WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Stereo Investigator
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boileau, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Czajkowski, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boileau, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Czajkowski, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 1999, 19(23):10213-10220

Identification of Transduction Elements for Benzodiazepine Modulation of the GABAA Receptor: Three Residues Are Required for Allosteric Coupling

Andrew J. Boileau and Cynthia Czajkowski

Department of Physiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Modulation of GABAA receptors by benzodiazepines (BZDs) is believed to involve two distinct steps: a recognition step in which BZDs bind and a conformational transition step in which the affinity of the receptor for GABA changes. Previously, using gamma 2/alpha 1 chimeric subunits (chi ), we demonstrated that although the N-terminal 167 gamma 2 amino acid residues confer high-affinity BZD binding, other gamma 2 domains couple BZD binding to potentiation of the GABA-mediated Cl- current (IGABA). To determine which gamma 2 regions couple binding to potentiation, we generated chi s with longer N-terminal gamma 2 segments for voltage-clamp experiments in Xenopus oocytes. Chimeras containing greater than the N-terminal 167 gamma 2 residues showed incremental gains in maximal potentiation for diazepam enhancement of IGABA. Residues in gamma 2199-236, gamma 2224-236 (pre-M1), and particularly gamma 2257-297 (M2 and surrounding loops) are important for BZD potentiation. For several positive BZD modulators tested, the same regions restored potentiation of IGABA. In contrast, beta -carboline inverse-agonism was unaltered in chimeric receptors, suggesting that structural determinants for positive and negative BZD allosteric modulation are different. Dissection of the gamma 2257-297 domain revealed that three residues in concert, gamma 2T281, gamma 2I282 (M2 channel vestibule), and gamma 2S291 (M2-M3 loop) are necessary to impart full BZD potentiation to chimeric receptors. Thus, these residues participate in coupling distant BZD-binding events to conformational changes in the GABAA receptor. The location of these novel residues provides insight into the mechanisms underlying allosteric coupling for other members of the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily.

Key words: GABA; GABAA receptor; benzodiazepines; benzodiazepine-binding site; allosteric coupling; chimeric subunits; mutagenesis; inverse agonist; positive modulation; gamma subunit; alpha subunit; M2 domain; M2-M3 loop; Xenopus oocytes


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GABAA receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the mammalian brain and are members of a ligand-gated ion channel (LGIC) superfamily (Ortells and Lunt, 1995), which also includes receptors for acetylcholine, glycine, and serotonin. The GABAA receptor gene family comprises several different classes and subtypes of receptor subunits including 6alpha , 4beta , 3gamma , 1delta , 1epsilon , and 1pi (Barnard et al., 1998). GABAA receptors are pentameric proteins containing an integral chloride-selective channel with specific binding sites for GABA, benzodiazepines (BZDs), barbiturates, and steroids (Smith and Olsen, 1995). BZDs, clinically used for their anxiolytic and antiepileptic actions, exert their therapeutic effects by allosteric modulation of GABAA receptors (Sieghart, 1995). Positive BZD modulators increase the opening frequency of the Cl- channel in the presence of GABA, whereas negative BZD modulators (e.g., beta -carbolines) decrease the opening frequency (Rogers et al., 1994). Because the therapeutic clinical value of these drugs depends on their ability to exert positive modulation on IGABA, we were interested in identifying the structural determinants underlying BZD efficacy in potentiating GABA-gated currents.

Evidence suggests that both the alpha  and gamma  subunits play critical roles in BZD binding and potentiation. Using the agonist-binding site of the nicotinic ACh receptor as an archetype for pentameric LGIC receptors (Czajkowski et al., 1993), the BZD-binding site of the GABAA receptor has been modeled with the gamma  subunit apposed to an alpha  subunit, and both subunits contributing to the binding site at the interface (Galzi and Changeux, 1994; Smith and Olsen, 1995). Although several studies have begun to identify amino acids in both gamma  and alpha  subunits involved in BZD binding (for review, see Sigel and Buhr, 1997), little is known about the structural components involved in coupling BZD binding to BZD potentiation of GABA-gated current (IGABA).

Our previous studies using gamma 2/alpha 1 chimeric subunits demonstrated that chimeras (chi ) containing the N-terminal 161 amino acid residues of gamma 2 exhibit wild-type binding but drastically impaired potentiation of IGABA by BZDs (Boileau et al., 1998). To further delineate the regions unique to the gamma 2 subunit that confer BZD potentiation, we generated additional gamma 2/alpha 1 chimeras, expanding the length of the N-terminal gamma 2 portion and reducing the alpha 1 C-terminal portion (Fig. 1). Two main regions of the gamma  subunit, gamma 2224-236 and gamma 2257-297, improve the allosteric coupling of BZD binding to potentiation of IGABA. The largest gain in potentiation is conferred by the gamma 2257-297 region, which surrounds and includes the M2 transmembrane segment. Further investigation revealed that a triplet set of residues, gamma 2T281, I282, and S291 underlie this function of the gamma 2 subunit. Unlike positive modulatory BZD compounds, the negative modulator 3-carbomethoxy-4-ethyl-6,7-dimethoxy-beta -carboline (DMCM) exhibits full wild-type inhibition for all chimeric receptors.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Chimeric gamma 2/alpha 1 subunits and mutants. A, Chimeras (chi ) used in this study contain 5' gamma 2 and 3' alpha 1 sequences and are named for the gamma 2 amino acid residue where the crossover with alpha 1 occurs (arrows) in the mature rat protein sequence. For example, chi 161 contains gamma 2 residues from position 1 to 161 and alpha 1 residues in the remainder of the subunit. Chimeric crossovers depicted are for chi 161, chi 167, chi 198, chi 223, chi 236, chi 256, and chi 297. B, Shown are aligned alpha 1 and gamma 2 protein sequence segments containing the putative transmembrane domains M1, M2, and the beginning of M3, with the relative crossover positions of chi 236, chi 256, and chi 297 indicated (arrows). Mutants were constructed in the background of chi 236. Numbering for chi  and gamma 2 subunits is identical. Boxes indicate blocks of mutations constructed simultaneously: box a represents the substitution of alpha 1 RES residues to the aligned gamma 2 residues KDA (RESright-arrowKDA); box b corresponds to VFGVright-arrowSLGI; box c corresponds to ISright-arrowTI; box d corresponds to NAAright-arrowKSV; box e corresponds to a subset of box d, AAright-arrowSV. Residues highlighted in black are important for positive BZD modulation of IGABA, and their positions in gamma 2 are indicated below them.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular cloning. Chimeras are named for the last gamma 2 amino acid residue before the crossover with alpha 1 in the mature rat protein sequence. Thus, numbering for chi  and gamma 2 subunits is identical. For chimeras used in this study (Fig. 1), the gamma 2 and alpha 1 amino acid residues at the crossovers are "gamma D161/alpha A149"(chi 161), "gamma L167/alpha K155" (chi 167), "gamma L198/alpha N188" (chi 198), "gamma M223/alpha T213" (chi 223), "gamma F236/alpha V226" (chi 236), "gamma W256/alpha L246" (chi 256), and "gamma D297/alpha W287" (chi 297). chi 161 and chi 167 were generated by a targeted random chimera production method (Boileau et al., 1998). All others (Fig. 1A) were produced by recombinant PCR using overlapping complementary oligonucleotides designed to create a gamma /alpha crossover at the desired amino acid junction. Using a gamma 2 sense oligonucleotide and an antisense gamma /alpha junction oligonucleotide with gamma 2 cDNA as a template, upstream PCR fragments with gamma 2 5' and an alpha 1 3' overhang were generated. Simultaneously, using a sense junction oligonucleotide and an alpha 1 antisense oligonucleotide with alpha 1 cDNA as template, downstream PCR fragments with gamma 2 5' overhang and alpha 1 3' sequences were also prepared in separate PCR reactions. Upstream and downstream PCR fragments were then combined and amplified to create gamma /alpha DNA cassette fragments that were subcloned into chi 167 cDNA using AflII and NcoI, thus replacing the cassette region of chi 167 with the new chimeric junction sequences.

Mutant subunit fragments were generated using the same recombinant PCR method and subcloned into the background of the chi 236 subunit to generate different combinations of mutants (Fig. 1B). Single and multiple mutants were named according to the alpha 1 to gamma 2 substitutions made in chi 236. For example, the "chi 236-RESright-arrowKDA" mutant is chi 236 with alpha 1 Arg-Glu-Ser (RES) residues replaced by the aligned gamma 2 sequence at positions 259-261, Lys-Asp-Ala (KDA). The "chi 236-A291S" mutant replaces alpha 1 Ala with gamma 2 Ser291 in chi 236; the "chi 236-I281T + A291S" mutant is chi 236 with an I281T and an A291S mutation. The chimeric and mutant subunits were subcloned in pGH19 vector (Liman et al., 1992; Robertson et al., 1996) for expression in Xenopus oocytes. All chimeras were verified by restriction digest and double-stranded DNA sequencing using standard techniques (Sambrook et al., 1989).

Expression of rat GABAA receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Capped cRNA coding for the wild-type and chimeric subunits was synthesized by in vitro transcription from NheI-linearized cDNA template in pGH19 using the mMessage mMachine T7 kit (Ambion). Oocytes from Xenopus laevis were prepared as previously described (Boileau et al., 1998) and injected with 28 nl of mRNA (10-200 pg/nl/subunit) mixed in a ratio of 1:1 (alpha :beta ), or 1:1:>= 20 (alpha :beta :gamma or alpha :beta :chi ). Excess molar ratios of gamma  or chi  cRNA were injected to ensure expression of these subunits in the receptor complex (Boileau et al., 1998). Oocytes were stored at 17-19°C in recording solution supplemented with 100 µg/ml gentamycin and 100 µg/ml BSA, and were used for electrophysiological experiments 2-14 d after injection. Total amount of cRNA was scaled to yield maximal GABA-induced currents of ~3-8 µA for alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 and alpha 1beta 2chi . cRNA concentrations were calculated by UV absorption and corroborated by comparison to RNA standards on 1.5% agarose gels.

Voltage-clamp analysis. Oocytes under two-electrode voltage-clamp (Vhold = -80 mV) were perfused continuously with ND96 recording solution containing (in mM) 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES, pH 7.4 at a rate of 5 ml/min. In general, drugs and reagents were dissolved in ND96. Stock drug solutions (1000-10,000×) were made in dimethylsulfoxide. No differences in currents were observed with the vehicle. Maximal current (~3-8 µA) for all receptors was achieved with 10 mM GABA. For some chimeras and mutants, GABA EC50 was estimated by examining the ratio of response to 1 µM versus 10 mM GABA. GABA (1 µM) elicits currents corresponding to EC5 for both alpha 1beta 2chi (range, EC2-7) and alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 (EC4.8 ± 1.7) receptors. Using a standard Hill equation to model the GABA dose responses and the determined 1 µM/10 mM GABA current ratio, we calculate that the chimeric and mutant receptors show no more than a twofold shift in GABA EC50 from wild-type receptors (EC50 = 12 µM). Greater than twofold shifts are detectable in our assay.

BZD potentiation or beta -carboline inhibition IGABA were recorded at 1 µM GABA (EC5). Potentiation is defined as (IGABA + DRUG/IGABA) - 1), where IGABA + DRUG is the current response in the presence of the drug tested, and IGABA is the control GABA-induced current. For single concentration experiments, BZD site ligands were tested at concentrations eliciting maximal effects on IGABA in wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors. If differences in potentiation for mutant receptors were caused entirely by a shift in GABA affinity, the Hill equation predicts that a sixfold shift in GABA affinity, and only to the left, would be required to account for a 50% reduction in maximal potentiation. This would result in a 1 µM/10 mM GABA ratio corresponding to EC27-32 (Hill coefficient varied from 1 to 2), well out of our observed range. Standard two-electrode voltage-clamp recording was performed using a GeneClamp 500 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) interfaced to a computer with an IT-16 A/D device (Instrutech). Electrodes were filled with 3 M KCl and had a resistance of 0.5-1.5 MOmega .

Data acquisition and analysis were performed using AxoData, AxoGraph (Axon Instruments), and Prism software (Graphpad). Statistical comparisons of potentiation data employed one-way ANOVA with Dunnet and Tukey post-tests for multiple independent samples using Prism software.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Regions of the gamma 2 subunit responsible for BZD binding can be separated from domains required for coupling BZD binding to potentiation of IGABA (Boileau et al., 1998). This "uncoupling" of high-affinity BZD binding and potentiation is apparent in the gamma /alpha chimera chi 161, which binds BZDs with wild-type affinity when expressed with wild-type alpha 1 and beta 2 subunits, but displays drastically impaired diazepam modulation of IGABA. In an effort to identify regions of the gamma 2 subunit required for full BZD potentiation, several additional chimeras (Fig. 1A) were constructed with longer gamma 2 N-terminal domains. Chimeras used here, named for the gamma 2 amino acid where the crossovers occur, are chi 161, chi 167, chi 198, chi 223, chi 236, chi 256, and chi 297 (see Materials and Methods). These chimeras were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and screened by two-electrode voltage clamp to test for restoration of allosteric modulation of IGABA with several structurally diverse BZD-binding site ligands. The expression, BZD radioligand binding, and diazepam modulation of GABA-gated currents for alpha 1beta 2chi 161 and alpha 1beta 2chi 167 receptors have been described previously (Boileau et al., 1998).

Different domains alter BZD EC50 and potentiation

Chimeric cRNA was coinjected with wild-type alpha 1 and beta 2 subunit cRNA into oocytes and tested for diazepam potentiation of IGABA with 1 µM GABA. This concentration corresponded to EC5 for GABA for both wild-type and chimeric receptors. Both maximal potentiation and EC50 for diazepam modulation of IGABA were measured. Dose-response curves and traces for diazepam potentiation of the GABA response for selected chimera-containing and wild-type receptors are depicted in Figure 2. At concentrations >1 µM diazepam, potentiation of wild-type receptors begins to depress (Fig. 2, dashed line; Amin et al., 1997). The decrease may be attributable to channel block and/or BZD blockage of the GABA-binding site. Receptors containing chi 161 and chi 167 exhibited low potentiation, whereas chimeras with increasingly longer N-terminal gamma 2 segments exhibited incremental gains in maximal potentiation (Table 1, Fig. 2). Full potentiation was restored with chi 297, which contains gamma 2 residues up to the beginning of the M3 transmembrane domain. For maximal potentiation, data from chimeric and wild-type receptors yielded the series alpha beta << alpha beta chi 161 approx  alpha beta chi 167 < alpha beta chi 198 approx  alpha beta chi 223 < alpha beta chi 236 approx  alpha beta chi 256 << alpha beta chi 297 approx  alpha beta gamma .



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Diazepam potentiation of IGABA for alpha 1beta 2chi receptors. A, Trace recordings from cells injected with alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 (leftmost), and chimeric constructs. Cells were voltage-clamped at -80 mV and perfused with ND96 recording solution or ND96 with 1 µM GABA or 1 µM GABA plus 1 µM diazepam (transition to diazepam-containing solutions indicated by white arrowheads). Cells were washed with ND96 recording solution for 5-20 min between drug applications. alpha 1beta 2chi 198 exhibits unusually fast desensitization properties. Note that chimeras show incrementally larger potentiation up to alpha 1beta 2chi 297, which is similar to wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2. B, Oocytes injected with wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 (1:1:20) and alpha 1beta 2chi (1:1:>= 20) cRNA mixtures were treated with a range of diazepam concentrations in the presence of GABA and further analyzed. A potentiation response ratio was determined by dividing the peak current for alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 (black-square), alpha 1beta 2chi 167 (black-down-triangle ), alpha 1beta 2chi 198 (diamond ), alpha 1beta 2chi 223 (), alpha 1beta 2chi 236 (), alpha 1beta 2chi 256 (triangle ), and alpha 1beta 2chi 297 (open circle ) exposed to 1 µM GABA plus diazepam (DZ) by the response to 1 µM GABA alone. Data were fitted to a curve described by the equation Y = Min + (Max - Min)/(1 + 10((LogEC50-X)·nH)), where Max is the maximal potentiation, Min is the potentiation at the lowest drug concentration tested, X is the logarithm of diazepam concentration, EC50 is the half-maximal potentiation response, and nH is the Hill coefficient. Data points represent mean potentiation from four or more cells from two or more batches of oocytes. Error bars indicate SD. The parameters from the curve fits are presented in Table 1. Inset, A plot of the same data after normalizing to the maximum diazepam potentiation for each receptor.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Summary of dose-response data for diazepam potentiation of chimeric and wild-type receptors

Differences in EC50 for diazepam potentiation of IGABA between chimeric and wild-type receptors were also measured (Fig. 2, inset; Table 1). Diazepam EC50 values for receptors containing chi 223 (120 ± 43 nM), chi 236 (164 ± 29 nM), chi 256 (73 ± 26 nM), and chi 297 (98 ± 5 nM) were not significantly different from those for wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors (64 ± 15 nM). However, the EC50 values for diazepam were significantly higher (p < 0.01) for receptors containing chi 161, chi 167, and chi 198 (310 ± 45, 437 ± 87, and 340 ± 118, respectively). A significant decrease in diazepam EC50 occurred between chi 198 and chi 223 (Fig. 2, inset). It was also noted that chi 198 displays unusually fast desensitization to application of either GABA or GABA plus diazepam. The reason for this is unclear, and was not pursued. Interestingly, although the diazepam EC50 for alpha 1beta 2chi 256 receptors was similar to wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors, the maximal potentiation was reduced by ~60% compared to wild-type receptors (Fig. 2; see Fig. 4). The most significant gain of potentiation occurred between chi 256 and chi 297 (Fig. 1); alpha 1beta 2chi 297 receptors exhibit potentiation and EC50 for diazepam indistinguishable from wild-type receptors.

Positive BZD modulators use the gamma 257-297 domain

To explore whether potentiation or inhibition by other drugs acting at the BZD site would require similar regions of the gamma 2 subunit, the chimeras were tested with several different BZD-binding site ligands. Surprisingly, the beta -carboline DMCM, an inverse agonist at the BZD site, inhibited IGABA in all chimeric receptors to the same extent as wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors (Fig. 3). In contrast, the positive modulatory BZD site ligands tested showed significant differences in potentiation between chimeric receptors (Fig. 4, Table 2). The differences between chimeric receptors for positive modulation could be caused by inefficient expression of the chimera in a receptor complex, yielding a mixture of alpha 1beta 2 and alpha 1beta 2chi receptors that would appear to have reduced potentiation. However, the observation that each chimera responds to DMCM akin to alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors, and not alpha 1beta 2 receptors, allays this concern.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.   Chimeric receptors are indistinguishable from wild-type receptors for negative modulation by DMCM. Negative modulation of 1 µM GABA responses by the beta -carboline DMCM (1 µM) is graphed for wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2, alpha 1beta 2chi 161, alpha 1beta 2chi 167, alpha 1beta 2chi 223, alpha 1beta 2chi 236, alpha 1beta 2chi 256, and alpha 1beta 2chi 297 chimeric receptors. No significant difference in the inhibition of the GABA current was measured between wild-type and chimeric receptors.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.   Positive BZD-site modulators potentiate the GABA responses of chimeric receptors to different extents depending on the amount of gamma 2 subunit in each receptor. Potentiation of 1 µM GABA responses is graphed for wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2, alpha 1beta 2chi 161, alpha 1beta 2chi 167, alpha 1beta 2chi 223, alpha 1beta 2chi 236, alpha 1beta 2chi 256, alpha 1beta 2chi 297, and "alpha 1beta 2chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S" chimeric receptors using 1 µM diazepam, 1-3 µM flurazepam (A), 1-3 µM midazolam (B), 10 µM zolpidem (C), and 1 µM CL218,872 (D). Also depicted in B is inhibition of the midazolam (MZ) potentiation by 1 µM Ro15-1788 (hatched bars) for chimeric and wild-type receptors. Open bars indicate the potentiation of IGABA by 1 µM Ro15-1788. Asterisks indicate level of significance (*p < 0.01; **p < 0.001) comparing mean potentiation for that chimera with the preceding chimera in the series (left to right). Error bars indicate SD.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Recovery of BZD potentiation of IGABA in chimeric receptors

Classical 1,4-benzodiazepines such as diazepam and water-soluble flurazepam exhibited similar increments in potentiation of IGABA in chimeras with increasingly larger N-terminal segments (Fig. 4A). The strong positive modulators midazolam (a triazolobenzodiazepine, Fig. 4B) and zolpidem (an imidazopyridine, Fig. 4C), and the partial agonist CL218,872 (a triazolopyridazine, Fig. 4D) also showed increments in potentiation from chi 167 to chi 297, indicating a common pattern of residues required for positive BZD allosteric modulation.

Table 2 summarizes the effects of various BZD site ligands on the potentiation of IGABA for chimeric receptors compared to wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors. For all positive modulators tested, a correlation between recovery of potentiation and length of the chimeric gamma 2 sequence emerges. Small increases in potentiation are observed between chi 167 and chi 223 (~10-15%), and between chi 223 and chi 236 (~10-25%) for all of the positive modulators tested. Whether a significant recovery of potentiation occurred between chi 167 and chi 198 or between chi 198 and chi 223 depended on the drug tested. The largest increases in potentiation (50-60%) for all of the positive modulatory BZDs tested occurred between chi 256 and chi 297, indicating that amino acid residues surrounding and/or including M2 are required for full potentiation of IGABA by these drugs.

In addition, we tested the activity of the imidazobenzodiazepine antagonist Ro15-1788 (flumazenil; Fig. 4B) in wild-type and chimera-containing receptors. Ro15-1788 (1 µM) was effective at blocking the midazolam-induced (1 µM) potentiation of IGABA in all chimeric receptors (Fig. 4B, hatched bars). At micromolar concentrations, Ro15-1788 acts as a weak positive modulator of GABA activation (Fig. 4B, open bars; Mihic et al., 1997). The pattern of potentiation in wild-type and chimeric receptors was similar to that seen for other positive modulators. After subtracting out the minor background Ro15-1788-induced potentiation, the midazolam-induced potentiation is inhibited by Ro15-1788 to the same extent for wild-type and all chimeric receptors (91.5 ± 3.7%).

Mutations conferring positive modulation of IGABA

Because the largest gain in BZD potentiation is mediated by the gamma 2I257-D297 domain, we focused on identifying the amino acid residue or residues in this region that contribute to BZD modulation of IGABA. To determine whether alpha 1beta 2chi 236 receptors are altered in their ability to bind BZDs, we performed radioligand-binding assays. The KD for [3H]flunitrazepam binding in alpha 1beta 2chi 236 receptors (3 ± 1 nM; n = 2) was similar to the values obtained for alpha 1beta 2chi 161 (11.3 ± 1.7 nM) and alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 (9.9 ± 0.8 nM; Boileau et al., 1998). Several mutants were constructed in a chi 236 background, corresponding to nonidentical residues between gamma 2 and alpha 1 in the M1-M2 loop, the M2 transmembrane domain, and the M2-M3 loop (Fig. 1B). The first set of such mutants with alpha 1 amino acid residues substituted to the homologous gamma 2 residues were chi 236-RESright-arrowKDA (Fig. 1B, box a), chi 236-RESright-arrowKDA + NAAright-arrowKSV (box a + box d), chi 236-VFGVright-arrowSLGI (box b), chi 236-VFGVright-arrowSLGI + NAAright-arrowKSV (box b + box d), chi 236-ISright-arrowTI (box c), and chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + AAright-arrowSV (box c + box e). Of these, only chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + AAright-arrowSV (box c + box e) exhibited full potentiation of IGABA by diazepam. All single-, double-, and triple-mutant combinations of the substitutions present in chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + AAright-arrowSV (box c + box e) were generated and tested with 1 µM diazepam for potentiation of IGABA (Fig. 5). Of these, only the triple mutant combination chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S (Fig. 1B, black outlined residues) restored full potentiation to chi 236; all values for diazepam potentiation of IGABA by mutant receptors depicted in Figure 5 are significantly different (p < 0.01) from those for chi 297 except for the quadruple mutant chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + AAright-arrowSV (box c + box e) and the triple mutant chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.   Diazepam potentiation of chimeric and chimeric mutant receptors. Potentiation of 1 µM GABA current using 1 µM diazepam (DZ) is graphed for alpha 1beta 2chi 236 (white), mutants, and mutant combinations made in the background of alpha 1beta 2chi 236 receptors (gray) and alpha 1beta 2chi 297 (black) chimeric receptors. Potentiation is defined as (IGABA + DZ/IGABA- 1), where IGABA + DZ is the current response in the presence of diazepam, and IGABA is the control GABA-induced current. Dashed lines at 1.0 and 2.0 on the ordinate axis are shown for ease of comparison. Only the alpha 1beta 2chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S and alpha 1beta 2chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + AAright-arrowSV chimeric receptors show no significant difference from alpha 1beta 2chi 297 receptors.

Diazepam dose-response curves for the components of chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S, namely chi 236-ISright-arrowTI, chi 236-A291S and the other two double mutants chi 236-I281T + A291S and chi 236-S282I + A291S demonstrate that all three mutations are necessary for full potentiation for diazepam (Fig. 6). Summary data for maximal potentiation and EC50 values are shown in Table 1. Although chi 236-A291S alone did restore some of the potentiation to chi 236, it is still significantly less than for chi 297 (p < 0.01). The triple mutant also exhibited wild-type maximal potentiation for other BZD-positive modulators (Fig. 4, Table 2).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.   Diazepam potentiation of IGABA for mutant alpha 1beta 2chi 236 receptors. A, Trace recordings from cells injected with wild-type alpha 1, beta 2, and either chi 236 (left), mutant chi 236 (middle), or chi 297 (right). Cells were voltage-clamped at -80 mV and perfused with ND96 recording solution, or ND96 with 1 µM GABA or 1 µM GABA plus 1 µM diazepam (transition to diazepam-containing solutions indicated by white arrowheads). Cells were washed with ND96 recording solution for 5-20 min between drug applications. Note that only the alpha 1beta 2chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S mutant chimeric receptors show potentiation as large as alpha 1beta 2chi 297 receptors. B, Oocytes injected with chimeric and chimeric mutant cRNA mixtures were treated with a range of diazepam concentrations in the presence of GABA and further analyzed. A potentiation response ratio was determined by dividing the peak current for alpha 1beta 2chi 297 (open circle ), alpha 1beta 2chi 236-ISright-arrowTI + A291S (black-triangle), alpha 1beta 2chi 236-A291S (black-down-triangle ), alpha 1beta 2chi 236-ISright-arrowTI (black-square), alpha 1beta 2chi 236-I281T + A291S (diamond ), alpha 1beta 2chi 236-S282I + A291S (), and alpha 1beta 2chi 236 () exposed to 1 µM GABA plus diazepam (DZ) by the response to 1 µM GABA alone. Data were fitted to a curve described by the equation Y = Min + (Max - Min)/(1 + 10((LogEC50 - X)·nH)), where Max is the maximal potentiation, Min is the potentiation at the lowest drug concentration tested, X is the logarithm of diazepam concentration, EC50 is the half-maximal potentiation response, and nH is the Hill coefficient. Data points represent mean potentiation from six or more cells from two or more batches of oocytes. Error bars indicate SD. The parameters from the curve fits are presented in Table 1.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We previously reported that chimeric subunits with gamma 2 sequence in the first 161 amino acid residues and alpha 1 sequence in the remainder exhibit high-affinity BZD binding, but impaired BZD modulation of IGABA (Boileau et al., 1998). Efficient coupling of BZD binding to potentiation of IGABA is therefore mediated, at least in part, by gamma 2 amino acid residues that are not directly involved in the binding of BZDs. In this study, we identified two novel gamma 2 regions, gamma 2224-236 (pre-M1) and gamma 2257-297 (M2 and surrounding loops) that are necessary for full restoration of coupling between high-affinity BZD binding and full BZD potentiation of IGABA by several disparate BZD positive allosteric modulators (Figs. 2, 4). In addition, a threefold shift in EC50 is observed between alpha 1beta 2chi 198 and alpha 1beta 2chi 223 receptors (Table 1). This change in diazepam EC50 may account for some or all of the increased potentiation observed in alpha 1beta 2chi 223 receptors as compared to alpha 1beta 2chi 167 receptors (Figs. 2, 4).

For all the BZD positive allosteric modulators tested, the largest recovery in BZD potentiation of IGABA (50-60%) is conferred by one or more gamma 2 residues in and/or surrounding the M2 region between chi 256 and chi 297. For this region, a change in diazepam EC50 cannot explain the complete restoration in the ability of diazepam to potentiate IGABA in alpha 1beta 2chi 297 receptors as compared to alpha 1beta 2chi 256 receptors because the diazepam EC50 values for alpha 1beta 2chi 297 and alpha 1beta 2chi 256 receptors are not significantly different from each other or wild-type receptors (Table 1). The differences in levels of potentiation for chimeric receptors are also not caused by inefficient expression of the chimeric subunit, as evidenced by the equivalence of DMCM inhibition of IGABA for each chimeric receptor and alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors (Fig. 3). Thus, DMCM inhibition of IGABA serves as a useful benchmark and control for chimeric insertion into the receptor complex. Finally, the differences in potentiation are not attributable to differences in GABA dose responses. Previously, we established that alpha 1beta 2chi 161 and alpha 1beta 2chi 167 receptors have EC50 values for GABA similar to alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 and alpha 1beta 2 receptors (Boileau et al., 1998). In addition, we have calculated that the EC50 values for all of the chimeric receptors are shifted by less than twofold compared to wild-type receptors (see Materials and Methods), which could not alone account for the decrease in maximal potentiation observed. Thus, we conclude that the gamma 2257-297 region contains structural determinants required for coupling BZD binding to BZD potentiation of IGABA.

Because DMCM inhibits alpha 1beta 2chi 167 receptors to a similar extent as wild-type alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 receptors (Fig. 3), negative modulation of the GABA-gated current by beta -carboline-binding to the BZD site must be transduced through different structural elements, i.e., using gamma 2 residues located within the first 167 amino acid residues, with or without downstream gamma 2 residues that are conserved in the alpha 1 and gamma 2 subunits. Because we are comparing alpha  to gamma  subunits for differences in BZD function, we cannot detect amino acid residues important for processes that are conserved between the two subunit subtypes.

The specific residues in the gamma 2257-297 region that underlie BZD potentiation of IGABA were identified. Of the twelve nonidentical residues between chi 256 and chi 297, the residues gamma 2T281, I282, and S291 are, in combination, necessary to confer wild-type potentiation of IGABA by positive BZD modulators (Figs. 4-6). Although we cannot rule out the possibility that these mutations somehow serve to relieve a conformational dysfunction in the structure of the chi 236 subunit and do not play a direct role in BZD actions, we think this unlikely. Wild-type responses to DMCM and equivalent values for competitive displacement by Ro15-1788 for all the chimeric receptors suggest that the overall structures of the chimeras are not severely disrupted. Equilibrium binding values for [3H]flunitrazepam to alpha 1beta 2chi 161, alpha 1beta 2chi 167, and alpha 1beta 2chi 236 receptors were similar to wild-type receptors, indicating that the BZD-binding site is intact. Further support for our conclusion that gamma 2T281, I282 and S291 are compulsory gamma 2 elements for BZD activity derives from the fact that all three residues are conserved in all known gamma  subunits cloned from various species but vary in other subunit subtypes. These identified residues, however, are not the sole gamma 2 determinants controlling BZD potentiation. Certainly other gamma 2 amino acid residues also play a role, particularly residues in the pre-M1 regions (e.g., gamma 2224-236), which have yet to be identified, and/or amino acid residues that are conserved between the gamma  and alpha  subunits.

Alterations in the ability of positive BZD modulators to potentiate IGABA can arise from several possible sources, including alterations at the BZD-binding site (Colquhoun, 1998), disruptions of the coupling (transduction of BZD binding to potentiation) machinery, and/or modifications of the ion channel pore itself. An example of a mutation that alters BZD "efficacy" of several BZD ligands is the gamma 2 subunit mutation T142S (Mihic et al., 1994); both a competitive antagonist at the BZD-binding site (Ro15-1788) and a weak negative modulator (Ro15-4513) take on the character of weak positive modulators. Because we previously demonstrated that high-affinity BZD binding is localized to the N-terminal 161 gamma 2 amino acid residues (Boileau et al., 1998), the novel regions and residues identified in this study control BZD potentiation by influencing the coupling machinery and/or the ion channel pore itself rather than the BZD-binding site. For the chimeric receptors described in this study, strong positive BZD modulators behave like weak modulators or BZD antagonists. Additionally, we observe that alpha 1beta 2chi 161, alpha 1beta 2chi 167, and alpha 1beta 2chi 236 receptors exhibit wild-type, high-affinity radioligand binding. Together, these observations suggest that we are measuring disruptions in coupling rather than binding. Because gamma 2T281 and I282 are likely to line the water-accessible surface of the Cl- channel based on homology with the alpha 1 subunit (Xu and Akabas, 1996), it is tempting to speculate that this region controls BZD potentiation by affecting the ion channel. These gamma 2 residues may influence ion channel gating, possibly facilitating channel opening by GABA when BZDs are present.

Structurally, allosteric coupling between GABA and BZD-binding sites could occur exclusively in the N-terminal extracellular domains of the receptor, from one binding site to the other. The Monod-Wyman-Changeux allosteric model predicts that ligand-binding events cause allosteric transitions that change the state of the receptor, which result in changes in the binding sites (Monod et al., 1965). Our chimeric receptors have either weakened or deleted allosteric transitions that are restored by gamma 2 segments distant from the presumed binding sites, and in particular by the combination of the channel-lining residues gamma 2T281 and I282 coupled with the M2-M3 loop residue gamma 2S291. Thus, allosteric coupling between the GABA and BZD-binding sites requires transduction through transmembrane or intracellular regions and then back out to the extracellular binding regions, subsequently affecting the kinetics of GABA binding at one or both cooperative GABA-binding sites.

Our results demonstrate that two M2 residues (gamma 2 T281, I282) and a M2-M3 extracellular loop residue (gamma 2 S291) are required for full, wild-type BZD potentiation of IGABA by a variety of BZD ligands. It is interesting that these gamma 2 residues map to corresponding regions as residues in other GABAA receptor subunits and the homologous glycine receptor believed to be involved in "direct" channel gating by agonists. In the GABAA receptor, when the M2 central leucine is substituted with threonine in the human beta 1 subunit, GABA activation is abolished, even though binding with the GABA agonist [3H]muscimol is unaltered (Tierney et al., 1996). In the glycine receptor, mutation of alpha 1 R271 (in the M2-M3 loop) to leucine or glutamine converts glycinergic agonists beta -alanine and taurine from agonists to competitive antagonists for glycine (Rajendra et al., 1995). Our results that residues in M2 and the M2-M3 loop are necessary for coupling BZD binding to BZD potentiation suggests that not only are the BZD and GABA-binding sites structurally conserved (Olsen et al., 1996), but the regions of the receptor involved in the coupling of binding to their functional effects are also conserved. We speculate that the BZD-binding site may in reality be a very low-affinity GABA-binding site that over evolutionary time has acquired the ability to bind BZDs and when the gamma 2 M2 region is present, BZDs may act as coagonists and increase channel opening frequency.

Mutations within the M2 region and surrounding loops in the GABAA receptor also affect the actions of other GABAA receptor modulators. Mutations in two specific M2 amino acid residues, alpha 1S267 or the aligned