 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 15,
Issue of August 1, 1997
pp. 5921-5927
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Noxious Cutaneous Thermal Stimuli Induce a Graded Release of
Endogenous Substance P in the Spinal Cord: Imaging Peptide Action
In Vivo
Brian J. Allen1, 3,
Scott D. Rogers1, 3,
Joseph
R. Ghilardi1, 3,
Patrick M. Menning1, 3,
Michael A. Kuskowski2,
Allan I. Basbaum4,
Donald A. Simone3, and
Patrick W. Mantyh1, 3
1 Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory and
2 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center,
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, and 4 Department of Anatomy
and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San
Francisco, California 94143
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons synthesize and transport
substance P (SP) to the spinal cord where it is released in response to
intense noxious somatosensory stimuli. We have shown previously that SP
release in vivo causes a rapid and reversible
internalization of SP receptors (SPRs) in dorsal horn neurons, which
may provide a pharmacologically specific image of neurons activated by
SP. Here, we report that noxious heat (43°, 48°, and 55°C) and
cold (10°, 0°, 10°, and 20°C) stimuli, but not innocuous
warm (38°C) and cold (20°C) stimuli, applied to the hindpaw of
anesthetized rats induce SPR internalization in spinal cord neurons
that is graded with respect to the intensity of the thermal stimulus. Thus, with increasing stimulus intensities, both the total number of
SPR+ lamina I neurons showing SPR internalization and the number of
internalized SPR+ endosomes within each SPR immunoreactive neuron
showed a significant increase. These data suggest that thermal stimuli
induce a graded release of SP from primary afferent terminals and that
agonist dependent receptor endocytosis provides evidence of a spatially
and pharmacologically unique "neurochemical signature" after
specific somatosensory stimuli.
Key words:
substance P receptor;
tachykinin;
neurokinin-1;
nociception;
pain;
sensory neuron
INTRODUCTION
Neurons with cell bodies located in dorsal root
ganglia (DRG) convey somatosensory information from peripheral tissues
to the CNS. These DRG neurons synthesize several neurotransmitters that
are released into the spinal cord to signal somatosensory stimulation.
To understand further how DRG neurons convey somatosensory information
and how somatosensory information is processed by spinal cord neurons,
several issues need to be clarified. First, it remains to be determined
whether release of a particular sensory neurotransmitter(s) in the
spinal cord is correlated with stimulation of a particular sensory
modality and with excitation of a specific group of primary afferent
fibers. Second, it is important to determine whether transmitter
release is graded with stimulus intensity. Last, correlation of the
intensity of sensory stimulation with the neurochemical changes that
take place in the spinal cord will begin to provide data on how
somatosensory stimuli are encoded within the spinal cord and whether
different intensities and modalities of sensory stimulation generate a
unique "neurochemical signature" within the spinal cord.
Substance P (SP), an undecapeptide that is present in 20-30% of
DRG neurons, is one of the most extensively studied primary afferent
neurotransmitters. Several lines of evidence suggest that SP is
involved in signaling nociceptive information in the spinal cord.
First, SP is contained primarily in small-diameter afferent fibers and
is released in the spinal cord after a noxious stimulus (Hokfelt et
al., 1975 ; Dalsgaard et al., 1984 ; Boehmer et al., 1989 ; Levine et al.,
1993 ). Second, iontophoresis of SP onto the spinal cord has been
reported to excite selectively the spinal nociceptive neurons with
minimal effect on the non-nociceptive neurons (Radhakrishnan and Henry,
1991 ; Salter and Henry, 1991 ; however, see De Koninck and Henry, 1991 ).
Noxious cutaneous stimulation and electrical stimulation of a
peripheral nerve at C-fiber strength evoke the release of SP in the
spinal cord (Schaible et al., 1990 ; Duggan et al., 1991 ). Third, the
release of SP in the spinal cord is inhibited by opiate analgesics
(Jessell and Iversen, 1977 ; Yaksh, 1988 ; Aimone and Yaksh, 1989 ), and
the depletion of SP by capsaicin (a neurotoxin that is relatively
selective for unmyelinated sensory neurons, including those containing
SP) is associated with a loss of behavioral responses to noxious
stimuli (Buck et al., 1983 ; Buck and Burks, 1986 ). Finally, in animals
with behavioral hyperalgesia resulting from experimental polyarthritis,
the release of SP in the spinal dorsal horn is evoked by normally
innocuous mechanical stimuli (Schaible et al., 1990 ).
The major receptor that SP interacts with in the spinal cord is the SP
receptor (SPR), also known as the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor. The SPR
is a prototypical G-protein-coupled receptor with seven
transmembrane-spanning domains that, when activated, induce inositol
phospholipid hydrolysis (Sjodin et al., 1980 ; Reubi et al., 1990 ;
Garland et al., 1994 ) and in some cases induce adenylate cyclase. In
previous experiments, we have shown that a subpopulation of spinal cord
neurons expresses SPR immunoreactivity and that this immunoreactivity
is present along most of the plasma membrane, in both the cell body and
dendrites (Liu et al., 1994 ). We have also shown in vivo
that injection of SP into the striatum (Mantyh et al., 1995a ) or
intraplantar injection of the irritant capsaicin (Mantyh et al.,
1995b ), which causes release of SP, evoked massive endocytosis of SPRs
in striatal and spinal cord neurons, respectively. This receptor
internalization, which follows receptor activation, is rapid, peaking
at 5-10 min after SP injection into the striatum and at 5-10 min
after capsaicin injection into the hindpaw, and is blocked by selective
nonpeptide SP antagonists. Agonist-induced receptor internalization
seems to be a common feature of several G-protein-coupled receptors and
has been suggested to contribute to receptor desensitization,
resensitization, and ligand degradation (Senogles et al., 1990 ;
Kobilka, 1992 ; Caron and Lefkowitz, 1993 ; Lefkowitz et al., 1993 ; Von
Zastrow et al., 1993 ; Garland et al., 1996 ).
In the present study, we used SPR internalization to monitor the
populations of spinal cord neurons activated by SP after noxious and
innocuous thermal stimuli were applied to the hindpaw of rats. We chose
to apply thermal stimuli because such stimuli can be delivered in a
highly quantifiable and reproducible manner (Yarnitsky et al., 1992 ).
We examined whether there is graded SPR internalization in response to
increasing intensities of thermal stimuli by determining whether the
number of SPR immunoreactive neurons showing SP-induced internalization
increases with stimulus intensity. Additionally, we examined whether
there is a greater amount of SPR internalization in individual cells
and whether only a specific subpopulation of SPR+ cells is activated
after cutaneous thermal stimuli.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals. A total of 63 male Sprague Dawley rats
(275-300 gm) were used. Animals were housed two to a cage on a 12 hr
light/dark cycle and were given food and water ad libitum.
All procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committees at the VA
Medical Center and the University of Minnesota.
Thermal stimulation of the rat hindpaw. Animals were divided
randomly into 12 groups of at least five rats each and were
anesthetized deeply with an intraperitoneal injection of sodium
pentobarbital (60 mg/kg). One randomly selected hindpaw was stabilized
by being placed into a clay mold. A feedback-controlled thermal
stimulator (Peltier type) with a contact thermode measuring 1 cm2 was used to deliver noxious and innocuous
stimuli to the plantar surface of the stabilized hindpaw. Each group of
animals was given one thermal stimulus. Noxious heat (43°, 48°, and
55°C) and noxious cold (10°, 0°, 10°, and 20°C) stimuli
were delivered from an adapting temperature of 32°C for 30 sec, after
which time the thermode was returned to the adapting temperature. Heat
stimuli were applied at a rate of 20°C/sec, and cold stimuli were
applied at a rate of 5°C/sec. The rate refers to the linear change in temperature (°C/sec) from the baseline to the stimulus temperature. Two additional groups of rats were given innocuous thermal stimuli; innocuous cold (20°C) and innocuous heat (38°C) were applied in the
same manner as the noxious stimuli. A separate group of animals received the adapting temperature (32°C) for 5 min and 30 sec, and
then the animals were perfused. In this group, the contralateral portion of the dorsal horn was used as the control. A separate group of
normal unstimulated animals were also perfused. After noxious and
innocuous stimuli, the thermode was kept in contact with the hindpaw
for 5 min at the adapting temperature, and then the animals were
removed and immediately killed (see below).
Preparation and characterization of the anti-SPR antibody.
The antibody used in the present study was raised against a synthetic 15 amino acid peptide sequence [SPR(393-407)]
corresponding to the C terminus of the rat SPR (Vigna et al., 1994 ).
The immunogen consisted of synthetic peptide conjugated to bovine
thyroglobulin using glutaraldehyde. The antiserum recognizes a protein
band at 80-90 kDa on Western blots of membranes prepared from cells transfected with the rat SPR (Vigna et al., 1994 ). The antibody staining in the rat spinal cord was blocked by preabsorbing the antiserum with SPR(393-407). Light microscopy revealed an excellent correlation between the patterns of SPR immunoreactivity and
the patterns of 125I-SP binding sites in the CNS. In the
striatum, the SP-induced internalization of the SPR is dose-dependent:
EC50 = 0.93 nM for SP, EC50 = 15.0 nM for neurokinin A, and EC50>1.0
µM for neurokinin B (Mantyh et al., 1995a ); these
potencies correspond closely to the affinities of these peptides for
the rat SPR (Mantyh et al., 1989 ). The SP-induced internalization of
the SPR also seems to be caused by interaction with the SPR agonist
binding site because injection of RP 67,580, a nonpeptide antagonist,
produced no significant internalization of the SPR by itself but
potently blocked the SP-induced SPR internalization both in the
striatum in vivo (Mantyh et al., 1995a ) and in primary
cultures of neonatal spinal cord neurons (S. D. Rogers and P. W. Mantyh, unpublished observations).
Immunohistochemical localization of the SPR. After thermal
stimulation, anesthetized rats were perfused via the ascending aorta
with 500 ml of 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4, at 22°C, followed by
750 ml of PBS, pH 6.9, at 4°C, containing 4% formaldehyde and 12.5% picric acid. Perfusions were timed such that the fixative entered the
spinal cord 8 min after the end of the 30 sec stimulus, which is the
time at which maximal SPR internalization was observed after local
injection of SP or after injection of capsaicin into the hindpaw
(Mantyh et al., 1995a ). After perfusion, the spinal cord was removed,
blocked in the transverse plane, post-fixed for between 12 and 24 hr at
4°C in PBS, pH 6.9, containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 12.5% picric
acid, and placed for 24 hr at 4°C in PBS, pH 7.4, containing 30%
sucrose. The cords were then sectioned at a thickness of 60 µm on a
sliding microtome, and serial sections were collected in PBS (Mantyh et
al., 1995b ). The tissue sections were pretreated for 30 min at 22°C
in PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% saponin and 1.0% normal goat serum
and then incubated for 12 hr at 22°C in PBS, pH 7.4, containing 1.0% normal goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, and the anti-SPR antibody (no.
11884-5) at a concentration of 1:5000.
After incubation with the primary antibody, the tissue sections were
washed for 30 min at 22°C in PBS, pH 7.4, and then incubated in the
secondary antibody solution, pH 7.4, for 2 hr at 22°C. This secondary
antibody solution was identical to the primary antibody solution with
the exception of cyanine (Cy-3)-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (no.
711-165-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) present at a
concentration of 1:600 in place of the anti-SPR antibody. Finally, the
tissue sections were washed for 20 min at 22°C in PBS, pH 7.4, mounted onto gelatin-coated slides, dehydrated via an alcohol gradient
(70, 90, 100%), cleared in xylene, and coverslipped with DPX (Fluka
BioChemika, Ronkonkoma, NY) to reduce photobleaching. To confirm the
specificity of the antibody, we routinely performed controls such as
leaving out the primary antibody and preabsorbing the anti-SPR antibody
with the peptide it was raised against (Mantyh et al., 1995a ,b ).
Quantification of SPR internalization in the cell bodies of
lamina I neurons. The tissue sections obtained from the
immunohistochemical protocol described above were analyzed by
fluorescent and confocal microscopy to determine the spinal levels and
laminae in which significant SPR internalization occurred. To examine
the sites of internalization within the cell, we viewed sections with
an MRC-1024 Confocal Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Boston, MA) equipped with
a 60× oil immersion objective and with an Olympus AX-70 microscope equipped for epifluorescence (Olympus, Lake Success, NY). The microscope was set up as described previously (Mantyh et al., 1995a ,b ).
In all cases we quantified the SPR internalization in lamina I cell
bodies. SPR immunoreactive endosomes were counted in 50 SPR
immunoreactive lamina I neurons in the medial aspect of the fourth
lumbar (L4) spinal segment in each animal, using a Leitz Orthoplan II
microscope equipped for fluorescence. These data were then given as the
average number of SPR immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive
lamina I neuron. An endosome was defined as an intense SPR
immunoreactive intracellular organelle between 0.1 and 0.7 µm in
diameter that was clearly not part of the external plasma membrane. In
cases in which there were >50 SPR immunoreactive endosomes per cell
body, we counted the neuron as having 50 endosomes per cell body
because the dense intracellular packing of the SPR immunoreactive
endosomes made exact delineation of each endosome difficult.
Statistical analysis. Two separate parameters, the
proportion of cell bodies with more than five SPR immunoreactive
endosomes per SPR immunoreactive lamina I neuron and the mean number of SPR immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive cell body, were
analyzed to determine whether noxious thermal stimuli evoked a graded
release of SP. The proportion of SPR immunoreactive lamina I cells with
more than five SPR immunoreactive endosomes per cell body and the mean
number of SPR immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive lamina I
cell body were computed separately for each temperature group. The
proportion of cell bodies with more than five SPR immunoreactive
endosomes as a function of stimulus temperature was evaluated using the
2 test. After arcsine transformation of the proportions,
an analog of Dunnett's test was used to compare the mean proportion of
cell bodies among the groups with that of the control group (Levy, 1975 ; Zar, 1984 ).
A one-way ANOVA was used to determine the effect of temperature on the
number of SPR immunoreactive endosomes per cell body. Comparisons of
mean values between individual groups were made using the nonparametric
Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS
Distribution of SPR immunoreactivity in the spinal cord
segment L4
In the normal spinal cord (L4) of unstimulated rats, SPR
immunoreactive neurons comprise ~5-7% of the neurons within lamina I, and the SPR immunoreactivity decorates almost the entire dendritic and somatic surface of each neuron that expresses this receptor (Liu et
al., 1994 ; Brown et al., 1995 ). Figure 1 shows
representative examples of normal cells (C3,
C4) that express the SPR on the cell surface and also
of SPR internalization (C1, C2, C5,
C6) after the various stimulus conditions. In
contrast, cell bodies containing SPR immunoreactivity are almost
completely absent within lamina II, although there is a dense plexus of
SPR+ dendrites in both laminae I and II. In the deeper laminae, SPR+
neuronal cell bodies are located in laminae III-V, with many of these
deep SPR+ neurons having dorsally directed dendritic arbors that
traverse the substantia gelatinosa to reach the marginal layer (Brown
et al., 1995 ). Under normal or unstimulated conditions, most SPR immunoreactivity in lamina I SPR+ neurons is associated with the plasma
membrane, with few SPR+ endosomes present in the cytoplasm.
Fig. 1.
Confocal images of SPR immunoreactivity in the rat
lumbar spinal cord. A, Confocal image of the rat spinal
cord (L4 segment) 8 min after the plantar surface of the right hindpaw
was stimulated for 30 sec with a 55°C thermode. The
boxes show the areas of the dorsal horn of the spinal
cord that were sampled on the contralateral and stimulated sides. This
medial aspect of the spinal cord is also the area that receives
nociceptive inputs from the plantar surface of the hindpaw. In
A the SPR immunoreactivity appears white,
whereas in B and C panels the SPR
immunoreactivity appears gray (low levels) and
white (high levels). B1,
B2, Confocal images, projected from 11 optical
sections acquired at 0.7 µm intervals, of SPR immunoreactivity in the
contralateral and ipsilateral sides, respectively, of the lumbar spinal
cord after a 20°C stimulus to the right hindpaw. In the
contralateral, unstimulated dorsal horn (B1),
the SPR immunoreactivity is present on the plasma membrane, whereas on
the stimulated side (B2), the SPR
immunoreactivity is associated mainly with SPR+ endosomes.
C1-C6, Confocal photomicrographs, projected from 22 optical sections acquired at 0.7 µm intervals, of SPR+ lamina I cell
bodies 8 min after a single thermal stimulus was delivered to the
hindpaw. In the contralateral control (C3) and in the
ipsilateral spinal cord after the 32°C stimulus
(C4), the SPR immunoreactivity is associated with
the cell surface. After noxious thermal stimuli, the cell bodies
experience a loss of immunoreactivity from the cell surface and an
increase in the number of SPR+ endosomes in the neuronal cell body
(C1, C2, C5, C6), suggesting that there is a graded release of
SP from the primary afferents that is correlated with the intensity of
the noxious thermal stimulation. Scale bars: A, 0.4 mm;
B1-B2, 35 µm; C1-C6, 20 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (107K GIF file)]
Innocuous thermal stimulation does not induce SPR internalization
in the normal animal
The normal unstimulated group, the ipsilateral 32°C-stimulated
group, and the 32°C contralateral group had nearly the same proportion of cell bodies, with more than five SPR immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive lamina I cell body (Fig.
2A), and had the same mean number of
SPR immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive cell body (Fig.
2B). Therefore we used the 32°C contralateral group
as the control group to which all other groups were compared. The
32°C contralateral group had a mean of 0.6 (±0.2) (SEM) SPR+
endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body. Stimulation with the adapting
temperature of 32°C for 30 sec did not produce internalization of the
SPR in the ipsilateral lumbar dorsal horn; the mean number of SPR+
endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body was 0.6 (±0.2)
(p > 0.05). In the normal unstimulated group,
the mean number of SPR+ endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body was 0.6 (±0.2) (p > 0.05). After a stimulus of 20°C,
lamina I cell bodies had a mean of 0.7 (±0.3) SPR+ endosomes
(p > 0.05). For the 32°C contralateral, the
32°C ipsilateral, the normal, and the 20°C-stimulated groups, the
proportion of cell bodies with more than five SPR+ internalized
endosomes was 2, 4, 2, and 6%, respectively. Stimulation with 38°C
produced an approximately twofold increase [1.3 (±0.3)] in the mean
number of SPR+ endosomes per cell body compared with the control group,
but this did not achieve statistical significance
(p > 0.05). The proportion of cell bodies in
the 38°C group that had more than five SPR+ endosomes per cell body
was 8%. In the normal unstimulated group, in the control group, and in
groups that received stimuli of 20°, 32°, and 38°C, the SPR
immunoreactivity was found on the surface of the plasma membrane of
cell bodies and dendrites, with few if any SPR+ endosomes present in
the cytoplasm (Figs. 1, 2).
Fig. 2.
A, Mean proportion of SPR
immunoreactive lamina I cell bodies exhibiting more than five SPR
immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive lamina I cell body as a
function of stimulus intensity. B, Mean (±SEM) number
of SPR+ endosomes per cell body in SPR immunoreactive lamina I neurons.
In both cases the thermal stimulus group was compared with the 32°C
contralateral control group, and the neurons sampled were present in
the medial aspect of the rat L4 spinal segment. *p < 0.05.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
SPR internalization evoked by noxious heat and
cold stimulation
Noxious heat (43°, 48°, and 55°C) and noxious cold (10°,
0°, 10°, and 20°C) stimuli applied to the hindpaw produced
significant internalization of the SPR in lamina I cell bodies and in
dendrites located in laminae I and II, as evidenced by the increase in
both the proportion of cell bodies exhibiting SPR+ endosomes and the mean number of SPR+ endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body. Figure 2A shows that the proportion of SPR+ lamina I neurons
with more than five SPR+ endosomes per cell body increased
significantly as the intensity of noxious heat and noxious cold
increased ( 2 = 99.15; df = 10; p < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that heat stimuli of
43-55°C and cold stimuli of 10° to 20°C evoked a monotonic
increase in the number of cell bodies with SPR+ endosomes (p < 0.05).
In the thin distal dendrites in laminae I and II, SPR internalization
was accompanied by a morphological reorganization of the dendrites.
Whereas in the normal animals SPR+ dendrites have a rather homogeneous
diameter, these dendrites in the animals that received noxious thermal
stimuli became highly varicose and were characterized by large swollen
varicosities containing many SPR+ endosomes linked by thin fibers.
Although we were unable to assess quantitatively whether this
morphological reorganization of the distal dendrites was graded with
the stimulus intensity, at least qualitatively it was observed that the
greater the thermal stimulus intensity the greater the morphological
reorganization in laminae I and II dendrites. In contrast to the SPR+
neurons in lamina I, none of the stimuli used in the present
experiments induced detectable SPR internalization in any SPR+ dendrite
or cell body located ventral to the laminae II-III border (i.e., in
laminae III-V). For this reason, our analysis focused solely on
changes that occurred in SPR+ neurons located in the medial aspect of
lamina I at the L4 segment of the spinal cord, which is the primary
termination site of the sensory neurons that innervate the hindpaw.
In addition to increasing the proportion of neurons with more than five
SPR+ endosomes per cell body, noxious heat and cold stimuli also
increased the mean number of SPR+ endosomes per SPR immunoreactive
lamina I cell body. A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference
between the groups in the mean number of endosomes per cell body
[F(10,549) = 16.71; p < 0.05]. The number of SPR+ endosomes in cell bodies increased
significantly after heat stimuli of 43°, 48°, and 55°C and cold
stimuli of 10°, 0°, 10°, and 20°C.
Quantification of SPR internalization in lamina I cell bodies in
response to noxious heat
Figure 2B shows the mean (±SEM) number of
endosomes per lamina I cell body as a function of stimulus temperature
(°C). Post hoc comparisons indicated that the number of
SPR+ endosomes per cell body increased after heat stimuli of 43°,
48°, and 55°C. Stimulation with 43°C produced a more than
fourfold increase in the number of SPR+ endosomes found in the SPR+
lamina I cell body compared with the contralateral control
(p < 0.05). Twenty-four percent of these SPR+
lamina I cell bodies exhibited more than five SPR+ endosomes per cell
body, and the mean number of SPR+ endosomes per cell was 3.0 (±0.7).
Stimulation with 48°C resulted in an approximately 17-fold increase
in the mean number of SPR+ endosomes found in SPR+ lamina I cell bodies
compared with control values (p < 0.05). These
SPR+ cell bodies had an average of 11.0 (±2.1) SPR+ endosomes, and
54% of these cells had more than five SPR+ endosomes. The greatest
amount of SPR internalization was observed after the 55°C stimulus.
The number of SPR+ endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body increased
greater than 26-fold compared with the control group
(p < 0.05); these SPR+ neurons had an average of 17.0 (±2.63) internalized endosomes per cell body, and 68% of
these SPR+ lamina I cell bodies exhibited more than five endosomes.
Quantification of SPR internalization in lamina I cell bodies in
response to noxious cold
The 10°C stimulus evoked an approximately fivefold increase in
the number of SPR+ endosomes found in SPR+ lamina I cell bodies compared with those observed in the control group
(p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). The mean number of SPR+
endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body was 3.4 (±1.0), and 18% of SPR+
lamina I cells exhibited more than five SPR+ endosomes. Similarly, a
greater than sixfold increase in the number of SPR+ endosomes was
produced by the 0°C stimulus compared with control counts
(p < 0.05), and 28% of the SPR+ lamina I cell
bodies had more than five SPR+ endosomes. The mean number of SPR+
endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body was 4.8 (±1.14). Stimulation
with 10°C resulted in an 11-fold increase (p < 0.05) in the number of SPR+ endosomes found in SPR+ lamina I cell
bodies compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Fifty percent of lamina I cell bodies that exhibited SPR
internalization had more than five SPR+ endosomes and contained an
average of 7.0 (±1.3) SPR+ endosomes. Stimulation with 20°C
produced a greater than 21-fold increase in the quantity of SPR+
endosomes found in the SPR+ lamina I cell bodies compared with the
control group (p < 0.05). Sixty percent of
these cell bodies had more than five SPR+ endosomes and had an average
of 13.8 (±2.3) SPR+ endosomes per SPR+ lamina I cell body.
DISCUSSION
SPR internalization in lamina I neurons is induced by noxious
thermal stimuli and is intensity dependent
Previous reports that examined the specific somatosensory stimuli
that induce SP release in the spinal cord have been divided. Early
studies using antibody-coated microelectrodes suggested that in
barbiturate-anesthetized spinalized cats, noxious thermal, mechanical,
or chemical cutaneous stimuli increased release of SP in the lumbar
spinal cord (Duggan et al., 1988 ; Schaible et al., 1990 ). Subsequent
studies using microdialysis in decerebrate rabbits suggested that among
the noxious stimuli only mechanical and inflammatory, but not heat,
stimuli led to the detectable release of SP in the spinal cord
(Kuraishi et al., 1989 ).
In the present study, we used SPR internalization as a measure of SP
release in the spinal cord to examine the range of thermal intensities
that induce the release of SP in the spinal cord. We found that both
noxious heat (43°, 48°, and 55°C) and noxious cold (10°, 0°,
10°, and 20°C) stimuli induced a graded SPR internalization in
the spinal cord, evidenced by an increase both in the proportion of SPR
immunoreactive neurons with more than five SPR immunoreactive endosomes
per cell body and in the mean number of SPR immunoreactive endosomes
per SPR immunoreactive lamina I cell body. In contrast, innocuous heat
(38°C) and innocuous cold (20°C) did not evoke a statistically
significant increase in SP release assayed either by mean number of SPR
immunoreactive endosomes per SPR immunoreactive lamina I cell body or
by the proportion of SPR immunoreactive neurons with more than five SPR
immunoreactive endosomes per cell body.
In comparing the present results with previous reports, it is important
to compare the relative invasiveness of the techniques. Both the
antibody-coated microelectrode and the microdialysis techniques involve
inserting the measuring device into the spinal cord before stimulation.
This invasiveness may itself produce release of SP. The method of
measuring receptor internalization used in this study does not require
any manipulation of the spinal cord until after perfusion and fixation
of the animal, thus eliminating the possibility that the measuring
instrument itself may induce SP release.
In examining the increase in SPR internalization that occurred in
response to increasing thermal cutaneous stimuli, we found that the
present data are in close agreement with previous human psychophysical
data in that the magnitude of pain evoked by noxious heat or cold
increases linearly as stimulus intensity increases (Chery-Crose, 1983 ).
These data suggest that increasing intensities of thermal stimuli
increase the amount of SP released from primary afferent fibers. Thus,
with the graded release of SP from primary afferent fibers, greater
numbers of SPR+ neurons are excited, and there is a progressive
increase in the number of internalized SPRs per neuron. This could
contribute to evoked responses of dorsal horn neurons and ultimately to
perceived magnitude of pain.
The role of SP and the SPR in signaling cutaneous thermal
information in the spinal cord
Although SP has been implicated in the sensitization of spinal
cord neurons after injurious stimuli (Urban et al., 1994 ), there are
several reasons why SP may play a modulatory, as opposed to a direct,
role in the transmission of noxious information in the spinal cord.
Most importantly, the kinetics of SPR activation, desensitization, and
ultimate recycling is simply too slow to permit the SP/SPR system to be
the fast-acting primary afferent neurotransmitter system
signaling thermal stimuli in the spinal cord. Intense noxious cutaneous
stimulation induces a substantial internalization of the SPR. Once
internalized, the SPR does not recycle to the plasma membrane for
10-60 min (Mantyh et al., 1995b ). Thus, if the SPR were the principle
receptor involved in signaling noxious cutaneous information in the
spinal cord, one would expect a significant refractory period after
noxious thermal stimulation, because the majority of the SPRs would be
in the cytoplasm and unavailable for activation by extracellular SP. In
contrast, psychophysical data demonstrate that instead of a refractory
period, sensations evoked by innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli
applied repeatedly are perceived normally or may be enhanced after
injury and sensitization (Yarnitsky et al., 1992 ).
If SP is not the fast-acting primary afferent neurotransmitter that
signals noxious thermal cutaneous information in the spinal cord, what
is its role? Previous studies have suggested that SPR activation
modulates NMDA receptors that are coexpressed in the same neurons. For
example, the combined application of SP and excitatory amino acids
(including NMDA) facilitated the responses of dorsal horn neurons
(Dougherty and Willis, 1991 ; Dougherty et al., 1993 ). That SP may have
a role in modulating NMDA activity is supported by the findings that
SPR activation of phospholipase C gives rise to diacylglycerol, which
in turn stimulates protein kinase C in the presence of
phosphatidylserine and Ca2+. It has also been shown
that membrane-bound protein kinase C levels are enhanced in the dorsal
horn in laminae I and II during hyperalgesia (Mao et al., 1992 ). The
activated protein kinase C can phosphorylate cytosolic and membrane
proteins, including the NMDA receptor, and offers a mechanism for SP
modulation of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission (Yamamoto,
1988 ; Gerber et al., 1989 ). Direct support for this hypothesis comes from studies showing that activation of protein kinase C and consequent phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor induces a change in the kinetics of Mg2+ binding to the NMDA receptor that is
expressed by neurons located in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis
(Chen and Huang, 1991 , 1992 ). SP activation of protein kinase C could
enable activation of NMDA receptor channels at more negative membrane
potential levels (Chen and Huang, 1991 ). Taken together, the above data
suggest that the SPR is involved in modulating spinal cord activity as
opposed to being the principal fast-acting neurotransmitter involved in conveying noxious cutaneous thermal information.
Spinal neurons that exhibit SPR internalization in response to
noxious thermal stimuli are predominately projection neurons
Recent studies using combined retrograde labeling and
immunohistochemical labeling of SPR+ neurons in the rat spinal cord have shown that 77% of all the lamina I spinothalamic neurons at the
L4 segment of the spinal cord are also SPR immunoreactive (Marshall et
al., 1996 ), as are the majority of spinoparabrachial neurons at the L4
segment (Ding et al., 1995 ). Because many of the lamina I SPR+ neurons
in the medial aspect of L4 show SPR internalization in response to high
intensity noxious thermal stimuli, these data suggest that many of the
lamina I SPR+ neurons that are activated by noxious thermal stimuli are
direct projection neurons whose ascending fibers terminate in the
thalamus and/or in the parabrachial nucleus.
SP-induced SPR internalization as a pharmacologically selective
marker of SPR activation
The present data suggest that agonist-induced endocytosis of
receptors can be used as a pharmacologically selective index of
neuronal activity. Thus, agonist-dependent endocytosis of a signal-transducing receptor not only allows identification of the
anatomical components of a highly specific neuronal pathway, but
because the extent of receptor endocytosis is dose responsive, also
offers the possibility of quantifying postsynaptic receptor activation
at the single and intracellular level.
Using SPR internalization as a measure of SP release and receptor
activation, we have shown that there is a clear correlation between the
intensity of the noxious cutaneous thermal stimuli and the number and
magnitude of spinal cord neurons showing SPR internalization. These
data raise the possibility that there is a unique neurochemical
signature in the spinal cord that reflects both the spectrum of sensory
fibers that have discharged in response to each cutaneous stimulus and
the response properties of the spinal cord neurons. The key is that the
neurochemical signature will correlate most closely with the cellular
activity in the spinal cord as opposed to the actual modality and
intensity of the cutaneous stimulation. Thus, in animals with allodynia
or hyperalgesia, innocuous cutaneous sensory stimulation would be expected to generate a neurochemical signature that is normally observed only after noxious stimulation (Abbadie et al., 1996 ). This
would reflect the fact that because both primary sensory neurons and
spinal cord neurons are sensitized, innocuous and mildly noxious
cutaneous stimuli would now be perceived as highly noxious.
Although it is clear that sensory neurons use various
neurotransmitters in addition to SP to signal pain in the spinal cord, the present results suggest that by using a similar approach for other
neurotransmitter/receptor systems (Faure et al., 1992 ; Von Zastrow et
al., 1993 ; Benya et al., 1994 ; Roettger et al., 1995 ) it may be
possible to define ultimately the neurochemical signature of each type
of acute and chronic pain. Defining such a neurochemical signature
would seem to offer significant insight into novel therapeutic targets
for the prevention of both acute and chronic pain.
FOOTNOTES
Received Feb. 4, 1997; revised May 12, 1997; accepted May 15, 1997.
This work was supported by the National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and a
Veterans Affairs Merit Review.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Patrick W. Mantyh, Molecular
Neurobiology Laboratory (151), Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Minneapolis, MN 55417.
REFERENCES
-
Abbadie C,
Brown JL,
Mantyh PW,
Basbaum AI
(1996)
Spinal cord substance P receptor immunoreactivity increases in both inflammatory and nerve injury models of persistent pain.
Neuroscience
70:201-209[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Aimone LD,
Yaksh TL
(1989)
Opioid modulation of capsaicin-evoked release of substance P from rat spinal cord in vivo.
Peptides
10:1127-1131[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Benya RV,
Fathi Z,
Kusui T,
Pradhan T,
Battey JF,
Jensen RT
(1994)
Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-induced internalization, down-regulation, desensitization, and growth: possible role for cyclic AMP.
Mol Pharmacol
46:235-245[Abstract].
-
Boehmer CG,
Norman J,
Catton M,
Fine LG,
Mantyh PW
(1989)
High levels of mRNA coding for substance P, somatostatin and
-tubulin are expressed by rat and rabbit dorsal root ganglia neurons.
Peptides
10:1179-1194[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Brown JL,
Liu H,
Maggio JE,
Vigna SR,
Mantyh PW,
Basbaum AI
(1995)
Morphological characterization of substance P receptor-immunoreactive neurons in the rat spinal cord and trigeminal nucleus caudalis.
J Comp Neurol
356:327-344[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Buck SH,
Burks TF
(1986)
The neuropharmacology of capsaicin: review of some recent observations.
Pharmacol Rev
38:179-250[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Buck SH,
Walsh JH,
Davis TP,
Brown MR,
Yamamura HI,
Burks TF
(1983)
Characterization of the peptide and sensory neurotoxic effects of capsaicin in the guinea pig.
J Neurosci
3:2064-2074[Abstract].
-
Caron MG,
Lefkowitz RJ
(1993)
Catecholamine receptors: structure, function, and regulation.
Recent Prog Horm Res
48:277-290.
-
Chen L,
Huang LY
(1991)
Sustained potentiation of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate responses through activation of protein kinase C by a mu opioid.
Neuron
7:319-326[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Chen L,
Huang LY
(1992)
Protein kinase C reduces Mg2+ block of NMDA-receptor channels as a mechanism of modulation.
Nature
356:521-523[Medline].
-
Chery-Crose S
(1983)
Painful sensation induced by a thermal cutaneous stimulus.
Pain
17:109-137[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dalsgaard CJ,
Ygge J,
Vincent SR,
Ohrling M,
Dockray GJ,
Elde R
(1984)
Peripheral projections and neuropeptide coexistence in a subpopulation of fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase reactive spinal primary sensory neurons.
Neurosci Lett
51:139-144[Web of Science][Medline].
-
De Koninck Y,
Henry JL
(1991)
Substance P-mediated slow excitatory postsynaptic potential elicited in dorsal horn neurons in vivo by noxious stimulation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:11344-11348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ding YQ,
Takada M,
Shigemoto R,
Mizumo N
(1995)
Spinoparabrachial tract neurons showing substance P receptor-like immunoreactivity in the lumbar spinal cord of the rat.
Brain Res
674:336-340[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dougherty PM,
Willis WD
(1991)
Enhancement of spinothalamic neuron responses to chemical and mechanical stimuli following combined micro-iontophoretic application of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and substance P.
Pain
47:85-93[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dougherty PM,
Palecek J,
Zorn S,
Willis WD
(1993)
Combined application of excitatory amino acids and substance P produces long-lasting changes in responses of primate spinothalamic tract neurons.
Brain Res Rev
18:227-246[Medline].
-
Duggan AW,
Hendry IA,
Morton CR,
Hutchison WD,
Zhao ZQ
(1988)
Cutaneous stimuli releasing immunoreactive substance P in the dorsal horn of the cat.
Brain Res
451:261-273[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Duggan AW,
Hope PJ,
Lang CW,
Williams CA
(1991)
Sustained isometric contraction of skeletal muscle results in release of immunoreactive neurokinins in the spinal cord of the anaesthetized cat.
Neurosci Lett
122:191-194[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Faure MP,
Shaw I,
Gaudreau P,
Cashman N,
Beaudet A
(1992)
Binding and internalization of neurotensin in hybrid cells derived from septal cholinergic neurons.
Ann NY Acad Sci
668:345-347[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Garland AM,
Grady EF,
Payan DG,
Vigna SR,
Bunnett NW
(1994)
Agonist-induced internalization of the substance P (NK-1) receptor expressed by epithelial cells.
Biochem J
303:177-186.
-
Garland AM,
Grady EF,
Lavett M,
Vigna SR,
Froucht MM,
Krause JE,
Bunnett NW
(1996)
Mechanisms of desensitization and resensitization of G protein-coupled neurokinin-1 and neurokinin-2 receptors.
Mol Pharmacol
49:438-446[Abstract].
-
Gerber G,
Kangrga I,
Ryu PD,
Larew JS,
Randic M
(1989)
Multiple effects of phorbol esters in the rat spinal dorsal horn.
J Neurosci
9:3606-3617[Abstract].
-
Hokfelt T,
Kellerth JO,
Nilsson G,
Pernow B
(1975)
Experimental immunohistochemical studies on the localization and distribution of substance P in cat primary sensory neurons.
Brain Res
100:235-252[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Jessell TM,
Iversen LL
(1977)
Opiate analgesics inhibit substance P release from rat trigeminal nucleus.
Nature
268:549-551[Medline].
-
Kobilka B
(1992)
Adrenergic receptors as models for G protein-coupled receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
15:87-114[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kuraishi Y,
Hirota N,
Sato Y,
Hanashima N,
Takagi H,
Satoh M
(1989)
Stimulus specificity of peripherally evoked substance P release from the rabbit dorsal horn in situ.
Neuroscience
30:241-250[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lefkowitz RJ,
Cotecchia S,
Kjelsberg MA,
Pitcher J,
Koch WJ,
Inglese J,
Caron MG
(1993)
Adrenergic receptors: recent insights into their mechanism of activation and desensitization.
Adv Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res
28:1-9[Medline].
-
Levine JD,
Fields HL,
Basbaum AI
(1993)
Peptides and the primary afferent nociceptor.
J Neurosci
13:2273-2286[Abstract].
-
Levy KJ
(1975)
Some multiple range tests for variances.
Educ Psychol Meas
35:599-604.[Abstract]
-
Liu H,
Brown JL,
Jasmin L,
Maggio JE,
Vigna SR,
Mantyh PW,
Basbaum AI
(1994)
Synaptic relationship between substance P and the substance P receptor: light and electron microscopic characterization of the mismatch between neuropeptides and their receptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:1009-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mantyh PW,
Gates T,
Mantyh CR,
Maggio JE
(1989)
Autoradiographic localization and characterization of tachykinin receptor binding sites in the rat brain and peripheral tissues.
J Neurosci
9:258-279[Abstract].
-
Mantyh PW,
Allen CJ,
Ghilardi JR,
Rogers SD,
Mantyh CR,
Basbaum AI,
Vigna SR,
Maggio JE
(1995a)
Visualization of rapid endosomal internalization of a G-protein coupled receptor in the CNS in vivo.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:2622-2626[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mantyh PW,
DeMaster E,
Malhotra A,
Ghilardi JR,
Rogers SD,
Mantyh CR,
Basbaum AI,
Vigna SR,
Maggio JE,
Simone DA
(1995b)
Receptor endocytosis and dendrite reshaping in spinal neurons after somatosensory stimulation.
Science
268:1629-1632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mao J,
Price DD,
Hayes RL,
Lu J,
Mayer DJ
(1992)
Differential roles of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor activation in induction and maintenance of thermal hyperalgesia in rats with painful peripheral mononeuropathy.
Brain Res
598:271-278[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Marshall GE,
Shehab SA,
Spike RC,
Todd AJ
(1996)
Neurokinin-1 receptors on lumbar spinothalamic neurons in the rat.
Neuroscience
72:255-263[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Radhakrishnan V,
Henry JL
(1991)
Novel substance P antagonist, CP-96,345, blocks responses of cat spinal dorsal horn neurons to noxious cutaneous stimulation and to substance P.
Neurosci Lett
132:39-43[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Reubi JC, Kvols L, Krenning E, Lamberts
SWJ (1990) Distribution of somatostatin receptors in normal
and tumor tissue. Metabolism 39[Suppl 2]:78-81.
-
Roettger BF,
Rentsch RU,
Pinon D,
Holicky E,
Hadac E,
Larkin JM,
Miller LJ
(1995)
Dual pathways of internalization of the cholecystokinin receptor.
J Cell Biol
128:1029-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Salter MW,
Henry JL
(1991)
Responses of functionally identified neurones in the dorsal horn of the cat spinal cord to substance P, neurokinin A and physalaemin.
Neuroscience
43:601-610[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schaible H-G,
Jarrott B,
Hope PJ,
Duggan AW
(1990)
Release of immunoreactive substance P in the spinal cord during development of acute arthritis in the knee joint of the cat: a study with antibody microprobes.
Brain Res
529:214-223[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Senogles SE,
Spiegel AM,
Padrell E,
Iyengar R,
Caron MG
(1990)
Specificity of receptor-G protein interactions. Discrimination of Gi subtypes by the D2 dopamine receptor in a reconstituted system.
J Biol Chem
265:4507-4514[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sjodin L,
Brodin E,
Nilsson G,
Conlon TP
(1980)
Interaction of substance P with dispersed pancreatic acinar cells from the guinea pig. Binding of radioiodinated peptide.
Acta Physiol Scand
109:97-105[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Urban L,
Thompson SWN,
Dray A
(1994)
Modulation of spinal excitability: co-operation between neurokinin and excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters.
Trends Neurosci
17:432-438[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vigna SR,
Bowden JJ,
McDonald DM,
Fisher J,
Okamoto A,
McVey DC,
Payan DG,
Bunnett NW
(1994)
Characterization of antibodies to the rat substance P (NK-1) receptor and to a chimeric substance P receptor expressed in mammalian cells.
J Neurosci
14:834-845[Abstract].
-
Von Zastrow M,
Link R,
Daunt D,
Barsh G,
Kobilka B
(1993)
Subtype-specific differences in the intracellular sorting of G protein-coupled receptors.
J Biol Chem
268:763-766[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Yaksh TL
(1988)
Substance P release from knee joint afferent terminals: modulation by opioids.
Brain Res
458:319-324[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yamamoto D
(1988)
Activation of protein kinase C promotes glutamate-mediated transmission at the neuromuscular junction of the mealworm.
J Physiol (Lond)
400:691-700[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Yarnitsky D,
Simone DA,
Dotson RM,
Cline MA,
Ochoa JL
(1992)
Single C nociceptor responses and psychophysical parameters of evoked pain: effect of rate of rise of heat stimuli in humans.
J Physiol (Lond)
450:581-592[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zar JH
(1984)
In: Biostatistical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Kondo, J. C. G. Marvizon, B. Song, F. Salgado, S. Codeluppi, X.-Y. Hua, and T. L. Yaksh
Inhibition by Spinal {micro}- and {delta}-Opioid Agonists of Afferent-Evoked Substance P Release
J. Neurosci.,
April 6, 2005;
25(14):
3651 - 3660.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ebner, N. M. Rupniak, A. Saria, and N. Singewald
Substance P in the medial amygdala: Emotional stress-sensitive release and modulation of anxiety-related behavior in rats
PNAS,
March 23, 2004;
101(12):
4280 - 4285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Song and J. C. G. Marvizon
Dorsal Horn Neurons Firing at High Frequency, But Not Primary Afferents, Release Opioid Peptides that Produce {micro}-Opioid Receptor Internalization in the Rat Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci.,
October 8, 2003;
23(27):
9171 - 9184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Song and J. C. G. Marvizon
Peptidases Prevent {micro}-Opioid Receptor Internalization in Dorsal Horn Neurons by Endogenously Released Opioids
J. Neurosci.,
March 1, 2003;
23(5):
1847 - 1858.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Cain, P. W. Wacnik, M. Turner, G. Wendelschafer-Crabb, W. R. Kennedy, G. L. Wilcox, and D. A. Simone
Functional Interactions between Tumor and Peripheral Nerve: Changes in Excitability and Morphology of Primary Afferent Fibers in a Murine Model of Cancer Pain
J. Neurosci.,
December 1, 2001;
21(23):
9367 - 9376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sinchak and P. E Micevych
Progesterone Blockade of Estrogen Activation of {micro}-Opioid Receptors Regulates Reproductive Behavior
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 2001;
21(15):
5723 - 5729.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Luger, P. Honore, M. A. C. Sabino, M. J. Schwei, S. D. Rogers, D. B. Mach, D. R. Clohisy, and P. W. Mantyh
Osteoprotegerin Diminishes Advanced Bone Cancer Pain
Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2001;
61(10):
4038 - 4047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Aicher, A. Punnoose, and A. Goldberg
{micro}-Opioid Receptors Often Colocalize with the Substance P Receptor (NK1) in the Trigeminal Dorsal Horn
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2000;
20(11):
4345 - 4354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Schwei, P. Honore, S. D. Rogers, J. L. Salak-Johnson, M. P. Finke, M. L. Ramnaraine, D. R. Clohisy, and P. W. Mantyh
Neurochemical and Cellular Reorganization of the Spinal Cord in a Murine Model of Bone Cancer Pain
J. Neurosci.,
December 15, 1999;
19(24):
10886 - 10897.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Furue, K Narikawa, E Kumamoto, and M Yoshimura
Responsiveness of rat substantia gelatinosa neurones to mechanical but not thermal stimuli revealed by in vivo patch-clamp recording
J. Physiol.,
December 1, 1999;
521(2):
529 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Honore, P. M. Menning, S. D. Rogers, M. L. Nichols, A. I. Basbaum, J.-M. Besson, and P. W. Mantyh
Spinal Substance P Receptor Expression and Internalization in Acute, Short-Term, and Long-Term Inflammatory Pain States
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 1999;
19(17):
7670 - 7678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Allen, J. Li, P. M. Menning, S. D. Rogers, J. Ghilardi, P. W. Mantyh, and D. A. Simone
Primary Afferent Fibers That Contribute to Increased Substance P Receptor Internalization in the Spinal Cord After Injury
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 1999;
81(3):
1379 - 1390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. B. Eckersell, P. Popper, and P. E Micevych
Estrogen-Induced Alteration of µ-Opioid Receptor Immunoreactivity in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus and Medial Amygdala
J. Neurosci.,
May 15, 1998;
18(10):
3967 - 3976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Abbadie, J. Trafton, H. Liu, P. W. Mantyh, and A. I. Basbaum
Inflammation Increases the Distribution of Dorsal Horn Neurons That Internalize the Neurokinin-1 Receptor in Response to Noxious and Non-Noxious Stimulation
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 1997;
17(20):
8049 - 8060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Mogil and S. M. Adhikari
Hot and Cold Nociception Are Genetically Correlated
J. Neurosci.,
September 15, 1999;
19(18):
RC25 - RC25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|