Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 1999, 19(23):10213-10220
Identification of Transduction Elements for Benzodiazepine
Modulation of the GABAA Receptor: Three Residues Are
Required for Allosteric Coupling
Andrew J.
Boileau and
Cynthia
Czajkowski
Department of Physiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
 |
ABSTRACT |
Modulation of GABAA receptors by benzodiazepines (BZDs)
is believed to involve two distinct steps: a recognition step in which BZDs bind and a conformational transition step in which the affinity of
the receptor for GABA changes. Previously, using
2/
1 chimeric subunits (
), we
demonstrated that although the N-terminal 167
2 amino
acid residues confer high-affinity BZD binding, other
2
domains couple BZD binding to potentiation of the GABA-mediated Cl
current
(IGABA). To determine which
2 regions couple binding to potentiation, we generated
s with longer N-terminal
2 segments for voltage-clamp
experiments in Xenopus oocytes. Chimeras containing greater than the N-terminal 167
2 residues showed
incremental gains in maximal potentiation for diazepam enhancement of
IGABA. Residues in
2199-236,
2224-236 (pre-M1), and particularly
2257-297 (M2 and surrounding loops) are important for
BZD potentiation. For several positive BZD modulators tested, the same
regions restored potentiation of IGABA. In
contrast,
-carboline inverse-agonism was unaltered in chimeric
receptors, suggesting that structural determinants for positive and
negative BZD allosteric modulation are different. Dissection of the
2257-297 domain revealed that three residues in
concert,
2T281,
2I282 (M2 channel
vestibule), and
2S291 (M2-M3 loop) are necessary to
impart full BZD potentiation to chimeric receptors. Thus, these
residues participate in coupling distant BZD-binding events to
conformational changes in the GABAA receptor. The location
of these novel residues provides insight into the mechanisms underlying
allosteric coupling for other members of the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily.
Key words:
GABA; GABAA receptor; benzodiazepines; benzodiazepine-binding site; allosteric coupling; chimeric subunits; mutagenesis; inverse agonist; positive modulation;
subunit;
subunit; M2 domain; M2-M3 loop; Xenopus oocytes
 |
INTRODUCTION |
GABAA
receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the
mammalian brain and are members of a ligand-gated ion channel (LGIC)
superfamily (Ortells and Lunt, 1995
), which also includes receptors for
acetylcholine, glycine, and serotonin. The GABAA
receptor gene family comprises several different classes and subtypes
of receptor subunits including 6
, 4
, 3
, 1
, 1
, and 1
(Barnard et al., 1998
). GABAA receptors are
pentameric proteins containing an integral chloride-selective channel
with specific binding sites for GABA, benzodiazepines (BZDs),
barbiturates, and steroids (Smith and Olsen, 1995
). BZDs, clinically
used for their anxiolytic and antiepileptic actions, exert their
therapeutic effects by allosteric modulation of
GABAA receptors (Sieghart, 1995
). Positive BZD
modulators increase the opening frequency of the
Cl
channel in the presence of GABA,
whereas negative BZD modulators (e.g.,
-carbolines) decrease the
opening frequency (Rogers et al., 1994
). Because the therapeutic
clinical value of these drugs depends on their ability to exert
positive modulation on IGABA, we were
interested in identifying the structural determinants underlying BZD
efficacy in potentiating GABA-gated currents.
Evidence suggests that both the
and
subunits play critical
roles in BZD binding and potentiation. Using the agonist-binding site
of the nicotinic ACh receptor as an archetype for pentameric LGIC
receptors (Czajkowski et al., 1993
), the BZD-binding site of the
GABAA receptor has been modeled with the
subunit apposed to an
subunit, and both subunits contributing to
the binding site at the interface (Galzi and Changeux, 1994
; Smith and
Olsen, 1995
). Although several studies have begun to identify amino
acids in both
and
subunits involved in BZD binding (for review, see Sigel and Buhr, 1997
), little is known about the structural components involved in coupling BZD binding to BZD potentiation of
GABA-gated current (IGABA).
Our previous studies using
2/
1 chimeric subunits
demonstrated that chimeras (
) containing the N-terminal 161 amino acid residues of
2 exhibit wild-type
binding but drastically impaired potentiation of
IGABA by BZDs (Boileau et al., 1998
).
To further delineate the regions unique to the
2 subunit that confer BZD potentiation, we
generated additional
2/
1 chimeras,
expanding the length of the N-terminal
2
portion and reducing the
1 C-terminal portion
(Fig. 1). Two main regions of the
subunit,
2224-236 and
2257-297, improve the allosteric coupling of
BZD binding to potentiation of IGABA.
The largest gain in potentiation is conferred by the
2257-297 region, which surrounds and includes the M2 transmembrane segment. Further investigation revealed that a
triplet set of residues,
2T281, I282, and S291
underlie this function of the
2 subunit.
Unlike positive modulatory BZD compounds, the negative modulator
3-carbomethoxy-4-ethyl-6,7-dimethoxy-
-carboline (DMCM)
exhibits full wild-type inhibition for all chimeric receptors.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Chimeric 2/ 1
subunits and mutants. A, Chimeras ( ) used in this
study contain 5' 2 and 3' 1 sequences and
are named for the 2 amino acid residue where the
crossover with 1 occurs (arrows) in the
mature rat protein sequence. For example, 161 contains
2 residues from position 1 to 161 and 1
residues in the remainder of the subunit. Chimeric crossovers depicted
are for 161, 167, 198, 223, 236, 256, and 297.
B, Shown are aligned 1 and
2 protein sequence segments containing the putative
transmembrane domains M1, M2, and the beginning of M3, with the
relative crossover positions of 236, 256, and 297 indicated
(arrows). Mutants were constructed in the background of
236. Numbering for and 2 subunits is identical.
Boxes indicate blocks of mutations constructed
simultaneously: box a represents the substitution of
1 RES residues to the aligned 2 residues
KDA (RES KDA); box b corresponds to VFGV SLGI; box
c corresponds to IS TI; box d
corresponds to NAA KSV; box e corresponds to a subset
of box d, AA SV. Residues highlighted in
black are important for positive BZD modulation of
IGABA, and their positions in
2 are indicated below them.
|
|
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Molecular cloning. Chimeras are named for the last
2 amino acid residue before the crossover with
1 in the mature rat protein sequence. Thus,
numbering for
and
2 subunits is identical. For chimeras used in this study (Fig. 1), the
2 and
1 amino acid
residues at the crossovers are "
D161/
A149"(
161),
"
L167/
K155" (
167), "
L198/
N188" (
198),
"
M223/
T213" (
223), "
F236/
V226" (
236),
"
W256/
L246" (
256), and "
D297/
W287" (
297).
161 and
167 were generated by a targeted random chimera
production method (Boileau et al., 1998
). All others (Fig.
1A) were produced by recombinant PCR using
overlapping complementary oligonucleotides designed to create a
/
crossover at the desired amino acid junction. Using a
2 sense oligonucleotide and an antisense
/
junction oligonucleotide with
2 cDNA
as a template, upstream PCR fragments with
2
5' and an
1 3' overhang were generated.
Simultaneously, using a sense junction oligonucleotide and an
1 antisense oligonucleotide with
1 cDNA as template, downstream PCR fragments
with
2 5' overhang and
1 3' sequences were also prepared in separate
PCR reactions. Upstream and downstream PCR fragments were then combined and amplified to create
/
DNA cassette fragments that were
subcloned into
167 cDNA using AflII and NcoI,
thus replacing the cassette region of
167 with the new chimeric
junction sequences.
Mutant subunit fragments were generated using the same recombinant PCR
method and subcloned into the background of the
236 subunit to
generate different combinations of mutants (Fig. 1B). Single and multiple mutants were named according to the
1 to
2 substitutions
made in
236. For example, the "
236-RES
KDA" mutant is
236 with
1 Arg-Glu-Ser (RES) residues
replaced by the aligned
2 sequence at
positions 259-261, Lys-Asp-Ala (KDA). The "
236-A291S" mutant
replaces
1 Ala with
2
Ser291 in
236; the "
236-I281T + A291S" mutant is
236 with
an I281T and an A291S mutation. The chimeric and mutant subunits were
subcloned in pGH19 vector (Liman et al., 1992
; Robertson et al., 1996
)
for expression in Xenopus oocytes. All chimeras were
verified by restriction digest and double-stranded DNA sequencing using
standard techniques (Sambrook et al., 1989
).
Expression of rat GABAA receptors in
Xenopus oocytes. Capped cRNA coding for the wild-type
and chimeric subunits was synthesized by in vitro
transcription from NheI-linearized cDNA template in pGH19
using the mMessage mMachine T7 kit (Ambion). Oocytes from Xenopus
laevis were prepared as previously described (Boileau et al.,
1998
) and injected with 28 nl of mRNA (10-200 pg/nl/subunit) mixed in
a ratio of 1:1 (
:
), or 1:1:
20 (
:
:
or
:
:
).
Excess molar ratios of
or
cRNA were injected to ensure
expression of these subunits in the receptor complex (Boileau et al.,
1998
). Oocytes were stored at 17-19°C in recording solution
supplemented with 100 µg/ml gentamycin and 100 µg/ml BSA, and were
used for electrophysiological experiments 2-14 d after injection.
Total amount of cRNA was scaled to yield maximal GABA-induced currents of ~3-8 µA for
1
2
2
and
1
2
. cRNA
concentrations were calculated by UV absorption and corroborated by
comparison to RNA standards on 1.5% agarose gels.
Voltage-clamp analysis. Oocytes under two-electrode
voltage-clamp (Vhold =
80 mV) were perfused continuously with ND96
recording solution containing (in mM) 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES, pH 7.4 at a rate of 5 ml/min. In general, drugs and reagents were dissolved in ND96. Stock drug solutions (1000-10,000×) were made in dimethylsulfoxide. No differences in currents were observed with the vehicle. Maximal current (~3-8 µA) for all
receptors was achieved with 10 mM GABA. For some
chimeras and mutants, GABA EC50 was estimated by
examining the ratio of response to 1 µM versus
10 mM GABA. GABA (1 µM)
elicits currents corresponding to EC5 for both
1
2
(range,
EC2-7) and
1
2
2
(EC4.8 ± 1.7) receptors. Using a standard
Hill equation to model the GABA dose responses and the determined 1 µM/10 mM GABA current
ratio, we calculate that the chimeric and mutant receptors show no more than a twofold shift in GABA EC50 from wild-type
receptors (EC50 = 12 µM).
Greater than twofold shifts are detectable in our assay.
BZD potentiation or
-carboline inhibition
IGABA were recorded at 1 µM GABA (EC5).
Potentiation is defined as (IGABA + DRUG/IGABA)
1),
where IGABA + DRUG is the current
response in the presence of the drug tested, and
IGABA is the control GABA-induced current. For single concentration experiments, BZD site ligands were
tested at concentrations eliciting maximal effects on
IGABA in wild-type
1
2
2
receptors. If differences in potentiation for mutant receptors were
caused entirely by a shift in GABA affinity, the Hill equation predicts
that a sixfold shift in GABA affinity, and only to the left, would be
required to account for a 50% reduction in maximal potentiation. This
would result in a 1 µM/10
mM GABA ratio corresponding to
EC27-32 (Hill coefficient varied from 1 to 2),
well out of our observed range. Standard two-electrode voltage-clamp
recording was performed using a GeneClamp 500 (Axon Instruments, Foster
City, CA) interfaced to a computer with an IT-16 A/D device
(Instrutech). Electrodes were filled with 3 M KCl
and had a resistance of 0.5-1.5 M
.
Data acquisition and analysis were performed using AxoData, AxoGraph
(Axon Instruments), and Prism software (Graphpad). Statistical comparisons of potentiation data employed one-way ANOVA with Dunnet and
Tukey post-tests for multiple independent samples using Prism software.
 |
RESULTS |
Regions of the
2 subunit responsible for
BZD binding can be separated from domains required for coupling BZD
binding to potentiation of IGABA
(Boileau et al., 1998
). This "uncoupling" of high-affinity BZD
binding and potentiation is apparent in the
/
chimera
161, which binds BZDs with wild-type affinity when expressed with wild-type
1 and
2 subunits, but
displays drastically impaired diazepam modulation of
IGABA. In an effort to identify
regions of the
2 subunit required for full BZD
potentiation, several additional chimeras (Fig. 1A)
were constructed with longer
2 N-terminal domains. Chimeras used here, named for the
2
amino acid where the crossovers occur, are
161,
167,
198,
223,
236,
256, and
297 (see Materials and Methods). These
chimeras were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and screened by
two-electrode voltage clamp to test for restoration of allosteric
modulation of IGABA with several
structurally diverse BZD-binding site ligands. The expression, BZD
radioligand binding, and diazepam modulation of GABA-gated currents for
1
2
161 and
1
2
167 receptors
have been described previously (Boileau et al., 1998
).
Different domains alter BZD EC50 and potentiation
Chimeric cRNA was coinjected with wild-type
1 and
2 subunit cRNA
into oocytes and tested for diazepam potentiation of
IGABA with 1 µM GABA. This concentration corresponded to
EC5 for GABA for both wild-type and chimeric
receptors. Both maximal potentiation and EC50 for
diazepam modulation of IGABA were
measured. Dose-response curves and traces for diazepam potentiation of
the GABA response for selected chimera-containing and wild-type
receptors are depicted in Figure 2. At
concentrations >1 µM diazepam, potentiation of wild-type receptors begins to depress (Fig. 2, dashed line;
Amin et al., 1997
). The decrease may be attributable to channel block and/or BZD blockage of the GABA-binding site. Receptors containing
161 and
167 exhibited low potentiation, whereas chimeras with increasingly longer N-terminal
2 segments
exhibited incremental gains in maximal potentiation (Table
1, Fig. 2). Full potentiation was
restored with
297, which contains
2
residues up to the beginning of the M3 transmembrane domain. For
maximal potentiation, data from chimeric and wild-type receptors
yielded the series 


161


167 < 

198


223 < 

236


256


297


.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Diazepam potentiation of
IGABA for
1 2 receptors. A, Trace
recordings from cells injected with
1 2 2
(leftmost), and chimeric constructs. Cells were
voltage-clamped at 80 mV and perfused with ND96 recording solution or
ND96 with 1 µM GABA or 1 µM GABA plus 1 µM diazepam (transition to diazepam-containing solutions
indicated by white arrowheads). Cells were washed with
ND96 recording solution for 5-20 min between drug applications.
1 2 198 exhibits unusually fast
desensitization properties. Note that chimeras show incrementally
larger potentiation up to 1 2 297, which
is similar to wild-type
1 2 2. B,
Oocytes injected with wild-type
1 2 2 (1:1:20) and
1 2 (1:1: 20) cRNA mixtures were
treated with a range of diazepam concentrations in the presence of GABA
and further analyzed. A potentiation response ratio was determined by
dividing the peak current for
1 2 2 ( ),
1 2 167 ( ),
1 2 198 ( ),
1 2 223 ( ),
1 2 236 ( ),
1 2 256 ( ), and
1 2 297 ( ) exposed to 1 µM GABA plus diazepam (DZ) by the response
to 1 µM GABA alone. Data were fitted to a curve described
by the equation Y = Min + (Max Min)/(1 + 10((LogEC50 X)·nH)),
where Max is the maximal potentiation,
Min is the potentiation at the lowest drug concentration
tested, X is the logarithm of diazepam concentration,
EC50 is the half-maximal potentiation
response, and nH is the Hill coefficient.
Data points represent mean potentiation from four or more cells from
two or more batches of oocytes. Error bars indicate SD. The parameters
from the curve fits are presented in Table 1. Inset, A
plot of the same data after normalizing to the maximum diazepam
potentiation for each receptor.
|
|
Differences in EC50 for diazepam potentiation of
IGABA between chimeric and wild-type
receptors were also measured (Fig. 2, inset; Table 1).
Diazepam EC50 values for receptors containing
223 (120 ± 43 nM),
236 (164 ± 29 nM),
256 (73 ± 26 nM), and
297 (98 ± 5 nM) were not significantly different from those
for wild-type
1
2
2
receptors (64 ± 15 nM). However, the
EC50 values for diazepam were significantly
higher (p < 0.01) for receptors containing
161,
167, and
198 (310 ± 45, 437 ± 87, and
340 ± 118, respectively). A significant decrease in diazepam
EC50 occurred between
198 and
223 (Fig. 2,
inset). It was also noted that
198 displays unusually
fast desensitization to application of either GABA or GABA plus
diazepam. The reason for this is unclear, and was not pursued.
Interestingly, although the diazepam EC50 for
1
2
256 receptors
was similar to wild-type
1
2
2
receptors, the maximal potentiation was reduced by ~60% compared to
wild-type receptors (Fig. 2; see Fig. 4). The most significant
gain of potentiation occurred between
256 and
297 (Fig. 1);
1
2
297 receptors
exhibit potentiation and EC50 for diazepam
indistinguishable from wild-type receptors.
Positive BZD modulators use the
257-297 domain
To explore whether potentiation or inhibition by other drugs
acting at the BZD site would require similar regions of the
2 subunit, the chimeras were tested with
several different BZD-binding site ligands. Surprisingly, the
-carboline DMCM, an inverse agonist at the BZD site, inhibited
IGABA in all chimeric receptors to the
same extent as wild-type
1
2
2
receptors (Fig. 3). In contrast, the
positive modulatory BZD site ligands tested showed significant differences in potentiation between chimeric receptors (Fig.
4, Table
2). The differences between chimeric
receptors for positive modulation could be caused by inefficient
expression of the chimera in a receptor complex, yielding a mixture of
1
2 and
1
2
receptors that
would appear to have reduced potentiation. However, the observation that each chimera responds to DMCM akin to
1
2
2
receptors, and not
1
2
receptors, allays this concern.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Chimeric receptors are indistinguishable from
wild-type receptors for negative modulation by DMCM. Negative
modulation of 1 µM GABA responses by the -carboline
DMCM (1 µM) is graphed for wild-type
1 2 2,
1 2 161,
1 2 167,
1 2 223,
1 2 236,
1 2 256, and
1 2 297 chimeric receptors. No
significant difference in the inhibition of the GABA current was
measured between wild-type and chimeric receptors.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Positive BZD-site modulators potentiate the GABA
responses of chimeric receptors to different extents depending on the
amount of 2 subunit in each receptor. Potentiation of 1 µM GABA responses is graphed for wild-type
1 2 2,
1 2 161,
1 2 167,
1 2 223,
1 2 236,
1 2 256,
1 2 297, and
" 1 2 236-IS TI + A291S" chimeric
receptors using 1 µM diazepam, 1-3 µM
flurazepam (A), 1-3 µM midazolam
(B), 10 µM zolpidem
(C), and 1 µM CL218,872
(D). Also depicted in B is
inhibition of the midazolam (MZ) potentiation by 1 µM Ro15-1788 (hatched bars) for chimeric
and wild-type receptors. Open bars indicate the
potentiation of IGABA by 1 µM
Ro15-1788. Asterisks indicate level of significance
(*p < 0.01; **p < 0.001)
comparing mean potentiation for that chimera with the preceding chimera
in the series (left to right). Error bars
indicate SD.
|
|
Classical 1,4-benzodiazepines such as diazepam and water-soluble
flurazepam exhibited similar increments in potentiation of IGABA in chimeras with increasingly
larger N-terminal segments (Fig. 4A). The strong
positive modulators midazolam (a triazolobenzodiazepine, Fig.
4B) and zolpidem (an imidazopyridine, Fig.
4C), and the partial agonist CL218,872 (a
triazolopyridazine, Fig. 4D) also showed increments
in potentiation from
167 to
297, indicating a common pattern of
residues required for positive BZD allosteric modulation.
Table 2 summarizes the effects of various BZD site ligands on the
potentiation of IGABA for chimeric
receptors compared to wild-type
1
2
2
receptors. For all positive modulators tested, a correlation between
recovery of potentiation and length of the chimeric
2 sequence emerges. Small increases in
potentiation are observed between
167 and
223 (~10-15%), and
between
223 and
236 (~10-25%) for all of the positive
modulators tested. Whether a significant recovery of potentiation
occurred between
167 and
198 or between
198 and
223
depended on the drug tested. The largest increases in potentiation
(50-60%) for all of the positive modulatory BZDs tested occurred
between
256 and
297, indicating that amino acid residues
surrounding and/or including M2 are required for full potentiation of
IGABA by these drugs.
In addition, we tested the activity of the imidazobenzodiazepine
antagonist Ro15-1788 (flumazenil; Fig. 4B) in
wild-type and chimera-containing receptors. Ro15-1788 (1 µM) was effective at blocking the
midazolam-induced (1 µM) potentiation of
IGABA in all chimeric receptors (Fig.
4B, hatched bars). At micromolar concentrations, Ro15-1788 acts as a weak positive modulator of GABA
activation (Fig. 4B, open bars; Mihic et
al., 1997
). The pattern of potentiation in wild-type and chimeric
receptors was similar to that seen for other positive modulators. After
subtracting out the minor background Ro15-1788-induced potentiation,
the midazolam-induced potentiation is inhibited by Ro15-1788 to the
same extent for wild-type and all chimeric receptors (91.5 ± 3.7%).
Mutations conferring positive modulation of
IGABA
Because the largest gain in BZD potentiation is mediated by the
2I257-D297 domain, we focused on identifying
the amino acid residue or residues in this region that contribute to
BZD modulation of IGABA. To determine
whether
1
2
236
receptors are altered in their ability to bind BZDs, we performed
radioligand-binding assays. The KD for
[3H]flunitrazepam binding in
1
2
236 receptors
(3 ± 1 nM; n = 2) was
similar to the values obtained for
1
2
161 (11.3 ± 1.7 nM) and
1
2
2
(9.9 ± 0.8 nM; Boileau et al., 1998
).
Several mutants were constructed in a
236 background, corresponding
to nonidentical residues between
2 and
1 in the M1-M2 loop, the M2 transmembrane domain, and the M2-M3 loop (Fig. 1B). The first set
of such mutants with
1 amino acid residues
substituted to the homologous
2 residues were
236-RES
KDA (Fig. 1B, box a),
236-RES
KDA + NAA
KSV (box a + box d),
236-VFGV
SLGI (box
b),
236-VFGV
SLGI + NAA
KSV (box b + box d),
236-IS
TI (box c), and
236-IS
TI + AA
SV
(box c + box e). Of these, only
236-IS
TI + AA
SV
(box c + box e) exhibited full potentiation of
IGABA by diazepam. All single-,
double-, and triple-mutant combinations of the substitutions present in
236-IS
TI + AA
SV (box c + box e) were generated and
tested with 1 µM diazepam for potentiation of
IGABA (Fig.
5). Of these, only the triple mutant
combination
236-IS
TI + A291S (Fig. 1B,
black outlined residues) restored full potentiation to
236; all values for diazepam potentiation of
IGABA by mutant receptors depicted in
Figure 5 are significantly different (p < 0.01)
from those for
297 except for the quadruple mutant
236-IS
TI + AA
SV (box c + box e) and the triple mutant
236-IS
TI + A291S.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Diazepam potentiation of chimeric and chimeric
mutant receptors. Potentiation of 1 µM GABA current using
1 µM diazepam (DZ) is graphed for
1 2 236 (white), mutants,
and mutant combinations made in the background of
1 2 236 receptors
(gray) and 1 2 297
(black) chimeric receptors. Potentiation is defined as
(IGABA + DZ/IGABA) 1), where
IGABA + DZ is the current response in the
presence of diazepam, and IGABA is the
control GABA-induced current. Dashed lines at 1.0 and
2.0 on the ordinate axis are shown for ease of comparison. Only the
1 2 236-IS TI + A291S and
1 2 236-IS TI + AA SV chimeric
receptors show no significant difference from
1 2 297 receptors.
|
|
Diazepam dose-response curves for the components of
236-IS
TI + A291S, namely
236-IS
TI,
236-A291S and the other two double mutants
236-I281T + A291S and
236-S282I + A291S demonstrate that
all three mutations are necessary for full potentiation for diazepam
(Fig. 6). Summary data for maximal
potentiation and EC50 values are shown in Table
1. Although
236-A291S alone did restore some of the potentiation to
236, it is still significantly less than for
297
(p < 0.01). The triple mutant also exhibited
wild-type maximal potentiation for other BZD-positive modulators (Fig.
4, Table 2).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Diazepam potentiation of
IGABA for mutant
1 2 236 receptors. A,
Trace recordings from cells injected with wild-type
1, 2, and either 236
(left), mutant 236 (middle), or 297
(right). Cells were voltage-clamped at 80 mV and
perfused with ND96 recording solution, or ND96 with 1 µM
GABA or 1 µM GABA plus 1 µM diazepam
(transition to diazepam-containing solutions indicated by white
arrowheads). Cells were washed with ND96 recording solution for
5-20 min between drug applications. Note that only the
1 2 236-IS TI + A291S mutant chimeric
receptors show potentiation as large as
1 2 297 receptors. B,
Oocytes injected with chimeric and chimeric mutant cRNA mixtures were
treated with a range of diazepam concentrations in the presence of GABA
and further analyzed. A potentiation response ratio was determined by
dividing the peak current for 1 2 297
( ), 1 2 236-IS TI + A291S ( ),
1 2 236-A291S ( ),
1 2 236-IS TI ( ),
1 2 236-I281T + A291S ( ),
1 2 236-S282I + A291S ( ), and
1 2 236 ( ) exposed to 1 µM GABA plus diazepam (DZ) by the response
to 1 µM GABA alone. Data were fitted to a curve described
by the equation Y = Min + (Max Min)/(1 + 10((LogEC50
X)·nH)),
where Max is the maximal potentiation,
Min is the potentiation at the lowest drug concentration
tested, X is the logarithm of diazepam concentration,
EC50 is the half-maximal potentiation
response, and nH is the Hill coefficient.
Data points represent mean potentiation from six or more cells from two
or more batches of oocytes. Error bars indicate SD. The parameters from
the curve fits are presented in Table 1.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We previously reported that chimeric subunits with
2 sequence in the first 161 amino acid
residues and
1 sequence in the remainder
exhibit high-affinity BZD binding, but impaired BZD modulation of
IGABA (Boileau et al., 1998
).
Efficient coupling of BZD binding to potentiation of
IGABA is therefore mediated, at least
in part, by
2 amino acid residues that are not
directly involved in the binding of BZDs. In this study, we identified two novel
2 regions,
2224-236 (pre-M1) and
2257-297 (M2 and surrounding loops) that are
necessary for full restoration of coupling between high-affinity BZD
binding and full BZD potentiation of
IGABA by several disparate BZD
positive allosteric modulators (Figs. 2, 4). In addition, a threefold
shift in EC50 is observed between
1
2
198 and
1
2
223 receptors
(Table 1). This change in diazepam EC50 may
account for some or all of the increased potentiation observed in
1
2
223 receptors as
compared to
1
2
167 receptors (Figs. 2, 4).
For all the BZD positive allosteric modulators tested, the largest
recovery in BZD potentiation of IGABA
(50-60%) is conferred by one or more
2
residues in and/or surrounding the M2 region between
256 and
297.
For this region, a change in diazepam EC50 cannot
explain the complete restoration in the ability of diazepam to
potentiate IGABA in
1
2
297 receptors as
compared to
1
2
256 receptors because the diazepam EC50 values for
1
2
297 and
1
2
256 receptors
are not significantly different from each other or wild-type receptors
(Table 1). The differences in levels of potentiation for chimeric
receptors are also not caused by inefficient expression of the chimeric
subunit, as evidenced by the equivalence of DMCM inhibition of
IGABA for each chimeric receptor and
1
2
2
receptors (Fig. 3). Thus, DMCM inhibition of
IGABA serves as a useful benchmark and
control for chimeric insertion into the receptor complex. Finally, the
differences in potentiation are not attributable to differences in GABA
dose responses. Previously, we established that
1
2
161 and
1
2
167 receptors
have EC50 values for GABA similar to
1
2
2
and
1
2 receptors
(Boileau et al., 1998
). In addition, we have calculated that the
EC50 values for all of the chimeric receptors are
shifted by less than twofold compared to wild-type receptors (see
Materials and Methods), which could not alone account for the decrease
in maximal potentiation observed. Thus, we conclude that the
2257-297 region contains structural determinants required for coupling BZD binding to BZD potentiation of
IGABA.
Because DMCM inhibits
1
2
167 receptors to
a similar extent as wild-type
1
2
2
receptors (Fig. 3), negative modulation of the GABA-gated current by
-carboline-binding to the BZD site must be transduced through
different structural elements, i.e., using
2
residues located within the first 167 amino acid residues, with or
without downstream
2 residues that are
conserved in the
1 and
2 subunits. Because we are comparing
to
subunits for differences in BZD function, we cannot detect amino
acid residues important for processes that are conserved between the
two subunit subtypes.
The specific residues in the
2257-297 region
that underlie BZD potentiation of
IGABA were identified. Of the twelve
nonidentical residues between
256 and
297, the residues
2T281, I282, and S291 are, in combination,
necessary to confer wild-type potentiation of
IGABA by positive BZD modulators
(Figs. 4-6). Although we cannot rule out the possibility that these
mutations somehow serve to relieve a conformational dysfunction in the
structure of the
236 subunit and do not play a direct role in BZD
actions, we think this unlikely. Wild-type responses to DMCM and
equivalent values for competitive displacement by Ro15-1788 for all
the chimeric receptors suggest that the overall structures of the
chimeras are not severely disrupted. Equilibrium binding values for
[3H]flunitrazepam to
1
2
161,
1
2
167, and
1
2
236 receptors were similar to wild-type receptors, indicating that the BZD-binding site is intact. Further support for our conclusion that
2T281, I282 and S291 are compulsory
2 elements for BZD activity derives from the
fact that all three residues are conserved in all known
subunits
cloned from various species but vary in other subunit subtypes. These
identified residues, however, are not the sole
2 determinants controlling BZD potentiation.
Certainly other
2 amino acid residues also
play a role, particularly residues in the pre-M1 regions (e.g.,
2224-236), which have yet to be identified,
and/or amino acid residues that are conserved between the
and
subunits.
Alterations in the ability of positive BZD modulators to potentiate
IGABA can arise from several possible
sources, including alterations at the BZD-binding site (Colquhoun,
1998
), disruptions of the coupling (transduction of BZD binding to
potentiation) machinery, and/or modifications of the ion channel pore
itself. An example of a mutation that alters BZD "efficacy" of
several BZD ligands is the
2 subunit mutation
T142S (Mihic et al., 1994
); both a competitive antagonist at the
BZD-binding site (Ro15-1788) and a weak negative modulator
(Ro15-4513) take on the character of weak positive modulators. Because
we previously demonstrated that high-affinity BZD binding is localized
to the N-terminal 161
2 amino acid residues
(Boileau et al., 1998
), the novel regions and residues identified in
this study control BZD potentiation by influencing the coupling
machinery and/or the ion channel pore itself rather than the
BZD-binding site. For the chimeric receptors described in this study,
strong positive BZD modulators behave like weak modulators or BZD
antagonists. Additionally, we observe that
1
2
161,
1
2
167, and
1
2
236 receptors
exhibit wild-type, high-affinity radioligand binding. Together, these
observations suggest that we are measuring disruptions in coupling
rather than binding. Because
2T281 and I282
are likely to line the water-accessible surface of the
Cl
channel based on homology with the
1 subunit (Xu and Akabas, 1996
), it is
tempting to speculate that this region controls BZD potentiation by
affecting the ion channel. These
2 residues
may influence ion channel gating, possibly facilitating channel opening by GABA when BZDs are present.
Structurally, allosteric coupling between GABA and BZD-binding sites
could occur exclusively in the N-terminal extracellular domains of the
receptor, from one binding site to the other. The Monod-Wyman-Changeux allosteric model predicts that ligand-binding events cause allosteric transitions that change the state of the receptor, which result in changes in the binding sites (Monod et al.,
1965
). Our chimeric receptors have either weakened or deleted
allosteric transitions that are restored by
2
segments distant from the presumed binding sites, and in particular by the combination of the channel-lining residues
2T281 and I282 coupled with the M2-M3 loop
residue
2S291. Thus, allosteric coupling between the GABA and BZD-binding sites requires transduction through transmembrane or intracellular regions and then back out to the extracellular binding regions, subsequently affecting the kinetics of
GABA binding at one or both cooperative GABA-binding sites.
Our results demonstrate that two M2 residues
(
2 T281, I282) and a M2-M3 extracellular loop
residue (
2 S291) are required for full,
wild-type BZD potentiation of IGABA by
a variety of BZD ligands. It is interesting that these
2 residues map to corresponding regions as
residues in other GABAA receptor subunits and the
homologous glycine receptor believed to be involved in "direct"
channel gating by agonists. In the GABAA
receptor, when the M2 central leucine is substituted with threonine in
the human
1 subunit, GABA activation is
abolished, even though binding with the GABA agonist
[3H]muscimol is unaltered (Tierney et
al., 1996
). In the glycine receptor, mutation of
1 R271 (in the M2-M3 loop) to leucine or glutamine converts glycinergic agonists
-alanine and taurine from
agonists to competitive antagonists for glycine (Rajendra et al.,
1995
). Our results that residues in M2 and the M2-M3 loop are
necessary for coupling BZD binding to BZD potentiation suggests that
not only are the BZD and GABA-binding sites structurally conserved
(Olsen et al., 1996
), but the regions of the receptor involved in the
coupling of binding to their functional effects are also conserved. We
speculate that the BZD-binding site may in reality be a very
low-affinity GABA-binding site that over evolutionary time has acquired
the ability to bind BZDs and when the
2 M2
region is present, BZDs may act as coagonists and increase channel
opening frequency.
Mutations within the M2 region and surrounding loops in the
GABAA receptor also affect the actions of other
GABAA receptor modulators. Mutations in two
specific M2 amino acid residues,
1S267 or the
aligned ![]()