Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 1999, 19(18):7834-7845
Lamina-Specific Synaptic Activation Causes Domain-Specific
Alterations in Dendritic Immunostaining for MAP2 and CAM Kinase
II
Oswald
Steward1 and
Shelley
Halpain2
1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, and 2 Department of Cell
Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
 |
ABSTRACT |
Polyribosomal complexes are selectively localized beneath
postsynaptic sites on neuronal dendrites; this localization suggests that the translation of the mRNAs that are present in dendrites may be
regulated by synaptic activity. The present study tests this hypothesis
by evaluating whether synaptic activation alters the immunostaining
pattern for two proteins whose mRNAs are present in dendrites: the
dendrite-specific cytoskeletal protein MAP2 and the
-subunit of
CAMKII. High-frequency stimulation of the perforant path projections to
the dentate gyrus, which terminate in a discrete band on the dendrites
of dentate granule cells, produced a two-stage alteration in
immunostaining for MAP2 in the dendritic laminae. Five minutes of
stimulation (30 trains) caused a decrease in MAP2 immunostaining in the
lamina in which the activated synapses terminate. After more prolonged
periods of stimulation (1-2 hr), there was an increase in
immunostaining in the sideband laminae just proximal and distal to the
activated band of synapses. The same stimulation paradigm produced a
modest increase in immunostaining for
-CAMKII in the activated
laminae, with no detectable changes in the sideband laminae. The
alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 were diminished, but not
eliminated, by inhibiting protein synthesis; the increases in CAMKII
were not. These findings reveal that patterned synaptic activity can produce domain-specific alterations in the molecular composition of
dendrites; these alterations may be caused in part by local protein
synthesis and in part by other mechanisms.
Key words:
dendritic mRNA; MAP2; calcium-calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II; synapse; protein synthesis; protein synthesis
inhibitors; LTP
 |
INTRODUCTION |
An important aspect of neuronal gene
expression is that certain mRNAs are translated locally at synapses.
This idea was based on the discovery of synapse-associated
polyribosome complexes (SPRCs), polyribosomes that are
localized beneath synaptic sites on dendrites (Steward and Levy, 1982
;
Steward, 1983
; Steward and Fass, 1983
). Subsequent studies revealed
that a select subset of mRNAs is present in dendrites, providing a
substrate for local synthesis of the respective proteins (Steward et
al., 1996a
,b
).
The selective localization of SPRCs in the subsynaptic cytoplasm
suggests that translation of dendritic mRNAs might be regulated by
synaptic activity (Steward and Levy, 1982
); however, evidence to
support this idea has been limited. Afferent stimulation in hippocampal
slices has been shown to cause an increased incorporation of labeled
amino acids in dendritic laminae when the stimulation was delivered in
the presence of a muscarinic cholinergic agonist (Feig and Lipton,
1993
). This incorporation suggests local protein synthesis within
dendrites. Other evidence has come from studies using subcellular
fractions of synaptic terminals with attached dendrites
(synaptoneurosomes). Treatment of synaptoneurosomes with metabotrophic
glutamate receptor agonists caused a transient increase in the
proportion of ribosomes in polyribosomes, suggesting enhanced
translation (Weiler and Greenough, 1993
). Interestingly, an mRNA with
sequence homology to fragile X mental retardation protein was among the
mRNAs that were regulated in this fashion (Weiler et al., 1997
).
Synaptic activity also triggers a local synthesis of the protein
encoded by the immediate early gene Arc (activity-regulated cytoskeletal protein). Stimulation of afferents to particular dendritic
segments causes the mRNA for Arc to localize selectively in
the activated portion of the dendrite (Steward et al., 1998
). Newly
synthesized Arc protein accumulates in the same dendritic domains as the newly synthesized mRNA. In this situation, the accumulation of the protein appears to be directly related to the
accumulation of the mRNA; it is not clear whether there is also
activity-dependent translational regulation of Arc mRNA once it
localizes at activated synaptic sites.
To assess whether the translation of dendritic mRNAs can be regulated
by synaptic activity, it is useful to focus on mRNAs that are present
constitutively in dendrites. Examples include the mRNAs for the
dendrite-specific cytoskeletal protein MAP2 and the
-subunit of
CAMKII (Steward et al., 1996a
,b
). CAMKII mRNA is of particular
interest because of recent evidence that its translation may be
regulated via cytoplasmic poly(A) elongation, and the molecular
machinery that mediates this process is present in the postsynaptic
junction (Wu et al., 1998
).
To explore whether synaptic activity regulates dendritic mRNA
translation, we activated the pathway from the entorhinal cortex to the
dentate gyrus (the perforant path) at frequencies that induce long-term
potentiation (LTP) and then used immunocytochemical techniques to
assess whether the activation caused an increase in MAP2 and CAMKII
protein in the activated dendritic domains. We demonstrate that
patterned synaptic activation does alter immunostaining patterns for
MAP2 and CAMKII, but in different ways. Protein synthesis inhibitors
were used to assess whether the changes in immunostaining depended on
new protein synthesis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Neurophysiological techniques. Adult male
Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized with urethane and positioned in a
stereotaxic apparatus as described previously (Steward et al., 1998
).
Stimulating and recording electrodes were positioned stereotaxically to
activate the pathway from the medial entorhinal cortex (EC) while
recording in the dentate gyrus. A monopolar stimulating electrode (an
insulated tungsten microelectrode) was positioned at 4.0 mm lateral to
the midline and 1.0 mm anterior to the transverse sinus. The depth of
the stimulating electrode was adjusted to obtain a maximal evoked
response in the dentate gyrus at minimal stimulus intensity. Recording
electrodes were glass micropipettes filled with 0.9% saline that were
positioned at 3.5 posterior to bregma and 1.5-2.0 mm lateral to the
midline. In some experiments, the micropipettes were filled with
various drugs as described below. The recording electrodes were
positioned in the cell layer of the dentate gyrus based on the evoked
responses generated by EC stimulation.
After the stimulating and recording electrodes were positioned,
stimulus intensity was set to evoke a ~1-3 mV population spike. Single test pulses were then delivered at a rate of one every 10 sec for 5-10 min to determine baseline response amplitude. Then
trains of high-frequency stimuli (eight pulses at 400 Hz) were
delivered at a rate of one every 10 sec for periods ranging from 1.5 min to 2 hr (see Table 1). At the end of the period of high-frequency
stimulation, test responses were delivered to determine the extent of
the synaptic potentiation that had been induced. Control experiments
involved delivering the same number and intensity of stimuli over the
same time period (2 hr) but at a low frequency that does not cause LTP
(0.8 pulses/sec).
In two experiments, protein synthesis was blocked globally by injecting
cycloheximide (CHX) systemically (20 mg/kg body weight) as described in
Wallace et al. (1998)
. In other experiments, protein synthesis was
inhibited locally by positioning recording micropipette electrodes
filled with either puromycin or cycloheximide (20 or 25 mg/ml of 0.9%
saline, respectively) in the dentate gyrus. The tips of the electrodes
were broken off to promote diffusion of the inhibitors into the tissue.
The area of effective protein synthesis inhibition was defined by
immunostaining sections for c-fos protein, which is strongly
induced by the stimulation. The area of effective protein synthesis
inhibition produced by diffusion of inhibitors from micropipettes was
~1-2 mm in diameter.
At the termination of the neurophysiological experiment, rats were
given an overdose of anesthetic (Nembutal, 100 mg/kg, i.p.). When
deeply anesthetized, the animals were perfused with 4%
paraformaldehyde. The brains were removed and stored in fixative
overnight. On the following day, the brains were sectioned on a
vibratome, and sections were collected and stored in phosphate buffer,
pH 7.4.
Immunocytochemistry. Free-floating vibratome sections were
treated with H2O2 to block
endogenous peroxidase. For some of the antibodies, immunostaining was
substantially improved using an antigen retrieval procedure in which
sections were heated to 95°C for 5 min. Sections were then
immunostained using one or more of the following antibodies (see Table
1). (1) Monoclonal antibody AP14, which recognizes MAP2, was used at a
dilution of 1:500. This antibody was a gift from A. Frankfurter
(University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA). (2) Monoclonal
antibody 6G9, which recognizes the
-subunit of CAMKII (Boehringer
Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), was used at a dilution of 1:1000. (3)
Monoclonal antibody 22B1 (Affinity Bioreagents), which recognizes
CAMKII only when it is phosphorylated on threonine-286, was used at a
dilution of 1:250. Sections stained for 22B1 were heat-treated for 5 min. The antibody for c-fos was a rabbit polyclonal antibody. Sections
were heat-treated, and the antibody was used at a dilution of
1:1000.
Sections were incubated for 72 hr in the primary antibody and then
washed and incubated in the secondary antibody for 2 hr. For the mouse
monoclonal antibodies, the secondary antibody was a horse anti-mouse
IgG used at a dilution of 1:100 in 5% normal horse serum. For the
rabbit polyclonal antibody against c-fos, the secondary antibody was
goat anti-rabbit IgG, which was used at a dilution of 1:100 in normal
goat serum. Subsequent immunocytochemical procedures were as described
in Wallace et al. (1998)
.
For quantitative assessment of immunostaining, optical density (OD)
measurements were taken across the granule cell layer and molecular
layer using an M4 Microcomputer Imaging Device (Imaging Research).
Digital images were collected at 400×. The light intensity was
adjusted so that areas exhibiting background levels of labeling (the
white matter) were just above threshold, whereas areas exhibiting maximal levels of labeling (the molecular layer) were within the measuring range. Then, a series of OD measurements were taken across
the granule cell layer and molecular layer using a 20 × 20 µm
measuring frame. A row of five separate measurements were taken at each
level of the granule cell layer and molecular layer, and the OD values
at each level (called row numbers in the figures) were averaged. The
values in the graphs illustrate the mean and SD of the five measurements.
 |
RESULTS |
The perforant path projections from the EC to the dentate gyrus
innervate the outer two-thirds of the molecular layer of the dentate
gyrus. Within that zone, the medial EC projects to the middle
molecular layer, whereas the lateral EC projects to the outer molecular
layer (Steward, 1976
). By positioning a stimulating electrode in
different parts of the EC, it is possible to selectively activate a
band of synapses that terminate in different sublayers of the molecular layer.
In the present experiments, we selectively activated the pathway from
the medial entorhinal cortex to the middle dendritic layers of the
dentate gyrus (the medial perforant pathway) using a stimulation
paradigm that reliably induces LTP (400 Hz trains, eight pulses per
train, delivered at a rate of one every 10 sec). Stimulation was
delivered for periods ranging from 1.5 min to 2 hr at an intensity that
initially evoked a 1-3 mV population spike. Physiological recordings
performed before and after the stimulation period confirmed that the
stimulation produced robust synaptic potentiation in every experiment
and that the potentiation persisted throughout the recording period
(data not shown). The set of animals from which the present
observations are derived is indicated in Table
1.
High-frequency stimulation of the perforant path produces a
two-stage alteration in immunostaining for MAP2 in the dendritic
laminae of the dentate gyrus
Assessment of MAP2 immunostaining patterns after various periods
of stimulation revealed a two-stage alteration in immunostaining. Brief
periods of stimulation produced a sharply defined band of decreased
immunostaining in the middle molecular layer (the lamina in which the
activated synapses terminate). Then, with continued stimulation, two
sharply defined bands of increased immunostaining appeared on each side
of the activated lamina.
Figure 1 illustrates the decreases in
immunostaining seen after brief periods of stimulation (in this case,
30 trains delivered over 5 min). The boundary of diminished
immunostaining was quite sharp (Fig. 1D,
arrows) and appeared to correspond exactly to the location
of the band of synapses that would have been activated. The band of
decreased immunostaining could be seen after as few as eight trains
delivered over a period of 1.5 min (data not shown), but these early
decreases were not as dramatic as those seen after 30 trains.

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Immunostaining pattern for MAP2 in the dentate
gyrus after 5 min of high-frequency stimulation of the medial perforant
path. A, Control immunostaining pattern contralateral to
the stimulation (MAP2 Con); B,
immunostaining pattern on the side in which the perforant path had
received 5 min of high-frequency stimulation (MAP2
Stim); C, D, higher magnification
views. Note the discrete band of decreased immunostaining in the middle
molecular layer (arrows) corresponding exactly to the
band of synapses that would have been activated. CA1,
CA1 region of the hippocampus; DG, dentate gyrus.
|
|
Longer periods of stimulation produced a striking trilaminar staining
pattern, in which there were bands of increased immunostaining on each
side of the activated lamina. Figure 2
illustrates an example of the staining pattern after 2 hr of
stimulation. Typically, the band of increased immunostaining located
proximal to the cell body layer appeared darker than the band of
increased immunostaining distal to the activated lamina.

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Immunostaining pattern for MAP2 in the dentate
gyrus after 2 hr of high-frequency stimulation of the medial perforant
path. A, Control immunostaining pattern contralateral to
the stimulation (MAP2 Con); B,
immunostaining pattern on the side in which the perforant path had
received 2 hr of high-frequency stimulation (MAP2 Stim);
C, D, higher magnification views. Note
the trilaminar staining pattern in the molecular layer in which the
central (activated) band was bounded by two thin bands of increased
immunostaining (arrows). CA1, CA1 region
of the hippocampus; DG, dentate gyrus.
|
|
The time course of development of the trilaminar staining pattern is
illustrated in Figure 4. After 30 min of stimulation, there was no
detectable increase in immunostaining in the sideband laminae, although
a band of decreased immunostaining could still be seen in the middle
molecular layer. The bands of increased immunostaining were detectable
at 1 hr, especially the more proximal band, and by 2 hr, the full
trilaminar staining pattern was evident.
Synaptic activation produces a selective increase in immunostaining
for CAMKII in the activated lamina
High-frequency stimulation of the medial perforant path also
caused an alteration in the immunostaining pattern for CAMKII; however,
the nature of the change was different than for MAP2. In particular,
synaptic activation led to the development of a sharply defined band of
increased immunostaining in the middle molecular layer that had been
synaptically activated (Figs.
3B,D, 4). This band seemed to exist in exactly
the same lamina in which MAP2 immunostaining was decreased. The band of
increased immunostaining for CAMKII was detectable after brief periods
of stimulation (5 min) (data not shown) but appeared more distinct with
longer periods of stimulation (Fig. 4). Also, after 2 hr of
stimulation, there was a hint of a more complicated lamination pattern
in which the band of increased immunostaining was bounded on each side
by bands of slightly decreased immunostaining, resulting in a
trilaminar pattern that was essentially a mirror image of the pattern
seen with MAP2 (Fig. 3D).

View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Immunostaining pattern for CAMKII in the
dentate gyrus after 2 hr of high-frequency stimulation of the medial
perforant path. A, Control immunostaining pattern
contralateral to the stimulation (CAMKII
Control); B, immunostaining pattern on
the side in which the perforant path had received 2 hr of
high-frequency stimulation (CAMKII Stim);
C, D, higher magnification views. Note
the discrete band of increased immunostaining in the middle molecular
layer (arrows) corresponding exactly to the band of
synapses that would have been activated. CA1, CA1 region
of the hippocampus; DG, dentate gyrus. E
and F compare immunostaining patterns for pan- CAMKII
(monoclonal antibody 6G9) and phosphoepitope-specific CAMKII
(monoclonal antibody 22B1). These sections are from a different case
than the one illustrated in A-D.
|
|

View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Time course of alterations in immunostaining
for MAP2 and CAMKII after high-frequency stimulation of the medial
perforant path. A and B illustrate the
control pattern of immunostaining for MAP2 (A;
MAP2 Con) and CAMKII (B; CAMKII
Con) in the dorsal blade of the dentate gyrus;
C, E, and G illustrate the
pattern of immunostaining for MAP2 after 30 min, l hr, and 2 hr of
high-frequency stimulation. D, F, and
H illustrate the pattern of immunostaining for CAMKII
after 30 min, l hr, and 2 hr of stimulation. Arrows
indicate bands of increased immunostaining.
|
|
To obtain a quantitative measure of the alterations in immunostaining,
OD measurements were taken across the molecular layer in six
representative cases that had been stimulated for 2 hr. Figure
5 illustrates an example of the results
from one animal. To obtain a single quantitative measure of the
alteration in MAP2 immunostaining, we calculated the mean difference in
OD between the activated lamina and the outermost band of increased
labeling (Fig. 5C). To quantify the alteration in CAMKII
immunostaining, we calculated the mean difference in OD between the
peak of staining in the activated lamina and the immediately adjacent
inner molecular layer (Fig. 5F). These quantitative
assessments revealed that in the six cases that were evaluated,
the average difference in OD between central (activated) and sideband
laminae was 18 ± 6% for MAP2 (that is, the OD in the outermost
band of increased staining was 19% higher than the OD in the activated
lamina). In the case of CAMKII, the OD was 32 ± 5% higher in the
activated lamina than in the inner molecular layer.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Quantitative assessment of immunostaining
for MAP2 and CAMKII after 2 hr of high-frequency stimulation. The
graphs illustrate the average optical density
(OD) of labeling across the molecular layer on the
control side contralateral to the stimulation (A,
MAP2, Control; D, CAMKII,
Control) and on the side of the stimulation
(B, MAP2, EC Stim;
E, CAMKII, EC Stim). Bars
indicate plus or minus 1 SD of the five measurements at each level of
the molecular layer. C and F are expanded
versions of the graphs in B and
D, which illustrate the method of quantification for
MAP2 and CAMKII, respectively. For further details, see Results.
HF, Hippocampal fissure.
|
|
Stimulation-induced alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 and CAM
kinase II are mediated by NMDA receptor activation
The stimulation paradigm that was used strongly activates NMDA
receptors, and NMDA receptor activation is thought to be critical for
inducing long-term changes in synaptic efficacy. Hence, we assessed
whether the stimulation-induced changes in immunostaining were mediated
by NMDA receptor activation. To address this question, micropipette
recording electrodes were filled with NMDA antagonists (AP5 or MK801).
As documented below, diffusion of the antagonist from the recording
electrode blocked NMDA receptor activation in a defined region
surrounding the micropipette.
To document the efficacy of antagonist action, we recorded synaptic
responses via the antagonist-filled micropipette and evaluated whether
the NMDA antagonists blocked the induction of LTP. For this experiment,
we first positioned a micropipette filled with saline in the molecular
layer to record the negative-going population EPSP. Control
responses were collected, and then the saline-filled electrode was
replaced with one filled with MK801 (10 mg/ml). The saline-filled
control micropipette was then repositioned at a distant site in the
dentate gyrus. The population EPSPs elicited by single-pulse
stimulation were of comparable amplitude before and after the placement
of the MK801-filled micropipette (data not shown). Nevertheless,
the potentiation of the population EPSP was completely blocked at the
site of the MK801-filled micropipette but not at the distant control
site (Fig. 6).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Local blockade of NMDA receptors blocks the
induction of LTP after high-frequency stimulation of the perforant
path. The graph plots the slope of population EPSPs
recorded via an MK801-filled electrode and a distant saline-filled
control electrode. Single test pulses were delivered at a rate of one
every 10 sec to determine baseline response amplitude, then a series of
three series of trains of 400 Hz stimuli (10 pulses per train, 10 trains) were delivered, collecting 10 test responses between each
train. Note the increase in response amplitude at the control site and
the absence of any change in response amplitude at the MK801 site.
After this testing paradigm was completed, trains of stimuli were
delivered for an additional 2 hr, after which the rat was perfused for
immunocytochemistry. The pattern of immunostaining in this case is
illustrated in Figure 7.
|
|
To actually visualize the area in which NMDA receptors had been
effectively blocked, we evaluated the stimulation-induced expression of
the immediate early gene c-fos. High-frequency stimulation of the perforant path strongly induced c-fos protein expression in
dentate granule cells (Fig.
7A); however, c-fos induction
was completely blocked in an area ~1 mm in diameter that surrounded the MK801-filled micropipette (Fig. 7A, arrows).
The local blockade of c-fos induction provides a striking visual marker
for the area in which NMDA receptors have been blocked, and the strong
induction in distant sites provides a useful intra-animal control.
Figure 7C-F illustrates the pattern of immunostaining for
MAP2 and CAMKII in sections from the animal illustrated in Figure
7A. Stimulation-induced alterations in immunostaining for
both MAP2 and CAMKII were eliminated in approximately the same area in
which c-fos induction was blocked, whereas alterations in
immunostaining persisted at locations distant from the
antagonist-filled micropipette.

View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Stimulation-induced alterations in immunostaining
for MAP2 and CAMKII are blocked by NMDA receptor antagonists.
A, Immunostaining for c-fos protein after 2 hr of
high-frequency stimulation of the perforant path. A micropipette filled
with MK801 was positioned in the dorsal blade of the dentate gyrus near
the level of this section. Note the virtually complete blockade of
c-fos induction in part of the dorsal blade between the
arrows. B illustrates the pattern of
immunostaining for c-fos on the control side contralateral to the
stimulation. C and D illustrate nearby
sections stained for MAP2; E and F
illustrate sections stained for CAMKII. Note the absence of alterations
of immunostaining in the dorsal blade in approximately the same area in
which c-fos induction is blocked. Abbreviations are as for Figure 1.
The lower case letters (a-i) indicate
the areas in which OD measurements were taken for the graphs of Figure
8A-I, respectively.
|
|
To document these results quantitatively, OD measurements were taken
across the molecular layer in the areas indicated in Figure 7
(lower case letters a-i). The results of these scans are
illustrated in the graphs of Figure
8A-I. The strong
induction of c-fos that normally occurs as a consequence of the
stimulation (Fig. 8A) is completely blocked in
the area near the MK801-filled micropipette (Fig.
8B). The trilaminar staining pattern for MAP2 is
present in areas distant from the MK801 site (Fig.
8D) but is not seen in the area near the MK801-filled
micropipette (Fig. 8E). Similarly, the increase in
immunostaining for CAMKII is clearly seen in areas distant from the
MK801 site (Fig. 8G) but not in the area near the
MK801-filled micropipette (Fig. 8H).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Quantitative analysis of stimulation-induced
alterations in immunostaining for c-fos, MAP2, and CAMKII in the
presence of NMDA receptor antagonists. The graphs
illustrate the average OD of labeling across the molecular layer in the
areas indicated by lower case letters a-i in Figure 7.
Error bars indicate ±1 SD of the five measurements at each level of
the molecular layer. Note that at the MK801 site, there is complete
blockade of c-fos induction (B), an elimination
of the trilaminar staining pattern for MAP2 (E),
and an elimination of the discrete band of increased immunostaining for
CAMKII.
|
|
Essentially identical results were obtained in one additional
experiment involving MK801 and in two other experiments in which the
recording micropipette was filled with AP5 (10 mg/kg). Taken together,
these results provide strong evidence that the alterations in
immunostaining for both MAP2 and CAMKII are mediated by NMDA receptor activation.
Stimulation-induced alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 are
diminished by inhibiting protein synthesis, whereas the increases in
immunostaining for CAMKII are not
To determine whether the lamina-specific increases in
immunostaining for MAP2 and CAMKII required protein synthesis, we
evaluated whether the alterations in immunostaining were blocked by
inhibiting protein synthesis during the stimulation period. Two
approaches were used. In the first, protein synthesis was blocked by a
single systemic injection of cycloheximide (20 mg/kg, i.p.). Such
systemic injections inhibit protein synthesis in brain by ~90%,
although protein synthesis recovers to ~50% of control levels over
the course of ~4 hr. In the second approach, protein synthesis was inhibited locally by positioning micropipettes filled with puromycin (25 mg/ml in saline) or cycloheximide (20 mg/ml in saline) in the
dentate gyrus.
To document the effectiveness of the protein synthesis inhibitors, we
again evaluated the stimulation-induced expression of the immediate
early gene c-fos. In animals not treated with protein synthesis inhibitors, high-frequency stimulation of the perforant path
strongly induced c-fos protein expression in dentate granule cells
(Fig. 9A). As expected, a
systemic injection of cycloheximide greatly attenuated this induction
of c-fos protein (Fig. 8C). In this same animal, the
alterations in MAP2 immunostaining on the stimulated side were
considerably less prominent than in control animals (Fig.
8E), although the trilaminar staining pattern could still be detected in part of the dentate gyrus. Inhibition of protein
synthesis did not block the development of the discrete band of
increased immunostaining for CAMKII. The band of increased immunostaining in the animal that received CHX appeared comparable to
that seen in animals that had not received CHX (Fig.
9G).

View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Systemic injections of cycloheximide block the
alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 but not the increases in
immunostaining for CAMKII. A, Induction of expression of
c-fos protein after 2 hr of high-frequency stimulation of the perforant
path as revealed by immunocytochemistry (C-fos Stim).
B, Pattern of immunostaining for c-fos on the control
side contralateral to the stimulation. C and
D illustrate sections from an animal that received
cycloheximide (20 mg/kg, i.p.) just before the initiation of the
stimulation (C-fos Con). C,
Immunostaining pattern for c-fos on the side of the stimulation
(C-fos Stim + CHX); D,
contralateral side (C-fos Con + CHX). Note that
the lack of induction of c-fos protein on the stimulated side as a
consequence of inhibiting protein synthesis during the stimulation
period. E and F illustrate the
immunostaining patterns for MAP2 on the stimulated and control sides of
the same animal illustrated in C and D.
There is a hint of the trilaminar staining pattern in one location, but
throughout most of the dentate gyrus, the pattern of MAP2
immunostaining resembles that on the nonstimulated side.
G and H illustrate the immunostaining
patterns for CAMKII on the stimulated and control sides of the same
animal illustrated in C and D. Note that
the discrete band of increased staining appears comparable to what is
seen in animals that did not receive protein synthesis
inhibitors.
|
|
In cases in which protein synthesis inhibitors were delivered via
diffusion from a micropipette, c-fos induction was blocked in an area
~1-2 mm in diameter surrounding the micropipette. For example,
Figure 10 illustrates a case in which
cycloheximide was present in the micropipette. In this case, the
alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 were less prominent in the area
around the cycloheximide-filled micropipette (Fig. 10C),
although again, some evidence of a trilaminar staining pattern could
still be seen. At the same time, the alterations in MAP2 immunostaining were clearly evident in sections taken from parts of the hippocampus that were distant from the micropipette. Similar results were obtained
when the micropipette contained puromycin (data not shown). Again,
however, local inhibition of protein synthesis did not block the
development of the discrete band of increased immunostaining for
CAMKII.

View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Local inhibition of protein synthesis blocks the
alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 but not the increases in
immunostaining for CAMKII. In this experiment, a recording micropipette
filled with cycloheximide (CHX) (20 mg/ml in
saline) was present on the stimulated side. A
illustrates the immunostaining pattern for c-fos on the stimulated side
(c-fos Stim+CHX). The diffusion of cycloheximide
from the pipette produced an area several hundred micrometers in
diameter in which protein synthesis was inhibited, as documented by the
absence of induced expression (arrows). In areas
distant from the micropipette, there was still strong induction of
c-fos protein expression. B illustrates the
immunostaining pattern for c-fos on the control side. C
illustrates the immunostaining pattern for MAP2 in the area in which
protein synthesis had been inhibited (MAP2
Stim+CHX). The trilaminar staining pattern is much less
evident than in areas distant from the site of protein synthesis
inhibition. D illustrates a region distant from the
CHX-containing micropipette. E and F
illustrate the immunostaining pattern for CAMKII in the area in which
protein synthesis had been inhibited. Note that the discrete band of
increased immunostaining appears comparable to what is seen in animals
that did not receive protein synthesis inhibitors.
|
|
To document these results quantitatively, we used the same strategy
that we used to document the effects of local injections of MK801. In
three representative cases that had been treated with CHX, OD
measurements were taken across the molecular layer in the areas near
the inhibitor-filled pipette and in distant areas. A single
quantitative measure of the alteration in immunostaining was then
determined as in Figure 5C,F, enabling us to
calculate the average change in immunostaining at the site of CHX
application in comparison to distant sites (Fig.
11). The results of this analysis confirmed the qualitative assessments. The strong induction of c-fos
that normally occurs as a consequence of the stimulation is completely
blocked in the area near the CHX-filled micropipette (Fig.
11A), the alteration in immunostaining for MAP2 is
diminished, but not eliminated, in the area near the CHX-filled
micropipette (Fig. 11B), and the increase in
immunostaining for CAMKII is only slightly diminished in the area near
the CHX-filled micropipette (Fig. 11C).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
Quantitative assessment of the effects of local
blockade of protein synthesis. To document the effects of local
blockade of protein synthesis, OD measurements were taken across the
molecular layer in three representative cases in which CHX was present
in the recording micropipette. Measurements were taken at the CHX site
and in a distant location. A single quantitative measure of the
alteration in immunostaining was then determined as in Figure
5C,F, enabling us to calculate the
average change in immunostaining at the site of CHX application in
comparison to distant sites. A, The strong induction of
c-fos that normally occurs as a consequence of the stimulation is
completely blocked in the area near the CHX-filled micropipette.
B, The alteration in immunostaining for MAP2 is
diminished, but not eliminated, in the area near the CHX-filled
micropipette. C, The increase in immunostaining for
CAMKII is only slightly diminished in the area near the CHX-filled
micropipette.
|
|
Similar results were obtained in the three experiments in which
puromycin was present in the recording electrode, except that in two
cases, the area of protein synthesis inhibition was larger, extending
for several millimeters. Throughout the area of inhibition, the
induction of c-fos was eliminated, and the alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 were substantially diminished. The larger size
of the area of inhibition in two cases made it difficult to compare
alterations near the puromycin site and at distant locations. Thus, we
did not perform quantitative assessments on these two cases.
Controls
The antibodies for MAP2 and CAMKII have been extensively
characterized in terms of their specificity. In the protocols used here, omission of either the primary or the secondary antibody eliminated immunostaining completely. An additional internal
control that these experiments provide is the laminar specificity of
the alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 and CAMKII. Immunostaining for MAP2 increased in the laminae on each side of the activated zone,
whereas immunostaining for CAMKII increased in the activated zone. This
complementary pattern virtually guarantees that the results are not
caused by some nonspecific alterations in tissue permeability for
antibodies or reagents, dendritic swelling, or a general change in the
dendritic cytoskeleton.
One possibility is that the changes in immunostaining reflect
local changes in the conformation and/or phosphorylation state of the
respective molecules. The fact that the changes in MAP2 immunostaining
are sensitive to protein synthesis inhibition argues against this idea
for MAP2, although it cannot be excluded that part of the observed
changes are caused initially by changes in the phosphorylation
state of MAP2. Nevertheless, we tested a phosphoepitope-specific antibody against MAP2 termed AP18 (Berling et al., 1994
). The same
pattern of change in immunostaining was seen with AP18 as described
above for AP14 (data not shown).
In the case of CAMKII, we tested antibodies that recognize CAMKII only
when it is phosphorylated on threonine-286 (P-CAMKII). If the
alterations in immunostaining that are seen with the pan-
CAMKII
antibody are caused by conformational changes associated with
phosphorylation at Thr-286, then the alterations might be revealed more
dramatically using the phosphoepitope-specific antibody. As illustrated
in Figure 3E,F, the pattern of
increased immunostaining appeared to be generally comparable whether
sections were stained with the P-CAMKII antibody or the pan-
CAMKII antibody.
One interesting aside regarding the immunostaining pattern for c-fos is
that there was a very light band of staining in the activated lamina
(Figs. 7, 9). This band was not seen in the control experiments in
which the primary antibody was omitted. This band was not seen in areas
in which c-fos induction was blocked by MK801 (Fig. 7A).
Interestingly, however, the band could still be seen when c-fos protein
synthesis was blocked by cycloheximide (Figs. 9, 10). This persistence
is not likely to be caused by an incomplete blockade of protein
synthesis because immunostaining over the cell body lamina was
completely blocked by local cycloheximide, whereas the light band of
staining in the dendritic lamina was still present in the area of local
blockade (Fig. 10A). Hence, this lightly stained band
may not reflect the presence of bona fide c-fos protein and may instead
reflect the accumulation of a fos-related antigen in the activated
lamina or nonspecific staining unique to the c-fos antibody that is
somehow disrupted by MK801.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the translation
of two representative dendritic mRNAs could be regulated by intense
synaptic activity. We reasoned that patterns of activity that induced
protein synthesis-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity might be
especially likely to regulate translation of mRNAs that are present in
dendrites constitutively. The enduring form of LTP induced by perforant
path stimulation meets this criterion (Krug et al., 1984
; Frey et al.,
1988
). We were especially interested in the possibility that synaptic
stimulation might induce CAMKII synthesis, because of recent evidence
demonstrating a mechanism for regulating CAMKII translation via
cytoplasmic poly(A) elongation (Wu et al., 1998
).
Our results revealed that stimulation patterns that induce LTP in the
perforant path do alter immunostaining patterns for both MAP2 and
CAMKII in dendritic laminae in the dentate gyrus in highly specific
ways. The nature of the alterations was different for the two
molecules, however, and only the alterations in MAP2 immunostaining
were detectably affected by inhibiting protein synthesis. We will
consider the findings for MAP2 and CAMKII separately.
Synaptic activation causes a local decrease in MAP2 levels
in the activated dendritic domains and increases in adjacent
domains
The alterations in immunostaining for MAP2 appeared to occur in
two phases. Initially, synaptic activation led to decreases in
immunostaining in the activated lamina. Then, over time, discrete bands
of increased immunostaining appeared on each side of the activated lamina.
The most obvious interpretation of the rapid decrease in immunostaining
is that intense synaptic activity causes a local degradation of MAP2 in
the activated dendritic domain. The strong activation of NMDA receptors
certainly leads to Ca2+ influx into
dendrites; this influx could activate calcium-activated proteases
(calpains) that are capable of cleaving MAP2 (Siman and Noszek, 1988
)
as well as other molecules (Seubert et al., 1988
). Excitotoxic neuronal
injury, traumatic brain injury, and focal ischemia also cause a rapid
decrease in MAP2 immunostaining, consistent with calpain-mediated
degradation (Siman and Noszek, 1988
; Taft et al., 1992
; Felipo et al.,
1993
; Pettigrew et al., 1996
). The novel finding of the present study
is that intense, brief, physiological, synaptic barrage also leads to
decreases in MAP2 immunostaining consistent with degradation, and that
these changes occur in very discrete dendritic domains that have been synaptically activated.
With more prolonged stimulation, two defined bands of increased
immunostaining appeared just adjacent to the band of activated synapses. This trilaminar staining pattern, with decreases in immunostaining in the activated lamina and increases in the immediately adjacent sidebands, implies that synaptic activation produces a
different set of signals in the activated and immediately adjacent dendritic domains. Whatever the mechanism of these changes may be, the
data reveal a striking domain-specific alteration in a key molecule of
the dendritic cytoskeleton as a consequence of lamina-specific synaptic activation.
The rationale of the present study suggests one possible interpretation
of the slowly developing increases in MAP2 immunostaining in the
sideband laminae: that the stimulation upregulated MAP2 protein
synthesis in the dendritic domains adjacent to the activated zone. The
fact that the alterations in immunostaining were partially blocked by
protein synthesis inhibitors is consistent with this interpretation.
Nevertheless, a hint of a trilaminar staining pattern was still
detectable following either systemic or local blockade of protein
synthesis. It is not likely that the partial preservation of the
induced trilaminar pattern reflects an incomplete inhibition of protein
synthesis, because the inhibition of induced c-fos protein synthesis
appeared to be complete. Hence, at least part of the change in MAP2
immunostaining may be attributable to something other than new protein synthesis.
One possibility is that part of the change in immunostaining reflects
changes in the molecular conformation of existing MAP2 caused by
changes in phosphorylation state. For example, synaptic activity might
stimulate increased phosphorylation of MAP2 within the microtubule
binding domain, an effect that would reduce the affinity of MAP2 for
microtubules (Ozer et al., 1998
). This might enable molecules of MAP2
to drift or be pulled away from the activated lamina and accumulate in
the adjacent dendritic zones. In addition, we cannot exclude
stimulation-dependent changes in the motor-driven transport of MAP2 as
being partly responsible for the appearance of the trilaminar staining pattern.
Another possibility is that the synaptic activation causes a local
reorganization of dendritic microstructure that is partly dependent on
new protein synthesis either locally or throughout the postsynaptic
neuron. In this case, the alterations in MAP2 immunostaining could be
either a cause or a consequence of the dendritic reorganization or growth.
The present results add to the story that MAP2 expression can be
regulated by synaptic activity. For example, previous studies have
revealed decreases in MAP2 immunostaining in the visual cortex after
activity over retinogeniculate pathways was blocked by injecting TTX
into the eye (Hendry and Bhandari, 1992
). These were seen after 5 d of TTX treatment and occurred selectively in the cortical columns
that represent the affected eye. The present data reveal new aspects of
this regulation. Specifically, the lamina-specific alterations indicate
that the modifications in MAP2 can occur selectively in local dendritic
domains based on the populations of synapses that are activated.
Moreover, the present data indicate that the changes can occur with
surprising rapidity. These findings invite the speculation that the
modifications in MAP2, a key component of the dendritic cytoskeleton,
may play a key role in the synaptic modifications that occur.
Alterations in immunostaining for CAMKII are mediated by different
processes than the alterations in MAP2
Intense synaptic activation induced a discrete band of increased
immunostaining for CAMKII in the activated lamina. This is in contrast
to the pattern of immunostaining for MAP2, where there was increased
immunostaining in the laminae on each side of the activated zone. This
complementary pattern suggests that the changes in CAMKII
immunostaining are mediated by different processes than the alterations
in MAP2.
A discrete band of increased immunostaining for CAMKII in the activated
lamina is expected if synaptic activation causes a local increase
in CAMK II synthesis. Yet the increase was affected minimally, if at
all, by inhibition of protein synthesis. This lack of sensitivity to
protein synthesis inhibition is in contrast to the situation for MAP2,
again suggesting that different mechanisms mediate the alterations in
CAMKII versus MAP2.
The fact that protein synthesis inhibition did not block the increase
in immunostaining for CAMKII suggests that mechanisms other than new
protein synthesis should be considered. Possible mechanisms include
those discussed above for MAP2, including conformation-dependent alterations in antibody recognition and accumulations caused by changes
in CAMKII targeting or transport. Nevertheless, the conclusion that
protein synthesis plays no role should be considered tentative. Immunocytochemistry is clearly subject to many variables, and it
is possible that changes in protein levels are not accurately reflected
by the accumulation of the immunocytochemical reaction product. For
example, a ceiling effect on detection sensitivity might have masked
differences in CAMKII protein levels in the protein synthesis
inhibition experiments. Nevertheless, the data support the conclusion
that MAP2 and CAMKII are differentially regulated in response to the
patterned synaptic activation that we used in the present experiments.
It is important to emphasize that our results do not exclude the
possibility that the translation of CAMKII could be regulated by other
patterns of synaptic activity. In this regard, a study designed to
address a similar question provided convincing evidence for increased
levels of CAMKII protein in the dendritic laminae of the CA1 region
following stimulation paradigms that induce LTP (Ouyang et al.,
1999
). Importantly, these increases were blocked by inhibiting
protein synthesis. The stimulation paradigm used by Ouyang et al.
(1999)
was different from the one used here (in terms of pattern
of stimulation), but in both cases the patterns used were the ones that
are most effective for inducing LTP in the respective structures.
Moreover, the stimulation paradigm that we used does lead to a dramatic
accumulation of newly synthesized Arc mRNA and protein in the activated
lamina, documenting that the activation is sufficient to dramatically
modulate translation of some mRNAs. It remains to be seen whether
different patterns of synaptic activation modulate CAMKII synthesis in
the dendritic laminae of the dentate gyrus.
Synaptic modifications in the activated and adjacent
dendritic domains
Our results, along with previous findings, document different
molecular alterations in the activated and sideband laminae after
intense synaptic activation. In the activated lamina, there are
alterations in CAMKII and dramatic increases in newly synthesized Arc
mRNA and protein. In the adjacent sideband laminae, there are increases
in the level of MAP2 protein. Given this trilaminar response, it is
interesting that the same pattern of stimulation used here has been
shown to produce different ultrastructural modifications in the
activated lamina versus the adjacent dendritic laminae in the dentate
gyrus (Desmond and Levy, 1983
, 1986
, 1988
). In the activated laminae,
spine synapses had larger contact areas, and the spines assumed a
U-shape, wrapping around the presynaptic terminal. There was actually a
decrease in synapse number per unit volume. In the sideband laminae,
synapses were smaller, and there was an increase in synapse number. It
remains to be determined whether the immunocytochemical alterations
described here are related to changes in synapse structure or number or
perhaps to other changes in dendritic microstructure. In any case, the
present study reveals the existence of novel mechanisms through which the molecular composition of particular dendritic regions can be
differentially modified as a consequence of signals generated by
synaptic activation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received March 11, 1999; revised June 25, 1999; accepted July 2, 1999.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS12333
(O.S.), National Science Foundation Grant NSF IBN92-22120 (O.S.), and National Institute of Mental Health Grant NM50861 (S.H.).
We thank Christine Duncan and Paula Falk for technical assistance.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Steward at his present
address: Reeve-Irvine Research Center, College of Medicine, University
of California at Irvine, 1105 Gillespie Neuroscience Research Facility,
Irvine, CA 92697.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Berling B,
Wille J,
Roll B,
Mandelkow E-M,
Garner C,
Mandelkow E
(1994)
Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated proteins MAP2a,b and MAP2c at Ser 136 by proline-directed kinases in vivo and in vitro.
Eur J Cell Biol
64:120-130[ISI][Medline].
-
Desmond NL,
Levy WB
(1983)
Synaptic correlates of associative potentiation and depression: an ultrastructural study in the hippocampus.
Brain Res
265:21-30[ISI][Medline].
-
Desmond NL,
Levy WB
(1986)
Changes in the numerical density of synaptic contacts with long-term potentiation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus.
J Comp Neurol
253:466-475[ISI][Medline].
-
Desmond NL,
Levy WB
(1988)
Anatomy of associative long-term synaptic modification.
In: Long-term potentiation: from biophysics to behavior (Lanfield PW,
Deadwyler S,
eds), pp 265-305. New York: Liss.
-
Feig S,
Lipton P
(1993)
Pairing the cholinergic agonist carbachol with patterned Schaffer collateral stimulation initiates protein synthesis in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites via a muscarinic, NMDA-dependent mechanism.
J Neurosci
13:1010-1021[Abstract].
-
Felipo V,
Grau E,
Minana MD,
Grisolia S
(1993)
Ammonia injection induces an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated proteolysis of the microtubule-associated protein MAP2.
J Neurochem
60:1626-1630[Medline].
-
Frey U,
Krug M,
Reymann KG,
Matthies H
(1988)
Anisomycin, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, blocks late phases of LTP phenomena in the hippocampal CA1 region in vitro.
Brain Res
452:57-65[ISI][Medline].
-
Hendry SHC,
Bhandari MA
(1992)
Neuronal organization and plasticity in adult monkey visual cortex: immunoreactivity for microtubule-associated protein 2.
Vis Neurosci
9:445-459[ISI][Medline].
-
Krug M,
Lossner B,
Ott T
(1984)
Anisomycin blocks the late phase of long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus of freely moving rats.
Brain Res Bull
13:39-42[ISI][Medline].
-
Ouyang Y,
Rosenstein A,
Kreiman G,
Schuman EM,
Kennedy MB
(1999)
Tetanic stimulation leads to increased accumulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II via dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal neurons.
J Neurosci
19:7823-7833[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ozer R,
Batinica A,
Halpain S
(1998)
Identification of phosphorylation sites for MAP kinase and PKA on the microtubule-associated protein MAP2.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
24:2016.
-
Pettigrew LC,
Holtz ML,
Craddock SD,
Minger SL,
Hall N,
Geddes JW
(1996)
Microtubular proteolysis in focal cerebral ischemia.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
16:1189-1202[Medline].
-
Seubert P,
Larson J,
Oliver M,
Jung MW,
Baudry M,
Lynch G
(1988)
Stimulation of NMDA receptors induces proteolysis of spectrin in hippocampus.
Brain Res
460:189-194[ISI][Medline].
-
Siman R,
Noszek JC
(1988)
Excitatory amino acids activate calpain I and induce structural protein breakdown in vivo.
Neuron
1:279-287[ISI][Medline].
-
Steward O
(1976)
Topographic organization of the projections from the entorhinal area to the hippocampal formation of the rat.
J Comp Neurol
167:285-314[ISI][Medline].
-
Steward O
(1983)
Polyribosomes at the base of dendritic spines of CNS neurons: their possible role in synapse construction and modification.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol
48:745-759.
-
Steward O,
Fass B
(1983)
Polyribosomes associated with dendritic spines in the denervated dentate gyrus: evidence for local regulation of protein synthesis during reinnervation.
Prog Brain Res
58:131-136[ISI][Medline].
-
Steward O,
Levy WB
(1982)
Preferential localization of polyribosomes under the base of dendritic spines in granule cells of the dentate gyrus.
J Neurosci
2:284-291[Abstract].
-
Steward O,
Falk PM,
Torre ER
(1996a)
Ultrastructural basis for gene expression at the synapse: synapse-associated polyribosome complexes.
J Neurocytol
25:717-734[ISI][Medline].
-
Steward O,
Kleiman R,
Banker G
(1996b)
Subcellular localization of mRNA in neurons.
In: Localized RNAs molecular biology intelligence unit series (Lipshitz HD,
ed), pp 235-255. Austin, TX: R. G. Landes.
-
Steward O,
Wallace CS,
Lyford GL,
Worley PF
(1998)
Synaptic activation causes the mRNA for the IEG arc to localize selectively near activated postsynaptic sites on dendrites.
Neuron
21:741-751[ISI][Medline].
-
Taft WC,
Yang K,
Dixon CE,
Hayes RL
(1992)
Microtubule-associated protein 2 levels decrease in hippocampus following traumatic brain injury.
J Neurotrauma
9:281-290[ISI][Medline].
-
Wallace CS,
Lyford GL,
Worley PF,
Steward O
(1998)
Differential intracellular sorting of immediate early gene mRNAs depends on signals in the mRNA sequence.
J Neurosci
18:26-35[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Weiler IJ,
Greenough WT
(1993)
Metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger postsynaptic protein synthesis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:7168-7171[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Weiler IJ,
Irwin SA,
Klintsova AY,
Spencer CM,
Brazelton AD,
Miyashiro K,
Comery TA,
Patel B,
Eberwine J,
Greenough WT
(1997)
Fragile X mental retardation protein is translated near synapses in response to neurotransmitter activation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:5395-5400[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wu L,
Wells D,
Tay J,
Mendis D,
Abborr M-A,
Barnitt A,
Quinlan E,
Heynen A,
Fallon JR,
Richter JD
(1998)
CPEB-mediated cytoplasmic polyadenylation and the regulation of experience-dependent translation of alpha-CaMKII at synapses.
Neuron
21:1129-1139[ISI][Medline].
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/19187834-12$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Messaoudi, T. Kanhema, J. Soule, A. Tiron, G. Dagyte, B. da Silva, and C. R. Bramham
Sustained Arc/Arg3.1 Synthesis Controls Long-Term Potentiation Consolidation through Regulation of Local Actin Polymerization in the Dentate Gyrus In Vivo
J. Neurosci.,
September 26, 2007;
27(39):
10445 - 10455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Willis, E. A. van Niekerk, Y. Sasaki, M. Mesngon, T. T. Merianda, G. G. Williams, M. Kendall, D. S. Smith, G. J. Bassell, and J. L. Twiss
Extracellular stimuli specifically regulate localized levels of individual neuronal mRNAs
J. Cell Biol.,
September 7, 2007;
178(6):
965 - 980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Huang, J. K. Chotiner, and O. Steward
Actin Polymerization and ERK Phosphorylation Are Required for Arc/Arg3.1 mRNA Targeting to Activated Synaptic Sites on Dendrites
J. Neurosci.,
August 22, 2007;
27(34):
9054 - 9067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sajikumar, S. Navakkode, and J. U. Frey
Identification of Compartment- and Process-Specific Molecules Required for "Synaptic Tagging" during Long-Term Potentiation and Long-Term Depression in Hippocampal CA1
J. Neurosci.,
May 9, 2007;
27(19):
5068 - 5080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gong, C. S. Park, N. R. Abbassi, and S.-J. Tang
Roles of Glutamate Receptors and the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Signaling Pathway in Activity-dependent Dendritic Protein Synthesis in Hippocampal Neurons
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 7, 2006;
281(27):
18802 - 18815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Alarcon, A. Barco, and E. R. Kandel
Capture of the Late Phase of Long-Term Potentiation within and across the Apical and Basilar Dendritic Compartments of CA1 Pyramidal Neurons: Synaptic Tagging Is Compartment Restricted
J. Neurosci.,
January 4, 2006;
26(1):
256 - 264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Jaworski, S. Spangler, D. P. Seeburg, C. C. Hoogenraad, and M. Sheng
Control of Dendritic Arborization by the Phosphoinositide-3'-Kinase-Akt-Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway
J. Neurosci.,
December 7, 2005;
25(49):
11300 - 11312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Iijima, T. Imai, Y. Kimura, A. Bernstein, H. J. Okano, M. Yuzaki, and H. Okano
Hzf protein regulates dendritic localization and BDNF-induced translation of type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor mRNA
PNAS,
November 22, 2005;
102(47):
17190 - 17195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
![]() |