 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 15, 1999, 19(22):10026-10035
Selective Inhibition of Spinal Cord Neurite Outgrowth and Cell
Survival by the Eph Family Ligand Ephrin-A5
Yong
Yue1, 2,
Jianying
Su1,
Douglas Pat
Cerretti3,
Gary M.
Fox4,
Shuqian
Jing4, and
Renping
Zhou1, 2
1 Laboratory for Cancer Research, College of Pharmacy,
Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, 2 Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Robert Wood
Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, 3 Immunex Research and Development Corporation, Seattle,
Washington 98101, and 4 Amgen, Incorporated, Thousand Oaks,
California 91320
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Eph family tyrosine kinase receptors and their ligands, the
ephrins, have been shown to play critical roles in cell migration, tissue morphogenesis, and axonal guidance in many different systems. However, their function in the spinal cord has not been examined carefully. We showed in this study that several Eph receptors, including EphA3, Eph A4, and Eph A5, are expressed in the ventral spinal cord in partially overlapping patterns, with EphA5 exhibiting the most widespread transcription in the entire ventral spinal cord
during early development. Complementary to the receptor expression, a
ligand of these receptors, ephrin-A5, is transcribed in the dorsal half
of the spinal cord. Consistent with the spatial location of receptor
expression, the ligand selectively inhibits neurite outgrowth and
induces cell death of the ventral, but not the dorsal, spinal cord
neurons. These observations suggest that interactions between the Eph
family receptors and ligands exerts negative influences on ventral
spinal cord neurons and thus may play important roles in regulating
morphogenesis and axon guidance in the spinal cord.
Key words:
Eph family receptors; ephrins; neurite outgrowth; spinal
cord; apoptosis; in situ hybridization
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Eph family receptor tyrosine
kinases and their ligands, the ephrins, have been shown recently to
play critical roles in the development of axonal connections (for
review, see Harris and Holt, 1995 ; Tessier-Lavigne, 1995 ; Friedman and
O'Leary, 1996 ; Drescher, 1997 ; Orioli and Klein, 1997 ; Flanagan and
Vanderhaeghen, 1998 ; Zhou, 1998 ). It has been proposed that ephrins
guide axons by repulsion via the interaction with their receptors.
Recent evidence also indicates that they may cause degeneration of
axons and neurons (Gao et al., 1999 ; Yue et al., 1999 ). The Eph family consists of at least 14 receptors and eight ligands (Zhou, 1998 ). All
of the ligands are membrane-bound and can be divided into two
subclasses according to the mechanism of membrane association. The
ephrin-A subclass ligands are attached to the cell membrane by glycosyl
phosphatidylinositol tail, whereas the ephrin-B ligands are anchored by
transmembrane domains (Zhou, 1998 ). Accordingly, the receptors also can
be divided into EphA and EphB subclasses, interacting respectively with
the ephrin-A and B subgroup ligands.
Recent studies suggest that the Eph family also may play key roles in
development of the spinal cord, because several members are expressed
in this tissue during development (Kilpatrick et al., 1996 ; Ohta et
al., 1996 ; Zhang et al., 1997 ). To define further the roles of Eph
family molecules in the developing spinal cord, we investigated the
expression of six of the eight known Eph-A subgroup receptors
(EphA3-A8) and all five known ephrin-A subgroup ligands
(ephrin-A1-A5). We further examined the biological effects of the
Eph ligands on spinal cord neurons in vitro. We report here that
the Eph receptors (EphA3, A4, A5) and one of their ligands, ephrin-A5,
are expressed in mutually exclusive patterns in the spinal cord, with
the receptors in the ventral and the ligand in the dorsal regions,
respectively. In addition, using in vitro culture assays, we
show that ephrin-A5 inhibits neurite outgrowth of the receptor-positive
ventral spinal cord neurons. We also observed that ephrin-A5 induced
apoptosis of the ventral spinal neurons in vitro. These
observations indicate that the interactions between ephrin-A5 and EphA
receptors may contribute to spinal cord morphogenesis or circuitry
formation by selectively regulating neurite outgrowth and cell survival
of the ventral horn neurons.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals and preparation of tissue sections for in
situ hybridization. CD-1 mouse embryos (Charles River
Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) of different gestation days (E11-E18)
were used in in situ hybridization experiments. The day of
vaginal plug occurrence was defined as embryonic day 1 (E1). At least
three animals were investigated for each experimental group. Whole
embryos were dissected under carbon dioxide anesthesia and frozen on
dry ice powder. Coronal and sagittal sections of 16 µm thickness were
cut with a cryostat at 23°C and mounted on slides coated with 2%
triethoxy-3-aminopropyl saline (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Then the slides
were stored at 80°C before use.
In situ hybridization. mRNA expression was examined by
either [35S]-labeled in
vitro-transcribed riboprobes or end-labeled oligonucleotide probes
as described (Zhang et al., 1996 ). EphA3 mRNA was detected with an
oligonucleotide probe of 51 base pairs (bp) containing the 3' mouse
EphA3 coding region (5'-TCC AGG ACT TTA CAC TGG AAC TGG ACC ATT CTT AGA
TTG TGT TTC TAG AGC-3'). This region has no significant homology to
other Eph family receptors. EphA4 mRNA was detected with a riboprobe
made from a 285 bp mouse cDNA fragment derived from the 5' coding
region cloned in pBluescript SK plasmid.
Antisense riboprobe was synthesized with T7 RNA polymerase for
hybridization, and sense control probe was generated with SP6 RNA polymerase.
EphA5 mRNA was detected with a riboprobe of 373 bp derived from the
region of a mouse cDNA encompassing the transmembrane domain
(nucleotides 1445-1818; Zhou et al., 1994 ) cloned in pGEM4 plasmid.
Antisense riboprobe was synthesized with SP6 RNA polymerase for
hybridization, and sense riboprobe was generated with T7 RNA polymerase
as a control.
To examine the expression of the ligands, we performed in
situ hybridization analyses with probes of all five ephrin-A
ligands. Only ephrin-A5 showed strong expression in the dorsal spinal
cord. Ephrin-A5 mRNA was detected with a riboprobe made from a 0.7 kb human ephrin-A5 cDNA containing the full coding region in pBluescript SK . Human ephrin-A5 shares >90%
sequence homology with mouse ephrin-A5 in the nucleotide level (Zhang
et al., 1996 ). It has been shown previously that this probe hybridizes
specifically to mouse ephrin-A5 and does not cross-react with other
ephrins (Zhang et al., 1996 ). Antisense riboprobe was synthesized with
T3 RNA polymerase and hydrolyzed in 0.2 M
carbonate buffer at 60°C for hybridization, and sense riboprobe was
synthesized with T7 RNA polymerase and treated the same as control.
EphA5-AP and ephrin-A5-AP staining. The ligand-affinity
probe (EphA5-AP), was constructed previously for detecting ephrin-A ligands (Gao et al., 1996 ). The construct was cotransfected into NIH
3T3 cells with aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene, which confers
G418 resistance. Then the transfected cells were selected with 400 µg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Tissue culture media from positive clones of EphA5-AP were used as probes to
detect ligand expression. The receptor-affinity probe ephrin-A2-AP was generously provided by John G. Flanagan (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and the fusion protein was prepared by transient expression in COS-7 cells. Staining of the cultured dorsal and ventral
spinal cord neurons was done as described previously (Flanagan and
Leder, 1990 ).
Coculture assay. Lumbar spinal cord neurons of E17 Sprague
Dawley rat embryos (Charles River Laboratories) were dissected under
microscope in PBS. Dissected tissues were dissociated with trituration to single-cell suspension and plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well in 12-well dishes
previously seeded with a confluent monolayer of ephrin-A5-expressing or
control NIH 3T3 cells transfected with the vector. Neurons were
cocultured in DMEM supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%),
penicillin (50 µg/ml), and streptomycin (50 µg/ml). The cocultures
were maintained for various periods of time and stained with a
polyclonal anti-neuronal specific enolase (NSE) antibody (Polysciences,
Warrington, PA) or a monoclonal anti-tau-1 antibody (Boehringer
Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). The number of neurons and the lengths of
neurites were measured with a Zeiss Telaval 31 microscope.
Assay for purified ephrin-A5-Fc. To assay the effect of
purified ephrin-A5-Fc, we treated 12-well tissue culture dishes
according to a procedure by Ohta et al. (1997) with modification.
Briefly, the wells first were coated with poly-D-lysine
(100 µg/ml) and laminin (20 µg/ml) sequentially for 1 hr each in a
CO2 incubator and then air-dried at room
temperature for 1 hr. Next the wells were coated with purified
ephrin-A5-Fc (100 ng for each well) either alone or cross-linked with
anti-human IgG (500 ng for each well). The cross-linking was
done by mixing 100 ng of ephrin-A5-Fc with 500 ng of anti-human IgG in
a total volume of 3 µl; the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. Wells coated with anti-human IgG also were used as an additional control.
Dissected dorsal or ventral E17 rat lumbar spinal cord neurons were
seeded in coated tissue culture wells (5 × 105 neurons/well) and cultured for 48 hr
in serum-free medium containing 50% Ham's F12, 50% minimum essential
medium (MEM), insulin (25 µg/ml), transferrin (100 µg/ml),
D-glucose (0.6%), putrescine (60 µM),
progesterone (20 nM), L-glutamine (146 mg/ml),
selenium (30 nM), penicillin (50 µg/ml), and streptomycin
(50 µg/ml). The cultured neurons were stained with monoclonal
anti-tau-1 antibody (Boehringer Mannheim).
Detection of apoptotic cells. E17 rat lumbar spinal cord
neurons were cultured as described for 24 hr and fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4, and then permeabilized with 0.1%
Triton X-100/0.1% sodium citrate at 4°C for 2 min. Then 200 µl of
terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling
(TUNEL) reaction mixture was added to each well according to company
specifications (Boehringer Mannheim) and was incubated for 60 min at
37°C. Positively stained apoptotic cells were examined by
fluorescence microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Region-specific expression of Eph receptors and ligands in the
mouse spinal cord
To examine the roles of Eph family receptors and ligands in the
development of the mouse spinal cord, we investigated the expression of
six EphA subgroup receptors, EphA3-A8, and all five ephrin-A subgroup
ligands, ephrin-A1-A5, at the critical time of mouse spinal cord
development by using in situ hybridization. EphA1 and A2
expression was not examined because they have not been shown to be
transcribed at significant levels in the nervous system (Zhou, 1998 ).
These studies showed that at least three EphA receptors, EphA3, A4 and
A5, and one ligand, ephrin-A5, are expressed in the spinal cord. In the
mouse embryos (E14-E18), EphA3 and EphA4 were expressed specifically
in the medial and lateral motor column neurons, respectively (Fig.
1A-C). EphA5 was found
in the entire ventral horn, which includes both interneurons and motor
neurons (Fig. 1D). A survey of the ephrin-A ligands showed that one ligand, ephrin-A5, showed high levels of expression in
the dorsal spinal cord at E14 (Fig. 1E). The
remaining four ephrin-A ligands had no or only low levels of expression
in the spinal cord (data not shown). No significant differences were observed along different levels of the spinal cord.

View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Complementary expression of the Eph family
receptors and ligands in the developing lumbar spinal cord.
A, Bright-field photomicrograph of a cross section of
E14 mouse lumbar spinal cord counterstained with thionine.
B-E, Dark-field photomicrographs of E14 lumbar spinal
cord cross sections hybridized with antisense EphA3, EphA4, EphA5, and
ephrin-A5 probes, respectively. The signals at the
bottom part of E are localized to the
dorsal root ganglia. DGM, Dorsal gray matter;
DRG, dorsal root ganglion; LMC, lateral
motor column; MMC, medial motor column;
VGM, ventral gray matter; WM, white
matter. Scale bar, 180 mm.
|
|
Dissection of dorsal and ventral spinal cord neurons
To elucidate the contributions of the Eph family guidance
molecules in the development of the spinal cord, we assayed the effects
of ephrin-A5 on neurite growth and survival of neurons from the dorsal
or ventral E17 rat lumbar spinal cord (equivalent to E16 in mouse). Rat
E17 spinal cord was used because active axon targeting and interneuron
cell death occur at approximately this time. Because the dorsal horn
cells express high levels of ephrin-A5 and the ventral horn cells
transcribe high levels of Eph receptors (these patterns of expression
were maintained in E16 and E18 mouse spinal cord), the precision of
dissection was determined by examining the expression of the ligand and
receptors in dissected neurons. Neurons from properly dissected dorsal
preparations should express primarily ephrin-A5, whereas neurons from
the ventral preparations should express mostly the Eph receptor
proteins. The expression of the ligand was assayed with EphA5-AP
fusion protein, which contains the ligand-binding domain of the
receptor linked in frame with human alkaline phosphatase (Zhang et al., 1996 ). EphA5-AP and similar constructs have been used widely to detect
the expression of ephrin-A subclass ligands (Cheng et al., 1995 ; Gale
et al., 1996 ; Flenniken et al., 1996 ; Zhang et al., 1996 ). Similarly,
the expression of the Eph receptors was assayed with ephrin-A2-AP
fusion protein, which contains ephrin-A2 fused to human alkaline
phosphatase (Cheng et al., 1995 ). Because of the promiscuity of
interaction between Eph receptors and ligands, ephrin-A2 binds to
almost all EphA subclass receptors (Flanagan and Vanderhaeghan,
1998 ; Zhou, 1998 ) and should detect the expression of the three
EphA receptors transcribed in the spinal cord.
Dissected dorsal and ventral lumbar rat spinal cord neurons were
cultured in serum-free medium on
poly-D-lysine/laminin-coated 12-well dishes for 48 hr and
then stained with EphA5-AP or ephrin-A5-AP fusion proteins (see
Materials and Methods for details). These analyses revealed that 76%
of the dissected dorsal neurons had EphA5-AP-staining and only 13% of
these neurons showed ephrin-A2-AP binding. In contrast, ~81% of the
dissected ventral neurons showed positive staining by ephrin-A2-AP,
and only 17% of these cells had positive staining for EphA5-AP (Fig.
2). These observations are consistent
with the results from our in situ hybridization analysis
that the dorsal neurons express ephrin-A5 and the ventral neurons
transcribe Eph receptors, and indicate that our dissection is precise.
Neurons from these dissections are mostly interneurons, because the
motor neurons consist of only ~7% of the total neuron population.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Dissection of dorsal and ventral spinal cord
neurons. Neurons from the dorsal or ventral E17 rat lumbar spinal cord
were plated on laminin-coated tissue culture wells and cultured for 48 hr. Then the neurons were stained with EphA5-AP or ephrin-A2-AP to
detect ligand or receptor expression, respectively. *Indicates that the
differences are statistically significant (p < 0.005; Student's t test).
|
|
Reduction of ventral spinal cord neurite length
by ephrin-A5
To examine the effects of ephrin-A5 on spinal cord neurite
outgrowth and survival, we cocultured dorsal or ventral spinal cord
neurons with ephrin-A5-expressing cells or control cells transfected
with the expression vector only. After 48 hr of culture the neurons
were identified by immunocytochemical staining with anti-neuron-specific enolase (NSE) antibody (Polysciences). These coculture assays showed that, whereas the ephrin-A5-expressing cells
had no significant effects on neurite outgrowth of the dorsal spinal
cord neurons as compared with the control NIH 3T3 cells (Fig.
3A,B), they greatly reduced
the neurite length of the ventral spinal cord neurons (compare Figs.
3C,D, 4A).
Quantitative analyses revealed that the lengths of the ventral neurites
cocultured with ephrin-A5-expressing cells were only ~40% of those
cocultured with the control cells (Fig. 4A). To
ascertain whether this negative effect is attributable specifically to
the expression of ephrin-A5, we studied the effect of
ephrin-A5-expressing cells in the presence of ephrin-A5-Fc and
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C (PI-PLC). Ephrin-A5-Fc has been
shown to counteract the effect of membrane-bound ligands on axon
guidance of retina ganglion neurons (Ciossek et al., 1998 ), whereas
PI-PLC treatment releases the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored ligand from the cell membrane and thus inactivates the ligand (Cheng et
al., 1995 ). Ephrin-A5-Fc treatment increased the ventral neurite length
cultured on ephrin-A5-expressing cells in a dose-dependent manner while
having no effects on neurites cocultured with the control cells (see
Figs. 3E,F, 4B). A similar increase in
neurite length was observed when PI-PLC was added in the coculture
(Fig. 4C).

View larger version (206K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Ephrin-A5 reduces the neurite length of ventral
spinal neurons. Dorsal or ventral E17 rat lumbar spinal cord neurons
growing on a confluent monolayer of ephrin-A5-expressing cells were
detected after 48 hr of culture by immunocytochemical staining with
anti-neuron-specific enolase antibody. Neurons and neurites are stained
darkly, and the underlying fibroblasts show background staining.
A, B, Dorsal spinal cord neurons plated
on ephrin-A5-expressing or control cells, respectively. C,
D, Ventral spinal cord neurons plated on ephrin-A5-expressing
or control cells, respectively. E, F, Ventral spinal
cord neurons plated on ephrin-A5-expressing or control cells,
respectively, in the presence of 5 µg/ml purified uncross-linked
ephrin-A5-Fc. Soluble uncross-linked ephrin-A5-Fc partially restored
neurite outgrowth from the ventral neurons but showed no effects on
neurons cocultured with control cells. Scale bar in F,
40 µm.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Quantitative analysis of ephrin-A5 effects on
spinal cord neurite outgrowth. A, The lengths of ventral
neurites are significantly shorter when cocultured with
ephrin-A5-expressing cells than when cocultured with control cells.
Data shown are the average length of neurites surveyed ± SEM.
*p < 0.05; Student's t test.
B, C, The ephrin inhibitors ephrin-A5-Fc
and PI-PLC partially restore the neurite outgrowth of ventral spinal
cord neurons in a dose-dependent manner. *p < 0.001; ANOVA. Control represents ventral spinal neurons grown on
control-transfected NIH 3T3 cells. The ventral neurites are the longest
under this condition. Soluble ephrin-A5-Fc does not alter neurite
outgrowth significantly in the control cultures. In the absence of
inhibitors the ventral neurites are the shortest on the
ephrin-A5-expressing cells.
|
|
Induction of ventral spinal cord cell death by ephrin-A5
In addition to a significant reduction in neurite length in the
presence of ephrin-A5, the cell density of NSE-positive ventral spinal
cord neurons cocultured with ephrin-A5-expressing cells is only ~58%
of that cocultured with the control cells (Fig.
5). In contrast, no significant
difference was found between the number of surviving dorsal spinal cord
neurons cocultured with ephrin-A5-expressing and control cells (Fig.
5).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Quantitative analysis of ephrin-A5 effects on the
survival of E17 rat ventral lumbar spinal cord neurons.
A, Ephrin-A5 selectively induces cell loss of ventral
spinal cord neurons. Ventral and dorsal spinal cord neurons were
cocultured with a confluent monolayer of ephrin-A5-expressing cells or
control NIH 3T3 cells for 48 hr and then stained with
anti-neuron-specific enolase antibody. Data shown are the average
numbers of surviving neurons/mm2 ± SEM from
six different assays. *Significant differences
(p < 0.05; Student's t
test). B, Time course of ventral spinal cord neuron
loss. Dorsal or ventral spinal cord neurons were cocultured with
ephrin-A5 or control cells for various time periods and examined for
survival by using immunocytochemical staining with
anti-neuronal-specific enolase antibody. *Significant differences
(p < 0.001; ANOVA). D,
Dorsal spinal neurons; V, ventral spinal neurons.
|
|
To examine whether the cell loss was attributable to the lack of cell
adhesion, we compared neuron numbers on ephrin-A5-expressing and
control cells at different culture times. If the ventral neurons fail
to adhere to the ligand-expressing cells initially, we would expect a
difference in neuron number soon after the establishment of the
coculture. Contrary to this expectation, at 8 hr of coculture the
numbers of neurons on ephrin-A5-expressing and control cells were
indistinguishable (Fig. 5B). However, cell loss in ventral spinal cord coculture with the ligand-expressing cells became obvious
by 36 hr, whereas few losses were observed when these neurons were
cocultured with control cells (Fig. 5B). By the end of the
3 d culture period, ~87% of dorsal neurons and 62.5% of ventral neurons survived in NIH 3T3 control culture. In contrast, 75%
of the dorsal and 25% of the ventral neurons survived in the presence
of membrane-attached ephrin-A5 (Fig. 5B), indicating that
ephrin-A5 has only a minor effect on the dorsal neurons but significantly promoted cell loss of the ventral neurons. These results suggest that the cell loss is unlikely to be attributable to
the lack of initial adhesion of ventral neurons to the
ligand-expressing cells. Further, we analyzed the effect of the two
reagents that interfere with ephrin function, PI-PLC and ephrin-A5-Fc.
In the presence of both reagents the number of surviving ventral
neurons increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
6). Inhibition of the ephrin effect on
cell survival by PI-PLC and soluble ephrin-A5-Fc indicates that the
effect is specifically attributable to ephrin-A5 expressed on the cell
surface.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Induction of ventral spinal cord neuron loss is
ephrin-dependent. Ventral E17 rat lumbar spinal neurons were cocultured
with ephrin-expressing or control cells in the presence of various
concentrations of PI-PLC (A) or purified soluble
ephrin-A5-Fc (B). Data shown are the average
numbers of neurons/mm2 ± SEM from three
different assays. *Significant differences
(p < 0.001; ANOVA).
|
|
Effects of cross-linked purified ephrin-A5-Fc
To exclude further the possibility that the negative effects of
ephrin-A5-expressing cells on ventral spinal neurons was related to the
presence of unknown factors secreted by the cell lines, we examined the
effect of ephrin-A5 in a cell-free system. Artificially cross-linked
purified ephrins have been shown to activate the tyrosine kinase
activity of Eph family receptors (Davis et al., 1994 ; Stein et al.,
1998 ) and to inhibit the neurite outgrowth of motor neurons (Ohta et
al., 1997 ). Purified ephrin-A5-Fc was tagged with human IgG-Fc region
and could be cross-linked with anti-human IgG. Dorsal or ventral spinal
cord neurons were cultured in tissue culture wells coated with the
cross-linked ligand, anti-IgG alone, or un-cross-linked ligand alone.
Neurons were cultured for 48 hr in serum-free medium and stained with
an anti-tau-1 monoclonal antibody. Similar to those observed in the
coculture assays, no significant differences were found in either
neurite length or the number of tau-positive dorsal neurons between
cultures in wells coated with cross-linked ligand and controls (Fig.
7A,B,E). However, the neurite
lengths of ventral neurons were much shorter in wells coated with
cross-linked ligand than in wells coated with either IgG or
uncross-linked ephrin-A5-Fc (Fig. 7C,D). Furthermore, the
cell density of tau-positive ventral neurons cultured on cross-linked ligand was significantly less (56%) than that on either the
uncross-linked ligand or the IgG control (Fig. 7C-E).
Together with the coculture results, these data strongly suggest that
ephrin-A5 reduces ventral neurite length and induces the loss of the
ventral spinal cord neurons.

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Selective inhibition of neurite outgrowth
and cell survival of the ventral spinal cord neurons by cross-linked
purified ephrin-A5-Fc. Dorsal or ventral E17 rat lumbar spinal cord
neurons were cultured in tissue culture wells coated with
uncross-linked purified ephrin-A5 alone, anti-human IgG alone, purified
ephrin-A5-Fc cross-linked with anti-human IgG, or neither of these two
proteins (see Materials and Methods for details). A, B,
Photomicrographs of dorsal spinal cord neurons cultured in tissue
culture wells coated with cross-linked or uncross-linked ephrin-A5,
respectively. C, D, Photomicrographs of
ventral spinal cord neurons cultured in tissue culture wells coated
with cross-linked or uncross-linked ephrin-A5, respectively. Scale bar
in D, 40 µm. E, Quantitative analysis
of the effects of ephrin-A5-Fc on the survival of cultured spinal cord
neurons. Data shown are the average numbers of
neurons/mm2 ± SEM. The difference of cell
density of ventral spinal cord neurons in cross-linked ephrin-A5 or
control cultures is significant (*p < 0.001;
ANOVA). No significant decrease was observed in the number of ventral
spinal cord neurons cultured with only soluble ephrin-A5-Fc or
anti-human IgG alone. In addition, there was no significant difference
in the number of dorsal spinal cord neurons cultured in wells coated
with cross-linked ephrin-A5-Fc or with
poly-D-lysine/laminin alone. Neurons are identified by
immunohistochemistry with the use of anti-tau-1 monoclonal
antibody.
|
|
Induction of apoptotic cell death by ephrin-A5
The loss of the ventral neurons could be explained by apoptotic
cell death induced by ephrin-A5. To examine this possibility, we
labeled the cocultured neurons as well as neurons in the cell-free assays with the TUNEL staining, which has been used widely as an
indicator for apoptotic cell death (Gavrieli et al., 1992 ). In both
assays active ephrin-A5 had no effects on the number of TUNEL-positive
cells in cultures of dorsal neurons (Fig.
8; data not shown). In contrast, the
ligand significantly increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells in
the ventral cultures (Fig. 8C; data not shown), indicating
that ephrin-A5 specifically induced apoptotic cell death of ventral
spinal cord neurons.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Induction of apoptosis of ventral spinal cord
neurons by cross-linked ephrin-A5-Fc. Dorsal or ventral E17 rat lumbar
spinal cord neurons were cultured in tissue culture wells coated with
cross-linked or uncross-linked ephrin-A5-Fc. After 30 hr of culture the
cells were analyzed with the TUNEL assay to identify apoptotic neurons.
A, B, Fluorescent and bright-field
microphotographs of TUNEL-stained ventral spinal cord neurons
(indicated by an arrowhead) in cross-linked ephrin-A5
culture. The TUNEL staining was specific, because live cells (indicated
by arrows in B) were negative. Scale bar
in A, 40 µm. C, Quantitative analysis
of dorsal and ventral spinal cord neurons labeled by the TUNEL assay.
The difference in the number of TUNEL-positive cells in the ventral
spinal cord culture in the presence of cross-linked or uncross-linked
ephrin-A5-Fc is significant (*p < 0.001;
Student's t test). Dorsal spinal cord neurons showed a
low background staining. Data shown are the average numbers of
neurons/mm2 ± SEM labeled by TUNEL staining
from five assays.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The current study has examined the role of the Eph family ligands
and receptors in regulating the growth and survival of spinal cord
neurons. Our analyses showed that several receptors of the EphA
subclass, including EphA3, A4, and A5, were expressed in the ventral
spinal cord in partially overlapping patterns during embryonic
development. EphA3 and A4 were transcribed specifically in the medial
and lateral motor columns, respectively. Eph-A5 exhibited more
widespread expression in the entire ventral spinal cord. Complementing
the expression of the receptors, a ligand of these receptors,
ephrin-A5, was expressed in the dorsal half of the spinal cord. The
specific expression of the receptors and ligands was demonstrated in
both the mRNA, as revealed by using in situ hybridization,
and the protein levels, as detected by using ligand-AP or receptor-AP
fusion protein binding of dissociated neurons. These expression
patterns are also consistent with the results of a previous study that
used receptor-Fc fusion proteins (Gale et al., 1996 ). We further
demonstrated that, consistent with the spatial location of receptor
expression, the ligand selectively inhibited neurite outgrowth of the
ventral spinal cord neurons. In contrast, the ligand had no significant
effect on the dorsal spinal neurons. In addition, our studies revealed
that ephrin-A5 induced apoptotic cell death in vitro. The
apoptotic activity of ephrin-A5 was also dependent on the presence of
receptor expression. These observations suggest that the Eph family
receptors and ligands may interact to regulate negatively the ventral
spinal cord neurons specifically and thus contribute to the
morphogenesis or the formation of neural circuitry in the spinal cord.
Roles of the Eph ligand and receptor expression in the
spinal cord
The expression of Eph receptors in the spinal cord is highly
restricted. EphA3 was transcribed primarily in the medial motor column,
whereas Eph-A4 was detected mainly in the lateral motor column. These
observations are consistent with previous studies showing that these
two receptors are expressed in subsets of motor neurons (Kilpatrick et
al., 1996 ; Ohta et al., 1996 ). EphA5, on the other hand, was
transcribed in the entire ventral half of the spinal cord in both motor
neurons and interneurons. Contrary to the receptor expression,
ephrin-A5, a ligand of the Eph family that interacts with all three
receptors (Flanagan and Vanderhaeghen, 1998 ; Zhou, 1998 ), was found at
high levels in the dorsal spinal cord.
The significance of the Eph expression is not clear at the present. The
complementary expression patterns suggest that the interaction between
the ligands and receptors may play a role in mediating the interactions
between the dorsal and ventral spinal cord. According to the initial
direction of axonal growth, ventral spinal cord interneurons can be
classified into two major groups: circumferential cells and
longitudinal cells (Yaginuma et al., 1993 ). Circumferential axons grow
ventrally first and then cross the midline to join the contralateral
longitudinal pathway (Silos-Santiago and Snider, 1992 , 1994 ; Yaginuma
et al., 1994 ). The ventroward extension has been shown to be mediated
by chemoattractive factors, the netrins, expressed in a dorsoventral
gradient in the ventral spinal cord with the highest levels in the
floor plate (Colamarino and Tessier-Lavigne, 1995 ). The longitudinal
cells project either rostrally or caudally along an ipsilateral
longitudinal pathway (Silos-Santiago and Snider, 1992 , 1994 ; Yaginuma
et al., 1994 ). Both types of neurons do not project significantly to
the dorsal spinal cord. The spatial distribution of the Eph receptors
and ligand in the spinal cord is consistent with a role in the
prevention of dorsoward projection by the ventral spinal neurons,
although this remains to be demonstrated in vivo.
It is also possible that the Eph receptors and ephrins may have other
functions in the developing spinal cord. For example, they may be
involved in the segregation of dorsal and ventral spinal neurons during
early development or in the segregation of different groups of motor
neurons, as suggested by the presence of ephrin-A5 in subpopulations of
the motor neurons at the upper limb level in the E12 and E13 mouse
embryos (Flenniken et al., 1996 ). Ephrins and their receptors have been
shown to be expressed alternatively in even and odd number rhombomeres
and to be critical for the maintenance of rhombomere boundaries (Xu et
al., 1995 ; Durbin et al., 1998 ). Further studies using ephrin-A5 and
EphA5 knock-out animals are necessary to differentiate these different possibilities.
Inhibition of ventral neurite outgrowth by ephrin-A5
In this study, we showed that the neuritic growth of ventral
spinal cord neurons was reduced severely by ephrin-A5. These observations are consistent with several previous observations that
ephrins are inhibitory and/or repulsive for the axonal growth of many
different neuronal populations (Drescher et al., 1995 ; Donoghue et al.,
1996 ; Gao et al., 1996 , 1998 , 1999 ; Nakamoto et al., 1996 ; Monschau et
al., 1997 ; Ohta et al., 1997 ; Wang and Anderson, 1997 ). The reduction
of neuritic length shown here is likely attributable to axon retraction
or degeneration, similar to that observed in hippocampal neurons (Gao
et al., 1999 ).
A previous study showed that purified soluble ephrin-A1 promotes the
survival and neurite outgrowth of spinal cord neurons (Magal et al.,
1996 ). The positive effects by soluble ephrin-A1 may result from the
inhibition of endogenous ligand/receptor interaction, because it has
been shown that uncross-linked ephrins inhibit receptor function (Gale
et al., 1996 ; Yue et al., 1999 ). Consistent with this interpretation,
uncross-linked soluble ephrin-A5-Fc also increased the length of
neurites and the number of surviving ventral spinal neurons in this
study, by reversing the negative effects of the membrane-anchored
ligand. Thus, our observations here suggest that ephrin-A5 may regulate
the formation of spinal cord neural circuitry by restricting the growth
of the ventral spinal cord neurites.
Ephrin-A5 and apoptosis of ventral spinal cord neurons
We also observed that ephrin-A5 induced apoptosis of the ventral
spinal neurons in vitro. There are two lines of evidence supporting this conclusion. First, the numbers of neurons were reduced
significantly by functional ephrin-A5, both in the coculture assay and
in the assay, using cross-linked purified ligand. Second, ephrin-A5
significantly increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells in both
assays. The physiological significance of the ephrin-induced apoptosis
in vitro is not clear at the present. There are at least two
interpretations. (1) Cell death is an indirect effect caused by the
gradual loss of adhesion of the ventral neurons in the presence of
ephrins. Although this possibility cannot be ruled out, we think it is
not very likely, because ephrin-A2, -A3, and -A5 all restrict
hippocampal neurite outgrowth but do not affect cell adhesion to the
substrate (Gao et al., 1996 , 1999 ). (2) Ephrin-induced apoptosis
contributes to the elimination of neurons with mistargeted axons or
neurons migrated to the wrong position during spinal cord
morphogenesis. A critical process during spinal cord development is
that significant numbers of neurons generated in early embryogenesis die via apoptosis in later stages (Oppenheim, 1991 ). In rat embryonic spinal cord, large numbers of ventral interneurons die at approximately E16 (Lawson et al., 1997 ). The time of EphA5 expression in the ventral
interneurons overlaps with that of interneuron cell death. In addition,
the spatial distribution of the dying interneurons overlaps with that
of EphA5 expression in the ventral spinal cord during this time (Lawson
et al., 1997 ) (see Fig. 1). Apoptosis in the nervous system has been
postulated to regulate the number of neurons in a population and/or the
precision of their connections as well as to remove erroneous
projections (Cowan et al., 1984 ; Clarke, 1985 ; Catsicas et al., 1987 ;
Purves, 1988 ; Oppenheim, 1991 ). Our results are consistent with a role
of the Eph family in inducing cell death in spinal cord morphogenesis
or the elaboration of neural circuits. Further studies using ephrin or
Eph knock-out mice are necessary to understand the significance of
these observations.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received July 8, 1999; revised Sept. 3, 1999; accepted Sept. 3, 1999.
This research was funded by National Institutes of Health Grants
NS36788 and DA11480 to R.Z. We acknowledge J. Flanagan for generously
providing the Ephrin-A2-AP construct and A. K. Halladay for her
assistance in statistical analysis.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Renping Zhou, Laboratory for
Cancer Research, 164 Frelinghusen Road, College of Pharmacy, Rutgers
University, Piscataway, NJ 08854. E-mail: rzhou{at}rci.rutgers.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Bernhardt RR,
Chitnis AB,
Lindamer L,
Kuwada JA
(1990)
Identification of spinal neurons in the embryonic and larval zebrafish.
J Comp Neurol
302:603-616[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Catsicas S,
Thanos S,
Clarke P
(1987)
Major role for neuronal death during brain development: refinement of topographic connections.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:8165-8168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Cheng H-J,
Nakamoto M,
Bergemann AD,
Flanagan JG
(1995)
Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map.
Cell
82:371-381[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ciossek T,
Monschau B,
Kremoser C,
Loschinger J,
Lang S,
Muller BK,
Bonhoeffer F,
Drescher U
(1998)
Eph receptor-ligand interactions are necessary for guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons in vitro.
Eur J Neurosci
10:1574-1580[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Clarke PGH
(1985)
Neuronal death during development in the isthmo-optic nucleus of the chick: sustaining role of afferents from the tectum.
J Comp Neurol
243:365-379.
-
Colamarino SA,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1995)
The role of the floor plate in axon guidance.
Annu Rev Neurosci
18:497-529[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cowan WM,
Fawcett JW,
O'Leary DD,
Stanfield BB
(1984)
Regressive events in neurogenesis.
Science
225:1258-1265[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Davis S,
Gale NW,
Aldrich TH,
Maisonpierre PC,
Lhotak V,
Pawson T,
Goldfarb M,
Yancopoulos GD
(1994)
Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity.
Science
266:816-819[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Donoghue MJ,
Lewis RM,
Merlie JP,
Sanes JR
(1996)
The Eph kinase ligand AL-1 is expressed by rostral muscles and inhibits outgrowth from caudal neurons.
Mol Cell Neurosci
8:185-198.
-
Drescher U
(1997)
The Eph family in the patterning of neural development.
Curr Biol
7:799-807.
-
Drescher U,
Kremoser C,
Handwerker C,
Loschinger J,
Noda M,
Bonhoeffer F
(1995)
In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases.
Cell
82:359-370[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Durbin L,
Brennan C,
Shiomi K,
Cooke J,
Barrios A,
Shanmugalingam S,
Guthrie B,
Lindberg R,
Holder N
(1998)
Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites.
Genes Dev
12:3096-3109[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Flanagan JG,
Leder P
(1990)
The kit ligand: a cell surface molecule altered in steel mutant fibroblasts.
Cell
63:185-194[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Flanagan JG,
Vanderhaeghen P
(1998)
The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development.
Annu Rev Neurosci
21:309-345[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Flenniken AM,
Gale NW,
Yancopoulos GD,
Wilkinson DG
(1996)
Distinct and overlapping expression patterns of ligands and Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases during mouse embryogenesis.
Dev Biol
179:382-401[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Friedman GC,
O'Leary DDM
(1996)
Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands in neural development.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
6:127-133[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gale NW,
Holland SJ,
Valenzuela DM,
Flenniken A,
Pan L,
Ryan TE,
Henkemeyer M,
Strebhardt K,
Hirai H,
Wilkinson DG,
Pawson T,
Davis S,
Yancopoulos GD
(1996)
Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis.
Neuron
17:9-19[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gao P-P,
Zhang J-H,
Yokoyama M,
Racey B,
Dreyfus CF,
Black IB,
Zhou R
(1996)
Regulation of topographic projection in the brain: Elf-1 in the hippocamposeptal system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:11161-11166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gao P-P,
Yue Y,
Zhang J-H,
Cerretti DP,
Levitt P,
Zhou R
(1998)
Regulation of thalamic neurite outgrowth by the Eph ligand ephrin-A5: implications in the development of thalamocortical projections.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:5329-5334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gao P-P,
Yue Y,
Cerretti DP,
Dreyfus C,
Zhou R
(1999)
Induction of axonal growth, branching, and degeneration by the Eph family ligands.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:4073-4077[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gavrieli Y,
Sherman Y,
Ben-Sasson SA
(1992)
Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation.
J Cell Biol
119:493-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Harris WA,
Holt CE
(1995)
From tags to RAGS: chemoaffinity finally has receptors and ligands.
Neuron
15:241-244[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kilpatrick TJ,
Brown A,
Lai C,
Gassmann M,
Goulding M,
Lemke G
(1996)
Expression of the tyro4/mek4/cek4 gene specifically marks a subset of embryonic motor neurons and their muscle targets.
Mol Cell Neurosci
7:62-74[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lawson SJ,
Davis HJ,
Bennett JP,
Lowrie MB
(1997)
Evidence that spinal interneurons undergo programmed cell death postnatally in the rat.
Eur J Neurosci
9:794-799[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Magal E,
Holash JA,
Toso RJ,
Chang D,
Lindberg RA,
Pasquale EB
(1996)
B61, a ligand for the Eck receptor protein-tyrosine kinase, exhibits neurotrophic activity in cultures of rat spinal cord neurons.
J Neurosci Res
43:735-744[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Monschau B,
Kremoser C,
Ohta K,
Tanaka H,
Kaneko T,
Yamada T,
Handwerker C,
Hornberger MR,
Loschinger J,
Pasquale EB,
Siever DA,
Verderame MF,
Muller BK,
Bonhoeffer F,
Drescher U
(1997)
Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons.
EMBO J
16:1258-1267[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nakamoto M,
Cheng H-J,
Friedman GC,
McLaughlin T,
Hansen MJ,
Yoon CH,
O'Leary DDM,
Flanagan JG
(1996)
Topographically specific effects of ELF-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo.
Cell
86:755-766[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ohta K,
Nakamura M,
Hirokawa K,
Tanaka S,
Iwama A,
Suda T,
Ando M,
Tanaka H
(1996)
The receptor tyrosine kinase, Cek8, is transiently expressed on subtypes of motoneurons in the spinal cord during development.
Mech Dev
54:59-69[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ohta K,
Iwamasa H,
Drescher U,
Terasaki H,
Tanaka H
(1997)
The inhibitory effect on neurite outgrowth of motoneurons exerted by the ligands ELF-1 and RAGS.
Mech Dev
64:127-135[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Oppenheim RW
(1991)
Cell death during development of the nervous system.
Annu Rev Neurosci
14:453-501[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Orioli D,
Klein R
(1997)
The Eph receptor family: axonal guidance by contact repulsion.
Trends Genet
13:354-359[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Purves D
(1988)
In: Body and brain: a trophic theory of neuronal connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
-
Silos-Santiago I,
Snider WD
(1992)
Development of commissural neurons in the embryonic rat spinal cord.
J Comp Neurol
325:514-526[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Silos-Santiago I,
Snider WD
(1994)
Development of interneurons with ipsilateral projections in embryonic rat spinal cord.
J Comp Neurol
342:221-231[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stein E,
Lane AA,
Cerretti DP,
Schoecklmann HO,
Schroff AD,
Van Etten RL,
Daniel TO
(1998)
Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses.
Genes Dev
12:667-678[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1995)
Eph receptor tyrosine kinases, axon repulsion, and the development of topographic maps.
Cell
82:345-348[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wang H,
Anderson DJ
(1997)
Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest migration and motor axon outgrowth.
Neuron
18:383-396[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Xu Q,
Alldus G,
Holder N,
Wilkinson DG
(1995)
Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain.
Development
121:4005-4016[Abstract].
-
Yaginuma H,
Shiga T,
Oppenheim RD
(1993)
Mechanisms of axonal guidance used by interneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord.
Perspect Dev Neurobiol
1:205-215[Medline].
-
Yaginuma H,
Shiga T,
Oppenheim RD
(1994)
Early developmental patterns and mechanisms of axonal guidance of spinal interneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord.
Prog Neurobiol
44:249-278[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yue Y,
Widmer DAJ,
Halladay AK,
Cerretti DP,
Wagner GC,
Dreyer J-L,
Zhou R
(1999)
Specification of distinct dopaminergic neural pathways: roles of the Eph family receptor Eph-B1 and ligand ephrin-B2.
J Neurosci
19:2090-2101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zhang J-H,
Cerretti DP,
Yu T,
Flanagan JG,
Zhou R
(1996)
Detection of ligands in regions anatomically connected to neurons expressing the Eph receptor Bsk: potential roles in neuron-target interaction.
J Neurosci
16:7182-7192[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zhang J-H,
Pimenta AF,
Levitt P,
Zhou R
(1997)
Dynamic expression suggests multiple roles of the Eph family receptor brain-specific kinase (Bsk) during mouse neurogenesis.
Mol Brain Res
47:202-214[Medline].
-
Zhou R
(1998)
The Eph family receptors and ligands.
Pharmacol Ther
77:151-181[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zhou R,
Copeland TD,
Kromer LF,
Schulz NT
(1994)
Isolation and characterization of Bsk, a growth factor receptor-like kinase associated with the limbic system.
J Neurosci Res
37:129-143[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/192210026-10$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Chadaram, M. B. Laskowski, and R. D. Madison
Topographic Specificity within Membranes of a Single Muscle Detected In Vitro
J. Neurosci.,
December 19, 2007;
27(51):
13938 - 13948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F Schmidt, O. A Agapova, P. Yang, P. L Kaufman, and M R. Hernandez
Expression of ephrinB1 and its receptor in glaucomatous optic neuropathy
Br J Ophthalmol,
September 1, 2007;
91(9):
1219 - 1224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Kadison, T. Makinen, R. Klein, M. Henkemeyer, and Z. Kaprielian
EphB Receptors and Ephrin-B3 Regulate Axon Guidance at the Ventral Midline of the Embryonic Mouse Spinal Cord.
J. Neurosci.,
August 30, 2006;
26(35):
8909 - 8914.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Munoz, D. Alfaro, J. Garcia-Ceca, L. M. Alonso-C, E. Jimenez, and A. Zapata
Thymic Alterations in EphA4-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol.,
July 15, 2006;
177(2):
804 - 813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yue, Z.-Y. Chen, N. W. Gale, J. Blair-Flynn, T.-J. Hu, X. Yue, M. Cooper, D. P. Crockett, G. D. Yancopoulos, L. Tessarollo, et al.
Mistargeting hippocampal axons by expression of a truncated Eph receptor
PNAS,
August 6, 2002;
99(16):
10777 - 10782.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Y. Li, Z. Mi, Y. Feng, C. F. McTiernan, R. Zhou, P. D. Robbins, S. C. Watkins, and A. M. Feldman
Differential effects of overexpression of two forms of ephrin-A5 on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
December 1, 2001;
281(6):
H2738 - H2746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lance-Jones, N. Omelchenko, A. Bailis, S. Lynch, and K. Sharma
Hoxd10 induction and regionalization in the developing lumbosacral spinal cord
Development,
June 15, 2001;
128(12):
2255 - 2268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Louvi and M Wassef
Ectopic engrailed 1 expression in the dorsal midline causes cell death, abnormal differentiation of circumventricular organs and errors in axonal pathfinding
Development,
January 9, 2000;
127(18):
4061 - 4071.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|