Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 4,
Issue of February 15, 1997
pp. 1406-1415
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
A Post-Transcriptional Regulatory Mechanism Restricts Expression
of the Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration Antigen cdr2 to Immune
Privileged Tissues
John P. Corradi1,
Chingwen Yang1,
Jennifer C. Darnell1,
Josep Dalmau2, and
Robert B. Darnell1, 2
1 Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The
Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, and
2 Department of Neurology and the Cotzias Laboratory of
Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, New York 10021
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) is believed to be an
autoimmune disorder initiated by the ectopic expression of a
neuron-specific protein in breast and ovarian tumors. PCD antisera was
used previously to identify several cerebellar degeneration-related (cdr) genes encoding putative PCD antigens. We have found that the cdr2
gene, which encodes a cytoplasmic leucine zipper protein of unknown
function, is expressed in PCD-associated tumors, whereas other cdr
genes are not; thus, cdr2 encodes the PCD tumor antigen. To determine
whether the expression pattern of cdr2 is consistent with its proposed
role in PCD, we have isolated the mouse homolog and examined both the
mRNA and protein distribution in adult tissues. We have found that cdr2
mRNA is expressed in almost all tissues, whereas the protein is
expressed only in the brain and testis. Within the brain, both the cdr2
mRNA and immunoreactivity are confined primarily to neurons in the
cerebellum and brainstem, the regions most affected in PCD. These
results suggest first that the tissue-specific expression of cdr2 is
regulated at a post-transcriptional level. Moreover, because the brain
and testis are considered to be immune-privileged sites, the expression
pattern of cdr2 is compatible with the autoimmune model of PCD
pathogenesis.
Key words:
paraneoplastic neurological disease;
neuron-specific gene
expression;
translational regulation;
immune privilege;
cerebellar
degeneration;
leucine zipper protein
INTRODUCTION
The paraneoplastic neurological disorders (PNDs)
are a rare group of neuronal degenerations that develop as remote
effects of systemic malignancies (for review, see Posner and Furneaux, 1990
; Darnell, 1996
). It is believed that the PNDs are immune-mediated, arising when systemic tumors express proteins (called onconeural antigens) that are normally entirely restricted in their expression to
immune-privileged neurons. The serum and CSF of PND patients harbor
high titers of anti-neuronal autoantibodies that are also reactive with
their tumors (Anderson et al., 1988a
; Furneaux et al., 1990
; Luque et
al., 1991
). Characterization of the nature of the disorders and the
onconeural antigens has been advanced by the use of PND antisera to
clone cDNAs encoding the antigens. Studies of several onconeural
antigens, including the breast tumor antigen Nova (Buckanovich et al.,
1993
, 1995) and the small cell lung cancer antigen Hu (Szabo et al.,
1991
; Dalmau et al., 1992
), have demonstrated that the normal
expression of their mRNA and protein is neuron-specific. Taken together
with evidence that immunity to PND antigens correlates with effective
anti-tumor immunity (Dalmau et al., 1990
; Darnell and DeAngelis, 1993
;
Darnell, 1996
), these observations suggest a model for PND in which the expression of onconeural antigens in tumor cells initiates an appropriate immune response that subsequently develops into autoimmune neurological disease.
Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) is a PND that develops in
patients with breast and ovarian tumors and is characterized by the
presence of a specific autoantibody referred to as "anti-Yo" (Anderson et al., 1988b
). Immunohistochemical studies with this antibody reveal that it reacts with both PCD-associated tumor cells
(Furneaux et al., 1990
) and discrete populations of neurons, reacting
most strongly with cerebellar Purkinje cell cytoplasm (Cunningham et
al., 1986
). PCD antisera identify a major antigen reported as either 52 kDa (Tsukamoto et al., 1989
; Sakai et al., 1991
) or 62 kDa (Cunningham
et al., 1986
) and a minor antigen of 34 kDa when used in Western blot
analysis of Purkinje cell extracts; the larger molecular weight antigen
is readily detectable in PCD tumor extracts (Furneaux et al.,
1990
).
Using PCD antisera, cDNAs encoding three
erebellar
egeneration
elated antigens (cdr1-3) have
been identified. cdr1 encodes the 34 kDa protein, the predicted amino
acid sequence of which reveals an unusual structure composed of nearly
identical hexapeptide repeats making up 91% of the protein (Dropcho et
al., 1987
). cdr2 was cloned independently from both HeLa cell and human
cerebellar cDNA libraries (Fathallah-Shaykh et al., 1991
; Sakai et al.,
1991
). This cDNA encodes a protein with a coiled coil/leucine zipper domain present near the N-terminus. A third cDNA (cdr3) cloned from an
HeLa expression library (Fathallah-Shaykh et al., unpublished observations), GenBank accession L02867[GenBank], shares significant homology
(~45% predicted amino acid identity) with cdr2, but has not been
investigated further.
It has been suggested that cdr2 may be widely expressed in normal
tissues, which is problematic for its proposed role in the pathogenesis
of PCD. Widespread expression of cdr2 would also be inconsistent with
the clinical features of PCD, which are restricted to evidence of
anti-tumor immunity and neuronal (primarily cerebellar) dysfunction
(Peterson et al., 1992
). Early studies using PCD antisera found
immunoreactivity with cerebellar Purkinje cells when the antibody was
used at limiting dilutions (Jaeckle et al., 1985
). Subsequent reports
have found Purkinje cell immunoreactivity at limiting antibody
dilutions, but more widespread reactivity both within and outside the
nervous system using high concentrations of antibody (Altermatt et al.,
1991
; Tomimoto et al., 1993
). Furthermore, Sakai et al. (1991)
detected
the cdr2 mRNA in cerebellum, brainstem, and intestine by reverse
transcription PCR (RT-PCR); additional samples were negative but were
not controlled for integrity of the RNA.
The present study was undertaken to clarify the expression pattern of
the PCD antigen. We have examined three clinical tumors for the
expression of cdr genes and found that the cdr2 gene encodes the PCD
tumor antigen. We then defined the tissue distribution of the cdr2 mRNA
and immunoreactive protein in the adult mouse and have found that
expression of the PCD antigen is restricted to the brain and testis,
tissues that are recognized as sites of immunological privilege. These
results demonstrate that the expression pattern of the PCD antigen is
consistent with the proposed autoimmune model of PCD. Interestingly,
the cdr2 mRNA displays a wider distribution than the protein,
indicating that expression of the cdr2 antigen is regulated at a
post-transcriptional level.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tumor RNA extraction and RT-PCR. Frozen samples of
ovarian tumors removed from patients with Yo-positive PCD were obtained from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Fragments (100 mg)
were used for purification of either total or poly(A+) RNA.
Total RNA was prepared by the method of Chomcynski and Sacchi (1987)
,
and the samples were subsequently treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase
(Promega, Madison, WI) before RT-PCR analysis. For the purification of
poly(A+) RNA, the section was homogenized by sonication in
400 µl extraction buffer (4 M guanidinium thiocyanate,
0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1% dithiothreitol, 0.5% lauryl
sarcosinate), and 800 µl of binding buffer (0.1 M
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.4 M LiCl, 20 mM EDTA) was
added and the lysate clarified by centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 5 min. Magnetic Dynabeads Oligo (dT)25
(Dynal, Great Neck, NY) were prepared by washing 300 µl of beads once
with 200 µl binding buffer. The lysate supernatant was added to the
Dynabeads, mixed, and incubated at room temperature for 3-5 min. A
magnet was used to immobilize the beads, the supernatant was removed,
and the beads were washed three times with 0.5 ml wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.15 M LiCl, 1 mM EDTA). Poly(A+) RNA was then eluted in 20 µl 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, at 65°C for 2 min.
For RT-PCR reactions, 2 µl tumor poly(A+) RNA, 1-2 µg
total tumor RNA, or 20 ng poly(A+) RNA from normal tissues
(CLONTECH Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) was denatured at 70°C for 10 min and placed on ice. The RNA was reverse-transcribed using random
hexanucleotide primers (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) and
Superscript reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD)
at 42°C for 50 min and the reaction stopped by incubation at 95°C
for 5 min. One-tenth of the first strand cDNA sample was used as
template for a PCR reaction using Amplitaq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer,
Norwalk, CT) and the following forward and reverse oligonucleotide
primers corresponding to cdr2: 5
-TGAATGGAGTTGAGA AGCTGGTG-3
and
5
-GAGATGCCCCTC-TGTTTCACAG-3
; and cdr3: 5
-CATTGAGCGCCTCCAGGCT-3
and 5
-AGCTCCTTGAGG CAGGGGAA-3
. The product was amplified for 35 cycles (94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 1 min). PCR
products were labeled by addition of trace amounts of
[
32P]dCTP (Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights,
IL) to the reaction mixtures and loaded on a 10% nondenaturing
acrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography.
cDNA library screening and sequencing. Adult mouse brain and
spleen cDNA libraries (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were plated at a
density of 1 × 105 pfu per 135 mm dish. Plaques were
lifted onto nitrocellulose filters for hybridization with
32P-labeled probes (Sambrook et al., 1989
). The mouse brain
library (1.2 × 106 pfu) was screened at low
stringency with a probe corresponding to bp 1-872 of the human cdr2
cDNA (Fathallah-Shaykh et al., 1991
). This screen resulted in the
isolation of a single 2.4 kb clone. The mouse spleen library (6 × 105 pfu) was screened with a cDNA probe corresponding to bp
153-720 of the mouse brain cdr2 cDNA (see Fig. 2). This screen
resulted in the isolation of three overlapping clones, one comprising
the full coding regions and untranslated regions (UTR). The cDNA clones were sequenced by the dideoxy method of Sanger et al. (1977)
using Sequenase 2.0 (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH), and sequence
data were analyzed using the MacVector software package (International
Biotechnologies, New Haven, CT).
Fig. 2.
Above. Immunoreactivity of PCD ovarian
tumors with PCD antisera. Serial sections of a paraffin-embedded PCD
ovarian tumor (tumor 2 from Fig. 1) stained with either biotinylated
normal human serum (A) or biotinylated PCD
antisera (B). PCD antisera displays a characteristic
cytoplasmic reactivity in the tumor tissue and not in the surrounding
connective tissue seen in the bottom of the photomicrograph.
C, Detection of the PCD ovarian tumor antigen by Western
blot. PCD antisera was immunoreactive with a protein of
Mr 56 kDa (arrowhead)
present in both human Purkinje (lane 1) and PCD tumor
(lane 2) protein extracts. The lower reactive band in
the tumor extract is IgG, determined by probing the same blot with the
anti-human IgG secondary antibody alone (data not shown).
Fig. 3.
Left. Immunohistochemical analysis of
normal or PCD cerebellar sections. A, Paraffin section
of the cerebellum of a PCD patient (corresponding to tumor 3 in Fig. 1)
showing complete lack of reactivity with biotinylated PCD antiserum and
the absence of Purkinje neurons. B, Paraffin section of
the cerebellum of a neurologically normal patient demonstrating
reactivity of Purkinje cell cytoplasm with PCD antiserum.
[View Larger Version of this Image (97K GIF file)]
Northern blot analysis. Adult ICR (Charles River) mouse
organs were dissected, and total RNA was prepared using the TRIZOL Reagent (Life Technologies) and the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. Total RNA (30 µg) was resolved on an agarose/50% glyoxal gel (Sambrook et al., 1989
) and transferred to Biodyne B nylon
membrane (Pall, Glen Cove, NY). The RNA was UV cross-linked to the
membrane, and the blot was prehybridized in 6× SSC, 0.5% SDS, 5×
Denhardt's solution, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate, 100 µg/ml denatured herring sperm DNA for 30 min at room temperature. cDNAs corresponding to a 580 bp fragment of the mouse cdr2 3
-UTR and the
full-length GAPDH coding region were labeled with
[32P]dCTP using the Prime-It Kit (Stratagene). The RNA
blot was hybridized with 1 × 106 cpm/ml labeled probe
in 6× SSC, 1× Denhardt's solution, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate, 100 µg/ml yeast tRNA for 16 hr at 65°C. The membrane was then washed
twice in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate at 65°C, and
twice in 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate at room
temperature, and hybridization was visualized by autoradiography.
Antibody affinity purification and Western blot analysis.
The region coding for amino acids 16-192 of human cdr2 was fused in frame to glutathione-S-transferase (GST) in the GSTag vector (the
gift of David Ron, New York University). Bacteria transformed with the
GSTag-cdr2 plasmid were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 and 1 mM isopropyl thiogalactoside added for an additional
3 hr. Cells were harvested and resuspended in ice-cold PBS and lysed by
sonication, and the lysate cleared by centrifugation. The cleared
lysate was incubated with glutathione Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, NJ) and washed in PBS, and fusion protein eluted with 10 mM reduced glutathione. Purity and immunoreactivity of the
GST-cdr2 fusion protein were verified by SDS-PAGE, Coomassie blue
staining, and Western blot analysis.
For affinity purification of PCD antisera, Immobilon membrane
(Millipore, Bedford, MA) was wetted with methanol and rinsed well with
ddH2O. GST-cdr2 fusion protein (20-30 µg) was spotted on
a 0.5 × 3 cm strip of membrane and blocked for 60 min in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mM NaN3,
150 mM NaCl, 5% nonfat dry milk. The strip was washed with
PBS/0.02% sodium azide and incubated with 1 ml of PCD antiserum for 2 hr at 4°C. The strip was then washed four times with 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mM NaN3,
150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, two times with 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mM NaN3,
150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and antibody was eluted with 1 ml 0.2 M glycine, pH 3.0. The elution was repeated,
and the pooled eluates were neutralized with 0.5N NaOH to a final pH of
7.5-8.0. Ultrafiltration in a Centricon-10 unit (Amicon, Beverly, MA)
was used to remove the glycine from the affinity-purified antibody.
For Western blot analysis, the indicated tissues were dissected from
adult ICR mice and homogenized in PBS, 2× SDS sample buffer added, and
the samples boiled. Frozen sections of PCD ovarian tumors were
pulverized with a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen and
homogenized in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 50 mM
potassium fluoride, 1% NP-40, 5 mM EDTA). Total protein
(45 µg) from each tissue extract was resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and
transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were incubated with
affinity-purified PCD antibody diluted to 1:50 or native PCD antisera
diluted to 1:400, washed, and incubated with anti-human IgG conjugated
to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham) at a 1:5000 dilution. Reactive
proteins were detected using the ECL kit (Amersham) according to the
manufacturer's instructions and stripped of antibody according to the
ECL protocol.
Two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis. Cerebellum and
testis from Sm/Ckc mice were homogenized in 2-D lysis buffer [9.5 M urea, 2% NP-40, 5%
-mercaptoethanol, 2% Biolyte
ampholytes (BioRad Labs, Hercules, CA) consisting of 75% 3/5 range and
25% 3/10 range Biolytes]. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 2100 × g for 5 min, and protein concentrations were
adjusted with 2-D lysis buffer. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) gels were
performed essentially by the method of O'Farrell (1975)
. IEF slab gels
[0.75 mm; 9.2 M urea, 4% acrylamide (ReadySol IEF,
Pharmacia Biotech), 2% NP-40, and 5% Biolyte ampholytes] were loaded
with 40 µg of total protein per lane, and the samples were covered
with sample overlay buffer (7% urea, 2.5% ampholytes, 5%
-mercaptoethanol). The gels were run using 0.01 M
H3PO4 and 0.02 M NaOH buffers, as
described by O'Farrell (1975)
at 4 W constant power. Voltage was
limited to 700 V, and gels were run for 1800 V/hr. Lanes containing the
samples were cut from the gel, equilibrated with 1× SDS sample buffer
for 5 min, and loaded horizontally onto a 1 mm 9% SDS-PAGE gel with a
3% stacking gel. A single well was loaded with 40 µg protein extract
in SDS sample buffer for one-dimensional analysis. Gels were
transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with PCD antisera.
In situ hybridization. The protocol used was essentially the
same as that described by Newman et al. (1995)
. Adult ICR mouse tissues
were embedded and frozen in O.C.T. compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN).
Sections (10 µm) were cut using a cryostat and applied to Probe-On
Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). A plasmid containing
the same region of the 3
-UTR of the mouse cdr2 gene as that used for
the Northern blot was linearized and both sense and antisense
riboprobes transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase (Stratagene) and
[33P]UTP (Dupont NEN, Boston, MA). Probe was purified on
a Sepharose G50 column and hybridized to tissue sections at 50°C for
36-48 hr.
Immunohistochemistry. For the human tissues, IgG from PCD
and normal human sera was isolated and biotinylated, as described previously (Furneaux et al., 1990
). Paraffin-embedded sections of
ovarian tumor and cerebellum from PCD patients were reacted with the
biotinylated antibodies, as described by Verschuuren et al. (1996)
.
For the mouse tissues, whole organs were dissected from adult ICR mice
and tissues were embedded and frozen in O.C.T. compound. Sections (10 µm) were fixed in methanol/0.3% H2O2 at room
temperature for 30-60 min to quench endogenous peroxidase activity,
washed in PBS, and blocked with PBS/2% normal goat serum (NGS) at room temperature for 1 hr. Sections were incubated with primary antibody diluted in PBS/2% NGS at 4°C overnight, washed in PBS, and incubated with biotinylated anti-human IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA)
diluted 1:5000 in PBS/2% NGS at room temperature for 1-2 hr. The
signal was enhanced by addition of an avidin-biotin complex (Vectastain Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories) and visualized with diaminobenzidene in the presence of H2O2.
RESULTS
Detection of cdr2 message in PCD-associated ovarian tumors
Previous studies demonstrated that PCD antisera recognized a
protein of ~62 kDa in all PCD tumor samples examined but detected the
34 kDa species (cdr1) in only one (Furneaux et al., 1990
), suggesting
that cdr2 might encode the PCD tumor antigen. However, the antigenic
epitope in cdr2 localizes to the leucine zipper domain of the protein
(Sakai et al., 1993
), which is nearly identical in sequence to the
leucine zipper of cdr3, and both cDNAs were cloned using PCD antisera.
To address which of these two genes encodes the in vivo PCD
tumor antigen, we assayed PCD tumors for the presence of cdr gene
transcripts by RT-PCR. Single-strand cDNA was synthesized from
poly(A+) or total RNA isolated from three ovarian tumors
obtained from PCD patients and amplified using gene-specific primers
corresponding to cdr2 or cdr3 (Fig. 1). Although both
cdr transcripts could be detected in the cerebellum, only cdr2 mRNA was
found in the PCD ovarian tumors. In addition, cdr1 mRNA was detected in
cerebellum but could not be detected in the PCD tumors (data not
shown).
Fig. 1.
RT-PCR analysis of PCD-associated ovarian tumors.
Total or poly(A+) RNA purified from tumor tissue or human
cerebellar poly(A+) RNA was used as templates for the RT.
Gene-specific primers corresponding to the coding region of either cdr2
or cdr3 were used for PCR amplification of the first strand cDNA.
Reactions were performed both in the presence and absence of RT to
control for DNA contamination. A
-actin primer pair was also used as a control for RNA integrity (data not shown). Although the transcripts of the expected size for both cdr2 and cdr3 were detectable in human
cerebellum, only the cdr2 transcript was detected in the PCD
tumors.
[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]
To confirm that the cdr2-positive PCD tumors we assayed came from
typical PCD patients, we examined tumor tissue for immunoreactivity with PCD antisera. Figure 2 demonstrates that tumor
tissue from one patient (tumor 2) was immunoreactive with PCD antisera
(Fig. 2B) but not control antisera (Fig.
2A); similar results were found with tumors 1 and 2 (data not shown). In addition, we assayed tissue from tumor 3 for PCD
reactivity by Western blot analysis. Figure 2C demonstrates
that PCD antisera recognized a protein that comigrates with the PCD
antigen recognized in human Purkinje extracts. Finally, we examined
cerebellar tissue obtained from the autopsy of patient 3. Immunohistochemical analysis of cerebellar tissue using PCD antisera
revealed the complete absence of immunoreactivity and Purkinje neurons
in PCD cerebellum (Fig. 3A) but showed a characteristic staining pattern in Purkinje neurons of control cerebellum (Fig. 3B). We conclude from the RT-PCR and
protein studies that the PCD tumor antigen is the cdr2 gene
product.
To facilitate the study of cdr2 expression, we used a human cdr2 cDNA
clone (Fathallah-Shaykh et al., 1991
) to isolate a 2.4 kb cDNA encoding
cdr2 from an adult mouse brain library (Fig. 4). Because
the initiating methionine of the human cDNA has not been defined
(Fathallah-Shaykh et al., 1991
; Sakai et al., 1991
), we compared the
degree of nucleic acid homology between the murine and human cdr2
sequences. The sequence homology decreases dramatically immediately
upstream of a methionine codon at position 154, and there is an
in-frame stop codon at position 88, indicating that this ATG is the
initiation codon. The full-length murine cdr2 open reading frame
encodes a protein of predicted molecular weight 52 kDa, and its amino
acid sequence is 87% identical to its human homolog (Fig. 4). Within
the region of the antigenic epitope (the leucine zipper domain), the
mouse and human proteins are identical.
Fig. 4.
Nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of
the adult mouse brain cdr2 cDNA. Amino acids are numbered on the
left and the nucleotides on the right.
The in-frame stop codon upstream of the presumptive initiating
methionine and a polyadenylation signal are underlined.
The translational stop codon is indicated with an
asterisk. The 455 amino acid protein of predicted
Mr = 52 kDa is 87% identical to the human
sequence. The amino acids that are not conserved are
underlined.
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]
cdr2 mRNA is expressed widely in adult mouse tissues, but the
protein is restricted to the brain and testis
To determine whether cdr2 gene expression was limited to the
nervous system, we performed Northern blot analysis using a
cdr2-specific cDNA probe. A single cdr2 transcript of 2.8 kb was
detected in eight of nine tissues examined; it was most abundant in
testis and spleen and was not detectable in liver (Fig.
5A). This result was confirmed by
hybridization with a probe from a different region of the cdr2 gene
(data not shown) and by RT-PCR analysis of mouse cerebellum, spleen,
heart, and testis RNA (Fig. 5B and data not shown). The cdr2
primer pair used for PCR amplification flanks the region encoding the
PCD epitope, suggesting that this region of the cdr2 transcript is the
same in each tissue.
Fig. 5.
Expression of the cdr2 mRNA in adult mouse
tissues. A, A Northern blot of total RNA prepared from
the indicated tissues was hybridized with a 32P-labeled
cDNA probe made from the 3
-UTR of mouse cdr2 (top
panel). The bottom panel shows
hybridization of a GAPDH probe to the same blot as a control for
loading of RNA. The mouse tissues used in the analysis were cerebellum
(Cb), cerebral cortex (Cx), heart (Ht), lung (Lu), liver
(Li), kidney (Kd) spleen
(Sp), ovary (Ov), and testis
(Ts). The relative positions of 28S (5.1 kb) and 18S (2.0 kb) rRNA are shown. A single cdr2 transcript of 2.8 kb was detected in all tissues tested, with the exception of the liver. B, RT-PCR analysis of cdr2 expression in cerebellum
versus spleen RNA was performed, as described in Figure 1, using
primers flanking the PCD epitope or
-actin primers. The cdr2
transcript was also detected in heart and testis by this assay (data
not shown).
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]
To investigate the expression pattern of the PCD antigen, Western
blot analysis using affinity-purified PCD antisera was performed on the
same battery of adult mouse tissues used for Northern blot analysis.
Interestingly, a single band of Mr = 56 kDa was
detected in cerebellum and testis but not in other tissues (Fig.
6A). On a longer exposure, a faint
band was also detected in the cerebral cortex (data not shown). The
blot was stripped of antibody and reprobed with a monoclonal antibody
to
-tubulin (Fig. 6A), demonstrating that
equivalent amounts of protein were loaded in each lane. To confirm the
identity of the immunoreactive species in brain and testis, we
performed 2-D gel electrophoretic analysis. Figure 6B
shows that the protein recognized by PCD antisera in cerebellum (top panel) and testis (bottom
panel) exactly comigrate by both their molecular weights
and isoelectric points (pI). The protein(s) runs as a broad band with a
pI of 6.1-6.4, consistent with previous 2-D gel analysis of human
Purkinje cell lysate (Cunningham et al., 1986
). This migration pattern
in the dimension of isoelectric focusing could be attributable to
post-translational or chemical modifications and may also explain the
difference between the observed pI and the predicted pI of 4.76.
Fig. 6.
Detection of the PCD antigen in adult mouse
tissues. A, Affinity-purified PCD antisera was used to
probe a Western blot of the indicated protein extracts (top
panel, abbreviated as in Fig. 3). The blot was stripped of
antibody and reprobed with a monoclonal antibody to
-tubulin as a
protein-loading and transfer control (bottom
panel); the lower band is mouse Ig heavy
chain. The cdr2 affinity-purified antibody recognizes a
Mr 56 kDa antigen only in brain and testis.
B, Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of protein
extracts from cerebellum (i) and testis
(ii). Proteins were resolved by their isoelectric points
in the horizontal direction (the direction and end points of the pH
gradient are shown above) and by their molecular weights in the
vertical direction. The major species detected by PCD antisera in
cerebellum and testis comigrate in both dimensions.
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]
There are several potential explanations for the discrepancy between
the tissue distribution of the cdr2 message and the protein detected by
the PCD antisera. In tissues other than brain and testis, the PCD
antigen may not be recognized by the Yo antibody as a result of
alternative processing of the primary transcript, differential
post-translational modification of the protein, or regulation at the
level of translation. To test for the first of these possibilities, we
cloned cdr2 cDNA from spleen. Mouse spleen was chosen, because it
represents a tissue in which the cdr2 mRNA was abundant, whereas the
protein was undetectable. Two overlapping clones, one nearly
full-length, were isolated and found to be identical to the brain cDNA
sequence throughout the coding region and UTR. These results suggest
that the apparent differences in detectable cdr2 protein in brain and
spleen cannot be accounted for by alternatively processed cdr2
mRNAs.
To address the possibility that the detection of cdr2 may be affected
by tissue-specific post-translational modifications or protein
stability, we transfected a non-neuronal cell line with an expression
vector containing the full cdr2 open reading frame without UTR
sequences. The transfected cdr2 plasmid yielded abundant immunoreactive
protein in NIH3T3 cells, suggesting that the protein was stable and the
epitope was not masked in this fibroblast cell line (data not
shown).
cdr2 expression is also regulated at the level
of transcription
To extend our cdr2 expression data, the tissue distribution of
cdr2 mRNA and protein was compared by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. A specific in situ hybridization
probe was generated from the mouse cdr2 3
-UTR, and the expression in mouse tissues was compared with the pattern of immunoreactivity seen
with affinity-purified or native PCD serum. Both sagittal and coronal
sections of adult mouse brain showed a pattern of cdr2 mRNA expression
that corresponded precisely to the pattern of immunoreactivity.
Abundant cdr2 mRNA and PCD antigen was detected specifically in the
cerebellar Purkinje cells, in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei,
and in brainstem (Fig.
7A,B). cdr2 mRNA and
protein were absent from hippocampus, basal ganglia, and neocortex, with the exception of scattered immunoreactive cortical neurons (data
not shown).
Fig. 7.
Analysis of cdr2 expression by in
situ hybridization (A, C,
E) and immunohistochemistry (B,
D, F). Sections of adult mouse brain (A, B), spleen
(C, D), and testis (E,
F) were hybridized with a 33P-labeled
cdr2 riboprobe or reacted with either affinity-purified or native PCD
antisera. Dark-field photomicrographs reveal that the cdr2 mRNA is
detected in cerebellar Purkinje neurons, many brainstem neurons
(A), splenic cortical cells
(C), and cells of the outermost layers of the
seminiferous tubules in the testis (E). There was
no clear pattern of expression in the cerebral cortex, and no
hybridization was observed with cdr2 sense probes in any of the tissues
examined (data not shown). Immunoreactivity with affinity-purified or
native PCD antisera was detected in cerebellar Purkinje neurons,
brainstem neurons (B, left and
right panels, respectively), scattered neurons of the
cerebral cortex (data not shown), and spermatogonia in the testis
(F). Immunoreactivity was absent in spleen
(D), which shows only background reactivity when
compared with a normal human serum control (data not shown). pc, Purkinje cells; gcl, granule cell
layer; ml, molecular layer; io, inferior
olive; rp, red pulp; ctx,
cortex; spg, spermatogonia; spc,
spermatocytes.
[View Larger Version of this Image (151K GIF file)]
Outside the nervous system, there was no correlation between cdr2
in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry except in testis. In sections of adult spleen, the cdr2 mRNA was readily detected, where it was found to be restricted to the splenic cortex (an
area rich in lymphocytes) but absent from the red pulp (Fig. 7C). In contrast, there was no detectable cdr2
immunoreactivity in either the splenic cortex or the pulp (Fig.
7D). Similarly, no immunoreactivity could be detected in any
other non-neuronal tissue examined except testis. Immunohistochemical
staining of testis revealed that cdr2 cytoplasmic reactivity was
restricted to the outermost cell layer of the seminiferous tubules
(Fig. 7F). By their relative position in the tubules
and by morphological criteria, these cells appear to be spermatogonia,
the least-differentiated type in the germ cell lineage. In
situ hybridization of testis revealed that cdr2 mRNA is abundantly
expressed in spermatogonia and could be detected to a lesser degree in
early differentiating spermatocytes (Fig. 7E). Taken
together, these data demonstrate an uncoupling of cdr2 mRNA and protein
expression, suggesting that a post-transcriptional mechanism restricts
cdr2 protein expression to spermatogonia and a subset of neurons.
DISCUSSION
The onconeural antigen cdr2
Three genes encoding putative PCD antigens have been identified by
expression library screening with PCD antisera (Dropcho et al., 1987
;
Fathallah-Shaykh et al., 1991
; Sakai et al., 1991
), but which of these
encode proteins that might be relevant to PCD in vivo has
been uncertain. Western blot analysis of PCD tumor tissue probed with
PCD antisera previously identified immunoreactive species that might
correspond in size to either the cdr2 or cdr3 gene products (Furneaux
et al., 1990
). Moreover, the cdr2 and cdr3 genes encode proteins that
share a common epitope (the leucine zipper domain). We have performed
RT-PCR analysis of three PCD-associated ovarian tumors and found that
in each of these tumors, the only PCD-related gene to be expressed is
cdr2, and we conclude that the cdr2 protein is the PCD tumor
antigen.
Based on RNA analysis and immunohistochemical studies (Sakai et al.,
1991
; Tomimoto et al., 1993
), it had been thought previously that the
PCD antigen cdr2 might be expressed outside the nervous system,
generating uncertainty regarding its role as an onconeural antigen. We
have demonstrated that the expression of the PCD antigen is normally
restricted to neurons and testis, sites exhibiting the characteristics
of immune privilege. Two-dimensional gel analysis confirms that the
immunoreactive species evident on Western blot analysis is the same
protein in both tissues. This expression pattern is consistent with the
proposed role of cdr2 as an onconeural antigen.
The expression of previously characterized onconeural antigens and some
autoimmune antigens has been found to be very tightly restricted to
neurons. The Nova and Hu onconeural antigens are RNA-binding proteins
expressed exclusively in neurons both early in embryogenesis and in
adults (Szabo et al., 1991
; Dalmau et al., 1992
; Buckanovich et al.,
1993
, 1995). Similarly, the autoimmune cerebellar degeneration antigen
-NAP is a neuron-specific vesicle coat protein (Newman et al.,
1995
), and the stiff-man syndrome antigens GAD (Solimena et al., 1988
)
and amphiphysin (DeCamilli et al., 1993
) are nerve terminal
vesicle-associated proteins. Our findings are thus concordant with the
strict regulation of onconeural antigen expression but indicate that
their expression may extend to immune-privileged cells outside the
nervous system.
The phenomenon of immune privilege, traditionally described as the
prolonged survival of allogeneic or xenogeneic grafts, has been studied
most extensively in the brain, eye, and testis (Streilein, 1993
).
Immune privilege in the nervous system has both a physical and a
molecular component, defined by the blood-brain barrier and the lack
of detectable MHC class I or II antigens, respectively (Bradbury, 1984
;
Pollack and Lund, 1990
). There are also active mechanisms by which
immune-privileged tissues evade immune surveillance. For example, cells
in the anterior chamber of the eye and the testis express fas ligand as
a means of inducing apoptosis of autoreactive immune cells (Bellgrau et
al., 1995
; for comments, see Griffith et al., 1995
). Although these
studies have examined the immune response to foreign antigens expressed within immune-privileged tissues, they imply that proteins normally restricted in their expression to such sites may be highly immunogenic when ectopically expressed.
In PND, it is believed that sequestration of onconeural antigens from
immune surveillance in the brain results in lack of immune tolerance to
these proteins when they are ectopically expressed in tumor cells. We
have shown that cdr2 is the only cdr gene expressed in ovarian tumors
from PCD patients, and thus appears to be the inciting onconeural
antigen. Ectopic expression of cdr2 is associated with a robust immune
response to the antigen. The presence of a specific high-titer
autoantibody and limited tumor growth in PCD patients provide clinical
evidence for an active anti-tumor immune response (Anderson et al.,
1988b
; Peterson et al., 1992
) and suggest that the cdr2 protein may act
as a bona fide tumor antigen.
It remains uncertain how a systemic immune response to ectopically
expressed cdr2 protein becomes competent to recognize the antigen
within the brain. However, it does appear that the autoimmune response
within the nervous system in PCD is likely to be directed against cdr2.
Pathological examination of PCD brains reveals degeneration of the same
neurons in which cdr2 is expressed, most prominently Purkinje neurons
of the cerebellum (Fig. 3) (Peterson et al., 1992
; Verschuuren et al.,
1996
). Taken together, these observations suggest that autoimmunity to
cdr2 in PCD proceeds in two steps. First, a naive immune system is
naturally competent to recognize cdr2 in PCD tumors. A second
unidentified event, perhaps involving cytokines or a change in the
nature of the cellular immune response, allows the immune privilege of
the brain to be breached, culminating in autoimmune neurological
disease.
Regulation of the cdr2 antigen at a post-transcriptional level
We have clarified the nature of PCD by definitively identifying
cdr2 as the neuronal gene that is ectopically expressed in PCD tumors.
Given the significance of such onconeural genes to tumor biology and
neurobiology (for review, see Darnell, 1996
), this observation focuses
attention on studies of the regulation of cdr2 expression. We have
defined the tissue-specific expression pattern of the cdr2 antigen and
found that it is regulated at a post-transcriptional level. A single
cdr2 transcript is detected in nearly all tissues, whereas the PCD
antigen is expressed specifically in brain and testis. Sequence
analysis of both brain and spleen cdr2 cDNAs reveals that these mRNAs
are identical, indicating that there is a tissue-specific regulatory
mechanism responsible for restricting expression of the cdr2 protein
that operates after mRNA processing.
The discrepancy between the distribution of cdr2 message and protein
suggests several possible underlying mechanisms. Perhaps the most
likely is that translational control regulates the expression of cdr2.
Such a mechanism might relate either to an induction of translation
specifically in brain and testis or a repression of translation in
other tissues. There are several examples of tissue- or cell
type-specific regulation of translation, including the testis
proenkephalin mRNA, S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase and the
transcription factor BTEB (Hill and Morris, 1992
; Rao and Howells,
1993
; Imataka et al., 1994
). Interestingly, the expression of BTEB
closely resembles that of cdr2, in that the mRNA is detected in many
tissues, whereas the protein is found only in brain and testis.
Most cases of translational regulation involve sequence elements in the
5
or 3
-UTRs of the mRNA. These elements may form stable secondary
structures that either directly impede the translation initiation
complex or may act as binding sites for trans-acting regulatory factors
(Melefors and Hentze, 1993
). In addition to complex secondary
structure, many tightly regulated genes contain multiple upstream AUG
codons (uAUGs), often present in long 5
-UTRs, that serve to decrease
translational efficiency (Kozak, 1989
, 1991a
,b; Geballe and Morris,
1994
). Both S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase and BTEB require the
presence of such uAUGs in their 5
-UTRs for inhibition of translation.
The 5
-UTR of human and mouse cdr2 cDNAs have ~80% G + C content in
the 135 bp immediately upstream of the initiating methionine,
predicting stable secondary structure. In addition, there are specific
sequence elements within the cdr2 5
-UTR that are conserved across
species.
Several alternate explanations for the discrepancy between the
expression of cdr2 mRNA and protein may be considered. The cdr2 protein
could be translated constitutively but selectively unstable because of
a tissue-specific degradation mechanism. Although there are examples of
proteins targeted for degradation in response to specific signals,
there is little precedence for such a mechanism regionally restricting
protein expression. Moreover, our observation that the cdr2 protein is
able to be expressed at high levels when transfected into non-neuronal
cells (data not shown) suggests that the stability of the protein is
not likely to be dependent on tissue-specific factors.
It is also possible that our results reflect tissue-specific
differences in post-translational modifications affecting the PCD
epitope, such that the protein is only immunoreactive in brain and
testis. Notably, the cdr2 leucine zipper harbors several potential phosphorylation sites. However, we have found that bacterially expressed cdr2 fusion protein, full-length cdr2 translated in reticulocyte lysate, and cdr2 protein expressed in a transfected fibroblast cell line are all readily detected by PCD antisera (Corradi
and Darnell, unpublished observations). Therefore, it is unlikely that
a neuron-specific post-translational modification, or lack thereof, is
a significant factor in recognition of the cdr2 epitope. A more direct
approach to address this question would be to generate antibodies
against other epitopes of the cdr2 protein to examine expression of the
antigen.
FOOTNOTES
Received Aug. 23, 1996; revised Nov. 11, 1996; accepted Dec. 4, 1996.
This work was supported by Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research
Award DAMD017-94-J-4277 (R.B.D. and J.C.D.). J.P.C. was supported by
National Research Service Award Training Grant GM07982-12, and C.Y. was
supported by the Cancer Research Institute Oliver R. Grace Endowed
Fellowship. We thank J. Okano for assistance with in
situ hybridization and members of the Darnell laboratory and
Jerome Posner for critical reading of this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Robert B. Darnell, Laboratory
of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York
Avenue, New York, NY 10021.
REFERENCES
-
Altermatt HJ,
Rodriguez M,
Scheithauer BW,
Lennon VA
(1991)
Paraneoplastic anti-Purkinje and type I anti-neuronal nuclear autoantibodies bind selectively to central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous system cells.
Lab Invest
65:412-420 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Anderson NE,
Rosenblum MK,
Graus F,
Wiley R,
Posner JB
(1988a)
Autoantibodies in paraneoplastic syndromes associated with small-cell lung cancer.
Neurology
38:1391-1398 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anderson NE,
Rosenblum MK,
Posner JB
(1988b)
Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration: clinical-immunological correlations.
Ann Neurol
24:559-567 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Bellgrau D,
Gold D,
Selawry H,
Moore J,
Franzusoff A,
Duke RC
(1995)
A role for CD95 ligand in preventing graft rejection.
Nature
377:630-632 .
[Medline]
-
Bradbury MWB
(1984)
The structure and function of the blood-brain-barrier.
Fed Proc
43:186-190.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Buckanovich R,
Posner JB,
Darnell RB
(1993)
Nova, the paraneoplastic Ri antigen, is homologous to an RNA-binding protein and is specifically expressed in the developing motor system.
Neuron
11:657-672 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Buckanovich RJ,
Yang YY,
Darnell RB
(1996)
The onconeural antigen Nova-1 is a neuron-specific RNA binding protein, the activity of which is inhibited by paraneoplastic antibodies.
J Neurosci
16:1114-1122 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chomcynski P,
Sacchi N
(1987)
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:156-159.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Cunningham J,
Graus F,
Anderson N,
Posner JB
(1986)
Partial characterization of the Purkinje cell antigens in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
Neurology
36:1163-1168 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dalmau J,
Furneaux HM,
Gralla RJ,
Kris MG,
Posner JB
(1990)
Detection of the anti-Hu antibody in the serum of patients with small cell lung cancer-a quantitative Western blot analysis.
Ann Neurol
27:544-552 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Dalmau J,
Furneaux HM,
Cordon-Cardo C,
Posner JB
(1992)
The expression of the Hu (paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis/sensory neuronopathy) antigen in human normal and tumor tissues.
Am J Pathol
141:881-886 .
[Abstract]
-
Darnell RB
(1996)
Onconeural antigens and the paraneoplastic neurologic disorders: at the intersection of cancer, immunity, and the brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:4529-4536 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Darnell RB,
DeAngelis LM
(1993)
Regression of small-cell lung carcinoma in patients with paraneoplastic neuronal antibodies.
Lancet
341:21-22 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
DeCamilli P,
Thomas A,
Cofiell R,
Folli F,
Lichte B,
Piccolo G,
Meinck HM,
Austoni M,
Fassetta G,
Bottazzo G,
Bates D,
Cartlidge N,
Solimena M,
Kilimann MW
(1993)
The synaptic vesicle-associated protein amphiphysin is the 128 kDa autoantigen of Stiff- Man syndrome with breast cancer.
J Exp Med
178:2219-2223.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dropcho EJ,
Chen YT,
Posner JB,
Old LJ
(1987)
Cloning of a brain protein identified by autoantibodies from a patient with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:4552-4556 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fathallah-Shaykh H,
Wolf S,
Wong E,
Posner JB,
Furneaux HM
(1991)
Cloning of a leucine-zipper protein recognized by the sera of patients with antibody-associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:3451-3454 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Furneaux H,
Rosenblum M,
Dalmau J,
Wong E,
Woodruff P,
Graus F,
Posner J
(1990)
Selective expression of Purkinje-cell antigens in tumor tissue from patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
N Engl J Med
322:1844-1851 .
[Abstract]
-
Geballe AP,
Morris DR
(1994)
Initiation codons within 5
-leaders of mRNAs as regulators of translation.
Trends Biochem Sci
19:159-164 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Griffith TS,
Brunner T,
Fletcher SM,
Green DR,
Ferguson TA
(1995)
Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege.
Science
270:1189-1192 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hill JR,
Morris DR
(1992)
Cell-specific translation of S- adenosylmethionine decarboxylase mRNA. Regulation by the 5
transcript leader.
J Biol Chem
267:21886-21893 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Imataka H,
Nakayama K,
Yasumoto K,
Mizuno A,
Fujii-Kuriyama Y,
Hayami M
(1994)
Cell-specific translational control of transcription factor BTEB expression. The role of an upstream AUG in the 5
-untranslated region.
J Biol Chem
269:20668-20673 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jaeckle KA,
Graus F,
Houghton A,
Cardon-Cardo C,
Nielsen SL,
Posner JB
(1985)
Autoimmune response of patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration to a Purkinje cell cytoplasmic protein antigen.
Ann Neurol
18:592-600 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Kozak M
(1989)
The scanning model for translation: an update.
J Cell Biol
108:229-241 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozak M
(1991a)
An analysis of vertebrate mRNA sequences: intimations of translational control.
J Cell Biol
115:887-903 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozak M
(1991b)
Structural features in eukaryotic mRNAs that modulate the initiation of translation.
J Biol Chem
266:19867-19870 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Luque F,
Furneaux H,
Ferziger R,
Rosenblum M,
Wray S,
Schold S,
Glantz M,
Jaeckle K,
Biran H,
Lesser M,
Paulsen W,
River M,
Posner J
(1991)
Anti-Ri: an antibody associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and breast cancer.
Ann Neurol
29:241-251 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Melefors O,
Hentze MW
(1993)
Translational regulation by mRNA/protein interactions in eukaryotic cells: ferritin and beyond.
BioEssays
15:85-90 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Newman LS,
McKeever MO,
Okano HJ,
Darnell RB
(1995)
-NAP, a cerebellar degeneration antigen, is a neuron-specific vesicle coat protein.
Cell
82:773-783 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
O'Farrell PH
(1975)
High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins.
J Biol Chem
250:4007-4021.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peterson K,
Rosenblum MK,
Kotanides H,
Posner JB
(1992)
Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. I. A clinical analysis of 55 anti-Yo antibody-positive patients.
Neurology
42:1931-1937 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pollack IF,
Lund RD
(1990)
The blood-brain barrier protects foreign antigens in the brain from immune attack.
Exp Neurol
108:114-121 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Posner JB,
Furneaux HM
(1990)
Paraneoplastic syndromes.
In: Immunologic mechanisms in neurologic and psychiatric disease, p 187. New York: Raven.
-
Rao SM,
Howells RD
(1993)
cis-acting elements in the 5
-untranslated region of rat testis proenkephalin mRNA regulate translation of the precursor protein.
J Biol Chem
268:22164-22169 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sakai K,
Mitchell DJ,
Tsukamoto T,
Steinman L
(1991)
Isolation of a complementary DNA clone encoding an autoantigen recognized by an anti-neuronal cell antibody from a patient with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
Ann Neurol
30:738 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Sakai K,
Ogasawara T,
Hirose G,
Jaeckle KA,
Greenlee JE
(1993)
Anal- ysis of autoantibody binding to 52-kd paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration-associated antigen expressed in recombinant proteins.
Ann Neurol
33:373-380 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Sambrook J,
Fritsch EF,
Maniatis T
(1989)
In: Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
-
Sanger F,
Nicklen S,
Coulson AR
(1977)
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
74:7463-7467.
-
Solimena M,
Folli F,
Denis-Donini S,
Comi G,
Pozza G,
DeCamilli P,
Vicari A
(1988)
Autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in a patient with stiff-man syndrome, epilepsy, and type I diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med
318:1012-1020 .
[Abstract]
-
Streilein JW
(1993)
Immune privilege as the result of local tissue barriers and immunosuppressive microenvironments.
Curr Opin Immunol
5:428-432 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Szabo A,
Dalmau J,
Manley G,
Rosenfeld M,
Wong E,
Henson J,
Posner JB,
Furneaux HM
(1991)
HuD, a paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis antigen contains RNA-binding domains and is homologous to Elav and sex lethal.
Cell
67:325-333 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Tomimoto H,
Brengman JM,
Yanagihara T
(1993)
Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration with a circulating antibody against neurons and non-neuronal cells.
Acta Neuropathol (Berlin)
86:206-211 .
[Medline]
-
Tsukamoto T,
Yamamoto H,
Iwasaki Y,
Yoshie O,
Terunuma H,
Suzuki H
(1989)
Antineural autoantibodies in patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
Arch Neurol
46:1225-1229 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Verschuuren J,
Chuang L,
Rosenblum M,
Lieberman F,
Pryor A,
Posner J,
Dalmau J
(1996)
Inflammatory infiltrates and complete absence of Purkinje cells in anti-Yo-associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.
Acta Neuropathol
91:519-525 .
[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Santomasso, W. K. Roberts, A. Thomas, T. Williams, N. E. Blachere, M. E. Dudley, A. N. Houghton, J. B. Posner, and R. B. Darnell
A T cell receptor associated with naturally occurring human tumor immunity
PNAS,
November 27, 2007;
104(48):
19073 - 19078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Darnell and J. B. Posner
Paraneoplastic Syndromes Involving the Nervous System
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 16, 2003;
349(16):
1543 - 1554.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Sahashi, K Sakai, K Mano, and G Hirose
Anti-Ma2 antibody related paraneoplastic limbic/brain stem encephalitis associated with breast cancer expressing Ma1, Ma2, and Ma3 mRNAs
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
September 1, 2003;
74(9):
1332 - 1335.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Darnell, M. L. Albert, and R. B. Darnell
cdr2, a Target Antigen of Naturally Occurring Human Tumor Immunity, Is Widely Expressed in Gynecological Tumors
Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2000;
60(8):
2136 - 2139.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Okano, W.-Y. Park, J. P. Corradi, and R. B. Darnell
The cytoplasmic Purkinje onconeural antigen cdr2 down-regulates c-Myc function: implications for neuronal and tumor cell survival
Genes & Dev.,
August 15, 1999;
13(16):
2087 - 2097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Darnell
The Importance of Defining the Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders
N. Engl. J. Med.,
June 10, 1999;
340(23):
1831 - 1833.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dalmau, S. H. Gultekin, R. Voltz, R. Hoard, T. DesChamps, C. Balmaceda, T. Batchelor, E. Gerstner, J. Eichen, J. Frennier, et al.
Ma1, a novel neuron- and testis-specific protein, is recognized by the serum of patients with paraneoplastic neurological disorders
Brain,
January 1, 1999;
122(1):
27 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Y. L. Yang, G. L. Yin, and R. B. Darnell
The neuronal RNA-binding protein Nova-2 is implicated as the autoantigen targeted in POMA patients with dementia
PNAS,
October 27, 1998;
95(22):
13254 - 13259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Okano and R. B. Darnell
A Hierarchy of Hu RNA Binding Proteins in Developing and Adult Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
May 1, 1997;
17(9):
3024 - 3037.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mummidi, G. Catano, L. Lam, A. Hoefle, V. Telles, K. Begum, F. Jimenez, S. S. Ahuja, and S. K. Ahuja
Extensive Repertoire of Membrane-bound and Soluble Dendritic Cell-specific ICAM-3-grabbing Nonintegrin 1 (DC-SIGN1) and DC-SIGN2 Isoforms. INTER-INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN EXPRESSION OF DC-SIGN TRANSCRIPTS
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 24, 2001;
276(35):
33196 - 33212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|