 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 23,
Issue of December 1, 1997
Estradiol Enhances Prostaglandin E2 Receptor Gene
Expression in Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Neurons and
Facilitates the LHRH Response to PGE2 by Activating a
Glia-to-Neuron Signaling Pathway
Florence Rage,
Byung Ju Lee,
Ying J. Ma, and
Sergio R. Ojeda
Division of Neuroscience, Oregon Regional Primate Research
Center-Oregon Health Sciences University, Beaverton, Oregon 97006
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) mediates the
stimulatory effect of norepinephrine (NE) on the secretion of
luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), the neuropeptide
controlling reproductive function. In rodents, this facilitatory effect
requires previous exposure to estradiol, suggesting that the steroid
affects downstream components in the cascade that leads to
PGE2-induced LHRH release. Because astroglia are the
predominant cell type contacting LHRH-secreting nerve terminals, we
investigated the involvement of hypothalamic astrocytes in the
estradiol facilitation of PGE2-induced LHRH release. A
subpopulation of LHRH neurons was found to express the mRNA encoding
the PGE2 receptor subtype EP1-R, which is coupled to
calcium mobilization. The LHRH-producing cell line GT1-1 also contains
EP1-R mRNA and, to a lesser extent, the three alternatively spliced
forms of EP3-R mRNA ( , , and ) that encode receptors linked to
inhibition and stimulation of cAMP formation. Hypothalamic astrocytes
treated with estradiol produced a conditioned medium that when applied
to GT1-1 cells resulted in a selective upregulation of EP1-R and
EP3 -R mRNAs. The conditioned medium also enhanced the LHRH
response to EP1-R and EP3-R agonists and the cAMP response to EP3-R
activation. Thus, one mechanism by which estradiol facilitates the
effect of neurotransmitters acting via PGE2 to stimulate
LHRH release is by enhancing the glial production of substances that upregulate PGE2 receptors on LHRH neurons. The existence of
such a mechanism underscores the emerging importance of glial-neuronal communication in the control of brain neurosecretory activity.
Key words:
gonadal steroids;
astrocytes;
hypothalamus;
neuropeptide
secretion;
prostaglandin receptors;
glial-neuronal interactions
INTRODUCTION
The secretory activity of
luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) neurons is controlled by
both neuronal and glial inputs (Ramirez et al., 1984 ; Kalra, 1986 ;
Ojeda, 1994 ; Terasawa, 1995 ). Although neuronal inputs are conveyed via
trans-synaptic mechanisms, glial influences are exerted via substances
able to effect cell-cell communication in a trans-synaptic-independent
manner (Ojeda et al., 1990 ; Gallo et al., 1995 ; Melcangi et al., 1995 ;
Voigt et al., 1996 ; Ma et al., 1997 ). Among the neurotransmitters
affecting LHRH release, norepinephrine (NE) is, perhaps, one of the
best characterized, because its effects on LHRH secretion have been thoroughly documented using both in vivo and in
vitro approaches (for review, see Barraclough and Wise, 1982 ;
Ramirez et al., 1984 ; Kalra, 1986 ). The stimulatory effect of NE on
LHRH release requires the intermediacy of prostaglandin E2
(PGE2) (Ojeda et al., 1979 , 1982 ), and the
intracellular mechanisms underlying the actions of PGE2
include mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores (Ojeda and
Negro-Vilar, 1985 ) and cAMP formation (Ojeda et al., 1985 ).
Surprisingly, central administration of NE to ovariectomized rats or
stimulation of a mesencephalic noradrenergic pathway in these animals
suppresses LH release, in contrast to the increase seen in
estrogen-primed rats (Gallo and Drouva, 1979 ; Leung et al., 1981 ,
1982 ). It is possible that in the absence of estrogen, NE no longer
sets in motion stimulatory mechanisms but instead activates pathways
inhibitory to LHRH secretion. Notwithstanding any action of estradiol
on the neuronal circuitry synaptically connected to LHRH neurons, it
seems clear that a significant part of the facilitatory effect of
estradiol is exerted at the median eminence (ME), where the LHRH
neuronal axons converge to release the neuropeptide into the portal
vasculature. Median eminence fragments from ovariectomized rats respond
less not only to NE but also to PGE2 (Ojeda et al., 1986 ),
indicating that estradiol is required for the manifestation of events
initiated by the prostaglandin.
In earlier reports, we and others (Ojeda et al., 1982 ; Gearing and
Terasawa, 1991 ) postulated that NE stimulates PGE2 by
binding to 1-adrenergic receptors located on LHRH
neurons and that, consequently, PGE2 was an intracellular
messenger acting within the LHRH neuron itself. There are, however,
several findings indicating the need to revise this concept. First,
noradrenergic neurons do not seem to contact LHRH neuronal perikarya
directly (Leranth et al., 1988 ). Second, noradrenergic axons projecting
to the ME terminate in the internal rather than the external layer
where most of the LHRH nerve terminals are located (McNeill and Sladek,
1978 ; Jennes et al., 1982 ). Third, NE induces LHRH release from the
LHRH-producing neuronal cell lines GT1 by activating
1-adrenoreceptors (Martinez de la Escalera et al., 1992 )
instead of the 1 receptors shown to mediate its effect
in vivo. Fourth, the actions of PGE2 are initiated by binding to the extracellular domain of membrane-anchored receptors (Coleman et al., 1990 ; Narumiya, 1994 ). This localization suggests that after -adrenoreceptor-mediated NE stimulation, the
prostaglandin is not synthesized within LHRH neurons themselves but
rather by an intermediate cell type. After release from these cells,
PGE2 would bind to specific receptors located on the LHRH neuron cell membrane.
Astroglia represent the cell type most intimately associated with LHRH
nerve terminals in the ME (Kozlowski and Coates, 1985 ; Ugrumov et al.,
1989 ; Silverman et al., 1991 ). The findings that both glial cells of
the median eminence and isolated hypothalamic astrocytes are targets of
estradiol action (Witkin et al., 1991 ; Langub and Watson, 1992 ; King
and Letourneau, 1994 ; Ma et al., 1994a ) and that astrocytes release
PGE2 in response to growth factor stimulation (Ma et al.,
1997 ) prompted us to consider the possibility that the sensitizing
effect of estradiol on PGE2-induced LHRH release is, at
least in part, mediated by glial cells.
The present experiments provide evidence of this concept. Partial
reports of the results in this paper have been published previously
(Rage et al., 1994 , 1995 ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were purchased from B & K Universal
(Fremont, CA) and housed in a room with a controlled photoperiod (14:10
hr light/dark cycle; lights on from 5:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.) and
temperature (23-25°C). They were fed pelleted food and tap water
ad libitum. Two to three days after birth, the pups were used to prepare astrocyte cultures. Immature (27-28-d-old) female mice
of the CD strain were used for detection of prostaglandin receptor mRNA
on hypothalamic LHRH neurons in situ. They were purchased
from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and housed under the
same conditions outlined above but in special quarters for mice.
Reagents
The selective EP1-R agonist 17-phenyl trinor PGE2
and the EP3-R and EP1-R agonist sulprostone were purchased from Cayman
Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). The EP2-R agonist butaprost was the generous gift of Dr. P. J. Gardiner (Bayer PLC-Stoke Court Research,
Berkshire, United Kingdom). The EP1-R antagonist AH-6809 was generously
provided by Dr. Simon G. Lister (Glaxo Wellcome Medicines Research
Centre, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom). Isobutyl methylxanthine was
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Cell culture
Hypothalamic astrocytes were purified by the method of McCarthy
and de Vellis (1980) , as reported by Ma et al. (1994a) . In brief,
hypothalamic cells were first cultured to confluency in T-75 flasks
(8-10 d). At this time, contaminating cells (neurons and
oligodendrocytes) were removed by shaking the cultures at 37°C for 6 hr at 250 rpm, followed by replacement of the medium and a second
shaking period of 18 hr. The purified astrocytes were then seeded on
six-well plates at 800,000 cells per well and grown in a mixture of
DMEM and F-12 medium (1/1, v/v) containing 10% bovine calf serum plus
penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). After reaching
80-90% confluency, the serum-containing medium was replaced by an
astrocyte-defined medium (ADM) consisting of a glutamate-free DMEM
without phenol red and supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mM), HEPES (15 mM), insulin (5 µg/ml), and
putrescine (100 µM). The experiments were initiated 48 hr
later by treating the cultures with 17 -estradiol
(17 -E2), its inactive stereoisomer 17 -estradiol (17 -E2), or ethanol (ETOH) (see
below).
The immortalized LHRH-producing cells GT1-1 (kindly provided by Dr. R. Weiner, University of California, San Francisco, CA) were grown in DMEM
containing 10% fetal calf serum and the antibiotics indicated above
under an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C. For experiments involving measurement of LHRH or cAMP release, the
cells were seeded at 100,000 cells/well in 24-well plates and used at
50-60% confluency. For experiments involving RNA measurements, the
cells were seeded at 500,000 cells/well in six-well plates and used at
70-80% confluency. At this time, the medium was replaced by the above
described ADM. The experiments were performed 24 hr later in either ADM
or astrocyte-conditioned media.
Treatments
Astrocytes
After 48 hr in ADM, the astrocytes were exposed for 12, 24, and
48 hr to ADM containing 17 -E2 (1 nM),
17 -E2 (1 nM), or the diluent ethanol (5 µl/ml). The conditioned media (CM-17 -E2,
CM-17 -E2, and CM-ETOH, respectively) were
collected at the end of the treatments and used to determine potential
effects on EP receptor gene expression in GT1-1 cells (see below).
Initial experiments demonstrated that the most effective treatment was
the CM from a 24 hr exposure of the astrocytes to 17 -E2.
This interval was then selected to prepare CM for all subsequent
experiments.
GT1-1 cells
To determine the effect of the different CMs on EP-R mRNA
content of GT1-1 cells, we exposed the cells to the CMs for 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hr before RNA extraction. Direct estradiol effects were
controlled for by treatment of GT1-1 cells with the hormone at 1 nM.
Other studies were performed to determine the ability of EP1 and EP3
receptor agonists to stimulate LHRH release after exposure of GT1-1
cells to astrocyte CMs. In trial experiments, the cells were exposed to
the CMs for 1, 2, or 3 hr before addition of the receptor agonist, and
the GT1-1 culture medium was removed for LHRH measurement after both
30 and 60 min exposures to the agonists. Based on the results from
these preliminary experiments, a protocol was adopted in which the
cells were first treated with the different CMs for 3 hr, the medium
was then removed, and the cells were exposed for 30 min to different
doses of the EP1-R agonist 17-phenyl trinor PGE2 (Coleman
et al., 1990 ; Watabe et al., 1993 ) or the EP3-R and EP1-R agonist
sulprostone (Coleman et al., 1990 ). The specificity of EP1-R activation
by 17-phenyl trinor PGE2 was verified by exposing the cells
to the agonist in the presence of the selective EP1-R antagonist
AH-6809 (Coleman et al., 1990 ; Watabe et al., 1993 ). The antagonist was
added to the cultures 30 min before the agonist. The ability of
sulprostone to activate EP3 receptors positively linked to the
cAMP-generating system (Irie et al., 1993 ) was assessed by measuring
cAMP release to the culture medium of GT1-1 cells treated with the
agonist. The medium of cultures treated with sulprostone was
supplemented with isobutyl methylxanthine (IBMX; 0.5 mM) to
inhibit phosphodiesterase activity. At the end of these treatments,
LHRH and cAMP released to the culture medium were measured by RIA (see
below).
Finally, it was important to determine whether GT1-1 cells have
functional EP2 receptors. The presence of these receptors in GT1-1
cells was assessed by treating the cells with different concentrations
of the EP2-R agonist butaprost (Nishigaki et al., 1995 ) diluted in
ADM.
RNA extraction
Total RNA was extracted by the method of Peppel and Baglioni
(1990) as modified by Salvatori et al. (1992) for RNA extraction from
cultured cells.
Probes
EP1-R mRNA was detected with a cRNA complementary to nucleotides
(nt) 1065-1312 in mouse EP1-R mRNA (Watabe et al., 1993 ). The cDNA
template for transcription was obtained by subcloning an appropriate
PstI-EcoRI fragment from a 1.3 kb cDNA (Watabe et al., 1993 ) into the corresponding sites of the riboprobe vector pGEM-3Z. After linearizing the vector with EcoRI,
transcription with SP6 RNA polymerase yields a 268 nt cRNA, of which 21 nt correspond to vector sequences. Sense EP1-R mRNA, used to construct
standard curves for RNase protection assays, was synthesized from the
same template linearized with HindIII and using T7 RNA
polymerase.
EP3-R mRNAs were detected with a cRNA derived from the 3 -end of a
mouse EP3 -R cDNA (Sugimoto et al., 1992 ). The DNA template used for
transcription was prepared by subcloning a blunt-ended BstEII-HindIII fragment (nt 774-1282 in
EP3 -R mRNA) into the SmaI site of pGEM-3Z. After
linearization of the vector with HindIII, T7
polymerase-directed transcription yields a probe of 577 nt, of which 69 nt correspond to vector sequences.
To detect EP4-R mRNA, we excised a SmaI-SmaI DNA
fragment complementary to nt 703-1362 in EP4-R mRNA from a 2.3 kb
mouse EP4-R cDNA (Honda et al., 1993 ) and subcloned this fragment into
the SmaI site of pGEM-3Z. Transcription of the
EcoRI-linearized template yields a 728 nt transcript, of
which 69 nt correspond to vector sequences.
Cyclophilin mRNA, which is constitutively expressed in many cells
(Danielson et al., 1988 ), was used in RNase protection assays to
correct for procedural variability and, thus, to normalize the EP1-R
mRNA values obtained. The labeled cyclophilin cRNA was transcribed from
a cDNA template generated by PCR amplification of a 158 bp fragment
corresponding to nt 265-422 in the rat cyclophilin mRNA sequence
(Danielson et al., 1988 ). Because of the similarity of the rat to the
mouse sequence, mouse cyclophilin mRNA protects 110 nt of this probe
(Voigt et al., 1996 ). The cDNA was cloned into the SmaI site
of pGEM-3Z, linearized with XbaI, and transcribed using T7
RNA polymerase.
Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA was detected by RNase protection assay in
GT1-1 cells using a 608 nt cRNA probe complementary to nt 1470-2078
in the 3 -end of mouse ER mRNA (White et al., 1987 ). The cRNA was
transcribed, using SP6 RNA polymerase, from a 608 bp cDNA template
generated by linearizing a 2.1 kb mouse ER cDNA (kindly provided by Dr.
R. White, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, United Kingdom) with
BglII.
When cRNAs were used in RNase protection assays, the probes were
transcribed using 32P-UTP as the radiolabeled nucleotide.
When used for in situ hybridization experiments, the
radiolabeled nucleotide was 35S-UTP.
Measurement of EP3-R mRNA variants
The EP3-R gene can be alternatively spliced to produce at least
three mRNA variants, which differ in portions of their 3 -ends (Irie et
al., 1993 ; Sugimoto et al., 1993 ). Because the EP3 -R cRNA used in
RNase protection assays does not differentiate between the EP3 -R and
EP3 -R forms, it was necessary to detect them by a different method.
We chose the method of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR because of its
resolution capabilities, sensitivity, and our previous experience with
the technique (Ma et al., 1994b ; Dissen et al., 1995 ).
Primers
All oligodeoxynucleotides used were synthesized in an Applied
Biosystems 391 DNA synthesizer (Foster City, CA). To amplify EP3 -R
and EP3 -R DNA fragments, we used a 21 mer sense primer (5 -ATG-GGG-ATC-ATG-TGT-GTG-CTG-3 ) corresponding to nt 899-920 of the
EP3-R common sequence (see Fig. 3) and an antisense 18 mer primer
(5 -GTC-CAC-TTC-AGG-TTG-TTC-3 ) corresponding to nt 1218- 1235 in
EP3 -R mRNA and 1129-1146 in EP3 -R mRNA (Sugimoto et al., 1993 )
(see Fig. 3). An EP3 -R DNA fragment was amplified using the same
5 -sense oligodeoxynucleotide and a 3 -primer corresponding to nt
1131-1150 in EP3 -R mRNA (Irie et al., 1993 ) (see Fig. 3). We also
synthesized an internal primer corresponding to nt 1064-1081 in the
EP3-R common sequence (Irie et al., 1993 ; Sugimoto et al., 1993 ). This
oligodeoxynucleotide was used as a probe in Southern blots to identify
the amplified EP3-R cDNA forms. Finally, a set of cyclophilin-specific
primers (sense, 5 -GGG-AAG-TCC-ATC-TAC-GGA-3 ; antisense,
5 -CAC-TGC-TTG-CCA-TCC-AAC-3 ), corresponding to nt 265-282 and
405-422, respectively, in rat cyclophilin mRNA, was synthesized for
the simultaneous amplification of cyclophilin mRNA and EP3-R mRNA forms
in the quantitative RT-PCR assays (see below).
Fig. 3.
PCR cloning of cDNAs encoding the alternatively
spliced products of the EP3-R gene from GT1-1 cells. A,
mRNA location of the deoxyoligonucleotide primers used for
amplification of the , , and forms of EP3-R mRNA.
B, Ethidium bromide staining of the PCR products derived
from the amplification of GT1-1 RNA using a pair of primers common for
the mRNA sequences encoding the EP3 -R and EP3 -R mRNA forms.
C, Ethidium bromide staining of the single PCR product
derived from the amplification of GT1-1 RNA using a 5 -primer
complementary to the mRNA sequence common to all forms of EP3-R mRNA
and a 3 -primer complementary to the unique 3 -sequence in EP3 -R
mRNA. C, PCR control, no RNA input.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
RT-PCR for DNA cloning
RT was performed for 2 hr at 37°C in a 20 µl volume
containing 1 or 5 µg of total RNA from GT1-1 cells, 1× RT buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3; 75 mM KCl; and 3 mM MgCl2), 0.01 M
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM each dNTP, 20 U RNasin, 25 pmol of
an oligo-dT primer, and 200 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Two µl of this
reaction were then used for PCR amplification. The PCR reaction was
performed in a 75 µl volume consisting of two parts. Part A contained
the RT mixture: 7.5 µl of 10× Taq buffer (Promega,
Madison, WI), 3 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, and
1 µl of 10 mM dNTPs in a 60 µl volume. Part B contained
50 pmol of each EP3-R specific sense and antisense primer and 0.5 U of
Taq polymerase. Part A was dispensed into 0.6 ml tubes,
overlaid with oil, and held at 94°C for 7 min in a thermal cycler (MJ
Research, Watertown, MA) to inactivate the reverse transcriptase. Part
B was added through the oil, while the tubes were at 72°C to diminish
nonspecific annealing of the primers ("hot" start). The subsequent
PCR reaction consisted of 35 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 15 sec,
annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min,
followed by a final extension of 7 min at 72°C.
Southern blot and sequencing
The PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on a 2%
agarose gel, transferred to Nytran membranes (Stratagene, La Jolla,
CA), cross-linked, and hybridized with the internal primer described
above with the 5 -end labeled with -32P-dATP, as
reported previously (Ma et al., 1994b ). After identification and
isolation of the appropriate bands, they were cloned into the pGEM-T
vector (Promega) and sequenced by the dideoxynucleotide termination
method of Sanger et al. (1977) using Sequenase T7 DNA polymerase and a
kit (Sequenase Version 2.0) purchased from United States Biochemicals
(Cleveland, OH).
Quantitative RT-PCR
Preparation of polyadenylated mRNA standards.
Synthetic mRNA standards used to quantitate the changes in EP3-R mRNA
( , , and forms) were prepared exactly as described (Ma et
al., 1994b ; Dissen et al., 1995 ). In brief, the corresponding cDNAs
were first subcloned into the SmaI site of the pSP64
A+ vector and then transcribed using SP6 RNA
polymerase to generate transcripts having a polyadenylated tail. RNA
yields were estimated by absorbance at 260 nm and by comparison with
known amounts of RNA in ethidium bromide-stained gels.
Assay. The conditions for both reverse transcription and PCR
amplification were the same as those described for the cloning of EP3-R
cDNA fragments (see above). In this case, however, each reaction tube
contained two sets of primers, one to amplify the EP3-R mRNA form of
interest (20 pmol of each primer) and another (10 pmol of each primer)
to amplify a fragment from cyclophilin mRNA to be used as an internal
standard for normalization of the EP3-R mRNA values obtained. Different
amounts of standard mRNA were reverse transcribed and amplified at the
same time as the unknowns.
Quantitative analysis. The assay used is designed to
minimize the two main sources of variability in quantitative PCR, i.e., variability caused by differences in RT and primer efficiency and
variability caused by "tube" effects and sample-to-sample processing errors (Wang et al., 1989 ). The former is minimized by
referring the experimental values to mRNA standards identical to the
target sequences and processed in the same assay; the latter is reduced
by coamplifying a fragment of cyclophilin, a constitutively expressed
gene (Danielson et al., 1988 ).
Aliquots of each PCR reaction were electrophoresed in a 2% agarose gel
containing ethidium bromide, photographed, and analyzed by computer
densitometry exactly as described previously (Ma et al., 1994b ). The
mRNA values obtained were normalized according to the cyclophilin
content of each sample and are expressed as fg/sample.
RNase protection assay
The presence of EP1- and EP3-R and of estrogen receptor mRNA in
GT1-1 cells was detected by RNase protection assay using a procedure
described previously (Ma et al., 1996 ). To quantitate the changes in
EP1-R mRNA observed after estradiol treatment, we first scanned the
hybridization signals using an Agfa flatbed scanner and then analyzed
them with an edited version of the computer program National Institutes
of Health-Image (Correa-Rotter et al., 1992 ). The optical density of
each protected band was compared with that of a standard curve
generated by different amounts of in vitro synthesized EP1-R
mRNA. The values obtained were then normalized using as a normalizing
unit the cyclophilin mRNA values detected in each sample (Ma et al.,
1994a , 1996 ).
Combined immunohistochemistry and in
situ hybridization
Because the PGE2 receptor subtypes EP1 and EP3 were
identified and studied in GT1-1 cells, which are of murine origin,
mouse brains were used to determine whether the mRNAs encoding these receptors are also expressed in normal LHRH neurons. The brains of four
immature female mice were fixed by transcardiac perfusion of 4%
paraformaldehyde in borate buffer, pH 9.5, as reported (Berg-von der
Emde et al., 1995 ). After an overnight post-fixation in the same
fixative plus 10% sucrose, blocks of tissue containing the septum,
diagonal band of Broca, the preoptic area, and the rostral part of the
anterior hypothalamic area were frozen on dry ice and stored at
85°C until sectioned. Thirty micrometer sections were obtained with
a frozen sliding microtome and stored in cryoprotectant (Simmons et
al., 1989 ) at 20°C.
On the day of the immunohistochemical procedure, the sections were
rinsed extensively in 0.02 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH
7.4 (KPBS); incubated in KPBS containing 2% BSA, 5 mM DTT, and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 2-4 hr at 4°C; and then incubated
overnight at 4°C with the polyclonal LHRH antibody HU60 diluted at
1:3200 in KPBS. The specificity of this antibody has been described
previously (Urbanski, 1990 ). On the next day, the sections were rinsed
in KPBS and incubated for 45 min with a goat anti-rabbit gamma globulin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) diluted 1:250 and then for 1 hr
with ABC (Vector Laboratories), before developing the reaction to a
brown color with diaminobenzidine (Nilaver and Kozlowski, 1989 ). After
completion of the reaction, the sections were mounted on Superfrost
Plus glass slides (Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX) and dried overnight
under vacuum before being subjected to the hybridization histochemistry
procedure.
Hybridization histochemistry was performed as described (Berg-von der
Emde et al., 1995 ) according to the procedure reported by Simmons et
al. (1989) . LHRH neurons were considered to contain EP1-R or EP3-R mRNA
when the density of the silver grains overlying the cell was at least
twice that of an area devoid of other cells.
Radioimmunoassays
LHRH was measured as described using the same antibody used for
immunohistochemistry but at a 1:25,000 dilution. cAMP was measured as
reported earlier (Ojeda et al., 1988 ) using a rabbit anti-3 ,5 -cAMP-BSA antibody (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA) at a
1:200 dilution. The samples and the standards were acetylated before
the assay to enhance the sensitivity of detection (Brooker et al.,
1979 ). Under these conditions, the sensitivity of the assay is 2 fmol/tube, and the standard curve is linear between 4 and 200 fmol/tube.
Statistics
Results were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by the
Student-Neumann-Keuls multiple comparison test for unequal
replications.
RESULTS
LHRH neurons express the gene encoding EP1-R
Combined immunohistochemistry-in situ hybridization
revealed that the basal forebrain of prepubertal (28-d-old) female mice contains immunoreactive LHRH neurons expressing the mRNA encoding EP1-R
(Fig. 1). A minority of LHRH neurons
exhibited strong (Fig. 1A) to moderate (Fig.
1B) EP1-R mRNA hybridization; in others, the content
of EP1-R mRNA was more discrete (Fig. 1C, arrow
with circle); and still, in many others there was either no
hybridization (Fig. 1B,D,
arrowheads) or a questionable signal (Fig.
1A, short arrow). EP1-R mRNA was
also expressed in LHRH-negative cells present in the immediate vicinity
of EP1-R mRNA-negative LHRH neurons (Fig. 1D,
double arrowheads). Whereas the neuronal nature of
these EP1-R-containing, LHRH-negative cells was evident, there were other regions, particularly near the OVLT, that exhibited a more diffuse pattern of hybridization (Fig. 1B). Although
this pattern could be interpreted as hybridization background, its
unevenness suggests the presence of low levels of EP1-R mRNA in
astrocytes. A similar hybridization profile has been reported for
epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA, which is also expressed in
astrocytes (Ma et al., 1994c ). Ten percent or less of the LHRH neurons
identified by immunohistochemistry in the four brains examined
contained detectable EP1-R mRNA levels. In contrast to EP1-R, we did
not find any LHRH neurons showing a distinct EP3-R mRNA hybridization signal; the neurons exhibited either no hybridization (Fig.
1D) or a weak signal difficult to resolve from
background hybridization without quantitative analysis. Because
combined immunohistochemistry-in situ hybridization
inevitably results in loss of mRNA content and/or decreased
accessibility of the 35S-labeled cRNA to cellular mRNA, no
attempts were made to perform such an analysis. The presence of a
"borderline" hybridization signal and the detection of EP3-R mRNA
in GT1-1 LHRH-producing cells (see below) do, however, suggest the
presence of EP3-R in LHRH neurons in situ.
Fig. 1.
Detection of EP1-R mRNA on LHRH neurons of the
mouse brain by combined immunohistochemistry-in situ
hybridization. The LHRH decapeptide was first detected by
immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal antibody (see Materials and
Methods). After completion of this procedure, the sections were
hybridized with an 35S-UTP-labeled EP1-R cRNA; the reaction
was developed after a 4 week exposure to NTB-2 emulsion.
A, LHRH neurons dorsal to the anterior recess of the
third ventricle showing a low (short arrow) to abundant
(arrow) content of EP1-R mRNA. B, LHRH
neurons in the vicinity of the organum vasculosum of the lamina
terminalis (OVLT) showing either moderate EP1-R mRNA levels
(arrows) or an undetectable hybridization signal
(arrowhead). C, An LHRH neuron in the
preoptic area showing moderate levels of EP1-R mRNA (arrow with
circle). D, An LHRH neuron devoid of detectable
EP1-R mRNA (arrowhead) located in the vicinity of
unidentified cells containing EP1-R mRNA (double
arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (120K GIF file)]
The LHRH-producing cell line GT1-1 expresses the mRNAs encoding
both the EP1-R and EP3-R genes
RNase protection assay demonstrated that GT1-1 cells contain
EP1-R and EP3 -R mRNAs (Fig. 2). The
protected fragments were identical in size to those protected by total
RNA derived from kidney, a tissue known to express the EP1 and EP3
receptors (Sugimoto et al., 1993 ; Watabe et al., 1993 ). GT1-1 cells
also contain mRNA species protecting a portion of the probe
corresponding to the expected size of EP3 -R and EP3 -R mRNAs. They
do not, however, express EP4-R mRNA, which (as shown in Fig. 2) is
present at low levels in lung.
Fig. 2.
Detection of prostaglandin E2 receptor
mRNAs in GT1-1 cells by RNase protection assay. Lane 1,
Undigested probes (UP); lanes 2, 3, 4,
digested EP1-R, EP3 -R, and EP4-R cRNA probes, respectively (DP); lane 5, GT1-1 RNA hybridized to
the EP1-R cRNA probe alone; lane 6, GT1-1 mRNA
hybridized to the EP4-R cRNA probe alone; lane 7, GT1-1
RNA hybridized to the EP3 -R cRNA probe alone; lane 8, GT1-1 RNA hybridized to both the EP1-R and EP3 -R probes;
lane 9, kidney (Kd) RNA hybridized to
both probes; and lane 10, lung (Lu) RNA
hybridized to all three probes.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]
The EP3 -R cRNA used for the RNase protection assay does not
differentiate between the EP3 -R and EP3 -R alternatively spliced forms of the EP3-R gene, because each of these species protects a
portion of the probe corresponding to the common EP3-R mRNA sequence
(of ~350 nt), whereas EP3 -R protects an additional fragment of 160 nt (not shown in Fig. 2). To determine whether the and/or the forms are expressed in GT1-1 cells, we subjected total mRNA from these
cells to RT-PCR amplification using specific oligodeoxynucleotide primers (Fig. 3A; see Material
and Methods for details). The common primers for EP3 -R and EP3 -R
mRNA amplified two fragments of the expected size (Fig. 3B).
Sequencing of each DNA fragment verified that the 336 bp cDNA contains
the EP3 -R sequence, whereas the 247 bp fragment corresponds to the
EP3 -R sequence. The EP3 -R primers amplified a 251 bp fragment
(Fig. 3C), which corresponded to the EP3 -R mRNA sequence.
Thus, GT1-1 cells express all three alternatively spliced mRNA forms
known for the EP3-R gene.
Astrocytes treated with estradiol secrete substances that
selectively increase EP1-R and EP3 -R mRNA levels in GT1-1 cells
To study the effect of estradiol on EP receptor expression, we
treated cultures of GT1-1 cells with CM from astrocytes exposed to
17 -estradiol, the inactive stereoisomer 17 -estradiol, or the
diluent ethanol. The changes in EP1-R mRNA were measured by RNase
protection assay; the changes in EP3-R alternatively spliced mRNA forms
were detected by quantitative RT-PCR.
Figure 4 illustrates the characteristics
of this quantitative assay. PCR amplification of increasing amounts of
in vitro transcribed EP3 -R and EP3 -R mRNAs resulted in
a concentration-dependent increase in the amount of PCR product
detected by ethidium bromide staining (top left).
Regression analysis of these PCR signals demonstrates the linearity of
the amplification reactions for both EP3 -R and EP3 -R mRNAs
(bottom). As shown in the top right, the
method allows one to measure simultaneously three mRNAs (EP3 -R, EP3 -R, and that encoding the housekeeping protein cyclophilin, p1B15) in a single assay. This experiment (top right)
illustrates the inability of CM-17 -E2 to affect the
abundance of either EP3 -R or EP3 -R mRNA in GT1-1 cells (see
below).
Fig. 4.
Quantitation of EP3-R mRNA alternatively spliced
forms by quantitative RT-PCR. Top left, Ethidium
bromide staining of PCR products obtained from the amplification of
increasing amounts of in vitro transcribed EP3 -R and
EP3 -R mRNAs, corresponding to the same cellular sequence targeted
for amplification. Bottom, Standard curves generated by
regression analysis of the PCR signals (top left) and
used to estimate the content of EP3 and EP3 -R mRNAs in GT1-1
cells. Top right, Example of an RT-PCR assay
demonstrating the ability of the assay to detect simultaneously three
mRNAs in GT1-1 cells [in this case EP3 -R, EP3 -R, and
cyclophilin (p1B15)]. Cyclophilin mRNA was used to normalize the EP3-R
mRNA values detected in the assay (see Materials and Methods); in all
cases the amount of total RNA reverse transcribed for PCR amplification
was 100 ng. LN (OD), Natural logarithm of optical
density.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
EP1-R mRNA levels, measured by RNase protection assay, increased within
1 hr of exposure to CM-17 -E2, remained
significantly elevated for the next hour, and decreased thereafter to
control values (Fig. 5). By 8 hr, the
levels seemed to be lower than that in ethanol-treated cells. Of the
three alternatively spliced forms of the EP3-R gene expressed in GT1-1
cells, only EP3 -R mRNA levels were affected by the
CM-17 -E2 treatment (Fig.
6). As seen with EP1-R mRNA, EP3 -R
mRNA levels increased rapidly after CM-17 -E2 exposure
(within 2 hr) and returned to control values thereafter.
Fig. 5.
Increase in EP1-R mRNA levels in GT1-1 cells by
exposure to culture medium derived from astrocytes treated for 24 hr
with 17 -estradiol (1 nM;
CM-17 -E2).
CM-17 -E2, Medium from astrocytes
treated with the inactive stereoisomer 17 -estradiol;
CM-ETOH, medium from astrocytes treated with ethanol. Numbers above the bars are the number of independent
observations per group; error bars indicate SEM; and
*p < 0.05, 17 -estradiol versus control
group(s).
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
Selective increase in EP3 -R mRNA levels in
GT1-1 cells by exposure to culture medium derived from astrocytes
treated for 24 hr with 17 -estradiol (1 nM;
CM-17 -E2).
CM-17 -E2, Medium from astrocytes
treated with 17 -estradiol; CM-ETOH, medium from
astrocytes treated with ethanol. Numbers above the bars
are the number of independent observations per group; error bars
indicate SEM; and *p < 0.01, 17 -estradiol
versus control group(s).
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]
17 -E2 does not act directly on GT1-1
cells to affect EP-R gene expression
Other investigators have shown the presence of functional
estrogen receptors on GT1 cells (Poletti et al., 1994 ), raising the
possibility that the increases in EP-R mRNAs caused by
CM-17 -E2 are because of a direct effect of the steroid
on GT1-1 cells. Experiments addressing this issue demonstrated,
however, that direct exposure of GT1-1 cells to
17 -E2, for 1-2 hr, affected neither EP1-R nor
EP3 -R mRNA abundance, as determined by RNase protection assay and
quantitative RT-PCR, respectively (Fig.
7A). Thus, the effect of
CM-17 -E2 seems to be mainly because of substances produced by astrocytes in response to 17 -E2 and not a
direct effect of the steroid on the GT1-1 cells. Nevertheless, RNase protection assay revealed that GT1-1 cells do contain very low levels
of estrogen receptor mRNA. As shown in Figure 7B, a
protected band was not detected in GT1-1 cells after 19 hr of film
exposure, a duration that resulted in a strong signal when using RNA
from the suprachiasmatic region of the brain. A weak band was detected only after an interval (96 hr) that resulted in overexposure of the
suprachiasmatic signal (Fig. 7C).
Fig. 7.
A, Inability of 17 -estradiol to
directly affect EP1-R and EP3 -R mRNA levels in GT1-1 cells.
B, Absence of detectable estrogen receptor
(ER) mRNA in GT1-1 cells as assessed by RNase
protection assay after a 19 hr film exposure. Lane 1,
Radiolabeled RNA standards; lane 2, undigested ER cRNA
probe; lane 3, digested probe; lane 4,
GT1-1 RNA (10 µg); lanes 5, 6, RNA (10 µg) from the
suprachiasmatic region of the mouse brain. C, Detection
of low ER mRNA levels (arrow) in GT1-1 cells after a
longer (96 hr) film exposure. Notice the presence of more abundant,
unidentified protected bands of lower molecular size.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]
The increase in EP1-R mRNA caused by
CM-17 -E2 in GT1-1 cells is accompanied by an increased
LHRH response to EP1-R activation
A 3 hr pretreatment of GT1-1 cells with CM-ETOH or
CM-17 -E2 followed by a 30 min exposure of the cells to
different doses of the EP1-R selective agonist 17-phenyl trinor
PGE2 resulted in a shallow LHRH response that was only
significant at the 10 5 and
10 4 M doses (Fig.
8). Pretreatment with
CM-17 -E2, however, significantly enhanced the
response of the cells to the EP1-R agonist, which was now effective in
stimulating LHRH release at 10 6 M. The
increase in LHRH levels caused by this dose after
CM-17 -E2 treatment was blocked by the EP1-R antagonist
AH-6809 (Fig. 8, inset), demonstrating that the enhanced
effect of 17-phenyl trinor PGE2 on LHRH release after
exposure of the cells to CM-17 -E2 is indeed mediated by
EP1-R activation.
Fig. 8.
Facilitatory effect of astrocyte culture medium
conditioned by a 24 hr exposure to 17 -estradiol (1 nM;
CM-17 -E2) on the LHRH release induced
by 17-phenyl trinor PGE2, a selective EP1-R agonist,
from GT1-1 cells. CM-17 -E2, Astrocyte medium conditioned by 17 -estradiol; CM-ETOH,
Astrocyte medium with diluent. The cells were treated with the
different CMs for 3 hr before a 30 min exposure to the agonist.
Inset, Blockade of the facilitatory effect of
CM-17 -E2 on 17-phenyl trinor PGE2-induced LHRH release by the EP1-R antagonist AH-6809. Data are mean ± SEM; each group consists of 6-12 independent observations;
*p < 0.05, CM-17 -E2 group versus
either the untreated or the other two CM-treated control groups;
inset *p < 0.02, AH-6809 group versus group treated with only 17-phenyl trinor
PGE2.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
The increase in EP3 -R mRNA caused by
CM-17 -E2 in GT1-1 cells is accompanied by an increased
cAMP and LHRH response to EP3-R activation
As observed in previous experiments, CM-ETOH and
CM-17 -E2 were similarly ineffective in altering EP-R
gene expression or LHRH release; thus only the latter treatment was
used as a control for these experiments. Treatment of GT1-1 cells
pre-exposed to CM-17 -E2 with different doses of the
mixed EP3 and EP1 agonist sulprostone failed to increase cAMP levels
with respect to the values observed in untreated controls (Fig.
9A). In contrast, the response
of GT1-1 cells pre-exposed to CM-17 -E2 to sulprostone was more complex, with cAMP levels increasing after the two lower doses
of the agonist (10 8 and 10 7
M) and failing to change significantly after the highest
dose (10 6 M). LHRH levels, on the
other hand, were increased by sulprostone in cultures pre-exposed to
either CM-17 -E2 or CM-17 -E2, but the responsiveness of two groups was markedly different. Whereas CM-17 -E2 pretreated cultures responded only to the
highest dose of sulprostone (10 6 M)
with a significant increase in LHRH release, the response of cultures
pretreated with CM-17 -E2 to the agonist was significant at all doses tested (10 8 to
10 6 M; Fig. 9B).
Fig. 9.
Facilitatory effect of astrocyte culture medium
conditioned by a 24 hr exposure to 17 -estradiol
(CM-17 -E2) on cAMP formation
(A) and LHRH release (B)
induced by the treatment of GT1-1 cells with the EP3-R and EP1-R
agonist sulprostone. CM-17 -E2, Medium
from astrocytes treated with 17 -estradiol. The GT1-1 cells were
pretreated with the CMs for 3 hr before a 30 min exposure to
sulprostone; *p < 0.05, CM-17 -E2-pretreated groups versus
control groups pretreated with CM-17 -E2
and the control group not exposed to sulprostone. In the case of
CM-17 -E2-pretreated cultures versus
controls not challenged with sulprostone, *p < 0.05.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
Activation of EP2-R increases LHRH release from
GT1-1 cells
To determine whether GT1-1 cells have functional EP2 receptors,
we treated the cells with butaprost, a selective EP2-R agonist. Consistent with the reported low potency of butaprost (10-100 × less potent than PGE2) (Coleman et al., 1994 ),
butaprost stimulated LHRH release only at the highest dose tested
(10 4 M) (20.5 ± 1 vs 46.7 ± 2.2 pg
LHRH/ml, control vs butaprost-treated cells; n = 10 in
each group; p < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrates that GT1-1-immortalized LHRH
neurons express a complement of PGE2 receptors known to be
encoded by two different genes and to be linked to both calcium
mobilization and cAMP formation. In addition, the results show that at
least the PGE2 receptor subtype linked to calcium
mobilization is also present in normal LHRH neurons. In all, the study
provides evidence of two related concepts: (1) that glial cells are
involved in the central mechanism by which estradiol facilitates the
response of LHRH neurons to neurotransmitters acting via
PGE2 and (2) that a significant portion of the
estradiol-directed glial influence on LHRH neurons may be exerted by
modifying the complement of PGE2 receptors expressed in
these neurons.
The actions of PGE2 are initiated by its binding to a
family of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein)-coupled
receptors (Narumiya, 1994 ). Four classes of PGE2 receptors,
EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4, have been described based on their
pharmacological properties (Coleman et al., 1990 ), and cDNAs encoding
each class have been isolated and characterized (Sugimoto et al., 1992 ,
1993 ; Honda et al., 1993 ; Irie et al., 1993 ; Watabe et al., 1993 ; Regan
et al., 1994 ; Nishigaki et al., 1995 ). The EP3-R is the most complex of
the known PGE2 receptors, because its gene can be
alternatively spliced to generate at least three different isoforms
(EP3 , EP3 , and EP3 ) that differ in their C-terminal tails
(Irie et al., 1993 ; Sugimoto et al., 1993 ) and in their efficiency for
activation and coupling to the G-protein/adenylate cyclase signal
transduction pathway. Although the EP3 -R and EP3 -R isoforms are
coupled exclusively to inhibition of adenylate cyclase via the
inhibitory G-protein Gi (Sugimoto et al., 1993 ), the EP3
isoform is coupled to both inhibition and stimulation of adenylate
cyclase, probably via activation of Gi and the cholera
toxin-sensitive protein Gs (Irie et al., 1993 ).
The presence of EP1-R mRNA in LHRH neurons of immature mice in
situ and in GT1-1 cells, plus the detection of less abundant amounts of all three alternatively spliced forms of EP3-R mRNA in these
cells, is consistent with earlier findings demonstrating the
involvement of calcium (Ojeda and Negro-Vilar, 1985 ) and cAMP (Ojeda et
al., 1985 ) in the intracellular mechanism underlying the stimulatory
effect of PGE2 on LHRH release. Although the sensitivity of
the combined immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization procedure used was insufficient to detect EP3-R mRNA in LHRH neurons in vivo, the presence of all three alternatively spliced
forms of the EP3-R gene in GT1-1 cells in vitro and the
appearance of borderline hybridization signals in some LHRH neurons
in situ suggest that the EP3-R gene is indeed expressed in
LHRH neurons of the intact hypothalamus. The ability of cholera toxin
and pertussis toxin to stimulate LHRH release from median eminence
fragments in vitro (Ojeda et al., 1985 ) further supports
this view, because it demonstrates that modification of the signal
transduction pathway used by the EP3 receptor to affect cellular
function (i.e., activation of stimulatory G-proteins or inhibition of
inhibitory G-proteins coupled to adenylate cyclase) results in LHRH
release from LHRH nerve terminals derived from normal animals.
The finding that only a small subpopulation of LHRH neurons contain
detectable EP1-R and the low prevalence of EP3-R throughout the LHRH
neuronal network suggest that at any given time only selected LHRH
neurons are responsive to PGE2 and, hence, to those neurotransmitters that, such as NE, use the prostaglandin to affect LHRH secretion. It also seems that the response of LHRH neurons to
PGE2 would depend on the relative prevalence of each
receptor subtype in a particular physiological or pathological
situation. Circumstances may be envisioned in which a predominance of
PGE2 receptors coupled to inhibition of adenylate cyclase
(EP3 -R and EP3 -R, for example) will lead to inhibition of LHRH
release after NE stimulation (as it occurs in ovariectomized rats). In
contrast, a predominance of EP1-R and EP3 -R may lead to stimulatory
responses (as seen in estradiol-treated animals). To date, very little, if anything, is known about the factors that may regulate the expression of PGE2 receptors in any system. Our results
indicate that hypothalamic astrocytes exposed to estradiol produce
substances able to increase the expression of the EP1-R gene and
selectively facilitate the accumulation of EP3 -R mRNA, one of the
alternatively spliced forms of EP3 mRNA. Because these two mRNAs encode
PGE2 receptors associated with activation of intracellular
signaling pathways mediating the stimulatory effect of PGE2
on LHRH release, it would seem that this is one of the cell-cell
signaling mechanisms used by the steroid to facilitate the LHRH
response to neurotransmitters acting via PGE2.
The enhanced LHRH response to EP1-R and EP3-R selective agonists after
exposure of GT1-1 cells to CM-17 -E2 suggests that the
transient increases in EP receptor mRNA levels induced by this
conditioned medium are associated with an increase in functional receptors. Our experiments, however, do not provide direct evidence of
this view. In addition, they identify neither the substance(s) responsible for the increase in receptor expression nor the mechanism by which such a substance(s) may act.
The PGE2 receptor agonists and antagonists currently
available are not absolutely specific for the different receptor
subtypes. Thus, 17-phenyl trinor PGE2, widely used
as an EP1-R agonist, can also activate EP2 and EP3 receptors (Coleman
et al., 1990 ). Sulprostone, on the other hand, is a mixed EP3 and EP1
agonist (Coleman et al., 1990 ), although it has been shown to be 10 times more potent on EP3 than on EP1 receptors (Coleman et al., 1994 ). The increase in basal cAMP release elicited by sulprostone in CM-17 -E2-treated GT1-1 cells indicates that, regardless
of any stimulatory effect on EP1-R, this dose of sulprostone activates EP3 -R in these cells, i.e., the EP3-R positively coupled to cAMP formation. On the other hand, the inability of the higher dose of
sulprostone to increase cAMP release in cells pre-exposed to CM-17 -E2, coupled with its effectiveness to
stimulate LHRH release, suggests that at this dose sulprostone not only
activates EP3 -R but also EP3-Rs coupled to inhibition of adenylate
cyclase and EP1-R.
In addition to EP1-R and EP3-Rs, GT1-1 cells may also contain EP2-R,
as evidenced by the ability of butaprost to stimulate LHRH release.
Butaprost has been shown to be selective for EP2-R but to have a much
lower potency than PGE2 (Coleman et al., 1994 ). Detection
of EP2-R mRNA will be required to conclusively demonstrate the presence
or absence of this receptor in GT1-1 cells.
Our results clearly show that the effect of estradiol on
PGE2 receptor gene expression is not directly exerted on
the LHRH neurons. In fact, RNase protection assays show that under our culture conditions, GT1-1 cells contain very low levels of ER mRNA, an
observation consistent with the finding of very low levels of specific
estradiol binding sites on GT1-1 cells (Poletti et al., 1994 ). Perhaps
the use of a much higher dose of estradiol may have allowed us to
detect an effect on EP3-R mRNA levels, because exposing the cells to a
micromolar dose of the steroid resulted in a measurable effect on the
content of another recognition molecule, the androgen receptor (Poletti
et al., 1994 ).
Taken altogether, the present observations identify some of the
cellular mechanisms that may underlie the facilitatory effect of
estradiol on PGE2-induced LHRH release and provide initial insights into the basic processes underlying the central component of
estradiol-positive feedback. By demonstrating the ability of estradiol
to activate a glia-to-neuron signaling pathway that leads to
upregulation of PGE2 receptors on LHRH neurons, the results also suggest that activation of this pathway may be important for the
integrated response of the LHRH neuronal network during the
preovulatory, estradiol-dependent surge of LHRH secretion. Because the
ability of estradiol to facilitate LHRH secretory responses also occurs
in systems that affect LHRH release via PGE2-independent
pathways (Kalra and Crowley, 1992 ; Woller and Terasawa, 1992 ), a
different mechanism must underlie the effect of estradiol in these
systems.
Considering that hypothalamic astrocytes are a significant source of
PGE2 (Ma et al., 1997 ) and that LHRH neurons contain PGE2 receptors, it may be postulated that the
neuronal-glial mechanisms underlying the facilitatory effect of
estradiol on neurotransmitter-induced LHRH release involve a two-step
process, the release of PGE2 from astrocytes (as a
consequence of a neurotransmitter-mediated activation) and the
estradiol-dependent production of glial substances able to act on LHRH
neurons to selectively enhance the expression of PGE2
receptors linked to stimulation of LHRH release.
FOOTNOTES
Received June 3, 1997; revised Sept. 8, 1997; accepted Sept. 18, 1997.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants
HD-25123, P-30 Population Center Grant HD-18185, and RR-00163 for the
operation of the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center. F.R. is a
postdoctoral research fellow supported by Institut National de la
Santé et de la Recherche Médicale France, and HD-25123. B.J.L. is a visiting professor supported by the Korea Science and
Engineering Foundation through the Hormone Research Center (96-K1-0405-01-02-2). We are indebted to Dr. Yukihiko Sugimoto (Faculty
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Japan) for providing us
with the EP receptor cDNAs used in this study.
Correspondence should be addressed to Sergio Ojeda, Division of
Neuroscience, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, 505 Northwest
185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006.
Dr. Rage's present address: Lab de Neurobiologie Endocrinologique,
Université de Montpellier-2, Unité de Recherche
Associeé, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Dr. Lee's present address: Department of Biology, College of Natural
Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.
REFERENCES
-
Barraclough CA,
Wise PM
(1982)
The role of catecholamines in the regulation of pituitary-luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion.
Endocr Rev
3:91-119[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Berg-von der Emde K,
Dees WL,
Hiney JK,
Hill DF,
Dissen GA,
Costa ME,
Moholt-Siebert M,
Ojeda SR
(1995)
Neurotrophins and the neuroendocrine brain: different neurotrophins sustain anatomically and functionally segregated subsets of hypothalamic dopaminergic neurons.
J Neurosci
15:4223-4237[Abstract].
-
Brooker G,
Harper JF,
Terasaki WL,
Moylan RD
(1979)
Radioimmunoassay of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP.
In: Advances in cyclic nucleotide research, Vol 10 (Brooker G,
Greengard P,
eds), pp 1-32. New York: Raven.
-
Coleman RA,
Kennedy I,
Humphrey PPA,
Bunce K,
Lumley P
(1990)
Prostanoids and their receptors.
In: Comprehensive medicinal chemistry, Vol 3 (Hansch C,
Sammes PG,
Taylor JB,
Emmett JC,
eds), pp 643-714. New York: Pergamon.
-
Coleman RA,
Smith WL,
Narumiya S
(1994)
International union of pharmacology classification of prostanoid receptors: properties, distribution and structure of the receptors and their subtypes.
Pharmacol Rev
46:205-229[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Correa-Rotter R,
Mariash CN,
Rosenberg ME
(1992)
Loading and transfer control for Northern hybridization.
Biotechniques
12:154-158[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Danielson PE,
Forss-Petter S,
Brow MA,
Calavetta L,
Douglass J,
Milner RJ,
Sutcliffe JG
(1988)
p1B15: a cDNA clone of the rat mRNA encoding cyclophilin.
DNA
7:261-267[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dissen GA,
Newman Hirshfield A,
Malamed S,
Ojeda SR
(1995)
Expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in the mammalian ovary is developmentally regulated: changes at the time of folliculogenesis.
Endocrinology
136:4681-4692[Abstract].
-
Gallo F,
Morale MC,
Avola R,
Marchetti B
(1995)
Cross-talk between luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) neurons and astroglial cells: developing glia release factors that accelerate neuronal differentiation and stimulate LHRH release from GT1-1 neuronal cell line and LHRH neurons induce astroglia proliferation.
Endocrine
3:863-874.
-
Gallo RV,
Drouva SV
(1979)
Effect of intraventricular infusion of catecholamines on luteinizing hormone release in ovariectomized and ovariectomized, steroid-primed rats.
Neuroendocrinology
29:149-162[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gearing M,
Terasawa E
(1991)
The alpha-1-adrenergic neuronal system is involved in the pulsatile release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in the ovariectomized female rhesus monkey.
Neuroendocrinology
53:373-381[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Honda A,
Sugimoto Y,
Namba T,
Watabe A,
Irie A,
Negishi M,
Narumiya S,
Ichikawa A
(1993)
Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype.
J Biol Chem
268:7759-7762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Irie A,
Sugimoto Y,
Namba T,
Harazono A,
Honda A,
Watabe A,
Negishi M,
Narumiya S,
Ichikawa A
(1993)
Third isoform of the prostaglandin-E-receptor EP3 subtype with different C-terminal tail coupling to both stimulation and inhibition of adenylate cyclase.
Eur J Biochem
217:313-318[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Jennes L,
Beckman WC,
Stumpf WE,
Grzanna R
(1982)
Anatomical relationships of serotoninergic and noradrenergic projections with the GnRH system in septum and hypothalamus.
Exp Brain Res
46:331-338[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kalra SP
(1986)
Neural circuitry involved in the control of LHRH secretion: a model for preovulatory LH release.
In: Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, Vol 9 (Ganong WF,
Martini L,
eds), pp 31-75. New York: Raven.
-
Kalra SP,
Crowley WR
(1992)
Neuropeptide Y: a novel neuroendocrine peptide in the control of pituitary hormone secretion, and its relation to luteinizing hormone.
In: Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, Vol 13 (Ganong WF,
Martini L,
eds), pp 1-46. New York: Raven.
-
King JC,
Letourneau RL
(1994)
Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone terminals in the median eminence of rats undergo dramatic changes after gonadectomy, as revealed by electron microscopic image analysis.
Endocrinology
134:1340-1351[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kozlowski GP,
Coates PW
(1985)
Ependymoneuronal specializations between LHRH fibers and cells of the cerebroventricular system.
Cell Tissue Res
242:301-311[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Langub Jr MC,
Watson Jr RE
(1992)
Estrogen receptor-immunoreactive glia, endothelia, and ependyma in guinea pig preoptic area and median eminence: electron microscopy.
Endocrinology
130:364-372[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Leranth C,
MacLusky NJ,
Shanabrough M,
Naftolin F
(1988)
Catecholaminergic innervation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and glutamic acid decarboxylase immunopositive neurons in the rat medial preoptic area.
Neuroendocrinology
48:591-602[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Leung PCK,
Arendash GW,
Whitmoyer DI,
Gorski RA,
Sawyer CH
(1981)
Electrical stimulation of mesencephalic noradrenergic pathway: effects on luteinizing hormone levels in blood of ovariectomized and ovariectomized, steroid-primed rats.
Endocrinology
109:720-728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Leung PCK,
Arendash GW,
Whitmoyer DI,
Gorski RA,
Sawyer CH
(1982)
Differential effects of central adrenoceptor agonists on luteinizing hormone release.
Neuroendocrinology
34:207-214[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ma YJ,
Berg-von der Emde K,
Moholt-Siebert M,
Hill DF,
Ojeda SR
(1994a)
Region-specific regulation of transforming growth factor
(TGF ) gene expression in astrocytes of the neuroendocrine brain.
J Neurosci
14:5644-5651[Abstract]. -
Ma YJ,
Costa ME,
Ojeda SR
(1994b)
Developmental expression of the genes encoding transforming growth factor alpha (TGF
) and its receptor in the hypothalamus of female rhesus macaques.
Neuroendocrinology
60:346-359[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Ma YJ,
Hill DF,
Junier M,
Costa ME,
Felder SE,
Ojeda SR
(1994c)
Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor changes in the hypothalamus during the onset of female puberty.
Mol Cell Neurosci
5:246-262[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ma YJ,
Dissen GA,
Rage F,
Ojeda SR
(1996)
RNase protection assay.
Methods
10:273-278.[Medline]
-
Ma YJ,
Berg-von der Emde K,
Rage F,
Wetsel WC,
Ojeda SR
(1997)
Hypothalamic astrocytes respond to transforming growth factor alpha with secretion of neuroactive substances that stimulate the release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.
Endocrinology
138:19-25[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Martinez de la Escalera G,
Choi ALH,
Weiner RI
(1992)
1-Adrenergic regulation of the GT1 gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal cell lines: stimulation of GnRH release via receptors positively coupled to adenylate cyclase.
Endocrinology
131:1397-1402[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
McCarthy KD,
de Vellis J
(1980)
Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue.
J Cell Biol
85:890-902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
McNeill TH,
Sladek JR
(1978)
Fluorescence-immunocytochemistry: simultaneous localization of catecholamines and gonadotropin-releasing hormone.
Science
200:72-74[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Melcangi RC,
Galbiati M,
Messi E,
Piva F,
Martini L,
Motta M
(1995)
Type 1 astrocytes influence luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release from the hypothalamic cell line GT1-1: is transforming growth factor-
the principle involved?.
Endocrinology
136:679-686[Abstract]. -
Narumiya S
(1994)
Prostanoid receptors: structure, function, and distribution.
Ann NY Acad Sci
744:126-138[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nilaver G,
Kozlowski GP
(1989)
Comparison of the PAP and ABC immunocytochemical techniques.
In: Techniques in immunocytochemistry, Vol 4 (Bullock GR,
Petrusz P,
eds), pp 199-215. New York: Academic.
-
Nishigaki N,
Negishi M,
Honda A,
Sugimoto Y,
Namba T,
Narumiya S,
Ichikawa A
(1995)
Identification of prostaglandin E receptor "EP2" cloned from mastocytoma cells as EP4 subtype.
FEBS Lett
364:339-341[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ojeda SR
(1994)
The neurobiology of mammalian puberty: has the contribution of glial cells been underestimated?.
J NIH Res
6:51-56.
-
Ojeda SR,
Negro-Vilar A
(1985)
Prostaglandin E2-induced LHRH release involves mobilization of intracellular Ca+2.
Endocrinology
116:1763-1770[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ojeda SR,
Negro-Vilar A,
McCann SM
(1979)
Release of prostaglandin E (PGEs) by hypothalamic tissue: evidence for their involvement in catecholamine-induced LHRH release.
Endocrinology
104:617-624[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ojeda SR,
Negro-Vilar A,
McCann SM
(1982)
Evidence for involvement of
-adrenergic receptors in norepinephrine-induced PGE2 and LHRH release from the median eminence.
Endocrinology
110:409-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Ojeda SR,
Urbanski HF,
Katz KH,
Costa ME
(1985)
Stimulation of cyclic adenosine 3
,5 -monophosphate production enhances hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release without increasing prostaglandin E2 synthesis: studies in prepubertal female rats.
Endocrinology
117:1175-1178[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Ojeda SR,
Urbanski HF,
Katz KH,
Costa ME
(1986)
Activation of estradiol positive feedback at puberty: estradiol sensitizes the LHRH releasing system at two different biochemical steps.
Neuroendocrinology
43:259-265[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ojeda SR,
Urbanski HF,
Katz KH,
Costa ME
(1988)
Prostaglandin E2 releases luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone from the female juvenile hypothalamus through a Ca2+-dependent, calmodulin-independent mechanism.
Brain Res
441:339-351[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ojeda SR,
Urbanski HF,
Costa ME,
Hill DF,
Moholt-Siebert M
(1990)
Involvement of transforming growth factor
in the release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone from the developing female hypothalamus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:9698-9702[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Peppel K,
Baglioni C
(1990)
A simple and fast method to extract RNA from tissue culture cells.
Biotechniques
9:711-713[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Poletti A,
Melcangi RC,
Negri-Cesi P,
Maggi R,
Martini L
(1994)
Steroid binding and metabolism in the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-producing neuronal cell line GT1-1.
Endocrinology
135:2623-2628[Abstract].
-
Rage F,
Ma YJ,
Ojeda SR
(1994)
Different prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptor subtypes are expressed in immortalized luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) neurons.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
20:637.
-
Rage F,
Costa ME,
Ojeda SR
(1995)
Estradiol upregulates prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptor gene expression in LHRH neurons via glial intermediacy.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
21:265.
-
Ramirez VD,
Feder HH,
Sawyer CH
(1984)
The role of brain catecholamines in the regulation of LH secretion: a critical inquiry.
In: Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, Vol 8 (Martini L,
Ganong WF,
eds), pp 27-84. New York: Raven.
-
Regan JW,
Bailey TJ,
Pepperl DJ,
Pierce KL,
Bogardus AM,
Donello JE,
Fairbairn CE,
Kedzie KM,
Woodward DF,
Gil DW
(1994)
Cloning of a novel human prostaglandin receptor with characteristics of the pharmacologically defined EP2 subtype.
Mol Pharmacol
46:213-220[Abstract].
-
Salvatori R,
Bockman RS,
Guidon Jr PT
(1992)
A simple modification of the Peppel/Baglioni method for RNA isolation from cell culture.
Biotechniques
13:510-512[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sanger F,
Nicklen S,
Coulson AR
(1977)
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Silverman RC,
Gibson MJ,
Silverman A
(1991)
Relationship of glia to GnRH axonal outgrowth from third ventricular grafts in hpg hosts.
Exp Neurol
114:259-274[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Simmons DM,
Arriza JL,
Swanson LW
(1989)
A complete protocol for in situ hybridization of messenger RNAs in brain and other tissues with radiolabeled single-stranded RNA probes.
J Histotechnol
12:169-181.
-
Sugimoto Y,
Namba T,
Honda A,
Hayashi Y,
Negishi M,
Ichikawa A,
Narumiya S
(1992)
Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP3 subtype.
J Biol Chem
267:6463-6466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sugimoto Y,
Negishi M,
Hayashi Y,
Namba T,
Honda A,
Watabe A,
Hirata M,
Narumiya S,
Ichikawa A
(1993)
Two isoforms of the EP3 receptor with different carboxyl-terminal domains: identical ligand binding properties and different coupling properties with Gi proteins.
J Biol Chem
268:2712-2718[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Terasawa E
(1995)
Mechanisms controlling the onset of puberty in primates: the role of GABAergic neurons.
In: The neurobiology of puberty (Plant TM,
Lee PA,
eds), pp 139-151. Bristol, U.K.: Journal of Endocrinology.
-
Ugrumov M,
Hisano S,
Daikoku S
(1989)
Topographic relations between tyrosine hydroxylase- and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-immunoreactive fibers in the median eminence of adult rats.
Neurosci Lett
102:159-164[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Urbanski HF
(1990)
A role for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the control of seasonal breeding.
Endocrinology
127:2223-2228[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Voigt P,
Ma YJ,
Gonzalez D,
Fahrenbach WH,
Wetsel WC,
Berg-von der Emde K,
Hill DF,
Taylor KG,
Costa ME,
Seidah NG,
Ojeda SR
(1996)
Neural and glial-mediated effects of growth factors acting via tyrosine kinase receptors on LHRH neurons.
Endocrinology
137:2593-2605[Abstract].
-
Wang AM,
Doyle MV,
Mark DF
(1989)
Quantitation of mRNA by the polymerase chain reaction.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
86:9717-9721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Watabe A,
Sugimoto Y,
Honda A,
Irie A,
Namba T,
Negishi M,
Ito S,
Narumiya S,
Ichikawa A
(1993)
Cloning and expression of cDNA for a mouse EP1 subtype of prostaglandin E receptor.
J Biol Chem
268:20175-20178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
White R,
Lees JA,
Needham M,
Ham J,
Parker M
(1987)
Structural organization and expression of the mouse estrogen receptor.
Mol Endocrinol
1:735-744[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Witkin JW,
Ferin M,
Popilskis SJ,
Silverman A
(1991)
Effects of gonadal steroids on the ultrastructure of GnRH neurons in the rhesus monkey: synaptic input and glial apposition.
Endocrinology
129:1083-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Woller MJ,
Terasawa E
(1992)
Estradiol enhances the action of neuropeptide Y on in vivo luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release in ovariectomized rhesus monkey.
Neuroendocrinology
56:921-925[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-S. Parent, G. Rasier, V. Matagne, A. Lomniczi, M.-C. Lebrethon, A. Gerard, S. R. Ojeda, and J.-P. Bourguignon
Oxytocin Facilitates Female Sexual Maturation through a Glia-to-Neuron Signaling Pathway
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2008;
149(3):
1358 - 1365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Takagi, T. Yamamura, T. Anraku, S. Yasuo, N. Nakao, M. Watanabe, M. Iigo, S. Ebihara, and T. Yoshimura
Involvement of Transforming Growth Factor {alpha} in the Photoperiodic Regulation of Reproduction in Birds
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2007;
148(6):
2788 - 2792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Mastronardi, G. G. Smiley, J. Raber, T. Kusakabe, A. Kawaguchi, V. Matagne, A. Dietzel, S. Heger, A. E. Mungenast, R. Cabrera, et al.
Deletion of the Ttf1 Gene in Differentiated Neurons Disrupts Female Reproduction without Impairing Basal Ganglia Function
J. Neurosci.,
December 20, 2006;
26(51):
13167 - 13179.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Prevot, A. Lomniczi, G. Corfas, and S. R. Ojeda
erbB-1 and erbB-4 Receptors Act in Concert to Facilitate Female Sexual Development and Mature Reproductive Function
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2005;
146(3):
1465 - 1472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bouret, S. De Seranno, J.-C. Beauvillain, and V. Prevot
Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 May Directly Influence Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Gene Expression in the Rat Hypothalamus
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2004;
145(4):
1794 - 1801.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Prevot, A. Cornea, A. Mungenast, G. Smiley, and S. R. Ojeda
Activation of erbB-1 Signaling in Tanycytes of the Median Eminence Stimulates Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Release via Prostaglandin E2 Production and Induces Cell Plasticity
J. Neurosci.,
November 19, 2003;
23(33):
10622 - 10632.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. J. Son, M. K. Hur, B. J. Ryu, S. K. Park, G. Damante, A. V. D'Elia, M. E. Costa, S. R. Ojeda, and B. J. Lee
TTF-1, a Homeodomain-containing Transcription Factor, Participates in the Control of Body Fluid Homeostasis by Regulating Angiotensinogen Gene Transcription in the Rat Subfornical Organ
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
27043 - 27052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Dziedzic, V. Prevot, A. Lomniczi, H. Jung, A. Cornea, and S. R. Ojeda
Neuron-to-Glia Signaling Mediated by Excitatory Amino Acid Receptors Regulates ErbB Receptor Function in Astroglial Cells of the Neuroendocrine Brain
J. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2003;
23(3):
915 - 926.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Prevot, C. Rio, G. J. Cho, A. Lomniczi, S. Heger, C. M. Neville, N. A. Rosenthal, S. R. Ojeda, and G. Corfas
Normal Female Sexual Development Requires Neuregulin-erbB Receptor Signaling in Hypothalamic Astrocytes
J. Neurosci.,
January 1, 2003;
23(1):
230 - 239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Amateau and M. M. McCarthy
A Novel Mechanism of Dendritic Spine Plasticity Involving Estradiol Induction of Prostaglandin-E2
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 2002;
22(19):
8586 - 8596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bilger, S. Heger, D. W. Brann, A. Paredes, and S. R. Ojeda
A Conditional Tetracycline-Regulated Increase in Gamma Amino Butyric Acid Production near Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Nerve Terminals Disrupts Estrous Cyclicity in the Rat
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2001;
142(5):
2102 - 2114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Speth, M. S. Smith, and K. L. Grove
Lactation decreases angiotensinogen mRNA expression in the midcaudal arcuate nucleus of the rat brain
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
April 1, 2001;
280(4):
R1169 - R1176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Harris, D. F. Battaglia, M. E. Brown, M. B. Brown, N. E. Carlson, C. Viguie, C. Y. Williams, and F. J. Karsch
Prostaglandins Mediate the Endotoxin-Induced Suppression of Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in the Ewe
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2000;
141(3):
1050 - 1058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Skynner, J. A. Sim, and A. E. Herbison
Detection of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and {beta} Messenger Ribonucleic Acids in Adult Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons
Endocrinology,
November 1, 1999;
140(11):
5195 - 5201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Ojeda, J. Hill, D. F. Hill, M. E. Costa, V. Tapia, A. Cornea, and Y. J. Ma
The Oct-2 POU Domain Gene in the Neuroendocrine Brain: A Transcriptional Regulator of Mammalian Puberty
Endocrinology,
August 1, 1999;
140(8):
3774 - 3789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Prevot, D. Croix, C. M. Rialas, P. Poulain, G. L. Fricchione, G. B. Stefano, and J.-C. Beauvillain
Estradiol Coupling to Endothelial Nitric Oxide Stimulates Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Release from Rat Median Eminence Via a Membrane Receptor
Endocrinology,
February 1, 1999;
140(2):
652 - 659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Herbison
Multimodal Influence of Estrogen upon Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons
Endocr. Rev.,
June 1, 1998;
19(3):
302 - 330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Southall and M. R. Vasko
Prostaglandin Receptor Subtypes, EP3C and EP4, Mediate the Prostaglandin E2-induced cAMP Production and Sensitization of Sensory Neurons
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 4, 2001;
276(19):
16083 - 16091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|