 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 6,
Issue of March 15, 1997
pp. 2143-2167
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Interconnected Parallel Circuits between Rat Nucleus Accumbens
and Thalamus Revealed by Retrograde Transynaptic Transport of
Pseudorabies Virus
Patricio O'Donnell1,
Antonieta Lavín1,
Lynn W. Enquist2,
Anthony
A. Grace1, and
J. Patrick Card1
1 Departments of Neuroscience and Psychiatry, Center
for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15260, and 2 Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton
University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
One of the primary outputs of the nucleus accumbens is directed to
the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD) via its projections to the
ventral pallidum (VP), with the core and
shell regions of the accumbens projecting to the lateral
and medial aspects of the VP, respectively. In this study, the
multisynaptic organization of nucleus accumbens projections was
assessed using intracerebral injections of an attenuated strain of
pseudorabies virus, a neurotropic herpesvirus that replicates in
synaptically linked neurons. Injection of pseudorabies virus into
different regions of the MD or reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN)
produced retrograde transynaptic infections that revealed multisynaptic
interactions between these areas and the basal forebrain.
Immunohistochemical localization of viral antigen at short
postinoculation intervals confirmed that the medial MD (m-MD)
receives direct projections from the medial VP, rostral RTN, and other
regions previously shown to project to this region of the thalamus. At
longer survival intervals, injections confined to the m-MD resulted in
transynaptic infection of neurons in the accumbens shell but not in the
core. Injections that also included the central segment of the MD
produced retrograde infection of neurons in the lateral VP and the
polymorph (pallidal) region of the olfactory tubercle (OT) and
transynaptic infection of a small number of neurons in the rostral
accumbens core. Injections in the lateral MD resulted in retrograde
infection in the globus pallidus (GP) and in transynaptic infection in
the caudate-putamen. Viral injections into the rostroventral pole of
the RTN infected neurons in the medial and lateral VP and at longer
postinoculation intervals, led to transynaptic infection of scattered
neurons in the shell and core. Injection of virus into the intermediate RTN resulted in infection of medial VP neurons and second-order infection of neurons in the accumbens shell. Injections in the caudal
RTN or the lateral MD resulted in direct retrograde labeling of cells
within the GP and transynaptic infection of neurons in the
caudate-putamen. These results indicate that the main output of VP
neurons receiving inputs from the shell of the accumbens is heavily
directed to the m-MD, whereas a small number of core neurons appear to
influence the central MD via the lateral VP. Further segregation in the
flow of information to the MD is apparent in the organization of VP and
GP projections to subdivisions of the RTN that give rise to MD
afferents. Collectively, these data provide a morphological basis for
the control of the thalamocortical system by ventral striatal regions,
in which parallel connections to the RTN may exert control over
activity states of cortical regions.
Key words:
transneuronal tracing;
reticular thalamic nucleus;
ventral pallidum;
nucleus accumbens;
mediodorsal thalamic nucleus;
prefrontal cortex;
globus pallidus;
pseudorabies virus
INTRODUCTION
The nucleus accumbens, which is the ventral
extension of the striatum, has been implicated in a number of
psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia (Snyder, 1973 ; Matthysse,
1981 ; Csernansky et al., 1991 ; Gray et al., 1991 ; Grace, 1992 ) and
Tourette's syndrome (Comings, 1987 ; Braun et al., 1993 ). This
structure is believed to subsume an integrative role in higher cortical
functions, given its position as an interface between limbic and motor
systems (Mogenson et al., 1980 ). The multisynaptic circuitry linking
the striatum [i.e., the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen (CPu)] and basal forebrain with cortical areas is organized in the form of
several parallel loops (Alexander and Crutcher, 1990 ; Berendse and
Groenewegen, 1990 ; Groenewegen et al., 1990 ). The nucleus accumbens
receives glutamatergic projections from the prefrontal cortex (PFC)
(Beckstead, 1979 ; Fuller et al., 1987 ), hippocampus (DeFrance and
Yoshihara, 1975 ; Kelley and Domesick, 1982 ; DeFrance et al., 1985 ), and
amygdala (Swanson and Cowan, 1975 ; Groenewegen et al., 1980 ; McDonald,
1991 ) that converge on single accumbens neurons (O'Donnell and Grace,
1995b ). In turn, the accumbens sends its primary output to the ventral
pallidum (VP) (Heimer and Wilson, 1975 ; Mogenson et al., 1983 ), which
inhibits thalamocortical activity by way of its projections to the
mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD) (Young et al., 1984 ; Haber et al.,
1985 ; Lavín and Grace, 1994 ).
Two major subdivisions of the nucleus accumbens have been defined
according to distinct anatomical connections (Heimer et al., 1991 ; Brog
et al., 1993 ; Zahm and Heimer, 1993 ). The portion of the nucleus
accumbens surrounding the anterior commissure, known as the
core, has been reported to receive its primary cortical input from the prelimbic (PL) PFC (Sesack et al., 1989 ; Berendse et
al., 1992 ; Brog et al., 1993 ; Montaron et al., 1996 ) and dorsal subiculum (Groenewegen et al., 1991 ; Brog et al., 1993 ) and projects to
the dorsolateral aspect of the VP (Zahm and Heimer, 1990 ; Heimer et
al., 1991 ). On the other hand, the medial-ventral aspect of the
accumbens, called the shell, receives input primarily from the infralimbic (IL) PFC (Berendse et al., 1992 ; Brog et al., 1993 ) and
the ventral subiculum (Kelley and Domesick, 1982 ; Yang and Mogenson,
1984 ; Sesack and Pickel, 1990 ; Aylward and Totterdell, 1993 ; Brog et
al., 1993 ) and sends projections to the ventromedial part of the VP
(Zahm and Heimer, 1990 ; Heimer et al., 1991 ). In addition to
differences in their connectivity, the core and shell regions of the
nucleus accumbens differ in neurochemical markers (Záborszky et
al., 1985 ; Meredith et al., 1989 , 1996 ; Deutch and Cameron, 1992 ;
Jongen-Rêlo et al., 1994a ,b), cell morphology (Meredith et al.,
1992 , 1993 ; O'Donnell and Grace, 1993b ), physiological properties
(Pennartz et al., 1992 ; O'Donnell and Grace, 1993a ,b; Onn and Grace,
1995 ), and responses to pharmacological and behavioral manipulations (Deutch et al., 1992 ; Kalivas and Duffy, 1995 ;
O'Donnell and Grace, 1995a ).
The present study was designed to determine whether the pathways
originating in the core and shell regions of the accumbens remain
segregated within the VP and in the efferent projections of this area
to the thalamocortical system. Although the primary thalamic target of
the VP is the MD (Young et al., 1984 ; Haber et al., 1985 ; Heimer et
al., 1991 ; Groenewegen et al., 1993 ), a projection from the VP to the
reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) has also been reported in the rat
(Cornwall et al., 1990 ; Groenewegen et al., 1993 ). Furthermore,
electrical stimulation of the lateral VP induces occasional
monosynaptic responses in the rat RTN (Lavín and Grace, 1994 ),
suggesting that a subset of VP neurons may project to the RTN.
Nonetheless, the multisynaptic organization of the accumbens-VP-thalamic connectivity has been difficult to establish with
conventional tract tracing or electrophysiological approaches, because
these methods only define one order of synaptic contact. Therefore,
resolution of the organization of connections between the nucleus
accumbens and thalamus requires a tracer that will cross synapses and
label second-order synaptically linked neurons. This was achieved by
using a neurotropic swine herpesvirus (pseudorabies virus, PRV)
that has proven to be an effective tracer of multisynaptic pathways in
a variety of systems (for review, see Card and Enquist, 1994 ; Loewy,
1995 ; Ugolini, 1995 ; Enquist and Card, 1996 ). The experimental approach
used in this study is based on the demonstrated ability of this family
of neurotropic viruses to replicate within synaptically linked
populations of neurons after intracerebral injection (Zemanick et al.,
1991 ; Middleton and Strick, 1994 ). Our data demonstrate a segregation
of multisynaptic projections through the VP that arise in either the
core or shell of the accumbens and terminate in either the MD or
reticular thalamic nuclei.
Parts of these data were presented at the 1995 Society for Neuroscience
meeting (O'Donnell et al., 1995 ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal handling and preparation. Adult male Sprague
Dawley rats (200-420 gm at time of virus injection) were used in these experiments. They were housed in pairs with food and water available ad libitum, and under a 12:12 hr light/dark cycle (light on
at 6:00 A.M.). Animal handling and experimental protocols were in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Animal Care and Use Committee. Injections of PRV were administered to anesthetized animals in a Biosafety Level 2 containment facility in
accordance with regulations stipulated in Health and Human Services
Publication No. 88-8395 entitled "Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories". Animals were inoculated, housed, and killed
in this facility.
Virus. An attenuated strain of PRV (Bartha strain) was used
in this study. The virus, initially developed as a swine vaccine in
1961 (Bartha, 1961 ), exhibits reduced virulence compared with wild-type
strains and replicates efficiently in rodent CNS (Enquist, 1994 ; Card
and Enquist, 1995 ). It has been used extensively for characterizing
multisynaptic circuits associated with the visual system (Card et al.,
1991 , 1992 ; Moore et al., 1995 ) and autonomic nervous system (Strack et
al., 1989 ; Card et al., 1990 , 1993 ; Strack and Loewy, 1990 ; Jansen et
al., 1992 , 1995 ; Nadelhaft et al., 1992 ; Standish et al., 1995 ; Vizzard
et al., 1995 ). More recently, intracerebral injection of this strain of
virus has been shown to produce retrograde transneuronal patterns of
infection (Enquist et al., 1993 ; Leak et al., 1995 ). The virus used in
the present study was grown in PK 15 cells to a titer of 1.4 × 109 plaque forming units (pfu) per milliliter. Procedures
for growing and harvesting the virus have been published elsewhere
(Enquist and Card, 1996 ). Aliquots of virus were stored at 80°C
before use and thawed immediately before injection. Unused portions of each aliquot were inactivated with Chlorox and discarded.
Antibodies. A rabbit polyclonal antiserum (Rb134) generated
against acetone-inactivated virus was used to localize infected neurons. The serum recognizes numerous virion proteins and produces robust immunohistochemical staining of the somata and dendrites of
PRV-infected neurons (Card and Enquist, 1994 ). Rb134 was used at a
dilution of 1:10,000. In some cases, PRV was co-injected with the fragment of cholera toxin (CT), a conventional tracer that identifies
one order of synaptic contact. A goat polyclonal antiserum (List
Biochemicals, Campbell, CA) was used at a 1:20,000 dilution to localize
CT in tissue from these animals.
Calbindin immunolocalization provided a precise definition of the
boundaries of the core and shell regions of the nucleus accumbens. This
calcium-binding protein is densely concentrated in the accumbens core
and absent in the shell (Zahm and Heimer, 1993 ), and it has been shown
to be the most accurate marker for core-shell boundaries
(Jongen-Rêlo et al., 1994b ). Calbindin was localized using a
rabbit polyclonal antiserum at a final dilution of 1:20,000. The extent
of the electrolytic lesion in two animals lesioned in the VP and globus
pallidus (GP) (see following section) was assessed by means of
immunohistochemical localization of glial fibrillar acidic protein, an
intermediate filament protein found within astrocytes, with a mouse
monoclonal antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) used at a dilution of
1:10,000.
Injection procedures. Animals were anesthetized with
ketamine and xylazine (60 mg/kg ketamine, 7 mg/kg xylazine, i.p.)
before being placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf, Tujunga, CA).
Virus was injected through a 1 µl Hamilton syringe lowered into
target areas through a hole drilled in the skull. The stereotaxic
coordinates used, obtained from a rat brain stereotaxic atlas (Paxinos
and Watson, 1986 ), were as follows. For the medial segment of the MD
(m-MD; 10 rats) coordinates were anteroposterior (AP): 3.2, mediolateral (ML): 0.5, dorsoventral (DV): 5.9; for the central segment of the MD (c-MD; 5 rats), AP: 3.2, ML: 0.7, DV: 5.8; and
for the lateral segment of the MD (l-MD; 6 rats), AP: 3.3, ML: 1.0, DV: 5.7. Injections in the RTN were grouped in the following three
rostrocaudal locations. The rostral pole of the RTN (AP: 1.3 to
1.5, ML: 1.6, DV: 6.3; 2 rats); the intermediate RTN (AP: 1.5 to
2.0, ML: 2.0, DV: 6; 2 rats); and the caudal RTN (AP: 2.0 to
3.3, ML: 3.8, DV: 5.6; 4 rats). A total of 100-200 nl of the
PRV-Bartha (1-2 × 105 pfu) was injected at a rate of
10 nl/min, and the syringe was left in place for an additional 5 min to
reduce reflux of the viral inoculum up the cannula tract. A subset of
animals were injected with a mixture of PRV and the subunit of CT.
The CT was diluted to 0.25% with isotonic saline, whereupon 10 µl
was mixed with 10 µl of PRV and 200 nl (2 × 105
pfu) of the mixture was injected intracerebrally at 10 nl/min. The
concentration of virus injected in all experiments produces an
infection in 100% of animals after intravitreal inoculation (Card et
al., 1995 ).
Two animals received an electrolytic lesion in the VP or the GP before
receiving the PRV injection into the MD. The lesions were performed
under deep anesthesia using a coated insect pin and a current generator
(Grass, Quincy, MA). Monopolar current (4 mA for 20 sec) was passed
though the electrode, placed in the rostral VP region (AP: 0.2, ML:
0.8, DV: 8.3). After recovery, the animals were returned to their
home cage. One week later, PRV was injected into the m-MD, and the
animals were killed for immunohistochemical detection of viral
infection in the neuraxis at 60 and 62 hr postinoculation.
Tissue processing. After postinoculation periods ranging
from 36 to 72 hr, the animals were deeply anesthetized with an overdose of ketamine and xylazine and perfused transcardially with a buffered aldehyde fixative (McLean and Nakane, 1974 ). The brains were removed, post-fixed for 1 hr at 4°C, and cryoprotected in 20% sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for a minimum of 12 hr before they were cut using a freezing microtome. The entire brain was sectioned serially
in the coronal plane at 35 µm per section and collected sequentially
in six bins of buffer. One bin of tissue was processed immediately for
immunohistochemical localization of viral antigen using the
avidin-biotin modification of the immunoperoxidase procedures (Hsu et
al., 1981 ) and Vectastain Elite reagents (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame. CA). The details of this procedure, as it is applied in our
laboratory, have been published (Card and Enquist, 1994 ). The remaining
bins of tissue were transferred to a cryopreservant (Watson et al.,
1986 ) and stored at 20°C to preserve antigenicity. Some of this
tissue was subsequently processed with Rb134 to provide more frequent
series of sections for analysis of viral transport. Other bins of
tissue were processed for localization of CT immunoreactivity to
define first-order connections or for immunohistochemical
localization of calbindin to define core-shell boundaries.
RESULTS
PRV was injected intracerebrally in 52 rats. Twenty-nine of these
animals contained injection sites that included one or more of the
subdivisions of the MD or the RTN. Twelve animals contained injections
that missed the MD or RTN. These cases were used as controls for the
specificity of the results obtained from injection of virus into either
the MD or the RTN. In two cases, electrolytic lesions of the VP or GP
preceded injection of virus into the m-MD. Eleven cases were discarded
because of poor placement of the injection (n = 7) or
failure to detect viral immunoreactivity at short postinoculation intervals (n = 4; 36-44 hr survival). Temporal
analysis of the extent of viral replication and transport indicated
that postinoculation survival intervals of 36-50 hr were the most
effective time span for characterizing the multisynaptic connections
between the MD, RTN, and nucleus accumbens. At longer survival
intervals, the more extensive transynaptic passage of virus made it
more difficult to ascertain the routes of viral transport.
Diffusion of PRV from the injection site
Controlled injection of PRV resulted in very little diffusion of
virus from the site of injection, as demonstrated by the restricted
distribution of infected cells at injection sites, even at the longest
postinoculation intervals (Fig.
1A,C,E;
see also Figs. 3A, 5A, 6A,
7A). Analysis of viral immunoreactivity at the injection
sites in closely spaced sections revealed that infected neurons were
confined to the immediate vicinity of the injection cannula. The
effective area of viral injection, as defined by the distribution of
neurons displaying viral immunoreactivity, ranged between 100 and 500 µm in diameter surrounding the tip of the cannula. Injection of
equivalent volumes of PRV produced smaller injection sites in the m-MD
compared with the l-MD (compare Figs. 3A and 5A),
and the injections in any region of the RTN produced the largest
injection sites (see Figs. 6A, 7A).
Co-injection of the subunit of CT with the viral inoculum resulted
in more extensive diffusion of CT from the injection site. An example of the differing extents of diffusion of CT and PRV from the same injection is shown in Figure 1. In this case, which is representative of all of those incorporating the co-injection paradigm
(n = 10), PRV immunoreactive neurons were confined to a
single segment of the MD (Fig.
1A,C,E), whereas CT
immunoreactivity extended into other subdivisions of the MD as well as
into adjacent thalamic nuclei (Fig.
1B,D,F).
Fig. 1.
The diffusion of CT and PRV from a common site of
injection is illustrated in this figure. The two tracers were mixed in
equal parts, and 200 nl was injected into the mediodorsal nucleus (MDN) at 10 nl/min. A-F illustrate
localization of PRV (A, C,
E) or CT (B, D,
F) in adjacent sections through rostral
(A, B), intermediate (C,
D), and caudal (E,
F) levels of the MDN. PRV immunoreactivity is
largely confined to the medial region of the MDN in the rostral half of
the nucleus, whereas CT exhibits a larger sphere of diffusion throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the MDN. Scale bar (shown in
F): 200 µm; all figures are of the same
magnification.
[View Larger Version of this Image (153K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Injection of PRV into the medial segment of the MD
nucleus revealed a disynaptic connection with the basal forebrain.
A and B demonstrate the restricted
injection site resulting from injection of 100 nl of virus at 10 nl per
minute. Neurons displaying PRV immunoreactivity are confined to the
medial segment of the nucleus with no apparent spread to the central
segment or adjacent thalamic nuclei. At short postinoculation
intervals, infected neurons were present in the medial/rostral aspect
of the VP (C, open block arrow,
inset) but were not found in either division of the
nucleus accumbens. The inset in C
illustrates the region that is shown at higher magnification in
D, in which calbindin immunoreactivity defines the
limits of the core (NAco) and shell
(NAsh) regions of the nucleus accumbens. With more
advanced infection, more infected neurons were apparent in the medial
VP, and they exhibited neuropathological changes characteristic of
advanced viral replication (E, F).
In addition, the virus passed transynaptically to infect neurons in the
shell, but not in the core, of the nucleus accumbens (E, G). See text for additional details of the experiments
and controls that established the route of viral transport through this
circuitry. The area marked by the open and closed
block arrows in E are shown at higher
magnification in F and G, respectively.
Scale bars: A, C, E, 200 µm; B, D, 100 µm; F,
G, inset in C, 50 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (136K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Injections of PRV that involved the c-MD and l-MD
(A) produced a pattern of infection that differed from
that produced by injection of virus into the m-MD. Infected first-order
neurons were present in the intermediate and caudal RTN
(B), the GP, (C), and the lateral VP
(E, F). At longer postinoculation
intervals, we did not observe transynaptic infection of neurons in the
shell of the nucleus accumbens (D), but did observe
occasional neurons in the core at rostral levels (G).
The cells marked by the open block arrow in
E are shown at higher magnification in F.
The prominent viral immunoreactivity in the somatodendritic
compartments of neurons in the GP and VP (C,
E) and pathological changes in some of the infected
cells (F, arrow) indicate that these
cells are in an advanced stage of infection. Hb,
Habenula; GP, globus pallidus; St,
striatum; AC, anterior commissure. Scale bars:
A-D (shown in C), 200 µm; E, 100 µm; F, G
(shown in G), 20 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (125K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
Injection of PRV into the rostral and ventral
portion of the RTN (A) labeled elements of the MD and
basal forebrain circuitry revealed by injection of virus into the l-MD
(compare with Fig. 5). The center of the injection site is marked by
the asterisk in A. Retrogradely infected
first-order neurons were observed in the lateral portion of the VP
(B) as well as in the c-MD and l-MD (C).
The morphology of the neurons marked by the large and small open block arrows in C are shown at
higher magnification in D and E,
respectively. Transynaptic infection of small numbers of neurons was
apparent in the medial VP and nucleus accumbens shell
(F) as well as in the rostral portion of the core
(G). Scale bars: A, C,
F, 200 µm; B, 100 µm;
D, E, 20 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (112K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
Injection of virus into the caudal RTN produced a
pattern of infection distinct from that produced by injection of the
rostral RTN. The site of injection is illustrated in A
and B, with the asterisks marking the
position of the tip of the injection cannula. Scattered infected
first-order neurons were present in the l-MD (C); the
neuron marked by the open block arrow in
C is shown at higher magnification in the
inset. Larger numbers of first-order neurons were
present in the GP (D, E). At longer
survival times, striatal medium spiny neurons were heavily infected
(G, bottom of field), and we also noted
viral immunoreactivity in large spiny interneurons of the striatum that
exhibited a morphology similar to that of cholinergic interneurons
(F, open block arrow). The appearance of
viral immunoreactivity in these cells at long survival intervals is
consistent with them becoming infected by retrograde transynaptic
passage of virus from the medium spiny neurons. No infected neurons
were observed in either the core or the shell of the nucleus accumbens
in these animals. Scale bars: A-C, 200 µm; D, 50 µm; E, F,
inset in C, 20 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (128K GIF file)]
Temporal analysis and specificity of transynaptic passage
of PRV
Intracerebral injection of PRV produced patterns of neuronal
infection consistent with retrograde transneuronal passage of virus
from the site of injection, as shown by temporal analysis of viral
replication and transport and the co-extensive distribution of PRV- and
CT-labeled neurons at sites of first-order projection. We analyzed the
distribution of viral infection at various postinoculation intervals as
an initial means of determining first- and second-order infections and
used the co-injection of a classical tracer (the fragment of CT) to
define further the pattern of first-order infection at longer
postinoculation intervals. The absence of anterograde viral transport
from the site of injection was established by comparing the patterns of
infection with the known connectivity of these regions, as shown in
previous investigations using conventional tracers. Using this
approach, we were unable to demonstrate any evidence of anterograde
transport of virus, either from the site of injection or through a
multisynaptic circuit. A good example of this can be found in the
patterns of infection resulting from injections in the MD, which failed
to produce an anterograde transneuronal infection of layers II or III
of PFC regions but did produce a retrograde infection of projection
neurons in deeper cortical layers (Fig. 2). Furthermore,
injections of virus that involved the m-MD resulted in infection of
neurons located in the rostral pole of the RTN, which is known to
project to the m-MD. Injections into the same region of the RTN failed
to induce infection of neurons in the m-MD, which should be expected if
the virus were anterogradely transported.
Fig. 2.
Examination of the cingulate cortex after
injection of PRV into the lateral subdivision of the MDN demonstrates
that this strain of virus is only transported retrogradely from the
site of intracerebral injection. In A, the most
prominent viral immunoreactivity is present in neurons found in deep
layers of the cortex. Densely staining somata and dendrites of these
neurons reveal the clear morphological features of pyramidal neurons
and also demonstrates that these neurons are in an advanced stage of
infection. In contrast, only scattered neurons in an early stage of
infection are apparent in superficial layers. In many of these cells,
viral immunoreactivity is confined to the cell nuclei
(B, small arrows), and when it is
apparent in the cytoplasm (open block arrow), the
staining reveals that the cells are small interneurons rather than
projection neurons. These data indicate that retrograde transport of
virus from the MDN produced the first-order infection of pyramidal
neurons in deeper layers of cingulate cortex and that transynaptic
passage of virus from these cells produced the temporally delayed
infection of interneurons in superficial layers. Scale bars:
A, 100 µm; B, 50 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (132K GIF file)]
The temporal aspects of viral replication allowed us to distinguish
first- and second-order infection in neurons. Continued replication of
virus in neurons that projected directly to the injection sites
(first-order neurons) eventually produced pathological changes in the
neurons and, at the longest postinoculation intervals, such neurons
were associated with immunoreactive glia (Fig.
3E,F). In
contrast, neurons in synaptic contact with the initially infected neurons (second-order neurons) exhibited fewer pathological changes (Fig. 3E,G), because the virus had
undergone replication in these neurons for a shorter period of time.
Thus, temporal order can be inferred by the degree of pathological
changes in the infected neurons and the association of infected glia.
The significance of the glial response in maintaining specific
transynaptic passage of PRV has been published (Card et al., 1993 ;
Rinaman et al., 1993 ) and is considered in greater detail in
Discussion.
Transport of virus from the MD
m-MD (n = 8)
PRV was confined to the m-MD in two animals that survived 49 hr.
The injection site in one case (94-H38; Fig.
3A,B) covered the m-MD throughout
most of its rostrocaudal extent, whereas in the other animal (94-H39),
the injection site was limited to the caudal third of the m-MD.
Although the survival times were similar in both animals, the extent of
infection was less in the case in which the injection was restricted to
the caudal m-MD. Large numbers of infected neurons were observed in the
VP in both animals, particularly in the ventral and medial aspects of
its rostral extent, at the region bordering the nucleus of the diagonal
band of Broca (NDBB) (Fig.
3E,F). Infected neurons were
also found in the rostral and intermediate regions of the RTN, but not
in its caudal region. All these cells showed signs of advanced viral infection and were associated with infected glia, suggesting that they
gave rise to a first-order, direct projection to the m-MD. Labeling in
the striatal regions involved only the accumbens shell, predominantly
in its caudal aspect (Fig. 3E,G),
as defined by the distribution of calbindin immunoreactivity (Fig.
3D). A clear temporal organization was observed in the
infection of these neurons compared with neurons in the medial VP.
Infection of medial VP neurons always preceded infection of shell
neurons (compare Fig. 3, C and E). Similarly,
when both populations were infected, neurons in the medial VP always
showed signs of more advanced viral replication (Fig.
3E-G). No infected neurons were present in the CPu and
accumbens core of these cases.
Injection in the m-MD also revealed a first-order infection of the RTN.
In cases in which the injection site was confined to the m-MD, we
observed a large number of infected neurons in the rostral and
intermediate RTN and no infected neurons at caudal levels of the RTN
(compare Fig. 4, A and B).
Furthermore, infected neurons in rostral and intermediate regions of
the RTN were confined to the ventral third of the nucleus (Fig.
4B).
Fig. 4.
Injection of the m-MD also revealed a
topographically organized afferent input from neurons in the RTN. After
restricted injections of this subdivision, infected neurons were
present in the ventromedial portion of the rostral RTN
(B), but were not present in the caudal RTN
(A, arrowheads). Scale bars:
A, 200 mm; B, 100 mm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (53K GIF file)]
Several injections that included the m-MD also extended into
neighboring regions. Two animals received PRV injections that involved
the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) (94-H40 and 94-H41).
These animals were killed at 39 and 51 hr after injection and, as in
the MD injected cases, they contained first-order infected neurons in
the medial VP and rostral RTN and second-order neurons in the shell
region of the accumbens. Two additional animals with an injection site
that involved the m-MD, PVT, and habenula (cases 94-H22 and 95-H6)
exhibited a similar pattern of infection, as seen in other animals in
which the injection involved the m-MD along with either the lateral
habenula (94-H13) or the anteromedial thalamic nucleus (95-H148). All
these cases also exhibited infected neurons consistent with projections
to these other thalamic nuclei. For example, cases involving the PVT
contained large numbers of infected neurons in the hypothalamic
suprachiasmatic nuclei, consistently with the recently demonstrated
projection between these nuclei (Moga et al., 1995 ). In contrast, cases
in which the injection was confined to the m-MD did not exhibit
infected neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.
C-MD (n = 5)
Five animals received viral injections in regions that included
the c-MD and were killed 39 to 52 hr after the viral injection. However, none of the injection sites were actually restricted to this
relatively small subdivision. The injection sites covered most of the
c-MD and part of l-MD in two animals (95-H149 and 96-H6) (Fig.
5A) and most of c-MD and part of m-MD in the
other three cases (95-H7, 94-H21, and 96-H5). All of these animals
showed advanced infection of a large number of neurons in the polymorph region of the OT (Fig. 5D) as well as in the lateral,
subcommissural region of the caudal VP (Fig.
5E,F). In cases including
the l-MD in the injection site (Fig. 5A), first-order
projection cells were also detected in the GP (Fig. 5C), and
in cases in which the injection also involved the m-MD, cells with
advanced infection were detected in the medial, rostral VP. Infection
in striatal regions varied according to the extent of the injection
site in these cases. We never observed infection of accumbens shell
neurons when the injection was restricted to the c-MD and l-MD (Fig.
5D). When injections involved the c-MD along with either the
lateral or medial segments, we observed a limited number of infected
core neurons that were found almost exclusively at rostral levels in the core (Fig. 5G). In contrast, when the viral injection
was confined to the l-MD, we never observed infected neurons in either of the accumbens regions (see below). A few scattered infected cells at
an early stage of infection at the septal border of the shell region of
the accumbens, as well as some infected cells in the core region of the
accumbens, were found in the cases in which the injection included the
m-MD and the c-MD. A few infected cells in the core and the CPu were
observed in the cases in which injections covered both the c-MD and
l-MD.
Cells in the RTN were also infected after injections that included the
c-MD (Fig. 5B). The distribution of infected RTN neurons was
different depending on the involvement of the m-MD or l-MD in the
injection site. The animals in which PRV was injected in the m-MD and
c-MD showed infected neurons in the rostral pole of the RTN, similar to
those with an injection selectively placed within the m-MD. On the
other hand, injections in the l-MD and c-MD resulted in infection of
neurons in more caudal parts of the RTN (Fig. 5B), similar
to that observed after injections restricted to the l-MD (see below).
Thus, these patterns appear to be the result of transynaptic passage
after m-MD and l-MD PRV rather than after c-MD PRV.
L-MD (n = 5)
Five animals received injections within the l-MD that largely
excluded the c-MD. Four animals were examined after survival periods of
44 to 50 hr. In one of these cases (94-H18), the injection site
encompassed the caudal half of the l-MD, whereas the other two animals
(94-H12 and 95-H150) received the PRV injection in the l-MD and the
lateral habenula. Infected neurons at an advanced stage were detected
in the GP, but no infected cells were seen in the VP. In addition,
neurons at an early stage of infection were detected in the CPu but not
in the accumbens. In these cases, cells in advanced stages of infection
were also seen in the caudal aspects of the RTN.
Two animals were killed after relatively long survival periods (~68
hr) that yielded a widespread infection that was extensive across most
of the structures studied. The injection site in one of these animals
(94-H7) was centered in the caudal third of the l-MD and extended into
the lateral habenula in the other (94-H9). Both animals exhibited
infected neurons in the VP at different stages of infection. Several
neurons showing signs of advanced infection could be observed in the GP
as well. Few scattered infected cells could be observed in both the
core and the shell regions of the nucleus accumbens in one case
(94-H7), and only in the shell in the other (94-H9). The sparse number
of infected neurons in the nucleus accumbens contrasted to the heavy
labeling throughout most other structures in these cases.
Control experiments (n = 8)
In two cases, PRV injections were made into the m-MD in rats that
had received an electrolytic lesion of the medial VP or the GP. The
injection sites in these cases were restricted to the m-MD. These
animals were killed after long incubation periods of 60 and 62 hr. In
one case with a GP lesion that spared most of the VP (95-H63), neurons
at an advanced stage of infection were observed in the medial VP, and
neurons earlier in the course of infection were detected in the
accumbens shell. In the case with an extensive lesion of the VP
(95-H64), PRV injection in the m-MD failed to label neurons in the
shell.
Three animals received viral injections in regions adjacent to, but
avoiding entirely, the m-MD. In one of the cases, the injection
included the medial habenula and the overlying dentate gyrus of the
hippocampus (94-H17), and no infected neurons could be detected in
striatal or pallidal regions. In another animal (95-H11), PRV was
injected in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, and no viral
immunoreactivity was observed in any basal ganglia or thalamic region.
A third case received the PRV injection into the lateral septum with
spread of virions into the lateral ventricle (95-H78), but no viral
infection could be detected in the basal ganglia.
Two additional animals received PRV injections in structures close to,
but not in, the l-MD. In one case (95-H8), PRV was injected into the
ventricle. No labeling was found in the basal ganglia in this animal.
In another animal (94-H47), PRV was injected in the laterodorsal
thalamic nucleus, which is located laterally to the MD. In this case,
infected neurons were observed in the septum and NDBB but not in the
basal ganglia.
The injection site in another animal encompassed all three segments of
the MD (case 95-H9), and the pattern of viral infection was similar to
that of the cases of injection in each segment combined. Thus, heavily
infected neurons were observed in the medial and lateral VP as well as
in the GP, and second-order neurons were detected in the shell and core
regions of the accumbens as well as in the CPu.
Transport of virus from the RTN
The injection sites that included the RTN were distributed along
most of the rostrocaudal axis of this thalamic nucleus. To analyze the
results without losing any potential topographic information, the cases
were sorted according to the location of the center of injection along
the rostrocaudal axis.
Rostral RTN (n = 2)
Two animals received PRV injections in the rostral pole of the RTN
and were killed 48 and 50 hr after the injection. The injection site
included the ventral aspect of the rostral RTN in one case (94-H45;
Fig. 6A), in the same region of the
RTN that showed infection after m-MD injections. In this case, neurons
at a comparatively advanced stage of infection were observed in the
medial/rostral VP (Fig. 6F) as well as in the lateral
and caudal aspects of the VP (Fig. 6B). Also,
scattered neurons very early in their infection were observed in both
the accumbens core and shell (Fig.
6F,G). The other animal (case
95-H143) received the PRV injection into the ventral and dorsal aspects
of the RTN rostral pole. In this case, first-order projection neurons
were observed in the lateral and caudal VP as well as in the GP.
Neurons at an early stage of infection were detected in the accumbens
core and CPu. No infected cells were found in the accumbens shell in
any of these cases. In the animal injected in the ventral aspect of the
rostral RTN, neurons advanced in infection were detected in the c-MD
but not in the m-MD. In the other, more extensively injected, case,
heavily infected neurons were detected in the c-MD and l-MD (Fig.
6C-E).
Intermediate RTN (n = 2)
Two cases were injected in the intermediate region of the RTN. In
one of them (95-H145), neurons advanced in infection were observed in
the medial and rostral VP and in the m-MD. The distribution of
first-order projection neurons was matched by CT immunoreactivity in
this animal (see Fig. 10). Neurons at an early stage of infection were
detected in the accumbens shell. In the other case (95-H75), which
received the PRV injection at a more dorsal location within the
intermediate RTN, no viral infection could be found in any pallidal or
striatal region.
Fig. 10.
Structures infected after a viral injection
restricted to the l-MD. The injection site of this representative case
is shown as a hatched area; solid circles
represent the distribution of first-order projection neurons;
open circles show the location of second-order
projection neurons.
[View Larger Version of this Image (55K GIF file)]
Caudal RTN (n = 4)
Four animals received the PRV injection at caudal locations within
the RTN. Two of these animals received the injections at 2.0-2.5 mm
caudal to bregma. In one of them (case 94-H46), the injection site was
tightly confined to the RTN (Fig.
7A,B), and no detectable infection was observed in the accumbens
or VP. The other case with a similar injection site (95-H12) extending
medially into the VPL thalamic nucleus did not result in viral
infection in the accumbens or VP. However, both cases exhibited a large number of neurons advanced in infection within the GP (Fig.
7D,E) and some infected neurons in
the l-MD (Fig. 7C). Cells in early stages of infection were
detected in the CPu (Fig. 7F). In two other animals,
the injection site was placed at even more caudal locations within the
RTN; i.e., 3.0 or 3.3 mm caudal to bregma. In these cases (95-H76 and
95-H146), no infected cells were labeled in any region within the basal
ganglia.
Control injections for the RTN (n = 7)
A group of animals received PRV injection in the vicinity of the
RTN rostral pole but without including the RTN. Three cases involved
the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) rostral to the RTN
(cases 94-H44, 94-H49, and 94-H51). In these cases, neurons at an
advanced stage of infection were detected in the medial and rostral VP,
and neurons with early infections were seen in the accumbens shell, but
not in the core, which is a different pattern from that of rostral RTN
injections. In two additional animals (cases 94-H48 and 95-H14), the
injection sites were restricted to the internal capsule with a little
involvement of the GP in one, just lateral to where the rostral RTN
injections were placed. Although widespread infection was seen
throughout most of the neocortex in those cases in which tissue damage
was present at the injection sites, no infected neurons were detected
in the accumbens or VP. In the case in which the GP was included in the injection site, however, heavily infected cells were detected in the
CPu.
Two animals received PRV injection in regions adjacent to the caudal
RTN. One of them received the viral injection in the lateral geniculate
nucleus and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (case 95-H13). In this
animal, neurons advanced in infection were observed in the dorsomedial
hypothalamus but not in the basal ganglia. Another animal (case 95-H77)
received the injection in the internal capsule, in a site located
laterally to that of the caudal RTN injection cases. In this animal, no
evidence of infected neurons was observed in the basal ganglia,
although extensive labeling was detected in most cortical regions.
Other circuits labeled after MD and RTN injections
The cortical regions retrogradely infected after PRV injections in
the MD also differ according to the segment injected. Thus, injections
in the m-MD resulted in viral infection in the infralimbic, medial
orbital, and agranular insular cortices. In the cases in which the
injection sites included the c-MD, neurons advanced in infection were
detected in orbital and PL cortices. In addition, selective injections
in the l-MD resulted in first-order infected neurons in the piriform
and cingulate cortices. Injections in the rostral RTN resulted in
infected neurons in cingulate and PL cortices, whereas injections in
the caudal RTN labeled the cingulate cortex.
In addition to structures in the basal ganglia, basal forebrain, and
cortex, a number of other brain regions exhibited viral immunoreactivity after PRV injections in the different divisions of the
MD or RTN. These were different for each of the regions studied, and
they were consistent with previously reported data using conventional
tract tracing techniques. The brain regions in which we observed
neurons with advanced infection (first order) and neurons with early
stages of infection (second order) are listed in Tables
1 and 2. Briefly, injections in the m-MD
resulted in viral infection in NDBB, VTA, and laterodorsal tegmental
nucleus (LDTg) (Fig. 8). In the cases in which the
injections sites extended into the PVT, cells at an advanced stage of
infection were also found in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and
dorsomedial hypothalamus. In the cases in which the injection sites
included the c-MD, neurons advanced in infection were detected in the
lateral septum, OT, NDBB, and LDTg (Fig. 9). In the
cases injected in the l-MD, infected neurons were seen in lateral
septum, NDBB, raphe magnus, substantia nigra pars reticulata, and LDTg
(Fig. 10).
Table 1.
Brain regions showing labeling after PRV injections in
different regions of the MD thalamic
nucleus
|
m-MD |
c- + m-MD |
l- + c-MD |
l-MD |
|
| Forebrain |
| Isocortex |
| Agranular
insular cortex |
1 |
| Cingulate
cortex |
|
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Entorhinal
cortex |
|
|
|
1 |
| Infralimbic prefrontal
cortex |
1 |
1* |
| Orbital
cortex |
1 |
1* |
* |
| Prelimbic prefrontal
cortex |
|
1* |
1* |
| Claustrum |
|
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Olfactory
cortex |
| Anterior olfactory
nucleus |
|
2 |
1* |
| Olfactory tubercle (polymorph
region) |
|
1* |
1* |
| Islands of
Calleja |
|
2 |
2 |
| Piriform
cortex |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
| Hippocampal
formation |
| Subiculum,
ventral |
1 |
| CA1/CA2 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
| Amygdala |
| Medial
nucleus |
|
|
* |
2 |
| Cortical
nucleus |
2 |
|
|
1 |
| Basolateral
nucleus |
|
|
2 |
2 |
| Septal
region |
| Lateral septal
nucleus |
1 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Medial septal
nucleus |
1 |
1* |
1* |
| Nucleus of the diagonal
band of Broca |
1 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Bed nucleus of
the stria terminalis |
2 |
1* |
2 |
2 |
| Basal
ganglia |
| Caudate-putamen |
|
|
2 |
2 |
| Accumbens
core |
|
2 |
2 |
| Accumbens
shell |
2 |
2 |
| Ventral pallidum
(rostral/medial) |
1 |
1* |
1* |
| Ventral pallidum
(caudal/lateral) |
|
1* |
1* |
| Globus
pallidus |
|
|
1* |
1 |
| Entopeduncular |
|
|
2 |
1 |
| Fundus
striatum |
|
|
1* |
| Thalamus |
| AV
nucleus |
|
|
2 |
| Intergeniculate
leaf |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Centromedian-parafascicular |
|
2 |
2 |
| Habenula,
medial |
|
|
2 |
2 |
| Reticular thalamic nucleus,
rostral |
1 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Reticular thalamic
nucleus, intermediate |
|
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Reticular
thalamic nucleus, caudal |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Zona
incerta |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
| Subthalamic
nucleus |
|
|
|
2 |
| Hypothalamus |
| Preoptic
area |
1 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Suprachiasmatic
nucleus |
|
|
2 |
| Dorsomedial
hypothalamus |
2 |
|
|
2 |
| Ventromedial
hypothalamus |
1 |
1* |
1* |
| Lateral
hypothalamus |
2 |
1* |
1* |
2 |
| Arcuate
nucleus |
2 |
2 |
| Brainstem |
| Superior
colliculus |
|
|
|
1 |
| Pretectal
area |
|
2 |
2 |
| Spinal trigeminal
nucleus |
|
|
|
2 |
| Nucleus of the solitary
tract |
1 |
| Parabrachial |
2 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Area
postrema |
2 |
| Laterodorsal tegmental
nucleus |
1 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Substantia nigra, pars
compacta (A9) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Substantia nigra,
pars reticulata |
|
|
|
1 |
| Retrorubral
formation (A8) |
|
|
2 |
2 |
| Ventral tegmental
area (A10) |
1 |
1* |
1* |
2 |
| Raphe
magnus |
|
|
1* |
1 |
| Dorsal
raphe |
1 |
1* |
|
2 |
| Locus
coeruleus |
2 |
|
|
1 |
| Periacqueductal
gray |
2 |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| (A5) |
|
|
|
2 |
| Nucleus
Darkschewitz |
|
|
|
2 |
| Vestibular nucleus,
lateral |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1, Cells labeled by direct retrograde transport; 2, second-order
retrograde labeling, after transynaptic passage;
*
presence of neurons
with CT immunoreactivity.
|
|
Table 2.
Brain regions showing labeling after PRV injections in
different RTN regions
|
Rostral RTN |
Intermediate RTN |
Caudal
RTN |
|
| Forebrain |
| Isocortex |
| Agranular
insular cortex |
|
|
2 |
| Cingulate
cortex |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Entorhinal
cortex |
|
|
1 |
| Infralimbic prefrontal
cortex |
|
1* |
| Orbital prefrontal
cortex |
* |
* |
| Perirhinal
cortex |
* |
2 |
| Prelimbic prefrontal
cortex |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Claustrum |
* |
1* |
1 |
| Olfactory
cortex |
| Olfactory
tubercle |
|
1* |
2 |
| Piriform
cortex |
2 |
| Endopiriform
nucleus |
1* |
1* |
| Hippocampal
formation |
| Subiculum,
dorsal |
* |
* |
| Amygdala |
| Medial
nucleus |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Basolateral
nucleus |
|
1* |
2 |
| Cortical
nucleus |
2 |
| Septal region |
| Lateral
septal nucleus |
2 |
1* |
| Medial septal
nucleus |
2 |
| Nucleus of the diagnoal band of
Broca |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Bed nucleus of the stria
terminalis |
2 |
2 |
1 |
| Basal
ganglia |
| Caudate-putamen |
2 |
|
2 |
| Accumbens
core |
2 |
|
2 |
| Accumbens
shell |
|
2 |
| Ventral pallidus
(rostral/medial) |
1* |
| Ventral pallidus
(caudal/lateral) |
1* |
|
1 |
| Globus
pallidus |
1* |
2 |
1 |
| Entopeduncular |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Substantia
innominata |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Thalamus |
| AD
nucleus |
|
|
1 |
| Mediodorsal, medial
segment |
1* |
1* |
| Mediodorsal, central
segment |
1* |
| VA-VL |
|
|
1 |
| VPL-VPM |
|
|
1 |
| Intergeniculate
leaf |
1* |
| Centromedian-parafascicular |
1* |
| Zona
incerta |
1* |
1* |
| Subthalamic
nucleus |
2 |
|
2 |
| Hypothalamus |
| Preoptic
area |
2 |
1* |
| Dorsomedial
hypothalamus |
2 |
|
2 |
| Ventromedial
hypothalamus |
|
|
1 |
| Lateral
hypothalamus |
2 |
1* |
| Brainstem |
| Parabrachial |
1* |
|
1 |
| Laterodorsal
tegmental
nucleus |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Pedunculopontine |
1* |
1* |
1 |
| Substantia
nigra, pars compacta (A9) |
|
|
1 |
| Retrorubral
field (A8) |
2 |
|
1 |
| Ventral tegmental area
(A10) |
2 |
| Dorsal
raphe |
2 |
| Periacqueductal gray |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1, Cells labeled by direct retrograde transport; 2, second-order
retrograde labeling, after transynaptic passage;
*
neurons
immunoreactive for CT.
|
|
Fig. 8.
PRV injection in the m-MD resulted in a consistent
pattern of infection across structures. Symbols
represent infected neurons and their placement in 12 representative
drawings of coronal sections of the rat brain, modified from a
stereotaxic rat brain atlas (Paxinos and Watson, 1986 ). The injection
sites of two cases are represented with hatched areas,
and the results from each animal are shown with different symbols
(circles, data from injection shown as vertical
hatch; triangles, data from injection shown as
horizontal hatch). Solid symbols
represent the location of first-order projection neurons, and
open symbols show the distribution of second-order
projection neurons.
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]
Fig. 9.
Injection of virus that included the c-MD
exhibited infection of some common structures. Symbols
represent the distribution of infected neurons after injection of PRV
in selected cases. Circles show the distribution of
infection after an injection including both the m-MD and the c-MD
(injection site shown with vertical hatch).
Triangles represent the distribution of infected neurons
after an injection that included both the c-MD and the l-MD (injection
site represented with horizontal hatch). The
distribution of infection in structures labeled in both cases is shown
in bold; the distribution of infection observed in any
of the cases but not on the other is shown in
gray.
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]
Injections in the rostral RTN resulted in infected neurons at a
relatively advanced stage in the medial nucleus of the amygdala, SI,
NDBB, septum, VPL and VPM thalamic nuclei, pedunculopontine nucleus,
LDTg, and contralateral RTN (Fig. 11). Injections in
the intermediate RTN labeled the m-MD and LDTg (Fig.
12). Also, injections in the caudal RTN resulted in
advanced neuronal infection in the medial nucleus of the amygdala, SI,
BNST, VPL-VPM thalamic nuclei, and SNc (Fig. 13).
Fig. 11.
Injections of virus in the rostral RTN resulted
in a specific pattern of infection. Circles and
triangles represent first-order infected neurons
(solid) and second-order infected neurons
(open) for two selected cases. The distribution of
infected neurons after the small injection (gray)
is shown with triangles, whereas the location of
infected cells after the larger injectio |