 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 15, 1999, 19(24):10767-10777
Compromised Glutamate Transport in Human Glioma Cells:
Reduction-Mislocalization of Sodium-Dependent Glutamate
Transporters and Enhanced Activity of Cystine-Glutamate Exchange
Zu-Cheng
Ye1,
Jeffrey
D.
Rothstein2, and
Harald
Sontheimer1
1 Department of Neurobiology, The University of Alabama
at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, and
2 Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, Maryland 21287
 |
ABSTRACT |
Elevated levels of extracellular glutamate
([Glu]o) can induce seizures and cause excitotoxic
neuronal cell death. This is normally prevented by astrocytic glutamate
uptake. Neoplastic transformation of human astrocytes causes malignant
gliomas, which are often associated with seizures and neuronal
necrosis. Here, we show that Na+-dependent glutamate
uptake in glioma cell lines derived from human tumors (STTG-1, D-54MG,
D-65MG, U-373MG, U-251MG, U-138MG, and CH-235MG) is up to 100-fold
lower than in astrocytes. Immunohistochemistry and subcellular
fractionation show very low expression levels of the astrocytic
glutamate transporter GLT-1 but normal expression levels of another
glial glutamate transporter, GLAST. However, in glioma cells,
essentially all GLAST protein was found in cell nuclei rather than the
plasma membrane. Similarly, brain tissues from glioblastoma patients
also display reduction of GLT-1 and mislocalization of GLAST. In glioma
cell lines, over 50% of glutamate transport was
Na+-independent and mediated by a
cystine-glutamate exchanger (system xc ). Extracellular
L-cystine dose-dependently induced glutamate release from
glioma cells. Glutamate release was enhanced by extracellular glutamine
and inhibited by (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine, which
blocked cystine-glutamate exchange. These data suggest that the
unusual release of glutamate from glioma cells is caused by
reduction-mislocalization of Na+-dependent
glutamate transporters in conjunction with upregulation of
cystine-glutamate exchange. The resulting glutamate release from
glioma cells may contribute to tumor-associated necrosis and possibly
to seizures in peritumoral brain tissue.
Key words:
brain tumor; glutamate transporter; glutamate release; cystine-glutamate exchange; system
xc ; excitotoxicity; epilepsy
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Glutamate is the primary excitatory
amino acid neurotransmitter in the mammalian CNS. Maintenance of
low extracellular glutamate concentrations
([Glu]o) is critical to ensure synaptic
transmission and to prevent neurotoxicity (Choi, 1988 ; Nicholls and
Attwell, 1990 ). Toxicity from elevated [Glu]o
(excitotoxicity) has been suggested to be involved in a wide spectrum
of acute and chronic nervous system diseases (Olney, 1982 ; Choi, 1988 ;
Lipton and Rosenberg, 1994 ). In the healthy brain, abnormal rises of
[Glu]o to excitotoxic levels are prevented by
the activities of Na+-dependent glutamate
transporters. To date, five transporter subtypes have been cloned
(Kanai and Hediger, 1992 ; Pines et al., 1992 ; Storck et al., 1992 ;
Fairman et al., 1995 ; Arriza et al., 1997 ). These include the glutamate
transporters GLAST and GLT-1, which are primarily expressed by
astrocytes (Rothstein et al., 1994 ; Torp et al., 1994 ; Lehre et al.,
1995 ) and appear to be the most abundant glutamate transporters in
brain (Lehre and Danbolt, 1998 ). Because astrocytes are in close
proximity to synapses, they are believed to play a pivotal role in
maintaining glutamate homeostasis (Bergles and Jahr, 1998 ; Magistretti
et al., 1999 ). Astrocytes can convert transported glutamate to
glutamine, which is then released as precursor for neuronal synthesis
of neurotransmitter glutamate (Rothstein and Tabakoff, 1984 ; Waniewski
and Martin, 1986 ; Laake et al., 1995 ; Sibson et al., 1997 ).
Under disease conditions, glial glutamate transport can be impaired and
may contribute to the elevation of [Glu]o. For
instance, GLT-1 expression is severely decreased in the motor cortex
and spinal cord of patients with the sporadic form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, leading to elevations of excitatory amino
acids in the CSF (Rothstein et al., 1990 , 1995 ). Direct links
between compromised glutamate transport and neurotoxicity have been
demonstrated through knock-out experiments. Suppression of the
astrocytic glutamate transporters GLT-1 and GLAST by antisense
oligonucleotides caused drastic rises in
[Glu]o, sufficient to induce neuronal damage (Rothstein et al., 1996 ). GLT-1 knock-out mice undergo lethal spontaneous epileptic seizures and display increased susceptibility to
acute brain injury (Tanaka et al., 1997 ), whereas mice in which the
neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC-1 had been knocked out developed neither neurodegeneration nor epilepsy (Peghini et al., 1997 ).
Elevation of [Glu]o may not only arise from
reduced expression of glutamate transporter but can also be caused by
the reversed operation of glutamate transport or by other pathways that
can mediate glutamate efflux. All the cloned
Na+-dependent transporters are driven by
the electrochemical gradients for Na+,
K+, and H+ to
transport glutamate against its steep transmembrane gradient (Attwell
et al., 1993 ; Zerangue and Kavanaugh, 1996a ). Compromising the ionic
environment can lead to reversal of transport. Then the millimolar
cytoplasmic concentrations of glutamate in astrocytes (Hertz et al.,
1988 ; Levi and Patrizio, 1992 ) can become a significant source for
nonvesicular glutamate release, which may contribute to neuronal injury
(Szatkowski et al., 1990 ; Longuemare and Swanson, 1995 ). In addition to
reversal of transport, swelling-activated anion channels have also been
shown to mediate efflux of amino acids, including glutamate (Kimelberg
and Mongin, 1998 ). Furthermore, an
Na+-independent cystine-glutamate
exchange (equal to system
xc in fibroblast)
(Bannai and Kitamura, 1980 ), which has recently been cloned (Sato et
al., 1999 ), is expressed by a variety of cell types (Watanabe and
Bannai, 1987 ; Cho and Bannai, 1990 ; Murphy et al., 1990 ; Piani and
Fontana, 1994 ). Intracellular glutamate concentrations in astrocytes
are at levels above 1 mM (Hertz et al., 1988 ), whereas
L-cystine levels are presumably much lower because
intracellular L-cystine is readily reduced to
L-cysteine (Bannai and Kitamura, 1980 ). Consequently, the
transmembrane glutamate gradient likely favors the efflux of glutamate
in exchange for cystine. L-Cystine is required for the
synthesis of glutathione (Sato et al., 1998 ).
Unlike most neurons, glial cells can proliferate in response to injury
or under neoplastic conditions. The vast majorities of primary brain
neoplasms derived from glial cells and are collectively called gliomas.
These tumors are rapidly expanding and are often associated with
seizures (Paillas, 1994 ). We show here that glioma cells show much
reduced cell surface expression of
Na+-dependent glutamate transporters
thereby compromising their ability to maintain glutamate homeostasis.
The resulting glutamate accumulation in the extracellular space may
contribute to seizures that are common in glioma patients. In addition,
glioma cells may actively kill neurons in the vicinity of the tumor
through the release of glutamate by cystine-glutamate exchange.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials. The enzymes NADPH:FMN oxidoreductase,
glutamate dehydrogenase, and propidium iodide were purchased from
Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). General cell culture supplies
were obtained from Becton Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ) and Corning (Corning, NY). Earle's minimum essential media (MEM) and DMEM were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Fetal bovine
serum (FBS) was purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT).
S-4-carboxyphenylglycine (S-4CPG),
(S)-3-carboxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycine
(S-3C4H-PG),
(S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine (S-4C3H-PG), and
(R)-4-carboxyphenylglycine (R-4CPG) were
purchased from Tocris Cookson (Bristol, UK). All radioactive tracers
and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kits were purchased from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Unless stated otherwise, other enzymes and
chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Cell lines and primary cultures of rat astrocytes. Glioma
cell lines used in these studies included STTG-1 (CCF-STTG1, CRF 1718)
(from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), U-138MG, U-251MG, U-373MG, CH-235MG, D-54MG, and D-65MG (all from Dr. D. D. Bigner, Duke University, Durham, NC). These cell lines were cultured in
DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. Glioma cells were
used 2-5 d after plating at which time they had reached ~ 80%
confluence. Unless mentioned otherwise, experiments were performed on
STTG-1 cells and repeated on at least three other cell lines.
Hippocampal astrocytes were prepared from Sprague Dawley rats as
described previously (Ye and Sontheimer, 1998 ). Briefly, hippocampi
were removed from the decapitated rat pups [postnatal day (P)
P0-P2], freed of meninges, minced into 1 mm3 pieces, and digested in papain
solution for 20-30 min. Cells were plated in 24 well plates or flasks
in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 20 mM glucose, 10 U/ml
penicillin, and 10 µg/ml streptomycin. Culture media for astrocytic
cultures was changed twice a week, and astrocytes were used after
10 d in culture, at which time >90% of cells were GFAP-positive
and essentially free of neurons.
Glutamate-aspartate uptake. Uptake procedures were similar
to those we have described previously (Ye and Sontheimer, 1996 ) with
minor modifications.
3H-D-aspartate and
D-aspartate as stable glutamate analogs were used
to study high-affinity, Na+-dependent
glutamate uptake. In some cultures, results were compared with
3H-glutamate uptake. The solution for
uptake consisted of (in mM): 125 NaCl, 3.0 KCl,
2.0 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 23 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, and 2.0 MgSO4, warmed to 37°C and saturated with 5%
CO2-95% O2. For
experiments dealing with Na+-independent
glutamate-aspartate uptake, NaCl was replaced by choline chloride or
N-methyl-D-glucamine,
NaH2PO4 was replaced by
KH2PO4 with KCl lowered by
1.25 mM, and NaHCO3 was
replaced with triethylammonium bicarbonate (Kimelberg et al., 1989 ).
Cells were washed twice with the above uptake solution before
experiments commenced. The above uptake solution supplemented with 0.1 mM D-aspartate and 0.5 µCi/ml
3H-D-aspartate
was then added for 10 min. Uptake was terminated by three washes with
ice-cold PBS. Cells were then dissolved in 0.3 N NaOH and aliquoted.
3H activity was detected in a liquid
scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) and
normalized to protein contents as determined by the Bio-Rad protein
assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Background radioactivity was
determined in the same manner as uptake but with the presence of 10 mM unlabeled glutamate or D-aspartate and was subtracted from the uptake reading.
To determine the kinetics of uptake,
3H-glutamate and
3H-D-aspartate uptake was
performed in the presence of 5.0-400 µM glutamate or
D-aspartate, respectively. Apparent
Vmax and
Km were determined from the double
reciprocal plot of uptake rate versus substrate concentration
(Lineweaver-Burk plot) or from Eadie-Hofstee plots.
L-cystine uptake.
35S-L-cystine uptake
was performed in a way similar to glutamate uptake. Because
intracellular cystine can be quickly reduced to cysteine and released
back into the media (Bannai and Ishii, 1982 ), the time course of uptake
was shortened to a 3 min period to minimize loss of intracellular
35S. For kinetic measurements,
L-cystine concentrations in the uptake media ranged from 15 to 400 µM.
Sampling and determination of extracellular and intracellular
glutamate levels. Cells were washed twice and incubated in
glutamate-depleted culture media (Ye and Sontheimer, 1998 ) or Earle's
balanced salt solution (EBSS) (supplemented with 10 mM D-glucose) with various testing agents and the supernatant collected for
[Glu]o measurement. After experiments, cells
were washed twice with PBS, harvested in 0.3 N NaOH, and then
neutralized with 0.3 N HCl. Aliquots were stored at 20°C for later
protein and [Glu]i determination. Samples containing serum and samples with glutamate levels higher than 20 µM were diluted 1:20-1:100 with distilled
water before measurement.
Glutamate concentration was determined by the bioluminescence method as
described by Fosse et al. (1986) with minor modifications. Briefly, the
glutamate-specific reagent mixture contained: potassium phosphate 25 mM, pH 7.0, Triton X-100 40 µg/ml, dithiothreitol 100 µM, myristyl aldehyde 30 µM, -NAD 2 mM, ADP 250 µM, FMN 2.5 µM,
luciferase 60 µg/ml, NADPH:FMN oxidoreductase 300 mU/ml, and glutamate dehydrogenase 0.5 mg/ml. Samples with a volume of 10 µl
were placed in white 96 well plates (Labsystem, Franklin, MA). Luminescence generated by the reaction of glutamate with the above reagent mixture (80 µl/well) was measured by a luminescence plate reader (LUMIstar; BMG LabTechnologies, Durham, NC). Luminescence readings remained linear within a glutamate range of 20 nM
to 10 µM. We determined that all drugs used in these
studies did not interfere with the bioluminescence assay at the
concentrations used. Glutamate standards used for calibration were
prepared in corresponding glutamate-free solutions.
[Glu]i was calculated, normalized to protein
contents, and expressed as nanomoles per milligram protein.
[Glu]o was either expressed as absolute
concentration or multiplied by the volume then normalized to cellular
protein levels and expressed as nanomoles per milligram protein.
Immunofluorescence microscopy. Glioma cells and control rat
hippocampal astrocytes used for immunocytochemistry were cultured on
glass coverslips. Cells were washed twice in PBS and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 10 min. This was followed with three rinses in TBS
(Tris-HCl buffer solution, pH 7.4) and incubated 30 min in blocking
solution (TBS plus 5% normal goat serum plus 0.1% Triton
X-100). Cells were then incubated overnight with anti-GLAST antibody
(diluted in blocking solution to 0.4 µg/ml) at 4°C. After removing
the primary antibody, the cells were rinsed three times (5 min each)
with blocking solution and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG for 2 hr at room temperature. Finally, cells were
washed four times and mounted on glass slides with fluorescent microscopy mounting solution and sealed with nail polish. Cell staining
was examined with a Leica (Nussloch, Germany) DMRB microscope with a 100× oil objective, and images were captured by a camera and
frame-grabber system (Optronics Engineering, Goleta, CA).
Surgically removed human glioma tissue and corresponding uninvolved
brain tissue from the same patients were freshly embedded in OCT,
sectioned to 8-10 µm on a cryotome (Zeiss HM505E; Zeiss, Oberkochen,
Germany), and mounted on Fisherbrand Plus microscopic slides. These
experiments were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the
University of Alabama at Birmingham (IRB F971030027). Subsequently, these samples were subject to the same
immunohistochemical procedures as described for culture cells above.
Propidium iodide (10 µg/ml) was applied together with
FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies as a nuclear (DNA)
counterstain. Double stainings were superimposed in Adobe PhotoShop
(Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).
Cellular fractionation. Cellular fractionation was conducted
in two ways, with all steps performed at 4°C. Cultured glioma cells
were washed twice with cold PBS, scraped from the culture plates with a
rubber policeman, and pelleted with a 5 min spin at 2000 × g. The collected cell pellet was homogenized with
Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinders in Tris-HCl (25 mM, pH 7.40) buffered homogenization solution
containing 0.3 M sucrose and 2 mM EDTA, supplemented with protease inhibitors
(0.5 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 µg/ml aprotinin). Cellular fractions were
separated by differential centrifugation. The homogenate was first
centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was then
resuspended in homogenization solution and centrifuged against a 36%
sucrose cushion at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The
resulting nuclear pellet was then collected as nuclei part. The
supernatant from the initial 1000 × g spin was
subsequently centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min to
isolate the plasma membrane and other high-density membrane structures. The supernatant from this step was further centrifuged at 200,000 × g with a Beckman Instruments T70.1 rotor for 60 min to
yield a pellet (P200) containing low-density membrane, vesicles, and a
supernatant (S-200) containing mainly soluble proteins.
For comparison, a modified method using digitonin (Stachowiak et al.,
1994 ; Bronfman et al., 1998 ) was used to isolate cell nuclei. The
collected cell pellet was resuspended in nuclei buffer containing 0.1%
digitonin and (in mM): 5 sodium phosphate, pH7.4, 50 NaCl,
5 KCl, 150 sucrose, 2 dithiothreitol, 1 MgCl2,
and 0.5 CaCl2, supplemented with protease
inhibitors. Suspended cells were then homogenized in a Dounce tissue
grinder with 10 gentle strokes. The resulting homogenate was
centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and the
pellet was resuspended in nuclei buffer and centrifuged through a 30%
sucrose solution at 1000 × g for 10 min. These
procedures yielded a purified nuclear pellet (N), and the remaining
nuclear supernatant (NS) on the top of the sucrose cushion mainly
contained cell nuclei that were associated with some other membrane
structure. The supernatant from 500 × g was further
centrifuged at 60,000 × g for 30 min, and the pellet
(P-60) and supernatant (S-60) contain cell debris and soluble
cytoplasmic proteins, respectively.
Biotinylation. To separate transporters in the plasma
membrane from intracellular transporters, a method for biotinylation was modified from Qian et al. (1997) and Davis et al. (1998) . Briefly,
cells cultured in 10 cm dishes were quickly washed with PBS-Ca/Mg
solution (in mM): 138 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 1.5 KH2PO4, 8.0 Na2HPO4, 1 MgCl2, and 0.1 CaCl2, pH
7.4. This was followed by incubation with 3.0 ml of Sulfo-NHS-biotin
(Pierce, Rockford, IL) solution (1.5 mg/ml in PBS-Ca/Mg solution) for
30 min at 4°C with occasional gentle shaking. Biotinylation was
quenched by double washing and an additional 30 min incubation with 100 mM glycine in PBS-Ca/Mg. The cells were then
rinsed with PBS-Ca/Mg, collected, and then lysed with 0.5-1.5 ml
radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM
NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% SDS, supplemented with
protease inhibitors. Supernatant from the lysate after centrifugation
(20,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C) was aliquoted as
sample of total lysate, and the rest was incubated with avidin agarose
beads (400 µl of beads/1 ml of supernatant; Pierce) for 2 hr at
4°C. The beads were then centrifuged at 10,000 × g
for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected. The beads were washed
four times with RIPA, and the absorbed protein was eluted by boiling
for 5 min with 200 µl of Laemmli's buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl at pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS,
5% -mercaptoethanol, and 0.1% bromophenol blue). Bead elutes (30 µl) (contained biotinylated cell surface transporters), total
lysate, and the supernatants after beads absorption (contained
intracellular transporters, used same volume as total lysate) were
separated with SDS-PAGE, and the protein was detected with immunoblotting.
Comparison biotinylation was performed on cells lysed with hypotonic
solution (5 min swelling in protease inhibitors supplemented PBS
solution diluted with distilled water in 5:95 v/v ratio). The cell
debris (mainly membrane and nuclei) was collected by centrifugation at
20,000 × g for 5 min and then incubated with biotin
agents for 30 min. Biotinylation was stopped by glycine (100 mM in PBS), and all the washes were done by
centrifugation and resuspension. The final pellet was dissolved in RIPA
and then treated the same way as intact cells.
Western blot. The expression of GLT-1 and GLAST by glioma
cells was assessed by Western blot. Protein content in cell lysates was
determined before adding Laemmli's buffer to samples and boiling for 5 min. Samples were loaded at a volume containing 30 µg of protein and
separated by 7% SDS-PAGE. Proteins in the gel were then transferred to
polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA).
The membrane was incubated for 1 hr at room temperature in blocking
solution: TBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T), 5% nonfat dry milk, and 1%
bovine serum albumin and washed twice with TBS-T. The membrane was then
probed at room temperature for 1 hr with an affinity-purified
anti-GLAST antibody (0.4 µg/ml), anti-GLT-1 antibody (0.04 µg/ml),
and anti-actin antibody (1:2000) diluted in probing TBS-T (TBS-T
supplemented with 0.5% nonfat dry milk and 1% BSA). Both transporter
antibodies were raised against a homology sequence in rat and human.
After washing six times for 5 min each with TBS-T, the blot was
incubated for 1 hr with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham) diluted 1:1000 in probing TBS-T. After
washing, the blots were visualized with ECL and exposed on
hypersensitive ECL film.
As a control for cell surface biotinylation, we used
Na+/K+-ATPase
as plasma membrane marker. For this purpose, blots probed for
transporters were first stripped at 50°C for 30 min with 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, and 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol. This was followed by two washes with TBS-T for 10 min each and blocking in 5% dry milk and 1% BSA for 1 hr; then the
blot was probed with monoclonal
anti-Na+/K+-ATPase
(0.4 µg/ml; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). Blots were then
washed and incubated with peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse secondary
antibody (1:1000; Amersham) and visualized with ECL.
 |
RESULTS |
Na+-dependent and
Na+-independent glutamate transport in glioma
cells
Using either 3H-glutamate or
3H-D-aspartate, we studied
glutamate and aspartate uptake into human glioma cells and compared the
rates of uptake with that of neonatal rat astrocytes. The established
human glioma cell lines used for these studies included STTG-1, D-54MG,
D-65MG, U-373MG, U-138MG, U-251MG, and CH-235MG. A representative
experiment is illustrated in Figure 1,
which shows a direct comparison of glutamate and aspartate uptake in astrocytes (Fig. 1A) and in STTG-1 cells (Fig.
1B), a cell line established from a WHO-IV grade
human astrocytoma. Data from quadruplicated experiments on each of the
seven glioma cells lines are summarized in Table
1. These data show that the uptake of
glutamate and aspartate is profoundly reduced in glioma cells compared
with normal rat astrocytes. This does not reflect a species difference because rat and human astrocytes have been reported to display similar
glutamate uptake (Whittemore et al., 1994 ). Compared with normal
astrocytes, glioma glutamate uptake exhibited an 11-fold to 45-fold
reduction in Vmax with little
alteration in Km. Interestingly, The
Na+-dependent uptake of
D-aspartate in these glioma cells was further reduced (Fig. 1B, Table 1). With the exception of
U-251MG and D-65MG, all glioma cell lines showed 3-fold to 30-fold
lower rates of aspartate uptake than glutamate uptake. This difference
was not observed in astrocytes in which
Km values for uptake for
D-aspartate and L-glutamate
were almost identical, and Vmax values
differed by <30% (Table 1). We then determined the contribution of
Na+-dependent glutamate uptake by
repeating these studies in the presence or absence of extracellular
Na+ (Fig. 1B, Table 1).
Interestingly, glioma cells showed only a ~50% reduction in
glutamate uptake in the absence of Na+,
suggesting that up to 50% of total glutamate uptake in glioma cells is
Na+-independent. In astrocytes, in
contrast, essentially all glutamate uptake was abolished in
Na+-free media (Fig.
1A). Importantly, the
Na+-independent glutamate uptake in glioma
cells was sensitive to L-cystine, whereas the
D-aspartate uptake was not (Fig.
1B). Together, these data suggest that
Na+-dependent glutamate uptake in glioma
cells is markedly reduced, but
Na+-independent glutamate uptake is
upregulated.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Na+-dependent and
Na+-independent glutamate transport in astrocytes
and glioma cells. A, Astrocytes transport glutamate and
D-aspartate at similar rates, and this transport is
primarily dependent on the presence of Na+.
B, STTG-1 glioma cells transport glutamate at much lower
rates than astrocytes and are only partially depend on
Na+. L-Cystine (100 µM)
reduced glutamate transport by ~50% in the presence of
Na+ but almost completely blocked
Na+-independent glutamate uptake. STTG-1 cells
transport D-aspartate much less efficiently than glutamate,
and this transport is insensitive to L-cystine. Data are
means ± SE; n = 4-6.
|
|
Glioma cells lack surface expression of GLAST
Numerous studies have reported reduced transport rates as a result
of reduced levels of transporter protein expression. In astrocytes,
GLAST and GLT-1 are the major
Na+-dependent glutamate transporters. We
thus set out to study and compare expression levels of GLAST and GLT-1
in astrocytes and glioma cells by Western blot (Fig.
2). To ensure that protein levels were
comparable under each condition, we also probed for actin in each blot.
Western blot of whole-cell lysates consistently showed very little
expression of GLT-1 protein in glioma cells, whereas both hippocampal
and cortical astrocytes showed prominent expression of GLT-1. However,
all glioma cell lines (except U-251MG) showed prominent expression of
GLAST (Fig. 2). Interestingly, GLAST expression levels in U-251MG were
less than all other cell lines on Western blot, and the band recognized
by the antibodies showed a somewhat lower apparent molecular weight
(~5 kDa smaller).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Differential expression of glutamate transporters
GLT-1 and GLAST in cultured rat hippocampal and cortical astrocytes and
seven human glioma cell lines; 30 µg (Cortical*, 10 µg) of protein of each whole-cell lysate were used and probed for the
expression of GLT-1 and GLAST. Blots were also probed with anti-actin
as loading control. Rat astrocytes (12 d in vitro)
expressed abundant GLT-1, whereas human glioma cells virtually lacked
GLT-1, except for a small amount of protein appearing as faint a band
that was ~10 kDa bigger than rat GLT-1. Most glioma cell lines
expressed comparable amounts of GLAST as rat astrocytes, except U-251MG
expressed less amount of GLAST that appeared ~5 kDa smaller.
|
|
In light of the high levels of GLAST expression, one would expect that
glioma cells are quite capable of transporting glutamate, although
experiments in Figure 1 suggest the contrary. To ensure that GLAST is
indeed expressed in the plasma membrane, we set out to determine the
subcellular distribution of GLAST in astrocytes and glioma cells using
immunocytochemistry. In astrocytes, GLAST appeared to be expressed on
the cell surface with enhanced labeling along contact sites between
cells and little staining in the cytoplasm or intracellular organelles
(Fig. 3A). In contrast, in
glioma cells, the cell nuclei were prominently labeled by GLAST
antibodies with little immunoreactivity elsewhere, as illustrated for
three representative examples from STTG1, D-54MG, and D-65MG cells, respectively (Fig. 3B-D).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Immunohistochemical localization of glutamate
transporters in cultured cells and human brain tissues.
A, GLAST staining of cultured rat hippocampal astrocytes
shows abundant staining in all aspects of the cell with more intense
labeling at cell-cell junctions. B-D, Representative
examples of GLAST expression in STTG-1 (B),
D54-MG (C), and D65-MG (D)
cells show intensive GLAST staining in the cell nuclei with little
staining on cell processes. E-L, Immunohistochemical
staining of biopsy sections. E-G show a representative
GBM section stained for GLAST (E), propidium
iodide (F), and superimposition of these to show
colocalization in cell nuclei (G).
H shows double staining of GLAST and propidium iodide in
uninvolved brain tissue from the same patient (note that the density of
nuclei is much lower than in GBM tissues). I,
K, GBM tumor tissues double-stained for GLT-1 and
propidium iodide. Areas with high nuclear densities exhibited no GLT-1
immunoreactivity, whereas comparison tissue from the same patient shows
strong immunoreactivity for GLT-1 (J).
Occasionally, tumor tissue showed areas that appeared to be tumor
margins in which the area with low density of nuclei stained
prominently for GLT-1 (presumably normal brain), but areas with high
densities of nuclei (presumably tumor) lack GLT-1 staining
(K). L, Secondary antibody
and reagent control. Section adjacent to
(J) stained with FITC-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit only. Scale bar: A-L, 20 µm.
|
|
To ensure that the nuclear localization of GLAST is not just a feature
of glioma cell lines, we also examine the localization of GLT-1 and
GLAST in human biopsy sections from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
surgically resected from five patients. As with the cell lines, we
consistently observed most of the GLAST immunoreactivity in the cells
nuclei (Fig. 3E). We double labeled these sections also with
propidium iodide (Fig. 3F), and the superimposition of these images (Fig. 3G) further emphasizes the nuclear
localization of GLAST in the cell nuclei. In contrast, uninvolved
tissue from the same patient showed prominent GLAST immunoreactivity
localized outside the cells nuclei (Fig. 3H). In four
of the five biopsies examined, we observed GLAST immunoreactivity
exclusively in the cell nuclei. In one, we observed both weak nuclear
and membrane staining. In contrast, we rarely observed any GLAST
immunoreactivity in cell nuclei in comparison tissues. The few cells
that did show nuclear staining may indeed be glioma cells that have
invaded normal brain. GLT-1 immunoreactivity was either weak or absent in GBM tissue (Fig. 3I) but was prominent in
comparison tissue (Fig. 3J). Interestingly, we
occasionally encountered areas in GBM tissue sections in which the
labeling pattern changed abruptly, an example of which is shown in
Figure 3K. Here, GLT-1 staining was absent in the area that
has a high nuclear density but prominent in the area with only a few
cell nuclei. These areas may be the boundaries between the tumor and
normal brain.
Cell surface expression of GLAST was further studied by biotinylation
of surface proteins and subsequent separation by binding to
avidin-conjugated agarose beads. The resulting biotinylated proteins
were run on SDS gels and probed with antibodies to GLAST. For control
purposes, the blot was stripped and probed with antibodies that
recognize the
Na+/K+-ATPase,
which is ubiquitously expressed in cell membranes, and with actin, a
ubiquitous cytoplasmic protein. Although the majority of the
Na+/K+-ATPase
was localized in the bead elutes, which contained extracted biotinylated cell surface proteins (Fig.
4B), no GLAST was found in the cell surface fractions but remained in the intracellular fractions (Fig. 4A), and the latter also showed
staining at ~160 kDa, which is likely a GLAST multimer (Haugeto et
al., 1996 ). To confirm that the lack of biotinylated GLAST was indeed
caused by a lack of surface expression resulting in the inaccessibility of the biotinylating reagent, similar experiments were performed on
glioma cells that were lysed by osmotic shock. Under those conditions,
GLAST could be detected in the biotinylated fraction (Fig.
4C). These data thus support the lack of cell surface
expression of GLAST. GLAST expression in glioma cells is most likely
confined to the nuclear membrane, as was seen immunohistochemically
(Fig. 3B-D). Because the cell nuclei are the heaviest cell
organelles, they were separated first from other cellular components by
differential centrifugation. In all tested glioma cells, most
immunoreactivity was found in the nuclear fraction. The P-20 fraction,
which stained for the plasma membrane marker
Na+/K+-ATPase,
showed only small amounts of GLAST, which was most likely a result of
GLAST contained in the endoplasmic reticulum found in this fraction.
Interestingly, GLAST immunoreactivity was also detected in the P-200
fraction, which mainly consists of Golgi and other low-density
vesicles; however, the band appeared at a molecular weight of ~160
kDa, possibly a multimer of GLAST (Haugeto et al., 1996 ). Again, there
was no GLAST detected in the soluble fraction (Fig.
4D, S-200). Similarly, cell nuclei
isolated by digitonin pretreatment followed with centrifugation at
500 × g also contained high levels of GLAST (Fig.
4E, N and NS). Further isolation by centrifuging against a 30% sucrose solution yielded an
actin-free fraction (N, purified nuclei as pellet in sucrose solution)
and a supernatant (NS) containing actin.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Localization of GLAST in human glioma cell lines.
A, Cell surface proteins were separated from
intracellular proteins through biotinylation, followed by separation
with a biotin-avidin interaction. No cell surface expression of GLAST
was detected in these cells, whereas GLAST remained at the
intracellular fraction. B, Blot of A was
stripped and reprobed for the cell surface protein
Na+/K+-ATPase. It appeared that
the majority of Na+/K+-ATPase was
located in the biotinylated cell surface fraction. C,
GLAST in osmotically lysed STTG-1 cells but not in intact ones was
accessible for biotinylation. Biotinylation increases the apparent
molecular weight by ~5 kDa. T, Total lysate;
B, biotinylated fraction; L, total lysate
minus biotinylated proteins. D, Subcellular
fractionation of glioma cells; the blot was probed with GLAST plus
actin, subsequently stripped, and probed with
Na+/K+-ATPase. Then, the two
staining patterns were superimposed for comparison. GLAST monomers were
found in the nuclear fraction (N), and the
multimers were found in the P-200 fraction. The P-20 fraction that
contained the cell surface marker
Na+/K+-ATPase had a small amount
of GLAST, which was likely caused by the presence of endoplasmic
reticulum in the P-20 fraction. E, Subcellular
fractionation of glioma cells using digitonin. Only the N and NS part
that were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 × g
contained significant amounts of GLAST. Fraction N and NS were further
separated by centrifugation against a 30% sucrose solution. Pellet N
contained purified nuclei, and the supernatant NS consisted of nuclei
that were associated with actin and potentially some other membrane
structures.
|
|
Glioma cells release glutamate in the presence
of L-cystine
As already demonstrated in Figure 1,
Na+-independent glutamate uptake in glioma
cells can be almost completely inhibited by low concentrations of
L-cystine, suggesting that
Na+-independent glutamate uptake is
mediated by cystine-glutamate exchange (Bannai and Kitamura, 1980 ). It
is likely that in the absence of extracellular L-cystine,
intracellular L-cystine can be used to exchange
3H-glutamate from the media, whereas the
presence of extracellular L-cystine primarily
reduces the L-cystine transmembrane gradient and inhibits
glutamate uptake. In addition, presence of extracellular L-cystine likely reverses the exchanger, resulting in
L-cystine uptake into the cell and glutamate release down
its concentration gradient and into the extracellular space. To study
the possible contribution of this exchanger to glutamate transport in
glioma cells, we further examined the effects of L-cystine
on glutamate transport.
To this end, we first examined glutamate release from glioma cells
incubated in EBSS. In the absence of L-cystine, glutamate release in EBSS was marginal (~ 41-47 nmol/mg, or ~ 2 µM). However, adding L-cystine to the EBSS
potently and dose-dependently stimulated glutamate release from glioma
cells (Fig. 5A). At
concentration of 100 µM,
L-cystine increased glutamate release 14-fold
over the L-cystine-free conditions at 5 hr and
38-fold at 14 hr (Fig. 5B). The
[Glu]o rise could have only resulted from
glutamate released from intracellular stores and is limited by the
amount of glutamate precursors in the EBSS. We therefore tested the
effects of exogenous glutamine on glutamate release. As the most
important glutamate precursor, glutamine potentiated
[Glu]o levels in STTG-1 cultures from 1.9-2.6
µM to 8.6-9.9 µM
(after 3 hr incubation). This increase was much lower than that induced
by L-cystine alone, which increased [Glu]o to over 31 µM
after a 3 hr incubation. However, if both glutamine and
L-cystine were added together, they showed a
synergistic effect and [Glu]o increased to
levels above 100 µM (Fig. 5B). In
agreement with the notion that glutamate is released from intracellular stores, the intracellular glutamate content
([Glu]i) of glioma cells in EBSS gradually
declined over a period of several hours. Notably, in the presence of
L-cystine and absence of glutamine, the amount of
glutamate released was more than twofold greater than the total loss of
intracellular glutamate (data not shown), suggesting that glioma cells
use intracellular glutamate precursors to generate glutamate.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Cystine-glutamate exchange mediates glutamate
release and cystine uptake in human glioma cells (STTG-1 cells).
A, L-Cystine stimulated glutamate release in
a dose- and time-dependent manner, EC50 of ~15
µM. B, L-Cystine (0.4 mM) gradually increased extracellular glutamate
concentrations, and this effect was enhanced by the presence of
glutamine (2.0 mM). C, Intracellular
35S reading reached a plateau in the continuous presence of
1 µCi/ml 35S-L-cystine and 100 µM unlabeled L-cystine. After 6 min
incubation, some cells were switched to 100 µM unlabeled
L-cystine alone (arrow), and the
intracellular 35S reading gradually declined.
D, L-Cystine uptake did not depend on the
presence of Na+. Data are means ± SE;
n = 4-6.
|
|
To further substantiate the notion that the
Na+-independent glutamate transport was
caused by cystine-glutamate exchange, we performed tracer studies with
35S-L-cystine. As expected,
the rise of [Glu]o was accompanied by intracellular accumulation of
35S-L-cystine. However, the
35S radioactivity quickly reached a
plateau (Fig. 5C). Bannai and Ishii (1982) observed a
similar phenomenon in fibroblast in which L-cystine was quickly converted to
L-cysteine and most cysteine was released into
the culture media. Subsequently, the L-cysteine in the media can be oxidized to cystine that can again become a
substrate for cystine-glutamate exchange (Bannai and Ishii, 1988 ).
This cystine-cysteine cycle may play an important role in
neuron-glial interaction, because neurons can only use cysteine. The
presence of astrocytes to convert media cystine to cysteine is
important for maintaining neuronal glutathione levels (Sagara et al.,
1993 ). In glioma cells, we also observed a rather rapid drop of
35S radioactivity if the cells were
switched to unlabeled L-cystine (Fig.
5C). Furthermore, as is typical of this exchanger,
L-cystine could be transported in both the
presence and absence of Na+ (Fig.
5D).
For a heteroexchange system of two substrates, A and B, which is only
driven by the concentration gradient, driving forces for uptake of
substrate A into cells is proportional to the ratio of
([A]o)m
([B]i)n/([A]i)m([B]o)n,
where m and n stand for the number of A and B molecules transported per
cycle, respectively. Reported tracer studies suggested that m = n = 1 for cystine-glutamate exchange (Kessler et al., 1987 ; Zaczek et al., 1987 ; Sato et al., 1999 ). Thus, increasing extracellular glutamate and cystine levels should mutually inhibit uptake of cystine
or glutamate, respectively. This is indeed what we observed. Namely,
extracellular glutamate competitively inhibited L-cystine uptake with an apparent Ki of 330 µM (Fig.
6A,B).
Similarly, extracellular L-cystine competitively
inhibited Na+-independent glutamate uptake
with an apparent Ki of 14 µM (Fig. 6C,D).
Interestingly, the Km values of
glutamate and cystine uptake are 32.3 µM
(41.2 ± 3.3 from three experiments) and 40.2 µM (46.2 ± 9.0 from three experiments),
respectively. In the literature, Km of
L-cystine and glutamate in fibroblast cell line
is 43 and 200 µM, respectively (Bannai and
Kitamura, 1980 ). Because the exchanger operates with an obligatory
molar ratio of 1:1 (Sato et al., 1999 ), the exchange process involved
both the extracellular substrate and the cytosol counter-transport
substrate. In light of the similarity in the
Km for glutamate and
L-cystine, the observed difference in
Ki values for extracellular glutamate
and L-cystine are most likely caused by
differences in the driving force for each substrate, which is
determined by both the intracellular and extracellular substrate
concentrations. We determined [Glu]i to be
~10 mM in glioma cells that were incubated for
10 min in glutamine-free solution, whereas the intracellular
L-cystine levels under the same conditions was
much lower, namely ~ 0.2 mM. Consequently, it required larger changes in [Glu]o than in
[L-cystine]o to achieve the same level of alteration in the transmembrane ratio of [Glu] and
[L-cystine], respectively. Thus, the
Ki of glutamate appeared higher than
the Ki of
L-cystine. The above data further support the
notion that Na+-independent glutamate
transport, which accounts for a significant portion of all glutamate
transport in glioma cells, is mediated by a cystine-glutamate exchange
process.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Mutual competitive inhibition of glutamate and
L-cystine uptake in STTG-1 glioma cells. A,
Lineweaver-Burk plot of L-cystine uptake in the presence
of glutamate. B, Glutamate competitively inhibited
L-cystine uptake with a Ki of ~330
µM. C, D,
L-Cystine competitively inhibited
Na+-independent glutamate transport with a
Ki of ~15 µM. Data are means ± SE;
n = 4.
|
|
Phenylglycine derivatives block glutamate release from glioma cells
by inhibiting cystine-glutamate exchange
We described previously that, in cultured astrocytes several
glutamate analogs, particularly those frequently used as metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonists or antagonists, can reduce extracellular glutamate levels. However, their effects could not be
blocked by mGluR antagonists or by altering their underlying signaling
pathways, and their effects were likely caused by decreased release
rather than enhanced uptake of glutamate (Ye and Sontheimer, 1999a ).
Among these glutamate analogs, S-4CPG was the most effective in reducing [Glu]o. We thus studied the effects
of S-4CPG on glutamate release from glioma cells. When
S-4CPG was applied simultaneously with glutamate-depleted
culture medium, S-4CPG led to a marked and dose-dependent
decrease in glutamate release (Fig.
7A). Its stereoisomer
R-4CPG was 1000-fold less effective (data not shown). Because we demonstrated above that L-cystine was
required to stimulate a maximal release of glutamate from glioma cells,
we also evaluated the effects of cystine-induced glutamate release in
the presence of 100 µM S-4CPG.
Coapplication of S-4CPG dramatically reduced the
L-cystine-elicited [Glu]o
release. However, in the absence of
L-cystine, S-4CPG did not reduce
the [Glu]o levels (Fig. 7B), suggesting that S-4CPG works specifically on the
cystine-glutamate exchanger. As shown above, glutamine
increases the total amount of glutamate released in both the presence
and absence of L-cystine (Fig. 5B).
However, the degree of increase in [Glu]o by
L-cystine was essentially identical, irrespective
of the presence of glutamine. Furthermore, S-4CPG exerted
similar levels of inhibition on L-cystine-induced [Glu]o elevation (Fig. 7C),
regardless of the presence of glutamine. Combined with the fact that
glutamine increased the total amount of glutamate release, this
suggests that the presence of glutamine provides better glutamate
source for cystine-glutamate exchange but does not directly interfere
with the exchange processes. In line with the abolishment of
cystine-stimulated [Glu]o elevation by
S-4CPG, S-4CPG also blocked the cystine-induced
decline of [Glu]i. However, in the presence of
glutamine, which can be converted to glutamate and is sufficient to
prevent cystine-induced decline of [Glu]i,
S-4CPG did not further alter [Glu]i
(Fig. 7D). These data again suggest that glioma cells are
sensitive to a drop in [Glu]i and are committed
to generating glutamate from its precursors, regardless of the
elevation of extracellular glutamate levels, which is contrary to
normal astrocytes that appear to be dedicated to maintaining low
[Glu]o.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Inhibition of cystine-induced glutamate release by
S-4CPG. A, Dose-dependent
reduction of extracellular glutamate levels
([Glu]o) sampled 5 hr after incubating glioma
cells in glutamate-depleted culture media, in the presence of various
concentration of S-4CPG. B,
S-4CPG specifically inhibited cystine-induced
[Glu]o elevation but was without effect in the absence of
L-cystine. C,
S-4CPG exerted a similar degree of inhibition on
L-cystine-induced glutamate release, regardless of the
presence of extracellular glutamine. D,
S-4CPG inhibited the cystine-induced decline of
intracellular glutamate content ([Glu]i), as did 2 mM glutamine. Data are means ± SE;
n = 4.
|
|
The above results suggest that S-4CPG specifically blocks
L-cystine-induced glutamate release, which is
mediated by L-cystine-glutamate exchange.
Several other carboxyphenylglycine derivatives, including S-4C3H-PG and S-3C4H-PG, also exerted inhibition
on cystine-glutamate exchange (data not shown). In addition,
S-4CPG did not inhibit Na+-dependent
glutamate-D-aspartate uptake in astrocytes.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although astrocytes use Na+-dependent
glutamate transport to actively control extracellular glutamate
[Glu]o, their malignant glioma counterparts are
deficient in this function. Indeed, glioma cells release glutamate into
the extracellular space rather than remove it. Our data suggest that
two functional changes account for this difference. First, of the two
abundant glial Na+-dependent transporters
GLT-1 and GLAST, only GLAST is expressed in glioma cells at levels
comparable with that of normal astrocytes. However, the GLAST protein
appears to accumulate in the nuclear membrane with little cell surface
expression. These findings are consistent with the up to 100-fold
reduction in Na+-dependent glutamate
uptake observed in glioma cells. Second, glioma cells display strong
Na+-independent cystine-glutamate
exchange activity. Because [Glu]i is much
higher than [Glu]o, the glutamate gradient
greatly outweighs the transmembrane L-cystine gradient.
This is important particularly with regard to the presence of
L-cystine in the culture media in which cystine
uptake in tandem with glutamate efflux is likely to be the dominant
direction of this exchange system. Furthermore, downhill movement of
glutamate at [Glu]i ~10 mM and the presence of extracellular L-cystine at ~100-200
µM enables this exchanger to operate at close to maximal
rates. In this case, cystine-glutamate exchange-induced glutamate
efflux outweighs the weak Na+-dependent
inward glutamate transport leading to the accumulation of glutamate in
the extracellular space. This process is illustrated in a schematic
drawing in Figure 8. Under normal
condition, e.g., in cells that also express sufficient
Na+-dependent glutamate uptake, the
activity of cystine-glutamate exchange would not pose a problem
because glutamate released by this exchanger would again become the
substrate for Na+-dependent glutamate
uptake. However, this glutamate release may significantly contribute to
the discrepancy between measured [Glu]o, both
in vitro and in vivo, and the theoretic minimal
maintainable [Glu]o predicted by the
stoichiometry of Na+-dependent glutamate
transport (Attwell et al., 1993 ; Zerangue and Kavanaugh, 1996a ).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Glutamate handling by glioma cells.
Reduction-mislocalization of Na+-dependent
glutamate transporters makes glioma cells incapable of sufficiently
removing glutamate from the extracellular space; cystine-glutamate
exchangers mediate glutamate efflux and cystine uptake in the presence
of extracellular L-cystine. The transported cystine can be
reduced to cysteine and released to the extracellular space, where
cysteine is likely to be oxidized to cystine and again serves as
substrate for cystine-glutamate exchange.
|
|
Under conditions in which Na+-dependent
glutamate transporters are not functioning sufficiently, as is the case
in glioma cells, it is possible that the cystine-glutamate exchange
will contribute to neurotoxic levels of glutamate released by gliomas.
In typical culture conditions, L-cystine is present in
concentrations of ~100-200 µM, which is sufficient to
drive glutamate release from gliomas to reach neurotoxic
concentrations. This is indeed what we observed in studies in which
hippocampal neurons were cocultured with glioma cells. This led to
widespread neurotoxicity, which could be completely prevented by the
NMDA receptor antagonists MK-801 or
D( )-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (Ye and Sontheimer, 1999b ). In addition, this toxicity could be inhibited by applying S-4CPG to the cocultures, consistent with S-4CPG
inhibition of cystine-glutamate exchange. Interestingly, it has been
shown that during hypoxia-ischemia, cysteine levels are markedly
elevated (Slivka and Cohen, 1993 ; Puka-Sundvall et al., 1996 ).
L-Cysteine can interfere and block
Na+-dependent glutamate transport
(Zerangue and Kavanaugh, 1996b ) and may thus exacerbate glutamate
accumulation caused by energy depletion. Furthermore,
L-cysteine can be readily oxidized to L-cystine, thus possibly leading to glutamate
release through the cystine-glutamate exchange as described here for
glioma cells.
Although astrocytes expressed both GLAST and GLT-1 in their plasma
membrane, GLT-1 was primarily absent and GLAST appeared to be
mislocalized to the nuclear membrane of glioma cells. We do not know
what causes this nuclear localization of GLAST, nor can we be certain
that the GLAST protein detected in the nuclear membrane by antibodies
corresponds to functional transporters. Altering cell surface
expression levels has been shown to be an effective way to control
transporter activity in C6 glioma cells and HEK293 cells (Qian et al.,
1997 ; Davis et al., 1998 ). In normal astrocytes, the majority of
transporter protein (GLAST and GLT-1) is located in the plasma membrane
(Chaudhry et al., 1995 ). To our knowledge, it has not been shown that
glutamate transporters can be localized in cell nuclei. A
mislocalization of GLAST not only occurred in cultured glioma cell
lines but was also observed in most acute glioblastome biopsies.
Importantly, however, uninvolved brain tissue from the same patients
did showed normal membrane-associated GLAST staining with little
evidence of nuclear localization. These data suggest that the
mislocalization of GLAST is an intrinsic feature of glioma cells and
not an artifact from prolonged cell culture. It is worth pointing out
that there are some cells in the GBM tissue sections that are not
labeled with GLAST (Fig. 3G), which are likely some nontumor
cells within the tumor. In addition, results from subcellular
fractionation (Fig. 4D) suggest different
distribution patterns of GLAST monomers and multimers in glioma cells,
and the multimers appear to be resistant to -mercaptoethanol. Because the P-200 fraction likely consists of Golgi and other low-density vesicles, the role of the differential localization of
monomers and multimers remains to be elucidated, as are the cellular
events that lead to these phenomena.
Reduction of GLT-1 was also observed in human GBM biopsy tissue, and
this is particularly evident in the border between tumor and normal
tissue (Fig. 3K). Although all the tested cell lines displayed greatly reduced glutamate and
D-aspartate uptake compared with normal
astrocytes, variation exist among cell lines, especially with regard to
D-aspartate uptake in which U-251MG and D-65MG cells exhibited higher D-aspartate transport
rates than other cell lines. Interestingly, in STTG-1 and D-65MG cells,
D-aspartate (50 µM)
uptake was reduced 57.6-68.0% by 5 mM
dihydrokinate, and Na+-dependent glutamate
(50 µM) uptake was reduced by 34.9-47.2%. However, 5 mM
D,L-threo-hydroxyaspartate
nearly completely blocked this residual
Na+-dependent
D-aspartate-glutamate uptake. We do not know
whether the residual levels of GLT-1 shown in Figure 2 are functional transporters and could account for these dihydrokainate-sensitive uptake.
It is worth emphasizing that, even without any exogenous supply of
glutamate precursor molecules, such as glutamine, glioma cells can
still release glutamate in amounts that exceeds their intracellular
content. Glioma cells can actively synthesize glutamate from precursor
stores to compensate for the release. In the presence of exogenous
glutamine, glutamate release was enhanced and the decline of
[Glu]i was completely blocked, suggesting that
deamination is a key pathway for the production of glutamate by glioma
cells in the presence of glutamine. Interestingly, the hyperpermeable blood vessels in tumor tissues can provide tumor cells with better access to various nutrition factors, including glutamine in the blood
than normal brain tissue. In the presence of L-cystine, these glioma cells could thus serve as a constant glutamate source.
It is difficult to extrapolate from our in vitro data to the
in vivo significance of these findings. The extracellular
space in vivo is usually <20% of the total volume, whereas
in an in vitro system extracellular space is
~103-fold larger than the cell volume.
Small amounts of glutamate can effectively raise the
[Glu]o to toxic levels. For instance, a 2 nmol · mg 1 · min 1 glutamate
release can increase [Glu]o in a volume of 2 µl (cells of 1 mg of protein take ~10 µl of space) at a rate of 1 mM/min; thus, our in vitro data may
underestimate the true extent of the glutamate release by glioma cells
in vivo. On the other hand, release of glutamate by glioma
cells requires the presence of extracellular
L-cystine. The concentrations of
L-cystine in and around gliomas in
vivo are unknown. In normal brain, cystine concentration in the
CSF are at submicromolar levels (Murphy et al., 1989 ), but the
trafficking of cystine-cysteine between neurons and glia may likely
make the cystine concentration in the extracellular space much higher
than that in CSF and could possibly reach micromolar levels.
Furthermore, the compromised blood-brain barrier may also allow brain
tumor cells access to blood cystine, which is ~100 µM. As determined in our experiments, the
Km for cystine-induced glutamate
release from STTG-1 glioma cell is ~15 µM.
Thus, micromolar levels of cystine surrounding tumor cells can induce
substantial glutamate release. Importantly, because
L-cystine tends to be reduced to cysteine and
released by cells, the released cysteine can readily be oxidized to
cystine and again become a substrate for cystine-glutamate exchange.
This cystine-cysteine shuttle could provide a continuous substrate for
cystine-glutamate exchanger and hence continuously induce the release
of glutamate from glioma cells.
Although the biological implications of glutamate release and the
ensuing neurotoxicity are evident, the role, if any, that this process
may have for gliomas is unclear. We could only speculate that glutamate
release might allow these aggressively growing tumors to actively kill
surrounding neurons, thereby creating space to expand. These results
also suggest that seizures often observed in patients with glioma might
be caused by glutamate spillage from the tumor into the peritumoral
neuronal tissue. In addition, the neuronally released glutamate after
synaptic transmission may accumulate by lack of sufficient glutamate
uptake into the nearby glioma cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received May 26, 1999; revised Sept. 7, 1999; accepted Oct. 6, 1999.
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants R01-NS-31234 and R01-NS-36692 and American Cancer Society Grant
RPG-97-083. We thank the Brain Tumor Tissue Bank (London, Ontario,
Canada), the National Cancer Institute of Canada, and the Brain Tumor
Foundation of Canada for providing tumor samples. We are grateful to
Dr. Susan Lyons and Jeffrey O'Neal for preparing tissue sections.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Harald Sontheimer, Department
of Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1719 6th
Avenue South, CIRC 545, Birmingham, AL 35294. E-mail: hws{at}nrc.uab.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Arriza JL,
Eliasof S,
Kavanaugh MP,
Amara SG
(1997)
Excitatory amino acid transporter 5, a retinal glutamate transporter coupled to a chloride conductance.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:4155-4160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Attwell D,
Barbour B,
Szatkowski M
(1993)
Nonvesicular release of neurotransmitter.
Neuron
11:401-407[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bannai S,
Ishii T
(1982)
Transport of cystine and cysteine and cell growth in cultured human diploid fibroblasts: effect of glutamate and homocysteate.
J Cell Physiol
112:265-272[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bannai S,
Ishii T
(1988)
A novel function of glutamine in cell culture: utilization of glutamine for the uptake of cystine in human fibroblasts.
J Cell Physiol
137:360-366[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bannai S,
Kitamura E
(1980)
Transport interaction of L-cystine and L-glutamate in human diploid fibroblasts in culture.
J Biol Chem
255:2372-2376[Free Full Text].
-
Bergles DE,
Jahr CE
(1998)
Glial contribution to glutamate uptake at Schaffer collateral-commissural synapses in the hippocampus.
J Neurosci
18:7709-7716[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bronfman M,
Loyola G,
Koenig CS
(1998)
Isolation of intact organelles by differential centrifugation of digitonin-treated hepatocytes using a table Eppendorf centrifuge.
Anal Biochem
255:252-256[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Chaudhry FA,
Lehre KP,
van Lookeren Campagne M,
Ottersen OP,
Danbolt NC,
Storm-Mathisen J
(1995)
Glutamate transporters in glial plasma membranes: highly differentiated localizations revealed by quantitative ultrastructural immunocytochemistry.
Neuron
15:711-720[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cho Y,
Bannai S
(1990)
Uptake of glutamate and cysteine in C6 glioma cells and in cultured astrocytes.
J Neurochem
55:2091-2097[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Choi DW
(1988)
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system.
Neuron
1:623-634[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Davis KE,
Straff DJ,
Weinstein EA,
Bannerman PG,
Correale DM,
Rothstein JD,
Robinson MB
(1998)
Multiple signaling pathways regulate cell surface expression and activity of the excitatory amino acid carrier 1 subtype of Glu transporter in C6 glioma.
J Neurosci
18:2475-2485[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Fairman WA,
Vandenberg RJ,
Arriza JL,
Kavanaugh MP,
Amara SG
(1995)
An excitatory amino-acid transporter with properties of a ligand-gated chloride channel.
Nature
375:599-603[Medline].
-
Fosse VM,
Kolstad J,
Fonnum F
(1986)
A bioluminescence method for the measurement of L-glutamate: applications to the study of changes in the release of l-glutamate from lateral geniculate nucleus and superior colliculus after visual cortex ablation in rats.
J Neurochem
47:340-349[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Haugeto O,
Ullensvang K,
Levy LM,
Chaudhry FA,
Honore T,
Nielsen M,
Lehre KP,
Danbolt NC
(1996)
Brain glutamate transporter proteins form homomultimers.
J Biol Chem
271:27715-27722[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hertz L,
Murthy CRK,
Schousboe A
(1988)
Metabolism of glutamate and related amino acids.
In: The biochemical pathology of astrocytes (Norenberg MD,
Hertz L,
Schousboe A,
eds), pp 395-406. New York: Liss.
-
Kanai Y,
Hediger MA
(1992)
Primary structure and functional characterization of a high-affinity glutamate transporter.
Nature
360:467-471[Medline].
-
Kessler M,
Baudry M,
Lynch G
(1987)
Use of cystine to distinguish glutamate binding from glutamate sequestration.
Neurosci Lett
81:221-226[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kimelberg HK,
Mongin AA
(1998)
Swelling-activated release of excitatory amino acids in the brain: Relevance for pathophysiology.
Contrib Nephrol
123:240-257[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kimelberg HK,
Pang S,
Treble DH
(1989)
Excitatory amino acid-stimulated uptake of 22 Na+ in primary astrocyte cultures.
J Neurosci
9:1141-1149[Abstract].
-
Laake JH,
Slyngstad TA,
Haug F-MS,
Ottersen OP
(1995)
Glutamine from glial cells is essential for the maintenance of the nerve terminal pool of glutamate: Immunogold evidence from hippocampal slice cultures.
J Neurochem
65:871-881[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lehre KP,
Danbolt NC
(1998)
The number of glutamate transporter subtype molecules at glutamatergic synapses: chemical and stereological quantification in young adult rat brain.
J Neurosci
18:8751-8757[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lehre KP,
Levy LM,
Ottersen OP,
Storm-Mathisen J,
Danbolt NC
(1995)
Differential expression of two glial glutamate transporters in the rat brain: quantitative and immunocytochemical observations.
J Neurosci
15:1835-1853[Abstract].
-
Levi G,
Patrizio M
(1992)
Astrocyte heterogeneity: endogenous amino acid levels and release evoked by non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonists and by potassium-induced swelling in type-1 and type-2 astrocytes.
J Neurochem
58:1943-1952[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lipton SA,
Rosenberg PA
(1994)
Excitatory amino acids as a final common pathway for neurologic disorders.
N Engl J Med
330:613-622[Free Full Text].
-
Longuemare MC,
Swanson RA
(1995)
Excitatory amino acid release from astrocytes during energy failure by reversal of sodium-dependent uptake.
J Neurosci Res
40:379-386[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Magistretti PJ,
Pellerin L,
Rothman DL,
Shulman RG
(1999)
Energy on demand.
Science
283:496-497[Free Full Text].
-
Murphy TH,
Miyamoto M,
Sastre A,
Schnaar RL,
Coyle JT
(1989)
Glutamate toxicity in a neuronal cell line involves inhibition of cystine transport leading to oxidative stress.
Neuron
2:1547-1558[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Murphy TH,
Schnaar RL,
Coyle JT
(1990)
Immature cortical neurons are uniquely sensitive to glutamate toxicity by inhibition of cystine uptake.
FASEB J
4:1624-1633[Abstract].
-
Nicholls D,
Attwell D
(1990)
The release and uptake of excitatory amino acids.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
11:462-468[Medline].
-
Olney JW
(1982)
The toxic effects of glutamate and related compounds in the retina and the brain.
Retina
2:341-359[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Paillas JE
(1994)
A review of 2,413 tumors operated over a 30-year period.
J Neuroradiol
2:79-106.
-
Peghini P,
Janzen J,
Stoffel W
(1997)
Glutamate transporter EAAC-1-deficient mice develop dicarboxylic aminoaciduria and behavioral abnormalities but no neurodegeneration.
EMBO J
16:3822-3832[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Piani D,
Fontana A
(1994)
Involvement of the cystine transport system xc
in the macrophage-induced glutamate-dependent cytotoxicity to neurons.
J Immunol
152:3578-3585[Abstract]. -
Pines G,
Danbolt NC,
Bjoras M,
Zhang Y,
Bendahan A,
Eide L,
Koepsell H,
Storm-Mathisen J,
Seeberg E,
Kanner BI
(1992)
Cloning and expression of a rat brain L-glutamate transporter.
Nature
360:464-467[Medline].
-
Puka-Sundvall M,
Gilland E,
Bona E,
Lehmann A,
Sandberg M,
Hagberg H
(1996)
Development of brain damage after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia: excitatory amino acids and cysteine.
Metab Brain Dis
11:109-123[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Qian Y,
Galli A,
Ramamoorthy S,
Risso S,
DeFelice LJ,
Blakely RD
(1997)
Protein kinase C activation regulates human serotonin transporters in HEK-293 cells via altered cell surface expression.
J Neurosci
17:45-57[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Rothstein JD,
Tabakoff B
(1984)
Alteration of striatal glutamate release after glutamine synthetase inhibition.
J Neurochem
43:1438-1446[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rothstein JD,
Tsai G,
Kuncl RW,
Clawson L,
Cornblath DR,
Drachman DB,
Pestronk A,
Stauch BL,
Coyle JT
(1990)
Abnormal excitatory amino acid metabolism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Ann Neurol
28:18-25[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rothstein JD,
Martin L,
Levey AI,
Dykes-Hoberg M,
Jin L,
Wu D,
Nash N,
Kuncl RW
(1994)
Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters.
Neuron
13:713-725[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rothstein JD,
Van Kammen M,
Levey AI,
Martin LJ,
Kuncl RW
(1995)
Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Ann Neurol
38:73-84[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rothstein JD,
Dykes-Hoberg M,
Pardo CA,
Bristol LA,
Jin L,
Kuncl RW,
Kanai Y,
Hediger MA,
Wang YF,
Schielke JP,
Welty DF
(1996)
Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate.
Neuron
16:675-686[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sagara J,
Miura K,
Bannai S
(1993)
Maintenance of neuronal glutathione by glial cells.
J Neurochem
61:1672-1676[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sato H,
Kuriyama-Matsumura K,
Siow RCM,
Ishii T,
Bannai S,
Mann GE
(1998)
Induction of cystine transport via system xc
and maintenance of intracellular glutathione levels in pancreatic acinar and islet cell lines.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1414:85-94[Medline]. -
Sato H,
Tamba M,
Ishii T,
Bannai S
(1999)
Cloning and expression of a plasma membrane cystine/glutamate exchange transporter composed of two distinct proteins.
J Biol Chem
274:11455-11458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sibson NR,
Dhankhar A,
Mason GF,
Behar KL,
Rothman DL,
Shulman RG
(1997)
In vivo 13C NMR measurements of cerebral glutamine synthesis as evidence for glutamate-glutamine cycling.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:2699-2704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Slivka A,
Cohen G
(1993)
Brain ischemia markedly elevates levels of the neurotoxic amino acid, cysteine.
Brain Res
608:33-37[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stachowiak MK,
Moffett J,
Joy A,
Puchacz E,
Florkiewicz R,
Stachowiak EK
(1994)
Regulation of bFGF gene expression and subcellular distribution of bFGF protein in adrenal medullary cells.
J Cell Biol
127:203-223[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Storck T,
Schulte S,
Hofmann K,
Stoffel W
(1992)
Structure, expression, and functional analysis of a Na+-dependent glutamate/aspartate transporter from rat brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:10955-10959[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Szatkowski M,
Barbour B,
Attwell D
(1990)
Non-vesicular release of glutamate from glial cells by reversed electrogenic glutamate uptake.
Nature
348:443-446[Medline].
-
Tanaka K,
Watase K,
Manabe T,
Yamada K,
Watanabe M,
Takahashi K,
Iwama H,
Nishikawa T,
Ichihara N,
Kikuchi T,
Okuyama S,
Kawashima N,
Hori S,
Takimoto M,
Wada K
(1997)
Epilepsy and exacerbation of brain injury in mice lacking the glutamate transporter GLT-1.
Science
276:1699-1702[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Torp R,
Danbolt NC,
Babaie E,
Bjoras M,
Seeberg E,
Storm-Mathisen J,
Ottersen OP
(1994)
Differential expression of two glial glutamate transporters in the rat brain: an in situ hybridization study.
Eur J Neurosci
6:936-942[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Waniewski RA,
Martin DL
(1986)
Exogenous glutamate is metabolized to glutamine and exported by rat primary astrocyte cultures.
J Neurochem
47:304-313[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Watanabe H,
Bannai S
(1987)
Induction of cystine transport activity in mouse peritoneal macrophages.
J Exp Med
165:628-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Whittemore SR,
Neary JT,
Kleitman N,
Sanon HR,
Benigno A,
Donahue RP,
Norenberg MD
(1994)
Isolation and characterization of conditionally immortalized astrocyte cell lines derived from adult human spinal cord.
Glia
10:211-226[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ye ZC,
Sontheimer H
(1996)
Cytokine modulation of glial glutamate uptake: a possible involvement of nitric oxide.
NeuroReport
7:2181-2185[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ye ZC,
Sontheimer H
(1998)
Astrocytes protect neurons from neurotoxic injury by serum glutamate.
Glia
22:237-248[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ye ZC,
Sontheimer H
(1999a)
Metabotropic glutamate receptor agonists reduce glutamate release from cultured astrocytes.
Glia
25:270-281[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ye ZC,
Sontheimer H
(1999b)
Glioma cells release excitotoxic concentrations of glutamate.
Cancer Res
59:4383-4391[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zaczek R,
Balm M,
Arlis S,
Drucker H,
Coyle JT
(1987)
Quisqualate-sensitive, chloride-dependent transport of glutamate into rat brain synaptosomes.
J Neurosci Res
18:425-431[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zerangue N,
Kavanaugh MP
(1996a)
Flux coupling in a neuronal glutamate transporter.
Nature
383:634-637[Medline].
-
Zerangue N,
Kavanaugh MP
(1996b)
Interaction of L-cysteine with a human excitatory amino acid transporter.
J Physiol (Lond)
493:419-423[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/192410767-11$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Piao, L. Lu, and J. de Groot
AMPA receptors promote perivascular glioma invasion via {beta}1 integrin-dependent adhesion to the extracellular matrix
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 2009;
11(3):
260 - 273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Lyons, W. J. Chung, A. K. Weaver, T. Ogunrinu, and H. Sontheimer
Autocrine Glutamate Signaling Promotes Glioma Cell Invasion
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2007;
67(19):
9463 - 9471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Y. Shih, H. Erb, X. Sun, S. Toda, P. W. Kalivas, and T. H. Murphy
Cystine/Glutamate Exchange Modulates Glutathione Supply for Neuroprotection from Oxidative Stress and Cell Proliferation
J. Neurosci.,
October 11, 2006;
26(41):
10514 - 10523.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Huang, Z. Dai, C. Barbacioru, and W. Sadee
Cystine-Glutamate Transporter SLC7A11 in Cancer Chemosensitivity and Chemoresistance
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2005;
65(16):
7446 - 7454.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Chung, S. A. Lyons, G. M. Nelson, H. Hamza, C. L. Gladson, G. Y. Gillespie, and H. Sontheimer
Inhibition of Cystine Uptake Disrupts the Growth of Primary Brain Tumors
J. Neurosci.,
August 3, 2005;
25(31):
7101 - 7110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Arcella, G. Carpinelli, G. Battaglia, M. D'Onofrio, F. Santoro, R. T. Ngomba, V. Bruno, P. Casolini, F. Giangaspero, and F. Nicoletti
Pharmacological blockade of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors reduces the growth of glioma cells in vivo
Neuro-oncol,
July 1, 2005;
7(3):
236 - 245.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. I. Melendez, J. Vuthiganon, and P. W. Kalivas
Regulation of Extracellular Glutamate in the Prefrontal Cortex: Focus on the Cystine Glutamate Exchanger and Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2005;
314(1):
139 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Cavelier and D. Attwell
Tonic release of glutamate by a DIDS-sensitive mechanism in rat hippocampal slices
J. Physiol.,
April 15, 2005;
564(2):
397 - 410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. de Groot, T. J. Liu, G. Fuller, and W.K. A. Yung
The Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter-2 Induces Apoptosis and Decreases Glioma Growth In vitro and In vivo
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2005;
65(5):
1934 - 1940.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kalandadze, Y. Wu, K. Fournier, and M. B. Robinson
Identification of Motifs Involved in Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention-Forward Trafficking of the GLT-1 Subtype of Glutamate Transporter
J. Neurosci.,
June 2, 2004;
24(22):
5183 - 5192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-C. Ye, M. S. Wyeth, S. Baltan-Tekkok, and B. R. Ransom
Functional Hemichannels in Astrocytes: A Novel Mechanism of Glutamate Release
J. Neurosci.,
May 1, 2003;
23(9):
3588 - 3596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Deshane, C. C. Garner, and H. Sontheimer
Chlorotoxin Inhibits Glioma Cell Invasion via Matrix Metalloproteinase-2
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 31, 2003;
278(6):
4135 - 4144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Baker, Z.-X. Xi, H. Shen, C. J. Swanson, and P. W. Kalivas
The Origin and Neuronal Function of In Vivo Nonsynaptic Glutamate
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 2002;
22(20):
9134 - 9141.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Sato, M. Tamba, S. Okuno, K. Sato, K. Keino-Masu, M. Masu, and S. Bannai
Distribution of Cystine/Glutamate Exchange Transporter, System xc-, in the Mouse Brain
J. Neurosci.,
September 15, 2002;
22(18):
8028 - 8033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Disease Mechanisms in Neuroscience
Neuroscientist,
February 1, 2002;
8(1):
5 - 5.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-X. Xi, D. A. Baker, H. Shen, D. S. Carson, and P. W. Kalivas
Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Modulate Extracellular Glutamate in the Nucleus Accumbens
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 2002;
300(1):
162 - 171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-C. Rimaniol, P. Mialocq, P. Clayette, D. Dormont, and G. Gras
Role of glutamate transporters in the regulation of glutathione levels in human macrophages
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2001;
281(6):
C1964 - C1970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Munch, A Penndorf, B Schwalenstocker, D Troost, A C Ludolph, P Ince, and T Meyer
Impaired RNA splicing of 5'-regulatory sequences of the astroglial glutamate transporter EAAT2 in human astrocytoma
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
November 1, 2001;
71(5):
675 - 678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. B. Ransom, J. T. O'Neal, and H. Sontheimer
Volume-Activated Chloride Currents Contribute to the Resting Conductance and Invasive Migration of Human Glioma Cells
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 2001;
21(19):
7674 - 7683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. MARKERT, C. M. FULLER, G. Y. GILLESPIE, J. K. BUBIEN, L. A. MCLEAN, R. L. HONG, K. LEE, S. R. GULLANS, T. B. MAPSTONE, and D. J. BENOS
Differential gene expression profiling in human brain tumors
Physiol Genomics,
February 7, 2001;
5(1):
21 - 33.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. MacFarlane and H. Sontheimer
Modulation of Kv1.5 Currents by Src Tyrosine Phosphorylation: Potential Role in the Differentiation of Astrocytes
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 2000;
20(14):
5245 - 5253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|