 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 7,
Issue of April 1, 1997
pp. 2314-2323
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Rapid Exocytosis in Single Chromaffin Cells Recorded from Mouse
Adrenal Slices
Tobias Moser and
Erwin Neher
Department of Membrane Biophysics, Max-Planck-Institute for
Biophysical Chemistry, Am Faßberg, D-37077, Göttingen,
Germany
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
We report here that brief depolarizations such as action
potentials trigger exocytosis in thin mouse adrenal slices. The
secretory rates obtained in membrane capacitance recordings from
chromaffin cells in slices are faster than those observed in isolated
cells. Fast exocytosis in slices is attributable to the rapid release of a small pool of vesicles. The pool recovers from depletion with a
time constant of 10 sec. Recruitment of the rapidly released vesicles
is strongly hindered by the fast Ca2+ chelator BAPTA and
much less by the slower chelator EGTA. We suggest that these vesicles
are located in close proximity to Ca2+ channels. Spatial
coupling of Ca2+ entry and exocytosis may be sensitive to
cell isolation and culture.
Key words:
exocytosis;
membrane capacitance measurement;
chromaffin;
adrenal slice;
calcium chelators;
calcium-secretion coupling;
neuroendocrine;
calcium current;
secretory depression
INTRODUCTION
Exocytosis is triggered by an elevation in
cytosolic [Ca2+] in both neuroendocrine cells and nerve
terminals (Douglas, 1968 ; Katz, 1969 ). Furthermore, just as in
presynaptic terminals, action potentials (APs) are physiological
stimuli for hormone release in neuroendocrine cells (Kidokoro and
Ritchie, 1980 ; Wakade, 1982 ; Zhou and Misler, 1995 ). Nevertheless,
there are distinct differences between hormone secretion from isolated
neuroendocrine cells and release of transmitters from small clear-cored
vesicles at neuronal synapses. For example, catecholamine release from
isolated chromaffin cells is only loosely coupled to action potentials
(Zhou and Misler, 1995 ), with latencies of several tens of
milliseconds, whereas neurotransmission is highly synchronized (Katz
and Miledi, 1965 ). The majority of the time delay of release in
isolated chromaffin cells is attributed to the time required for
Ca2+ to diffuse from a Ca2+ channel orifice to
the release sites (Chow et al., 1996 ). On this basis a mean diffusional
distance on the order of 300 nm has been estimated (Klingauf and Neher,
1997 ). Exocytosis of chromaffin granules can occur very quickly if the
[Ca2+] at the release site is elevated to a sufficiently
high level (Heinemann et al., 1994 ). In fact, isolated chromaffin cells
release a small fraction of granules well synchronized with
depolarizing stimuli, with latencies of <5 msec (Chow et al., 1994 ).
This more synchronous release has been suggested to result from
exocytosis of a small population of vesicles located closer to
Ca2+ channels (Klingauf and Neher, 1997 ).
Morphological studies have suggested a polarized phenotype for adrenal
chromaffin cells in situ (Carmichael, 1986 ). Synaptic inputs
occur at the neural pole, and exocytosis may take place preferentially
at the capillary pole (Carmichael et al., 1989 ). We were interested in
whether chromaffin cells in situ show substantial synchronous secretion, as would be expected if distances for
Ca2+ diffusion were short in a specialized region of the
cell.
We performed patch-clamp measurements of membrane capacitance
(Cm) (Neher and Marty, 1982 ) in mouse chromaffin
cells in thin slices of adrenal glands and in primary culture. We
report here that kinetics of exocytosis is more neuron-like in mouse
chromaffin cells in slices than in culture. Cells in our slice
preparation typically responded to individual APs with sizable
exocytotic capacitance changes ( Cexo),
whereas only one of seven isolated cells showed comparable responses to
single APs. Cells in slices secreted more than isolated cells for
equivalent Ca2+ current integrals during short step
depolarizations. Two different protocols, both evoking secretory
depression, were used to demonstrate the existence of a small, rapidly
secreted pool of vesicles in slices. The rapid kinetics of secretion in
chromaffin cells in slices is suggested to result from close spatial
coupling of release sites and Ca2+ channels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Adrenal slice preparation and whole-cell recordings.
NMRI mice (4- to 10-week-old females) were killed by decapitation.
After adrenal glands were removed, they were embedded in a 3% agar
solution. The hardened agar block was then glued with cyanoacrylate
onto the stage of a slicing chamber. The chamber contained ice-cold bicarbonate-buffered saline (BBS, solution 2). Slices of 100-200 µm
thickness were sectioned on a vibrating tissue slicer (Campden Instruments, Cambridge, UK) at a frequency of 6 Hz. After the slices
were sectioned, they were immediately transferred into a holding
chamber containing oxygenated BBS (solution 1, continuously bubbled
with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). Slices were kept at
37°C for 15 min and thereafter at room temperature.
For recording, slices were fixed in the recording chamber by means of a
grid of nylon threads. After the slices were mounted onto the stage of
an upright microscope (Axioscope, Zeiss), the chamber was perfused with
bubbled BBS (95% O2 and 5% CO2, solution 1)
at a flow rate of 1-2 ml/min. Usually a cleaning pipette was used to
remove loose material from the cell surface. Conventional whole-cell
recordings (Hamill et al., 1981 ) were performed with 3-4 M
pipettes, and an EPC-9 patch-clamp amplifier together with Pulse
software (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) were used. Usually, gigaohm seals
were formed on the nucleus-containing region. The access resistances
ranged from 5 to 12 M . Stable recordings could be obtained between
15 min and at least 8 hr after the slicing.
Evoked Ca2+ currents were measured under conditions in
which potassium currents were blocked by intracellular Cs+
and extracellular d-tubocurarine (Park, 1994 ). We did not use tetrodotoxin to block sodium channels because it prolongs a transient nonsecretory capacitance change ( Ct)
(Horrigan and Bookman, 1993 ), which is observed after depolarization of
chromaffin cells. Instead, when the whole-cell current was integrated
for estimation of the Ca2+ charge
(QCa), the current during the first 1.9 msec was
neglected for both preparations. Thus, our QCa
estimate presumably missed the activating phase of the Ca2+
current. For 2 msec pulses, therefore, QCa
represents mainly the Ca2+ tail current
(QCa was measured until 1 msec after the end of the depolarization). No leak correction was applied; instead, cells
with resting currents of more than 30 pA were discarded from
analysis. Experiments on both preparations were carried out at room
temperature.
Isolated chromaffin cell preparation and whole-cell
recordings. After they were removed, 8-12 mouse adrenal glands
were minced in cold calcium-free saline (Locke's buffer). The tissue
was then incubated with collagenase (Collagenase A, Boehringer
Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; catalytic activity 0.97 U/mg) in Locke's
buffer at a concentration of 3 mg/ml, in a shaking bath at 37°C for
15, 10, and 5 min. The tissue was triturated between incubations. The
collagenase was then washed, and the resuspended material was filtered
through a nylon mesh. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in
culture medium (M199 medium, Biochrom KG, Berlin, Germany) supplemented
with penicillin/streptomycin, 10% FCS, and 1 mg/ml bovine serum
albumin, plated on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips, and
incubated at 37°C with 10% CO2.
Cells were used for experiments starting 16 hr after isolation up to
day 2 of primary culture. Chromaffin cells could easily be
discriminated from cortical cells and fibroblasts by their round and
smooth appearance. Experiments were carried out on an inverted
microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 100). An EPC-9 patch-clamp amplifier was
used together with PULSE software (Heka, Lambrecht, Germany). The
access resistance ranged from 4 to 10 M .
Whole-cell capacitance measurements. After the whole-cell
configuration was established, the membrane capacitance was compensated by means of the "C-slow" compensation feature of the EPC-9.
Capacitance measurements were performed using the Lindau-Neher
technique implemented as the "sine+dc" mode of the "software
lock-in" extension of PULSE software. A 1 kHz, 70 mV peak-to-peak
sinusoid stimulus was applied at a DC holding potential of 80 mV.
Estimation of Cexo. Capacitance
changes obtained in mouse chromaffin cells in response to
depolarizations show, in addition to stable Cm
increments (attributable to exocytosis), a transient, nonsecretory
component ( Ct). Estimation of the exocytotic capacitance change (separation of Cexo from
Ct) was performed using three different
approaches (Figs. 1B, 2A,
3C). In all cases the average prepulse
Cm served as baseline.
Fig. 1.
Single AP-like voltage commands cause exocytotic
Cm changes in mouse chromaffin cells in
slices. A (top), Shape of a
representative mouse chromaffin cell AP measured in current clamp with
a potassium-based pipette solution (dashed line). The
solid line shows the simulated AP-like voltage command
used to study secretory responses to single APs. A,
(bottom), A typical current response to the AP-like
command, with K+ currents blocked by a
Cs+-containing pipette solution (solution A) and
d-tubocurarine in the extracellular saline (solution 1).
B, Representative Cm
measurement before and after application of a simulated chromaffin cell
AP from a holding potential of 80 mV. The top trace
displays the AP-induced Cm change. After an
initial decay ( Ct) (for more detail, see
Results), a stable Cm increment
( Cexo) remains. The asymptote of the
exponential fit to Cm was used to
quantify the Cexo evoked by the
individual APs (approach 1 in Materials and Methods).
Middle and bottom traces, Membrane
conductance (Gm) and series resistance (Gs) are shown to illustrate that there was
no major cross-talk among Cm,
Gm, and Gs
estimates.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Exocytotic Cm changes
in response to short depolarizations are restricted to the time during
the stimulation. Starting 30-60 sec after whole-cell recording, cells
were depolarized for different durations 7-15 times, with an
interpulse interval of 30 sec (depolarizing potential 0 mV). Solution 1 was used as external saline. [Ca2+]i was
buffered to 300 nM (pipette solution B or C) by mixing Ca2+-free and Ca2+-loaded buffers to accelerate
the vesicle replenishment (von Rüden and Neher, 1993 ). The
holding potential was 80 mV. A (top),
Typical capacitance changes in response to a 5 msec depolarization
early (top trace: high release probability, 1 response)
and late (bottom trace: after exhaustion of secretion,
20 responses averaged) in the experiment. The numbered shaded
areas indicate the time periods over which
Cm was averaged for the estimation of
Cexo by approaches 1-3, as described in
Materials and Methods. For this particular cell, the three approaches
estimated Cexo with 27.8 and 27 fF (average over period 1 and asymptote of the exponential fit,
respectively: approach 1), 24.4 fF (average
Cm of period 2: 35.9 and 11.5 fF for the
early trace and the average of late traces, respectively, approach 2),
and 22.9 fF (average Cm of period 3: 49.5 fF; correction term: 8.3 fF/nA × 3.2 nA sodium current, approach
3). The bottom of A displays the same
early Cm trace as above after subtraction of the exponential fit to the average of the late traces.
B, Cm traces depicting
Cexo of another slice cell in response to
depolarizations of 2, 30, 100, and 200 msec duration (from
bottom to top) recorded at comparable experimental
times. As in the bottom of A, an
exponential fit to the average Cm in
response to 5 msec depolarizations at low release probability was
subtracted from each trace. Both the 2 and the 30 msec responses do not
exhibit increases in Cm after the end of the
depolarization, indicating that Cexo is
synchronized to Ca2+ entry for short pulses; however,
longer depolarizations caused some secretion after the end of
Ca2+ entry.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Mouse chromaffin cells in slices show a biphasic
rise of Cexo with increasing duration of
Ca2+ current injection. A
(top), The filled circles represent
pooled data of 10 slice cells with Cexo
estimated by approach 2 in Materials and Methods. For convenience these
data were fitted by a double exponential (solid line).
The slow secretory component, however, did not saturate with our
maximal stimuli. The empty squares plot the
Cexo versus pulse duration data of 20 isolated mouse chromaffin cells. No clear separation into two secretory
components was observed. Experiments were carried out as described
above (pipette solution B), except that an external
[Ca2+] of 10 mM was used. The
Cexo versus pulse duration data obtained from isolated rat chromaffin cells by Horrigan and Bookman (1994) are
displayed for comparison (diamonds).
Bottom, A plot of QCa versus
pulse duration demonstrates that for short depolarizations, QCa rises linearly with increasing pulse
duration for both preparations. Furthermore, it shows that the
QCa values of slice (filled
circles) and isolated (empty squares) cells more
or less overlap for short pulses. B, The same
Cexo data as in Figure 3A
were related to their corresponding Ca2+ current integrals
(QCa). The filled circles
represent pooled and binned data from slice experiments. The data for
isolated mouse cells are displayed as empty circles.
Note that the
Cexo-QCa relation is displayed only for small QCa
values (where a difference between both preparations was observed). The
numbers of data points per bin are printed
above and below the graph for slice and
isolated chromaffin cells, respectively. The vertical
bars are SEM for Cexo values,
whereas the horizontal bars indicate SD of binned QCa values. C, The different
lines represent Cexo data from the same
experiments in slices as those analyzed in Figure 3A,
estimated by three different approaches (see Materials and Methods and
Fig. 2A). The dashed line
(approach 3 in Materials and Methods) represents early
Cexo estimates, whereas the solid
line (approach 2) and the dotted line (approach
1) result from later measurements after the pulse. This figure
demonstrates that all three approaches give quite similar
Cexo estimates at short depolarizations.
The discrepancy between the estimates at 200 and 300 msec pulse
durations is most likely attributable to some "post-pulse"
secretion.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
(1) Cexo was estimated after decline
of Ct, either as the asymptote of an
exponential fit to Cm (Figs.
1B, 4) or as the Cm average
taken over the time from 700 to 900 msec after the depolarization (Fig.
2A, and dotted line in Fig.
3C).
Fig. 4.
Secretory depression of slice cells is obtained
with a pair of 20 msec depolarizations. This figure shows a
representative Cm trace in response to a
pair of 20 msec depolarizations (to 6 and 0 mV respectively; see
top panel for illustration of the voltage-clamp
protocol). Pipette solution B and external solution 1 were used. The
sum response (S) to both stimuli was measured as the
asymptote of an exponential fit (solid line) to
Cm after the second depolarization. The
nonexocytotic Ct makes direct separate
measurement of the exocytotic responses to the first and second
depolarization ( Cexo1 and
Cexo2) difficult. Here, Cexo2 was estimated as the difference of
Cm averages over the initial 300 msec
after the second and the first depolarization, respectively.
Cexo1 was then calculated as
S Cexo2. This
analysis relies on the assumption that the nonsecretory transient
( Ct) is the same after the first and the
second depolarization. This is reasonable, because
Ct saturates for depolarizations as short as 5 msec (Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ). For illustration, the exponential fit to the Cm trace after the
second depolarization in addition was overlayed onto the
Cm segment after the first pulse
(dashed line).
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]
(2) Ct was measured in response to 5 msec depolarizations late in the experiment after the release
probability was lowered by reduction of Ca2+ influx
(omission of Ca2+ from the extracellular solution or
application of 50 µM Cd2+) or by exhaustion
of secretion by repetitive stimulation. For the purpose of
illustration, an exponential fit to the averaged low release
probability Cm traces of a cell was
subtracted from early Cm traces of the same
cell in Figure 2, A and B. For quantitative analysis, Ct was estimated by averaging
Cm between 100 and 400 msec after the end of
depolarization in low release probability traces. The same averaging
time window was used for estimation of Cm at
high release probability early in the experiment. Finally, Ct was subtracted from the early
Cm estimates to yield
Cexo shown in Figures
3A,B,C (solid
line) and 5. The different Cm estimates
at early and late experimental times are most likely attributable to
different amounts of exocytosis, because in the rare cases in which
cells did not show Ca2+ influx but had robust
voltage-dependent Na+ currents, there was no such change in
Cm with time (data not shown).
(3) For comparison, we also measured
Cm by averaging over the initial 10 msec
after the depolarization and then subtracting 8.3 fF times the peak
sodium current amplitude in nanoamperes (a correction term given by
Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ) (Fig. 2A, dashed
line in Fig. 3C). Figure 3C shows that all
three approaches result in similar values for responses to short
depolarizations.
Cm estimation and other analyses were
performed in Igor software (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR). Data are
given as mean ± SEM unless indicated otherwise. A paired
Student's t test was used for comparison of means.
Potential contamination of the capacitance measurements by
electrical coupling of mouse chromaffin cells in situ.
In our study only a fraction of mouse chromaffin cells showed
electrical coupling, and most of the coupled cells seemed to be
connected to only one neighboring cell with low junctional conductance
(200-500 pS; T. Moser, unpublished observation). Thus, for calculation
of the potential contribution of the neighbors to the capacitance
measured in the patch-clamped cell, we assumed that a cell was coupled to one neighbor with a 2 G resistance. For the high frequency of the
sinusoidal excitation voltage used (1 kHz), we can simplify the
equivalent circuit of the coupled neighbor cell to an RC circuit consisting of the junctional resistance (Rj) and
the membrane capacitance (Cm). The real and
imaginary components of this RC-circuit will contribute very little to
the Cm estimation in the patch-clamped cell,
because the break frequency of this RC element is 8.6 Hz (more than 100 times less than the excitation frequency). Thus, assuming a 9 pF
neighbor cell coupled with a Rj of 2 G , we
estimate that the Cm recording would be in error
by <1 fF because of cell coupling.
Recording solutions. The standard BBS (solution 1)
used for slice recordings contained 125 mM NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 0.2 mM d-tubocurarine. For
reduction of Ca2+ influx, we either omitted extracellular
Ca2+ (replacing it with 2 mM MgCl2)
or added 50 µM CdCl2. Our
low-Ca2+ BBS (solution 2) was identical to solution 1 except that it contained 0.1 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgCl2, and no d-tubocurarine. All BBS
solutions were adjusted to pH 7.4 by bubbling with 95% O2
and 5% CO2. The standard extracellular solution used for
recordings from isolated chromaffin cells (solution 3) contained 150 mM NaCl, 2.8 mM KCl, 10 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM sodium-HEPES, 0.2 mM
D-tubocurarine, pH 7.2.
All pipette solutions contained 145 mM cesium-glutamate, 8 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM magnesium-ATP, 0.3 mM Na2-GTP
(Boehringer Mannheim), 10 mM cesium-HEPES [CsOH was
purchased from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI)]. Pipette solution A contained
200 µM EGTA and no added Ca2+. Pipette
solutions (B, C, D, and E) were all buffered to a [Ca2+]
of ~300 nM using mixtures of Ca2+-free and
Ca2+-loaded chelator solutions, but they differed in the
amount and type of the chelator. Scatchard plot analysis was used to
determine the Kd for Ca2+ and the
purity of BAPTA to be 220 nM and 98.8%, respectively (the
Ca2+ electrode was from Microelectrodes, Londondarry, NH;
cesium-BAPTA was from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).
Ca2+-loaded EGTA was prepared as described in Neher (1988) ,
and its Kd for Ca2+ was assumed to
be 150 nM. Pipette solutions B and C contained 100 µM Ca2+-free EGTA or BAPTA, respectively; D
and E included 1 mM Ca2+-free EGTA or BAPTA,
respectively. Chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless stated
otherwise. The liquid junction potentials of extracellular solutions
against the cesium-glutamate-based internal solutions were measured to
be +10 mV for all extracellular solutions used, and all clamp
potentials were corrected accordingly.
RESULTS
Mouse chromaffin cells in slices secrete in response to
single APs
Patch-clamped mouse chromaffin cells in slices were stimulated
with AP-like voltage commands. The AP voltage template used was similar
to the average shape of mouse chromaffin cell APs (n = 80) recorded from three cells in slices in the current-clamp mode (Fig.
1A). To monitor the secretory
response, we measured Cm before and after each
stimulus (Cm cannot be measured during the
depolarization). In each of the seven cells we studied, AP stimulation
caused a stable Cm increment after a rapidly
decaying Cm transient (for an example, see Fig.
1B). Although the stable Cm
increments most likely represent exocytotic Cm
changes ( Cexo), the initial
Cm transient ( Ct) is
probably attributable to a nonsecretory capacitance change caused by
gating charge movement of sodium channels (Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ).
Thus, we could still observe Ct after rundown
of the secretory response as well as after reduction of the
voltage-gated Ca2+ entry (see Materials and Methods). Like
Horrigan and Bookman (1994) , we could abolish
Ct by incubation with dibucaine (200 µM, data not shown), which blocks gating charge movement
in squid axons (Gilly and Armstrong, 1980 ).
Ct in mouse chromaffin cells in slices on
average decays with a time constant of ~230 msec. During this study
we used three different approaches to separate exocytotic capacitance
changes ( Cexo) from
Ct, which result in similar estimates for
Cexo (see Materials and Methods and Figs.
2A, 3C).
To quantify the exocytotic response to individual APs, we applied five
to seven stimuli at intervals of 30-45 sec to seven cells starting
30-60 sec after the beginning of whole-cell recording. After
subtraction of the prepulse capacitance, the
Cm traces of a cell were averaged, and
Cexo was estimated as the asymptote of an
exponential fit to Cm (representing the part
of Cm remaining after decline of
Ct; approach 1 in Materials and Methods). For the pooled data, an average Cexo of 16.6 ± 3.6 fF (n = 7) was determined.
Analogous experiments were performed in isolated mouse chromaffin
cells. We used 10 mM extracellular [Ca2+],
instead of the 2 mM [Ca2+] in the experiments
in slices, to compensate for the reduction of calcium current caused by
the cell isolation (see "Comparison with isolated mouse chromaffin
cells" below). Nevertheless, only one of seven cells showed
comparable exocytotic responses to single APs, although all of them
secreted in response to longer depolarizations (data not shown). The
average Cexo of the seven isolated cells was
4.4 ± 2.6 fF.
For comparison of the observed AP-induced capacitance changes with the
results of an amperometric study on AP-stimulated catecholamine secretion from isolated rat chromaffin cells by Zhou and Misler (1995) ,
capacitance units must be converted to numbers of granules. The size of
chromaffin granules varies (diameters range from ~50 to 500 nM) (for review, see Carmichael, 1986 ), and thus variation is also observed for membrane capacitance increments attributable to
fusion of individual chromaffin granules (Neher and Marty, 1982 ). The
mean capacitance of individual chromaffin granules has been measured to
be 2.5 fF in bovine chromaffin cells (Neher and Marty, 1982 ; Chow et
al., 1996 ). Therefore, isolated mouse chromaffin cells would
secrete less than two granules per single AP if one assumes an
analogous mean capacitance for mouse chromaffin granules. Zhou and
Misler (1995) detected less than one release event/AP at low AP
frequency (0.2-1.0 Hz). Considering that the efficiency of their
amperometric detector was only ~25% (Zhou and Misler, 1995 ), whereas
all fusion events are revealed by Cm measurements performed in the present study, the numbers obtained in
isolated mouse and rat chromaffin cells seem compatible. On the other
hand, mouse chromaffin cells in slices did respond to individual APs
with larger capacitance changes, which on average would correspond to
approximately six to seven granules/AP (if a mean capacitance of 2.5 fF
is assumed for chromaffin granules).
Unfortunately, it was not technically possible to confirm by
amperometry that the secretory capacitance changes in response to APs
observed in slices represent fusion of chromaffin granules. In
particular, there was a large amperometric background current, probably
resulting from catecholamines set free from damaged cells (data not
shown). From fluctuation analysis of capacitance changes in response to
repetitive, brief (10 msec) depolarizations in slices, we have
estimated a mean capacitance contribution of single vesicles compatible
with values expected for chromaffin granules (T. Moser and E. Neher,
unpublished observations). Thus, it is likely that the bulk of the 16.6 fF capacitance change measured in slices in response to individual APs
is attributable to exocytosis of chromaffin granules instead of small
synaptic-like microvesicles that have been observed in neuroendocrine
cells (for review, see Thomas-Reetz and De Camilli, 1994 ).
High secretory rates in mouse chromaffin cells in slices result
from rapid release of a small pool of vesicles
The rate of secretion is commonly modeled as the product of the
number of release-ready vesicles and the Ca2+-dependent
rate constant of secretion (Thomas et al., 1993 ; Heinemann et al.,
1994 ). Thus, high secretory rates can be obtained by a large pool of
fusion-competent vesicles and/or by fast release kinetics. The
existence of a distinct depletable pool of vesicles is suggested by the
observation that the secretory rate drops despite continued
stimulation. This secretory depression is commonly interpreted as
depletion of a pool of fusion-competent vesicles, which cannot be
refilled sufficiently fast to maintain rapid secretion. We used two
protocols designed to deplete pools to characterize the kinetic
components of depolarization-induced secretion in mouse chromaffin
cells in slices.
Protocol 1: secretory responses to Ca2+ current
injections of different duration
Ideally, the study of release kinetics would include measurements
of the secretory rate throughout the time of stimulation. Then, in
principle, increasing the duration of the stimulation (depolarization-induced Ca2+ current injection) should lead
to a drop in secretory rate, indicating pool depletion. However,
voltage-dependent conductances make Cm measurements unreliable during the depolarization. In addition, amperometric measurements of catecholamine release, which can be
performed during a depolarization, are problematic in slices (see
above).
Instead, we reconstructed the relation between secretory response and
duration of Ca2+ current injection by measuring the
Cexo in response to step depolarizations (to
0 mV) of different durations. This protocol has been used previously to
study secretion in bipolar terminals (von Gersdorff and Matthews,
1994 ), isolated rat chromaffin cells (Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ),
bovine chromaffin cells (Gillis et al., 1996 ), and nerve terminals in
thin slices of the neurohypophysis (Hsu and Jackson, 1996 ).
Pulses of different duration were applied in random order. Thirty
seconds were allowed for recovery between the depolarizations. In the
course of the experiments, decline of Cexo
and Ca2+ currents was observed for all pulse durations,
which we interpreted as run-down (Augustine and Neher, 1992 ; Burgoyne,
1995 ). Interpretation of recent results has suggested that after
decline of Cexo attributable to run-down,
secretion in a different kinetic mode may persist (threshold-type
secretory mode) (Seward and Nowycky, 1996 ).
Figure 2, A and B, shows representative
Ct-corrected responses to pulses of different
length and demonstrates that for short stimuli, the exocytotic
capacitance change occurred only during the stimulation. Therefore,
even when Cexo was measured at different times after short depolarizations (see Materials and Methods and Figs.
2A, 3C), it could be interpreted as the
exocytotic capacitance change during the time of depolarization. The
highest secretory rate (calculated as
Cexo/pulse duration) was observed for the shortest (2 msec) depolarizations, indicating a very short delay of
secretion to the onset of the stimulus. On average, 2 msec depolarizations resulted in a Cexo of
14.7 ± 3.7 fF (nine depolarizations in three cells), which
corresponds to a maximal secretory rate of ~7300 fF/sec.
The top of Figure 3A (filled circles)
shows the biphasic rise of Cexo, with
increasing pulse duration in mouse chromaffin cells in slices (pooled
data from 10 cells). The fast component of a double exponential fit to
the data had a time constant ( fast) of ~7 msec
(n = 10 cells, 112 depolarizations). The observed drop in the secretory rate could be attributable to depletion of
fusion-competent vesicles or result from lessening of the stimulus
intensity (for example, because of Ca2+ current
inactivation). The integrals of the Ca2+ currents
(QCa) are plotted as a function of the pulse
length in the bottom of Figure 3A (filled
circles). The slope of this plot (which is the average calcium
current) does not decline for short pulses even if durations are much
longer than fast. Thus, the observed drop of the
secretory rate is most likely attributable to depletion of available
vesicles rather than to Ca2+ current inactivation.
Therefore, the fast component is interpreted as secretion from a
limited pool of vesicles, with fast being the time
constant for pool depletion (7 msec) and its amplitude of ~42 fF
representing the pool size. Similar results were obtained in five mouse
chromaffin cells in slices that were dialyzed with pipette solution A,
which contained 200 µM free EGTA without added Ca2+ (data not shown).
The slow secretory component apparent in the
Cm versus pulse duration plot could be fitted
equally well by a line or a slow exponential. The slope of the best fit
line between 20 and 300 msec is ~270 fF/sec. Interpretation of this
component is complicated by two observations. Secretion often persists
after the end of long depolarizations (Fig. 2B), such
that for longer pulses the rise of the Cexo
estimates with increasing pulse duration cannot be easily interpreted
as secretory rate. Also, the bottom of Figure 3A shows that
Ca2+ current inactivation is significant for long pulses.
Comparison with isolated mouse chromaffin cells
Figure 3 also presents data obtained from 20 isolated mouse
chromaffin cells (empty squares) in experiments analogous to
those performed in slices. Again, 10 mM extracellular
[Ca2+] was used for isolated cells. In most of the
isolated cells, short depolarizations (<50 msec) caused much less
secretion than in slices; however, longer stimuli (>100 msec) gave
similar Cexo values for the two preparations.
The highest secretory rate was observed for 5 msec depolarizations,
which on average caused Cexo of 7.6 ± 2.52 fF (n = 46 responses from 20 cells), corresponding to a secretory rate of ~1300 fF/sec. Responses of isolated mouse chromaffin cells to short depolarizations were similar to those obtained from isolated rat chromaffin cells (diamonds in
Fig. 3A, taken from Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ) or from
isolated bovine chromaffin cells (Gillis et al., 1996 ).
The bottom of Figure 3A shows that isolated mouse chromaffin
cells, on average, have smaller Ca2+ currents despite the
higher extracellular [Ca2+] (10 vs 2 mM).
Nevertheless, a plot of Cexo versus
QCa (Fig. 3B) depicts that cells in
slices still secrete more for a given amount of Ca2+ influx
for small QCa values. The difference between
mean Cexo values of slice and isolated cells
was statistically significant at QCa values of
0.9 pC and 2.2 pC (p < 0.01 and
p < 0.02, respectively). At higher
QCa, Cexo values from
both preparations were hard to distinguish statistically.
Protocol 2: secretory responses to pairs of
depolarizing pulses
To obtain a second estimate for the number of rapidly releasable
vesicles (pool size), we further studied secretory depression using a
paired-pulse protocol. We applied short depolarizations (20 msec,
~3 × fast, see above; interval between both
stimuli: 300 msec) to preferentially recruit vesicles with fast-release kinetics. Starting 30-60 sec after whole-cell recording, dual pulses
were applied with intervals of at least 30 sec to allow replenishment
of fusion-competent vesicles.
Figure 4 shows a typical
Cm trace and illustrates the analysis. Using
the sum (S) of the secretory Cm
responses to the first ( Cexo1) and second
( Cexo2) stimulus and the ratio (R)
of Cexo2 over
Cexo1, an upper boundary for the pool size
(Bmax) can be calculated according to:
|
(1)
|
if depression is achieved [R < 1; see Gillis et
al. (1996) for derivation].
The actual pool size would be given exactly by Equation 1 if both
stimuli released the same fraction of the pool of releasable vesicles.
Here, the depolarizing potentials were adjusted to match the
QCa values of both pulses. Using potentials of
6 mV and 0 mV for the first and second pulses, respectively, the
ratio QCa2/QCa1 was
1.05 ± 0.04 (21 double pulses in seven cells). The second Ca2+ injection of the dual pulse, however, presumably
caused a higher and spatially more extended rise of
[Ca2+]i than the first pulse, because of
residual Ca2+ and submembrane "buffer depletion" (or
saturation) remaining 300 msec after the first stimulus. In terms of
the kinetic pattern revealed by the Cexo
versus pulse duration plot, we assume that the second depolarization
recruited not only vesicles involved in the fast secretory component
but also those comprising the slower phase of secretion. This
assumption is supported by the finding that a second pulse several
seconds after the first actually gave a smaller response than a pulse
that followed the first depolarization by only 300 msec (Fig. 6). It is
therefore likely that Bmax overestimates the
actual pool size (hence the "max" notation). This may not be the
case if shorter pulses are used in the dual-pulse protocol. Here,
Bmax is taken as an upper boundary for the size
of the pool. Cexo1, on the other hand, is a
reasonable lower boundary.
Fig. 6.
Recovery time course of the fast secretory
component in mouse chromaffin cells in slices. The ratio of
Cexo caused by two identical 20 msec
depolarizations (ratio of the second over the first
Cexo) is plotted versus the separation
times of the two stimuli. Intervals of 30 sec or more were allowed
between the pairs of stimuli for complete recovery of the fast
secretory component. The filled triangles represent
ratios of responses to accordingly separated, individual 20 msec
depolarizations to 0 mV. The data were obtained in five cells from two
preparations (pipette solution B, external solution 1).
Cexo was estimated by approach 1 in Materials and Methods. The filled circles represent data
from a different set of eight cells in which we applied pairs of dual pulses at varying separation times (configuration of the dual pulses as
described in Fig. 4, pipette solution B, external solution 1).
Cexo1 of the second and the first dual
pulses (estimated as described in Fig. 4) were related to each other.
The fit to the pooled ratios from both sets of experiments revealed a
recovery time constant of 10 sec. Back-extrapolation to 0 sec
separation time indicates that the maximum depletion by the first
stimulus was 80% (empty square). For comparison, the
star symbol represents the mean ratio
Cexo2 over
Cexo1 within a dual pulse (300 msec separation, 40% depletion) determined for the same experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
In all seven cells analyzed, secretory depression (R < 1) was observed in the majority of the pulses (R = 0.60 ± 0.06; n = 21 dual pulses from seven
cells). The mean Cexo1 was 31.7 ± 4.1 fF, and the mean Cexo2 was 17.6 ± 2.4 fF. Three of twenty-one dual pulses were excluded from the
Bmax estimation because their R was
>0.8. The average Bmax was then 73.1 ± 10.7 fF. Thus, the dual-pulse analysis (in this set of experiments)
indicated a size of the pool of rapidly releasable vesicles between
31.7 and 73.1 fF.
The fast secretory component in slices is more sensitive to BAPTA
than to EGTA
In the case of close spatial coupling of Ca2+ channels
and release sites, secretion should be more sensitive to intracellular application of fast Ca2+ chelators like BAPTA than to slow
Ca2+ chelators like EGTA (Adler et al., 1991 ). The
rapid-release kinetics in mouse chromaffin cells in slices prompted us
to test the effects of 1 mM free BAPTA and EGTA on the fast
secretory component. Ten cells were investigated under each condition,
using the same protocol as depicted in Figures 2 and 3.
Both the amplitude and the time constant of the fast exponential
component were slightly altered by EGTA (~28 fF and 8 msec, respectively, as compared with 42 fF and 7 msec at low buffering conditions). In contrast, the fast secretory component was hardly detectable in cells dialyzed with BAPTA (Fig.
5A). The delayed rise of
Cexo in cells dialyzed with BAPTA most likely
represents recruitment of vesicles after the chelator became locally
increasingly saturated by the incoming Ca2+. Responses to
longer depolarizations were comparable between EGTA- and BAPTA-buffered
cells but smaller than those observed at low buffering conditions,
indicating that both buffers similarly suppress the slow secretory
component. A plot of Cexo versus QCa (Fig. 5B) shows a small
inflection for the case of BAPTA at small QCa
values, but otherwise is quite similar in shape to the Cexo pulse duration plot for both chelators
(Fig. 5A).
Fig. 5.
The fast secretory component in mouse chromaffin
cells in slices is strongly reduced by BAPTA but much less by EGTA.
Experiments were performed similarly as described in Figure 2.
Stimulation was started ~60 sec after the whole-cell configuration
was established. Cexo values were
estimated by approach 2 in Materials and Methods. For both pipette
solutions (D and E), [Ca2+] was adjusted at ~300
nM by mixing Ca2+-free and
Ca2+-loaded buffers. The holding potential was 80 mV.
A, Cexo versus pulse
duration plot of pooled data from experiments with either 1 mM free EGTA (filled circles;
n = 10 cells; solution D) or 1 mM free
BAPTA (empty circles; n = 10 cells;
solution E). Experiments were carried out in the same slice
preparations for both conditions (five different preparations). In the
BAPTA-buffered cells, short depolarizations caused much less secretion
than in those dialyzed with EGTA. With longer pulses, however, the
secretory responses under both buffering conditions were comparable or
even larger with BAPTA (possibly because of the lessening of
Ca2+ channel inactivation). B, The same
Cexo data as in A were
plotted against their corresponding Ca2+ current integrals
(QCa). The raw data were arbitrarily binned; vertical bars are SEM of
Cexo, and horizontal bars
are SD of QCa. The right-most BAPTA point
indicates that the higher Cexo values at
longer pulse durations were at least partly attributable to larger
Ca2+ currents in the BAPTA-buffered cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (10K GIF file)]
Recovery of the fast secretory component in slices
(pool refilling)
We investigated the recovery time course of the fast secretory
component by comparing Cexo for two
"pool-depleting" depolarizations (20 msec) separated by different
intervals. Figure 6 shows the time course of recovery
with 300 nM [Ca2+]free in the
pipette. The symbols represent ratios of second over first
Cexo responses. Secretion was elicited either
by separated individual depolarizations (triangles) or by
separated dual pulses (circles; the dual pulses had the same
configuration as depicted in Fig. 4). In the latter case, ratios were
calculated for the first depolarizations
( Cexo1; see Fig. 4) of the two separated dual
pulses. Pool refilling measured in both ways is quite similar and well
fitted by a single exponential with a time constant of ~10 sec
(pooled data from 13 cells, seven preparations). Back-extrapolation to
time 0 gave a ratio of 0.2 (empty square in Fig. 6),
indicating 80% pool depletion for the first stimulus.
If a first-order kinetic scheme can be assumed for the pool refilling,
as indicated by the mono-exponential time course, then the maximal
refilling rate is given by the product of the recovery rate constant
(1/ ) and the pool size. Applying the dual-pulse analysis (see above)
to each first of the separated dual pulses (which recruited the
completely filled pool in these experiments), we estimated the lower
( Cexo1) and upper pool size bounds
(Bmax) to be 25.4 ± 2.35 fF and 55.7 ± 4.8 fF, respectively (n = 26 pulses from eight
cells). Taking Cexo1,
Bmax, and the refilling rate constant, we
calculated lower and upper bounds for the maximal refilling rate as 2.5 and 5.6 fF/sec, respectively.
DISCUSSION
Chromaffin cells in situ can secrete in response to
individual APs. We demonstrated that this rapid exocytosis is from a
small pool of vesicles that probably experience a very high
[Ca2+] during the stimulation. Furthermore, the
characterization of secretion kinetics for wild-type mouse adrenal
chromaffin cells lays the foundations for future comparison with
transgenic mice.
Kinetic components of depolarization-induced secretion in mouse
chromaffin cells in slices
Fast secretory component
When voltage step depolarizations of varying duration are applied
to mouse chromaffin cells in slices, a rapid secretory component is
observed that can be well separated from a slower secretory component.
The fast component most likely represents a pool of vesicles similar in
size (42 fF) to rapidly recruited pools found in isolated rat
chromaffin cells (33.9 fF) (Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ), isolated
bovine chromaffin cells (34 fF) (Gillis et al., 1996 ), and peptidergic
nerve terminals in slices of the rat posterior pituitary (40 fF) (Hsu
and Jackson, 1996 ). The size of our fast secretory component also falls
well into the range for the pool size derived from the dual-pulse
analysis (25-73 fF) in our slice preparation.
The recovery time constant of the rapidly recruited pool in our slice
preparation (10 sec) is in good agreement with time constants of pool
refilling in other preparations. Thus, Stevens and Tsujimoto (1995)
obtained a time constant of 10 sec for synapses of cultured hippocampal
neurons, and a time constant of 8 sec was measured in bipolar terminals
by von Gersdorff and Matthews (1997) . The time needed for complete
recovery (~3 ) of the fast secretory component in our slice
preparation (with [Ca2+]i buffered to 300 nM) is slightly shorter than that required for complete
pool refilling in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells (60 sec, without
addition of Ca2+-loaded buffers to the pipette solution)
(von Rüden and Neher, 1993 ). This difference could well be caused
by the slightly elevated [Ca2+]i in our
experiments, because refilling is Ca2+ dependent (von
Rüden and Neher, 1993 ).
Slow secretory component
We did not explore the slow secretory component in detail.
Although we cannot exclude that it represents a fast delivery or priming process, we favor the idea that longer Ca2+
injections lead to a spatially more extended rise in submembrane [Ca2+] and thereby recruit fusion-competent vesicles
located at greater distances from the Ca2+ channels. The
rate of pool recovery (upper boundary: 5.6 fF/sec) is almost 50 times
smaller than the slope of the slow Cm rise (270 fF/sec). Even though [Ca2+]i is higher during
a pulse (when the slow secretory component is measured) than between
pulses (as in the recovery experiments), it seems unlikely to us that
the supply rate could increase fiftyfold because of an increased
[Ca2+]. Thus, it was concluded from experiments in which
catecholamine secretion was triggered by dialysis with high
[Ca2+] that the vesicle delivery rate may be half-maximal
already at a [Ca2+]i of 1.2 µM
(Heinemann et al., 1993 ).
The concept of a "releasable pool" implies a set of vesicles in the
same state of fusion competence; however, spatial heterogeneity of the
Ca2+ signal during membrane depolarization can divide a
pool of vesicles with homogeneous fusion competence into kinetically
distinct subpools (Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ). The fractions of
vesicles comprising the fast and slow secretory components described
here might represent subpools of a large readily releasable pool. This
large pool was presumably only marginally depleted by our maximal
stimuli.
Thus, at least two kinetic components might ensure catecholamine
release over a wide range of splanchnic nerve activities. Release at
low chromaffin cell AP frequencies will be mediated by the small fast
pool, whereas the large slow secretory component is probably recruited
during stronger stimulation.
The fast kinetics of secretion in mouse chromaffin cells in slices
suggests close spatial coupling of release sites and Ca2+
channels
The average initial secretory rate for mouse chromaffin cells in
slices (7300 fF/sec) is much faster than that obtained for isolated
mouse (1300 fF/sec), rat (680 fF/sec) (Horrigan and Bookman, 1994 ), and
bovine (860 fF/sec) (Chow et al., 1994 ) chromaffin cells. We conclude
that a fast release kinetics rather than a large pool underlies the
high secretory rate in mouse chromaffin cells in slices, because their
fast secretory component compares well in size with rapidly secreted
pools described previously for isolated chromaffin cells (see above).
High average secretory rates have also been obtained from peptidergic
nerve terminals in slices of the posterior pituitary (Hsu and Jackson,
1996 ). The different kinetics in mouse chromaffin cells in slices and in primary culture are not simply attributable to the larger
Ca2+ currents in slices, because cells in slices show more
secretion for a given amount of Ca2+ entry when the
responses to short depolarizations are compared (Fig. 3B).
Possible explanations for the faster release kinetics in chromaffin
cells in slices include (1) higher [Ca] at the release sites because
of particular spatial arrangements of Ca 2+ channels and
release sites, (2) higher [Ca] at the release sites in slices caused
by contribution of fast calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) present
only in the slice preparation, and (3) different Ca2+
dependencies of secretion in slice and isolated cells.
Possibilities (2) and (3) are unlikely. When we intracellularly
applied ruthenium red, an inhibitor of CICR (Miyamato and Racker,
1982 ), rapid exocytosis remained unaffected (50 µM in the
presence of 1 mM free EGTA; data not shown), ruling out a major contribution of CICR. Regarding possibility (3), it seems important to note that the amount of secretion in slice and isolated cells was clearly distinguishable only for small amounts of
Ca2+ influx. Therefore, one would have to postulate that
only the fast release component is more sensitive to
[Ca2+] in slices, whereas the slow component shares the
same (low) Ca2+ sensitivity with the isolated cells.
We favor the interpretation that the Ca2+ sensors of a
fraction of release sites in chromaffin cells in slices experience a very high [Ca2+] because of their close spatial relation
to the Ca2+ channels [possibility (1)]. A global
elevation of [Ca2+]i of 40-80
µM by flash photolysis in bovine chromaffin cells (Heinemann et al., 1994 ) provides a vesicle release rate constant comparable to the average value in slices (140 sec 1).
Buffering [Ca2+]i with BAPTA strongly
decreased the fast secretory component. The different effects of
equimolar concentrations of BAPTA and EGTA on the fast secretory
component in mouse chromaffin cells in slices suggest that
Ca2+ is trapped by the Ca2+ sensor of the
release site before Ca2+ binding to the chelators has
reached an equilibrium. This is taken as additional support for short
diffusional distances between Ca2+ channels and release
sites.
Possible explanations for a high [Ca2+] at the release
sites with Ca2+ originating solely from Ca2+
entry include clustering of Ca2+ channels with or without
co-clustering of release sites and molecular coupling of release sites
and Ca2+ channels. The polarized phenotype of chromaffin
cells in situ (Carmichael, 1986 ) certainly motivates
speculation of a co-clustering of "exocytotic" Ca2+
channels and release sites at the capillary pole (Michelena et al.,
1995 ), which then would favor directional catecholamine release into
the capillaries. Robinson et al. (1995) reported overlap of hotspots of
submembrane [Ca2+] and of secretion in isolated bovine
chromaffin cells and argued for release from active zone-like
structures in these cells. On the other hand, Robinson et al. (1995)
acknowledged that hotspots of submembrane [Ca2+] were
seen only in a fraction of cells. Furthermore, functional studies on
the same preparation indicated that the majority of the release sites
is located, on average, several hundreds of nanometers away from the
nearest channel (Klingauf and Neher, 1997 ). The two findings can be
accommodated if it is assumed that morphological specializations, which
exist in situ, are preserved only to a variable extent in
primary culture. The different secretion kinetics observed for slice
and isolated cells in the present study support this assumption.
Molecular coupling has been demonstrated for syntaxins with N- and
P/Q-type Ca2+ channels (Bennett et al., 1992 ; Rettig et
al., 1996 ). To our knowledge, however, no data are available showing to
what extent Ca2+ influx through different Ca2+
channel types triggers secretion in mouse chromaffin cells in situ or in isolation. Whether the high [Ca2+] at
release sites of chromaffin cells in slices during depolarization is
attributable to molecular coupling of release sites to Ca2+
channels or to segregation of Ca2+ channels into
specialized regions of the plasma membrane remains to be clarified.
FOOTNOTES
Received Dec. 3, 1996; accepted Jan. 21, 1997.
This work was supported by grants from the Human Frontiers
Science Program (RG-4/95B) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB
523) to E. Neher. We thank Drs. Kevin Gillis, Henrique v. Gersdorff,
Corey Smith, and C. Matthes for critical feedback on this manuscript.
We thank F. Friedlein and M. Pilot for expert technical assistance. We
thank Dr. R. J. Bookman for providing the rat chromaffin cell data
shown in Figure 3A.
Correspondence should be addressed to E. Neher at the above
address.
REFERENCES
-
Adler EM,
Augustine GJ,
Duffy SN,
Charlton MP
(1991)
Alien intracellular calcium chelators attenuate neurotransmitter release at the squid giant synapse.
J Neurosci
11:1496-1507 .
[Abstract]
-
Augustine GJ,
Neher E
(1992)
Calcium requirements for secretion in bovine chromaffin cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
450:247-271 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bennett MK,
Calakos N,
Scheller RH
(1992)
Syntaxin: a synaptic protein implicated in docking of synaptic vesicles at presynaptic active zones.
Science
257:255-259 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burgoyne RD
(1995)
Fast exocytosis and endocytosis triggered by depolarisation in single adrenal chromaffin cells before rapid Ca2+ current run-down.
Pflügers Arch
430:213-219 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Carmichael SW
(1986)
Morphology and innervation of the adrenal medulla.
In: Stimulus-secretion coupling, Vol 1 (Rosenheck K,
Lelkes P,
eds), pp 1-29. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
-
Carmichael SW,
Brooks JC,
Malhotra RK,
Wakade TD,
Wakade AR
(1989)
Ultrastructural demonstration of exocytosis in the intact rat adrenal medulla.
J Electron Microsc Tech
12:316-322 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Chow RH,
Klingauf J,
Neher E
(1994)
Time course of Ca2+ concentration triggering exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:12765-12769 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chow RH,
Klingauf J,
Heinemann C,
Zucker RS,
Neher E
(1996)
Mechanisms determining the time course of secretion in neuroendocrine cells.
Neuron
16:369-376 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Douglas WW
(1968)
Stimulus-secretion coupling: the concept and clues from chromaffin cells and other cells.
Br J Pharmacol
34:453-474 .
[Medline]
-
Gillis KD,
Mößner R,
Neher E
(1996)
Protein kinase C enhances exocytosis from chromaffin cells by increasing the size of the readily releasable pool of secretory granules.
Neuron
16:1209-1220 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Gilly WF,
Armstrong CM
(1980)
Gating current and potassium channels in the giant axon of the squid.
Biophys J
29:485-492 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hamill OP,
Marty A,
Neher E,
Sakmann B,
Sigworth F
(1981)
Improved patch clamp techniques for high resolution current recordings from cells and cell-free membrane patches.
Pflügers Arch
391:85-100 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Heinemann C,
von Rüden L,
Chow RH,
Neher E
(1993)
A two-step model of secretion control in neuroendocrine cells.
Pflügers Arch
424:105-112 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Heinemann C,
Chow RH,
Neher E,
Zucker RS
(1994)
Kinetics of the secretory response in bovine chromaffin cells following flash photolysis of caged Ca2+.
Biophys J
67:2546-2557 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Horrigan FT, Bookman RJ (1993) Na channel gating charge
movement is responsible for the transient capacitance increase evoked
by depolarization in rat adrenal chromaffin cells. Biophys J
64:101A.
-
Horrigan FT,
Bookman RJ
(1994)
Releasable pools and the kinetics of exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells.
Neuron
13:1119-1129 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hsu S-F,
Jackson MB
(1996)
Rapid exocytosis and endocytosis in nerve terminals of the rat posterior pituitary.
J Physiol (Lond)
494.2:539-553.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Katz B
(1969)
In: The release of neural transmitter substances. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool UP.
-
Katz B,
Miledi R
(1965)
The measurement of synaptic delay, and the time course of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction.
Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]
161:483-495.
[Medline]
-
Kidokoro Y,
Ritchie AK
(1980)
Chromaffin cell action potentials and their possible role in adrenalin secretion from the rat adrenal medulla.
J Physiol (Lond)
307:199-216 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Klingauf J,
Neher E
(1997)
Modelling buffered Ca2+ diffusion near the membrane: implications for secretion in neuroendocrine cells.
Biophys J
72:674-690 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Michelena P,
Vega T,
Montiel C,
Lopez MG,
Garcia-Perez LE,
Gandia L,
Garcia AG
(1995)
Effects of tyramine and calcium on the kinetics of secretion in intact and electroporated cells superfused at high speed.
Pflügers Arch
431:283-296.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Miyamato H,
Racker E
(1982)
Mechanism of calcium release from skeletal sarcoplasmatic reticulum.
J Membr Biol
66:193-201.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Neher E
(1988)
The influence of intracellular calcium concentration on degranulation of dialysed mast cells from rat peritoneum.
J Physiol (Lond)
395:193-214 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Neher E,
Marty A
(1982)
Discrete changes in cell membrane capacitance observed under conditions of enhanced secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
79:6712-6716 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Park YB
(1994)
Ion selectivity and gating of small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels in cultured rat adrenal chromaffin cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
481:555-570 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rettig J,
Sheng Z-H,
Kim DK,
Hodson CD,
Snutch TP,
Caterall WA
(1996)
Isoform-specific interaction of the
1a subunits of brain Ca2+ channels with the presynaptic proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:7363-7368 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Robinson IM,
Finnegan JM,
Monck JR,
Wightman RM,
Fernandez JM
(1995)
Colocalization of calcium entry and exocytotic release sites in adrenal chromaffin cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:2474-2478 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Seward EP,
Nowycky MC
(1996)
Kinetics of stimulus-coupled secretion in dialyzed bovine chromaffin cells in response to trains of depolarizing pulses.
J Neurosci
16:553-562 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stevens CF,
Tsujimoto T
(1995)
Estimates for the pool size of releasable quanta at a single central synapse and for the time required to refill the pool.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:846-849 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thomas P,
Wong JG,
Lee A,
Almers W
(1993)
A low affinity Ca2+ receptor controls the final steps in peptide secretion from pituitary melanotrophs.
Neuron
11:93-104 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Thomas-Reetz AC,
De Camilli P
(1994)
A role of synaptic vesicles in non-neuronal cells: clues from pancreatic beta cells and from chromaffin cells.
FASEB J
8:209-216 .
[Abstract]
-
von Gersdorff H,
Matthews G
(1994)
Dynamics of synaptic vesicle fusion and membrane retrieval in synaptic terminals.
Nature
367:735-739 .
[Medline]
-
von Gersdorff H,
Matthews G
(1997)
Depletion and replenishment of vesicle pools at a ribbon-type synaptic terminal.
J Neurosci
17:1919-1927 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
von Rüden L,
Neher E
(1993)
A Ca-dependent early step in the release of catecholamines from adrenal chromaffin cells.
Science
262:1061-1065 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wakade AR
(1982)
Studies on secretion of catecholamines evoked by acetylcholine or transmural stimulation of the rat adrenal gland.
J Physiol (Lond)
313:463-480.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhou Z,
Misler S
(1995)
Action potential-induced quantal secretion of catecholamines from rat adrenal chromaffin cells.
J Biol Chem
270:3498-3505 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Iankova, C. Chavey, C. Clape, C. Colomer, N. C. Guerineau, N. Grillet, J.-F. Brunet, J.-S. Annicotte, and L. Fajas
Regulator of G Protein Signaling-4 Controls Fatty Acid and Glucose Homeostasis
Endocrinology,
November 1, 2008;
149(11):
5706 - 5712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-W. Chen, Y.-Q. Feng, C.-J. Hao, X.-L. Guo, X. He, Z.-Y. Zhou, N. Guo, H.-P. Huang, W. Xiong, H. Zheng, et al.
DTNBP1, a schizophrenia susceptibility gene, affects kinetics of transmitter release
J. Cell Biol.,
October 20, 2008;
181(5):
791 - 801.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Liu, C. Schirra, D. R. Stevens, U. Matti, D. Speidel, D. Hof, D. Bruns, N. Brose, and J. Rettig
CAPS Facilitates Filling of the Rapidly Releasable Pool of Large Dense-Core Vesicles
J. Neurosci.,
May 21, 2008;
28(21):
5594 - 5601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Neef, D. Khimich, P. Pirih, D. Riedel, F. Wolf, and T. Moser
Probing the Mechanism of Exocytosis at the Hair Cell Ribbon Synapse
J. Neurosci.,
November 21, 2007;
27(47):
12933 - 12944.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Rose, S. Efendic, and M. Rupnik
Ca2+-Secretion Coupling Is Impaired in Diabetic Goto Kakizaki rats
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 1, 2007;
129(6):
493 - 508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Wang, S.-a. Chan, M. Ogier, D. Hellard, Q. Wang, C. Smith, and D. M. Katz
Dysregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression and neurosecretory function in mecp2 null mice.
J. Neurosci.,
October 18, 2006;
26(42):
10911 - 10915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Dudanova, S. Sedej, M. Ahmad, H. Masius, V. Sargsyan, W. Zhang, D. Riedel, F. Angenstein, D. Schild, M. Rupnik, et al.
Important Contribution of {alpha}-Neurexins to Ca2+-Triggered Exocytosis of Secretory Granules
J. Neurosci.,
October 11, 2006;
26(41):
10599 - 10613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Garcia, A. M. Garcia-De-Diego, L. Gandia, R. Borges, and J. Garcia-Sancho
Calcium signaling and exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells.
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2006;
86(4):
1093 - 1131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Arroyo, J. Fuentealba, N. Sevane-Fernandez, M. Aldea, A. G. Garcia, and A. Albillos
Amperometric Study of the Kinetics of Exocytosis in Mouse Adrenal Slice Chromaffin Cells: Physiological and Methodological Insights
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2006;
96(3):
1196 - 1202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Xu, K. S. Tang, V. B. Lu, C. P. Weerasinghe, A. Tse, and F. W. Tse
Maintenance of quantal size and immediately releasable granules in rat chromaffin cells by glucocorticoid
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
November 1, 2005;
289(5):
C1122 - C1133.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sedej, T. Rose, and M. Rupnik
cAMP increases Ca2+-dependent exocytosis through both PKA and Epac2 in mouse melanotrophs from pituitary tissue slices
J. Physiol.,
September 15, 2005;
567(3):
799 - 813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-A. Chan, L. Polo-Parada, L. T. Landmesser, and C. Smith
Adrenal Chromaffin Cells Exhibit Impaired Granule Trafficking in NCAM Knockout Mice
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2005;
94(2):
1037 - 1047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yang, H. Liu, Z. Hu, H. Zhu, and T. Xu
PKC-induced Sensitization of Ca2+-dependent Exocytosis Is Mediated by Reducing the Ca2+ Cooperativity in Pituitary Gonadotropes
J. Gen. Physiol.,
February 28, 2005;
125(3):
327 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gopel, Q. Zhang, L. Eliasson, X.-S. Ma, J. Galvanovskis, T. Kanno, A. Salehi, and P. Rorsman
Capacitance measurements of exocytosis in mouse pancreatic {alpha}-, {beta}- and {delta}-cells within intact islets of Langerhans
J. Physiol.,
May 1, 2004;
556(3):
711 - 726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-A. Chan and C. Smith
Low frequency stimulation of mouse adrenal slices reveals a clathrin-independent, protein kinase C-mediated endocytic mechanism
J. Physiol.,
December 15, 2003;
553(3):
707 - 717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yang, S. Udayasankar, J. Dunning, P. Chen, and K. D. Gillis
A highly Ca2+-sensitive pool of vesicles is regulated by protein kinase C in adrenal chromaffin cells
PNAS,
December 24, 2002;
99(26):
17060 - 17065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. O. Martin, M.-N. Mathieu, C. Chevillard, and N. C. Guerineau
Gap Junctions Mediate Electrical Signaling and Ensuing Cytosolic Ca2+ Increases between Chromaffin Cells in Adrenal Slices: A Role in Catecholamine Release
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 2001;
21(15):
5397 - 5405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Angleson and W. J. Betz
Intraterminal Ca2+ and Spontaneous Transmitter Release at the Frog Neuromuscular Junction
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2001;
85(1):
287 - 294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Albillos, E. Neher, and T. Moser
R-Type Ca2+ Channels Are Coupled to the Rapid Component of Secretion in Mouse Adrenal Slice Chromaffin Cells
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 2000;
20(22):
8323 - 8330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Dinkelacker, T. Voets, E. Neher, and T. Moser
The Readily Releasable Pool of Vesicles in Chromaffin Cells Is Replenished in a Temperature-Dependent Manner and Transiently Overfills at 37{degrees}C
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 2000;
20(22):
8377 - 8383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Tse and A. K Lee
Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and intracellular Ca2+ release regulate exocytosis in identified rat corticotrophs
J. Physiol.,
October 1, 2000;
528(1):
79 - 90.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Moser and D. Beutner
Kinetics of exocytosis and endocytosis at the cochlear inner hair cell afferent synapse of the mouse
PNAS,
January 18, 2000;
97(2):
883 - 888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Gopel, T Kanno, S Barg, J Galvanovskis, and P Rorsman
Voltage-gated and resting membrane currents recorded from B-cells in intact mouse pancreatic islets
J. Physiol.,
December 15, 1999;
521(3):
717 - 728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Amzica and D. Neckelmann
Membrane Capacitance of Cortical Neurons and Glia During Sleep Oscillations and Spike-Wave Seizures
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 1999;
82(5):
2731 - 2746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Villarroya, R. Olivares, A. Ruiz, M. F Cano-Abad, R. de Pascual, R. B Lomax, M. G Lopez, I. Mayorgas, L. Gandia, and A. G Garcia
Voltage inactivation of Ca2+ entry and secretion associated with N- and P/Q-type but not L-type Ca2+ channels of bovine chromaffin cells
J. Physiol.,
April 15, 1999;
516(2):
421 - 432.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Smith
A Persistent Activity-Dependent Facilitation in Chromaffin Cells Is Caused by Ca2+ Activation of Protein Kinase C
J. Neurosci.,
January 15, 1999;
19(2):
589 - 598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elhamdani, Z. Zhou, and C. R. Artalejo
Timing of Dense-Core Vesicle Exocytosis Depends on the Facilitation L-Type Ca Channel in Adrenal Chromaffin Cells
J. Neurosci.,
August 15, 1998;
18(16):
6230 - 6240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C. Guerineau, X. Bonnefont, L. Stoeckel, and P. Mollard
Synchronized Spontaneous Ca2+ Transients in Acute Anterior Pituitary Slices
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 24, 1998;
273(17):
10389 - 10395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Moser
Low-conductance intercellular coupling between mouse chromaffin cells in situ
J. Physiol.,
January 1, 1998;
506(1):
195 - 205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mennerick, D. Zenisek, and G. Matthews
Static and Dynamic Membrane Properties of Large-Terminal Bipolar Cells From Goldfish Retina: Experimental Test of a Compartment Model
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 1997;
78(1):
51 - 62.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Moser and E. Neher
Estimation of mean exocytic vesicle capacitance in mouse adrenal chromaffin cells
PNAS,
June 24, 1997;
94(13):
6735 - 6740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ales, N. H. Gabilan, M. F. Cano-Abad, A. G. Garcia, and M. G. Lopez
The Sea Anemone Toxin Bc2 Induces Continuous or Transient Exocytosis, in the Presence of Sustained Levels of High Cytosolic Ca2+ in Chromaffin Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2000;
275(48):
37488 - 37495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Keller and E. A. Neale
The Role of the Synaptic Protein SNAP-25 in the Potency of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 13, 2001;
276(16):
13476 - 13482.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|