 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 1998, 18(5):1795-1805
Functional Cooperation of 1-Integrins and Members of the Ig
Superfamily in Neurite Outgrowth Induction
Ullrich
Treubert and
Thomas
Brümmendorf
Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, D-72076
Tübingen, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
Neurite outgrowth is a central aspect of the ontogenetic formation
of neural networks and is regulated by distinct groups of cell surface
molecules. One protein involved in neurite elongation and fasciculation
is the neural Ig superfamily member F11/contactin. We have shown
previously that F11 promotes neurite extension of chick tectal neurons
by interaction with the tectal receptor NrCAM, a member of the L1
subgroup of the Ig superfamily. By contrast, it does not induce
outgrowth of retinal neurons despite the fact that these cells also
express NrCAM, suggesting that in retinal cells the F11-NrCAM
interaction alone is not sufficient to induce neurite extension. In
this report we present a novel image analysis procedure to quantify
neurite outgrowth and use it to demonstrate that F11 enhances the
fibronectin-induced outgrowth response of embryonic retinal neurons. We
reveal that NrCAM is the neuronal receptor mediating the enhanced
outgrowth of retinal neurons, whereas the related F11-binding molecule
NgCAM is not involved. Furthermore, we provide evidence that a
1-integrin may represent the fibronectin-dependent
receptor that cooperates indirectly with the F11-NrCAM pathway. Our
results support the concept of a combinatorial labeling of cells in
nervous system histogenesis by different classes of cell surface
proteins, in particular by integrins and molecules of the Ig
superfamily.
Key words:
retina; neurite growth; neural development; Ig
superfamily; integrins; F11; NrCAM
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Outgrowth of neurites in nervous
system ontogenesis can be divided into at least two aspects,
pathfinding of elongating axons on their way to their target regions
and formation of the dendritic tree that is typical for a particular
neuron. In the last decade several classes of ligands and receptors
have been described to regulate neurite outgrowth and axon guidance
(Dodd and Schuchardt, 1995 ; Keynes and Cook, 1995 ; Goodman, 1996 ). On
the one hand, the ligands have been categorized, on the basis of their
mode of action, in long- and short-range cues, which may have repulsive or attractive effects (Culotti and Kolodkin, 1996 ; Tessier-Lavigne and
Goodman, 1996 ; Wadsworth and Hedgecock, 1996 ). On the other hand,
receptors known so far have been grouped according to structural properties in integrins, cadherins, members of the Ig superfamily (IgSF), receptor protein tyrosine kinases, and phosphatases (Reichardt and Tomaselli, 1991 ; Bixby, 1992 ; Sonderegger and Rathjen, 1992 ; Doherty and Walsh, 1994 ; Schachner and Martini, 1995 ; Brümmendorf and Rathjen, 1996 ; Chien, 1996 ; Friedman and O'Leary, 1996 ; Hall et
al., 1996 ; Müller et al., 1996 ; Stoker, 1996 ). Because the number
of specific cellular interactions that have to be coordinated in the
period of neurite outgrowth is likely to exceed the coding capacity of
the genome, it is reasonable to assume that cell surfaces in the
nervous system are labeled on the basis of combinatorial principles. To
investigate a putative cooperativity of distinct receptor-ligand pairs
in the regulation of neurite outgrowth, we have chosen chick retinal
neurons as a model system and have focused on their integrin- and
IgSF-mediated neurite outgrowth response in the present study.
Retinal neurons of embryonic day 6 (E6) are well suited to studying the
interplay between integrin- and IgSF-mediated neurite outgrowth for two
reasons. First, these neurons simultaneously express molecules of both
protein classes on their surface during the period of neurite
outgrowth. For instance, identified integrin subunits in embryonic
chick retina include 1, 2,
4, 6,
8, v,
1, 3,
5, and 8 (Bossy et al., 1991 ; de
Curtis et al., 1991 ; Neugebauer et al., 1991 ; Duband et al., 1992 ;
Reichardt et al., 1992 ; de Curtis and Reichardt, 1993 ; Cann et al.,
1996 ; Gervin et al., 1996 ). Additionally, a large set of IgSF members is also expressed on these neurons, including NCAM, NrCAM, L1/NgCAM, neurofascin, F11/contactin, axonin-1, Thy-1, and DM-GRASP (for review,
see Brümmendorf and Rathjen, 1995 ). Second, these neurons were
shown to actually use these receptors to extend neurites in
vitro. For example, the retinal integrin
6 1 is involved in laminin-stimulated
neurite extension (de Curtis et al., 1991 ), and retinal IgSF members
promote outgrowth by homophilic binding or by heterophilic interactions
with other IgSF members (for review, see Brümmendorf and Rathjen,
1995 , 1996 ).
The F11 molecule, also referred to as F3 (Buttiglione et al., 1996 ) or
contactin (Peles et al., 1997 ), is a member of a growing subgroup of
neural glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked molecules that most
likely arose from a common ancestor by gene duplication events (Plagge
and Brümmendorf, 1997 ). The molecule has been shown to be
involved in the induction of chick tectal neurite outgrowth by
interaction with NrCAM, a member of the L1 subgroup of the IgSF
(Morales et al., 1993 ; Volkmer et al., 1996 ; Sakurai et al., 1997 ).
However, in contrast to tectal neurons, embryonic retinal neurons do
not respond to F11 despite the fact that they express the NrCAM
receptor (see below). This suggested to us that there may be additional
outgrowth-mediating receptors on the retinal neurons, for instance,
integrins, which are not stimulated if F11 alone is offered as a
substrate. To investigate a potential co-stimulation of F11-binding
partners and integrins on retinal neurons, we cultured retinal cells on
mixtures of F11 with fibronectin (FN). This extracellular matrix (ECM)
molecule promotes outgrowth of retinal neurons in vitro
(Akers et al., 1981 ; Thompson and Pelto, 1982 ; Leifer et al., 1984 ),
most likely by triggering retinal integrins. Therefore, we used FN as a
model integrin ligand in the present study, because it binds to a large set of different integrins, among them
2 1,
3 1,
4 1,
4 7, 5 1,
7 1,
8 1,
v 1,
v 3,
v 5,
v 6, and
IIb 3 (for review, see Haas and Plow,
1994 ; Müller et al., 1995 , and references therein), which raises
the chances of detecting integrin-dependent co-stimulation of retinal
neurite outgrowth. In the present study, we describe a functional
cooperativity between the NrCAM pathway and a 1-integrin
with respect to neurite outgrowth induction.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Antibodies. The preparation and specificity of
antibodies directed to F11, NCAM, NgCAM, and NrCAM have been described
(Rathjen et al., 1987 ; Wolff et al., 1987 ; de la Rosa et al., 1990 ;
Pollerberg and Beck Sickinger, 1993 ; Volkmer et al., 1996 ). Fab
fragments of antibodies were prepared using agarose-coupled papain
(Pierce, Rockford, IL) followed by retention of Fc fragments and
residual whole antibody on a protein A-Sepharose column (Pharmacia,
Freiburg, Germany). Hybridomas producing JG22 were obtained from the
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Johns Hopkins University School
of Medicine, Baltimore, MD). To control whether the NgCAM antibodies
(which had no effect in our assay) are functional under the conditions used, tectal cells were seeded on an NgCAM substrate (isolated as
outlined previously; Rathjen et al., 1987 ), which promotes neurite
outgrowth of tectal cells (Brümmendorf et al., 1993 ). Inhibition
of neurite extension on this substrate confirmed that the NgCAM
antibodies are functional (data not shown).
Recombinant soluble F11. Because we intended to evaluate
hexahistidine tagging as a means of isolating native, soluble
recombinant protein from tissue culture supernatants, we inserted a DNA
sequence encoding this tag after the leader sequence of F11. To this
end, the DNA sequence corresponding to mature F11 (Thr22-Ala988) was amplified by PCR on the plasmid pSG5/F11 (Brümmendorf et al., 1993 ) using the primers 5'-gtg gcg agc tct acc cat ttt tca gag gaa
gga-3' and 5'-agt cga agc tta agc agt ggc acc tga aat-3'. PCR was
performed as described (Spaltmann and Brümmendorf, 1996 ); however, the annealing temperature and extension time were adjusted to
the requirements of this experiment, 65° and 3 min, respectively. In
this PCR, restriction enzyme cleavage sites for SacI and
HindIII were added and were used to subclone the product
into the plasmid pQE31 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), which provides the
hexahistidine tag. In a second PCR, the DNA sequence corresponding to
histidine-tagged F11 was amplified on this plasmid using the primers
5'-gag aaa tta cgc gtt cta gaa tct cac cat cac cat-3' and 5'-ctg gat
tga tca aca gga gtc caa gct cag cta-3' and was subcloned, making use of
the restriction enzyme cleavage sites MluI and
BclI, into the MluI- and
BamHI-digested plasmid pSG5/FN (Brümmendorf et al., 1993 ). The hexahistidine-tagged F11 molecule is referred to as cHisF11
in this study. Sequencing of the F11 coding region of the plasmid with
an automated laser fluorescent DNA sequencer (Pharmacia, Uppsala,
Sweden) did not reveal PCR-caused sequence deviations.
The plasmid was used to transfect COS cells transiently by the
DEAE-dextran method as outlined previously (Brümmendorf et al.,
1996 ). Under conditions not disrupting the tertiary structure of the
molecule, however, we did not succeed in isolating pure preparations of
cHisF11 by chelate affinity chromatography using its histidine tag.
Recombinant F11 was therefore isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography
using a monoclonal antibody essentially as outlined (Rathjen et al.,
1987 ) but with an additional high-salt washing step with PBS containing
1.2 M NaCl. A typical transfection experiment in 16 dishes
of 140 cm2 yielded ~50 µg of F11, as estimated
in SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining (performed as described by
Rathjen et al., 1987 ). The protein proved to be functional in the
attachment and outgrowth assay with tectal cells reported previously
(Morales et al., 1993 ).
Neurite outgrowth assay. To prepare fibronectin substrates,
a solution containing 20 µg/ml fibronectin (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) in PBS was spotted as 3 µl spots on Petriperm dishes (20 cm2; Heraeus, Osterode, Germany) and incubated for 3 hr in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C. To generate a fibronectin-F11
substrate, fibronectin (20 µg/ml) and F11 (4 µg/ml, recombinant or
isolated from adult chick brain as described; Rathjen et al., 1987 )
were mixed before coating. With respect to neurite outgrowth
essentially the same effect was observed up to 50 µg/ml of both
proteins in the mixture, suggesting that the concentrations chosen are
saturating. If coated alone, F11 did not promote outgrowth of retinal
cells in this range of concentrations but supported cell adhesion at
>4 µg/ml. As a negative control protein, the Fc fragment of chick
IgY (4 µg/ml, Dianova) was used, because it is very similar to F11 in biochemical terms (Warr et al., 1995 ). Coating efficiencies of FN in
the presence of F11 or IgY were monitored by indirect
immunofluorescence analysis with polyclonal antibodies specific for
human fibronectin (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), followed by
quantification with a digital image analysis system. The amount of FN
bound to the substrate was not found to be significantly influenced by
the presence of F11 or IgY in the protein mixtures. After coating, each
spot was washed separately with 5 µl of PBS, followed by a final wash
of the whole dish with 5 ml of PBS. Before plating of neurons, the
dishes were blocked for at least 1 hr at 37°C with serum-free N2
neuronal cell culture medium (Bottenstein and Sato, 1979 ) containing 1 mg/ml essentially fatty acid-free BSA (Sigma).
To isolate retinal cells, retinas were dissected from E6 chick embryos
in HBSS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and
incubated for 15 min at 37°C with 0.05% trypsin in PBS and 0.02%
EDTA (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). After aspiration of the
trypsin solution, cells were dissociated by trituration in PBS
containing 1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor (Sigma), 1 mg/ml DNase
(Worthington, Freehold, NJ) and 3 mg/ml BSA (Sigma). The cells were
pelleted and carefully resuspended in serum-free N2 culture medium with
0.5-1.5 × 105 cells/ml, followed by seeding
0.5-4.5 × 105 cells in a protein-coated
Petriperm dish. The dishes were incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of
5% CO2 for 20 hr. In contrast to tectal cells, which
extend neurites if grown on a pure F11 substrate in serum-free N2
medium or DMEM with 10% FCS, retinal cells do not in either medium
(our unpublished observations).
For antibody perturbation or peptide inhibition experiments, spots were
prepared, and cells were seeded as described. After attachment of the
cells (2 hr at 37°C), medium was aspirated, and the region between
spots was dried with wicks. The medium was replaced with 100 µl of
fresh medium containing antibodies or the GRGDSP peptide (Nova-Biochem,
Bad Soden, Germany). Polyclonal rabbit antibodies directed to F11,
NgCAM, or NrCAM or their Fab fragments were used at 200 µg/ml. JG22
hybridoma culture supernatant was dialyzed against PBS and diluted 1:10
in N2 culture medium. This resulted in a functionally saturating (with
respect to retinal ganglion cell binding to FN) concentration of the
monoclonal antibody (mAb), as determined by serial dilution experiments
(data not shown). The peptide GRGDSP was used with 200 µg/ml, a
functionally saturating concentration if retinal cell binding to FN is
examined.
Immunofluorescence analysis of retinal ganglion cell
cultures. Cultures were fixed in PBS containing
Ca2+ and Mg2+ (PBSCM) and 4%
formaldehyde for 1 hr at room temperature. After three washes with
PBSCM containing 0.02% BSA, cultures were processed for
immunofluorescence analysis. Cell bodies and neurites were detected by
incubating for at least 1 hr with NCAM-specific antibodies, followed by
Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies from goat (Dianova). To reveal
cellular nuclei, the DNA-staining reagent bisbenzimide (H33258,
Boehringer Mannheim) was added to the secondary antibodies at a final
concentration of 50 ng/ml. Alternatively, to ensure that effects
measured on neurite growth were attributable to increased growth of
axons originating from retinal ganglion cells, polyclonal antibodies
specific for NgCAM, a marker predominantly expressed on retinal
ganglion cell axons at stage E6 (de la Rosa et al., 1990 ; Rager et al.,
1996 ), were used instead of the NCAM antibodies.
Quantification of neurite growth by digital image analysis.
To determine parameters reflecting neurite outgrowth, images of neurons
and their nuclei were captured at the appropriate wavelength by an
intensified CCD camera (Proxitronic, Bensheim, Germany) attached to a
fluorescence microscope (Axiophot; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Spectral overlap of the images was not observed. Images with a
resolution of 512 × 512 pixels were processed with an image analysis card [Machine Vision System IV120(C); AIT Göhner,
Stuttgart, Germany] on a standard personal computer. With the help of
the JL Genias image analysis software (AIT Göhner) an algorithm
was developed that was suited to evaluating automatically the number of
attached cells, the number of putative neurites, and their individual
length (see Results and Fig. 1). Raw data generated by JL Genias were
processed with a spreadsheet program (Excel; Microsoft,
Unterschleißheim, Germany) and evaluated statistically using the
Mann-Whitney U test implemented in the SPSS (Chicago, IL)
package. The final layout of figures was created with graphics programs
(Freehand; Altsys Inc., Richardson, TX; and Photoshop; Adobe Systems,
Mountain View, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Quantification of neurite outgrowth in vitro by an
automatic image analysis procedure
The study of potential synergistic or cooperative effects between
different adhesion receptor ligand pairs with respect to neurite
outgrowth requires the quantification of process outgrowth of a large
number of neurons. To this end we developed an automatic digital image
analysis algorithm, which is suited to evaluation of several hundreds
of neurons for each experimental condition by a standardized procedure.
This enabled us to measure parameters reflecting neurite outgrowth
without any manual processing of the micrographs to be compared with
each other. Two different parameters have been chosen to quantify
neurite outgrowth in this study, namely, the number of neurites
observed and their average length.
Retinal cells were grown in a tissue culture system in vitro
on different substrates composed of the proteins to be analyzed. After
incubation for 20 hr, the cultures were fixed, and the neurons were
detected by immunofluorescence analysis with NCAM-specific antibodies
(Fig. 1a). The nuclei of the
cells were simultaneously stained with bisbenzimide, a reagent
intercalating in DNA (Fig. 1d). Two digitized images
representing the neurons and their nuclei, respectively, were then
captured separately by a CCD camera. The images were processed
automatically to estimate the number of attached cells, the number of
neurites, and their average length (Fig. 1).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Digital image analysis procedure to evaluate
neurite outgrowth in vitro. Retinal cells were seeded on
a substratum composed of a mixture of FN and F11. After cultivation for
20 hr, cell bodies and processes were detected by immunofluorescence
analysis using antibodies directed to NCAM (a),
and cellular nuclei were identified by bisbenzimide staining of DNA (d). To discriminate neurites from cell bodies, both fields were processed as follows. The
field showing cells and neurites (a) was
processed by applying a staining intensity threshold and size exclusion
criteria to distinguish the significant structures representing neurons
from background and from small artifactual signals of subcellular size (b, blue objects). These structures were then eroded to
a skeleton of a single-pixel width (c). The field
comprising cellular nuclei (d) was also processed
by applying a staining intensity threshold and size exclusion criteria
to label cellular nuclei (e, green objects). These were
used to estimate the number of attached cells by dividing the total
area representing cell nuclei by the average area covered by a single
nucleus. Because we are interested in quantifying primarily the long
neurites with a length of more than two cell diameters, all structures
within this distance of every cell nucleus had to be excluded from the
analysis. To this end, every object that represents a cell nucleus was
enlarged correspondingly (f). A
comparison of the resulting image with the image representing putative
neurites (c) allows the identification of long
neurites and fragments thereof, because they do not overlap with the
enlarged nuclei (g). To enhance the stringency of
the procedure further, objects below a defined length threshold were discarded. The remaining objects (h) were counted, and
their individual lengths were measured automatically. The values
obtained were normalized with respect to the cell number to correct for
intra-assay variations in the number of attached cells. In this
procedure we did not attempt to measure the real number of neurites in
the observed field or their real length, but we were merely interested in parameters that reflect the outgrowth and can be used to quantify the response of a large number of neurons. Scale bar, 50 µm.
|
|
To examine the performance of this automatic procedure, we compared it
with a manual method that we had used earlier to measure neurite
lengths of tectal neurons. In our previous studies, we had shown that
immobilized F11 or NgCAM promotes neurite outgrowth of tectal neurons
and that NgCAM is a more potent substratum than F11 (Morales et al.,
1993 ). Evaluation of such cultures with the manual method and with the
automatic procedure shows that both reveal the outgrowth-promoting
effect of the molecules and that both lead to the same result, namely,
that NgCAM is a stronger substratum than F11 (Fig.
2). We therefore conclude that our method is suited to evaluating neurite outgrowth at least as well as the
manual method.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Comparison of methods to evaluate neurite
outgrowth. Neurite extension of tectal neurons on immobilized F11 was
compared with that on immobilized NgCAM. A manual evaluation, which was
performed as described (Brümmendorf et al., 1993 ; Morales et al.,
1993 ), determines the percentage of neurons with neurites longer than a
given length (a). The automatic procedure, which
is illustrated in Figure 1, estimates the number of adhered cells
(b), the number of neurites per cell
(c), and their average length
(d). Each histogram bar represents
the average of 10 values and their SDs (error bars) derived from 10 distinct images captured in a stereotyped layout: three in the upper
third, four in the middle, and three in the lower third of each protein
spot. For each parameter, arbitrary units are given at the
ordinates, rather than real values. **Statistical significance of the difference (Mann-Whitney U test,
p < 0.001). Both methods show that NgCAM is a
better substrate than F11.
|
|
F11 enhances FN-induced neurite outgrowth of retinal cells
Because retinal cells do not extend neurites on F11 (data not
shown) and only poorly on FN, these neurons are well suited to study
synergistic promotion of outgrowth elicited by a mixture of both
proteins. Retinal cells of embryonic day 6 were isolated and plated on
FN alone or on an FN-F11 mixture. On the FN substrate, a significant
neurite outgrowth response is elicited (Fig.
3a). If retinal cells are
plated on a mixed substrate of FN and F11, the number of attached cells
is almost indistinguishable from that on FN alone (Fig.
3c,g). However, the neurite outgrowth response on the
FN-F11 mixture is enhanced if compared with FN alone (Fig. 3a,e). To quantify this enhancement, the image analysis
procedure that was outlined in detail above (Fig. 1) was applied. Cell
bodies and neurites that had been detected by immunofluorescence
analysis (Fig. 3a,e) were identified by application of a
staining intensity threshold and size exclusion criteria (Fig.
3b,f). In parallel, cell bodies were identified
analogously by staining of their nuclei (Fig. 3c,g). Both
images were then processed to identify the neurites (Fig.
3d,h) and to estimate their number and length by applying the stringent criteria outlined in Figure 1.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Enhancement of FN-based retinal neurite outgrowth
by F11. Retinal cells of embryonic day 6 were cultured for 20 hr on FN
alone (left column) or on a mixture of FN and F11
(right column). Cells and neurites were identified by
immunofluorescence analysis using NCAM-specific antibodies, and
cellular nuclei were identified by bisbenzimide staining. The
first row shows immunofluorescence micrographs, and the
second through fourth rows show objects
that have been processed by the image analysis procedure outlined in detail in Figure 1. In the second row cells and neurites
are depicted; in the third row, the cellular nuclei; and
in the fourth row, the identified neurites. Scale bar,
100 µm.
|
|
To compare the neurite outgrowth-promoting effect of FN and the FN-F11
mixture, 10 different images were evaluated by the image analysis
procedure for each experimental condition. For each image the number of
attached cells, the number of observed neurites, and the sum of the
lengths of these neurites were determined to estimate the number of
neurites per cell and the average length of neurites per cell. In a
typical experiment, the average number of cells attached to the FN
substrate is not significantly different from that on an FN-F11
mixture (Fig. 4a, open bar, filled
bar). However, the neurite outgrowth response is enhanced in the
presence of F11 (Fig. 4b,c). Mixing of FN with an equal
amount of the biochemically similar control protein IgY did not
modulate the outgrowth-promoting effect of FN (Fig. 4, open bars,
hatched bars).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
F11 enhances FN-dependent neurite outgrowth of
retinal ganglion cells. Retinal cells were cultured on FN alone, on an
FN-IgY mixture, or on an FN-F11 mixture. Cultures were evaluated, and data are presented as outlined in the legend of Figure 2. The average
number of attached cells is indistinguishable on the three substrates
(a). If F11 is added to FN before coating, the
average number of neurites per cell (b) and the
average length of neurites per cell (c) are
larger (filled bars) on this mixture than on FN
alone (open bars). By contrast, substitution of F11 by
an equal amount of IgY (hatched bars) did not enhance
the outgrowth response of retinal neurons. Data from one representative
experiment of at least four independent experiments are depicted.
**Statistical significance of the difference (Mann-Whitney
U test, p < 0.001).
|
|
The F11 protein used in the previous experiment was isolated from
embryonic chick brain by immunoaffinity chromatography as outlined
previously (Rathjen et al., 1987 ). To demonstrate that the enhancement
effect is specific for F11 and not caused by potential contaminants in
the F11 preparation, the experiment was repeated in the presence of
F11-specific antibodies. Incubation of substrate spots with polyclonal
F11-specific antibodies before addition of neurons did not interfere
significantly with cell adhesion to FN-IgY or to FN-F11 (Fig.
5a). This shows that they have
no unspecific toxic effect and confirms that F11 in the FN-F11 mixture does not contribute significantly to cell adhesion under these conditions. However, the antibodies were found to neutralize the F11-mediated enhancement of neurite outgrowth and to reduce it to the
level observed with FN-IgY alone (Fig. 5b,c).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
F11-induced enhancement of neurite outgrowth
can be inhibited by F11-specific antibodies and can also be observed if
recombinant F11 is analyzed. Retinal cells were cultured on an FN-IgY
mixture and on an FN-F11 mixture in the presence or absence of
polyclonal F11-specific antibodies. Cultures were evaluated, and data
are presented as outlined in the legend of Figure 2. The number of substrate-bound cells was indistinguishable on both substrates and was
not influenced by the application of the antibodies
(a). On the FN-IgY substratum the antibodies did
not interfere with the average number of neurites per cell
(b) and the average length of neurites per cell
(c). However, the antibody neutralized the outgrowth-promoting effect mediated by F11 contained in the FN-F11 substratum (b, c). In another set of experiments, the
outgrowth-promoting effect of soluble recombinant F11, expressed in
eukaryotic cells, was evaluated. Two different preparations of
recombinant F11 were found to enhance neurite outgrowth to a similar
extent as F11 isolated from embryonic chick brain
(d-f). Data from one representative experiment
of at least four independent experiments are depicted. **Statistical
significance of the difference (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001).
|
|
As a further specificity control, recombinant F11, which was
heterologously expressed in eukaryotic cells, was also tested. To
express soluble recombinant F11 in COS cells, the C-terminal hydrophobic stretch involved in the posttranslational attachment of the
GPI anchor was deleted on the cDNA level in a eukaryotic F11 expression
plasmid. Recombinant F11 was isolated from tissue culture supernatants
by immunoaffinity chromatography using a monoclonal antibody (Rathjen
et al., 1987 ). It has an apparent molecular mass of 135 kDa (Fig.
6b,e), ~5 kDa larger than
F11 isolated from brain (Fig. 6a,d) which may be caused by
aberrant glycosylation in the COS cells. A comparison of recombinant
soluble F11 with embryonic chick brain F11 showed that identical
amounts of both preparations enhance retinal neuron outgrowth to a
similar extent (Fig. 5e,f) but do not affect cell
adhesion (Fig. 5d). In conclusion, the enhancement of
retinal neuron outgrowth can be inhibited by F11-specific antibodies
and can also be observed if recombinant F11 is analyzed in the assay.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Characterization of heterologously expressed
soluble F11. Soluble F11 that was isolated from culture supernatants of
transfected COS cells by immunoaffinity chromatography was
characterized by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining
(a-c) or Western blot analysis with an F11-specific
monoclonal antibody (d-f). F11 isolated from chick brain (a, 600 ng; d, 120 ng) is
compared with recombinant soluble F11 (b, 1.6 µg;
e, 320 ng). The latter contains a 53 kDa contaminant
(b), which is unrelated to F11
(e) and which is also found in preparations of
other recombinant proteins isolated from tissue culture supernatants,
for instance, the 23 kDa DiFc protein (c, 3.2 µg;
f, 640 ng), which consists of two IgG Fc domains (our unpublished data). Because preparations of the DiFc protein did not
enhance neurite outgrowth of retinal neurons on FN (data not shown),
suggesting that the 53 kDa protein does not interfere with aspects of
this study, we did not attempt to separate the contaminant from
recombinant F11.
|
|
Taken together, we showed that the addition of F11 to an FN substrate
did not affect retinal cell attachment to FN but enhanced retinal
neuron outgrowth on this substrate.
The enhancement of retinal neurite outgrowth is mediated by
neuronal NrCAM
The enhancement of retinal neuron outgrowth, which is triggered by
F11 in the FN-F11 substrate, is likely to be mediated by a receptor on
the retinal neurons. The two similar IgSF cell surface molecules NgCAM
and NrCAM are expressed on retinal neurons (Morales et al., 1996 ) (and
on other neurons) and have been demonstrated in previous studies to
interact with F11 (Brümmenorf et al., 1993 ;
Morales et al., 1993 ). Whereas NrCAM has been shown to represent an
axonal receptor mediating neurite outgrowth of tectal cells by
interaction with F11 (Morales et al., 1993 ), the biological function of
the F11-NgCAM interaction is currently unknown. We therefore
investigated whether NgCAM or NrCAM is involved in the F11-mediated
enhancement of FN-dependent neurite outgrowth. To this end, retinal
cells were cultured in the presence of Fab fragments of NgCAM- or
NrCAM-specific antibodies.
Fab fragments of NgCAM-specific antibodies were not found to interfere
with attachment of retinal cells to FN-IgY or FN-F11 substrates (Fig.
7a), indicating that they have
no nonspecific toxic effect. Furthermore, addition of the Fab fragments
to the culture medium of cells grown on an FN-F11 substrate did not
neutralize the F11-mediated enhancement of neurite outgrowth (Fig.
7b,c). We therefore conclude that NgCAM is unlikely to be
involved in the enhancement effect.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Perturbation of F11-induced enhancement of neurite
outgrowth by different reagents. Retinal cells were cultured on an
FN-IgY or an FN-F11 substrate in the presence or absence of
polyclonal NgCAM-specific Fab fragments (a-c),
NrCAM-specific Fab fragments (d-f), a
1-integrin-specific mAb (g-i), or GRGDSP
peptides (k-m). Cultures were evaluated, and data are
presented as outlined in the legend of Figure 2. Data from one
representative experiment of at least three independent experiments are
shown. **Statistical significance of the difference (Mann-Whitney
U test, p < 0.001). The number of
substrate-bound cells was not influenced by application of the NrCAM or
NgCAM antibodies (a, d). On the FN-IgY substratum, neither the NgCAM antibodies (b, c) nor the NrCAM
antibodies (e, f) interfered with the average
number of neurites per cell (b, e) or the average length
of neurites per cell (c, f). On the FN-F11 substratum, the NgCAM antibodies also did not interfere with the F11-induced enhancement of outgrowth (b, c). By
contrast, the NrCAM-specific antibodies reduced outgrowth to the
FN-dependent level (e, f). The 1-integrin
antibody (g) and the GRGDSP peptide (k) interfere significantly with cell attachment
on both substrates. Although the antibody did not reduce FN-dependent
basal neurite outgrowth (h, i), the
peptide strongly decreased outgrowth on the FN substrate (l,
m). In the presence of the antibody, the subpopulation of
attached cells does not respond to F11 in the FN-F11 substrate but
shows only FN-dependent basal outgrowth (h, i). By contrast, the cells that are attached in the
presence of the peptide show F11-mediated enhancement of outgrowth,
which is not significantly different (p > 0.001) from that in the absence of the peptide (l,
m).
|
|
To test whether NrCAM is the F11-binding molecule on the E6 retinal
neurons, Fab fragments of NrCAM-specific antibodies were tested and
were not found to interfere with the cell attachment to FN-IgY or
FN-F11 substrate (Fig. 7d), which demonstrates that they
are not toxic for the neurons. Interestingly and in contrast to the
finding concerning NgCAM, the antibodies directed to NrCAM neutralized
the F11-mediated enhancement of neurite outgrowth and reduced it to the
level observed with FN alone (Fig. 7e,f).
Taken together, our data suggest that F11-triggered enhancement of
retinal neuron outgrowth is mediated by the neuronal F11 receptor NrCAM
but not by NgCAM, a related F11-binding molecule that is also expressed
by these neurons.
Involvement of 1-integrins in retinal
neurite outgrowth
It has been shown previously that FN is an outgrowth-promoting
substratum for E6 retinal cells (Akers et al., 1981 ; Thompson and
Pelto, 1982 ; Leifer et al., 1984 ). As we have shown above, FN promotes
weak but significant outgrowth if offered alone as a substrate but
promotes increased outgrowth if coated together with F11. Because FN is
known to bind a large set of different integrins, it is very likely
that attachment and basal neurite outgrowth is mediated by one of these
adhesion receptors. We therefore studied a putative cooperation of
integrin signaling with the NrCAM pathway in more detail. As a first
step to analyze which integrin(s) might be involved, we examined the
effect of an mAb that blocks 1-integrin function (Greve
and Gottlieb, 1982 ), and we also tested a peptide that competitively
blocks integrin binding to the RGD motif within FN (Main et al., 1992 ,
and references therein).
Addition of functionally saturating amounts of mAb JG22, which
interferes with 1-integrin binding (Greve and Gottlieb,
1982 ), leads to a substantial reduction of the number of attached
cells, both on FN and on the FN-F11 substrate (Fig. 7g).
The subpopulation of attached cells, which is supposed to bind to FN in
a 1-integrin independent manner, shows FN-dependent
basal neurite outgrowth. However, these cells did not respond to F11 in
the FN-F11 substrate by enhancement of outgrowth (Fig.
7h,i). This suggests that a 1-integrin may contribute to
the F11-mediated enhancement of outgrowth in the mixed substrate.
To get a first clue to which 1-integrin may be involved, we took
advantage of observations that FN binding of some 1-integrins is
dependent on the RGD site within FN, and that of others is not. To
inactivate all RGD-dependent integrins, functionally saturating amounts
of the peptide GRGDSP were added to the culture medium. Similar to the
effect of the JG22 antibody, this leads to a significantly decreased
number of cells bound to both substrates (Fig. 7k). Although
basal, FN-dependent neurite outgrowth on FN alone was almost abolished
in the presence of the peptide, it reduced the enhanced outgrowth on
the FN-F11 substrate only weakly and nonsignificantly (Fig.
7l,m). Therefore, in contrast to the effect of mAb JG22, the
RGD peptide does not appear to interfere significantly with the
F11-mediated enhancement of neurite outgrowth.
One possible interpretation of these findings might be that a
1-integrin that seems to interact with FN at a site
distinct of its RGD site (a potential candidate may be integrin
4 1; see Discussion) cooperates
functionally with the NrCAM-dependent signaling pathway in neurite
outgrowth promotion.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Evaluation of neurite outgrowth by an automatic image
analysis procedure
Analysis of multiple variables affecting neurite outgrowth and
detection of subtle modulatory effects requires the quantification of
outgrowth from a large number of neurons. In the present study, we
introduce an automatic procedure to analyze hundreds of neurons in vitro for each experimental condition to determine
parameters reflecting the number of analyzed cells, the number of
neurites, and their length. Neurite outgrowth was quantified by two
criteria, the average number of neurites per cell and the average
length of neurites per cell. Both criteria were found to be correlated and to be equally suited to describe neurite outgrowth in the present
study under all experimental conditions. Comparison of this novel
procedure with a manual method that we have used previously to quantify
tectal neurite outgrowth (Morales et al., 1993 ) confirmed that
application of both methods leads to the same conclusion, namely, that
NgCAM is a more favorable substratum for tectal neurons than F11 (Fig.
2).
In an attempt to analyze as many neurons as possible, we used a higher
cell density of retinal neurons in the present study than we did
previously with tectal neurons. Therefore, in our automatic procedure,
we are more conservative and underestimate neurite outgrowth for two
reasons. First, fasciculated neurites cannot be distinguished from
single isolated neurites. This is attributable to the process of
eroding to a single pixel width (Fig. 1), which is done before the
neurites are measured and leads to an underestimation of the number of
neurites. Second, growing neurites are more likely to encounter other
neurons than in the low-density cultures used previously. Therefore the
very long neurites are undetectable, which leads to an underestimation
of neurite length. The cultures of retinal cells analyzed in this study
contained a variable number of single cells and cell aggregates, which
differed between distinct preparations of retinal cells and which were
also dependent on the cell density at the time of plating. To avoid an
influence of the total cell numbers and the size distribution of the
aggregates to the outcome of the analyses, only data obtained in one
single experiment were compared with each other, and data of
consecutive experiments have not been pooled.
The main advantage of our approach is that any bias that might be
introduced by the investigator (if neurites have to be chosen by eye
and labeled manually for processing) can be excluded. Because a large
number of neurons can be evaluated, subtle modulatory effects on
neurite outgrowth can be revealed with this method, which therefore
might facilitate future studies to elucidate signal transduction
mechanisms leading to neurite extension.
NrCAM and NgCAM as receptors involved in neurite outgrowth
In the present study we provided strong evidence that NrCAM on
retinal neurons mediates F11-triggered enhancement of FN-induced neurite outgrowth, either as a receptor or as component of a receptor complex. Therefore, the NrCAM molecule plays the role of a receptor in
F11-induced neurite outgrowth of two distinct types of neurons, namely,
retinal neurons (this study) and tectal neurons, as shown previously
(Morales et al., 1993 ). Whereas in the tectal system, F11 alone is
sufficient to promote significant outgrowth, this is not the case for
the retinal neurons, which neither adhere significantly to F11 nor
extend neurites under the same conditions (data not shown). Therefore,
F11 seems to modulate outgrowth of different types of neurons
differentially, suggesting that it may be a component of a complex
system of neuronal cell surface molecules that regulate neuronal
outgrowth during development.
Our approach does not allow us to distinguish between cis
and trans interactions of F11 and NrCAM, because the F11
molecule is most likely bound to the substratum in random orientations. Therefore, concerning the retina, our model may reflect an in vivo interaction of NrCAM with F11 in the same cell membrane, with
released F11 in the ECM or with F11 on the opposing cell membrane. A
related situation has been analyzed recently in another cellular
context, namely, outgrowth of dorsal root ganglion neurons. These cells
extend neurites on immobilized NgCAM (Kuhn et al., 1991 ), and it
has been demonstrated that this response is dependent on a
cis cooperation of neuronal NgCAM with neuronal axonin-1 (Buchstaller et al., 1996 ; Stoeckli et al., 1996 ). Because axonin-1 is
related to F11 (Plagge and Brümmendorf, 1997 ), and NgCAM is similar to NrCAM (Grumet and Sakurai, 1996 ), F11 and NrCAM may also
bind in a cis configuration. Accordingly, recent
co-precipitation studies using transfected COS cells showed that F11
and NrCAM may form a cis complex at the cell surface
(Sakurai et al., 1997 ), implicated in neurite outgrowth induced by
receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase / on glia (Peles et al.,
1995 ).
Binding to F11 is not the only heterophilic molecular interaction that
has been characterized for the NrCAM protein, which also binds
homophilically (Mauro et al., 1992 ). Recently, NrCAM has been
demonstrated to bind to the L1-related molecule neurofascin (Volkmer et
al., 1996 ) and to the F11-related protein axonin-1 (Suter et al.,
1995 ). Whereas the NrCAM-neurofascin interaction has been identified
in the context of tectal neurite outgrowth, the axonin-1 binding has
been functionally implicated in axonal guidance in the developing
spinal cord (Stoeckli and Landmesser, 1995 ).
In contrast to the functional role of the F11-NrCAM interaction in
neurite outgrowth, the significance of the F11-NgCAM interaction is
currently unknown. We therefore examined in this study whether NgCAM
could play a role in F11-enhanced retinal neuron outgrowth, but we
could not provide evidence for involvement of this molecule (Fig.
7a-c). One possible reason for this may be that binding of
NgCAM on the neuronal membrane to substrate-bound F11 does not elicit a
signal or may be undetectable. Binding of F11 to NgCAM has been shown
using NgCAM-coated covaspheres, on which the molecule is most likely
immobilized in random orientations (Brümmendorf et al., 1993 ). It
is conceivable that membrane-bound NgCAM may be in a conformation that
is incompetent for F11 binding. In principle this would be similar to
cell surface-anchored axonin-1, which has been shown to exist in a
horseshoe-like conformation with a buried ligand-binding site (Rader et
al., 1996 ). Further experiments are needed to understand the impact of
molecular conformations on the F11-NgCAM interaction.
Cooperativity between different outgrowth-mediating
receptor systems
Because the size of the vertebrate genome is to small to encode
all types of cellular interactions in neurohistogenesis by distinct
receptor-ligand pairs, any combinatorial principle of cell surface
labeling is of great conceptual interest. In the present experiments we
provided evidence of cooperativity between two different receptor
systems on retinal neurons, namely, integrins and IgSF molecules, with
respect to neurite outgrowth. Our data suggest that the retinal neuron
outgrowth response is based on stimulation of neuronal integrins by FN
and enhanced by triggering of neuronal NrCAM by F11. Similar
cooperative effects have been reported recently for other molecules
involved in neurite outgrowth. Concerning retinal neurons, it has been
demonstrated that purified NgCAM strongly promotes outgrowth, but
purified NrCAM does not. However, if both are mixed, a synergistic
growth-promoting effect is observed (Morales et al., 1996 ). A
synergistic response has also been observed for NCAM and N-cadherin in
a system in which neurite outgrowth of cerebellar neurons has been
examined on a substrate of transfected fibroblasts (Doherty et al.,
1991 ). Similarly, tectal neurons respond to F11 and not to the ECM
protein tenascin-R (restrictin), but if both are combined, the F11
response is enhanced by tenascin-R (Nörenberg et al., 1995 ). One
possible explanation for these observations may be that two distinct
receptor systems are triggered in these experimental paradigms. This
would be similar to a model proposed for the TAG-1-induced outgrowth of
dorsal root ganglion cells, which implicated an L1-like molecule and 1-integrins as receptors (Felsenfeld et al., 1994 ).
Enhancement of 1-integrin-mediated outgrowth of
retinal neurons by F11-binding to NrCAM
We have shown that F11-triggered enhancement of FN-dependent
retinal neurite outgrowth can be blocked by an mAb that interferes with
1-integrin function. There are two interpretations that can be offered for these findings.
In our model, which is shown in Figure 8,
a functional cooperation of the 1-integrin pathway and
the NrCAM pathway is proposed. In the absence of any antibody, retinal
neurons attach to an FN substrate via a 1-integrin
and/or a non- 1-integrin, which promotes basal neurite
outgrowth (Figs. 7g-i, 8a). If the cells are
plated on an FN-F11 substrate, the mechanism of attachment is the
same, but triggering of NrCAM by F11 leads to intracellular events that amplify the 1-integrin signal and increase the neurite
outgrowth response (Figs. 7h,i, 8b). In the
presence of NrCAM-specific antibodies, cell attachment is unchanged,
and only the basal, FN-dependent, and integrin-mediated neurite
outgrowth is observed (Figs. 7d-f, 8c). If
1-integrin function is blocked by an mAb, cell adhesion is decreased, and only a subpopulation of cells is attached (Fig. 7g). These cells bind to FN in the FN-F11 substrate most
likely via non- 1-integrins and show only the
integrin-mediated basal outgrowth (Fig. 7h,i). This suggests
that the non- 1-integrins are unable to cooperate
functionally with the NrCAM pathway (Fig. 8d).
It is unclear at present which 1-integrin might be
involved in this model, but its identification might be guided by the
observation that it seems to bind FN at a site distinct from the RGD
motif (Fig. 7l,m). One plausible candidate might be integrin
4 1, because it is expressed in the
E6 chick retina (Cann et al., 1996 ), and it interacts with a C-terminal
fragment of FN, a property shared with retinal neurons (Reichardt et
al., 1992 ). However, the involvement of the RGD motif within
4 1 ligands is only partially understood at present (Mould et al., 1991 ; Massia and Hubbell, 1992 ; Cardarelli et
al., 1994 ; Sanchez Aparicio et al., 1994 ).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Model of NrCAM-mediated enhancement of
1-integrin-dependent neurite outgrowth. Retinal ganglion
cells attach via non- 1-integrins ( x) and 1-integrins to the FN
substrate, which promotes weak neurite outgrowth
(a). If the cells attach via the same integrin(s) to an FN-F11 substrate, F11 binding to NrCAM triggers unknown intracellular events, which enhance the outgrowth-promoting effect mediated by 1-integrins (b).
Blocking of NrCAM by an antibody neutralizes the NrCAM-mediated
enhancement (c). In the presence of an
anti- 1-mAb, cells attach via
non- 1-integrins ( x), which stimulate outgrowth weakly. Because triggering of NrCAM by F11 does not
enhance the outgrowth response in the presence of the mAb, it is
suggested that the NrCAM pathway can only cooperate with
1-integrins, not with non- 1-integrins
(d). Note that under these conditions, the
NrCAM-F11 interaction does not contribute to cell adhesion and is
therefore indicated by a dotted line.
|
|
Currently, we cannot formally exclude a second explanation for our
data. We observed that even if a functionally saturating concentration
of the 1-blocking mAb is applied, E6 retinal cell attachment is only reduced to ~50% (Fig. 7g), which is
consistent with the observation that approximately half of E6 retinal
cells express 1-integrins (Cann et al., 1996 ). This
suggests that there are two populations of cells, one with
1-integrins, which is not attached in the presence of
mAb JG22, and one expressing non- 1 FN-binding integrins,
which is attached. It is conceivable that only the former population
can respond to F11, and therefore, F11-induced outgrowth enhancement
cannot be observed in the presence of MAb JG22.
The molecular mechanisms of cooperation between the NrCAM and the
integrin pathway remain uncharacterized. However, it may be important
in this context that NrCAM and other members of the L1 subgroup that
are involved in neurite outgrowth (for review, see Brümmendorf
and Rathjen, 1995 ) bind ankyrin-like repeats within ankyrins (Davis and
Bennett, 1994 ; Michaely and Bennett, 1995 ) and that an ankyrin-like
molecule in Caenorhabditis elegans plays a role in axon
guidance (Otsuka et al., 1995 ). Recently, 1-integrins
have been demonstrated to associate with integrin-linked kinase, which
contains four ankyrin-like repeats (Hannigan et al., 1996 ). It remains
to be examined whether L1-like proteins might also associate with this
serine/threonine protein kinase, which would provide a convergence
point of the integrin and the L1 subgroup pathways of neurite outgrowth
induction. However, detailed analyses of signal transduction downstream
of L1 argue against an early convergence molecule of integrin- and
L1-triggered neurite outgrowth, because the L1-dependent outgrowth can
be inhibited by a set of agents that does not interfere with
integrin-triggered outgrowth (for review, see Doherty and Walsh,
1996 ).
Because we used preparations of freshly dissociated whole E6 retinas,
cells examined in our study are composed of at least two cell
populations, undifferentiated neuroepithelial precursor cells and
differentiated retinal ganglion cells. We therefore refer to the cells
that extend neurites in our assays as early embryonic retinal cells,
but we assume that most of them represent retinal ganglion cells (RGCs)
for four reasons. First, RGCs are the first differentiating neurons in
the retina at E6 (for review, see Mey and Thanos, 1992 ). Second, RGCs
are the only retinal neurons that extend long neurites, a selection
criterion implemented in our algorithm (Fig. 1g,h). Third,
at this developmental stage of the retina, RGCs are the only cells
expressing the NrCAM receptor (de la Rosa et al., 1990 ; Morales et al.,
1996 ), which is involved in the outgrowth response (Fig.
7e,f). Fourth, RGCs are the only E6 retina cells that
express the NgCAM molecule (de la Rosa et al., 1990 ; Rager et al.,
1996 ), and analysis of cultures stained with NgCAM-specific antibodies
(rather than NCAM-specific antibodies) leads to essentially the same
conclusions concerning F11-mediated enhancement of outgrowth (data not
shown).
Our model of a functional cooperation of integrin- and IgSF-mediated
neurite outgrowth is related to a similar model proposed previously for
dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. These neurons are known to extend
neurites in response to axonin-1/TAG-1 (Kuhn et al., 1991 ; Stoeckli et
al., 1996 ), a neural IgSF member structurally related to F11 (Plagge
and Brümmendorf, 1997 ). Neurite outgrowth of these neurons can be
inhibited independently by antibodies specific for 1-integrins or
for L1, suggesting that a neuronal 1-integrin and neuronal L1 may
cooperate in the induction of outgrowth (Felsenfeld et al., 1994 ). A
striking similarity of the retinal neuron system reported in the
present study and the situation in the DRGs lies in the nature of the
molecules involved, namely NrCAM in the retinal neurons (Fig. 8) and L1
in the DRGs (Felsenfeld et al., 1994 ). Because both are members of the
L1 subgroup of neural IgSF molecules, it is conceivable that other members of this subgroup, such as neurofascin and CHL1 in mammals, E587
in goldfish, and neuroglian in Drosophila (for review, see Brümmendorf and Rathjen, 1995 , 1996 ; Holm et al., 1996 ), might also cooperate with 1-integrins in the regulation of neurite outgrowth.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Aug. 18, 1997; revised Oct. 31, 1997; accepted Dec. 19, 1997.
This study was partly supported by European Union Biotechnology
Programme Project BIO4-CT96-0450, The Role of the Neural Cell Adhesion
Molecule L1 and its Ligands in Normal Brain Development and Hereditary
Brain Diseases. We thank Dr. A. Gierer for generous support and
encouragement and Dr. F. G. Rathjen for stimulating discussions.
The kind gift of antibodies by Drs. G. Morales, H. Volkmer, and G. E. Pollerberg is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Drs. H. Volkmer,
F. G. Rathjen, and T. Lufkin for helpful comments on this
manuscript, A. Schöffski for technical assistance, and C. Hug for
secretarial help.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Thomas Brümmendorf,
Max-Delbrueck-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin,
Robert-Rösslestrasse 10, D-13122 Berlin, Germany.
Dr. Treubert's present address: Brookdale Center for Developmental and
Molecular Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Akers RM,
Mosher DF,
Lilien JE
(1981)
Promotion of retinal neurite outgrowth by substratum-bound fibronectin.
Dev Biol
86:179-188[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bixby JL
(1992)
Diversity of axonal growth-promoting receptors and regulation of their function.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
2:66-69[Medline].
-
Bossy B,
Bossy-Wetzel E,
Reichardt LF
(1991)
Characterization of the integrin
8 subunit: a new integrin 1-associated subunit, which is prominently expressed on axons and on cells in contact with basal laminae in chick embryos.
EMBO J
10:2375-2385[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Bottenstein JE,
Sato GH
(1979)
Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:514-517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Brümmendorf T,
Rathjen FG
(1995)
Cell adhesion molecules 1: immunoglobulin superfamily.
Protein Profile
2:963-1108[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Brümmendorf T,
Rathjen FG
(1996)
Structure/function relationships of axon-associated adhesion receptors of the immunoglobulin superfamily.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
6:584-593[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Brümmendorf T,
Hubert M,
Treubert U,
Leuschner R,
Tarnok A,
Rathjen FG
(1993)
The axonal recognition molecule F11 is a multifunctional protein: specific domains mediate interactions with Ng-CAM and restrictin.
Neuron
10:711-727[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Brümmendorf T,
Plagge A,
Treubert U
(1996)
Epitope mapping on extracellular domains of cell-surface proteins using exonuclease III.
In: Methods in molecular biology: epitope mapping protocols (Morris GE,
ed), pp 319-342. Totowa, NJ: Humana.
-
Buchstaller A,
Kunz S,
Berger P,
Kunz B,
Ziegler U,
Rader C,
Sonderegger P
(1996)
Cell adhesion molecules Ng-CAM and axonin-1 form heterodimers in the neuronal membrane and cooperate in neurite outgrowth promotion.
J Cell Biol
135:1593-1607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Buttiglione M,
Revest JM,
Rougon G,
Faivre Sarrailh C
(1996)
F3 neuronal adhesion molecule controls outgrowth and fasciculation of cerebellar granule cell neurites: a cell-type-specific effect mediated by the Ig-like domains.
Mol Cell Neurosci
8:53-69[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cann GM,
Bradshaw AD,
Gervin DB,
Hunter AW,
Clegg DO
(1996)
Widespread expression of
1 integrins in the developing chick retina: evidence for a role in migration of retinal ganglion cells.
Dev Biol
180:82-96[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Cardarelli PM,
Cobb RR,
Nowlin DM,
Scholz W,
Gorcsan F,
Moscinski M,
Yasuhara M,
Chiang SL,
Lobl TJ
(1994)
Cyclic RGD peptide inhibits
4 1 interaction with connecting segment 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule.
J Biol Chem
269:18668-18673[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Chien CB
(1996)
Py in the fly: receptor-like tyrosine phosphatases in axonal pathfinding.
Neuron
16:1065-1068[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Culotti JG,
Kolodkin AL
(1996)
Functions of netrins and semaphorins in axon guidance.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
6:81-88[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Davis JQ,
Bennett V
(1994)
Ankyrin binding activity shared by the neurofascin/L1/NrCAM family of nervous system cell adhesion molecules.
J Biol Chem
269:27163-27166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
de Curtis I,
Reichardt LF
(1993)
Function and spatial distribution in developing chick retina of the laminin receptor
6 1 and its isoforms.
Development
118:377-388[Abstract]. -
de Curtis I,
Quaranta V,
Tamura RN,
Reichardt LF
(1991)
Laminin receptors in the retina: sequence analysis of the chick integrin
6 subunit. Evidence for transcriptional and posttranslational regulation.
J Cell Biol
113:405-416[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
de la Rosa EJ,
Kayyem JF,
Roman JM,
Stierhof YD,
Dreyer WJ,
Schwarz U
(1990)
Topologically restricted appearance in the developing chick retinotectal system of Bravo, a neural surface protein: experimental modulation by environmental cues.
J Cell Biol
111:3087-3096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Dodd J,
Schuchardt A
(1995)
Axon guidance: a compelling case for repelling growth.
Cell
81:471-474[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Doherty P,
Walsh FS
(1994)
Signal transduction events underlying neurite outgrowth stimulated by cell adhesion molecules.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
4:49-55[Medline].
-
Doherty P,
Walsh FS
(1996)
CAM-FGF receptor interactions: a model for axonal growth.
Mol Cell Neurosci
8:99-111[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Doherty P,
Rowett LH,
Moore SE,
Mann DA,
Walsh FS
(1991)
Neurite outgrowth in response to transfected N-CAM and N-cadherin reveals fundamental differences in neuronal responsiveness to CAMs.
Neuron
6:247-258[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Duband JL,
Belkin AM,
Syfrig J,
Thiery JP,
Koteliansky VE
(1992)
Expression of
1 integrin, a laminin-collagen receptor, during myogenesis and neurogenesis in the avian embryo.
Development
116:585-600[Abstract]. -
Felsenfeld DP,
Hynes MA,
Skoler KM,
Furley AJ,
Jessell TM
(1994)
TAG-1 can mediate homophilic binding, but neurite outgrowth on TAG-1 requires an L1-like molecule and
1 integrins.
Neuron
12:675-690[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Friedman GC,
O'Leary DDM
(1996)
EPH receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands in neural development.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
6:127-133[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gervin DB,
Cann GM,
Clegg DO
(1996)
Temporal and spatial regulation of integrin vitronectin receptor mRNAs in the embryonic chick retina.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
37:1084-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Goodman CS
(1996)
Mechanisms and molecules that control growth cone guidance.
Annu Rev Neurosci
19:341-377[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Greve JM,
Gottlieb DI
(1982)
Monoclonal antibodies which alter the morphology of cultured chick myogenic cells.
J Cell Biochem
18:221-229[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Grumet M,
Sakurai T
(1996)
Heterophilic interactions of the neural cell adhesion molecules Ng-CAM and Nr-CAM with neural receptors and extracellular matrix proteins.
Semin Neurosci
8:379-389.
-
Haas TA,
Plow EF
(1994)
Integrin-ligand interactions: a year in review.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
6:656-662[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hall H,
Walsh FS,
Doherty P
(1996)
Review: a role for the FGF receptor in the axonal growth response stimulated by cell adhesion molecules?
Cell Adhes Commun
3:441-450[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hannigan GE,
Leung Hagesteijn C,
Fitz Gibbon L,
Coppolino MG,
Radeva G,
Filmus J,
Bell JC,
Dedhar S
(1996)
Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new
1-integrin-linked protein kinase.
Nature
379:91-96[Medline]. -
Holm J,
Hillenbrand R,
Steuber V,
Bartsch U,
Moos M,
Lubbert H,
Montag D,
Schachner M
(1996)
Structural features of a close homologue of L1 (CHL1) in the mouse: a new member of the L1 family of neural recognition molecules.
Eur J Neurosci
8:1613-1629[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Keynes R,
Cook GM
(1995)
Axon guidance molecules.
Cell
83:161-169[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kuhn TB,
Stoeckli ET,
Condrau MA,
Rathjen FG,
Sonderegger P
(1991)
Neurite outgrowth on immobilized axonin-1 is mediated by a heterophilic interaction with L1(G4).
J Cell Biol
115:1113-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Leifer D,
Lipton SA,
Barnstable CJ,
Masland RH
(1984)
Monoclonal antibody to Thy-1 enhances regeneration of processes by rat retinal ganglion cells in culture.
Science
224:303-306[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Main AL,
Harvey TS,
Baron M,
Boyd J,
Campbell ID
(1992)
The three-dimensional structure of the tenth type III module of fibronectin: an insight into RGD-mediated interactions.
Cell
71:671-678[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Massia SP,
Hubbell JA
(1992)
Vascular endothelial cell adhesion and spreading promoted by the peptide REDV of the IIICS region of plasma fibronectin is mediated by integrin
4 1.
J Biol Chem
267:14019-14026[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Mauro VP,
Krushel LA,
Cunningham BA,
Edelman GM
(1992)
Homophilic and heterophilic binding activities of Nr-CAM, a nervous system cell adhesion molecule.
J Cell Biol
119:191-202[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mey J,
Thanos S
(1992)
Development of the visual system of the chick: a review.
J Hirnforsch
33:673-702[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Michaely P,
Bennett V
(1995)
Mechanism for binding site diversity on ankyrin: comparison of binding sites on ankyrin for neurofascin and the Cl
/HCO3- anion exchanger.
J Biol Chem
270:31298-31302[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Morales G,
Hubert M,
Brümmendorf T,
Treubert U,
Tarnok A,
Schwarz U,
Rathjen FG
(1993)
Induction of axonal growth by heterophilic interactions between the cell surface recognition proteins F11 and NrCAM/Bravo.
Neuron
11:1113-1122[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Morales G,
Sanchez Puelles JM,
Schwarz U,
de la Rosa EJ
(1996)
Synergistic neurite-outgrowth promoting activity of two related axonal proteins, Bravo/Nr-CAM and G4/Ng-CAM in chicken retinal explants.
Eur J Neurosci
8:1098-1105[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mould AP,
Komoriya A,
Yamada KM,
Humphries MJ
(1991)
The CS5 peptide is a second site in the IIICS region of fibronectin recognized by the integrin
4 1: inhibition of 4 1 function by RGD peptide homologues.
J Biol Chem
266:3579-3585[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Müller U,
Bossy B,
Venstrom K,
Reichardt LF
(1995)
Integrin
8 1 promotes attachment, cell spreading, and neurite outgrowth on fibronectin.
Mol Biol Cell
6:433-448[Abstract]. -
Müller BK,
Bonhoeffer F,
Drescher U
(1996)
Novel gene families involved in neural pathfinding.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
6:469-474[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Neugebauer KM,
Emmett CJ,
Venstrom KA,
Reichardt LF
(1991)
Vitronectin and thrombospondin promote retinal neurite outgrowth: developmental regulation and role of integrins.
Neuron
6:345-358[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nörenberg U,
Hubert M,
Brümmendorf T,
Tarnok A,
Rathjen FG
(1995)
Characterization of functional domains of the tenascin-R (restrictin) polypeptide-cell attachment site, binding with F11, and enhancement of F11-mediated neurite outgrowth by tenascin-R.
J Cell Biol
130:473-484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Otsuka AJ,
Franco R,
Yang B,
Shim KH,
Tang LZ,
Zhang YY,
Boontrakulpoontawee P,
Jeyaprakash A,
Hedgecock E,
Wheaton VI
(1995)
An ankyrin-related gene (unc-44) is necessary for proper axonal guidance in Caenorhabditis elegans.
J Cell Biol
129:1081-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Peles E,
Nativ M,
Campbell PL,
Sakurai T,
Martinez R,
Lev S,
Clary DO,
Schilling J,
Barnea G,
Plowman GD,
Grumet M,
Schlessinger J
(1995)
The carbonic anhydrase domain of receptor tyrosine phosphatase
is a functional ligand for the axonal cell recognition molecule contactin.
Cell
82:251-260[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Peles E,
Nativ M,
Lustig M,
Grumet M,
Schilling J,
Martinez R,
Plowman GD,
Schlessinger J
(1997)
Identification of a novel contactin-associated transmembrane receptor with multiple domains implicated in protein-protein interactions.
EMBO J
16:978-988[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Plagge A,
Brümmendorf T
(1997)
The gene of the neural cell recognition molecule F11: conserved exon-intron arrangement in genes of neural members of the immunoglobulin superfamily.
Gene
192:215-225[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Pollerberg GE,
Beck Sickinger A
(1993)
A functional role for the middle extracellular region of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in axonal fasciculation and orientation.
Dev Biol
156:324-340[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rader C,
Kunz B,
Lierheimer R,
Giger RJ,
Berger P,
Tittmann P,
Gross H,
Sonderegger P
(1996)
Implications for the domain arrangement of axonin-1 derived from the mapping of its NgCAM binding site.
EMBO J
15:2056-2068[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rager G,
Morino P,
Schnitzer J,
Sonderegger P
(1996)
Expression of the axonal cell adhesion molecules axonin-1 and Ng-CAM during the development of the chick retinotectal system.
J Comp Neurol
365:594-609[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rathjen FG,
Wolff JM,
Frank R,
Bonhoeffer F,
Rutishauser U
(1987)
Membrane glycoproteins involved in neurite fasciculation.
J Cell Biol
104:343-353[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Reichardt LF,
Tomaselli KJ
(1991)
Extracellular matrix molecules and their receptors: functions in neural development.
Annu Rev Neurosci
14:531-570[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Reichardt LF,
Bossy B,
de Curtis I,
Neugebauer KM,
Venstrom K,
Sretavan D
(1992)
Adhesive interactions that regulate development of the retina and primary visual projection.
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
57:419-429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sakurai T,
Lustig M,
Nativ M,
Hemperly JJ,
Schlessinger J,
Peles E,
Grumet M
(1997)
Induction of neurite outgrowth through contactin and Nr-CAM by extracellular regions of glial receptor tyrosine phosphatase
.
J Cell Biol
136:907-918[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Sanchez Aparicio P,
Dominguez Jimenez C,
Garcia Pardo A
(1994)
Activation of the
4 1 integrin through the 1 subunit induces recognition of the RGDS sequence in fibronectin.
J Cell Biol
126:271-279[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Schachner M,
Martini R
(1995)
Glycans and the modulation of neural-recognition molecule function.
Trends Neurosci
18:183-191[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sonderegger P,
Rathjen FG
(1992)
Regulation of axonal growth in the vertebrate nervous system by interactions between glycoproteins belonging to two subgroups of the immunoglobulin superfamily.
J Cell Biol
119:1387-1394[Free Full Text].
-
Spaltmann F,
Brümmendorf T
(1996)
CEPU-1, a novel immunoglobulin superfamily molecule is expressed by developing cerebellar Purkinje cells.
J Neurosci
16:1770-1779[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Stoeckli ET,
Landmesser L
(1995)
Axonin-1, Nr-CAM, and Ng-CAM play different roles in the in vivo guidance of chick commissural neurons.
Neuron
14:1165-1179[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stoeckli ET,
Ziegler U,
Bleiker AJ,
Groscurth P,
Sonderegger P
(1996)
Clustering and functional cooperation of Ng-CAM and axonin-1 in the substratum-contact area of growth cones.
Dev Biol
177:15-29[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stoker AW
(1996)
Axon guidance: motor-way madness.
Curr Biol
6:794-797[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Suter DM,
Pollerberg GE,
Buchstaller A,
Giger RJ,
Dreyer WJ,
Sonderegger P
(1995)
Binding between the neural cell adhesion molecules axonin-1 and Nr-CAM/Bravo is involved in neuron-glia interaction.
J Cell Biol
131:1067-1081[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Goodman CS
(1996)
The molecular biology of axon guidance.
Science
274:1123-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Thompson JM,
Pelto DJ
(1982)
Attachment, survival and neurite extension of chick embryo retinal neurons on various culture substrates.
Dev Neurosci
5:447-457[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Volkmer H,
Leuschner R,
Zacharias U,
Rathjen FG
(1996)
Neurofascin induces neurites by heterophilic interactions with axonal NrCAM while NrCAM requires F11 on the axonal surface to extend neurites.
J Cell Biol
135:1059-1069[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wadsworth WG,
Hedgecock EM
(1996)
Hierarchical guidance cues in the developing nervous system of C. elegans.
BioEssays
18:355-362[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Warr GW,
Magor KE,
Higgins DA
(1995)
IgY: Clues to the origins of modern antibodies.
Immunol Today
16:392-398[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wolff JM,
Rathjen FG,
Frank R,
Roth S
(1987)
Biochemical characterization of polypeptide components involved in neurite fasciculation and elongation.
Eur J Biochem
168:551-561[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 1998 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/98/1851795-11$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Laursen, C. W. Chan, and C. ffrench-Constant
An Integrin-Contactin Complex Regulates CNS Myelination by Differential Fyn Phosphorylation
J. Neurosci.,
July 22, 2009;
29(29):
9174 - 9185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Zelina, H. X. Avci, K. Thelen, and G. E. Pollerberg
The cell adhesion molecule NrCAM is crucial for growth cone behaviour and pathfinding of retinal ganglion cell axons
Development,
August 15, 2005;
132(16):
3609 - 3618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Ivins, M. K. Parry, and D. A. Long
A Novel cAMP-Dependent Pathway Activates Neuronal Integrin Function in Retinal Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
February 4, 2004;
24(5):
1212 - 1216.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Buhusi, B. R. Midkiff, A. M. Gates, M. Richter, M. Schachner, and P. F. Maness
Close Homolog of L1 Is an Enhancer of Integrin-mediated Cell Migration
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 27, 2003;
278(27):
25024 - 25031.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Buttner, C. Kannicht, C. Schmidt, K. Loster, W. Reutter, H.-Y. Lee, S. Nohring, and R. Horstkorte
Biochemical Engineering of Cell Surface Sialic Acids Stimulates Axonal Growth
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 2002;
22(20):
8869 - 8875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Thelen, V. Kedar, A. K. Panicker, R.-S. Schmid, B. R. Midkiff, and P. F. Maness
The Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1 Potentiates Integrin-Dependent Cell Migration to Extracellular Matrix Proteins
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2002;
22(12):
4918 - 4931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Vogelezang, Z. Liu, J. B. Relvas, G. Raivich, S. S. Scherer, and C. ffrench-Constant
{alpha}4 Integrin Is Expressed during Peripheral Nerve Regeneration and Enhances Neurite Outgrowth
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 2001;
21(17):
6732 - 6744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Werner, M. Willem, L. L. Jones, G. W. Kreutzberg, U. Mayer, and G. Raivich
Impaired Axonal Regeneration in alpha 7 Integrin-Deficient Mice
J. Neurosci.,
March 1, 2000;
20(5):
1822 - 1830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Marg, P. Sirim, F. Spaltmann, A. Plagge, G. Kauselmann, F. Buck, F. G. Rathjen, and T. Brummendorf
Neurotractin, A Novel Neurite Outgrowth-promoting Ig-like Protein that Interacts with CEPU-1 and LAMP
J. Cell Biol.,
May 17, 1999;
145(4):
865 - 876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Gruenbaum and T. J. Carew
Growth Factor Modulation of Substrate-Specific Morphological Patterns in Aplysia Bag Cell Neurons
Learn. Mem.,
May 1, 1999;
6(3):
292 - 306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Hoang and A. Chiba
Genetic Analysis on the Role of Integrin during Axon Guidance in Drosophila
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 1998;
18(19):
7847 - 7855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Volkmer, U. Zacharias, U. Norenberg, and F. G. Rathjen
Dissection of Complex Molecular Interactions of Neurofascin with Axonin-1, F11, and Tenascin-R, Which Promote Attachment and Neurite Formation of Tectal Cells
J. Cell Biol.,
August 24, 1998;
142(4):
1083 - 1093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. De Angelis, T. Brummendorf, L. Cheng, V. Lemmon, and S. Kenwrick
Alternative Use of a Mini Exon of the L1 Gene Affects L1 Binding to Neural Ligands
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 24, 2001;
276(35):
32738 - 32742.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|