 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 1999, 19(5):1824-1835
Major Changes in the Brain Histamine System of the Ground
Squirrel Citellus lateralis during Hibernation
Tina
Sallmen1,
Alexander L.
Beckman2,
Toni
L.
Stanton3,
Krister S.
Eriksson1,
Juhani
Tarhanen4,
Leena
Tuomisto5, and
Pertti
Panula1
1 Department of Biology, Åbo Akademi University,
Åbo/Turku, Finland, Departments of 2 Psychology, and
3 Biological Sciences, California State University, Long
Beach, California, and Departments of 4 Environmental
Sciences, and 5 Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of
Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland
 |
ABSTRACT |
Hibernation in mammals such as the rodent hibernator
Citellus lateralis is a physiological state in which CNS
activity is endogenously maintained at a very low, but functionally
responsive, level. The neurotransmitter histamine is involved in the
regulation of diurnal rhythms and body temperature in nonhibernators
and, therefore, could likely play an important role in maintaining the
hibernating state. In this study, we show that histamine neuronal systems undergo major changes during hibernation that are consistent with such a role. Immunohistochemical mapping of histaminergic fibers
in the brains of hibernating and nonhibernating golden-mantled ground
squirrels (C. lateralis) showed a clear increase in
fiber density during the hibernating state. The tissue levels of
histamine and its first metabolite
tele-methylhistamine were also elevated throughout the brain of hibernating animals, suggesting an increase in
histamine turnover during hibernation, which occurs without an increase
in histidine decarboxylase mRNA expression. This hibernation-related apparent augmentation of histaminergic neurotransmission was
particularly evident in the hypothalamus and hippocampus, areas of
importance to the control of the hibernating state, in which
tele-methylhistamine levels were increased more than
threefold. These changes in the histamine neuronal system differ from
those reported for the metabolic pattern in other monoaminergic systems
during hibernation, which generally indicate a decrease in turnover.
Our results suggest that the influence of histamine neuronal systems
may be important in controlling CNS activity during hibernation.
Key words:
hibernation; CNS; hippocampus; hypothalamus; preoptic
area; septum; histamine; tele-methylhistamine; monoamine
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Histamine (HA) is a multifunctional
messenger that acts as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator in the
brain (Schwartz et al., 1991 ; Wada et al., 1991 ). In mammals,
histaminergic perikarya are located in the tuberomammillary nucleus of
the posterior hypothalamus, projecting fibers to almost all parts of
the brain (Airaksinen and Panula, 1988 ; Inagaki et al., 1988 ;
Airaksinen et al., 1989 , 1992 ; Panula et al., 1989 ).
HA has been implicated in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, body
temperature, energy metabolism, reproductive behavior, and
neuroendocrine secretion (Schwartz et al., 1991 ). These functions may
reflect the action of the histaminergic neuronal system on the general
activity level of the brain (Wada et al., 1991 ).
Hibernation is a physiological state characterized by an extreme
reduction of various functions, such as body temperature and
metabolism. This process is under strict neuronal control involving the
hypothalamus, septum, hippocampus and brainstem reticular formation
(Heller, 1979 ; Beckman and Stanton, 1982 ), but the neurochemical
mechanisms underlying the regulatory processes are, as yet, poorly
understood. Mammalian hibernation provides a good model for studying
the control of central activity by neurotransmitters/neuromodulators because the range of CNS activity displayed across the nonhibernating versus hibernating states is larger than that of any other mammalian CNS. During the nonhibernating state, CNS activity is quite
representative of nonhibernators; during the hibernating state,
however, it is reduced to a level that defines the lower limit of
mammalian brain activity (Heller, 1979 ; Beckman and Stanton, 1982 ).
Histaminergic nerve fibers innervate many of the key areas involved in
controlling hibernation (Inagaki et al., 1988 ; Panula et al., 1989 ). HA
receptors are also present in these areas (Schwartz et al., 1991 ;
Lintunen et al., 1998 ). The involvement of histamine in the regulation
of, for example, diurnal rhythms and body temperature (Schwartz et al.,
1991 ) renders it a good candidate transmitter for the control of
hibernation, wherein brain homeostasis is substantially altered, and
major changes in electrical and neurochemical activity occur. If HA is
involved in hibernation, changes in histaminergic innervation,
histamine levels, and turnover, as well as responsiveness of target
neurons can be expected to take place in connection with this
physiological state. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine
whether the histaminergic system undergoes major changes during
hibernation. The golden-mantled ground squirrel, a rodent hibernator,
was used in this study.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals. Adult male and female golden-mantled ground
squirrels (Citellus lateralis) were used in this study. The
animals were trapped in the wild and kept in the laboratory for 1-4
years before killing. Nonhibernating (i.e., euthermic) animals
were housed in individual cages in a colony room maintained at an
ambient temperature (Ta) of 21°C with a light/dark
cycle that approximated the times of sunrise and sunset. Hibernating
animals were housed in individual cages in a dimly illuminated cold
room maintained at a Ta of 6°C. All animals were provided
with food (rat chow and sunflower seeds) and water ad
libitum, and they were provided with cotton from which they
constructed nests.
Hibernating animals were killed at approximately the midportion of
their hibernation bout. All animals (nonhibernating and hibernating)
were killed during the same period (late February to early April) of
the year.
Immunocytochemical protocol. Twenty ground squirrels,
ten in the nonhibernating and ten in the hibernating state (five
females and five males in each group) were anesthetized with sodium
pentobarbital (nonhibernating animals: 90 mg/kg, i.p.; hibernating
animals: 40 mg, intracardiac injection) and perfused through the left
ventricle with physiological saline followed by 4%
1-ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (Sigma, St Louis,
MO) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The brains were
removed immediately and immersed in the same fixative for 24 hr, then
transferred into 20% sucrose in 0.1 m phosphate buffer and kept
at 4°C for 24 hr. After this, they were quick-frozen in isopentane
( 30°C) and stored in sealed containers at 75°C. Cryostat
sections (22-µm-thick) were collected on gelatin-coated slides and
air-dried for 30-60 min. The sections were washed with PBS
containing 0.25% Triton X-100 (PBS-T) and incubated with a rabbit
antiserum against histamine (HA19C) diluted 1:1000 in PBS-T with 1%
normal swine serum. After the incubation, which was performed overnight
at 4°C, the sections were washed twice for 10 min with PBS-T and then
incubated with FITC-conjugated swine anti-rabbit IgG (Dako, Glostrup,
Denmark) diluted 1:40 in PBS-T, for 2 hr at room temperature. The
samples were washed with PBS, coverslipped with PBS and glycerol (1:1),
and examined under a Leitz Aristoplan microscope equipped for
epiillumination. Other sections were processed using the Vectastain
Elite kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). These sections were
incubated for three nights with HA19C diluted 1:100,000 in PBS-T with
2% normal goat serum. The sections were washed twice for 10 min in
PBS-T and incubated with a biotinylated antibody to rabbit IgG diluted
1:600 for 2 hr at room temperature. After washing twice for 10 min in
PBS-T, the sections were incubated with an avidin-biotin solution, and
both reagents were diluted 1:500 for 2 hr at room temperature. The
sections were washed with 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, twice
for 10 min, and the staining was developed with 0.025%
diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, 0.3% NiSO4,
and 0.01% H2O2 in Tris-HCl. The reaction was
terminated with several changes in distilled water, the sections were
air-dried, dehydrated, and coverslipped with Permount. These sections
were used for evaluation of fiber density.
The specificity of the antiserum has been tested extensively with
dot-blot assays and preabsorption tests with histamine, L-histidine, and L-histidine-containing
peptides (Panula et al., 1990 ). All immunoreactivity was abolished by
preincubation of the antiserum with a histamine-protein conjugate (1 µg/ml), whereas preincubation with L-histidine protein
conjugates (up to 100 µg/ml) did not affect the staining.
Preincubation of the antiserum with thyrotropin-releasing hormone,
luteinizing hormone, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, or substance K
(1-10 µg/ml) did not affect the staining. When the specific
histamine antiserum was replaced by normal rabbit serum, no
immunofluorescence was detected.
Brain atlas. Because published brain maps of Citellus
lateralis with sufficient anatomical details are not available,
one was prepared by cutting the brain of one nonhibernating male ground squirrel into 22-µm-thick cryosections and staining every third section with toluidine blue. The sections were photographed, and the
pictures were scanned into a computer. Using these pictures, a brain
atlas was prepared using Adobe Photoshop and Corel Draw computer
programs. The nuclei of the ground squirrel brain were identified
according to a rat brain atlas (Paxinos and Watson, 1982 ) and a brain
atlas of the ground squirrel Citellus tridecemlineatus (Joseph et al., 1966 ). The nomenclature was adopted from the atlas of
Paxinos and Watson (1982) .
Determination of histamine and tele-methylhistamine.
Nonhibernating (n = 6; three female and three male) and
hibernating (n = 7; three female and four male) animals
were killed by decapitation. The brains were rapidly removed, dissected
on ice into 10 regions, and each of the ten regions was split in half
and quick frozen in isopentane at 25 to 30°C. The samples were
weighed in the frozen state and stored at 75°C until assay. One
half of each region was used for HPLC determination of HA content; the
other half was used for measurement of tele-methylhistamine
(tmHA) by mass spectrometry (see below). The regions dissected
for analysis were: cortex, striatum, preoptic area/septum,
hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus, midbrain, medulla, pons, and cerebellum.
The HA content in the tissue was determined by an automated
HPLC-fluorimetric method (Yamatodani et al., 1985 ). The brain tissue
was thawed and homogenized in 10 volumes of 2% perchloric acid. The
homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min, and 20 ml of the supernatant was injected onto the column (4 mm inner
diameter × 60 mm) packed with cation exchanger (TSKgel
Histaminepak; Tosoh). The fluorescence intensity was measured at 450 nm
with excitation at 360 nm in a spectrofluorometer (F-1050; Hitachi). The detection limit for the assay was 0.05 pmol per injection.
tele-Methylhistamine in the ten regions of hibernating and
nonhibernating ground squirrel brain was measured with gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry by the method of Hough et al. (1981) ,
with some modifications (Tuomisto et al., 1996 ).
Statistical analysis of the total difference in HA and tmHA content
between nonhibernating and hibernating ground squirrel brains was
performed using two-way ANOVA. The difference between the two states in
each individual brain region was analyzed by separate two-tailed
t tests.
In situ hybridization. An oligonucleotide probe (CCG
TGT CTG ACA TGT GCT TGA AGA TTC TTC ACC CCG AAG GAC CGA ATC AC)
complementary to a highly conserved region of the histidine
decarboxylase (HDC) gene was generated according to the
published sequences of rat (Joseph et al., 1990 ), mouse (Yamamoto et
al., 1990 ), and human (Yamauchi et al., 1990 ) HDC. The probe has a 98%
identity with the human sequence and a 100% with the rat and mouse
sequences. A 50-mer oligonucleotide probe complementary to the
Staphylococcus aureus chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene
was used as a control. The probes were labeled with deoxyadenosine
5'- (-thio)triphosphate (35S, NEG-034H; DuPont NEN,
Boston, MA) at their 3'-ends using terminal deoxynucleotide transferase
(Promega, Madison, WI). The purifications were done in Sephadex
G-50-columns. The labeled probes with specific activities of 1-2 × 109 cpm/µg were stored at 20°C in 10 mm
dithiotreitol until used.
Unfixed ground squirrel brains were cryosectioned (10 µm) and
thaw-mounted onto poly-L-lysine-coated slides. The slides
were illuminated with UV light for 5 min at a distance of 25 cm.
Sections were hybridized for 20 hr at 50°C in a humidified chamber
with 200 µl of hybridization buffer containing 50% deionized
formamide, 4× SSC (0.6 M sodium chloride, 0.06 M sodium citrate), 1× Denhardt's solution (0.02%
polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% Ficoll, and 0.02% bovine serum albumin),
1% sarcosyl (N-lauroylsarcosine), 0.02 M sodium
phosphate, pH 7.0, 10% dextran sulfate, 500 µg/ml denatured salmon
sperm DNA, 250 µg/ml tRNA, 200 mm dithiotreitol, and
107 cpm/ml of labeled probe. After hybridization,
the slides were dipped in 1× SSC at room temperature, shortly washed
with 1× SSC at 56°C and then three times 20 min at 56°C in 1×
SSC. They were left to cool to room temperature in fresh 56°C 1× SSC
before dehydration with ethanol. Tissue sections were then apposed to
Kodak BioMax MR-film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 4 d.
 |
RESULTS |
Histamine immunoreactivity in the ground squirrel brain
The HA-immunoreactive fiber system was very widespread in the
ground squirrel brain both in the nonhibernating and in the hibernating
state, and a dense network of fibers and nerve terminals was found in
almost all parts of the brain.
Histamine-immunoreactive cell bodies
HA-immunoreactive cell bodies were found exclusively in the
posterior hypothalamus, in a region corresponding to the
tuberomammillary nucleus in the rat brain. Figure
1 indicates the location of the cells
schematically at consecutive frontal levels from rostral to caudal. A
few cell bodies were found close to the third ventricle and scattered
around the mammillary nuclei, but the majority of the histaminergic
cell bodies comprised a cluster in the ventrolateral part of the
posterior hypothalamus (Fig.
2A). The compartments of the tuberomammillary neurons thus resembled those found in the rat
brain (Panula et al., 1984 ).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Schematic drawing of the distribution of
histaminergic neurons in the ground squirrel brain. The frontal
sections are consecutively arranged from rostral to caudal. One
dot represents approximately two cell bodies. The
middle panel corresponds to level d in
Figure 3.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
A, Histamine-immunoreactive
tuberomammillary neurons of the posterior hypothalamus.
LM, Lateral mammillary nucleus. Scale bar, 100 µm.
B, Histaminergic fibers in the most anterior part of the
hypothalamus at the level of the suprachiasmatic nucleus.
3V, Third ventricle; LPO, lateral
preoptic nucleus; MPO, medial preoptic nucleus;
SCh, suprachiasmatic nucleus; ox, optic
chiasm. Scale bar, 200 µm.
|
|
Telencephalon
Most neocortical and allocortical areas contained moderately dense
fiber networks, except for the deep areas of the most anterior parts of
the neocortex, where the fiber density was low (Fig. 3a-f). The
striatum (caudate putamen) had low to moderate fiber density (Fig.
3a-c). The most anterior and posterior parts
displayed low density of fibers, whereas moderate fiber density was
observed in the medial part. Adjacent to the lateral ventricle, the
density was even higher. Low to moderate density of fibers was seen in the nucleus accumbens (Fig. 3a,b). The bed
nucleus of the stria terminalis displayed moderate fiber density (Fig.
3b). A very high density of fibers was observed in the
medial septal nucleus and the nucleus of the diagonal band, whereas the
lateral septal nuclei had high fiber density (Fig. 3a). A
high density of fibers was seen in the fornix and the medial preoptic
nucleus (Fig. 3b). High fiber density was observed in the
fimbria (Fig. 3c), whereas the anterior parts of the
hippocampus displayed relatively low fiber density. In the more
posterior parts, there were larger differences between the hippocampal
areas (Fig. 3e,f). The density of
fibers was high in the subiculum, moderate in the dentate gyrus and
CA4, moderate to high in CA3, low to moderate in CA1, and low in CA2.
The amygdaloid nuclei had high fiber density (Fig. 3c).

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Distribution of HA-immunoreactive fibers in the
ground squirrel brain. The frontal sections are arranged from rostral
to caudal. The small photomicrographs at the bottom of
the panel show the fiber densities representative of the different
patterns used in the map. The area shown in the micrographs is 250 × 250 µm. 3, Principal oculomotor nucleus;
Me, medial amygdaloid nucleus; ac,
anterior commissure; MGD, medial geniculate nucleus,
dorsal part; Acb, nucleus accumbens; MGV,
medial geniculate nucleus, ventral part; AD,
anterodorsal thalamic nucleus; ml, medial lemniscus;
AH, anterior hypothalamic nucleus; AM,
anteromedial thalamic nucleus; mlf, medial longitudinal
fasciculus; Arc, arcuate nucleus; MM,
medial mammillary nucleus, medial part; AV, nucleus
anterior ventralis thalami; MnR, median raphe nucleus;
B, basal amygdaloid nucleus; MPO, medial
preoptic nucleus; bic, brachium of the inferior
colliculus; MS, medial septal nucleus;
bsc, brachium of the superior colliculus;
mt, mammillothalamic tract; BST, bed
nucleus of the stria terminalis; Op, optic nerve layer
of the superior colliculus; CA1-4, fields
CA1-4 of ammons horn; opt, optic tract;
cc, corpus callosum; Pa, paraventricular
hypothalamic nucleus; Ce, central amygdaloid nucleus;
pc, posterior commissure; CG, central
gray; PH, posterior hypothalamic nucleus;
cp, cerebral peduncle; Pir, piriform
cortex; CPu, caudate putamen (striatum);
Pn, pontine nuclei; DG, dentate gyrus;
PnO, pontine reticular nucleus, oral part;
Dk, nucleus of Darkschewitsch; PT,
paratenial thalamic nucleus; DpMe, deep mesencephalic
nucleus; PV, paraventricular thalamic nucleus;
DR, dorsal raphe nucleus; R, red nucleus;
F, fields of Forel; Re, reuniens thalamic
nucleus; f, fornix; S, subiculum;
fi, fimbria; s5, sensory root of the
trigeminal nerve; gcc, genu corpus callosi;
sox, supraoptic decussation; ic, internal
capsule; STh, subthalamic nucleus; ICj,
islands of Calleja; SuG, superficial gray layer of the
superior colliculus; InG, intermediate gray layer of the
superior colliculus; TM, tuberomammillary nucleus;
IP, interpenduncular nucleus; VDB,
nucleus of the ventral limb of the diagonal band of Broca;
La, lateral amygdaloid nucleus; LD,
laterodorsal thalamic nucleus; vhc, ventral hippocampal
commissure; ll, lateral lemniscus; VL,
ventrolateral thalamic nucleus; lo, lateral olfactory
tract; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus;
LSD, lateral septal nucleus, dorsal part;
VPL, ventral posterolateral thalamic nucleus;
LSI, lateral septal nucleus, intermediate part;
VPM, ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus;
LSV, lateral septal nucleus, ventral part;
xsc, decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle;
mcp, middle cerebral peduncle; MD,
mediodorsal thalamic nucleus; ZI, zona incerta.
|
|
Diencephalon
In the thalamus, low density of fibers was observed in the
anteroventral, ventrolateral (Fig. 3c), dorsal,
ventroposterior (Fig. 3e), posterior, pretectal,
parafascicular, and lateral geniculate nuclei. Moderate fiber density
was found in the paratenial (Fig. 3c), anteromedial (Fig.
3c,d), periventricular (Fig. 3d),
mediodorsal, habenular, and medial geniculate nuclei (Fig.
3e,f). The reuniens thalamic nucleus
displayed high fiber density (Fig. 3d). The densest fiber
network in the whole brain was found in the hypothalamus. The fiber
density was even and high throughout most areas of the hypothalamus and
very high in the supraoptic commissure and the posterior basal parts
(Fig. 3c,d). In the suprachiasmatic nucleus the
fiber density was low to moderate (Fig. 2b).
Mesencephalon
The density of HA-immunoreactive fibers was high in the substantia
nigra and very high in the ventral tegmental area and the supramammillary nucleus and commissure. The fiber density was low in
the red nucleus and high in the interpenduncular nucleus (Fig.
3e). In the superior (Fig.
3e,f) and inferior colliculus, a
high density of fibers was observed.
Rhombencephalon
A moderate density of fibers was observed in the central gray,
except for the caudal part, wherein fibers were highly concentrated in
a zone beginning from the ventricle and spreading laterally (Fig.
3e,f). A low density of fibers
was observed in the pons, medial lemniscus (Fig.
3e,f), reticular nuclei (Fig.
3e), inferior olive, and the cuneate nucleus. The density of
fibers in the raphe nuclei varied. In the dorsal and median raphe
nuclei a high fiber density was found (Fig. 3f),
whereas the raphe obscurus nucleus contained a low density of fibers. A
moderate density of fibers was observed in the nucleus of the solitary
tract and the spinal trigeminal nucleus. A low density of fibers was
observed in the cerebellum.
Comparison of brains from hibernating and nonhibernating
ground squirrels
HA-immunoreactive nerve fibers displayed a higher density and were
more strongly stained in hibernating ground squirrels than in
nonhibernating ones. This was evident, for example in the cortex (Fig.
4), septum (Fig.
5), hippocampus (Fig.
6), anterior hypothalamus (Fig.
7), central gray (Fig.
8), and the dorsal raphe nucleus (Fig.
9). In addition to increased fiber
density, the fibers in the hibernating brains appeared to be thicker
with fewer varicosities. No obvious differences could be seen in the
number of histaminergic perikarya.

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Histamine immunohistochemical staining of the
frontal cortex of nonhibernating (A) and
hibernating (B) ground squirrels using an
antibody against histamine. Scale bar, 200 µm.
|
|

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Histamine immunohistochemical staining of the
medial septum of nonhibernating (A) and
hibernating (B) ground squirrels. Scale bar,
100 µm.
|
|

View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Areas from the rostral part of the ground squirrel
hippocampus stained with an antibody against histamine.
A, C, E, and
G show areas from nonhibernating animals, whereas
B, D, F, and
H show areas from hibernating animals. A
and B show hippocampal area CA1, C and
D area CA2, E and F area
CA3, G and H area CA4. Scale bar, 100 µm.
|
|

View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Histamine-immunoreactive fibers in the anterior
hypothalamus nonhibernating (A) and hibernating
(B) ground squirrels. Scale bar, 200 µm.
|
|

View larger version (189K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Histaminergic fibers in the dorsal Raphe nucleus
of nonhibernating (A) and hibernating
(B) ground squirrels. The cell bodies visible in
A are nonspecifically autofluorescent. Scale bar, 100 µm.
|
|
Histamine and tele-methylhistamine concentrations in
the ground squirrel brain
HPLC analysis showed that HA levels were higher in all brain areas
of hibernating ground squirrels compared with those of nonhibernating
ones (Fig. 10A). The
two-way ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference in HA
content between the hibernating and the nonhibernating brains in total
(p < 0.0001; F = 57.433; df = 1) and a significant interaction between the two states and the brain areas (p < 0.0001; F = 6.122; df = 9). The t tests proved the differences in
HA concentrations very highly significant in the pons
(p < 0.0001; t = 6.321; df = 11), highly significant in the cortex (p = 0.0035; t = 4.648; df = 6), thalamus
(p = 0.0064; t = 4.089; df = 6), midbrain (p = 0.0050; t = 4.023; df = 7), medulla (p = 0.0023;
t = 4.395; df = 8), and cerebellum
(p = 0.0012; t = 4.348; df = 11), and significant in the striatum (p = 0.0199; t = 3.147; df = 6), preoptic area/septum
(p = 0.0152; t = 3.362; df = 6), hippocampus (p = 0.0125; t = 2.980; df = 11), and hypothalamus (p = 0.0295; t = 3.016; df = 5). However, if the level was adjusted by the Bonferroni correction, yielding a
significance level of p < 0.005, only the cortex,
thalamus, midbrain, medulla, pons, and cerebellum were significant.
During the hibernating state the mean HA levels were 93% higher in the
striatum, 95% in the pons, 109% in the medulla, 113% in the
cerebellum, 125% in the cortex, 126% in the preoptic area/septum,
133% in the hippocampus, 138% in the midbrain, 150% in the
hypothalamus, and 186% in the thalamus.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
A, HA concentrations.
B, tmHA concentrations in different brain areas of
hibernating and nonhibernating ground squirrels. Values show mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001. POA,
Preoptic area.
|
|
Analysis of tmHA concentrations showed higher levels during hibernation
than during the nonhibernating state (Fig. 10B). The two-way ANOVA showed a significant difference between hibernating and
nonhibernating brains in total (p < 0.0001;
F = 38.418; df = 1) but no significant interaction
between state and brain region (p = 0.733;
F = 0.671; df = 9). The t test showed
that the tmHA levels were significantly higher in the hippocampus
(p = 0.0281; t = 2.880; df = 6), hypothalamus (p = 0.0126;
t = 3.034; df = 10), midbrain
(p = 0.0108; t = 3.646; df = 6), pons (p = 0.0044; t = 3.774; df = 9), and cerebellum (p = 0.0112;
t = 3.414; df = 7), but not in the cortex
(p = 0.0957; t = 1.822; df = 11), striatum (p = 0.1563; t = 1.743; df = 4), preoptic area/septum (p = 0.1933; t = 1.562; df = 4), thalamus
(p = 0.1336; t = 1.620; df = 11), and medulla (p = 0.0825;
t = 2.025; df = 7). If the level was adjusted
by the Bonferroni correction, none of the areas were
significant. In brains from hibernating animals the mean tmHA levels
were 55% higher in the thalamus, 93% in the cortex, 103%
in the preoptic area/septum, 112% in the medulla, 121% in the
midbrain, 162% in the cerebellum, 169% in the striatum, 260% in the
hypothalamus and hippocampus, and 267% in the pons.
Expression of HDC mRNA
The oligonucleotide probe from a highly conserved region of the
HDC gene gave a positive signal in the cells corresponding to the
tuberomammillary neurons but in no other location of the brain.
Hybridizations with the control oligonucleotide complementary to
Staphylococcus aureus chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gave no signal. Although the sequence of the HDC gene is unknown in this
species, we consider the HDC signal to be specific, because of its
location and the fact that the probe is complementary to a sequence
highly conserved among diverse mammalian species. No apparent
difference was found in the level of expression between the hibernating
and nonhibernating states (Fig.
11).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
Expression of the histamine-synthesizing enzyme
HDC in the hypothalamus of nonhibernating (A) and
hibernating (B) ground squirrels, shown by
in situ hybridization with a radioactively labeled
oligonucleotide probe, complementary to a highly conserved region of
the HDC gene. Expression is seen exclusively in the tuberomammillary
neurons. The anteroposterior level is that between the two
bottom panels in Figure 1. The level of expression does
not differ between A and B.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We present here the first comprehensive immunohistochemical study
of the CNS of a hibernator for a brain monoamine. An important outcome
of this study is the demonstration of major changes in the central
histaminergic system during hibernation. We examined the distribution
of histaminergic nerve fibers in the brain of the golden-mantled ground
squirrel and evaluated the differences in fiber density between the
nonhibernating and hibernating states. In addition, we examined the
nonhibernating versus hibernating state differences in HA and tmHA
concentrations and HDC mRNA expression. This study demonstrated that
the histaminergic neuronal system in the ground squirrel brain is more
extensive than in some nonhibernators such as the rat (Panula et al.,
1989 ). The fiber density was clearly higher, for example, in the
septum, hippocampus, and hypothalamus of ground squirrels than in
corresponding areas of the rat brain. This could be interpreted as an
indication of an enhanced importance of HA in the CNS of this animal,
compared with other species. Moreover, our demonstration of an increase
in HA-immunoreactive fibers, HA content, and HA metabolite (tmHA)
content during the hibernating versus the nonhibernating state suggests
that HA neuronal systems may play an important role in the control of
the hibernating state. Our results raise some interesting issues
regarding the possible mechanisms underlying the changes we observed.
For example, do the hibernation-related changes in the histaminergic
system occur as a result of an increase in the activity of HA-releasing
neurons? The increased fiber density we observed may result from an
increase in fiber HA concentration consequent to a decrease in HA
release, with the intraneuronally accumulated HA thereby bringing more
fibers to a detectable level. Alternatively, we note that tmHA levels
are considered to be strongly correlated with HA turnover in mammalian
brain (Hough et al., 1984 ) and, in accordance with this, our findings
of elevated regional tmHA levels during hibernation suggest increased
histaminergic activity (i.e., histamine release) in this state. In this
view, the elevated regional HA concentrations we observed would be
expected to result from an enhanced level of HA synthesizing activity
by the enzyme HDC that outpaces that of the HA-metabolizing enzyme
histamine N-methyltransferase.
With regard to this latter point, we do not know the status of HDC
activity during hibernation. Our HDC in situ hybridization data do, however, show that the amount of HDC mRNA remained unchanged during hibernation, making any increased synthesis of HA most likely a
consequence of increased enzyme activity rather than to increased
production of HDC itself. Although a general decline in enzyme activity
might be expected to be associated with hibernation, there is evidence
in the literature for increased as well as decreased enzyme activity in
the brain during the hibernating versus the nonhibernating state
(Robinson and Bradley, 1963 ; Stanton and Johnson, 1987 ).
Thus, it remains that if the elevation of tmHA levels found throughout
the brain of hibernating C. lateralis is indeed a
consequence of increased HA turnover, it follows that histaminergic
transmission is increased in this state. We hold this interpretation
with caution, however, because the possibility does exist that tmHA
levels increased during hibernation as a consequence of changes in
enzyme activity downstream in the degradation pathway of HA. For
example, levels of homovanillic acid, a monoamine oxidase
(MAO)-dependent dopamine metabolite, have been shown to decrease during
hibernation (Salzman et al., 1985 ; Haak et al., 1991 ), indicating a
decline in the activity of MAO (which also metabolizes tmHA). The
extracellular level of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenethanol has been
shown to increase, suggesting a shift in metabolizing enzymes from
aldehyde dehydrogenase to alcohol dehydrogenase (Salzman et al., 1985 ).
tele-Methylimidazol acetic acid, the end product of the
metabolic pathway of HA, is also a product of aldehyde dehydrogenase.
Hence, the increase in tmHA levels we report here could be a result of
a shift in enzyme activity that alters the clearance of tmHA from the
brain. If this is the case, the activity of the histaminergic system may in fact be decreased rather than increased during hibernation. We
note, however, that there are two types of MAO enzymes, MAO-A and
MAO-B, in which dopamine is metabolized by both types and tmHA is
metabolized by MAO-B. It is possible that the decrease in dopamine
metabolites observed during hibernation results from a decline in MAO-A
activity only.
Given these considerations, our results could either indicate an
increase or a decrease in histaminergic activity. It may seem most
natural to assume that the HA neuronal system would be inactive during
hibernation in view of its well known role in promoting wakefulness.
The brain levels of HA are known to show diurnal (Orr and Quay, 1975 ;
Tuomisto and Tuomisto, 1982 ) and circadian (Garbarg et al., 1974 )
variation, and several studies have shown that HA increases wakefulness
and decreases slow-wave sleep through the action of H1
receptors (Schwartz et al., 1991 ). HA depolarizes human cortical
neurons via blockade of a voltage-independent potassium conductance
(Reiner and Kamondi, 1994 ) and switches thalamic neuronal activity from
rhythmic burst firing to single-spike activity (McCormick and
Williamson, 1991 ). HA activates cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons
(Khateb et al., 1995 ) and increases EEG activity in the mesopontine
tegmentum, presumably through interaction with cholinergic
neurons (Lin et al., 1996 ). These findings support the
interpretation that HA-releasing neural systems are inactive in the
hibernating state. Given this, the high levels of intracellular HA
accumulating in the fibers and terminals during the maintenance phase
of the hibernation bout may be rapidly released during the arousal phase as part of the neuronal drive that activates and sustains this portion of the hibernation cycle. In concert with this,
it seems plausible to speculate that a constant, but very low, level of
histamine release during the maintenance phase of hibernation could be
ongoing to keep CNS activity at a minimal functional level.
Another important outcome of the present study, which bears on whether
HA activity is enhanced or reduced during hibernation, is the
demonstration that hibernation-related changes in the metabolism of HA
follow a unique pattern compared with that of other monoamines reported
in the literature. That is, whereas HA metabolite levels increase
during hibernation, the turnover of norepinephrine (Cai et al., 1989 ),
dopamine (Salzman et al., 1985 ), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (Popova and
Voitenko, 1981 ) decrease during hibernation. Given these results of
decreased turnover, it seems reasonable to assume that the maintenance
of brain activity in the hibernation mode requires activity in these
respective monoamine systems be held at a low level and that increases
in the activity of these systems would trigger arousal from
hibernation. Indeed, intracerebroventricular microinjections of
norepinephrine (Glass and Wang, 1978 , 1979 ) and intrahypothalamic
microinjections of acetylcholine (Stanton and Beckman, 1977 ),
norepinephrine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (Beckman and Satinoff, 1972 )
have been shown to induce arousal in hibernating ground squirrels. From
these microinjection findings, it may again be concluded that each of
these neurotransmitter systems seems to be subjected to inhibitory
influence during hibernation and that arousal occurs when this
inhibition ceases and the transmitter systems are reactivated.
Histamine is known to both enhance and inhibit the release of other
neurotransmitters through different histamine receptor mechanisms.
Histamine H3 heteroreceptors have been shown to inhibit the
release of 5-hydroxytryptamine (Schlicker et al., 1988 ; Fink et al.,
1990 ), norepinephrine (Schlicker et al., 1989 ), dopamine (Schlicker et
al., 1993 ), and acetylcholine (Arrang et al., 1995 ). On the other hand,
HA evokes the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine and norepinephrine through
H1 and H2 receptors (Young et al., 1988 ). The
net effect of HA in a given brain area is therefore likely to be
dependent on the relative constitution of receptor subtypes in that
area. If the results of the present study are taken to indicate an
increase in histaminergic activity during hibernation, it would follow
that the role of HA activity would be to inhibit other neurotransmitter
systems, such as those noted above, through a H3
receptor-related mechanism. A shift in HA receptor constitution during
hibernation or alternatively a downregulation of HA turnover could then
contribute to reactivating the brain and inducing arousal.
Receptor-binding studies in progress should provide further insight
into this issue.
Our results showing that tmHA levels are increased more than threefold
in the hypothalamus and hippocampus of hibernating animals may be of
particular importance, if one considers the role of these areas in
controlling hibernation. First, the preoptic/anterior hypothalamus is
known to be of central importance for the regulation of body
temperature. During hibernation, activity within this region shifts,
producing a decline in the regulated level of body temperature (Heller,
1979 ; Beckman and Stanton, 1982 ) that provides the hallmark of
mammalian hibernation (i.e., decreased body temperature and metabolic
rate). Given that brain histaminergic neuronal systems have been
implicated in the regulation of body temperature (Sakata et al., 1997 ),
it is likely that the histaminergic system in the ground squirrel brain
is actively involved in controlling this aspect of hypothalamic
function during hibernation. Second, the hippocampus has been
hypothesized to be involved in controlling entrance into, maintenance
of, and arousal from hibernation (Heller, 1979 ; Beckman and Stanton,
1982 ). Studies of the effect of HA on synaptic transmission in
hippocampal slices from Turkish hamsters have shown that augmentation
of population spikes by HA is significantly stronger in slices from
hibernating hamsters than in slices from warm-acclimated ones
(Nikmanesh et al., 1996 ), indicating that HA neuronal activity in the
hippocampus during hibernation should exert a strong influence on the
manner in which the hippocampus contributes to the control of the
hibernation state.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that dramatic changes
occur in the histaminergic system during hibernation. However, the
mechanisms underlying these changes, and therefore our understanding of
their significance for the role of HA neuronal activity in controlling
the hibernation state, requires further clarification.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received March 20, 1998; revised Dec. 7, 1998; accepted Dec. 15, 1998.
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, the Erna and Viktor
Hasselblad foundation, the Signal Transduction Program of Åbo Akademi
University, and the California State University, Long Beach, CA. We
thank Ms. Hannele Jaatinen and Mr. Esa Nummelin for skillful technical help.
Correspondence should be addressed to Pertti Panula, Department of
Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6, BioCity, 20520 Åbo, Finland.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Airaksinen MS,
Panula P
(1988)
The histaminergic system in the guinea pig central nervous system: an immunocytochemical mapping study using an antiserum against histamine.
J Comp Neurol
273:163-186[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Airaksinen MS,
Flügge G,
Fuchs E,
Panula P
(1989)
Histaminergic system in the tree shrew brain.
J Comp Neurol
286:289-310[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Airaksinen MS,
Alanen S,
Szabat E,
Visser TJ,
Panula P
(1992)
Multiple neurotransmitters in the tuberomammillary nucleus: comparison of rat, mouse and guinea pig.
J Comp Neurol
323:103-116[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Arrang J-M,
Drutel G,
Schwartz J-C
(1995)
Characterization of histamine H3 receptors regulating acetylcholine release in rat entorhinal cortex.
Br J Pharmacol
114:1518-1522[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Beckman AL,
Satinoff E
(1972)
Arousal from hibernation by intrahypothalamic injections of biogenic amines in ground squirrels.
Am J Physiol
222:875-879[Free Full Text].
-
Beckman AL,
Stanton TL
(1982)
Properties of the CNS during the state of hibernation.
In: The Neural Basis of Behavior (Beckman AL,
ed), pp 19-45. New York: Spectrum.
-
Cai YP,
Zhao HQ,
Huang QH
(1989)
Reevaluation of involvement of norepinephrine and serotonin in initiation of hibernation.
In: Living in the Cold II (Malan A,
Canguilhem B,
eds), pp 477-484. London: Libbey.
-
Fink K,
Schlicker E,
Neise A,
Göthert M
(1990)
Involvement of presynaptic H3 receptors in the inhibitory effect of histamine on serotonin release in the rat brain cortex.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
342:513-519[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Garbarg M,
Julien C,
Schwartz J-C
(1974)
Circadian rhythm of histamine in the pineal gland.
Life Sci
14:539-543[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Glass JD,
Wang LC
(1978)
Thermoregulatory effects of central injection of noradrenaline in the Richardson's ground squirrel.
Comp Biochem Physiol
61C:347-351.
-
Glass JD,
Wang LC
(1979)
Effects of central injections of biogenic amines during arousal from hibernation.
Am J Physiol
236:R162-R167[Medline].
-
Haak LL,
Mignot E,
Kilduff TS,
Dement WC,
Heller HC
(1991)
Regional changes in central monoamine and metabolite levels during the hibernation cycle in the golden-mantled ground squirrel.
Brain Res
563:215-220[Medline].
-
Heller HC
(1979)
Hibernation: neural aspects.
Annu Rev Physiol
41:305-321[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hough LB,
Khandelwal JK,
Green JP
(1984)
Histamine turnover in regions of rat brain.
Brain Res
291:103-109[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hough LB,
Khandelwal JK,
Morrishow AM,
Green JP
(1981)
An improved GCMS method to measure tele-methylhistamine.
J Pharmacol Methods
5:143-148[Medline].
-
Inagaki N,
Yamatodani A,
Ando-Yamamoto M,
Tohyama M,
Watanabe T,
Wada H
(1988)
Organization of histaminergic fibers in the rat brain.
J Comp Neurol
273:283-300[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Joseph SA,
Knigge KA,
Kalejs LM,
Hoffman RA,
Reid P
(1966)
In: A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the 13-line ground squirrel (Citellus tridecemlineatus). Edgewood, MD: Edgewood Arsenal Special Publications.
-
Joseph DR,
Sullivan PM,
Wang Y-M,
Kozak C,
Fenstermacher DA,
Behrendsen ME,
Zahnow CA
(1990)
Characterization and expression of the complementary DNA encoding rat histidine decarboxylase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:733-737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Khateb A,
Fort P,
Pegna A,
Jones BE,
Mühlethaler M
(1995)
Cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons are excited by histamine in vitro.
Neuroscience
69:495-506[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lin J-S,
Hou Y,
Sakai K,
Jouvet M
(1996)
Histaminergic descending outputs to the mesopontine tegmentum and their role in the control of cortical activation and wakefulness in the cat.
J Neurosci
16:1523-1537[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lintunen M,
Sallmen T,
Karlstedt K,
Fukui H,
Eriksson KS,
Panula P
(1998)
Postnatal expression of H1-receptor mRNA in the rat brain: correlation to L-histidine decarboxylase expression and local upregulation in limbic seizures.
Eur J Neurosci
10:2287-2301[Web of Science][Medline].
-
McCormick DA,
Williamson A
(1991)
Modulation of neuronal firing mode in cat and guinea pig LGNd by histamine: possible cellular mechanism of histaminergic control of arousal.
J Neurosci
11:3188-3199[Abstract].
-
Nikmanesh FG,
Spangenberger H,
Igelmund P
(1996)
Histamine enhances synaptic transmission in hippocampal slices from hibernating and warm-acclimated Turkish hamsters.
Neurosci Lett
210:119-120[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Orr E,
Quay WB
(1975)
Hypothalamic 24-hour rhythms in histamine, histidine decarboxylase and histamine-N-methyltransferase.
Endocrinology
96:941-945[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Panula P,
Yang H- YT,
Costa E
(1984)
Histamine containing neurons in the rat hypothalamus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
81:2572-2576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Panula P,
Pirvola U,
Auvinen S,
Airaksinen MS
(1989)
Histamine-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the rat brain.
Neuroscience
28:585-610[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Panula P,
Airaksinen MS,
Pirvola U,
Kotilainen E
(1990)
A histamine-containing neuronal system in human brain.
Neuroscience
34:127-132[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Paxinos G,
Watson C
(1982)
In: The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. New York: Academic.
-
Popova NK,
Voitenko NN
(1981)
Brain serotonin metabolism in hibernation.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
14:773-777[Medline].
-
Reiner PB,
Kamondi A
(1994)
Mechanisms of antihistamine-induced sedation in the human brain: H1 receptor activation reduces a background leakage potassium current.
Neuroscience
59:579-588[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Robinson JD,
Bradley RM
(1963)
Cholinesterase and glutamic acid decarboxylase levels in the brain of the hibernating hamster.
Nature
197:389-390.
-
Sakata T,
Yoshimatsu H,
Kurokawa M
(1997)
Thermoregulation modulated by histamine in rats.
Inflamm Res [Suppl 1]
46:S35-S36.
-
Salzman SK,
Llados-Eckman C,
Beckman AL
(1985)
In vivo analysis of dopamine and its metabolites in the caudate nucleus during euthermia and hibernation.
Brain Res
343:95-103[Medline].
-
Schlicker E,
Betz R,
Göthert M
(1988)
Histamine H3 receptor-mediated inhibition of noradrenaline release in the rat brain cortex.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
337:588-590[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schlicker E,
Fink K,
Hinterthaner M,
Göthert M
(1989)
Inhibition of noradrenaline release in the rat brain cortex via presynaptic H3 receptors.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
340:633-638[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schlicker E,
Fink K,
Detzner M,
Göthert M
(1993)
Histamine inhibits dopamine release in the mouse striatum via presynaptic H3 receptors.
J Neural Transm Gen Sect
93:1-10[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schwartz J-C,
Arrang J-M,
Garbarg M,
Pollard H,
Ruat M
(1991)
Histaminergic transmission in the mammalian brain.
Physiol Rev
71:1-51[Free Full Text].
-
Stanton TL,
Beckman AL
(1977)
Thermal changes produced by intrahypothalamic injections of acetylcholine during hibernation and euthermia in Citellus lateralis.
Comp Biochem Physiol
59A:143-150.
-
Stanton TL,
Johnson GVW
(1987)
In vitro measurements of cholinergic activity in brain regions of hibernating ground squirrels.
Brain Res Bull
18:663-668[Medline].
-
Tuomisto L,
Tuomisto J
(1982)
Diurnal variations in brain and pituitary histamine and histamine-N-methyltransferase in the rat and guinea pig.
Med Biol
60:204-209[Medline].
-
Tuomisto L,
Ylinen M,
Onodera K,
Tacke U,
Airaksinen M
(1996)
Comparison of regional brain histamine and tele-methylhistamine levels in genetically epilepsy-prone rats and in rats resistant to epilepsy.
Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol [Suppl A]
18:155-159.
-
Wada H,
Inagaki N,
Yamatodani A,
Watanabe T
(1991)
Is the histaminergic system a regulatory center for whole-brain activity?
Trends Neurosci
14:415-418[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yamamoto J,
Yatsunami K,
Ohmori E,
Sugimoto Y,
Fukui T,
Katayama T,
Ichikawa A
(1990)
cDNA-derived amino acid sequence of L-histidine decarboxylase from mouse mastocytoma P-815 cells.
FEBS Lett
276:214-218[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yamatodani A,
Fukuda H,
Wada H,
Iwaeda T,
Watanabe T
(1985)
High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of plasma and brain histamine without previous purification of biological samples: cation-exchange chromatography coupled with post-column derivatization fluorometry.
J Chromatogr
344:115-123[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yamauchi K,
Ruriko S,
Ohkawara Y,
Tanno Y,
Maeyama K,
Watanabe T,
Satoh K,
Yoshizawa M,
Shibahara S,
Takishima T
(1990)
Nucleotide sequence of the histidine decarboxylase cDNA derived from human basophilic leukemia cell line, KU-812-F.
Nucleic Acids Res
18:5891-5891[Free Full Text].
-
Young CS,
Mason R,
Hill SJ
(1988)
Studies on the mechanisms of histamine-induced release of noradrenaline and 5-hydroxytryptamine from slices of rat cerebral cortex.
Biochem Pharmacol
37:2799-2805[Medline].
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/1951824-12$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Haas, O. A. Sergeeva, and O. Selbach
Histamine in the Nervous System
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2008;
88(3):
1183 - 1241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Barrett, A. W. Ross, A. Balik, P. A. Littlewood, J. G. Mercer, K. M. Moar, T. Sallmen, J. Kaslin, P. Panula, S. Schuhler, et al.
Photoperiodic Regulation of Histamine H3 Receptor and VGF Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in the Arcuate Nucleus of the Siberian Hamster
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2005;
146(4):
1930 - 1939.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Ross, L. M. Bell, P. A. Littlewood, J. G. Mercer, P. Barrett, and P. J. Morgan
Temporal Changes in Gene Expression in the Arcuate Nucleus Precede Seasonal Responses in Adiposity and Reproduction
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2005;
146(4):
1940 - 1947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Xu, K. A Michelsen, M. Wu, E. Morozova, P. Panula, and M. Alreja
Histamine innervation and activation of septohippocampal GABAergic neurones: involvement of local ACh release
J. Physiol.,
December 15, 2004;
561(3):
657 - 670.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. V. CAREY, M. T. ANDREWS, and S. L. MARTIN
Mammalian Hibernation: Cellular and Molecular Responses to Depressed Metabolism and Low Temperature
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2003;
83(4):
1153 - 1181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Drutel, N. Peitsaro, K. Karlstedt, K. Wieland, M. J. Smit, H. Timmerman, P. Panula, and R. Leurs
Identification of Rat H3 Receptor Isoforms with Different Brain Expression and Signaling Properties
Mol. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2001;
59(1):
1 - 8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|