 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 7,
Issue of April 1, 1997
pp. 2338-2347
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
The Secretion of Classical and Peptide Cotransmitters from a
Single Presynaptic Neuron Involves a Synaptobrevin-Like Molecule
Matthew D. Whim1,
Heiner Niemann2, and
Leonard K. Kaczmarek1
1 Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of
Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8066, and 2 Federal
Research Center for Virus Diseases of Animals, D-72076 Tübingen,
Germany
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
It is not yet understood how the molecular mechanisms controlling
the release of neuropeptides differ from those controlling the release
of classical transmitters, mainly because there are few peptidergic
synapses in which the environment at the presynaptic release sites can
be manipulated. Using Aplysia californica neuron B2,
which synthesizes both peptide and classical transmitters, we have
established two synaptic types. When B2 is cocultured with a sensory
neuron, a peptidergic synapse is formed. In contrast, when B2 is
cocultured with neuron B6, a classical synapse is formed. In contrast
to a common assumption, single action potentials can release both types
of transmitters. The secretion of peptide and classical transmitters by
B2 is inhibited by the presynaptic injection of tetanus toxin, but not
by an inactive mutant. Thus a synaptobrevin-like molecule is involved
in the secretion of these two types of transmitters.
Key words:
neuropeptide;
classical transmitter;
neurotransmission;
synapse;
synaptobrevin;
synaptic vesicle protein
INTRODUCTION
Many neurons, perhaps all, contain classical and
peptide cotransmitters (Kupfermann, 1991 ). Although there are
similarities in the secretion of the two types of transmitters,
differences are known. For example, the release of classical
transmitters occurs with a single action potential, whereas secretion
of peptides can require high frequency firing or a particular pattern
of activity (Dutton and Dyball, 1979 ; Jan and Jan, 1982 ; Whim and
Lloyd, 1989 ; Cropper et al., 1990b ; Peng and Horn, 1991 ). In addition,
the relationship between transmitter release and intracellular calcium apparently differs between the two transmitter types (Dodge and Rahamimoff, 1967 ; Peng and Zucker, 1993 ). Finally, although clear vesicles that contain classical transmitters are clustered at release
sites, peptide secretion does not occur at a well defined active zone
(De Camilli and Jahn, 1990 ).
Whereas many proteins likely to be important in the secretion of
synaptic vesicles have been identified, comparatively little is known
about their specific roles in transmitter secretion, particularly of
neuropeptides. One protein that seems to be essential for the release
of classical transmitters is synaptobrevin (also known as VAMP:
vesicle-associated membrane protein), a protein for which two isoforms
are known and which is expressed in neurons and other secretory cells
(Trimble et al., 1988 ; Elferink et al., 1989 ; Cain et al., 1992 ).
Synaptobrevin interacts with other nerve terminal proteins to form
complexes that may mediate vesicle docking and fusion (Sollner et al.,
1993 ). Investigations of the physiological role of synaptobrevin have
profited from the discovery that tetanus toxin, an inhibitor of
neurotransmitter release, is a protease that selectively digests
synaptobrevin 1 and 2 (Schiavo et al., 1992 ; Niemann et al., 1994 ).
Evidence also exists for the involvement of the synaptobrevins in the
release of dense core granules, some of which may contain peptides
(Penner et al., 1986 ; Dayanthi et al., 1994 ; Bruns and Jahn, 1995 ).
However, most studies have used nonpeptidergic or nonsynaptic models.
It is not clear whether synaptobrevin is involved in the synaptic
secretion of neuropeptides.
A major difficulty in studying neuropeptide release has been that there
are very few synaptic responses that have been demonstrated to be
attributable to the release of neuropeptides and in which it is
possible to record both pre- and postsynaptically (but see Willard,
1990 ). This criterion is important because it allows the selective
presynaptic injection of probes of transmitter release. We therefore
sought to produce a synapse from which we could monitor the release of
an identified neuropeptide reliably. We used motor neurons B1 or B2
from Aplysia as the peptide-releasing cell. These neurons
synthesize and release the small cardioactive peptides A and B (SCPs;
Lloyd et al., 1986 ), which are localized to dense core granules in both
cells (Reed et al., 1988 ). In addition, B2 is thought to be cholinergic
(Lloyd et al., 1985 ). Using different postsynaptic targets, we have
measured the release of both peptide and classical transmitters. Our
data indicate that a synaptobrevin-like protein is involved in both
types of neurotransmission.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture. Cells were isolated and maintained via
standard techniques (Schacher and Proshansky, 1983 ). Briefly, buccal and pedal-pleural ganglia from Aplysia californica (~5
and ~150 gm, respectively) were incubated in 1% protease (Sigma type
IX, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in sterile normal artificial seawater (nASW) at 34°C for 2 or 3 hr, respectively. Neurons were removed by using finely pulled glass probes and maintained in sterile culture medium [30% Aplysia hemolymph: 70% ASW containing penicillin (50 U/ml), streptomycin (50 µg/ml), vitamins (0.5 × MEM),and nonessential (0.2 × MEM) and essential amino acids
without L-glutamine (0.2 × MEM)] at room
temperature. Neurons generally could be identified by visual criteria
alone (Church et al., 1993 ; Whim and Lloyd, 1994 ), and any anomalous
ganglia were rejected.
Two synaptic configurations were used, depending on the type of synapse
required. In most experiments in which peptide release was monitored,
the presynaptic B1 or B2 neurons were plated individually into
poly-L-lysine-coated culture dishes (Falcon 1006, Falcon, Oxnard, CA). After 2 d, during which the neuron had grown an
extensive neuritic tree, a single pleural sensory neuron was
manipulated onto the neuritic tree. Synapses generally were used within
24 hr before significant postsynaptic growth had occurred. This
improved the conditions for voltage clamp. The second configuration
enabled synapses to form between isolated somata. All of the
experiments in which the release of ACh was monitored used this
soma soma synapse (see Haydon, 1988 ). Briefly, the presynaptic B2 and
the postsynaptic B6 neurons were isolated and separately maintained in
droplets of culture medium on dishes made nonadherent by coating them
with 5% BSA. After 24 hr the primary neurite had been reabsorbed, and
the pre- and postsynaptic cells were juxtaposed in a soma soma configuration. The neurons rapidly adhered to each other and were used
within 1-7 d. In some experiments B3 was used as the ACh detector cell
(because it also receives a cholinergic IPSP; Gardner, 1971 ). No
differences were observed between experiments using B3 and B6. For
recording, the cell pair was transferred to a
poly-L-lysine-coated culture dish. In some experiments the
release of the SCPs also was monitored in a soma soma synapse. In
these experiments the presynaptic cell was either B1 or B2, whereas the
postsynaptic cell was a single pleural sensory neuron. Most experiments
were performed in nASW containing (in mM): 460 NaCl, 10.4 KCl, 55 MgCl2, 11 CaCl2, and 15 HEPES, pH 7.8. Some experiments made use of a low Ca2+ (0.5 mM)/high Mg2+ (110 mM) ASW.
Neuron terminology. In the present experiments in which
peptide release was measured from neurons B1 and B2, no differences were seen between the two cells (see also Whim and Lloyd, 1994 ); for
simplicity in the text they are referred to collectively as B1,2. For
each figure the individual neuron is identified. For the experiments
studying the release of ACh, only B2 neurons were used.
Electrical recordings. Pre- and postsynaptic recordings were
made with two Axoclamp 2A amplifiers (Axon Instruments, Foster City,
CA) that were "linked" electronically to reduce coupling artifacts.
Each cell was impaled with a single microelectrode (5-10 M ) filled
with 2 M potassium acetate, 0.5 M KCl, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2. Before impalement the tips were dipped
into Sigmacoat (Sigma), which significantly improved the quality of the
recordings. The presynaptic cell was held under current clamp in either
bridge or discontinuous current-clamp (DCC) mode while the postsynaptic
cell was voltage-clamped with the switching voltage-clamp technique.
Voltage-clamp gain was generally 0.3-0.8 nA/mV, and switching
frequencies of 5 kHz were obtained routinely. Membrane current was
filtered at 20 Hz to 2 kHz, and recordings were stored on tape. Voltage
protocols were generated with Indec BASIC-FASTLAB software (Sunnyvale,
CA). In early experiments in which the presynaptic cell was recorded in
DCC mode (see Figs. 2 and 5), transients were apparent in the
postsynaptic records, which were phase-locked to the presynaptic
spikes. These arose as coupling artifacts between the two amplifiers
and were reduced in later recordings made in bridge mode.
Fig. 2.
The postsynaptic current evoked by B1,2
stimulation is calcium-dependent and is desensitized by exogenous SCPs.
Ai, Stimulation of B1 at 5 Hz for 5 sec in nASW evoked a
slow inward current in the postsynaptic sensory neuron, which was
voltage-clamped at a holding potential of 40 mV. Aii,
When the bathing solution was changed to a low Ca2+/high
Mg2+ ASW (0.5 mM Ca2+/110
mM Mg2+), the synaptic current could not be
evoked, but (Aiii) could be elicited again when
the bath solution was returned to nASW. The notch in the
synaptic current was an artifact caused by electrical coupling between
pre- and postsynaptic electrodes (individual transients are not visible
because of filtering). Bath application of 0.1 µM
SCPB evoked a slow inward current in the sensory neuron in
(Aiv) nASW and (Av) low
Ca2+/high Mg2+ ASW. B,
Desensitization of SCP receptors blocked the synaptic current.
Bi, In nASW, stimulation of B1 at 5 Hz for 5 sec evoked a slow synaptic current in the postsynaptic sensory neuron, which was
voltage-clamped at a holding potential of 40 mV. Bii,
Continuous application of 0.1 µM SCPB for 10 min desensitized the postsynaptic SCP receptors (see Results). In these
conditions stimulation of B1 no longer evoked a synaptic current. Note
the slow presynaptic depolarization (arrow) that
occurred after B1 stimulation. Biii, After extensive
washing in nASW, stimulation of B1 again evoked a slow synaptic
current. The notch in the synaptic current reflects coupling between the pre- and postsynaptic electrodes (individual transients are not visible because of filtering). A and
B are from different cell pairs.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
The slow synaptic current induced by B2
stimulation does not involve the release of ACh. Ai, In
a B2 sensory neuron synapse, the puffed application of 100 µM ACh onto the somata of the sensory neuron evoked an
outward current. Aii, This current was blocked in the
presence of 500 µM PTMA, a cholinergic antagonist.
Aiii, After washout of PTMA, the response to ACh was
observed again. Bi, In the same synaptic pair,
stimulation of B2 at 2 Hz for 10 sec evoked a slow inward current in
the sensory neuron. Bii, This current was not affected
by the presence of 500 µM PTMA. Biii, The
synaptic current remained stable after washout of the PTMA. The sensory
neuron was voltage-clamped at 40 mV throughout. The notch in the synaptic current reflects coupling between
the pre- and postsynaptic electrodes (individual transients are not
visible because of filtering). C, In an isolated sensory
neuron, the outward current evoked by a 100 msec puff of 100 µM ACh (Control) was reduced in the
presence of 0.1 µM SCPB. The sensory neuron
was voltaged-clamped at a holding potential of 40 mV.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]
Cell injections. Injections were made with brief pressure
pulses (3-20 msec) with a Picospritzer (General Valve, Fairfield, NJ)
and an injection pressure of 14 psi. Microelectrodes had tip diameters
of ~1 µm. Recombinant tetanus toxin and the inactive tetanus toxin
mutant were prepared as described (Yamasaki et al., 1994 ) and stored in
aliquots at 80°C. Toxin (12 µM) was injected in a
solution containing 0.5% fast green, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM HEPES, and 75 mM potassium glutamate, pH
7.2. For the purposes of statistical analysis, comparisons between
treatments were made by a two-tailed Student's t test.
RESULTS
Stimulation of B1,2 neurons induces a slow inward current in the
postsynaptic sensory neuron
To establish cocultures of peptidergic neurons with postsynaptic
targets, we cultured single B1 or B2 neurons from the buccal ganglia of
Aplysia with single sensory neurons from the pleural ganglia. Exogenous application of the SCP neuropeptides has been shown
to evoke an inward current in these sensory neurons (Ocorr and Byrne,
1985 ). The sensory neurons were placed onto the neurites of the B1,2
neurons (see Materials and Methods for neuron terminology) after 2 d in culture, at which time the peptidergic B1,2 neurons had
regenerated a large neuritic tree (Fig.
1A).
Fig. 1.
B1,2 stimulation and SCPB application
evoke a slow current in the postsynaptic neuron associated with a
decrease in membrane conductance. A, Bright-field image
of a presynaptic B1 neuron (at left) with associated
neuritic tree and a postsynaptic sensory neuron. Scale bar, 80 µm.
Bi, Stimulation of B2 at 5 Hz for 20 sec evoked a slow
inward current in the sensory neuron. The sensory neuron was
voltage-clamped at a holding potential of 40 mV, and 10 mV
hyperpolarizing steps were applied at 20 sec intervals. Bii, Bath application of 3 µM
SCPB (indicated by black bar) evoked a slow
inward current in the sensory neuron. C, In a different cell pair, a single B2 spike elicited a slow inward current in the
postsynaptic sensory neuron, which was voltaged-clamped at 40 mV and
hyperpolarized by 2 mV every 20 sec.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
Stimulation of a presynaptic B1,2 neuron with depolarizing current
pulses triggered action potentials (for which the duration at 50%
amplitude was 3.5 msec ± 1.1; mean ± SD, n = 7). These action potentials evoked a slow inward current in the
postsynaptic sensory neuron when the latter was voltage-clamped at a
holding potential of 40 mV (Fig. 1Bi). The inward
current outlasted the period of B1,2 stimulation. Recordings of the
activity of B1,2 in the freely behaving animal have indicated that
these cells fire at frequencies at ~3 Hz for up to 3 sec during
ingestion of food (Lloyd et al., 1988 ). The postsynaptic inward current progressively increased when cells were stimulated by frequencies within this range.
To determine the change in conductance during the slow inward current,
we stepped the postsynaptic membrane potential at regular intervals
from 40 to 50 mV. The decrease in the size of the current steps
during the synaptic current indicated an apparent decrease in membrane
conductance (Fig. 1Bi). Bath application of 3 µM SCPB also evoked a slow inward current,
with an associated decrease in membrane conductance (Fig.
1Bii).
Although, as is typical for many peptidergic neurons, the amplitude of
the postsynaptic current increased during trains of action potentials,
in some preparations a single action potential was sufficient to induce
a slow synaptic current. This was observed most frequently (in ~50%
of preparations) when a synapse was made between two opposed cell
bodies (see Materials and Methods). This may indicate that under these
conditions the synapses are concentrated in a relatively small area.
The synaptic delay after a single action potential was 1.18 sec ± 1.02 (mean ± SD, n = 5). Part of this delay
presumably reflects the fact that peptides are not released at
specialized zones but diffuse to the site of action. In addition, the
postsynaptic actions of the SCPs are mediated via a second messenger
(Abrams et al., 1984 ). A similar decrease in membrane conductance to
that observed during repetitive stimulation also was observed during
the current evoked by a single action potential (Fig.
1C).
Induction of the synaptic current is calcium-dependent
The synaptic current induced by stimulation of B1,2 neurons in
nASW (Fig. 2Ai) was blocked by
lowering the concentration of calcium and raising that of magnesium in
the bathing medium (Fig. 2Aii). The synaptic current
could be evoked again when nASW was reintroduced (Fig.
2Aiii). Bath application of a low concentration of
SCPB evoked a slow postsynaptic current in both nASW and
low Ca2+/high Mg2+ ASW (Fig.
2Aiv,v), indicating that the elimination of the
synaptic current in the low Ca2+/high Mg2+ ASW
was likely to be attributable to an action at a presynaptic site. Thus
the induction of the synaptic current involved the release of
transmitter and was mimicked by the exogenous application of the SCPs
(although SCPB generally was used, the SCPs are equipotent in all preparations examined; Lloyd et al., 1985 ). The following experiments were then designed to test directly whether the synaptic current was attributable to the release of the SCPs.
The synaptic current is desensitized by exogenous SCPs
If the slow synaptic current results from the release of the SCPs,
it should be possible to block the current by desensitizing the
postsynaptic SCP receptors. SCPA and SCPB have
similar sequences, and the responses to these two peptides
cross-desensitize. Their effects thus are thought to be mediated by a
single receptor (Abrams et al., 1984 ).
A synaptic current was evoked by stimulation of the presynaptic B1,2
neuron (Fig. 2Bi). Bath application of 0.1 µM SCPB then induced an inward current in the
sensory neuron. In the continued presence of peptide, this current
slowly recovered toward the control level. Desensitization typically
took ~10 min in the continuous presence of peptide, after which
subsequent stimulation of B1,2 no longer evoked a synaptic current
(Fig. 2Bii). After prolonged washout of exogenous
SCPB, the synaptic current could be evoked again by
presynaptic stimulation (Fig. 2Biii). Similar results were
seen in five experiments.
The inhibition of the synaptic current in response to application of
the SCPs was not attributable to a reduction of presynaptic excitability. Previous work has shown that the release of radiolabeled SCPs from B1,2 neurons is unaffected by the presence of exogenous SCPs
(Whim and Lloyd, 1992 ). Moreover, B1,2 neurons were hyperexcitable in
the presence of SCPB, as evidenced by the slow presynaptic depolarization that occurred in these conditions (Fig. 2Bii,
arrow). Thus the inhibition of the slow synaptic current in the
presence of SCPB is likely to be attributable to a
desensitization of the postsynaptic receptor for the SCPs rather than
to an inhibition of peptide release.
The synaptic- and SCPB-induced currents have the same
null potential
To determine the null potential of the synaptic current evoked by
stimulation of the presynaptic B1,2 neuron, we stepped the postsynaptic
membrane potential from 30 mV to 70 mV in 5 mV increments before
and at the peak of the synaptic current. Similar measurements were made
before and at the peak of the current induced by the exogenous
application of 0.1 µM SCPB to the same
synaptically coupled cell pair. The resulting I-V traces
for one cell pair are shown in Figure 3A.
Then the net induced current (i.e., the difference current) was
calculated for both the synaptic- and SCPB-evoked currents.
The voltage dependence and null potential of the difference currents
were very similar, and some rectification was observed for both (Fig.
3B). Similar results were obtained in four synapses. The
null potential for the synaptic current from four cell pairs was 54
mV ± 3.4 (mean ± SD), whereas the null potential for the
SCPB-induced current was 54 mV ± 5.9 (mean ± SD). The slow synaptic currents induced by repetitive stimulation or by
a single action potential showed the same voltage dependence (data not
shown).
Fig. 3.
The synaptic- and SCPB-induced
currents have a similar voltage dependence. A,
Current-voltage relationships were measured in a postsynaptic sensory
neuron before (Control) and at the peak of the
synaptic current evoked by stimulation of B2 at 5 Hz for 15 sec
(+B2 stimulation) and before
(Control) and at the peak of the current evoked
by bath application of 0.1 µM SCPB
(+SCPB). The records show the
membrane current recorded in response to voltage steps to 30 mV
(top traces), 50 mV (middle traces), and 70 mV (bottom traces). The holding voltage was
40 mV. B, The difference currents for both the
synaptic- and SCPB-induced currents show a similar voltage
dependence and null potential. A and B
are from the same experiment.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
SCPB application and synaptic stimulation produce
antiaccommodation in the postsynaptic sensory neuron
When a depolarizing current pulse (500 msec) is applied to the
postsynaptic sensory neuron in a synaptic pair, a single action potential is evoked at the onset of the pulse. In the presence of a low
concentration of SCPB the same depolarization evokes multiple action potentials (Fig. 4A).
This behavior has been termed "antiaccommodation" and is believed
to be attributable to the inhibition of a potassium conductance that is
open at the resting potential (Klein et al., 1986 ). If the SCPs are
released synaptically, then stimulation of the presynaptic B1,2 neuron
also should evoke antiaccommodation in the sensory neuron. This is
indeed what we observed. In the experiment illustrated in Figure 4,
when the presynaptic B1 neuron was stimulated at 5 Hz for 15 sec (a
paradigm that induced a synaptic current in this cell pair; data not
shown), the number of action potentials evoked by the depolarizing
pulse was increased from one to five (Fig. 4B). Both
the response to exogenous SCPB application and B1
stimulation readily reversed. Similar results were observed in three
other experiments. Thus both B1,2 stimulation and SCPB
application produce antiaccommodation in the postsynaptic sensory
neuron.
Fig. 4.
B1,2 stimulation and SCPB application
both produce anti-accommodation in the postsynaptic sensory neuron.
A, Depolarization of the sensory neuron for 500 msec
evoked a single action potential (Control). After
bath application of 0.1 µM SCPB, the same
depolarization evoked seven action potentials in the sensory neuron
(Peak of response). Recovery was seen after washout of
SCPB. B, Same protocol as in
A, but after a control depolarization
(Control) B1 was stimulated at 5 Hz for 15 sec,
after which depolarization of the sensory neuron now evoked five action
potentials (Peak of response). After washout, each
depolarization again evoked one action potential. The sensory neuron
was maintained at a holding potential of 40 mV throughout the
experiment by injecting a variable amount of hyperpolarizing
current.
[View Larger Version of this Image (9K GIF file)]
The synaptic current does not contain a significant
cholinergic component
In addition to releasing the SCPs, neuron B2 is thought
to be a cholinergic neuron on the basis of its choline
acetyltransferase activity (Lloyd et al., 1985 ). To determine whether
the synaptic current evoked by B2 stimulation involved the release of
acetylcholine (ACh), we examined the response of the sensory neurons to
local application of 100 µM ACh. When ACh was applied to
the sensory neuron in a synaptically coupled cell pair, it evoked an
outward current (Fig. 5Ai). This current was
blocked in the presence of 500 µM phenyltrimethylammonium
(PTMA; Fig. 5Aii), an antagonist of the "slow IPSP" ACh
receptor in Aplysia (Kehoe, 1972a ). However, in the same
synaptic pair PTMA did not markedly affect the slow synaptic current
evoked by stimulation of B2 at 2 Hz for 10 sec (Fig. 5B).
Similar results were observed at three synapses. These results indicate
that the slow inward current does not include a significant cholinergic
component.
Because neuron B2 is believed to be cholinergic, these findings raise
the question as to why a cholinergic component was not observed. One possibility is that released peptide modulated the postsynaptic ACh receptor. Consistent with this suggestion, we noted
that the response of the sensory neuron to the puffed application of
ACh was attenuated in the presence of exogenous SCPB (Fig. 5C). This effect was observed consistently. In six cells the
response to 100 µM ACh was significantly depressed to
44 ± 15% of its control value in the presence of 1 µM SCPB (mean ± SD, p < 0.001). Because B2 often fires spontaneously in culture (Whim and
Lloyd, 1994 ), the released SCPs therefore may have resulted in a
chronic depression of the ACh response at the postsynaptic membrane.
Other explanations include the possibility that the ACh receptors are
not clustered under the sites of transmitter release (Anderson et al.,
1977 ).
Presynaptic neuron B2 releases ACh
Although the secretion of ACh from B2 could not be detected by
using a pleural sensory neuron, we examined whether other neurons might
be able to monitor the release of ACh. For these experiments we used
neurons B6 or B3, because both receive a cholinergic IPSP in
situ (Gardner, 1971 ). In the experiment shown in Figure
6, when B2 was combined with buccal neuron B6 in a
soma soma configuration (Fig. 6A), single
presynaptic action potentials evoked a rapid outward current in B6 when
the latter was voltage-clamped at 40 mV (Fig. 6Bi).
The synaptic current was eliminated in a low Ca2+/high
Mg2+ ASW (data not shown) and was blocked completely in the
presence of D-tubocurarine and PTMA (Fig.
6Bii), antagonists of the "rapid" and "slow"
IPSPs in Aplysia neurons, respectively (Kehoe, 1972a ). Similarly, local application of ACh from a puffer pipette onto the B6
neuron in the same synaptic pair also evoked an outward current, which
was blocked by the combination of D-tubocurarine and PTMA
(Fig. 6Cii). Interestingly, the synaptic current was eliminated completely by D-tubocurarine, but not by PTMA,
whereas the response to the application of ACh was blocked only in the presence of both antagonists (data not shown). As a control for specificity, when B1 (a noncholinergic neuron) was combined with neuron
B6 (or B3) in a soma soma configuration, a single B1 action potential
did not evoke a rapid outward current in the postsynaptic neuron
(n = 2).
Fig. 6.
Release of ACh from B2 can be detected with B6 as
the postsynaptic neuron. A, Bright-field image of a
presynaptic B2 neuron and a postsynaptic B6 neuron combined in a
soma soma configuration. The B2 neuron is at lower
right. The stumps projecting from both neurons are the remains
of the primary neurites. Scale bar, 80 µm. Bi, A
single action potential in B2 evoked a rapid outward current in the
postsynaptic B6 neuron, which was voltage-clamped at 40 mV.
Bii, The outward current was blocked in the presence of
the cholinergic antagonists D-tubocurarine and PTMA (100 µM and 500 µM, respectively).
Biii, After washout of the antagonists, the outward
current could be elicited again. Ci, The puffed
application of 1 mM ACh onto B6 evoked an outward current.
Cii, The current was blocked in the presence of
D-tubocurarine and PTMA. Ciii, The current
recovered after washout of the antagonists. Di, Bath application of 10 µM SCPB evoked a slow
biphasic current in the B6 neuron. Dii, The current was
not markedly affected by the presence of D-tubocurarine and
PTMA. Diii, The current remained stable after washout of
the antagonists. All recordings are from the same cell pair. B2 was
held at 40 mV throughout, except when stimulated to fire in
B.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]
To confirm further that the outward current at these synapses was
elicited by ACh release and not by release of the SCPs, we tested the
response of B6 and B3 to bath-applied SCPs. In the cell pair shown in
Figure 6B-D, SCPB produced a biphasic
response: an early inward current followed by a later outward current.
Neither phase was markedly affected by D-tubocurarine and
PTMA (Fig. 6Dii). We conclude that the outward
synaptic current produced in response to a single action potential in
neuron B2 likely is attributable to the secretion of ACh and does not
involve a significant SCP-dependent component.
Presynaptic injection of tetanus toxin inhibits the release of both
ACh and the SCPs
Tetanus toxin has been shown to cleave Aplysia
synaptobrevin (Yamasaki et al., 1994 ) and to inhibit the release of ACh
from Aplysia neurons in situ (Mochida et al.,
1989 ; Schiavo et al., 1992 ). We observed similar effects of tetanus
toxin light chain on the release of ACh from B2 (Fig.
7Ai). After control postsynaptic currents
were recorded, the toxin was injected into the presynaptic B2 neuron.
To ensure that inhibition did not occur simply as a result of
transmitter depletion, we stored the synaptic pairs in low
Ca2+/high Mg2+ ASW to prevent secretion. Six to
eight hours later the postsynaptic response to single B2 action
potentials again was recorded in nASW at the same synapse. In the
experiment shown in Figure 7Ai, the synaptic current was
eliminated after tetanus toxin injection. In a series of experiments
toxin injection reduced the postsynaptic current to 8 ± 9% of
the preinjected value (mean ± SD, n = 4).
Fig. 7.
Tetanus toxin inhibits the release of ACh and the
SCPs. A, ACh release was monitored as the amplitude of
the postsynaptic current at a holding voltage of 40 mV (in neuron B3
in these examples), which was evoked by a B2 action potential before
and 6-8 hr after injection into the presynaptic neuron of either
(Ai) tetanus toxin light chain
(TeTX) or (Aii) an inactive
mutant [TeTX(E-Q)]. B, SCP release was
monitored as the amplitude of the inward current evoked in the
postsynaptic sensory neuron by stimulation of the presynaptic B2 neuron
(in these examples) before and 6-8 hr after injection into the
presynaptic neuron of either (Bi) tetanus toxin light
chain (TeTX) or (Bii) an inactive
mutant [TeTX(E-Q)]. The synaptic current was evoked by
a single action potential in these examples. The holding voltage was
40 mV in Bi and 35 mV in Bii. C, Group data indicate that the release of the SCPs and
ACh was inhibited significantly by tetanus toxin light chain
[ p < 0.02 for ACh release,
p < 0.01 for SCP release; inhibition was measured by comparing the effect of TeTx and
TeTX(E-Q) injections]. Values are mean ± SD
(n = 4-6 for each treatment).
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]
As a control for any nonspecific changes in transmission after
intracellular injection, we also tested the effects of injecting a
mutated tetanus toxin in which a glutamate in the zinc-binding domain
had been replaced with a glutamine. This mutant is unable to digest
Aplysia synaptobrevin (Yamasaki et al., 1994 ). Presynaptic injection of this protein did not inhibit secretion of ACh over the
same time course (98 ± 54% of the preinjection value, mean ± SD, n = 4; the raw traces from one experiment are
shown in Fig. 7Aii). Comparing the effects of the two
treatments indicated that the inhibition seen with tetanus toxin light
chain was significant (Fig. 7C; p < 0.02).
After confirming that tetanus toxin inhibits the release of ACh from
synapses in vitro, we then examined the effect of injecting the light chain of tetanus toxin on the release of the SCPs. In preliminary experiments we noted that the result of the toxin injection
tended to vary with the distance between the pre- and postsynaptic
recording sites. Thus, to standardize the distance between the point of
injection and the site of action, we measured peptide release, using
soma soma synapses made from presynaptic B1 or B2 neurons and single
postsynaptic sensory neurons. Six to eight hours after injection of
toxin, the slow synaptic current was reduced to 19 ± 34% of the
preinjection value (mean ± SD, n = 6). In four of
the six synaptic pairs, transmission was effectively eliminated (see
Fig. 7Bi). Tetanus toxin injection inhibited the release of
peptide that was induced either by single (Fig. 7Bi) or
multiple action potentials (data not shown). Again, as a control for
any nonspecific changes resulting from the injection, we also injected
the inactive tetanus toxin mutant. After injection the slow synaptic
current was 92 ± 22% of the preinjection value (mean ± SD,
n = 4; an example of one experiment is shown in Fig.
7Bii). Comparing the effects of the two treatments indicated
that the inhibition seen with tetanus toxin was significant (Fig.
7C; p < 0.01). We conclude that tetanus
toxin inhibits the secretion of peptide transmitters, in addition to
classical transmitters, from B1 and B2 neurons.
DISCUSSION
We have developed two synaptic preparations in which it is
possible to monitor the release of a peptide and a classical
transmitter from a single presynaptic neuron and have tested the role
of synaptobrevin in transmitter release along both pathways.
Using the B1 and B2 neurons, which synthesize and release the SCPs
(Lloyd et al., 1986 ; Whim et al., 1992), we have constructed a
peptidergic synapse in vitro that used a sensory neuron as a postsynaptic detector for the SCPs. Five lines of evidence indicate that transmission is attributable to the release of the SCPs at this
synapse. First, the synaptic current and the SCPB-induced current have a prolonged time course, are inward at 40 mV, and are
associated with an apparent decrease in membrane conductance. Second,
the voltage dependence and null potential of the synaptic- and
peptide-induced currents are very similar. Third, because antagonists
for most neuropeptide receptors (including the SCPs) are not available,
we used a desensitization protocol to block the function of the
postsynaptic SCP receptors. When the SCP receptors had been
desensitized, we were unable evoke the synaptic current. Fourth, both
stimulation of the B1,2 neuron and SCPB application produced an antiaccommodatory effect on the postsynaptic sensory neuron. Finally, although B2 is a combined cholinergic/peptidergic neuron, the slow synaptic current did not seem to involve the release
of ACh, because a cholinergic antagonist that blocked the effect of ACh
on the postsynaptic neuron was without effect on the synaptic current.
These five lines of evidence all point to the conclusion that the
synaptic current is at least partially (and maybe wholly) attributable
to the release of the SCPs.
Because B2 also synthesizes ACh (Lloyd et al., 1985 ), we also were able
to detect the release of this classical transmitter from neuron B2 by
using a different postsynaptic detector neuron. The outward synaptic
current that we observed in these synapses likely is attributable to
the secretion of ACh, because it was mimicked by exogenous ACh (but not
the SCPs) and was blocked completely by a cholinergic antagonist.
We have demonstrated that the synaptic vesicle protein synaptobrevin is
required for the synaptic release of neuropeptides. The presynaptic
injection of tetanus toxin, a metalloprotease that selectively digests
synaptobrevin, inhibited the release of both the SCPs and ACh.
Injection of a mutated toxin, which does not digest synaptobrevin, did
not depress the release of either ACh or the SCPs. Thus a
synaptobrevin-like protein plays an important role in the secretion of
both clear vesicles and large dense core granules. These data are in
agreement with the emerging picture that the secretion of many vesicle
types share common proteins (Martin, 1994 ; Rothman, 1994 ).
Synaptobrevin, first identified as a component of synaptic vesicles,
recently has been localized to the dense core granules of PC12 cells, a neuroendocrine cell line (Papini et al., 1995 ), and is involved in
secretion of norepinephrine from permeabilized PC12 cells (Lomneth et
al., 1991 ). The precise role of synaptobrevin is not known, but because
vesicles seem to dock normally in its absence, it has been suggested
that it is involved in evoked vesicle fusion at a point downstream from
docking (Hunt et al., 1994 ).
We found that peptide release often could be evoked with a single
action potential. This agrees with previous data that the release of
radiolabeled SCPs from B1 and B2 is linearly dependent on the spike
number (Whim and Lloyd, 1994 ). Thus, contrary to a widespread
assumption, the secretion of neuropeptides does not necessarily require
high frequency bursts of action potentials. This observation is
unlikely to be an artifact of cell culture, because the frequency
characteristics of SCP release from another Aplysia motor
neuron, B15, are very similar in situ and in culture (Whim
and Lloyd, 1994 ). Instead, the parameters controlling the release of
peptides may vary from cell to cell. For example, neurons B1 and B2,
which fire at low frequencies in the behaving animal (Lloyd et al.,
1988 ), can release the SCPs with a single action potential (see
Results), whereas neuron B15, which fires at up to 12 Hz in the
behaving animal (Cropper et al., 1990a ,b), only releases the SCPs when
firing at a relatively high frequency during long-duration bursts (Whim
and Lloyd, 1989 , 1990 ; Cropper et al., 1990b ). This diversity
influences the types of transmitter released. Like B2, neuron B15 is a
cholinergic neuron, and release of ACh occurs with each action
potential (Cohen et al., 1978 ). Thus when firing slowly, B15 seems to
function as a purely cholinergic neuron and as a combined
cholinergic-peptidergic neuron when firing rapidly. In contrast,
neuron B2 may function as a combined cholinergic-peptidergic neuron at
all frequencies.
It is believed that in contrast to the vesicles that contain classical
neurotransmitters, peptide-containing dense core granules are not
released at specialized sites (but see Schroeder et al., 1994 ). This
has led to the proposal that only with multiple action potentials does
calcium rise to sufficiently high levels away from the vicinity of the
plasma membrane to trigger the release of neuropeptides. Our finding
that the SCPs may be released with a single action potential indicates
that some dense core granules could be functionally docked at the
presynaptic membrane (although this needs to be examined at the EM
level). This suggestion is consistent with the observation that a
subset of dense core granules in pituitary cells can be released
rapidly (Thomas et al., 1993 ).
Although neuron B2 is a cholinergic neuron and sensory neurons express
ACh receptors, we could not detect a cholinergic component in the
synaptic response when these neurons were paired. One explanation is
that the ACh receptor is not clustered at postsynaptic sites. These
neurons seem to express only one type of ACh receptor, which is blocked
by the antagonist PTMA. In contrast, B6 neurons, which readily form
cholinergic synapses with B2 neurons, express at least two types of
receptors, one of which is blocked by D-tubocurarine and
the other by PTMA. Only the D-tubocurarine receptors seemed to be localized at synaptic sites, because the synaptic response could
be blocked by D-tubocurarine alone. We also found that the synaptic current reversed close to 60 mV (data not shown) as expected
for the D-tubocurarine-sensitive ACh receptor (Kehoe, 1972b ). It is likely, therefore, that only the
D-tubocurarine receptors cluster under the sites of
transmitter release.
A second factor that may contribute to the absence of a cholinergic
synapse between a B1,2 neuron and a sensory neuron is a reduction in
the sensitivity of the target PTMA-ACh receptors in the presence of
the SCPs. This follows from the observation that the outward current
evoked by the local application of ACh was reduced when the SCPs were
coapplied. A similar mechanism operates at some vertebrate receptors in
which calcitonin gene-related peptide has been shown to desensitize
nicotinic ACh receptors (Mulle et al., 1988 ).
Some neurons require a signal from their in vivo target
before they become competent to release transmitter (see Haydon and Drapeau, 1995 ), whereas others can be induced to do so when their initial axon segments are manipulated into close proximity (Hawver and
Schacher, 1993 ). The area of contact between two cells may be important
for the stabilization of classical transmitter synapses in
vitro (Evers et al., 1989 ). Whether similar considerations apply
to the formation of peptidergic synapses is not known. A specialized
area of contact, however, seems not to be required. For example, in the
bullfrog the release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)
from preganglionic neurons is detected by cells that are not
anatomically close to the LHRH-containing nerve terminals (Jan and Jan,
1982 ). The detector neuron simply may record the spillover of peptide
into the extracellular space.
Although the mechanism by which the SCPs evoked a postsynaptic inward
current was not the focus of this study, other work has indicated that
the SCPs inhibit a resting potassium current (probably the "S"
current) in sensory neurons (Baxter and Byrne, 1989 ). Nevertheless the
reversal potential of approximately 54 mV that we observed for both
the synaptic- and SCPB-induced currents does not correspond
to the equilibrium potential for potassium. Possibly additional ionic
currents are modulated. Other workers, however, have shown that the
serotonin-dependent depolarization of sensory neurons, which also
involves a modulation of the S channel, approaches the null current at
approximately 45 mV. This has been explained by the strong outward
rectification of the S current (Siegelbaum et al., 1982 ; Pollock et
al., 1985 ). We likewise observed a rectification in the synaptic- and
SCPB-induced currents in some experiments.
In conclusion, we have used two in vitro synapses to
demonstrate the release of a neuropeptide and a classical transmitter from the same presynaptic neuron. A synaptobrevin-like molecule is
involved in the two forms of neurotransmission, and the release of both
types of transmitter can occur with a single action potential. This
preparation may be useful in examining further the role of other
vesicular and plasma membrane molecules in the release of neuropeptides.
FOOTNOTES
Received Dec. 4, 1996; revised Jan. 15, 1997; accepted Jan. 21, 1997.
This work was supported by Grant NS-18492 from National Institutes of
Health to L.K.K. We thank Drs Si-Qiong Liu and Benjamin White for
critically reading this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Matthew D. Whim, Department
of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street,
New Haven, CT 06520-8066.
REFERENCES
-
Abrams TW,
Castellucci VF,
Camardo JS,
Kandel ER,
Lloyd PE
(1984)
Two endogenous neuropeptides modulate the gill and siphon withdrawal reflex in Aplysia by presynaptic facilitation involving cAMP-dependent closure of a serotonin-sensitive potassium channel.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
81:7956-7960 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anderson MJ,
Cohen MW,
Zorychta E
(1977)
Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
268:731-756 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baxter DA,
Byrne JH
(1989)
Serotonergic modulation of two potassium currents in the pleural sensory neurons of Aplysia.
J Neurophysiol
62:665-679 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bruns D,
Jahn R
(1995)
Real-time measurement of transmitter release from single synaptic vesicles.
Nature
377:62-65.
[Medline]
-
Cain CC,
Trimble WS,
Lienhard GE
(1992)
Members of the VAMP family of synaptic vesicle proteins are components of glucose transporter-containing vesicles from rat adipocytes.
J Biol Chem
267:11681-11684 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Church PJ,
Whim MD,
Lloyd PE
(1993)
Modulation of neuromuscular transmission by conventional and peptide transmitters released from excitatory and inhibitory motor neurons in Aplysia.
J Neurosci
13:2790-2800 .
[Abstract]
-
Cohen JL,
Weiss KR,
Kupfermann I
(1978)
Motor control of buccal muscles in Aplysia.
J Neurophysiol
41:157-180 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Cropper EC,
Kupfermann I,
Weiss KR
(1990a)
Differential firing patterns of the peptide-containing motor neurons B15 and B16 during feeding behavior in Aplysia.
Brain Res
522:176-179 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Cropper EC,
Price D,
Tenenbaum R,
Kupfermann I,
Weiss KR
(1990b)
Release of peptide cotransmitters from a cholinergic neuron under physiological conditions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:933-937 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dayanthi G,
Stecher B,
Hohne-Zell B,
Yamasaki S,
Binz T,
Weller U,
Niemann H,
Gratzl M
(1994)
Exploring the functional domain and the target of the tetanus toxin light chain in neurohypophysial terminals.
Neuroscience
58:423-431.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
De Camilli P,
Jahn R
(1990)
Pathways to regulated exocytosis in neurons.
Annu Rev Physiol
52:625-645 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Dodge Jr FA,
Rahamimoff R
(1967)
Co-operative action of calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction.
J Physiol (Lond)
193:419-432 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dutton D,
Dyball REJ
(1979)
Phasic firing enhances vasopressin release from the rat neurohypophysis.
J Physiol (Lond)
290:433-440.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Elferink LA,
Trimble WS,
Scheller RH
(1989)
Two vesicle-associated membrane protein genes are differentially expressed in the rat central nervous system.
J Biol Chem
264:11061-11064 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Evers J,
Laser M,
Sun Y-A,
Poo M-M
(1989)
Studies of nerve-muscle interactions in Xenopus cell culture: analysis of early synaptic currents.
J Neurosci
9:1523-1539 .
[Abstract]
-
Gardner D
(1971)
Bilateral symmetry and interneuronal organization in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia.
Science
173:550-553 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hawver DB,
Schacher S
(1993)
Selective fasiculation as a mechanism for the formation of specific chemical connections between Aplysia neurons in vitro.
J Neurobiol
24:368-383 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Haydon PG
(1988)
The formation of chemical synapses between cell-cultured neuronal somata.
J Neurosci
8:1032-1038 .
[Abstract]
-
Haydon PG,
Drapeau P
(1995)
From contact to connection: early events during synaptogenesis.
Trends Neurosci
18:196-201 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Hunt JM,
Bommert K,
Charlton MP,
Kistner A,
Habermann E,
Augustine GJ,
Betz H
(1994)
A post-docking role for synaptobrevin in synaptic vesicle fusion.
Neuron
12:1269-1279 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Jan LY,
Jan YN
(1982)
Peptidergic transmission in sympathetic ganglia of the frog.
J Physiol (Lond)
327:219-246 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kehoe JS
(1972a)
Three acetylcholine receptors in Aplysia neurones.
J Physiol (Lond)
225:115-146.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kehoe JS
(1972b)
Ionic mechanisms of a two-component cholinergic inhibition in Aplysia neurones.
J Physiol (Lond)
225:85-114.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Klein M,
Hochner B,
Kandel ER
(1986)
Facilitatory transmitters and cAMP can modulate accommodation as well as transmitter release in Aplysia sensory neurons: evidence for parallel processing in a single cell.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
83:7994-7998.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kupfermann I
(1991)
Functional studies of cotransmission.
Physiol Rev
71:683-732 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Lloyd PE,
Mahon AC,
Kupfermann I,
Cohen JL,
Scheller RH,
Weiss KR
(1985)
Biochemical and immunocytological localization of molluscan small cardioactive peptides (SCPs) in the nervous system of Aplysia californica.
J Neurosci
5:1851-1861 .
[Abstract]
-
Lloyd PE,
Schacher S,
Kupfermann I,
Weiss KR
(1986)
Calcium-dependent release of neuropeptides during intracellular stimulation of single identified Aplysia neurons in culture.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
83:9794-9798 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lloyd PE,
Kupfermann I,
Weiss KR
(1988)
Central peptidergic neurons regulate gut motility in Aplysia.
J Neurophysiol
59:1613-1626 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lomneth R,
Martin TFJ,
DasGupta BR
(1991)
Botulinum neurotoxin light chain inhibits norepinephrine secretion in PC12 cells at an intracellular membranous or cytoskeletal site.
J Neurochem
57:1413-1421 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Martin TFJ
(1994)
The molecular machinery for fast and slow neurosecretion.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
4:626-632.
[Medline]
-
Mochida S,
Poulain B,
Weller U,
Habermann E,
Tauc L
(1989)
Light chain of tetanus toxin intracellularly inhibits acetylcholine release at neuro-neuronal synapses, and its internalization is mediated by heavy chain.
FEBS Lett
253:47-51 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Mulle C,
Benoit P,
Roa M,
Changeux J-P
(1988)
Calcitonin gene-related peptide enhances the rate of desensitization of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in cultured mouse muscle cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85:5728-5732 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Niemann H,
Blasi J,
Jahn R
(1994)
Clostridial neurotoxins: new tools for dissecting exocytosis.
Trends Cell Biol
4:179-185.[Medline]
-
Ocorr K,
Byrne JH
(1985)
Membrane responses and changes in cAMP levels in Aplysia sensory neurons produced by serotonin, tryptamine, FMRFamide, and small cardioactive peptide B (SCPB).
Neurosci Lett
55:113-118 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Papini E,
Rossetto O,
Cutler DF
(1995)
Vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP)/synaptobrevin-2 is associated with dense core secretory granules in PC12 neuroendocrine cells.
J Biol Chem
270:1332-1336 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peng Y-Y,
Horn JP
(1991)
Continuous repetitive stimuli are more effective than bursts for evoking LHRH release in bullfrog sympathetic ganglia.
J Neurosci
11:85-95 .
[Abstract]
-
Peng Y-Y,
Zucker RS
(1993)
Release of LHRH is linearly related to the time integral of presynaptic Ca2+ elevation above a threshold level in bullfrog sympathetic ganglia.
Neuron
10:465-473 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Penner R,
Neher E,
Dreyer F
(1986)
Intracellularly injected tetanus toxin inhibits exocytosis in bovine chromaffin cells.
Nature
324:76-78 .
[Medline]
-
Pollock JD,
Bernier L,
Camardo JS
(1985)
Serotonin and cyclic adenosine 3
:5 -monophosphate modulate the potassium current in tail sensory neurons in the pleural ganglion of Aplysia.
J Neurosci
5:1862-1871 .
[Abstract]
-
Reed W,
Weiss KR,
Lloyd PE,
Kupfermann I,
Chen M,
Bailey CH
(1988)
Association of neuroactive peptides with the protein secretory pathway in identified neurons of Aplysia californica: immunolocalization of SCPA and SCPB to the contents of dense-core vesicles and the trans face of the Golgi apparatus.
J Comp Neurol
272:358-369 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Rothman JE
(1994)
Mechanisms of intracellular protein transport.
Nature
372:55-63 .
[Medline]
-
Schacher S,
Proshansky E
(1983)
Neurite regeneration by Aplysia neurons in dissociated cell culture: modulation by Aplysia hemolymph and the presence of the initial axon segment.
J Neurosci
3:2403-2413 .
[Abstract]
-
Schiavo G,
Benfenati F,
Poulain B,
Rossetto O,
de Laureto P,
DasGupta BR,
Montecucco C
(1992)
Tetanus and botulinum B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin.
Nature
359:832-835 .
[Medline]
-
Schroeder TJ,
Jankowski JA,
Senyshyn J,
Holz RW,
Wrightman RM
(1994)
Zones of exocytotic release on bovine medullary cells in culture.
J Biol Chem
269:17215-17220 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Siegelbaum SA,
Camardo JS,
Kandel ER
(1982)
Serotonin and cyclic AMP close single K+ channels in Aplysia sensory neurones.
Nature
299:413-417 .
[Medline]
-
Sollner T,
Whiteheart SN,
Brunner M,
Erdjument-Bromage H,
Geromanos S,
Tempst P,
Rothman JE
(1993)
SNAP receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion.
Nature
362:318-324 .
[Medline]
-
Thomas P,
Wong JG,
Almers W
(1993)
Millisecond studies of secretion in single rat pituitary cells stimulated by flash photolysis of caged Ca2+.
EMBO J
12:303-306 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Trimble WS,
Cowan DM,
Scheller RH
(1988)
VAMP-1: a synaptic vesicle-associated integral membrane protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85:4538-4542 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Whim MD,
Lloyd PE
(1989)
Frequency-dependent release of peptide cotransmitters from identified cholinergic motor neurons in Aplysia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
86:9034-9038 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Whim MD,
Lloyd PE
(1990)
Neuropeptide cotransmitters released from an identified cholinergic motor neuron modulate neuromuscular efficacy in Aplysia.
J Neurosci
10:3313-3322 .
[Abstract]
-
Whim MD,
Lloyd PE
(1992)
Modulation of peptide release from single identified Aplysia neurons in culture.
J Neurosci
12:3545-3553 .
[Abstract]
-
Whim MD,
Lloyd PE
(1994)
Differential regulation of the release of the same peptide transmitters from individual identified motor neurons in culture.
J Neurosci
14:4244-4251 .
[Abstract]
-
Willard AL
(1990)
A vasoactive intestinal peptide-like cotransmitter at cholinergic synapses between rat myenteric neurons in cell culture.
J Neurosci
10:1025-1034 .
[Abstract]
-
Yamasaki S,
Hu Y,
Binz T,
Kalkuhl A,
Kurazono H,
Tamura T,
Jahn R,
Kandel E,
Niemann H
(1994)
Synaptobrevin/vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) of Aplysia californica: structure and proteolysis by tetanus toxin and botulinum neurotoxins type D and F.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:4688-4692 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Whim
Measuring Peptide Secretion Using the FMRFamide Tagging Technique
Sci. Signal.,
August 6, 2002;
2002(144):
pl12 - pl12.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ohnuma, M. D Whim, R. D Fetter, L. K Kaczmarek, and R. S Zucker
Presynaptic target of Ca2+ action on neuropeptide and acetylcholine release in Aplysia californica
J. Physiol.,
September 15, 2001;
535(3):
647 - 662.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Whim and L. K. Kaczmarek
Heterologous Expression of the Kv3.1 Potassium Channel Eliminates Spike Broadening and the Induction of a Depolarizing Afterpotential in the Peptidergic Bag Cell Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 1998;
18(22):
9171 - 9180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Karhunen, F. S. Vilim, V. Alexeeva, K. R. Weiss, and P. J. Church
Targeting of Peptidergic Vesicles in Cotransmitting Terminals
J. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2001;
21(3):
RC127 - RC127.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|