Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1, 1998, 18(21):9099-9111
Spike-and-Wave Oscillations Based on the Properties of
GABAB Receptors
Alain
Destexhe
Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Laval
University, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
Neocortical and thalamic neurons are involved in the genesis of
generalized spike-and-wave (SW) epileptic seizures. The cellular mechanism of SW involves complex interactions between intrinsic neuronal firing properties and multiple types of synaptic receptors, but because of the complexity of these interactions the exact details
of this mechanism are unclear. In this paper these types of
interactions were investigated by using biophysical models of thalamic
and cortical neurons. It is shown first that, because of the particular
activation properties of GABAB receptor-mediated responses, simulated field potentials can display SW waveforms if
cortical pyramidal cells and interneurons generate prolonged discharges
in synchrony, without any other assumptions. Here the "spike"
component coincided with the synchronous firing, whereas the "wave"
component was generated mostly by slow
GABAB-mediated K+ currents. Second, the
model suggests that intact thalamic circuits can be forced into a ~3
Hz oscillatory mode by corticothalamic feedback. Here again, this
property was attributable to the characteristics of
GABAB-mediated inhibition. Third, in the thalamocortical
system this property can lead to generalized ~3 Hz oscillations with SW field potentials. The oscillation consisted of a synchronous prolonged firing in all cell types, interleaved with a ~300 msec period of neuronal silence, similar to experimental observations during
SW seizures. This model suggests that SW oscillations can arise from
thalamocortical loops in which the corticothalamic feedback indirectly
evokes GABAB-mediated inhibition in the thalamus. This
mechanism is shown to be consistent with a number of different experimental models, and experiments are suggested to test its consistency.
Key words:
computational models; thalamus; cerebral cortex; epilepsy; absence; intrinsic properties; low-threshold spikes; spindle
oscillations; thalamocortical
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Generalized spike-and-wave (SW)
patterns characterize the human electroencephalogram during several
types of epilepsy as well as in animal models of absence seizures.
Initially suggested by Jasper and Kershman (1941)
, the possible
involvement of the thalamus in SW seizures was shown by recordings of
thalamic nuclei in humans during absence attacks (Williams, 1953
;
Prevett et al., 1995
). An important role for the thalamus also is
supported by electrophysiological recordings in experimental models of
SW seizures, which show that cortical and thalamic cells fire prolonged
discharges in phase with the "spike" component, whereas the
"wave" is characterized by a silence in all cell types (Pollen,
1964
; Steriade, 1974
; Avoli et al., 1983
; McLachlan et al., 1984
;
Buzsáki et al., 1990
; Inoue et al., 1993
). Electrophysiological
recordings also indicate that spindle oscillations, which are generated
by thalamic circuits (Steriade et al., 1990
, 1993
), can be transformed
gradually into SW discharges, and all manipulations that promote or
antagonize spindles have the same effect on SW (Kostopoulos et al.,
1981a
,b
; McLachlan et al., 1984
). Finally, it has been demonstrated
that SW patterns disappear after thalamic lesions or after inactivation of the thalamus (Pellegrini et al., 1979
; Avoli and Gloor, 1981
; Vergnes and Marescaux, 1992
).
A series of pharmacological results suggests that GABAB
receptors play a critical role in the genesis of SW discharges in rats,
because GABAB agonists exacerbate seizures whereas
GABAB antagonists suppress them (Hosford et al., 1992
;
Snead, 1992
; Puigcerver et al., 1996
; Smith and Fisher, 1996
). The
anti-absence drug clonazepam seems to act by diminishing
GABAB-mediated IPSPs in thalamocortical (TC) cells,
reducing their tendency to burst in synchrony (Huguenard and Prince,
1994a
; Gibbs et al., 1996
). In ferret thalamic slices, spindle
oscillations can be transformed into slower ~3 Hz oscillations after
blocking GABAA receptors, and, like SW, these oscillations
are suppressed by GABAB receptor antagonists (von Krosigk
et al., 1993
). These experiments could be replicated by computational
models of thalamic circuits (Destexhe and Sejnowski, 1995
; Destexhe et
al., 1996a
; Golomb et al., 1996
).
Although these results could suggest a thalamic origin of SW seizures
involving GABAB-mediated mechanisms, clear evidence suggests a determinant role for the cortex: thalamic injections of high
doses of GABAA antagonists such as penicillin (Ralston and
Ajmone-Marsan, 1956
; Gloor et al., 1977
) or bicuculline (Steriade and
Contreras, 1998
) led to 3-4 Hz oscillations, with no sign of SW
discharge. On the other hand, injection of the same drugs to the
cortex, with no change in the thalamus, resulted in seizure activity
with SW patterns (Gloor et al., 1977
; Steriade and Contreras, 1998
).
These experiments show that both cortical and thalamic neurons are
necessary to generate SW rhythms and that both GABAA and GABAB receptors are actively involved, but the exact
mechanisms are unclear. In this paper a thalamocortical loop mechanism
for the genesis of SW oscillatory patterns was investigated by the use
of computational models that were based on the complex intrinsic firing
properties of thalamic and cortical neurons (see Llinás, 1988
)
and the properties particular to each receptor type (Destexhe et al.,
1998b
).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
All models that are shown here were based on biophysical
representations of the ionic mechanisms underlying synaptic currents, field potential generation, intrinsic firing properties, and network behavior. The modeling methods that were used to simulate these various
aspects are described successively.
Synaptic currents. Postsynaptic currents mediated by
glutamate AMPA and NMDA receptors as well as by GABAergic
GABAA and GABAB receptors were simulated by
kinetic models of postsynaptic receptors (Destexhe et al., 1994
,
1998b
). When a spike occurred in the presynaptic cell, a brief pulse of
transmitter concentration (0.5 mM during 0.3 msec) was
simulated in the synaptic cleft, and binding of the transmitter to
postsynaptic receptors occurred according to simple open/closed
kinetics, leading to a transient increase of the postsynaptic current
described by the following equation (Destexhe et al., 1994
):
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
where Isyn is the postsynaptic current,
-gsyn is the maximal conductance, m
is the fraction of open receptors, Esyn is the reversal potential, [T] is the transmitter concentration
in the cleft, and
and
are forward and backward binding rate
constants of T to open the receptors. This scheme was used
to simulate AMPA, NMDA, and GABAA types of receptors, with
the following parameters: Esyn = 0 mV,
= 0.94 × 106 M
1
s
1,
= 180 s
1 for AMPA receptors;
Esyn = 0 mV,
= 11 × 104 M
1
s
1,
= 6.6 s
1 for NMDA receptors; and
Esyn =
80 mV,
= 20 × 106 M
1
s
1,
= 160 s
1 for GABAA receptors.
These parameters were obtained by fitting the model to postsynaptic
currents recorded experimentally (see Destexhe et al., 1998b
). In
addition, NMDA receptors had a voltage-dependent term corresponding to
an extracellular Mg2+ concentration of 2 mM [Jahr and Stevens (1990)
; see Destexhe et al. (1998b)
for the details of implementation].
The modeling of slow GABAB receptor-mediated
inhibition required a more complex scheme to capture the nonlinear
properties of this type of interaction (Destexhe and Sejnowski, 1995
).
The activation properties of GABAB receptors were based on
the following steps: (1) the binding of GABA on the
GABAB receptor, leading to the activated receptor; (2)
the activated GABAB receptor catalyzes the activation of
G-proteins in the intracellular side; (3) the binding of activated
G-proteins to open K+ channels. These steps are
described by the following equations:
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
where [T] is the GABA concentration in the synaptic
cleft, r is the fraction of GABAB receptors in
the activated form, s is the normalized G-protein
concentration in activated form,
-gGABAB is the maximal
postsynaptic conductance of K+ channels,
KD is the dissociation constant of G-protein
binding on K+ channels, V is the
postsynaptic membrane potential, and EK is the
equilibrium potential for K+. The fitting of this
model to experimental GABAB responses led to the following
values of parameters (Destexhe et al., 1998b
): KD = 100, K1 = 9×
104 M
1
s
1,
K2 = 1.2 s
1, K3 = 180 s
1, and K4 = 34 s
1, with n = 4 binding
sites.
Field potentials. Extracellular field potentials were
calculated from postsynaptic currents in single-compartment models
according to the model of Nunez (1981)
:
|
(6)
|
where Vext is the electrical potential at
a given extracellular site, Re = 230
cm is
the extracellular resistivity, Ij is the
postsynaptic current, and rj is the distance
between the site of generation of Ij and the
extracellular site.
Field potentials were calculated from a single cell receiving 200 simulated synapses (100 excitatory synapses had AMPA and NMDA receptor
types, and 100 inhibitory synapses had GABAA and GABAB receptors; see the scheme in Fig.
1B). In this case, trains of presynaptic action
potentials were generated individually for each synapse. To avoid
possible artifactual effects because of the coincident timing of action
potentials at different synapses, a random time jitter of ±1 msec was
included in the timing of each presynaptic action potential.
Intrinsic currents. Intrinsic voltage-dependent or
calcium-dependent currents were modeled by kinetic models of the
Hodgkin and Huxley (1952)
type. These intrinsic membrane currents were described by the following generic equation:
|
(7)
|
|
(8)
|
|
(9)
|
where Iint is the intrinsic membrane
current, -gint is the maximal conductance, and
Eint is the reversal potential. The gating properties of the current were dependent on N activation
gates and M inactivation gates, with m and
h representing the fraction of gates in open form, and with
respective rate constants
m,
m,
h, and
h.
Rate constants were dependent on either membrane voltage
(V) or intracellular calcium concentration.
Thalamocortical networks. Network models were based on
single-compartment representations of thalamic and cortical neurons. The thalamocortical network was simulated with four cell types: cortical pyramidal cells (PY), cortical interneurons (IN), thalamic reticular cells (RE), and thalamocortical (TC) cells. Cortical cells
represent layer VI of the cerebral cortex, in which PY cells constitute
the major source of corticothalamic fibers. Because corticothalamic PY
cells receive a significant proportion of their excitatory synapses
from ascending thalamic axons (Hersch and White, 1981
; White and
Hersch, 1982
), these cells mediate a monosynaptic excitatory feedback
loop (thalamus-cortex-thalamus) that has been modeled here. Each
layer of cells has been arranged in one dimension (connectivity is
schematized in Fig. 4A). This one-dimensional network
model with four cell types is a greatly simplified representation of
the multilayered structure of the thalamocortical system, but no
additional complexity was required.
The cellular models had intrinsic and synaptic currents described by
the membrane equation:
|
(10)
|
where Vi is the membrane potential,
Cm = 1 µF/cm2 is
the specific capacity of the membrane, gL is the
leakage conductance, and EL is the leakage
reversal potential. Intrinsic and synaptic currents are represented by
Iintji and
Isynki, respectively.
The synaptic currents Isynki, from
presynaptic cell k to postsynaptic cell i, were
simulated by activating a short pulse of transmitter when cell
k fired an action potential (see above). The receptor types
present in synaptic connections between cells depended on the cell
type. All excitatory connections (TC
RE, TC
IN, TC
PY, PY
PY,
PY
IN, PY
RE, PY
TC) were mediated by AMPA receptors; some
inhibitory connections (RE
TC, IN
PY) were mediated by a mixture of
GABAA and GABAB receptors, whereas intra-RE
connections were mediated by GABAA receptors. Simulations
also were performed with NMDA receptors added to all excitatory
connections (with maximal conductance set to 25% of that of AMPA), and
no appreciable difference was observed. They therefore were not
included in the present figures. The total synaptic conductance on each
neuron was the same for cells of the same type and was expressed as the sum over all individual synaptic conductances of the same connection type. The total conductances corresponding to the reference state, displaying spindle oscillations, were 0.2 µS (AMPA, TC
RE), 0.2 µS (GABAA, RE
RE), 0.02 µS
(GABAA, RE
TC), 0.04 µS
(GABAB, RE
TC), 0.6 µS (AMPA, PY
PY), 0.2 µS
(AMPA, PY
IN), 0.15 µS (GABAA, IN
PY), 0.03 µS (GABAB, IN
PY), 1.2 µS (AMPA, PY
RE),
0.01 µS (AMPA, PY
TC), 1.2 µS (AMPA, TC
PY), and 0.4 µS
(AMPA, TC
IN).
The connectivity between thalamic and cortical layers was topographic:
within the thalamus and within cortex, each axon contacted the 11 nearest neighbors to the presynaptic cell. The axonal divergence was of
21 cells for projections between thalamus and cortex. The connection
topology, values of synaptic conductances, and robustness of the
network were described in detail in a previous study (Destexhe et al.,
1998a
).
All intrinsic membrane currents Iintji were
described by a variant of the Hodgkin and Huxley (1952)
model (Eqs.
7-9). All cell types had Na+ and
K+ currents for generating action potentials, for
which the kinetics was taken from Traub and Miles (1991)
. Additional
currents conferred to each cell type the most salient features of its
intrinsic firing patterns. Thalamic cells produced bursts of action
potentials because of the presence of a T-current (see inset
in Fig. 3A). In TC cells, in addition to
IT, the presence of
Ih conferred oscillatory properties. The
upregulation of Ih by intracellular
Ca2+ led to waxing and waning properties of these
oscillations, as detailed in previous models (Destexhe et al., 1993
,
1996a
, 1998a
). In RE cells the T-current was of slower kinetics, as
modeled previously (Destexhe et al., 1996b
). Models for cortical cells
were kept as simple as possible to reproduce their repetitive firing
properties (see inset in Fig. 4A). IN
cells contained no other current than was necessary for action
potentials, producing similar firing patterns to "fast-spiking"
cells (Connors and Gutnick, 1990
). PY cells had one additional slow
voltage-dependent K+ current
(IM) generating adapting trains of action
potentials, similar to "regular-spiking" pyramidal cells (Connors
and Gutnick, 1990
). The conductance values and the activation
properties of all intrinsic membrane currents were identical to a
previous study (Destexhe et al., 1998a
).
Field potentials were calculated from network simulations. In this case
only cortical pyramidal cells were considered and were arranged
equidistantly in one dimension (intercellular distance of 20 µm).
Then field potentials at a given extracellular site were calculated
from postsynaptic currents:
|
(11)
|
where ri is the distance between each PY
cell and the extracellular site.
In some cases the contribution of the voltage-dependent current
IM in field potentials was evaluated according
to the relation:
|
(12)
|
where IMi is the
voltage-dependent K+ current responsible for
adaptation of repetitive firing in the ith PY cells.
All models were simulated by using NEURON (Hines and Carnevale, 1997
)
and were run on a Sparc-20 workstation (Sun Microsystems, Mountain
View, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
The mechanism underlying a slow oscillation similar to SW is
explained in three steps: (1) the nonlinear activation properties of
GABAB responses can lead to the generation of SW waveforms in field potentials; (2) intact thalamic circuits can be forced into a
~3 Hz oscillation by corticothalamic feedback; (3) the combination of
these two factors can generate ~3 Hz oscillations with SW field
potentials in thalamocortical networks. These points are considered
successively.
The nonlinear activation properties of
GABAB responses
A property consistently observed for GABAB responses
is that they require high stimulus intensities to be evoked, as shown in hippocampal (Dutar and Nicoll, 1988
; Davies et al., 1990
) and thalamic slices (Kim et al., 1997
). This property can be reproduced under certain nonlinearity assumptions in the G-protein transduction mechanisms evoked by GABAB receptors; assuming that the
binding of four G-proteins is required to activate
K+ channels is enough to provide a nonlinear
stimulus dependence similar to GABAB responses (Destexhe
and Sejnowski, 1995
). The multiplicity of binding sites of G-proteins
is indeed in agreement with the tetrameric structure of
K+ channels (Hille, 1992
) and the cooperativity
evidenced in the activation of GABAB responses (Sodickson
and Bean, 1996
).
The nonlinear stimulus dependence in the model of GABAB
currents is illustrated in Figure
1A. An isolated
presynaptic spike could not evoke detectable GABAB current
(Fig. 1A1), in agreement with the absence of
GABAB-mediated miniature events (Otis and Mody, 1992
;
Thompson and Gahwiler, 1992
; Thompson, 1994
). However, a burst of 5-10
high-frequency spikes is a very powerful means of evoking
GABAB responses (Fig. 1A2). The latter
feature is consistent with the observation that GABAB
responses appear only under high-intensity stimulus conditions (Dutar
and Nicoll, 1988
; Davies et al., 1990
) and the evidence that bursts of
high-frequency action potentials are an ideal presynaptic signal to
evoke GABAB currents (Huguenard and Prince, 1994b
; Kim et
al., 1997
). In the model this property is obtained from the fact that a
sufficient level of G-proteins must be accumulated to evoke significant
K+ current.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Simulation of spike and wave in field potentials,
based on the properties of GABAB receptors.
A, Nonlinear activation properties of GABAB
receptors. If the binding of four G-proteins is needed to activate the
K+ channels associated with GABAB
receptors, then GABAB-mediated inhibitory responses are
dependent on the number of presynaptic action potentials.
A1, With a single presynaptic spike no GABAB
response was detectable. A2, A burst of presynaptic
spikes led to sufficient accumulation of G-proteins to generate the
slow IPSP. B, Scheme for the model of local field
potentials. Excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic trains of action
potentials were generated to stimulate various postsynaptic receptor
types (AMPA, NMDA, GABAA, and
GABAB). One hundred synapses of each type were
simulated, and the synaptic currents were integrated into a single
compartment model and used to calculate the extracellular field
potential at a distance of 5 µm from the simulated neuron.
C, Field potentials generated by single spikes and
bursts of spikes. With single spikes (C1) the mixed
EPSP/IPSP sequence led to negative deflections in the field potentials.
With bursts of spikes (C2) the fast spiky components
alternate with slow positive deflections, similar to spike-and-wave
patterns. These slow positive waves are attributable to the activation
of GABAB-mediated currents (arrows).
Conductance values are 4, 1, 1.5, and 4 nS for individual AMPA, NMDA,
GABAA, and GABAB synapses,
respectively.
|
|
Possible role of GABAB-mediated currents in generating
spike-and-wave field potentials
The possible role of the particular activation properties of
GABAB currents in generating SW patterns was investigated
by simulating field potentials from the postsynaptic currents generated by 100 excitatory synapses (AMPA and NMDA receptors) and 100 inhibitory synapses (GABAA and GABAB receptors; see scheme
in Fig. 1B and Materials and Methods). With
presynaptic trains consisting of single spikes, the voltage showed
mixed EPSP/IPSP sequences, and the field potential was dominated by
negative deflections (Fig. 1C1). By contrast, bursts of
high-frequency presynaptic spikes produced mixed EPSP/IPSPs, followed
by large GABAB-mediated IPSPs in the cell (Fig.
1C2). In this case the fast EPSP/IPSPs generated spiky field
potentials, followed by a slow positive wave caused by
GABAB currents. This simple simulation therefore shows
that, if excitatory and inhibitory cells generate high-frequency
discharges in synchrony and if GABAB receptors are present,
sufficient conditions are brought together to generate field potential
waveforms consisting of interleaved spikes and waves.
The effect of various parameters on the morphology of simulated SW
complexes was investigated in Figure
2A. When excitatory synapses discharged earlier than inhibitory synapses (2 and 5 msec
latency), the spike component was enhanced. Spike and wave components
also were influenced by synaptic conductances. AMPA and NMDA
conductances affected primarily the negative peak of the spike
component (Fig. 2B, top trace), whereas the positive peak was influenced mostly by GABAA conductances (Fig.
2B, middle trace). GABAB conductances had
few effects on the spike component but mostly affected the wave (Fig.
2B, bottom trace).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Factors determining the morphology of simulated
spike-and-wave complexes. A, Effect of a latency between
the firing of excitatory and inhibitory synapses.
Control, Simulation is identical to Figure
1C2. If excitatory synapses discharged earlier than
inhibitory synapses (2 and 5 msec latency), the spike component was
enhanced. B, Effect of synaptic receptor types. The
5 msec latency simulation from A was
repeated here with different values for synaptic conductances. A 90%
reduction of AMPA/NMDA conductances (top trace),
GABAA conductances (middle trace), or
GABAB conductances (bottom trace) affected
the morphology of the SW patterns. The right column
shows the last complexes at higher resolution.
|
|
Intact thalamic circuits can be forced into ~3 Hz oscillations
because of GABAB-mediated currents
To investigate how this type of field potentials can be generated
by the thalamocortical system, we first turn to the behavior of
thalamic circuits, and, more particularly, we turn to how they are
controlled by the cortex. An important behavior of thalamic networks is
their propensity to generate oscillations such as the 7-14 Hz spindle
oscillations (Steriade et al., 1993
; von Krosigk et al., 1993
).
Although these oscillations are generated in the thalamus, the
neocortex has been shown to trigger them powerfully (Steriade et al.,
1972
; Roy et al., 1984
; Contreras and Steriade, 1996
), and the
corticothalamic feedback has been shown to exert a decisive control
over thalamic oscillations (Contreras et al., 1996
).
In computational models, reproducing this cortical control required
more powerful corticothalamic EPSPs on RE cells as compared with TC
cells (Destexhe et al., 1998a
). In these conditions the excitation of
corticothalamic cells led to mixed EPSPs and IPSPs in TC cells in which
the IPSP was dominant, consistent with experimental observations (Burke
and Sefton, 1966
; Deschênes and Hu, 1990
). If cortical EPSPs and
IPSPs from RE cells were of comparable conductance, cortical feedback
could not evoke oscillations in the thalamic circuit because of
shunting effects between EPSPs and IPSPs (Destexhe et al., 1998a
). The
most likely reason for these experimental and modeling evidences for
"IPSP dominance" in TC cells is that RE cells are extremely
sensitive to cortical EPSPs (Contreras et al., 1993
), probably because
of a powerful T-current in dendrites (Destexhe et al., 1996b
). In
addition, cortical synapses contact only the distal dendrites of TC
cells (Liu et al., 1995
) and probably are attenuated for this reason.
Taken together, these data suggest that corticothalamic feedback
operates mainly by eliciting bursts in RE cells, which in turn evoke
powerful IPSPs on TC cells that in large part overwhelm the direct
cortical EPSPs.
The effect of corticothalamic feedback on the thalamic circuit is
depicted in Figure 3A:
simulated cortical EPSPs evoked bursts in RE cells (Fig. 3B,
arrow), which recruited TC cells via IPSPs, and triggered a ~10
Hz oscillation in the circuit. During the oscillation TC cells
rebounded after GABAA-mediated IPSPs once every two cycles,
and RE cells discharged only a few spikes, evoking GABAA-mediated IPSPs in TC cells with no significant
GABAB currents (Fig. 3B). These features are
typical of spindle oscillations (Steriade et al., 1993
; von Krosigk et
al., 1993
).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Corticothalamic feedback can force thalamic
circuits into ~3 Hz oscillations because of the properties of
GABAB receptors. A, Scheme of connectivity
and receptor types in a circuit of thalamocortical (TC)
and thalamic reticular (RE) neurons. Corticothalamic
feedback was simulated through AMPA-mediated synaptic inputs (shown on
the left of the connectivity diagram; total conductance
was 1.2 µS to RE cells and 0.01 µS to TC cells). The
inset shows simulated burst responses of TC and RE cells
after current injection (pulse of 0.3 nA during 10 msec for RE and
0.1 nA during 200 msec for TC). B, A single
stimulation of corticothalamic feedback (arrowhead)
entrained the circuit into a 10 Hz mode similar to that for spindle
oscillations. C, With a strong-intensity stimulation at
3 Hz (arrowheads; 14 spikes per stimulus), RE cells were
recruited into large bursts, which evoked IPSPs onto TC cells dominated
by GABAB-mediated inhibition. In this case the circuit
could be entrained into a different oscillatory mode, with all cells
firing in synchrony. D, Weak stimulation at 3 Hz
(arrowheads) entrained the circuit into spindle
oscillations (identical intensity as in B).
E, Strong stimulation at 10 Hz
(arrowheads) led to quiescent TC cells because of
sustained GABAB current (identical intensity as in
C).
|
|
Repetitive stimulation of the same thalamic circuit at 3 Hz with larger
intensity (14 spikes every 333 msec) entrained the system into a
different type of oscillatory behavior (Fig. 3C). All cell
types were entrained to discharge in synchrony at ~3 Hz. On the other
hand, repetitive stimulation at 3 Hz with low intensity produced
spindle oscillations (Fig. 3D) similar to those in Figure
3A. Strong-intensity stimulation at 10 Hz led to quiescence in TC cells (Fig. 3E) because of sustained GABAB
currents, similar to a previous analysis [Lytton et al. (1997)
, their
Fig. 12].
These simulations indicate that strong corticothalamic feedback at 3 Hz
can force thalamic circuits in a different type of oscillation.
Cortical EPSPs force RE cells to fire large bursts (Fig. 3C,
arrows), fulfilling the conditions needed to activate GABAB responses (see Fig. 1A). The
consequence is that TC cells were "clamped" at hyperpolarized
levels by GABAB IPSPs during ~300 msec before they could
rebound. The nonlinear properties of GABAB responses are
therefore responsible for the coexistence between two types of
oscillations in the same circuit: mild corticothalamic feedback
recruits the circuit in ~10 Hz spindle oscillations, whereas strong
feedback at 3 Hz could force the intact circuit at the same frequency
because of the nonlinear activation properties of intrathalamic
GABAB responses.
Suppression of intrathalamic GABAA-mediated inhibition
does not generate spike and wave
The impact of this mechanism at the network level was explored
using a thalamocortical network consisting in different layers of
cortical and thalamic cells (see details in Materials and Methods). The
network included thalamic TC and RE cells and a simplified representation of the deep layers of the cortex with pyramidal cells
and interneurons (Fig.
4A). In control
conditions (Fig. 4B) the network generated
synchronized spindle oscillations with cellular discharges in phase
between in all cell types, as observed experimentally (Contreras and
Steriade, 1996
). TC cells discharged on average once every two cycles
after GABAA-mediated IPSPs, whereas all other cell types
discharged approximately at every cycle at ~10 Hz, consistent with
the typical features of spindle oscillations observed intracellularly
(Steriade et al., 1990
; von Krosigk et al., 1993
). The simulated field
potentials displayed successive negative deflections at ~10 Hz (Fig.
4B; in agreement with the pattern of field potentials
during spindle oscillations) (Steriade et al., 1990
). Consistent with
the analysis of Figure 1C1, this pattern of field potentials
was generated by the limited discharge in PY cells, which fired
approximately one spike per oscillation cycle.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Transformation of spindle oscillations into ~4
Hz oscillations by blocking thalamic inhibition in thalamocortical
networks. A, Scheme of the connectivity among different
cell types: 100 cells of each type were simulated, including
thalamocortical (TC) and thalamic reticular
(RE) cells, cortical pyramidal cells
(PY), and interneurons
(IN). The connectivity is shown by
continuous arrows, representing AMPA-mediated
excitation, and dashed arrows, representing mixed
GABAA and GABAB inhibition. In addition, PY
cells were interconnected by using AMPA receptors, and RE cells were
interconnected by using GABAA receptors. The
inset shows the repetitive firing properties of PY and
IN cells that follow depolarizing current injection (0.75 nA during 200 msec; 70 mV rest). B, Spindle oscillations in the
thalamocortical network in control conditions. Five cells of each type,
equally spaced in the network, are shown (0.5 msec time resolution).
The field potentials, consisting of successive negative deflections at
~10 Hz, are shown at the bottom. C,
Oscillations after the suppression of GABAA-mediated
inhibition in thalamic cells with cortical inhibition intact (all
GABAA conductances postsynaptic to RE cells were
suppressed). The network generated synchronized oscillations at ~4
Hz, with thalamic cells displaying prolonged discharges. PY cells
showed discharge patterns similar to those of spindles but at a slower
frequency; so did the field potentials (bottom).
|
|
When GABAA receptors were suppressed in thalamic cells in
this model, with cortical inhibition intact, spindle oscillations were
transformed into slower oscillation patterns at 3-5 Hz (Fig. 4C). In this case there was an increase in synchrony, as
indicated by the TC cells that fired at every cycle of the oscillation. RE cells generated prolonged burst discharges, leading to
GABAB-mediated IPSPs in TC cells and, consequently, to a
slow oscillation frequency. The field potentials consisted of
successive negative deflections (Fig. 4C, bottom) similar to
that of spindles. This pattern of field potentials was generated by PY
cells that discharged approximately single spikes at each cycle of the
oscillation (similar to Fig. 1C1). This simulation therefore
suggests that removing intrathalamic GABAA-mediated
inhibition affects the oscillation frequency but does not generate SW,
because pyramidal cells are still under the strict control of cortical
fast inhibition. This is in agreement with in vivo
injections of bicuculline into the thalamus, which reported slow
oscillations with increased thalamic synchrony, but no SW patterns in
the field potentials (Ralston and Ajmone-Marsan, 1956
; Steriade and
Contreras, 1998
).
Suppression of intracortical GABAA-mediated inhibition
leads to spike and wave
On the other hand, the alteration of GABAA receptors
in the cortex had a considerable impact in generating SW. When
GABAA-mediated inhibition was reduced in the cortex, with
no change in thalamic inhibitory mechanisms, then spindle oscillations
transformed into 2-3 Hz SW-like discharges (Fig.
5). With intracortical fast inhibition decreased by 50%, increased occurrences of prolonged high-frequency discharges were seen during spindle oscillations (Fig. 5A).
In field potentials these events tended to generate large-amplitude negative deflections, followed by small-amplitude positive waves (Fig.
5A, bottom).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Transformation of spindle oscillations into ~3
Hz oscillations with spike-and-wave field potentials by reducing
cortical inhibition. Shown is a similar arrangement of traces as
in Figure 4, B and C. A,
Oscillations with a 50% decrease of GABAA-mediated
inhibition in cortical cells (0.075 µS, IN PY). Stronger burst
discharges appeared within spindle oscillations, leading to
large-amplitude negative spikes, followed by small positive waves in
the field potentials (bottom). B,
Oscillations after suppression of GABAA-mediated inhibition
in cortical cells. All cells displayed prolonged discharges in phase,
separated by long periods of silences, at a frequency of ~2 Hz.
GABAB currents were activated maximally in TC and PY cells
during the periods of silence. Field potentials (bottom)
displayed spike-and-wave complexes. Thalamic inhibition was intact in
A and B.
|
|
With totally suppressed GABAA-mediated inhibition in the
cortex, the network generated a slow oscillation at 2-3 Hz, with field
potentials similar to SW (Fig. 5B). Field potentials
displayed one or several negative/positive sharp deflections, followed
by a slowly developing positive wave (Fig. 5B, bottom).
During the spike all cells fired prolonged high-frequency discharges in
synchrony, whereas the wave was coincident with neuronal silence in all
cell types. This portrait is typical of experimental recordings of cortical and thalamic cells during SW patterns (Pollen, 1964
; Steriade,
1974
; Avoli et al., 1983
; McLachlan et al., 1984
; Buzsáki et al.,
1990
; Inoue et al., 1993
). Some TC cells stayed hyperpolarized during
the entire oscillation (second TC cell in Fig. 5B), as also
was observed experimentally (Steriade and Contreras, 1995
). A similar
oscillation arose if GABAA receptors were suppressed in the
entire network (data not shown).
These simulations thus indicate that spindles can be transformed into
an oscillation with field potentials displaying SW and that this
transformation can occur by the alteration of cortical inhibition with
no change in the thalamus, in agreement with SW discharges obtained
experimentally by diffuse application of diluted penicillin onto the
cortex (Gloor et al., 1977
). The mechanism of the ~3 Hz oscillation
of this model depends on a thalamocortical loop in which both cortex
and thalamus are necessary, but none of them generates the 3 Hz
rhythmicity alone (see next section below).
The progressive transformation between spindles and SW oscillations in
the model is shown in Figure 6. With
intact cortical inhibition the discharge of cells in the network was
limited to a few spikes. Consequently, IPSPs in PY cells were almost
exclusively GABAA-mediated, leading to field potentials
consisting of negative deflections only (Fig. 6, 100%). With the
intracortical inhibition partially reduced, there was an increased
tendency of producing prolonged discharges and an increased
contribution of GABAB IPSPs in PY cells, leading to small
positive waves in field potentials (Fig. 6, 50%). With a further
reduction of intracortical GABAA-mediated inhibition, the
system showed fully developed SW complexes in field potentials, with
oscillation frequencies within the 2-3 Hz range (Fig. 6, from 25 to
0%). The frequency of SW oscillations was approximately proportional
to the amount of fast inhibition still present in the cortex. The
occurrence of a positive spike also was correlated with intracortical
fast inhibition (Fig. 6), in agreement with the effect of
GABAA conductances in Figure 2B.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Gradual transformation of spindles to
spike-and-wave complexes. The field potentials obtained for different
simulations similar to Figure 5 are shown from top to
bottom. The different simulations correspond to
identical conditions, except that intracortical
GABAA-mediated inhibition (IN PY) was reduced, with total
conductance values of 0.15 µS (100%), 0.075 µS (50%), 0.0375 µS
(25%), 0.018 µS (12%), and 0.009 µS (6%). 100%
corresponded to a spindle sequence (same simulation as in Fig.
4B) and 0% to fully developed SW
complexes when the intracortical GABAA inhibition was
suppressed (same simulation as in Fig. 5B);
intrathalamic inhibition was intact in all cases.
|
|
The waxing and waning appearance of spindles (Fig. 6, 100%) was
attributable here to intrathalamic mechanisms. A calcium-dependent upregulation of Ih in TC cells was included
here, similar to previous models (Destexhe et al., 1993
, 1996a
). Such
regulation was demonstrated recently in thalamic slices (Lüthi
and McCormick, 1998
). This mechanism was responsible for the waxing and
waning of oscillations in model thalamic and thalamocortical networks
(Destexhe et al., 1996a
, 1998a
). It interesting to note that SW
oscillations also may follow a similar waxing and waning envelope (Fig.
6, 25%), which was attributable here to the same intrathalamic
mechanisms as spindles. The model therefore suggests that the
calcium-dependent upregulation of Ih in TC cells
is responsible for the temporal modulation of SW oscillations and may
lead to bursts of several cycles of SW oscillations, interleaved with
long periods of silence (~20 sec), as are observed experimentally in
sleep spindles and SW epilepsy, thus stressing further the resemblance
between the two types of oscillation.
A thalamocortical loop mechanism for
spike-and-wave oscillations
The thalamocortical mechanism leading to SW oscillations in this
model is illustrated and compared with spindles in Figure 7. During spindles the oscillation is
generated by intrathalamic interactions (TC-RE loop in Fig.
7A). Oscillations can also be generated by a thalamocortical
loop (TC-Cx-RE loop in Fig. 7A), as suggested previously
(Destexhe et al., 1998a
). The combined action of intrathalamic and
thalamocortical loops provides a moderate excitation of RE cells, which
evokes GABAA-mediated IPSPs in TC cells and sets the
frequency to ~10 Hz. During SW oscillations (Fig. 7B) an
increased cortical excitability provides a corticothalamic feedback
that is strong enough to force prolonged burst discharges in RE cells,
which in turn evoke IPSPs in TC cells dominated by the
GABAB component. In this case the prolonged inhibition sets the frequency to ~3 Hz. The oscillation is generated by a
thalamocortical loop (TC-Cx-RE loop in Fig. 7B) in which
the thalamus is intact. Therefore, if the cortex is inactivated during
SW, this model predicts that the thalamus should resume generating
spindle oscillations, as observed experimentally in cats treated with
penicillin (Gloor et al., 1979
).

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Thalamocortical loop mechanism for spike and wave.
Simplified diagrams represent the major steps involved in generating
oscillations (Cx, cortex). A, Spindle
oscillations resulting from a mutual recruitment of thalamic TC and RE
cells (thick lines) in which TC cells rebound after fast
GABAA-mediated IPSPs, setting the frequency to ~10 Hz.
Here, the oscillation is generated in the thalamus and is reinforced by
the thalamocortical loop (thin lines). B,
Proposed mechanism for spike and wave. In this case the corticothalamic
feedback is much stronger because of increased cortical excitability,
forcing thalamic cells to display prolonged burst discharges, which
evoke GABAB-mediated IPSPs in TC cells. This prolonged
inhibition prevents cells from firing during ~300 msec and sets the
frequency to ~3 Hz.
|
|
The relation between cellular events and field potentials in this model
of SW is shown in Figure 8. The pattern
displayed by the network is similar to Figure 1C2:
high-frequency discharges generated spike components in the field
potentials, whereas wave components were generated by GABAB
IPSPs in PY cells because of the prolonged firing of cortical
interneurons. The hyperpolarization of PY cells during the wave also
contained a significant contribution from the voltage-dependent
K+ current IM (data not
shown), maximally activated because of the prolonged discharge of PY
cells during the spike. The wave component is therefore attributable in
this model to two types of K+ currents, intrinsic
and GABAB-mediated. The relative contribution of each
current to the wave depends on its respective conductance values.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Phase relations during simulated spike-and-wave
discharges. A, Local field potentials
(LFP) and representative cells of each type during SW
oscillations. Spike, All cells displayed prolonged
discharges in synchrony, leading to spiky field potentials.
Wave, The prolonged discharge of RE and
IN neurons evoked maximal GABAB-mediated
IPSPs in TC and PY cells, respectively
(dashed arrows), stopping the firing of all neuron types
during a period of 300-500 msec and generating a slow positive wave in
the field potentials. The next cycle restarted because of the rebound
of TC cells after the GABAB IPSP
(arrow). B, Phase relationships in the
thalamocortical model. TC cells discharged first,
followed by PY, RE, and IN
cells. The initial negative peak in the field potentials coincided with
the first spike in TC cells before the PY
cells started firing and was generated by thalamic EPSPs in
PY cells.
|
|
During the spike component the discharges were not perfectly in phase.
As indicated in Figure 8B, there was a significant phase advance of TC cells, as observed experimentally (Inoue et al.,
1993
). This phase advance was responsible for the initial negative
spike in the field potentials, which coincided with the first spike in
the TC cells (Fig. 8B, dashed line). This feature implements the precedence of EPSPs over IPSPs in the PY cell to generate SW complexes, as evidenced above (see Fig.
2A). The simulations therefore suggest that the
initial spike of SW complexes is attributable to thalamic EPSPs that
precede other synaptic events in PY cells.
Determinants of spike-and-wave oscillations
The critical factors involved in the genesis of SW oscillations in
the thalamocortical model were characterized by investigating the range
of synaptic conductances giving rise to SW for each type of connection
in the absence of intracortical GABAA-mediated inhibition
(Table 1). It must be noted that this
model considered greatly simplified single-compartment models of
thalamic and cortical neurons, with minimal sets of intrinsic currents,
no dendrites (and therefore no dendritic currents and no dendritic
synapses), and simplified models of intrinsic and synaptic currents.
The conductance values therefore cannot match quantitatively the
physiological values and must be interpreted qualitatively.
Table 1 shows the optimal values of the conductance that were used and,
for each connection, the range of values leading to SW oscillations.
The minimal frequency of SW bursts when each parameter was varied
within 50-200% of the optimal value is indicated in the last two
columns of Table 1. The synaptic conductances that were influential on
SW were PY
PY, PY
IN, IN
PY, RE
RE, RE
TC (GABAB), PY
RE, and a weak effect for RE
TC
(GABAA). TC
RE, TC
PY, TC
IN, and PY
TC had
minimal effect. As expected, the recurrent excitation between pyramidal
cells (PY
PY) and the excitation of interneurons (PY
IN), as well
as the inhibitory feedback on PY cells (IN
PY), are effective on SW
because these conductance determine the excitability of the cortical
network. Less expected was the role of cortical excitatory feedback on
RE cells (PY
RE), intra-RE inhibition (RE
RE), and the
GABAB inhibition from RE onto TC cells (RE
TC). These
factors are examined in more detail below.
A first influential factor was the intra-RE GABAergic connections.
Figure 9A shows the transition
curve from SW oscillations to spindle waves as a function of
intracortical GABAA inhibition, similar to Figure 6.
Reinforcing intra-RE GABAA inhibition significantly reduced
SW in favor of the spindles (Fig. 9A, compare open
triangles with filled circles), whereas decreasing this
inhibition had the opposite effect (Fig. 9A, open
squares). In the model, reinforcing intra-RE
GABAA-mediated inhibition diminished the tendency of RE
cells to produce bursts of action potentials, therefore diminishing GABAB-mediated IPSPs in TC cells and reducing the tendency
to generate SW oscillations. This behavior is consistent with the presumed role of the anti-absence drug clonazepam, which may reduce the
tendency of the network to produce SW by specifically acting on
GABAA receptors in the thalamic RE nucleus (Huguenard and
Prince, 1994a
; Gibbs et al., 1996
; Hosford et al., 1997
).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Determinants of spike-and-wave
oscillations. A, Effect of GABAA-mediated
inhibition between RE cells. The lowest frequency of SW complexes is
represented as a function of the amount of GABAA inhibition
in cortex (simulations similar to Fig. 6). In control
(filled circles) the frequency of SW increased
steadily up to 60% of cortical GABAA; then a
transition occurred to spindle oscillations (lowest frequency of ~8
Hz). With twice smaller intra-RE GABAA conductances
(open squares) this transition occurred at ~75%
cortical GABAA. When intra-RE GABAA
conductances were doubled, the domain of SW was significantly smaller,
with a transition occurring at ~20% of cortical GABAA
(open triangles). B, Effect of
corticothalamic feedback on RE cells. With diminished AMPA conductance
in PY RE synapses (50% of control value), the domain of SW was
reduced significantly (open triangles), whereas
reinforced cortical EPSPs had the opposite effect (open
squares). Filled circles, Same control as in
A. C, Effect of the T-current conductance
in RE cells. With reinforced T-current (200% of control value) the
transition occurred at ~75% of cortical GABAA
(open squares), whereas with diminished T-current (50%
of control value) the domain of SW was reduced significantly
(open triangles). Filled circles, Same
control as in A. D, Determinants of SW
frequency. The frequency of SW bursts in the simulation of Figure
5B was represented when several parameters were varied.
These parameters are represented as the percentage of their
control value (100% = control). The parameters represented are the
decay of intrathalamic GABAB currents (filled
circles), the T-current conductance in TC (open
squares), and RE cells (open triangles).
|
|
A second factor that was particularly effective on SW was the
corticothalamic feedback on RE cells. Reducing the AMPA conductance of
cortical EPSPs on RE cells significantly diminished SW in favor of the
spindles (Fig. 9B, compare open triangles with
filled circles), and increasing this conductance had the
opposite effect. The model therefore indicates that diminishing the
impact of corticothalamic EPSPs on RE cells is a potential factor in
reducing the threshold for SW in the network.
The need for larger conductances of cortical EPSPs in RE cells versus
TC cells also is evidenced for SW oscillations, similar to a previous
suggestion in the context of spindle oscillations (Destexhe et al.,
1998a
). SW oscillations coexisting with spindles required at least four
times larger AMPA conductances on RE cells (0.4 µS for PY
RE and
0.1 µS of PY
TC in Table 1). This is consistent with the
anatomical observation that cortical synapses contact only the distal
dendrites of TC cells (Liu et al., 1995
), leading to attenuated
cortical EPSPs.
An additional influential factor, not included in Table 1, was the
T-current conductance in RE cells. Reducing the T-current of RE cells
significantly reduced SW in favor of the spindles (Fig. 9C,
compare open triangles with filled circles),
whereas reinforcing this current had the opposite effect (Fig.
9C, open squares). Reducing T-current amplitude therefore
diminishes the tendency of the network to produce SW, similar to
reinforcing GABAergic inhibition in the RE nucleus. This effect is
consistent with the experimental finding that the T-current is
increased selectively in RE cells in a rat model of absence epilepsy
(Tsakiridou et al., 1995
).
On the other hand, reducing the T-current conductance in TC cells had
only a weak effect on SW threshold (data not shown), but T-current
reduction >40% in TC cells led to the suppression of oscillatory
behavior. This was consistent with the effect of the anti-absence drug
ethosuximide in reducing the total T-current conductance in TC cells
(Coulter et al., 1989
).
As predicted from the mechanism of Figure 7B, the frequency
of SW essentially was determined by GABAB-mediated IPSPs on
TC cells (Fig. 9D, filled circles). Changing the decay of
intrathalamic GABAB currents (parameter
K4) affected only the frequency, with minimal changes in the bursting patterns of the different cell types
(data not shown). This effect was attributable to the fact that, in
this model, the duration of the wave is determined essentially by
GABAB IPSPs in TC cells, longer IPSPs leading to slower SW by further delaying the rebound of TC cells. The frequency varied from
1 to 5 Hz for decay values of 50-250% of the control value, suggesting that the different frequency of SW bursts in different experimental models may be attributable to differences in the kinetics
of GABAB-mediated inhibition in TC cells.
The T-current amplitude in TC cells also affected the SW frequency
(Fig. 9D, open squares). Stronger T-current conductances led
to earlier rebound and faster frequencies. By contrast, the T-current
amplitude in RE cells had minimal effect on SW frequency (Fig.
9C, open triangles). Consistent with the mechanism depicted in Figure 7B, the frequency of SW was mostly attributable to
intrathalamic mechanisms, whereas the threshold for SW was dependent on
the different elements involved in the thalamus-cortex-thalamus
loop.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This paper proposed a thalamocortical loop mechanism for the
genesis of spike-and-wave oscillations. This mechanism, its
similarities and differences with experimental SW, plus predictions to
test its validity are discussed successively.
A GABAB-based mechanism for spike and wave
The cellular mechanism proposed here is based on the following
properties:
(1) Because of the characteristics of GABAB-mediated
responses, simulated field potentials can display SW waveforms if
cortical pyramidal cells and interneurons generate prolonged discharges in synchrony, without the need of any other assumption about intrinsic cellular or circuit mechanisms.
(2) Also because of the characteristics of GABAB-mediated
inhibition, model thalamic circuits can be forced into ~3 Hz
oscillations. It is known from slice experiments that thalamic circuits
naturally oscillate at ~10 Hz but display ~3 Hz oscillations in the
presence of GABAA-receptor agonists (von Krosigk et al.,
1993
). The present model suggests that a similar oscillation can be
forced in intact thalamic circuits if corticothalamic
feedback EPSPs are strong enough.
(3) Generalized ~3 Hz oscillations can be generated through
thalamocortical loops. If because of an increase of cortical
excitability the thalamic-projecting cortical cells generate
exceedingly strong discharges, then the ensuing corticothalamic
feedback EPSPs may become strong enough to force the thalamus in
the 3 Hz mode. The ~3 Hz oscillations then invade the entire network
through thalamocortical loops. The ~3 Hz frequency depends on
intrathalamic GABAB-mediated inhibition.
(4) This ~3 Hz oscillation generates SW field potentials. During the
spike the thalamic and cortical cells produce prolonged discharges in synchrony, whereas the wave is generated by a
mixture of voltage-dependent and GABAB-mediated
K+ currents.
Similarities with experimental models of spike and wave
This thalamocortical loop model is consistent with a number of
experimental results on SW epilepsy: (1) thalamic and cortical neurons
discharge in synchrony during the spike, whereas the wave is
characterized by neuronal silence (Pollen, 1964
; Steriade, 1974
; Avoli
et al., 1983
; McLachlan et al., 1984
; Buzsáki et al., 1990
; Inoue
et al., 1993
), similar to the data in Figures 4E and
8A; (2) TC cell firing precedes that of other cell
types, followed by cortical cells and RE cells (Inoue et al., 1993
), similar to the phase relations of the present model (see Fig. 8B); (3) SW patterns disappear after the removal of
either the cortex (Avoli and Gloor, 1982
) or the thalamus (Pellegrini
et al., 1979
; Vergnes and Marescaux, 1992
), as also predicted by the
present mechanism; (4) antagonizing thalamic GABAB
receptors suppresses SW discharges (Liu et al., 1992
), consistent with
this model; (5) spindle oscillations can be transformed gradually into SW discharges (Kostopoulos et al., 1981a
,b
), as described in Figure 6.
The present mechanism also emphasizes a critical role for the RE
nucleus. Reinforcing GABAA-mediated inhibition in the RE nucleus will antagonize the genesis of large burst discharges in RE
cells by corticothalamic EPSPs, antagonizing the genesis of
GABAB-mediated IPSPs in TC cells and therefore antagonizing SW. This property is consistent with the diminished frequency of
seizures that is observed after the reinforcement of GABAA receptors in the RE nucleus (Liu et al., 1991
). It is also consistent with the action of the anti-absence drug clonazepam, which seems to act
preferentially by enhancing GABAA responses in the RE
nucleus (Hosford et al., 1997
), leading to diminished
GABAB-mediated IPSPs in TC cells (Huguenard and Prince,
1994a
; Gibbs et al., 1996
).
The fact that injections of GABAA antagonists in the
thalamus with intact cortex failed to generate SW (Ralston and
Ajmone-Marsan, 1956
; Gloor et al., 1977
; Steriade and Contreras, 1998
)
also was considered. In the model, suppressing thalamic
GABAA receptors led to "slow spindles" at ~4 Hz, very
different from SW oscillations (see Fig. 4C). In this case
the discharge of PY cells was extremely brief, because cortical
GABAA-mediated inhibition was preserved and no
GABAB IPSPs could be evoked. This result is consistent with
the powerful control exerted on pyramidal cells by intracortical GABAA-mediated inhibition, as shown by intracellular
recordings and modeling (Contreras et al., 1997
).
Differences with experimental models of spike and wave
On the other hand, a number of experimental observations are
not consistent with the mechanism presented here. First, an apparent intact cortical inhibition was reported in cats treated with penicillin (Kostopoulos et al., 1983
). However, this study did not distinguish between GABAA and GABAB-mediated inhibition. In
the present model, even when GABAA was antagonized, IPSPs
remained approximately the same size because cortical interneurons
fired stronger discharges (see Fig. 4D,E) and led to
stronger GABAB currents. There was