 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 17, Number 8,
Issue of April 15, 1997
pp. 2766-2774
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience
Presynaptic Control of Subunit Composition of NMDA Receptors
Mediating Synaptic Plasticity
Kurt Gottmann,
Alexander Mehrle,
Günter Gisselmann, and
Hanns Hatt
Lehrstuhl für Zellphysiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum,
44780 Bochum, Germany
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Subunit composition of subsynaptic transmitter receptors is
controlled presynaptically in the developing neuromuscular junction. To
investigate presynaptic regulation of NMDA receptor subunit composition
in the CNS, we co-cultured different types of hippocampal explants with
dissociated target neurons. Postsynaptic NMDA receptors were studied
using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings.
After 1 week in culture with innervation by dentate gyrus (dg)
explants, the kinetic and pharmacological properties of postsynaptic NMDA receptors indicated the expression of NMDA receptor subtypes containing NR2B subunits (NR1/NR2A/NR2B or NR1/NR2B or both). The
properties of NMDA receptors in noninnervated neurons were similar to
those of neurons innervated by dg explants. In contrast, after
innervation by explants from the cornu ammonis (CA) region, we found an
additional NMDA receptor subtype with properties consistent with the
subunit composition NR1/NR2A. These findings indicate that presynaptic
signals determine NMDA receptor subunit composition.
After prolonged cultivation (11-12 d) the properties of synaptic NMDA
receptors in the majority of dg-innervated neurons also indicated the
expression of NR1/NR2A receptors. This suggests a delayed developmental
maturation of NMDA receptors in dg-innervated neurons.
Long-term plasticity of central glutamatergic synapses is critically
influenced by the subunit composition of NMDA receptors, and thus
presynaptic control of NMDA receptor subunit composition might regulate
synaptic plasticity.
Key words:
hippocampal cells;
developmental maturation;
NMDA
receptors;
synaptic transmission;
patch clamp;
single-cell RT-PCR
INTRODUCTION
In central glutamatergic synapses, NMDA receptors
mediate several types of long-term synaptic plasticity (Collingridge
and Singer, 1990 ; Bliss and Collingridge, 1993 ). NMDA receptor
properties crucial for the induction of long-term plasticity are
calcium permeability, voltage-dependent Mg2+ block, and
slow channel kinetics (Mayer et al., 1984 ; Nowak et al., 1984 ;
MacDermott et al., 1986 ; Ascher and Nowak, 1988 ; Hestrin et al., 1990 ;
Lester et al., 1990 ; Schneggenburger et al., 1993 ; McBain and Mayer,
1994 ). Molecular cloning has revealed NR1 and four types of NR2
subunits (Moriyoshi et al., 1991 ; Kutsuwada et al., 1992 ; Meguro et
al., 1992 ; Monyer et al., 1992 ; Hollmann and Heinemann, 1994 ). In
native NMDA receptor channels, these subunits form hetero-oligomeric
complexes (Sheng et al., 1994 ). In heterologous expression systems, NR1
subunits are necessary for the formation of functional NMDA receptors,
whereas the addition of NR2 subunits specifically modifies NMDA
receptor properties (Kutsuwada et al., 1992 ; Monyer et al., 1992 ,
1994 ). During development, changes in subunit composition (Watanabe et
al., 1992 ; Williams et al., 1993 ; Monyer et al., 1994 ; Sheng et al.,
1994 ) and thus in the properties of NMDA receptors (Carmignoto and
Vicini, 1992 ; Hestrin, 1992 ; Khazipov et al., 1995 ) seem to regulate
long-term plasticity of glutamatergic synapses (Crair and Malenka,
1995 ; Izumi and Zorumski, 1995 ; Sakimura et al., 1995 ).
At the developing neuromuscular junction, the presynaptic motoneuron
initiates subsynaptic accumulation and changes in subunit composition
of muscle acetylcholine receptors (Hall and Sanes, 1993 ). In the CNS,
however, synaptogenesis is complex, because each neuron is contacted by
multiple types of presynaptic neurons. Centrally, it is unknown whether
presynaptic signals regulate subsynaptic expression and subunit
composition of postsynaptic NMDA receptors. There is some suggestion in
hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons that NMDA receptors are
differentially distributed according to specific types of synaptic
input (Monaghan and Cotman, 1985 ; Benke et al., 1993 ; Petralia et al.,
1994 ; Siegel et al., 1994 ; Weisskopf and Nicoll, 1995 ); however,
investigation involving experimental manipulation of the innervation is
required to analyze the role of presynaptic signaling.
To study presynaptic control of NMDA receptor expression, we developed
a co-culture system that permitted innervation of postsynaptic hippocampal neurons by different populations of presynaptic neurons. Innervation sources were explants of embryonic rat hippocampus, from
either the dentate gyrus (dg) or the hippocampus proper [cornu ammonis
(CA) region]. Dissociated target neurons from the CA region were added
at low density. Here we compare the kinetic and pharmacological properties of NMDA receptors in target neurons innervated by dg or CA
explants. Our results indicate that the expression of at least one NMDA
receptor subtype is controlled by presynaptic signals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture. Defined regions, i.e., the dg and the
CA region, of the immature hippocampus of rat embryos (embryonic day
19-20; Wistar rats) were isolated and cut into explants (diameter
0.3-0.8 mm, with CA explants larger than dg explants). These served as sources of presynaptic fibers. Postsynaptic target neurons were obtained by mechanically dissociating the isolated CA region after trypsin treatment. A 200 µl drop of culture medium [Eagle's basal medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%), insulin, glucose, and L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD)]
containing 3-5 × 104 cells was placed in the center
of a polyornithine-coated culture dish. After attachment of dissociated
cells, 4-6 dg or CA explants were added. Culture conditions were as
described (Gottmann et al., 1994 ; Pfrieger et al., 1994 ). Because of
the addition of cytosine- -D-arabinofuranoside
hydrochloride (10 µM, after 5 d in
vitro), the cultures contained almost no glial cells outside the
explants. The origin of postsynaptic target neurons was confirmed by
labeling dissociated neurons with DiI before cultivation. Patch-clamp recordings were obtained only from target neurons that were isolated from other dissociated cells, not from local aggregates of dissociated neurons that formed occasionally.
Electrophysiology and data analysis. Whole-cell
patch-clamp recordings were obtained at room temperature as described
(Gottmann et al., 1994 ; Pfrieger et al., 1994 ). Patch pipettes were
filled with 100 mM potassium gluconate, 10 mM
KCl, 0.25 mM CaCl2, 10 mM EGTA, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3. The standard extracellular solution contained 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES, 10 µM glycine, pH 7.3. EPSCs were recorded at a holding
potential of 60 mV near the Cl equilibrium potential.
Paired recordings were performed as described (Pfrieger et al., 1992 ).
Autaptic currents were recorded according to Bekkers and Stevens
(1991) .
AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated miniature EPSCs (AMPA mEPSCs) were
recorded in an extracellular solution with elevated potassium (103 mM NaCl, 32 mM KCl, 5 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) and with 1 µM tetrodotoxin
(TTX) at a holding potential of 60 mV. Analysis of mEPSC frequencies
and amplitudes was performed using AUTESP software (H. Zucker,
Max-Planck-Institute for Psychiatry, Martinsried, Germany), as
described (Gottmann et al., 1994 ). Local application of high potassium
solution (32 mM) was performed according to Bekkers and
Stevens (1989) . At a holding potential of 10 mV, GABAergic mIPSCs
occurred in all cells tested (n = 6). mIPSCs were
blocked after the addition of bicuculline methochloride (20 µM; n = 4).
To record NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs (NMDA EPSCs), the extracellular
solution contained 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 10 µM glycine, 10 µM
6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX), 20 µM
bicuculline methochloride. The holding potential was 60 mV. NMDA
EPSCs were evoked by extracellular stimulation of explant fibers by
means of a patch pipette (tip diameter 5-10 µm) filled with
extracellular solution using 200 µsec-1 msec pulses of 50-80 V. The
decay of evoked NMDA EPSCs was fitted after 10 individual synaptic
responses were averaged using PCLAMP 6.0 software (Axon Instruments,
Foster City, CA). For pharmacological characterization of NMDA EPSC
bursts, postsynaptic target cells were selectively superfused as
described (Pfrieger et al., 1994 ), without applying the antagonists to
the explants. Evoked AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated EPSCs were recorded
in extracellular solution after omission of DNQX and addition of 1 mM MgCl2.
mEPSCs were recorded at a holding potential of 60 mV in the
presence of 1 µM TTX in the extracellular solution. The
extracellular Ca2+ concentration was reduced to 3 mM, and DNQX was omitted from the extracellular solution to
facilitate the detection of small-amplitude NMDA receptor-mediated
components by means of the AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated component. To
determine the decay kinetics of NMDA receptor-mediated components,
mEPSCs were aligned and averaged (Bekkers and Stevens, 1989 ) by means
of AUTESP software using the AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated component
as a detection signal. For each cell, 25-100 mEPSCs showing an NMDA
receptor-mediated component were averaged. The decay of the averaged
NMDA receptor-mediated component was fitted using PCLAMP 6.0 software.
NMDA receptor-mediated components were selectively blocked by 50 µM D-AP-5.
Fast L-glutamate application. Fast application
and removal of L-glutamate (100 µM) was
achieved by means of a pressure-driven, two-barrel application system
combined with a continuously operating suction barrel. This perfusion
system removes the agonist from whole hippocampal neurons within 20-30
msec, as shown by recording the unblocking kinetics of
voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents after removal of
Cd2+ (Pfrieger et al., 1994 ). Open pipette responses
occurred within 1 msec. To isolate NMDA receptor-mediated currents, the
extracellular solution consisted of 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 10 µM glycine, 10 µM DNQX. The holding potential was 60 mV.
L-Glutamate was applied for 100 or 300 msec by switching from the barrel containing control solution to the barrel containing agonist using electrically operated valves. Fast removal of
L-glutamate was performed by switching back to the barrel
containing control solution. For local dendritic application of
L-glutamate, a 30 µm tip diameter glass pipette was used
to apply agonist. Local application resulted in a mean reduction of the
peak current amplitude by 70 ± 11% (n = 15)
compared with the whole-cell current and was confirmed by the addition
of dye. Fast application of Mg2+ was performed after
activation of NMDA receptor-mediated currents by switching from the
barrel containing L-glutamate to a barrel containing
L-glutamate (100 µM) and Mg2+ (1 mM). The amount of Mg2+ block was determined by
comparing current amplitudes before and 100 msec after the onset of
Mg2+ application. Offset kinetics of NMDA receptor-mediated
currents and kinetics of Mg2+ block were determined by
fitting the current decay after five trials were averaged. Increasing
the extracellular Ca2+ concentration to 5 mM
did not alter offset kinetics (n = 2).
Single-cell reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. Cellular RNA
harvest, first-strand reaction, and PCR amplification were performed according to Lambolez et al. (1992) . The pipette solution (100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) containing cellular mRNA and random hexamers (6 pmol/µl) was expelled into a
reaction tube containing DTT and desoxyribonucleotides (final concentration 10 mM and 500 µM,
respectively). Fifteen units of RNAsin (Promega, Madison, WI) and 100 U
of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies) were added per 10 µl, and the first-strand mix was
incubated at 37°C for 60-90 min, 80°C for 10 min. To PCR-amplify a
specific fragment from the rat NMDA receptor subunits NR2A and NR2B
(Monyer et al., 1992 ), two oligonucleotide primers were designed: upper
primer = CTGGCCT(G,C)AGTGACAAGAAGTTCC, corresponding to positions
1988-2011 on NR2A and 1991-2014 on NR2B; lower primer = CAGATGAAGGTGATGAGGCTGAGG, corresponding to positions 2487-2510 on NR2A
and 2490-2513 on NR2B (position 1 is the first base of the initiation
codon). Amplification reactions were performed with 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM of each desoxyribonucleotide
(final concentration), 20 pmol of upper and lower primer, and 10 µl
of first-strand mix in 100 µl, with the following temperature
protocol: 96°C for 4 min, 80°C to add 2.5 U of taq DNA-polymerase
(Life Technologies), 40 cycles (94°C for 30 sec, 68°C for 1 min,
72°C for 1 min), 72°C for 10 min. The PCR product was reamplified
(same PCR conditions but only 30 cycles) and after purification was
subjected to a restriction enzyme digestion (HinfI,
Promega); 50-100 ng of the digested fragments was resolved on a 2%
agarose gel and blotted onto a nylon membrane (Hybond N+,
Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). For hybridization,
digoxygenin-labeled, PCR-generated fragments specific for the subunits
NR2A and NR2B were used. Hybridization (high stringency conditions),
washes, and detection (NBT/X-phosphate color reaction) were performed according to the Dig Systems Users Guide for Filter Hybridization (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). No NR2A or NR2B amplification products were obtained with mRNA harvested from single non-neuronal cells, thus demonstrating the lack of contamination.
RESULTS
Formation of glutamatergic synapses between presynaptic explants
and postsynaptic target neurons
After 7-9 d in vitro, target neurons were strongly
innervated by explant fibers (Fig.
1A). Both types of explant fibers
established glutamatergic synapses on target neurons, as indicated by
bursts of EPSCs that were elicited in target neurons after
extracellular electrical stimulation of explants and by spontaneous
EPSCs (sEPSCs) (Fig. 1B). To confirm that the sEPSCs
were attributable to synaptic input arising from the explants, we
tested whether target neurons innervate each other by means of paired
recordings. Out of 20 possible synaptic connections tested
(dg-innervated, n = 5 pairs; CA-innervated,
n = 5 pairs), only one small amplitude synapse (<100
pA) was detectable. Innervated target neurons (n = 15)
did not exhibit autaptic currents. To study whether explant fibers form
synapses on the majority of target neurons or selectively on a subset
of target neurons, we recorded sEPSCs from more than 10 target neurons
surrounding the same explant. Spontaneous EPSCs occurred at a frequency
of at least 0.5 sec 1 in 82% of dg-innervated neurons
(n = 34, 3 explants) and in 89% of CA-innervated
neurons (n = 35, 3 explants). Spontaneous EPSCs were
absent in noninnervated neurons located outside the area covered by
explant fibers (Fig. 1B). In the vast majority (10 of
13 cells tested) of neurons not innervated by explant fibers, autaptic
currents were also absent. Only in three neurons were small amplitude
(<50 pA) autaptic currents detectable.
Fig. 1.
Glutamatergic synapses form on postsynaptic target
neurons after innervation by hippocampal explants. A,
Target neuron (arrow) obtained from the CA region and
innervated by a dg explant (asterisk). Scale bar, 50 µm. B, Spontaneous EPSCs recorded from target neurons innervated by dg (top traces, dg) or CA
explants (middle traces, CA). Note that
in neurons not innervated by explant fibers (bottom traces, ni) spontaneous EPSCs were
absent. Holding potential: 60 mV. C, Typical AMPA
mEPSCs in innervated target neurons. D, Comparison of
mEPSC frequency (bar graph, mean ± SD) in neurons innervated by dg explants (dg) and in neurons innervated
by CA explants (CA). Comparison of mEPSC amplitude
histograms. Total number of events (ntotal)
was 3945 for neurons innervated by dg explants (top
histogram, dg) and 6683 for neurons innervated
by CA explants (bottom histogram,
CA).
[View Larger Version of this Image (48K GIF file)]
To compare innervation by dg and CA explants, we recorded AMPA/kainate
receptor-mediated mEPSCs (AMPA mEPSCs) in high potassium (32 mM) extracellular solution containing 1 mM
Mg2+. AMPA mEPSCs were blocked by the addition of DNQX (10 µM; n = 5). Amplitudes of AMPA mEPSCs
(Fig. 1C) in neurons innervated by dg explants were
comparable to those in neurons innervated by CA explants (Fig.
1D). AMPA mEPSC frequencies were slightly lower in
dg-innervated neurons (dg-innervated: 26.8 ± 7.8 sec 1, n = 3; CA-innervated: 45.4 ± 3.3 sec 1, n = 3) (Fig.
1D). To exclude selective innervation of specific regions of target neurons, we elicited AMPA EPSCs by local application of high potassium solution to proximal and distal dendritic regions. In
all target neurons examined (dg-innervated, n = 4;
CA-innervated, n = 4), AMPA EPSCs were elicited in both
proximal and distal dendritic regions.
Decay kinetics and pharmacological properties of NMDA EPSCs depend
on the type of innervation
To study the properties of NMDA EPSCs, DNQX (10 µM)
was added to block AMPA/kainate receptors and bicuculline methochloride (20 µM) to block GABAA receptors (in
nominally Mg2+-free solution containing 10 µM
glycine). In the presence of bicuculline methochloride, NMDA
receptor-mediated postsynaptic currents occurred spontaneously in
innervated neurons, with a mean frequency of 0.05 ± 0.03 sec 1. They were dependent on action potential activity in
the explant fibers, because they were blocked by the addition of 1 µM TTX (n = 5), were absent after explant
removal without damaging the outgrown fibers and postsynaptic target
neurons by means of a fine-tip pipette under visual control
(n = 7), and were absent in noninnervated neurons
(n = 6). As indicated by their slow rise times (mean
time-to-peak: 129 ± 47 msec), they were elicited by asynchronous
transmitter release caused by rhythmic action potential activity and
thus represent spontaneous bursts of NMDA EPSCs. Interestingly, the
decay kinetics of spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts depended strikingly on
the type of innervation (Fig. 2). In 23 of 25 neurons
innervated by CA explants, the decay of NMDA EPSC bursts could be fit
by the weighted sum of two exponentials. Mean time constants were
131 ± 36 (SD) and 1039 ± 379 msec, with the fast component
contributing >50% to the total amplitude. In contrast, in the vast
majority (21 of 27 cells) of neurons innervated by dg explants, NMDA
EPSC bursts showed monoexponential decay kinetics with a mean time
constant of 620 ± 268 msec. In the remaining six neurons, a small
(<50% of total amplitude), fast decaying component (162 ± 21 msec) was detectable in approximately one third of the EPSCs. The
amplitudes of spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts differed significantly
(p < 0.001) between neurons innervated by dg
and CA explants, with mean values of 111 ± 59 and 745 ± 360 pA, respectively.
Fig. 2.
After 1 week in culture, decay kinetics of NMDA
EPSC bursts depend on the type of innervation. A, B,
Successive spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts recorded from target neurons
innervated by dg (A) and CA (B) explants
(top traces). Holding potential: 60 mV. Bottom
traces show spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts on an expanded time
scale. NMDA EPSC bursts of comparable amplitudes are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
To demonstrate innervation-dependent differences in NMDA EPSC decay
kinetics, we elicited NMDA EPSCs by extracellular stimulation of
explant fibers. Evoked NMDA EPSCs showed much shorter rise times (mean
time-to-peak: 22 ± 9 msec) compared with spontaneous NMDA EPSC
bursts attributable to more synchronous transmitter release. The decay
kinetics of evoked NMDA EPSCs showed a strong dependence on the type of
presynaptic explant (Fig. 3A,B). In all
neurons innervated by CA explants (n = 7), the decay of
evoked NMDA EPSCs could be fit by the sum of two exponentials with mean time constants of 71 ± 13 msec (60-80% of the total amplitude) and 489 ± 98 msec. In contrast, in five of seven neurons
innervated by dg explants, evoked NMDA EPSCs showed monoexponential
decay kinetics with a mean time constant of 416 ± 161 msec. An
additional fast decaying component ( < 100 msec) was detectable in
the remaining two neurons. Mean amplitudes were significantly smaller
(p < 0.001) in dg-innervated neurons (42 ± 31 pA) compared with CA-innervated neurons (214 ± 73 pA). To
assess the kinetic properties of synaptic NMDA receptors under
conditions of minimal transmitter release, we recorded mEPSCs in the
presence of 1 µM TTX. DNQX was omitted from the
extracellular solution, and the AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated component was used for detection of mEPSCs. Similar to evoked NMDA
EPSCs, the decay kinetics of the NMDA receptor-mediated component of
mEPSCs were strongly dependent on the type of presynaptic explant (Fig.
3C-E). In six of seven neurons innervated by CA explants, the decay of the NMDA receptor-mediated component could be fit by the
sum of two exponentials with mean time constants of 61 ± 25 msec
(60-90% of the total amplitude) and 379 ± 120 msec. In six of
eight neurons innervated by dg explants, the decay of the NMDA
receptor-mediated component showed monoexponential kinetics with a mean
time constant of 170 ± 51 msec. In the remaining two neurons, a
fast decaying component ( < 100 msec) was detectable.
Fig. 3.
After 7-9 d in culture, decay kinetics of NMDA
EPSCs depend on the type of innervation. A, B, Averages
of 10 NMDA EPSCs evoked by extracellular stimulation in target neurons
innervated by dg (A) and CA (B) explants.
Stimulus artifacts are truncated. Holding potential: 60 mV. Note the
innervation-dependent differences in decay kinetics.
C-E, NMDA receptor-mediated components of mEPSCs. C, D, Individual mEPSCs recorded in a dg-innervated
neuron (C) and in a CA-innervated neuron
(D). Holding potential: 60 mV. NMDA receptor-mediated
components after the AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated component are
indicated by arrows. E, NMDA
receptor-mediated components of average mEPSCs recorded in a
dg-innervated neuron (dg) and in a CA-innervated neuron
(CA). The AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated component is
truncated. D-AP-5 (50 µM) selectively blocked
the NMDA receptor-mediated components (AP-5).
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
Channel kinetics of NMDA receptors determine decay kinetics of NMDA
EPSCs (Hestrin et al., 1990 ; Lester et al., 1990 ), and channel kinetics
are in turn determined by subunit composition. In heterologous
expression systems, binary NR1/NR2A receptors are characterized by fast
( ~ 100 msec) offset kinetics, whereas NR1/NR2B receptors show
slow ( ~ 400 msec) offset kinetics (Monyer et al., 1994 ). Offset
kinetics of ternary NR1/NR2A/NR2B receptors are intermediate ( ~ 200 msec) (Köhr and Seeburg, 1996 ). Thus the observed
innervation-dependent differences in decay kinetics indicate that the
subsynaptic expression of an additional NMDA receptor subtype was
presynaptically induced by CA explants. The additional NMDA receptor
subtype with fast offset kinetics most likely consisted of NR1 and NR2A
subunits.
To confirm innervation-dependent differences in subunit composition, we
characterized synaptic NMDA receptors using subunit selective
antagonists. We studied spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts, because their
amplitudes were much larger compared with those of evoked or miniature
NMDA EPSCs. Postsynaptic neurons were locally superfused, whereas the
explants remained in antagonist-free solution. D-AP-5 (50 µM) reversibly blocked NMDA EPSC bursts by >80% in neurons innervated by dg explants (n = 3) as well as in
neurons innervated by CA explants (n = 3).
In heterologous expression systems, NMDA receptor subtypes containing
NR2A or NR2B subunits are more sensitive to Mg2+ blockade
than are NMDA receptor subtypes containing NR2C or NR2D subunits
(Kutsuwada et al., 1992 ; Monyer et al., 1992 , 1994 ). At a holding
potential of 60 mV, 1 mM Mg2+ reversibly
reduced the peak amplitudes of NMDA EPSC bursts by 90 ± 9%
(dg-innervated, n = 5) and 86 ± 2%
(CA-innervated, n = 5) without significant differences
(Fig. 4A,B). A low concentration of
Mg2+ (0.1 mM) also strongly reduced NMDA EPSC
amplitudes in neurons innervated by dg (65 ± 13%,
n = 3) and CA (60 ± 6%, n = 3)
explants. These results indicate that NMDA EPSCs were largely mediated
by NMDA receptor subtypes containing NR2A or NR2B subunits.
Fig. 4.
Pharmacological properties of NMDA EPSC bursts
depend on the type of innervation after 1 week in culture.
A, Reversible blockade of spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts
in neurons innervated by dg explants (top traces,
dg) and in neurons innervated by CA explants
(bottom traces, CA) by addition of 1 mM Mg2+. Holding potential: 60 mV.
B, Plot of NMDA EPSC burst peak amplitudes in the
presence of 1 mM Mg2+ normalized to peak
amplitudes under control conditions (mean ± SD) for neurons
innervated by dg explants (dg, 10 ± 9%) and CA
explants (CA, 14 ± 2%). C,
Reversible effects of the NR2B subunit-selective blocker ifenprodil (3 µM) on spontaneous NMDA EPSC bursts in neurons innervated
by dg explants (top traces, dg) and in
neurons innervated by CA explants (bottom traces,
CA). Holding potential: 60 mV. D, Plot
of NMDA EPSC burst peak amplitudes in the presence of 3 µM ifenprodil normalized to peak amplitudes under control
conditions (mean ± SD) for neurons innervated by dg explants
(dg, 21 ± 3%) and CA explants (CA,
52 ± 8%). Note the innervation-dependent difference in
sensitivity to ifenprodil.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
NMDA receptor subtypes containing NR2B subunits are selectively blocked
by ifenprodil, whereas the receptor subtypes NR1/NR2A, NR1/NR2C, or
NR1/NR2D are much less sensitive (Williams et al., 1993 ; Williams,
1995 ). Ifenprodil (3 µM) reversibly blocked peak amplitudes of NMDA EPSC bursts in neurons innervated by dg explants by
79 ± 3% (n = 7). In contrast, NMDA EPSC bursts
in neurons innervated by CA explants were reduced in amplitude only by
48 ± 8% (n = 7) (Fig. 4C,D). This
innervation-dependent difference in sensitivity to ifenprodil was
statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Ifenprodil (3 µM) did not significantly affect evoked
AMPA EPSCs recorded in the presence of 1 mM
Mg2+ (dg-innervated, n = 3; CA-innervated,
n = 3). In line with our results, a significant
(>10%) block of voltage-dependent calcium channels was observed only
at ifenprodil concentrations higher than 3 µM in cultured
hippocampal neurons (Church et al., 1994 ). This excludes the
possibility that the differences in sensitivity to ifenprodil were
attributable to differential presynaptic inhibition of transmitter
release by ifenprodil. Thus, a NMDA receptor subtype containing
NR2B subunits (NR1/NR2A/NR2B or NR1/NR2B or both) mediated NMDA EPSCs
in neurons innervated by dg explants. Obviously, an additional NMDA
receptor subtype contributed to NMDA EPSCs in neurons innervated by CA
explants. As indicated by the fast decay kinetics of NMDA EPSCs, the
NR1/NR2A receptor subtype was additionally present.
Offset kinetics of NMDA receptor-mediated currents depend on the
type of innervation
Depending on subunit composition, NMDA receptor subtypes show
characteristic offset kinetics of NMDA receptor-mediated currents (Monyer et al., 1992 , 1994 ; Köhr and Seeburg, 1996 ). To examine whether NMDA receptors of the NR1/NR2A subtype are selectively expressed by neurons innervated by CA explants, we studied offset kinetics of NMDA receptors. We evoked NMDA receptor-mediated currents by fast application of L-glutamate (100 µM)
in the presence of DNQX (10 µM) to block AMPA/kainate
receptors. Mean peak amplitudes of NMDA receptor-mediated whole-cell
currents were 2.57 ± 1.39 nA (dg-innervated), 2.25 ± 0.90 nA (CA-innervated), and 1.33 ± 0.65 nA (noninnervated neurons).
NMDA receptor-mediated currents were reversibly blocked by >80% in
the presence of 100 µM DL-AP-5 (dg-innervated, n = 5; CA-innervated, n = 5). The addition of 1 mM Mg2+ reversibly
blocked NMDA receptor-mediated currents at a holding potential of 60
mV by 88 ± 4% in neurons innervated by dg explants (n = 7) and by 83 ± 6% in neurons innervated by
CA explants (n = 7). The Mg2+ block
developed with a mean time constant of 13 ± 5 msec (Fig. 5A). Thus, superfusion of the whole neuron
was sufficiently fast to resolve differences in the offset kinetics of
NMDA receptor subtypes.
Fig. 5.
Innervation dependence of functional
expression of NMDA receptor subtypes after 7-9 d in culture.
A, Control: NMDA receptor-mediated whole-cell current
evoked by application of 100 µM L-glutamate. Black bar indicates L-glutamate application
(100 msec). L-glu + 1 mM
Mg2+: Blockade of NMDA receptor-mediated
whole-cell current by addition of 1 mM
Mg2+ in the continued presence of
L-glutamate. Holding potential: 60 mV. B,
NMDA receptor-mediated currents evoked by application of 100 µM L-glutamate selectively to dendrites.
Black bar indicates L-glutamate application
(300 msec). Offset kinetics were faster in neurons innervated by CA
explants (CA) compared with neurons innervated by dg
explants (dg). C, Agarose gel
electrophoresis of PCR products after HinfI digestion.
Templates used to PCR-amplify 523 bp fragments: Lane 1:
plasmid vector containing NR2A cDNA; 2: plasmid vector
containing NR2B cDNA; 3: cDNA obtained from a
CA-innervated neuron; 4: cDNA obtained from a
dg-innervated neuron; 5: molecular weight marker.
Fragment sizes in lane 4, from top: 523 bp (undigested PCR products), 390 bp (NR2A), 315 bp (NR2B), 208 bp
(NR2B), 133 bp (NR2A). The top band (523 bp) represents
PCR products not digested by the restriction enzyme. This band contains
NR2A and NR2B fragments and thus hybridizes with both NR2A and NR2B
probes. D, Southern blot analysis of the gel shown in
C at the same scale to confirm identification of fragments. For hybridization, digoxygenin-labeled NR2A (left
panel) or NR2B (right panel)
specific probes (523 bp) were used. Hybridization with the NR2A
specific probe was performed at lower stringency conditions to detect
the 133 bp fragment, because hybridization signals were weak because of
its small size.
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
Offset kinetics of NMDA receptor-mediated currents could be fit by the
weighted sum of two exponentials. In neurons innervated by dg explants
(n = 11), offset kinetics of NMDA receptor-mediated currents elicited by dendritic application of L-glutamate
showed a mean fast time constant of 218 ± 38 msec. In contrast,
neurons innervated by CA explants (n = 10) showed a
mean value of 126 ± 25 msec (Fig. 5B). This difference
was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Whole-cell NMDA receptor-mediated currents exhibited a similar
innervation-dependent difference in offset kinetics (dg-innervated:
210 ± 37 msec, n = 16; CA-innervated: 157 ± 48 msec, n = 22; p < 0.01). In neurons
not innervated by explant fibers, the fast time constant (201 ± 42 msec, n = 14) was similar to that in neurons
innervated by dg explants. The second, slow time constant in offset
kinetics ranged from 500 msec to 2 sec and was not dependent on
innervation.
Analysis of NMDA receptor-mediated currents thus revealed fast offset
kinetics consistent with the expression of NR1/NR2A receptors in
neurons innervated by CA explants. Ternary NMDA receptors of the
NR1/NR2A/NR2B subtype are characterized by offset kinetics ( ~ 200 msec) intermediate between the fast kinetics of NR1/NR2A receptors and
the slow kinetics of NR1/NR2B receptors. Offset kinetics in
dg-innervated and noninnervated neurons were thus consistent with the
expression of NR1/NR2A/NR2B receptors. To examine whether NR2A subunits
are expressed in dg-innervated and noninnervated neurons, we analyzed
the expression of the NMDA receptor subunits NR2A and NR2B at the mRNA
level. We used the single-cell RT-PCR technique to specifically amplify
cDNA obtained from individual cells. Subsequent restriction-enzyme
analysis, Southern blotting, and hybridization of PCR products revealed NR2A mRNA expression, independent of the type of innervation, in almost
all neurons examined (in 8 of 10 neurons innervated by CA explants, in
7 of 10 neurons innervated by dg explants, and in 8 of 10 noninnervated
neurons) (Fig. 5C,D). Similarly, NR2B mRNA was detected,
regardless of innervation, in all cells analyzed. Because these results
are not quantitative, they cannot exclude innervation-dependent
quantitative differences in NR2A mRNA levels. Thus, the conclusion that
can be drawn is limited to the point that NR2A mRNA is expressed in
dg-innervated and noninnervated neurons. This additionally supports the
expression of ternary NMDA receptors in these neurons.
Delayed developmental maturation of synaptic NMDA receptors in
dg-innervated neurons
During development of the hippocampus in vivo, fast
decaying NMDA EPSC components consistent with the expression of
NR1/NR2A receptors appear during developmental maturation of
glutamatergic synapses (Khazipov et al., 1995 ). After 1 week in culture
a minority of dg-innervated neurons showed fast decaying NMDA EPSC
components, suggesting that the developmental maturation of synaptic
NMDA receptors might be delayed in dg-innervated neurons because of a
lack of presynaptic signals. To examine this, we recorded mEPSCs in
dg-innervated neurons after prolonged cultivation. After 11-12 d
in vitro a fast decaying NMDA receptor-mediated component
( = 77 ± 23 msec, >60% of total amplitude) was found in two
thirds of dg-innervated neurons (n = 12). Thus, the
innervation-dependent difference in the functional expression of
NR1/NR2A receptors seemed to be caused by a delayed developmental
maturation of glutamatergic synapses in neurons innervated by dg
explants.
DISCUSSION
We have developed and characterized a co-culture system that has
enabled us to control the innervation of postsynaptic target neurons
obtained from the CA region of the embryonic rat hippocampus. Explants
from different, defined hippocampal regions were used as sources of
innervation. In our co-cultures, glutamatergic synaptic input to target
neurons arose from outgrowing explant fibers, as demonstrated by the
absence of synapses between target neurons and by the absence of
autapses. The formation of glutamatergic synapses by different types of
explants, i.e., from the dg and the CA region, was comparable, as
indicated by quantitatively similar frequencies and amplitudes of AMPA
mEPSCs. Different types of explants might selectively establish
synapses on specific subsets of target neurons and/or selectively form
synapses on specific subcellular regions of target neurons. Both types
of explants, however, established glutamatergic synapses on almost all
target neurons surrounding an explant and on both proximal and distal dendritic regions of target neurons, thus excluding selective synapse
formation.
Presynaptic control of NMDA receptor subtypes
Studies of NMDA receptor subtypes in heterologous expression
systems have established that the kinetic and pharmacological properties of NMDA receptors are determined by their subunit
composition (Kutsuwada et al., 1992 ; Monyer et al., 1992 , 1994 ;
Williams et al., 1993 ; Williams, 1995 ; Köhr and Seeburg, 1996 ).
Here, we used kinetic and pharmacological properties of NMDA EPSCs and of NMDA receptor-mediated currents to analyze differences in the subunit composition of NMDA receptors in target neurons. With both
types of innervation, postsynaptic NMDA receptors were strongly sensitive to Mg2+ blockade, indicating that they contained
NR2A or NR2B subunits or both.
The kinetic properties of NMDA receptor-mediated currents are
characteristic of distinct subunit compositions of NMDA receptor subtypes containing NR2A or NR2B subunits or both. Binary NR1/NR2A receptors show fast offset kinetics, whereas NR1/NR2B receptors are
indicated by slow offset kinetics (Monyer et al., 1992 , 1994 ). Ternary
NR1/NR2A/NR2B receptors are characterized by intermediate offset
kinetics (Köhr and Seeburg, 1996 ). Because offset kinetics of
NMDA receptors determine the decay kinetics of NMDA EPSCs (Hestrin et
al., 1990 ; Lester et al., 1990 ), the analysis of NMDA EPSC kinetics
allows the differences in subunit composition of NMDA receptors to be
studied. In addition, we studied the offset kinetics of NMDA
receptor-mediated currents that were elicited by
L-glutamate application. After 1 week in culture in target
neurons innervated by dg explants, the kinetic analysis of NMDA
receptors indicated the subunit composition NR1/NR2A/NR2B or NR1/NR2B
or both. In target neurons innervated by CA explants, strikingly
different, fast kinetics of NMDA receptors were found, indicating the
additional expression of NR1/NR2A receptors. Because NMDA receptor
kinetics in noninnervated neurons were similar to that of dg-innervated neurons, this innervation-dependent difference in the expression of
NR1/NR2A receptors suggests that they were induced selectively in
neurons innervated by CA explants. The innervation-dependent difference
in the expression of NMDA receptor subtypes was transient because of a
delayed developmental maturation of NMDA receptors in neurons
innervated by dg explants. Thus, CA explants seem to generate more
efficiently the presynaptic signals that control the expression of
NR1/NR2A receptors. The selective expression of NR1/NR2A receptors was
confirmed pharmacologically. After 1 week in culture, NMDA receptors
were blocked only partially by the well established NR2B subunit
selective antagonist ifenprodil in CA-innervated neurons. In contrast,
ifenprodil blocked NMDA receptors almost completely in dg-innervated
neurons. To this end, our results demonstrate that the subunit
composition of synaptic NMDA receptors is determined by presynaptic
signaling.
In dg-innervated neurons, which were cultured for 7-9 d, and in
noninnervated neurons, the expression of ternary NR1/NR2A/NR2B receptors was indicated by intermediate offset kinetics. Although direct comparison of the kinetics of dendritic currents with data obtained from outside-out patches is not possible because of the kinetic limitations of whole dendrite application, our results in
neurons innervated by dg explants agree with offset kinetics in
outside-out patches from the mossy fiber termination zone of CA3
pyramidal neurons (Spruston et al., 1995 ). In addition to kinetic
properties, the expression of NR1/NR2A/NR2B receptors was suggested by
the expression of NR2A mRNA in dg-innervated and noninnervated neurons.
In vivo, the expression of ternary receptors has been
demonstrated in the visual cortex on the basis of immunoprecipitation
experiments (Sheng et al., 1994 ).
The functional expression of synaptic NR1/NR2A receptor complexes may
represent a major postsynaptic step in the development of mature
properties of central glutamatergic synapses. This is supported by
developmental changes in the kinetic properties of NMDA EPSCs in
vivo (Carmignoto and Vicini, 1992 ; Hestrin, 1992 ; Khazipov et al.,
1995 ). These changes are accompanied by a developmental increase in the
expression of NR2A subunits (Watanabe et al., 1992 ; Monyer et al.,
1994 , Sheng et al., 1994 ). Our study indicates the control of NR1/NR2A
receptor expression by presynaptic signaling. The molecular mechanisms
that are involved remain to be studied. Activity-dependent mechanisms
might contribute to presynaptic control of NMDA receptor subunit
composition. This idea is supported by inhibitory effects of electrical
activity blockade on the developmental appearance of fast decaying NMDA
EPSC components (Carmignoto and Vicini, 1992 ) and on NR2A mRNA
expression (Audinat et al., 1994 ; Bessho et al., 1994 ).
Our findings have important implications for the mechanisms underlying
differences in long-term plasticity of glutamatergic synapses. First,
in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons, long-term potentiation at
different, anatomically distinct synaptic inputs is either NMDA
receptor-dependent or NMDA receptor-independent (Zalutsky and Nicoll,
1990 ). Presynaptic control of subsynaptic NMDA receptor expression
might be a mechanism that contributes to synapse-specific differences
in long-term plasticity. Second, drastic changes in the susceptibility
to long-term potentiation occur during development of the visual cortex
and the hippocampal formation (Crair and Malenka, 1995 ; Izumi and
Zorumski, 1995 ). Differences in subunit composition of NMDA receptors
seem to underlie these developmental maturation processes (Carmignoto
and Vicini, 1992 ; Watanabe et al., 1992 ; Williams et al., 1993 ; Monyer
et al., 1994 ; Sheng et al., 1994 ,; Khazipov et al., 1995 ). Thus, signals from presynaptic neurons may play a major role in regulating long-term plasticity of central glutamatergic synapses by controlling NMDA receptor subunit composition.
FOOTNOTES
Received Nov. 27, 1996; revised Jan. 21, 1997; accepted Jan. 30, 1997.
This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We
thank Drs. A. Konnerth, T. Plant, and C. Schirra for demonstrating
single-cell RT-PCR; J. Boulter for NR2A and NR2B subunit cDNAs; and B. W. Ache, M. Behbehani, J. Dudel, S. Kleene, V. Leßmann, R. Lindlbauer,
E. Neher, S. Pixley, and B. Rörig for comments on this
manuscript. We also thank H. Bartel and H. Jung for technical
assistance.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Kurt Gottmann, Lehrstuhl
für Zellphysiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum,
Universitätsstrasse 150, 44780 Bochum,
Germany.
REFERENCES
-
Ascher P,
Nowak L
(1988)
The role of divalent cations in the N-methyl-D-aspartate responses of mouse central neurones in culture.
J Physiol (Lond)
399:247-266 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Audinat E,
Lambolez B,
Rossier J,
Crépel F
(1994)
Activity-dependent regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit expression in rat cerebellar granule cells.
Eur J Neurosci
6:1792-1800 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Bekkers JM,
Stevens CF
(1989)
NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are colocalized at individual excitatory synapses in cultured rat hippocampus.
Nature
341:230-233 .
[Medline]
-
Bekkers JM,
Stevens CF
(1991)
Excitatory and inhibitory autaptic currents in isolated hippocampal neurons maintained in cell culture.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:7834-7838 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Benke TA,
Jones OT,
Collingridge GL,
Angelides KJ
(1993)
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are clustered and immobilized on dendrites of living cortical neurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:7819-7823 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bessho Y,
Nawa H,
Nakanishi S
(1994)
Selective up-regulation of an NMDA receptor subunit mRNA in cultured cerebellar granule cells by K+-induced depolarization and NMDA treatment.
Neuron
12:87-95 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Bliss TVP,
Collingridge GL
(1993)
A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus.
Nature
361:31-39.
[Medline]
-
Carmignoto G,
Vicini S
(1992)
Activity-dependent decrease in NMDA receptor responses during development of the visual cortex.
Science
258:1007-1011 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Church J,
Fletcher EJ,
Baxter K,
MacDonald JF
(1994)
Blockade by ifenprodil of high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels in rat and mouse cultured hippocampal neurones: comparison with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist actions.
Br J Pharmacol
113:499-507 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Collingridge GL,
Singer W
(1990)
Excitatory amino acid receptors and synaptic plasticity.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
11:290-296 .
[Medline]
-
Crair MC,
Malenka RC
(1995)
A critical period for long-term potentiation at thalamocortical synapses.
Nature
375:325-328 .
[Medline]
-
Gottmann K,
Pfrieger FW,
Lux HD
(1994)
The formation of glutamatergic synapses in cultured central neurons: selective increase in miniature synaptic currents.
Dev Brain Res
81:77-88 .
[Medline]
-
Hall ZW,
Sanes JR
(1993)
Synaptic structure and development: the neuromuscular junction.
Cell [Suppl]
72:99-121.
-
Hestrin S
(1992)
Developmental regulation of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents at a central synapse.
Nature
357:686-689 .
[Medline]
-
Hestrin S,
Sah P,
Nicoll RA
(1990)
Mechanisms generating the time course of dual component excitatory synaptic currents recorded in hippocampal slices.
Neuron
5:247-253 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Hollmann M,
Heinemann S
(1994)
Cloned glutamate receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
17:31-108 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Izumi Y,
Zorumski CF
(1995)
Developmental changes in long-term potentiation in CA1 of rat hippocampal slices.
Synapse
20:19-23 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Khazipov R,
Ragozzino D,
Bregestovski P
(1995)
Kinetics and Mg2+ block of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channels during postnatal development of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons.
Neuroscience
69:1057-1065 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Köhr G,
Seeburg PH
(1996)
Subtype-specific regulation of recombinant NMDA receptor-channels by protein tyrosine kinases of the src family.
J Physiol (Lond)
492:445-452.
[ISI][Medline]
-
Kutsuwada T,
Kashiwabuchi N,
Mori H,
Sakimura K,
Kushiya E,
Araki K,
Meguro H,
Masaki H,
Kumanishi T,
Arakawa M,
Mishina M
(1992)
Molecular diversity of the NMDA receptor channel.
Nature
358:36-41 .
[Medline]
-
Lambolez B,
Audinat E,
Bochet P,
Crepel F,
Rossier J
(1992)
AMPA receptor subunits expressed by single Purkinje cells.
Neuron
9:247-258 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Lester RAJ,
Clements JD,
Westbrook GL,
Jahr CE
(1990)
Channel kinetics determine the time course of NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents.
Nature
346:565-567.
[Medline]
-
MacDermott AB,
Mayer ML,
Westbrook GL,
Smith SJ,
Barker JL
(1986)
NMDA-receptor activation increases cytoplasmic calcium concentration in cultured spinal cord neurones.
Nature
321:519-522 .
[Medline]
-
Mayer ML,
Westbrook GL,
Guthrie PB
(1984)
Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones.
Nature
309:261-263 .
[Medline]
-
Meguro H,
Mori H,
Araki K,
Kushiya E,
Kutsuwada T,
Yamazaki M,
Kumanishi T,
Arakawa M,
Sakimura K,
Mishina M
(1992)
Functional characterization of a heteromeric NMDA receptor channel expressed from cloned cDNAs.
Nature
357:70-74 .
[Medline]
-
McBain CJ,
Mayer ML
(1994)
N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor structure and function.
Physiol Rev
74:723-760 .
[Free Full Text]
-
Monaghan DT,
Cotman CW
(1985)
Distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate-sensitive L-[3H]glutamate-binding sites in rat brain.
J Neurosci
5:2909-2919 .
[Abstract]
-
Monyer H,
Sprengel R,
Schoepfer R,
Herb A,
Higuchi M,
Lomeli H,
Burnashev N,
Sakmann B,
Seeburg PH
(1992)
Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes.
Science
256:1217-1221 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Monyer H,
Burnashev N,
Laurie DJ,
Sakmann B,
Seeburg PH
(1994)
Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors.
Neuron
12:529-540 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Moriyoshi K,
Masu M,
Ishii T,
Shigemoto R,
Mizuno N,
Nakanishi S
(1991)
Molecular cloning and characterization of the rat NMDA receptor.
Nature
354:31-37 .
[Medline]
-
Nowak L,
Bregestovski P,
Ascher P,
Herbert A,
Prochiantz A
(1984)
Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones.
Nature
307:462-465 .
[Medline]
-
Petralia RS,
Yokotani N,
Wenthold RJ
(1994)
Light and electron microscope distribution of the NMDA receptor subunit NMDAR1 in the rat nervous system using a selective anti-peptide antibody.
J Neurosci
14:667-696 .
[Abstract]
-
Pfrieger FW,
Veselovsky NS,
Gottmann K,
Lux HD
(1992)
Pharmacological characterization of calcium currents and synaptic transmission between thalamic neurons in vitro.
J Neurosci
12:4347-4357 .
[Abstract]
-
Pfrieger FW,
Gottmann K,
Lux HD
(1994)
Kinetics of GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of calcium currents and excitatory synaptic transmission in hippocampal neurons in vitro.
Neuron
12:97-107 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Sakimura K,
Kutsuwada T,
Ito I,
Manabe T,
Takayama C,
Kushiya E,
Yagi T,
Aizawa S,
Inoue Y,
Sugiyama H,
Mishina M
(1995)
Reduced hippocampal LTP and spatial learning in mice lacking NMDA receptor
1 subunit.
Nature
373:151-155 .
[Medline]
-
Schneggenburger R,
Zhou Z,
Konnerth A,
Neher E
(1993)
Fractional contribution of calcium to the cation current through glutamate receptor channels.
Neuron
11:133-143 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Sheng M,
Cummings J,
Roldan LA,
Jan YN,
Jan LY
(1994)
Changing subunit composition of heteromeric NMDA receptors during development of rat cortex.
Nature
368:144-147 .
[Medline]
-
Siegel SJ,
Brose N,
Janssen WG,
Gasic GP,
Jahn R,
Heinemann SF,
Morrison JH
(1994)
Regional, cellular, and ultrastructural distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1 in monkey hippocampus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:564-568 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Spruston N,
Jonas P,
Sakmann B
(1995)
Dendritic glutamate receptor channels in rat hippocampal CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons.
J Physiol (Lond)
482:325-352 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Watanabe M,
Inoue Y,
Sakimura K,
Mishina M
(1992)
Developmental changes in distribution of NMDA receptor channel subunit mRNAs.
NeuroReport
3:1138-1140 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Weisskopf MG,
Nicoll RA
(1995)
Presynaptic changes during mossy fibre LTP revealed by NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic responses.
Nature
376:256-259 .
[Medline]
-
Williams K
(1995)
Pharmacological properties of recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors containing the
4 (NR2D) subunit.
Neurosci Lett
184:181-184 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Williams K,
Russel SL,
Shen YM,
Mollinoff PB
(1993)
Developmental switch in the expression of NMDA receptors occurs in vivo and in vitro.
Neuron
10:267-278 .
[ISI][Medline]
-
Zalutsky RA,
Nicoll RA
(1990)
Comparison of two forms of long-term potentiation in single hippocampal neurons.
Science
248:1619-1624 .
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Groc, M. Heine, S. L. Cousins, F. A. Stephenson, B. Lounis, L. Cognet, and D. Choquet
NMDA receptor surface mobility depends on NR2A-2B subunits
PNAS,
December 5, 2006;
103(49):
18769 - 18774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Thomas, A. J. Miller, and G. L. Westbrook
Synaptic and Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptor NR2 Subunits in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2006;
95(3):
1727 - 1734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Copi, K. Jungling, and K. Gottmann
Activity- and BDNF-Induced Plasticity of Miniature Synaptic Currents in ES Cell-Derived Neurons Integrated in a Neocortical Network
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2005;
94(6):
4538 - 4543.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wu, R. Kawakami, Y. Shinohara, M. Fukaya, K. Sakimura, M. Mishina, M. Watanabe, I. Ito, and R. Shigemoto
Target-Cell-Specific Left-Right Asymmetry of NMDA Receptor Content in Schaffer Collateral Synapses in {epsilon}1/NR2A Knock-Out Mice
J. Neurosci.,
October 5, 2005;
25(40):
9213 - 9226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Martin, A. Guadano-Ferraz, B. Morte, S. Ahmed, G. F. Koob, L. de Lecea, and G. R. Siggins
Chronic Morphine Treatment Alters N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptors in Freshly Isolated Neurons from Nucleus Accumbens
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
October 1, 2004;
311(1):
265 - 273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Prybylowski and R. J. Wenthold
N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptors: Subunit Assembly and Trafficking to the Synapse
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 12, 2004;
279(11):
9673 - 9676.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Joshi, S. Shokralla, P. Titis, and L.-Y. Wang
The Role of AMPA Receptor Gating in the Development of High-Fidelity Neurotransmission at the Calyx of Held Synapse
J. Neurosci.,
January 7, 2004;
24(1):
183 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kawakami, Y. Shinohara, Y. Kato, H. Sugiyama, R. Shigemoto, and I. Ito
Asymmetrical Allocation of NMDA Receptor {epsilon}2 Subunits in Hippocampal Circuitry
Science,
May 9, 2003;
300(5621):
990 - 994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Desai, D. Turetsky, K. Vasudevan, and A. Buonanno
Analysis of Transcriptional Regulatory Sequences of the N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor 2A Subunit Gene in Cultured Cortical Neurons and Transgenic Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2002;
277(48):
46374 - 46384.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lawrence and L. O. Trussell
Long-Term Specification of AMPA Receptor Properties after Synapse Formation
J. Neurosci.,
July 1, 2000;
20(13):
4864 - 4870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Mohrmann, M. Werner, H. Hatt, and K. Gottmann
Target-Specific Factors Regulate the Formation of Glutamatergic Transmitter Release Sites in Cultured Neocortical Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 1999;
19(22):
10004 - 10013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Martin, S. H. Ahmed, T. Blank, J. Spiess, G. F. Koob, and G. R. Siggins
Chronic Morphine Treatment Alters NMDA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Transmission in the Nucleus Accumbens
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 1999;
19(20):
9081 - 9089.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]() | |