 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 17,
Issue of September 1, 1997
pp. 6504-6511
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Targeted Transduction of CNS Neurons with Adenoviral Vectors
Carrying Neurotrophic Factor Genes Confers Neuroprotection That Exceeds
the Transduced Population
Brian J. Baumgartner1 and
H. David Shine1, 2, 3
1 Department of Neurosurgery, 2 Department
of Cell Biology, and 3 Division of Neuroscience, Baylor
College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Application of neurotrophic factors (NFs) to the cut stump of motor
nerves of neonatal rats confers neuroprotection from trauma-induced neuronal death. To test whether motoneurons are capable of responding to endogenously produced NFs, facial motoneurons were genetically modified in vivo to express several NFs and then tested
for their response to peripheral nerve damage. Replication-defective
adenoviral vectors [Adv.Rous sarcoma virus
(RSV)-nf] representing three families of NFs were
constructed that carried genes for brain-derived neurotrophic factor
(BDNF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and nerve growth factor. Media from cultured cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf contained NFs
that supported the survival of cultured chick sensory neurons in the
same manner as recombinant NF standards. When Adv.RSV-nf
or an adenoviral vector containing the -galactosidase gene
(Adv.RSV- -gal) were injected into the facial muscles of neonatal
rats the vectors were retrogradely transported to the facial nucleus
where the NFs or -gal were expressed. A fraction (~10%) of the
neurons were transduced as demonstrated by reverse transcriptase-PCR, histochemistry, and immunocytochemistry. In the case of Adv.RSV-BDNF, Adv.RSV-CNTF, and Adv.RSV-GDNF, a significant portion of the facial nucleus neurons was protected, 16.5, 18.2, and 53.3%, respectively, from death after axotomy, showing that neurons are capable of transporting the Adv.RSV-nf, expressing the recombinant
NF genes, and responding to the NFs. In the case of Adv.RSV-GDNF, a
greater number of facial nucleus motoneurons survived than were
transduced, indicating that neighboring untransduced neurons were
protected by the GDNF expressed by the transduced neurons by a
paracrine mechanism.
Key words:
neurotrophic factors;
neuroprotection;
adenoviral vector;
facial nerve;
facial nucleus;
nervous system trauma;
retrograde
transport
INTRODUCTION
A number of biologically active
molecules, collectively called neurotrophic factors (NFs), promote
neuronal survival through receptor-mediated processes and are thought
to be involved in nervous system development, maintenance, and response
to trauma. Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), a member of the
neuropoietin family, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member
of the neurotrophin family, and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), a member of the Transforming Growth Factor (TGF- ) family, all have demonstrable neuronal survival activity in
vivo. Application of any one of these NFs to the proximal stump of
a cut facial nerve or sciatic nerve of a neonatal rat protects the facial nucleus and spinal cord motoneurons, respectively, from axotomy-induced death (Sendtner et al., 1990 , 1992 ; Yan et al., 1992 ;
Koliatsos et al., 1993 ; Henderson et al., 1994 ; Friedman et al., 1995 ;
Li et al., 1995 ). Under other conditions neurons may be stimulated by
target-derived NFs to themselves express NFs that may, in turn, act
both in an autocrine/paracrine manner (Schecterson and Bothwell, 1992 ).
This could amplify the neurotrophic effect of the retrogradely
transported factors. If neurons are capable of producing and responding
to NFs in an autocrine/paracrine manner, then genetically modifying
them to produce and release NFs through the normal secretory pathway
would protect them from axotomy-induced death as well as protecting
their neighboring unmodified neurons. To test this postulate we
genetically modified the target facial nucleus motoneurons with
replication-defective adenoviral vectors carrying NF genes and
determined whether neuronal-expressed NFs would result in protection
from axotomy-induced neuronal death in the same manner as exogeneously
applied NFs. Adenoviral vectors are retrogradely transported by axons
and will transduce postmitotic neurons (Akli et al., 1993 ; Davidson et
al., 1993 ; Le Gal La Salle et al., 1993 ; Neve, 1993 ). The adenoviral
vectors carried NF genes representing neuropoietin, neurotrophin, and
TGF- gene families and were shown to direct the expression of
biologically active NFs in mammalian cells in vitro. The
property of axonal transport of adenoviral vectors made it possible to
introduce the NFs to their neuronal targets where they were expressed.
Hence, it was possible to transduce facial nucleus neurons in the CNS
by injecting the vectors in the facial muscles. This left the CNS
intact by avoiding physical trauma to the region of the target neurons
and inflammation caused by the direct introduction of vector particles. Neuronal survival over control values would suggest that neurons can
express NFs and can respond to the NFs in an autocrine manner. A
survival greater than the number of transduced neurons would indicate
that neighboring untransduced neurons are capable of responding to NFs
produced by transduced neurons in a paracrine manner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of adenoviral vectors carrying genes for
NFs. Total RNA was extracted from cells or tissues using the
procedure of Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987) . Total RNA from rat sciatic
nerve or adult rat brain was used to synthesize CNTF cDNA or BDNF cDNA, respectively. RNA from the astrocytoma cell line C6 was
used to generate GDNF cDNA. Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis was performed as described elsewhere (Baumgartner and Barnes, 1994 ).
First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using avian
myeloblastosis virus (AMV) RT and an oligo-dT primer (CNTF and BDNF) or
the specific PCR reverse primer (GDNF). Specific oligonucleotide
primers (Genosys, The Woodlands, TX) for PCR were designed using the
nucleotide sequences of rat CNTF (forward, 5 -ATAAAGCTTTTAGGGGATGGCTTTCGCAG-3 ; reverse,
5 -TATTCTAGACTACATCTGCTTATCTTTGGC-3 ), BDNF (forward,
5 -ATAAAGCTTAGAGTGATGACCATCCTTTTCC-3 ; reverse, 5 -TATTCTAGACTATCTTCCCCTTTTAATGGTC-3 ), and GDNF (forward,
5 -ATAAAGCTTGGACGGGACTCTAAGATGAAG-3 ; reverse,
5 -ATATCTAGATCAGATACATCCACACCGTT-3 ). The forward
primers spanned the Kozak translation initiation sequence and the
first two to three codons. The reverse primers corresponded to the
final six to seven codons, including the translation termination codon. Nucleotide sequences encoding the HindIII (forward primer)
or XbaI (reverse primer) restriction endonuclease cleavage
sites (shown in italics) were added to the 5 ends to facilitate
cloning. Additional primers used in this study included the Rous
sarcoma virus (RSV)-long terminal repeat (LTR) forward primer
(5 -CCACATTGGTGTGCACCTCC-3 ), the NGF reverse primer
(5 -TCAGCCTCTTCTTGCAGCCT-3 ), and a BDNF reverse primer
(5 -TACTGTCACACACGCTCAGC-3 ). Agarose electrophoresis showed that
single cDNA fragments of the expected size were obtained from each
primer set after PCR, which were then cloned into the plasmid
pAdL.1/RSV (Fang et al., 1994 ). The plasmid pADL.1/RSV (kindly provided
by B. Fang and S. L. C. Woo, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX) contains a multiple cloning site (MCS) for inserting DNA
fragments, which is flanked on the 5 end by the RSV-LTR promoter and
contains the polyadenylation [poly(A)] sequence from the bovine
growth hormone (BGH) gene at the 3 end. The RSV-LTR promoter, MCS, and
BGH poly(A) site are flanked by adenovirus (Adv) DNA sequences from the
"left" end of the adenoviral genome. DNA sequence analysis of the
resultant recombinant plasmids was performed using the Sequenase II kit
(United States Biochemicals, Cleveland, OH) and showed 100% identity
to the published sequences. NGF cDNA (from pBluescribe/NGF, kindly
provided by S. Whittemore, University of Miami School of Medicine,
Miami, FL) was also subcloned into pADL.1/RSV. Others have shown that
the RSV promoter functions in neuronal cells (Akli et al., 1993 ; Le Gal
La Salle et al., 1993 ; Finiels et al., 1995 ). The methods of Graham and
Prevec (1991) were used to construct replication-defective recombinant Adv vectors via homologous recombination using the plasmid pJM17 (which
contains the E1A-deleted Adv type 5 genome). The recombinant pADL.1/RSV
plasmid containing the neural growth factor cDNAs
(pADL.1/RSV-nf) were co-transfected with pJM17 into
HEK293 cells, and plaques (consisting of recombinant Adv vectors)
were allowed to develop over 2 weeks. PCR with the specific cDNA
reverse primer and the RSV-LTR vector forward primer was used to
confirm that the resultant Adv.RSV-nf vectors contained the
correct NF gene construct. Adv.RSV-nf vectors were purified
by two rounds of "plaque purification" using PCR to confirm that
the plaques contained the appropriate NF sequences. Large scale
production and CsCl purification of the Adv.RSV-nf vectors was performed as described by Graham and Prevec (1991) , and the
viral titer was determined by plaque assay.
Western blot analysis of NFs expressed by HeLa cells transduced
with Adv.RSV-nf in vitro. HeLa cells were transduced with the
Adv.RSV-nf vectors at an appropriate multiplicity of
infection (MOI; usually 100) to obtain a high degree of transduction
without viral-induced cytopathic effect. The medium was replaced after 16 hr with serum-free DMEM and further incubated for 56 hr. The serum-free medium (100-500 µl) was concentrated 10-fold with 3000 molecular weight cutoff SpinX-UF3 centrifuge filters (Costar, Cambridge, MA). For expression of CNTF, HeLa cells were transfected as
above. After 72 hr, the cells were harvested into HBSS and freeze-thawed. The extracts were centrifuged to remove cellular debris,
and the supernatant was used as the source of CNTF. Control cells were
transduced with an adenoviral vector carrying the gene for
-galactosidase (Adv.RSV- -gal). The concentrated conditioned medium or HeLa cell extracts (for Adv.RSV-CNTF-transduced cells) were
electrophoresed on 15% polyacrylamide gels (Laemmli, 1970 ) and
electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Towbin et
al., 1979 ). Commercially obtained NFs were included as standards. NFs
were identified on the nitrocellulose filters using commercially
obtained antibodies to NGF, BDNF, and GDNF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA; and Promega, Madison, WI), and anti-CNTF was provided
by H.D.S. (Rabinovsky et al., 1992 ). Antibodies to NGF, BDNF, and GDNF
were shown to be specific for their respective neurotrophic factors by
the manufacturers with no detectable cross-reaction with the other
factors. Detection of the immobilized antibodies was performed with
anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase (anti-CNTF, anti-BDNF, and
anti-GDNF), whereas anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was
used for anti-NGF. The nitro blue
tetrazolium-5-bromo-1-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate substrate was used
for color detection by the IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugates, whereas the ECL kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) was used for the
IgG-HRP conjugate. To determine whether conditioned medium from HeLa
cells transduced with Adv.RSV-GDNF contained glycosylated forms of
GDNF, it was digested with endoglycosidase F and
N-glycosidase F. Serum-free medium was lyophilized and
resuspended in 1% SDS and boiled for 2 min. The solution was cooled,
added to a reaction buffer solution to give a final concentration of 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, and
0.5% n-octylglucoside and boiled for 2 min. After cooling,
1 U each of endoglycosidase F and N-glycosidase F
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) was added to the mixture, and
it was incubated for 12 hr at 37°C. The digested sample was analyzed
by Western blot analysis as described above and compared with
undigested conditioned medium and an unglycosylated recombinant GDNF
standard.
Determination of NF synthesis rates from
Adv.RSV-nf-transduced HeLa cells in vitro by
ELISA. The concentration of NGF in the culture medium of cells
transduced with Adv.RSV-NGF or the concentration of CNTF in
Adv.RSV-CNTF-transduced cells was measured using quantitative ELISAs
from Boehringer Mannheim. GDNF levels were measured using the GDNF
ELISA from Promega (Madison, WI). BDNF concentration was determined as
described by Eaton and Whittemore (1996) . The appropriate recombinant
NF was used to generate a standard curve for each ELISA.
Analysis of biological activity of conditioned medium from HeLa
cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf on chick sensory
neurons. HeLa cells were transduced with the Adv.RSV-nf
vectors at an MOI of 100 and incubated for 48 hr, after which the
medium was replaced. After 24 hr the conditioned medium was collected
(except for HeLa cells that were transduced with Adv.RSV-CNTF, which
were harvested in HBSS after 72 hr as described above for Western
blotting) and was analyzed for NF activity in sensory neuron cultures.
Primary cultures of dissociated E10 chick embryo dorsal root ganglia
(DRGs) or E6 nodose ganglia (NGs) were grown in DMEM with 10% fetal
bovine serum that was supplemented with commercial recombinant NFs at 100 ng/ml for BDNF, GDNF, and NGF, 10 ng/ml for CNTF, 25% (v/v) for
the conditioned medium, or 100 µg of extract from
Adv.RSV-CNTF-transduced cells. DRG and NG neurons were also cultured
with combinations of Adv.RSV-nf conditioned media in which
the conditioned media (or 100 µg of Adv.RSV-CNTF cell extract) were
mixed to give a total concentration of 25% (v/v) with DMEM. Dissection
of ganglia and neuronal cell culture was as described elsewhere
(Davies, 1989 ). The number of surviving neurons per culture well was
determined by counting cresyl violet-stained neurons at 100×
magnification in 10 fields and then computing the total number for each
well in each of two or three wells in NG or DRG cultures, respectively. Treatment effect on survival was analyzed using ANOVA followed by
Bonferroni's test. Analysis of DRG survival was repeated five times,
and analysis of NG survival was repeated three times with the same
results.
Determination of transduction rate of facial nucleus
neurons after Adv.RSV- -gal injection in the facial muscles.
Experiments and care of animals were performed in accordance with
approved protocols of Baylor College of Medicine and under biosafety
level 2 guidelines. A total of 10 µl of Adv.RSV- -gal (1.9 × 108 pfu) was injected into the left facial muscles
of the cheek, lower lip, and whisker pad of newborn Sprague Dawley rats
(Harlan, Houston, TX; n = 4) anesthetized with
hypothermia. Seven days later they were anesthetized with halothane and
perfused intracardially with heparinized PBS, pH 7.4, and then 4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS. The brains were removed, postfixed overnight
in paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected in 21% sucrose, embedded in O.C.T.
(Tissue-Tek; Miles, Elkhart, IN), and frozen. The facial nucleus region
was sectioned at 40 µm with a cryostat and washed in PBS. The
sections were reacted for -galactosidase activity by incubating them
for 1-2 hr at 37°C in a solution containing 0.5 mg/ml
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- -D-galactoside (X-gal; Sigma,
St. Louis, MO) in 44 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, with 3 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 3 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 15 mM NaCl, and 1.3 mM MgCl2. The
sections were washed in PBS, mounted on gelatin-coated slides, and
counterstained with cresyl violet. -Galactosidase-positive neurons
in the treated facial nucleus and untransduced neurons in both left and
right facial nuclei were counted.
Analysis of neuroprotective activity in neonatal rat facial
nucleus motoneurons after facial nerve trauma.
Adv.RSV-nf or Adv.RSV- -gal (10 µl) was injected into
the left facial muscles as described above. The maximum amount of virus
obtainable in a 10 µl volume was used. After 2 d the pups were
anesthetized as above, the facial nerve was severed, and a 5 mm segment
was removed (including the auricular branch) from ~1 mm distal to the
stylomastoid foramen. Seven days later they were anesthetized with
halothane and perfused intracardially with heparinized PBS followed by
4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and the brains removed and embedded in
paraffin. Coronal sections (10 µm) were taken through the full extent
of the facial nucleus and stained with cresyl violet, and the neurons
in both facial nuclei were counted. Neurons were only counted if they were >20 µm in diameter and their nucleoli were readily visible. In
some experiments the brains were processed for immunocytochemical staining by fixing with Zamboni's fixative (4% paraformaldehyde and
15% picric acid in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) and sectioning at 40 µm with a cryostat. CNTF was detected in the neurons of the
facial nucleus by immunocytochemistry using an antiserum raised in
rabbits to recombinant CNTF (Rabinovsky et al., 1992 ) and techniques described elsewhere (Smith et al., 1993 ).
RT-PCR analysis of facial nuclei regions for the presence
of NF mRNA. RT-PCR was used to detect expression of
Adv.RSV-nf in CNS tissues or tissues at the injection site.
Seven days after Adv.RSV-nf was injected into facial muscles
the rat pups were killed, and the brains and facial muscles were
collected. The regions of the brains containing the facial nuclei were
isolated by sectioning the brainstem at the pontine-mesencephalic
junction and the medullary-spinal cord junction and then dividing the
medulla at the midline. RNA was extracted and treated with 2 U of RQ1 DNase (RNase-free; Promega) for 30 min followed by phenol extraction. First-strand cDNA was synthesized (20 µg/ml total RNA concentration) with AMV RT (Promega) and oligo-dT12-18 primer. Negative control reactions included minus RT and minus RNA reactions; positive controls included RNA from Adv.RSV-nf-transduced HeLa cells,
as well as the original shuttle plasmids
(pADL.1/RSV-nf). cDNA from 200 ng of RNA was used for
PCR, which was cycled 35 times at 90°C for 60 sec, 63°C for 30 sec,
and 70°C for 1 min. The RSV-LTR forward primer and the specific
reverse primers were used in the PCR to detect the chimeric
Adv.RSV-nf transcripts and thus would not amplify endogenous
NF gene transcripts. PCR products were visualized by agarose
electrophoresis.
RESULTS
Expression of NFs by HeLa cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf
in vitro
To verify that transduction with Adv.RSV-nf can
cause cells to produce NFs, HeLa cells were transduced with the
vectors, and the culture medium was collected 72 hr later and analyzed
by Western blot analysis using commercially available recombinant NFs
as references. HeLa cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf
produced proteins that co-migrated with the NF standards and
cross-reacted with antibodies that were specific for each of the NF
proteins (Fig. 1). Neither untransduced
HeLa cells nor cells transduced with Adv.RSV- -gal produced proteins
that cross-reacted with the anti-NF antibodies (data not shown). In the
case of GDNF, higher molecular weight cross-reacting species were
present, indicating that the protein was post-translationally modified,
presumably by glycosylation in a manner similar to the native protein
(Lin et al., 1993 ). Endoglycosidase F and N-glycosidase F
digestion of serum-free medium from HeLa cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-GDNF almost completely eliminated the higher molecular weight
bands and increased the density of the 15 kDa band, verifying that
these bands represented glycosylated forms of GDNF. An estimate of the
amount of NF produced was obtained by using quantitative ELISAs. HeLa
cells transduced with 100 active particles of Adv.RSV-NGF per cell
produced -NGF at a rate of ~5 µg · 106
cells 1 · d 1. This
compares favorably with estimates of 1 µg of
NGF · 106
cells 1 · d 1 produced in
cultured 3T3 fibroblasts transduced with a herpes virus vector carrying
the NGF cDNA (Geschwind et al., 1994 ). The rates of expression of BDNF,
CNTF, and GDNF produced by HeLa cells transduced with 100 MOI of the
respective Adv.RSV-nf were determined to be 63.6 ± 22.3 ng · 106
cells 1 · d 1, 0.54 ± 0.19 µg · 106
cells 1 · d 1, and
11.3 ± 2.5 ng · 106
cells 1 · d 1,
respectively.
Fig. 1.
Expression of NFs by HeLa cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-nf. Western blot analyses were performed on
conditioned media or cell extracts from HeLa cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-nf. The media and cell extract contained
proteins that co-migrated (lanes 2) with the
corresponding purified recombinant growth factors used as standards
(lanes 1). The protein produced from cells transduced with Adv.RSV-GDNF showed cross-reacting bands
(arrowhead) that migrated at higher apparent molecular
weights than the unglycosylated standard. Glycosidase digestion of the
conditioned medium from cells transduced with Adv.RSV-GDNF converted
most of the high molecular weight protein to the size of the GDNF
standard (lane 4), indicating that the protein
was glycosylated by the HeLa cells. (Lane 3 is
Adv.RSV-GDNF conditioned medium incubated in glycosidase reaction
buffer without the addition of glycosidase.) Neither untransduced HeLa
cells nor cells transduced with Adv.RSV- -gal produced proteins that
cross-reacted with the anti-NF antibodies (not shown). Molecular
weights for the monomeric forms of recombinant standards are: rat CNTF,
23 kDa; human BDNF, 14 kDa; human -NGF, 14 kDa; and human GDNF, 15 kDa.
[View Larger Version of this Image (60K GIF file)]
Neuroprotection of cultured chick sensory neurons by media
conditioned by cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf
The biological potency of the NFs produced by HeLa cells
transduced with Adv.RSV-nf was measured by culturing
embryonic sensory neurons from dissociated chick NGs and DRGs in media
from cultures of HeLa cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf. The
biological activities of the conditioned media were compared with the
activities of conditioned medium from cells transduced with
Adv.RSV- -gal, conditioned medium from untransduced HeLa cells, and
saturating amounts of commercial NFs. The conditioned media from HeLa
cells that had been transduced with the Adv.RSV-nf had
significant (p < 0.05) survival effects on NG
and DRG neurons compared with medium removed from cells transduced with
Adv.RSV- -gal, with the exception of medium from cells transduced
with Adv.RSV-NGF when applied to NG cells (Fig.
2). Media from untransduced HeLa cells or
HeLa cells transduced with Adv.RSV- -gal provided a slight survival effect over nonconditioned medium alone. However, the survival effects
were enhanced 2- to 11-fold in media from HeLa cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-nf, suggesting that the survival effects seen
in vitro were primarily attributable to NFs produced by the
Adv.RSV-nf. The lack of an effect with Adv.RSV-NGF is not
unexpected, because NG cells do not respond to NGF in vitro
(Lindsay and Rohrer, 1986). Combining multiple neurotrophic factors
produces an additive effect on neuronal survival in vitro.
Combining conditioned media from HeLa cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-BDNF and Adv.RSV-GDNF had an additive survival effect on NG
cells, and combining conditioned media from cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-BDNF and Adv.RSV-NGF with extracts of cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-CNTF had an additive effect on DRG cells as well (Fig. 2).
Because the final total concentrations of the conditioned media were
held to 25%, there was a lower concentration of each NF in the
combined media. Nevertheless, greater neuronal survival was obtained
with the combined media than from each conditioned medium alone, and
this verifies that the Adv.RSV-nf-transduced HeLa cells are
producing NFs. If neuronal survival was attributable to a factor
produced by HeLa cells, the combined conditioned media from HeLa cells
transduced with several different Adv.RSV-nf would have no
greater survival effect than conditioned medium from HeLa cells
transduced with a single Adv.RSV-nf or untransduced HeLa
cells.
Fig. 2.
Biological activity of NFs produced by HeLa cells
transduced with Adv.RSV-nf vectors in
vitro. Primary cultures of dissociated DRG
(A) and NG (B) cells from
chick embryos were grown in media containing culture medium from
untransduced HeLa cells (white bar), 25% (v/v) of
conditioned medium from HeLa cells (CM)
transduced with Adv.RSV- -gal (cross-hatched gray
bars), or Adv.RSV-nf (black bars). In the case of CNTF a crude extract of cells transduced with Adv.RSV-CNTF or Adv.RSV- -gal was mixed with standard medium. Surviving neurons were counted after 48 hr. *Value significantly different (p < 0.05) from Adv.RSV- -gal
value by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test.
Error bars indicate SD. B+G, BDNF and GDNF;
B+C+N, BDNF, CNTF, and NGF.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
Retrograde transport of Adv.RSV- -gal from facial muscles to
facial nucleus neurons
When Adv.RSV- -gal was injected into the facial muscles of
newborn rats, the vector was taken up and retrogradely transported to
facial nucleus neurons where the -galactosidase gene under RSV
promoter control was expressed (Fig. 3).
Trigeminal neurons were also positive for -galactosidase, indicating
that Adv.RSV- -gal was taken up and retrogradely transported by
trigeminal nerve axons (data not shown) as well. The percentage of
facial nucleus neurons on the injected side that expressed
-galactosidase was 9.4 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD;
n = 4). Within each tissue section the -galactosidase-positive neurons tended to be grouped within the facial nucleus. We believe that these neurons preferentially innervated the muscles that were injected with Adv.RSV- -gal, and thus their axons were more readily exposed to the vector. There was no significant (p = 0.73) difference between the total number
of neurons in the left (injected) and right (uninjected) facial nuclei
(3922 ± 406 and 3769 ± 756 neurons, respectively; mean ± SD; n = 4), indicating that at 7 d after
injection there was no neuronal death caused by the vector or the
-galactosidase. No inflammation or other neuropathology was observed
in facial nuclei on the injected side. In most cases the X-gal reaction
product was present in the nuclei of the neurons, because the
-galactosidase gene has a nuclear localization sequence, but in some
cases the reaction product filled the whole neuron and delineated its
processes (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Retrograde transport and expression of
Adv.RSV- -gal and Adv.RSV-CNTF. A,
-Galactosidase-positive neurons in the facial nucleus (arrow) 7 d after injection of Adv.RSV- -gal into
facial muscles. Scale bar, 500 µm. B, Detail of facial
nucleus of a different rat than in A showing
-galactosidase-positive neurons (filled arrows) and nontransduced neurons (open arrows).
Scale bar, 100 µm. C, Facial nucleus neurons that are
immunopositive for CNTF in a field of nontransduced neurons stained
with cresyl violet. Scale bar, 50 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (106K GIF file)]
Retrograde transport of Adv.RSV-nf, expression of NF
genes, and neuroprotection of facial nucleus neurons from
axotomy-induced death
Protection against axotomy-induced neuronal death was tested by
injecting Adv.RSV-nf into the muscles of the terminal fields of the facial nerve of neonatal (1-d-old) rats. Control animals were
injected with Adv.RSV- -gal. Two days later the facial nerves on the
injected side were cut. The neurons of the ipsilateral facial nuclei
that survived 7 d after axotomy were counted, and their numbers
were compared with the number of facial motoneurons of the unlesioned
and untreated contralateral nuclei (Table
1). In control animals, 7 d after
axotomy a large portion of the facial motoneurons on the cut side had
disappeared, and the area of the facial nucleus was populated by cells
with small nuclei, presumably astrocytes (Fig.
4). Injection of Adv.RSV-GDNF into facial
muscles produced a robust survival effect (Table 1) on the lesioned
facial nucleus neurons (53.3%; p < 0.01) compared
with the percentage of surviving neurons in animals treated with
Adv.RSV- -gal (7.9%). Injection with Adv.RSV-CNTF and with
Adv.RSV-BDNF each produced smaller but statistically significant
(p < 0.05) survival effects compared with
Adv.RSV- -gal-treated controls (18.2 and 16.5%, respectively).
Adv.RSV-NGF produced a small increase (11.4%) of surviving neurons,
which was not statistically significant and is in agreement with
experiments in which NGF applied to cut facial nerves did not have
neuroprotective activity (Koliatsos et al., 1993 ). The percentage of
surviving facial nucleus neurons (53%) in animals treated with
Adv.RSV-GDNF was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater than the number of neurons (9.4%) expected to be transduced based on injection with Adv.RSV- -gal. There was no significant difference in the number of surviving neurons treated with the other
Adv.RSV-nf and the expected transduction rate of
9.4%. There was no correlation between the relative neuronal survival
and the plaque-forming units injected, as determined by Pearson's product-moment correlation test, and the numbers of contralateral neurons between groups were not significantly different by ANOVA.
Fig. 4.
Protective effect of Adv.RSV-nf on
axotomized facial nucleus neurons. Photomicrographs of cross-sections
through the facial nucleus 9 d after injection of the ipsilateral
facial muscles with Adv.RSV- -gal (A) and
Adv.RSV-GDNF (B) and 7 d after facial nerve
transection. C, A typical nucleus contralateral to the
side injected. Scale bar, 200 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (109K GIF file)]
Detection of nf gene expression
in vivo
To confirm that the vectors were transported to and were expressed
in the facial nuclei, RT-PCR was performed on RNA from tissue
containing the ipsilateral facial nuclei, contralateral facial nuclei,
and facial muscles 7 d after Adv.RSV-nf injections using primers specific for mRNA transcribed from the vectors. The
RT-PCR reactions were run in the presence or absence of RT to
differentiate between signal from vector DNA and mRNA. Positive signal
was detected only in the presence of RT for BDNF (two of three
animals), CNTF (three of three animals), and GDNF (two of three
animals) in RNA from tissue containing the ipsilateral facial nucleus
(Fig. 5) but not the contralateral
nucleus. For tissue from animals injected with Adv.RSV-NGF, PCR product
was detected (one of three animals) in the presence and absence
of RT but only in RNA from the ipsilateral tissues. RT-PCR was also
performed on RNA from the facial muscles ipsilateral to the sites of
injection. As expected, positive signal was obtained, showing the
presence of Adv.RSV-nf mRNA from all four vectors in muscle
cells at the injection site (data not shown).
Fig. 5.
Detection of NF mRNA in regions of the facial
nucleus after retrograde transport of Adv.RSV-nf.
Adv.RSV-nf was injected into the facial muscles of
neonatal rats, and total RNA was extracted from brainstem tissue after
7 d and analyzed by RT-PCR. Lane 1, No RNA;
lane 2, positive control plasmid; lanes 3, 4, ipsilateral; lanes 5, 6, contralateral;
lanes 3, 5; plus RT; lanes 4, 6, minus RT. Numbers to the left indicate sizes of
markers in kilobase pairs.
[View Larger Version of this Image (62K GIF file)]
For immunocytochemical detection of Adv.RSV-nf-mediated
expression in the facial nucleus, Adv.RSV-CNTF was injected into the facial muscles of neonatal rats, and 7 d later the brains were removed and immunostained for CNTF. Intense reaction product was evident in the soma and processes of ~5-10% of the facial nucleus neurons (Fig. 3), demonstrating the presence of elevated levels of CNTF
protein in these cells. Our attempts to detect BDNF, GDNF, and NGF by
immunocytochemistry using commercially available antibodies (Chemicon
International, Temecula, CA) were unsuccessful. Measurement of NF
levels in tissues containing Adv.RSV-nf-transduced facial nuclei neurons using commercially available ELISA kits for GDNF, NGF,
and CNTF did not show concentrations of NFs greater than endogenous
levels after 7 d (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
These experiments demonstrate that (1) non-neuronal cells
transduced with adenoviral vectors carrying NF genes will express biologically active NFs; (2) these vectors are retrogradely transported from peripheral nerve fields to the soma of CNS neurons where the
recombinant genes are expressed; (3) the expressed NFs protect facial
nucleus neurons from axotomy-induced death; and (4) a greater number of
neurons are protected than the number that are transduced, indicating
that the transduced neurons release the NFs that protect both
themselves and their neighboring untransduced neurons.
Mammalian cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf produce
authentic, biologically active NF proteins
Western blot analysis of conditioned medium from HeLa cells
transduced with Adv.RSV-nf showed that the cells produced
proteins that were homologous to recombinant NF standards. In the case of Adv.RSV-GDNF-transduced HeLa cells, digestion of conditioned medium
with glycosidases confirmed that they produced GDNF that was
glycosylated, as is native GDNF (Lin et al., 1993 ). The amount of NFs
produced by Adv.RSV-nf-transduced HeLa cells as estimated by
ELISA was different for each Adv.RSV-nf vector. A number of explanations for this variability are possible. Because the vector backbones and RSV promoter were identical for each construct, a
difference in expression rate must be a function of differences in
post-transcriptional characteristics of each NF in the host cell. These
differences may include the rate of post-translational modification,
secretion, intracellular degradation, and the half-lives of NFs in the
tissue culture medium. Additionally, it is possible that because
antibodies used in these assays were produced against recombinant NFs
produced in Escherichia coli, they may have different specificities to NFs produced by mammalian cells. For instance, post-translational modification may modify or hide epitopes that are
present on unmodified proteins.
Conditioned medium from HeLa cells transduced with
Adv.RSV-nf vectors had significant survival effects on NG
and DRG neurons in vitro compared with medium from
untransduced HeLa cells or HeLa cells transduced with Adv.RSV- -gal.
This verified that the NF proteins were biologically active. The
observation that a mixture of conditioned media from cells transduced
with Adv.RSV-nf had an additive effect on chick sensory
neurons (Fig. 2) is consistent with the findings of others (Kato and
Lindsay, 1994 ).
Conditioned media from HeLa cells transduced with Adv.RSV-nf
had greater survival effects than medium supplemented with recombinant NFs obtained from commercial sources. These elevated biological activities may result from one or more factors, including survival factors produced by the HeLa cells that have additive effects with the
adenovirally produced NFs, post-translational modification by the
mammalian host cells that increase the specific activity of the NFs
compared with NFs produced by prokaryotic systems, or that the
commercial NFs had less than optimal biological activities.
Adv.RSV-nf is retrogradely transported from terminal
fields to CNS soma where the nf genes are expressed
Histochemical localization of -galactosidase activity in facial
nucleus neurons verified that the Adv.RSV- -gal vector was retrogradely transported and expressed in facial nucleus motoneurons and was consistent with the observation of others (Finiels et al.,
1995 ; Ghadge et al., 1995 ). RT-PCR analysis of the region containing
the facial nucleus with primers specific for products of the vector
constructs verified that Adv.RSV-nf was transported from the
injection sites to neurons in the ipsilateral facial nucleus where the
recombinant genes were expressed. The lack of positive signal in the
region of the contralateral facial nuclei indicates that the vector did
not enter the brain by a systemic route. The low proportion of positive
RT-PCR signal from RNA in animals injected with Adv.RSV-NGF compared
with the other vectors may reflect poor PCR amplification efficiency of
the cDNA, inefficient transport of the vectors, poor expression of the
genes, transcriptional down-regulation, or rapid degradation of the
mRNA. However, because all of the vectors were constructed from an
identical viral backbone and were under control of an RSV promoter, it
is more likely that inefficient PCR and/or rapid degradation of the
transcripts may explain the results obtained with the Adv.RSV-NGF
vector. Immunocytochemical localization of CNTF in facial nuclei
neurons of animals transduced with Adv.RSV-CNTF verified that a
mammalian gene for a neurotrophic factor under RSV control was
expressed and confirms that the NF mRNAs are translated. We believe
that our lack of success localizing these NFs other than CNTF by
immunocytochemistry is a reflection of the difficulty of using this
technique to localize NFs in neural tissue (Zhou et al., 1994 ). It is
likely that CNTF was detected by immunocytochemistry, because it does
not have a signal peptide, so the protein remained sequestered in the
soma, unlike the other NFs that were probably rapidly secreted. Based
on the positive detection of BDNF, GDNF, and NGF mRNAs in the region of
the facial nucleus by RT-PCR and the measurable neuroprotective effect
of facial nucleus motoneurons by Adv.RSV-nf, it is
reasonable to conclude that biologically active NF was produced in
neurons transduced by all vectors.
NFs expressed by transduced CNS neurons protect against
axotomy-induced death
The in vivo experiments showed that the neurons
of the facial nucleus retrogradely transported Adv.RSV-nf
vectors, expressed the gene products, and, in turn, were protected from
injury-induced death through an autocrine/paracrine mechanism. Although
similar amounts of vector were injected into each treatment group, the neuroprotective effects of the Adv.RSV-nf varied. Most
likely this variability was attributable to the differences in the
response of facial motoneurons to each NF. For instance, in
vitro measurements show that GDNF is 75- and 650-fold more potent
than BDNF and CNTF, respectively, in supporting the survival of
purified embryonic rat spinal motoneurons (Henderson et al., 1994 ),
which would be expected to be similar in NF dependence to facial nerve
motoneurons. The observation that 53% of the neurons were protected at
1 week after axotomy when only ~10% were transduced (based on
Adv.RSV- -gal transduction data) suggests that neighboring neurons
responded to secreted GDNF through a paracrine mechanism.
The rate of survival of facial neurons in these experiments was not as
high as reported in experiments in which recombinant NFs were used.
When BDNF, CNTF, and GDNF were applied directly to the proximal stump
of a severed facial nerve, they protected 80, 76, and 92%,
respectively, of the facial nucleus motoneurons (Sendtner et al., 1990 ;
Koliatsos et al., 1993 ; Henderson et al., 1994 ). The difference
between our observations and those using recombinant NFs may in part be
attributable to the amounts of NFs that were available to the
axotomized facial nucleus neurons. In experiments in which purified NFs
were applied to the nerve stump, 5 µg of CNTF (Sendtner et al.,
1990 ), 15 µg of BDNF (Koliatsos et al., 1993 ), and 20 µg of GDNF
(Henderson et al., 1994 ) were used. Based on our histochemical
estimates of the expression of Adv.RSV- -gal and Adv.RSV-CNTF, only
~10% of the facial nucleus neurons expressed the recombinant
proteins. This transduction efficiency and the estimated in
vitro expression rates suggest that the total concentrations of
NFs in the facial nuclei after Adv.RSV-nf treatment were
much lower than what was potentially available in experiments in which
the NFs were applied directly to the cut axons.
Adenoviral vector delivery of NFs may have potential for the
treatment of neurological disorders
The capacity of motoneurons to both express and respond to
endogenous NF genes, coupled with the ability to modify the CNS genetically with adenoviral vectors administered peripherally, suggests
that this may be a useful strategy in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders and trauma. Although NFs may have applications in the therapy for trauma and neurodegenerative disease (Springer, 1993 ), their clinical use has been constrained by the difficulty of delivering the NFs to target neurons by systemic administration or direct infusion. The short half-life of NFs and the
lack of secondary modifications of bacteria-derived recombinant NFs may
limit their biological activity and may require administration of large
amounts of NFs to reach an effective therapeutic concentration at the
target site. High systemic concentrations of NFs may enable them to act
on cells other than the intended targets, thereby causing unwanted side
effects. Directly targeting the sites in the CNS through retrograde
transport of gene vectors may avoid problems associated with systemic
delivery of therapeutic proteins and at the same time may enable the
delivery of a protein that may have greater biological efficacy with
less toxicity, because it is produced and modified by the host's own
cells. The observation that a greater percentage of neurons were spared
from axotomy-induced death than the percentage transduced with
Adv.RSV-nf demonstrates that it is not necessary to modify
all neurons genetically to achieve a significant therapeutic
effect. Note added in proof: While this
paper was in review two papers were published reporting similar
neuroprotective effects on facial neuron survival after axotomy using
adenoviral vectors carrying genes for BDNF, CNTF, and GDNF [Gimenez y
Ribotta M, Revah F, Pradier L, Loquet I, Mallet J, Privat A (1997)
Prevention of motoneuron death by adenovirus-mediated neurotrophic
factors. J. Neurosci Res 48:281-285; and Gravel C, Gotz R, Lorrain A,
Sendtner M (1997) Adenoviral gene transfer of ciliary neurotrophic
factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor leads to long-term
survival of axotomized motor neurons. Nat Med 3:765-770].
FOOTNOTES
Received March 5, 1997; revised May 1, 1997; accepted June 10, 1997.
We thank Dr. R. Grossman for support and critical review of the
manuscript; Ms. M. Docker, Dr. Z. S. Guo, Dr. J. Noebels, Dr. B. O'Malley, and Dr. S. L. C. Woo for their review of this manuscript; Dr. C. Contant for review of the statistical analysis; Ms.
C. Cho, Ms. H. Collier, Ms. M. Docker, Mr. C. Hall, Mr. G. Louie, and
Ms. N. Nash for their expert technical assistance in preparing vector
and histological analysis; Dr. S. Whittemore for the NGF cDNA clone;
and Dr. S. L. C. Woo and Dr. B. Fang for the pAdL.1/RSV
plasmid.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. H. David Shine, Department of
Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6560 Fannin Street, Suite
944, Houston, TX 77030.
REFERENCES
-
Akli S,
Caillaud C,
Vigne E,
Stratford-Perricaudet LD,
Poenaru L,
Perricaudet M,
Kahn A,
Peschanski MR
(1993)
Transfer of a foreign gene into the brain using adenovirus vectors.
Nat Genet
3:224-228[ISI][Medline].
-
Baumgartner BJ,
Barnes Jr EM
(1994)
Analysis of neuronal mRNA levels by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
In: Neuroscience protocols, Module 4, Sec 20 (Wouterlood FG,
ed), pp 1-13. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
-
Chomczynski P,
Sacchi N
(1987)
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:156-159[ISI][Medline].
-
Davidson BL,
Allen ED,
Kozarsky KF,
Wilson JM,
Roessler BJ
(1993)
A model system for in vivo gene transfer into the central nervous system using an adenoviral vector.
Nat Genet
3:219-223[ISI][Medline].
-
Davies AM
(1989)
Neurotrophic factor bioassay using dissociated neurons.
In: Nerve growth factors (Rush RA,
ed), pp 95-109. New York: Wiley.
-
Eaton MJ,
Whittemore SR
(1996)
Autocrine BDNF secretion enhances the survival and serotonergic differentiation of raphe neuronal precursor cells grafted into the adult rat CNS.
Exp Neurol
140:105-114[ISI][Medline].
-
Fang B,
Eisensmith RC,
Li XHC,
Finegold MJ,
Shedlovsky A,
Dove W,
Woo SLC
(1994)
Gene therapy for phenylketonuria: phenotypic correction in a genetically deficient mouse model by adenovirus-mediated hepatic gene transfer.
Gene Ther
1:247-254[ISI][Medline].
-
Finiels F,
Gimenez y Ribotta M,
Barkats M,
Samolyk M,
Robert J,
Privat A,
Revah F,
Mallet J
(1995)
Specific and efficient gene transfer strategy offers new potentialities for the treatment of motor neurone disease.
NeuroReport
7:373-378[ISI][Medline].
-
Friedman B,
Kleinfeld D,
Ip NY,
Verge VMK,
Moulton R,
Boland P,
Zlotchenko E,
Lindsay RM,
Liu L
(1995)
BDNF and NT-4/5 exert neurotrophic influences on injured adult spinal motor neurons.
J Neurosci
15:1044-1056[Abstract].
-
Geschwind MD,
Kessler JA,
Geller AI,
Federoff HJ
(1994)
Transfer of the nerve growth factor gene into cell lines and cultured neurons using a defective herpes simplex virus vector. Transfer of NGF gene into cells by a HSV-1 vector.
Mol Brain Res
24:327-335[Medline].
-
Ghadge GD,
Roos RP,
Kang UJ,
Wollmann R,
Fishman PS,
Kalynych AM,
Barr E,
Leiden JM
(1995)
CNS gene delivery by retrograde transport of recombinant replication-defective adenoviruses.
Gene Ther
2:132-137[ISI][Medline].
-
Graham F,
Prevec L
(1991)
Manipulation of adenovirus vectors.
In: Methods in molecular biology: gene transfer and expression protocols (Murray EJ,
ed), pp 109-128. Clifton, NJ: Humana.
-
Henderson CE,
Phillips HS,
Pollock RA,
Davies AM,
Lemeulle C,
Armanini M,
Simmons L,
Moffet B,
Vandlen RA,
Koliatsos VE,
Rosenthal A
(1994)
GDNF: a potent survival factor for motoneurons present in peripheral nerve and muscle.
Science
266:1062-1064[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kato AC,
Lindsay RM
(1994)
Overlapping and additive effects of neurotrophins and CNTF on cultured human spinal cord neurons.
Exp Neurol
130:196-201[ISI][Medline].
-
Koliatsos VE,
Clatterbuck RE,
Winslow JW,
Cayouette MH,
Price DL
(1993)
Evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a trophic factor for motor neurons in vivo.
Neuron
10:359-367[ISI][Medline].
-
Laemmli UK
(1970)
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[Medline].
-
Le Gal La Salle G,
Robert JJ,
Berrard S,
Ridoux V,
Stratford-Perricaudet LD,
Perricaudet M,
Mallet J
(1993)
An adenovirus vector for gene transfer into neurons and glia in the brain.
Science
259:988-990[Abstract].
-
Li L,
Wu W,
Lin LF,
Lei M,
Oppenheim RW,
Houenou LJ
(1995)
Rescue of adult mouse motoneurons from injury-induced cell death by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:9771-9775[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lin LH,
Doherty DH,
Lile JD,
Bektesh S,
Collins F
(1993)
GDNF: a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons.
Science
260:1130-1132[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lindsay RM,
Rohrer H
(1985)
Placodal sensory neurons in culture: nodose ganglion neurons are unresponsive to NGF, lack NGF receptors but are supported by a liver-derived neurotrophic factor.
Dev Biol
112:30-48[ISI][Medline].
-
Neve RL
(1993)
Adenovirus vectors enter the brain.
Trends Neurosci
16:251-253[ISI][Medline].
-
Rabinovsky ED,
Smith GM,
Browder DP,
Shine HD,
McManaman JL
(1992)
Peripheral nerve injury down-regulates CNTF expression in adult rat sciatic nerves.
J Neurosci Res
31:188-192[ISI][Medline].
-
Schecterson LC,
Bothwell M
(1992)
Novel roles for neurotrophins are suggested by BDNF and NT-3 mRNA expression in developing neurons.
Neuron
9:449-463[ISI][Medline].
-
Sendtner M,
Kreutzberg GW,
Thoenen H
(1990)
Ciliary neurotrophic factor prevents the degeneration of motor neurons after axotomy.
Nature
345:440-441[Medline].
-
Sendtner M,
Holtmann B,
Kolbeck R,
Thoenen H,
Barde YA
(1992)
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor prevents the death of motoneurons in newborn rats after nerve section.
Nature
360:757-759[Medline].
-
Smith GM,
Rabinovsky ED,
McManaman JL,
Shine HD
(1993)
Temporal and spatial expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor after peripheral nerve injury.
Exp Neurol
121:239-247[ISI][Medline].
-
Springer JE
(1993)
Experimental evidence for growth factor treatment and function in certain neurological disorders.
Exp Neurol
124:2-4[ISI][Medline].
-
Towbin H,
Staehelin T,
Gordon J
(1979)
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Yan Q,
Elliott J,
Snider WD
(1992)
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rescues spinal motor neurons from axotomy-induced cell death.
Nature
360:753-755[Medline].
-
Zhou XF,
Zettler C,
Rush RA
(1994)
An improved procedure for the immunohistochemical localization of nerve growth factor-like immunoreactivity.
J Neurosci Methods
54:95-102[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Byrne, R. M. Stuart, C. Fakhry, M. Lehar, and P. W. Flint
An Electrophysiologic Model for Functional Assessment of Effects of Neurotrophic Factors on Facial Nerve Reinnervation
Arch Facial Plast Surg,
March 1, 2005;
7(2):
114 - 118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Akazawa, H. Tsuzuki, Y. Nakamura, Y. Sasaki, K. Ohsaki, S. Nakamura, Y. Arakawa, and S. Kohsaka
The Upregulated Expression of Sonic Hedgehog in Motor Neurons after Rat Facial Nerve Axotomy
J. Neurosci.,
September 8, 2004;
24(36):
7923 - 7930.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Perrelet, F. E. Perrin, P. Liston, R. G. Korneluk, A. MacKenzie, M. Ferrer-Alcon, and A. C. Kato
Motoneuron Resistance to Apoptotic Cell Death In Vivo Correlates with the Ratio between X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (XIAPs) and Its Inhibitor, XIAP-Associated Factor 1
J. Neurosci.,
April 14, 2004;
24(15):
3777 - 3785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zhou, B. J. Baumgartner, S. J. Hill-Felberg, L. R. McGowen, and H. D. Shine
Neurotrophin-3 Expressed In Situ Induces Axonal Plasticity in the Adult Injured Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci.,
February 15, 2003;
23(4):
1424 - 1431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Xu, K. M. Gingras, L. Bengston, A. Di Marco, and N. G. Forger
Blockade of Endogenous Neurotrophic Factors Prevents the Androgenic Rescue of Rat Spinal Motoneurons
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2001;
21(12):
4366 - 4372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Hottinger, M. Azzouz, N. Deglon, P. Aebischer, and A. D. Zurn
Complete and Long-Term Rescue of Lesioned Adult Motoneurons by Lentiviral-Mediated Expression of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in the Facial Nucleus
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 2000;
20(15):
5587 - 5593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. F. Goins, K. A. Lee, J. D. Cavalcoli, M. E. O'Malley, S. T. DeKosky, D. J. Fink, and J. C. Glorioso
Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Vector-Mediated Expression of Nerve Growth Factor Protects Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons from Peroxide Toxicity
J. Virol.,
January 1, 1999;
73(1):
519 - 532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|