 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 7,
Issue of April 1, 1997
pp. 2615-2625
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Temporal Integration and Duration Tuning in the Dorsal Zone of
Cat Auditory Cortex
Jufang He1, 2, 3,
Tsutomu Hashikawa1,
Hisayuki Ojima4, and
Yohsuke Kinouchi2
1 Laboratory for Brain Structure and Function, Frontier
Research Program, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
(RIKEN), Wako, Saitama 351-01, Japan, 2 Department of
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Tokushima,
Tokushima 770, Japan, 3 Advanced Research Laboratory,
Hitachi, Hatoyama, Saitama 350-03, Japan, and 4 First
Department of Anatomy, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo 143, Japan
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The present study examined auditory cortical neurons, the responses
of which depended on the duration of noise bursts. We recorded from 150 neurons with response latencies exceeding 30 msec and from 28 neurons
with OFF responses to auditory stimuli in the dorsal zone of cat
auditory cortex. Of 150 long-latency neurons, 132 displayed some form
of duration selectivity. Seventy-eight were classified as selective for
long durations. Among the long-duration-selective neurons, 30 responded
only to noise burst stimuli with durations longer than a minimal
threshold and were classified further as duration threshold neurons. Of
132 duration-selective neurons, 41 responded selectively to noise
bursts of short duration; 13 showed maximal responses to noise bursts
of a particular duration and could be regarded as duration-tuned
neurons. OFF-response neurons included ones that were
long-duration-selective, duration-tuned, and nonduration-selective.
Duration tuning has been described previously only at the midbrain
level in amphibians and bats. The present finding of sensitivity to
sound duration in at least one region of cat auditory cortex indicates
that this form of neural tuning may be important for hearing in all
vertebrates, and for processing of sound at multiple levels in the
auditory pathway. The duration tuning in the cat auditory cortex was
much broader, and the best duration was distributed over a wider range
than in the bat inferior colliculus. We suggest that the duration
selectivity of the long-latency neurons results from integration along
the time domain of a stimulus during the latent period.
Key words:
dorsal auditory cortex;
long-latency response;
duration-selective neuron;
temporal summation;
temporal suppression;
duration threshold neuron;
OFF response;
cat
INTRODUCTION
The duration of a sound is an important component
of acoustic information. Animals perceive the same sounds differently
depending on the duration (Repp et al., 1978 ). Neurons tuned to sound
duration were first found in the midbrain of the frog by Potter (1965) and Feng et al. (1990) , and later in the bat inferior colliculus by
Pinheiro et al. (1991) and by Casseday et al. (1994) . The finding of
duration-tuned neurons suggests that there may be a place code for
sound duration (Casseday et al., 1994 ).
Calford and colleagues found that neurons in the dorsal nucleus (MGd)
of the medial geniculate body (MGB) respond to pure tones with
latencies that exceed the duration of activity in the ventral nucleus
of the MGB (MGv) by tens of milliseconds (Calford and Webster, 1981 ;
Calford, 1983 ; Lennartz and Weinberger, 1992 ). The MGd projects to the
dorsal zone (DZ), the primary auditory cortex (AI), the anterior
auditory field (AAF), and other regions of auditory cortex (Winer et
al., 1977 ; Andersen et al., 1980 ). Some have considered the DZ to be a
part of AI and AAF (Woolsey, 1964 ; Andersen et al., 1980 ), whereas
others have suggested that DZ is functionally and anatomically distinct
with its major input from the MGd (Middlebrooks and Zook, 1983 ; He et
al., 1994 ).
Physiologically, neurons in the DZ differ in frequency specificity from
AI, showing broad and/or multipeaked tuning properties and binaural
responses (Middlebrooks and Zook, 1983 ; Sutter and Schreiner, 1991 ). In
the present study, we demonstrate that many neurons in the DZ respond
with long latency and are selective for sound duration. It is possible
that the DZ may be involved in more complex aspects of sound processing
in terms of analyses in the frequency domain and in the time
domain.
Some of the present results have been reported in abstract form (He et
al., 1994 , 1996 ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal preparation. Eleven healthy cats of both sexes
served as subjects, weighing 2.4-3.8 kg with clean external ears and normal auditory thresholds estimated from cortical unit responses. Because it took a long time to identify the DZ at the beginning of the
study, we performed chronic experiments on five animals (110, 113, 114, 115, and 116). During the latter half of the study, we were able to
identify the target region in a sufficiently short time, and thus
shifted to acute experiments (6 cats: 120, 123, 125, 137, 138, and
139).
In the chronic experiments, anesthesia was initially induced with
pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg Nembutal, i.p., Abbott Laboratories, Irving, TX) and maintained by supplemental doses (5-10 mg/kg/hr, i.p.)
during the surgical preparation. A midline incision was made in the
scalp, and a craniotomy was performed over the left and/or right
ectosylvian gyri, especially in their dorsal regions. The craniotomy
opening was usually smaller than 8.0 × 8.0 mm2. The
dura mater was left intact. A brass block to be used for head fixation
was attached to the frontal top of the skull with stainless steel
screws and acrylic resin. A stainless steel chamber 18 mm in diameter
was installed over the skull opening for later unit recordings. Inside
the chamber on the skull above the craniotomy, we drilled two small
holes in an anteroposterior orientation to act as reference marks for
the systematic identification of the auditory cortex in the later
recording sessions.
Recordings were made once a week on each chronic animal under sterile
conditions. Anesthesia was induced with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg,
i.p.) and supplemented as needed during the recording sessions (1-4
mg/kg/hr, i.p). A single injection of atropine sulfate (0.05 mg/kg,
s.c.) was given 15 min before anesthesia. The head of the animal was
fixed by a brass block cemented to the skull. Ear bars were not used.
Body temperature was maintained between 37.5°C and 38.5°C using a
feedback-controlled heating pad. Connective tissue over the dura was
removed before recording. Animals were given an antibiotic (penicillin,
Tomiyama Chemical, 100 mg/kg, i.m.) at the beginning and end of each
recording session.
In the acute experiments, anesthesia for surgery was the same as that
used for chronic experiments. Anesthesia was then switched to ketamine
during the recording session as needed (5 mg/kg/hr, i.m.). Head
fixation during the recording session was the same as in the chronic
experiments. These procedures have been evaluated and approved by the
Laboratory Animal Care Committee in The Institute of Physical and
Chemical Research.
Acoustic stimuli. Acoustic stimuli were generated digitally
by an MALab system (Kaiser Instruments, Irvine, CA) that was controlled by a Macintosh computer (Semple and Kitzes, 1993 ; Spitzer and Semple,
1993 ). Fifty millisecond tone pips (10 msec rise/fall time) were used
to identify the AI and AAF. Noise bursts (white noise), varying in
duration between 20 and 500 msec, and 100-msec-long pure tones were
used to examine neuronal responses in the DZ. Stimuli were repeated at
long intervals of 1.2-3.0 sec to prevent habituation. The rise/fall
times of those stimuli were 10 msec for four experiments and 5 msec for
seven experiments. The auditory stimuli were delivered by two
headphones and conducted to each ear by silicon tubes. Before
recording, tympanic sound pressure level (SPL, expressed in dB re 20 mPa) was calibrated for a frequency range of 100 Hz to 40 kHz under
computer control using a previously calibrated probe tube and a
condenser microphone (Brüel and Kjær, Copenhagen, Denmark; 1/4
inch). The calibration data were stored in a computer file for use in
controlling the attenuator to obtain desired SPLs (Semple and Kitzes,
1993 ). The cat was placed in a double-walled soundproof room
(Industrial Acoustic, Bronx, NY), and its head was held using the brass
block.
Recording. Platinum or tungsten microelectrodes with
impedances of 9-12 M (Frederick Haer & Co., Brunswick, ME)
penetrated the dura and were further advanced by a stepping-motor
microdrive that was controlled from outside the soundproof room.
Electrode penetrations were made approximately orthogonal to the
cortical surface. After being amplified and filtered, neural signals
were led through a window discriminator and passed to an oscilloscope and an audio monitor. The times of spike occurrence relative to stimulus delivery were stored on the same computer that controlled stimulus delivery, which also automatically created raster displays and
peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of the responses.
To identify AI and AAF, we most often recorded spikes from cell
clusters (2-5 cells) rather than single cells in order to map a large
cortical area in a reasonable period of time (Ojima et al., 1991 ; He,
1997 ). However, we specifically isolated single units in the primary
area of interest, i.e., the DZ. The electrode picked up responses of a
few neurons simultaneously. The spike shape of a single unit was then
discriminated from the responses of the neuronal cluster using an
amplitude and time window discriminator in the software package of the
MALab system.
The coordinates of the manipulator were reset to its original values by
reference to the two marks on the skull at the beginning of each
recording session. The exposed dura was covered with paraffin to
prevent it from drying and to reduce movements of the brain caused by
pulsation and respiration. A total of 20-50 penetrations and an
average of eight sessions were made in each hemisphere.
After the last recording session of each chronic experiment, 0.05-0.10
ml of 2% wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) in
0.05 M Tris buffer (pH 8.6) was injected by pressure in the
DZ, where single-unit recordings were made to visualize subsequently
retrogradely labeled cells in the auditory fields and the MGB (J. He,
T. Hashikawa, and E. G. Jones, unpublished observations). The animals
were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and perfused
transcardially with 0.9% saline followed by a mixture of 0.4%
paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M
phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) 48 hr after the injection of WGA-HRP. The
brains were dissected free and stored overnight in 0.1 M
phosphate buffer containing 30% sucrose. The brainstems were cut
transversally, and the auditory cortices were sectioned in an oblique
horizontal plane approximately perpendicular to the posterior
ectosylvian sulcus and the middle and posterior ectosylvian gyri on a
freezing microtome (Imig and Reale, 1980 ). Retrogradely labeled cells
in auditory fields and the MGB in every fourth section (50 µm) were
visualized by the tetramethylbenzidine reaction (Mesulam, 1976 ; He et
al., 1994 ; He, 1997 ). The injection site was used to determine the
penetration coordinates.
Data analysis. We observed three firing patterns: phasic,
phasic burst (PB), and sustained (for classification, see Gooler and
Feng, 1992 ). The number of spikes was counted over the full phasic or
PB firing period. The sustained firing neurons continued to fire during
or slightly longer than the stimulus duration. In the few cases of
sustained discharge, the number of spikes was counted over their period
of sustained firing (maximally to 300 msec). Although the spontaneous
activity of neurons in the DZ under anesthetized conditions in this
study was low, the average spontaneous firing rate over repeated trials
during the 100 msec immediately before the stimulus onset was
subtracted from spike number or normalized discharges (in which maximal
response equals 1.0).
For the purpose of observing the latency distribution of all recorded
neurons as shown in Figures 1 and 2, the
minimal latency was defined as the period between stimulus onset and
the time when the neuron showed a response obviously greater than its
spontaneous firing in the PSTH. However, the latency shown in other
figures was precisely calculated by averaging the first spikes of all effective, repeated trials of a stimulus. The influence of spontaneous firing on the latency calculation was eliminated by restricting spikes
in the calculation to a limited time period according to the firing
pattern. The calculation was made using the software package of the
MALab system.
Fig. 1.
Topographic distribution of BFs and minimal
latencies of neurons in the DZ, AI, and
AAF. The map was obtained from the left hemisphere of
animal 116. The BFs are indicated as decimal digits in
kilohertz. Minimal latencies (in milliseconds) determined by noise
burst stimuli at 80 dB SPL with 200 msec durations are indicated by
integers inside oval markers. Sites
showing latencies but no BF indicate neurons that were not
frequency-tuned, but showed response to noise bursts.
NR, No response to noise burst; WR, weak
response to noise burst; SSS, suprasylvian sulcus;
AES, anterior ectosylvian sulcus; PES,
posterior ectosylvian sulcus. The map was drawn to scale using the
relative penetrations to an injection site in a slice.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Histogram showing distribution of minimal
latencies for units recorded in the DZ.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
All means in the text are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons
between response latencies and stimuli of different intensities were
evaluated with Student's t tests. Results were considered significant at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
Dorsal zone of the cat auditory cortex
The tonotopic organization of AI and AAF of the cat has been
described previously (Woolsey, 1961 ; Merzenich et al., 1975 ; Reale and
Imig, 1980 ). In the present study, multiple-electrode penetrations
provided partial maps of the spatial distribution of best frequencies
(BFs), enabling us to identify AI based on its tonotopic organization.
One example of such a frequency map is shown in Figure 1. The numbers
with decimal points indicate the BFs (in kilohertz) of single- or
multiunits located at the indicated sites. In AI, neurons with high BF
were located anteriorly, and neurons of low BF were located
posteriorly. The situation was the reverse for neurons in AAF. Most
neurons in these two fields had minimal response latencies shorter than
20 msec and were sharply tuned to their BFs. The response latencies to
noise bursts are indicated as integers in the figure.
When we shifted the recording electrode from AI to the DZ, a large
population of long-latency neurons was revealed, and tuning curves
became broad and/or multipeaked, which confirmed previous findings of
such tunings in DZ by Middlebrooks and Zook (1983) and by Sutter and
Schreiner (1991) . Neurons recorded in the DZ showed a variety of
minimal latencies ranging from 10 to 230 msec. The map of minimal
latencies, however, was not systematically organized in any subject
examined.
Long-latency neurons
One hundred and fifty neurons in the DZ with response latencies
longer than 30 msec were defined as long-latency neurons, and the
distribution of their minimal latencies is shown in Figure 2. The
latencies plotted in Figure 2 were obtained from responses to noise
bursts that varied in duration from 10 to 300 msec. The maximum of the
minimal latencies was 230 msec, and the minimal latencies of 85% of
neurons were distributed from 30 to 120 msec. Of 150 long-latency
neurons, 125 (83%) showed PB or phasic temporal discharge patterns,
and 25 (17%) showed sustained discharge patterns. Spontaneous activity
of most of these neurons was very low.
In addition to measuring latencies, we determined the monotonicity of
the responses of these neurons as a function of sound intensity.
Because many neurons in the DZ show broad and/or multipeaked frequency-tuning properties, we tested the monotonicity of the long-latency neurons by using noise bursts of 200 msec duration instead
of pure tones at their BFs. Most neurons (127 of 150) exhibited a
monotonic rate/intensity function in that their responses progressively
increased, eventually saturated, or declined only slightly as a
function of stimulus intensity. We used the same criterion to
discriminate nonmonotonic neurons from monotonic neurons as used by
Phillips et al. (1994 , 1995) . Two stimulus intensities, 10-20 dB and
50-60 dB above the threshold, were used to evoke the neuronal
responses. If spike counts evoked at the higher stimulus intensity were
<50% of those evoked at the lower stimulus intensity, then the neuron
was classified as nonmonotonic.
We were able to record from long-latency neurons in animals
anesthetized with either pentobarbital sodium or ketamine. Their response properties to stimuli of varied duration did not show obvious
differences under the two forms of anesthesia. However, the average
spontaneous firing rate increased to 4.60 ± 3.67 spikes/sec (n = 136) from 1.14 ± 1.16 spikes/sec
(n = 42) after we shifted the anesthesia from
pentobarbital sodium to ketamine. This result is consistent with that
of Zurita et al. (1994) , who showed an average spontaneous firing rate
of 4.1 spikes/sec when using ketamine as the anesthetic, and 1.3 spikes/sec when using pentobarbital sodium anesthesia in the cat
nonspecific auditory cortex.
An example of the responses to noise bursts of a long-latency neuron is
shown in the raster display in Figure 3. The mean latencies of the first spikes evoked by noise stimuli are shown in the
figure. The neuron responded to noise bursts of 70, 100, and 200 msec
duration at latencies of 96-111 msec, whereas it showed weak responses
to pure tones of 8.0-14 kHz at similar latencies (data not shown). The
intensities of the noise bursts and pure tones were the same (80 dB
SPL). The number of spikes evoked on each trial of effective stimuli
(both noise bursts and pure tones) varied from 0 to 3, and the spikes
were distributed primarily over a range of 90-130 msec after stimulus
onset.
Fig. 3.
Responses of a long-latency neuron
(114r-015). Raster displays (30 trials) show the times
of occurrence of spikes elicited by noise bursts of varied duration (80 dB SPL). PSTHs for stimuli of 70, 100, and 200 msec durations are shown
below the raster displays. Normalized discharges (number
of spikes divided by the maximal number of spikes) are shown by
numbers over the PSTHs. Duration of noise bursts is
indicated below the raster displays or PSTHs. The
response latencies (L), calculated by averaging the
first spikes of all effective repeated trials of a stimulus, are shown
with their SDs. The influence of spontaneous firing on the latency
calculation was eliminated by restricting the spikes used in the
calculation to a limited time period according to the firing pattern.
The calculation was made using the software package of the MALab
system.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
The neuron in Figure 3 showed an increasing number of spikes as the
duration of a noise burst was increased from 50 to 100 msec and reached
its maximum response to a noise burst of 100 msec duration. The
responses in terms of number of spikes and timing of spikes remained
unchanged when we prolonged the duration of the noise burst further
from 100 to 200 msec. Among the 150 long-latency neurons, 78 showed
increasing responses of this type when we prolonged the duration of the
noise burst stimulus, as illustrated by the three additional examples
shown in Figure 4. Fifty-four long-latency neurons
showed decreasing numbers of discharges as the stimulus duration was
lengthened, and are described in a separate section below. The
remaining 18 neurons showed complicated response properties as a
function of stimulus duration or were not duration-dependent and were
excluded from further study. There was no obvious difference in latency
properties among different response-type neurons (data not shown in the
figures).
Fig. 4.
Responses of long-duration-selective neurons in
the DZ to noise bursts of varied duration and varied sound intensity.
The duration of noise bursts is shown below the PSTHs. A
thicker duration marker indicates a stimulus of higher
intensity. A, Discharges of neuron
114r-003 were summed over 50 trials. The left
column shows the responses to stimuli of 60 dB SPL, and the
right column shows the responses to those of 70 dB SPL.
The neuron was activated at a mean latency of 146 msec, but only when
the stimulus lasted longer than 100 msec. B, Discharges
of neuron 114r-013 were summed over 30 trials. The
neuron was activated with a mean latency of ~120 msec and showed no
difference in spike number or minimal latency when presented with noise
bursts of 100 or 200 msec duration. C, Discharges of
neuron 116r-105 were summed over 100 trials. Responses
to noise bursts of 60, 80, 100, 120, and 400 msec duration are shown in
the PSTHs. The neuron was active with a mean latency of ~76-90 msec
and showed increasing activity when the duration of the noise burst was
prolonged up to 120 msec.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
Long-duration-selective neurons
The 78 neurons whose responses increased when we prolonged the
stimulus duration were classified as long-duration-selective neurons.
Many of these neurons required certain minimal stimulus durations. For
example, the neuron in Figure 3 did not respond to noise bursts shorter
than 50 msec, but did respond to noise bursts longer than 50 msec.
Operationally, we consider that this neuron has a duration threshold of
~50 msec. Applying this criterion, 30 neurons were further classified
as duration threshold (long-duration-selective) neurons. Of the three
neurons shown in Figure 4, those in Figure 4, A and
B, had duration thresholds of approximately 100 and 50 msec,
respectively. Neurons that responded to noise bursts of increasing
duration with increasing numbers of spikes, but did not have a duration
threshold, were called nonduration threshold (long-duration-selective)
neurons. For example, the neuron in Figure 4C had a minimal
latency of ~70 msec and showed increasing spike numbers for noise
bursts of longer duration, but responded to all durations tested.
The neuron in Figure 4A had a latency of 146 msec,
responded to noise bursts of 300 msec duration, and showed increasing
responses to stimulus intensities above 70 dB SPL. The duration
threshold of the neuron did not change when we varied the stimulus
intensity from 60 to 70 dB SPL. A common feature of
long-duration-selective neurons with phasic or PB discharge patterns
was that responses in terms of number of spikes and timing of spikes
remained unchanged when the stimulus duration was prolonged beyond
their phasic or PB discharge latency. Two examples of this feature are
shown in Figures 3 and 4B.
To demonstrate the classification of duration threshold and nonduration
threshold neurons, the number of spikes recorded as a function of the
duration of the stimulus for each of 11 sampled neurons is shown in
Figure 5, A and B. Curves in
Figure 5A showed a steep slope over only a short period, and
the slope started from a critical stimulus duration, whereas curves in
Figure 5B showed increasing spike numbers from the
beginning. Neurons showing spike number/stimulus duration curves like
those in Figure 5A were classified as duration threshold
neurons, and neurons showing curves like those in Figure 5B
were classified as nonduration threshold neurons.
Fig. 5.
Number of spikes of long-duration-selective
neurons elicited by noise burst stimuli as functions of stimulus
duration. A, Duration threshold neurons
(n = 6); B, nonduration threshold
neurons (n = 5). The number of spikes was summed
over 30 trials. Data of neurons 114r-003, 116l-019, and
115r-055 were normalized to 30 trials from their
original data, which were summed over 50, 20, and 50 trials,
respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Responses to stimuli of varied intensity
Responses of two long-duration-selective neurons to noise bursts
of varied intensity and varied duration are shown in Figure 6. The neuron in Figure 6A had a
minimal latency of ~45 msec, showed responses only to noise bursts
with durations longer than 30 msec, and was considered to have a
duration threshold of 30 msec. This neuron responded to noise bursts
with increasing numbers of spikes as their duration increased from 30 to 80 msec. As shown in the figure, the response latency of the neuron
did not vary when the stimulus intensity was changed from 50 to 90 dB
SPL. The neuron in Figure 6B showed increasing spike
numbers in response to noise bursts with durations up to 100 msec, but
did not show a clear duration threshold in its responses. The response
latency of this neuron showed a small increase from 97.0 to 106.9 msec (p = 0.057, n = 4) when the
stimulus intensity was strengthened from 80 to 95 dB SPL. Because both
of these neurons showed monotonically increasing spike numbers for
stimuli of higher intensity, they were regarded as having monotonic
responses to stimulus intensity.
Fig. 6.
PSTHs showing responses of two
long-duration-selective neurons, 123l-044 (A) and
123l-005 (B), to noise bursts of varied duration and
varied intensity. Duration of noise bursts is shown by the length of
the black bars under the PSTHs. Number of spikes per bin
(bin width, 5 msec) shown in top right corner applies in
each figure to all PSTHs. The PSTHs of both neurons were summed over 30 trials. Decimal digits over the PSTHs indicate the
normalized responses. The response latency for each stimulus was
calculated in the same manner shown in the legend to Figure 3 and is
shown above each PSTH. The mean latency
(ML), shown to the right of each row, is
the average over stimuli of the same intensity and varying
durations.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
Among 78 long-duration-selective neurons, 70 (90%) showed monotonic
functions to stimulus intensity and only 8 (10%) showed nonmonotonic
functions. A greater proportion of the remaining long-latency neurons
(15 of 72, or 21%) showed nonmonotonic functions to stimulus intensity
compared with long-duration-selective neurons.
Responses of duration threshold neurons depended more on the stimulus
duration than on the stimulus intensity when the stimulus duration was
shorter than the duration thresholds. The neuron in Figure
6A, which responded monotonically to stimulus
intensity, gave a greater response to a 60 msec duration stimulus at 90 dB SPL (0.98) than to an 80 msec duration stimulus at 55 dB SPL (0.72), and a greater response to a 30 msec duration stimulus at 90 dB SPL
(0.63) than to a 40 msec duration stimulus at 55 dB SPL (0.33). The
neuron responded to a 30 msec duration stimulus at 55 dB SPL but did
not respond to a 25 msec duration stimulus at a much greater intensity,
90 dB SPL. That is, the response of the neuron depended more on the
stimulus duration than on its intensity when the duration was shorter
than 30 msec. The situation was different for nonduration threshold
neurons. The dependence of the response on duration or intensity for
the neuron shown in Figure 6B could not be clearly categorized.
Short-duration-selective and duration-tuned neurons
Fifty-four long-latency neurons showed decreasing numbers of
discharges as the stimulus duration was lengthened. Three examples are
shown in Figure 7. The neuron in Figure 7A
showed a good response to noise bursts of 50 msec duration and a
decreasing number of spikes when the duration of the stimulus was
prolonged to 100 and 200 msec. In other words, the neuron could be
regarded as a short-duration-selective neuron. The neuron in Figure
7B was similarly classified as a short-duration-selective
neuron. As shown in the figure, the latency of this neuron became
longer when the stimulus intensity was increased. The neuron in Figure 7C, however, showed an increasing number of spikes when we
prolonged the duration of the stimulus from 20 to 50 msec, and then a
decreasing number of spikes if we prolonged the duration of the
stimulus further. The neuron responded best to stimuli with a duration of 50 msec and could be regarded as a duration-tuned neuron. In contrast to the neurons in Figures 6B and
7B, the response latency of the neuron in Figure
7C showed a decreasing function as the stimulus intensity
was increased (p < 0.05).
Fig. 7.
Responses of short-duration-selective and
duration-tuned neurons to noise burst stimuli. In the PSTHs of neuron
114r-017 (A) and neuron 123l-004 (B),
discharges were summed over 50 trials. Both neurons showed decreasing
activity as the duration of the noise burst was prolonged.
C, In the PSTHs, discharges were summed over 30 trials.
The same conventions as in Figure 6 are applied.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]
Forty-one neurons were classified as short-duration-selective neurons,
and 15 were classified as duration-tuned neurons. The remaining neurons
showed complicated discharge patterns that could not be categorized
readily in terms of duration selectivity and were excluded from further
study. Figure 8 shows discharge-rate/stimulus-duration functions of 11 examples of short-duration-selective and duration-tuned neurons. Five short-duration-selective neurons are shown in Figure 8A, and six duration-tuned neurons are shown in
Figure 8B. The short-duration-selective neurons
showed short-pass property, and the duration-tuned neurons showed
band-pass property in their spike-number/stimulus-duration
functions.
Fig. 8.
Number of spikes as a function of stimulus
duration. A, Short-duration-selective neurons
(n = 5); B, duration-tuned neurons (n = 6). Stimuli were noise bursts. #, Summation of
20 trials; *, summation of 100 trials. All other neurons summed over 50 trials.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Based on a criterion of two-thirds of the maximal discharge, the
average width of the pass windows of the short-duration-selective neurons was 65 msec (n = 33; 8 neurons were excluded
from the calculation), with an SD of 30 msec. The average width of the pass windows of duration-tuned neurons was 92 msec, with an SD of 30 msec. Windows started from an average of 35 msec (range, 15-60 msec;
n = 11; 4 neurons were excluded) and terminated at an
average of 127 msec (range, 69-172 msec).
OFF-response neurons
Of 28 OFF-response neurons recorded from the DZ of the auditory
cortex, 17 were classified as long-duration-selective neurons, 7 as
duration-tuned neurons, and the remaining 4 as nonduration-specific neurons. Figure 9 shows two examples of OFF-response
neurons. The neuron in Figure 9A was a
long-duration-selective neuron and showed increasing discharges to
stimuli of longer duration. The neuron in Figure 9B was a
duration-tuned neuron and showed (1) no response to noise bursts of
durations shorter than 100 msec, (2) a maximal response to a noise
burst of 200 msec duration, and (3) small responses to noise bursts of
durations longer than 500 msec.
Fig. 9.
OFF-response neurons. A, Responses
of a long-duration-selective neuron to noise bursts of constant sound
intensity, but varied duration. B, Responses of a
duration-tuned neuron to noise bursts of varied intensity and varied
duration. Duration of noise bursts is shown by the length of the
black bars under the PSTHs. Thicker bars
indicate higher-intensity stimuli. Number of spikes per bin (bin width,
5 msec) shown on the right applies to all PSTHs. PSTHs of both neurons were summed over 30 trials.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Functions of spike-number/stimulus-duration for six
long-duration-selective neurons and seven duration-tuned neurons are
shown in Figure 10.
Fig. 10.
A, B, Number of
spikes, which were elicited by noise bursts, as a function of stimulus
duration for 13 OFF-response neurons. The integers in
parentheses indicate the number of trials on which the
spike counts were based.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
The present study examined the effect of varying stimulus duration
on neuronal response properties, including total spike count and
latency in the DZ of the cat auditory cortex. The neurons exhibited
different degrees of selectivity for noise bursts of varied duration,
and long-duration-selective, short-duration-selective, and
duration-tuned neurons could be recognized.
Duration-tuned neurons have been reported in the central thalamus and
midbrain of the frog where short-pass, long-pass, band-pass, and
band-suppression response characteristics were demonstrated (Potter,
1965 ; Feng et al., 1990 , 1991 ; Gooler and Feng, 1992 ). These neurons in
the bullfrog had response latencies between 8.5 and 150 msec (85 of 93 neurons were >20 msec) (Potter, 1965 ). The variability of the first
spike latency for each neuron was small and comparable to our results
as shown over the PSTHs of sampled neurons in the figures. Casseday et
al. (1994) found short-pass and band-pass duration-tuned neurons in the
inferior colliculus but not in the cochlear nucleus of the bat,
suggesting that duration tuning is computed in the inferior colliculus.
Long-pass, short-pass, and band-pass duration-tuned neurons correspond
to the long-duration-selective, short-duration-selective, and
duration-tuned neurons of the present report.
In their whole-cell patch-clamp study, Casseday et al. (1994) showed
that the duration-tuned neurons in the bat inferior colliculus had OFF
responses similar to those obtained in the present study. The duration
tuning in the DZ of the cat auditory cortex appears to be broader than
in the bat inferior colliculus, and the best durations were distributed
over a wider time domain of up to 200 msec compared with the bat (up to
75 msec) (Casseday et al., 1994 ).
In the present study, 17 of 28 OFF-response neurons showed duration
selectivity. OFF responses have been frequently reported previously in
the midbrain, the thalamus, and in the cortex in various species of
mammals (Aitkin and Prain, 1974 ; Calford and Webster, 1981 ; Rhode and
Smith, 1986 ; Bordi and LeDoux, 1994 ; Grothe, 1994 ). It has been
suggested that the OFF response may be formed by a rebound after the
offset of inhibitory input (Calford and Webster, 1981 ), and that
duration-tuned OFF-response neurons may take advantage of this rebound
to create a coincidence mechanism that in turn produces duration tuning
(Casseday et al., 1994 ).
This coincidence mechanism seems to be applicable for OFF-response
neurons, but cannot explain the response properties of long-latency
duration-selective neurons. An alternate mechanism of temporal
integration is discussed below.
In the present study, we observed that the response latencies of
different neurons showed different functions with respect to sound
intensity. The response latency might be an information-bearing element
as suggested by Middlebrooks and colleagues (Middlebrooks et al., 1994 ;
Middlebrooks and Xu, 1996 ) in the auditory system, and by Gawne et al.
(1996) in the visual system.
Temporal integration
Long-latency neurons showing increasing responses to stimuli of
longer duration could be considered to be demonstrating temporal summation over the period of stimulus duration. Neurons that showed decreasing responses to stimuli of longer duration could be considered to be demonstrating temporal suppression during the later period of the
stimulus. If a long stimulus consists of a sequence of many short time
periods, then it is possible to place a value of a temporal integration
weight for each period of the stimulus on the neuronal responses, based
on the rate of change of the responses as stimulus duration is
prolonged. Temporal summation is associated with a positive temporal
integration weight, whereas temporal suppression is associated with a
negative integration weight.
Long-duration-selective neurons could be considered as having positive
temporal integration weights over the effective period of the stimulus.
Duration-tuned and short-duration-selective neurons might be considered
as having a positive integration weight for the beginning period of a
stimulus and a negative weight for the later period of the stimulus. It
is possible that the short-duration-selective neurons are a subset of
the duration-tuned neurons, which might be tuned to a shorter duration
than those that were tested.
Munson (1947) , Zwislocki (1960) , and Moore et al. (1988) introduced the
concept of the temporal window, i.e., a temporal integration period for
summation of auditory information. Because each duration-threshold neuron showed rapidly increasing spike-number only when the stimulus duration was prolonged in a restricted time period, it could be considered as having a large positive value of temporal integration weight over a restricted time period of the stimulus. Each of the
duration-threshold neurons may have a preferred time period for
temporal information integration and indicate a particular time
subsequent to the onset of a stimulus. Many such neurons together might
represent the time axis of an auditory stimulus. The auditory system
must have the ability to discriminate different time periods in a
stimulus, and neurons with narrow time periods for temporal integration
should provide more precise timing than neurons with wider time
periods.
In other preliminary experiments, neuronal responses to noise bursts of
varying durations have been examined in cat MGB, and many
long-duration-selective neurons were found in the MGd, but so far no
short-duration-selective or duration-tuned neurons have been found in
the MGB (J. He, T. Hashikawa, and E. G. Jones, unpublished observations). Further investigation is necessary to clarify whether duration tuning first arises in the cortex of the cat or whether it
reflects a process that has already taken place in the midbrain.
Origin of long-latency responses in DZ
Long-latency responses of greater than 30 msec to pure-tone
stimuli have been observed in more than 75% of the neurons in the MGd
(Calford and Webster, 1981 ; Calford, 1983 ), and may depend in large
part on the properties of the monosynaptic tectothalamic pathway,
coupled with the membrane properties of the thalamic neurons (Hu,
1995 ). The pathway running through the MGd appears to form a parallel
system to that through the MGv in which neurons respond at much shorter
latencies (Calford and Aitkin, 1983 ). Most of the long-latency neurons
in the MGd show broad frequency tuning (Calford and Webster, 1981 ).
Injection of a retrograde tracer, WGA-HRP, into the DZ, labeled many
cells in MGd (He et al., 1994 ; J. He, T. Hashikawa, and E. G. Jones,
unpublished observations), indicating that the DZ receives its thalamic
input from the dorsal nucleus (Middlebrooks and Zook, 1983 ). The DZ
cannot be regarded as a simple replication of the MGd, because
projections from different frequency loci in AI converge on it (Ojima
and He, 1994 ). This convergence suggests that further complicated
processing of sound might take place in the DZ.
Relation of duration sensitivity to temporal
pattern processing
Psychophysicists have measured temporal integration periods for
detection of a wide variety of inputs in all sensory systems. From one
psychophysical perspective, the temporal integration period is defined
by the minimal duration of a specific, detected stimulus. From another
perspective, which we emphasize here, the temporal integration period
is the time epoch over which new inputs can add information to a
perceived stimulus event (Dilollo, 1980 ; Green, 1985 ; Gerken et al.,
1990 ) (for review, see Merzenich et al., 1993 ).
The temporal integration process is suggested to commence with the
introduction of any new input, but can be interrupted and reset with
the arrival of any novel subsequent stimuli (Merzenich et al., 1993 ).
Backward maskers represent one class of interrupting stimuli (Hafter
and Buell, 1990 ). Large variations in amplitude and/or frequency
components of the stimulus may reset the integration. Short-latency ON
responses to stimuli can be found in most MGB and AI neurons (Irvine,
1980 ; Calford and Webster, 1981 ; Langner and Schreiner, 1988 ), and
these may form a basis for resetting.
In humans, speech perception is based on recognition of segmental units
of various sizes, such as syllable phonemes, morphemes, and whole words
(Goodman et al., 1994 ), involving the use of large variations in their
amplitude and/or frequency components. We assume that the temporal
pattern perception of animals is similar to human temporal information
perception in a short time period of a segmental unit as mentioned
above. The duration-selective neurons described in the present report
may contribute to the perception of auditory information in the time
domain for periods within a segmental unit of approximately hundreds of
milliseconds. The possibility that duration-selective neurons will be
predominant components of higher auditory areas involved in complex
sound perception should be investigated.
In conclusion, duration tuning has been described previously only at
the midbrain level in amphibians and bats. The present finding of
sensitivity to sound duration in at least one region of cat auditory
cortex indicates that this form of neural tuning may be important for
hearing in all vertebrates, and for processing of sound at multiple
levels in the auditory pathway. The duration selectivity of the
long-latency neurons is suggested to be the result of temporal
integration, which includes both temporal summation and suppression
during the latent period.
FOOTNOTES
Received Oct. 15, 1996; revised Jan. 2, 1997; accepted Jan. 22, 1997.
This study was supported by the Frontier Research Program, The
Institute of Physical and Chemical Research. We thank E. G. Jones for
continuous support and encouragement during the course of the study and
two unnamed reviewers for much help in improving this manuscript. We
also thank M. N. Semple, S. Lehky, C. N. Honda, S. Tanaka, and K. Cheng
for comments on an early draft of this manuscript, and N. Suga and M. Merzenich for fruitful discussions.
Correspondence should be addressed to Jufang He, Advanced Research
Laboratory, Hitachi, Hatoyama, Saitama 350-03, Japan.
REFERENCES
-
Aitkin LM,
Prain SM
(1974)
Medial geniculate body: unit responses in the awake cat.
J Neurophysiol
37:512-521 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Andersen RA,
Knight PL,
Merzenich MM
(1980)
The thalamocortical and corticothalamic connections of AI, AII and the anterior auditory field (AAF) in the cat: evidence for two largely segregated systems of connections.
J Comp Neurol
194:663-701 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Bordi F,
LeDoux JE
(1994)
Response properties of single units in areas of rat auditory thalamus that project to the amygdala. I. Acoustic discharge patterns and frequency receptive fields.
Exp Brain Res
98:261-274 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Calford MB
(1983)
The parcellation of the medial geniculate body of the cat defined by the auditory response properties of single units.
J Neurosci
3:2350-2364 .
[Abstract]
-
Calford MB,
Aitkin LM
(1983)
Ascending projections to the medial geniculate body of the cat: evidence for multiple, parallel auditory pathways through thalamus.
J Neurosci
3:2365-2380 .
[Abstract]
-
Calford MB,
Webster WR
(1981)
Auditory representation within principal division of cat medial geniculate body: an electrophysiological study.
J Neurophysiol
45:1013-1028 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Casseday JH,
Ehrlich D,
Covey E
(1994)
Neural tuning for sound duration: role of inhibitory mechanisms in the inferior colliculus.
Science
264:847-850 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dilollo V
(1980)
Temporal integration in visual memory.
J Exp Psychol
109:75-97.
[Web of Science]
-
Feng AS,
Hall JC,
Goller DM
(1990)
Neural basis of sound pattern recognition in anurans.
Prog Neurobiol
34:313-329 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Feng AS,
Hall JC,
Siddique S
(1991)
Coding of temporal parameters of complex sounds by frog auditory nerve fibers.
J Neurophysiol
65:424-445 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gawne TJ,
Kjær TW,
Richmond BJ
(1996)
Latency: another potential code for feature binding in striate cortex.
J Neurophysiol
76:1356-1360 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gerken GM,
Bhat UK,
Hutchison-Clutter M
(1990)
Auditory temporal integration and the power function model.
J Acoust Soc Am
88:767-768 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Goodman JC,
Lee L,
DeGroot J
(1994)
Development theories of speech perception: constraints from developmental data.
In: The development of speech perception (Goodman JC,
Nusbaum HC,
eds), pp 3-33. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Gooler DM,
Feng AS
(1992)
Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain: the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli.
J Neurophysiol
67:1-22 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Green DM
(1985)
Temporal factors in psychoacoustics.
In: Time resolution in auditory systems (Michelsen A,
ed), pp 122-140. Berlin, New York: Springer.
-
Grothe B
(1994)
Interaction of excitation and inhibition in processing of pure tone and amplitude-modulated stimuli in the medial superior olive of the mustached bat.
J Neurophysiol
71:706-721 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hafter ER,
Buell TN
(1990)
Restarting the adapted binaural system.
J Acoust Soc Am
88:806-812 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
He J (1997) Modulatory effects of regional cortical
activation on the onset responses of the cat medial geniculate neurons.
J Neurophysiol, in press.
-
He J,
Ojima H,
Hashikawa T,
Jones EG
(1994)
Neuronal responses to noise-burst in and connection of anterodorsal region of cat primary auditory cortex.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
20:324.
-
He J,
Hashikawa T,
Ojima H,
Kinouchi Y
(1996)
Long-latent neurons in the cat dorsal auditory cortex in relation to temporal integration.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
22:1068.
-
Hu B
(1995)
Cellular basis of temporal synaptic signaling: an in vitro electrophysiological study in rat auditory thalamus.
J Physiol (Lond)
483:167-182 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Imig TJ,
Reale RA
(1980)
Patterns of cortico-cortical connections related to tonotopic maps in cat auditory cortex.
J Comp Neurol
192:293-332 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Irvine DRF
(1980)
Acoustic properties of neurons in posteromedial thalamus of cat.
J Neurophysiol
43:395-408.
[Free Full Text]
-
Langner G,
Schreiner CE
(1988)
Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms.
J Neurophysiol
60:1799-1822 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lennartz RC,
Weinberger NM
(1992)
Frequency selectivity is related to temporal processing in parallel thalamocortical auditory pathways.
Brain Res
583:81-92 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Merzenich MM,
Knight PL,
Roth GL
(1975)
Representation of cochlea with primary auditory cortex in the cat.
J Neurophysiol
38:231-249 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Merzenich MM,
Schreiner C,
Jenkins W,
Wang X
(1993)
Neural mechanisms underlying temporal integration, segmentation, and input sequence representation: some implications for the origin of learning disabilities.
Ann NY Acad Sci
682:1-22 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Mesulam MM
(1976)
The blue reaction product in horseradish peroxidase neurochemistry: incubation parameters and visibility.
J Histochem Cytochem
24:1273-1280 .
[Abstract]
-
Middlebrooks JC,
Xu L
(1996)
Information-bearing elements of spike trains in the cat's auditory cortex.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
22:1068.
-
Middlebrooks JC,
Zook JM
(1983)
Intrinsic organization of the cat's medial geniculate body identified by projections to binaural response-specific bands in the primary auditory cortex.
J Neurosci
3:203-224 .
[Abstract]
-
Middlebrooks JC,
Clock AE,
Xu L,
Green DM
(1994)
A panoramic code for sound location by cortical neurons.
Science
264:842-844 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moore BCJ,
Glasberg BR,
Plack CJ,
Biswas AK
(1988)
The shape of the ear's temporal window.
J Acoust Soc Am
83:1102-1116.
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Munson WA
(1947)
The growth of auditory sensation.
J Acoust Soc Am
19:584-591.
-
Ojima H,
He J
(1994)
Cortical convergence of horizontal axons originating from loci representing different frequencies in AI.
Neurosci Res
19:S212.
-
Ojima H,
Honda CN,
Jones EG
(1991)
Patterns of axon collateralization of identified supragranular pyramidal neurons in the cat auditory cortex.
Cereb Cortex
1:80-94 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Phillips DP,
Semple MN,
Calford MB,
Kitzes LM
(1994)
Level-dependent representation of stimulus frequency in cat primary auditory cortex.
Exp Brain Res
102:210-226 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Phillips DP,
Semple MN,
Kitzes LM
(1995)
Factors shaping the tone level sensitivity of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex.
J Neurophysiol
73:674-686 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pinheiro AD,
Wu M,
Jen PHS
(1991)
Encoding repetition rate and duration in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
J Comp Physiol [A]
169:69-85 .
[Medline]
-
Potter HD
(1965)
Patterns of acoustically evoked discharges of neurons in the mesencephalon of the bullfrog.
J Neurophysiol
28:1155-1184 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Reale RA,
Imig TJ
(1980)
Tonotopic organization in auditory cortex of the cat.
J Comp Neurol
192:265-291 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Repp BH,
Liberman AM,
Eccardt T,
Pesetsky D
(1978)
Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
4:621-637 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Rhode WS,
Smith PH
(1986)
Encoding timing and intensity in the ventral cochlear of the cat.
J Neurophysiol
56:261-286 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Semple MN,
Kitzes LM
(1993)
Binaural processing of sound pressure level in cat primary auditory cortex: evidence for a representation based on absolute levels rather than interaural level differences.
J Neurophysiol
69:449-461 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Spitzer MW,
Semple MN
(1993)
Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to time-varying interaural phase disparity: effects of shifting the locus of virtual motion.
J Neurophysiol
69:1245-1263 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sutter ML,
Schreiner CE
(1991)
Physiology and topography of neurons with multipeaked tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex.
J Neurophysiol
65:1207-1226 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Winer JA,
Diamond IT,
Raczkowski D
(1977)
Subdivisions of the auditory cortex of the cat: the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase to the medial geniculate body and posterior thalamic nuclei.
J Comp Neurol
176:387-418 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Woolsey CN
(1961)
Organization of cortical auditory system.
In: Sensory communication (Rosenblith WR,
ed), pp 235-257. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Woolsey CN
(1964)
Electrophysiological studies on thalamocortical relations in the auditory system.
In: Unfinished tasks in the behavioral sciences (Abrams A,
Garner HH,
Tamam JEP,
eds), pp 45-57. Baltimore: William & Wilkins.
-
Zurita P,
Villa AEP,
de Ribaupierre Y,
de Ribaupierre F,
Rouiller EM
(1994)
Changes of single unit activity in the cat's auditory thalamus and cortex associated to different anesthetic conditions.
Neurosci Res
19:303-316 .
[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Zwislocki J
(1960)
Theory of temporal auditory summation.
J Acoust Soc Am
32:1046-1060.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Aubie, S. Becker, and P. A. Faure
Computational Models of Millisecond Level Duration Tuning in Neural Circuits
J. Neurosci.,
July 22, 2009;
29(29):
9255 - 9270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gao, X. Meng, C. Ye, H. Zhang, C. Liu, Y. Dan, M.-m. Poo, J. He, and X. Zhang
Entrainment of Slow Oscillations of Auditory Thalamic Neurons by Repetitive Sound Stimuli
J. Neurosci.,
May 6, 2009;
29(18):
6013 - 6021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Ma and N. Suga
Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Primary Auditory Cortex Elicited by Thalamic Auditory Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 2009;
29(15):
4888 - 4896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Malhotra, G. C. Stecker, J. C. Middlebrooks, and S. G. Lomber
Sound Localization Deficits During Reversible Deactivation of Primary Auditory Cortex and/or the Dorsal Zone
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2008;
99(4):
1628 - 1642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Mossbridge, B. N. Scissors, and B. A. Wright
Learning and generalization on asynchrony and order tasks at sound offset: Implications for underlying neural circuitry
Learn. Mem.,
January 3, 2008;
15(1):
13 - 20.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Luo, W. Metzner, F. J. Wu, S. Y. Zhang, and Q. C. Chen
Duration-Sensitive Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of Horseshoe Bats: Adaptations for Using CF-FM Echolocation Pulses
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2008;
99(1):
284 - 296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Qin, S. Chimoto, M. Sakai, J. Wang, and Y. Sato
Comparison Between Offset and Onset Responses of Primary Auditory Cortex ON-OFF Neurons in Awake Cats
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2007;
97(5):
3421 - 3431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schonwiesner, N. Novitski, S. Pakarinen, S. Carlson, M. Tervaniemi, and R. Naatanen
Heschl's Gyrus, Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus, and Mid-Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Have Different Roles in the Detection of Acoustic Changes
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2007;
97(3):
2075 - 2082.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Kulesza Jr, A. Kadner, and A. S. Berrebi
Distinct Roles for Glycine and GABA in Shaping the Response Properties of Neurons in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Rat
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2007;
97(2):
1610 - 1620.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gourevitch and J. J. Eggermont
Spatial Representation of Neural Responses to Natural and Altered Conspecific Vocalizations in Cat Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2007;
97(1):
144 - 158.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Mossbridge, M. B. Fitzgerald, E. S. O'Connor, and B. A. Wright
Perceptual-Learning Evidence for Separate Processing of Asynchrony and Order Tasks
J. Neurosci.,
December 6, 2006;
26(49):
12708 - 12716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kadner, R. J. Kulesza Jr, and A. S. Berrebi
Neurons in the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body and Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Rat May Play a Role in Sound Duration Coding
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2006;
95(3):
1499 - 1508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Perez-Gonzalez, M. S. Malmierca, J. M. Moore, O. Hernandez, and E. Covey
Duration Selective Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Rat: Topographic Distribution and Relation of Duration Sensitivity to Other Response Properties
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2006;
95(2):
823 - 836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Lee and J. A. Winer
Principles Governing Auditory Cortex Connections
Cereb Cortex,
November 1, 2005;
15(11):
1804 - 1814.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. V. Buonomano
A Learning Rule for the Emergence of Stable Dynamics and Timing in Recurrent Networks
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2005;
94(4):
2275 - 2283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Fremouw, P. A. Faure, J. H. Casseday, and E. Covey
Duration Selectivity of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Big Brown Bat: Tolerance to Changes in Sound Level
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2005;
94(3):
1869 - 1878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. C. Stecker, I. A. Harrington, E. A. Macpherson, and J. C. Middlebrooks
Spatial Sensitivity in the Dorsal Zone (Area DZ) of Cat Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2005;
94(2):
1267 - 1280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-Q. Yu, Y. Xiong, Y.-S. Chan, and J. He
In vivo intracellular responses of the medial geniculate neurones to acoustic stimuli in anaesthetized guinea pigs
J. Physiol.,
October 1, 2004;
560(1):
191 - 205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Mora and M. Kossl
Ambiguities in Sound-Duration Selectivity by Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Bat Molossus molossus From Cuba
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2004;
91(5):
2215 - 2226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Lee, K. Imaizumi, C. E. Schreiner, and J. A. Winer
Concurrent Tonotopic Processing Streams in Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
April 1, 2004;
14(4):
441 - 451.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. He
Slow Oscillation in Non-Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus
J. Neurosci.,
September 10, 2003;
23(23):
8281 - 8290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Raggio and C. E. Schreiner
Neuronal Responses in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Electrical Cochlear Stimulation: IV. Activation Pattern for Sinusoidal Stimulation
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2003;
89(6):
3190 - 3204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Kulesza Jr., G. A. Spirou, and A. S. Berrebi
Physiological Response Properties of Neurons in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Rat
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2003;
89(4):
2299 - 2312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Faure, T. Fremouw, J. H. Casseday, and E. Covey
Temporal Masking Reveals Properties of Sound-Evoked Inhibition in Duration-Tuned Neurons of the Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci.,
April 1, 2003;
23(7):
3052 - 3065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. He
Corticofugal Modulation on Both ON and OFF Responses in the Nonlemniscal Auditory Thalamus of the Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2003;
89(1):
367 - 381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. He
OFF Responses in the Auditory Thalamus of the Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2002;
88(5):
2377 - 2386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ojima and K. Murakami
Intracellular Characterization of Suppressive Responses in Supragranular Pyramidal Neurons of Cat Primary Auditory Cortex In Vivo
Cereb Cortex,
October 1, 2002;
12(10):
1079 - 1091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Harms and J. R. Melcher
Sound Repetition Rate in the Human Auditory Pathway: Representations in the Waveshape and Amplitude of fMRI Activation
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2002;
88(3):
1433 - 1450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. He, Y.-Q. Yu, Y. Xiong, T. Hashikawa, and Y.-S. Chan
Modulatory Effect of Cortical Activation on the Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus of the Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2002;
88(2):
1040 - 1050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Geissler and G. Ehret
Time-critical integration of formants for perception of communication calls in mice
PNAS,
June 25, 2002;
99(13):
9021 - 9025.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Ma and N. Suga
Corticofugal modulation of duration-tuned neurons in the midbrain auditory nucleus in bats
PNAS,
November 9, 2001;
(2001)
241517098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. He
ON and OFF Pathways Segregated at the Auditory Thalamus of the Guinea Pig
J. Neurosci.,
November 1, 2001;
21(21):
8672 - 8679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Read, J. A. Winer, and C. E. Schreiner
Modular organization of intrinsic connections associated with spectral tuning in cat auditory cortex
PNAS,
July 3, 2001;
98(14):
8042 - 8047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. C. Loftus and M. L. Sutter
Spectrotemporal Organization of Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Cat Posterior Auditory Field Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2001;
86(1):
475 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Brand, R. Urban, and B. Grothe
Duration Tuning in the Mouse Auditory Midbrain
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2000;
84(4):
1790 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. V. Buonomano
Decoding Temporal Information: A Model Based on Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity
J. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2000;
20(3):
1129 - 1141.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Sutter, C. E. Schreiner, M. McLean, K. N. O'connor, and W. C. Loftus
Organization of Inhibitory Frequency Receptive Fields in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 1999;
82(5):
2358 - 2371.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Ma and N. Suga
Corticofugal modulation of duration-tuned neurons in the midbrain auditory nucleus in bats
PNAS,
November 20, 2001;
98(24):
14060 - 14065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|