 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 15,
Issue of August 1, 1997
pp. 5900-5920
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor
Neural Network Model
Alexei Samsonovich and
Bruce L. McNaughton
Arizona Research Laboratories Division of Neural Systems, Memory
and Aging, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85749
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
A minimal synaptic architecture is proposed for how the brain might
perform path integration by computing the next internal representation
of self-location from the current representation and from the perceived
velocity of motion. In the model, a place-cell assembly called a
"chart" contains a two-dimensional attractor set called an
"attractor map" that can be used to represent coordinates in any
arbitrary environment, once associative binding has occurred between
chart locations and sensory inputs. In hippocampus, there are different
spatial relations among place fields in different environments and
behavioral contexts. Thus, the same units may participate in many
charts, and it is shown that the number of uncorrelated charts that can
be encoded in the same recurrent network is potentially quite large.
According to this theory, the firing of a given place cell is primarily
a cooperative effect of the activity of its neighbors on the currently
active chart. Therefore, it is not particularly useful to think of
place cells as encoding any particular external object or event.
Because of its recurrent connections, hippocampal field CA3 is proposed
as a possible location for this "multichart" architecture; however, other implementations in anatomy would not invalidate the main concepts. The model is implemented numerically both as a network of
integrate-and-fire units and as a "macroscopic" (with respect to
the space of states) description of the system, based on a continuous
approximation defined by a system of stochastic differential equations.
It provides an explanation for a number of hitherto perplexing
observations on hippocampal place fields, including doubling,
vanishing, reshaping in distorted environments, acquiring directionality in a two-goal shuttling task, rapid formation in a novel
environment, and slow rotation after disorientation. The model makes
several new predictions about the expected properties of hippocampal
place cells and other cells of the proposed network.
Key words:
hippocampus;
CA3;
place cells;
head direction;
dead
reckoning;
path integration;
idiothetic;
allocentric;
spatial learning;
cognitive map;
attractor;
integrate-and-fire
INTRODUCTION
It is known from individual and multiple parallel
recordings of single-neuron activity in freely moving rodents that the
dynamics of the rodent hippocampus during active locomotion in a planar maze is essentially two-dimensional in its space of states;
furthermore, it is a two-dimensional model of the animal's motion on
the maze (O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971 ; O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978 ;
Wilson and McNaughton, 1993 ). This statement becomes clear when one
considers a chart, i.e., an abstract plane, on which all
place cells are symbolically represented by units (nodes).
The fact is that there exists an arrangement of units on a chart such
that a typical distribution of neuronal activity over a chart (Fig.
1) is a localized activity packet of an
invariant shape, the center of which, given a certain fixed mapping
from the chart onto the environment, points to the current location of
the rat's head.
Fig. 1.
Activity packet on a chart constructed
from the experimental data of Wilson and McNaughton (1993) . The rat was
randomly foraging for food in a 62 × 62 cm box. Parallel
recordings of ~100 hippocampal cells, 36 of which showed robust
activity, were taken during the running session. The whole population
of recorded place cells is symbolically distributed in the box, each
cell being placed at the center of its place field. In the present
paper, this planar arrangement of place cells is called a
chart. A fuzzy snapshot of a momentary firing rate
distribution over the chart is taken every 50 msec. The rat's position
and orientation are marked on each snapshot, and all of the snapshots
are superimposed so that all rat position marks are aligned at the
center. The resultant average distribution is shown on the figure;
therefore, the plot can be viewed as a typical momentary distribution
of the firing rate over a chart (in allocentric coordinates). Units on
horizontal axes are centimeters. The animal is located at the
center of the square and is moving to the
left and toward the viewer. The total number of P cells
(presumably CA1-CA3 pyramidal cells) in a rat's hippocampus is of the
order of 3 × 105 (Amaral et al., 1990 ). From
empirical studies, for a typical recording environment of ~1
M2, a given P cell has a probability of ~0.3
of having a place field. Thus, the density of units on a typical chart
can be estimated as ~105
M 2. The variance of the distribution shown on
the figure is ~0.15 M, which is consistent with the
observation that ~10 2 of all P cells fire at a
given location. The averaged activity packet seems to have two
"subcomponents." In fact, the real activity packet oscillates
between these "subcomponents" with the theta frequency (Fig.
9C) (also see Skaggs et al., 1995 ) and therefore has
smaller variance. We performed after-processing of the experimental data as described above with various data selection: right turns only
versus left turns only, high velocity versus low velocity, high
acceleration versus low acceleration, etc. The results suggest (within
the error of measurement) that the shape of the activity packet does
not depend on velocity, acceleration, future trajectory of motion, or
theta frequency. This result will be presented in more detail
elsewhere.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]
As experimental data show, the activity packet has the following
dynamical properties. (1) It persists and retains its shape during
active locomotion regardless of motion parameters and regardless of the
stability and immediate availability of sensory cues, e.g., in complete
darkness; (2) under certain conditions, the whole representation,
rather than a fraction of it, can be spontaneously remapped, without
distortion of the intrinsic structure of the chart, and this new
mapping may subsequently persist; (3) on entering a novel environment,
a new chart (i.e., a new spatial code) appears immediately and normally
does not undergo subsequent topographical modifications after
exploration or changes in environmental stimuli; and (4) under
different behavioral conditions, different charts for the same
environment are expressed in the hippocampus, showing uncorrelated
arrangements of common place cells.
In the present paper, the term "spatial" is used in a restricted
sense to refer to location in a plane and does not include yaw. Several
proposals have been made regarding possible explanations of the
spatially selective firing of hippocampal pyramidal cells (Zipser,
1985 ; Muller et al., 1991 , 1996 ; Touretzky et al., 1993 ; Blum and
Abbott, 1995 ; Tsodyks and Sejnowski, 1995 ; Touretzky and Redish, 1996 ).
None of these explanations, however, is consistent with all of the
foregoing facts. To date, there is no satisfactory theory that explains
the full range of observed phenomena; however, the scheme proposed by
McNaughton et al. (1996) seems to be capable of accounting for most of
the existing experimental data. Therefore, the objective of the present
work is to test, through numerical simulations, the plausibility of the
multichart map-based path integrator (MPI) model proposed by McNaughton
et al. (1996) .
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To define the MPI model of the hippocampus, the necessary
concepts must be introduced, and then the components of the MPI scheme
proposed by McNaughton et al. (1996) are identified, the MPI model is
defined, and the numerical procedure is described. Finally, on the
basis of the results of simulations presented in the Results, a reduced
model is defined and its numerical implementation and the simulation
procedure are described.
Basic concepts
Chart concept. A chart is defined here as an
imaginary arrangement of a population of place cells on an abstract
plane, such that when this plane is appropriately mapped onto an
environment, each cell appears to be located at the image of the
absolute maximum of its firing rate distribution. Therefore, the total
activity distribution on the chart appears to be localized around the
image of the animal's head. Moreover, whenever there exists a planar arrangement of cells such that the activity distribution appears to be
focused at a particular location within it, it is called an
active chart.
In the models proposed by Muller et al. (1991 , 1996) and McNaughton et
al. (1996) , a chart is associated with a place-cell assembly. As shown
below, the distribution of activity on an appropriately "wired"
chart is localized regardless of any existing association with an
environment. Therefore, the notion of a chart in this case makes sense
for an isolated network as well, i.e., in the absence of external
input.
In different environments, and even in the same environment under
different behavioral paradigms or other conditions, alternative charts
may be active in which the spatial relations among place fields of the
same place cells may be different. Typically, there are no significant
correlations between the alternative charts for the whole population of
recorded place cells (O'Keefe and Conway, 1978 ; O'Keefe and Nadel,
1978 ; Kubie and Ranck, 1983 ; Muller and Kubie, 1987 ; O'Keefe and
Speakman, 1987 ; Bostock et al., 1991 ; Markus et al., 1994a ).
Attractor map concept. According to the cognitive
map concept (O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978 ), not only do different
firing patterns represent different places, but furthermore the spatial
relationship between places is encoded by the interconnections between
place cells, so that the place cells may fire consistently with each other regardless of the immediate availability of sensory cues, whereas
the orientation of the entire map can be changed and subsequently remembered after reorientation and then removal of controlled cues
(O'Keefe and Speakman, 1987 ). Here consistent firing means the persistence of the active chart, i.e., the same correlations between individual cell activities, as under previous normal
conditions. In other words, the system refers not to a set of
independently stored local views but to a cognitive map of
the environment, wherein the representation of the location is
maintained regardless of external input and updated on the basis of
exteroceptive and idiothetic information (here idiothetic
information means all direct self-motion information, including
vestibular signals, motor efference copy, optic flow, and somatosensory
feedback). This internal map can be constructed from a set of spatial
memory fragments (Worden, 1992 ) or based on an abstract preconfigured model of space (O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978 ). Usually only the latter is
called a cognitive map.
An attractor map concept (cf. Ranck, 1992 ; Tsodyks and Sejnowski, 1995 ;
Samsonovich and McNaughton, 1996 ), which is used in the present paper,
is one possible way to introduce a cognitive map mathematically. An
attractor (Strogatz, 1994 ) is a minimal closed set A in the
space of states of a dynamic system such that (1) any trajectory that
starts in A stays in A, and (2) A attracts all trajectories that start
in an open set containing A (in the present case, this definition makes
precise sense for an isolated network without noise). It follows from
the definition that there is a finite threshold for an external
perturbation to be capable of taking the system out of an
attractor.
An attractor map can be defined as a two-dimensional,
quasicontinuous set of attractors (associated with a particular
environment or not), with the following dynamical property: the
mobility threshold for transitions between neighboring attractors is
negligibly small (tends to zero, with the number of units tending to
infinity) as compared with the finite threshold for jumps between
distant points or outside of the attractor map. Basically this is a
generalization of the one-dimensional continuous attractor
concept (Amari, 1977 ; Amit and Tsodyks, 1991a ,b ; Griniasty et al.,
1993 ; Amit et al., 1994 ; Cugliandolo and Tsodyks, 1994 ). It follows
from the definition that given a network with an attractor map
subjected to subthreshold external perturbations, one may observe an
active chart, as defined above. On the other hand, observation of an
active chart in a particular network does not necessarily imply the
existence of an attractor map in this network: the chart property may
result from two-dimensionally organized input.
Map-based path integration concept. It is clear from
behavioral studies that mammals and many other species possess highly developed path integration capabilities (Mittelstädt and
Mittelstädt, 1980 ; Etienne, 1987 ; Thinus-Blanc et al., 1987;
Müller and Wehner, 1988 ; Maurer and Séguinot, 1995 ; Etienne
et al., 1996 ), and the history of study of path integration goes back
more than 100 years (Darwin, 1873 ).
The planar path integration concept involves (1) selecting a physical
reference frame, implying the reference location, the reference
direction, the metrics, and the clock, and (2) performing integration
of the velocity vector over time in this reference frame to update the
currently represented, or "perceived," coordinates. This implies
two necessary building blocks: an internal representation of the planar
coordinates, maintained independently of immediate exteroceptive
stimuli, and a mechanism of its updating based on idiothetic
information.
According to McNaughton et al. (1991) , the hippocampus (although it
could be another brain system connected to it) works as an inertial
path integrator. In an MPI, the internal representation of
coordinates is based on a cognitive (attractor) map, whereas in a
"naive" path integrator, coordinates are not based on a
map associated with a particular environment, and this implies a
universal (i.e., environment-independent) representation of a
two-dimensional vector. Because an internally updated path integration
mechanism would be prone to cumulative drift error, visual or other
sensory information must be used to correct the representation using
previously learned associations between map coordinates and external
stimuli (McNaughton et al., 1991 ). Similar schemes of a planar path
integrator were proposed by Droulez and Berthoz (1991) and Zhang (1996)
but were not explicitly simulated.
The map-based path integration concept is represented by a possible MPI
scheme of the hippocampal spatial representation system (Fig.
2) (McNaughton et al., 1996 ). It contains the following components: P (an array of place units implementing an attractor map),
V (an external sensory input array), H (an array of head-direction units), H (an array representing the angular velocity of the head), M
(an array representing the speed of motion), R [an array sensitive to
both horizontal head direction (yaw) and the angular velocity], and I
(an array that receives inputs from P, H, and M). The core of the
scheme is the P-I path integrator fragment. The foregoing components
and the model are described below. For a simpler treatment of the path
integration principles in the present scheme, the reader is referred to
McNaughton et al. (1991) and to an earlier proposal based on learning
conditional relationships between locations and movements (McNaughton
et al., 1989 ).
Fig. 2.
Hippocampal path integration system (according to
McNaughton et al., 1996 ). The main components of the system are sensory array (V), array of place cells
(P), array of integrator cells (I), motion cells
(M), and the head direction system;
W stands for synaptic efficacy. The head direction
system (H, R, H ) works according to the scheme of
Figure 3. In particular, head direction cells are weakly affected by
sensory representations in V that correct the activity packet position.
The P-I system involves the two-dimensional array P of place cells and
the three-dimensional array of I cells. Each "layer" of the latter
has asymmetric connections with the P array, with displacement in the
particular direction represented by this layer. The layer associated
with the current head direction is selected by the H array via
WHI connections; the rest of the layers remain
silent. Because of local internal connectivity of the P array, its
activity is self-focused into an activity packet. This activity packet
excites a small region on the selected I layer. When projected backward
onto the P layer, the stimulation appears to be displaced in the
current direction of the head (which is the direction of the animal's motion in this model). As a result, the activity packet moves along the
chart in this direction. Because total activity of the I layer is
modulated by the M system, the magnitude of stimulation and therefore
the speed of the activity packet motion depend on the speed of the
animal's motion represented by the activity level in M. In addition to
this path integration mechanism, the activity packet location is
corrected by sensory information represented by the V array. The latter
can be viewed as a three-dimensional array of cells tuned to different
local views (there is a three-dimensional array of local views in a
stationary environment). Therefore, the displacement of the activity
packet (horizontal arrow in the P
layer) is determined by the sum of three "gaussians" that result from activities in P, I, and V.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]
Identification of components
V. The component referred to as the V
network (Fig. 2) can be identified with sensory association
cortex, which provides high-level representations of the local sensory
information and sends its output to the hippocampus mainly via the
entorhinal cortex and the perforant path. Under normal conditions, a
neocortical representation of multimodal sensory stimuli can be thought
of as a function of the animal's current location x and its
head direction in the horizontal plane (yaw) given by the angle .
This function is presumably smooth. For the sake of parsimony, a
mnemonic mechanism in the sensory system (e.g., imagery) involved in
maintaining the activity of local sensory representations is not
assumed. Therefore, in this oversimplified picture the space of states of the V network is three-dimensional (two spatial coordinates plus the
yaw angle). The term local view is used here as a shorthand for the entire sensory representation that is typically specific for a
particular combination of location and orientation in the environment.
Each local view is associated with a corresponding pattern in the P
network, because of associative learning in the afferent synapses
rather than in the internal P-to-P connections. Different parts of the
environment will typically have separate representations in V, thus
allowing differential binding of the attractor map coordinates to local
cues.
M. The path integration concept implies that the integrator
receives information about self-motion (M). Participation of the motor
system in the dynamics of hippocampal spatial representations is
suggested by the finding that under conditions of movement restraint,
both hippocampal place cells (McNaughton et al., 1983 ; Foster et al.,
1989 ) and thalamic head-direction cells (Knierim et al., 1995 , 1996 )
become virtually silent, even when the animal is passively moved. The
pattern of place fields can be reproduced during passive movement,
however, provided that the animal retains the possibility of
self-motion (Muller et al., 1987 ; Foster et al., 1989 ). Thus, for place
cells to fire, it is sufficient that the animal is free to move its
limbs, even if it does not actually move. Moreover, the firing rates of
virtually all hippocampal neurons are modulated by locomotion (Ranck,
1973 ; Whishaw and Vanderwolf, 1973 ; McNaughton et al., 1983 ; Mizumori
et al., 1990 ), which implies that the hippocampal system has access to
information about self-motion.
I. To perform spatial path integration, it is necessary to
know the speed and direction of motion. In general, hippocampal place
cells are known to be relatively nondirectional in a two-dimensional environment, if the behavior does not involve the following of specific
routes between discrete reinforcement sites (O'Keefe, 1979 ; Muller et
al., 1987 ; Markus et al., 1994b ; Muller et al., 1994 ); however (and
this is very important for the MPI model), some cells in the subiculum,
the presubiculum, and the parasubiculum have been found with spatial
and directional selectivity at the same time (Sharp and Green, 1994 ;
Taube, 1995b ), under conditions in which hippocampal place cells are
nondirectional. According to McNaughton et al. (1996) , they
can be considered as candidates for the integrator cells, or I
cells. A population of such cells would provide a distributed
representation of all possible combinations of head orientation and
location in an environment. Such a representation could be used to
update the activity packet coordinates and must be constructed on the
basis of directional information. This population of cells is referred
to as the I network, which thus could possibly be identified
with the subicular complex, although this would require a more complex
connectional scheme than the simple networks under consideration
here.
H, H , and R. Directional information is represented in the
brain by a population of head-direction cells (H cells), which therefore is likely to be the essential H component of the spatial path
integrating system. An H cell fires at a high rate when the rat's head is oriented in a specific absolute direction in the environment, regardless of either the spatial location or the position
of the head with respect to the body. H cells were first discovered in
the dorsal presubiculum (Ranck, 1984 ; Taube et al., 1990 ). Later, H
cells have been found in the anterior nuclei of the thalamus (Mizumori
and Williams, 1993 ; Taube, 1995a ; Blair and Sharp, 1995 ), the
retrosplenial (posterior cingulate) neocortex (Chen et al., 1994a ,b ),
the striatum (Wiener, 1993 ), and the lateral mammillary nuclei
(Leonhard et al., 1996 ). All of these areas are closely connected with
the hippocampus proper.
Actually, the path integration mechanisms proposed in the present paper
require information about direction of motion rather than head
orientation. Head direction will suffice so long as it remains highly
correlated with movement direction. The possibility remains, however,
that true "direction-of-motion cells" exist but have not been
documented. Such cells could arise from a simple coordinate
transformation such as the one that has been suggested by Andersen and
his colleagues (Andersen et al., 1985 ; Zipser and Andersen, 1988 ) to
occur in the primate parietal cortex and could easily have been
mistaken for H cells in many previous experimental studies.
Knierim et al. (1995) demonstrated experimentally that the origin of
the head direction representation is likely to be based on a path
integration mechanism rather than on immediate conversion of visual
stimuli into H cell firing (cf. Blair and Sharp, 1995 ). A model of such
a head-direction path integration mechanism (Fig. 3) has
been developed by McNaughton and colleagues (McNaughton et al., 1991 ;
Skaggs et al., 1995 ). The model includes a circular array of locally
interconnected H cells, in which an activity bump is stabilized by
intrinsic dynamic mechanisms as an attractor state, and a
two-dimensional array of angular rotation cells (R cells) that force
the activity packet to move in a manner consistent with the head
angular velocity. These R cells are connected to angular velocity cells
H , which presumably represent primarily vestibular information. They
encode the interaction between H and H . Such cells were observed in
parietal cortex by McNaughton et al., (1991) and Chen et al. (1994b) .
More recently, fundamentally similar models, although different in
detail, have been proposed (Blair, 1996 ; Zhang, 1996 ; Redish et al.,
1997 ).
Fig. 3.
Head direction path integration system (according
to McNaughton et al., 1991 ; Skaggs et al., 1995 ). The main components
of the system are head direction cells
(H), "tuned" to allocentric head
directions; angular velocity cells (H ); rotation cells
(R); and the external sensory representation
system (V). Because of local connectivity
of the circular array, H unit activity here is self-localized into an
activity packet centered at unit 1. Given angular velocity represented
by unit 2, unit 3 of the R array becomes activated by units 1 and 2. This results in stimulation of unit 4 and therefore in displacement of
the activity packet in the counterclockwise direction. In another case,
when the activity packet (not shown) is centered at unit 9 in the H
system, and the angular velocity is represented by unit 5, activation
of units 6 and 7 results in clockwise rotation. Excitation of unit 8 stabilizes the activity packet at its current location. Thus, the
activity packet in the H array points to the current direction of the
head. This H array is coupled to the two-dimensional R array arranged on the cylinder according to their connections with H cells, and in
another dimension according to connections to the H cells. The
architecture of the interconnections can be explained as follows: an H
cell sends equal outputs to the slab of R associated with it via
WH R, whereas an H cell sends equal
outputs to its column in R via WHR.
The nonzero WRH connections, also all
of equal strength, are established with different angular displacement
with respect to their counterparts WHR, depending on the slab of their
origin at the R array; namely, this displacement is proportional to the
angular velocity represented by the associated H cell. In addition, H
cells are locally interconnected to each other, with the connectivity
matrix given by Equation 3. This results in formation of a stable
activity packet in the H network, as described in text. Driven by R
cells, the activity packet in the H array moves together with head
rotation, thus performing angular path integration. The inevitable
cumulative error is corrected by representations of visual cues in V. This presumably requires associative learning between visual
representations in V and activity packet locations in H, based on
modification of the V-to-P connections. The space of V representations
is three-dimensional: it has two spatial coordinates
x1 and x2 and the
head direction angle . Only the latter is distinguished by V-to-H
connections. According to the MPI model (Fig. 2), H cells send their
output to the integrator (I)
cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]
Slow rotation of the place-field pattern, which was observed by Knierim
et al. (1995) , can be understood as a result of a weak influence of the
symmetry breaking cue card on the head direction system rather than on
the P network, thus indicating a direct or indirect connection between
the H and P systems.
P. According to the above considerations, the main candidate
for the attractor map as a component of the path integrating system is
the P network, presumably based on the areas CA3, CA1, and dentate
gyrus, with a primary role for CA3 in the origination of the attractor
dynamics. Indeed, neuroanatomical data show that CA3 has multiple,
long-range excitatory internal connections (Amaral and Witter, 1995 )
and therefore has a necessary requirement for the P network; however,
the same architecture could be implemented in other parts of the
hippocampal formation, such as the entorhinal cortex, and in general,
the present model is not intended to provide a strong argument for any
particular anatomical implementation (see Discussion).
It seems natural to extend the principles underlying the head direction
path integration model to two dimensions, taking the locally
interconnected two-dimensional array of P cells as the central element;
however, experimental data indicate that this extension cannot be made
in a straightforward manner (e.g., as was suggested recently by Zhang,
1996 ).
The first problem with a parallel between the spatial and the
head direction system is that preferred directions of H cells typically
have unique relations to each other, even though the absolute direction
selected by an H cell may vary between environments, parts of an
environment, and recording sessions (Ranck, 1984 ; Taube et al., 1990 ;
Knierim et al., 1995 ; Taube and Burton, 1995 ). In contrast, in
different environments, and even in the same environment under
different behavioral paradigms or other conditions, P cells may be
involved in alternative representations in which spatial relations
between their place fields may be different. Typically there are no
clear correlations between the alternative place-field patterns for the
whole population of recorded place cells (O'Keefe and Conway, 1978 ;
O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978 ; Kubie and Ranck, 1983 ; Muller and Kubie,
1987 ; O'Keefe and Speakman, 1987 ; Bostock et al., 1991 ; Markus et al.,
1994a ). Moreover, in a two-goal shuttling task, switching between
representations appears to occur on reaching the goal, making place
fields appear directionally tuned (Barnes et al., 1983 ; O'Keefe and
Recce, 1993 ; Muller et al., 1994 ; Markus et al., 1995 ).
A possible solution to this problem is that the P network may implement
many alternative two-dimensional attractor maps at the same time, and a
typical P cell participates in a number of these implementations, one
of which is selected by the current activity state (McNaughton et al.,
1996 ). Spatial firing properties of a given P cell are thus strongly
dependent on the current distribution of activity over the whole P
network, and strictly speaking it is incorrect to use the term
"tuning curve" for an individual P cell. The problem of multiple
place fields (Muller et al., 1987 ) can be solved by placing P cells
several times on the same chart, which is similar to placing the same P
cell on many charts; however, this more complex scheme is not
considered here.
Would individual attractor maps not be destroyed by interference? What
kind of architecture does this point of view imply? These questions are
examined below. Another problem is that of formation of the attractor
map. In particular, a new chart can become active in the dark (Quirk et
al., 1990 ), when path integration is presumably the only source of
spatial information for the animal. Briefly, for the present purpose,
the prewiring of the multichart attractor map is assumed without
consideration for how this occurs.
Elements and dynamic rules of the MPI model
Elements of the above networks were implemented as model
integrate-and-fire units interconnected by synapses. In such a network, dynamic variables are "spikes" (S), "EPSPs,"
or "voltages" (V), and some of the
synaptic weights (W) that are slow variables. The latter were mostly assumed fixed in the simulations. The network to
which a given variable belongs is marked by a superscript.
The discrete time approximation is used here, with a time bin = 6 msec, which is bigger than the refractory period, close to axonal plus
synaptic delays, and yet smaller than the neuronal integration time
(for review, see Shepherd, 1990 ). Therefore, S can be
treated as an array of Boolean variables. The integration time for
inhibitory interneurons, however, is smaller than for principal cells
(Fox and Ranck, 1981 ; McNaughton and Morris, 1987 ; Mizumori et al.,
1989 ; Shepherd, 1990 ) and is close to the time bin. For this reason,
the approximation of fast inhibition is used, assuming that the amount
of inhibition (uniformly distributed among all units) is adjusted at
every discrete time bin, so that the total number M of
firing units is preserved near the given level, which varies
periodically in time according to the theta rhythm.
There are two ways to achieve this: (1) by adjusting the global
inhibition h at each step to match the total number of
firing units, and (2) by taking h as a function of the total
number of firing units computed at the previous iteration. The latter
is consistent with the idea of hidden inhibitory interneurons and may
permit the model to exhibit theta oscillations naturally; however, the
time bin is too large for the model to be realistic, and it is not the
present goal to study the origin of the theta rhythm. For this reason
the first approach is adopted.
Therefore, the dynamic equations describing an isolated network of
leaky integrate-and-fire units with reciprocal interconnections (e.g.,
P or H component) can be written as:
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
Here i is the unit number, N is the total
number of units in this subnetwork, t is the discrete time,
is the time bin, is the neuronal integration time, W
is the synaptic matrix, and is the Heaviside step function. The
global threshold ht is an implicit
function of the set of variables {V} defined by the
right Equation 2, where M is the given total number of
active units.
Multichart architecture of the P network. Now the multichart
architecture of the P component is introduced. Consider all P cells
distributed on an abstract plane according to the relative locations of
their place-field centers. This arrangement is called a chart; however,
there may be multiple such arrangements of the same P cells that are
uncorrelated and can be used to represent different environments.
Therefore, consider n possible arrangements of the same P
cells. In this model they are random permutations of each other. In
general, a P cell may not be found on some charts. In the present
model, however, it is assumed that each chart is composed of all model
units. To obtain the matrix of internal connections
WPP of the P network, local
interconnections were created on each chart (local in the sense that
weights decay rapidly with distance between units on the chart, rather
than with the anatomical distance), and then the sum over all charts
was taken. The result is a multichart architecture. Although
charts, being defined in terms of firing rate distributions, make sense
without relation to any connectionist model, the structure of the
synaptic matrix is an important feature of the MPI model. It is given
by the formula:
|
(3)
|
where rijk is the distance between units
i and j on the chart k, or infinity,
if at least one of the two units is missing on this chart (also see
Muller et al., 1991 ; Shen and McNaughton, 1996 ), n is the
number of charts, and is a fixed parameter. The resultant
multichart architecture is illustrated by Figure 4.
Fig. 4.
Multichart architecture. A, The set
of n charts, composed of the same P units. Activity that
is well localized on one of the charts (1) looks
scattered on other charts (2, 3, n).
B, C, Two arbitrarily selected charts with some
interconnections between units on them. Local interconnections on chart
B (solid lines) appear to be random
(nonlocal) on chart C; local interconnections on chart C
(dashed lines) are random (nonlocal) on chart
B. Therefore, on a given chart, contributions from other
charts to the synaptic matrix can be treated, approximately, as random
noise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]
Although this model has all-to-all, symmetric, excitatory connections
according to Equation 3, the matrix W can be called sparse
because most of its elements are very close to zero, if L, where L is the chart dimension. Quantities
rijk, , and L have the
dimensionality of distance. The metrics on the chart, which is assumed
for now to be given, is provided by the M system output, as
given by Equations 4 and 8, which specify the relationship between the
"perceived" velocity of self-motion and the velocity of the
activity packet on the chart.
Summary of assumptions of the MPI model. In summary,
the proposed MPI model (Fig. 2) is based on the following basic
assumptions about the hippocampal formation. (1) The architecture of
the P network is preconfigured as a sum of uncorrelated,
quasi-two-dimensional architectures. This is most likely to be the
architecture of internal CA3 connections; however, other
implementations in anatomy would not invalidate the concept. (2) The
primary driving mechanism for the activity packet on a chart is based
on internal dynamics and is attributable to asymmetry in the
connections from I cells to P cells. (3) Activation of I cells is
controlled jointly by representations of the speed of motion (M) and
head direction (H) and by return projections from the P network. (4)
Learning results in selective strengthening of V to P connections. This enables stimulation of the P layer by the V array to determine on which
chart and at which location the activity packet emerges on entry into a
familiar environment. (5) Connections between H and I cells are also
preconfigured and fixed. In other words, each chart has a built-in
compass. Because there is only one chart in the H network, the layered
structure of the I network must be the same for all charts.
It follows from the last assumption that although spatial relations
between place fields of I cells may be different for different environments, relations between their preferred directions must be the
same in all environments and for all representations. This is an
untested prediction of the theory.
Numerical implementation of the MPI model
The MPI model described above has been implemented numerically
on SUN Sparc-20 and Ultra-Spark work stations as a system of networks
of integrate-and-fire units. In the simulations of Figure 9 (see
Results) each layer of the P-I system was composed of
n = 256 × 192 45,000 model neuronal
units distributed in a square lattice on a torus (i.e., a rectangle
with periodic boundary conditions).
Fig. 9.
Simulation results for the integrate-and-fire
model I. Snapshots in all rows except B and
C are taken at a constant phase of the theta rhythm.
A, Self-focusing, formation, and propagation of the
activity packet in a six-chart network. The network consists of P and I
layers. Each pixel on the figure represents a P unit. Each plate
consists of 256 × 192 pixels. Boundary conditions are periodic
for all charts. The four plates A1-A4 show the four
sequential theta cycles that correspond to different stages of
spontaneous self-focusing of activity on the chart 1. Spikes arranged
according to this chart are represented by red; the
background is blue. When the same units are arranged
according to chart 2 (not shown), their spikes appear almost uniformly
scattered and some are grouped into small patches. B,
Simulated phase precession. The self-focused activity packet propagates
to the right; the simulated rat location (same on all 4 plates) is shown by the white arrow. Only one chart is
represented. B1 through B4 correspond to
the four phases of the same theta cycle (0, 90, 180, and 270°). The
center of the distribution clearly oscillates in the direction of
motion, which resembles the phenomenon shown in C.
C, Real phase precession of the activity packet in CA1
reconstructed from experimental data. Color on each plate represents an
average firing rate distribution on a chart, where the momentary rat
location and head direction is shown by the arrow in the
center. High activity is coded by red.
The two ends of the arrow are images of
the two infrared light-emitting diodes attached to the rat's head,
spaced 0.15 m from each other (for details, see Wilson and McNaughton,
1993 ). The average firing rate was computed from spikes that occurred within a narrow phase window with respect to the local EEG theta oscillations. Four consecutive phases were selected. Each plot was
constructed as described in the caption to Figure 1 (Fig. 1 shows the
average of the same data, taken over all phases). These oscillations of
the distribution with phase in the direction of motion (from
left to right) are known as the
phase precession phenomenon (O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ).
This spatiotemporal structure of the experimentally observed activity
packet was independent (within the error level) of the current
trajectory configuration (e.g., left vs
right turns), as well as of the velocity and the acceleration of the rat. This observation indicates that the
spatiotemporal structure of the activity packet is probably a result of
intrinsic dynamics of the hippocampal networks and does not reflect
other brain representations, such as future plans or recent memories, goals, or intentions of the animal. (Some of these data can be viewed
as movies at http://www.nsma.arizona.edu/∼alexei.) D,
The activity packet performs path integration. Four consecutive moments
of the activity packet motion are represented. The simulated rat
trajectory is a circle (dashed line); the simulated
rat's position is shown by the arrow; the speed is
constant. The head direction system was not simulated explicitly, as
described in the text; therefore, the direction represented by the
active I layer was always consistent with the direction of motion of
the simulated rat. After self-focusing at a particular location on the
chart, which is taken as the image of the starting point, the activity
packet moves around a circle; however, a systematic error in the
activity packet position accumulates with time. In this simulation,
visual input to the P layer was absent. Spikes are represented by
yellow. E, F, G, The role of visual
input. E, The activity packet performs path integration,
similarly to D, but now the simulated rat trajectory is
a straight line. The actual simulated rat's position is shown by the cross; stimulation of the P array
by V is turned off. F, Addition of a gaussian-shaped stimulation to the P layer centered at the cross changes
the activity packet velocity. The stimulation is relatively weak; the
activity packet accelerates following the center of the stimulated
area. G, The stimulation is strong enough to cause the
activity packet to jump to the center of the stimulated area. The jump
occurs with a certain probability, when the stimulation magnitude
exceeds a certain threshold. The duration of the jump is approximately one to two theta cycles (time scales are different in F
and G).
[View Larger Version of this Image (162K GIF file)]
In the simulations of Figure 9A,B,E,F,G, the external inputs
to I from H and M were assumed fixed, meaning that the model rat
velocity was constant. In a more general case (see Fig.
9D) the I array is modulated by the
internal representations of velocity in the M and H systems. The P-I
system evolves according to the following system of equations
constructed on the basis of Equations 1-3:
|
(4)
|
Here t is the discrete time with a 6 msec time bin
, = 10 msec is the neuronal integration time, and is the
step function. The last term in the first equation of (4) describes
the effect of visual input: xt = x(t) is the given trajectory of the model rat
running with a fixed speed of 116 pixels/sec, = 200 pixels,
rik is the fixed coordinate of unit
i on a chart k, and µ is the efficacy of V-to-P
connections, which was zero in the simulations of Figure
9A,B,D,E, 0.01 in F, and 0.1 in G. The
last term in the second equation of (4) describes modulation of the I
array by the H system (v is a unit vector pointing in the
direction of motion).
Fig. 5.
The continuous model. The dynamic state of the
whole path integrator system is described by the following variables:
the currently selected chart number k, the activity
packet coordinates on this chart
(y1,
y2), and the "perceived" direction of
motion i , dynamically stored in the H array
(the symbol i here stands for a unit vector
pointed at the angle with respect to north). The actual model rat
coordinates in the environment are x1,
x2, and the actual head direction angle is
. The direction of motion is assumed to be the same as the head
direction; therefore, the model rat moves in the direction
i .
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]
The set of constant, random vectors {bi} is
the same as the set {bj} in Equation 8. The
whole I component can be viewed as containing cells with a continuous
range of gaussian-like directional tuning functions at each chart
coordinate. An interval on this range is selected by the
"perceived" direction of motion v. The M, H, and V
systems represented in Equation 4 by MI,
v, and x, respectively, were assumed to be
consistent with the model rat motion and were not simulated explicitly.
The total activities MP and
MI are periodic functions of time:
|
(5)
|
with A = 1000, B = 500, C = 250, D = 200: the relative values
A/B and C/D were adjusted to fit the experimental
data on the population theta rhythm in CA1 and in DG, respectively
(Skaggs, 1995 ). The theta cycle period T = 120 msec.
The magnitudes of the parameters C and D
determine the total activity of the I layer and thus reflect the
modulation of the I array by the M system.
All synaptic connections W in Equation 4 are excitatory; the role of
interneurons implicitly present in the model consists of adjustment of
the global thresholds h at each iteration, according to
Equation 4. Thus, in the terminology of Amit (1989) , the model contains
a hard constraint for the total activity in each array. The
synaptic matrices W in Equation 4 are defined as:
|
(6)
|
|
(7)
|
|
(8)
|
Here is the static synaptic noise (centered at 0 and <1 in
absolute value) that results from the numerical algorithm (see below)
and simulates the anatomical irregularities in the connectivity matrix;
n is the number of charts; the vector
rijk connects the nodes i and
j on chart k; the constant, random gaussian vector bj, which represents the asymmetry in the
I-P connections, is centered at zero and has a variance of ; the
constant gaussian width 10 pixels. Up to n = six
charts (see Results) have been implemented simultaneously in the same
synaptic matrices WPP,
WPI, and
WIP in the simulations of Figure 9, and
up to n = 200 charts were implemented in the
simulations of Figure 10.
Fig. 10.
Simulation results for the
integrate-and-fire model II. Networks with 300,000 units in each
layer, with 20 charts (A, C, D), and with 30,000 units
per layer with 100 and 200 charts (B) were implemented (see Materials and Methods for details and other
parameters). A, Self-focusing on one of the 20 charts in
a network of 300,000 units. The variance of the distribution on the
active chart (solid line) and on one of the other charts
(dashed line) is plotted as a function of time. Both
curves correspond to the same simulation epoch. B,
Self-focusing in the network of 30,000 units implementing 100 charts
(solid line). The variance of the distribution on the chart that eventually becomes active is plotted as a function of time.
The dashed line represents the minimal variance over all
200 charts observed in another simulation in the network of 30,000 units. C, Linear motion of the activity packet in a
network of 300,000 units with 20 charts. Only one layer in the I
component is active, which corresponds to the x
direction. Solid line, x coordinate of
the center; dashed line, y coordinate of
the center. Oscillations of the position of the center in the direction
of motion are clearly seen. This somewhat resembles the phase
precession phenomenon; however, retrograde motion occurs at particular
locations only. D, Path integration during circular
motion in a network of 300,000 units per layer with 20 charts. The plot
represents the trajectory of the activity packet on the active chart;
motion is counterclockwise. The duration of the simulated episode is 6 sec. The model rat velocity vector rotates with a constant angular velocity. Cumulative error of path integration is clearly seen as
deviation from a circle. A small zigzag at the beginning
of the trajectory is attributable to the self-focusing period.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
In the simulations of Figure 10 the same model was implemented, but
with the following differences in detail. Instead of placing exactly
one unit at each node of the square lattice on each chart, as in Figure
9, each unit i was assigned random coordinates
rik on each chart k; all vectors
rik were generated independently of each
other, with a uniform probability distribution. In addition, an
explicit division of the I array into L = six head
direction layers (Fig. 2) was used, so that the vector b in
Equations 4 and 8 was the same for all I units in each layer and was
rotated by 60° from layer to layer. The fixed absolute value of this
vector b = six pixels was the same for all I units. The
number N of P units was the same as the number of I units in
each head direction layer; therefore, the total number of I units was
six times larger than the number of P units in this implementation.
Only one I layer was active in the simulation of Figure 10C.
The static synaptic noise in Equations 6-8 and the parameter µ in Equation 4 were set to zero. The values of some other parameters in
this implementation were also different: = 3.1 pixels,
A = C = 0.01 × N,
B = D = 0.002 × N. The
values of A and B were taken close to the real
fraction of place cells that are active at a given location (McNaughton et al., 1996 ). In simulations of Figure 10 A,C,D, each layer
consisted of n = 300,000 units (which is approximately
the real number of place cells in rat CA3), with n = 20 charts implemented in the synaptic weights. The lattice dimensions in
this case were 256 × 192. In simulations of Figure 10C
each layer consisted of n = 30,000 units, with
n = 100 (Fig. 10B, solid line) or
n = 200 (Fig. 10B, dashed line); the
lattice dimensions in this case were 96 × 96. The variance of the
activity distribution in Figure 10A,B was computed
for a torus embedded into a four-dimensional space (to preserve the
Euclidean internal metrics of the torus). This provides a measure of
the degree of focusing of the activity. In both simulations of Figures
9 and 10 (except for Fig. 9E-G), a network was started from
a random configuration (i.e., randomly generated S and
V variables).
To implement the synaptic matrix numerically, an additional,
intermediate array and a two-dimensional filtering procedure were used.
At each iteration, for each chart, the output of P and I units was
added to the intermediate layer, according to the unit arrangement on
this chart. After that, a noisy gaussian filtering procedure was
applied, which consisted of redistribution of spike densities among
lattice cells in the intermediate layer, and the result was taken as
input to P and I units, together with external inputs from V, H, and M
according to Equation 4. Two parallel filtering methods were combined:
random gaussian filtering that created additional static synaptic noise
and the standard gaussian filtering with the kernel (0.09, 0.24, 0.34, 0.24, 0.09). This algorithm substantially reduced the necessary
computer memory and enabled the performance of
O(N · n) operations per iteration instead of O(N2), which would
be the case for an explicit implementation of synaptic connections. On
the other hand, the number of charts that could be simulated was
limited by the computation time.
Reduced continuous model
Because the simulation of complex experimental results using the
integrate-and-fire scheme was severely limited by computational constraints, an alternative strategy was to characterize the dynamical state of each component by a set of "macroscopic" variables,
instead of a detailed description in terms of variables S
and V, and to formulate dynamic laws in terms of these
"macroscopic variables." The rationale for this approach is
described below.
For the present purpose, the critical results of the integrate-and-fire
model of one- and multichart networks (see Results) can be summarized
as follows. (1) Under the given conditions, the distribution of
activity in a model network possessing an attractor map (P or H
network) is described by an activity packet, which retains its shape
and moves smoothly, remaining on the same chart. (2) In the two-layer
model (I-P fragment), it is possible to control the velocity and
direction of motion of the activity packet with reasonable precision
via modulation of activity of the I array by the outputs of the M and H
arrays. The activity packet in the R-H system can be similarly
controlled. (3) The activity packet position on the chart can be
smoothly corrected by an additional stimulation of the substrate array
(P or H) by the output of the V array. (4) With the introduction of a
strong local stimulation of the substrate array, distant from the
current activity packet location, the activity packet may jump, with
some probability, to the stimulated area on the same or different
chart.
These results allow the introduction of a simple, continuous
description of the above components. In this approach the state of the
H network is described by one angular variable characterizing the
activity packet position in H, and the state of the multichart network
P is characterized by the vector y, representing the
activity packet location in P, and the chart number k on
which the activity packet is located. Thus, the dynamical variables of
the continuous model (see Fig. 5) are y = (y1, y2), the animal's perceived location in space, i.e., the coordinates of the
activity packet on the chart in the P network; , the perceived head
direction angle, represented by another activity packet on the unique
circular chart of the H system; and the current chart number
k. The outputs of M and V subsystems are assumed to be consistent with the model rat's "actual" trajectory given as
x(t) and with the actual head direction, tangent
to x(t), given by the angle (t). In
this model the head direction always coincides with the direction of
motion. The model is given by a system of stochastic differential
equations:
|
(9)
|
|
(10)
|
where µ and are constants that represent activity packet
mobility; i is the unit vector in the
direction given by : i = (cos , sin
); the gradient operator is acting on y;
U is the effective attractive potential for the activity
packet, and u is similarly the attractive potential in the
head directional system (when U and u are thought
of as attractive potentials, they should be taken with the negative sign). and are gaussian random variables centered at zero.
In the unchanged familiar environment U is a single
symmetric well, independent of its second argument, whereas in a
stretched or shrunken environment U may become a
double-well potential, because of the two contributions from the two
parts of the environment, displaced with respect to each other. The
depth of each half depends on the rat's position x, which
results in systematic transitions of the activity packet from one well
to another with some hysteresis.
It is assumed here that in the unchanged environment, U is a
gaussian, with some variance , as a function of its first argument, and is independent of its second argument. A reasonably simple shape of
u is also assumed. Thus:
|
(11)
|
|
(12)
|
Next, the differential binding assumption is made.
Behavioral studies indicate independent binding of the cognitive map to individual local parts of the environment. For example, Collett et al.
(1986) and Collett (1987) studied goal-directed searching by gerbils
when landmarks were displaced. The results indicate binding of internal
representations to individual landmarks rather than to the whole
configuration. A related study was conducted by Thinus-Blanc and
colleagues (1987).
Therefore, it is assumed that in a geometrically changed environment,
the gaussian (Eq. 11) is split into several components, each of which
is bound to some rigid part of the environment, and their relative
strengths depend on the rat's position x:
|
(13)
|
Here ai is the vector of displacement of
the ith part of the environment, and the coefficients
Ci are smooth functions of x. They
reach their maxima at those environmental locations to which the
corresponding terms Ui are bound.
A similar assumption about the stimulation function was made by
O'Keefe and Burgess (1996) , although their model does not include
internal P network dynamics or path integration. The partition (Eq. 13)
of U may result from separate representations of the environment in the V system. We do not discuss possible
neurophysiological mechanisms of the partition; it is sufficient to
know that this assumption (Eq. 13) is consistent with experimental
observations, as will be seen below.
To complete the definition of the model, the initial conditions must be
specified. It is assumed that when the rat finds itself in a familiar
environment (modified or not), the activity packet jumps under the
influence of a strong external stimulus to the location on the
corresponding chart that is mostly stimulated by V, that is, to the
absolute maximum of U taken over all charts. The same
assumption is made for the H system: the first perceived allocentric
head direction in the entered environment is determined by the
strongest visual cue:
|
(14)
|
This "initial condition rule" applies not only at the moment
of entry or waking up. It is assumed that under certain circumstances the state of the path integration system can be reset during active running. This means a jump of the activity packet to another location on the same or a different chart. Although there is only one chart in
the head direction system, chart switching may happen in the P-I
system and appears to do so during shuttling tasks on linear tracks in
which the rats follow routes back and forth between goals. In such
cases, the charts representing journeys in opposite directions appear
to be different, leading to an appearance of directional dependence of
place fields (McNaughton et al., 1983 ). If two charts are associated
with the same environment, it is assumed that given x and
y, the probability P of switching from chart 1 to
chart 2 is a function of stimulation on both charts:
|
(15)
|
where y is the current activity packet location on
chart 1; U1 is taken at y on chart 1, and U2 is taken on chart 2 at its absolute
maximum (the expected new activity packet location on chart 2 is at the
absolute maximum of U2); p and
Ut are constants. The same formula describes
possible jumps of the activity packet between two distant points on the
same chart, if one takes U1 = U2 = U.
The shape of the activity packet is not a dynamical property in this
reduced model; however, it affects place-field shape and dimension and
therefore needs to be specified. Thus, a fixed gaussian shape of the
activity packet is assumed, with the variance , and if the activity
packet is centered at y, then the relative firing rate for a
cell located at a coordinate z on the currently active chart
is:
|
(16)
|
Equations 9-16 define the continuous model that was implemented
numerically to reproduce the basic experimental results, including the
results in unstable environments described below. Learning within this
model will be considered afterward.
Understanding place fields in stretched and
shrunken environments
To develop an intuitive understanding, it is useful to consider
a further simplification of the model (represented by Eqs. 9-16). The
dynamics of the activity packet in this simplified model is described
by Equation 9, if the last two terms in it are neglected: the path
integration term and the noise . The case of one-dimensional motion
is considered, which is described by x = x1, the rat's physical coordinate in the
environment, and y = y1,
the activity packet coordinate on the chart. For now, the approximation
of slow motion or strong visual input (however, not so strong that it
can change the shape of the activity packet) is taken, in which the
activity packet is always located at the local minimum of
U to which it is trapped, and never jumps to another
minimum, unless the current minimum disappears. This may result in a
hysteresis loop on the x-y plane. Thus, suppose that U is given by:
|
(17)
|
where l is the length of the stretched/shrunken
environment and 2a is the amount of stretching, which
becomes negative in the case of shrinking: if l0
is the original length, then l = (1 + 2a)l0. This situation is depicted in
Figure 6.
Fig. 6.
Splitting of the stimulated region on the chart in
linearly shrunken and stretched environments. a, b,
Original environment; c, d, shrunken environment;
e, f, stretched environment. a, c, e, The
rat is in the first half of the journey; b, d, f, the
rat is in the second half. The activity packet location is marked by
the black dot. The amount of stretching a
is defined as shown in e. On each figure, the top
bar represents the environment, and the bottom
bar represents the chart. Given two reference points L and R (walls, landmarks, reward sites,
etc.), the current rat location x is associated with two
locations on the chart, yL and yR, according to the original map
anchored at L or UR,
respectively: yL = x + a and yR = x a. These locations and
surroundings are stimulated by the V array. The resultant distribution
of stimulation is given by the sum of the two gaussian components,
UL (hatched) and
UR (blank), each of which is
stronger near its reference point and linearly decays with distance
from it (Eq. 17). For some locations x the resultant
distribution has one maximum and therefore one stable activity packet
location for a given x; for other locations there are
two maxima, in each of which the activity packet may be trapped, and
therefore, the activity packet location (and place-cell firing) may
depend on the past trajectory, and through it, on the direction of
motion. This may be the actual reason for acquired directionality of
doubled place fields in a stretched environment, reported by O'Keefe
and Burgess (1996) . Switching of "host" maxima by the activity
packet results in a hysteresis loop (Fig. 7). As the rat moves, the
maximum of U at which the activity packet is trapped may
disappear; in this case the activity packet quickly moves or jumps to
another maximum and becomes bound to it. Moreover, with some
probability (Eq. 15) the activity packet may jump to another maximum,
when the current maximum becomes too weak and the other one is strong
enough. In some cases (e.g., consider continuation of motion in
f) the host maximum may disappear because it exits
the part of the chart associated with the original environment.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
Then the activity packet coordinate y, as a function of
x and a, is given by the transcendent equation:
|
(18)
|
This equation for y has one or two stable roots,
depending on the values of x and a. Figure
7 shows the activity packet coordinate y as a
function of x, when x changes monotonically from
l/2 to l/2 and back from l/2 to
l/2, for different values of a. Transition to
another minimum occurs when the current local minimum disappears, which
results in the hysteresis loop. This means doubling (stretched environment) (O'Keefe and Burgess, 1996 ) or missing (shrunken environment) (Gothard et al., 1996 ) place fields for the intermediate region on the chart.
Fig. 7.
Transformation of the map in distorted
environments. These plots show solutions to Equation 18, i.e., stable
(with respect to corrections by visual information) activity packet
coordinate y as a function of the rat coordinate
x in an environment of the variable length
l = (1 + 2a)l0 in the attractor map
model approximation. a, Shrunken environment;
b, stretched environment. The straight diagonal
line represents the map in the unchanged environment (a = 0). Values of the parameters are the variance
of the "visual gaussian" = 0.3; the original length of the
environment l0 = 2. Different curves
represent different amounts of stretching: a = 0, 0.2, 0.4 (a); 0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.45 (b).
The x axis represents the environment, with the
reference points L and R (Fig. 6) located at l/2 and l/2 (the two
ends of each curve), whereas the y axis represents the
array of place cells (chart). Therefore, horizontal sections of the
plot for each y give environmental locations
x of maximal firing rate for a place cell located at
that given y on the chart. The width of an elementary
place field is determined by the size of the activity packet (measured along the y axis, not shown) and by the slope
of the plot. For small deformations ( 0.3 < a < 0.25), place fields get shrunken or stretched
together with the environment, although not in the right proportion;
however, the map preserves topology. For bigger stretching (0.25 < a < 0.3) place cells in the middle of the chart
develop multiple place fields. When the deformation is too big ( 0.5 < a < 0.3, or a > 0.3), the hysteresis loop develops, which implies the appearance of
directional place fields for the region within the loop. In the case of
shrinking, some place fields disappear: the middle region of the
y axis does not fire at any x. In the
case of stretching, some place cells acquire double place fields, with
at least one directional component. Place fields near the reference
points, however, retain their compactness and shape. This picture
provides intuitive understanding of the experiments in geometrically
altered environments (Gothard et al., 1995 ; O'Keefe and Burgess,
1996 ).
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
Suppose a P cell is located in the middle of the chart
(y = 0), which is mapped to the middle of the
box (x = 0). Then, in the original environment (Fig. 7,
diagonal line) this cell will fire near one location only:
x = 0. The size of the place field is determined by the
size of the activity packet (measured along the y axis)
and by the slope of the plot. When the environment is slightly
shrunken, the place field shrinks too, remaining in the middle. After a
certain degree of shrinking (~50% with the gaussian half-width of 0.4l) a hysteresis loop appears, which means that
this cell will be skipped by the activity packet, and its place field
must vanish. This situation is shown in Figure 7a. Given a
smaller gaussian half-width, however, the place field may become
doubled (not shown). For this particular cell, place-field doubling
should always be the case in a stretched environment, if the hysteresis
condition is reached (Fig. 7b).
Numerical implementation of the continuous model
The model (represented by Eqs. 9-16) was implemented
numerically using the simple Euler scheme, which is sufficiently
accurate for the qualitative purposes of this model. Typical parameter values were = 0.2 M; Ut = 0.6;
p = 0.04; µ = 0.007; = 0.0005; < 2>1/2 = 0.2;
< 2>1/2 = 0.002; the value of was
varied between 0.1 and 2 M; the time step was 6 msec; the
model rat's speed was ~0.2 M/sec; the original track/box
length was 1.5 M. Further details of simulation procedures are given in the next section. Results are represented in Figures 11
and 12.
Fig. 11.
Simulation results for the continuous model.
a-f, Predictions for the place-field modifications in
two-dimensional environments computed according to Equations 9, 10,
12-14, 16. The two reference points L and R (Fig. 6) are the left and
right walls of the box on a-f. In the case of
stretching (a-c) studied by O'Keefe and Burgess
(1996) , the original place field (a) gets stretched
(b) and then becomes split into two fields
(c). In the case of shrinking (d-f) studied by Gothard et al. (1996) , the
original place field (d) becomes shrunken
(e) and eventually disappears
(f). An intuitive explanation of these
phenomena is given by Equation 18 and Figure 7. g, h,
Place fields on a shrinking rail (g)
outbound journey; (h) inbound journey. The five
colors represent firing rates of the five selected cells. Each
colored horizontal line represents a simulated running
episode. Therefore, the horizontal axis represents the rat's position
on the rail; the vertical axis is the amount of shrinking of the
environment ( a). "Hatching" results from random
jumps of the activity packet according to Equation 15. Similar results
were obtained in the Gothard et al. (1996) experiment. i-n, Simulated slow rotation of place fields after
disorientation in a familiar environment. Starting from a disoriented
state (i), the system slowly relaxes with time to its stationary state (n) determined
by the learned WVH and
WVP connections. The green
arrow shows the averaged perceived head direction; the three
colors (red, blue, and yellow) represent temporary place fields of the three selected P units. These
distributions were obtained by averaging over an ensemble of equivalent
model running sessions for five (i-m) equal sequential
time intervals. The original place fields (n) of these
units were eventually restored. Their centers are marked by
colored crosses on all six figures (i-n). Similar results were obtained experimentally by
Knierim et al. (1995) . Slow relaxation of place fields indicates
involvement of a path integration mechanism.
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]
Fig. 12.
Numerical counterpart of the Sharp et al. (1990)
experiment. According to the assumption of the model, on entry into a
familiar environment, the activity packet appears on the chart that has been associated with this environment, and at the location that is
mostly stimulated by V representation of the local view. Thus, if the
position of the stimulated domain is determined by a cue card, and the
cue card is doubled, then there are two stimulated domains on the
chart, and the strongest one is selected by self-focusing of activity.
Later place fields remain bound to the selected cue card, if the two
maxima of stimulation originating from the two cue cards remain well
separated on the chart. This is provided by an appropriate choice of
parameters of the potential U. Therefore, after doubling
the cue card, the locations of place fields depend on the entry site,
which corresponds exactly to the results observed by Sharp et al.
(1990) . A, The stable place field in the cylinder of one
selected model place unit, which is formed on entry to the environment
from northwest. B, The stable place field of the same
unit formed on entry from southwest. The original place field center is
shown by the cross. The two cue cards are represented by
vertical lines. The arrow outside the
circle shows the entry site. The arrow in the
center shows the "perceived" north.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]
Finally, the continuous model is extended on the basis of Equations 9
and 10 to incorporate learning mechanisms. To do that, the H circle,
the P plane, and the V volume (Fig. 8) were divided into
lattice cells to which virtual Boolean synapses are attached. In this
sense the model is not continuous anymore but is still referred to here
as "continuous" to distinguish it from the original network of
integrate-and-fire units. Potentials U and u are
computed as follows. Given the coordinates (x, ),
y and , gaussians centered at these coordinates in V and
P with variances  and , respectively, and the bell-shaped curve
(Eq. 12) in H were assigned. Then the contribution of each nonzero
synapse to U (or u) is equal to the product of
the two bell-shaped curves estimated at the two cells connected by the
synapse.
Fig. 8.
Binding of sensory features to charts. This figure
illustrates the learning rules of the model. Each P unit is virtually
connected to any V unit, and the list of nonzero connections is stored
in each P unit, and similarly for the H units. There is a limit of connections per unit in each array. Given the activity distribution in
V centered at the unit 1, the activity packet in P centered at the unit
2, and the activity packet in H centered at the unit 3, the connections
1-2 and 1-3 can be potentiated (i.e., added to the list) with some
probability. At the same time, connections 1-5, 4-2, 1-7, and 6-3
can be depressed (i.e., deleted from the list).
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
In terms of the original model, the matrices of synapses
WVP and WVH
are implemented as sparse matrices of Boolean values. According to the
selected rules, the number of nonzero synapses per unit is limited for
all units. In the learning regime, the probabilities of a synapse
switching at a given iteration from zero to one
(P+) and from one to zero
(P ) are:
|
(19)
|
|
(20)
|
where is the rate of learning; mV and
mP are the total numbers of synapses per unit
(i,j) in V and in P; mVmax and
mPmax are their maximal allowed values; is the Kronecker . In the continuous approximation, the local
average firing rates <Si> and
<Sj> in Equations 19 and 20 are approximated
as gaussians estimated at locations of the units i and
j, centered at (x, ) and at y (or
). Thus, learning is accomplished by modifications of the synapses
[(x, ) y] and [(x, )  ], as illustrated in Figure 8. Further details are given in Results.
RESULTS
Simulated dynamics of the integrate-and-fire MPI model
Observation of a multichart attractor map
First, the simulation exhibited self-focusing of activity on a
chart in the P component (Fig. 9A,
10A,B). In this architecture, within a certain
parameter range, the only dynamically stable configurations of cell
activity are gaussian-like activity packets on one of the charts. Such
an activity packet was found to be stable in the sense that it
maintains its uniqueness and shape, and given constant external input
to the P-I system (no input from V) it moves on the chart with a
persistent velocity. An activity packet forms spontaneously when the
network is started with random activity. The process of self-focusing
in the network of 45,000 units in each layer and with six charts is
represented on Figure 9A; the variance of the activity
distribution as a function of time for a network of 300,000 units in
each layer with 20 stored charts is represented on Figure
10A; and the same for a network of
30,000 units with 100 and 200 charts is represented on Figure 10B. Figure 10A shows relatively
fast relaxation that lasts less than one theta cycle: ~40 msec. It
takes 0.8 sec for 100 charts (Fig. 10B, solid
line), and it does not happen at all in a network of 30,000 units
with 200 charts (Fig. 10B, dashed line).
The activity packet remains stable on the same chart while exploring
the chart for at least 6 sec (Fig. 10D).
These observations indicate the existence of an attractor map in the P
component: the two-dimensional set of fixed-point attractors at zero
input to the I component corresponds to the two-dimensional set of
possible activity packet locations on a chart. The estimated storage
capacity in terms of the maximal number of stable charts stored in the
same network is thus ~0.004 × N. A similar value for
a simpler model was obtained analytically by Samsonovich (1997) . The
latter analytical consideration shows that given simplifying assumptions the number of charts that can be stored should scale in
proportion to the number of neurons. The implementation of the model
with the number of units close to the real number of CA3 units in rat
(Fig. 10) resulted in ~17,000 synapses per cell, many of which were
of negligibly low strength and could possibly have been eliminated.
Obviously, the maximum number of charts will be limited by the number
of synapses that can be made by each cell if this number is small
compared with the number of cells. For comparison, the average rat CA3
pyramidal neuron receives ~12,000 contacts from other CA3 pyramids
(Amaral et al., 1990 ). Over a range of parameters, spontaneous focusing
and subsequent stability of the activity packet on single charts were
observed in the simulations.
Simulated propagation of the activity packet
Next, the details of the activity packet dynamics under the
condition of constant external input to the I component, corresponding to a fixed "perceived" direction and speed of motion, were studied. The result is shown in Figures 9B and 10C; the
latter represents propagation of the center of the distribution in a
network of 300,000 units with 20 charts; the variance of the
distribution oscillates with theta rhythm at the same level as in
Figure 10A after self-focusing. The related Figure
9C was constructed from the actual experimental data of
Wilson and McNaughton (1993) , as described in captions to Figures 1 and
9C.
Comparison of the two figures (Fig. 9B,C; see also Fig.
10C) shows that the model reproduces qualitatively the phase
precession phenomenon, which can be defined as follows: the firing
phase of hippocampal neurons relative to the local theta rhythm
advances systematically through almost 360° as the rat passes through
the place field of each cell (O'Keefe and Recce, 1993 ; Skaggs et al., 1996 ). Stated differently, the activity packet moves ahead of the rat
image on a chart during each theta cycle and then jumps backward, at
the beginning of the next cycle, to the rat's actual location. The
model (Figs. 9B, 10C) reproduces qualitatively
the features specific for a two-dimensional motion (Skaggs et al., 1996 ), although there are important deviations from the actual phase
precession dynamics that will be treated elsewhere.
Thus, the phase precession phenomenon occurs as a byproduct of path
integration in this model. This mechanism is quite different from that
suggested by Tsodyks et al. (1995) , in which the retrograde motion of
the activity packet is caused by sensory input. In contrast, according
to the present model, the effect should persist regardless of
availability of sensory cues.
As can be seen in Figure 10C, the average group velocity of
the activity packet remains constant given a constant input to the I
layer. In addition, over multiple trials, the average speed of motion
appeared to be a monotonic function of the I layer activity.
Simulated path integration
Next, the activity packet was allowed to perform path integration
(Figs. 9D, 10D) in a circular motion, in
the absence of input from V. The simulated rat moves counterclockwise
around a circle. The activity packet repeats this motion with a certain
degree of error, which accumulates with time (here, by assumption, the starting position of the activity packet on the chart coincides with
the image of the model rat's starting position in the environment). This result shows that the velocity and the direction of motion of the
activity packet can be controlled effectively by appropriate stimulation of the I array, and therefore the activity packet position
can be accurately updated by idiothetic information; however, after a
few seconds, a small correction of the activity packet position becomes
necessary.
The role of sensory input: accelerated motion and jumps of
activity packet
The next numerical study (Fig. 9E-G) examined the
question of correction of the activity packet position by the visual
input. Now the simulated rat moves to the right with a constant
velocity. The rat's position (projected onto the chart) is marked by
the cross. It differs from the activity packet position from the
beginning of motion, because of an initially introduced error. The
input to the P layer from V representations is absent in Figure
9E, relatively weak in F, and relatively strong
in G. Therefore, the V system has no effect on the activity
packet motion in E. (See Materials and Methods.)
It was observed that the addition of a gaussian-shaped stimulation to
the P layer from V changes the activity packet velocity, thus
correcting the activity packet position. Namely, a smooth acceleration
of the activity packet occurred at a relatively weak V input (Fig.
9F), and an abrupt jump to the stimulated region occurred when V input was relatively strong (Fig. 9G). Both
of these phenomena have recently been observed experimentally (Gothard et al., 1996 ).
Continuous model: reproduction of experimental results
Place fields in stretched and shrunken environments
O'Keefe and Burgess (1996) examined the question of geometrical
determinants of the hippocampal spatial code and showed that a place
field can become stretched or even doubled in a linearly stretched
rectangular environment. When fields doubled, each half field became
directional, with the preferred directions of each half oriented toward
each other. When the environment is stretched in both directions, a
place field may become tripled or may vanish.
In contrast, Gothard and colleagues (1996) performed a set of
experiments involving shuttling between two food sites on a linear
track. During the experiment, the distance between reward sites was
reduced by varying degrees on a random schedule over trials. As a
result, place fields became compressed, but not always in the right
proportion, and in some cases disappeared.
It is remarkable that when two place fields that originally did not
overlap became overlapped in the shrunken environment, the two cells
actually did not fire simultaneously, as shown by cross-correlation
analysis (Gothard et al., 1996 ). The apparent overlap in the average
place fields was thus attributable to trial-to-trial fluctuations in
the behavior of the activity packet. This observation supports the
attractor map concept, according to which each P cell has its permanent
location on the chart, and therefore two cells associated with two
distant locations in the original environment cannot be active
simultaneously as long as the activity packet remains on the same
chart. Nevertheless, they can be activated in sequence during a short
time interval, if an activity packet jump occurs.
In both cases (Gothard et al., 1996 ; O'Keefe and Burgess, 1996 ), P
cells showed binding to a part of the environment that was behind the
rat and generally outside of its field of view (the visual field in rat
is approximately 300°), although the velocity of the activity packet
on the chart in these cases was approximately the same as in an
unperturbed environment. This fact makes a local-view explanation
(i.e., a direct effect of visual cues) of O'Keefe and Burgess (1996)
unlikely (see Discussion). Another straightforward explanation is that
after the "position fix" at the beginning of the route, the
activity packet is guided primarily by the path integration mechanism,
until the rat "bumps" into the opposite wall (McNaughton, 1996 ).
Therefore, as concluded by Gothard et al.(1996) , these observations
strongly support the path integration concept. The analysis, however,
does show that place-field doubling and acquired directionality in this
case could result from visual input in the limit of very slow motion (Figs. 6, 7).
First, numerical results for the continuous model (represented by Eqs.
9-16) are presented, with the potential U given by Equation 17. The predicted place-field modifications computed according to these
equations for the cases studied experimentally by O'Keefe and Burgess
(1996) and Gothard et al. (1996) are shown in Figure 11a-h. In the case of two-dimensional
motion in a box (Fig. 11a-f), the assumptions were
that the only source of discrepancy between and is noise
(distal directional visual cues remain valid for the original,
stretched, and shrunken boxes), and that the rat performs
two-dimensional random walks in the box, reflecting from the walls. It
was also assumed that the visual stimulus originating from a particular
wall decays linearly with the distance from this wall, reaching zero
near the opposite wall. The results clearly show the phenomena of
doubling, stretching, and vanishing of place fields.
The effect of finite noise is broadening of the place field and later
appearance of the hysteresis (not shown). Removal of the path
integration term changes nothing in the limit of slow motion, which is
the only case when the above simplified consideration (Fig. 6) may be
valid. In the opposite limit of fast motion, however, path integration
becomes necessary to speed up the activity packet, which because of its
finite mobility under a given driving force cannot follow the
stimulated area without an additional driving force.
The two components of the doubled place field (Fig. 11c) are
highly directional: each component fires when the rat is facing the
more distant wall. This directionality results from two mechanisms: (1)
the hysteresis in activity packet motion on the chart (Fig. 7) and (2)
the path integration together with "position fixes" (McNaughton,
1996 ). The nature of directionality in this case is considered further
in Discussion.
In the case of a shrunken environment (Fig. 11f), the
place field vanishes instead of doubling; however, doubling could occur with slightly different coefficients in Equation 17, as well as according to a pure path integration mechanism, depending on the location of the field (McNaughton, 1996 ). Directionality of the two
components in this case should be opposite to the directionality in the
case of Figure 11c.
If a cell has its place field closer to one end of the box, then, as
can be derived from Figure 7, the place field may be doubled with
increased stretching or not doubled at all if its location is very near
the wall. In the case of shrinking, such a place field may acquire
directionality without doubling.
The question of directionality requires special attention in the
case of the Gothard et al. (1996) study and similar experiments using
shuttling or route-following paradigms. All place fields observed in
this study between the reinforcement sites were 100% directional in
the shrunken as well as the original environment. As discussed above,
this fact suggests that chart switching occurs when the animal reaches
the goal. It is easy to see that chart switching results in a
hysteresis loop (of a different origin than that just discussed) and
therefore in directionality of place fields for cells contained within
this loop, i.e., in the middle region of each chart.
Place-field behavior on the shrinking rail (Gothard et al., 1996 ) was
simulated using the model represented by Equations 9-17 at a finite
velocity, with finite noise and path integration terms (Fig.
11g,h). The assumptions here are the same as before, except that (1) chart switching was assumed to occur each time on reaching a
reinforcement site or earlier, according to Equation 15; (2) the angle
was taken fixed (0 or , depending on the direction of motion);
and (3) the moving part of the environment, the box, was assumed to
have limited visibility described by an exponentially decaying rather
than linear coefficient in Equation 17, with the characteristic length
of 0.3l.
The results (Fig. 11g,h) reproduce the principal
observations: vanishing and shifting of place fields, including
"fractional slope" place fields, i.e., place fields that show
smaller displacement than that of the box. The relative influence of
the moving box on place field location in this case is different for
inbound and outbound journeys, in agreement with the experiment. This difference illustrates the effect of path integration.
Path integration has a clear influence on place fields in this
case. It becomes necessary for the activity packet to move when the
limited range of visibility of the box behind the rat is taken into
account by introducing a finite-range rather than exponential
coefficient into (17), although in this case the activity packet is
accelerated by the other stimulated area on the chart, without path
integration. It is unlikely, however, that this mechanism of
acceleration by chance would result in the correct activity packet
velocity.
Dependence of place field location on the entry site
By assumption, on entry into a familiar environment, the activity
packet appears on the chart that has been associated with this
environment, and at the location that is mostly stimulated by the V
representation of the local view. Thus, if the position of the
stimulated domain is determined by a cue card and the cue card is
doubled, then there will be two stimulated domains on the chart. The
stimulation originating from the most clearly visible cue card at the
moment of entry will be stronger and therefore, according to the
assumption of the model, will determine the activity packet location on
the chart. Subsequently, place fields will remain bound to the selected
cue card. This implies that the positions of the place fields may
depend on the entry site and/or the orientation of the rat when first
placed into the cylinder. This corresponds to results observed by Sharp
et al. (1990) . These results are reproduced numerically in Figure
12, using the model represented by Equations
9-17. The Sharp et al. (1990) experiment
differs from the case of the O'Keefe and Burgess (1996) experiment in
that the activity packet remains bound to the originally selected part of the environment at all times, which implies that the corresponding local minimum of U never disappears during motion in this
restricted environment. In the numerical experiment this situation is
easily created by appropriate selection of the coefficients
Ci in Equation 13.
Slow rotation of place fields
Now consider two-dimensional motion of the model rat in a cylinder
according to the model represented by Equations 9-17. Assume here
strong binding to tactile cues, i.e., that the radial component of the
activity packet coordinate is reset every time the rat reaches the wall
of the cylinder and therefore is close to the model rat's radial
coordinate at all times. If the rat is initially disoriented, that is,
substantially differs from , then most of the time the activity
packet is far enough from the stimulated region and therefore its
relaxation to the stimulated region may go relatively slowly; however,
at some point, namely, at the center, the activity packet and the
stimulated region come together. In the absence of path integration,
when the activity packet has no preferred direction of motion, it would
follow the stimulated region after the first touch, and thus spatial
representations would be reset immediately. Because of path
integration, however, the activity packet continues its motion in the
wrong direction, missing the stimulated region (Fig.
13). This results in persistent displacement of the
place fields from their original locations. Interaction of the V and H
systems, however, slowly corrects the perceived yaw angle ,
resulting in slow rotation of place fields together with H-cell tuning
curves, as was observed by Knierim et al. (1995) . The simulation
results are shown in Figure 11i-n.
Fig. 13.
Conflict between visual cues and path integrator
in the case of disorientation in a familiar environment.
A, The activity packet and the gaussian (the localized
stimulation from the V network) get together at the
center of the circle. The activity packet
trajectory is y(t); the trajectory of the gaussian
(which is the image of the rat trajectory) is x(t). The
activity packet would be captured immediately in the absence of path
integration. Knierim et al. (1995) observed the opposite case: slow
rotation of place fields (seconds to minutes), which is evidence for
persistent direction of activity packet motion. B,
Relaxation of the systematic error in the "perceived" head
direction with respect to the "actual" head direction ,
which results from the influence of a symmetry-breaking visual cue
representation on the internal head direction representation : the
solution to Equations 10 and 12.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
Learning a novel environment
Following the scheme described in Materials and Methods, the two
synaptic matrices WVP and
WVH with sizes of 400,000 × 90,000 and 400,000 × 10 were implemented. The maximal number of nonzero
synapses per unit was 1 for the V array, 3 for the P array, and 40,000 for the H array; the value of  was 0.05 M. Results are
represented in Figure 14.
Fig. 14.
Simulation of learning of a novel environment.
a-d, Numerical counterpart of the Wilson and McNaughton
(1993) experiment. The density of each plot represents the distribution
of the error in reconstructed rat's position according to the averaged
map for this particular session. Error distributions were averaged during equal time intervals. After exploration of the north part (top) of the box (a), the rat discovers
the south part (b). After exploration of this part, the
error in it is gradually reduced (c), reaching the same
level as in the north part. The average error in the north part stays
approximately at the same level during all sessions
(a-d). e, Place field formed by learning
with path integration; f, without path integration. In
the absence of the path integration term in Equation 9, the activity
packet still moves, driven by initially random
WVP connections (which are modified
during this motion). This process, however, did not converge to a
one-to-one map from the environment to the chart during the simulated
running session. Therefore, a path integration mechanism must be
substantially involved in the process of learning.
[View Larger Version of this Image (87K GIF file)]
First, the Wilson and McNaughton (1993) experimental paradigm
(Fig. 14a-d) was reproduced numerically. A rapid
stabilization of place fields in the new environment was observed, with
a decrease of the average position error with time. In analogy to how
error was defined by Wilson and McNaughton (1993) , the error was
measured as the discrepancy between the activity packet location on the chart and the simulated rat location in the environment, projected onto
the chart according to the average map obtained during this particular
simulated epoch. At the same time, persistence of previously formed
place fields was observed, in agreement with the results of Wilson and
McNaughton (1993) .
In agreement with the experimental results, the average error in
the new part of the environment was higher than in the familiar part at
the beginning of exploration and was reduced to the same level after a
certain learning period. At the same time, the average error in the
familiar part remained approximately on the same level before, during,
and after exploration of the new part.
In addition, the results of learning with (Fig. 14e) and
without (Fig. 14f) the path integration term in
Equation 9 were compared, using a "random start" for
WVP and
WVH. Without path integration, the
activity packet moves on the chart, as the animal moves in the
environment, being guided by V representations via preexisting V-to-P
connections (which initially were taken as random). This process, which
is similar to the Kohonen learning scheme, after a given period of time
(which is too short for the Kohonen learning) results in formation of a
"map," which is not one-to-one. The results of the simulation show
that despite the preexistence of an attractor map in P, appropriate
binding of this attractor map to the environment requires a path
integration mechanism.
DISCUSSION
Principal findings
The principal findings from the integrate-and-fire model
concern the formation, shape, stability, oscillations, two-dimensional controllable motion, and controllable jumps of the activity packet in
the proposed multichart MPI model. These results are obtained on the
basis of numerical simulations of networks of leaky integrate-and-fire model neurons in discrete time, with predetermined total activity.
The principal finding from the continuous model is the reproduction of
several basic experimental facts about pace fields, including doubling,
vanishing, reshaping in distorted environments, acquiring
directionality in a two-goal shuttling task, rapid formation in a novel
environment, and slow rotation after disorientation. Simulation results
strongly suggest that a path integration mechanism is involved in the
foregoing processes.
Significance
The theoretical framework proposed here provides a plausible
explanation for how hippocampal place-cell activity may be updated by
self-motion cues and how self-motion itself may provide the metrics for
representation of spatial relationships. It also provides new insight
into how multiple "maps" may be stored within the same synaptic
matrix with minimal interference. A multichart architecture implies
that the activity of a given place cell has meaning only in the context
of the ensemble of other cells that are active with it at a given
location on a given chart. In particular, the cooperative interactions
that lead to an activity packet suggest that it is misleading and, in
general, not useful to think of individual place cells as representing
external features at all, in the manner that one thinks of sensory
neurons. The multichart architecture easily explains the generally
all-or-none "remapping" effects that have been observed in
experiments involving cue rearrangements and deletions. Comparison of
the simulation results with available experimental data unambiguously
supports the underlying general theoretical framework, i.e., the
activity packet self-localization property, the multichart property,
and the path integration property. The theoretical framework itself
provides new insight into how path integration and local view-based
mechanisms may interact to update hippocampal spatial representations,
and it begins to explain some of the peculiar effects that are observed
when path-integration and external sensory inputs are placed in
conflict with one another, such as during geometrical distortion of the
environment.
The question arises as to how many independent charts can be
represented in a globally interconnected network such as CA3 (Amaral
and Witter, 1995 ) while still maintaining stable activity packets that
remain on a single chart. No evidence of instability was observed in
simulations with up to 100 charts. Analytical calculations of the
maximal number of stored uncorrelated spherical attractor maps in a
Hopfield-like network (Samsonovich, 1997 ) give the number 0.0042 · N, where N is the number of model neuronal units.
In conjunction with the numerical simulations, this suggests that a
network the size of the rodent CA3 may have the capacity to store
substantially more than 100 charts, although the number is likely
ultimately to be limited not by the number of neurons but by the number
of connections. The possibility remains, however, that the capacity may
be improved further by invoking some temporary, experience-dependent
plasticity of the intrinsic connections (see below).
The proposed anatomical implementation of the MPI model is not the only
one possible. In principle, the P-I path integrator loop of the MPI
model could be based on other structures, such as presubiculum and
parasubiculum or entorhinal cortex. One difficulty with this
interpretation is that these structures appear not to express multiple
charts (e.g., Quirk et al., 1992 ; Sharp, 1997 ). The possibility
remains, however, that dentate gyrus and CA3 may select an active chart
that is expressed in these structures and in CA1, whereas a single,
"universal" chart is implemented in the subicular complex and
entorhinal cortex. This possible variant of the MPI scheme will be
discussed elsewhere (Samsonovich and McNaughton, 1997 ).
Alternative theoretical approaches and related works
The trajectory learning concept, which has not yet been
discussed here, is in some sense opposite to the concept of a cognitive map. According to this point of view (Blum and Abbott, 1995 ), the
intrinsic synaptic connections between place cells representing sequentially visited locations are asymmetrically potentiated during
repeated motion along a specific route. Indeed, the asymmetric expansion of place fields in a direction opposite the rat's motion that has been predicted by such models has been observed experimentally (Mehta et al., 1997 ), and recent demonstrations of the spontaneous reactivation of sequences of place fields during sleep subsequent to
repeated route-following (Skaggs and McNaughton, 1996 ) suggest that
sequence information may be encoded in asymmetric changes in the
intrinsic connections of a chart; however, the effects observed to date
represent relatively weak changes in the overall structure of existing
charts and do not involve any topological rearrangement. Moreover, any
asymmetries would tend to cancel out in the case of random
two-dimensional foraging, leaving a net simple expansion of the place
fields. In general, mild, experience-dependent changes in the intrinsic
connectivity of the P layer may be thought of as a higher order effect
superimposed on the basic dynamics described here. They may be useful
in stabilizing the current or recently visited charts and may play a
role in the spontaneous reactivation of recently experienced chart
coordinates during sleep (Shen and McNaughton, 1996 ) but are unlikely
to alter the overall dynamics in any major way.
The model of path integration recently proposed by Touretzky and Redish
(1996) assumes a rather complicated learning mechanism for P units that
store local views in conjunction with internal path integrator
coordinates. In addition, this model assumes a rather complicated
mechanism of "resets" for internal representations. The path
integrator is introduced by Touretzky and Redish (1996) as an abstract
element with ad hoc functional properties. This model, in
its present form, fails to account for multiple uncorrelated charts. In
addition, the model does not explain how allocentric features,
independent of the head orientation, are extracted by place units from
a local view representation.
In another paper (Redish and Touretzky, 1997 ), the same authors propose
a holistic model of the hippocampal spatial code formation based on a
concept of a reference frame, which includes a reference location, a reference direction, and a set of frame-specific
declarative memories, as well as the relationships between these
components. A representation of a reference frame is presumably
supported by an ensemble of interacting brain structures located inside and outside the hippocampus proper; in particular, this results in
selection of an active chart. Thus, the question of "holistic" versus "localized" attractor dynamics underlying chart selection remains open.
O'Keefe and Burgess (1996) offer an alternative explanation of their
recent observation of place-field splitting when one or more dimensions
of their rectangular recording environment were doubled. Their model is
based on the assumption of stimulation of the P cells by visual
representations, which resembles the U potential of the
present model; however, there is no self-localization mechanism (no
P-to-P synapses) and no path integration mechanism in their model.
Therefore, the model fails to account for the existence of place fields
in complete darkness and for slow rotation of place fields together
with head direction fields after disorientation. In addition, in this
particular case, it is not clear how different "superimposed
directional subcomponents" exactly compensate each other's
directionality in the original environment, resulting in a compact,
omnidirectional place field.
A model called the "cognitive graph," proposed by Muller et al.
(1991 , 1996) , suggested a possible mechanism for encoding relative
distances in the environment based on a synaptic matrix similar to the
present P layer. The possibility of storing several maps in such a
network was also discussed. The architecture outlined in the present
work, in principle, would also support the computations that motivated
the cognitive graph theory; however, there are several fundamental
differences between the theories. First, in the cognitive graph theory,
the existence of some external, spatially selective input was assumed
as the primary source of place-cell activity. The P-to-P matrix itself
was learned after coactivation of cells that had been driven by this
input and was sensitive to the history of the rat's behavior. The
present theory assumes the opposite, namely that the basic attractor
map structure in the network is given, and the external inputs become
spatially selective only through learning and remain always relatively
weak compared with the intrinsic connections. It requires cooperative interactions among a minimum number of cells in the corresponding position on a given chart to generate a stable activity packet. It is
this architecture that enables orthogonal representations to be
assigned to very similar environments (e.g., Bostock et al., 1991 ) or
sometimes to the same environment under changing behavioral contexts
(Markus et al., 1995 ). Completely orthogonal maps for similar
environments cannot be generated easily in a system whose spatial
selectivity is initially imposed externally. Similarly, the cognitive
graph theory could not account, without ad hoc assumptions,
for the apparent preexistence of place fields in the absence of any
external input (Quirk et al., 1990 ). Second, although a secondary role
of movement information was alluded to, the "cognitive graph"
theory as presented actually had no intrinsic metrics, because the
synaptic modification process depended on a time interval between
locations rather than explicitly on distance, and there was no explicit
coupling between self-motion and place-cell activation as in the
present model. Thus, the cognitive graph theory could not examine
effects that are explicitly dependent on path integration, such as the
correct activation of place-cell sequences in the absence of external
sensory input or the slow rotation of place fields in cylindrical
environments (Knierim et al., 1995 ). Finally, the cognitive graph
theory encountered serious problems with the existence of multiple
place fields in a given environment. These do not pose more than a
computational inconvenience and a net reduction in capacity in the
present theory.
Predictions
The proposed MPI model predicts (1) the specific, persistent,
microscopic architecture of the CA3 network (although, as stated above,
the model may have a different implementation in anatomy); (2) that the
directional relations between the I cells will be the same for all
environments; (3) a possibility of "translational disorientation"
in a nontrivial, translationally symmetric environment; (4) "activity
packet jumps" occurring at the scale of one to two theta cycles; and
(5) coherent behavior of neighboring cells on the active chart during
distortions of the environment provided that chart switching does not
occur [this prediction distinguishes the present model from that of
O'Keefe and Burgess (1996) ]. Prediction 4 was recently confirmed
experimentally (Gothard et al., 1996 ). Strictly speaking, statement 1 is an assumption of the model rather than a prediction; however, the
agreement between experiments and the simulation results strongly
suggests the validity of this assumption.
A corollary of prediction 5 is that in a distorted environment two
place cells with overlapping place fields cannot be active simultaneously if their original place fields do not overlap and there
is no chart switching. This prediction is consistent with recent
observations (Gothard et al., 1996 ).
Another critical test would consist of an observation of place-cell
firing during head turns in a stretched box (O'Keefe and Burgess,
1996 ) while the rat is located inside a directional component of a
split place field. According to the model of the present paper, firing
rate in a "directional" component is actually determined by the
past trajectory rather than by the current head direction. The
prediction of the present model, therefore, is that the place-cell firing should persist in this case for all head directions, as long as
the rat stays within the place field. According to the theory of
O'Keefe and Burgess (1996) , the firing should remain direction-dependent.
Generalizations
The above picture of the hippocampal model of space argues for a
general concept of an attractor-map-based internal cognitive model.
Many cognitive tasks can be represented effectively on the basis of
abstract mathematical models such as graphs (e.g., Muller et al., 1996 )
and manifolds and therefore may require internal "mapping."
According to this concept, the underlying attractor map of the
cognitive model is presumed to preexist, and representations of
particular memory items may become bound to it. For example, in analogy
to the multichart architecture for space, it is possible to conceive of
attractor map primitives for egocentric space or even for objects such
as chairs or people, which exist in a synaptic matrix without yet
having been bound to particular exemplars. To navigate around the map,
it is necessary to have a sense of possible local transitions. This can
be provided by another attractor map, in analogy with the spatial map
and the head direction map in the model of this paper. A related
concept was proposed by Droulez and Berthoz (1991) .
Therefore, attractor maps are likely to be found in various brain areas
in addition to the hippocampus; e.g., they may underlie cortical mental
rotations (Georgopoulous et al., 1989 ; 1993 ) and motion control
(Sparkes and Neson, 1987; Sparks et al., 1990 ; Droulez and Berthoz,
1991 ; Munoz et al., 1991 ; Fikes and Townsend, 1995 ).
Conclusions
Hippocampal spatial representations can be described efficiently
in terms of charts and self-localized activity packets. This representation inspires a new concept of an attractor map, which may
have broad applications elsewhere. The attractor map concept together
with the path integration concept lead to a plausible connectionist
model (MPI) of the hippocampal spatial representation system, which
uses previously suggested ideas of multiple wired charts (Muller et
al., 1991 ; McNaughton et al., 1996 ). Numerical simulations of this
theory confirm intuitive assumptions about its dynamics. The proposed
point of view, although incomplete, leads to a straightforward
explanation of many available experimental facts and currently seems to
be the most inclusive among alternative theories of hippocampal
place-cell dynamics.
FOOTNOTES
Received Feb. 24, 1997; revised May 14, 1997; accepted May 15, 1997.
This work was conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (A.S.) and supported by National
Institue of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS20331 and The
Office of Naval Research. We are grateful to Drs. C. A. Barnes, K. M. Gothard, J. J. Knierim, W. B. Levy, L. Nadel, J. O'Keefe, W. E. Skaggs, D. S. Touretzky, M. V. Tsodyks, and A. D. Redish for comments
on this manuscript and useful discussions.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Bruce L. McNaughton, Room
344, Life Sciences North Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
85724.
REFERENCES
-
Amaral DG,
Witter MP
(1995)
Hippocampal formation.
In: The rat nervous system, 2nd edition (Paxinos G,
ed), pp 443-493. San Diego: Academic.
-
Amaral DG,
Ishizuka N,
Claiborne B
(1990)
Neurons, numbers and the hippocampal network.
Prog Brain Res
83:1-11[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Amari S
(1977)
Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral inhibition type neural fields.
Biol Cybern
27:77-87[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Amit DJ
(1989)
In: Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks. New York: Cambridge UP.
-
Amit DJ, Tsodyks M (1991a) Quantitative study of attractor
neural network retrieving at low spike rates. I. Substrate-spikes,
rates and neuronal gain. Network: Computat Neural Sys 2:259-274.
-
Amit DJ, Tsodyks M (1991b) Effective neurons and attractor
neural networks in critical environments. Network: 2:275-294.
-
Amit DG,
Brunel N,
Tsodyks M
(1994)
Correlations of cortical Hebbian reverberations: theory versus experiment.
J Neurosci
14:6435-6445[Abstract].
-
Andersen RA,
Essick GK,
Siegel RM
(1985)
Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons.
Science
230:456-458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Barnes CA,
McNaughton BL,
O'Keefe J
(1983)
Loss of place specificity in hippocampal complex spike cells of senescent rat.
Neurobiol Aging
4:113-119[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Blair HT
(1996)
Simulation of a thalamocortical circuit for computing directional heading in the rat.
In: Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol 8 (Touretzky DS,
Moser MC,
Hasselmo ME,
eds), pp 152-158. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Blair HT,
Sharp PE
(1995)
Anticipatory head-direction cells in anterior thalamus: evidence for a thalamocortical circuit that integrates angular head velocity to compute head direction.
J Neurosci
15:6260-6270[Abstract].
-
Blum KI,
Abbott LF
(1995)
A model of spatial map formation in the hippocampus of the rat.
Neural Comput
8:85-93[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bostock E,
Muller RU,
Kubie JL
(1991)
Experience-dependent modifications of hippocampal place cell firing.
Hippocampus
1:193-206[Medline].
-
Chen LL,
Lin LH,
Barnes CA,
McNaughton BL
(1994a)
Head direction cells in the rat posterior cortex. II. Contributions of visual and idiothetic information to the directional firing.
Exp Brain Res
101:24-34[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Chen LL,
Lin LH,
Green EJ,
Barnes CA,
McNaughton BL
(1994b)
Head direction cells in the rat posterior cortex. I. Anatomical distribution and behavioral modulation.
Exp Brain Res
101:8-23[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Collett TS
(1987)
The use of visual landmarks by gerbils: reaching a goal when landmarks are displaced.
J Comp Physiol [A]
160:109-113[Medline].
-
Collett TS,
Cartwright BA,
Smith BA
(1986)
Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.
J Comp Physiol [A]
158:835-851[Medline].
-
Cugliandolo LF,
Tsodyks MV
(1994)
Capacity of networks with correlated attractors.
J Physics A
27:741-756.
-
Darwin C
(1873)
Origin of certain instincts.
Nature
7:417-418.
-
Droulez J,
Berthoz A
(1991)
A neural network model of sensoritopic maps with predictive short-term memory properties.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:9653-9655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Etienne AS
(1987)
The control of short-distance homing in the golden hamster.
In: Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animals and man (Ellen P,
Thinus-Blank C,
eds), pp 233-251. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
-
Etienne AS,
Maurer R,
Séguinot V
(1996)
Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks.
J Exp Biol
199:201-209[Abstract].
-
Fikes TG,
Townsend JT
(1995)
Moving models of motion forward: explication and a new concept.
Behav Brain Sci
18:751-753.[Web of Science]
-
Foster TC,
Castro CA,
McNaughton BL
(1989)
Spatial selectivity of rat hippocampal neurons: dependence on preparedness for movement.
Science
244:1580-1582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Fox SE,
Ranck Jr JB
(1981)
Electrophysiological characteristics of hippocampal complex-spike cells and theta cells.
Exp Brain Res
41:399-410[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Georgopoulous AP,
Lurito JT,
Petrides M,
Schwartz AB,
Massey JT
(1989)
Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector.
Science
260:47-52.
-
Georgopoulous AP,
Taira M,
Lukashin A
(1993)
Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex.
Science
260:47-52[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gothard KM,
Skaggs WE,
McNaughton BL
(1995)
Interaction between multiple spatial reference frames in the rat hippocampus.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
21:941.
-
Gothard KM,
Skaggs WE,
McNaughton BL
(1996)
Dynamics of mismatch correction in the hippocampal ensemble code for space: interaction between path integration and environmental cues.
J Neurosci
16:8027-8040[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Griniasty M,
Tsodyks MV,
Amit DJ
(1993)
Conversion of temporal correlations between stimuli to spatial correlations between attractors in neural networks.
Neural Comput
5:1-17.
-
Knierim JJ,
Kudrimoti HS,
McNaughton BL
(1995)
Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability.
J Neurosci
15:1648-1659[Abstract].
-
Knierim JJ,
Kudrimoti HS,
Skaggs WE,
McNaughton BL
(1996)
The interaction between vestibular cues and visual landmark learning in spatial navigation.
In: Perception, memory, and emotion: frontiers in neuroscience (Ono T,
McNaughton B,
Molotchnikoff S,
Rolls E,
Nishijo H,
eds), pp 343-357. New York: Elsevier Science.
-
Kubie JL,
Ranck JB
(1983)
Sensory-behavioral correlates in individual hippocampal neurons in three situations: space and context.
In: Neurobiology of the hippocampus (Seifert W,
ed), pp 433-447. New York: Academic.
-
Leonhard CL,
Stackman RW,
Taube JS
(1996)
Head direction cells recorded from the lateral mammillary nuclei in rats.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
22:1873.
-
Markus EJ,
Barnes CA,
McNaughton BL,
Gladden VL,
Skaggs WE
(1994a)
Spatial information content and reliability of hippocampal CA1 neurons: effects of visual input.
Hippocampus
4:410-421[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Markus EJ,
Qin Y,
McNaughton BL,
Barnes CA
(1994b)
Place fields are affected by behavioral and spatial constraints.
Cognit Neurosci Soc Abstr
1:91.
-
Markus EJ,
Qin YL,
Leonard B,
Skaggs WE,
McNaughton BL,
Barnes CA
(1995)
Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons.
J Neurosci
15:7079-7094[Abstract].
-
Maurer R,
Séguinot V
(1995)
What is modeling for? A critical review of the models of path integration.
J Theor Biol
175:457-475.
-
McNaughton BL
(1996)
Cognitive cartography.
Nature
381:368-369[Medline].
-
McNaughton BL,
Morris RG
(1987)
Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system.
Trends Neurosci
10:408-415[Web of Science].
-
McNaughton BL,
Barnes CA,
O'Keefe J
(1983)
The contribution of position, direction, and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of freely moving rats.
Exp Brain Res
52:41-49[Web of Science][Medline].
-
McNaughton BL,
Leonard BL,
Chen LL
(1989)
Cortico-hippocampal interactions and cognitive mapping: an hypothesis based on reintegration of the parietal and inferotemporal pathways for visual processing.
Psychobiology
17:230-235.[Web of Science]
-
McNaughton BL,
Chen LL,
Markus EJ
(1991)
"Dead reckoning", landmark learning, and the sense of direction: a neurophysiological and computational hypothesis.
J Cognit Neurosci
3:190-202.
-
McNaughton BL,
Barnes CA,
Gerrard JL,
Gothard K,
Jung MW,
Knierim JJ,
Kudrimoti H,
Qin Y,
Skaggs WE,
Suster M,
Weaver KL
(1996)
Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system.
J Exp Biol
199:173-185[Abstract].
-
Mehta M, Barnes CA, McNaughton
BL (1997) Experience-dependent, asymmetric expansion of
hippocampal place fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, in press.
-
Mittelstädt ML,
Mittelstädt H
(1980)
Homing by path integration in a mammal.
Naturwissenschaften
67:566-567[Web of Science].
-
Mizumori SJY,
Williams JD
(1993)
Directionally selective mnemonic properties of neurons in the lateral dorsal nucleus of the thalamus of rats.
J Neurosci
13:4015-4028[Abstract].
-
Mizumori SJY,
McNaughton BL,
Barnes CA
(1989)
A comparison of supramammillary and medial septal influences on hippocampal field potentials and single-unit activity.
J Neurophysiol
61:15-31[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mizumori SJY,
Barnes CA,
McNaughton BL
(1990)
Behavioral correlates of theta-on and theta-off cells recorded from hippocampal formation of mature young and aged rats.
Exp Brain Res
80:365-373[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Müller M,
Wehner R
(1988)
Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85:5287-5290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Muller RU,
Kubie JL
(1987)
The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells.
J Neurosci
7:1951-1968[Abstract].
-
Muller RU,
Kubie JL,
Ranck JB
(1987)
Spatial firing patterns of hippocampal complex-spike cells in a fixed environment.
J Neurosci
7:1935-1950[Abstract].
-
Muller RU,
Kubie JL,
Saypoff R
(1991)
The hippocampus as a cognitive graph: abridged version.
Hippocampus
1:243-246[Medline].
-
Muller RU,
Bostok E,
Taube JS,
Kubie JL
(1994)
On the directional firing properties of hippocampal place cells.
J Neurosci
14:7235-7251[Abstract].
-
Muller RU,
Stead M,
Pach J
(1996)
The hippocampus as a cognitive graph.
J Gen Physiol
107:663-694[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Munoz DP,
Pelisson D,
Guitton D
(1991)
Movement of neural activity on the superior colliculus motor map during gaze shifts.
Science
251:1358-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
O'Keefe J
(1979)
A review of the hippocampal place cells.
Prog Neurobiol
13:419-439[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Keefe J,
Burgess N
(1996)
Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurones.
Nature
381:425-428[Medline].
-
O'Keefe J,
Conway DH
(1978)
Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: why they fire where they fire.
Exp Brain Res
31:573-590[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Keefe J,
Dostrovsky J
(1971)
The hippocampus as a spatial map: preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat.
Brain Res
34:171-175[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Keefe J,
Nadel L
(1978)
In: The hippocampus as a cognitive map. New York: Clarendon.
-
O'Keefe J,
Recce ML
(1993)
Phase relationship between hippocampal place units and the EEG theta rhythm.
Hippocampus
3:317-330[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Keefe J,
Speakman A
(1987)
Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task.
Exp Brain Res
68:1-27[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Quirk GJ,
Muller RU,
Kubie JL
(1990)
The firing of the hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat's recent experience.
J Neurosci
10:2008-2017[Abstract].
-
Quirk GJ,
Muller RU,
Kubie JL,
Ranck JB
(1992)
The positional firing properties of medial entorhinal neurons: description and comparison with hippocampal place cells.
J Neurosci
12:1945-1963[Abstract].
-
Ranck Jr JB
(1973)
Studies of single neurons in dorsal hippocampal formation and septum in unrestrained rats. I. Behavioral correlates and firing repertoires.
Exp Neurol
41:461-531[Medline].
-
Ranck Jr JB
(1984)
Head direction cells in the deep cell layer of dorsal presubiculum in freely moving rats.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
10:599.
-
Ranck Jr JB
(1992)
Neuronal firing as differentiable manifolds embedded in neuronal firing rate space.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
18:321.
-
Redish AD,
Touretzky DS
(1997)
Cognitive maps beyond the hippocampus.
Hippocampus
7:15-35[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Redish AD,
Elga AN,
Touretzky DS
(1997)
A coupled attractor model of the rodent head direction system.
Network
7:671-686.[Web of Science]
-
Samsonovich A (1997) Attractor-map theory of the hippocampal
representation of space. PhD thesis, The University of Arizona.
-
Samsonovich A,
McNaughton BL
(1996)
Attractor-map-based path integration model of the hippocampus reproduces the phase precession phenomenon.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
22:1872.
-
Samsonovich A, McNaughton BL (1997) A model of formation of
the hippocampal spatial code. Soc Neurosci Abstr, in press.
-
Sharp PE
(1997)
Subicular cells generate similar spatial firing patterns in two geometrically and visually distinctive environments: comparison with hippocampal place cells.
Behav Brain Res
85:71-92[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sharp PE,
Green C
(1994)
Spatial correlates of firing patterns of single cells in the subiculum of freely moving rat.
J Neurosci
14:2339-2356[Abstract].
-
Sharp PE,
Kubie JL,
Muller RU
(1990)
Firing properties of hippocampal neurons in a visually symmetrical environment: contributions of multiple sensory cues and mnemonic processes.
J Neurosci
10:3093-3105[Abstract].
-
Shen B,
McNaughton BL
(1996)
Modeling the spontaneous reactivation of experience specific hippocampal cell assemblies during sleep.
Hippocampus
6:685-692[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Shepherd GM
(1990)
In: The synaptic organization of the brain, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford UP.
-
Skaggs WE (1995) Relations between the theta rhythm and
activity patterns of hippocampal neurons. PhD thesis, The University of
Arizona.
-
Skaggs WE,
McNaughton BL
(1996)
Replay of neuronal firing sequences in rat hippocampus during sleep following spatial experience.
Science
271:1870-1873[Abstract].
-
Skaggs WE,
Knierim JJ,
Kudrimoti HS,
McNaughton BL
(1995)
A model of the neural basis of the rat's sense of direction.
In: Advances in neural information processing systems (Tesauro G,
Touretzky D,
Leen T,
eds), pp 130-180. Cambridge: MIT.
-
Skaggs WE,
McNaughton BL,
Wilson MA,
Barnes CA
(1996)
Theta phase precession in hippocampal neuronal populations and the compression of temporal sequences.
Hippocampus
6:149-172[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sparks DL,
Nelson JS
(1987)
Sensory and motor maps in the mammalian superior colliculus.
Trends Neurosci
10:312-314[Web of Science].
-
Sparks DL,
Lee C,
Rohrer WH
(1990)
In: Population coding of the direction, amplitude and velocity of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, Vol LV, pp 805-811. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
-
Strogatz SH
(1994)
In: Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
-
Taube JS
(1995a)
Head direction cells recorded in the interior thalamic nuclei of freely moving rats.
J Neurosci
15:70-86[Abstract].
-
Taube JS
(1995b)
Place cells recorded in the parasubiculum of freely moving rats.
Hippocampus
5:569-583[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Taube JS,
Burton HL
(1995)
Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation.
J Neurophysiol
74:1953-1971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Taube JS,
Muller RU,
Ranck JB
(1990)
Head direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.
J Neurosci
10:420-435[Abstract].
-
Thinus-Blank C, Bouzouba L, Chaix K, Chapius N, Durup M, Poucet
B (1987) A study of spatial parameters encoded during
exploration in hamsters. J Exp Psychol: Animal Behav Proc
13:418-427.
-
Touretzky DS,
Redish AD
(1996)
A theory of rodent navigation based on interacting representations of space.
Hippocampus
6:247-270[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Touretzky DS,
Redish AD,
Wan HS
(1993)
Neural representation of space using sinusoidal arrays.
Neural Comp
5:869-884[Web of Science].
-
Tsodyks M,
Sejnowski T
(1995)
Associative memory and hippocampal place cells.
Int J Neural Sys [Suppl]
6:81-86.
-
Tsodyks M,
Skaggs WE,
Sejnowski TJ,
McNaughton BL
(1995)
On the phase relation between excitatory and inhibitory populations during hippocampal theta rhythm.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
21:941.
-
Whishaw IQ,
Vanderwolf CH
(1973)
Hippocampal EEG and behavior: changes in amplitude and frequency of RSA (theta rhythm) associated with spontaneous and learned movement patterns in rats and cats.
Behav Biol
8:461-484[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wiener SI
(1993)
Spatial and behavioral correlates of striatal neurons in rats performing a self-initiated navigation task.
J Neurosci
13:3802-3817[Abstract].
-
Wilson MA,
McNaughton BL
(1993)
Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space.
Science
261:1055-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Worden R
(1992)
Navigation by fragment fitting: a theory of hippocampal function.
Hippocampus
2:165-188[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zhang K
(1996)
Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory.
J Neurosci
16:2112-2126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zipser D
(1985)
A computational model of hippocampal place fields.
Behav Neurosci
99:1006-1018[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zipser D,
Andersen RA
(1988)
A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons.
Nature
331:679-684[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. Muzzio, C. Kentros, and E. Kandel
What is remembered? Role of attention on the encoding and retrieval of hippocampal representations
J. Physiol.,
June 15, 2009;
587(12):
2837 - 2854.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. R. Isaac, K. A. Buchanan, R. U. Muller, and J. R. Mellor
Hippocampal Place Cell Firing Patterns Can Induce Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity In Vitro
J. Neurosci.,
May 27, 2009;
29(21):
6840 - 6850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lisman and A.D. Redish
Prediction, sequences and the hippocampus
Phil Trans R Soc B,
May 12, 2009;
364(1521):
1193 - 1201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Clark, A. Sarma, and J. S. Taube
Head Direction Cell Instability in the Anterior Dorsal Thalamus after Lesions of the Interpeduncular Nucleus
J. Neurosci.,
January 14, 2009;
29(2):
493 - 507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Diba and G. Buzsaki
Hippocampal Network Dynamics Constrain the Time Lag between Pyramidal Cells across Modified Environments
J. Neurosci.,
December 10, 2008;
28(50):
13448 - 13456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Fenton, H.-Y. Kao, S. A. Neymotin, A. Olypher, Y. Vayntrub, W. W. Lytton, and N. Ludvig
Unmasking the CA1 Ensemble Place Code by Exposures to Small and Large Environments: More Place Cells and Multiple, Irregularly Arranged, and Expanded Place Fields in the Larger Space
J. Neurosci.,
October 29, 2008;
28(44):
11250 - 11262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Gerrard, S. N. Burke, B. L. McNaughton, and C. A. Barnes
Sequence Reactivation in the Hippocampus Is Impaired in Aged Rats
J. Neurosci.,
July 30, 2008;
28(31):
7883 - 7890.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Alvernhe, T. Van Cauter, E. Save, and B. Poucet
Different CA1 and CA3 Representations of Novel Routes in a Shortcut Situation
J. Neurosci.,
July 16, 2008;
28(29):
7324 - 7333.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. R. Fiete, Y. Burak, and T. Brookings
What Grid Cells Convey about Rat Location
J. Neurosci.,
July 2, 2008;
28(27):
6858 - 6871.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Ji and M. A. Wilson
Firing Rate Dynamics in the Hippocampus Induced by Trajectory Learning
J. Neurosci.,
April 30, 2008;
28(18):
4679 - 4689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Siegel, J. P. Neunuebel, and J. J. Knierim
Dominance of the Proximal Coordinate Frame in Determining the Locations of Hippocampal Place Cell Activity During Navigation
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2008;
99(1):
60 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. T. Rolls
An attractor network in the hippocampus: Theory and neurophysiology
Learn. Mem.,
November 15, 2007;
14(11):
714 - 731.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Papp, M. P Witter, and A. Treves
The CA3 network as a memory store for spatial representations
Learn. Mem.,
November 15, 2007;
14(11):
732 - 744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Leutgeb and J. K. Leutgeb
Pattern separation, pattern completion, and new neuronal codes within a continuous CA3 map
Learn. Mem.,
November 15, 2007;
14(11):
745 - 757.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Kesner
Behavioral functions of the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus
Learn. Mem.,
November 15, 2007;
14(11):
771 - 781.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Geisler, D. Robbe, M. Zugaro, A. Sirota, and G. Buzsaki
Hippocampal place cell assemblies are speed-controlled oscillators
PNAS,
May 8, 2007;
104(19):
8149 - 8154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Giocomo, E. A. Zilli, E. Fransen, and M. E. Hasselmo
Temporal Frequency of Subthreshold Oscillations Scales with Entorhinal Grid Cell Field Spacing
Science,
March 23, 2007;
315(5819):
1719 - 1722.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. T. Blair, A. C. Welday, and K. Zhang
Scale-Invariant Memory Representations Emerge from Moire Interference between Grid Fields That Produce Theta Oscillations: A Computational Model
J. Neurosci.,
March 21, 2007;
27(12):
3211 - 3229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Knierim
Neural representations of location outside the hippocampus
Learn. Mem.,
July 1, 2006;
13(4):
405 - 415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Bingman and P. E. Sharp
Neuronal implementation of hippocampal-mediated spatial behavior: a comparative evolutionary perspective.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev,
June 1, 2006;
5(2):
80 - 91.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Sargolini, M. Fyhn, T. Hafting, B. L. McNaughton, M. P. Witter, M.-B. Moser, and E. I. Moser
Conjunctive representation of position, direction, and velocity in entorhinal cortex.
Science,
May 5, 2006;
312(5774):
758 - 762.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Fuhs and D. S. Touretzky
A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex.
J. Neurosci.,
April 19, 2006;
26(16):
4266 - 4276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Olypher, D. Klement, and A. A. Fenton
Cognitive Disorganization in Hippocampus: A Physiological Model of the Disorganization in Psychosis
J. Neurosci.,
January 4, 2006;
26(1):
158 - 168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Fuhs, S. R. VanRhoads, A. E. Casale, B. McNaughton, and D. S. Touretzky
Influence of Path Integration Versus Environmental Orientation on Place Cell Remapping Between Visually Identical Environments
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2005;
94(4):
2603 - 2616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Terrazas, M. Krause, P. Lipa, K. M. Gothard, C. A. Barnes, and B. L. McNaughton
Self-Motion and the Hippocampal Spatial Metric
J. Neurosci.,
August 31, 2005;
25(35):
8085 - 8096.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Leutgeb, J. K. Leutgeb, C. A. Barnes, E. I. Moser, B. L. McNaughton, and M.-B. Moser
Independent Codes for Spatial and Episodic Memory in Hippocampal Neuronal Ensembles
Science,
July 22, 2005;
309(5734):
619 - 623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Wills, C. Lever, F. Cacucci, N. Burgess, and J. O'Keefe
Attractor Dynamics in the Hippocampal Representation of the Local Environment
Science,
May 6, 2005;
308(5723):
873 - 876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Samsonovich and G. A. Ascoli
A simple neural network model of the hippocampus suggesting its pathfinding role in episodic memory retrieval
Learn. Mem.,
March 1, 2005;
12(2):
193 - 208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Krichmar, D. A. Nitz, J. A. Gally, and G. M. Edelman
Characterizing functional hippocampal pathways in a brain-based device as it solves a spatial memory task
PNAS,
February 8, 2005;
102(6):
2111 - 2116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cacucci, C. Lever, T. J. Wills, N. Burgess, and J. O'Keefe
Theta-Modulated Place-by-Direction Cells in the Hippocampal Formation in the Rat
J. Neurosci.,
September 22, 2004;
24(38):
8265 - 8277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Leutgeb, J. K. Leutgeb, A. Treves, M.-B. Moser, and E. I. Moser
Distinct Ensemble Codes in Hippocampal Areas CA3 and CA1
Science,
August 27, 2004;
305(5688):
1295 - 1298.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Rivard, Y. Li, P.-P. Lenck-Santini, B. Poucet, and R. U. Muller
Representation of Objects in Space by Two Classes of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 28, 2004;
124(1):
9 - 25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. Wilson, S. Ikonen, I. Gureviciene, R. W. McMahan, M. Gallagher, H. Eichenbaum, and H. Tanila
Cognitive Aging and the Hippocampus: How Old Rats Represent New Environments
J. Neurosci.,
April 14, 2004;
24(15):
3870 - 3878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Taube and J. P. Bassett
Persistent Neural Activity in Head Direction Cells
Cereb Cortex,
November 1, 2003;
13(11):
1162 - 1172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Anderson and K. J. Jeffery
Heterogeneous Modulation of Place Cell Firing by Changes in Context
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 2003;
23(26):
8827 - 8835.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Knierim
Dynamic Interactions between Local Surface Cues, Distal Landmarks, and Intrinsic Circuitry in Hippocampal Place Cells
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 2002;
22(14):
6254 - 6264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. H. Brun, M. K. Otnass, S. Molden, H.-A. Steffenach, M. P. Witter, M.-B. Moser, and E. I. Moser
Place Cells and Place Recognition Maintained by Direct Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuitry
Science,
June 21, 2002;
296(5576):
2243 - 2246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Aota, B. L. McNaughton, and P. Lipa
Bimodality of Theta Phase Precession in Hippocampal Place Cells in Freely Running Rats
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2002;
87(6):
2629 - 2642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Gothard, K. L. Hoffman, F. P. Battaglia, and B. L. McNaughton
Dentate Gyrus and CA1 Ensemble Activity during Spatial Reference Frame Shifts in the Presence and Absence of Visual Input
J. Neurosci.,
September 15, 2001;
21(18):
7284 - 7292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Cooper and S. J. Y. Mizumori
Temporary Inactivation of the Retrosplenial Cortex Causes a Transient Reorganization of Spatial Coding in the Hippocampus
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2001;
21(11):
3986 - 4001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Knierim and B. L. McNaughton
Hippocampal Place-Cell Firing During Movement in Three-Dimensional Space
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2001;
85(1):
105 - 116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Redish, E. S. Rosenzweig, J. D. Bohanick, B. L. McNaughton, and C. A. Barnes
Dynamics of Hippocampal Ensemble Activity Realignment: Time versus Space
J. Neurosci.,
December 15, 2000;
20(24):
9298 - 9309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kali and P. Dayan
The Involvement of Recurrent Connections in Area CA3 in Establishing the Properties of Place Fields: a Model
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 2000;
20(19):
7463 - 7477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Fenton, G. Csizmadia, and R. U. Muller
Conjoint Control of Hippocampal Place Cell Firing by Two Visual Stimuli: I. the Effects of Moving the Stimuli on Firing Field Positions
J. Gen. Physiol.,
August 1, 2000;
116(2):
191 - 210.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Fenton, G. Csizmadia, and R. U. Muller
Conjoint Control of Hippocampal Place Cell Firing by Two Visual Stimuli: II. a Vector-Field Theory That Predicts Modifications of the Representation of the Environment
J. Gen. Physiol.,
August 1, 2000;
116(2):
211 - 222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Holden and B. Therrien
The Effect of Familiarity on Distraction and Single Cue Use after Hippocampal Damage
Biol Res Nurs,
January 1, 2000;
1(3):
165 - 178.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Leutgeb and S. J. Y. Mizumori
Excitotoxic Septal Lesions Result in Spatial Memory Deficits and Altered Flexibility of Hippocampal Single-Unit Representations
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 1999;
19(15):
6661 - 6672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Q. Whishaw and B. Gorny
Path Integration Absent in Scent-Tracking Fimbria-Fornix Rats: Evidence for Hippocampal Involvement in "Sense of Direction" and "Sense of Distance" Using Self-Movement Cues
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 1999;
19(11):
4662 - 4673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S. Kudrimoti, C. A. Barnes, and B. L. McNaughton
Reactivation of Hippocampal Cell Assemblies: Effects of Behavioral State, Experience, and EEG Dynamics
J. Neurosci.,
May 15, 1999;
19(10):
4090 - 4101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Matsumura, H. Nishijo, R. Tamura, S. Eifuku, S. Endo, and T. Ono
Spatial- and Task-Dependent Neuronal Responses during Real and Virtual Translocation in the Monkey Hippocampal Formation
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 1999;
19(6):
2381 - 2393.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. Stackman and J. S. Taube
Firing Properties of Rat Lateral Mammillary Single Units: Head Direction, Head Pitch, and Angular Head Velocity
J. Neurosci.,
November 1, 1998;
18(21):
9020 - 9037.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. E. Skaggs and B. L. McNaughton
Spatial Firing Properties of Hippocampal CA1 Populations in an Environment Containing Two Visually Identical Regions
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 1998;
18(20):
8455 - 8466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Knierim, H. S. Kudrimoti, and B. L. McNaughton
Interactions Between Idiothetic Cues and External Landmarks in the Control of Place Cells and Head Direction Cells
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 1998;
80(1):
425 - 446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Q. Whishaw and H. Maaswinkel
Rats with Fimbria-Fornix Lesions Are Impaired in Path Integration: A Role for the Hippocampus in "Sense of Direction"
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 1998;
18(8):
3050 - 3058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Zhang, I. Ginzburg, B. L. McNaughton, and T. J. Sejnowski
Interpreting Neuronal Population Activity by Reconstruction: Unified Framework With Application to Hippocampal Place Cells
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 1998;
79(2):
1017 - 1044.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zinyuk, S. Kubik, Yu. Kaminsky, A. A. Fenton, and J. Bures
Understanding hippocampal activity by using purposeful behavior: Place navigation induces place cell discharge in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant spatial reference frames
PNAS,
March 28, 2000;
97(7):
3771 - 3776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|