 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 13,
Issue of July 1, 1997
pp. 4956-4964
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Activation of
Phospholipase C in Cultured Astrocytes Depends on the Level of Receptor
Expression
Knut Biber1, 2,
Karl-Norbert Klotz3,
Mathias Berger1,
Peter J. Gebicke-Härter1, and
Dietrich van Calker1
1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg,
D-79104 Freiburg, Germany, 2 Institute for Biology II,
University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany, and
3 Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of
Würzburg, D-97078 Würzburg, Germany
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Adenosine A1 receptors induce an inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase via G-proteins of the Gi/o family. In addition,
simultaneous stimulation of A1 receptors and of
receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase C (PLC) results in a
synergistic potentiation of PLC activity. Evidence has accumulated that
G subunits mediate this potentiating effect. However, an
A1 receptor-mediated increase in extracellular glutamate
was suggested to be responsible for the potentiating effect in mouse
astrocyte cultures. We have investigated the synergistic activation of
PLC by adenosine A1 and 1 adrenergic receptors in primary cultures of astrocytes derived from different regions of the newborn rat brain. It is reported here that (1) adenosine A1 receptor mRNA as well as receptor protein is
present in astrocytes from all brain regions, (2) A1
receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase is of similar extent
in all astrocyte cultures, (3) the A1 receptor-mediated
potentiation of PLC activity requires higher concentrations of agonist
than adenylyl cyclase inhibition and is dependent on the expression
level of A1 receptor, and (4) the potentiating effect on
PLC activity is unrelated to extracellular glutamate.
Taken together, our data support the notion that  subunits are
the relevant signal transducers for A1 receptor-mediated PLC activation in rat astrocytes. Because of the lower affinity of
 , as compared with subunits, more  subunits are
required for PLC activation. Therefore, only in cultures with higher
levels of adenosine A1 receptors is the release of 
subunits via Gi/o activation sufficient to stimulate PLC.
It is concluded that variation of the expression level of adenosine
A1 receptors may be an important regulatory mechanism to
control PLC activation via this receptor.
Key words:
inhibitory G-protein;
 subunits;
inositol
phosphates;
rat astrocytes;
phospholipase C;
adenosine A1
receptor coupling;
RT-PCR;
receptor binding
INTRODUCTION
Cultured astrocytes are known to express adenosine
A1 and A2 receptors (van Calker et al., 1979 ).
In glial cells, adenosine regulates the synthesis of cytokines and
prostaglandins (Fiebich et al., 1996a ,b ) and has effects on glial cell
proliferation (Ayane et al., 1989 ; Gebicke-Härter et al., 1996 ).
Although A1 and A2 subtypes were distinguished
originally by their differential effects on adenylyl cyclase (van
Calker et al., 1978b , 1979 ), more recent findings have revealed
coupling of adenosine receptors to other signal transduction systems,
including phospholipase C (PLC) (for review, see Fredholm et al., 1994 ;
Williams, 1995 ). Activation of PLC leads to the formation of inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol (Berridge, 1993 ). PLC
isoenzymes are target enzymes for subunits from the
Gq-protein family (Lee et al., 1992 ). However, PLC
isozymes also can be activated by G-protein  subunits (Sternweiss
and Smrcka, 1992 ; Wu et al., 1993 ). Although  subunits have long
been thought to play only a passive role and serve essentially as a
membrane anchor for subunits, it has become obvious that they are
involved actively in a number of signal transduction events (for
review, see Sternweiss, 1994 ; Müller and Lohse, 1995 ). However,
higher concentrations of  subunits than subunits are required
to activate PLC or other target enzymes, i.e., the affinity of subunits for their target enzymes is much higher (10- to 100-fold) than
those of  subunits (Birnbaumer, 1992 ; Park et al., 1993 ;
Sternweiss, 1994 ; Bygrave and Roberts, 1995 ; Müller and Lohse,
1995 ).
Very often the coupling of adenosine A1 receptors to PLC
is synergistic, with the stimulation evoked by other receptors like 1 adrenergic receptors (El-Etr et al., 1989 ; Biber et
al., 1996 ), histamine H1 receptors (Dickenson and Hill,
1993 ), muscarinic receptors (Biden and Browne, 1993 ), or thyrotropin
receptors (Okajima et al., 1995 ). There are, however, also reports
suggesting direct activation of PLC by adenosine A1
receptors (Gerwins and Fredholm, 1992b ; Freund et al., 1994 ). Two
alternative mechanisms have been put forward to explain the stimulatory
action of adenosine A1 receptors on PLC : the synergistic
effect of A1 receptor agonists in primary astrocyte
cultures from embryonic mouse striatum (El-Etr et al., 1989 ) was
hypothesized to be caused by an adenosine A1 receptor-mediated inhibition of astrocytic glutamate uptake and subsequent increase of extracellular glutamate, resulting in
stimulation of inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation via metabotropic
glutamate receptors (El-Etr et al., 1992 ). On the other hand, effects
of A1 receptor agonists in various cell lines may be
mediated by  subunits of Gi-proteins (Akbar et al.,
1994 ; Freund et al., 1994 ).
In this study the potentiation of PLC activation via A1
receptors after stimulation of 1 adrenergic receptors
was investigated in cultured astrocytes derived from distinct regions
of the rat brain. In contrast to the mechanism postulated for mouse
astrocytes, the effect in rat astrocytes was unrelated to an increase
of extracellular glutamate. Our data support the hypothesis of a 
subunit-mediated PLC activation and, furthermore, give evidence that
coupling of adenosine A1 receptors to PLC and/or adenylyl
cyclase is determined by the expression level of the receptor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Reagents were purchased from the following sources:
cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), phenylephrine (PE), glutamate,
8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX),
L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarbolic acid (PDC),
pertussis toxin (PTX), mastoparan, and isoproterenol from Research
Biochemicals (RBI, Natick, MA); cyclic AMP-RIA Kit from Immuno
Biological Laboratories (IBL); and [3H]glutamate
from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (ARC, St. Louis, MO); all were
distributed by Biotrend (Köln, Germany). DMEM and glutamate-pyruvate-transaminase (GPT) were obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany), fetal calf serum and
[3H]DPCPX from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim,
Germany), scintillation fluid (Rotiszint Ecoplus) from Roth (Karlsruhe,
Germany), Dowex anion exchanger (Formiate Form AG 1 × 8) from
Bio-Rad (München, Germany),
[3H]-myo-inositol from Amersham-Buchler
(Braunschweig, Germany), and Moloney-murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptase (M-MLV RT) and 0.1 M DTT from Life
Technologies (Eggenstein, Germany). RNase inhibitor, 5× RT buffer,
10× PCR buffer, and Taq polymerase were obtained from
Pharmacia (Freiburg, Germany).
Cell cultures
Astrocyte cultures were established as described previously
(Gebicke-Härter et al., 1989 ). In brief, rat brains were
dissected out of newborn Wistar rat pups (<1 d), and various regions
(cortex, hippocampus, striatum, tegmentum, thalamus, and cerebellum)
were isolated. Brain tissues were dissociated gently by trituration in
Dulbecco's PBS and filtered through a cell strainer (70 µm ,
Falcon, Oxnard, CA) into DMEM. After two washing steps (200 × g for 10 min), cells were seeded into 24-well dishes
(Falcon; 5 × 105 cells/well) or 6-well dishes
(Falcon; 2 × 106 cells/well) for second
messenger determination and glutamate uptake experiments or RNA
extraction, respectively. For preparation of membranes, cells were
grown in single dishes (Falcon, 10 cm ) (8 × 106 cells/dish). Cultures were maintained for 4 weeks in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum with 0.01% penicillin
and 0.01% streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere (5%
CO2) at 37°C. Culture medium was changed on the
second day after preparation and every 6 d thereafter.
Cyclic AMP determination
Four-week-old cultures were washed three times with 500 µl of
incubation buffer containing (in mM): 118 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 3 CaCl, 1.2 MgSO4, 1.2 KH2PO4, 0.5 EDTA, 10 glucose, and 20 HEPES, pH 7.4. Then cells were stimulated at 37°C in the same buffer
with the receptor agonist isoproterenol (1 µM) in the
presence or absence of CPA. After 10 min, the buffer was removed and
the reaction stopped by the addition of 400 µl of ice-cold ethanol
(70%). Dishes were incubated on ice for 30 min, and the supernatants
were harvested. For each sample 10 µl was dried in a speed vac
centrifuge (Bachhofer, Reutlingen, Germany) and redissolved in 500 µl
of sample buffer (cAMP-RIA Kit, IBL). Cyclic AMP levels were determined
according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Inositol phosphate determination
Four-week-old cultures were labeled for 24 hr with 1 µCi
[3H]-myo-inositol in 250 µl of
culture medium. After three washings with 500 µl of incubation
buffer, cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C in the same buffer
supplemented with 10 mM LiCl and stimulated for 20 min with
the 1 receptor agonist phenylephrine (100 µM) in the presence or absence of CPA. The reaction was
stopped by the addition of ice-cold TCA (100% w/v) up to a final
concentration of 10% TCA. Dishes were incubated on ice for 30 min.
Separation of inositol phosphates was performed on Dowex anion exchange
columns (Formiate Form AG 1 × 8) as described previously (van
Calker et al., 1987 ). In brief, TCA was extracted with diethylether (3 times), and samples were neutralized to pH 7 with 5 mM
disodium tetraborate. Samples were loaded on Dowex columns and after
two washing steps (10 ml water; 10 ml of 50 mM disodium
tetraborate/60 mM ammonium formate), inositol phosphates
were eluted with 2 ml of 1 M ammonium formate and 0.1 M formic acid. Samples were mixed with 6 ml of liquid
scintillation fluid and counted. Determinations were performed in
triplicate.
Determination of glutamate uptake
Four-week-old cultures were incubated for 1 hr in serum-free
DMEM without glutamine. Then cells were washed twice with 500 µl of
incubation buffer and maintained at 37°C for 15 min in the same
buffer supplemented with 10 mM LiCl in the presence or
absence of PDC. Glutamate uptake was initiated by the addition of a
10-fold concentrated glutamate solution (final concentration 100 µM) containing [3H]glutamate (0.05 µCi/well) in the presence or absence of PE and/or CPA. The reaction
was terminated after 20 min by the addition of 1 ml of ice-cold
incubation buffer, followed by two washing steps within 30 sec. Cells
were lysed in 0.5 M NaOH and 0.1% Triton X-100 (500 µl/well); [3H]glutamate uptake was determined by
liquid scintillation counting. Determinations were performed in
triplicate.
mRNA extraction
Cells were lysed in guanidinium isothiocyanate/mercaptoethanol
(GTC) solution (250 µl/well). Two samples were pooled, and total RNA
was extracted according to Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987) .
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Reverse transcription. Total RNA (1 µg) was
transcribed into cDNA in a final volume of 25 µl containing 0.5 µl
of M-MLV RT (Life Technologies), 0.5 µl of RNase inhibitor
(Pharmacia), 1 µl of random hexamers (2.5 nM), 9 µl of
H2O, 5 µl of 5× buffer (Pharmacia), 4 µl of DTT (0.1 M), and 5 µl of deoxynucleosidetriphosphates (dNTPs) (2.5 mM). After 10 min of incubation at 30°C and 60 min at
42°C, the reaction was stopped by heating at 95° for 5 min. Potential contaminations by genomic DNA were checked for by running the
reactions without RT and using S12 primers in subsequent PCR amplifications. Only RNA samples that showed no bands after that procedure were used for further investigations.
Polymerase chain reaction. For PCR amplifications, the
following reagents were added to 1 µl of the RT reaction: 4 µl of
25 mM MgCl, 5 µl of 10× PCR buffer (Pharmacia), 4 µl
of 10 mM dNTPs, 35 µl of H2O, 0. 5 µl of
each primer, and 0.125 µl of Taq polymerase (Pharmacia). PCR conditions were as follows: 1 min denaturation at
94°C, 1 min primer annealing, and 1.5 min amplification at 72°C.
PCR was terminated by an incubation at 72°C for 7 min.
Sequences of oligonucleotide primer pairs and PCR conditions were
as follows: adenosine A1 receptor (Mahan et al., 1991 ), number 55 5 -ATTG-CCTTGGTCTCTGTGC and number 690 5 -CAGCTCCTTCCCGTAG-TAC, annealing temperature 59°C for 35 cycles. S12 ribosomal protein (Ayane et al., 1989 ), number 49 5 -ACGTCAACACTGCTCTACA and number 360 5 -CTTTGCCATAGTCCTTAAC, annealing
temperature 56°C for 29 cycles. The plateau phase of the PCR reaction
was not reached under these PCR conditions.
Quantification of PCR products. Amplified cDNAs were
separated on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels and analyzed by a gel imaging system (One-DeScan; MWG Biotech, München, Germany). Arbitrary units of adenosine A1 receptor mRNA were
correlated to arbitrary units of S12 mRNA (= 100%) of the same sample.
Results are given as mean ± SD from nine RNA probes, which were
obtained from three independent cell preparations with three
independent RNA extractions each.
Preparation of membranes
Preparation of membranes from cells was based on a protocol for
membrane preparation from various tissues as described by Lohse et al.
(1987) . Cells from five dishes were harvested in 2 ml of ice-cold lysis
buffer (5 mM Tris and 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and
homogenized (2 × 15 sec) with an Ultraturrax. The homogenate was
centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 × g (4°C), and the
resulting supernatant was spun for 40 min at 50,000 × g (4°C). The membrane pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
80°C. Protein concentration was determined with a Bradford method
(Bio-Rad).
Saturation experiments
The saturation experiments with [3H]DPCPX
as described by Lohse et al. (1987) were adopted to a 96-well
microplate format. Membranes (35-45 µg of membrane protein) from
astrocyte cultures derived from different brain areas were incubated in
a total volume of 200 µl in 96-well microplates with filter bottoms
(Millipore filtration system MultiScreen MAFC, Bedford, MA). The assay
buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4) contained seven different
radioligand concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 4 nM.
Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 100 µM (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA). Samples were incubated at room temperature, and the
reaction was terminated after 3 hr by filtration through the filter
bottom of the wells. Filters were washed four times with 250 µl of
assay buffer, and the microplates were dried at 40°C for 30 min. Then 20 µl of liquid scintillation fluid was added to each well, and the
plates were counted in a microplate counter (Wallac Microbeta, Turku, Finland).
RESULTS
Effects of adenosine A1 receptor activation on
agonist-induced IP formation and cyclic AMP production in astrocytes
cultured from various brain areas
Depending on the brain region from which the astrocyte cultures
were prepared, stimulation with the 1 adrenergic agonist PE increased the formation of IPs 1.5- to threefold (Fig.
1a). As reported recently for hippocampal
astrocytes (Biber et al., 1996 ), this IP formation was potentiated in
some but not all astrocyte cultures by costimulation of adenosine
A1 receptors with agonists like CPA (Fig. 1a,b)
and (R)-PIA (data not shown), which had no effects on
their own. This effect was antagonized (rightward shift of the
concentration-response curve) by 100 nM DPCPX (data not shown), as already reported for hippocampal astrocyte cultures (Biber
et al., 1996 ).
Fig. 1.
a, Effect of CPA on
phenylephrine-stimulated IP formation. Primary astrocyte cultures were
established from various brain regions and stimulated with 100 µM PE ± 1 µM CPA. IP control levels (100%) in unstimulated cells ranged from 1060 ± 70 to 2200 ± 180 cpm, depending on the brain region. Shown is the increase caused by the addition of PE ± CPA. CPA alone had no effect (IP levels between 1130 ± 83 and 2310 ± 210 cpm, depending on the
brain region). Data given are mean ± SD. b,
Comparison of the potentiating effect of CPA in astrocytes from
different brain regions. The formation of inositol phosphates induced
by 100 µM phenylephrine (100%) ranged from 2300 ± 180 to 4880 ± 640 cpm. The columns indicate the
relative increase over the phenylephrine effect caused by 100 nM CPA. Data given are mean ± SD.  ,
Significantly higher as compared with striatum, cerebellum, or whole
brain; p < 0.01 (Student's t
test). st, Striatum (n = 12);
co, cortex (n = 12); hi, hippocampus (n = 12);
th, thalamus (n = 6);
te, tegmentum (n = 4);
ce, cerebellum (n = 4);
wb, whole brain (n = 7).
n, Number of experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]
Potentiating effects of A1 receptor agonists were found in
cultures from hippocampus, cortex, thalamus, tegmentum, and whole brain. No potentiation was found in cultures from striatum and cerebellum (Fig. 1a,b). The maximal potentiating effect of 1 µM CPA was in the same order of magnitude (approximately
twofold) in cultures from cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and tegmentum, whereas cultures from whole brain exhibited less pronounced
potentiation (~1.4-fold) (Fig. 1b). Moreover, we found
EC50 values for the potentiating effect of CPA of ~100
nM (exemplified for cortical cultures in Fig.
2a) in cultures from hippocampus,
cortex, thalamus, and tegmentum but a five- to 10-fold higher
EC50 value for the potentiating effect of CPA in cultures
from whole brain (data not shown).
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the concentration-response curves
of CPA (a) of the potentiation of PE-induced IP
accumulation and (b) of the inhibitory effect on the
isoproterenol-induced cyclic AMP formation in astrocyte cultures from
rat cortex. Data are given as a percentage of (a) effect
of PE (100 µM; 2960 ± 240 cpm = 100%) and
(b) effect of isoproterenol (1 µM; 52 ± 8 pmol/well = 100%). Values are mean of three independent
experiments ± SD.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
However, these regional differences were not found when the inhibitory
effect of adenosine A1 receptors on the formation of cyclic
AMP was measured. Inhibition of cyclic AMP production was measured in
astrocyte cultures in which receptor-mediated stimulation of
adenylyl cyclase was induced by isoproterenol (1 µM). The
extent of this stimulation was comparable in astrocytes from all brain areas. The resulting cyclic AMP accumulation was inhibited by the
adenosine A1 receptor agonist CPA (Fig.
2b). This inhibitory effect of CPA was antagonized
(rightward shift of the concentration-response curve) by the
A1 selective antagonist DPCPX (100 nM; data not shown), indicating the involvement of an adenosine A1
receptor as already shown by van Calker et al. (1978a ,b , 1979). Figure 2b exemplifies for cortical astrocytes that the
IC50 value for CPA was ~10 nM and that a
maximal inhibitory effect was achieved at a concentration of 100 nM CPA. Higher concentrations of CPA did not increase
further the inhibitory action of CPA. Similar concentration-response
curves for CPA were found in cell cultures prepared from the other
brain regions, with maximal inhibitory effects of 40-70% at a
concentration of 100 nM CPA (Table 1).
Table 1.
Inhibitory effect of 100 nM CPA on the
isoproterenol (1 µM)-induced synthesis of cyclic AMP in
astrocyte cultures from various brain
regions
| Striatum |
Cortex |
Hippocampus |
Thalamus |
Tegmentum |
Cerebellum |
Whole
brain |
|
| 45 ± 12 |
57 ± 10 |
51 ± 8 |
64
± 15 |
54 ± 12 |
42 ± 15 |
43 ± 12 |
|
|
Control levels of cyclic AMP in unstimulated cells, 0.5 ± 0.4 pmol cyclic AMP/well; CPA (100 nM), 0.6 ± 0.4 pmol cyclic
AMP/well; isoproterenol (1 µM), from 48 ± 13 to 65 ± 14 pmol cyclic AMP/well (= 100%), depending on the brain region. Data are
given as the percentage of maximal stimulation by isoproterenol and as
mean of three independent experiments ± SD.
|
|
Influence of extracellular glutamate and inhibition of glutamate
uptake on the potentiating effect of CPA
To identify a potential role of glutamate in the
adenosine-mediated potentiation of IP response, we tested the effect of
extracellular glutamate, the effects of its degradation with GPT, and
the effects of the inhibition of glutamate uptake by the selective
uptake inhibitor PDC (1 mM). Stimulation of tegmental
cultures with glutamate (100 µM) led only to a very small
accumulation of IPs of ~20% over basal level, and costimulation with
PE and glutamate did not induce a comparable IP accumulation as was
found after costimulation of PE and CPA (Fig. 3).
Similar results were obtained when these experiments were performed in
the presence of 1 mM PDC to inactivate the astrocytic
glutamate uptake system (data not shown). Pronounced IP accumulation in
response to glutamate was found in other cultures, including those that
did not show any potentiating effect with CPA (data not shown).
Moreover, degradation of extracellular glutamate and inhibition of
glutamate uptake had no effect on the potentiating effect of CPA (Fig.
3). Exemplified for tegmental cultures (Fig. 3), similar results were
found in cultures from cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus.
Fig. 3.
Effect of glutamate (GLU)
(100 µM) on IP levels of unstimulated cells
(control) and PE-stimulated (100 µM) cells, and effect of GPT (10 U/ml) and PDC (1 mM) on the potentiating effect of CPA (100 nM)
of the PE-induced formation of inositol phosphates in cultures from
tegmentum. Experiments with glutamate were performed in the presence of
1 mM PDC to avoid the uptake of glutamate. Basal level of
unstimulated cells (control), 1651 ± 14 cpm = 100%. The effect of PE (2641 ± 32 cpm) was unaffected
by treatment with GPT (2635 ± 51 cpm) or PDC (2689 ± 86 cpm). GPT was used in the presence of 1 mM pyruvate
(O'Brien and Fischbach, 1986 ; El-Etr et al., 1992 ). Similar results
with GPT and PDC were obtained in all cultures with potentiating
effect. Values are given as mean ± SD from three independent
experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
Effect of PE, CPA, and PDC on glutamate uptake in astrocyte
cultures from tegmentum
Incubation with glutamate for 20 min led to a pronounced glutamate
uptake into astrocytes cultured from rat tegmentum. Neither PE nor CPA
nor the combination of both compounds affected glutamate uptake (Table
2), but glutamate uptake was inhibited effectively by
PDC (Table 2).
Table 2.
Effects of PE, CPA, and PDC on glutamate uptake in
astrocytes from tegmentum
| PE (100 µM) |
CPA (100 nM) |
PE + CPA |
PDC (1 mM) |
|
| 98
± 6 |
94 ± 8 |
90 ± 4 |
18 ± 4 |
|
|
Glutamate uptake was determined in incubation buffer supplemented
with 10 mM LiCl in the presence or absence of PDC. Reaction was initiated by addition of a glutamate solution containing
[3H]glutamate and stopped after 20 min (for details, see
Material and Methods). Data are percentages of glutamate uptake from
unstimulated cells (4230 ± 370 cpm = 100%) and given as mean ± SD
from three independent experiments.
|
|
Influence of PTX and mastoparan on IP formation in
astrocyte cultures from various brain regions
To elucidate the role of Gi/o-proteins in the
CPA-induced potentiation of IP production, we performed experiments
with pertussis toxin and mastoparan. Pertussis toxin (400 ng/ml for 18 hr), which inhibits the action of Gi/o-proteins, completely
abolished the potentiating effect of CPA (1 µM), whereas
the PE-induced (100 µM) IP formation was unaffected (Fig.
4). Mastoparan activates Gi/o-proteins in a
manner comparable to receptor-mediated activation (Higashijima et al.,
1990 ). Stimulation of astrocyte cultures with mastoparan (1 mM) for 1 hr led to an approximately fourfold increased
accumulation of IPs, as compared with controls. This mastoparan-induced
IP formation was of similar magnitude in all cultures, independent of
the brain region from which the astrocytes had been cultured, as
exemplified in Figure 4 for cultures that show (tegmentum) and do not
show (striatum) a potentiating effect of CPA.
Fig. 4.
Effect of inhibition and activation of
Gi/o-proteins by PTX (400 ng/ml) and mastoparan (1 mM) in cultures from tegmentum and striatum. CPA-induced (1 µM) potentiation of PE-stimulated (100 µM)
IP accumulation in cultures from tegmentum was abolished completely by
PTX treatment. Similar results were obtained in cultures from cortex,
hippocampus, and thalamus. Stimulation with mastoparan induced a
comparable IP accumulation of approximately fourfold, as compared with
controls in cultures from tegmentum and striatum. Similar results were
found in all other culture types. Control levels of unstimulated cells
(1367 ± 112 cpm for tegmental cultures, 1429 ± 156 cpm for
striatal cultures = 100%) and PE-induced IP accumulation in
tegmental cultures were not affected by PTX treatment. Values are given
as mean ± SD from three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]
Expression of adenosine A1 receptor mRNA in
astrocyte cultures from various brain areas
Adenosine A1 receptor mRNA in astrocyte cultures was
examined by RT-PCR, using primers specific for rat adenosine
A1 receptor cDNA (Mahan et al., 1991 ) and S12 cDNA as
internal standards (Appel et al., 1995 ). Adenosine A1
receptor mRNA was present in astrocyte cultures from all brain regions
(Fig. 5a). The levels of adenosine A1 receptor mRNA, however, differed substantially among the
brain areas examined (Fig. 5a). mRNA concentrations were
markedly higher in cultures from hippocampus, cortex, thalamus, and
tegmentum (Fig. 5b). Low expression of adenosine
A1 receptor mRNA was found in cultures from striatum,
cerebellum, and whole brain (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 5.
Semiquantitative determination of A1
receptor mRNA expression in astrocytes cultured from different brain
regions. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed, and receptor cDNAs were
quantified by the use of ribosomal protein S12 cDNA as the internal
standard (for details, see Materials and Methods). a,
RT-PCR products using adenosine A1 receptor primers
(top panel) or primers for S12 (bottom panel). RNA was prepared from astrocyte cultures derived
from striatum (st), cortex (co),
hippocampus (hi), thalamus (th),
tegmentum (te), cerebellum (ce), and
whole brain (wb). The bright band in marker lanes is 800 bp. b, Shown is adenosine
A1 receptor cDNA quantified with a gel analytics program.
Arbitrary units of adenosine A1 cDNA were normalized to S12
cDNA (= 100%). st, Striatum; co, cortex;
hi, hippocampus; th, thalamus;
te, tegmentum; ce, cerebellum; wb, whole brain. Values are given as mean of nine
experiments ± SD. , p < 0.05;  ,
p < 0.01; significantly higher as compared with
striatum, cerebellum, or whole brain (Student's t
test).
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
[3H]DPCPX binding in membranes from astrocyte
cultures from various brain areas
Saturation experiments with the specific A1 receptor
radioligand [3H]DPCPX (Lohse et al., 1987 ) to
membranes derived from primary astrocyte cultures from various brain
regions were performed to determine the amount of A1
receptor protein. Specific radioligand binding was found in astrocytic
membranes with kDa values between 0.5 and 1.2 nM,
irrespective of the brain region from which the astrocytes had been
cultured. A binding curve for membranes obtained from thalamic cultures
is shown exemplarily in Figure 6. Computer analysis of
this experiment yielded a kDa value of 0.8 nM and a
Bmax value of 28 fmol/mg.
Bmax values (~25 fmol/mg) measured in
membranes obtained from cultures with potentiating adenosine A1 receptor effect were significantly higher, as compared
with the Bmax values (~14 fmol/mg) obtained
from whole brain cultures (Fig. 7). Saturation
experiments with membranes derived from striatal and cerebellar
astrocyte cultures revealed only very low receptor numbers near the
detection limit, where reliable determinations were problematic. If any
specific binding was detected, Bmax values were
in the range 5 fmol/mg.
Fig. 6.
Isotherm binding of [3H]DPCPX
to membranes derived from thalamic cultures with total binding ( )
and nonspecific binding ( ), which was defined with 100 µM (R)-PIA. Points
represent the mean of triplicate samples or duplicate samples for total
binding or nonspecific binding, respectively. Computer analysis of this
experiment yielded a kDa value of 0.8 nM and a
Bmax value of 28 fmol/mg. Similar results
were obtained in three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
A1 adenosine receptor density in
membranes prepared from astrocyte cultures derived from different brain
regions. Bmax values were determined in
saturation binding experiments with the antagonist [3H]DPCPX. Astrocytes from cortex
(co), hippocampus (hi), thalamus (th), and tegmentum (te) showed
significantly higher receptor density than membranes from astrocytes
from whole brain (wb). Values are mean of three
experiments ± SEM. , Significantly higher, as compared with
whole brain; p < 0.05, Student's t
test. In astrocytes from striatum (st) and cerebellum
(ce) only very low receptor numbers near the detection
limit (Bmax values 5 fmol/mg) were found. Thus, a reliable determination of these values was not feasible.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
Effect of chronic treatment of cultures from cerebellum with the
A1 receptor antagonist carbamazepine
Chronic treatment with A1 receptor antagonists
like theophylline (Lupica et al., 1991 ) and carbamazepine (Marangos et
al., 1987 ) is known to upregulate the number of receptors in brain. Upregulation of A1 receptors with carbamazepine (50 µM) leads to an A1 receptor-mediated
potentiation of IP accumulation in cerebellar cultures, which did not
exhibit this effect before (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effect of chronic carbamazepine (50 µM)
treatment on the potentiating effect in cultures from
cerebellum
|
Cerebellar cultures |
Cerebellar
cultures + carbamazepine (50 µM) |
|
| PE + CPA (1 µM) |
120 ± 15 |
158 ± 22 |
| PE + CPA (10 µM) |
117 ± 18 |
210 ± 28 |
|
|
Data are given as percentage (mean ± SD) of the effect of PE
(100 µM) (4590 ± 367 cpm for untreated cultures and 4476 ± 218 cpm for carbamazepine-treated cultures = 100%). Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.
|
|
DISCUSSION
Adenosine caused a pronounced potentiation of PE-mediated IP
accumulation in most astrocyte cultures established from different parts of the rat brain (cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and tegmentum). This effect is mediated by adenosine A1 receptors, as has
been shown previously for hippocampal astrocyte cultures (Biber et al.,
1996 ). The extent of the adenosine-mediated poten- tiation in hippocampal, cortical, thalamic, and tegmental cultures was of
similar magnitude (approximately twofold), whereas astrocytes cultivated from other brain regions or from total brain showed no or
little synergistic effects on A1 receptor activation.
Because CPA alone had no effect on IP accumulation and astrocyte
cultures from cerebellum showed the most pronounced IP accumulation on PE stimulation but no potentiation by A1 adenosinergic
costimulation, it is concluded that IP formation induced by PE is
necessary but not sufficient for an A1 receptor-mediated
increase in IP accumulation. It is not clear why A1
receptor-mediated activation of PLC very often occurs synergistically
with other receptors. In DDT1 MF-2 smooth muscle cells an
increase in intracellular calcium is required for the adenosine-induced
potentiation of IP formation, which has led to the speculation that
this elevated intracellular calcium enables the manifestation of an
otherwise latent A1 receptor-stimulated pathway (Schachter
et al., 1992 ).
In mouse astrocytes it was shown that glutamate is implicated in
activation of PLC by adenosine. In our hands, no evidence points to a
role of extracellular glutamate for the potentiating effect of
adenosine. Enzymatic degradation of extracellular glutamate or
inhibition of glutamate uptake had no effect on IP accumulation induced
by CPA. In addition, cultures from tegmentum showed no significant
potentiation of PE-induced IP accumulation by 100 µM
glutamate even in the presence of the glutamate uptake inhibitor PDC.
However, a pronounced synergistic effect on costimulation with PE and 1 µM CPA was observed in these cultures. On the other hand,
we found marked glutamate-induced IP accumulation in cultures from
other brain regions (e.g., striatum), which did not correlate with
A1 receptor-induced potentiation (our unpublished results). Moreover, results from glutamate uptake experiments indicate that CPA
did not inhibit astrocytic glutamate uptake in these cultures. It is,
therefore, concluded that an increase in extracellular glutamate is not
responsible for the adenosine A1 receptor-induced potentiation of IP formation in primary astrocyte cultures from rat
brain. It is known that adenosine effects on the IP system in the same
brain region may differ from one species to another (Alexander et al.,
1989 ) and that astrocytes cultivated from embryonic or neonatal brain
may exhibit differences in the expression of a variety of receptors
(Hans-son, 1990). Such differences may explain the results on
adenosine-mediated PLC stimulation revealed in astrocyte cultures from
mouse and rat brain.
Like others (El-Etr et al., 1992 ; Dickenson and Hill, 1993 ; Akbar et
al., 1994 ; Freund et al., 1994 ), we found that PTX completely abolished
A1 receptor potentiation of PLC activity, confirming an
active role of Gi/o-proteins in this process. There is no
evidence that subunits of Gi/o-proteins have any
effects on PLC (Neer, 1995 ), but it is widely accepted that 
subunits are the signal transducers for the PTX-sensitive PLC
stimulation mediated by Gi/o-proteins (Zhu and Birnbaumer,
1996 ). Hence, the adenosinergic potentiation of IP formation in rat
astrocyte cultures most probably is attributable to an activation of
PLC through  subunits. This contention is supported by the
following findings.
Saturation experiments with the specific A1 receptor
radioligand [3H]DPCPX revealed different levels of
receptor in cells of different origin. These radioligand binding data
correlated with receptor mRNA levels indicating that the content of
A1 receptor protein corresponds with the expression of
A1 receptor mRNA. Stimulation of adenosine A1
receptors resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of cyclic
AMP production with an IC50 value of ~10 nM
CPA and a maximal inhibition of ~50% at 100 nM CPA in
astrocytes derived from all brain regions, irrespective of the level of
mRNA and A1 receptor protein. In contrast, the potentiating
effect on PLC was found only in cultures with higher levels of
adenosine A1 receptors. In addition, CPA concentrations for
EC50 values (~100 nM) and maximal
potentiating effect (at 1 µM CPA) were 10-fold higher
than those for inhibition of cyclic AMP production, suggesting that the
coupling of adenosine A1 receptors to adenylyl cyclase is
more efficient than their coupling to PLC .
These observations strongly suggest that the potentiation of IP
accumulation is a G -mediated effect. Indeed, the affinity of
 subunits for their target enzymes is much lower (10-100 fold),
as compared with subunits (Birnbaumer, 1992 ; Park et al., 1993 ;
Sternweiss, 1994 ; Müller and Lohse, 1995 ). Thus, more 
subunits are necessary to activate PLC than subunits to inhibit
adenylyl cyclase. Additional experiments with mastoparan, the
Gi/o-protein-activating peptide, verified that
 -mediated PLC activation occurs with approximately similar
efficacy in astrocyte cultures from all brain regions. This documents
that in all cell types sufficient Gi/o-protein is available
to release  subunits for a substantial PLC response.
A compelling explanation for the striking correlation between the
magnitude of the synergistic effect of A1 receptor
activation and the levels of A1 receptor is, therefore,
that at low receptor levels such as in striatal or cerebellar cultures
the extent of release of  subunits is not sufficient for
activation of PLC . However, because of the higher affinity of subunits for their target enzymes, even low levels of A1
receptors appear to be sufficient to mediate an inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase.
Taken together, the data lead us to conclude that the ability of
adenosine A1 receptors to activate PLC and to potentiate the formation of IPs is determined by the expression level of the
receptor in the cell. This conclusion is in accordance with results
obtained in other systems: M2 muscarinic receptors
expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells inhibited adenylyl
cyclase and stimulated PLC, and both effects were PTX-sensitive.
However, the inhibitory action on adenylyl cyclase was independent of
the receptor level, whereas the stimulatory action on PLC depended on
increased expression of the receptor in the cell (Ashkenazi et al.,
1987 ). DDT1 MF-2 cells, which show an A1
agonist-mediated potentiation of bradykinin-evoked (Gerwins and
Fredholm, 1992a ) and ATP-evoked (Gerwins and Fredholm, 1992b ) IP
accumulation, have high levels of adenosine A1 receptors
(Gerwins and Fredholm, 1991 ). In these cells the coupling of
A1 receptors to PLC was less efficient than the inhibitory
coupling of A1 receptors to adenylyl cyclase (Gerwins and
Fredholm, 1991 , 1992a) . Similarly, efficient inhibitory coupling to
adenylyl cyclase and less efficient potentiation of PLC activity also
was found for A1 receptors transfected into CHO cells
(Freund et al., 1994 ) and for other Gi/o-protein receptors
like 2 adrenergic receptors (Cotecchia et al., 1990 ), serotonin 5-HT1A receptors (Raymond et al., 1992 ), and
D2 dopamine receptors (Vallar et al., 1992 ). In preliminary
experiments we have shown that upregulation of adenosine A1
receptors in cells with very low receptor levels (cerebellum) gives
rise to the potentiating effect seen in other cultures. This
observation supports the notion that alterations of receptor expression
might be an important mechanism for differential regulation of
receptor-mediated signaling to separate effector enzymes.
G-protein  subunits not only stimulate PLC but also can activate
several types of adenylyl cyclases, modify K+ and
Ca2+ channels, and play an important role in
receptor desensitization (for review, see Müller and Lohse,
1995 ). It is, therefore, possible that adenosine A1
receptors via  -mediated signaling could regulate effector systems
other than adenylyl cyclase and that this regulation is determined by
receptor expression. Interestingly, human adenosine A1
receptor mRNA occurs in two splice variants that encode for the same
receptor but differ markedly in their efficacy of translation (Ren and
Stiles, 1994a ,b ). It is tempting to speculate that one reason for this
subtle regulation could be that the amount of A1 receptors
not only determines the intensity of one given signal but also, via
 subunit-mediated signaling, controls the degree of cross-talk to
and desensitization of other signal-transducing systems (Bygrave and
Roberts, 1995 ).
In summary, we have shown that, in primary astrocyte cultures
from neonatal rat brain, A1 receptors couple to two
different signal transduction systems. The A1
receptor-mediated stimulation of PLC is independent of extracellular
glutamate, and, in contrast to coupling of the receptor to adenylyl
cyclase, there is a strict correlation between PLC coupling and the
level of adenosine A1 receptors. It is concluded that
G-protein  subunits are the signal transducers for the
A1 signal to PLC and that the magnitude of this signal is
determined by the expression of the receptor in the cell.
FOOTNOTES
Received Feb. 18, 1997; revised April 11, 1997; accepted April 14, 1997.
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants Ca
115/1-5/2-5 and Ge 486/6-1/9-1. We gratefully acknowledge the valuable
help in statistical calculations by G. Spraul and skillful technical
assistance by C. Adamovic.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Dietrich van Calker,
Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg, Hauptstrasse 5, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
REFERENCES
-
Akbar M,
Okajima F,
Tomura H,
Shimegi S,
Kondo Y
(1994)
A single species of A1 adenosine receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells not only inhibits cAMP accumulation but also stimulates phospholipase C and arachidonic acid release.
Mol Pharmacol
45:1036-1042[Abstract].
-
Alexander SPH,
Kendall DA,
Hill SJ
(1989)
Differences in the adenosine receptors modulating inositol phosphates and cyclic AMP accumulation in mammalian cerebral cortex.
Br J Pharmacol
98:1241-1248[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Appel K,
Buttini M,
Sauter A,
Gebicke-Härter PJ
(1995)
Cloning of rat interleukin-3 receptor
-subunit from cultured microglia and its mRNA expression in vivo.
J Neurosci
15:5800-5809[Abstract]. -
Ashkenazi A,
Winslow JW,
Peralta EG,
Peterson GL,
Schimerlik MI,
Capon DJ,
Ramachandran J
(1987)
An M2 muscarinic receptor subtype coupled to both adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositide turnover.
Science
238:672-675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ayane M,
Nielsen P,
Köhler G
(1989)
Cloning and sequencing of mouse ribosomal protein S12 cDNA.
Nucleic Acids Res
17:6722-6728[Free Full Text].
-
Berridge MJ
(1993)
Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling.
Nature
361:315-325[Medline].
-
Biber K,
Walden J,
Gebicke-Härter PJ,
Berger M,
van Calker D
(1996)
Carbamazepine inhibits the potentiation by adenosine analogues of agonist-induced inositol phosphate formation in hippocampal astrocyte cultures.
Biol Psychiatry
40:563-567[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Biden TJ,
Browne CL
(1993)
Cross-talk between muscarinic- and adenosine-receptor signalling in the regulation of cytosolic free Ca2+ and insulin secretion.
Biochem J
293:721-728.
-
Birnbaumer L
(1992)
Receptor to effector signaling through G-proteins: roles for
 dimers as well as subunits.
Cell
71:1069-1072[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Bygrave FL,
Roberts HR
(1995)
Regulation of cellular calcium through signaling cross-talk involves an intricate interplay between the actions of receptors G-proteins and second messengers.
FASEB J
9:1297-1303[Abstract].
-
Chomczynski P,
Sacchi N
(1987)
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:156-159[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cotecchia S,
Kolbika BK,
Daniel KW,
Nolan RD,
Lapentina EY,
Caron MG,
Lefkowitz RJ,
Regan JW
(1990)
Multiple second messenger pathways of
-adrenergic receptor subtypes expressed in eukaryotic cells.
J Biol Chem
265:63-69[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Dickenson JM,
Hill SJ
(1993)
Adenosine A1-receptor stimulated increases in intracellular calcium in the smooth muscle cell line DDT1 MF-2.
Br J Pharmacol
108:85-92[Web of Science][Medline].
-
El-Etr M,
Cordier J,
Glowinski J,
Premont N
(1989)
A neuroglial cooperativity is required for the potentiation by 2-chloroadenosine of the muscarinic-sensitive phospholipase C in the striatum.
J Neurosci
9:1473-1480[Abstract].
-
El-Etr M,
Marin P,
Tence M,
Delumeau JC,
Cordier J,
Glowinski J,
Premont N
(1992)
2-Chloroadenosine potentiates the
1-adrenergic activation of phospholipase C through a mechanism involving arachidonic acid and glutamate in striatal astrocytes.
J Neurosci
12:1363-1369[Abstract]. -
Fiebich BF,
Biber K,
Gyufko K,
Berger M,
Bauer J,
van Calker D
(1996a)
Adenosine A2b-receptors mediate an increase in interleukin (IL)-6 mRNA and IL-6 protein synthesis in human astroglioma cells.
J Neurochem
66:1426-1431[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Fiebich BF,
Biber K,
Lieb K,
van Calker D,
Berger M,
Bauer J,
Gebicke-Härter P
(1996b)
Cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in rat microglia is induced by adenosine A2a receptors.
Glia
18:152-160[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Fredholm BB,
Abbrachio MP,
Burnstock G,
Daly JW,
Harden KT,
Jacobson KA,
Leff P,
Williams M
(1994)
VI. Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors.
Pharmacol Rev
46:143-156[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Freund S,
Ungerer M,
Lohse MJ
(1994)
A1 adenosine receptors expressed in CHO cells couple to adenylyl cyclase and to phospholipase C.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
350:49-56[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gebicke-Härter PJ,
Bauer J,
Schobert A,
Northoff H
(1989)
Lipopolysaccharide free conditions in primary astrocyte cultures allow growth and isolation of microglial cells.
J Neurosci
9:183-194[Abstract].
-
Gebicke-Härter PJ,
Christoffel F,
Timmer J,
Northoff H,
Berger M,
van Calker D
(1996)
Both adenosine A1 and A2 receptors are required to stimulate microglial proliferation.
Neurochem Int
29:37-42[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gerwins P,
Fredholm BB
(1991)
Glucocorticoid receptor activation leads to up-regulation of adenosine A1 receptors and down-regulation of adenosine A2 responses in DDT1 MF2 smooth muscle cells.
Mol Pharmacol
40:149-155[Abstract].
-
Gerwins P,
Fredholm BB
(1992a)
Stimulation of adenosine A1-receptors and bradykinin receptors which act via different G-proteins synergistically raises inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and intracellular free calcium in DDT1 MF-2 smooth muscle cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:7330-7334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gerwins P,
Fredholm BB
(1992b)
ATP and its metabolite adenosine act synergistically to mobilize intracellular calcium via the formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate in a smooth muscle cell line.
J Biol Chem
267:16081-16087[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hansson E
(1990)
Regional heterogeneity among astrocytes in the central nervous system.
Neurochem Int
16:237-245.
-
Higashijima T,
Burnier J,
Ross E
(1990)
Regulation of Gi and Go by mastoparan-related amphilic peptides and hydrophobic amines.
J Biol Chem
265:14176-14186[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lee CH,
Park D,
Wu D,
Rhee SG,
Simon MI
(1992)
Members of the Gq
subunit gene family activate PLC isozymes.
J Biol Chem
267:16044-16047[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Lohse MJ,
Klotz K-N,
Lindenborn-Fotinos J,
Reddington M,
Schwabe U,
Olsson RA
(1987)
8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX)
a selective high affinity antagonist radioligand for A1 adenosine receptors.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
336:204-210[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Lupica CR,
Berman RF,
Jarvis MF
(1991)
Chronic theophylline treatment increases adenosine A1, but not A2, receptor binding in the rat brain: an autoradiographic study.
Synapse
9:95-102[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mahan LC,
McVittie LD,
Smyk-Randall EM,
Nakata H,
Monsma FJ,
Gerfen CR,
Sibley DR
(1991)
Cloning and expression of an A1 adenosine receptor from rat brain.
Mol Pharmacol
40:1-7[Abstract].
-
Marangos PJ,
Montgomery P,
Weiss SRB,
Patel J,
Post RM
(1987)
Persistent upregulation of brain adenosine receptors in response to chronic carbamazepine treatment.
Clin Neuropharmacol
10:443-448[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Müller S,
Lohse MJ
(1995)
The role of G-protein beta gamma subunits in signal transduction.
Biochem Soc Trans
23:141-148[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Neer EJ
(1995)
Heterotrimeric G-proteins: organizers of transmembrane signals.
Cell
80:249-257[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Brien RJ,
Fischbach GD
(1986)
Modulation of embryonic chick motoneuron glutamate sensitivity by interneurons and agonists.
J Neurosci
6:3290-3296[Abstract].
-
Okajima F,
Tomura H,
Sho K,
Akbar M,
Madjid MA,
Kondo Y
(1995)
Intracellular cross-talk between thyrotropin receptor and A1 adenosine receptor in regulation of phospholipase C and adenylate cyclase in COS-7 cells transfected with their receptor genes.
Biochem J
306:709-715.
-
Park D,
Jhon D-Y,
Lee C,
Lee KH,
Rhee SG
(1993)
Activation of phospholipase C isozymes by G-protein beta gamma subunits.
J Biol Chem
268:4573-4576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Raymond JR,
Albers FJ,
Middleton JP
(1992)
Functional expression of human 5-HT 1A receptors and differential coupling to second messengers in CHO cells.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
346:127-137[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ren H,
Stiles GL
(1994a)
Characterization of human A1 adenosine receptor gene.
J Biol Chem
269:3104-3110[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ren H,
Stiles GL
(1994b)
Post-translational mRNA processing as a mechanism for regulation of human A1 adenosine receptor expression.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:4864-4866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Schachter JB,
Ivins JK,
Pittman RN,
Wolfe BB
(1992)
Competitive regulation of phospholipase C responses by cAMP and calcium.
Mol Pharmacol
41:577-586[Abstract].
-
Sternweiss PC
(1994)
The active role of beta gamma in signal transduction.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
6:198-203[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sternweiss PC,
Smrcka AV
(1992)
Regulation of phospholipase C by G-proteins.
Trends Biochem Sci
17:502-506[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vallar L,
Muca C,
Magni M,
Albert P,
Bunzow J,
Meldolesi J,
Civelli O
(1992)
Differential coupling of dopamine D2 receptors expressed in different cell types.
J Biol Chem
265:10320-10326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
van Calker D,
Müller M,
Hamprecht B
(1978a)
Adrenergic
- and -receptors expressed by the same cell type in primary cultures of perinatal mouse brain.
J Neurochem
30:713-718[Web of Science][Medline]. -
van Calker D,
Müller M,
Hamprecht B
(1978b)
Adenosine inhibits the accumulation of cyclic AMP in cultured brain cells.
Nature
276:839-841[Medline].
-
van Calker D,
Müller M,
Hamprecht B
(1979)
Adenosine regulates via two different types of receptors the accumulation of cyclic AMP in cultured brain cells.
J Neurochem
33:999-1005[Web of Science][Medline].
-
van Calker D,
Assmann K,
Greil W
(1987)
Stimulation by bradykinin, angiotensin II, and carbachol of the accumulation of inositol phosphates in PC-12 pheochromocytoma cells: differential effects of lithium ions on inositol mono- and polyphosphates.
J Neurochem
49:1379-1385[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Williams M
(1995)
Purinoceptors in central nervous system function.
In: Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress (Bloom FE,
Kupfer DJ,
eds), pp 643-655. New York: Raven.
-
Wu D,
Katz A,
Simon MI
(1993)
Activation of PLC
2 by the and  subunits of trimeric GTP-binding proteins.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:5297-5301[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Zhu X,
Birnbaumer L
(1996)
G-protein subunits and the stimulation of phospholipase C by Gs- and Gi-coupled receptors: lack of receptor selectivity of G
and the evidence for a synergistic interaction between G and the subunit of a receptor-activated G-protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:2827-2831[Abstract/Free Full Text].
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Sher, R. Rossler, N. Brouwer, V. Balasubramaniyan, E. Boddeke, and S. Copray
Differentiation of Neural Stem Cells into Oligodendrocytes: Involvement of the Polycomb Group Protein Ezh2
Stem Cells,
November 1, 2008;
26(11):
2875 - 2883.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-W. Liu and X.-B. Gao
Adenosine Inhibits Activity of Hypocretin/Orexin Neurons by the A1 Receptor in the Lateral Hypothalamus: A Possible Sleep-Promoting Effect
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2007;
97(1):
837 - 848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rappert, I. Bechmann, T. Pivneva, J. Mahlo, K. Biber, C. Nolte, A. D. Kovac, C. Gerard, H. W. G. M. Boddeke, R. Nitsch, et al.
CXCR3-Dependent Microglial Recruitment Is Essential for Dendrite Loss after Brain Lesion
J. Neurosci.,
September 29, 2004;
24(39):
8500 - 8509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Oostendorp, M. N. Hylkema, M. Luinge, M. Geerlings, H. Meurs, W. Timens, J. Zaagsma, D. S. Postma, H. W. Boddeke, and K. Biber
Localization and Enhanced mRNA Expression of the Orphan Chemokine Receptor L-CCR in the Lung in a Murine Model of Ovalbumin-induced Airway Inflammation
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
March 1, 2004;
52(3):
401 - 410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Biber, M. W. Zuurman, H. Homan, and H. W. G. M. Boddeke
Expression of L-CCR in HEK 293 cells reveals functional responses to CCL2, CCL5, CCL7, and CCL8
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
August 1, 2003;
74(2):
243 - 251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Hansen, S. Hashimoto, J. Briggs, and J. Schnermann
Attenuated renovascular constrictor responses to angiotensin II in adenosine 1 receptor knockout mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
July 1, 2003;
285(1):
R44 - R49.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Basheer, E. Arrigoni, H. S. Thatte, R. W. Greene, I. S. Ambudkar, and R. W. McCarley
Adenosine Induces Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor-Mediated Mobilization of Intracellular Calcium Stores in Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 2002;
22(17):
7680 - 7686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rappert, K. Biber, C. Nolte, M. Lipp, A. Schubel, B. Lu, N. P. Gerard, C. Gerard, H. W. G. M. Boddeke, and H. Kettenmann
Secondary Lymphoid Tissue Chemokine (CCL21) Activates CXCR3 to Trigger a Cl- Current and Chemotaxis in Murine Microglia
J. Immunol.,
April 1, 2002;
168(7):
3221 - 3226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Q. Ren, D. K. Garrett, M. Syapin, and P. J. Syapin
Differential Fibronectin Expression in Activated C6 Glial Cells Treated with Ethanol
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 13, 2001;
58(6):
1303 - 1309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. C. Chan, J. W. M. Lee, M. K. C. Ho, and Y. H. Wong
Preactivation Permits Subsequent Stimulation of Phospholipase C by Gi-Coupled Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2000;
57(4):
700 - 708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|