 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 15, 1999, 19(6):2273-2287
Coding of Sound Envelopes by Inhibitory Rebound in Neurons of the Superior Olivary Complex in the Unanesthetized Rabbit
Shigeyuki Kuwada and Ranjan Batra University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Anatomy, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3405
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Most natural sounds (e.g., speech) are complex and have amplitude envelopes that fluctuate rapidly. A number of studies have examined the neural coding of envelopes, but little attention has been paid to the superior olivary complex (SOC), a constellation of nuclei that receive information from the cochlear nucleus. We studied two classes of predominantly monaural neurons: those that displayed a sustained response to tone bursts and those that gave only a response to the tone offset. Our results demonstrate that the off neurons in the SOC can encode the pattern of amplitude-modulated sounds with high synchrony that is superior to sustained neurons. The upper cutoff frequency and highest modulation frequency at which significant synchrony was present were, on average, slightly higher for off neurons compared with sustained neurons. Finally, most sustained and off neurons encoded the level of pure tones over a wider range of intensities than those reported for auditory nerve fibers and cochlear nucleus neurons. A traditional view of inhibition is that it attenuates or terminates neural activity. Although this holds true for off neurons, the robust discharge when inhibition is released adds a new dimension. For simple sounds (i.e., pure tones), the off response can code a wide range of sound levels. For complex sounds, the off response becomes entrained to each modulation, resulting in a precise temporal coding of the envelope.
Key words: auditory system; amplitude modulation; single unit recording; monaural signal processing; envelope coding; intensity coding
INTRODUCTION
Most natural sounds (e.g., speech) have envelopes that over time fluctuate in both frequency and amplitude. Consequently, considerable attention has been devoted to the neural processing of envelopes. Studies of envelope coding of monaural sounds have concentrated on the auditory nerve (Palmer, 1982
; Joris and Yin, 1992
MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental preparation. Almost all previous studies of envelope coding have used an anesthetized preparation. We used unanesthetized Dutch-Belted rabbits (n = 9) because anesthetics are known to alter auditory responses (Evans and Nelson, 1973
Surgery and recording procedures. Our surgical procedures have been described previously (Batra et al., 1997a
During the recording session the animal was restrained as described above. The elastopolymer cap was removed, and the exposed dura was desensitized with a topical anesthetic (Lidocaine). The dura was pierced with a thin-wall hypodermic needle (23xx gauge) inside which rode the microelectrode (glass-coated platinum-iridium or platinum-tungsten). A Burleigh microdrive advanced the microelectrode. Electrode advancement, acoustic stimulation, and data collection were controlled from outside the soundproof booth. Neural recordings were filtered between 300 and 3000 Hz and amplified 5,000-10,000 times. Action potentials were timed with an accuracy of 10 µsec.
Typically, a rabbit participated in daily recording sessions over a period of ~2-3 months. Each session lasted ~2 hr. Although we did not measure the rabbit's exact behavioral state (e.g., asleep, awake, drowsy), it was monitored with a video camera, and the session was terminated if the rabbit fidgeted. The rabbit's comfort was a priority for ethical as well as for practical reasons, because any movement would disrupt neural recordings.
Acoustic stimulation and calibration. Stimuli were generated by dual digital stimulators (Rhode, 1976
Testing procedure. A neuron's best frequency was assessed by collecting the responses to short (50 msec), monaural tone bursts between 0.2 and 35 kHz in 0.5 octave steps at a suprathreshold level [typically 50-70 dB sound pressure level (SPL)]. For sustained neurons, the best frequency was defined as the frequency at which the sustained response was maximal, whereas for off neurons it was the frequency at which the off response was maximal. The rate versus level function and discharge pattern were then determined using short, best-frequency tone bursts (100-125 msec repetition interval, 50-100 repetitions, typically 20-70 dB SPL).
We usually determined whether a neuron was binaural by delivering best-frequency tone bursts to the preferred ear while varying the level to the other ear. Another way was to separately test each ear over a range of frequencies. If the binaural response resembled the monaural response to the preferred ear, or if it could be attributed to the effects of acoustic cross talk, then the neuron was classified as monaural. Conversely, if the binaural response differed systematically from the monaural response to the preferred ear, or if its response to the other ear could not be attributed to cross talk (e.g., responses to the preferred ear were excitatory and the responses to the other ear were inhibitory), then the neuron was classified as binaural. Neurons were also tested for binaural inputs by examining their sensitivity to interaural time difference using the binaural beat stimulus, i.e., a small frequency difference between the carrier or envelope frequencies between the two ears (Kuwada et al., 1979
Sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones were 1-1.1 sec in duration, with a repetition interval of 1.2 or 1.3 sec. At each modulation frequency, two to three repetitions of the SAM tone were presented. The carrier was held at the neuron's best frequency, and modulation depth was initially set at 80%. Modulation frequencies between 25 and 800 Hz were routinely tested, and higher frequencies were tested if necessary. Conditions permitting, we tested the response to SAM tones over a range of levels and modulation depths.
Data analysis. The regularity of the discharge pattern to short tone bursts for sustained neurons was assessed by using the coefficient of variation (CV). We determined the average CV by dividing the mean of the interspike intervals (ISIs) over the tone bursts by the SD.
The dynamic range of a neuron to tones, i.e., the range of intensities over which the response increased monotonically, was estimated from its rate-level function. The analysis window was the stimulus duration for sustained neurons and was the off interval for off neurons. The lower limit of the dynamic range (i.e., threshold) was neural threshold, i.e., the lowest intensity that evoked a significant response. Threshold was determined using the "repetition interval synchronization coefficient" (Batra et al., 1997a
Phase-locking (i.e., synchrony) to the modulation frequency was assessed both visually and quantitatively. Visual assessment was performed using period histograms, which depict the average response over a cycle of the modulation period. The first 100 msec of the response was excluded from the analysis to avoid onset effects. Strength of synchrony (R) was determined by calculating the vector strength of the response (Goldberg and Brown, 1969
Localization of recording sites. For each electrode penetration, the electrode was positioned relative to a reference mark on the skull. The depth at which each neuron was studied was noted. During the last recording session, electrolytic lesions were made at selected sites (10 µA for 10-20 sec). Four to six days after lesion, the animals was deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital, and most were perfused with a 10% solution of formol saline. In some animals, the brain was fixed by immersion in a 10% formol-saline solution. The brains were frozen and sectioned (30 or 60 µm) in the plane of the electrode penetrations and then stained with cresyl violet or thionin (Kuwada et al., 1987
RESULTS Our results are based on the responses of 65 neurons in the SOC. We classified these neurons into sustained (n = 42) or off (n = 23) on the basis of their discharge pattern (see Materials and Methods). Onset responses constituted a small part of our sample and were not considered further. The best frequencies of sustained and off neurons were similar and ranged from 0.75 to 35 kHz, with a mode between 8 and 9 kHz.
Of the 35 sustained neurons tested for binaural influences, most were monaural (29/35; 83%). Of the monaural neurons, approximately half (15/29) responded to contralateral stimulation, and the remainder responded to ipsilateral stimulation. The remaining six sustained neurons exhibited binaural influences (see Materials and Methods). Two of these respond more strongly to contralateral stimulation. To ipsilateral stimulation, one showed a sustained suppression of spontaneous activity, and the other showed a transient excitation. The other four preferred ipsilateral stimulation. To contralateral stimulation, two showed a sustained excitation, and two displayed a transient suppression. Most off neurons tested for binaural influences were monaural (13/18; 72%), and all responded to contralateral stimulation. The five binaural off neurons (28%) all preferred contralateral stimulation. To ipsilateral stimulation, two responded with sustained excitation, another responded with a transient excitation, another with a transient excitation followed by a sustained suppression, and yet another with a sustained suppression of spontaneous activity.
Location of recording sites
Our procedure for estimating the location of a neuron was subject to considerable error because recordings made over the course of months were referenced to electrolytic marking lesions made at the end of this period. Thus brain movements and any slight day-to-day variations in electrode positioning could influence the estimated location of a neuron. Another factor was the large distance (~14-18 mm) the electrode traversed to reach the SOC. Slight deviations in straightness of the electrode or the guide tube in which it rode could lead to large errors in the intended location (Batra et al., 1997a
The sustained and off neurons were likely not located in the principal binaural nuclei, i.e., LSO and MSO. Previously, we reported on neurons in the SOC that were sensitive to interaural time differences. Most of these were presumed to be located in the LSO and MSO (Batra et al., 1997a
Responses to tones
Sustained neurons displayed various discharge patterns in response to short tone bursts (Fig. 1A-D) that were similar to those reported previously in the CN (for review, see Rhode and Greenberg, 1992
View larger version (25K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Examples of discharge patterns of sustained (A-D) and off neurons (E-H). In all cases, responses are to 50 msec tone bursts at the frequency and intensity indicated. A, Repetition interval and number of repetitions, 125 msec × 100; B, 125 msec × 75; C, 100 msec × 100; D, 100 msec × 100; E, 125 msec × 50; F, 200 msec × 50; G, 125 msec × 50; H, 125 msec × 50. The CV is indicated for sustained neurons (see Materials and Methods). Bin width is 0.5 msec.
A common feature of many sustained neurons was the regularity of their discharge. Regularity was assessed by examining the CV (see Materials and Methods) at the intensity that elicited the strongest discharge. The neurons of Figure 1, A and B, had CVs <0.5, which was consistent with their sustained or transient chopping pattern. The pauser neuron (Fig. 1C) had an intermediate CV (0.50), whereas the primary-like neuron (Fig. 1C) had an irregular firing pattern (CV = 0.81). Most sustained neurons (31/42; 74%) had a regular firing pattern.
The off discharge pattern has rarely been reported in the CN but was encountered routinely in the SOC. Off neurons displayed a complete or almost complete absence of activity during the tone burst but discharged at the tone offset (Fig. 1E-H). Spontaneous activity was almost always suppressed during the tone (Fig. 1E,G,H). The magnitude of the off response differed among neurons. Some neurons had relatively weak responses (Fig. 1E), whereas others had relatively strong responses (Fig. 1H). Off neurons also differed in the pattern of their responses. Some responded with a single peak that decayed to spontaneous levels by ~50 msec after tone offset (Fig. 1F,G), whereas others responded with two peaks separated by a pause (Fig. 1E,H). For both types of off responses, each peak in the poststimulus time histogram (PST) consisted of multiple action potentials.
Sustained neurons had dynamic ranges that were larger than those of auditory nerve fibers and neurons in the CN. For auditory nerve fibers and neurons in the CN, the dynamic range is typically 10-40 dB SPL (Rhode and Greenberg, 1994b
40 dB. Approximately 19% had dynamic ranges >50 dB. For many neurons, their dynamic range was probably underestimated (see Materials and Methods).
View larger version (14K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Sustained and off neurons can display a wide dynamic range. A, Discharge rate versus stimulus level for the four sustained neurons in Figure 1. B, Same for the four off neurons in Figure 1. Dynamic ranges for neurons A-H were 60, 50, 40, 30, 50, 50, 50, and 65 dB.
Off neurons also had dynamic ranges that were larger than auditory nerve fibers or CN neurons (Fig. 2B). As with sustained neurons, some off neurons had relatively small dynamic ranges (data not illustrated), whereas others had much larger dynamic ranges (Fig. 2B; all >50 dB). The average dynamic range for off neurons was 42 ± 12 dB. Almost all off neurons (16/17; 94%) showed a monotonic increase in discharge rate with stimulus level and most (12/17; 71%) had a dynamic range
Responses to SAM tones: modulation transfer functions
To determine the ability of sustained and off neurons to encode the envelopes of complex sounds, we measured their discharge rate and response synchrony to SAM tones over a range of modulation frequencies. Although the activity of off neurons was suppressed during a tone burst, they discharged continuously to SAM tones at lower modulation frequencies. Figure 3 depicts PSTs of the responses of a sustained and an off neuron to SAM tones. The sustained neuron gave a sustained response at all modulation frequencies (Fig. 3A-E), similar to its response to tone bursts. The off neuron produced an off discharge at all modulation frequencies (Fig. 3F-J), but at lower frequencies there was also a sustained discharge during the SAM tone (Fig. 3G-J).
View larger version (44K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Sustained neurons and off neurons responded during a SAM tone. A-E, Discharge pattern for a sustained neuron to SAM tones at the modulation frequencies indicated; F-J, same for an off neuron. For both neurons, modulation depth (80%) and stimulus duration (1100 msec), repetition interval (1300 msec), and number of repetitions (3) were the same. Sustained neuron carrier frequency and intensity: 14 kHz, 22 dB SPL. Off neuron: 6 kHz, 42 dB SPL. Bin width is 10 msec.
Off neurons were strongly synchronized to the envelope at all modulation frequencies at which they responded to SAM tones, whereas the synchrony of sustained neurons varied with modulation frequency. Figure 4 shows the responses of the same neurons as in Figure 3 plotted as a function of modulation phase. The sustained neuron synchronized well at intermediate modulation frequencies (Fig. 4C-E), but at higher and lower modulation frequencies the strength of synchrony declined (Fig. 4A,B,F). In contrast, the off neuron synchronized strongly at all (Fig. 4H-L) but the highest modulation frequency (Fig. 4G), although the discharge declined at higher frequencies (Fig. 4G,H).
View larger version (12K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Synchrony of off neurons was generally higher and more constant across modulation frequencies than sustained neurons. A-F, Cycle histograms of a sustained neuron at different modulation frequencies (derived from the responses in Fig. 3A-E). G-L, Same for an off neuron (derived from the responses in Fig. 3F-J). Cycle histograms were created by averaging the responses at the same stimulus modulation phase. All responses showed significant synchrony except A. Bin width is 0.033 cycles.
The contrasting responses of sustained and off neurons to SAM tones resulted in their having different modulation transfer functions (MTFs) (Fig. 5). For the sustained neuron of Figures 3 and 4, the discharge rate as a function of modulation frequency (rate MTF) was relatively flat (Fig. 5A,
), whereas for the off neuron it was low-pass (Fig. 5A,
). The synchrony as a function of modulation frequency (synchrony MTF) was bandpass for the sustained neuron (Fig. 5B,
View larger version (14K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Summary plot of the rate MTFs and synchrony MTFs for the sustained neurons and the off neuron illustrated in Figure 4. A, Plots of discharge rate versus modulation frequency (rate MTFs) for the sustained (
In general, the MTF patterns of the neurons illustrated in Figures 3-5 reflected the responses of our entire sample of sustained and off neurons. Figure 6A shows the synchrony and rate MTFs for about half of our sustained neurons (n = 20). The remainder (n = 22) were not plotted for the sake of visual clarity. In general, the synchrony MTFs of sustained neurons were bandpass (Fig. 6A). Averaging across all neurons yielded a population MTF that was mildly bandpass (Fig. 6B). The bandpass nature of most MTFs was more clearly visible when the MTFs in Figure 6A were normalized to each neuron's best modulation frequency (BMF) and its maximum synchrony (Fig. 6C). Averaging across the normalized MTFs of all the neurons yielded a population MTF based on synchrony that was clearly bandpass (Fig. 6D). In contrast the rate MTFs were relatively flat (Fig. 6E), and the corresponding population MTF was relatively flat as well (Fig. 6F). Most off neurons had synchrony and rate MTFs that were low-pass (Fig. 7, A and C, respectively). The synchrony was usually very high (>0.8) within the pass-band. The low-pass shapes of the MTFs resulted in population MTFs that were also low-pass (Fig. 7B,D).
View larger version (32K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 6. In general, the synchrony MTFs of sustained neurons were bandpass in shape, whereas their rate MTFs were flat. For visual clarity, only the responses of half (20/42) the sustained neurons are shown. A, Synchrony MTFs. B, Mean synchrony MTF derived by averaging the synchrony MTFs of all (n = 42) the sustained neurons. C, Normalized synchrony MTFs of responses in A. Both synchrony and each neuron's BMF were normalized. D, Mean normalized synchrony MTF of all sustained neurons. E, Rate MTFs of the neurons in A. F, Mean rate MTF of all sustained neurons. Error bars represent SE.
View larger version (34K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 7. In general, synchrony and rate MTFs of off neurons were low-pass. A, Synchrony MTFs of all off neurons (n = 23). B, Mean synchrony MTF derived by averaging the synchrony MTFs in A. C, Rate MTFs of all off neurons. D, Mean rate MTF of all off neurons. Error bars represent SE.
Off neurons encoded a slightly higher range of modulation frequencies than sustained neurons. Figure 8 compares the upper cutoff modulation frequency and the highest modulation frequency at which significant synchrony was present for these two groups. Figure 8A displays the BMFs of sustained neurons. Because most off neurons had MTFs that were low-pass, it was inappropriate to measure their BMFs. For this reason, we estimated (by interpolation) the high modulation frequency cutoff at which the synchrony was 20% lower than the maximum (Fig. 8B). This level was chosen because at high modulation frequencies synchrony of off neurons declined abruptly to where synchrony was no longer significant. The steep decline made interpolating the cutoff frequency at a conventional level (e.g., 6 dB below maximum) impossible in most neurons. The same measure was made on sustained neurons. Based on this measure, off neurons synchronized, on average, to modulation frequencies ~140 Hz higher than sustained neurons (t = 2.39; df = 53; p < 0.02). We also measured the highest modulation frequency at which significant synchrony was present (Fig. 8C). The highest modulation frequency was ~80 Hz higher for off neurons, but this difference was not significant (p > 0.05).
View larger version (14K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 8. Off neurons encoded a slightly higher range of modulation frequencies than sustained neurons. A, Distribution of BMF for sustained (n = 42) neurons. B, Distribution of upper cutoff frequencies for sustained (n = 40) and off (n = 15) neurons. The upper cutoff was the modulation frequency above the neuron's BMF at which the synchrony was 20% lower than the maximum. C, Distribution of highest modulation frequency where significant synchrony was still present for sustained (n = 42) and off (n = 23) neurons. D, Off neurons synchronized more strongly than sustained neurons. For each neuron, the highest synchrony across modulation frequency, modulation depth, and sound intensity was selected. Shown is the distribution of this synchrony for sustained (n = 42) and off (n = 23) neurons. For A-C, bin width is 0.5 octaves; for D it is 0.1 cycles. Solid lines (sustained neurons) were centered on each bin, and dashed lines (off neurons) have been shifted slightly rightward for visual clarity. For each distribution, the mean and SD for sustained and off neurons is indicated.
Off neurons also displayed higher synchrony than sustained neurons. We compared the highest synchrony exhibited by neurons of each type (Fig. 8D). The highest synchrony of sustained neurons covered a wide range (0.21-0.95), with an average of 0.70. In contrast, the highest synchrony of off neurons clustered tightly between 0.83 and 0.99 with an average of 0.94. This difference in synchrony between sustained and off neurons was highly significant (t = 6.78; df = 71; p < 0.001).
In a linear system, the phase of the synchronized response changes linearly with modulation frequency. The slope of the linear fit to this plot is an estimate of the delay between the acoustic stimulus and the responses of the neuron (Anderson et al., 1971
View larger version (21K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 9. Sustained and off neurons had similar delays but different phase intercepts. A, Phase versus frequency plots for a sustained ( ) and an off (
) and synchrony (R) are as indicated. In both B and C, solid lines (sustained neurons) reflect the center of each bin and dashed lines (off neurons) have been shifted slightly rightward for visual clarity. Distributions are based on 41 sustained and 23 off neurons.
On average, sustained and off neurons responded with similar delays (sustained, 5.1 ± 1.2 msec; off, 4.9 ± 0.3 msec) (Fig. 9B). However, the delays of sustained neurons were distributed over a wider range than those of off neurons.
In the auditory nerve and CN, delay decreases with characteristic frequency of the neuron. This relationship reflects the travel time along the basilar membrane. In our SOC neurons there was little if any relationship between a neuron's delay and its best frequency.
The phase intercepts of the phase-frequency plots were consistent with the notion that the response of sustained neurons is via excitation and the response of off neurons is via a rebound from inhibition (Fig. 9C). The phase intercepts of all but three of the sustained neurons were grouped slightly below 0.25 cycles, and those of off neurons were all grouped slightly below 0.75 cycles. The difference between the means was 0.57 cycles. Thus, sustained neurons responded just before the maximum amplitude of the incoming signal was reached (0.25 cycles), and off neurons responded just before the minimum amplitude was reached (0.75 cycles).
Effects of modulation depth
Both sustained and off neurons synchronized to a wide range of modulation depths but differed in how the response changed with modulation depth. Figure 10 plots the discharge rate and synchrony as a function of modulation depth for four sustained and four off neurons. For comparison, we also include the minimum and maximum of rate and synchrony functions (Fig. 10, dashed lines) in a small number of auditory nerve fibers in the cat (Joris and Yin, 1992
View larger version (29K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 10. Effects of changing modulation depth on the responses of sustained and off neurons to SAM tones. A, B, Discharge rate as a function of modulation depth for four sustained neurons (A) and four off neurons (B). For comparison, the responses of auditory nerve fibers (dashed line) (from Joris and Yin, 1992
Sustained and off neurons also differed in how their synchrony changed with modulation depth. Sustained neurons showed a gradual increase in synchrony with modulation depth that was similar to that of auditory nerve fibers (Fig. 10C, dashed line). The absolute synchrony could be similar or greater than that of auditory nerve fibers. In contrast, the synchrony of off neurons increased rapidly to a high value and then remained constant with modulation depth (Fig. 10D). The synchrony of off neurons was noticeably higher than even the maximum seen in the sample of auditory nerve fibers.
The constancy of the synchrony of off neurons across a wide range of modulation depths implies that the amplification (gain) by these neurons of the modulation in the stimulus changes with increasing depth. This was demonstrated by calculating the modulation gain according to the formula 20 log 2R/modulation depth (Joris and Yin, 1992
Figure 11 plots the rate and synchrony MTFs at several modulation depths for a sustained (Fig. 11A,B) and an off neuron (Fig. 11E,F). The rate MTFs of the sustained neuron remained relatively flat and constant at all modulation depths (Fig. 11B). In contrast, the rate MTFs of the off neuron changed with modulation depth (Fig. 11F). At lower modulation depths (<30%), the functions were flat, and the discharge rate was lower than the spontaneous activity (arrows). This presumably occurred because at lower modulation depths the SAM tones resemble pure tones that suppress neural activity during the stimulation period (e.g., Fig. 1E-H). At higher modulation depths, the discharge rate of off neurons rose above the spontaneous level, and the rate MTFs were low-pass. Note that even at these modulation depths, the response falls below the spontaneous level at high modulation frequencies. However, at lower modulation frequencies, the periodic inhibition to each modulation is completely or nearly completely released, evoking a rebound discharge to each modulation. This results in a discharge rate higher than the spontaneous activity. In contrast, at low modulation depths or high modulation frequencies, the periodic inhibition is never released and consequently there is no rebound response. The inhibition now serves to only attenuate and modulate the spontaneous activity.
View larger version (34K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 11. Synchrony and rate MTFs for a sustained and off neuron as a function of modulation depth (A, B and E, F) and stimulus level (C, D and G, H). The shape of the synchrony and rate MTFs of sustained (A, B) and off (E, F) neurons remained relatively constant across modulation depths, but the synchrony MTF of sustained neurons could change with level. Carrier frequency was at the neuron's best frequency. Intensity of the SAM tone for the sustained neuron (A, B) was 29 dB SPL, and for the off neuron (E, F) it was 28 dB SPL. Depth of modulation of the SAM tone for C, D, G, and H was 80%. Horizontal arrows indicate spontaneous activity (9.7 and 39.1 spikes/sec for spontaneous and off neuron, respectively).
The synchrony MTFs of the sustained neuron at different modulation depths resembled a bandpass function (Fig. 11A), and synchrony increased with modulation depth. Although the BMF could shift slightly with modulation depth, in general the function remained bandpass. In comparison, the synchrony MTFs of the off neuron (Fig. 11E) were low-pass and uniformly high, except at the lowest modulation depths (5%). The lower synchrony at these low modulation depths is likely to be a consequence of the periodic modulation of the spontaneous activity as discussed above.
Effects of stimulus level
We have already described the dynamic range of neurons in the SOC to short tone bursts (Fig. 2). Here we examine their dynamic range to SAM tones. Figure 12 plots the rate and synchrony of the response as a function of stimulus level for seven sustained and seven off neurons at their BMF. The discharge rate of sustained neurons increased monotonically with a dynamic range typically >40 dB SPL (Fig. 12A). Off neurons usually had a nonmonotonic rate level function (Fig. 12B). The two off neurons in the sample that displayed a monotonic rate-level function (Fig. 12B; neurons 13 and 14) also had a high threshold for synchrony. If we had tested higher stimulus levels on these neurons, the rate-level function might have been nonmonotonic. The monotonic rate-level functions to tones and nonmonotonic functions to SAM tones displayed by off neurons have also been observed in the MSO of the free-tailed bat (Grothe et al., 1997
View larger version (32K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 12. Discharge rate and synchrony of sustained and off neurons as a function of the intensity of a SAM tone. A, B, Discharge rate as a function of stimulus level for seven sustained neurons (A, neurons 1-7) and for seven off neurons (B, neurons 8-14). C, D, Synchrony as a function of stimulus level for the same seven sustained (C) and off (D) neurons. In all cases, modulation depth was 80%, and modulation frequency was at or near the neuron's BMF.
In contrast to the rate-level function, the synchrony-level function of sustained neurons took many forms. Synchrony could remain relatively constant (Fig. 12C, neuron 6), increase (neuron 2), decrease (neurons 1, 3, 7), or be nonmonotonic (neurons 4, 5) with stimulus level. In comparison, the synchrony of most off neurons increased rapidly with stimulus level (Fig. 12D), saturating at a value of ~0.9 by ~20 dB SPL.
The shape of the synchrony MTFs of a sustained neuron could change when the stimulus intensity level was changed (Figs. 11C), whereas that of an off neuron remained relatively constant (Fig. 11G). At the lowest intensity, the synchrony MTFs of the sustained neuron were low-pass (Fig. 11C). However, they became more and more bandpass with increasing stimulus levels. In comparison, the synchrony MTFs of the off neuron were low-pass at all stimulus levels (Fig. 11G). The lower synchrony at low stimulus levels reflect a modulation of spontaneous activity, where an off response was not present.
The rate MTFs for the sustained neuron remained relatively flat with increasing stimulus levels (Fig. 11D). Where the rate was above spontaneous, the rate MTFs of off neurons were low-pass or mildly bandpass (Fig. 11H).
DISCUSSION Our results demonstrate that sustained and off neurons differ in their ability to follow the pattern of sounds. Somewhat surprisingly, off neurons were better at this than sustained neurons. This indicates that an inhibitory rebound mechanism by itself is sufficient to encode, with high fidelity, ongoing envelopes in complex sounds.
Location of sustained and off neurons
The locations of sustained and off neurons in the SOC of the rabbit, as shown here, are consistent with those reported in the cat by Guinan et al. (1972a
Response to tones
The short delays of our sustained and off neurons suggest that their inputs are from CN neurons or from other SOC neurons. Their large dynamic ranges suggest that they receive inputs from many CN neurons, or from a select population of cells in the CN [e.g., onset choppers (Rhode and Greenberg, 1994b
Our off neurons probably correspond to three different categories of neurons described by Guinan et al. (1972a)
Responses to SAM tones
The responses of sustained neurons in the SOC to SAM tones could simply be a reflection of the input from the ventral CN. Most of the MTFs of our regular, sustained neurons (Fig. 6A) resembled those of regular, sustained neurons in the CN. There, sustained neurons have synchrony MTFs with a bandpass shape that becomes more low-pass at lower stimulus intensities (Frisina et al., 1990
In contrast to sustained neurons, the responses of off neurons to SAM tones did not appear to be a mere reflection of CN input. The gain of off neurons was much higher than that of most neurons in the CN, particularly at shallow modulation depths. Similar results have been reported for off neurons in the MSO of the mustached bat (Grothe, 1994
The MTFs of binaural neurons in the LSO have also been examined (Batra et al., 1997b
Neural mechanisms of off neurons
The off response is most likely a rebound from inhibition, rather than an excitatory response that has been partially occluded by inhibition during the stimulus. Off neurons in the MSO of the bat are monaural and receive excitatory and inhibitory inputs from the contralateral side (Grothe, 1994
The source of the inhibitory input to off neurons is probably not the ventral CN because it has very few glycinergic or GABAergic neurons (Peyret et al., 1986
Inhibitory rebound by itself appears sufficient to explain the strong off responses we encountered, but in other neurons in the CNS it usually evokes only an action potential or two. Recently, Wu and Kelly (1995)
Why is synchrony of off neurons so high? Grothe (1994)
Functional considerations
In general, the rate MTFs of sustained and off neurons were flat and low-pass, respectively. Thus, there is little, if any, information about modulation frequency conveyed in the discharge rate. However, the discharge rate of sustained neurons displayed a monotonic increase with intensity to SAM tones, suggesting a role in intensity coding of complex signals and pure tones.
The synchrony of sustained neurons often peaked at a particular modulation frequency, suggesting that such neurons could optimally convey information about that modulation frequency using a temporal code. However, the BMF often changed as a function of level. Furthermore, at low levels the synchrony MTFs were low-pass, and a BMF was not present. In contrast, the synchrony of off neurons was high and constant across a wide range of modulation frequencies and levels. Because off neurons can discharge to each cycle of the modulation, independent of stimulus level, they are ideal candidates to transmit precise temporal information about envelopes to higher centers. Whether their influence on neurons in higher centers is excitatory or inhibitory is unknown, but in either case they could serve to shape the way that information about envelopes is encoded by the system.
FOOTNOTES Received Sept. 16, 1998; revised Dec. 29, 1998; accepted Dec. 31, 1998.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DC02178 and NS18027. We thank Lisa Seman for technical assistance and Douglas C. Fitzpatrick and Bill D'Angelo for helpful comments.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Shigeyuki Kuwada, Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3405.
REFERENCES
- Anderson D, Rose J, Hind JE, Brugge JF (1971) Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sine-wave stimulus: frequency and intensity effects. J Acoust Soc Am 49:1131-1139.
- Banks MI, Smith PH (1992) Intracellular recordings from neurobiotin-labeled cells in brain slices of the rat medial nucleus of the trapezoid body. J Neurosci 12:2819-2837[Abstract].
- Barker JL, Ransom BR (1978) Pentobarbitone pharmacology of mammalian central neurones grown in tissue culture. J Physiol (Lond) 280:355-372
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Batra R, Kuwada S, Stanford TR (1989) Temporal coding of envelopes and their interaural delays in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit. J Neurophysiol 61:257-268
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Batra R, Kuwada S, Fitzpatrick DC (1997a) Sensitivity to interaural temporal disparities of low- and high-frequency neurons in the superior olivary complex. I. Heterogeneity of responses. J Neurophysiol 78:1222-1236
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Batra R, Kuwada S, Fitzpatrick DC (1997b) Sensitivity to interaural temporal disparities of low- and high-frequency neurons in the superior olivary complex. II. Coincidence detection. J Neurophysiol 78:1237-1247
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Brownell WE, Manis PB, Ritz LA (1979) Ipsilateral inhibitory responses in the cat lateral superior olive. Brain Res 177:189-193[Web of Science][Medline].
- Covey E, Casseday JH (1991) The monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus in an echolocating bat: parallel pathways for analyzing temporal features of sound. J Neurosci 11:3456-3470[Abstract].
- Creutzfeldt O, Hellweg F-C, Schreiner C (1980) Thalamocortical transformations of responses to complex auditory stimuli. Exp Brain Res 39:87-104[Web of Science][Medline].
- Eggermont JJ (1993) Differential effects of age on click-rate and amplitude modulation-frequency coding in primary auditory cortex of the cat. Hear Res 65:175-192[Web of Science][Medline].
- Evans EF, Nelson PG (1973) The responses of single neurons in the cochlear nucleus of the cat as a function of their location and anesthetic state. Exp Brain Res 117:402-427.
- Frisina RD, Smith RL, Chamberlin SC (1990) Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear Res 44:99-122[Web of Science][Medline].
- Glendenning KK, Masterton RB (1995) Comparative morphometry of mammalian central auditory system: variation in nuclei and form of the ascending system. Brain Behav Evol 51:59-89.
- Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Response properties of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32:613-636
[Free Full Text] .- Ghoshal S, Kim DO (1996) Marginal shell of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: intensity coding in single units of the unanesthetized, decerebrate cat. Neurosci Lett 205:71-74[Web of Science][Medline].
- Grothe B (1994) Interaction of excitation and inhibition in processing of pure tone and amplitude-modulated stimuli in the medial superior olive of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol 71:706-721
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Grothe B, Park TJ, Schuller G (1997) Medial superior olive in the free-tailed bat: responses to pure tones and amplitude-modulated tones. J Neurophysiol 77:1553-1565
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Guinan JJ, Guinan SS, Norris BE (1972a) Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex I: responses to sounds and classifications based on physiological properties. Int J Neurosci 4:101-120.
- Guinan JJ, Norris BE, Guinan SS (1972b) Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex II: locations of unit categories and tonotopic organization. Int J Neurosci 4:147-166.
- Heil P, Schultz H, Langner G (1995) Ontogenetic development of periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the mongolian gerbil. Auditory Neurosci 1:363-383.
- Helfert RH, Aschoff A (1997) Superior olivary complex and nuclei of the lateral lemniscus. In: The central auditory system (Erhet G, Romand R, eds), pp 193-258. New York: Oxford UP.
- Joris PX, Yin TCT (1992) Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 91:215-232[Web of Science][Medline].
- Joris PX, Yin TCT (1998) Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. III. Comparison with afferent pathways. J Neurophysiol 79:253-269
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Kim DO, Sirianni JG, Change SO (1990) Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum. Hear Res 45:95-113[Web of Science][Medline].
- Kuwabara N, Zook JM (1992) Projections of the medial superior olive from the medial and lateral nuclei of the trapezoid body in rodents and bats. J Comp Neurol 324:522-538[Web of Science][Medline].
- Kuwada S, Yin TCT, Wickesberg RE (1979) Response of cat inferior colliculus neurons to binaural beat stimuli: possible mechanisms for sound localization. Science 206:586-588
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Kuwada S, Stanford TR, Batra R (1987) Interaural phase-sensitive units in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effects of changing phase. J Neurophysiol 57:1338-1360
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Kuwada S, Batra R, Stanford TR (1989) Monaural and binaural response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rabbit: effects of sodium pentobarbital. J Neurophysiol 61:269-282
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Langner G, Schreiner CE (1988) Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 60:1799-1822
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Liberman MS, Brown ME (1986) Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 24:17-36[Web of Science][Medline].
- Mardia KV (1972) In: Statistics of directional data. New York: Academic.
- Moller AR (1974) Coding of sounds with rapidly varying spectrum in the cochlear nucleus. J Acoust Soc Am 55:631-640[Web of Science][Medline].
- Moller AR (1976) Dynamic properties of the responses of single neurones in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. J Neurophysiol 259:63-82.
- Morest DK (1968) The growth of synaptic endings in the mammalian brain: a study of the calyces of the trapezoid body. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 127:201-220[Medline].
- Palmer AR (1982) Encoding of rapid amplitude fluctuations by cochlear-nerve fibers in the guinea pig. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 236:197-202[Medline].
- Peyret D, Geffard M, Aran JM (1986) GABA immunoreactivity in the primary nuclei of the auditory central nervous system. Hearing Res 23:115-121[Medline].
- Peyret D, Campistron G, Gelfard M, Aran J-M (1987) Glycine immunoreactivity in the brainstem auditory and vestibular nuclei of the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 104:71-76[Medline].
- Ramón y Cajal S (1909) In: Histologie du Système Nerveux de l'Homme et des Vertébrés, Vol 1 Madrid, Instituto Ramon y Cajal. Paris: Maloine, 1972.
- Rees A, Moller AR (1987) Stimulus properties influencing the responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated sounds. Hear Res 27:129-143[Web of Science][Medline].
- Rees A, Palmer AR (1989) Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise. J Acoust Soc Am 85:1978-1994[Web of Science][Medline].
- Rhode WS (1976) A digital system for auditory neurophysiological research. In: Current computer technology in neurobiology (Brown P, ed), pp 543-567. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
- Rhode WS (1994) Temporal coding of 200% amplitude modulated signals in the ventral cochlear nucleus of cat. Hearing Res 77:43-68[Web of Science][Medline].
- Rhode WS, Greenberg S (1992) Physiology of the cochlear nuclei. In: The mammalian auditory pathway: neurophysiology, Ed 1, Vol 2 (Popper AN, Fay RR, eds), pp 94-152. New York: Springer.
- Rhode WS, Greenberg S (1994a) Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 71:1797-1825
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Rhode WS, Greenberg S (1994b) Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 71:493-514
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Ritz LA, Brownell WE (1982) Single unit analysis of the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the decerebrate cat. Neuroscience 7:1995-2010[Web of Science][Medline].
- Rouiller E, de Ribaupierre Y, Toros-Morel A, de Ribaupierre F (1981) Neural coding of repetitive clicks in the medial geniculate body of the cat. Hear Res 11:235-247.
- Schreiner CE, Urbas JV (1986) Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. I. The anterior auditory field (AAF). Hear Res 21:227-241[Web of Science][Medline].
- Schreiner CE, Urbas JV (1988) Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields. Hear Res 32:49-64[Web of Science][Medline].
- Schwartz IR (1992) The superior olivary complex and lateral lemniscal nuclei. In: The mammalian auditory pathway: neuroanatomy, Vol 1 (Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds), pp 117-167. New York: Springer.
- Tsuchitani C (1977) Functional organization of the lateral cell groups of the cat superior olivary complex. J Neurophysiol 40:296-318
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Warr WB (1992) Organization of the olivocochlear efferent system in mammals. In: The mammalian auditory pathway: neuroanatomy (Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds), pp 410-448. New York: Springer.
- Wenthold RJ (1991) Neurotransmitters of brainstem auditory nuclei. In: Neurobiology of hearing: the central auditory system (Altschuler RA, Bobbin RP, Clopton BM, Hoffman DW, eds), pp 121-140. New York: Raven.
- Wu S, Kelly JB (1995) In vitro brain slice studies of the rat's dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus. I. Membrane and synaptic response properties. J Neurophysiol 73:780-793
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Young ED, Brownell WE (1976) Response to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. J Neurophysiol 39:282-300
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .
Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/99/1962273-15$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
P. C. Nelson, Z. M. Smith, and E. D. Young
Wide-Dynamic-Range Forward Suppression in Marmoset Inferior Colliculus Neurons Is Generated Centrally and Accounts for Perceptual Masking
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2553 - 2562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. J. Kulesza Jr, A. Kadner, and A. S. Berrebi
Distinct Roles for Glycine and GABA in Shaping the Response Properties of Neurons in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Rat
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1610 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. C. Nelson and L. H. Carney
Neural Rate and Timing Cues for Detection and Discrimination of Amplitude-Modulated Tones in the Awake Rabbit Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 522 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. Batra
Responses of Neurons in the Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus to Sinusoidally Amplitude Modulated Tones
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2388 - 2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. J. Eliades and X. Wang
Dynamics of Auditory-Vocal Interaction in Monkey Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1510 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. Nabatiyan, J.F.A. Poulet, G. G. de Polavieja, and B. Hedwig
Temporal Pattern Recognition Based on Instantaneous Spike Rate Coding in a Simple Auditory System
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2484 - 2493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
H. Zhang and J. B. Kelly
Glutamatergic and GABAergic Regulation of Neural Responses in Inferior Colliculus to Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 477 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. J. Kulesza Jr., G. A. Spirou, and A. S. Berrebi
Physiological Response Properties of Neurons in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Rat
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 2299 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. He
OFF Responses in the Auditory Thalamus of the Guinea Pig
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2377 - 2386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
O. Behrend, A. Brand, C. Kapfer, and B. Grothe
Auditory Response Properties in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus of the Gerbil
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2915 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. Grothe, E. Covey, and J. H. Casseday
Medial Superior Olive of the Big Brown Bat: Neuronal Responses to Pure Tones, Amplitude Modulations, and Pulse Trains
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2219 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. Sivaramakrishnan and D. L. Oliver
Distinct K Currents Result in Physiologically Distinct Cell Types in the Inferior Colliculus of the Rat
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2001; 21(8): 2861 - 2877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. Brand, R. Urban, and B. Grothe
Duration Tuning in the Mouse Auditory Midbrain
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1790 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. S. Krishna and M. N. Semple
Auditory Temporal Processing: Responses to Sinusoidally Amplitude-Modulated Tones in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 255 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. Batra and D. C. Fitzpatrick
Discharge Patterns of Neurons in the Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus of the Unanesthetized Rabbit
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1097 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This Article Abstract 
Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager 
Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (34) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kuwada, S. Articles by Batra, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kuwada, S. Articles by Batra, R.
|
|
|
|
 |
|