 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1, 1998, 18(21):8571-8579
-Conotoxin AuIB Selectively Blocks 3 4
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Nicotine-Evoked Norepinephrine
Release
Siqin
Luo1,
Jennifer M.
Kulak1,
G. Edward
Cartier1,
Richard B.
Jacobsen1,
Doju
Yoshikami1,
Baldomero M.
Olivera1, and
J. Michael
McIntosh1, 2
Departments of 1 Biology and 2 Psychiatry,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
 |
ABSTRACT |
Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) with putative
3 4-subunits have been implicated in the mediation of signaling in
various systems, including ganglionic transmission peripherally and
nicotine-evoked neurotransmitter release centrally. However, progress
in the characterization of these receptors has been hampered by a lack
of 3 4-selective ligands. In this report, we describe the
purification and characterization of an 3 4 nAChR antagonist, -conotoxin AuIB, from the venom of the "court cone,"
Conus aulicus. We also describe the total chemical
synthesis of this and two related peptides that were also isolated from
the venom. -Conotoxin AuIB blocks 3 4 nAChRs
expressed in Xenopus oocytes with an IC50 of
0.75 µM, a kon of 1.4 × 106 min-1
M 1, a koff
of 0.48 min-1, and a
Kd of 0.5 µM. Furthermore,
-conotoxin AuIB blocks the 3 4 receptor with
>100-fold higher potency than other receptor subunit combinations,
including 2 2, 2 4, 3 2, 4 2, 4 4, and
1 1 . Thus, AuIB is a novel, selective probe for
3 4 nAChRs. AuIB (1-5 µM) blocks
20-35% of the nicotine-stimulated norepinephrine release from rat
hippocampal synaptosomes, whereas nicotine-evoked dopamine release from
striatal synaptosomes is not affected. Conversely, the
3 2-specific -conotoxin MII (100 nM)
blocks 33% of striatal dopamine release but not hippocampal
norepinephrine release. This suggests that in the respective systems,
3 4-containing nAChRs mediate norepinephrine release, whereas
3 2-containing receptors mediate dopamine release.
Key words:
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; conotoxin; 3 4; norepinephrine; dopamine; hippocampus; striatum; synaptosomes; Xenopus oocytes
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
(nAChRs) are widely distributed in both the PNS and CNS. In
vertebrates, eight -subunits ( 2- 9) and three -subunits
( 2- 4) have been cloned. When expressed in oocytes or cell lines
individually (i.e., 7, 8, and 9) or in various pairwise
combinations of - and -subunits, they yield functional nicotinic
receptors (for review, see Sargent, 1993 ). Furthermore, receptor
combinations with up to four different subunits have been demonstrated
both in vitro and in vivo (Conroy and Berg, 1995 ). Thus, the number of potential molecular forms of nicotinic receptors is very large. Elucidation of the precise structure and
function of various neuronal nAChRs in vivo is particularly challenging, in large part because of the scarcity of ligands selective
for specific receptor subtypes.
In an effort to improve this situation, we have been systematically
screening components from the venoms of carnivorous cone snails
(Conus) for selective nicotinic ligands. There are >500 species of these snails, and their venoms contain small
disulfide-bonded peptides that target receptors and ion channels in a
highly subtype-selective manner. Every venom examined thus far has its
own distinct complement of nicotinic receptor antagonists. From
Conus magus, a fish-hunting cone, we previously isolated
-conotoxin MII, specific for 3 2 nAChRs (Cartier et al.,
1996a ). MII has been used to pharmacologically dissect the nAChR
subtypes in sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia (Tavazoie et al.,
1997 ; Ullian et al., 1997 ). From a worm-hunting cone, Conus
imperialis, we previously characterized -conotoxin ImI, which
specifically blocks 7 homomers expressed in oocytes as well as
putative 7-containing receptors in hippocampus (McIntosh et al.,
1994 ; Johnson et al., 1995 ; Pereira et al., 1996 ). In this report we
describe the first peptides isolated from the venom of the snail-eating
cone Conus aulicus and demonstrate that one of them,
-conotoxin AuIB, selectively inhibits 3 4 nAChRs.
Presynaptic nAChRs modulate the release of several neurotransmitters in
the CNS, including norepinephrine and dopamine (for review, see
Wonnacott, 1997 ). Changes in CNS norepinephrine levels appear to be
involved in mood disorders (for review, see Schatzberg and Nemeroff,
1995 ; Mongeau et al., 1997 ), and dopamine appears to play an important
role in addictive and psychotic disorders (Kahn and Davis, 1995 ;
Pontieri et al., 1996 ). A greater understanding of the molecular
mechanisms regulating the release of these neurotransmitters may be
valuable in the development of treatments for these illnesses. This
report describes the effects of -conotoxin AuIB on nicotine-evoked norepinephrine and dopamine release. These studies begin to elucidate the subunit composition of nAChRs mediating the release of these neurotransmitters.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Peptide isolation and sequencing
Venom extraction. Crude venom from dissected ducts of
C. aulicus (see Fig. 1) was collected in the Philippines,
lyophilized, and stored at 70°C until used. Extraction procedures
were conducted at 4°C. For direct screening on oocytes, lyophilized
venom was dissolved in ND96 buffer to provide a 50 mg/ml extract. This
extract was diluted to 6.5 mg/ml and applied to Xenopus
oocytes expressing 3 4 receptors. For venom purification, 15 ml of
0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was added to 500 mg of lyophilized
venom, and extraction was performed as described previously (Cartier et
al., 1996a ).
RPLC purification. All reverse-phase liquid chromatography
(RPLC) columns were from Rainin Instruments (Ridgefield, NJ). Crude venom extract was fractionated on a semipreparative Vydac
C18 column (10 mm × 25 cm, 5 µm particle size, 300 Å pore size) equipped with a guard module (catalog #83-223-65). All
subsequent chromatographic purifications used an analytical Vydac
C18 column (4.6 mm × 22 cm, 5 µm particle size, 300 Å pore size). Synthetic peptide was purified on a preparative Vydac
C18 column (22 mm × 25 cm, 10 µm particle size, 300 Å pore size). For all chromatographic gradients, buffer A was 0.1%
TFA and buffer B was 0.1% TFA with either 60 or 90% acetonitrile. TFA
(sequencing grade) was from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI); acetonitrile (UV
grade for semipreparative and analytical RPLC, nonspectroscopic grade
for preparative RPLC) was from Baxter (Deerfield, IL).
Pyridylethylation and purification of modified peptide.
Peptide from the final purification was stored in the RPLC buffer in
which it eluted. A solution of this purified peptide was combined with
0.5 M Tris-base (20:1 v/v) to raise the pH to a value
between 7 and 8 (as measured with pH paper). Dithiothreitol was added to a final concentration of 10 mM, the reaction vessel was
flushed with argon, and the reaction was incubated at 65°C for 15 min. The solution was allowed to cool, 4-vinyl pyridine (20% in
ethanol) was added (1:25, v/v), and the solution was reacted for a
further 25 min at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was
diluted threefold with 0.1% TFA, and the alkylated peptide was
purified on an analytical C18 column (see above).
Sequence analysis. Sequencing was performed with Edman
chemistry on an Applied Biosystems 477A Protein Sequencer at the
Protein/DNA Core Facility at the University of Utah Cancer Center. Mass
spectrometry was performed as described previously (Martinez et al.,
1995 ).
Peptide synthesis
Linear peptide. The linear peptides were built on
Rink amide resin by Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl) methoxycarbonyl)
procedures with 2-(1H-benzotriole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium
tetrafluoroborate coupling, using an ABI model 431A peptide
synthesizer. Side-chain protection of non-Cys residues was in the form
of t-butyl (Asp, Ser, Tyr, Thr) and trityl (Asn). Orthogonal protection
was used on cysteines: Cys3 and Cys16 were protected as the stable
Cys(S-acetamidomethyl), whereas Cys2 and Cys8 were protected as the
acid-labile Cys(S-trityl). After assembly of the resin-bound peptide,
the terminal Fmoc group was removed in situ by treatment
with 20% piperidine in N-methylpyrrolidone. Linear peptide
amide was cleaved from resin by treatment with TFA/H2O/ethanedithiol/phenol/thioanisole (90:5:2.5:7.5:5 by
volume) (1 ml/50 mg resin) for 1.5 hr at 20°C. This procedure
simultaneously cleaved peptide from the resin and deprotected
Cys(S-trityl) and non-Cys residue side chains, but not
Cys(S-acetamidomethyl). Released peptide was precipitated by filtering
the reaction mixture into methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) that had been
cooled to 10°C. The cleavage reaction vessel was rinsed with 100%
TFA, and this rinse was also filtered into the MTBE solution. The MTBE
solution was centrifuged to pellet the precipitate. The pellet was
washed twice by suspension in ~30 ml of chilled MTBE. Pelleted
peptide was dissolved in ~20 ml of 0.1% TFA in 60% acetonitrile by
gentle swirling (to avoid foaming). The linear peptide solution was
diluted 20-fold with 0.1% TFA and purified by RPLC on the preparative C18 Vydac column with a 20-50% buffer B gradient over 30 min. Flow rate was 20 ml/min. This gradient was also used for all
subsequent preparative RPLC purifications of the synthetic peptide.
Peptide cyclization. To form a disulfide bridge between Cys2
and Cys8 (i.e., the first and third cysteines), the major linear peptide fraction obtained by preparative RPLC (see above) was diluted
to 500 ml with H2O, and solid Tris base was added to raise the pH to ~7.5. The solution was placed in a 2 l flask and
stirred vigorously at room temperature for 2-5 d until the reaction
was judged to be complete by analysis of peak shape and retention time
of sample subjected to analytical RPLC. The pH of the solution was
decreased to a value of 2-3 by the addition of TFA. The monocyclic peptide was then purified by RPLC. Simultaneous removal of the S-acetamidomethyl groups and closure of the second disulfide bridge (Cys3-Cys16, i.e., the second and fourth cysteines) was performed by
iodine oxidation. The monocyclic peptide in RPLC eluent was dripped
into an equal volume of rapidly stirred solution of iodine (10 mM) in H20/TFA/acetonitrile (78:2:20 by volume)
over a period of 1 min at room temperature. The reaction was allowed to
proceed for another 10 min and was terminated by the addition of
ascorbic acid sufficient to cause the solution to clear. The solution
was diluted 20-fold with 0.1% TFA and the bicyclic peptide purified by
RPLC.
Co-elution studies. Comparison of natural and synthetic
-conotoxins AuIA, -B, and -C was performed by RPLC. Native and
synthetic peptides were chromatographed individually, and subsequently
equal amounts of each peptide were co-injected onto the RPLC column. Peptide was eluted with a linear positive gradient of 0.6%
acetonitrile/min.
Electrophysiology
RNA preparation. cDNA clones encoding nAChR subunits
were provided by S. Heinemann and D. Johnson (Salk Institute, San
Diego, CA). cRNA was transcribed using RiboMAX large-scale RNA
production systems (Promega, Madison, WI). Diguanosine triphosphate
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used for synthesis of capped cRNA
transcripts according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Plasmid
constructs of nAChR subunits from mouse ( 1, 1, , and ) and
from rat ( 2, 3, 4, 7, 2, and 4) were used as
described (Cartier et al., 1996a ) .
Voltage-clamp recording. Oocytes were harvested and injected
with cRNA encoding nAChR subunits as described previously (Cartier et
al., 1996a ). The oocyte recording chamber consisting of a cylindrical well (~4 mm diameter × 2 mm deep; ~30 µl) fabricated from
Sylgard; it was gravity-perfused either with ND96 (96.0 mM
NaCl, 2.0 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2,
5 mM HEPES, pH 7.1-7.5) or with ND96 containing 1 µM atropine (ND96A) at a rate of ~1 ml/min. All toxin
solutions also contained 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) to reduce
nonspecific adsorption of peptide. The perfusion medium could be
switched to one containing peptide or ACh by use of a distributor valve
(SmartValve, Cavro Scientific Instruments, Sunnyvale, CA) and a series
of three-way solenoid valves (model 161T031, Neptune Research,
Northboro, MA). For toxin concentrations >10 µM, a 300 µl recording chamber was used with a perfusion flow rate of ~5
ml/min. Toxin was pre-applied for 5 min in a static bath (to conserve
material). All recordings were made at room temperature (~22°C).
ACh-gated currents were obtained with a two-electrode voltage-clamp
amplifier (model OC-725B, Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT). Glass
microelectrodes, pulled from fiber-filled borosilicate capillaries (1 mm outer diameter × 0.75 mm inner diameter) (WPI, Sarasota, FL)
and filled with 3 M KCl, served as voltage and current electrodes. Resistances for voltage and current electrodes were 0.5-3
M and 0.5-2 M , respectively. The membrane potential was clamped
at 70 mV, and the current signal, recorded through virtual ground,
was low-pass-filtered (5 Hz cut-off) and digitized at a sampling
frequency of 20 Hz. The solenoid perfusion valves were controlled with
solid-state relays (model ODC5 in a PB16HC digital I/O backplane; Opto
22, Temecula, CA). A Lab-LC or Lab-NB board (National Instruments,
Austin, TX) in a Macintosh computer (Quadra 630 or IIcx) was used for
A/D conversion and digital control of solenoid valves. The computer
communicated with the distributor valve via its serial port. Data
acquisition, measurement of peak responses, and control of the
distributor and solenoid valves were automated by a homemade virtual
instrument constructed with the graphical programming language LabVIEW
(National Instruments).
To apply a pulse of ACh to the oocyte, the perfusion fluid was switched
to one containing ACh for 1 sec. This was automatically done at
intervals of 1-5 min. The shortest time interval was chosen such that
reproducible control responses were obtained with no observable
desensitization. This time interval depended on the nAChR subtype being
tested. The concentration of ACh was 1 µM for test of
1 1 , 1 mM for 7, and 300 µM for
all other nAChRs. The ACh was diluted in ND96A for tests of all except
7, in which case the diluent was ND96. For control responses, the
ACh pulse was preceded by perfusion with ND96 (for 7) or ND96A (all
others). No atropine was used with oocytes expressing 7, because it
has been demonstrated to be an antagonist of these receptors (Gerzanich et al., 1994 ). For responses in toxin (test responses), the perfusion solution was switched to one containing toxin while maintaining the
same interval of ACh pulses. Toxin was continuously perfused until
responses reached a steady state. All ACh pulses contained no toxin,
for it was assumed that little, if any, bound toxin would have washed
away in the brief time (<2 sec) it takes for the responses to peak.
Oocytes were exposed to static solutions of toxin in two special cases
to conserve material: during toxin purification and when concentrations
of >10 µM toxin were used.
Data analysis. The average peak amplitude of three control
responses just preceding exposure to toxin were used to normalize the
amplitude of each test response to obtain "% response" or "%
block." Each data point of a dose-response curve represents the
average value ± SE of measurements from at least three oocytes. Dose-response curves were fit to the equation: % response = 100/{1 + ([toxin]/IC50)nH}, where
nH is the Hill coefficient. Data fits were
performed with Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA)
running on an Apple Power Macintosh.
Nicotine-stimulated neurotransmitter release
Materials. [3H]-dopamine
(dihydroxyphenyl-ethylamine, 3,4 [7-3H]-) (~30 Ci/mmol)
and [3H]-norepinephrine (norepinephrine,
levo-[ring-2,5,6-3H]-) (~42 Ci/mmol) were purchased
from DuPont NEN (Boston, MA) (NET-131 and NET-678, respectively). These
were distributed into 5 and 14.1 µCi aliquots, respectively, and
stored under argon at 80°C. ( )-Nicotine hydrogen tartrate was
from Sigma. Pargyline HCl and mecamylamine HCl were from Research
Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). On the day of use, all drugs
were prepared in superfusion buffer (SB) consisting of 128 mM NaCl, 2.4 mM KCl, 3.2 mM
CaCl2, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, 0.6 mM
MgSO4, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM
D-glucose, 1 mM L-ascorbic acid,
0.1 mM pargyline, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, with the pH adjusted to
7.5 with NaOH. -Conotoxin MII was synthesized as described
previously (Cartier et al., 1996a ).
Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 200-400 gm,
were maintained on a 12 hr light/dark cycle. Rats were drug-naive and
housed three per cage, and food and water were available ad libitum.
Synaptosomal preparation and [3H]
radioligand loading. Synaptosomes were prepared as described
previously (Kulak et al., 1997 ). A crude P2 synaptosomal fraction was
resuspended in SB (0.5 ml/100 mg wet tissue weight) containing 0.12 µM [3H]-dopamine for striatal tissue
or 0.2 µM [3H]-norepinephrine for
hippocampal tissue and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The loaded
synaptosomes were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at
room temperature (24°C), and the pellet was gently resuspended in 2.0 ml of SB. The high [K+]-stimulated release
solution was SB in which the [K+] was elevated to
22.4 mM and [Na+] was decreased to 108 mM.
Superfusion. The assay system was as described previously
(Kulak et al., 1997 ). Briefly, the system had 12 identical channels connected to a pump that continuously pulled the superfusate through individual filter holders containing the synaptosomes at a rate of 0.5 ml/min. Teflon tetrafluoroethylene tubing and Teflon-coated parts were
used upstream of the synaptosomes to avoid plasticizers such as Tinuvin
770 (a common light and UV radiation stabilizer used in a wide range of
plastics), which are known to block neuronal nAChRs (Papke et al.,
1994 ).
After a preliminary superfusion period of 13 min (for assays containing
-conotoxin AuIB) or 31 min (for all other toxins), a 1 min (0.5 ml)
pulse of synaptosomal buffer with or without agonist was delivered
simultaneously to all channels by switching on 12 three-way solenoid
valves. Nicotine concentration was 3 µM in
dopamine-release experiments and 100 µM in
norepinephrine-release experiments. Fractions (2 min each) per channel
were collected in polypropylene minivials containing 4.0 ml of
scintillation fluid. After the collection period, the filters holding
the synaptosomes were removed to determine the residual radioactivity.
A liquid scintillation counter (Beckman LS9800, 57.2% efficiency) was
used to determine tritium levels.
Data analysis. It has previously been shown that tritium
released by nAChR agonists or by depolarizing concentrations of KCl is
directly proportional to total radioligand released (Rapier et al.,
1988 ). Thus levels of tritium released are assumed to correspond
directly to amounts of radioligand released.
Release is calculated as (dpm in the peak fractions baseline)/baseline, where baseline is the average dpm of two prerelease and two postrelease fractions. Release is expressed as a percentage of
agonist-stimulated release under control conditions. Agonist-stimulated release with superfusate containing different -conotoxin
concentrations was compared with those of controls without toxin and
analyzed for statistically significant mean differences using a
t test with SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation and biochemical characterization of
AuI -conotoxins
Venom extract from the snail-eating mollusk C. aulicus
(Fig. 1A) was applied
at a concentration of 6.5 mg/ml to voltage-clamped Xenopus
oocytes expressing 3 4 receptors; this concentration blocked 99%
of the ACh-gated current. This initial encouraging result provided
incentive to purify C. aulicus venom as shown in Figure
1B. The strategy basically entailed repeated RPLC
purifications of venom fractions. To test for activity, fractions were
lyophilized, resuspended in ND96 buffer, and assessed for inhibition of
ACh-gated current in Xenopus oocytes expressing 3 4
nAChRs as described in Materials and Methods. After the initial
semipreparative RPLC, two consecutive fractions (0.1% of each) totally
inhibited 3 4 receptors in the oocyte assay. These active
fractions were further purified by applying small portions (e.g., 16%)
of the active fractions to an analytical RPLC column.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
A, C. aulicus. Cone
snails are venomous marine predators. C. aulicus is
found in coral reefs and sand substrates in the Indo-Pacific (except
Hawaii) and hunts primarily gastropods but also small fish. For the
first time, nicotinic antagonists were isolated from its venom.
B, Purification of AuI -conotoxins by RPLC.
Panel 1, Filtrate of venom extract was loaded onto a
semipreparative Vydac C18 column with 100% buffer A and
eluted with a gradient of 5-65% buffer B per hour. Flow rate was 5 ml/min. Panel 2, Sixteen percent of the material eluting
in the position indicated by the arrow in panel
1 was diluted with 2 vol of 0.1% TFA and repurified on an
analytical Vydac C18 column, using a flow rate of 1 ml/min.
The gradient was 25-30% buffer B for 5 min and then 30-55% buffer B
for 50 min. Panel 3, Fractions indicated in panel
2 were rechromatographed as described to obtain the final
purified products. Although AuIB is well separated, AuIA and AuIC
nearly co-elute. A 5-ml-sample loading loop was used in all
chromatography. Buffer A = 0.1% TFA; buffer B = 0.1% TFA,
90% acetonitrile (panel 1) and 0.1% TFA, 60%
acetonitrile for all other purifications steps. Absorbance was
monitored at 280 nm.
|
|
It became apparent during the purification that there were multiple
active fractions. Some of these fractions (Fig. 1B,
AuIA and AuIC) were difficult to resolve
chromatographically. The active components were purified by RPLC using
the gradient system described in Figure 1B
(panels 2 and 3). To obtain a
homogeneous product by RPLC it was necessary that the presumed
impurities in the leading and tailing edges of the peak be excluded
from the recovered peptide sample. Activity of all fractions on
3 4 receptors was verified using the oocyte assay. Repeated RPLC
and collection of these peak fractions eventually resulted in pure
material. To obtain AuIA and AuIC separately, material was collected
from the left half (AuIA) and far right half (AuIC) of a coalesced
peptide absorbance (Fig. 1B, panel
3). Ultimately three active peptides were isolated and
designated as fractions A, B, and C. However, because of the large
number of peptides eluting in this portion of the chromatogram, it is
possible that there were additional 3 4-active peptides that were
not recovered during this process.
The disulfide bonds of the purified peptides were reduced, the
cysteines alkylated, and the peptides sequenced as described in
Materials and Methods. Three sequences were obtained as shown in Table
1. Liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry
was performed on each peptide and indicated that Cys residues are
present as disulfides and that the C-terminal -carboxyl group in
each peptide is amidated. Monoisotopic MH+ mass
calculated for each peptide is 1725.6, 1572.5, and 1667.6 Da for
-conotoxins AuIA, B, and C, respectively. The observed masses were
1725.6, 1572.5, and 1667.6 Da, respectively. The sequences were further
verified by total chemical synthesis as described below. The three
sequences are clearly homologs of each other and resemble previously
isolated -conotoxins in their Cys spacing, particularly
-conotoxins MII, PnIA, and PnIB, which also target neuronal nAChRs.
The AuI peptides, however, differ substantially in non-Cys amino acids
(Table 1). As will be shown below, the AuIB peptide selectively targets
the 3 4 receptor, and it is likely that these non-Cys amino acids
confer this unique specificity.
Chemical synthesis
Solid-phase chemical synthesis of the AuI -conopeptides was
achieved by methods similar to those used to synthesize -conotoxin MII. For all -conotoxins characterized to date, the disulfide bonding pattern has been conserved and is first Cys-third Cys, second
Cys-fourth Cys. To synthesize the AuI peptides, we assumed this
conservation of disulfide bonds and protected Cys groups in pairs to
direct the disulfide formation. Acid-labile protecting groups were
removed from the first and third cysteines during the cleavage
reaction, which released the linear peptide. The first disulfide bridge
was closed via air oxidation, and monocyclic peptide was purified by
RPLC. The acid-stable protecting groups were subsequently removed from
the second and fourth cysteines, and the second disulfide bridge was
closed by rapid iodine oxidation. The final bicyclic peptide was
purified by RPLC.
The proper synthesis of each peptide was confirmed by liquid secondary
ionization/mass spectrometry. The observed masses for -AuIA, -B, and
-C were 1725.6, 1572.5, and 1667.7 Da, in good agreement with the
calculated values. Proper synthesis was further verified by mixing
equal portions of synthetic and native peptides and fractionating the
mixture by RPLC. In each case, the native and synthetic peptides
co-eluted (data not shown).
Kinetics and selectivity of nAChR block
The peptides were tested for their ability to block
ACh-induced currents in Xenopus oocytes expressing 3 4
nAChRs. The intent of the studies was to assess the effect of the
peptide on the nicotinic receptors in their resting state. For this
reason we preincubated the preparation with toxin until equilibrium
for toxin was reached. Thus, peptide was perfused onto the
oocyte and the response to a 1 sec pulse of ACh was assessed every 1-5 min. Toxin application was continued until no further changes in the
responses to ACh were observed (i.e., equilibrium with toxin was
achieved). It was assumed that little if any toxin dissociates during
ACh application for two reasons. (1) The application of ACh is brief (1 sec) compared with the off-rate of the toxin (see below). (2) In our
recording chamber the bolus of ACh does not project directly at the
oocyte but rather enters tangentially, swirls, and mixes with the bath
solution. The volume of entering ACh is such that the toxin
concentration remains at a level >50% of that originally in the bath
until the ACh response has peaked (<2 sec). Thus the reduction in
toxin bathing the oocyte during the ACh pulse is minimized. Under these
conditions (pre-equilibration with toxin) the relative attenuation of
the peak amplitude of the response to ACh is assumed to be a direct
measure of the fraction of receptors blocked by toxin and to be
relatively independent of the ACh concentration in the pulse. Indeed,
in support of this assumption, -conotoxin AuIB (3 µM)
blocked 83.9 ± 1.8% of the response when a 300 µM
ACh bolus was used (n = 10) and blocked 81.7 ± 3.3% of the response when the bolus was 60 µM ACh
(n = 3).
Preliminary tests indicated that -conotoxins AuIA, AuIB, and AuIC
each preferentially blocked the 3 4 receptor versus other receptor
subunit combinations expressed in oocytes (data not shown). When tested
at a peptide concentration of 3 µM -conotoxin, AuIB blocked a greater fraction of the ACh response of 3 4 receptors than did either -conotoxin AuIA or AuIC (Fig.
2A). Thus, AuIB was
selected for particular scrutiny. Block of the ACh response by
-conotoxin AuIB is fully reversible, as shown in Figure
2B.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
A, -Conotoxin AuIA, AuIB, and
AuIC block ACh responses in oocytes expressing 3 4 nAChRs.
Xenopus oocytes expressing 3 4 nAChRs were
voltage-clamped, and the responses to 1 sec pulses of ACh were
monitored before exposure to toxin and during equilibrium exposure to 3 µM -conotoxins. Note that the block by -conotoxin
AuIB is the greatest of the three peptides. B, AuIB (10 µM) reversibly blocks 95% of the ACh response. Peptide
application and washout are indicated by the bars.
|
|
Previous studies of -conotoxins have determined that these peptides
bind at the ligand binding interface of - and non- -subunits of
nAChRs (Sine et al., 1995 ). Kinetics of the block of 3 4 receptors by -conotoxin AuIB were determined by perfusing toxin at a
concentration below the IC50, so the fraction of
receptors blocked by toxin is dominated by singly occupied receptors,
i.e., receptors with only one of the two putative ACh binding sites (at
3 4 interfaces) occupied by toxin. Development of block of the ACh
response during toxin wash-in and recovery from block after toxin
washout were measured. An individual experiment is shown in Figure
3. The results of six experiments were
averaged to determine the rate constants kon = 1.4 × 106 ± 0.3 × 106 min-1
M 1, and koff = 0.48 ± 0.06 min-1. The
Kd values determined in individual experiments
from koff/kon were
averaged to determine a Kd of 0.5 ± 0.14 µM.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Kinetics of block by -conotoxin AuIB.
A, -Conotoxin AuIB (300 nM) was perfused
onto an oocyte expressing 3 4 receptors while the responses to 1 sec applications of ACh were measured. B, After maximal
block was achieved -conotoxin AuIB was washed out. Solid
lines are single exponential curves that best fit the
data.
|
|
-conotoxin AuIB was tested on several nAChR subunit combinations to
assess its selectivity. Although many peptide antagonists of nAChRs
block the skeletal muscle subtype ( 1 1 ) of receptor, -conotoxin AuIB (3 µM) failed to do so (Fig.
4A). Further tests were
performed with various neuronal nAChR subunit combinations. Dose-response studies indicated that AuIB has an IC50 of
0.75 µM for 3 4 nAChRs (Fig. 4B).
This value is in good agreement with the Kd (0.5 µM) derived from kinetic studies described above. In
contrast, -conotoxin AuIB (3 µM) had little if any
effect on the heteromeric receptor combinations 2 2, 2 4,
3 2, 4 2, 4 4, and 1 1 (data not shown). To
further quantitate the magnitude of selectivity of -conotoxin AuIB,
we tested it at 75 µM, 100-fold the IC50 for
the 3 4 nAChR. As shown in Figure 4B,
-conotoxin AuIB is at least 100 times more potent on 3 4 than
on all other / -subunit receptor combinations tested. In contrast,
-conotoxin AuIB (3 µM) blocked a substantial portion
(34 ± 5%) of the ACh response on 7 nAChRs. This indicates
that the peptide is less able to discriminate between 3 4 and 7
(homomeric) receptors than between 3 4 and other
non- 7-containing heteromeric receptors.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Selectivity of -conotoxin AuIB.
A, AuIB blocks 3 4 but not muscle nAChR. The
peptide AuIB (3 µM) blocks 84 ± 2% of the ACh
response of 3 4 receptors (n = 10). In
contrast, it fails to inhibit the 1 1
(muscle) receptor. B, -conotoxin AuIB
preferentially blocks 3 4 versus other nAChR subunit combinations.
The dose-response curve shows that -conotoxin AuIB blocks 3 4
receptors with an IC50 of 0.75 µM,
(nH is 1.05). By comparison, AuIB is
~10-fold ( 7) and >100-fold less potent on
other nAChR subtypes. Each data point represents the average of three
to five oocytes. Error bars are SEM. SEM is not shown for the
top right five data points for figure clarity, but is
less than 5% of the mean in each of these cases.
|
|
Norepinephrine release
Presynaptic nicotinic receptors are known to be involved in the
release of various neurotransmitters, including norepinephrine and
dopamine. The effects of -conotoxin AuIB and other -conotoxins were assessed in this regard. Nicotine-stimulated norepinephrine release was analyzed using synaptosomes from rat hippocampus; dopamine
release was assayed in synaptosomes from rat striatum. As shown in
Figure 5, AuIB (1 and 5 µM), blocked a portion (one-fifth and one-third,
respectively) of nicotine-stimulated norepinephrine release but was
ineffective on dopamine release. The converse result was obtained with
the 3 2 selective -conotoxin MII. MII (100 nM)
blocked nicotine-stimulated dopamine release by one-third but had no
effect on nicotine-evoked norepinephrine release. We did not test
higher concentrations of AuIB because of the limited supply of peptide.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
AuIB blocks nicotine-stimulated norepinephrine,
but not dopamine, release. A, AuIB blocks norepinephrine
release from rat hippocampal synaptosomes. In contrast, -CTx MII
( 3 2-selective), -CTx ImI ( 7-selective), and -CTx MI
( 1  -selective) all fail to block release. B,
Conversely, -CTx MII, but not -CTx AuIB, -CTx ImI, or -CTx
MI, blocks dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes.
*p 0.001. Data are from 3-10 experiments with
three to six replicates within each experiment. Norepinephrine release:
1 µM AuIB, p = 0.001; 5 µM AuIB, p < 0.001; MII,
p = 0.75; ImI, p = 0.64; MI,
p = 0.5. Dopamine release: 1 µM AuIB,
p = 0.93; 5 µM AuIB,
p = 0.68; MII, p < 0.001; ImI,
p = 0.24; MI, p = 0.85.
|
|
Specificity and effects
The specificity of -conotoxin AuIB's block of norepinephrine
release was further assessed by testing its effects on norepinephrine release stimulated by high [K+] (22.4 mM). Concentrations of AuIB that significantly block
nicotine-stimulated norepinephrine release had no effect on high
[K+]-stimulated norepinephrine release (response
in 1 µM AuIB = 92.2 ± 3.7%, p = 0.5; response in 5 µM AuIB = 99.0 ± 4.6%,
p = 0.95). The experiment was performed three times
with three to five replicates per experiment.
We also assessed the effects of other -conotoxins on nicotine-
stimulated norepinephrine release. Neither -conotoxin ImI [ 7-selective; Johnson et al. (1995) ] nor -conotoxin MI
[ 1-selective; McIntosh et al. (1982) ; Johnson et al. (1995) ] had
any effect on release (Fig. 5). We have shown previously that
-conotoxins ImI and MI are without effect on nicotine-stimulated
dopamine release (Kulak et al., 1997 ). Thus, of the four structurally
and functionally related peptides tested, only -conotoxin AuIB
blocks nicotine-stimulated norepinephrine release, and only
-conotoxin MII blocks nicotine-stimulated dopamine release.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We used oocytes expressing rat 3 4 nAChRs as an assay to
guide the purification of components in the venom of C. aulicus that block nicotinic receptors. These studies have
resulted in the isolation of three peptides designated -conotoxins
AuIA, -B, and -C. The structures of these homologous disulfide-rich peptides have been confirmed by mass spectrometry and total chemical synthesis. We have characterized one of these peptides, -conotoxins AuIB, in detail and observed that although it is structurally similar
to previously isolated -conotoxins, its pharmacological profile is
unique (Table 2). We used nicotinic
receptors expressed in oocytes to demonstrate that -conotoxin AuIB
produces dose-dependent selective block of the 3 4-subunit
combination. To our knowledge, this is the first report of nicotinic
antagonists that can selectively block 3 4 receptors. The
selectivity for 3 4 versus 3 2 receptors is particularly
remarkable given AuIB's structural similarity to -conotoxin MII,
which potently and selectively blocks 3 2 nAChRs (Cartier et al.,
1996a ).
3 and 4 subunits are distributed throughout both the PNS
and CNS. How often these subunits combine to form a receptor is unknown. 3 4-like receptors have been reported to be present in
trigeminal sensory, superior cervical ganglion, and habenula neurons and have been implicated in CNS neurotransmitter release (Clarke and Reuben, 1996 ; Flores et al., 1996 ; Zoli et al., 1998 ).
In the present study, we demonstrate that -conotoxin AuIB
discriminates among heterologously expressed receptors in
Xenopus oocytes. There is evidence, however, that 3 4
receptors expressed in oocytes differ from 3 4 receptors expressed
in cultured mammalian cell lines as well as 3 4-like native
receptors present in the superior cervical ganglion. Differences among
these receptors include dissimilarities in channel conductance and
kinetics as well as relative sensitivity to nicotinic agonists (Lewis
et al., 1997 ; Sivilotti et al., 1997 ). Reasons for these differences
are unknown. Possibilities include differences in post-translational modifications, variations in folding or assembly of subunits, or
differences in subunit stoichiometry. Although differences in
sensitivity to antagonists among these receptors have not been reported, caution should be exercised in extrapolating our results to
native receptor subtypes. Nevertheless, -conotoxin AuIB recently has
been shown to discriminate among native nAChRs. -Conotoxin AuIB (1 µM) blocks ~75% of the (putative
3 4-subunit-containing) nAChR response in habenula neurons (Lester
et al., 1998 ). In contrast, 5 µM -conotoxin AuIB fails
to inhibit -bungarotoxin and -conotoxin MII-sensitive (putative
3 2-subunit-containing) nAChRs that underlie spontaneous waves in
retinal ganglion cells (Penn et al., 1998 ). In addition, we demonstrate
in the present study that -conotoxin AuIB distinguishes between
nAChRs that mediate nicotine-evoked norepinephrine versus dopamine
release. Thus -conotoxin AuIB clearly is able to discriminate among
different subtypes of native receptors and may be used in combination
with other selective ligands to "fingerprint" receptor
subtypes.
-Conotoxin MII has been used previously to study the role of
3 2-like receptors in nicotine-stimulated dopamine release (Kulak
et al., 1997 ; Grady et al., 1997 ; Kaiser et al., 1998 ). In this report
the newly isolated -conotoxin AuIB was used to investigate a role
for 3 4-like nAChRs in nicotine-stimulated neurotransmitter
release. With respect to 3-containing receptors, the selectivity of
-conotoxin MII is opposite that of -conotoxin AuIB, with MII
being highly selective for the 3 2 receptor subtype and AuIB
preferring 3 4. When nicotine-stimulated dopamine and norepinephrine release were investigated using synaptosomal
preparations, the effects of MII and AuIB were found to be
complementary. MII blocked a fraction of nicotine-evoked dopamine
release but not norepinephrine release, whereas AuIB blocked a fraction
of norepinephrine but not dopamine release. Previous studies had
suggested that the subtype(s) of nicotinic receptors that modulates
dopamine versus norepinephrine release might be different (Sacaan et
al., 1995 ; Clarke and Reuben, 1996 ). Our results with -conotoxins AuIB and MII strongly support these earlier suggestions and provide evidence for the identity of the specific nAChR subtypes likely to be
involved.
The subunit composition of the nAChR(s) that modulates norepinephrine
release is unknown. The native receptor may be a heteromer with two or
more distinct subunits. Previous investigators have generally agreed
that an 3-subunit is likely to be present but have differed as to
which -subunit(s) is present. In hippocampal slices it has been
reported that an 3 2-like receptor is responsible (Sershen et al.,
1997 ), whereas in synaptosomes it has been reported that the
pharmacological profile most closely resembles that of 3 4-like
receptors (Clarke and Reuben, 1996 ). These differences, however, may be
attributable to the types of preparations (i.e., slices vs
synaptosomes) being used. The magnitude of norepinephrine release in
slices is severalfold larger and tetrodotoxin sensitive (Sacaan et al.,
1995 ), compared with release in synaptosomes that is tetrodotoxin
insensitive (Clarke and Reuben, 1996 ). Therefore, it is conceivable
that the large response seen in slices is attributable primarily to
distal 3 2-like receptors that indirectly stimulate norepinephrine
release, whereas the receptors present at synaptic terminals are
primarily 3 4-like, the latter consistent with the effects of
-conotoxins AuIB and MII on nicotine-evoked norepinephrine release
from hippocampal synaptosomes.
Although the results with AuIB suggest the presence of an
3/ 4-subunit interface in the nicotinic receptor that mediates norepinephrine release, it remains to be determined whether the receptor target is purely 3 4 or composed of additional subunits as well. In general it is believed that each nicotinic receptor requires the binding of two molecules of acetylcholine for activation; therefore, the binding of one agonist site by AuIB should be sufficient to block receptor function. This scenario in fact has been demonstrated with other -conotoxins and other nicotinic receptors (Martinez et
al., 1995 ; Cartier et al., 1996b ). Thus, it is not known what subunits
in addition to the 3/ 4-subunit interface are present in the
AuIB-sensitive receptors. However, an 3 2-subunit interface appears to be absent, because -conotoxin MII fails to block
nicotine-evoked norepinephrine release. Pharmacological definition of
the remaining subunits of these synaptic receptors may require
additional antagonists with novel subunit specificity.
The isolation of -conotoxin AuIB provides further incentive to
screen Conus venoms for additional selective nicotinic
receptor antagonists. The underlying reason for the extreme diversity
of nicotinic-targeted peptides in these venoms is unknown. However, the
broad diversity of prey types (five different phyla) of the cone snails
and the likely high degree of heterogeneity of nicotinic receptor
subtypes present in their prey (and potential predators) could provide
the rationale for this diversity.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received June 26, 1998; revised Aug. 4, 1998; accepted Aug. 10, 1998.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants MH53631
and GM48677. Mass spectrometry was performed by A. Gray Craig of the
Salk Institute. Robert Schackmann of the Protein/DNA Core Facility at
the University of Utah Cancer Center synthesized the linear peptides.
We thank Lourdes Cruz for providing crude Conus venom
and Thu A. Nguyen for assistance with norepinephrine release
assays.
Correspondence should be addressed to J. Michael McIntosh, 201 South
Biology Building, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
84112-0840.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Cartier GE,
Yoshikami D,
Gray WR,
Luo S,
Olivera BM,
McIntosh JM
(1996a)
A new
-conotoxin which targets 3 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
J Biol Chem
271:7522-7528[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Cartier GE,
Yoshikami D,
Luo S,
Olivera BM,
McIntosh JM
(1996b)
-Conotoxin MII ( -CTx-MII) interaction with neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
22:268. -
Clarke PBS,
Reuben M
(1996)
Release of [3H]-noradrenaline from rat hippocampal synaptosomes by nicotine: mediation by different nicotinic receptor subtypes from striatal [3H]-dopamine release.
Br J Pharmacol
111:595-606.
-
Conroy WG,
Berg DK
(1995)
Neurons can maintain multiple classes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors distinguished by different subunit compositions.
J Biol Chem
270:4424-4431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Flores CM,
DeCamp RM,
Kilo S,
Rogers SW,
Hargreaves KM
(1996)
Neuronal nicotinic receptor expression in sensory neurons of the rat trigeminal ganglion: demonstration of
3 4, a novel subtype in the mammalian nervous system.
J Neurosci
16:7892-7901[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Gerzanich V,
Anand R,
Lindstrom J
(1994)
Homomers of
8 and 7 subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors exhibit similar channel but contrasting binding site properties.
Mol Pharmacol
45:212-220[Abstract]. -
Grady SR,
McIntosh JM,
Marks MJ,
Collins AC
(1997)
Effects of
-conotoxin MII on nicotine-stimulated dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
23:671. -
Johnson DS,
Martinez J,
Elgoyhen AB,
Heinemann SS,
McIntosh JM
(1995)
-Conotoxin ImI exhibits subtype-specific nicotinic acetylcholine receptor blockade: preferential inhibition of homomeric 7 and 9 receptors.
Mol Pharmacol
48:194-199[Abstract]. -
Kahn RS,
Davis KL
(1995)
New developments in dopamine and schizophrenia.
In: Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress (Bloom FE,
Kupfer DJ,
eds), pp 1193-1203. New York: Raven.
-
Kaiser SA,
Soliakov L,
Harvey SC,
Luetje CW,
Wonnacott S
(1998)
Differential inhibition by
-conotoxin MII of the nicotinic stimulation of [3H]-dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes and slices.
J Neurochem
70:1069-1076[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Kulak JM,
Nguyen TA,
Olivera BM,
McIntosh JM
(1997)
-Conotoxin MII blocks nicotine-stimulated dopamine release in rat striatal synaptosomes.
J Neurosci
17:5263-5270[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Lester RAJ,
McIntosh JM,
Quick MW
(1998)
Relationship between nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNA levels and channel function in central neurons.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
24:1342.
-
Lewis TM,
Harkness PC,
Sivilotti LG,
Colquhoun D,
Millar NS
(1997)
The ion channel properties of a rat recombinant neuronal nicotinic receptor are dependent on the host cell type.
J Physiol (Lond)
505.2:299-306[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Martinez JS,
Olivera BM,
Gray WR,
Craig AG,
Groebe DR,
Abramson SN,
McIntosh JM
(1995)
-Conotoxin EI, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-targeted peptide.
Biochemistry
34:14519-14526[Medline]. -
McIntosh JM,
Cruz LJ,
Hunkapiller MW,
Gray WR,
Olivera BM
(1982)
Isolation and structure of a peptide toxin from the marine snail Conus magus.
Arch Biochem Biophys
218:329-334[Web of Science][Medline].
-
McIntosh JM,
Yoshikami D,
Mahe E,
Nielsen DB,
Rivier JE,
Gray WR,
Olivera BM
(1994)
A nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand of unique specificity,
-conotoxin ImI.
J Biol Chem
269:16733-16739[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Mongeau R,
Blier P,
de Montigny C
(1997)
The serotonergic and noradrenergic systems of the hippocampus: their interactions and the effects of antidepressant treatments.
Brain Res Rev
23:145-195[Medline].
-
Papke RL,
Craig AG,
Heinemann SF
(1994)
Inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl) sebacate (Tinuvin 770), an additive to medical plastics.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
268:718-726[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Penn AA,
Riquelme PA,
Feller MB,
Shatz CJ
(1998)
Competition in retinogeniculate patterning driven by spontaneous activity.
Science
279:2005-2168.
-
Pereira EFR,
Alkondon M,
McIntosh JM,
Albuquerque EX
(1996)
-Conotoxin ImI: a competitive antagonist at -bungarotoxin-sensitive neuronal nicotinic receptors in hippocampal neurons.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
278:1472-1483[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Pontieri FE,
Tanda G,
Orzi F,
Di Chiara G
(1996)
Effects of nicotine on the nucleus accumbens and similarity to those of addictive drugs.
Nature
382:255-257[Medline].
-
Rapier C,
Lunt GG,
Wonnacott S
(1988)
Stereoselective nicotine-induced release of dopamine from striatal synaptosomes: concentration dependence and repetitive stimulation.
J Neurochem
50:1123-1130[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sacaan AI,
Dunlop JL,
Lloyd GK
(1995)
Pharmacological characterization of neuronal acetylcholine gated ion channel receptor-mediated hippocampal norepinephrine and striatal dopamine release from rat brain slices.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
274:224-230[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sargent PB
(1993)
The diversity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
16:403-443[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schatzberg AF,
Nemeroff CB
(1995)
Section II: classes of psychiatric drugs: animal and human pharmacology.
In: Textbook of pharmacology (Meltzer HY,
ed), pp 141-438. Washington: American Psychiatric Press.
-
Sershen H,
Balla A,
Lajtha A,
Vizi ES
(1997)
Characterization of nicotinic receptors involved in the release of noradrenaline from the hippocampus.
Neuroscience
77:121-130[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sine SM,
Kreienkamp H-J,
Bren N,
Maeda R,
Taylor P
(1995)
Molecular dissection of subunit interfaces in the acetylcholine receptor: identification of determinants of
-conotoxin MI selectivity.
Neuron
15:205-211[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Sivilotti LG,
McNeil DK,
Lewis TM,
Nassar MA,
Schoepfer R,
Colquhoun D
(1997)
Recombinant nicotinic receptors, expressed in Xenopus oocytes, do not resemble native rat sympathetic ganglion receptors in single-channel behaviour.
J Physiol (Lond)
500.1:123-138[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tavazoie SF,
Tavazoie MF,
McIntosh JM,
Olivera BM,
Yoshikami D
(1997)
Differential block of nicotinic synapses on B vs. C neurones in sympathetic ganglia of frog by
-conotoxins MII and ImI.
Br J Pharmacol
120:995-1000[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Ullian EM,
McIntosh JM,
Sargent PB
(1997)
Rapid synaptic transmission in the avian ciliary ganglion is mediated by two distinct classes of nicotinic receptors.
J Neurosci
17:7210-7219[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wonnacott S
(1997)
Presynaptic nicotinic ACh receptors.
Trends Neurosci
20:92-98[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zoli M,
Léna C,
Picciotto MR,
Changeux J-P
(1998)
Identification of four classes of brain nicotinic receptors using
2 mutant mice.
J Neurosci
18:4461-4472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Copyright © 1998 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/98/18218571-09$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Armishaw, A. A. Jensen, T. Balle, R. J. Clark, K. Harpsoe, C. Skonberg, T. Liljefors, and K. Stromgaard
Rational Design of {alpha}-Conotoxin Analogues Targeting {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: IMPROVED ANTAGONISTIC ACTIVITY BY INCORPORATION OF PROLINE DERIVATIVES
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 3, 2009;
284(14):
9498 - 9512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Sargent
Nicotinic Receptors Concentrated in the Subsynaptic Membrane Do Not Contribute Significantly to Synaptic Currents at an Embryonic Synapse in the Chicken Ciliary Ganglion
J. Neurosci.,
March 25, 2009;
29(12):
3749 - 3759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. W. Kamendi, Q. Cheng, O. Dergacheva, C. Gorini, H. S. Jameson, X. Wang, J. M. McIntosh, and D. Mendelowitz
Abolishment of Serotonergic Neurotransmission to Cardiac Vagal Neurons During and After Hypoxia and Hypercapnia With Prenatal Nicotine Exposure
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2009;
101(3):
1141 - 1150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. I. Westphalen, R. S. Gomez, and H. C. Hemmings Jr
Nicotinic receptor-evoked hippocampal norepinephrine release is highly sensitive to inhibition by isoflurane
Br. J. Anaesth.,
March 1, 2009;
102(3):
355 - 360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Grady, M. Moretti, M. Zoli, M. J. Marks, A. Zanardi, L. Pucci, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Rodent Habenulo-Interpeduncular Pathway Expresses a Large Variety of Uncommon nAChR Subtypes, But Only the {alpha}3{beta}4 and {alpha}3{beta}3{beta}4 Subtypes Mediate Acetylcholine Release
J. Neurosci.,
February 18, 2009;
29(7):
2272 - 2282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Zwart, A. L. Carbone, M. Moroni, I. Bermudez, A. J. Mogg, E. A. Folly, L. M. Broad, A. C. Williams, D. Zhang, C. Ding, et al.
Sazetidine-A Is a Potent and Selective Agonist at Native and Recombinant {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2008;
73(6):
1838 - 1843.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Lendvai and E. S. Vizi
Nonsynaptic Chemical Transmission Through Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2008;
88(2):
333 - 349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Azam and J. M. McIntosh
Characterization of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors That Modulate Nicotine-Evoked [3H]Norepinephrine Release from Mouse Hippocampal Synaptosomes
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2006;
70(3):
967 - 976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Talley, B. M. Olivera, K.-H. Han, S. B. Christensen, C. Dowell, I. Tsigelny, K.-Y. Ho, P. Taylor, and J. M. McIntosh
{alpha}-Conotoxin OmIA Is a Potent Ligand for the Acetylcholine-binding Protein as Well as {alpha}3beta2 and {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 25, 2006;
281(34):
24678 - 24686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Schwarz, S. C. Schwarz, O. Dorigo, A. Stutzer, F. Wegner, C. Labarca, P. Deshpande, J. S. Gil, A. J. Berk, and H. A. Lester
Enhanced expression of hypersensitive {alpha}4* nAChR in adult mice increases the loss of midbrain dopaminergic neurons
FASEB J,
May 1, 2006;
20(7):
935 - 946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Barik and S. Wonnacott
Indirect Modulation by {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors of Noradrenaline Release in Rat Hippocampal Slices: Interaction with Glutamate and GABA Systems and Effect of Nicotine Withdrawal
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2006;
69(2):
618 - 628.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Zhu, R. R. Stewart, J. M. McIntosh, and F. F. Weight
Activation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Increases the Frequency of Spontaneous GABAergic IPSCs in Rat Basolateral Amygdala Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2005;
94(5):
3081 - 3091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Z. Guo, Y. Liu, E. M. Sorenson, and V. A. Chiappinelli
Synaptically Released and Exogenous ACh Activates Different Nicotinic Receptors to Enhance Evoked Glutamatergic Transmission in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2005;
94(4):
2549 - 2560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Obaid, M. E. Nelson, J. Lindstrom, and B. M. Salzberg
Optical studies of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the guinea-pig enteric nervous system
J. Exp. Biol.,
August 1, 2005;
208(15):
2981 - 3001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Cao, C. S. Surowy, and P. S. Puttfarcken
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor-Mediated [3H]Dopamine Release from Hippocampus
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
March 1, 2005;
312(3):
1298 - 1304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. I. Chernyavsky, J. Arredondo, L. M. Marubio, and S. A. Grando
Differential regulation of keratinocyte chemokinesis and chemotaxis through distinct nicotinic receptor subtypes
J. Cell Sci.,
November 1, 2004;
117(23):
5665 - 5679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Orb, J. Wieacker, C. Labarca, C. Fonck, H. A. Lester, and J. Schwarz
Knockin mice with Leu9'Ser {alpha}4-nicotinic receptors: substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons are hypersensitive to agonist and lost postnatally
Physiol Genomics,
August 11, 2004;
18(3):
299 - 307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Salminen, K. L. Murphy, J. M. McIntosh, J. Drago, M. J. Marks, A. C. Collins, and S. R. Grady
Subunit Composition and Pharmacology of Two Classes of Striatal Presynaptic Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mediating Dopamine Release in Mice
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2004;
65(6):
1526 - 1535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. McIntosh, L. Azam, S. Staheli, C. Dowell, J. M. Lindstrom, A. Kuryatov, J. E. Garrett, M. J. Marks, and P. Whiteaker
Analogs of {alpha}-Conotoxin MII Are Selective for {alpha}6-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2004;
65(4):
944 - 952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. TERLAU and B. M. OLIVERA
Conus Venoms: A Rich Source of Novel Ion Channel-Targeted Peptides
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2004;
84(1):
41 - 68.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dowell, B. M. Olivera, J. E. Garrett, S. T. Staheli, M. Watkins, A. Kuryatov, D. Yoshikami, J. M. Lindstrom, and J. M. McIntosh
{alpha}-Conotoxin PIA Is Selective for {alpha}6 Subunit-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
September 17, 2003;
23(24):
8445 - 8452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Nai, J. M. McIntosh, and J. F. Margiotta
Relating Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes Defined by Subunit Composition and Channel Function
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2003;
63(2):
311 - 324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nicke, M. L. Loughnan, E. L. Millard, P. F. Alewood, D. J. Adams, N. L. Daly, D. J. Craik, and R. J. Lewis
Isolation, Structure, and Activity of GID, a Novel alpha 4/7-Conotoxin with an Extended N-terminal Sequence
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 24, 2003;
278(5):
3137 - 3144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Dutton, P. S. Bansal, R. C. Hogg, D. J. Adams, P. F. Alewood, and D. J. Craik
A New Level of Conotoxin Diversity, a Non-native Disulfide Bond Connectivity in alpha -Conotoxin AuIB Reduces Structural Definition but Increases Biological Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 6, 2002;
277(50):
48849 - 48857.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. McIntosh, C. Dowell, M. Watkins, J. E. Garrett, D. Yoshikami, and B. M. Olivera
alpha -Conotoxin GIC from Conus geographus, a Novel Peptide Antagonist of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 6, 2002;
277(37):
33610 - 33615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Miller, S. P. Sumithran, and L. P. Dwoskin
Bupropion Inhibits Nicotine-Evoked [3H]Overflow from Rat Striatal Slices Preloaded with [3H]Dopamine and from Rat Hippocampal Slices Preloaded with [3H]Norepinephrine
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
September 1, 2002;
302(3):
1113 - 1122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Quik, Y. Polonskaya, J. M. Kulak, and J. M. McIntosh
Vulnerability of 125I-{alpha}-Conotoxin MII Binding Sites to Nigrostriatal Damage in Monkey
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 2001;
21(15):
5494 - 5500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Barazangi and L. W. Role
Nicotine-Induced Enhancement of Glutamatergic and GABAergic Synaptic Transmission in the Mouse Amygdala
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2001;
86(1):
463 - 474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-L. Si and T. J. F. Lee
Presynaptic alpha 7-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mediate Nicotine-Induced Nitric Oxidergic Neurogenic Vasodilation in Porcine Basilar Arteries
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2001;
298(1):
122 - 128.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H Hicks, J. A Dani, and R. A J Lester
Regulation of the sensitivity of acetylcholine receptors to nicotine in rat habenula neurons
J. Physiol.,
December 15, 2000;
529(3):
579 - 597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bansal, J. H. Singer, B. J. Hwang, W. Xu, A. Beaudet, and M. B. Feller
Mice Lacking Specific Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunits Exhibit Dramatically Altered Spontaneous Activity Patterns and Reveal a Limited Role for Retinal Waves in Forming ON and OFF Circuits in the Inner Retina
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 2000;
20(20):
7672 - 7681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. Oppenheim, D. Prevette, A. D'Costa, S. Wang, L. J. Houenou, and J. M. McIntosh
Reduction of Neuromuscular Activity Is Required for the Rescue of Motoneurons from Naturally Occurring Cell Death by Nicotinic-Blocking Agents
J. Neurosci.,
August 15, 2000;
20(16):
6117 - 6124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bibevski, Y. Zhou, J. M. McIntosh, R. E. Zigmond, and M. E. Dunlap
Functional Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors That Mediate Ganglionic Transmission in Cardiac Parasympathetic Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
July 1, 2000;
20(13):
5076 - 5082.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Francis, R. W. Vazquez, R. L. Papke, and R. E. Oswald
Subtype-Selective Inhibition of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by Cocaine Is Determined by the alpha 4 and beta 4 Subunits
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2000;
58(1):
109 - 119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dhar, F. Nagy, J. M. McIntosh, and H. N. Sapru
Receptor subtypes mediating depressor responses to microinjections of nicotine into medial NTS of the rat
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
July 1, 2000;
279(1):
R132 - R140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Cho, K. H. Mok, B. M. Olivera, J. M. McIntosh, K.-H. Park, and K.-H. Han
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Solution Conformation of alpha -Conotoxin AuIB, an alpha 3beta 4 Subtype-selective Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonist
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 17, 2000;
275(12):
8680 - 8685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lena, A. de Kerchove d'Exaerde, M. Cordero-Erausquin, N. Le Novere, M. del Mar Arroyo-Jimenez, and J.-P. Changeux
Diversity and distribution of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the locus ceruleus neurons
PNAS,
October 12, 1999;
96(21):
12126 - 12131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Cardoso, S. J. Brozowski, L. E. Chavez-Noriega, M. Harpold, C. F. Valenzuela, and R. A. Harris
Effects of Ethanol on Recombinant Human Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
May 1, 1999;
289(2):
774 - 780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D Kristufek, E Stocker, S Boehm, and S Huck
Somatic and prejunctional nicotinic receptors in cultured rat sympathetic neurones show different agonist profiles
J. Physiol.,
May 1, 1999;
516(3):
739 - 756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Giniatullin, S. Di Angelantonio, C. Marchetti, E. Sokolova, L. Khiroug, and A. Nistri
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Rapidly Downregulates Nicotinic Receptor Function and Slowly Raises Intracellular Ca2+ in Rat Chromaffin Cells In Vitro
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 1999;
19(8):
2945 - 2953.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. McIntosh, G. O. Corpuz, R. T. Layer, J. E. Garrett, J. D. Wagstaff, G. Bulaj, A. Vyazovkina, D. Yoshikami, L. J. Cruz, and B. M. Olivera
Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Conus Peptide with Apparent Antinociceptive Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 13, 2000;
275(42):
32391 - 32397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-P. Feng, J. Hamid, C. Doering, G. M. Bosey, T. P. Snutch, and G. W. Zamponi
Residue Gly1326 of the N-type Calcium Channel alpha 1B Subunit Controls Reversibility of omega -Conotoxin GVIA and MVIIA Block
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 4, 2001;
276(19):
15728 - 15735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-H. Park, J.-E. Suk, R. Jacobsen, W. R. Gray, J. M. McIntosh, and K.-H. Han
Solution Conformation of alpha -Conotoxin EI, a Neuromuscular Toxin Specific for the alpha 1/delta Subunit Interface of Torpedo Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2001;
276(52):
49028 - 49033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|