 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 7,
Issue of April 1, 1997
pp. 2273-2283
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
43 : An Enhancer Displaying Neural-Restricted Activity Is
Located in the 3 -Untranslated Exon of the Rat Nicotinic Acetylcholine
Receptor 4 Gene
Jennifer McDonough and
Evan Deneris
Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western
Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Members of a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit gene
cluster ordered 4, 3, 5 in the vertebrate genome are expressed
in highly restricted patterns in the PNS and CNS. Nothing is known,
however, about the regulatory elements that control transcription of
these genes in selected neuronal cell populations. We report here a
novel enhancer, designated 43 , that is positioned in the 4
3 -untranslated exon. It is composed of two nearly identical 37 bp
direct repeats that are separated by 6 bp. Multimerization of the
enhancer upstream of the 3 minimal promoter results in synergistic
activation. Analysis in different cell types, including three neural
lines and primary keratinocytes, shows that 43 is preferentially
active in the neural line PC12, which expresses all members of the
cluster. Mobility shift assays reveal a cell-type-specific complex,
which forms with the first repeat of the enhancer and PC12 extracts.
Complexes co-migrating with the PC12 cell complex are not detected with
extracts from other lines, which suggests that PC12 cells contain a
differentially expressed factor that may be important for the
restricted activity of 43 . The cell-type-specific activity of the
43 enhancer suggests that it is important for regulating restricted
expression patterns of one or more clustered neuronal acetylcholine
receptor genes. Its location within the 4 gene may be a selective
pressure for maintaining tight linkage of clustered neuronal nAchR
genes.
Key words:
neuronal nicotinic receptors;
cis-acting elements;
enhancer;
cell-type specific;
gene transcription;
3 -untranslated
exon
INTRODUCTION
The tremendous diversity of vertebrate neural cell
phenotypes implies an underlying complexity of cis regulatory element
needed to control thousands of genes in the appropriate spatial and
temporal patterns (He and Rosenfeld, 1991 ; Mandel and McKinnon, 1993 ). A key transcriptional element essential for neuron-specific expression of some genes is the neuron-restrictive silencer element (Mori et al.,
1992 ) or repressor element 1 (Kraner et al., 1992 ). The neuron-restrictive silencer element/repressor element 1 silences transcription by binding a repressor factor REST (Chong et al., 1995 )
or NRSF (Schoenherr and Anderson, 1995 ), which is ubiquitously expressed in non-neuronal cells. Transgenic mice studies have shown,
however, that positive modulation of transcription resulting from the
binding of factors to cell- or region-specific enhancers is also
required for controlling the varied patterns of transcription in the
nervous system (Tuggle et al., 1990 ; Whiting et al., 1991 ; Zimmerman et
al., 1994 ). This is also evident from studies with transgene constructs
in which the deletion of relatively large fragments of DNA flanking
promoter regions results in loss of transgene expression in specific
neural cell populations (Vandaele et al., 1991 ; Min et al., 1994 ;
Carroll et al., 1995 ). An example of an enhancer that directs
expression to particular populations of neurons is the
gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene enhancer (Whyte et al., 1995 ). This
multicomponent enhancer is active specifically in a clonal line derived
from hypothalamic neurosecretory neurons that secrete
gonadotropin-releasing hormone. For the vast majority of genes
expressed in the vertebrate nervous system, however, we know nothing
about the organization of regulatory regions and transcription factors
responsible for directing expression to specific neuronal cell
types.
A cluster of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAchR) genes ordered
4, 3, 5 in mammals and birds (Boulter et al., 1990 ; Couturier
et al., 1990 ; Raimondi et al., 1992 ) is expressed in peripheral and
central neurons. Neuronal expression patterns of these genes in the CNS
are highly restricted (Duvoisin et al., 1989 ; Wada et al., 1989 , 1990 ;
Dineley-Miller and Patrick, 1992 ), which suggests the presence of
enhancers with narrow cell specificities. PC12 cells express all
members of the cluster (Boulter et al., 1990 ) as well as many other
markers of peripheral and central neuronal phenotype and, therefore,
these cells are an attractive system for investigating mechanisms of
neural transcription (Kraner et al., 1992 ; Mori et al., 1992 ; Yoon and
Chikaraishi, 1992 ).
We and others have begun to analyze transcriptional control of the
nAchR 3 gene (Duvoisin and Heinemann, 1993 ; Boyd, 1994 , 1996 ; Yang
et al., 1994 , 1995 ). We identified and characterized the promoter
region of the rat nAchR 3 gene (Yang et al., 1994 , 1995 ) and showed
that it initiates transcription at multiple sites in PC12 cells and
sympathetic neurons (Yang et al., 1994 ; Fyodorov and Deneris, 1996 ).
The significant activity of this promoter in various cell lines,
however, suggests that it lacks cell-type-specific information. To
search for cis elements mediating cell-restricted activity, we have
analyzed sequences that extend upstream of the 3 gene and that
include part of the juxtaposed 4 gene. Reported here is a novel
cell-type-specific enhancer, which is located in the 4
3 -untranslated exon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Luciferase reporters
Reporters described here contain all or part of a 2.8 kb rat
genomic SacI fragment, 3( 2732/+47), with coordinates
designated relative to the major 3 transcription start site. This
fragment extends 1.3 kb into the upstream 4 gene (Yang et al.,
1997 ). A 187 bp 4 3 -untranslated exon fragment at coordinates
2732/ 2546 and exhibiting enhancer activity (Fig. 3) was used to
prepare a series of SV40, 3, or 4 promoter constructs in the pGL2
series of luciferase vectors (Promega, Madison, WI). The relative
activities of the 3 and 4 core promoters are approximately equal
to each other and are 20-30% of SV40 promoter activity in PC12 cells. For reporter designations described below, numbers in brackets indicate
the sequences beginning on the 4 side of the 2.8 kb SacI
fragment that are present in a particular construct, unless stated
otherwise.
Fig. 3.
The 187 bp fragment displays characteristics of an
enhancer: orientation and position independence. The 187 bp fragment
was cloned either upstream of the 3 minimal promoter
(cross-hatched rectangle) or downstream of the
luciferase gene as indicated in the schematic. Sequence features of the
fragment described in Figure 2 are represented by symbols
(tandem-filled rectangles, 37 bp repeats; open
rectangle, 14 bp palindrome; thick line,
remainder of SacI/SpeI fragment) below
dark arrow, which indicates orientation of the element.
The activity of reporter constructs containing the 187 bp fragment was
measured relative to the 3 minimal promoter reporter
3( 238/+47)-luc in PC12 cells. Error bars indicate mean ± SD.
Data are from at least two experiments in which duplicate transfections
were performed and corrected for transfection efficiency by a
co-transfected RSV- gal plasmid.
[View Larger Version of this Image (7K GIF file)]
SV40 promoter reporters. A single copy of the 187 bp
enhancer fragment was placed immediately upstream of and in reverse
orientation relative to the SV40 promoter by subcloning a 1.1 kb
SacI/KpnI fragment of 3( 2732/+47) into the
polylinker of pGL2-promoter (Promega) to generate [1-1100]SV-luc.
This intermediate was then cut with SpeI, treated with
Klenow to blunt end, and cut with SmaI, and the gel-purified
vector fragment religated to generate [1-187]SV-luc.
3 Promoter reporters. Deletions from the 5 end of
3( 2732/+47)-luc were made using convenient restriction sites.
3( 238/+47)-Luc, constitutes our 3 minimal promoter construct
(Yang et al., 1995 ) and was used to prepare reporters in which all or
part of the 187 bp enhancer fragment was subcloned in one or the other
orientation either immediately upstream of the minimal promoter or
downstream of the luciferase gene. To prepare a reporter,
[1-187] 3-luc, in which the 187 bp fragment was positioned
immediately upstream of the minimal promoter, 3( 2732/+47)-luc was
cut with SpeI, treated with Klenow to blunt end, digested
with PmlI, and then the gel-purified vector fragment was religated. A
second reporter, [1-187] PN 3-luc, in which enhancer fragment
sequences 95-161 bp that lie downstream of the palindrome were
removed, was prepared by digestion of [1-187] 3-luc with
PstI and NsiI, followed by religation of these compatible
ends. To place the enhancer downstream of the luciferase gene and in
the correct orientation relative to the 3 promoter, a 1.1 kb
XhoI/SmaI fragment of [1-1100]SV-luc was
subcloned into the SalI and blunt-ended BamHI
sites located in the vector backbone of 3( 238/+47)-luc. The
resulting construct was then cut with KpnI and
PstI and treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of
dNTPs to blunt end, and the vector fragment was religated to generate
[1-161] 3[dc]-luc. To place the enhancer downstream of the
luciferase gene and in the reverse orientation relative to the 3
promoter, a 1.1 kb BglII/SmaI fragment of
[1-1100]SV-luc was subcloned into the BamHI and
blunted-ended SalI sites located in the vector backbone of
3( 238/+47)-luc. The resulting construct was then cut with
KpnI and PstI and treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dNTPs to blunt end, and the vector fragment was
religated to generate [1-161] 3[do]-luc. To prepare a reporter, [86-107] 3-luc, in which a single copy of the palindrome was
placed upstream of the 3 promoter, complementary oligonucleotides
were synthesized to generate KpnI and blunt compatible ends,
annealed, and subcloned into 3( 1607/+47)-luc vector that was cut
with KpnI and PmlI. To prepare a reporter,
[1-107] 3-luc, in which both repeats of the enhancer fragment were
placed upstream of the palindrome, the KpnI and Ppu10I cut
[86-107] 3-luc vector fragment was gel-purified. This linearized
DNA was then used in a shotgun ligation with KpnI, Ppu10I,
ScaI, and BamHI cut 3( 2732/+47)-luc DNA.
To place two copies of the enhancer fragment upstream of the 3
minimal promoter, the 1055 bp SmaI/EcoRI fragment
of [1-107] 3-luc was ligated to a [1-107] 3-luc vector
fragment that was cut with Ppu10I, blunt-ended with Klenow, and then
cut with EcoRI. Three copies of the enhancer fragment were
placed upstream of the 3 minimal promoter by repetition of the above
process with the 2× enhancer construct and the 1055 bp
SmaI/EcoRI fragment of [1-107] 3-luc.
4 promoter reporters. A rat HindIII genomic
fragment with one end in the 4 5 -untranslated exon and the other
2.8 kb upstream was subcloned into pGL2Basic (Promega). The resulting
4 promoter construct, 4( 2663/+137)-luc, has coordinates defined
relative to the 4 transcription start site determined by Hu et al.
(1994) . To prepare a 4 minimal promoter construct,
4( 2663/+137)-luc was digested with BamHI,
Klenow-treated to blunt end, and then digested with EcoRI.
The resulting 950 bp 4 promoter fragment was then subcloned into the
vector fragment of 3( 2732/+47) that was obtained by digestion with
SmaI and EcoRI to generate 4( 254/+137)-luc. To prepare a reporter, [1-187] 4-luc, in which a single copy of the enhancer fragment was placed immediately upstream of and in the
correct orientation relative to the 4 minimal promoter sequences 254/+137, the reporter 4( 2663/+137)-luc was cut with
BamHI, treated with Klenow to blunt end, then digested with
EcoRI. The resulting 950 bp promoter fragment was
gel-purified and ligated to the vector fragment of 3( 2732/+47)
that was digested with SpeI, Klenow-treated to blunt end,
and then cut with EcoRI. To place a single copy of the
enhancer fragment downstream of the luciferase gene,
4( 2663/+137)-luc and [1-161] 3[dc]-luc were cut with
EcoRI and ScaI. The 4 promoter fragment was then ligated to the enhancer fragment of [1-161] 3[dc]-luc to generate
[1-161] 4[dc]-luc.
Cell lines and transfections
Rat2 cells, a rat fibroblast line, and HeLa cells (American Type
Culture Collection) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS
(Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT). PC12 cells were grown in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS and 5% heat-inactivated horse serum
(Hyclone). ARIP cells, a rat pancreatic tumor line; Clone 9 cells, a
rat liver line; mouse C1300 neuroblastoma, and rat C6 CNS glioma (ATCC)
were grown in DMEM/Ham's F12K medium supplemented with 10% FBS.
Penicillin G sodium (100 U/ml) and streptomycin sulfate (100 µg/ml)
(Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) were added to all media. Lines
were maintained at 37°C and 7% CO2.
Cell lines were electroporated as described previously (Yang et al.,
1994 ) using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) Gene Pulser. Semioptimal electroporation conditions were determined for different cell lines by
electroporating Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV)-luciferase at different
voltages (200-350 V) and different capacitances (250-960 µF)
followed by determination of luciferase activities in cell extracts
2 d later. Electroporations were performed at 290 V and 960 µF
for PC12, Rat2, HeLa, C1300, and C6, and at 350 V and 960 µF for ARIP
and Clone 9 cells. Approximately 106 cells in 0.4 ml
electroporation buffer (0.1 M HEPES, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 6 mM dextrose, 7 mM
Na3PO4) were transfected using equimolar
amounts of Qiagen-purified (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) luciferase
reporter constructs. Human keratinocytes were transfected using
lipofectin (Life Technologies) as described previously (Welter et al.,
1996 ). RSV- gal was co-transfected (5 µg/transfection) to control
for transfection efficiency. Either the pGLC (Promega) luciferase
reporter containing the SV40 promoter and enhancer or RSV-luciferase
was used as positive controls. Luciferase activities were measured
after either ~24 or ~48 hr for HeLa, Rat2, ARIP, and Clone 9 cells
and after ~48 hr for PC12, C1300, and C6 lines and keratinocytes.
Cell extracts were prepared with luciferase lysis buffer (Promega), and
then extracts were used to measure luciferase activities with Promega
reagents and -galactosidase activities with a chemiluminescence
substrate and reagents (Tropix, Bedford, MA).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)
Nuclear extracts were prepared based on the method described by
Schreiber et al. (1989) . Approximately 107 cells were
pelleted and resuspended in 800 µl of cold buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM
EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM
PMSF, 4 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 40 µg/ml bestatin),
then swelled on ice for 15 min. A 10% solution of Nonidet NP-40 was
added (50 µl), mixed and centrifuged 30 sec in a microfuge. The
pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of cold buffer C (20 mM
HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.4 M NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 4 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 40 µg/ml bestatin, 20% glycerol), then
centrifuged for 5 min in a microfuge, and the nuclear extract was
frozen at 70°C until needed. An aliquot of each preparation was
used to determine protein concentration (Bio-Rad). A variety of
conditions were explored to optimize binding of proteins to probe. The
[NaCl] in the binding buffer was varied from 0 to 50 mM.
Binding reactions were performed at 4°C, 25°C, 30°C, or 37°C in
the presence or absence of detergents and polyamines. For separation of
complexes from probe, polyacrylamide concentrations in gels were varied
from 4 to 8% with several different cross-linking ratios. Optimal
conditions for binding were 2 µl of extract (~3 µg/µl protein)
in buffer C, 6 µl of 2× binding buffer (40 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 2 mM DTT), 2 µg poly dI/dC, and
~70,000 cpm [32P]-end-labeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide in a total volume of 12 µl at room temperature for 30 min. The products were then run on a 6.5% polyacrylamide gel, 20:1
cross-link ratio, at room temperature in 1× Tris-glycine buffer (50 mM Tris base, 380 mM glycine, 2 mM
EDTA). The probe used was a double-stranded 35mer including most of the
first repeat 5 -CAA TGC CAC TTC CTT GTA TAA GCC TTC CCA TGA TC-3
(Great American Gene Company, Ramona, CA). EMSAs were repeated with
several different batches of extract and probe preparations with
similar results.
RESULTS
A 187 bp fragment of the 4 3 -untranslated exon
activates transcription
Analysis of a 2.8 kb fragment extending upstream of the neuronal
nAchR 3 transcriptional start site region revealed a subfragment that increases transcriptional activity of reporters in PC12 cells. This subfragment, which constitutes part of the 4 3 -untranslated exon, is likely to contain an enhancer and not an upstream 3 promoter, because PC12 cell-derived 3 exons are not detectable in
this region of the cluster (Yang et al., 1997 ). To precisely localize
the position of the putative enhancer, we prepared a set of 3
promoter 5 deletion reporter constructs through the 4
3 -untranslated exon starting from 2732 relative to the major 3
transcription start site. The activity of each reporter was then
quantitated after transfection into PC12 cells (Fig. 1). The results of this experiment showed that the activity of reporter 3( 2732/+47)-luc was approximately fivefold greater than that of
3( 238/+47)-luc, which is deleted down to the 3 minimal promoter (Yang et al., 1995 ). Deletion to 2554 resulted in a 70% decrease in
activity, whereas additional deletion to 2110 produced only a small
additional decrease to a level similar to the activity of the minimal
promoter construct (Fig. 1). This analysis indicates that sequences
responsible for the majority of the positive transcriptional activity
reside within a 187 bp SacI/SpeI fragment of the
4 3 untranslated exon, which is ~2.5 kb upstream of the 3
promoter.
Fig. 1.
Identification of a positive transcriptional
activity within the nAchR 4 gene 3 -untranslated exon. The schematic
depicts a 2.8 kb SacI fragment that contains the
4/ 3 intergenic region as well as portions of 4 3 -untranslated
and 3 5 -untranslated exon sequences (rectangles).
The transcription start site region of the 3 promoter is shown by
the open arrow, which is located ~1.4 kb downstream of
the 4 gene. The cross-hatched area of the 4
3 -untranslated exon indicates the location of the 187 bp
SacI/SpeI fragment that activates
transcription. Shown below the schematic are deletions of the 2.8 kb
SacI fragment that were used to localize the position of
the positive transcriptional activity. Equimolar amounts of these
reporters were transiently transfected into PC12 cells. Luciferase
activity of each reporter construct was measured relative to that of
the reporter containing the intact SacI fragment ( 2732/+47), which was set at 100%. Activities were obtained from at
least three separate experiments in which duplicate transfections were
performed and corrected for transfection efficiency with a
co-transfected RSV- gal plasmid. Error bars indicate mean ± SD.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]
Inspection of the 187 bp fragment revealed the presence of two motifs
suggestive of enhancer elements (Fig. 2). First, two 37 bp direct repeats are present beginning at the 4 proximal end of the
fragment and are separated from one another by 6 bp. There are only
three mismatches between the repeats, and each mismatch is either a
purine-to-purine substitution or a pyrimidine-to-pyrimidine substitution. Second, a nearly perfect 14 bp palindrome begins 7 bp
downstream of the second repeat (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Genomic location and sequence features of the 187 bp SacI/SpeI fragment.
Schematic, The 187 bp fragment (cross-hatched
rectangle) is part of the 4 3 -untranslated exon. It begins
480 bp downstream of the 4 translation stop codon
(TAG) and is ~2.5 kb upstream of the 3 promoter.
Solid rectangles, Protein coding sequences of 3 and
4; open rectangles, untranslated exon sequences;
thin lines, intron and intergenic region sequences.
Sequence, Within the
SacI/SpeI fragment are two 37 bp direct
repeats. These repeats, shown by long arrows above the
sequence, are separated by 6 bp and followed by a nearly perfect 14 bp
palindrome (boxed sequence). Bases that differ between
the two repeats are underlined.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]
The 187 bp fragment functions as an enhancer
To determine whether the 187 bp SacI/SpeI
fragment meets the criteria for a classical enhancer, we investigated
the dependence of its activity on position and orientation relative to
the 3 promoter. For this experiment, reporter constructs were made
in which the 187 bp fragment was placed either immediately upstream of
the 3 minimal promoter or downstream of the luciferase coding sequence. As shown in Figure 3, the 187 bp fragment
stimulated the 3 minimal promoter severalfold. The magnitude of
stimulation is similar to that obtained with the 2732/ 2554 fragment
(Fig. 1), thus confirming that most of the positive transcriptional activity of the 2732/ 2554 region is located in the 187 bp fragment. As expected for an enhancer, we found that the 187 bp fragment produced
comparable activations regardless of its position or orientation
relative to the 3 promoter. (Fig. 3).
In the CNS, the expression patterns of the clustered 4 and 3
subunit genes only partially overlap, raising the possibility that
there are cis elements that can activate particular members of the
cluster but not others. On the other hand, because the 4 and 3
genes are co-expressed in numerous neuronal cell populations, especially in the PNS, they may be regulated by shared
cell-type-specific cis elements. To determine whether the 187 bp
SacI/SpeI fragment is able to discriminate
between the 4 and 3 promoters, we isolated the 4 promoter
region from rat genomic cosmid clones (Yang et al., 1994 ). A
HindIII fragment extending 2.8 kb upstream of the 4
5 -untranslated exon was isolated and subcloned into pGL2-Basic (Promega). The resulting reporter, 4( 2663/+137)-luc, and a
truncated version, 4( 254/+137)-luc, with coordinates designated
relative to the major 4 transcription start site reported by Hu et
al. (1994) were used to prepare additional reporters in which the putative enhancer in the 187 bp fragment was placed either downstream or upstream of the 4 promoter, respectively. Transfection of these
reporters into PC12 cells revealed that similar to the 3 promoter,
equivalent activations were seen regardless of the position of the
putative enhancer relative to the 4 promoter (Fig.
4A). Furthermore, the magnitude of
activation was similar for both promoters. This result indicates that
in cell culture, there is no fundamental selectivity of the putative
enhancer for 4 and 3, which suggests that it may be capable of
regulating both genes.
Fig. 4.
Equivalent activations of the 4, 3, and SV40
promoters by 43 . A, PC12 cells were transfected with
constructs containing the 187 bp fragment either upstream or downstream
of the 4 promoter (stippled rectangles) as shown in
the schematic. The 3 minimal promoter constructs
(cross-hatched rectangles) served as a positive control.
The activity of reporter constructs containing the putative enhancer
was measured relative to reporters containing the 4 or 3 promoter
alone. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. Data are from at least two
experiments in which duplicate transfections were performed and
corrected for transfection efficiency by a co-transfected RSV- gal
plasmid. B, The 187 bp fragment was cloned in the
indicated orientation upstream of either the SV40 promoter or SV40
enhancer, as shown in the schematic. Symbols representing sequence
features of the fragment are as described in previous figures.
Luciferase activities were calculated after correction for differences
in transfection efficiency by a co-transfected RSV- Gal plasmid.
Error bars indicate mean ± range for a typical experiment in
which duplicate transfections were performed.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
A second criterion for enhancer activity is the ability to activate an
heterologous promoter. To test for this property, the 187 bp fragment
was placed immediately upstream of and in reverse orientation relative
to the SV40 promoter. Transfection into PC12 cells revealed a sixfold
stimulation of the SV40 promoter activity, which demonstrates that the
putative enhancer can act equally well on an heterologous promoter
(Fig. 4B). The inability to significantly stimulate a
reporter carrying the SV40 enhancer, but no promoter, confirms that the
187 bp fragment itself does not behave as a promoter. Together, the
results presented above show that the 187 bp fragment from the 4
3 -untranslated exon behaves as a classical enhancer. We have
designated this enhancer 43 .
An intact repeat region is necessary and sufficient for
43 activity
Having demonstrated that the 187 bp
SacI/SpeI fragment behaves as an enhancer, we
next investigated which parts of it are necessary and sufficient for
activity. For this experiment, we prepared reporters in which various
segments of the fragment were placed immediately upstream of the 3
minimal promoter. The activities of each were then determined in PC12
cells and compared with the activity of the 3 minimal promoter in
the presence or absence of an intact 187 bp fragment (Fig.
5, lines 1 and 2). We found that
sequences downstream of the palindrome were dispensable for full
activity, because deletion of these sequences did not decrease reporter
activity (line 3). The palindrome was clearly not sufficient for activity, because an 3 reporter bearing a single copy of the
palindrome was no more active than the minimal promoter (Fig. 5,
compare line 1 with line 4). Furthermore,
an intact palindrome was not necessary for activity as shown by the
retention of complete reporter activity when the palindrome and
downstream sequences were deleted (line 5). These results
point to the tandem repeat region as the essential segment of the
43 enhancer. Enhancer elements often act synergistically when
multimerized in cis to promoters (Sauer et al., 1995 ). To determine
whether multiple copies of the tandem repeat region could act in this
way, additional reporters were prepared in which two or three copies of
the repeat region were placed adjacent to one another and in front of
the 3 promoter. The activities of these reporters were then compared with 3 minimal promoter activity in PC12 cells. As shown in Figure 6, the presence of additional copies of the repeat
region resulted in a greater than additive activation of the 3
promoter, such that when three copies were present, a >60-fold
stimulation was seen. These results show that multiple copies of the
repeat region act synergistically to create a powerful cis element and
thus provide additional confirmation that the repeat region of the 187 bp SacI/SpeI fragment is an enhancer.
Fig. 5.
The repeat region is necessary and sufficient for
43 activity. Comparison of 3 minimal promoter activities when
linked in cis with different portions of the 43 enhancer fragment. RSV- gal-corrected activities are relative to the activity of the
3( 238/+47)-luc in PC12 cells. Error bars indicate mean ± SD,
n = 4, except for line 3, in which
error bars indicate mean ± range for two separate transfections.
Solid tandem rectangles, 37 bp repeats; open
rectangle, 14 bp palindrome; thick line,
remainder of 187 bp SacI/SpeI fragment;
cross-hatched rectangle, 3 minimal promoter.
[View Larger Version of this Image (8K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
Multimerized repeat region activates
synergistically. RSV- Gal-corrected luciferase activities were
determined relative to the activity of the 3 minimal promoter
construct 3( 238/+47)-luc for reporters bearing either one, two, or
three copies of the 43 repeat region cloned upstream of the 3
minimal promoter. Error bars indicate mean ± SD,
n = 3. Schematic symbols are as described in
previous legends. Open data bar represents predicted additive activity of the 3× enhancer reporter.
[View Larger Version of this Image (8K GIF file)]
The 43 enhancer displays cell-type-specific activity
We next investigated whether the activity of 43 was
cell-type-restricted. For this experiment, the enhancer was tested
upstream and in reverse orientation relative to the SV40 promoter in a variety of cell lines from diverse tissue origins. We chose to use the
SV40 promoter for these assays because of its robust activity in a
variety of cell lines; however, results similar to those presented
below were obtained in the context of the 3 promoter (J. McDonough
and E. Deneris, unpublished observations). For each cell line assay,
positive-control luciferase reporters bearing the SV40 promoter and
enhancer, the CMV promoter, or the RSV promoter were transfected in
sister cultures to ensure the linearity of luciferase activity. In
addition to PC12 cells, two other neural lines, C1300 and C6, were
tested. The C6 line is derived from a CNS glioma and C1300 from a mouse
neuroblastoma. The four non-neural lines were HeLa cells, which are
derived from a human adenocarcinoma, Rat 2 cells, a rat fibroblast
line, Clone 9 cells, a rat liver line, and ARIP cells, which are a rat
pancreatic tumor line. Northern blot analyses showed that among these
lines, only the PC12 line expresses the 3 gene (McDonough and
Deneris, unpublished observations). In contrast to the six- to
sevenfold activation of the SV40 promoter in PC12 cells, a less than
twofold activation was seen in each of the non-neural lines, which
shows that the enhancer does indeed exhibit cell-type-restricted
activity (Fig. 7). Interestingly, although the enhancer
showed some activity in C6 and C1300 cells, it was weak relative to its
activity in PC12 cells. Because human keratinocytes have been shown to
express the 3 and 4 genes (Grando et al., 1995 ), we also tested
43 activity in the primary cultures of these cells. As shown in
Figure 7, 43 activity was virtually inactive in these cells.
Together, these results suggest that the activity of 43 is highly
restricted even among different neural cell types, which makes it an
attractive candidate for participating in the neuron-restricted
expression of one or more of the clustered neuronal nAchR genes.
Fig. 7.
Cell-type-specific activity of 43 . Cell lines
and primary keratinocytes were transfected with a luciferase reporter
bearing a single copy of the 187 bp 43 enhancer fragment placed
immediately upstream of and in reverse orientation relative to the SV40
promoter. RSV- gal-corrected data are presented as SV40 promoter
activity in the presence of the enhancer divided by basal SV40 promoter activity. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, n 4, except for keratinocytes, in which n = 3. PC12, Rat pheochromocytoma; HeLa, human
adenocarcinoma; Rat2, rat fibroblast; Clone
9, rat liver; ARIP, rat pancreatic tumor;
C6, rat CNS glioma; C1300, mouse
neuroblastoma.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
The 43 repeat forms a unique complex with PC12 cell
nuclear extracts
To begin to characterize the nuclear proteins that bind 43 and
to determine whether PC12 cells express unique 43 binding factors
that correlate to its cell-type-specific activity, EMSAs were performed
with a radiolabeled oligonucleotide bearing the first repeat of 43
and nuclear extracts prepared from cell lines described in Figure 7.
With PC12 cell extracts, a complex RBP1 was detected (Fig.
8A). RBP1 represents specific binding
to probe, because a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled repeat
eliminated formation of this complex, but competition with an
equivalent molar excess of oligonucleotides bearing either AP1 binding
sites or Pax-5 binding sites failed to compete (Fig.
8A). Competition with unlabeled second repeat also
inhibited RBP1 formation, which suggests (as expected) that the two
repeats are able to bind the same protein or proteins (data not shown).
A slightly faster migrating complex just below RBP1 was also detected,
but this may represent nonspecific binding to probe, because as shown
in Figure 8A, 100-fold molar excess of each
competitor oligonucleotide eliminated nearly all of this complex.
Oligonucleotides bearing octamer sites or AP2 sites also eliminate this
complex, which further support the idea that this complex represents
nonspecific binding to probe (data not shown). Interestingly, when
extracts from the rat non-neural cell lines were tested, complexes
co-migrating with RBP1 were not detected (Fig. 8B).
One complex was detected in each of these extracts, which co-migrated
with the PC12 nonspecific complex. These are likely to be nonspecific
complexes as well, because similar to the PC12 nonspecific complex,
competition with oligonucleotides bearing AP1 and Pax-5 bindings sites
eliminated the Rat 2 complex (data not shown) and a similar C6-derived
complex (see below).
Fig. 8.
The 43 repeat forms a unique complex with PC12
extracts. A duplex oligonucleotide probe bearing a single copy of the
43 first repeat was used in mobility shift assays with nuclear
extracts prepared from the indicated cell lines, as described in
Methods and Materials. A, Analysis of the PC12 cell
extract. Lane 1, Free probe; lane 2, PC12
extract; lane 3, PC12 extract incubated with 100-fold
molar excess unlabeled first repeat-bearing oligonucleotide; lane 4, PC12 extract incubated with 100-fold molar
excess AP1-bearing oligonucleotide; lane 5, PC12 extract
incubated with 100-fold molar excess Pax-5-bearing oligonucleotide.
B, Analysis of the indicated rat non-neural extracts.
Lane 1, Free probe; lane 2, PC12 extract;
lane 3, Rat 2 extract; lane 4, Clone 9 extract; lane 5, ARIP extract. C,
Analysis of C6 nuclear extract. Lane 1, Free probe;
lane 2, PC12 extract, slowest mobility complex is RBP1;
lane 3, C6 extract; lane 4, C6 extract
incubated with 100-fold molar excess unlabeled first repeat-bearing
oligonucleotide; lane 5, C6 extract incubated with
100-fold molar excess AP1-bearing oligonucleotide; lane
6, C6 extract incubated with 100-fold molar excess
Pax-5-bearing oligonucleotide. D, Analysis of C1300
nuclear extract. Lane 1, Free probe; lane
2, PC12 extract, slowest mobility complex is RBP1; lane
3, C1300 extract; lane 4, C1300 extract incubated with 100-fold molar excess unlabeled first repeat-bearing oligonucleotide; lane 5, C1300 extract incubated with
100-fold molar excess AP1-bearing oligonucleotide; lane
6, C1300 extract incubated with 100-fold molar excess
Pax-5-bearing oligonucleotide. Vertical line adjacent to
each of the autoradiograms marks a set of ubiquitous
low-molecular-weight complexes detected with all extracts and,
therefore, their distribution does not correlate with the
cell-type-specific activity of 43 . Arrows point to the position of the PC12 cell-derived RBP1 complex.
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]
Analysis of the C6 and C1300 extracts revealed more than one complex,
some of which appeared to be similar in size to the PC12 cell-derived
RBP1 complex. As shown in Figure 8C, extracts from C6 cells
formed two complexes. The lower mobility complex represents specific
binding to probe, because a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled repeat
eliminated formation of this complex, but competition with an
equivalent molar excess of oligonucleotides bearing either AP1 binding
sites or Pax-5 binding sites did not compete. However, this complex is
not likely to be formed by the same PC12 cell protein forming RBP1,
because the mobilities of these complexes are slightly different,
suggesting that they represent novel complexes (Fig. 8C).
The higher mobility complex formed with C6 extracts co-migrated with
the nonspecific complex formed with PC12 extracts and, similar to PC12
extracts, this probably represents nonspecific binding to probe,
because its formation was eliminated by competition with AP1- and
Pax-5-bearing oligonucleotides. Two complexes were detected with C1300
extracts, and both of these represented specific binding, because
although a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled repeat completely
eliminated these complexes, an equivalent excess of AP1 and Pax-5
competitors did not inhibit formation of these complexes. However,
similar to the protein(s) in C6 cells that binds to the repeat, the
repeat-binding proteins in C1300 appear to be different from the PC12
cell protein that forms RBP1. Together these results suggest that among
the neural and non-neural cell lines investigated, PC12 cells contain a
differentially expressed factor (or factors) that specifically binds
the 43 enhancer repeat, and this binding activity correlates well
with the cell-type-specific activity of 43 .
DISCUSSION
Highly restricted expression patterns of clustered neuronal nAchR
genes are likely to be established, in part, by cell-type-specific enhancers. Described here is an enhancer, 43 , which is positioned within the 3 -untranslated exon of the neuronal nAchR 4 gene ~2.5
kb upstream of the 3 gene. The cell-type-specific activity of this
enhancer suggests that it is important for regulating patterns of one
or more clustered neuronal nAchR genes.
Several lines of evidence support the conclusion that 43 is an
enhancer and not a second 3 promoter. First, its activity does not
depend on its position or orientation relative to a test promoter.
Second, it activates transcription when placed in reverse orientation
to the SV40 promoter. Third, no significant activity is seen unless
43 is linked in cis to a promoter. Fourth,
multimerization of the element upstream of the 3 minimal promoter
results in synergistic activation. Fifth, no PC12 cell-derived 3
exon sequences can be detected in the 3 -untranslated exon of 4
(Yang et al., 1997 ).
The enhancer was identified within a 187 bp fragment that we
subdivided, based on sequence features, into three regions. The first
region proximal to the 4 translation stop codon bears two nearly
identical 37 bp repeats, which are separated by a 6 bp spacer segment.
There are only three nucleotide differences between the two repeats,
and these differences are clustered near one another. The second region
located 6 bp downstream of the repeats consists of a nearly perfect 14 bp palindrome. The remainder of the 187 bp fragment constitutes the
third region, which is 80 bp. We investigated the importance of each of
these regions for positive transcriptional activity by testing
deletions of the 187 bp fragment and found that the second and third
regions were dispensable for full activity. Although the palindrome in
the second region did not exhibit activity in our assays, it is still possible that this sequence motif has a function in other cell types.
Our results, therefore, demonstrate that the activity of the enhancer
in PC12 cells is mediated by sequences in the repeat region.
Computer-assisted comparison with transcription factor-motif databases
(Computational Biology and Informatics Laboratory, University of
Pennsylvania, TESS database) revealed some weak similarities to DNA
binding sites described previously. The majority of the repeat
sequence, however, appears to be unrelated to consensus sequences
previously described. This, together with the relatively long length of
the 43 repeats, suggest that the repeats may constitute a unique
cis regulatory interface for multiple interacting DNA binding proteins,
some of which are perhaps novel transcription factors.
The expression patterns of the clustered neuronal nAchR subunit genes
are complex. In the CNS, members of the cluster are expressed in
selected populations of neurons but not in glia. The three genes are
co-expressed in peripheral ganglia neurons and, at least in ciliary
ganglia neurons, the subunits encoded by these genes are assembled
together into a neuronal nAchR subtype (Conroy and Berg, 1995 ). The
expression of these genes in peripheral ganglia is regulated
differentially during development and in response to cell-cell
interactions, which arise from presynaptic innervation and synaptic
connections with target tissues (Boyd et al., 1988 ; Devay et al., 1994 ;
Mandelzys et al., 1994 ; Levey et al., 1995 ). It is not clear, however,
whether differential regulation occurs at the level of gene
transcription, a post-transcriptional step, or both. Outside of the
nervous system, the only tissues reported to express members of the
cluster are thymus, which expresses 3 (Mihovilovic and Roses, 1993 ),
muscle, which expresses 4 and 5 (Corriveau et al., 1995 ), and
human keratinocytes, which express 3 and 4 (Grando et al., 1995 ).
This suggests that control of the three clustered genes is achieved, at
least in part, through the activity of enhancers with narrow cell-type
specificities. The 43 enhancer is intriguing in this sense, because
although it has strong activity in PC12 cells, it is nearly inactive in several non-neural lines and human keratinocytes. Moreover, it is only
weakly active in two other neural lines, the mouse C1300 neuroblastoma
line and rat C6 CNS glioma line. PC12 cells are the only cell line used
here that express the endogenous 3 gene. Thus, the activity of
43 is remarkably restricted and in a manner that correlates with
major aspects of nAchR expression patterns. The narrow cell specificity
of 43 is correlated with the formation of a protein-DNA complex,
RBP1, in PC12 cell nuclear extracts that was not detected in other cell
line extracts. Our findings suggest, therefore, that the preferential
activity of 43 in PC12 cells results from interactions with at
least one cell-type-specific regulatory protein.
As described above, the expression patterns of clustered neuronal nAchR
genes overlap with one another, which is consistent with the
heteromeric composition of nAchR subtypes (Duvoisin et al., 1989 ; Wada
et al., 1989 ; Boulter et al., 1990 ; Dineley-Miller and Patrick, 1992 ;
Corriveau and Berg, 1993 ; Mandelzys et al., 1994 ). One way in which
co-expression among these genes might be controlled is through shared
cis regulatory elements positioned to influence more than one member of
the cluster. For example, regulatory elements located between members
of the Hox complexes control Hox genes on either side of the elements
(Gérard et al., 1996 ; van der Hoeven et al., 1996 ). The 43
enhancer is, perhaps, a shared cell-type-specific cis element, because
it is located between the 4 and 3 coding regions, which may allow
it to influence both the 4 and 3 promoters. It also has the
ability to act equally well on both the 4 and 3 promoters
irrespective of orientation and is preferentially active in a neural
cell type that expresses both genes. The expression patterns of the
clustered genes, however, are not identical, which suggests that
gene-specific cis elements may play a role in establishing individual
patterns of transcription. Although our transient assays indicate that
there is no fundamental discrimination between 4 and 3 promoters
by 43 , it is possible that additional mechanisms involving
chromatin insulator sequences may isolate the endogenous 4 gene from
the influence of the enhancer (Cai and Levine, 1995 ). Thus, an
important future goal is to use transgenic methods to determine which
of the three clustered genes is influenced by 43 in vivo
and whether 43 is a shared cell-type-specific cis element.
Control of nAchR gene transcription in muscle is achieved, at least in
part, through the interaction of myogenic factors with E boxes located
upstream of nAchR subunit genes (Piette et al., 1990 ; Gilmour et al.,
1991 ; Simon and Burden, 1993 ). In contrast to nAchR genes expressed in
muscle, very limited information is available regarding the cis-acting
elements that regulate neuronal nAchR gene transcription. Daubas et al.
(1993) showed that an 2 transgene construct bearing the entire avian
2 gene coding region, as well as 7 kb upstream and 3 kb downstream,
was expressed in a neuron-specific manner in selected CNS nuclei. In a
separate study, these investigators identified a silencer near the
transcription start site region of the 2 gene, which was active in
both neural and non-neural cells (Bessis et al., 1993 ). At least part
of the silencing activity was found to reside in six Oct-like repeats distributed over a 160 bp region both upstream and downstream of the
most 5 start site. Near the start site region of the 3 gene is a
G-rich motif, which mediates Sp1 transactivation and binds
Sp1-immunoreactive material in PC12 cells extracts. Mutation of this
site nearly abolishes 3 promoter activity (Yang et al., 1995 ). A
similar element is present near the 4 promoter start site and is
thought to bind novel factors enriched in brain (Hu et al., 1995 ). It
is not clear, however, what role, if any, these cis elements play in
controlling restricted patterns of neuronal nAchR gene
transcription.
Expression of the avian nAchR 3 gene is limited to inner nuclear and
ganglion cells of the retina and sensory ganglia. Interestingly, Hernandez et al. showed, using transient transfection assays in freshly
dissociated cultures of central neurons, that a 143 bp 3 promoter
fragment was active in retinal neurons isolated at an early
developmental stage but not at other stages or in non-neural cells
(Hernandez et al., 1995 ). Thus, cis elements directing highly restricted expression of a reporter gene to the appropriate
3-positive cell types are present within the 3 promoter region.
The results presented here suggest that the 3 gene may be regulated
differently from 3 in that control of what is apparently a
housekeeping-type promoter near the 3 coding region is regulated by
distant cell-type-specific enhancers. This difference in regulation may
arise, because although 3 expression is restricted, it is not as
restricted as 3 and, therefore, more complex and diverse regulatory
regions may be required to control 3 in a wider range of cell types.
We propose that 43 is one of the cis-acting regulatory interfaces
required to restrict expression of one or more of the neuronal nAchR
cluster genes to neurons. Its presence within another gene may be a
selective pressure for maintaining the tight linkage of the 4 and
3 genes.
FOOTNOTES
Received Aug. 20, 1996; revised Jan. 14, 1997; accepted Jan. 15, 1997.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1
NS29123 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and
Stroke. We thank Eric B. Banks in Dr. Richard Eckert's laboratory in
the School of Medicine for performing keratinocyte transfections. We
also thank Nicole Francis and Dr. David Setzer for their helpful comments on this manuscript and Tim Miller for preparation of some
nuclear extracts.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Evan Deneris, Case Western
Reserve University, School of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience,
2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH 44106-4975.
REFERENCES
-
Bessis A,
Savatier N,
Devillers-Thiery A,
Bejanin S,
Changeux JP
(1993)
Negative regulatory elements upstream of a novel exon of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 2 subunit gene.
Nucleic Acids Res
21:2185-2192 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boulter J,
O'Shea-Greenfield A,
Duvoisin RM,
Connolly G,
Wada E,
Jensen A,
Gardner PD,
Ballivet M,
Deneris ES,
McKinnon D,
Heinemann S,
Patrick J
(1990)
3, 5 and 4: three members of the rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-related gene family form a cluster.
J Biol Chem
265:4472-4482 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boyd RT
(1994)
Sequencing and promoter analysis of the genomic region between the rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
4 and 3 genes.
J Neurobiol
25:960-973 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Boyd RT
(1996)
Transcriptional regulation and cell specificity determinants of the rat nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
3 gene.
Neurosci Lett
208:73-76 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Boyd RT,
Jacob MH,
Couturier S,
Ballivet M,
Berg DK
(1988)
Expression and regulation of neuronal acetylcholine receptor mRNA in chick ciliary ganglia.
Neuron
1:495-502 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Cai H,
Levine M
(1995)
Modulation of enhancer-promoter interactions in the Drosophila embryo.
Nature
376:533-536.
[Medline]
-
Carroll SL,
Schweitzer JB,
Holtzman DM,
Miller ML,
Sclar GM,
Milbrandt J
(1995)
Elements in the 5
flanking sequences of the mouse low-affinity NGF receptor gene direct appropriate CNS, but not PNS, expression in transgenic mice.
J Neurosci
15:3342-3356 .
[Abstract]
-
Chong JA,
Tapia-Ramirez J,
Kim S,
Toledo-Aral JJ,
Zheng Y,
Boutros MC,
Altshuller YM,
Frohman MA,
Kraner SD,
Mandel G
(1995)
REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons.
Cell
80:949-957 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Conroy WG,
Berg DK
(1995)
Neurons can maintain multiple classes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors distinguished by different subunit combinations.
J Biol Chem
270:4424-4431 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Corriveau RA,
Berg DK
(1993)
Coexpression of multiple acetylcholine receptor genes in neurons: quantification of transcripts during development.
J Neurosci
13:2662-2671 .
[Abstract]
-
Corriveau RA,
Romano SJ,
Conroy WG,
Oliva L,
Berg DK
(1995)
Expression of the neuronal acetylcholine receptor genes in vertebrate skeletal muscle during development.
J Neurosci
15:1372-1383 .
[Abstract]
-
Couturier S,
Erkman L,
Valera S,
Rungger D,
Bertrand S,
Boulter J,
Ballivet M,
Bertrand D
(1990)
5, 3, and non- 3: three clustered avian genes encoding neuronal nicotinic acetylcholinereceptor-related subunits.
J Biol Chem
265:17560-17567 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Daubas P,
Salmon AM,
Zoli M,
Geoffroy B,
Devillers-Thiery A,
Bessis A,
Medevielle F,
Changeux JP
(1993)
Chicken neuronal acetylcholine receptor alpha 2- subunit gene exhibits neuron-specific expression in the brain and spinal cord of transgenic mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:2237-2241 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Devay P,
Qu X,
Role L
(1994)
Regulation of nAchR subunit gene expression relative to the development of pre- and postsynaptic projections of embryonic chick sympathetic neurons.
Dev Biol
162:56-70 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Dineley-Miller K,
Patrick J
(1992)
Gene transcripts for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit, beta4, are distributed in multiple areas of the rat central nervous system.
Mol Brain Res
16:339-344 .
[Medline]
-
Duvoisin RM,
Heinemann S
(1993)
Transcription control elements of the rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit
3.
Braz J Med Biol Res
26:137-150 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Duvoisin RM,
Deneris ES,
Patrick J,
Heinemann S
(1989)
The functional diversity of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors is increased by a novel subunit:
4.
Neuron
3:487-496 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Fyodorov D,
Deneris E
(1996)
The POU domain of SCIP/Tst-1/Oct-6 is sufficient for activation of an acetylcholine receptor promoter.
Mol Cell Biol
16:5004-5014 .
[Abstract]
-
Gérard M,
Chen J-Y,
Gronemeyer H,
Chambon P,
Duboule D,
Zakany J
(1996)
In vivo targeted mutagenesis of a regulatory element required for positioning the Hoxd-11 and Hoxd-10 expression boundaries.
Genes Dev
10:2326-2334 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gilmour BP,
Fanger GR,
Newton C,
Evans SM,
Gardner PD
(1991)
Multiple binding sites for myogenic factors are required for expression of the acetylcholine receptor
-subunit.
J Biol Chem
266:19871-19874 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grando SA,
Horton RM,
Pereira EF,
Diethelm-Okita BM,
George PM,
Albuquerque EX,
Conti-Fine BM
(1995)
A nicotinic acetylcholine receptor regulating cell adhesion and motility is expressed in human keratinocytes.
J Invest Dermatol
105:774-781 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
He X,
Rosenfeld MG
(1991)
Mechanisms of complex transcriptional regulation: implications for brain development.
Neuron
7:183-196 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hernandez MC,
Erkman L,
Matter-Sadzinski L,
Roztocil T,
Ballivet M,
Matter JM
(1995)
Characterization of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta 3 gene. Its regulation within the avian nervous system is effected by a promoter 143 base pairs in length.
J Biol Chem
270:3224-3233 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hu M,
Theobald Whiting N,
Gardner PD
(1994)
Nerve growth factor increases the transcriptional activity of the rat neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
4 subunit promoter in transfected PC12 cells.
J Neurochem
62:392-395 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hu M,
Bigger CB,
Gardner PD
(1995)
A novel regulatory element of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene interacts with a DNA binding activity enriched in rat brain.
J Biol Chem
270:4497-4502 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kraner SD,
Chong JA,
Tsay H-J,
Mandel G
(1992)
Silencing the type II sodium channel gene: a model for neural-specific gene regulation.
Neuron
9:37-44 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Levey MS,
Brumwell CL,
Dryer SE,
Jacob MH
(1995)
Innervation and target tissue interactions differentially regulate acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNA levels in developing neurons in situ.
Neuron
14:153-162 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Mandel G,
McKinnon D
(1993)
Molecular basis of neural-specific gene expression.
Annu Rev Neurosci
16:323-345 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Mandelzys A,
Pié B,
Deneris ES,
Cooper E
(1994)
The developmental increase in ACh current densities on rat sympathetic neurons correlates with changes in nicotinic ACh receptor
-subunit gene expression and occurs independently of innervation.
J Neurosci
14:2357-2364 .
[Abstract]
-
Mihovilovic M,
Roses AD
(1993)
Expression of alpha-3, alpha-5, and beta-4 neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit transcripts in normal and myasthenia gravis thymus. Identification of thymocytes expressing the alpha- 3 transcripts.
J Immunol
151:6517-6524 .
[Abstract]
-
Min N,
Joh TH,
Kim KS,
Peng C,
Son JH
(1994)
5
upstream DNA sequence of the rat tyrosine hydroxylase gene directs high-level and tissue-specific expression to catecholamine neurons in the central nervous system of transgenic mice.
Mol Brain Res
27:281-289 .
[Medline]
-
Mori N,
Schoenherr C,
Vandenbergh DJ,
Anderson DJ
(1992)
A common silencer element in the SCG10 and type II Na+ channel gene binds a factor present in nonneuronal cells but not in neuronal cells.
Neuron
9:45-54 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Piette J,
Bessereau JL,
Huchet M,
Changeux JP
(1990)
Two adjacent MyoD1-binding sites regulate expression of the acetylcholine receptor
-subunit gene.
Nature
345:353-355 .
[Medline]
-
Raimondi E,
Rubboli F,
Moralli D,
Chini B,
Fornasari D,
Tarroni P,
De-Carli L,
Clementi F
(1992)
Chromosomal localization and physical linkage of the genes encoding human alpha3, alpha5, and beta4 neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits.
Genomics
12:849-850 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Sauer F,
Hansen SK,
Tjian R
(1995)
DNA templates and activator-coactivator requirements for transcriptional synergism by Drosophila bicoid.
Science
270:1825-1828 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schoenherr CJ,
Anderson DJ
(1995)
The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes.
Science
267:1360-1363 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schreiber E,
Matthias P,
Muller MM,
Schaffer W
(1989)
Rapid detection of octamer binding proteins with "mini-extracts," prepared from a small number of cells.
Nucleic Acids Res
17:6419 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Simon AM,
Burden SJ
(1993)
An E-box mediates activation and repression of the AChR
 |