 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 1999, 19(18):8071-8082
Serotonin Differentially Modulates Responses to Tones and
Frequency-Modulated Sweeps in the Inferior Colliculus
Laura M.
Hurley and
George D.
Pollak
University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
 |
ABSTRACT |
Although almost all auditory brainstem nuclei receive serotonergic
innervation, little is known about its effects on auditory neurons. We
address this question by evaluating the effects of serotonin on
sound-evoked activity of neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) of
Mexican free-tailed bats. Two types of auditory stimuli were used: tone
bursts at the neuron's best frequency and frequency-modulated
(FM) sweeps with a variety of spectral and temporal structures.
There were two main findings. First, serotonin changed tone-evoked
responses in 66% of the IC neurons sampled. Second, the influence of
serotonin often depended on the type of signal presented. Although
serotonin depressed tone-evoked responses in most neurons, its effects
on responses to FM sweeps were evenly mixed between depression and
facilitation. Thus in most cells serotonin had a different effect on
tone-evoked responses than it did on FM-evoked responses. In some
neurons serotonin depressed responses evoked by tone bursts but left
the responses to FM sweeps unchanged, whereas in others serotonin had
little or no effect on responses to tone bursts but substantially
facilitated responses to FM sweeps. In addition, serotonin could
differentially affect responses to various FM sweeps that differed in
temporal or spectral structure. Previous studies have revealed that the efficacy of the serotonergic innervation is partially modulated by
sensory stimuli and by behavioral states. Thus our results suggest that
the population activity evoked by a particular sound is not simply a
consequence of the hard wiring that connects the IC to lower and higher
regions but rather is highly dynamic because of the functional
reconfigurations induced by serotonin and almost certainly other
neuromodulators as well.
Key words:
serotonin; inferior colliculus; auditory; neuromodulation; brainstem; frequency modulation
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A major focus of auditory research
has been on how acoustic information is encoded in the inferior
colliculus (IC) (Yin and Kuwada, 1984 ; Aitkin, 1986 ; Pollak et al.,
1986 ; Brugge, 1992 ; Irvine, 1992 ; Oliver and Huerta, 1992 ). The IC is
of particular interest because it is a nexus in the ascending auditory
pathway. It receives and integrates information coming from almost all lower auditory nuclei and as a consequence is involved in most, if not
all, aspects of auditory processing (Beyerl, 1978 ; Roth et al., 1978 ;
Adams, 1979 ; Brunso-Bechtold et al., 1981 ; Zook and Casseday, 1982 ;
Aitkin, 1986 ; Ross et al., 1988 ; Oliver and Huerta, 1992 ; Vater et al.,
1992 ).
The pathways ascending from lower regions, however, are not the only
sources of innervation to the IC. Other sources include descending
input from the cortex (Huffman and Henson, 1990 ) and from
neuromodulatory networks that include serotonergic, cholinergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic systems (Olazábal and Moore, 1989 ; Henderson and Sherriff, 1991 ; Klepper and Herbert, 1991 ; Thompson
et al., 1994 ; Kaiser and Covey, 1997 ). The innervation from the
neuromodulatory systems is diffuse, in that a few neurons from each
system innervate large numbers of neurons in each brain region. An
example is serotonergic innervation, which originates from cell groups
in the raphe of the brainstem. Serotonergic raphe neurons innervate
virtually all regions of the CNS, from telencephalon to spinal
cord, and these neurons play key roles in such diverse processes as
development, motor output, and sensory processing (e.g., Rogawski and
Aghajanian, 1980 ; Bassant et al., 1990 ; Jacobs and Azmitia, 1992 ;
Jankowska et al., 1994 ; Lavdas et al., 1997 ; Hsiao et al., 1998 ;
Vitalis et al., 1998 ).
With regard to the auditory system, the serotonergic system is of
particular interest because it innervates most, if not all, nuclei in
the ascending auditory system (Willard et al., 1984 ; Klepper and
Herbert, 1991 ; Thompson et al., 1994 ; Kaiser and Covey, 1997 ). However,
the influence of serotonergic innervation on auditory processing is
poorly understood, even though a great deal is known about serotonergic
effects in a variety of nonauditory cells in both vertebrates and
invertebrates (e.g., Rogawski and Aghajanian, 1980 ; Harris-Warrick et
al., 1992 ; Oleskevich and Lacaille, 1992 ; Byrne and Kandel, 1996 ; Wang
et al., 1996 ). Only three electrophysiological studies that evaluated
the influence of serotonin have been conducted in brainstem auditory
nuclei. One study by Ebert and Ostwald (1992) was conducted in the
cochlear nucleus, and another study by Wang and Robertson (1997) was on
the ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body and rostral periolivary zone.
The descriptions in both studies are sparse and only report that
serotonin can either facilitate or depress responses evoked by tone
bursts or injected current. There is a comparable paucity of
information about the influence of serotonin on IC neurons. The only
information is contained in a short paragraph in a review of
neurotransmitters in the IC by Faingold et al. (1991) . There he
briefly mentions that serotonin had only depressive effects on the six
IC neurons that he studied.
To obtain additional insights into the functional roles that serotonin
might have in the processing of acoustic information, we initiated
studies to evaluate its effects on the responses of IC neurons evoked
by simple and complex signals in Mexican free-tailed bats. We chose
Mexican free-tailed bats as experimental subjects because they were the
subjects of previous anatomical and physiological studies (Pollak et
al., 1977 ; Bodenhamer et al., 1979 ; Grothe et al., 1994 , 1997 ; Park et
al., 1996 , 1998 ). Those studies showed that their auditory nuclei are
greatly hypertrophied but the circuitry and response properties of
their brainstem auditory nuclei are fundamentally similar to those
reported for other, less specialized mammals. Furthermore, these
animals rely heavily on their sense of hearing for both communication
and echolocation, and the features of many of those signals have been
described (Simmons et al., 1978 , 1979 ; Gelfand and McCracken, 1986 ;
Balcombe and McCracken, 1992 ). Here we present the results from a study that evaluated the influence of serotonin on the responses evoked by
both tone bursts and frequency-modulated (FM) signals whose structure
approximates their echolocation calls. We show that serotonin has
substantial effects on discharge properties of many IC neurons and that
the particular effect often depends on the structure of the acoustic signal.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Surgical procedures. Animals were anesthetized with
methoxyflurane inhalation (Metofane; Mallinckrodt Veterinary,
Mundelein, IL) and 0.02 mg/gm neuroleptic Innovar-Vet (Pitman-Moore)
injected intraperitoneally. The hair on the head was removed with a
depilatory, and the head was placed in a holder with a bite bar. The
skin and muscle overlying the skull were reflected after the topical application of 2% Lidocaine (Elkins-Sinn, Cherry Hill, NJ) to the
initial incision. The surface of the skull was scraped free of tissue,
and a foundation layer of cyanoacrylate and a layer of glass beads were
applied to the skull. A small hole was then drilled over the center of
the inferior colliculus.
The bat was transferred to a heated, sound-attenuated recording
chamber, where it was placed in a restraining cushion constructed of
foam molded to the animal's body. The restraining cushion was attached
to a platform mounted on a custom-made stereotaxic instrument (Schuller
et al., 1986 ). A small metal rod was cemented to the foundation layer
on the skull and then attached to a bar mounted on the stereotaxic
instrument to ensure a uniform positioning of the head. A ground
electrode was placed between the reflected muscle and the skin.
Recordings were begun after the bats recovered from the anesthetic. The
bats typically lie quietly in the restraining cushion and show no signs
of pain or discomfort. Water was provided with a dropper every 1-2 hr.
Supplementary doses of the neuroleptic were given if the bat struggled
or otherwise appeared in discomfort. If the bat continued to show signs
of discomfort, recordings were terminated, and the bat was returned to
its cage.
After the bat was placed in the recording chamber, the electrode was
advanced to the surface of the IC through the previously drilled hole
under a dissecting microscope. The electrode was subsequently advanced
through the brain from outside of the recording chamber using a
piezoelectric microdrive (model 6000; Burleigh, Fishers, NY).
All experimental procedures were in accordance with a protocol approved
by the University of Texas Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Electrodes. Recordings were made with "piggy back"
multibarrel electrodes (Havey and Caspary, 1980 ). A five-barrel H
configuration blank (model 6120; A-M Systems, Carlsburg, WA) was
pulled, and the tip was blunted to 10-15 µm. Recordings were made
with a single-barrel micropipette, pulled previously, that was glued to
the multibarrel array so that the tip of the recording electrode was
10-20 µm from the blunted end of the multibarrel electrode. The
recording electrodes had resistances of 8-15 M . The
recording electrodes and the central barrel of the multibarrel
electrode were filled with buffered 1 M NaCl and 2% fast
green, pH 7.4. The fast green allowed the electrodes to be easily
visualized during placement over the inferior colliculus. The remaining
barrels were each filled with serotonin creatinine sulfate (20 mM in 200 mM NaCl, pH 4) or the vehicle
solution (200 mM NaCl, pH 4). This concentration of
serotonin was similar to that used previously by Faingold et al.
(1991) . Throughout the text we will also refer to serotonin as
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). The barrels of the multibarrel electrode
were connected via silver-silver chloride wires to a six-channel
microiontophoresis constant-current generator (Neurophore, BH-2;
Medical Systems, Greenvale, NY). The central barrel was connected to
the sum channel to balance current in the drug barrels and reduce
current effects on the recorded neuron. The recording electrode was
connected via a silver-silver chloride wire to a Dagan AC amplifier
(model 2400; Minneapolis, MN). When a drug was not being applied, a
retention current of 15 nA was applied to each drug barrel to prevent
leakage. Drugs were applied by passing a positive ejection current that
ranged from +10 to +90 nA.
Acoustic stimulation, processing of spike trains, and
iontophoresis. Search stimuli were tone bursts presented to the
contralateral (excitatory) ear at a rate of 4 per second. The search
tones were generated by a sine wave function generator (model 136;
Wavetek, San Diego, CA) and shaped by a custom-made analog switch
(model 15; Restek, Austin, TX). Tone bursts shaped by the switch were 10-20 msec in duration and had 0.2 msec rise-fall times. Tone-burst frequency was monitored by a frequency counter. Tone bursts and downward-sweeping frequency-modulated (FM) signals having any desired
duration as well as starting and terminal frequency could be digitally
generated by the computer (Power Macintosh 7100/66). A 24-bit digital
interface NuBus card (DIO-24; National Instruments, Austin, TX) and a
digital distributor (model 99; Restek) communicated the Power Macintosh
7100/66 computer to a two-channel digital attenuator (model PATT;
Wilsonics, San Jose, CA). The outputs of each independently controlled
channel of the attenuator were sent to two 1/4 inch Brüel & Kjaer
microphones biased with 200 V DC and driven as loudspeakers. The
loudspeakers were flat within ±5 dB from 18 to at least 60 kHz. At the
start of each experiment, speakers, with windscreens attached, were
inserted into the funnels formed by the bat's pinnae and positioned
adjacent to the external auditory meatus. The pinnae were folded onto
the housing of the microphones and wrapped with Scotch tape. The
acoustic isolation with this arrangement was at least 40 dB.
Spikes were fed to a window discriminator and then to a Macintosh 7100 computer controlled by a Restek model 45 real-time clock. Peristimulus
time (PST) histograms and rate-level functions were generated and
graphically displayed. Unless otherwise noted, each PST histogram was
generated from the discharges evoked by 20 presentations of a signal at
a particular intensity.
After a unit was isolated, the best frequency (BF, the frequency to
which the neuron was most sensitive) and the threshold at BF were
determined. Threshold was defined as the intensity that evoked at least
4 spikes/20 tone bursts. After this initial evaluation of neuronal
properties, computer-generated BF tone bursts and/or FM signals were
presented to the contralateral ear. The tone bursts were either 10 or
20 msec in duration and had 0.2 msec rise-fall times. The FM signals
had a duration of 5-10 msec with 0.2 msec rise-fall times and had
frequency excursions tailored to each neuron's BF. The FM signals
always spanned 10 kHz and swept downward from above the BF (usually 5 kHz above) to beneath the BF (usually 5 kHz beneath). Rate-level
functions were obtained for each unit by plotting spike counts evoked
by BF tone bursts or FM sweeps at intensities ranging from threshold, or 5-10 dB below threshold, to 40-50 dB above threshold in 10 dB
increments. After the acquisition of these data, the same stimuli were
presented during the application of serotonin. During serotonin application, rate-level functions were monitored while ejection currents from +10 to +90 nA were applied. For each ejection current, rate-level functions were obtained until spike counts had stabilized. After spike counts were stable, the complement of tone bursts or FM
signals was presented again, and the same response features were
obtained for comparison with those obtained before the application of
drugs. The ejection current was then switched off, and "recovery" rate-level functions were obtained over the next 5-10 min.
Statistics. In addition to spike counts, we also measured
latencies to first spikes and, where appropriate, interspike intervals. For individual neurons, ANOVAs were performed on latencies and interspike intervals, with sound intensity and treatment (pre-ejection or serotonin) as independent variables.
Pre-ejection and serotonin latencies were also compared across the
population of inferior colliculus neurons. The latency value for each
neuron was the average obtained from 20 sound presentations at each
sound intensity. The latency values for each neuron were then
normalized for threshold and pooled with values from other neurons.
Pre-ejection and serotonin values were then compared with paired
two-tailed t tests.
 |
RESULTS |
Here we report on the influence of 5-HT on 151 single cells
from the inferior colliculi of Mexican free-tailed bats. All signals were presented monaurally to the contralateral ear. In 70 neurons we
examined serotonin effects on the responses to tones, whereas in 45 neurons we evaluated effects of serotonin on the responses to
standardized FM signals. These two groups of neurons overlapped by 35 neurons, in which we examined the effects of serotonin on responses to
both tone bursts and FM sweeps in the same neuron. The term
"standardized" refers to 5 or 10 msec FM signals that swept
downward through a 10 kHz range and had a starting frequency that was
usually 5 kHz above the neuron's BF and a terminal frequency that was
usually 5 kHz below the BF. In 71 other neurons we evaluated the
influence of serotonin on FM signals that had a variety of durations
and sweep frequencies.
The principal effect of serotonin that we evaluated was whether it
depressed or facilitated response magnitude. We considered that
serotonin had either a depressive or facilitative effect if the spike
counts evoked by either BF tone bursts or FM sweeps changed by at least
30% over the pre-ejection spike counts for at least one sound
intensity. When changes in spike count occurred, they developed over
the course of several minutes after serotonin was first applied and
recovered either partially or completely within 5 min of terminating
the application of serotonin. To ensure that whatever effects we
observed were indeed caused by serotonin and not by the vehicle or by
the iontophoretic current, we iontophoresed the vehicle alone in 39 neurons. In each neuron, we documented the cell's rate-level function
before (pre-ejection) and during the iontophoresis of the vehicle. We
then evaluated the effect of the vehicle by comparing the maximum
tone-evoked spike counts before and during the ejection of the vehicle
in each of the 39 neurons. Spike counts were measured at the lowest
intensity that evoked the maximum response for neurons with monotonic
rate-level functions and at 20-30 dB above threshold for neurons with
nonmonotonic rate-level functions. In the pre-ejection condition, the
maximum tone-evoked response was, on average, 35.3 ± 5.3 spikes
(±SEM), whereas the same tones evoked an average spike count of
38.4 ± 5.6 spikes (±SEM) while the vehicle solution was
iontophoresed. The two values were not significantly different
(p > 0.05, two-tailed paired t
test). We also applied serotonin to nine of these cells. Serotonin
depressed the spike counts in three cells and facilitated the spike
count in one cell. The vehicle alone, however, did not. A
representative neuron is shown in Figure
1 and illustrates that although the
cell's spike counts were depressed by serotonin, the vehicle solution
alone caused no change in spike count. We are therefore confident that
whatever changes in responsiveness we observed during the application
of serotonin were indeed caused by serotonin and not by the vehicle
solution or the spread of current through the ejection electrode.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Neuron in which iontophoresis of 5-HT depressed
tone-evoked discharges whereas iontophoresis of vehicle solution alone
had no effect on neuronal responsiveness. Controls are spike counts
evoked by 20 repetitions of the tone bursts presented over a range of
intensities (filled circles).
After the controls, serotonin was applied with an ejection current of
50 nA (open circles), which reduced the
spike counts evoked by most intensities. After the ejection current was
turned off, the spike counts recovered within 5 min to pre-ejection
values (filled squares).
After recovery, the vehicle solution alone was iontophoresed with an
ejection current of 50 nA (open squares),
the same ejection used for iontophoresis of serotonin. The spike counts
evoked during the ejection of the vehicle solution were virtually the
same as those evoked in the pre-ejection condition. BF was 34.1 kHz.
The tone-burst duration was 20 msec. SPL, Sound pressure
level.
|
|
Serotonin often modulated responses to tone bursts
Serotonin had a substantial effect on the spike counts evoked by
tone bursts in 46 of the 70 neurons tested (66%). Typically, serotonin
depressed responses evoked by tone bursts. Of the 46 cells whose
responses to tone bursts were changed by serotonin, 36 cells (78%) had
spike counts that were depressed. Although our criterion for depression
was a spike-count reduction of 30%, the depression was commonly
greater, where the average spike counts were depressed to 66.8%
(±4%) of their pre-ejection values. The depressive effects of
serotonin are illustrated by the neuron in Figure
2.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Neuron in which serotonin depressed tone-evoked
discharges. Top, PST histograms from 20 tone
presentations of BF tone bursts at various intensities. Spike counts
evoked by each intensity are shown to the right of each
histogram. Responses evoked before application of serotonin
(pre-ejection), during application of 5-HT, and 5 min after serotonin
was terminated (recovery) are shown in the three panels.
Bottom, The spike counts evoked by increasing sound
intensities for the three conditions. Open
circles show spike counts obtained during application of
serotonin, closed circles represent spike
counts in the pre-ejection condition, and closed
squares show spike counts in the recovery condition. The
BF was 44 kHz. The tone-burst duration was 20 msec, indicated by the
time bar.
|
|
Figure 2 also illustrates four other features that were seen in the
majority of IC cells whose tone-evoked discharges were affected by
serotonin. The first feature is that serotonin depressed the spike
counts by approximately the same proportion at every sound intensity.
In this neuron the spike counts were depressed ~50% below the
pre-ejection spike count at each intensity. Consequently, the shape of
the rate-level function was not changed by serotonin, because it was
monotonic before and during the application of serotonin. In other
cells, the rate-level function was nonmonotonic both before and during
the application of serotonin. The second common feature of Figure 2 was
that the tone-evoked temporal discharge pattern was not markedly
changed by serotonin. If a neuron displayed a sustained or an onset
discharge pattern in the pre-ejection condition, serotonin simply
reduced the overall magnitude of the response. This was also generally
true for neurons whose tone-evoked responses were facilitated by
serotonin, as described below. The third common feature was that the
spike counts recovered within 5 min after terminating the application
of serotonin. Although not every cell recovered completely, 70 neurons
for which we obtained data 5 min after the termination of serotonin
application recovered to an average of >90% of their pre-ejection
spike counts (recovery was obtained from 24 neurons tested with tones
and from 36 neurons tested with FM sweeps). The fourth feature was that
the threshold of tone-evoked discharges was usually not changed by
serotonin; thresholds for tone bursts were unchanged in 67% of the
neurons recorded. In the other 33% of neurons, for which serotonin did change the threshold, the direction of the threshold change always corresponded to the change in the spike count. For example, when serotonin depressed spike counts, it also caused a threshold increase in those cells.
The effects of serotonin on the neuron represented in Figure 2 also had
some features not shared by the general neuronal population in the
inferior colliculus. One feature was that the spike-count depression
for the neuron in Figure 2 was accompanied by a statistically significant decrease in first-spike latency at low intensities. As
shown in Figure 3A, the
pre-ejection latency at 10 dB SPL was 9.9 msec and increased to 16.2 msec during the application of serotonin. Serotonin-induced latency
changes, however, were not generally seen in inferior colliculus
neurons. Indeed, when we pooled the latencies of the population we
recorded, there were no significant differences in average first-spike
latencies to tone bursts, as shown in Figure 3B, or to
standardized FM sweeps (Fig. 3C) at any intensity.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Serotonin effects on latency to first spike.
A, Single neuron in which serotonin changed the latency
to the first spike is shown. Latency values are taken from the neuron
in Figure 2; each data point represents
the average latency for 20 tone presentations at the sound level shown
on the x-axis. The average latency during serotonin
application is significantly different from the average pre-ejection
latency (ANOVA, p < 0.01). B,
Average tone-evoked latency of the population of IC cells was not
significantly changed by serotonin at any sound intensity (2-tailed
paired t tests, p > 0.1). Sample
sizes were, at 10 dB above threshold, 46; at 20 dB, 46; at 30 dB, 39;
at 40 dB, 27; at 50 dB, 11; and, at 60 dB, 4. C,
Serotonin had no overall effect on latencies to FM sweeps across the
population of inferior colliculus neurons at any sound intensity
(2-tailed paired t tests, p > 0.1).
Sample sizes were, at 10 dB above threshold, 29; at 20 dB, 29; at 30 dB, 24; at 40 dB, 15; and, at 50 dB, 3. Error bars represent the
SEM.
|
|
In contrast to the depression seen in most neurons, serotonin
facilitated tone-evoked responses in only 10 of the 46 cells (22%).
The facilitation in these 10 cells, however, was usually substantial
and caused the spike count to increase on average by 168.7%
(±61.4%). Facilitation is illustrated by the neuron in Figure
4. This neuron showed a particularly
dramatic facilitation, partly because it hardly fired at all to tones
before serotonin was applied (in the pre-ejection condition). Other
neurons had relatively high pre-ejection spike counts that were also
facilitated by at least 30%, and usually more, by serotonin. Although
it is not obvious in Figure 4, the facilitation in most neurons was typically an increase in discharge vigor without a marked change in
discharge pattern. Thus, the overall response magnitude of sustained
cells increased while the discharges of onset cells became more
vigorous at the onset of the signal without prolonged discharges that
would transform the pattern into a sustained pattern. Two exceptions
were the neurons (see Figs. 7, 8) whose discharge patterns were
lengthened by serotonin.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Serotonin facilitated tone-evoked discharges.
Figure conventions are described in Figure 2. The BF was 23.5 kHz. The tone-burst duration was 20 msec, indicated by the time
bar.
|
|
In summary, in the 46 cells whose responsiveness to tone bursts was
modulated by serotonin, the spike counts in the majority (78%) of the
cells were depressed, whereas the spike counts in only a minority of
the population (22%) were facilitated.
Serotonin also altered spontaneous activity in
some cells
Serotonin altered spontaneous activity as well as tone-evoked
activity in many IC neurons. To evaluate the degree to which serotonin
had parallel effects on spontaneous and tone-evoked activity, we
collected data on spontaneous activity in 38 neurons in which we also
evaluated the effect of serotonin on tone-evoked responses. Because the
spontaneous firing rate of IC neurons in these animals is low, we
collected spike counts in the absence of acoustic stimulation in a 200 msec window (in contrast to the 20-50 msec window for tone-evoked
discharges) and summed the discharges in up to 50 trials. Serotonin
depressed spontaneous activity in 16 cells (42%), facilitated
spontaneous activity in 12 cells (32%), and had no effect on 10 others
(26%). Serotonin also affected the tone-evoked responses in 21 of
these 38 neurons, depressing 15 (39%) and facilitating 6 (16%).
The effects of serotonin on spontaneous and tone-evoked discharges were
not always the same. In the 38 neurons tested, the effect (or lack of
effect) of serotonin on spontaneous and tone-evoked activity was
qualitatively similar in 18 neurons and different in 20 other neurons.
Figure 5, A and B,
illustrates neurons for which serotonin had similar effects on both
spontaneous and tone-evoked discharges, either to decrease (Fig.
5A) or to increase (Fig. 5B) discharges. Figure
5, C and D, illustrates neurons for which serotonin had different effects on spontaneous and tone-evoked activity. For the neuron in Figure 5C, serotonin increased
spontaneous discharges while it suppressed tone-evoked discharges. For
the neuron in Figure 5D, serotonin had no effect on the
spontaneous activity but facilitated tone-evoked activity.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Effects of 5-HT on spontaneous and tone-evoked
activity in four cells. Left-hand
records, PST histograms show spontaneous activity before
(pre-ejection) and during application of serotonin. These records are
the accumulated spike counts over a 200 msec time period for 50 trials
for the neuron in A and 20 trials for the neurons in
B-D. The number to the
upper right of each histogram is the
total spike count during this period.
Right-hand records,
Rate-level functions of tone-evoked activity before (pre-ejection) and
during application of serotonin are shown. A, B, Two
neurons in which serotonin had the same effect on spontaneous and
tone-evoked activity are shown. A, Serotonin decreased
both spontaneous and tone-evoked activity. B, Serotonin
increased spontaneous and tone-evoked activity and decreased the
threshold for the tone-evoked response. C, D, Two
neurons in which serotonin had different effects on spontaneous and
tone-evoked activity are shown. C, Serotonin increased
spontaneous activity but decreased tone-evoked activity.
D, Serotonin had no effect on spontaneous activity but
increased tone-evoked activity. The BFs of the cells in
A-D were 27, 25.7, 25.5, and 26.8 kHz,
respectively.
|
|
These effects of serotonin on tone-evoked and spontaneous activity may
provide insights into whether serotonin was acting pre- or
postsynaptically. Serotonin can act by altering one or more
conductances that either hyperpolarize or depolarize the postsynaptic
cell (Andrade and Nicoll, 1987 ; Colino and Halliwell, 1987 ; Baskys et
al., 1989 ), or it can act presynaptically by altering a conductance in
presynaptic regions, thereby influencing transmitter release (Segal,
1990 ; Mintz and Korn, 1991 ; Huang et al., 1993 ). If serotonin were
acting only on postsynaptic receptors in IC neurons, it should have the
same effect on both spontaneous and tone-evoked activity, as it did in
some IC neurons. The fact that serotonin had different effects on
spontaneous and tone-evoked activity in approximately one-half of the
other cells suggests that the effects of serotonin on IC neurons were
not exclusively postsynaptic.
Serotonin effects on responses to standardized FM sweeps were
evenly mixed between facilitation and depression
Forty-five neurons were tested with standardized FM sweeps. The
responses of 20 cells (44%) were influenced by serotonin, but the
effects of serotonin on these 20 cells were more evenly divided between
depression (12 cells; 60%) and facilitation (8 cells; 40%) than were
the effects of serotonin on tone-evoked responses described above.
Serotonin depressed the spike counts of the 12 cells (60%) by an
average of 59.9% (±5.2%) of their pre-ejection spike counts.
Figure 6 illustrates the depressive
effects of serotonin on FM-evoked activity. For this neuron, serotonin
caused an overall depression of spike counts. Although the depression
was greatest at lower intensities (30-40 dB SPL), there was no change
in the general shape of the rate-level function, which was monotonic before and during the application of serotonin. In this neuron, serotonin also caused an increase in threshold and a small, but significant, increase in the latency to the first spike. For example, at 60 dB the average latency to the first spike changed from 13.2 msec
before serotonin to 13.9 msec during serotonin addition.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Serotonin depressed FM-evoked discharges. Figure
conventions are described in Figure 2. The neuron's BF was 24.8 kHz. The FM signal swept from 29.8 to 19.8 kHz and was 10 msec in
duration, as indicated by the time bar.
|
|
Overall, serotonin had a larger effect on FM-evoked thresholds than on
tone-evoked thresholds. With FM sweeps, serotonin changed thresholds in
44% of the neurons, whereas tone-evoked thresholds were changed in
33% of the neurons. As was the case for tone-evoked threshold
changes, when serotonin changed the FM-evoked threshold, the
direction of the threshold change always corresponded to the change in
the spike count, in that when serotonin raised the threshold it always
depressed spike counts and when it lowered the threshold it always
facilitated responses.
In 8 of the 20 cells (40%), serotonin facilitated spike counts evoked
by FM sweeps by an average of 144% (± 45%). Figure
7 illustrates facilitation in a neuron in
which FM-evoked spike counts more than doubled at most sound
intensities. This serotonin-induced facilitation was attributable both
to an increase in the magnitude of the initial discharge rate and to an
increase in the duration of the discharge train. For example, at 50 dB
SPL, the initial discharge rate to the FM sweep was far more vigorous
with serotonin, and the duration of the spike train was three times
longer than that of the pre-ejection discharge train. Both the duration
of the spike train and the spike count partially recovered after serotonin iontophoresis was terminated. Such a serotonin-induced change
in the temporal discharge pattern was rarely seen with tone-evoked
facilitation, although it was seen with FM sweeps in another neuron
(Fig. 8) besides the neuron in Figure 7.
However, in the 6 other neurons in which serotonin facilitated spike
counts, the facilitation was not accompanied by a change in the
duration of their spike trains, which is similar to the
serotonin-induced effects on responses to tone bursts described
previously.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Serotonin facilitated FM-evoked discharges. Figure
conventions are described in Figure 2. The neuron's BF was 18 kHz. The
FM signal swept from 23 to 13 kHz and was 10 msec in duration, as
indicated by the time bar. This neuron was one in which serotonin
increased the duration of the discharge train.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Neuron in which serotonin had the same effect on
tone- and FM-evoked responses. In this neuron, serotonin increased the
spike count and the duration of firing for responses to both tones
(left) and FM sweeps (right). Figure
conventions are described in Figure 2. The neuron's BF was 25 kHz. The FM signal swept from 30 to 20 kHz and was 5 msec in duration,
whereas the tone burst was 10 msec in duration, as indicated by the
time bars.
|
|
Serotonin often had differential effects on responses to tones and
standardized FM sweeps in single cells
In the above sections we described the influence of serotonin on
responses evoked either by tone bursts or by standardized FM sweeps.
Here we evaluate the effects serotonin had on responses to both tone
bursts and standardized FM sweeps in the same neuron.
Of the 35 neurons tested with both signals, 25 neurons (71%) displayed
a change in spike count either to tone bursts, to FM sweeps, or to both
signals during the application of serotonin. We classified these
neurons on the basis of whether serotonin effects on the responses to
tones and FM sweeps were similar or divergent. In 9 of the 25 cells
(36%), serotonin changed the responses to tones and FM sweeps in the
same direction, either depressing the responses to both signals or
facilitating them. In agreement with the predominately depressive
effects of serotonin on tone-burst responses presented previously, the
spike counts evoked by both tones and FM sweeps were depressed by
serotonin in 7 of the 9 cells, whereas the responses evoked by the two
signals were facilitated by serotonin in only 2 cells.
The neuron in Figure 8 was one of the two neurons in which serotonin
facilitated the responses both to tone bursts and to FM sweeps.
Serotonin increased the duration of the response for both tones and FM
sweeps. In the pre-ejection control, the neuron usually fired only once
per stimulus for both tones and FM sweeps. When serotonin was
iontophoresed, however, the neuron often fired twice in response to the
tone and three times in response to the FM sweep. During serotonin
addition, the interspike interval at 60 dB was 3.2 ± 0.4 msec for
the tone response and 2.3 ± 0.2 msec for the FM response.
Serotonin did not significantly alter the latency to the first spike
for either tone or FM responses.
The most interesting results occurred in 16 of the 25 neurons (64%),
because in these neurons serotonin had a different effect on
tone-evoked responses than it did on FM-evoked responses. In some
neurons serotonin depressed responses evoked by tone bursts but left
the responses to FM sweeps unchanged. This differential effect is
illustrated by the neuron in Figure 9. In
other neurons serotonin had little or no effect on the spike count in
response to tone bursts although it facilitated responses to FM sweeps. The spike counts evoked by tone bursts for the neuron in Figure 10, for example, were hardly changed by
serotonin. Serotonin appeared to increase the average latency to the
first spike at 50 dB, from 6 to 7.2 msec, but did not change the
latency at other intensities. In contrast, serotonin substantially
facilitated the responses evoked by FM sweeps. In particular, serotonin
increased the spike count in the latter part of the cell's FM response
at 50 and 60 dB. The total duration of the FM response was not changed
much at these intensities by serotonin, because the cell fired over the
same time period before and during serotonin addition, but only weakly
in the pre-ejection condition. However, when serotonin was added, the
increase in firing over this similar duration led to greatly shortened
interspike intervals. For example, at 60 dB, the interspike interval
decreased from 4.71 ± 0.85 msec before serotonin addition to
2.69 ± 0.15 msec during serotonin application.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Neuron in which serotonin had a different effect
on tone- and FM-evoked responses. Serotonin almost completely
suppressed responses to BF tone bursts (left) but had
virtually no effect on responses to FM sweeps (right).
Figure conventions are described in Figure 2. The neuron's BF
was 26 kHz. The FM signal swept from 31 to 21 kHz. The duration of the
tone burst was 20 msec, and the duration of the FM sweep was 10 msec,
as indicated by the time bars.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Neuron in which serotonin had a different effect
on tone- and FM-evoked responses. For this neuron, serotonin had
virtually no effect on responses to BF tone bursts
(left) but facilitated the responses to FM sweeps
(right). Figure conventions are described in Figure
2. The neuron's BF was 43.5 kHz. The FM signal swept from 50 to
40 kHz. The duration of the tone burst was 20 msec, and the duration of
the FM sweep was 10 msec, as indicated by the time bars.
|
|
Serotonin differentially influenced responses to FM sweeps
that had different temporal or spectral structures
The results presented above show that serotonin had substantial
effects on discharge properties of many IC neurons and that the
particular effect often depended on the structure of the acoustic signal. Here we show that not only did serotonin often have a differential effect on the responses of tones compared with that of
standardized FM sweeps but serotonin could also differentially influence the responses evoked by FM sweeps that had different temporal
or spectral structures. Differential serotonin effects on FM sweeps
were seen in 15.5% (11 of 71) of the neurons to which we presented two
or more types of FM sweeps. The neurons shown in Figures
11 and
12 illustrate these effects. For
the neuron in Figure 11, we presented two FM signals that swept through
the same frequencies but had different durations and, thus, different
sweep rates. Both signals swept downward from 22.6 to 20.6 kHz, but one
signal swept through these frequencies over a 10 msec duration whereas
the other signal sweep through the same frequencies over 2 msec. When
the 10 msec FM sweeps were presented, the neuron fired briskly, and
spike counts increased monotonically with increasing signal
intensities. Serotonin had little effect on the discharge magnitude at
any intensity, except at 50 dB SPL at which the spike count increased
slightly over the pre-ejection level. In contrast, the responses evoked
by the 2 msec FM sweep were initially weak and were markedly
facilitated by serotonin.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
Serotonin can affect the responses to FM sweeps
of different structure differently. The neuron's BF was 21.6 kHz.
A, Serotonin had little effect on the response to one
type of FM sweep. Left, An FM sweep is plotted as a
function of frequency versus time; this FM sweep ranged downward from
22.6 to 20.6 kHz over 10 msec. Right, The cell's
response to this FM sweep in the pre-ejection and serotonin conditions
is plotted as rate-level functions. B, Serotonin
facilitated the response to one type of FM sweep. Left,
The sweep is plotted as a function of frequency versus time; this
sweep ranged downward from 22.6 to 20.6 kHz over 2 msec.
Right, The rate-level functions for the response to this
FM sweep are plotted.
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 12.
Serotonin can affect the responses to FM sweeps
of different structure differently. The neuron's BF was 27.3 kHz.
A, Serotonin depressed the response to one type of FM
sweep. Left, An FM sweep is plotted as a function of
frequency versus time; this FM sweep ranged upward from 22.3 to 32.3 kHz over 10 msec. Right, The cell's response to this FM
sweep in the pre-ejection and serotonin conditions is plotted as
rate-level functions. B, Serotonin facilitated the
response to one type of FM sweep. Left, The sweep is
plotted as a function of frequency versus time; this sweep ranged
upward from 25.3 to 29.3 kHz over 10 msec. Right, The
rate-level functions for the response to this FM sweep are plotted.
|
|
Figure 12 shows a neuron in which serotonin had differential effects on
FM sweeps that had the same duration but different frequency
excursions. The duration of both FM sweeps was 10 msec, but one signal
swept upward by 10 kHz, from 22.3 to 32.3 kHz, whereas the other signal
swept upward by 4 kHz, from 25.3 to 29.3 kHz. Serotonin depressed
responses to the 10 kHz sweep at all intensities. In contrast,
serotonin enhanced responses at most intensities to the shallower, 4 kHz sweep. Thus, in this neuron serotonin had a different effect on
responses to FM sweeps that had the same duration but differed in
frequency excursion, whereas in the previous neuron serotonin
differentially influenced responses to FM sweeps that swept through the
same range of frequencies but with different sweep rates.
 |
DISCUSSION |
There are two central findings of this paper. The first is that
serotonin depresses or facilitates the responsiveness of many IC
neurons. In this regard, our findings agree with three previous reports
that serotonin can have either facilitative or depressive effects on
auditory neurons (Faingold et al., 1991 ; Ebert and Ostwald, 1992 ; Wang
and Robertson, 1997 ). The second and more interesting finding is that
the effect of serotonergic modulation on the responses of many IC
neurons is dependent on the type of auditory signal presented. Thus the
predominant effect of serotonin on responses evoked by tone bursts is
depression, whereas serotonin depresses or facilitates the responses
evoked by FM sweeps in approximately equal numbers of neurons. More
strikingly, this difference in the effects of serotonin on responses to
tones and FM sweeps also occurs in single IC neurons. Thus serotonin
often had no effect on the responses evoked by one signal, whereas in the same cell it had a profound effect on the responses evoked by
another signal. Finally, in some neurons serotonin has a differential influence on responses to FM sweeps that have different temporal or
spectral structures. These differential effects of serotonin have not
been reported previously.
Mechanism of serotonin effects is complex
Ideally, we would like to explain the effects of serotonin on IC
cells in terms of the particular 5-HT receptors that are activated by
serotonergic inputs to IC cells. However, very little is known about
the types of 5-HT receptors that are present in the IC, and the
techniques that we used provide insufficient information for advancing
explanations on this level. There is a vast array of 5-HT receptors in
the CNS that can act pre- or postsynaptically. Seven serotonin receptor
families, designated 5-HT1 through
5-HT7, have been classified, and numerous
subtypes are recognized within each family (Peroutka, 1994 ). With one
exception, the 5-HT3 receptor (Gyermek, 1995 ),
all other receptors act metabotropically, by triggering second
messenger cascades that ultimately modulate one or more currents
(Andrade et al., 1986 ; Peroutka, 1994 ). The variety of currents
modulated by one or another of the 5-HT receptors is impressive and
includes sodium currents and a variety of potassium and calcium
currents, as well as a mixed cation current, the
Ih current (Colino and Halliwell, 1987 ;
Berger and Takahashi, 1990 ; McCormick and Pape, 1990 ; Sah, 1990 ;
Bayliss et al., 1995 ; Aghajanian and Marek, 1997 ). However, the only
5-HT receptor in the auditory system identified so far is the
5-HT1A receptor, which is densely distributed in
the IC (Thompson et al., 1994 ). This is the only receptor that has been
identified so far because probes for other 5-HT receptors have not been
used in studies of the auditory system.
Although we cannot explain our results via the influences of various
receptor types, our results suggest that serotonin modulates some of
the excitatory and/or inhibitory synapses but not others. Stated
differently, it would appear that serotonin facilitates (or depresses)
the responses to frequencies that generate portions of the cell's
excitatory tuning curve as well as facilitating or depressing the
responses to frequencies that generate its inhibitory flanks. For
example, one possibility is that serotonin depresses excitation evoked
by BF tone bursts in some neurons and also depresses the inhibition
evoked by higher or lower frequencies that comprise the cell's
inhibitory surround. If we assume that the starting frequencies of the
sweep initially stimulate the inhibitory surround, which would be
depressed by serotonin, and then sweep through the excitatory portions
of its tuning curve, the elimination of inhibition could offset the
depression of excitation. This arrangement offers a potential
explanation for how serotonin could depress the responses to BF tone
bursts while having little or no apparent effect on responses to FM
sweeps. The effects of serotonin on excitatory tuning and its
inhibitory flanks and the degree to which those influences can explain
facilitation or depression of responses evoked by various signals are
currently under investigation and will be the subject of a future report.
Although the mechanisms are not well understood, the serotonergic
influences that we observed have functional consequences of
considerable importance. Below we discuss those consequences and argue
that the modulatory effects of serotonin can profoundly change the
population coding of acoustic signals in the IC. We then discuss why
the modulation is highly dynamic and may well be subject to behavioral states.
Some functional consequences of serotonergic innervation on
the processing of acoustic information in the IC
The finding that serotonin often modulates responses to tones
differently than responses evoked by FM sweeps shows that the conclusions drawn from studies evaluating the effects of serotonin in
auditory nuclei would be determined, in large part, by the nature of
the acoustic signal used. If, for example, we had only evaluated the
influence of serotonin on responses evoked by tone bursts, we would
have concluded that the dominant effect of serotonin on IC neurons is
depression. However, had we only evaluated the influence of serotonin
on FM sweeps, we would have concluded that serotonin effects are mixed
equally between facilitation and depression. Both conclusions would be
justified by the data, but neither is entirely correct. Rather the
particular effect that serotonin has on a neuron most often depends on
the nature of the acoustic signal, as illustrated both by the
differential effects serotonin often has on responses to tones compared
with FM sweeps and also by the differential influences serotonin can
have on responses to FM sweeps that differ in temporal or spectral
structure. It therefore follows that serotonin modulates the population
coding differently for different signals.
We point out that the results of this study also may not accurately
reflect the way serotonin modulates responses evoked by the various
signals these animals normally receive. Although many of the FM sweeps
that we used are structurally similar to the echolocation calls emitted
by Mexican free-tailed bats, they are not the same as their natural
echolocation calls. The majority of FM signals that we used had
durations of 5-10 msec, swept downward only by 10 kHz, and most
importantly were spectrally tailored so that they swept through the
neuron's BF. The natural echolocation calls have larger frequency
excursions, which sweep from ~40 to 20 kHz over a 2-5 msec duration,
are emitted with a harmonic, and change systematically both in duration
and spectral content as these bats search for, detect, and then home in
on a target (Simmons et al., 1978 , 1979 ). Additionally, these animals
use a rich diversity of acoustic signals for communication. Calls emitted during interactions between mothers and infants, for example, are rich in harmonics, have both upward and downward frequency modulations, and have durations of tens of milliseconds (Gelfand and
McCracken, 1986 ; Balcombe and McCracken, 1992 ). Because the effect of
serotonin in many neurons depends on the type of signal presented, it
seems likely that if we had used a repertoire of true echolocation and
communication signals we would have obtained a more complex set of
serotonin effects in an even larger proportion of cells than we found
with the more limited stimuli that we presented in this study.
Serotonergic modulation is dynamic and influenced by
behavioral states
The substantial impact of serotonin on the responsiveness of
many IC neurons suggests that modulation of the activity of
serotonergic neurons should also modulate responsiveness of neurons at
each level of the auditory pathway. Below we discuss this issue as well
as what some of the functional consequences of having response properties of auditory neurons modulated by serotonergic innervation might be.
With regard to the issue of the activity of serotonergic neurons,
previous studies have shown that some serotonergic neurons in the
dorsal raphe, the region that provides the largest projection to the
IC, have a slow rhythmic discharge rate in quiet, awake animals
(Trulson and Jacobs, 1979 ; Trulson and Trulson, 1982 ; Rasmussen et al.,
1986 ). This basal level of activity presumably has some influence on
the processing of acoustic information in awake animals. The hypothesis
that basal serotonergic activity influences auditory processing is
consistent with a recent study that showed that systemic depletion of
serotonin, by intravenous injections of
para-chlorophenylalanine, significantly increased the
latency of auditory brainstem responses from several lower levels in
awake bush babies (Revelis et al., 1998 ). Taken together, these
findings suggest that basal levels of endogenous serotonin influence
the responsiveness of auditory neurons in passively listening awake
animals. It also follows that the effects of the iontophoretically
applied serotonin we observed most likely enhanced the effects of
endogenous serotonin.
The roles of the serotonergic system become more interesting when
changes in its activity levels induced by behavioral states, such as
when an animal vocalizes or directs its attention to a sound source,
are considered. A recent proposal by Fornal et al. (1996) is
particularly relevant to this issue. On the basis of studies showing
that serotonin depresses responses in visual and nociceptive systems,
they suggest that under conditions in which the animal is not directing
attention to any stimulus, the basal activity of serotonergic neurons
inhibits afferent sensory systems and thereby depresses activity in
sensory systems. However, their studies have also shown that when an
animal orients to a novel stimulus, the activity of dorsal raphe
neurons decreases significantly. Thus, they propose that the decreased
serotonergic activity disinhibits sensory systems. The disinhibition
allows the sensory system to respond with facilitated responses as the
animal focuses its attention on the stimulus that evoked the orienting response.
The results of this study, however, are inconsistent with the
hypothesis of a general suppression of sensory responsiveness because
of serotonergic activity. If we had presented only tone bursts, the
dominant effect of serotonin would have been a suppression that is
consistent with the hypothesis. However, the increased number of
neurons in which responses to FM sweeps are facilitated and the
differential effects serotonin has on responsiveness evoked by tones
and FM sweeps in individual neurons are not consistent with the
proposition that serotonin simply has a suppressive effect on auditory neurons.
Rather, our results show that the modulatory influences that serotonin
exerts differ among neurons and often depend on the nature of the
acoustic signal. Whatever form these serotonin-induced shifts in
responsiveness assume, they result in changes in the population coding
of an auditory stimulus. These shifts in responsiveness can be viewed
as a functional reconfiguration of the neural circuitry, with serotonin
accentuating responses to sounds in some neurons and dampening it in
others. Additionally, the efficacy of the serotonergic innervation
depends on the activity level of the raphe serotonergic system, which
itself is partially modulated by sensory stimuli and by attention or
other behavioral states. All of this suggests that the pattern of
activity presented to the IC from lower centers, as well as the way the
IC population responds to that innervation, can be changed
substantially when an animal emits vocalizations, when it directs
attention toward a stimulus, and by its general state of arousal. In
short, our data suggest that the sound-evoked population activity in
the IC is not simply a consequence of the hard-wiring that connects the
IC to lower and higher regions but rather is highly dynamic because of
the functional reconfigurations induced by serotonin and almost
certainly other neuromodulators as well.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Feb. 12, 1999; revised June 18, 1999; accepted June 25, 1999.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DC20068.
We would like to thank Carl Resler for his technical support. We also
thank Brad May, Paul Katz, Eric Bauer, Michael Burger, and Achim Klug
for their critical comments.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Laura Hurley, 140 Patterson,
CO920, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Adams JC
(1979)
Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus.
J Comp Neurol
183:519-538[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Aghajanian GK,
Marek GJ
(1997)
Serotonin induces excitatory postsynaptic potentials in apical dendrites of neocortical pyramidal cells.
Neuropharmacology
36:589-599[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Aitkin L
(1986)
In: The auditory midbrain: structure and function in the central auditory pathway. Clifton, NJ: Humana.
-
Andrade R,
Nicoll RA
(1987)
Pharmacologically distinct actions of serotonin on single pyramidal neurones of the rat hippocampus recorded in vitro.
J Physiol (Lond)
394:99-124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Andrade R,
Malenka RC,
Nicoll RA
(1986)
A G protein couples serotonin and GABAB receptors to the same channels in hippocampus.
Science
234:1261-1265[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Balcombe JP,
McCracken GF
(1992)
Vocal recognition in Mexican free-tailed bats: do pups recognize mothers?
Anim Behav
43:79-87.
-
Baskys A,
Niesen CE,
Davies MF,
Carlen PL
(1989)
Modulatory actions of serotonin on ionic conductances of hippocampal dentate granule cells.
Neuroscience
29:443-451[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bassant MH,
Ennouri K,
Lamour Y
(1990)
Effects of iontophoretically applied monoamines on somatosensory cortical neurons of unanesthetized rats.
Neuroscience
39:431-439[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bayliss DA,
Umemiya M,
Berger AJ
(1995)
Inhibition of N- and P-type calcium currents and the afterhyperpolarization in rat motoneurones by serotonin.
J Physiol (Lond)
485:635-647[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Berger AJ,
Takahashi T
(1990)
Serotonin enhances a low-voltage-activated calcium current in rat spinal cord.
J Neurosci
10:1922-1928[Abstract].
-
Beyerl BD
(1978)
Afferent projections to the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the rat.
Brain Res
145:209-223[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bodenhamer RD,
Pollak GD,
Marsh DS
(1979)
Coding of fine frequency information by echoranging neurons in the inferior colliculus of the Mexican free-tailed bat.
Brain Res
171:530-535[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Brugge JF
(1992)
An overview of central auditory processing.
In: The mammalian auditory pathway: neurophysiology (Popper AN,
Fay RR,
eds), pp 1-35. New York: Springer.
-
Brunso-Bechtold JK,
Thompson GC,
Masterton RB
(1981)
HRP study of the organization of auditory afferents ascending to the central nucleus of inferior colliculus in cat.
J Comp Neurol
197:705-722[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Byrne JH,
Kandel ER
(1996)
Presynaptic facilitation revisited: state and time dependence.
J Neurosci
16:425-435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Colino A,
Halliwell JV
(1987)
Differential modulation of three separate K-conductances in hippocampal CA1 neurons by serotonin.
Nature
328:73-77[Medline].
-
Ebert U,
Ostwald J
(1992)
Serotonin modulates auditory information processing in the cochlear nucleus of the rat.
Neurosci Lett
145:51-54[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Faingold CL,
Gehlbach G,
Caspary DM
(1991)
Functional pharmacology of inferior colliculus neurons.
In: Neurobiology of hearing: the central auditory system (Altschuler RA,
Clopton BM,
Bobbin RP,
Hoffman DW,
eds), pp 223-251. New York: Raven.
-
Fornal CA,
Metzler CW,
Marrosu F,
Ribiero-do-Valle LE,
Jacobs BL
(1996)
A subgroup of dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons in the cat is strongly activated during oral-buccal movements.
Brain Res
716:123-133[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gelfand DL,
McCracken GF
(1986)
Individual variation in the isolation calls of Mexican free-tailed bat pups (Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana).
Anim Behav
34:1078-1086[Web of Science].
-
Grothe B,
Schweizer H,
Pollak GD,
Schuller G,
Rosemann C
(1994)
Anatomy and projection patterns of the superior olivary complex in the Mexican free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana.
J Comp Neurol
343:630-646[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Grothe B,
Park TJ,
Schuller G
(1997)
Medial superior olive in the free-tailed bat: response to pure tones and amplitude-modulated tones.
J Neurophysiol
77:1553-1565[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gyermek L
(1995)
5-HT3 receptors: pharmacologic and therapeutic aspects.
J Clin Pharmacol
35:845-855[Abstract].
-
Harris-Warrick RM,
Nagy F,
Nusbaum MP
(1992)
Neuromodulation of stomatogastric networks by identified neurons and transmitters.
In: Dynamic biological networks: the stomatogastric nervous system (Harris-Warrick RM,
Marder E,
Selverston AI,
Moulins M,
eds), pp 87-137. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Havey DC,
Caspary DM
(1980)
A simple technique for constructing "piggy-back" multibarrel microelectrodes.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
48:249-251[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Henderson Z,
Sherriff FE
(1991)
Distribution of choline acetyltransferase immunoreactive axons and terminals in the rat and ferret brainstem.
J Comp Neurol
314:147-163[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hsiao C-F,
Del Negro CA,
Trueblood PR,
Chandler SH
(1998)
Ionic basis for serotonin-induced bistable membrane properties in guinea pig trigeminal motoneurons.
J Neurophysiol
79:2847-2856[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Huang X,
Mooney RD,
Rhoades RW
(1993)
Effects of serotonin on retinotectal-, corticotectal-, and glutamate-induced activity in the superior colliculus of the hamster.
J Neurophysiol
70:723-732[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Huffman RF,
Henson Jr OW
(1990)
The descending auditory pathway and acousticomotor systems: connections with the inferior colliculus.
Brain Res Rev
15:295-323[Medline].
-
Irvine DRF
(1992)
Physiology of the auditory brainstem.
In: The mammalian auditory pathway: neurophysiology (Popper AN,
Fay RR,
eds), pp 153-231. New York: Springer.
-
Jacobs BL,
Azmitia EC
(1992)
Structure and function of the brain serotonin system.
Physiol Rev
72:165-229[Free Full Text].
-
Jankowska E,
Läckberg ZS,
Dyrehag LE
(1994)
Effects of monoamines on transmission from Group II muscle afferents in sacral segments in the cat.
Eur J Neurosci
6:1058-1061[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kaiser A,
Covey E
(1997)
5-HT innervation of the auditory pathway in birds and bats.
In: Acoustical signal processing in the central auditory system (Syka JL,
ed), pp 71-78. New York: Plenum.
-
Klepper A,
Herbert H
(1991)
Distribution and origin of noradrenergic and serotonergic fibers in the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus of the rat.
Brain Res
557:190-201[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lavdas AA,
Blue ME,
Lincoln J,
Parnavelas JG
(1997)
Serotonin promotes the differentiation of glutamate neurons in organotypic slice cultures of the developing cerebral cortex.
J Neurosci
17:7872-7880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
McCormick DA,
Pape H-C
(1990)
Noradrenergic and serotonergic modulation of a hyperpolarization-activated cation current in thalamic relay neurones.
J Physiol (Lond)
431:319-342[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mintz I,
Korn H
(1991)
Serotonergic facilitation of quantal release at central inhibitory synapses.
J Neurosci
11:3359-3370[Abstract].
-
Olazábal UE,
Moore JK
(1989)
Nigrotectal projection to the inferior colliculus: horseradish peroxidase transport and tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemical studies in rats, cats, and bats.
J Comp Neurol
282:98-118[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Oleskevich S,
Lacaille J-C
(1992)
Reduction of GABAB inhibitory postsynaptic potentials by serotonin via pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms in CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus in vitro.
Synapse
12:173-188[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Oliver DL,
Huerta MF
(1992)
Inferior and superior colliculi.
In: The mammalian auditory pathway: neuroanatomy (Webster DB,
Popper AN,
eds), pp 168-221. New York: Springer.
-
Park TJ,
Grothe B,
Pollak GD,
Schuller G,
Koch U
(1996)
Neural delays shape selectivity to interaural intensity differences in the lateral superior olive.
J Neurosci
16:6554-6566[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Park TJ,
Klug A,
Oswald JP
(1998)
A novel circuit in the bat's midbrain recruits neurons into sound localization processing.
Naturwissenschaften
85:176-179[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Peroutka SJ
(1994)
Molecular biology of serotonin (5-HT) receptor.
Synapse
18:241-260[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Pollak GD,
Marsh DS,
Bodenhamer R,
Souther A
(1977)
Characteristics of phasic on neurons in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized bats with observations relating to mechanisms for echo ranging.
J Neurophysiol
40:926-942[Free Full Text].
-
Pollak GD,
Wenstrup JJ,
Fuzessery ZM
(1986)
Auditory processing in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus.
Trends Neurosci
9:556-561[Web of Science].
-
Rasmussen K,
Strecker RE,
Jacobs BL
(1986)
Single unit responses of noradrenergic, serotonergic, and dopaminergic neurons in freely moving cats to simple sensory stimuli.
Brain Res
369:336-340[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Revelis J,
Thompson AM,
Britton BH,
Thompson GC
(1998)
Effects of para-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA) on the bush baby auditory brainstem response.
Hear Res
116:119-130[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rogawski MA,
Aghajanian GK
(1980)
Norepinephrine and serotonin: opposite effects on the activity of lateral geniculate neurons evoked by optic pathway stimulation.
Exp Neurol
69:678-694[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ross LS,
Pollak GD,
Zook JM
(1988)
Origin of ascending projections to an isofrequency region of the mustache bat's inferior colliculus.
J Comp Neurol
270:488-505[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Roth GL,
Aitkin LM,
Andersen RA,
Merzenich MM
(1978)
Some features of the spatial organization of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of the cat.
J Comp Neurol
182:661-680[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sah DW
(1990)
Neurotransmitter modulation of calcium current in the rat spinal cord.
J Neurosci
10:136-141[Abstract].
-
Schuller G,
Radtke-Schuller S,
Betz M
(1986)
A stereotaxic method for small animals using experimentally determined reference profiles.
J Neurosci Methods
18:339-350[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Segal M
(1990)
Serotonin attenuates a slow inhibitory postsynaptic potential in rat hippocampal neurons.
Neuroscience
36:631-641[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Simmons JA,
Lavender WA,
Lavender BA,
Childs JE,
Hulebak K,
Rigden MR,
Sherman J,
Woolman B,
O'Farrell MJ
(1978)
Echolocation by free-tailed bats (Tadarida).
J Comp Physiol
125:291-299.
-
Simmons JA,
Fenton MB,
O'Farrell MJ
(1979)
Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.
Science
203:16-21[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Thompson GC,
Thompson AM,
Garrett KM,
Britton BH
(1994)
Serotonin and serotonin receptors in the central auditory system.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
110:93-102[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Trulson ME,
Jacobs BL
(1979)
Raphe unit activity in freely moving cats: correlation with level of behavioral arousal.
Brain Res
163:135-150[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Trulson ME,
Trulson VM
(1982)
Differential effects of phasic auditory and visual stimuli on serotonergic neurons in the nucleus raphe dorsalis and nucleus raphe pallidus in freely moving cats.
Neurosci Lett
32:137-142[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vater M,
Kossl M,
Horn AK
(1992)
GAD- and GABA-immunoreactivity in the ascending auditory pathway of horseshoe and mustached bats.
J Comp Neurol
325:183-206[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vitalis T,
Cases O,
Callebert J,
Launay J-M,
Price DJ,
Seif I,
Gaspar P
(1998)
Effects of monoamine oxidase A inhibition on barrel formation in the mouse somatosensory cortex: determination of a sensitive developmental period.
J Comp Neurol
393:169-184[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wang X,
Robertson D
(1997)
Effects of bioamines and peptides on neurones in the ventral nucleus of trapezoid body and rostral periolivary regions of the rat superior olivary complex: an in vitro investigation.
Hear Res
106:20-28[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wang Y,
Ramage AG,
Jordan D
(1996)
Mediation by 5HT3 receptors of an excitatory effect of 5-HT on dorsal vagal preganglionic neurones in anaesthetized rats: an ionophoretic study.
Br J Pharmacol
118:1697-1704[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Willard FH,
Ho RH,
Martin GF
(1984)
The neuronal types and the distribution of 5-hydroxytryptamine and enkephalin-like immunoreactive fibers in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the North American opossum.
Brain Res Bull
12:253-266[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yin T,
Kuwada S
(1984)
Neuronal mechanisms of binaural interaction.
In: Dynamic aspects of neocortical function (Edelman GM,
Gall WE,
Cowan WM,
eds), pp 263-313. New York: Wiley.
-
Zook JM,
Casseday JH
(1982)
Origin of ascending projections to inferior colliculus in the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnelli.
J Comp Neurol
207:14-28[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/19188071-12$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Hurley, J. A. Tracy, and A. Bohorquez
Serotonin 1B Receptor Modulates Frequency Response Curves and Spectral Integration in the Inferior Colliculus by Reducing GABAergic Inhibition
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2008;
100(3):
1656 - 1667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Hurley
Different Serotonin Receptor Agonists Have Distinct Effects on Sound-Evoked Responses in Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2006;
96(5):
2177 - 2188.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Metzger, N. T. Greene, K. K. Porter, and J. M. Groh
Effects of reward and behavioral context on neural activity in the primate inferior colliculus.
J. Neurosci.,
July 12, 2006;
26(28):
7468 - 7476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Hurley and G. D. Pollak
Serotonin Shifts First-Spike Latencies of Inferior Colliculus Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
August 24, 2005;
25(34):
7876 - 7886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Koch and B. Grothe
Hyperpolarization-Activated Current (Ih) in the Inferior Colliculus: Distribution and Contribution to Temporal Processing
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2003;
90(6):
3679 - 3687.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Marsh, Z. M. Fuzessery, C. D. Grose, and J. J. Wenstrup
Projection to the Inferior Colliculus from the Basal Nucleus of the Amygdala
J. Neurosci.,
December 1, 2002;
22(23):
10449 - 10460.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Hurley and G. D. Pollak
Serotonin Effects on Frequency Tuning of Inferior Colliculus Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2001;
85(2):
828 - 842.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Brand, R. Urban, and B. Grothe
Duration Tuning in the Mouse Auditory Midbrain
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2000;
84(4):
1790 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|