Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 17,
Issue of September 1, 1997
pp. 6565-6574
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
-Opioid Receptor Activation Modulates Ca2+
Currents and Secretion in Isolated Neuroendocrine Nerve Terminals
K. I. Rusin,
D. R. Giovannucci,
E. L. Stuenkel, and
H. C. Moises
Department of Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0622
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed together with
time-resolved measurements of membrane capacitance
(Cm) in nerve terminals acutely
dissociated from neurohypophysis of adult rats to investigate
modulation of Ca2+ currents and secretion by
activation of opioid receptors. Bath superfusion of the
-opioid
agonists U69,593 (0.3-1 µM), dynorphin A (1 µM), or U50,488H (1-3 µM) reversibly
suppressed the peak amplitude of Ca2+ currents
32.7 ± 2.7% (in 41 of 56 terminals), 37.4 ± 5.3% (in 5 of
8 terminals), and 33.5 ± 8.1% (in 5 of 10 terminals),
respectively. In contrast, tests in 11 terminals revealed no effect of
the µ-opioid agonist [D-Pen2,5]-enkephalin
(1-3 µM; n = 7) or of the
-agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-N-Me-Phe-Gly-ol (1 µM; n = 4) on Ca2+
currents. Three components of high-threshold current were distinguished on the basis of their sensitivity to blockade by
-conotoxin GVIA, nicardipine, and
-conotoxin MVIIC: N-, L-, and P/Q-type current, respectively. Administration of U69,593 inhibited N-type current in
these nerve terminals on average 32%, whereas L-type current was
reduced 64%, and P/Q-type current was inhibited 28%. Monitoring of
changes in Cm in response to brief
depolarizing steps revealed that the
-opioid-induced reductions in
N-, L-, or P/Q-type currents were accompanied by attenuations in two
kinetically distinct components of Ca2+-dependent
exocytotic release. These data provide strong evidence of a functional
linkage between blockade of Ca2+ influx through
voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and inhibitory
modulation of release by presynaptic opioid receptors in mammalian
central nerve endings.
Key words:
-opioid receptor;
Ca2+ currents;
membrane capacitance;
secretion;
neuroendocrine nerve terminals;
patch-
clamp
INTRODUCTION
Opiates and endogenous opioid
peptides (opioids) produce their analgesic effects primarily by
reducing Ca2+-dependent release of neurotransmitters
from nerve terminals, thereby disrupting the communication between
neurons involved in sensory signaling (Jessell and Iversen, 1977
;
Macdonald and Nelson, 1978
; Grudt and Williams, 1994
). Opioids also
depress neuropeptide release from the posterior pituitary, acting
directly on vasopressin- (AVP) and oxytocin (OT)-containing neurons in the hypothalamus (Wuarin and Dudek, 1990
; Renaud et al., 1992
; Russell
et al., 1995
) and through presynaptic receptors located on their
neurosecretory endings in the neurohypophysis (Zhao et al., 1988b
; Kato
et al., 1992
). Although it remains unclear how the presynaptic
inhibitory effects of opioids are manifested, measurements from
neuronal somata suggest that the depression of release may result from
reductions in Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent
Ca2+ channels (North, 1993
). Activation of µ-,
-, or
-opioid receptors has been shown to inhibit somatic N- and
P/Q-type Ca2+ currents in several types of neurons
(Schroeder et al., 1991
; Moises et al., 1994
; Rhim and Miller, 1994
;
Rusin and Moises, 1995
) and clonal cells (Seward et al., 1991
; Taussig
et al., 1992
). These same channel types have been implicated to play a
pivotal role in mediating Ca2+ influx that triggers
depolarization-evoked neurotransmitter release from nerve endings in
the periphery (Kongsamut et al., 1989
; Toth et al., 1993
) and CNS
(Takahashi and Momiyama, 1993
; Turner et al., 1993
; Wheeler et al.,
1994
). Such data support the idea that presynaptic inhibition by
opioids might result, at least in part, from suppression in the
activity of exocytotic Ca2+ channels (Illes, 1989
;
North, 1993
). However, this hypothesis awaits direct experimental
confirmation in a mammalian neuronal system.
Elucidation of the role of Ca2+ channel modulation
in opioid-induced presynaptic inhibition would be accomplished best
through direct and simultaneous measurements of the ionic currents and release events in the terminal. However, technical limitations imposed
by the size and fragility of mammalian nerve endings have primarily
precluded such studies in CNS tissues. Instead, previous studies have
relied on indirect measurements to probe the nature of this
relationship, comparing opioid effects on intracellular free
Ca2+
([Ca2+]i), monitored
fluorometrically, with changes in K+
depolarization-evoked release of neurotransmitters in synaptosome preparations (Xiang et al., 1990
) or of neurohormones from dissociated neurosecretomes and isolated neurohypophysis (Dayanithi et al., 1992
;
Kato et al., 1992
). Although some studies report a good correspondence
between opioid-induced reductions in evoked release and changes in
[Ca2+]i (Dayanithi et al., 1992
),
these particular approaches lack the temporal resolution to
characterize the rapid electrical and exocytotic events involved in
excitation-secretion coupling at the terminal and hence afford only
limited insight regarding a functional linkage between opioid-induced
modulation of Ca2+ influx and release. Moreover, a
requirement for precise temporal resolution within the millisecond
domain is dictated by the need to ascertain whether an effect of
opioids on release results directly from modulation of
Ca2+ influx or might reflect alterations in
downstream events that influence the exocytotic machinery in a
Ca2+-dependent manner (Gillis et al., 1996
),
subsequent to any imposed changes in
[Ca2+]i.
The use of patch-clamp techniques to record Ca2+
currents in single neurosecretory endings of the rat neurohypophysis,
simultaneously with time-resolved membrane capacitance
(Cm) measurements as a monitor of
exocytotic activity, enabled us to directly examine the involvement of
Ca2+-dependent processes in the mechanism of
opioid-induced presynaptic inhibition. The present experiments were
designed to identify the specific types of Ca2+
channels that serve as targets of inhibitory modulation by opioid receptors in neurohypophysial nerve endings and to decipher the role of
this channel regulation in opioid depression of release.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of isolated nerve endings. Male rats
(150-250 gm) were rendered unconscious with CO2 and
decapitated rapidly by guillotine. After isolation of the pituitary,
the anterior and posterior lobes were separated by dissection, the
isolated neural lobe was collected, and isolated neurohypophysial nerve
endings were prepared as described previously (Cazalis et al., 1987
;
Stuenkel, 1994
) by brief homogenization of the neural lobe in 100 µl
of buffer containing (in mM): sucrose 270, EGTA 2, and
HEPES 10, with pH adjusted to 7.0 with Tris. The resulting homogenate
was directly aliquoted onto a glass coverslip forming the bottom of a
specially designed superfusion and recording chamber of elliptical shape and 100 µl solution volume. After allowing time for adherence to the chamber bottom, we superfused the nerve endings under laminar flow with a physiological saline (PS) solution containing (in mM): NaCl 140, KHCO3 5, CaCl2 2.2, MgCl2 1, glucose 10, and NaOH-HEPES 10, with pH adjusted to
7.2. For recording of Ca2+ currents and
Cm responses, the superfusion was changed from
PS to one normally consisting of (in mM): TEA 137, CaCl2 10, MgCl2 2, glucose 19, and HEPES 10, with pH adjusted to 7.2 with Tris. All studies were performed on
spherical nerve endings having diameters of 5-12 µm to facilitate
patch-clamp recording.
Recording of Ca2+ currents. Whole-cell
patch-clamp recording techniques (Hamill et al., 1981
; Lindau and
Neher, 1988
) were used to evoke and record Ca2+
currents and measure changes in Cm (see below)
under voltage clamp from single neurohypophysial nerve endings.
Whole-terminal recordings (as appropriately termed) were made at room
temperature (23-25°C) using patch pipettes fashioned from 1.5 mm
outer diameter capillary glass (WP Instruments), coated to within 100 µm of the tip with Sylgard elastomer, and fire-polished to
resistances of 3-8 M
. The standard pipette recording solution
contained (in mM):
N-methyl-D-glucamine 140, HEPES 40, MgATP 2, GTP
0.2, and Tris-EGTA 0.25, adjusted to pH 7.1 and ~300 mOsm.
Current recordings and Cm measurements were
obtained using an Axopatch 200A patch-clamp amplifier (Axon
Instruments, Foster City, CA) that provides compensation circuitry to
correct for pipette and whole-cell Cm and series
resistance. Electrode capacitance was compensated electronically before
transition to whole-terminal recording. Whole-terminal capacitance
(0.8-3.5 pF) and 65-80% of the series resistance (3-35 M
) were
compensated to eliminate membrane-charging transients and voltage and
temporal errors, respectively. The evoked Ca2+
currents were low-pass filtered (5-10 kHz) before digitization at 5 kHz and corrected for linear leak currents and capacitative transients
by digital subtraction of an appropriately scaled current elicited by a
series of small hyperpolarizing voltage commands, using a P/N routine.
Voltage-clamp protocols, data acquisition, and analyses of current and
Cm recordings were performed using Pulse Control
V4.5 Apple computer-based software routines generously distributed by
Dr. Richard Bookman (Herrington et al., 1995
).
Capacitance measurements. High-resolution membrane
capacitance measurements under whole-terminal patch-clamp recording
were used to monitor
Cm, which
directly reflects secretory activity. The fusion of synaptic vesicles
or granules to the plasma membrane during exocytosis results in an
increase in the total plasma membrane surface area (with corresponding
increases in Cm) provided that the rate
of exocytosis is much greater than the rate of endocytosis. Time-resolvable changes in Cm were monitored
using an adaptation of the phase-tracking method of Fidler and
Fernandez (1989)
. Briefly, changes in whole-terminal
Cm were measured by adding a 30 mV r.m.s., 1.2 kHz sine wave to the holding potential (usually
90 mV), and the
resulting current output signal of the voltage clamp was analyzed at
two orthogonal phase angles using a software-based, phase-sensitive detector with high time resolution. Current signals were sampled 16 times per sinusoidal period (19.1 kHz sampling rate), and a Cm value was computed every 13.3 msec. The
Cm signal is shifted 90° from changes in
access resistance (Ra) and membrane
conductance (Gm), eliminating
interference with the Cm measurement. Imposing defined changes in Ra, by periodically
inserting a 500 k
resistor between the bath electrode and electrical
ground, allowed for immediate calculation by computer of the correct
phase angle for the phase-sensitive detector. Lack of projection of the
resistor-induced Ra changes in the
Cm trace ensured correct alignment of the
phase-sensitive detector. Calibration of the Cm
trace was obtained by computer-controlled unbalancing of the whole-cell
capacitance circuitry of the amplifier to provide a series of 100 fF
signals. Data acquisition and the software-based phase-sensitive
detector were controlled by software developed for the Apple Macintosh
computer (Pulse Control 4.5) and generously distributed by Dr. Richard
Bookman (Herrington et al., 1995
).
Delivery of test substances. External solution was
continuously passed at a rate of 1-1.5 ml/min through the recording
chamber by means of a gravity-fed delivery system. For combined
measurements of Ca2+ current and
Cm, rapid change of solution in the
recording chamber (100 µl total volume) was accomplished through use
of a manually controlled, eight port distribution valve connected at
the chamber inflow to a series of solution reservoirs. The perfusion
system maintains a constant bath volume, which is essential for
accurate Cm measurements, and the presence of
baffles on the chamber influx and efflux ports results in the
generation of a laminar flow across individual nerve endings.
Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-N-Me-Phe-Gly-ol (DAMGO), [D-Pen2,5]-enkephalin (DPDPE), and dynorphin
A (all obtained from Peninsula Laboratories) were prepared as 1 mM stock solutions in sterile water, partitioned into 10 µl aliquots, lyophilized, and stored at
20°C.
-Conotoxin GVIA
(GVIA) (Peninsula Laboratories) and
-conotoxin MVIIC (MVIIC) (Bachem
California) were prepared as 500 µM and 1 mM
stock solutions, respectively, and stored in the same manner. On the
day of the experiment, aliquots of the above compounds and freshly
weighed amounts of nicardipine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), U69,593,
U50,488H, naloxone, and nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) (all obtained
from Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA) were dissolved in the
extracellular bathing solution to the desired concentrations.
Nicardipine was held in a light-proof container and routinely applied
to the recording chamber under restricted light conditions to minimize
degradation caused by exposure to light. For all experiments involving
use of Ca2+ channel blockers, only one nerve ending
was examined from each dish in which recordings were obtained.
Statistical comparisons. Statistical comparisons were
performed using either a paired or unpaired Student's t
test. Values are given as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise
indicated.
RESULTS
Opioid regulation of Ca2+ currents in
neurohypophysial nerve terminals
Whole-terminal recordings (n = 67) were obtained
using bath and pipette solutions of composition that suppressed
K+ and Na+ conductances, with
Ca2+ (10 mM) as the charge carrier. Step
depolarizations of 5-200 msec were made to various test potentials
from a holding potential (Vh) of
90 mV
to evoke Ca2+ currents and associated increases in
Cm (see below). The Ca2+
currents that we recorded consisted of inactivating and sustained components of high-voltage activated current, with a threshold for
activation of
40 mV and peak amplitudes obtained at +10 mV, but
contained no rapidly inactivating low-threshold T-type component. The
amplitude of the Ca2+ currents, measured at the peak
of the current-voltage curve, averaged 128.9 ± 10.9 pA
(n = 67), yielding a mean current density of 71.8 ± 7.2 A/F for these nerve endings. Overall, the
Ca2+ currents we measured corresponded closely to
those described previously in acutely isolated rat neurohypophysial
nerve endings (Lemos et al., 1994
; Stuenkel, 1994
) with regard to their
amplitudes, voltage-dependent activation, and kinetic properties.
Binding studies and immunohistochemical localization of mRNA coding for
the various opioid receptor subtypes indicate that opioid receptors on
the nerve endings of rat neurohypophysial magnocellular
secretory neurons are predominantly, if not exclusively, of the
-type (Herkenham et al., 1986
; Sumner et al., 1990
; Mansour et al.,
1995
). Guided by these considerations, we first looked for regulation
of the evoked Ca2+ current by agonists acting at
-opioid receptors. Bath superfusion of the
-opioid agonists
dynorphin A (1 µM), U50,488H (1-3 µM), or
U69,593 (0.3-1 µM) reversibly suppressed the peak
amplitude of Ca2+ currents in 45 of 67 terminals
examined. The inhibitory response to a particular agonist varied
considerably among the group of nerve endings that showed
-opioid
sensitivity. For example, the maximal response to U69,593 ranged from 9 to 66% inhibition of the control current, while exceeding 50%
suppression in Ca2+ current in approximately
one-third (12) of 41 responsive nerve endings. However, comparisons of
the effects of U69,593, dynorphin A (n = 5), and
U50,488H (n = 2) in the same nerve ending revealed equivalent inhibitory responses to these agonists (Fig.
1A). Moreover, when the
data were pooled for a particular agonist, no significant differences
were observed in the maximal inhibition of Ca2+
current produced by U69,593 (32.7 ± 2.7%; 41 of 56 terminals), dynorphin A (37.4 ± 5.3%; 5 of 8 terminals), and U50,488H
(33.5 ± 8.1%; 5 of 10 terminals). Although the predominant
effect of the
-opioid agonists was to decrease a rapidly
inactivating current (
, 142 ± 6 msec; n = 10),
more-sustained components were also reduced in many of the terminals.
We simplified the interpretation of experimental outcomes by using
U69,593 for assessing
-opioid regulation of Ca2+
currents and Cm responses (see below), avoiding
potential problems associated with the susceptibility of dynorphin
peptides to breakdown and cross-reactivity with multiple opioid
receptor subtypes.
Fig. 1.
Opioid-induced inhibition of
Ca2+ currents mediated via
-opioid receptors.
A-C, Recordings from three different terminals of whole-terminal Ca2+ currents evoked by a 100 msec
(A, C) or 50 msec
(B) step to +10 mV from
90 mV before the
application and in the presence of selective
-opioid (dynorphin A, 1 µM; U69,593, 1 µM),
-opioid (DPDPE, 1 µM), or µ-opioid (DAMGO, 3 µM) agonists.
Only the
-opioid agonists reversibly inhibited
Ca2+ currents. D1,
D2, Recordings from another terminal showing
that this effect of U69,593 was blocked by the
-selective antagonist
nor-BNI (1 µM). E, Comparison of effects
of
-, µ-, and
-opioid-selective drugs on
Ca2+ current. Open bars represent the
mean ± SEM of the values obtained in the presence of a particular
agonist (number of terminals shown in denominator);
values are expressed as a percentage of the predrug control current.
Current amplitudes were reduced significantly (p < 0.05) by U69,593, dynorphin A, and
U50,488H but not by DAMGO and DPDPE. Filled bars
represent only the data obtained from opioid-responsive terminals
(number shown in numerator) and demonstrate equivalent inhibitory efficacy of the three
-opioid agonists examined.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]
In a separate set of experiments on 11 nerve terminals, the effects of
administration of agonists selective for either µ- or
-opioid
receptors on Ca2+ currents were compared with those
produced by a subsequent application of U69,593 (0.3-1
µM) to determine whether opioid-induced suppression of
these currents resulted specifically from the activation of
-opioid
receptors. These tests revealed no effect of the µ-opioid-selective agonist DAMGO (1-3 µM; n = 7; Fig.
1B) or of the
-agonist DPDPE (1 µM;
n = 4; Fig. 1C) on Ca2+
currents, although reductions in current by the
-opioid were registered in more than half (n = 8) of the same
preparations. The graph depicted in Figure 1E
summarizes the results of all experiments in which we tested for
regulation of nerve terminal Ca2+ currents by
agonists having selectivity for different subtypes of opioid receptors.
The inhibitory effects of the five
-, µ-, or
-opioid-selective
agonists tested were compared by plotting the averaged amount of
Ca2+ current evoked in the presence of a particular
agonist (represented by open bars), expressed as a
percentage of the predrug control current. Current amplitudes were
reduced significantly (p < 0.05) by U69,593,
dynorphin A, and U50,488H but not by DAMGO and DPDPE. Furthermore,
recomputation of the effects of each
-opioid agonist using only
those data obtained from opioid-responsive terminals (filled bars) demonstrated equivalent
inhibitory efficacy of the three
-opioids examined. In additional
experiments, inhibitory responses to U69,593 were tested for
sensitivity to blockade by naloxone or nor-BNI, a
-opioid
receptor-selective antagonist (Portoghese et al., 1987
), to confirm
their mediation via activation of the corresponding subtype of opioid
receptor. In all eight nerve endings examined, the ability of U69,593
to inhibit the evoked Ca2+ current was blocked by
coadministration of naloxone (1 µM; n = 4) or nor-BNI (1 µM; n = 4; Fig.
1D1,D2).
These data, when taken together, indicate that only the
-subtype of
opioid receptors is functionally coupled to Ca2+
channels in rat neurohypophysial nerve terminals.
Identification of high-threshold currents sensitive
to
-opioids
To identify the types of high-threshold Ca2+
channels that are modulated by presynaptic
-opioid receptors, we
examined the ability of U69,593 to reduce Ca2+
current before and after selective blockade of N-, L-, and P/Q-type current components (n = 11). The traces in
Figure 2A illustrate the inhibitory effect of U69,593 (1 µM) on
Ca2+ currents evoked by 50 msec steps to +10 mV from
a Vh of
90 mV. Application of U69,593 (for 1 min) reduced the peak amplitude of the Ca2+ current
from 260 to 110 pA (150 pA), and this effect was reversed after washout
of the opioid. After the current recovered from the inhibition by
U69,593, GVIA (0.5 µM) was administered for 40 sec. GVIA
irreversibly suppressed the peak amplitude of the control current from
260 to 75 pA (185 pA, representing 71.2% of the control current), and
after GVIA the fraction of current that was inhibited by U69,593 was
reduced from 150 to 48 pA (representing a 68% blockade). The
application of nicardipine (10 µM) subsequent to the
establishment of the irreversible blockade by GVIA reduced peak current
amplitude further from 75 to 29 pA (equivalent to 17.7% of the control
current), and this was associated with a further reduction in the
inhibitory response to U69,593 (from 48 to 17 pA). Administration of
MVIIC (1 µM) in the presence of nicardipine abolished
whole-cell current and any effect of U69,593 that remained after
nicardipine. The pairs of traces depicted in Figure
2A (lower) were obtained by subtraction of
corresponding currents evoked before and after application of
antagonists and illustrate sensitivity to U69,593 of pharmacologically
distinguished N-, L-, and P/Q-type current components. Overall, in 3 of
11 terminals (28.9%) tested, Ca2+ currents showed
sensitivity to blockade by selective Ca2+ channel
blockers similar to that illustrated for the nerve terminal in Figure
2. The majority of terminals that were studied (5 of 11, 45.5%)
possessed only N- and L-type Ca2+ channels, whereas
the remaining 3 terminals expressed L- and P/Q-type but not N-type
channels. It should be noted, however, that all three pharmacologically
distinct current components demonstrated sensitivity to
-opioids.
These data suggest that
-opioid receptors are negatively coupled to
all types of Ca2+ channels in rat neurohypophysial
nerve terminals, including a GVIA-sensitive (N-type) channel, a
nicardipine-sensitive (L-type) channel, and a MVIIC-sensitive
(P/Q-type) channel.
Fig. 2.
-Opioids inhibited GVIA-sensitive,
nicardipine-sensitive, and MVIIC-sensitive Ca2+
current components. A, upper, Recordings
from a single nerve terminal show the effects of U69,593
(traces marked with asterisks) on
Ca2+ currents evoked by 50 msec steps to +10 mV from
a holding potential of
90 mV before the application and in the
presence of Ca2+ channel-type selective blockers.
Sequential administration of GVIA (0.5 µM), nicardipine
(10 µM), and MVIIC (1 µM) completely abolished whole-terminal current. The ability of U69,593 to suppress Ca2+ current was greatly reduced after application
of each of these blockers. A, lower,
Subtraction of the corresponding currents evoked before and after
application of antagonists yielded pharmacologically distinguished N-,
L-, and P/Q-type current components in control conditions and in the
presence of U69,593. B, Relative contribution of
pharmacologically distinguished N-, L-, and P/Q-type current components
to the total whole-terminal current and their sensitivity to the
inhibitory effect of U69,593. Bars in the graph
represent the mean ± SEM of the normalized current amplitudes
obtained from the number of terminals shown, examined using the
experimental protocol depicted in A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
To quantify the relative contribution of individual current components
to the total whole-terminal current and its
-opioid-sensitive portion, we averaged measurements of current amplitude blocked by each
antagonist that were obtained from the terminals examined using the
same protocol as described for the experiment in Figure 2A. This analysis revealed that 59 ± 8%
(n = 8) of high-threshold Ca2+
current was contributed through GVIA-sensitive N-type channels, 25 ± 4% (n = 6) through dihydropyridine-sensitive L-type
channels, and 13 ± 5% (n = 3) through
pharmacologically defined P/Q-type channels. Administration of U69,593
inhibited N-type current on average ~32%, whereas
nicardipine-sensitive current (L-type) was reduced ~64%, and
MVIIC-sensitive (P/Q-type) current was inhibited ~28% (Fig.
2B).
Opioid regulation of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis
in nerve terminals
The changes in Cm that are measured in
response to brief depolarizations reflect increases in surface membrane
area caused by the fusion of vesicles (provided that the rate of
exocytosis exceeds the rate of endocytosis), and these depend not only
on Ca2+ entry (Fig. 3)
and buffering but also on the pattern and duration of stimulation
(Lindau and Neher, 1988
; Lim et al., 1990
; Horrigan and Bookman, 1994
;
Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
). Single-step depolarizations to
potentials that yielded maximal inward Ca2+ currents
were associated with Cm responses in virtually
all nerve endings examined, and the evoked increases in
Cm measured in 43 of these were sufficiently
stable to allow systematic examination of their modulation by
-opioids (see below). Despite variation in the depolarization-evoked
Cm increases that were measured among individual
nerve endings, each Cm response was resolvable
into several kinetically and functionally distinct components, as has been described in detail in an earlier report (Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
). Briefly, depolarizations of single nerve endings achieved with 5 msec steps produced a transient
Cm increase that was independent of
Ca2+ entry. It was shown for these peptidergic nerve
endings that this transient Cm signal does not
represent Ca2+-dependent exocytotic activity and is
most likely related to a charge redistribution within the membrane
(Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
). Depolarizations of longer duration
(50-200 msec) to between 0 and +30 mV produced more-prolonged
Ca2+-dependent increases in
Cm that could be resolved into two kinetically distinct phases (Fig. 3A): an immediate step-like jump (seen
in all 43 terminals) reflecting fusion of an immediately releasable pool of "predocked vesicles" followed by a larger, slow
Cm increase of several seconds duration
indicative of fusion and release from a distinct, larger readily
releasable pool of vesicles (Lindau et al., 1992
; Horrigan and Bookman,
1994
; Hsu and Jackson, 1996
; Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
). This
latter component of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis was
observed in 19 of the 43 nerve terminals studied. The presence of the
transient Cm change together with slower
Ca2+-dependent Cm components
obfuscates the correct estimation of the immediate step-like exocytotic
Cm jump. Therefore, the transient
Cm evoked by a 5 msec step was digitally
subtracted from the Cm changes evoked with
longer depolarizations to yield a measure of
Ca2+-dependent exocytosis. All data described
subsequently were obtained from transient
Cm-subtracted records.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of current-voltage and
Cm-voltage relationships determined for
single nerve endings. Cm responses
(A) and corresponding Ca2+
currents (B) evoked in a single terminal by 200 msec step depolarizations to different command potentials (shown near
corresponding traces) from a holding potential of
90
mV. The depolarizations to
10 and +50 mV produced small currents that
were accompanied by an immediate, step-like
Cm increase, whereas steps to +10 mV evoked a larger current and prolonged Cm increase
lasting for several seconds. Ca2+-dependent
Cm responses were corrected for transient
Cm artifacts (as explained in text) by
subtracting the response to a 5 msec depolarization aligned with the
pulse. C. Integrated Ca2+ currents
(open circles; n = 8) and
corresponding immediate (filled circles;
n = 8) and slow (filled
squares; n = 6)
Cm responses plotted against command
potential at which they were evoked.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]
The properties of the immediate and slow Cm
responses measured here, as illustrated in Figure 3A, for
example, were similar to those described for these peptidergic nerve
endings in previous studies (Lim et al., 1990
; Seward et al., 1995
; Hsu
and Jackson, 1996
; Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
). In contrast to the
transient
Cm, both the immediate jump
and slowly increasing Cm responses were markedly
altered by manipulations that resulted in attenuation of
depolarization-evoked Ca2+ entry. Administration of
Cd2+ (100 µM) to the external medium
was found to abolish the inward Ca2+ currents and
any corresponding immediate or slow Cm
responses, without appreciable change in the transient
Cm components [n = 2; see also
Giovannucci and Stuenkel (1997)
, their Fig. 3A].
Conversely, depolarization-evoked inward currents were greatly
enhanced, whereas both immediate and slow Cm
responses were reduced when Ba2+ (10 mM)
was substituted for external Ca2+ (n = 2). These results support the notion that the immediate step and
slowly increasing Cm changes reflect exocytotic
activity that is dependent on Ca2+ influx. In
additional experiments (n = 8), the dependence of these
Cm responses on Ca2+ entry
was examined further by comparing the relationships of the magnitude of
the evoked Ca2+ current and associated changes in
Cm (measured in the same nerve ending) as a
function of the step depolarization (Fig. 3). Depolarizing pulses of
200 msec duration were applied in a random order to membrane potentials
between
40 and +60 mV from a Vh of
90 mV, and all changes in Cm were allowed to return to
baseline (typically requiring 60-90 sec) before we initiated the next
depolarization. To facilitate comparisons between current-voltage and
Cm-voltage relationships, we normalized the
magnitude of the time-integrated Ca2+ currents and
the amplitudes of immediate and slow Cm
responses measured in a given nerve ending to the corresponding maximal responses obtained, and the results from all experiments were pooled,
yielding the plots shown in Figure 3C. The inward
Ca2+ current began to activate at
30 mV and
reached a maximum at +10 mV, at which point the time-integrated
Ca2+ current averaged 12.0 ± 2.3 pC
(n = 8). The corresponding immediate step increases in
Cm (n = 8) closely followed the
current-voltage profile and also reached a maximal value (18.4 ± 5.0 fF) at +10 mV (Fig. 3C). When steps were made to
potentials
0 mV (Figs. 3A,C), a slowly increasing
Cm was observed after the immediate Cm response in six of the terminals. With a
higher threshold, the plot of the slow Cm
increase as a function of test potential showed a rightward shift
compared with the voltage relationships of the evoked
Ca2+ and immediate Cm
responses but also peaked at +10 mV (57.6 ± 17.8 fF). On the
other hand, voltage steps to test potentials positive to +50 mV evoked
no inward currents and failed to induce immediate or slow
Cm responses in any of the nerve endings (Fig. 3C). These results support the conclusion that both the
immediate and slow Cm responses measured here
are tightly coupled to elevations in
[Ca2+]i produced by influx through
voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. Nevertheless, the
normalized amplitude of the immediate Cm
increase exceeded that of the slow Cm response
at all test potentials, suggesting that the initial component of
exocytotic release may have a different requirement for triggering by
elevations in [Ca2+]i than the slow
phase of release (Lim et al., 1990
; Lindau et al., 1992
; Seward et al.,
1995
; Hsu and Jackson, 1996
; Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
).
To determine whether the activation of
-opioid receptors had an
effect on Ca2+-dependent exocytosis, we tested the
ability of U69,593 (1 µM) and dynorphin A (1 µM), administered at concentrations near-maximal for
Ca2+ current inhibition, to modulate
depolarization-evoked immediate (n = 43) and slow
(n = 19) increases in Cm. The
effects of U69,593 were examined in 41 individual nerve endings, of
which 19 exhibited a slowly increasing phase of
Cm in addition to the immediate step Cm response. The traces in Figure
4 show Ca2+ currents
(A3) and corresponding
Cm responses (A1,
A2) elicited by a 200 msec step to +10 mV
from a Vh of
90 mV. Bath application of
U69,593 (1 µM; for 30 sec) decreased the peak amplitude
of the Ca2+ current from 193 to 121 pA (Fig.
4A3), resulting in a 32%
reduction in the depolarization-evoked Ca2+ influx
(from 18.5 to 12.6 pC). The immediate step-like increase in
Cm was only slightly attenuated (9%, from 49 to
44 fF) by
-opioid administration in this terminal (Fig.
4A2); however, the magnitude of
the subsequent slowly increasing phase of Cm was
appreciably reduced (19%, from 193 to 157 fF; Fig.
4A1). In three additional terminals in which we used the same protocol to examine for mediation of agonist effects via
-opioid receptors, both the inhibition in
evoked Ca2+ current and corresponding attenuation in
immediate or slow Cm responses produced by
U69,593 (1 µM) were blocked reversibly by administration
of nor-BNI (1 µM; Fig. 5).
Overall, the administration of U69,593 reduced immediate step increases
in Cm in 13 of 41 nerve endings examined
(25.2 ± 4.2%; range, 8-40%), when measurements were obtained
using step depolarizations to test potentials yielding maximal
Ca2+ currents (Fig. 4C). Under these
condition, an inhibition in the evoked Ca2+ current
was observed in 31 of the nerve terminals (30.1 ± 3.0%; range,
9-67%), including 11 of those in which reductions in the immediate
Cm response were registered (26.2 ± 5.0%;
range, 8-62%). In contrast, administration of the
-opioid agonist
reduced the slowly increasing Cm responses
evoked by depolarizing steps to the peak of the current-voltage curve
in 16 of the 19 terminals that showed this additional exocytotic
component. In 14 of these 16 terminals, U69,593 reduced the evoked
Ca2+ current by an average of 33.7 ± 5.1%
(range, 9-66%), a value close to the mean reduction observed in the
peak amplitude of the slow Cm response
(33.0 ± 3.5%; range, 6-47%). Interestingly, in the other two
terminals, opioid-induced reductions in the slow Cm response (and in the immediate step increases
that preceded them) were observed without appreciable changes in the
Ca2+ current. Application of U69,593 had no effect
on either the evoked Ca2+ currents or the associated
slow (and immediate) Cm responses in the
remaining three terminals. Tests with dynorphin A (1 µM) in seven terminals, including five that were screened initially with
U69,593, revealed a similar profile of inhibitory effects on
depolarization-evoked Ca2+ currents and the
corresponding immediate and slow Cm responses. Administration of the
-opioid peptide routinely suppressed
inward currents (five of seven terminals) and the associated slowly
increasing phase of Cm (three of three
terminals), whereas significant inhibitory effects on immediate
Cm responses were observed in only a single terminal. Direct comparisons of the effects of U69,593 and dynorphin A
in the same nerve ending (n = 5) demonstrated nearly
equivalent inhibitory responses to these agonists (Fig.
6). Moreover, when the data were pooled
for all terminals that responded to a particular agonist, no
significant differences were observed in the maximal inhibition of
Ca2+ current produced by U69,593 (30.1 ± 3.0%; n = 31) and dynorphin (37.4 ± 5.3%;
n = 5) and in agonist-induced attenuation of the slow
Cm response produced by U69,593 (33.7 ± 3.1%; n = 16) and dynorphin (37.9 ± 4.1%;
n = 3).
Fig. 4.
Activation of
-opioid receptors
attenuates immediate and slow Cm responses
evoked by steps inducing smaller Ca2+ influx.
Cm increases (A1,
A2, B1, B2) and corresponding Ca2+
currents (A3, B3)
recorded in response to 200 msec depolarizations to +10 mV
(A) and +30 mV (B) from a
holding potential of
90 mV. Administration of U69,593 appreciably
reduced Ca2+ influx (32.1%, from 18.53 to 12.58 pC)
evoked by depolarization to +10 mV but had little effect on the
corresponding immediate Cm response (9%
reduction, from 49 to 44 fF, indicated by dotted lines).
Depolarization to +30 mV induced much smaller Ca2+
influx (9.1 pC) that was attenuated further by activation of
-opioid
receptors (to 6.23 pC, representing 31.5% blockade). Under this
condition of reduced driving force for Ca2+ influx,
inhibition of the immediate Cm response by
the
-opioid agonist was markedly increased (47%, from 36 to 19 fF).
Opioid administration also reduced the slowly increasing
Cm component recorded in this nerve ending,
and this effect of U69,593 was greater on the response measured at +30
mV (33.9%, from 118 to 78 fF) compared with that recorded at +10 mV
(17.7%, from 192 to 158 fF). C, Bar graph summarizes
the effects of U69,593 on the immediate step and slowly increasing
components of Cm responses. Bars represent
the mean ± SEM of the normalized Cm
responses pooled from
-opioid-responsive terminals (number
shown in numerator, out of the total number of terminals
examined, shown in denominator) for immediate and slow
Cm responses evoked at command potentials of
+10 or +30 mV, expressed as a percent of the corresponding predrug
control values. Reduction of depolarization-evoked
Ca2+ influx to submaximal levels resulted in an
increased probability for modulation of the immediate
Cm response by
-opioid receptor activation from 32% (13 of 41) at +10 mV to 100% (6 of 6) at +30 mV,
without significantly (p = 0.19, NS indicates not significant) altering the magnitude of
the inhibitory effect of U69,593 on these initial exocytotic events. In
contrast, the inhibitory effect of U69,593 on the slow
Cm responses was significantly increased under conditions in which the driving force for Ca2+
influx and the net amount of depolarization-evoked
Ca2+ influx was reduced (asterisk
indicates p < 0.001).
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Activation of
-opioid receptors attenuates
depolarization-evoked exocytotic Cm
responses in neurohypophysial nerve endings in nor-BNI-sensitive
manner. Cm increases
(A1, B1) and
corresponding Ca2+ currents
(A2, B2) recorded in
response to 200 msec depolarizations to +10 mV from a holding potential
of
90 mV in control solution (A) and in the
presence of the selective
-opioid antagonist nor-BNI
(B). Administration of U69,593 reduced the evoked
Ca2+ current and accompanying slowly increasing
Cm response, and these effects were
prevented after blockade of
-opioid receptors by nor-BNI (1 µM).
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
Comparison of effects of U69,593 and dynorphin A
demonstrates the similar efficacy of the two
-opioid agonists in
inhibiting Ca2+ currents and slow
Cm responses. Cm
increases (A1, B1) and
corresponding Ca2+ currents
(A2, B2) recorded in the
same nerve terminal in response to 200 msec depolarizations to +10 mV
from a holding potential of
90 mV in control solution and in the
presence of U69,593 (A) and dynorphin A
(B). Administration of U69,593 reduced the evoked
Ca2+ current and accompanying slowly increasing
Cm response to a degree similar to that seen
with dynorphin A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
Despite a routine suppression of the slow phase of exocytosis,
activation of
-opioid receptors had variable and inconsistent effects on the immediate step-like increases in
Cm measured in response to depolarizations that
yielded maximal Ca2+ currents. Given the close
correlation observed between the opioid-induced inhibition in evoked
Ca2+ currents and in slow Cm
responses, what might account for the lack of correspondence between
changes in Ca2+ currents and the immediate
Cm increases that constitute the initial secretory event? One possibility is that such an outcome might derive
from fundamental differences in the dependency of the initiation and
maintenance of vesicular exocytosis on increases in
Ca2+ concentration within functionally distinct
intraterminal domains (Lindau et al., 1992
; Horrigan and Bookman, 1994
;
Hsu and Jackson, 1996
; but see Seward et al., 1995
). We hypothesized
that if the immediate Cm response reflects
exocytosis of predocked vesicles (Lindau et al., 1992
; Horrigan and
Bookman, 1994
), then activation of Ca2+ channels by
depolarizations to the peak of the current-voltage curve may increase
submembrane Ca2+ concentration within spatially
restricted domains close to the release sites beyond the level of
saturation for vesicle fusion. Under these conditions, a modest
reduction in the evoked Ca2+ current by
-opioids
might not decrease submembrane concentrations of
Ca2+ near the release sites below the level for
saturation and, therefore, would have little if any effect on the
immediate Cm response. To test this hypothesis,
we examined the effects of U69,593 on Ca2+ currents
and Cm responses that were evoked by stepping to
more positive command potentials (+30 mV) closer to
ECa, thereby reducing the driving force
for Ca2+ influx (Fig. 4B). We
relied on this approach to manipulate the magnitude of
Ca2+ entry induced by depolarization rather than to
modify influx by altering [Ca2+]o
because the latter manipulations induce changes in basal levels of
[Ca2+]i in these nerve endings with
dramatic effects on the functional readiness of different vesicular
pools (Stuenkel, 1994
), thereby precluding valid comparisons between
values obtained under control and experimental conditions. With
delivery of single depolarizing steps to +30 mV, the amplitudes of the
evoked currents and associated immediate and slow
Cm responses were reduced on average 45.8 ± 10.5% (n = 6), 20.7 ± 5.7%
(n = 6), and 45.8 ± 6.4% (n = 3), respectively, compared with the corresponding values measured in
the same terminals after depolarizations to +10 mV. Under this test
condition, all response parameters recorded in each nerve terminal were
inhibited by the
-opioid receptor agonist, including the immediate
step Cm increases in three terminals that did
not show modulation by the
-opioid when evoked by steps to +10 mV.
For this entire subgroup of nerve terminals (n = 6), no
significant difference was observed between the inhibitory effect of
U69,593 on the peak Ca2+ currents evoked at +10 and
+30 mV (34.2 ± 4.0% and 29.5 ± 5.2%, respectively), nor
was there any difference in the extent of inhibition of the
noninactivating current component measured at the end of the 200 msec
pulse (32.2 ± 4.7% and 34.3 ± 4.4% at +10 and +30 mV,
respectively). However, the U69,593-induced inhibition of the immediate
Cm increase tended to be greater for responses
evoked at +30 mV (34.3 ± 3.9%) compared with responses evoked at
+10 mV (14.1 ± 9.9%) and was comparable in magnitude with the
-opioid inhibition of slow Cm increases
(33.7 ± 3.1%; n = 16) measured in response to
depolarizations (+10 mV) that yielded maximal Ca2+
currents. Similarly, under the condition of reduced
Ca2+ driving force, the inhibitory effect of U69,593
on the slow Cm response was markedly increased
in two of three nerve terminals that exhibited this additional
component of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis. Figure
4C provides a graphical comparison of the inhibitory effects
of U69,593 on the immediate step and slowly increasing
Cm responses evoked by depolarizations to +10 or
+30 mV, expressed as a percent of the corresponding predrug control
responses. The height of each bar represents the opioid effect computed
by pooling results obtained only from nerve terminals that showed
modulation of the particular Cm response. The
principal effect of reducing depolarization-evoked
Ca2+ influx to submaximal levels was to increase the
probability for modulation of the immediate Cm
response by activation of
-opioid receptors (from 32 to 100%, Fig.
4C), without significantly altering the magnitude of the
inhibitory effect of U69,593 on the initial exocytotic events evoked by
depolarizing steps yielding peak inward currents compared with
submaximal Ca2+ influx (25.2 ± 4.2% at +10 mV
compared with 34.3 ± 3.9% at +30 mV; p = 0.19).
An additional effect of this manipulation was to significantly increase
the extent to which the slowly increasing Cm
component can be inhibited by
-opioid receptor activation (79.2 ± 20.8% at +30 mV compared with 33.7 ± 3.1% at +10 mV;
p < 0.001). Taken together, the results of these
experiments suggest that activation of
-opioid receptors on the
endings of rat neurohypophysial magnocellular neurons reduces the
secretion of the neurohormones AVP and OT by modulating several
kinetically distinct components of exocytotic vesicular release.
DISCUSSION
This work provides the first direct examination of the
relationship between opioid-induced suppression of
Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated
Ca2+ channels and inhibitory modulation of
neurotransmitter or neuropeptide release in mammalian nerve terminals.
This became possible because of the development of an anatomically
unique preparation of neurosecretory terminals from the rat
neurohypophysis. These nerve endings maintain cytoplasmic constituents,
release neuropeptides in a Ca2+-dependent manner,
and respond to receptor-mediated modulatory influences (Cazalis et al.,
1987
; Nordmann et al., 1987
).
Opioids have been shown to act at
- and, possibly, µ-opioid
receptors (Zhao et al., 1988a
) to inhibit depolarization-evoked release
of AVP and OT from isolated rat neural lobes and single neurohypophysial nerve terminals (Zhao et al., 1988b
; Dayanithi et al.,
1992
; Kato et al., 1992
). In some reports,
-opioid agonists and
nonselective opioids (etorphine) also reduced the associated rise in
[Ca2+]i, measured with Fura-2,
but the relationship between the changes in intraterminal
[Ca2+]i and inhibition of
K+-stimulated release of neuropeptides from isolated
endings or intact neural lobes showed only a weak correlation
(Dayanithi et al., 1992
; Kato et al., 1992
). To clarify the role of
Ca2+-dependent processes in opioid-induced
inhibition of release, we examined the effects of µ-,
-, and
-opioid-selective agonists on Ca2+ currents in
single neurohypophysial nerve terminals using the whole-terminal
recording configuration, while simultaneously monitoring changes in
whole-terminal Cm as an assay of
Ca2+-triggered exocytotic release (Lindau and Neher,
1988
; Lim et al., 1990
).
Inhibition of Ca2+ current by the
-opioid
agonists dynorphin A, U69,593, or U50,488H was observed in 67% of
neurohypophysial nerve terminals, and these responses were
blocked by naloxone and the
-selective antagonist nor-BNI.
Ca2+ currents were unaffected by either µ- or
-opioid agonists, although reductions in current by
-opioids were
registered in most (8 of 11) of the same preparations. Thus, only
-opioid receptors are negatively coupled to Ca2+
channels in these neurosecretory endings.
The Ca2+ currents we recorded were high-threshold
and consisted of both inactivating and sustained components, but these
currents contained no rapidly inactivating low-threshold T-type
current. Our findings that GVIA irreversibly blocked ~59%,
nicardipine suppressed 25%, and MVIIC (applied subsequent to GVIA and
in the presence of nicardipine) blocked 13% of the total current are consistent with earlier reports that such terminals only express N-,
L-, and Q-type channels (Wang et al., 1993
; Lemos et al., 1994
).
However, only one-fourth of the terminals examined demonstrated this
profile of sensitivity to Ca2+ channel blockers,
whereas approximately one-half seemed to express only N- and L-type
Ca2+ channels, and the remainder possessed only L-
and P/Q-type channels.
Somatic recordings obtained from rat peripheral sensory (Schroeder et
al., 1991
; Moises et al., 1994
; Rusin and Moises, 1995
) and nucleus
tractus solitarius neurons (Rhim and Miller, 1994
) have identified
several high-threshold Ca2+ channels that are
modulated by opioid receptors. In these neurons, µ-opioids, and
-selective agonists to a lesser extent, inhibit Ca2+ current contributed by GVIA-sensitive N-type
and pharmacologically distinct P- and Q-type channels but spare L- and
T-type currents, thereby regulating the principal
Ca2+ channel types involved in exocytosis at central
synapses and peripheral sites of release (Luebke et al., 1993
;
Takahashi and Momiyama, 1993
; Wheeler et al., 1994
; Dunlap et al.,
1995
). Studies in cortical synaptosomes suggest a similar pattern of
coupling of presynaptic opioid receptors to Ca2+
channels, in that here both N- and L-type channels contribute to
depolarization-evoked Ca2+ entry, whereas the
inhibitory effects of
-opioid agonists on [Ca2+]i and exocytosis are blocked by
GVIA but not by dihydropyridines (Adamson et al., 1989
; Xiang et al.,
1990
). However, L-type channels have been shown in chromaffin cells to
be more efficiently coupled to exocytosis than N- and P-type channels
(Artalejo et al., 1994
) and similarly play an important role in
neurohormone release in rat neurosecretory endings (Stuenkel and
Nordmann, 1993
). It is not surprising, therefore, that L channels are
the target for G-protein modulation in melanotrophs from rat pituitary
gland (Ciranna et al., 1996
) and that they are most sensitive to
modulation by
-opioids in isolated neurohypophysial nerve terminals
as reported here. Administration of U69,593 in a saturating
concentration inhibited L-type current on average by ~64%, whereas
N- and P/Q-type currents were reduced by ~32 and ~28%,
respectively. The present results also serve to emphasize the necessity
for direct examination of isolated terminal Ca2+
currents to establish the involvement of particular
Ca2+ channel subtypes in opioid regulation of
exocytosis. Thus, recordings from magnocellular supraoptic neurons
reveal that activation of µ-opioid receptors inhibits N- and P-type
but not L-type Ca2+ channels, yet these recordings
fail to demonstrate functional coupling between
-opioid receptors
and Ca2+ channels (Soldo and Moises, 1996
).
We tested for a functional linkage between opioid suppression of
voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and inhibition of
release by comparing the effects of opioid-induced alterations in
Ca2+ influx on kinetically distinct components of
the neurosecretory response. The slow increases in
Cm that we measured are thought to reflect the
trafficking and membrane fusion of secretory vesicles from a readily
releasable vesicular pool (Lindau et al., 1992
; Horrigan and Bookman,
1994
). Administration of U69,593 consistently attenuated the amplitude
of these slow Cm responses evoked by depolarization to +10 mV as well as potentials (+30 mV) closer to
ECa. On the other hand, the immediate step-like
Cm increases in response to depolarizations that
induced maximal Ca2+ influx were not affected by the
-opioids in more than two-thirds of the terminals examined, this
despite the fact that Ca2+ currents were
substantially reduced in three-quarters of these preparations.
Interestingly, the effects produced by
-opioid receptor activation
mirror the relationship between changes in Ca2+
influx and release described in chromaffin cells, wherein manipulations that reduce Ca2+ currents (reducing
[Ca2+]o or stepping closer to
ECa) decreased the delayed rise in
Cm but had little effect on the immediate
Cm jump after 100 msec depolarizations (Horrigan
and Bookman, 1994
). It was proposed that in those cells high levels of
submembrane Ca2+ might saturate the
Ca2+ receptors, resulting in a constant probability
of release of the vesicles from the immediately releasable pool (IRP).
Similarly, saturation of Ca2+ receptors might
account for the variable effects of opioids on immediate responses
observed here. In fact, when we evoked smaller Ca2+
currents by stepping closer to ECa, the
amplitudes of the immediate Cm responses were
correspondingly reduced, indicating that Ca2+ levels
at the release sites were decreased to a level below saturation. Under these conditions, the immediate Cm
responses were reliably decreased by U69,593. The ability of
-opioids to modulate any associated slowly increasing
Cm component was also related to the size of the
depolarizing step used to evoke these responses and the corresponding
Ca2+ currents. Thus, this slowly increasing phase of
Cm was inhibited to a much greater extent (being
abolished in two-thirds of the terminals) when U69,593 was applied
under conditions in which the Ca2+ driving force was
reduced (+30 mV) compared with the effects measured on responses evoked
by stepping to test potentials that yielded maximal
Ca2+ currents. This experimental outcome is in
keeping with recent findings that suggest that maintenance of
exocytotic activity in these nerve endings (presumably reflected in the
slowly increasing Cm response) may involve a
replenishment of vesicles into the IRP that is directly dependent on
the level of intraterminal [Ca2+]i
(Giovannucci and Stuenkel, 1997
).
Overall, our results provide strong evidence that activation of
-opioid receptors modulates several components of exocytotic release
in rat neurohypophysial nerve endings, including both vesicle fusion
and the recruitment of vesicles into an IRP. However, the molecular
mechanism(s) whereby
-opioid receptors produce these presynaptic
inhibitory actions remains to be elucidated. Our findings support the
hypothesis that modulation of Ca2+-dependent
processes plays a role in
-opioid-induced inhibition of exocytosis
in neurohypophysial nerve endings. However, they do not preclude the
possibility that the relationship between opioid-induced reduction of
voltage-dependent Ca2+ influx and presynaptic
modulation of release could be more complex and that the inhibition of
Ca2+ channels may be selectively involved in
regulatory mechanisms that govern distinct aspects of the exocytotic
process. In this regard, recent findings obtained in rat hippocampal
slice preparations that µ-opioid agonists reduced the occurrence of
spontaneous, Ca2+-independent synaptic events raise
the possibility of a direct opioid effect on the intracellular
machinery that regulates vesicle exocytosis (Cohen et al., 1992
;
Capogna et al., 1993
; Rekling, 1993
). The possibility of a direct
depressant action of opioids on the secretory apparatus is also
supported by recent findings obtained in the GLC8 small-cell lung
carcinoma cell line, wherein it was found that activation of endogenous
-opioid receptors not only inhibited the depolarization-induced
release of [3H]serotonin but also the
Ca2+-dependent secretion of the labeled transmitter
induced by thapsigargin and ionomycin (Sher et al., 1997
). Our finding
in a few terminals that administration of
-opioids attenuated
depolarization-evoked Cm responses despite
little or no decrease in the associated Ca2+
currents raises the additional possibility that opioids might regulate
vesicle fusion and/or trafficking independently of
Ca2+ current modulation. In any event, the present
results suggest a potential mechanism whereby endogenous release of
prodynorphin-derived opioid peptides, known to be colocalized in AVP-
and OT-containing terminals (Zhao et al., 1988b
; Russell et al., 1995
),
can exert inhibitory modulation of neuropeptide release from the
neurohypophysis.
FOOTNOTES
Received Jan. 30, 1997; revised June 12, 1997; accepted June 16, 1997.
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 9410834 to
E.L.S., American Heart Association of Michigan Postdoctoral Fellowship
09F956 to D.R.G., and National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA03365 to
H.C.M.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Hylan C. Moises, Department
of Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
48109-0622.
REFERENCES
-
Adamson P,
Xiang JZ,
Mantzourides T,
Brammer MJ,
Campbell IC
(1989)
Presynaptic
2-adrenoceptor and
-opiate receptor occupancy promotes closure of neuronal (N-type) calcium channels.
Eur J Pharmacol
174:63-70[ISI][Medline]. -
Artalejo CR,
Adams ME,
Fox AP
(1994)
Three types of Ca2+ channel trigger secretion with different efficacies in chromaffin cells.
Nature
367:72-76[Medline].
-
Capogna M,
Gahwiler BH,
Thompson SM
(1993)
Mechanism of µ-opioid receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition in the rat hippocampus in vitro.
J Physiol (Lond)
470:539-558[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Cazalis M,
Dayanithi G,
Nordmann JJ
(1987)
Hormone release from isolated nerve endings of the rat neurohypophysis.
J Physiol (Lond)
390:55-70[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ciranna L,
Feltz P,
Schlichter R
(1996)
Selective inhibition of high voltage-activated L-type and Q-type Ca2+ currents by serotonin in rat melanotrophs.
J Physiol (Lond)
490.3:595-609[ISI].
-
Cohen GA,
Doze VA,
Madison DV
(1992)
Opioid inhibition of GABA release from presynaptic terminals of rat hippocampal interneurons.
Neuron
9:325-335[ISI][Medline].
-
Dayanithi G,
Stuenkel EL,
Nordmann JJ
(1992)
Intracellular calcium and hormone release from nerve endings of the neurohypophysis in the presence of opioid agonists and antagonists.
Exp Brain Res
90:539-545[ISI][Medline].
-
Dunlap K,
Luebke JI,
Turner TJ
(1995)
Exocytotic Ca2+ channels in mammalian central neurons.
Trends Neurosci
18:89-97[ISI][Medline].
-
Fidler NH,
Fernandez J
(1989)
Phase tracking: an improved phase detection technique for cell membrane capacitance measurements.
Biophys J
56:1153-1162[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gillis KD,
Mobner R,
Neher E
(1996)
Protein kinase C enhances exocytosis from chromaffin cells by increasing the size of the readily releasable pool of secretory granules.
Neuron
16:1209-1220[ISI][Medline].
-
Giovannucci DR,
Stuenkel EL
(1997)
Regulation of secretory granule recruitment and exocytosis at rat neurohypophysial nerve endings.
J Physiol (Lond)
498.3:735-751[ISI].
-
Grudt TJ,
Williams JT
(1994)
µ-Opioid agonists inhibit spinal trigeminal substantia gelatinosa neurons in guinea pig and rat.
J Neurosci
14:1646-1654[Abstract].
-
Hamill OP,
Marty A,
Neher E,
Sakmann B,
Sigworth SJ
(1981)
Improved patch-clamp techniques for high resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches.
Pflügers Arch
391:85-100[ISI][Medline].
-
Herkenham M,
Rice KC,
Jacobson AE,
Rothman RB
(1986)
Opiate receptors in rat pituitary are confined to the neural lobe and are exclusively kappa.
Brain Res
382:365-371[ISI][Medline].
-
Herrington J,
Newton KR,
Bookman RJ
(1995)
In: Pulse control V4.5:IGOR XOPs for patch clamp data acquisition and capacitance measurements. Miami: University of Miami.
-
Horrigan FT,
Bookman RJ
(1994)
Releasable pools and the kinetics of exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells.
Neuron
13:1119-1129[ISI][Medline].
-
Hsu SF,
Jackson MB
(1996)
Rapid exocytosis and endocytosis in nerve terminals of the rat posterior pituitary.
J Physiol (Lond)
494.2:539-553[ISI][Medline].
-
Illes P
(1989)
Modulation of transmitter and hormone release by multiple neuronal opioid receptors.
Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol
112:141-233.
-
Jessell TM,
Iversen LL
(1977)
Opiate analgesics inhibit substance P release from rat trigeminal nucleus.
Nature
268:549-551[Medline].
-
Kato M,
Chapman C,
Bicknell RJ
(1992)
Activation of
-opioid receptors inhibits depolarisation-evoked exocytosis but not the rise in intracellular Ca2+ in secretory nerve terminals of the neurohypophysis.
Brain Res
574:138-146[ISI][Medline]. -
Kongsamut S,
Lipscombe D,
Tsien RW
(1989)
The N-type Ca2+ channel in frog sympathetic neurons and its role in
-adrenergic modulation of transmitter release.
Ann NY Acad Sci
560:312-333[ISI][Medline]. -
Lemos JR,
Wang G,
Wang X,
Stuenkel EL,
Nordmann JJ,
Treistman SN
(1994)
Effects of toxins on Ca2+ currents and peptide release from nerve terminals.
Ann NY Acad Sci
710:11-29[ISI][Medline].
-
Lim NF,
Nowycky MC,
Bookman RJ
(1990)
Direct measurement of exocytosis and calcium currents in single vertebrate nerve terminals.
Nature
344:449-451[Medline].
-
Lindau M,
Neher E
(1988)
Patch-clamp techniques for time-resolved capacitance measurements in single cells.
Pflügers Arch
411:137-146[ISI][Medline].
-
Lindau M,
Stuenkel EL,
Nordmann JJ
(1992)
Depolarization, intracellular calcium and exocytosis in single vertebrate nerve endings.
Biophys J
61:19-30[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Luebke JI,
Dunlap K,
Turner TJ
(1993)
Multiple calcium channel types control glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.
Neuron
11:895-902[ISI][Medline].
-
Macdonald RL,
Nelson PG
(1978)
Specific opiate-induced depression of transmitter release from dorsal root ganglion cells in culture.
Science
199:1449-1551[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mansour A,
Fox CA,
Akil H,
Watson SJ
(1995)
Opioid-receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: anatomical and functional implications.
Trends Neurosci
18:22-29[ISI][Medline].
-
Moises HC,
Rusin KI,
Macdonald RL
(1994)
µ- and
-Opioid receptors selectively reduce the same transient components of high-threshold calcium current in rat dorsal root ganglion sensory neurons.
J Neurosci
14:5903-5916[Abstract]. -
Nordmann JJ,
Dayanithi G,
Lemos JR
(1987)
Isolated neurosecretory nerve endings as a tool for studying the mechanism of stimulus-secretion coupling.
Biosci Rep
7:411-426[ISI][Medline].
-
North RA
(1993)
Presynaptic actions of opioids.
In: Presynaptic receptors in the mammalian brain (Dunwiddie TV,
Lovinger DM,
eds), pp 71-76. Boston: Birkenhauser.
-
Portoghese PS,
Lipkowski AW,
Takemori AE
(1987)
Binaltorphimine and nor-binaltorphimine, potent and selective
-opioid receptor antagonists.
Life Sci
40:1287-1292[ISI][Medline]. -
Rekling JC
(1993)
Effects of met-enkephalin on GABAergic spontaneous miniature IPSPs in organotypic slice cultures of the rat hippocampus.
J Neurosci
13:1954-1964[Abstract].
-