 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1, 1999, 19(17):7434-7449
Synaptic Control of Glycine and GABAA Receptors and
Gephyrin Expression in Cultured Motoneurons
Sabine
Lévi1,
Dominique
Chesnoy-Marchais2,
Werner
Sieghart3, and
Antoine
Triller1
1 Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire de la Synapse
Normale et Pathologique (Institut National de la Santé et de la
Recherche Médicale U-497), 2 Laboratoire de
Neurobiologie (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
URA-1867), Ecole Normale Supérieure, F-75005 Paris,
France, and 3 University Clinic For Psychiatry, Department
of Biochemical Psychiatry, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have evaluated the influence of the secretory phenotype of
presynaptic boutons on the accumulation of postsynaptic glycine receptors (GlyRs), type A GABA receptors (GABAARs),
and gephyrin clusters. The cellular distribution of these components
was analyzed on motoneurons cultured either alone or with glycinergic
and/or GABAergic neurons. In motoneurons cultured alone, we observed gephyrin clusters at nonsynaptic sites and in front of cholinergic boutons, whereas glycine and GABAA receptors formed
nonsynaptic clusters. These receptors are functionally and
pharmacologically similar to those found in cultures of all spinal
neurons. Motoneurons receiving GABAergic innervation from dorsal root
ganglia neurons displayed postsynaptic clusters of gephyrin and
GABAAR but not of GlyR / subunits. In motoneurons
receiving glycinergic and GABAergic innervation from spinal
interneurons, gephyrin, GlyR / , and GABAAR formed
mosaics at synaptic loci. These results indicate that (1) the
transmitter phenotype of the presynaptic element determines the
postsynaptic accumulation of specific receptors but not of gephyrin and
(2) the postsynaptic accumulation of gephyrin alone cannot account for
the formation of GlyR-rich microdomains.
Key words:
dorsal root ganglia; GABAA receptor; gephyrin; glycine receptor; motoneurons; picrotoxinin; presynaptic
innervation; spinal neurons; strychnine
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the nervous system, certain
ionotropic receptors accumulate at postsynaptic membrane-facing
terminals enriched in the corresponding neurotransmitter. Such is the
case for GlyR (Triller et al., 1985 , 1987 ; Van den Pol and Gorcs,
1988 ), GABAAR 6 and
GABAAR 3 subunits (Baude et al., 1992 ; Todd et
al., 1996 ), and ionotropic glutamate receptors (Petralia and Wenthold,
1992 ; Craig et al., 1993 ; Aoki et al., 1994 ; Petralia et al., 1994 ).
Other GABAA and glutamate receptor subtypes are
also present at nonsynaptic sites (Baude et al., 1992 , 1994 , 1995 ; Sur
et al., 1995a ). On the cytoplasmic side, peripheral membrane proteins
bind and contribute to the clustering of various types of receptors.
These include gephyrin for GlyR and some GABAAR
subtypes [see references in Vannier and Triller (1997) and Essrich et
al. (1998) ] and PDZ domain (initially identifed in PSD95, Disc
Large, and Zonula Occludens 1 proteins) molecules for ionotropic and
metabotropic glutamate receptors [see references in Sheng and
Wyszynski (1997) ]. These molecules are functionally homologous to
rapsyn, which stabilizes the muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
(nAChR) [see references in Sanes (1997) ]. Peripheral proteins anchor
receptors by direct or indirect attachment to perisynaptic or
subsynaptic cytoskeletal elements. An unresolved question is that of
the involvement of presynaptic innervation in postsynaptic accumulation
of transmitter receptors and associated proteins. We have examined this
question for the postsynaptic accumulation of GlyR,
GABAAR, and gephyrin in spinal motoneurons.
Glycine and GABA are involved in postsynaptic inhibition through the
activation of the chloride (Cl ) channels
associated with GlyR and GABAAR. Both receptors
belong to the nAChR superfamily (Betz, 1990 ). GlyR is a pentamer
composed of and subunits ( 3 2) [see references in Vannier
and Triller (1997) ]. Gephyrin links GlyR through its subunit to
the subsynaptic cytoskeleton (Kirsch and Betz, 1995 ; Meyer et al.,
1995 ). GABAARs are also pentamers. The 2,
3, 5, 3, and 2 subunit mRNAs are detected in motoneurons
(Persohn et al., 1991 ; Wisden et al., 1991 ). A recent study has shown
that gephyrin is involved in the stabilization of
GABAAR in the postsynaptic membrane (Essrich et
al., 1998 ).
We have analyzed the distribution of gephyrin, GlyR / , and
GABAAR 2/3 subunits on cultured motoneurons:
(1) alone, establishing connections among themselves and therefore
receiving cholinergic inputs; (2) with dorsal root ganglia (DRG)
neurons to supply a GABAergic innervation, taking advantage of the fact
that a subclass of DRG neurons expresses a GABAergic phenotype (Roy et
al., 1991 ; Chauvet et al., 1995 ); or (3) with spinal interneurons to
provide glycinergic and GABAergic innervations. We show that in the
absence of inhibitory presynaptic innervation, motoneurons express GlyR and GABAAR that are functional and form
nonsynaptic clusters. In the presence of presynaptic innervation, these
receptors accumulate specifically under boutons containing the
corresponding neurotransmitter. In contrast, gephyrin accumulates under
all synaptic terminals whether they contain acetylcholine (ACh), GABA,
or glycine. Our results demonstrate that gephyrin alone is not able to
sort GlyR and GABAAR to synaptic sites and that
glycinergic and GABAergic endings provide specific signals for
accumulation of the corresponding receptors.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Motoneuron purification and culture. Motoneurons were
purified from ventral spinal cords of embryonic day 15 Sprague Dawley rats (Janvier, Le Genest-sur-Isle, France) by a combination of metrizamide density-gradient centrifugation and immunopanning on dishes
coated with the 192 antibody as previously described (Henderson et al.,
1995 ). This antibody recognizes the low-affinity neurotrophin receptor
p75NTR, which is selectively expressed by
motoneurons at this developmental stage (Chandler et al., 1984 ;
Yan and Johnson, 1988 ) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank,
Iowa City, IA). Purified motoneurons (2 × 103) were plated on polyornithine-laminin
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO) precoated 12 mm coverslips in four-well plates
(Nunc, Dannstadt, Germany). Culture medium was the Neurobasal-B27
medium combination (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD)
supplemented with 0.5 mM L-glutamine (Life
Technologies), 25 µM -mercaptoethanol (Life Technologies), and 2% horse serum (v/v; Sigma). For certain
experiments, motoneurons were cultured in the glycine-free MEM medium
(Life Technologies) supplemented with vitamins and essential amino
acids (except glycine) (Life Technologies), 1 mM glucose
(Sigma), B27, 0.5 mM L-glutamine (Life
Technologies), 25 µM -mercaptoethanol (Life
Technologies), and 2% horse serum (v/v; Sigma). The amount of glycine
in the horse serum was found to be 229 µM (Beckman 6300 amino acid analyzer), which gave a final concentration of 4.6 µM. To keep motoneurons alive, 1 ng/ml recombinant rat
ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF; Peprotech, London) (Arakawa et al., 1990 ) and 100 pg/ml recombinant human glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF; Peprotech) (Henderson et al., 1994 ) were
added to the culture medium. Cultures were kept at 37°C in 7.5%
CO2 for up to 11 d in vitro
(DIV). The culture medium was renewed every 4 d.
Motoneuron and DRG neuron cocultures. DRG were
dissected from embryonic day 15 (E15) mice, collected in PBS (120 mM, pH 7.4), and centrifuged for 5 min at 800 × g. The supernatant was discarded and replaced by the
Neurobasal-B27 medium with 0.2% horse serum. One or two whole DRG
explants were added to purified motoneurons plated the day before. The
culture medium was completely replaced after 4 d, and cultures
were maintained for up to 7 DIV.
Motoneuron and spinal interneuron cocultures. Primary
cultures of spinal cord neurons were prepared from E15 Sprague Dawley rats as described previously (Béchade et al., 1996 ; Lévi et al., 1998 ). In parallel, ventral spinal cords were dissected and dissociated, and neurons were centrifuged on a 6.5% metrizamide cushion. The interface of the metrizamide cushion enriched in large
motoneurons was collected. Neurons (2 × 103) from the latter fraction were mixed
with 105 spinal neurons and plated on 12 mm glass coverslips. Cultures were maintained in the Neurobasal-B27
medium with 0.2% horse serum for up to 11 DIV.
Antibodies. The mAbs used in this study were as follows: (1)
mAb7a, which recognizes gephyrin (1:200; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim,
Germany) (Pfeiffer et al., 1984 ). Splice variants of gephyrin
transcripts are widely expressed in the CNS (Kirsch et al., 1993a ).
Immunocytochemistry with mAb7a showed the same widespread distribution
(Kirsch and Betz, 1993 ), suggesting that mAb7a has a broad spectrum of
recognition for gephyrin. However, some heavy forms of gephyrin may not
be detected by mAb7a (Kawasaki et al., 1997 ); (2) mAb4a, which binds to
all GlyR and subunit isoforms (1:100; gift from H. Betz)
(Pfeiffer et al., 1984 ; Schröder et al., 1991 ); (3) mAb bd17
directed against the GABAA R 2/3 subunits (10 µg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim) (Richards et al., 1987 ); (4) anti-Islet1 homeodomain protein (clone 2D6, 1:2; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) (Ericson et al., 1992 ; Tsuchida et al., 1994 ); (5) anti-155 kDa
rat neurofilament protein that specifically stains axons (clone 2H3,
1:2000; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) (Dodd et al., 1988 ); (6)
AP14, which detects MAP2A (1:50; gift from B. Riederer) (Binder et al.,
1984 ); and (7) anti-synaptophysin (1:20; Boehringer Mannheim). As
secondary antibodies, we used a carboxymethyl indocyanine-3 (CY3)-coupled affinity-purified goat anti-mouse IgG (1:200; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) were also used: (1) rabbit anti-synapsin I (1:2000; gift from P. de Camilli) (De Camilli et al., 1983 ); (2) rabbit anti-glutamate decarboxylase of 67 kDa (GAD67, 1:2000; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) (Wong
et al., 1974 ); (3) rabbit anti-MAP2 (1:250; Sigma); (4) rabbit
antiserum raised against the rat GABAAR 3
subunit (5 µg/ml) (Todd et al., 1996 ); (5) rabbit anti-glutamate
receptor 1 (GluR1, 10 µg/ml; Chemicon) (Wenthold et al., 1992 ); and
(6) goat anti-choline acetyltransferase (ChAT, 1:500; Chemicon). The
rabbit pAbs were recognized by a fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated
affinity-purified goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:200; Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories). For double-staining of gephyrin and ChAT,
mAb7a was recognized by an FITC-conjugated affinity-purified horse
anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and
the goat pAb anti-ChAT was recognized by a CY3-conjugated
affinity-purified donkey anti-sheep IgG (H+L) (1:200; Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories).
Immunocytochemistry. For all immunodetections except that of
mAb4a, cells were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 15 min.
Cells were washed in PBS and permeabilized with 0.12% Triton X-100 in
PBS with 0.12% (w/v) gelatin for 5 min. The permeabilized cells were
incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The next day,
cells were washed in PBS and incubated with secondary fluorescent
antibodies for 45 min at room temperature. For mAb4a immunocytochemistry, a methanol/acetic acid (95:5) mixture was used as
fixative (10 min at 20°C). Cells were rinsed in PBS and incubated
successively in primary and secondary antibodies as described above.
For multiple-labeling experiments, antibodies were incubated
simultaneously. For immunoperoxidase reactions, cells were incubated
successively with the Islet1 mAb and the secondary biotinylated
affinity-purified horse anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:200; Vector
Laboratories) for 1 hr, rinsed in PBS, and then incubated with the ABC
complex (1:200; Vector Laboratories) for 30 min. Peroxidase
staining was obtained by incubating cells in a
DAB-H2O2 reactant
(Sigma). Peroxidase reactions were monitored under the microscope and
stopped by washing with PBS.
For sequential mAb7a and mAb4a immunodetections, cells were fixed in a
methanol/acetic acid (95:5) solution (10 min at 20°C), rinsed, and
incubated with mAb4a (1:100, 1 hr). After washes, cells were treated
with lissamine rhodamine-conjugated affinipure Fab fragment goat
anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:50, 45 min; Jackson Immunoresearch
Laboratories). They were then rinsed and incubated with unconjugated
Fab fragment goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:50, 45 min; Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories) to saturate still unbound mAb4a. Then they
were incubated with mAb7a (1:200, 1 hr), which was further recognized
by an FITC-conjugated affinity-purified horse anti-mouse IgG (H+L)
(1:200, 45 min; Vector Laboratories). All incubations were performed at
room temperature. Control cells were exposed to the same treatment
except that they were incubated with only one of the primary antibodies.
In all experiments, the specificity of immunolabeling and the absence
of antibody cross-reaction in double-staining experiments were
controlled by omission of the primary antibodies. Cultures were
observed with a standard or a confocal (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale,
CA) epifluorescence microscope. Fluorescent images were acquired on a
Hamamatsu CCD camera (C5985) mounted on a Leica DMR/HCS microscope
(objective 40 or 63×), and dual color images were obtained using
Imagespace software (Molecular Dynamics). Images were prepared for
printing using Adobe Photoshop software.
Quantitative analysis. Motoneuron purity was estimated by
counting under phase contrast (objective 40×) the number of cells with
nuclear peroxidase staining of Islet1. The proportions of cells
displaying gephyrin-, GlyR / -, and
GABAAR 3-immunoreactivity (IR) were determined
by visual inspection using a standard fluorescence microscope
(objective 63×). For each experiment, 36 ± 3 fields were
analyzed. For these quantifications, data are expressed as means ± SEM of three independent experiments. Colocalization of gephyrin,
GlyR / , or GABAAR 2/3 with synapsin was
determined from double-staining experiments of synapsin and mAb7a,
mAb4a, or mAbbd17. The quantifications were performed on images
acquired with a Hamamatsu CCD camera and specific filters for FITC and CY3 fluorescences (Leica). This procedure was chosen because it allows
a minimal bleed-through between FITC and CY3 channels, which was always
found to be lower than 0.3%. Confocal microscopy was used to measure
the surface area of gephyrin, GlyR / , and GABAAR 3 clusters. To improve accuracy, the
quantification was performed by means of simple staining experiments.
Immunopositive cells were displayed in the center of the digitized
field, and all neurites within the field were computed. Excitation was
obtained with an argon ion laser set at 514 nm for CY3 excitation, and the emitted light was filtered with a long-pass filter (530 nm). Pixel size and focus steps were 0.21 and 0.3 µm, respectively (objective 63×, numerical aperture 1.4), with images of 512 × 512 pixels. Digitized series of optical sections at different planes of
focus were collected using a host computer (Indy, Silicon Graphics).
The background noise was reduced, and the contrast was enhanced by
applying a median (3 × 3 × 3) Gaussian filter. Maximum
intensity projections were derived from these sections using Imagespace
(Molecular Dynamics) software. The surface area of clusters was
determined with NIH 1.52 software. The threshold intensity fluorescence
was set manually for each cell to insure efficient detection and to
avoid coalescence of clusters. An image-object was computed if it
comprised at least three pixels. This analysis was performed on
motoneurons cultured alone or in the presence of spinal interneurons,
as well as on interneurons. Statistical analysis was performed using
StatView F.4.11 software.
Electrophysiology. The experiments were performed at room
temperature (20-23°C) between 6 and 8 DIV in the whole-cell
configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Before recording, the
culture medium was replaced by the external solution to be used during
the experiment, which contained (in mM): 150 NaCl, 2.5 KCl,
1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 20 glucose, and 10 HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4. The internal solutions used to fill
the recording electrode contained (in mM): either 145 CsCl,
1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 1 CaCl2,
3 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na, and 10 HEPES-CsOH, pH 7.2, for internal solution
A or 145 Cs methanesulfonate, 15 CsCl, 1 MgCl2,
0.1 EGTA, 3 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na, and 10 HEPES-CsOH, pH 7.2, for internal
solution B. The culture dish was continuously perfused with the
external solution. In addition, a fast perfusion system was used for
rapid applications of glycine and modulators onto the recorded cell.
All solutions applied via this system contained 0.2 µM
tetrodotoxin. This system was made of glass syringes, Teflon taps, and
Teflon tubing connected to two parallel glass barrels (one of them only
containing glycine); lateral movements of this system were controlled
by a computer-driven motor to apply the solution of the desired barrel
to the cell [continuously perfused with one of the solutions of this
system; for more details, see Chesnoy-Marchais (1996) ]. For
concentrations of glycine below 40 µM, successive
responses recorded under identical conditions were quite stable when
tested every 40 sec. For higher concentrations (80-160
µM), the interval between successive tests was longer (100 sec) to allow for recovery from desensitization. Stock solutions of strychnine (hemisulfate, Sigma) and picrotoxinin (Sigma) were prepared at 1 mM in water and at 100 mM in
ethanol, respectively. In the experiments using picrotoxinin, the
solutions applied by fast perfusion contained 1:1000 ethanol. When a
modulator was applied "with preincubation," it was applied
continuously between and during the successive glycine applications,
that is, in both barrels of the fast perfusion. When applied "without
preincubation," it was present only in the glycine-containing barrel.
Patch-clamp micropipettes were made from hard glass (Kimax 51); the
shank of each pipette was covered with Sylgard, and the tip was
fire-polished. Their resistance was close to 5 M . The cells were
voltage-clamped by an EPC7 List amplifier, which was controlled by a
TANDON 38620 computer, via a Cambridge Electronic Design (CED) 1401 interface, using CED patch- and voltage-clamp software. The current
monitor output of the amplifier was filtered at 0.3 kHz before being
sampled on-line at 0.6 kHz. The bath was connected to the ground via an
agar bridge. Membrane potentials were corrected for junction
potentials. The series resistance was routinely measured and
compensated. The zero indicated on the current traces is the absolute
zero current level.
 |
RESULTS |
Gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR cellular distribution in
motoneurons cultured alone
Motoneurons were purified by a combination of metrizamide
density-gradient and immunopanning techniques (Henderson et al., 1995 ).
As estimated by immunoperoxidase staining of the motoneuronal embryonic
marker Islet1 (Ericson et al., 1992 ), 89.2 ± 1.3% of the cells
had a motoneuronal phenotype (Fig.
1A). The remaining cells corresponded to Islet1-negative but p75 low-affinity neurotrophin receptor- and L14 lectin-positive motoneurons (Henderson et al., 1993 ).
Double-immunofluorescence experiments with antibodies against MAP2 and
155 kDa neurofilament protein were performed to label dendrites and
axons, respectively. These experiments showed that at 7 DIV,
motoneurons are polarized with somato-dendritic and axonal compartments
(Fig. 1B). We used the mAb7a and mAb4a antibodies to
stain gephyrin and GlyR / subunits, respectively (Pfeiffer et al.,
1984 ), whereas GABAAR 3 subunit was recognized
by a previously characterized pAb (Todd et al., 1996 ). The gephyrin,
GlyR / , and GABAAR 3 formed puncta on
somata and dendrites as shown in double-labeling experiments with
anti-MAP2 antibodies (Fig. 1C-E). A few scattered spots of
gephyrin were also detected along the length of some axons (data not
shown). Clusters of GlyR / and GABAAR 3
were not detected in axons. However, in some neurons, clusters of
GlyR / (Fig. 1D) or
GABAAR 3 (Fig. 1E) were
detected at the level of the axon-hillock. Confocal optical sections
revealed small, round or ellipsoidal clusters of gephyrin at membrane
areas in contact with the coverslip (Fig. 1F1
exemplifies a neuron with a large number of clusters) as well as at
distance from it (Fig. 1F2). Numerous bright spots of
GlyR / (Fig. 1G1) and GABAAR 3 (data not shown) were also detected at the substrate-neuron interface as well as at a distance from it. On some cells, GlyR / -IR (Fig. 1G2) and GABAAR 3-IR (Fig.
1K1, arrow) formed large patches at the neuronal
surface.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR
distribution on motoneurons cultured alone. A,
Immunoperoxidase showing the nuclear staining of the embryonic
motoneuronal marker Islet1. B, Double-staining of the
dendritic protein MAP2 (green) and the
axon-enriched 155 kDa neurofilament protein (red).
C-E, Presence of clusters (arrows) of
gephyrin (C, red), GlyR /
(D, red), or GABAAR 3
(E, green) on MAP2-IR somato-dendritic
compartment (green in C, D;
red in E). GlyR / clusters are also
accumulated at the level of axon-hillock (arrowhead in
D). F, G, Confocal visualization of
Geph-IR (F1-2) and GlyR / -IR
(G1-2), respectively. Discontinuous Geph-IR
(arrows) at the cell-to-substrate contact
(F1) and at a distance from the coverslip (F2).
GlyR / forms clusters at the cell-to-substrate contact
(arrows in G1) and occasionally displays
a continuous labeling (arrows in G2) on
sections passing through the nucleus. H, I,
Double-immunofluorescence showing that Geph-IR clusters (H1,
I1) accumulate in front of synapsin-IR boutons
(arrowheads in H2) displaying ChAT-IR
(arrowheads in I2). Geph-IR clusters
(H1, I1) are also detected at nonsynaptic sites
(arrows). In contrast, GlyR / (J1)
and GABAAR 2/3 (K1) do not concentrate at
synaptic sites (arrowheads in J1-2 and
K1-2, respectively). Insets in
H2, I2, J2, and K2 show superimposed
images of H1-H2, I1-I2, J1-J2, and
K1-K2, respectively. ChAT, Choline
acetyltransferase;
GABAAR 2/3,
GABAAR 2/3 subunits-IR;
GABAAR 3,
GABAAR 3 subunits-IR; Geph, gephyrin-IR;
GlyR / , GlyR / subunits-IR;
MAP2, dendritic marker; NF, NF155 Kda-IR;
Syn, synapsin-IR. Scale bar: A,
B, 50 µm; C-K2, 10 µm.
|
|
The relationships of these receptor components to presynaptic endings
were analyzed in double-staining experiments in which the synaptic
boutons were identified with a pAb against synapsin. For these
experiments, we used the mAb bd17 directed against
GABAAR 2/3 subunits (Richards et al., 1987 )
because the anti-synapsin Ab is a pAb. Synapsin-positive endings were
detected over somata and/or dendrites of many motoneurons and could
correspond to autapses or may originate from other motoneurons. On
these cells, gephyrin-IR clusters were found on the soma and neurites
at synaptic and nonsynaptic loci (Fig.
1H1-H2). Almost all presynaptic
specializations were facing gephyrin-IR clusters. These postsynaptic
gephyrin-IR clusters were larger than those observed at nonsynaptic
loci and extend all along the synaptic contact (Fig.
1H1). To verify that presynaptic boutons in these
pure cultures of motoneurons were cholinergic, we immunostained for
ChAT (Fig. 1I1-2). We found that after 11 DIV,
almost all boutons were ChAT-positive and that 90.2 ± 3.8% (10 cells encompassing 199 boutons) of these boutons were apposed to
gephyrin-IR clusters (Fig. 1I1-2). In contrast, most
GlyR / (Fig. 1J1-2) and
GABAAR 2/3 (Fig.
1K1--2) clusters were detected at the cell
surface at sites that were not facing presynaptic boutons. Because
glycine was present at high concentration (400 µM) in the culture medium, it may be involved
in the clustering of gephyrin. To examine this issue, motoneurons were
cultured in glycine-depleted medium. This medium was not completely
glycine free because the added serum contributed to a final
concentration of 4.6 µM (see Materials and
Methods). However, this low concentration is shown to activate <2% of
the GlyR channels (see Fig. 3). With this low amount of glycine, we
found that motoneurons had postsynaptic and nonsynaptic clusters of
gephyrin (data not shown), similar to motoneurons cultured in a
glycine-rich medium.
The question remains of the association of large gephyrin clusters
postsynaptic to cholinergic synapses with GlyR / -IR. This was
approached by sequential detection of gephyrin (Fig.
2A1) and GlyR /
(Fig. 2A2) on motoneurons cultured alone for 7 DIV. We found that large gephyrin-IR clusters were not associated with GlyR / -IR, suggesting that gephyrin microdomains postsynaptic to
cholinergic afferences do not recruit GlyR / at this site. In
contrast, many small, round-shaped clusters of gephyrin found at
nonsynaptic loci colocalized with GlyR / -IR clusters of comparable size and shape.

View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Simultaneous detection of gephyrin-IR (A1,
A3, A5) and GlyR / -IR (A2, A4, A6)
on motoneurons cultured alone for 7 DIV. Motoneurons display large and
small, round-shaped Geph-IR clusters. Large Geph-IR clusters do not
colocalize with GlyR / -IR (crossed arrows). Most
(arrowheads) but not all (arrows) small
Geph-IR clusters colocalize with GlyR / -IR clusters.
Geph, Gephyrin-IR; GlyR / ,
GlyR / subunits-IR. A1-2, Pairs of digitized
images acquired with CCD camera (A1, FITC channel;
A2, TRITC channel). A3-4, A5-6, Higher
magnification of the plain and dotted outlined
regions in A1-2, respectively. Scale bar:
A1-2, 10 µm; A3-4,
A5-6, 1.2 µm.
|
|
Our data indicate that in cultured motoneurons that do not receive
glycinergic and GABAergic functional innervation, one can observe
clusters of gephyrin, GlyR / , and
GABAAR 2/3. Gephyrin accumulates in front of
synaptic cholinergic boutons, and these postsynaptic gephyrin clusters
hardly recruit GlyR / and GABAAR 2/3 (for
quantification, see Fig. 8).
Functional and pharmacological properties of GlyR and
GABAAR in motoneurons cultured alone
In an attempt to understand the different localizations of GlyRs
and gephyrin in motoneurons cultured alone (in particular the absence
of GlyRs at gephyrin-rich synaptic loci), we investigated the
functional and pharmacological properties of the receptors of these
cells. Glycine (applied at 10-320 µM by a fast perfusion system) evoked responses in all the motoneurons recorded in the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique (n > 50). A
concentration-response curve obtained from a single motoneuron is
illustrated in Figure 3A. The
response (recorded here for an inward driving force of 20 mV only) was
already detectable at 10 µM glycine. Raising
the concentration increased the peak response and revealed some
desensitization. For each cell in which a complete curve was obtained,
the concentration dependence of the peak response was fitted by a Hill
equation (Fig. 3A, right graph and legend). The
EC50, Hill coefficient
(nH), and maximum response
(Imax) values thus derived were then
averaged for two series of motoneurons (Fig. 3C, bars
labeled MN1 and MN2; see legend);
EC50 and nH were always
close to 40 µM and 2, respectively. For
comparison, identical experiments (Fig. 3B) were performed
on cultured neurons from the whole spinal cord (spinal neuron). The
physiological properties of neurons in both types of cultures were
almost identical (Fig. 3C). For example, the mean
EC50 and nH values found
using internal solution A were 37.1 ± 7.4 µM (4) and 1.92 ± 0.19 (4) for purified motoneurons (MN2), and 38.3 ± 8.5 µM (6)
and 2.25 ± 0.20 (6) for cultures of all spinal neurons (SN),
respectively. The Imax values were
more variable and usually slightly larger for purified motoneurons, which can be explained by their greater surface area.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Comparison of the functional and pharmacological
properties of GlyRs in cultures of purified motoneurons and all spinal
neurons. A-C, Concentration-response curves in both
types of cultures (purified motoneurons: A,
C, bars labeled MN; cultures of all
spinal neurons: B, C, bars labeled
SN). The internal solution and membrane potential
were solution A and 20 mV (A-C, bars labeled
MN2 and SN) or solution B and 70
mV(C, bars labeled MN1). The left
traces in A or B show
superimposed current recordings obtained during successive applications
of glycine at increasing concentrations (10-160 µM). The
right graph in A or B
(obtained from the corresponding left traces) shows for
each cell the fit of the concentration dependence of the peak response
by a Hill equation: y = Imax/(1 + (EC50/x)nH).
The values and corresponding errors given by the computer for
EC50, nH, and
Imax for each of these cells were,
respectively, 46.7 ± 3.4 µM, 1.92 ± 0.16 and
0.744 ± 0.035 nA in A, and 47.7 ± 0.9 µM, 2.16 ± 0.06 and 0.833 ± 0.011 nA in
B. C, Mean values and SD for these three parameters,
derived from several such experiments performed in different cells
under identical conditions. D, Voltage dependence of the
responses of purified motoneurons to glycine (internal solution A).
Glycine (10 µM) was applied for 2 sec at different test
potentials, using long voltage jumps from the holding potential ( 20
mV) toward the test potential (the voltage jump beginning 0.8 sec
before each glycine application). Left graphs,
Normalized I-V curves for three different motoneurons,
obtained by dividing each glycine response by the response of the
corresponding cell at 60 mV. Right traces, Records
obtained in one of these cells during voltage jumps to 80 and +80 mV.
E, Strychnine sensitivity of glycine responses (internal
solution A, holding potential 20 mV). Left panel, Mean
values of the percentage of inhibition of the peak glycine responses by
strychnine (50 or 500 nM applied with preincubation) in
cultures of purified motoneurons (white bars) and in
cultures of all spinal neurons (hatched bars). The
glycine concentration was either 40 µM (close to the
EC50) or 100 µM. Middle
panel, Effect of strychnine applied with preincubation first at
50 nM, then at 500 nM, on the response to
glycine (40 µM) of a purified motoneuron
(MN). Right panel, Effect of 500 nM strychnine, applied first without preincubation, then
with preincubation, on the response to glycine (100 µM)
in a culture of all spinal neurons
(SN).
|
|
The voltage-sensitivity of glycine responses of motoneurons cultured
alone was investigated. The I-V curves of the responses to
10 µM glycine obtained from three motoneurons
with symmetrical chloride concentrations are illustrated in Figure
3D. As shown by the plot of the normalized responses of
these cells and by the records obtained in one of them for two
symmetrical driving forces, the voltage dependence was clearly
nonlinear, favoring outward responses. The reversal potential was close
to ECl (here 0 mV); this was confirmed in an
experiment using asymmetrical chloride concentrations (internal
solution B), bringing the reversal potential to 50 mV (data not shown).
The blocking effect of the classical GlyR antagonist strychnine was
investigated in the two types of cultures. In motoneurons cultured
alone, when strychnine was applied with preincubation (both between and
during glycine applications) at either 50 or 500 nM, the
peak responses to 40 µM glycine were reduced by 52.8 ± 5.3% (5) or 96.2 ± 1.1% (5), respectively (Fig.
3E, white bars and records labeled
MN). The responses recorded in cultures of all spinal
neurons showed a similar strong sensitivity to strychnine (Fig.
3E, hatched bars). For all neurons studied, when
strychnine was applied without preincubation (i.e., only with glycine),
its blocking effect was apparently much lower. This is illustrated for
the effect of 500 nM strychnine on the response
to 100 µM glycine in a culture of all spinal
neurons (Fig. 3E, traces labeled SN), and
the results were confirmed in four similar experiments (relatively
small blockade between 21 and 44%). The requirement for preincubation
with strychnine was confirmed in motoneurons cultured alone (the peak
response to 40 µM glycine, which could be
completely blocked by 500 nM strychnine with
preincubation, was only reduced by 60 ± 11% (3) without preincubation).
Low sensitivity of glycine responses to picrotoxinin (PTX) is usually
considered to be indicative of the presence of subunits in
functional heteromeric receptors (Pribilla et al., 1992 ; Pistis et al.,
1997 ). Therefore, the blocking effect of a high concentration of PTX
(100 µM, applied with preincubation) on the responses to glycine of motoneurons cultured alone was investigated. The responses to 40 µM glycine, recorded at 20 mV in four experiments
with internal solution A, were reduced by only 44 ± 10%. In
addition, the responses to 100 µM glycine, recorded
between 30 and 90 mV in three other experiments with internal
solution B, were reduced by only 26-28%, confirming the low
sensitivity to PTX of GlyR in motoneurons.
In conclusion, the nonsynaptic GlyRs of motoneurons cultured alone
retain the main pharmacological properties of the receptors found in
cultures of all spinal neurons.
Cultured neurons from embryonic spinal cord (Ransom et al., 1977 ), as
well as motoneurons from slices of embryonic or neonatal rat spinal
cord (Gao and Ziskind-Conhaim, 1995 ), display chloride responses not
only to glycine but also to GABA. The responses to 5 or 10 µM GABA were tested in motoneurons cultured alone (data not shown). Large responses of at least 0.8 nA were recorded for a
driving force of only 20 mV (four cells). These responses were little
affected (reduced by only 9.5 ± 7.6% in three experiments using
5 µM GABA) by a concentration of strychnine (500 nM applied with preincubation) that almost completely
blocked glycine responses. In contrast, these GABA responses were
almost completely blocked (result qualitatively confirmed in three
cells) by a low concentration of bicuculline (10 µM)
known to be ineffective on glycine responses (Lewis and Faber, 1993 ).
Thus motoneurons cultured alone also display functional
GABAA receptors.
Cellular distribution of gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR in
motoneurons cocultured with dorsal root ganglia
Initially, embryonic DRG explants were added to purified
motoneurons to provide a glutamatergic presynaptic innervation to motoneurons. To our surprise, we found that a large proportion of DRG
neurons were GAD67-positive, indicating the presence of GABAergic
neurons in the culture. These results were consistent with previous
reports showing that embryonic (Roy et al., 1991 ; Chauvet et al., 1995 )
and adult (Schoenen et al., 1989 ; Roy et al., 1991 ; Chauvet et al.,
1995 ) DRG neurons express a GABAergic phenotype. In our cultures, the
colocalization of GAD67-IR puncta with synaptophysin-IR over
Islet1-positive neurons indicate that DRG differentiate GABAergic
synapses impinging on motoneurons. Gephyrin formed clusters on somata
and neurites of motoneurons that accumulated in front of synapsin-IR
profiles (Fig. 4A1-2). Most clusters of gephyrin were adjacent to GAD-positive boutons (Fig.
4B1-2), which were also synaptophysin positive (data
not shown). Occasionally, gephyrin-IR clusters were detected in front of synaptophysin-positive but GAD-negative terminals (data not shown).
On Islet1-positive motoneurons, GABAAR 2/3 were
present in front of synapsin-positive boutons (Fig. 4C1-2);
some clusters were also detected at nonsynaptic loci as described
in vivo (Todd et al., 1996 ). Gephyrin was also detected at
the level of GABAAR 3 clusters (Fig.
4D1-2). The GlyR / staining pattern was
identical to that observed on motoneurons cultured alone.
GlyR / -IR clusters were present on the soma and along the length
of the dendrites of motoneurons (Fig. 4E1). These
GlyR / clusters did not form under synapsin-positive varicosities
(Fig. 4E1-2) or under GAD-IR blobs (Fig.
4F1-2). In some instances, a diffuse GlyR / -IR
was observed over the soma and dendrites (Fig.
4F1).

View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Gephyrin and GABAAR but not GlyR form
postsynaptic clusters on motoneurons cocultured with DRG neurons. In
all pairs of images, motoneurons are identified by the nuclear Islet1
staining. A, B, Geph-IR is concentrated in front of
synapsin-IR boutons (arrowheads in A1-2)
displaying GAD-IR (arrowheads in B1-2).
C, D, GABAAR 2/3 accumulate at synaptic
(arrowheads in C1-2) and nonsynaptic
loci (crossed arrow in C1-2). Geph-IR
clusters colocalize with GABAAR 3 clusters
(arrowheads in D1-2). E,
F, GlyR / (E1, F1) form clusters
(arrowheads) that are not adjacent to synapsin-IR
(E1-2, crossed arrows) or GAD-IR
(F1-2, crossed arrows) boutons.
GABAAR 2/3,
GABAAR 2/3 subunits-IR;
GABAAR 3,
GABAAR 3 subunits-IR; GAD, GAD67-IR;
Geph, gephyrin-IR, GlyR / ,
GlyR / subunits-IR; Isl, Islet1-IR;
Syn, synapsin-IR. A1-A2, B1-B2, C1-C2, D1-D2,
E1-E2, F1-F2, Pairs of digitized images acquired with CCD
camera (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, TRITC channel;
A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, F2, FITC channel). Scale bar, 10 µm.
|
|
These results again indicate that gephyrin accumulates under synaptic
boutons, but when these boutons are GABAergic there is also a
postsynaptic accumulation of GABAAR 2/3 but not
of GlyR / .
Cellular distribution of gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR in
motoneurons cocultured with spinal interneurons
Dissociated spinal interneurons were cocultured with motoneurons
to supply glycinergic and GABAergic innervation to motoneurons. In
these cultures, motoneurons were identified by the Islet1 nuclear staining. At the somatic and dendritic surface, gephyrin, GlyR / , and GABAAR 2/3 formed numerous patches in front
of synapsin-IR boutons (Fig.
5A1-2, B1-2,
C1-2). A few synapsin-stained endings (Fig.
5A1-2, B1-2, C1-2, crossed arrows)
did not colocalize with these receptor components; they may correspond
to excitatory synapses (O'Brien et al., 1997 ). These data indicate
that gephyrin, GlyR / , and GABAAR 2/3
clusters present at the periphery of motoneurons innervated by spinal
interneurons face synaptic boutons.

View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR
distribution on motoneurons cocultured with spinal neurons. In all
pairs of images, motoneurons are identified by the nuclear Islet1
staining. A-C, Accumulation of Geph
(A2), GlyR / (B2), and
GABAAR 2/3 (C2) in front of most
(arrowheads) but not all (crossed arrows)
synapsin-IR boutons (A1, B1, C1). D-F,
Double-staining of GAD (D1, E1, F1) and Geph
(D2); GlyR / (E2) or
GABAAR 2/3 (F2) show closely apposed
signals (arrowheads). Some Geph and GlyR / spots
are not adjacent to GAD-IR boutons (crossed arrows in
D1-2, E1-2, respectively). G, H,
Double-immunofluorescence showing that most GABAAR 3-IR
spots (arrowheads in G1, H1) are
associated with Geph-IR (G2) and GlyR / -IR
(H2) clusters. Few Geph-IR clusters do not colocalize
with GABAAR 3-IR (crossed arrows in
G1-2).
GABAAR 2/3,
GABAAR 2/3 subunits-IR;
GABAAR 3,
GABAAR 3 subunits-IR; GAD, GAD67-IR;
Geph, gephyrin-IR; GlyR / ,
GlyR / subunits-IR; Isl, Islet1-IR;
Syn, synapsin-IR. A1-A2, B1-B2, C1-C2, D1-D2,
E1-E2, F1-F2, G1-G2, H1-H2, Pairs of digitized images
acquired with CCD camera (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1,
H1, FITC channel; A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, F2, G2,
H2, TRITC channel). Scale bar, 10 µm.
|
|
Previous reports have shown that in the ventral horn of the spinal cord
in vivo, boutons containing both glycine and GABA are
presynaptic to gephyrin-IR synapses (Triller et al., 1987 ; Todd et al.,
1996 ; Colin et al., 1998 ) and that corelease of these two
neurotransmitters occurs (Jonas et al., 1998 ). Furthermore, some
GABAAR and GlyR clusters are colocalized in front
of GABAergic terminals (Bohlhalter et al., 1994 ; Todd et al., 1996 ).
The relationship of gephyrin, GlyR / , and
GABAAR 2/3 to GABAergic axons was therefore analyzed. Gephyrin (Fig. 5D2) and GlyR / (Fig.
5E2) clusters were often apposed to GAD-positive terminals
(Fig. 5D1, E1). However, gephyrin and GlyR / clusters
were not always adjacent to GAD-IR profiles, suggesting that some of
them are apposed to boutons enriched in glycine only. In contrast, all
somato-dendritic GABAAR 2/3-IR clusters
detected on motoneurons were apposed to GAD-IR boutons (Fig.
5F1-2). Simultaneous experiments in which
GABAAR 3 was detected with gephyrin or with
GlyR / indicated that most but not all GABAAR 3-IR clusters were also immunoreactive
for gephyrin (Fig. 5G1-2) or GlyR / (Fig.
5H1-2). This raised the question regarding whether gephyrin
is able to accumulate receptors other than GlyR and
GABAAR. This was determined by examining the
cellular distribution of the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors on neurons
cultured for 11 DIV (Fig. 6). The large
majority of gephyrin clusters did not colocalize with GluR1 clusters
(Fig. 6A1-2). However, we found that 9.8 ± 2.2% (10 cells for a total of 422 gephyrin clusters) of gephyrin
clusters were associated with GluR1-IR. Similarly, most GlyR /
clusters were not stained for GluR1 clusters (Fig. 6B1-2). However, 8.0 ± 1.5% (10 cells for a
total of 713 GlyR / clusters) of GlyR / clusters colocalized
with GluR1-IR. For this quantification, we selected neurons with large
numbers of GluR1 clusters. Interestingly, these neurons had a lower
count of gephyrin and GlyR clusters.

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Comparison of GluR1-IR with gephyrin- or
GlyR / -IR clusters on spinal interneurons. Spinal neurons
immunolabeled at 11 DIV for GluR1 (A1, B1) and Geph
(A2) or GlyR / (B2). Most Geph- or
GlyR / -IR (arrowheads) and GluR1-IR (crossed
arrows) do not colocalize. Few Geph- and GlyR / -IR
clusters colocalized with GluR1-IR (arrows).
Geph, gephyrin-IR; GluR1, glutamate
receptor subunit GluR1; GlyR / , GlyR /
subunits-IR. A1-A2, B1-B2, Pairs of digitized images
acquired with CCD camera (A1, B1, FITC channel;
A2, B2, TRITC channel). A3-4, B3-4,
Higher magnification of a region outlined in A1-2,
B1-2, respectively. Scale bar, A1-2, B1-2, 10 µm; A3-4, B3-4, 2.5 µm.
|
|
These data indicate that gephyrin, GABAAR 2/3,
and GlyR / can be detected at the same synapse on motoneurons
apposed to GABAergic terminals. Some synapses had only one of these two
receptors. Few gephyrin-IR synapses were associated with a
noninhibitory receptor subunit, i.e., GluR1.
Quantification of gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR-IR
The proportion of cells displaying immunoreactivity for gephyrin,
GlyR / , and GABAAR 3 was determined at 7 DIV on motoneurons cultured alone or with spinal interneurons (Table
1). The immunoreactivity corresponding to GlyR / and GABAAR 3 was
present at the neuronal surface and had a clustered or diffuse
distribution. The latter could only be observed when motoneurons were
cultured alone. Diffuse staining of gephyrin was never observed on
motoneurons cultured alone, therefore indicating that diffuse
GlyR / and GABAAR 3 are not associated
with gephyrin. We found that the percentage of motoneurons displaying
immunoreactivity for either gephyrin or
GABAAR 3 increased when interneurons were added
to the culture. In contrast, the presence of interneurons in the
culture decreased the number of motoneurons with GlyR / -IR.
The mean surface areas of gephyrin, GlyR / , and
GABAAR 3 clusters were determined at 7 DIV on
maximum intensity projections of a series of confocal
sections spanning the whole thickness of the neuronal somata. The
quantifications were performed on motoneurons cultured alone or with
interneurons and on interneurons of the latter coculture (Table
2). We found that the presence of
interneurons increased significantly the surface area of GlyR / , GABAAR 3, and gephyrin clusters on motoneurons.
On motoneurons cultured alone for 7 DIV, most GlyR / and
GABAAR 2/3 clusters were nonsynaptic, but when
cultured with interneurons they were detected in front of synaptic
contacts (see Fig. 8). The GlyR / , GABAAR 3, and gephyrin clusters were slightly
but significantly smaller on motoneurons cultured with interneurons
than on interneurons themselves.
The proportion of synapses apposed to gephyrin, GlyR / , or
GABAAR 2/3 clusters and the proportion of
nonsynaptic clusters were quantified on images collected with a CCD
camera and are shown for motoneurons cultured alone for 3, 7, and 11 DIV (Fig. 7). Whether or not the
gephyrin-, GlyR / -, and GABAAR 2/3-IR were
adjacent to synapsin-IR, the proportion of apposition varied depending
on the nature of the postsynaptic marker and stage of maturation (Fig.
8). The same analysis was performed on
motoneurons cultured with interneurons (data not shown). The mean
number of synaptic boutons increased significantly at the surface of
motoneurons cultured with or without interneurons during maturation,
indicating a progressive establishment of synaptic connections (Table
3). The mean numbers of gephyrin,
GlyR / , or GABAAR 2/3 clusters per cell
were not significantly different on motoneurons cultured alone,
regardless of the stage in culture. In contrast, when motoneurons were
cocultured with interneurons, the mean numbers of gephyrin, GlyR / , or GABAAR 2/3 clusters per cell
increased significantly during the formation of synaptic contacts
(between 3 and 7 DIV). On motoneurons cultured with interneurons, the
number of gephyrin clusters was much smaller than the sum of
GlyR / and GABAAR 2/3 clusters. This
indicates that a large proportion of postsynaptic aggregates were
composed of mosaics of receptors, as already seen by double-labeling
experiments (Fig. 5G1-2, H1-2). The level of synaptic
localization of the postsynaptic markers was further quantified on
motoneurons cultured alone (Fig. 8A1-3) or in the presence of interneurons (Fig. 8B1-3). When
motoneurons were cultured alone, the proportion of synapses showing
gephyrin clusters was already high (77.7 ± 6.5%) at 3 DIV and
varied little until 11 DIV (90.1 ± 3.1%), whereas the proportion
of nonsynaptic gephyrin clusters per cell decreased progressively
during maturation (Fig. 8A1). In contrast, only
9-14% of synapses formed between motoneurons were apposed to
GlyR / clusters at any of the stages analyzed, and the proportion
of nonsynaptic clusters decreased slightly between 7 and 11 DIV (Fig.
8A2). The percentage of synapses with GABAAR 2/3 clusters increased slightly during
maturation to 36.1 ± 3.9% at 11 DIV, whereas that of nonsynaptic
GABAAR 2/3 clusters decreased in parallel (Fig.
8A3). The scheme was different when motoneurons were
cocultured with interneurons. The proportion of synapses showing
gephyrin clusters increased significantly between 3 and 7 DIV and then
remained stable until the end of the experiment, whereas the proportion
of nonsynaptic gephyrin clusters decreased dramatically between 3 and 7 DIV (Fig. 8B1). The evolution of the level of
synaptically and nonsynaptically localized GlyR / (Fig.
8B2) and GABAAR 2/3 (Fig.
8B3) clusters was a mirror image of what was found on
motoneurons cultured alone.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Relationships during in vitro
maturation of gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR with synaptic
terminals on motoneurons cultured alone. Motoneurons double-stained for
synapsin and gephyrin (A1-2, B1-2, C1-2), synapsin
and GlyR / (D1-2, E1-2, F1-2), and synapsin and
GABAAR 2/3 (G1-2, H1-2, I1-2) at 3, 7, and 11 DIV (left, middle, and
right columns, respectively). A-C, At 3 DIV, Geph-IR clusters accumulate in front of most but not all synaptic
boutons. Numerous Geph-IR clusters are also detected at nonsynaptic
loci. At 7 and 11 DIV, the number of postsynaptic Geph-IR clusters
increased, and the number of nonsynaptic Geph-IR clusters decreased.
D-F, At all stages, most GlyR / clusters are
detected at nonsynaptic sites. G-I, At 3 and 7 DIV, few
GABAAR 2/3 clusters are in front of synapsin-IR
terminals. Their number increases at 11 DIV. Arrows,
Apposed synapsin and postsynaptic markers (Geph, GlyR / , or
GABAAR 2/3); crossed arrows, presence of
synapsin-IR but not of the above-mentioned postsynaptic markers;
arrowheads, presence of Geph-, GlyR / -, or
GABAAR 2/3-IR clusters without adjacent synapsin-IR.
GABAAR 2/3,
GABAAR 2/3 subunits-IR; Geph, gephyrin-IR;
GlyR / , GlyR / subunits-IR;
Syn, synapsin-IR. A1-A2, B1-B2, C1-C2, D1-D2,
E1-E2, F1-F2, G1-G2, H1-H2, I1-I, Pairs of
digitized images acquired with CCD camera (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1,
F1, G1, H1, I1, FITC channel; A2, B2, C2,
D2, E2, F2, G2, H2, I2, TRITC channel). Scale
bar, 10 µm.
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Quantifications of the synaptic localization of
gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR on motoneurons cultured alone
(A1-3) or with spinal interneurons
(B1-3). In each case, the open bars give
the proportion of synapses with the indicated postsynaptic IR
(Gephyrin, GlyR / , or
GABAAR 2/3),
and the filled bars give the proportion of nonsynaptic
clusters per cell. Gephyrin, GlyR / , and GABAAR 2/3
clusters were classified as synaptic when adjacent to synapsin-IR.
Results are means (± SEM) from 10-18 cells. The levels of
significance (ANOVA, Scheffé F test) are indicated
by one (p < 0.05), two
(p < 0.01), or three
(p < 0.001) symbols. , Significance
between 3 and 7 DIV; ¥, significance between 7 and 11 DIV; $,
significance between 3 and 11 DIV.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 3.
Quantifications of the mean numbers of synapses and of
gephyrin, GlyR, and GABAAR clusters per cell during
in vitro maturation
|
|
These data suggest that the presynaptic glycinergic and/or GABAergic
innervation supplied by interneurons (1) increases the number, size,
and synaptic localization of GlyR / ,
GABAAR 2/3, and gephyrin clusters and (2)
controls negatively the number of nonsynaptic clusters of receptors.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Role of presynaptic innervation in the formation of GlyR and
GABAAR microdomains
The role of presynaptic innervation in the formation of
postsynaptic clusters was investigated on motoneurons cultured alone, with DRG, or with spinal interneurons. On motoneurons cultured alone,
GlyR / and GABAAR 2/3 formed nonsynaptic
clusters. Therefore, clustering is independent of the corresponding
presynaptic innervation, a situation comparable to that found in muscle
(Kuromi and Kidokoro, 1984 ). Some motoneurons also expressed large
patches of diffuse GlyR / and GABAAR 3.
GlyR and GABAAR-IR were present on the
somato-dendritic compartment, suggesting that targeting of receptors
does not depend on innervation.
When motoneurons were contacted by GABAergic boutons,
GABAAR 2/3 accumulated in front of these
boutons, and the nonsynaptic GABAAR 3
disappeared. Nonsynaptic GlyR |