 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 12,
Issue of June 15, 1997
pp. 4839-4848
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Dual Ultrastructural Localization of µ-Opioid Receptors and
NMDA-Type Glutamate Receptors in the Shell of the Rat Nucleus
Accumbens
K. Noelle Gracy,
Adena L. Svingos, and
Virginia M. Pickel
Division of Neurobiology, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience,
Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York 10021
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Summary
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The effectiveness of NMDA antagonists in modulating the motor and
motivational effects of opiates is attributed, in part, to functional
associations involving NMDA receptors and µ-opioid receptors (MORs)
in the shell of the nucleus accumbens (Acb). To determine the
subcellular sites for potential functional interactions between opiate
ligands and NMDA receptors in this region, we examined the
ultrastructural localization of antipeptide antisera against MOR and
the R1 subunit of the NMDA receptor in the Acb shell of the adult rat
brain. MOR-like immunoreactivity (MOR-LI) was seen primarily in
dendrites, whereas NMDAR1-like immunoreactivity (NMDAR1-LI) was
detected more often in axon terminals forming asymmetric synapses. In
these profiles, MOR labeling was localized mainly to extrasynaptic plasma membranes, whereas NMDAR1-LI was associated with both synaptic and extrasynaptic sites. Of 307 MOR-labeled processes, 17.9% of the
dendrites and 9.4% of the axon terminals also contained NMDAR1-LI. In
addition, 24.7% of the dendrites containing only MOR-LI were apposed
to NMDAR1-labeled axons or terminals. We conclude that in the shell of
the Acb, the output of single neurons can be dually modulated by (1)
activation of MOR and NMDA receptors in the same dendrites or (2)
combined activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors in afferents
contacting dendrites containing MOR. In addition, the colocalization of
MOR and NMDAR1 in certain axon terminals in the Acb suggests their dual
involvement in the presynaptic release of neurotransmitters in this
region.
Key words:
opiate;
withdrawal;
locomotion;
addiction;
glutamate;
colocalization;
immunocytochemistry;
morphine;
enkephalin
INTRODUCTION
Behavioral studies suggest that the nucleus
accumbens (Acb) is critically involved in locomotor and opiate
tolerance/withdrawal effects produced by activation of the µ-opioid
receptor (MOR). Infusion of MOR agonists into the Acb results in an
initial decrease in locomotor activity followed by a period of
hyperactivity (Pert and Sivit, 1977 ; Costall et al., 1978 ; Meyer et
al., 1994 ). Depending on dopamine levels (Burns et al., 1994 ; Svensson
et al., 1994 ), locomotor activity can also be increased by
administration of NMDA receptor antagonists into the shell subregion of
the Acb (Pulvirenti et al., 1992 ). This NMDA receptor
antagonist-induced response can be attenuated by MOR agonists (Layer et
al., 1991 ), thus suggesting that MOR and NMDA receptors have opposing
behavioral effects in this region. The functional association between
MOR and NMDA receptor ligands is further supported by observations in
opiate addiction paradigms. Tolerance and withdrawal symptoms, for
example, are both prevented by the administration of MOR or NMDA
receptor antagonists (Gulya et al., 1988 ; Ben-Eliyahu et al., 1992 ;
Kolesnikov et al., 1993 ; Trujillo and Akil, 1994 ). Opiate
self-administration is also blocked by lesioning the Acb (Zito et al.,
1985 ), providing further evidence that this region is involved in the
motivational and withdrawal aspects of opiate addiction (Olds, 1982 ;
Goeders et al., 1984 ; Koob et al., 1989 ). Thus, functional associations
between the NMDA receptor and MOR in the Acb most likely contribute to
the known effectiveness of NMDA receptor antagonists in the inhibition
of opiate tolerance and withdrawal (Trujillo and Akil, 1994 ; Herman et
al., 1995 ).
The susceptibility of both locomotor and opiate addictive behaviors to
modulation by MOR and NMDA receptor ligands suggests that these
receptors may be present in the same neurons in the Acb.
Electrophysiological studies in the Acb support this hypothesis by
showing that MOR activation increases postsynaptic NMDA-induced currents (Martin et al., 1997 ). Anatomical studies also indirectly suggest colocalization of MOR and NMDA receptors, because MOR and NMDA
receptors have overlapping light microscopic distributions in the Acb
(Hiller et al., 1994 ; Petralia et al., 1994 ). Furthermore, we have
shown by electron microscopic immunocytochemical single labeling that
MOR and NMDA receptors are each localized to dendritic plasma membranes
and to axon terminals in the Acb (Gracy and Pickel, 1996 ; Svingos et
al., 1996 ). These results suggest that MOR and NMDA receptor ligands
may dually modulate the activity of single neurons or could
differentially modulate pre- or postsynaptic components of single
synapses. To test this hypothesis, we used dual-labeling immunogold and
immunoperoxidase techniques to examine the electron microscopic
immunocytochemical localization of antipeptide antisera against the
intracellular C terminus of the cloned MOR protein and the R1 subunit
of the NMDA receptor in sections through the shell of the rat Acb.
Expressed throughout the CNS, the R1 subunit is necessary for NMDA
channel function (Hollmann and Heinemann, 1994 ; Petralia et al., 1994 ).
Analysis revealed that MOR is present in many NMDAR1-containing
dendrites and in dendrites receiving input from NMDAR1-labeled
terminals. MOR and NMDAR1 immunoreactivities were also seen colocalized
in axon terminals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissue preparation. Four adult male Sprague Dawley
rats (Hilltop Farms) (200-250 gm) were anesthetized deeply with 100 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital. They were then perfused
transcardially through the ascending aorta with 50 ml of 3.75%
acrolein followed by 200 ml of 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4. The brains were removed
and post-fixed in 2.0% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Coronal sections
40-50 µm thick were cut through the Acb on a Vibratome (Technical
Products International). The Acb was identified using plates 12-14 of
the Paxinos and Watson Atlas (Paxinos and Watson, 1986 ).
Antisera. The MOR antiserum was raised in rabbit against the
intracellular C terminus (amino acids 384-398) of the cloned receptor
(Arvidsson et al., 1995 ). The monoclonal NMDAR1 antibody, which
recognizes only the R1 subunit of the NMDA receptor, was made in mouse
against a portion of the intracellular loop of the protein between
transmembrane regions III and IV. This region is thought to be common
to all of the eight NMDAR1 splice variants (Brose et al., 1994 ; Siegel
et al., 1994 ; Zukin and Bennett, 1995 ).
Immunocytochemical labeling. The majority of Vibratome
sections were processed using immunogold labeling for MOR detection and
immunoperoxidase for NMDAR1 detection. A few sections were processed
with reversed makers to verify the distribution of each receptor.
Vibratome sections processed according to Chan et al. (1990) were
placed in 1.0% sodium borohydride in 0.1 M PB for 30 min
to bind reactive aldehydes. This procedure was followed by extensive
rinsing in 0.1 M Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and incubation in 0.5% bovine serum albumin in 0.1 M TBS for 30 min. The
tissue was then processed using a modification of the freeze-thaw
method described by Descarries et al. (1992) , in which sections were cryoprotected by incubation for 15 min in a solution of 30% sucrose and 0.07% glycerol in 0.1 M PBS. Sections were
subsequently immersed in liquid freon, liquid nitrogen, and room
temperature PB in rapid succession. After several rinses in TBS, the
tissue was incubated for 2 d at 4°C in a solution containing
rabbit anti-MOR antiserum (1:10,000 or 1:5000 for immunogold; 1:6500
for immunoperoxidase) (Incstar, Stillwater, MN) and mouse anti-NMDAR1
antibody (1:10 for immunogold; 1:10 or 1:25 for immunoperoxidase)
(PharMingen, San Diego, CA).
The sections were rinsed in TBS and placed for 30 min in Jackson
biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG (1:200; Jackson, West Grove, PA) for
peroxidase identification of NMDAR1. In reversed marker studies, a
biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA)
was used to identify MOR with immunoperoxidase. All tissue was
incubated for 30 min in avidin-biotin complex (Vector) (Hsu et al.,
1981 ) and rinsed in TBS. The biotinylated antibody was then visualized
by a 6 min reaction in 22 mg of 3-3 -diaminobenzidine (Aldrich,
Milwaukee, WI) and 10 µl of 30% hydrogen peroxide in 100 ml of 0.1 M TBS.
Visualization of immunogold labeling proceeded with a rinse in 0.01 M PBS followed by a 10 min incubation in 0.8% BSA with 0.1% gelatin in 0.01 M PBS. Sections then were incubated
for 2 hr in goat anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) (for MOR immunogold identification) or goat anti-mouse IgG (Amersham) (for
NMDA immunogold identification; 1:50) conjugated to 1 nM gold particles. They were rinsed in the 0.01 M PBS gelatin
solution and in PBS alone, and then placed for 10 min in 1.25%
glutaraldehyde in PBS. The tissue was rinsed in PBS, washed in 0.2 M sodium citrate buffer, pH 7.4, and silver-intensified
using a silver enhancement kit (Amersham) for 4-7 min.
After a rinse in 0.1 M PB, the sections were incubated for
1 hr in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.2 M PB. They were washed
in PB, dehydrated through a series of increasing alcohol
concentrations, and incubated overnight in a 1:1 mixture of propylene
oxide and Epon 812. They were then flat-embedded in Epon 812 (Leranth
and Pickel, 1989 ), mounted on Epon blocks, and thin-sectioned with an
LKB ultramicrotome using a diamond knife (Diatome, Fort Washington, PA). Thin sections of the shell region of the Acb were taken from the
outer surface of the tissue. These were collected on copper grids,
counterstained with uranyl acetate and Reynolds' lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963 ), and examined on a Philips 201 electron
microscope.
Electron micrographs used for illustrations were scanned with an AGFA
Arcus II scanner (Agfa-Gevaert) to a Power Macintosh 8500/150 Computer
(Apple Computer). The micrographs were minimally adjusted for contrast
and sharpness using Adobe Photoshop (version 3.0.4, Adobe Systems). The
lettering on the plates was composed using Adobe Illustrator (version
6.0; Adobe Systems) and QuarkXPress (version 3.32; Quark).
Data analysis. Electron micrographs were collected from four
vibratome sections from each of four rats. A total area of 7640 µm2 of tissue from the shell of the Acb was used to
determine the relative cellular distribution of immunoreactivity
associated with neuronal and glial profiles for each antiserum.
Furthermore, the number and type of immunolabeled profiles dually
labeled with both antisera or apposed to other labeled elements were
noted. Virtually all immunogold-silver labeling for MOR was associated with plasma or organelle membranes; there were few random particles. Medium or large profiles (0.50-5.0 µm) were counted only if they contained two or more gold particles, and small (0.10-0.50 µm) profiles were counted if they contained a single gold particle associated with the plasma membrane. The validity of this approach was
shown previously by similarities in the number of immunogold versus
immunoperoxidase-labeled profiles in reversed marker studies. Immunogold labeling was described as "perisynaptic" if the
immunogold-silver particles were immediately adjacent to or up to 0.10 µm away from the synaptic density; labeling was described as
"extrasynaptic" if the particles were localized to regions of the
plasma membrane >0.10 µm away from the synaptic density. Elements
labeled with peroxidase were identified by comparing the process with
unlabeled elements of the same type within the adjacent neuropil. These immunoreactive profiles were recognized by their enhanced density and
granularity in comparison with the unlabeled structures.
The cellular elements and synaptic types were classified according to
Peters et al. (1991) . Neuronal profiles not containing synaptic
vesicles and receiving synaptic contacts from axon terminals were
identified as dendrites. Structures 0.25 µm or smaller in diameter,
which contained vesicles but did not make synaptic contacts, were
identified as axons. Those profiles that contained vesicles and were
0.25-1.25 µm in diameter were classified as axon terminals. Glial
processes were identified by the amorphous shape of the plasma
membrane, by the lack of vesicles or synaptic contacts, and by the
presence of glial filaments. Profiles with membranes contacting each
other but not making a synapse were classified as "apposed"
elements. Synaptic junctions were identified as symmetric or asymmetric
on the basis of thin or thick postsynaptic specializations, respectively.
RESULTS
MOR-LI was most often localized to extrasynaptic plasmalemmal
portions of dendrites or dendritic spines, whereas NMDAR1-LI was more
commonly seen in axons. Of 307 profiles containing MOR-LI, 86 also
contained NMDAR1-LI. Most colocalization was seen in dendrites, but one
third was seen in axon terminals. In addition to colocalization, 76 processes containing MOR-LI were synaptically contacted by or directly
apposed to NMDAR1-labeled elements. The remainder of MOR-labeled
processes showed no apparent association with profiles containing
NMDAR1-LI.
MOR-LI is localized mainly to extrasynaptic plasma membranes of
dendrites and is rarely present in axons and terminals
MOR-LI was seen mainly in dendrites and dendritic spines in the
shell of the Acb (Fig. 1). As described previously by
Svingos et al. (1996) , the immunogold labeling for MOR was primarily
localized along perisynaptic and extrasynaptic regions of the dendritic plasma membrane (Figs. 2A, 3,
4B). On rare occasions, MOR-LI was seen at
intracellular sites associated with the smooth endoplasmic reticulum
(Fig. 3A). Dendrites containing MOR-LI were
most often apposed to unlabeled axons and terminals (Fig.
2A). When junctions were seen, they were primarily
asymmetric synapses (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 1.
Bar graph showing the distribution of
immunogold-labeled MOR and immunoperoxidase-labeled NMDAR1 in
neuronal compartments (dendrites, axons, terminals, somata) and in
glial processes in the Acb. n = 307 MOR-labeled
profiles and n = 397 NMDA-labeled profiles seen in
7640 µm2 area of tissue.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Electron micrographs through the Acb showing
single MOR labeling and dual MOR and NMDAR1 labeling in spiny
dendrites. A, A spiny dendrite (MOR-D)
showing plasmalemmal immunogold labeling (arrows) for
MOR is apposed to two unlabeled terminals (UT)
and an unlabeled dendrite (UD). n,
Nucleus; m, mitochondrion. B, A dendrite
(dl-D) labeled with both immunogold
(arrows) for MOR and immunoperoxidase for NMDAR1.
UT, Unlabeled terminal. The electron dense peroxidase
reaction product is most evident in the region above a mitochondrion
(m) in the dendrite. C, A dually labeled small dendritic spine (dl-S) shows immunogold
(arrow) MOR labeling along a nonsynaptic region of the
plasma membrane. In contrast, immunoperoxidase for NMDAR1 is present
within the asymmetric, excitatory-type contact (closed
arrowhead) from an unlabeled terminal (UT). The peroxidase reaction product is also
diffusely localized within the cytoplasm and the nonsynaptic regions of
the plasma membrane. Scale bars, 0.5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (208K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Electron micrographs showing MOR-immunoreactive
dendrites in contact with NMDAR1-labeled terminals. A, A
dendrite (MOR-D) labeled with immunogold
(arrows) for MOR is apposed by a small terminal
(NMDA-T) labeled with immunoperoxidase for
NMDAR1. B, A small preterminal axon
(NMDA-A) containing immunoperoxidase labeling for NMDAR1
apposes a dendrite (MOR-D) labeled with immunogold (arrows) for MOR. The dendrite is apposed by an
unlabeled terminal (UT). Scale bars, 0.5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (130K GIF file)]
Fig. 4.
Electron micrographs showing appositional contacts
between MOR-labeled neurons and NMDAR1-labeled neuronal and glial
processes. A, An unlabeled dendritic spine
(US) is apposed to a terminal (MOR-T) labeled with immunogold
(arrows) for MOR. The spine also receives an asymmetric,
excitatory-type contact (open arrowhead) from a terminal
(NMDA-T) labeled with immunoperoxidase for
NMDAR1. An apposed small unmyelinated axon (MOR-A)
contains immunogold labeling (arrow) along the plasma
membrane. B, A glial process (NMDA-G)
shows immunoperoxidase reaction product that is recognizable by the
granular precipitate within the cytoplasm and along its irregularly
shaped plasma membrane. The peroxidase product can be seen by
comparison with an unlabeled glial process (UG) in the
micrograph. The labeled glial process apposes a dendritic spine
(MOR-S) containing immunogold (arrows)
for MOR on nonsynaptic regions of the plasma membrane. The spine
receives an asymmetric contact (open arrowhead) from an
unlabeled terminal (UT). NMDA-A, NMDAR1-labeled axon. Scale bars, 0.5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (129K GIF file)]
MOR-labeling in the Acb was seen less often in small unmyelinated axons
and axon terminals (Fig. 1). In these axon terminals, immunogold
particles were associated with both the plasma and vesicular membranes
(Figs. 4A, 5A). MOR-labeled
terminals were either without recognizable synapses or made asymmetric
contact with unlabeled, or occasionally NMDAR1-labeled, dendrites or
dendritic spines (Fig. 5A). In small, unmyelinated axons,
MOR-LI was localized almost exclusively to the plasma membrane (Fig.
4A); these axons were usually seen in bundles
containing other unlabeled axons. Relatively few somata or glial
processes contained detectable MOR-LI (Fig. 1).
Fig. 5.
Electron micrographs showing labeling for MOR
and/or NMDAR1 in axon terminals in the Acb. A, A
terminal (MOR-T) shows immunogold labeling
(arrows) for MOR along nonsynaptic regions of the plasma membrane. This terminal forms an asymmetric synapse with a dendritic spine (NMDA-S) containing immunoperoxidase reaction
product for NMDA. The immunoperoxidase reaction product is associated
with the asymmetric junction (closed arrowhead), which
is notably more electron dense than that seen in an unlabeled spine
(US) postsynaptic density (open
arrowhead). UT, Unlabeled terminal;
UD, unlabeled dendrite. B, A terminal
(NMDA-T) showing dense immunoperoxidase reaction
product for NMDAR1 that rims the membranes of many small synaptic
vesicles (SSVs) forms an asymmetric contact on a
dendritic spine. C, A dually labeled axon terminal
(dl-T) contains both immunogold
(arrow) labeling for MOR and immunoperoxidase labeling for NMDAR1. The gold particle is located on the plasma membrane of the
terminal. The peroxidase reaction product is also associated with the
plasma membrane (pm) and the membrane of adjacent
SSVs. UT, Unlabeled terminal. Scale bars, 0.5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (155K GIF file)]
NMDAR1-LI is present most often in axons and terminals
but is also seen in dendrites
Immunoperoxidase labeling for NMDAR1 was seen most frequently in
axons and axon terminals (Fig. 1). Immunoperoxidase labeling for the
NMDA receptor in presynaptic axons and axon terminals was usually
diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm. The reaction product, however,
was sometimes associated with the plasma membrane or the membranes of
small synaptic vesicles (SSVs) (Figs. 3, 4A, 5B). Although only slightly more terminals contained
NMDAR1-LI than MOR-LI, substantially more unmyelinated axons were
labeled for NMDAR1 versus MOR (Fig. 1). These axons and terminals
apposed both unlabeled and MOR-labeled processes (Fig. 3), and the
terminals often made asymmetric synapses with dendrites or dendritic
spines (Figs. 4A, 5B).
NMDAR1-labeled dendrites were less numerous than MOR-labeled dendrites
(Fig. 1). In dendrites containing NMDAR1-LI, the reaction product was
distributed diffusely within the cytoplasm and was sometimes associated
with smooth endoplasmic reticulum or nonsynaptic sites of the plasma
membrane in larger dendrites. Unlike MOR, NMDAR1 labeling in dendritic
spines was often seen along asymmetric synaptic junctions (Fig.
5A). Reversed marker studies in which NMDAR1 was identified
using immunogold showed that immunogold-silver particles were also
occasionally associated with asymmetric postsynaptic junctions. In
contrast, MOR immunoreactivity was not seen within synaptic
specializations with the use of either immunogold or immunoperoxidase
methods.
MOR- and NMDAR1-LI are colocalized in dendrites
Colocalization of MOR- and NMDAR1-LI was seen most commonly in
dendrites (Fig. 6). More than half of the dendrites and
dendritic spines containing NMDAR1-LI also expressed MOR-LI, whereas
only 30.9% of the MOR-labeled dendrites contained detectable NMDAR1 (Fig. 7). As seen in singly labeled dendrites,
immunogold localization of MOR was associated mainly with extrasynaptic
regions of the plasma membranes in dendrites and dendritic spines
(Figs. 2B,C). Within the same dendrites,
immunoperoxidase labeling for the NMDA receptor was distributed
diffusely within the cytoplasm and/or associated with smooth
endoplasmic reticulum in larger dendrites (Fig. 2B).
In dually labeled spines, the peroxidase reaction product was localized
more intensely to asymmetric postsynaptic junctions (Fig.
2C). The immunogold and immunoperoxidase labeling was
occasionally seen along the same regions of the plasma membrane in
dually labeled dendrites. Dendrites and spines that colocalized MOR and
NMDAR1 immunoreactivities received asymmetric (Fig. 2C) and,
more rarely, symmetric synapses from unlabeled terminals.
Dendrites containing MOR- and NMDAR1-LI also were contacted
infrequently by terminals containing NMDAR1-LI.
Fig. 6.
Bar graph showing the relative frequencies of
colocalization of MOR and NMDAR1 in neuronal (dendrites, axons, and
terminals) and glial processes in the Acb. The distribution represents
the 28% (86/307) of immunogold MOR-labeled profiles that contained immunoperoxidase NMDAR1 labeling from 7640 µm2 area of
tissue.
[View Larger Version of this Image (10K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
Bar graphs showing proportion of single versus
dual labeling in MOR- and NMDAR1-labeled dendrites in the Acb. Analysis
carried out in 7640 µm2 area of tissue processed for
immunogold labeling of MOR and immunoperoxidase detection of
NMDAR1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Axons containing NMDAR1-LI show synaptic and appositional contacts
with dendrites expressing MOR-LI
Synaptic and/or appositional contacts between neurons separately
labeled for NMDAR1 and MOR were seen almost as frequently as dendritic
colocalization. Of 76 observed MOR/NMDAR1 appositions, 42 were between
MOR-labeled dendrites or spines and NMDAR1-immunoreactive axons or
terminals (Fig. 3). On rare occasions, the dendrite or spine also
contained detectable NMDAR1-LI. NMDAR1-labeled terminals most often
apposed dendrites and spines without recognizable membrane specializations (Fig. 3), but they occasionally formed asymmetric synapses with MOR-immunoreactive dendrites. MOR-labeled dendrites were
infrequently apposed to NMDAR1-labeled dendrites (6 of 76) or glial
processes (3 of 76) (Fig. 4B).
MOR-labeled axon terminals and unmyelinated axons also apposed
NMDAR1-labeled axons and terminals (18 of 76) (Fig.
4A). Most often, MOR-labeled terminals apposed other
terminals containing NMDAR1-LI, and MOR-labeled axons apposed other
axons that were labeled with NMDAR1. Axo-axonic synapses were not
observed, but terminals labeled with either MOR- or NMDAR1-LI sometimes
made asymmetric contacts on unlabeled spines. In rare instances,
terminals separately labeled for MOR or NMDAR1 converged on unlabeled
spines (Fig. 4A). A few terminals containing MOR-LI
also apposed or formed asymmetric synapses with dendrites or dendritic
spines containing NMDAR1-LI (Fig. 5A) (5 of 76) or apposed
glial processes (2 of 76).
MOR- and NMDAR1-LI are colocalized in axons
One third of all colocalization was seen in axons and
terminals (Fig. 6). Terminals containing both receptors were generally 0.25-1.25 µm in diameter. These terminals contained numerous densely packed, round SSVs and occasional flattened clear vesicles or large
dense-core vesicles. Immunogold labeling for MOR was associated with
the plasma membrane or SSVs of terminals and axons (Fig. 5C). In the same presynaptic processes, NMDAR1-LI was also
associated with the plasma membrane and nearby SSVs (Fig.
5C). Terminals containing both MOR- and NMDAR1-LI were most
often surrounded by unlabeled profiles. When synaptic junctions were
seen, dually labeled terminals formed asymmetric contacts with
unlabeled dendrites or dendritic spines; these synapses occasionally
appeared to be perforated. MOR-labeled terminals more frequently showed
detectable NMDAR1-LI in comparison with the small percentage of
NMDAR1-labeled terminals that contained MOR-LI (Fig.
8).
Fig. 8.
Bar graph showing proportions of single versus
dual labeling in MOR- and NMDAR1-labeled axons and terminals in the
Acb. Analysis carried out in 7640 µm2 area of tissue
processed for immunogold labeling of MOR and immunoperoxidase detection
of NMDAR1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
Glial processes rarely contain MOR- or NMDAR1-LI
NMDAR1-LI was more commonly seen in glial processes than was
MOR-LI (Fig. 1). The labeled glial processes, however, were still infrequent in comparison with dendritic or axonal localization of
NMDAR1-LI. The NMDAR1-labeled astrocytic processes were usually apposed
to unlabeled profiles, particularly unlabeled axons and axon terminals
forming asymmetric junctions. Glial processes rarely contained both
NMDAR1- and MOR-LI (1 of 86), although some (5 of 76) of the
NMDAR1-labeled glial processes apposed profiles containing MOR-LI. In
these processes, the NMDAR1-LI was seen most intensely along regions of
the plasma membrane away from the apposed MOR-labeled profile (Fig.
4B).
DISCUSSION
We have shown that in the shell of the Acb, MOR is localized
mainly to extrasynaptic plasma membranes of dendrites that (1) express
NMDAR1-LI or (2) receive input from NMDAR1-containing terminals. The
results indicate that neurons responsive to MOR ligands may be subject
to either direct or indirect (i.e., presynaptic) modulation by NMDA
receptor ligands. We also present evidence that MOR and NMDAR1 are
colocalized in certain axon terminals in the Acb, suggesting their dual
involvement in presynaptic release of other neurotransmitters in this
region.
Methodological considerations
MOR and NMDAR1 labeling have been referred to here as "-like
immunoreactivity" (-LI) to include the possibility that other similar
proteins may be recognized by the antisera and that both functional and
nonfunctional receptors may be detected. We believe, however, that the
localization reflects mainly functional receptors, because the
specificity of both antisera was shown previously by Western blot,
immunoisolation studies, and immunolabeling of transfected cells
(Siegel et al., 1994 ; Arvidsson et al., 1995 ). Furthermore, the MOR and
NMDAR1 labeling described here is consistent with receptor
autoradiography studies using radiolabeled ligands (Jarvis et al.,
1987 ; Jacobson and Cottrell, 1993 ; Mansour et al., 1994 ).
In the present study using the monoclonal antibody against
NMDAR1, we found a lower incidence of glial labeling and a higher incidence of axonal labeling in the Acb than was observed previously using a polyclonal NMDAR1 antibody made against a different region of
the R1 subunit (Gracy and Pickel, 1996 ). This disparity may reflect
differences in the proportion of total neuronal versus glial processes
labeled by each antibody as well as known differences in antibody
specificity to splice variants expressed specifically in glia (Farb et
al., 1995 ; Zukin and Bennett, 1995 ).
We may have underestimated the relative frequencies of association
between MOR and NMDA receptors attributable to differences in
sensitivity and/or penetration of peroxidase and colloidal gold
markers, although we examined thin sections from only the surface of
the tissue to minimize this problem. Furthermore, reversal of markers
showed that the distribution of both MOR and NMDAR1 labeling was
similar to that documented with the original markers, suggesting that
the detection of immunoreactive profiles was largely independent of the
detection method. The proportion of colocalization was also similar in
reversed marker studies.
Dendrites and dendritic spines contain both MOR- and NMDAR1-LI
In dendrites containing NMDAR1- and/or MOR-LI, MOR labeling was
seen almost exclusively along the plasma membrane. As described previously in this region (Hamel and Beaudet, 1984 , 1987 ; Svingos et
al., 1996 ), the MOR-LI was associated primarily with extrasynaptic or
perisynaptic regions of the plasma membrane. This suggests that
endogenous opioid ligands for this receptor (1) are released at
synaptic sites and then diffuse to extrasynaptic functional sites
(Sesack and Pickel, 1992 ) or (2) are released at nonsynaptic sites by
exocytosis from dense-core vesicles (O'Connor et al., 1991 ). In
contrast, in both singly and dually labeled dendrites, NMDAR1-LI was
often localized to asymmetric postsynaptic junctions in dendritic
spines, suggesting potentially closer associations between presynaptic
release and postsynaptic functions for glutamate.
The presence of MOR in more than half of the NMDAR1-labeled dendrites
suggests that the activity of at least one population of spiny neurons
is subject to dual modulation by MOR and NMDA receptor ligands. Both
may exert their physiological effects through calcium channels. MOR
agonists decrease ion currents through calcium channels (Schroeder et
al., 1991 ; Stefani et al., 1994 ; Wilding et al., 1995 ), which are
distributed along the plasma membrane of dendrites (Hoehn et al., 1993 ;
Westenbroek et al., 1995 ). Furthermore, the calcium channels have been
shown to change the cellular responsiveness to NMDA receptor ligands
(Huber et al., 1995 ; Hurt et al., 1995 ). Thus, when colocalized within
dendrites, MOR activation may modulate the postsynaptic effects of NMDA
receptor ligands by regulating calcium flux.
Colocalization of MOR and NMDA receptors in dendrites also suggests
their involvement in common signal transduction mechanisms. In the Acb,
MOR ligands increase postsynaptic responses to NMDA receptor
stimulation through activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and
calcium/calmodulin-dependent (CaM) kinase (Chen and Huang, 1991 ;
Kitamura et al., 1993 ; Martin et al., 1997 ). This effect is believed to
depend on the ability of PKC to remove the magnesium block from the
NMDA receptor (Chen and Huang, 1992 ). Both PKC and CaM kinase are
localized to the postsynaptic density of dendrites (Kitamura et al.,
1993 ), suggesting that this may be a functional site of NMDA receptor
activity.
Activation of NMDA receptors through PKC may also be a mechanism
involved in the production of opiate tolerance. PKC agonists potentiate
MOR desensitization (Mayer et al., 1995 ; Mestek et al., 1995 ), whereas
PKC antagonists inhibit the development of tolerance (Mayer et al.,
1995 ; Narita et al., 1995 ). NMDA receptor antagonists also prevent
MOR-induced increases in PKC and tolerance (Mao et al., 1994 , 1995 ),
suggesting that dendritic MOR and NMDA receptors may interact through
common mechanisms such as PKC or CaM kinase to modulate behaviors
associated with opiate administration.
Many MOR-labeled dendrites receive input from
NMDAR1-containing terminals
Dendrites containing MOR, but lacking detectable NMDAR1, often
apposed or received synaptic input from morphologically heterogeneous NMDAR1-labeled terminals. Some were small and either lacked
recognizable junctions or formed symmetric synapses. These features are
typical of those described for dopaminergic afferents (Bouyer et al., 1984 ; Freund et al., 1984 ; Sesack et al., 1994 ). NMDAR1-LI is present
in dopaminergic terminals (Gracy and Pickel, 1996 ) where it may
modulate presynaptic dopamine release (Chowdhury and Fillenz, 1991 ;
Krebs et al., 1991 ). This suggests that some of the dopamine-mediated effects of opiate administration (Sharp et al., 1995 ; Azaryan et al.,
1996 ) may result from NMDA receptor modulation of dopamine release onto
dendrites also affected by MOR ligands (Sharp et al., 1995 ).
Other NMDAR1-labeled terminals formed asymmetric synapses with
MOR-immunoreactive dendrites and dendritic spines. Such asymmetric synapses are characteristically associated with glutamatergic afferents
(Carlin et al., 1980 ), suggesting that autoregulation of glutamate
release through activation of NMDA receptors may also contribute to the
functional relationship between opiates and glutamate in the Acb.
MOR- and NMDAR1-LI are colocalized in terminals
The present demonstration that MOR- and NMDAR1-LI are also
colocalized in many small axons and axon terminals provides direct ultrastructural evidence for functional associations between MOR and
NMDA receptor ligands at presynaptic sites. In singly and dually
labeled presynaptic processes, immunoreactivity for both MOR and NMDAR1
was associated mainly with nonsynaptic portions of the plasma membrane
and nearby membranes of SSVs. This localization is comparable to that
described in the Acb for MOR by Svingos et al. (1996) and for NMDAR1 by
Gracy and Pickel (1996) . Many of the terminals containing MOR and
NMDAR1-LI did not form recognizable synapses. This may indicate either
that the terminals do not form synapses in this region or that the
receptors are localized to sites away from the synapse.
Occasionally, terminals containing both MOR and NMDAR1 immunoreactivity
formed asymmetric contacts with dendrites and dendritic spines in the
Acb, thus suggesting the involvement of both receptors in the
presynaptic release of excitatory neurotransmitters in this region.
Although both MOR and NMDA receptors were shown previously to be
present in axon terminals making asymmetric synapses (Gracy and Pickel,
1996 ; Svingos et al., 1996 ), this is the first demonstration that both
MOR and NMDA receptor ligands target the same excitatory afferents to
the Acb. These may include glutamatergic prefrontal cortical
projections (Jaskiw et al., 1991 ). Several studies in other brain
regions also indicate that enkephalin, acting at presynaptic opioid
receptors on glutamatergic terminals, may inhibit the release of
glutamate by suppressing calcium entry into axon terminals (Hori et
al., 1992 ; Wilding et al., 1995 ). Conversely, NMDAR1 is believed to
presynaptically autoregulate glutamate release through increased
calcium entry (Sherman et al., 1992 ; Shew et al., 1995 ). These findings
support the hypothesis that MOR and NMDAR1 receptor agonists have
opposing effects in mediating presynaptic calcium influx in the same
glutamatergic terminals.
Summary
The results of the present study provide morphological evidence
that there are at least three relevant sites contributing to the
reported functional interactions between MOR and NMDA receptor ligands
in the shell of the Acb. First, colocalization in dendrites suggests
that occupancy of either MOR or NMDA receptors could alter the
postsynaptic responses to the other receptor ligand. The most likely
mechanisms include changes in the permeability of calcium channels or
activity of signal transduction pathways (Chen and Huang, 1991 ; Mao et
al., 1995 ; Wilding et al., 1995 ). Second, our results indicate that
NMDA receptor ligands may modulate the presynaptic release of other
neurotransmitters (dopamine or glutamate) onto dendrites that are
direct targets of neurons responsive to MOR but not NMDA receptor
activation. Third, the colocalization of MOR and NMDAR1 in terminals
indicates that ligands of both receptors can alter the presynaptic
release of the same neurotransmitters. Each of these sites may play a
distinct role in the locomotor and motivational effects of opiates in
the Acb.
FOOTNOTES
Received Jan. 24, 1997; revised March 26, 1997; accepted March 31, 1997.
This research was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse
(DA04600) and National Institute of Mental Health (MH40342 and 00078)
grants to V.M.P. and by an Aaron Diamond Postdoctoral Fellowship to
A.L.S.
Correspondence should be addressed to K. Noelle Gracy, Division of
Neurobiology, Cornell University Medical College, 411 East 69th Street,
New York, NY 10021.
REFERENCES
-
Arvidsson U,
Riedl M,
Chakrabarti S,
Lee J,
Nakano A,
Dado R,
Loh H,
Law P,
Wessendorf M,
Elde R
(1995)
Distribution and targeting of a µ-opioid receptor (MOR1) in brain and spinal cord.
J Neurosci
15:3328-3341[Abstract].
-
Azaryan AV,
Coughlin LJ,
Buzas B,
Clock BJ,
Cox BM
(1996)
Effects of chronic cocaine treatment on mu- and delta-opioid receptor mRNA levels in dopaminergically innervated brain regions.
J Neurochem
66:443-448[ISI][Medline].
-
Ben-Eliyahu S,
Marek P,
Vaccarino AL,
Mogil JS,
Sternberg WF,
Liebeskind JC
(1992)
The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 prevents long-lasting non-associative morphine tolerance in the rat.
Brain Res
575:304-308[ISI][Medline].
-
Bouyer JJ,
Miller RJ,
Pickel VM
(1984)
Ultrastructural relation between cortical efferents and terminals containing enkephalin-like immunoreactivity in rat neostriatum.
Regul Pept
8:105-115[ISI][Medline].
-
Brose N,
Huntley GW,
Stern BY,
Sharma G,
Morrison JH,
Heinemann SF
(1994)
Differential assembly of coexpressed glutamate receptor subunits in neurons of rat cerebral cortex.
J Biol Chem
269:16780-16784[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Burns LH,
Everitt BJ,
Kelley AE,
Robbins TW
(1994)
Glutamate-dopamine interactions in the ventral striatum: role in locomotor activity and responding with conditioned reinforcement.
Psychopharmacology (Berl)
115:516-528[Medline].
-
Carlin RK,
Grab DJ,
Cohen RS,
Siekovitz P
(1980)
Isolation and characterization of postsynaptic densities from various brain regions.
Cell Biol
86:831-843.
-
Chan J,
Aoki C,
Pickel VM
(1990)
Optimization of differential immunogold-silver and peroxidase labeling with maintenance of ultrastructure in brain sections before plastic embedding.
J Neurosci Methods
33:113-127[ISI][Medline].
-
Chen L,
Huang L-YM
(1991)
Sustained potentiation of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate responses through activation of protein kinase C by a µ opioid.
Neuron
7:319-326[ISI][Medline].
-
Chen L,
Huang L-YM
(1992)
Protein kinase C reduces Mg2+ block of NMDA-receptor channels as a mechanism of modulation.
Nature
356:521-523[Medline].
-
Chowdhury M,
Fillenz M
(1991)
Presynaptic adenosine A2 and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors regulate dopamine synthesis in rat striatal synaptosomes.
J Neurochem
56:1783-1788[ISI][Medline].
-
Costall B,
Fortune DH,
Naylor RJ
(1978)
The induction of catalepsy and hyperactivity by morphine administered directly into the nucleus accumbens of rats.
Eur J Pharmacol
49:49-64[ISI][Medline].
-
Descarries L,
Soghomonian J-J,
Garcia S,
Doucet G,
Bruno JP
(1992)
Ultrastructural analysis of the serotonin hyperinnervation in adult rat neostriatum following neonatal dopamine denervation with 6-hydroxydopamine.
Brain Res
569:1-13[ISI][Medline].
-
Farb CR,
Aoki C,
LeDoux JE
(1995)
Differential localization of NMDA and AMPA receptor subunits in the lateral and basal nuclei of the amygdala: a light and electron microscopic study.
J Comp Neurol
362:86-108[ISI][Medline].
-
Freund TF,
Powell JF,
Smith AD
(1984)
Tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive boutons in synaptic contact with identified striatonigral neurons, with particular reference to dendritic spines.
Neuroscience
13:1189-1215[ISI][Medline].
-
Goeders NE,
Lane JD,
Smith JE
(1984)
Self-administration of methionine enkephalin into the nucleus accumbens.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
20:451-455[ISI][Medline].
-
Gracy KN,
Pickel VM
(1996)
Ultrastructural immunocytochemical localization of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and tyrosine hydroxylase in the shell of the rat nucleus accumbens.
Brain Res
739:169-181[ISI][Medline].
-
Gulya K,
Krivan M,
Nyoczas N,
Sarnyai Z,
Kovacs GL
(1988)
Central effects of the potent and highly selective mu opioid antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP) in mice.
Eur J Pharmacol
150:355-360[ISI][Medline].
-
Hamel E,
Beaudet A
(1984)
Electron microscopic autoradiographic localization of opioid receptors in rat neostriatum.
Nature
312:155-157[Medline].
-
Hamel E,
Beaudet A
(1987)
Opioid receptors in rat neostriatum: radioautographic distribution at the electron microscopic level.
Brain Res
401:239-257[ISI][Medline].
-
Herman BH,
Vocci F,
Bridge P
(1995)
The effects of NMDA receptor antagonists and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on opioid tolerance and withdrawal: medication development issues for opiate addiction.
Neuropsychopharmacology
13:269-293[ISI][Medline].
-
Hiller JM,
Zhang Y,
Bing G,
Gioannini TL,
Stone EA,
Simon EJ
(1994)
Immunohistochemical localization of mu-opioid receptors in rat brain using antibodies generated against a peptide sequence present in a purified mu-opioid binding protein.
Neuroscience
62:829-841[ISI][Medline].
-
Hoehn K,
Watson TWJ,
MacVicar BA
(1993)
Multiple types of calcium channels in acutely isolated rat neostriatal neurons.
J Neurosci
13:1244-1257[Abstract].
-
Hollmann M,
Heinemann S
(1994)
Cloned glutamate receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
17:31-108[ISI][Medline].
-
Hori Y,
Endo K,
Takahashi T
(1992)
Presynaptic inhibitory action of enkephalin on excitatory transmission in superficial dorsal horn of rat spinal cord.
J Physiol (Lond)
450:673-685[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hsu S,
Raine L,
Fanger H
(1981)
Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.
J Histochem Cytochem
29:577-580[Abstract].
-
Huber KM,
Mauk MD,
Kelly PT
(1995)
Distinct LTP induction mechanisms: contribution of NMDA receptors and voltage-dependent calcium channels.
J Neurophysiol
73:270-279[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hurt KJ,
Fiskum G,
Rosenthal RE,
Werling LL
(1995)
The role of L-type voltage dependent calcium channels in stimulated [3H]norepinephrine release from canine hippocampal slices following global cerebral ischemia and reperfusion.
Brain Res
673:226-232[ISI][Medline].
-
Jacobson W,
Cottrell GA
(1993)
Rapid visualization of NMDA receptors in the brain: characterization of (+)-3-[125I]-iodo-MK-801 binding to thin sections of rat brain.
J Neurosci Methods
46:17-27[ISI][Medline].
-
Jarvis MF,
Murphy DE,
Williams M
(1987)
Quantitative autoradiographic localization of NMDA receptors in rat brain using [3H]CPP: comparison with [3H]TCP binding sites.
Eur J Pharmacol
141:149-152[ISI][Medline].
-
Jaskiw GE,
Tizabi Y,
Lipska BK,
Kolachana BS,
Wyatt RJ,
Gilad GM
(1991)
Evidence for a frontocortical-septal glutamatergic pathway and compensatory changes in septal glutamate uptake after cortical and fornix lesions in the rat.
Brain Res
550:7-10[ISI][Medline].
-
Kitamura Y,
Miyazaki A,
Nomura Y
(1993)
Stimulatory effects of protein kinase C and calmodulin kinase II on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor/channels in the postsynaptic density of rat brain.
J Neurochem
61:100-109[ISI][Medline].
-
Kolesnikov YA,
Ferkany J,
Pasternak GW
(1993)
Blockade of mu and kappa1 opioid analgesic tolerance by NPC17742, a novel NMDA antagonist.
Life Sci
53:1489-1494[ISI][Medline].
-
Koob GF,
Wall TL,
Bloom FE
(1989)
Nucleus accumbens as a substrate for the aversive stimulus effects of opiate withdrawal.
Psychopharmacology
98:530-534[Medline].
-
Krebs MO,
Desce JM,
Kemel ML,
Gauchy C,
Godeheu G,
Cheramy A,
Glowinski J
(1991)
Glutamate control of dopamine release in the rat striatum: evidence for presynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors on dopaminergic nerve terminals.
J Neurochem
56:81-85[ISI][Medline].
-
Layer RT,
Uretsky NJ,
Wallace LJ
(1991)
Effects of morphine in the nucleus accumbens on stimulant-induced locomotion.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
40:21-26[ISI][Medline].
-
Leranth C,
Pickel VM
(1989)
Electron microscopic pre-embedding double immunostaining methods.
In: Tract-tracing methods 2, recent progress (Heimer L,
Zaborsky L,
eds), pp 129-172. New York: Plenum.
-
Mansour A,
Fox CA,
Thompson RC,
Akil H,
Watson SJ
(1994)
µ-opioid receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: comparison to µ-receptor binding.
Brain Res
643:245-265[ISI][Medline].
-
Mao J,
Price DD,
Mayer DJ
(1994)
Thermal hyperalgesia in association with the development of morphine tolerance in rats: roles of excitatory amino acid receptors and protein kinase C.
J Neurosci
14:2301-2312[Abstract].
-
Mao J,
Price DD,
Phillips LL,
Lu J,
Mayer DJ
(1995)
Increase in protein kinase C gamma immunoreactivity in the spinal cord of rats associated with tolerance to the analgesic effects of morphine.
Brain Res
677:257-267[ISI][Medline].
-
Martin G,
Nie Z,
Siggins GR
(1997)
µ-Opioid receptors modulate NMDA receptor-mediated responses in nucleus accumbens neurons.
J Neurosci
17:11-22[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mayer DJ,
Mao J,
Price DD
(1995)
The development of morphine tolerance and dependence is associated with translocation of protein kinase C.
Pain
2813:365-374.
-
Mestek A,
Hurley JH,
Bye LS,
Campbell AD,
Chen Y,
Tian M,
Liu J,
Schulman H,
Yu L
(1995)
The human µ-opioid receptor: modulation of functional desensitization by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C.
J Neurosci
15:2396-2406[Abstract].
-
Meyer ME,
McLaurin BI,
Allen M,
Meyer ME
(1994)
Biphasic effects of intraaccumbens µ-opioid peptide agonist DAMGO on locomotor activities.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
47:827-831[ISI][Medline].
-
Narita M,
Narita M,
Mizoguchi H,
Tseng LF
(1995)
Inhibition of protein kinase C, but not protein kinase A, blocks the development of acute antinocioceptive tolerance to an intrathecally administered µ-opioid receptor agonist in the mouse.
Eur J Pharmacol
280:R1-R3[ISI][Medline].
-
O'Connor DT,
Klein RL,
Thureson-Klein AK,
Barbosa JA
(1991)
Chromogranin A: localization and stoichiometry in large dense core catecholamine storage vesicles from sympathetic nerve.
Brain Res
567:188-196[ISI][Medline].
-
Olds ME
(1982)
Reinforcing effects of morphine in the nucleus accumbens.
Brain Res
237:429-440[ISI][Medline].
-
Paxinos G,
Watson C
(1986)
In: The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. New York: Academic.
-
Pert A,
Sivit C
(1977)
Neuroanatomical focus for morphine and enkephalin-induced hypermotility.
Nature
265:645-647[Medline].
-
Peters A,
Palay SL,
Webster HD
(1991)
In: The fine structure of the nervous system. New York: Oxford UP.
-
Petralia RS,
Yokotani N,
Wenthold RJ
(1994)
Light and electron microscope distribution of the NMDA receptor subunit NMDAR1 in the rat nervous system using a selective anti-peptide antibody.
J Neurosci
14:667-696[Abstract].
-
Pulvirenti L,
Maldonado-Lopez R,
Koob GF
(1992)
NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens modulate intravenous cocaine but not heroine self-administration in the rat.
Brain Res
594:327-330[ISI][Medline].
-
Reynolds ES
(1963)
The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy.
J Cell Biol
17:208[Free Full Text].
-
Schroeder JE,
Fischback PS,
Zeng D,
McCleskey EW
(1991)
Activation of µ opioid receptors inhibits transient high- and low-threshold Ca2+ currents, but spares a sustained current.
Neuron
6:13-20[ISI][Medline].
-
Sesack SR,
Pickel VM
(1992)
Dual ultrastructural localization of enkephalin and tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the rat ventral tegmental area: multiple substrates for opiate-dopamine interactions.
J Neurosci
12:1335-1350[Abstract].
-
Sesack SR,
Aoki C,
Pickel VM
(1994)
Ultrastructural localization of D2 receptor-like immunoreactivity in midbrain dopamine neurons and their striatal targets.
J Neurosci
14:88-106[Abstract].
-
Sharp FR,
Liu J,
Nickolenko J,
Bontempi B
(1995)
NMDA and D1 receptors mediate induction of cfos and junE genes in striatum following morphine administration: implications for studies of memory.
Behav Brain Res
66:225-230[ISI][Medline].
-
Sherman AD,
Hegwood TS,
Baruah S,
Waziri R
(1992)
Presynaptic modulation of amino acid release from synaptosomes.
Neurochem Res
17:125-128[ISI][Medline].
-
Shew TR,
Morishita W,
Sastry BR
(1995)
Presynaptic action of glutamate receptor agonists in the CA1 region of rat hippocampus in vitro.
Eur J Pharmacol
284:93-99[ISI][Medline].
-
Siegel SJ,
Brose N,
Gasic GP,
Jahn R,
Heinemann SF,
Morrison JH
(1994)
Regional, cellular, and ultrastructural distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1 in monkey hippocampus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:564-568[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Stefani A,
Surmeier DJ,
Bernardi G
(1994)
Opioids decrease high-voltage activated calcium currents in acutely dissociated neostriatal neurons.
Brain Res
642:339-343[ISI][Medline].
-
Svensson A,
Carlsson ML,
Carlsson A
(1994)
Glutamatergic neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens can affect motor functions in opposite directions depending on the dopaminergic tone.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
18:1203-1218[Medline].
-
Svingos AL,
Moriwaki A,
Wang JB,
Uhl GR,
Pickel VM
(1996)
Ultrastructural immunocytochemical localization of µ-opioid receptors in rat nucleus accumbens: extrasynaptic plasmalemmal distribution and association with leu5-enkephalin.
J Neurosci
16:4162-4173[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Trujillo KA,
Akil H
(1994)
Inhibition of opiate tolerance by non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists.
Brain Res
633:178-188[ISI][Medline].
-
Westenbroek RE,
Sakurai T,
Elliot EM,
Hell JW,
Starr TV,
Snutch TP,
Catterall WA
(1995)
Immunochemical identification and subcellular distribution of the
1A subunits of brain calcium channels.
J Neurosci
15:6403-6418[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Wilding TJ,
Womack MD,
McCleskey EW
(1995)
Fast, local signal transduction between the mu opioid receptor and Ca2+ channels.
J Neurosci
15:4134-4132.
-
Zito KA,
Vickers G,
Roberts DCS
(1985)
Disruption of cocaine and heroin self-administration following kainic acid lesions of the nucleus accumbens.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
23:1029-1036[ISI][Medline].
-
Zukin RS,
Bennett MV
(1995)
Alternatively spliced isoforms of the NMDAR1 receptor subunit.
Trends Neurosci
18:306-313[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Paquet and Y. Smith
Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors in the Monkey Striatum: Subsynaptic Association with Glutamatergic and Dopaminergic Afferents
J. Neurosci.,
August 20, 2003;
23(20):
7659 - 7669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mao, B. Sung, R.-R. Ji, and G. Lim
Neuronal Apoptosis Associated with Morphine Tolerance: Evidence for an Opioid-Induced Neurotoxic Mechanism
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 2002;
22(17):
7650 - 7661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Liberzon, J. K. Zubieta, L. M. Fig, K. L. Phan, R. A. Koeppe, and S. F. Taylor
{micro}-Opioid receptors and limbic responses to aversive emotional stimuli
PNAS,
May 14, 2002;
99(10):
7084 - 7089.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Hubert, M. Paquet, and Y. Smith
Differential Subcellular Localization of mGluR1a and mGluR5 in the Rat and Monkey Substantia Nigra
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 2001;
21(6):
1838 - 1847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Williams, M. J. Christie, and O. Manzoni
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2001;
81(1):
299 - 343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Boutin, F. Dauphin, E. T. MacKenzie, P. Jauzac, and R. C. Koehler
Differential Time-Course Decreases in Nonselective, µ-, {delta}-, and {kappa}-Opioid Receptors After Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Mice • Editorial Comment
Stroke,
June 1, 1999;
30(6):
1271 - 1278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Gu, F. Varoqueaux, and R. B. Simerly
Hormonal Regulation of Glutamate Receptor Gene Expression in the Anteroventral Periventricular Nucleus of the Hypothalamus
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 1999;
19(8):
3213 - 3222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Svingos, E. E. O. Colago, and V. M. Pickel
Cellular Sites for Dynorphin Activation of kappa -Opioid Receptors in the Rat Nucleus Accumbens Shell
J. Neurosci.,
March 1, 1999;
19(5):
1804 - 1813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Martin, R. Przewlocki, and G. R. Siggins
Chronic Morphine Treatment Selectively Augments Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Induced Inhibition of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Nucleus Accumbens
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 1999;
288(1):
30 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Svingos, C. L. Clarke, and V. M. Pickel
Cellular Sites for Activation of delta -Opioid Receptors in the Rat Nucleus Accumbens Shell: Relationship with Met5-Enkephalin
J. Neurosci.,
March 1, 1998;
18(5):
1923 - 1933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|