efficiency of antisense mRNA, defined as the percentage of radiolabeled antisense GFAP mRNA found in the cells
as compared with the total radiolabeled antisense added to the culture,
was 24 or 26% 3 hr after transfection, 21 or 25% at 10 hr, and 17 or
21% at 19 hr (results of two separate experiments).
Fig. 4.
Micrograph of coculture 3 hr after transfection
with 16 µg of lipofectin and 8 µg of radiolabeled antisense GFAP
mRNA. Arrows point to clusters of silver grains
revealing antisense GFAP mRNA. Cells were counterstained with cresyl
violet. Scale bar, 5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (168K GIF file)]
This uptake of antisense GFAP mRNA had biochemical consequences
illustrated by a decrease in the translational capacity of the cells
for GFAP and a decrease in GFAP synthesis. In vitro translation assays with equivalent amounts of total RNA showed a
similar total translation rate in treated and untreated cocultures. Electrophoretic separation of the different translation products revealed a 50 kDa protein corresponding to GFAP. Densitometric evaluation of this 50 kDa fraction indicated that antisense treatment provoked a decrease in GFAP translation efficiency of 16 or 8% of the
control value 3 hr after transfection and of 53 or 35% 19 hr after
transfection (results of two separate experiments). Under antisense
conditions additional translated GFAP-immunoprecipitated peptides of
~44, 41, 26, and 24 kDa were observed (Fig.
5). These additional bands were not
observed, however, in parallel Western blots, and Northern blots showed
only one GFAP transcript, suggesting that they were attributable to a
technical artifact. Western blot analysis showed a significant decrease
in GFAP of 20 ± 3% (n = 4, mean ± SEM) in
antisense-treated cocultures, as compared with control at 24 and 36 hr.
GFAP levels returned to control values at 3 d.
Fig. 5.
GFAP immunoprecipitation of in
vitro translated RNA of lipofectin-treated cocultures
(L) or antisense-treated cocultures (AS) at 3 or 19 hr. Translated protein was immunoprecipitated with anti-GFAP
antibody (Dakopatts, High Wycombe, UK).
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
Vimentin levels were not altered by the antisense treatment. In sharp
contrast, GAP-43 increased 36 hr after treatment in three separate
experiments, as compared with controls, by a mean of 50 ± 14%
(mean ± SEM; range, 31-70%).
DISCUSSION
In this paper we have sought to identify the role of phenotypic
changes in astrocytes in the failure of axonal regeneration after
mechanical lesion. This analysis was based on a specifically designed
coculture system that appeared to reproduce adequately in
vitro the phenomena characterized in vivo. In this
experimental setup addition of an antisense GFAP mRNA was proved
efficient in blocking the inhibition of neurite outgrowth into a
mechanical lesion. These results support the hypothesis that
morphological hypertrophy of astrocytes, associated with GFAP
synthesis, is responsible, directly or indirectly, for the inhibitory
role of the so-called glial scar on axonal regeneration.
An in vitro model for CNS injury
To analyze in vitro the interaction between neurons and
astrocytes in the vicinity of a mechanical lesion, we have designed a
coculture system derived from previous experiments showing that astrogliosis could be induced in astrocytic cultures. In
vivo a mechanical lesion such as a stab wound (Hozumi et al.,
1990 ) or spinal cord compression (Farooque et al., 1995 ) provokes
stereotyped phenotypic changes in astrocytes characterized, in
particular, by a hypertrophy of the cell body and processes and an
increase in the content of gliofilaments. These gliofilaments are rich in GFAP. GFAP mRNA and GFAP protein levels are increased a few hours
and a few days postlesion, respectively (Mucke et al., 1991 ). Similar
changes were obtained in purified astrocytic cultures by Yu et al.
(1993) , Ghirnikar et al. (1994) , and Faber-Elman et al. (1995) , who
induced astrogliosis by mechanical lesion of the cells. We have taken
advantage of the possibility of culturing dissociated neurons on an
astroglial monolayer (Noble et al., 1984 ; Hatten, 1985 ) to reproduce
more completely the phenomena induced by an in vivo lesion,
in particular, the presence in the same place of cut ends of both axons
and glial processes. The lesions, performed after a few days of
coculture, induced phenotypic changes in astrocytes found in the
vicinity of the lesion, with hypertrophy of cell bodies and processes.
Neither neurite outgrowth nor neuronal migration was observed at the
lesion site. This CNS injury model reproduced, therefore, the inability
of neurons to regenerate after axotomy into an astroglial scar,
something that is classically reported in in vivo
experiments (for review, see Reier, 1986 ). This result is also
consistent with those obtained in coculture experiments by Smith et al.
(1990) , Rudge and Silver (1990) , and McKeon et al. (1991) , who
demonstrated a poor axonal growth of cortical neurons cultured over
either mature astrocytes or explant cultures of reactive glia.
This in vitro model does not reproduce, however, all the
features of an in vivo injury. The main limitation is that
in this model there is no participation of the other cell types present in the CNS, especially microglia, oligodendroglia, and endothelial cells. The impact of microglia-derived factors on the CNS lesion (Giulian et al., 1994 ) and the inhibitory role of oligodendrocytes on
axon growth (Schnell and Schwab, 1990 ; Lang et al., 1995 ) have been
well documented. A second limitation is that this model does not
include the three dimensions of a tissue and thus limits intercellular contacts and excludes, for instance, the possibility for axons to
regenerate around a lesion (Foerster, 1982 ). Altogether, this model
must be considered at face value, i.e., as a basis to study specifically the consequences of astrocytic reactivity on axonal growth.
The second methodological basis of our study was the use of antisense
GFAP mRNA to alter astrocytic response to injury. Weinstein et al.
(1991) and Rutka et al. (1994) have demonstrated a disappearance of
astrocytic processes, using a stable transfection of an antisense GFAP
construct in astrocytoma cell lines. In an astrocyte primary culture
addition of an antisense for GFAP (mRNA, oligonucleotides, or cDNA)
prevented the increase in GFAP synthesis and reduced hypertrophy of the
cell body observed after a mechanical lesion (Yu et al., 1993 ;
Ghirnikar et al., 1994 ). We have confirmed these effects of antisense
GFAP mRNA in our coculture model in association with a decrease in the
capacity of the cells to translate GFAP mRNA.
We have, therefore, used this technique to evaluate the relationship
between the morphological differentiation of astrocytes after a lesion
and the blockade of axonal regeneration.
Inhibition of hypertrophy induces functional changes in astrocytes
beneficial for axonal regrowth
After antisense GFAP mRNA treatment, neuronal cell bodies and
neurites were observed over astrocytes of the lesion border and into
the lesion site, in sharp contrast with the paucity of neuronal
elements observed in untreated cocultures. Accordingly, the synthesis
of the protein GAP-43, which is known to be correlated with nerve
sprouting (Schreyer and Skene, 1991 ), was enhanced, as compared with
both unlesioned and lesioned untreated cocultures. These results
support our working hypothesis that glial morphological differentiation
plays a role in the failure of axonal regeneration at a site of injury.
It is at this stage, however, but a matter of speculation as to which
mechanisms are altered under these conditions.
A first hypothesis in line with that put forward by several authors
(see references and discussion in Reier, 1986 ; Reier and Houle, 1988 )
is the possibility that blockade of GFAP synthesis preventing morphological alteration of reactive astrocytes would have impeded the
formation of a physical barrier to axon growth or neuron migration. This cannot be excluded completely. In our experimental conditions, however, this is unlikely, because the axotomized end of the neurites is not, at first, facing hypertrophic astrocytes but, rather, the
"empty" zones created by the scratch. In addition, neuronal cell
bodies are, at first, present close to the scratch and then disappear.
Reactive astrocytes in the absence of antisense GFAP mRNA seem,
therefore, more to offer a poor substratum for axonal growth rather
than to act as an actual physical obstacle to it. Several properties of
astrocytes reported in the literature are directly relevant to such a
hypothesis. It has been shown, in particular, that astrocytes
synthesize many components of the extracellular matrix that seem to
play major although opposite roles in axonal outgrowth. On the one
hand, astrocytes synthesize molecules that inhibit axonal growth, such
as proteoglycans (Braunewell et al., 1995 ) or tenascin (McKeon et al.,
1991 ; Faissner and Steindler, 1995 ). Interestingly, astroglial
hypertrophy is associated with an increase in synthesis of both
chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and tenascin (McKeon et al., 1991 ).
Blockade of astrocytic hypertrophy under our experimental conditions,
therefore, may block, in parallel, this oversynthesis of potentially
inhibitory molecules.
Astrocytes also synthesize laminin (Chiu et al., 1991 ), which is a well
known promoter of axonal growth (Smith et al., 1990 ). Synthesis of this
molecule decreases, in parallel to astrocytic maturation, in
neuron-astrocyte cocultures (Ard and Bunge, 1988 ). Again, under our
experimental conditions reduction of hypertrophy may be paralleled by a
maintained synthesis of the molecule and, therefore, a maintained
promotion of axonal regrowth. As regarding laminin, our results also
point out two patterns of laminin immunoreactivity similar to those
described by Garcia-Abreu et al. (1995) , which seem to bear different
potentials for axonal growth. Indeed, a punctate pattern of
immunoreactivity, apparently located in the cytoplasm of glial cells,
was associated with nonpermissive conditions for neurons and axons,
whereas a fibrillar pattern, mostly extracellular, was associated with
both a dense axonal network and numerous cell bodies. Lesioned
cocultures treated with antisense GFAP mRNA exhibited a prominent
network of laminin, i.e., a supposedly permissive substrate; in
contrast, in untreated cultures, giant astrocytes of the border site,
which displayed an apparent intracellular laminin immunolabeling,
appeared to be a nonpermissive substrate for neurons. Laminin in its
synthesis and its distribution therefore may be one of the factors that
play a role in the lack of inhibition of neurite outgrowth after
antisense treatment. Alternatively, one cannot exclude that, rather
than an alteration or a lack thereof in the synthesis of secreted
molecules, the maintained ability of reactive astrocytes to support
axonal regrowth may be related to membrane-bound molecules involved in
cell-to-cell contact between neurons and astrocytes, such as cell
adhesion molecules (for review, see Zhang et al., 1995 ).
In conclusion, blockade of cellular hypertrophy in reactive astrocytes
by antisense GFAP mRNA induces a major functional alteration, revealed
as modified interactions in cocultured neurons. If, as hypothesized,
this functional alteration relates to changes in secreted and/or
membrane-bound proteins, it remains to be defined how GFAP synthesis
can be linked to these apparently very different phenomena. As a
working hypothesis, one may consider changes in the intracellular
transport system in which gliofilaments are involved (Steinert and
Roop, 1988 ) or a direct or indirect modulation of genetic
transcription, as suggested by Rutka et al. (1994) .
FOOTNOTES
Received April 16, 1996; revised March 11, 1997; accepted March 24, 1997.
This work was supported by Institut National de la Santé et de la
Recherche Médicale (INSERM) and by Grant PSS0731 from European
Community. We thank Jerôme Honorat (INSERM U443, Lyon, France)
for the Hu autoantibody and Elaine Parrish for assistance with
English.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Thierry Lefrançois,
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 421, Faculté de Médecine, 8 Rue du
Général Sarrail, 94010 Créteil, France.
REFERENCES
-
Andres-Barquin PJ,
Fages C,
Le Prince G,
Rolland B,
Tardy M
(1994)
Thyroid hormones influence the astroglial plasticity: changes in the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and of its encoding message.
Neurochem Res
19:65-69[ISI][Medline].
-
Ard MD,
Bunge RP
(1988)
Heparan sulfate proteoglycan and laminin immunoreactivity on cultured astrocytes: relationship to differentiation and neurite growth.
J Neurosci
8:2844-2858[Abstract].
-
Bottenstein JE
(1984)
Culture methods for growth of neuronal cell lines in defined media.
In: Methods for serum-free culture of neuronal and lymphoïd cells (Barnes D,
Sirbasku D,
Savo A,
eds), pp 3-13. New York: Liss.
-
Braunewell KH,
Martini R,
Lebaron R,
Kresse H,
Faissner A,
Schmitz B,
Schachner M
(1995)
Up-regulation of a chondroitin sulphate epitope during regeneration of mouse sciatic nerve. Evidence that the immunoreactive molecules are related to the chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans decorin and versican.
Eur J Neurosci
7:792-804[ISI][Medline].
-
Chiu AY,
Espinosa de los Monteros A,
Cole RA,
Loera S,
De Vellis J
(1991)
Laminin and s-laminin are produced and released by astrocytes, Schwann cells, and schwannomas in culture.
Glia
4:11-24[ISI][Medline].
-
Chomczynski P,
Sacchi N
(1987)
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:156-159[ISI][Medline].
-
Condorelli DF,
Dell'Albani P,
Kaczmarek L,
Messina L,
Spampinato G,
Avola R,
Messina A,
Giuffrida Stella AM
(1990)
Glial fibrillary acidic protein messenger RNA and glutamine synthetase activity after nervous system injury.
J Neurosci Res
26:251-257[ISI][Medline].
-
Eng LF
(1985)
GFAP: the major protein of glial intermediate filaments in differentiated astrocytes.
J Neuroimmunol
8:203-214[ISI][Medline].
-
Eng LF,
Ghirnikar RS
(1994)
GFAP and astrogliosis.
Brain Pathol
4:229-237[ISI][Medline].
-
Faber-Elman A,
Lavie V,
Schwartz I,
Shaltiel S,
Schwartz M
(1995)
Vitronectin overrides a negative effect of TNF
on astrocyte migration.
FASEB J
9:1605-1613[Abstract]. -
Faissner A,
Steindler D
(1995)
Boundaries and inhibitory molecules in developing tissues.
Glia
13:233-254[ISI][Medline].
-
Farooque M,
Badonic T,
Olsson Y,
Holtz A
(1995)
Astrocytic reaction after graded spinal cord compression in rats: immunohistochemical studies on glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin.
J Neurotrauma
12:41-52[ISI][Medline].
-
Foerster AP
(1982)
Spontaneous regeneration of cut axons in adult rat brain.
J Comp Neurol
210:335-356[ISI][Medline].
-
Garcia-Abreu J,
Cavalcante LA,
Neto VM
(1995)
Differential patterns of laminin expression in lateral and medial midbrain glia.
NeuroReport
6:761-764[ISI][Medline].
-
Ghirnikar RS,
Yu ACH,
Eng LF
(1994)
Astroglios in culture. III. Effect of recombinant retrovirus expressing antisense glial fibrillary acidic protein RNA.
J Neurosci Res
38:376-385[ISI][Medline].
-
Giulian D,
Li J,
Li X,
George J,
Rutecki PA
(1994)
The impact of microglia-derived cytokines upon gliosis in the CNS.
Dev Neurosci
16:128-136[ISI][Medline].
-
Hatten ME
(1985)
Neuronal regulation of astroglial morphology and proliferation in vitro.
J Cell Biol
100:384-396[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hertz E,
Yu ACH,
Hertz L,
Juurlink BHJ,
Schousboe A
(1989)
Preparation of primary cultures of mouse cortical neurons.
In: A dissection and tissue culture manual for the nervous system (Shahar A,
DeVellis J,
Vernadakis A,
Haber B,
eds), pp 183-186. New York: Liss.
-
Hozumi I,
Chiu FC,
Norton WT
(1990)
Biochemical and immunocytochemical changes in GFAP after stab wound.
Brain Res
524:64-71[ISI][Medline].
-
Laemmli UK
(1970)
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[Medline].
-
Lang DM,
Rubin BP,
Schwab ME,
Stuermer CAO
(1995)
CNS myelin and oligodendrocytes of the Xenopus spinal cord
but not optic nerve are nonpermissive for axon growth.
J Neurosci
15:99-109[Abstract]. -
Lowry OH,
Rosebrough NJ,
Farr AL,
Randall RJ
(1951)
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J Biol Chem
193:265-275[Free Full Text].
-
Marusich MF,
Weston JA
(1992)
Identification of early neurogenic cells in the neural crest lineage.
Dev Biol
149:295-306[ISI][Medline].
-
Mc Carthy KD,
De Vellis J
(1980)
Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cultures from rat cerebral tissue.
J Cell Biol
85:890-902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
McKeon RJ,
Schreiber RC,
Rudge JS,
Silver J
(1991)
Reduction of neurite outgrowth in a model of glial scarring following CNS injury is correlated with the expression of inhibitory molecules on reactive astrocytes.
J Neurosci
11:3398-3411[Abstract].
-
McKeon RJ,
Höke A,
Silver J
(1995)
Injury-induced proteoglycans inhibit the potential for laminin-mediated axon growth on astrocytic scars.
Exp Neurol
136:32-43[ISI][Medline].
-
Mucke L,
Oldstone MBA,
Morris JC,
Nerenberg MI
(1991)
Rapid activation of astrocyte-specific expression of GFAP-lacZ transgene by focal injury.
New Biol
3:465-474[ISI][Medline].
-
Noble M,
Kok-Seang J,
Cohen J
(1984)
Glia are a unique substrate for the in vitro growth of central nervous system neurons.
J Neurosci
4:1892-1903[Abstract].
-
Reier PJ
(1986)
Gliosis following CNS injury: the anatomy of astrocytic scars and their influences on axonal elongation.
In: Cell biology and pathology of astrocyte, Vol 3 (Fedoroff S,
Vernadakis A,
eds), pp 263-324. New York: Academic.
-
Reier PJ,
Houle JD
(1988)
The glial scar: its bearing on axonal elongation and transplantation approaches to CNS repair.
In: Advances in neurology: functional recovery in neurological diseases (Waxman SG,
ed), pp 87-138. New York: Raven.
-
Rudge JS,
Silver J
(1990)
Inhibition of neurite outgrowth on astroglial scars in vitro.
J Neurosci
10:3594-3603[Abstract].
-
Rutka JT,
Hubbard SL,
Fukuyama K,
Matsuzawa K,
Dirks PB,
Becker LE
(1994)
Effects of antisense glial fibrillary acidic protein complementary DNA on the growth, invasion, and adhesion of human astrocytoma cells.
Cancer Res
54:3267-3272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Schmechel DE,
Rakic P
(1979)
A Golgi study of radial glial cells in developing monkey telencephalon: morphogenesis and transformation into astrocytes.
Anat Embryol (Berl)
156:115-152[Medline].
-
Schnell L,
Schwab ME
(1990)
Axonal regeneration in the rat spinal cord produced by an antibody against myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitors.
Nature
343:269-272[Medline].
-
Schreyer DJ,
Skene JHP
(1991)
Fate of GAP-43 in ascending spinal axons of DRG neurons after peripheral nerve injury: delayed accumulation and correlation with regenerative potential.
J Neurosci
11:3738-3751[Abstract].
-
Silver J,
Sidman RL
(1980)
A mechanism for the guidance and topographic patterning of retinal ganglion cell axons.
J Comp Neurol
189:101-111[ISI][Medline].
-
Silver J,
Edwards MA,
Levitt P
(1993)
Immunocytochemical demonstration of early appearing astroglial structures that form boundaries and pathways along axon tracts in the fetal brain.
J Comp Neurol
328:415-436[ISI][Medline].
-
Smith DD,
Campbell JW
(1983)
Subcellular location of chicken brain glutamine synthetase.
J Biol Chem
258:12265-12268[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Smith GM,
Miller RH,
Silver J
(1986)
Changing role of forebrain astrocytes during development, regenerative failure, and induced regeneration upon transplantation.
J Comp Neurol
251:22-43.
-
Smith GM,
Rutishauser U,
Silver JR,
Miller RH
(1990)
Maturation of astrocytes in vitro alters the extent and molecular basis of neurite outgrowth.
Dev Biol
138:377-390[ISI][Medline].
-
Steinert PM,
Roop DR
(1988)
Molecular and cellular biology of intermediate filaments.
Annu Rev Biochem
57:593-625[ISI][Medline].
-
Weinstein DE,
Shelanski ML,
Liem RKH
(1991)
Suppression by antisense mRNA demonstrates a requirement for the glial fibrillary acidic protein in the formation of stable astrocytic processes in response to neurons.
J Cell Biol
112:1205-1213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Yu ACH,
Lee YL,
Eng LF
(1991)
Inhibition of GFAP synthesis by antisense RNA in astrocytes.
J Neurosci Res
30:72-79[ISI][Medline].
-
Yu ACH,
Lee YL,
Eng LF
(1993)
Astrogliosis in culture. I. The model and the effect of antisense oligonucleotides on glial fibrillary acidic protein synthesis.
J Neurosci Res
34:295-303[ISI][Medline].
-
Zhang Y,
Campbell G,
Anderson PN,
Martini R,
Schachner M,
Lieberman AR
(1995)
Molecular basis of interactions between regenerating adult rat thalamic axons and Schwann cells in peripheral nerve grafts. I. Neural cell adhesion molecules.
J Comp Neurol
361:193-209[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Rozovsky, M. Wei, D. J. Stone, H. Zanjani, C. P. Anderson, T. E. Morgan, and C. E. Finch
Estradiol (E2) Enhances Neurite Outgrowth by Repressing Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Expression and Reorganizing Laminin
Endocrinology,
February 1, 2002;
143(2):
636 - 646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sugawara, B.T. Himes, M. Kowada, M. Murray, A. Tessler, and W. P. Battisti
Putative Inhibitory Extracellular Matrix Molecules Do Not Prevent Dorsal Root Regeneration into Fetal Spinal Cord Transplants
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 1999;
13(2):
135 - 147.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Stone, Y. Song, C. P. Anderson, K. K. Krohn, C. E. Finch, and I. Rozovsky
Bidirectional Transcription Regulation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein by Estradiol in Vivo and in Vitro
Endocrinology,
July 1, 1998;
139(7):
3202 - 3209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E MAcLAREN
Regeneration and transplantation of the optic nerve: developing a clinical strategy
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
May 1, 1998;
82(5):
577 - 583.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|