 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 1, 1999, 19(15):6417-6426
Local Presentation of Substrate Molecules Directs Axon Specification by Cultured Hippocampal Neurons
Teresa Esch1, Vance Lemmon2, and Gary Banker3 1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, 2 Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4975, and 3 Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201-3098
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Axon specification is a crucial, early step in neuronal development, but little is known about how this event is controlled in vivo. To test the hypothesis that local presentation of growth-promoting molecules can direct axon specification, we cultured hippocampal neurons on substrates patterned with stripes of poly-L-lysine and either laminin (LN) or the neuron-glia cell adhesion molecule (NgCAM). Although undifferentiated neurites contacted both substrates equally, axons formed preferentially on LN or NgCAM. Time-lapse studies revealed that changes in the growth pattern of a cell indicative of axon specification began almost immediately after the growth cone of one of the neurites of the cell contacted LN or NgCAM. When cells were plated on alternating stripes of LN and NgCAM, cells with their somata on LN usually formed axons on NgCAM, whereas those with somata on NgCAM preferentially formed axons on LN. This suggests that the change from one axon-promoting substrate to another also provides a signal sufficient to specify the axon. These results demonstrate that contact with preferred substrate molecules can govern which neurite becomes the axon and thus direct the development of neuronal polarity.
Key words: neuronal development; polarity; NgCAM; laminin; axonal specification; hippocampal cultures
INTRODUCTION
Neurons must develop highly complex forms with morphologically and molecularly distinct axons and dendrites. The development of this polarity, which is crucial for nearly every aspect of neuronal function, generally begins with the formation of the axon. Although many studies have examined the cellular mechanisms that mediate axonal extension and guidance (for review, see Tanaka and Sabry, 1995
; Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996
The initial stages of axon development have been studied in greatest detail in cell cultures of hippocampal neurons from embryonic rats. When neurites first form, they cannot be distinguished as either axons or dendrites (Dotti et al., 1988
In a model proposed by Goslin and Banker (1989)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Substrate proteins and antibodies
Mouse LN (from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm sarcoma) was obtained from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Poly-L-lysine (molecular weight, 30,000-70,000), protamine sulfate, and rabbit anti-tubulin were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Fluorescein-conjugated bovine serum albumin (BSA) was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Rabbit anti-LN was obtained from Telios Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA). NgCAM was purified from chick brains, using an affinity column conjugated with 8D9 antibodies (Lemmon and McLoon, 1986Substrate preparation
Silicon matrix. Coverslips were patterned with alternating stripes of two substrates, using a silicon matrix obtained from Juergen Jung (Max-Planck Institut, Tubingen, Germany), as described by Vielmetter et al. (1990)Procedure
PLL/LN stripes. Acid-washed glass coverslips were incubated overnight in 1 mg/ml PLL in borate buffer at room temperature. Coverslips were rinsed several times with water, air-dried, and inverted onto the silicon matrix. Fluorescein-conjugated BSA (2% in PBS) was injected into the channels and incubated for 2 hr at 37°C to block possible LN binding sites. The channels were rinsed three to four times by injecting PBS, after which the coverslips were removed and rinsed two times in water. LN (25 µg/ml in PBS) was applied to the entire coverslip and incubated for 2 hr at 37°C. Under these conditions the laminin bound in stripes between the BSA-treated lanes. Coverslips were rinsed three times in water and placed in Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) containing 10% horse serum for plating. In some cases, instead of applying LN to the entire coverslip, we injected LN (100 µg/ml in PBS) into the channels and incubated the coverslips for 2 hr at 37°C before injecting fluorescein-conjugated BSA. Comparable results were obtained with both methods. PLL/NgCAM stripes. Acid-washed glass coverslips were incubated overnight in 1% protamine sulfate in water at 37°C. The coverslips were rinsed several times with water, air-dried, and inverted onto the silicon matrix. PLL (1 mg/ml in borate buffer) was injected into the matrix channels and incubated for 2 hr at 37°C. Then fluorescein-conjugated BSA (2% in PBS) was injected into the channels and incubated for 1.5 hr at 37°C to block possible NgCAM binding sites. This step was repeated once. Next the channels were rinsed three to four times by injecting PBS, after which the coverslips were removed and rinsed two times in water. NgCAM (50 µg/ml in PBS) was applied to the entire coverslip and incubated for 2 hr at 37°C. Coverslips were rinsed three times in water and placed in MEM with 10% horse serum for plating. LN/NgCAM stripes. Acid-washed glass coverslips were incubated overnight in 1% protamine sulfate in water at 37°C. Coverslips were rinsed several times with water, air-dried, and inverted onto the silicon matrix. LN (100 µg/ml in PBS) was injected into the matrix channels and incubated for 2 hr at 37°C. Then fluorescein-conjugated BSA (2% in PBS) was injected into the channels, and the coverslips were treated in the same manner as described above for PLL/NgCAM stripes. In our experience LN/NgCAM stripes were more difficult to produce reliably than either PLL/LN or PLL/NgCAM stripes. Borders between LN and NgCAM were not always crisp, and blocking was sometimes incomplete so that NgCAM bound in the same regions as LN. In some regions there appeared to be a buildup of material at the borders between lanes that prevented neurites from crossing. These problems should not affect our results, however, because for all substrate combinations we included data only from regions of the coverslip where the lanes were crisp (based on immunostaining at the end of the experiment) and only counted cells that had at least one neurite that crossed a border.Cell culture
Hippocampal cultures were prepared as described previously (Goslin et al., 1998Analysis of fixed cells
Immunofluorescence microscopy. Approximately 24 hr after plating the cells were fixed for 20-30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS containing 4% sucrose, permeabilized in 0.25% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and rinsed several times in PBS. Coverslips were blocked with 10% BSA in PBS for 1 hr at 37°C and then incubated with either anti-tubulin (1:200) or tau-1 (1:100) and either anti-LN (1:200) or anti-NgCAM (1:500) antibodies (in 3% BSA/PBS) for 1 hr at 37°C or overnight at 4°C. Coverslips were rinsed three times (15 min each) with PBS and incubated with Cascade Blue- and rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:600 each) for 1 hr at 37°C. Coverslips again were rinsed three times (for 15 min each) with PBS, rinsed briefly in water, and then mounted on glass slides in a polyvinyl alcohol-based mounting medium containing 2% diazobicyclo-octane. Fluorescence images were acquired with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope, a Photometrics AT-200 cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, and Metamorph image analysis software (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA). Cell and substrate images were superimposed with Metamorph so that the position of cells could be visualized in relation to stripes. Data analysis. Only cells that had at least one growth cone contacting each substrate were analyzed. Because fixed cells were examined only after axons had formed, it was necessary to use these images to estimate the position of growth cones at the time of axon formation. Because the length of minor processes that do not become the axon changes little over the first 24 hr in culture, we used the position of their growth cones at 24 hr as an estimate of their position at the time of axon formation. The position of the axon growth cone at the time of axon initiation was taken to be at a position along the axon 35 µm from its base. This estimate was based on previous time-lapse studies of neurons growing on uniform PLL substrates, which show that the position of neurites does not change after the axon forms and that the transition from a minor process to an axon appears to occur when the minor process is ~35 µm long (J. Cooper and G. Banker, unpublished observations). Although this approach is not exact, the errors should be equal for each substrate and therefore should cancel each other. Time-lapse studies of neurons growing on striped substrates confirmed the validity of these estimates. Of 77 cells recorded on striped substrates before and after axon initiation, only three shifted position. In all three cases the soma migrated from the middle of the PLL stripe to overlap the LN border after the axon had formed on LN, a change that would not have altered our conclusions if the cells had been examined only after 24 hr. Of 125 minor processes that were recorded continuously for many hours, only 13 would have been miscounted if they had been examined only at the end of the recording. Because approximately the same number of processes crossed onto LN or NgCAM as crossed onto PLL, the distribution measured after 24 hr would not have been significantly different from the distribution at the time of axon formation. The2 test was used to compare the distribution of minor process growth cones (including the process that became the axon) on each substrate with the distribution of axons on each substrate. Results are based on three experiments for cells grown on PLL/LN stripes, two experiments on PLL/NgCAM stripes, and six experiments on LN/NgCAM stripes.
Time-lapse studies
Video microscopy. Approximately 5 hr after plating the neuronal coverslips were sealed in a recording chamber containing 400 µl of glial-conditioned medium and placed on a Zeiss IM-35 inverted microscope equipped with a heated stage driven by a Centroid motor controller. Cells were visualized with phase-contrast optics, and stripes were visualized by fluorescence (using fluorescent BSA to mark the lanes as described above). Of the cells, 8-12 were selected for recording, and phase-contrast images of each cell were collected every 5 min for 12-18 hr, using a Neuvicon video camera and Image-1 software (Universal Imaging). Images were stored on an optical memory disk recorder (OMDR). At the beginning and end of the recording session, a combined phase-contrast and fluorescence image of each cell also was recorded with a silicon-intensified target (SIT) camera to view positions of cells relative to the stripes. At the end of the recording the coverslips were fixed and stained with antibodies against tubulin and either LN or NgCAM, as described above, to assess the quality of the stripes. Cells were not analyzed if substrate borders were not well defined. Data analysis. All isolated cells that formed a single axon and had at least one process that had crossed from PLL onto LN or NgCAM during the recording session were analyzed. For each 5 min interval starting ~3 hr before and continuing ~3 hr after axon formation, the length of every process was measured with Image-1 software. The length was traced from the base of the process to the center of the growth cone. To determine the position of each growth cone relative to the stripes, we compared the x-y coordinates of the center of the growth cone with the x-y coordinates of the stripes on fluorescence images. To correct for shifts in stage position between frames, we also tracked the position of a stationary object on the substrate. The length of each process and the position of its growth cone were plotted over time and compared with the location of the stripes.
RESULTS
Local contact with LN or NgCAM can define neuronal polarity
To determine whether local contact with substrates that accelerate axon growth can direct axon formation, we grew dissociated hippocampal neurons on coverslips patterned with alternating stripes of LN and PLL. When neurons developed for 24 hr on these substrates, the axons almost always originated from processes that contacted LN (Fig. 1A-C). In cells that had their somata on PLL (Fig. 1A,C), the axon usually developed from a neurite that crossed onto LN within 30-40 µm of its base. In some cases the axons crossed back onto PLL after traversing the LN stripe, but in others the axonal growth was restricted mainly to LN. In cells with their somata on LN (Fig. 1B), most axons grew on LN for their entire length.
View larger version (75K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. When hippocampal neurons are grown on striped substrates, axons form predominantly on one substrate. Neurons were cultured on substrates patterned with alternating stripes of PLL and LN (A-C) or PLL and NgCAM (D-F). When they were examined after 24 hr in culture, minor process growth cones (arrowheads) were positioned on both substrates, but axons (arrows) almost always formed on LN or NgCAM. Neurons were immunolabeled for tubulin, and the patterns were revealed by immunostaining for either LN or NgCAM so that PLL appears dark and LN or NgCAM appears light. Fluorescent images of neurons and stripes were superimposed. Scale bar, 25 µm.
Interpretation of these results is based on the assumption that neurons fell randomly when plated on the patterned substrates and that minor processes contacted each substrate with equal probability. We found that 56% of neuronal somata attached to PLL, and 44% were on LN; this is the distribution expected, because the PLL stripes were 45 µm wide whereas the LN stripes were 35 µm wide. We found that 63% of processes contacted PLL. To quantify the ability of LN to induce axon formation, we compared the percentage of processes contacting each substrate with the percentage of axons that formed on each substrate.
We found that most axons formed on LN despite the fact that slightly more minor processes had their growth cones on PLL at the time of axon specification (Fig. 2A). Specifically, whereas only 37% of minor process growth cones were determined to be on LN at the time of axon formation, 82% of axons formed from these minor processes (
View larger version (16K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Quantification of the effects of LN and NgCAM on axon formation. The percentage of all processes and of axons that formed on each substrate was determined after 24 hr in culture. A, Distribution of processes on PLL/LN stripes. B, Distribution of processes on PLL/NgCAM stripes. If axons formed equally well on both substrates, the percentage of all processes and the percentage of axons on each substrate would be equal. Instead, most of the axons formed from a process in which the growth cone contacted LN (
Local contact with NgCAM also stimulates axon formation. In neurons grown on alternating stripes of PLL and NgCAM, the axons were restricted almost entirely to NgCAM (see Fig. 1D-F). Statistical analyses confirmed that the majority of axons formed from processes that contacted NgCAM (Fig. 2B). Although 40% of minor processes growth cones were calculated to be on NgCAM at the time of axon formation, 91% of axons formed from these processes (
In some experiments, tau-1 immunostaining was used to confirm that axons identified by morphological criteria also exhibited the expected molecular characteristics (Fig. 3). Tau-1 labeling was present in axons, primarily in their distal portions, and was absent from minor processes. This was true even in short axons that had grown only the width of the LN stripe (Fig. 3A,B).
View larger version (50K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Neurons that develop on striped substrates appropriately polarize marker proteins. Cells were fixed ~24 hr after plating and were double-immunolabeled for tau-1 and LN. A, C, Combined phase/fluorescence images showing cells positioned on stripes (LN is light). B, D, Tau-1 immunofluorescence. Tau-1 labeling is concentrated in the nascent axon (arrows) and absent from the minor processes (arrowheads) even in axons as short as 55 µm (A, B).
LN/NgCAM stripes
The experiments described thus far indicate that local contact with an axon-promoting substrate can influence which of a cell's neurites goes on to become the axon. We next asked whether LN or NgCAM would prove dominant in specifying the axon if cells were grown on alternating stripes of these axon-promoting substrates; alternatively, would axons show no preference but rather form with equal probability on both substrates? The results of this experiment, shown in Figure 4, were inconsistent with either prediction. In the case of cells that had their somata on LN, axons formed preferentially on NgCAM, whereas cells with their somata on NgCAM formed axons predominantly on LN. This suggests that both substrates were approximately equal in their growth-promoting abilities and that growth from one axon-promoting substrate to another was a more potent stimulus for axon specification than continuous growth on a single substrate.
View larger version (20K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Axon specification on stripes of LN/NgCAM depends on soma position. The percentage of all processes and of axons that formed on each substrate was determined after 24 hr in culture. A, Distribution of processes for cells with somata on LN. Most axons formed from a process for which the growth cone contacted NgCAM (Ng) (
Contact with the preferred substrate rapidly induces axonal growth
To investigate the changes that occur when a growth cone contacts LN, we examined neurons growing on striped substrates, using time-lapse video microscopy. Images were recorded at 5 min intervals for 10-16 hr, beginning 6-8 hr after plating. Because filopodial contact with LN could not be measured reliably with phase optics, we considered contact to occur when the central region of the growth cone crossed the border between PLL and LN.
When a single minor process of a neuron growing on PLL crossed onto LN, that process almost always became the axon of the cell (9 of 11 cells). A representative cell is illustrated in Figure 5. Initially, all of the processes of the cell were on PLL (Fig. 5A) and had a similar growth pattern, exhibiting alternating periods of growth and partial retraction (Fig. 5E). When one process grew enough to cross onto the LN stripe, its growth pattern changed (Fig. 5B,C): the process grew rapidly and without significant retraction for an extended period of time (Fig. 5E). Such extended growth is characteristic only of axons in these cultures (Dotti et al., 1988
View larger version (58K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Time-lapse images showing axon formation after contact with LN. A-D, Phase micrographs photographically lightened in regions corresponding to the LN stripes. E, Length of processes over time. All minor process growth cones were on PLL at the beginning of the recording (A, E). Immediately after the growth cone of one process (P1) crossed onto LN (B), the process grew rapidly across the stripe (C, E). On reaching the far side of LN, the growth of P1 slowed (E), but ultimately it grew across the PLL stripe and acquired a length characteristic of axons (D). In E, the letters correspond to the frames depicted in A-D; open circles represent growth cone contact with PLL, black circles represent growth cone contact with LN, and black hourglasses represent growth cone contact with a border between two substrates. Scale bar, 25 µm.
An immediate increase in growth rate typically occurred when the growth cone of a neurite crossed onto LN. On average, the growth rate increased from 12.9 µm/hr in the 15 min before the cross to 48.3 µm/hr in the 15 min after the cross (n = 9; p < 0.005). In most cases the increase in growth rate was sustained for at least 1 hr; regression analysis showed that the rate increased from 11.4 µm/hr for the 1 hr before encountering LN to 35.1 µm/hr for the 1 hr after crossing onto LN (n = 9; p < 0.05). These results suggest that, when a growth cone crosses onto LN, it immediately begins the transition into an axon.
Although only one process contacted LN, this interaction induced a change in the behavior of the entire cell (Fig. 6). The other processes of the cell, which had been exhibiting a slow net growth, now exhibited an overall retraction. The moment the first process contacted LN can be seen as an inflection both in the rate of the growing axon and in the total growth of the remaining processes. In cells growing on uniform substrates of PLL, LN, or NgCAM, such a retraction of minor processes is among the first indications that the polarity of a cell has been defined (T. Esch, J. Cooper, and G. Banker, unpublished observations). Thus, when a growth cone contacts LN, this rapidly initiates a shift toward polarity that involves the cell as a whole.
View larger version (18K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 6. When a process contacts LN, its growth rapidly increases, whereas the growth of the remaining processes decreases. This plot compares the length of the contacting process (the axon, filled squares) with the total length of the remaining minor processes (open squares). Before contact with LN all processes exhibit the same pattern of growth. Once a single growth cone crosses onto a LN stripe, the overall behavior of the neuron changes and growth is directed primarily to the axon. Measurements from different cells (n = 9) were aligned to the time point when the process first contacted LN (time 0). Regression lines (solid lines) show the predicted trajectory if growth had continued at the same rate as before contact with LN.
After rapidly growing processes contacted the far side of a LN stripe and encountered PLL, they exhibited a range of behaviors. Typically, growth slowed or stopped temporarily. In the cell illustrated in Figure 5 the pause lasted ~30 min (see Fig. 5E, at ~13.5 hr); in others it lasted as long as several hours. When growth resumed, sometimes the process continued growing across PLL (see Fig. 5D); sometimes the process turned and continued growing on LN; and sometimes the original process remained stalled, but a branch formed proximally and grew along the LN stripe.
Although contact with LN induced rapid growth in all cases, in two of the 11 cells observed the first process that crossed onto LN did not become the axon. Instead, when the process approached the far border with PLL, it retracted to within a few micrometers of its initial length. Eventually, a process that was growing on PLL became the axon. These results suggest that, although LN initiates the transition of a minor process into the axon, the process is not always maintained as the axon if its growth is interrupted.
When multiple growing processes contacted LN at approximately the same time, a competition between them ensued that continued for an extended period. A cell representative of the six cases we observed is illustrated in Figure 7. Two processes contacted LN within a 20 min period (Fig. 7B). One of these processes (Fig. 7, P1) exhibited several periods of rapid growth followed by retractions, but the growth cones of both processes remained near the PLL/LN border for ~4 hr. Eventually, one process grew to become the axon of the cell (Fig. 7E). In the six cells that were examined, contact with LN initiated an average increase in rate of growth from 6.2 µm/hr in the 15 min before the cross to 23.2 µm/hr in the 15 min after the cross (p < 0.01), but in most cases this growth was not sustained. In all cases, however, one of the processes contacting LN eventually entered a period of sustained growth and became the axon of the cell. Thus when two or more neurites contact LN simultaneously, one of them usually becomes the axon, but the transition is delayed as compared with cases in which a single process crosses onto LN.
View larger version (44K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 7. When two or more processes contact LN at approximately the same time, axon formation is delayed. A-E, Phase micrographs photographically lightened in regions corresponding to the LN stripes. F, Length of the two processes that contacted LN. Initially, all processes were on PLL (A). Processes grew and retracted for 3-4 hr (F) before two processes (P1, P2) contacted LN within a 20 min period (B, F). Both processes retracted until their growth cones were again on PLL (C). Over the next 4 hr both processes grew and retracted but did not extend far onto LN (D, F). Eventually P2 developed into the axon (E). In F, the letters correspond to the frames depicted in A-E; open circles represent growth cone contact with PLL, black circles represent growth cone contact with LN, and black hourglasses represent growth cone contact with a border between two substrates. Scale bar, 25 µm.
Contact with NgCAM directed axon formation in a manner similar to that with LN (based on observations of eight cells). In most cases, when a process crossed from PLL to NgCAM, there was an immediate increase in growth rate (data not shown). On average, the rate of growth increased from 8.9 ± 1.9 µm/hr in the 15 min before to 28.8 ± 4.1 µm/hr in the 15 min after a process crossed from PLL onto NgCAM (n = 12; p < 0.001). When multiple processes contacted NgCAM, the accelerated growth was not always sustained, but in seven of eight cells the axon ultimately formed from a process growing on NgCAM.
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that any of the neurites that initially develop from cultured hippocampal neurons are capable of becoming axons and that local extracellular signals can direct axon specification. To address these questions, we cultured neurons on coverslips patterned with alternating stripes of different substrate proteins. When an unspecified neurite crossed from PLL onto either LN or NgCAM, it frequently entered an extended period of growth and became the axon of the cell. Time-lapse analysis revealed that changes in the pattern of cell growth began almost immediately after one of its growth cones contacted the preferred substrate. These results suggest that novel contact with either of two substrate molecules from widely disparate protein families can cause a neurite for which the identity is not yet specified to become an axon and thereby determine the polarity of the cell.
Specification of the axon is a fundamental step in neuronal development, yet remarkably little is known about the factors that govern this event in vivo. Paralleling the behavior of cultured neurons (Dotti et al., 1988
Contact with a preferred substrate induces a rapid increase in the rate of neurite growth
When the growth cone of a neurite first contacts LN or NgCAM, that process immediately begins to grow. This implies that contact with a preferred substrate must initiate a series of events that ultimately lead to selective elongation and stabilization of microtubules in the neurite (Lin et al., 1994
The signaling events that are initiated when a process first encounters a favorable substrate may be greater than those that occur during continuous growth on that substrate. When neurites growing on PLL cross onto LN and become axons, their initial rate of growth is more rapid than that of axons that form on uniform LN substrates (48 vs 27 µm/hr; our unpublished observations). Moreover, on some substrate combinations the axons formed preferentially from those neurites that encountered a novel substrate. When cells were grown on stripes of LN and NgCAM, cells that had their somata on LN preferentially formed axons on NgCAM, and cells with their somata on NgCAM formed axons preferentially on LN. On stripes of PLL and LN the preference for axons to form on LN was greater when the soma was on PLL than when the soma was on LN. Perhaps the concentration of receptors for substrate molecules is downregulated after extended growth. For example, Condic and Letourneau (1997)
Local signals initiated at a single growth cone lead to global changes in neurite growth
When an unspecified neurite contacts a preferred substrate, this leads not only to its own elongation but also to a reduction in the growth rate of the other processes of the cell, often resulting in their net retraction. A similar phenomenon has been observed in cultures of Xenopus spinal neurons: application of cAMP to a single growth cone, which enhances its rate of elongation, also inhibits the growth of the other neurites of the cell (Zheng et al., 1994
We observed two circumstances in which contact with the preferred substrate was not sufficient to initiate the establishment of polarity. When two processes contacted LN at approximately the same time, both continued to grow and retract for some time, as if competing to become the axon. This suggests that, to specify neuronal polarity, the signal generated by contact with a preferred substrate must be restricted to a single neurite or must be significantly greater in one neurite than in the others. In some instances the process that first contacted LN did not become the axon if it stalled or retracted when it reached the far side of the LN stripe. This suggests that the signal generated when a growth cone contacts the preferred substrate must be sustained for some time to lead to axon specification. The requirement for a unique, sustained signal could serve as a control to prevent the formation of multiple axons and to correct errors if the axon began to form in the wrong direction.
What is the instruction that specifies neuronal polarity?
On the basis of an analysis of the consequences of transecting the axon at different distances from the soma, Goslin and Banker (1989)
The answer to this question may have important implications for the mechanisms that specify neuronal polarity in vivo. It is not known whether neurons in situ exhibit the overt competition between neurites that is observed in culture, but the underlying mechanisms that prevent neurons from forming more than a single axon may be similar in both situations. In situ, axons consistently arise from a given pole of the cell (relative to the overall organization of the tissue). In the case of hippocampal neurons, for example, axons arise from the basilar aspect of the soma. If differentiation of the axon requires a specific signal, there may be a separate, novel class of extracellular molecules for which the function is to govern the development of neuronal polarity. Alternatively, if specification of the axon is simply a function of differential growth, then any molecule that enhanced or inhibited neurite growth could, if differentially distributed, bias the rate of outgrowth from different poles of the cell and hence govern where the axon emerged. Many of the known molecules that guide growing axons, including the netrins and semaphorins, exhibit just these properties (for review, see Cook et al., 1998
Our findings also may be of value for future studies of axonal specification in vitro. In previous investigations the inability to identify the nascent axon until polarity was already fully established has made it extremely difficult to study the events that lead to the specification of polarity. The ability to control which minor process develops into the axon via the use of localized substrate-bound cues offers an important new approach to investigate the mechanisms underlying this key event in neuronal development.
FOOTNOTES Received Jan. 21, 1999; revised May 10, 1999; accepted May 21, 1999.
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS17112 (G.B.) and EY5285 (V.L.). Teresa Esch was supported in part by a predoctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation. We thank Hannelore Asmussen for preparation of the neuronal cultures and Ginger Withers, Chris Wallace, and Michelle Burack for helpful comments on this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Gary Banker, Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L606, Portland, OR 97201-3098.
Dr. Esch's present address: Biology Department, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0357.
REFERENCES
- Bixby JL (1989) Protein kinase C is involved in laminin stimulation of neurite outgrowth. Neuron 3:287-297[Web of Science][Medline].
- Bixby JL, Grunwald GB, Bookman RJ (1994) Ca2+ influx and neurite growth in response to purified N-cadherin and laminin. J Cell Biol 127:1461-1475
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Bottenstein JE (1985) Growth and differentiation of neural cells in defined media. In: Cell culture in the neurosciences (Bottenstein JE, Sato G, eds), pp 3-44. New York: Plenum.
- Bottenstein JE, Sato GH (1979) Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:514-517
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Bradke F, Dotti CG (1999) The role of local actin instability in axon formation. Science 283:1931-1934
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Brittis PA, Silver J (1995) Multiple factors govern intraretinal axon guidance: a time-lapse study. Mol Cell Neurosci 6:413-432[Web of Science][Medline].
- Burden-Gulley SM, Lemmon V (1996) L1, N-cadherin, and laminin induce distinct distribution patterns of cytoskeletal elements in growth cones. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 35:1-23[Web of Science][Medline].
- Condic ML, Letourneau PC (1997) Ligand-induced changes in integrin expression regulate neuronal adhesion and neurite outgrowth. Nature 389:852-856[Medline].
- Cook G, Tannahill D, Keynes R (1998) Axon guidance to and from choice points. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:64-72[Web of Science][Medline].
- Davis JQ, Bennett V (1994) Ankyrin binding activity shared by the neurofascin/L1/NrCAM family of nervous system cell adhesion molecules. J Biol Chem 269:27163-27166
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Davis JQ, McLaughlin T, Bennett V (1993) Ankyrin-binding proteins related to nervous system cell adhesion molecules: candidates to provide transmembrane and intercellular connections in adult brain. J Cell Biol 121:121-133
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Dotti CG, Banker GA (1987) Experimentally induced alteration in the polarity of developing neurons. Nature 330:254-256[Medline].
- Dotti CG, Sullivan CA, Banker GA (1988) The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci 8:1454-1468[Abstract].
- Futerman AH, Banker GA (1996) The economics of neurite outgrowth
the addition of new membrane to growing axons. Trends Neurosci 19:144-149[Web of Science][Medline].
- Goslin K, Banker G (1989) Experimental observations on the development of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J Cell Biol 108:1507-1516
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Goslin K, Banker G (1990) Rapid changes in the distribution of GAP-43 correlate with the expression of neuronal polarity during normal development and under experimental conditions. J Cell Biol 110:1319-1331
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Goslin K, Schreyer DJ, Skene JH, Banker G (1990) Changes in the distribution of GAP-43 during the development of neuronal polarity. J Neurosci 10:588-602[Abstract].
- Goslin K, Asmussen H, Banker G (1998) Rat hippocampal neurons in low density culture. In: Culturing nerve cells (Banker G, Goslin K, eds), pp 339-370. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Ignelzi Jr MA, Miller DR, Soriano P, Maness PF (1994) Impaired neurite outgrowth of src
cerebellar neurons on the cell adhesion molecule L1. Neuron 12:873-884[Web of Science][Medline].
- Jareb M, Banker G (1997) Inhibition of axonal growth by brefeldin A in hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci 17:8955-8963
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Kamiguchi H, Long KE, Pendergast M, Schaefer AW, Rapoport I, Kirchhausen T, Lemmon V (1998) The neural cell adhesion molecule L1 interacts with the AP-2 adaptor and is endocytosed via the clathrin-mediated pathway. J Neurosci 18:5311-5321
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Klinz SG, Schachner M, Maness PF (1995) L1 and N-CAM antibodies trigger protein phosphatase activity in growth cone-enriched membranes. J Neurochem 65:84-95[Web of Science][Medline].
- Kuhn TB, Schmidt MF, Kater SB (1995) Laminin and fibronectin guideposts signal sustained but opposite effects to passing growth cones. Neuron 14:275-285[Web of Science][Medline].
- Kuhn TB, Williams CV, Dou P, Kater SB (1998) Laminin directs growth cone navigation via two temporally and functionally distinct calcium signals. J Neurosci 18:184-194
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Kunz S, Ziegler U, Kunz B, Sonderegger P (1996) Intracellular signaling is changed after clustering of the neural cell adhesion molecules axonin-1 and NgCAM during neurite fasciculation. J Cell Biol 135:253-267
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Lafont F, Rouget M, Triller A, Prochiantz A, Rousselet A (1992) In vitro control of neuronal polarity by glycosaminoglycans. Development 114:17-29[Abstract].
- Lein PJ, Banker GA, Higgins D (1992) Laminin selectively enhances axonal growth and accelerates the development of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 69:191-197[Medline].
- Lein P, Johnson M, Guo X, Rueger D, Higgins D (1995) Osteogenic protein-1 induces dendritic growth in rat sympathetic neurons. Neuron 15:597-605[Web of Science][Medline].
- Lemmon V, McLoon SC (1986) The appearance of an L1-like molecule in the chick primary visual pathway. J Neurosci 6:2987-2994[Abstract].
- Lin CH, Thompson CA, Forscher P (1994) Cytoskeletal reorganization underlying growth cone motility. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:640-647[Medline].
- Lochter A, Schachner M (1993) Tenascin and extracellular matrix glycoproteins: from promotion to polarization of neurite growth in vitro. J Neurosci 13:3986-4000[Abstract].
- Mandell JW, Banker GA (1996) A spatial gradient of tau protein phosphorylation in nascent axons. J Neurosci 16:5727-5740
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- McKerracher L, Chamoux M, Arregui CO (1996) Role of laminin and integrin interactions in growth cone guidance. Mol Neurobiol 12:95-116[Web of Science][Medline].
- Polleux F, Giger RJ, Ginty DD, Kolodkin AL, Ghosh A (1998) Patterning of cortical efferent projections by semaphorin-neuropilin interactions. Science 282:1904-1906
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Rivas RJ, Burmeister DW, Goldberg DJ (1992) Rapid effects of laminin on the growth cone. Neuron 8:107-115[Web of Science][Medline].
- Suter DM, Forscher P (1998) An emerging link between cytoskeletal dynamics and cell adhesion molecules in growth cone guidance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:106-116[Web of Science][Medline].
- Tanaka E, Sabry J (1995) Making the connection: cytoskeletal rearrangements during growth cone guidance. Cell 83:171-176[Web of Science][Medline].
- Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS (1996) The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274:1123-1133
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- van den Pol AN, Kim WT (1993) NILE/L1 and NCAM-polysialic acid expression on growing axons of isolated neurons. J Comp Neurol 332:237-257[Web of Science][Medline].
- Vielmetter J, Stolze B, Bonhoeffer F, Stuermer CA (1990) In vitro assay to test differential substrate affinities of growing axons and migratory cells. Exp Brain Res 81:283-287[Web of Science][Medline].
- Williams EJ, Doherty P, Turner G, Reid RA, Hemperly JJ, Walsh FS (1992) Calcium influx into neurons can solely account for cell contact-dependent neurite outgrowth stimulated by transfected L1. J Cell Biol 119:883-892
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Williams EJ, Mittal B, Walsh FS, Doherty P (1995) A Ca2+/calmodulin kinase inhibitor, KN-62, inhibits neurite outgrowth stimulated by CAMs and FGF. Mol Cell Neurosci 6:69-79[Web of Science][Medline].
- Zheng JQ, Zheng Z, Poo M (1994) Long-range signaling in growing neurons after local elevation of cyclic AMP-dependent activity. J Cell Biol 127:1693-1701
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/19156417-10$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
S. Tahirovic and F. Bradke
Neuronal Polarity
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, September 1, 2009; 1(3): a001644 - a001644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. E. Cosker, S. Shadan, M. van Diepen, C. Morgan, M. Li, V. Allen-Baume, C. Hobbs, P. Doherty, S. Cockcroft, and B. J. Eickholt
Regulation of PI3K signalling by the phosphatidylinositol transfer protein PITP{alpha} during axonal extension in hippocampal neurons
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2008; 121(6): 796 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
F. Calderon de Anda, A. Gartner, L.-H. Tsai, and C. G. Dotti
Pyramidal neuron polarity axis is defined at the bipolar stage
J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2008; 121(2): 178 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. W. Grabham, G. E. Seale, M. Bennecib, D. J. Goldberg, and R. B. Vallee
Cytoplasmic Dynein and LIS1 Are Required for Microtubule Advance during Growth Cone Remodeling and Fast Axonal Outgrowth
J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5823 - 5834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. Gomez, S. Chen, and C. E Schmidt
Polarization of hippocampal neurons with competitive surface stimuli: contact guidance cues are preferred over chemical ligands
J R Soc Interface, April 22, 2007; 4(13): 223 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
I. Oinuma, H. Katoh, and M. Negishi
R-Ras Controls Axon Specification Upstream of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta through Integrin-linked Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2007; 282(1): 303 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. Yoshimura, N. Arimura, and K. Kaibuchi
Signaling networks in neuronal polarization.
J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10626 - 10630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. Toriyama, T. Shimada, K. B. Kim, M. Mitsuba, E. Nomura, K. Katsuta, Y. Sakumura, P. Roepstorff, and N. Inagaki
Shootin1: a protein involved in the organization of an asymmetric signal for neuronal polarization
J. Cell Biol., October 9, 2006; 175(1): 147 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. A. Oliva Jr, C. M. Atkins, L. Copenagle, and G. A. Banker
Activated c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Is Required for Axon Formation.
J. Neurosci., September 13, 2006; 26(37): 9462 - 9470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. Anderson, S. Maday, J. Sfakianos, M. Hull, B. Winckler, D. Sheff, H. Folsch, and I. Mellman
Transcytosis of NgCAM in epithelial cells reflects differential signal recognition on the endocytic and secretory pathways
J. Cell Biol., August 15, 2005; 170(4): 595 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. Hayashi, R. Kawai-Hirai, A. Harada, and K. Takata
Inhibitory neurons from fetal rat cerebral cortex exert delayed axon formation and active migration in vitro
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2003; 116(21): 4419 - 4428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. J. Zieziulewicz, D. W. Unfricht, N. Hadjout, M. A. Lynes, and D. A. Lawrence
Shrinking the Biologic World--Nanobiotechnologies for Toxicology
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2003; 74(2): 235 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. Yang, R. Bernabeu, Y. Xie, J. S. Zhang, S. M. Massa, H. C. Rempel, and F. M. Longo
Leukocyte Antigen-Related Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor: A Small Ectodomain Isoform Functions as a Homophilic Ligand and Promotes Neurite Outgrowth
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3353 - 3363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. Lamoureux, G. Ruthel, R. E. Buxbaum, and S. R. Heidemann
Mechanical tension can specify axonal fate in hippocampal neurons
J. Cell Biol., November 7, 2002; 159(3): 499 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. K. W. Dertinger, X. Jiang, Z. Li, V. N. Murthy, and G. M. Whitesides
Gradients of substrate-bound laminin orient axonal specification of neurons
PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 12542 - 12547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. A. Rodriguez, E. Piddini, T. Hasegawa, T. Miyagi, and C. G. Dotti
Plasma Membrane Ganglioside Sialidase Regulates Axonal Growth and Regeneration in Hippocampal Neurons in Culture
J. Neurosci., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 8387 - 8395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. Kunda, G. Paglini, S. Quiroga, K. Kosik, and A. Caceres
Evidence for the Involvement of Tiam1 in Axon Formation
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2001; 21(7): 2361 - 2372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. Peretti, L. Peris, S. Rosso, S. Quiroga, and A. Caceres
Evidence for the Involvement of Kif4 in the Anterograde Transport of L1-Containing Vesicles
J. Cell Biol., April 3, 2000; 149(1): 141 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. Zmuda and R. Rivas
Actin disruption alters the localization of tau in the growth cones of cerebellar granule neurons
J. Cell Sci., January 8, 2000; 113(15): 2797 - 2809.
[Abstract] [PDF]
This Article Abstract 
Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager 
Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (69) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Esch, T. Articles by Banker, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Esch, T. Articles by Banker, G.
|
|
|
|
 |
|