 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 1999, 19(8):3094-3106
Selective Color Constancy Deficits after Circumscribed Unilateral
Brain Lesions
Lukas
Rüttiger1,
Doris I.
Braun2,
Karl R.
Gegenfurtner3,
Dirk
Petersen4,
Paul
Schönle5, and
Lindsay T.
Sharpe1
1 Forschungsstelle für Experimentelle
Ophthalmologie, Universitätsaugenklinik Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, 2 Sektion Visuelle Sensorik,
Universitätsaugenklinik Tübingen, 72072 Tübingen,
Germany, 3 Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische
Kybernetik, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, 4 Medizinische
Universität, Abteilung Neuroradiologie, 23538 Lübeck, Germany, and 5 Neurologische
Rehabilitationsklinik Schmieder, 78473 Allensbach, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
The color of an object, when part of a complex scene, is determined
not only by its spectral reflectance but also by the colors of all
other objects in the scene (von Helmholtz, 1886 ; Ives, 1912 ; Land,
1959 ). By taking global color information into account, the
visual system is able to maintain constancy of the color appearance of
the object, despite large variations in the light incident on the
retina arising from changes in the spectral content of the illuminating
light (Hurlbert, 1998 ; Maloney, 1999 ). The neural basis of this
color constancy is, however, poorly understood. Although there seems to
be a prominent role for retinal, cone-specific adaptation mechanisms
(von Kries, 1902 ; Pöppel, 1986 ; Foster and Nascimento, 1994 ), the
contribution of cortical mechanisms to color constancy is still unclear
(Land et al., 1983 ; D'Zmura and Lennie, 1986 ). We examined the
color perception of 27 patients with defined unilateral lesions mainly
located in the parieto-temporo-occipital and fronto-parieto-temporal
cortex. With a battery of clinical and specially designed color vision
tests we tried to detect and differentiate between possible deficits in
central color processing. Our results show that color constancy can be
selectively impaired after circumscribed unilateral lesions in
parieto-temporal cortex of the left or right hemisphere. Five of 27 patients exhibited significant deficits in a color constancy task, but
all of the 5 performed well in color discrimination or higher-level
visual tasks, such as the association of colors with familiar objects. These results indicate that the computations underlying color constancy
are mediated by specialized cortical circuitry, which is independent of
the neural substrate for color discrimination and for assigning colors
to objects.
Key words:
color vision; color constancy; visual perception; patients; lesions; clinical
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Acquired color perception deficits
caused by cerebral lesions have been reported since the 19th century
(MacKay and Dunlop, 1899 ). The impairments reported in patients, either
in combination with other disorders or alone, range from attenuation of
wavelength discrimination or color sorting up to a complete loss of
color perception, color agnosia, and deficiencies in color constancy.
A loss of color perception, which is often referred to as
dyschromatopsia or achromatopsia, has been reported in patients after
bilateral cortical damage to the lingual and fusiform gyri on the
ventro-medial side of the occipito-temporal lobe (for review, see Damasio et al., 1980 ; Zeki, 1990 ). Achromatopsic patients describe
colors as dim, dirty, pale, or washed out or as shades of gray.
Although they show abnormal performance on pseudoisochromatic color
plates and on color-sorting tasks such as the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test, they name hues of brightly colored or remembered objects
correctly (Meadows, 1974 ; Green and Lessel, 1977 ; Heywood and Cowey,
1987 ; Rizzo et al., 1993 ).
Color agnosia is characterized by an impairment in relating typical
colors or color names to everyday objects such as fruits or vegetables.
Also, the ability to name colors or to select, for example, color
tokens by name can be lost (color anomia). These deficits are often
associated with aphasic symptoms such as alexia and seem to occur
independently either of specific or complete color perception deficits.
A deficit of color constancy is the inability to compensate for changes
in color appearance when the spectral composition of the illuminating
light changes (Hurlbert, 1998 ; Maloney, 1999 ). The visual system seems
to achieve color constancy by comparing the colors of all objects
within the field of view and attributing an increase, for example, in
the amount of long wavelengths reflected from all objects to a shift in
redness of the illuminant (Land, 1959 ). This implies that the perceived
hue of an object depends on the colors of the surrounding objects, or
that color constancy requires a context (von Helmholtz, 1886 ; Ives,
1912 ; Land, 1959 ; Hurlbert, 1996 ). Although such compensation is never
complete, it seems to correct for at least approximately half of the
change of color appearance under different illuminations (Helson and Michels, 1948 ; Brainard and Wandell, 1991 , 1992 ; Arend, 1993 ; Bäuml, 1994 ; Brainard, 1998 ).
At present, it is unclear which cortical areas are responsible for
mediating color constancy (D'Zmura and Lennie, 1986 ). First, lesion
studies in macaque monkeys have shown that ablation of area V4 results
in color constancy deficits (Wild et al., 1985 ; Walsh et al., 1993 ),
but accompanying deficits in hue discrimination were also found. This
makes it uncertain whether the color constancy deficit was caused by
the more basic hue discrimination deficit. Furthermore, the results of
lesion experiments in macaque monkeys and of clinical studies in human
patients do not support a simple parallel between monkey and human
visual cortices (Merigan, 1993 ; Heywood et al., 1995 ; Hadjikani et al.,
1998 ; Heywood and Cowey, 1998 ; Zeki et al., 1998 ). Second, and most
importantly, the effect of cortical lesions on color constancy in
humans has not been studied systematically. All published studies
involve patients who were either achromatopsic (Bramwell et al., 1997 ;
Cowey and Heywood, 1997 ; D'Zmura et al., 1998 ) or had severely
impoverished wavelength discrimination (Kennard et al., 1995 ; Morland
and Ruddock, 1997 ). Kennard et al. (1995) and D'Zmura et al. (1998)
used a color-naming task and found that their patients altered the
names of surface colors in accord with the changes in their Commission Internationale d'Éclairage (CIE) chromaticity coordinates when the illumination was varied. This inability to compensate for the
changes in the illuminant resulted in a shift in the color category
associated with the chromaticity coordinates.
These clinical observations, although interesting, leave unanswered the
basic question of whether deficits in color constancy can occur
independently of those in other color vision function. In response to
that question, we investigated the perception of color in 27 patients
with unilateral cortical lesions, using a battery of different color
vision tests, which included standard clinical tests as well as those
especially designed to investigate color discrimination and color constancy.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patients
The 27 patients of this study (12 female and 15 male; for
clinical details, see Table 1) suffered
from unilateral brain lesions, resulting from either a stroke (19), a
tumor (5), ischemia (1), hematoma (1), or bleeding and trauma (1). The
patients' mean age was 46.0 ± 13.1 (SD) years (range, 25-72
years). Patients had to fulfill the following selection criteria, as
determined from their neurological records and informal assessment: a
good general state of mental and physical health, full comprehension of
the tasks, normal or corrected to normal acuity, absence of severe oculomotor disorders, no sedative medication, and an interval between
lesion and testing of >2 months. Nine of the patients suffered from
different types of aphasic syndromes, but all were able to talk or to
communicate reliably. For 22 patients, we were able to obtain their
computed tomographic (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan,
made at the time closest to the incident, to verify the lesion
location. All of them had a circumscribed unilateral lesion with a
clear demarcation of the lesioned from the surrounding tissue. For the
other five patients, CT or MRI scans were not conducted or unavailable.
Other clinical details of the patients are provided in Table 1. Before
any testing, informed consent was obtained from all patients in
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
To evaluate the patients' general visual and attentional status, we
administered several standard tests of visual fields, acuity, contrast
sensitivity, and color perception (see below).
 |
Control group |
For comparison, we also tested nine control subjects (three
female and six male) who had no known history of any neurological or
visual dysfunction. Their age distribution was similar to that of the
patients [mean age, 40.2 ± 14.6 (SD) years; range, 20-70 years]. Three of the authors served as control subjects, but the others were naive with respect to the purpose of this
study.
Standard visual tests
Perimetry
Visual fields were examined separately for each eye with the
standard Tübingen Automatic Perimeter in 25 of the 27 patients (Table 2). In 12 patients, visual field
defects were found; 6 of them had a defect in their left visual
hemifield, and 6 had a defect in their right hemifield. Nine of the 12 patients had a complete hemianopia, 1 had an incomplete hemianopia, and
2 patients had an upper right quadranopia.
Contrast sensitivity
Each patient's monocular contrast sensitivity was evaluated
with the Vistech-VCTS 6500 charts at a viewing distance of 3 m. Sensitivity was measured by testing the orientation discrimination of
gratings with spatial frequencies ranging from 1.5 to 18 cycles/degree at various contrast levels. None of the patients fell out of the normal range.
Spatial attention
As a test of neglect, patients were tested in a visual search
task using the shape cancellation test of Mesulam (1985) . Subjects were
asked to mark all examples of one symbol (a hatched "sun") with a
colored pencil on the test sheet covered with various symbols. The time
to completion was not restricted but was recorded. The occurrence of
errors (wrong symbol markings) and misses as well as the search
strategy were evaluated. Only two patients showed more than two
mistakes. Patient HR omitted five symbols on the left side of the test
sheet only, whereas patient MS, who also missed five symbols, made
mistakes on both sides.
Congenital color vision deficiencies
Red-green congenital color vision impairments were tested by
means of the Mollon-Reffin color test (Mollon et al., 1991 ) and the
Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates (Ishihara 1962 ). The data of
patients with congenital color vision impairments were excluded from
further analysis.
All paper-and-pencil tests were run under daylight with additional neon
light illumination (~250 lux, 3100°K). The color tests described
below were run on a computerized setup in an otherwise dark room.
Color tests
Color constancy
For the evaluation of color constancy, we used an achromatic
matching task that has been widely used in psychophysics to quantify color constancy performance (Helson and Michels, 1948 ; Arend, 1993 ;
Bäuml, 1994 ; Brainard, 1998 ). Stimuli were displayed on a color
monitor (BARCO CCID7751) driven by a graphic board (VSG 2/3,
Cambridge Research Systems). A "Mondrian" stimulus, as shown in
Figure 1, A and B,
extending 21 × 20° of visual angle, was displayed in the center
of the monitor screen, surrounded by a black nonreflecting cardboard
covering ~70 × 53° of the visual field. No other objects were
visible in the dark room. The color field consisted of an irregular,
randomized arrangement of small, colored rectangular patches. The
patches had different, irregular sizes, with the smallest elements
extending 12 arc min2 and the average size being 30 arc min2. A larger horizontally oriented rectangle (2°
wide) was positioned at the center. The central rectangle had a uniform
gray color, which could be adjusted by the observers.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
A, Illustration of the color
constancy display under the neutral illuminant C (daylight). Each of
the Mondrian patterns consisted of a random arrangement of small,
colored rectangles and a central larger, horizontal gray rectangle.
B, Same reflectances under a bluish simulated
illuminant. The colored patches above the Mondrian
illustrate settings at different levels of color constancy (not shown
during the experiment). C, CIE coordinates of the
simulated surface colors of 226 different Munsell chips illuminated by
five different illuminants. The corresponding transformation in color
space for each Munsell chip under the four colored illuminants is
indicated by the appropriate color; the neutral setting under CIE
standard illuminant C is indicated in black.
D, The observer had to adjust the color of the central
rectangle by changing its color value along one of the cardinal
directions of color space, as illustrated by the colored
lines, until it appeared as a neutral gray under each of the
five illuminants.
|
|
The colors of the small rectangles were calculated from the known
reflectance spectra of 226 different Munsell chips (Cohen, 1964 ),
virtually illuminated by light sources of different color temperature
and dominant wavelength. Five different illuminations were chosen: CIE
standard illuminant C (Wyszecki and Stiles, 1982 ) and four virtual
illuminants, which had the effect of shifting the color of the neutral
gray square along one of the cardinal directions of color space
(Krauskopf et al., 1982 ; Fig. 1D). Under illuminant C
the neutral gray had CIE 1931 x,y coordinates of (0.310,0.316) and a luminance of 15 cd/m2. The
coordinates were shifted toward (0.358,0.304) under the red illuminant,
toward (0.262,0.329) under the green illuminant, toward (0.297,0.268)
under the blue illuminant, and toward (0.323,0.364) under the yellow
illuminant. The virtual illuminations were computed by using a
broad-band filter in combination with illuminant C. The broad-band
filters were positive (yellow and green) or negative (blue and red)
Gaussian functions with different means (red, 505 nm; green, 500 nm;
blue, 522 nm; and yellow, 549 nm) and SDs (red, 50 nm; green, 90 nm;
blue, 95 nm; and yellow, 105 nm). The transmittance of the filters was
normalized so that the mean luminance of the illuminated Munsell chips
stayed roughly constant. Figure 1C illustrates the shift in
color space of all 226 Munsell chips under the four different
illumination changes, indicated by the differently colored symbols. The
neutral setting (illuminant C) is indicated in black. Figure
1B shows an example of the monitor display under a
bluish simulated illuminant; Figure 1A shows the same
under neutral illumination.
The observer's task was to adjust the color of the central rectangular
patch until it appeared as a neutral gray surface under each illuminant
("surface match"). In the first part of the test, the Mondrian was
set to neutral illumination C, and the color of the target rectangle
was set to red, green, blue, or yellow. Then the observer adjusted the
target rectangle along a line in color space corresponding to the axis
of the illumination change until it appeared neutral gray. For each of
these four initial colors, at least four neutral adjustments were
completed by each subject. In the second part, the Mondrian was
presented consecutively under one of the four different illuminations
(red, green, blue, or yellow). Again, the color of the target rectangle
could be modified along one axis of color space only, extending through the neutral setting and the setting predicted under full color constancy (Fig. 1D). The initial color of the target
rectangle was always in the direction of the illuminant, being twice as far from the actual neutral point as the illuminant itself. The time
for adjustment was not limited, and at the end of each trial the
observers were asked whether they perceived the matched rectangle as
neither reddish nor greenish and neither bluish nor yellowish, respectively, before they accepted a match to appear gray. After each
match, a new Mondrian with randomized geometry was presented, and after
each change of the illuminant, an adaptation break of at least 2 min
was given.
Color constancy was calculated for each of the four virtual
illuminations as the difference between the matched gray at the neutral
illumination C and the matched gray under the virtual illumination,
normalized to the difference of the illuminant coordinates. As a
result, color constancy performance could be expressed as a percentage,
which was typically between 0 and 100%. A setting of 100% indicated
perfect color constancy. A value of 0% indicated no color constancy at
all; i.e., the subject always matched the same physical gray,
independent of the illumination of the surrounding Mondrian. However,
because there were no constraints on the adjustments, a subject could
theoretically also produce negative settings or settings >100%.
Nevertheless, negative settings or settings >100% rarely occurred
during testing.
Subjects were tested in three to five sessions, each lasting between 30 min and 1 hr. Breaks were given after each test and whenever subjects
requested them.
Color and luminance discrimination
Discrimination thresholds were measured using the same
computerized setup as above. The stimulus consisted of an 8 × 8 matrix of separate light gray squares (23 cd/m2)
presented on a darker gray background (15 cd/m2).
Each square subtended 1.2 × 1.2° of visual angle; the distance between the squares was 0.4° from edge to edge. The stimulus
contained a target consisting of 2 × 2 neighboring squares, which
differed slightly either in color (red, green, yellow, or blue) or in
luminance (lighter or darker) from the other squares. The target was
always presented in one of the four corners of the stimulus (Fig.
2). The stimulus appeared for 1.5 sec and
was followed by a uniform gray field matching the background luminance
of the target display. The viewing distance was 70 cm.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
A, Stimulus for the color
discrimination task. A matrix of 8 × 8 squares was presented: 4 of the 64 squares were arranged as a 2 × 2 quadratic subset,
which differed either slightly in color (red, green, blue, or yellow)
or in luminance (lighter or darker) from the other 60 neutral gray
squares. The subject had to report the location (quadrant) of the
subset. B, Illustration of the color directions used in
this study. Note that the appearances of these "cardinal direction"
stimuli are distinctly different from perceptually determined "unique
hues" (Krauskopf et al., 1982 ).
|
|
Subjects had to indicate the location of the target squares. The color
or luminance difference between the target and the other squares was
varied by a staircase procedure (Levitt, 1971 ) that converged at the
color or luminance difference at which subjects were just able to
correctly locate the target squares in 80% of all cases. Separate but
randomly interleaved staircases were used for each of the six different
test conditions: for a brighter, darker, redder, greener, bluer, or
more yellow target (Fig. 2B). Each test session
lasted ~20 min. In the color conditions, the colors of the target
squares were changed along the cardinal directions of color space
(Krauskopf et al., 1982 ), which differentially excite the second-stage
color opponent mechanisms in the early visual pathways (Derrington et
al., 1984 ). These color directions were identical to the ones used in
the color constancy experiments. Chromaticities for the color changes
in the four directions were given above. To prevent the detection of
the color target squares by means of luminance differences, small
random luminance variations from square to square were introduced. The
maximum variation was ± 1.6 cd/m2 and was just
barely noticeable.
Naming and object recognition tests
We performed tests to evaluate the patients' ability to name
colors and objects and to assign characteristic colors to familiar objects (Fig. 3). Colored or
black-and-white line drawings of natural objects, such as fruits,
vegetables, and animals, and man-made objects, such as tools, were
taken from the picture sets of Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) . Three
different tests were administered.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Examples of the stimuli used in the color-naming,
object-naming, and color association tests. A, In the
color-naming test, the subjects were required to name the color of
familiar objects. B, In the object-naming test, they
were required to name the familiar objects and their typical colors.
C, In the color association test, they were required to
say whether the object was appropriately colored.
|
|
Color naming. The ability to name colors correctly was
tested on cards of paper, showing 24 different colored man-made objects (Fig. 3A). Subjects had to name the color of each object.
Object and (typical) color naming. To test the subjects'
memory for colors and objects, 24 simple black-and-white drawings of
objects were presented (Fig. 3B). Subjects were asked to
name each single object and its typical color. Approximately half of the items were man-made objects.
Color association of objects. Thirty pictures of different
objects were shown (Fig. 3C). Half of these objects were
shown in their typical color (e.g., a red bell pepper), the other half in an unusual color (e.g., a green horse). The subject had to name the
color of each object and to say whether it was typical for the object.
If the subject had doubts about the color of a specific object or
rejected the color as being atypical, they were required to give their
reason, which was recorded.
The performance on the three tests was evaluated by the percentage of
correct answers.
 |
Statistics |
We used an iterative procedure to determine whether the
performance of any of the observers was significantly worse than that of the whole group of patients and control observers. Because our
control group with nine observers was too small to determine reliably
the distributions of performance, and because most patients showed
quite good performance in most of the tasks, we computed our
distribution of "normal" performance from both control observers and those patients without deficits. We initially selected the control
group as our normal group and computed the mean and SD of
performance for each task separately. Then patients were added to the
normal group if their performance did not deviate by >2.28 SDs from
the mean of the previously selected normal group, equivalent to a
one-sided confidence level of 1%. Mean and SD of the revised normal
group were computed, and the procedure was iterated until the largest
subset of controls and patients without any outliers was reached.
 |
Reconstruction of the lesion and anatomical evaluation |
To reconstruct each patient's lesion, the CT or MRI scans
recorded closest to the incident were used. The location and extent of
each lesion were traced from slices of CT and/or MRI scans onto axial
(horizontal) templates, the tilt plane of which best corresponded to
the tilt plane of the CT or MRI scans. For reconstruction of each
lesion, the distance between the axial levels of the brain templates
was 4 mm. These (possibly) tilted templates were then transformed into
the standard Talairach coordinate frame (Talairach and Tournoux,
1988 ).
 |
RESULTS |
Color constancy
The color constancy tests, which formed the core of these studies,
were performed for color changes along the red-green and blue-yellow
cardinal axes of color space. Figure 4
shows the results of these tests. In this and all other histograms,
filled bars indicate the patients' data, and open
bars indicate the data from the control group. The black
line shows the normal distribution obtained by using the iterative
procedure described above. The gray-shaded area
indicates the data lying outside 2.28 SDs of the mean and corresponds
to 1% of the area under the curve. Median color constancy in our task
was 45.5 and 35.5% for the red-green and blue-yellow axes,
respectively. Along both color axes, patient AS showed the largest
deficit and made slightly negative matches. In addition, along the
red-green axis, four other patients, AK, HR, GZ, and RM, made matches
outside of the statistically normal range. And, along the blue-yellow
axis, five patients, AK, HR, GZ, RB, and MH, in addition to AS showed
serious color constancy deficits. Patient RM, who showed a clear
deficit along the red-green axis, had reduced color constancy (13%)
along the blue-yellow axis. There was no systematic difference in the
neutral gray adjustments between the patients and the control group,
although the SD of the adjustments was slightly higher in the group of
patients.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Histograms of the color constancy results of 27 patients and 8 control subjects. The ordinate gives the
number of cases as a function of the color constancy indices in percent
for neutral gray settings along both cardinal color directions. An
index value of 0 indicates a setting of the gray rectangle irrespective
of the change in illuminant (no color constancy); an index value of 100 indicates perfect adjustment to the illuminant (absolute color
constancy). For comparison, the black line shows the
distribution of settings for all unimpaired observers, including the
control subjects; significant deviations of >2.28 SD are indicated by
the shaded area. A, Color constancy
indices for neutral gray settings along the red-green axis. The
average of settings in both directions, toward red and toward green, is
plotted. In this task, the five patients, AK, AS, GZ, RM, and GK,
matched the gray value outside the statistically normal range. Patients
HR and GR were just barely within the normal range. B,
Color constancy indices for neutral gray settings along the
blue-yellow axis. The average of settings in both directions along the
blue-yellow axis is plotted. In this task, the six patients, AK, AS,
HR, GZ, RB, and MH, matched the gray value outside the statistically
normal range. The match of patient RM was just barely within the normal
range.
|
|
Figure 5 presents a scatterplot of color
constancy performance along both color axes, replotted from Figure 4.
The dark-shaded area indicates the range in which
the average color constancy was impaired along both axes. For clarity,
slightly negative matches have been set to zero in this plot. It can be
seen that five patients showed combined deficits along both color axes,
AK, AS, HR, GZ, and RM. In addition, patients MH and RB exhibited a
marked deficit along the blue-yellow axis only and showed average
performance along the red-green color axis. In contrast, patient GK
showed a marginal disturbance along the red-green color axis without any defect along the blue-yellow axis.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Scatterplot of the color constancy indices from
Figure 4 along the red-green and blue-yellow color axes. The
shaded area indicates the range of average color
constancy impairment. Slightly negative matches have been set to a
value of zero. The five patients showing color constancy deficits along
both color axes are AK, AS, HR, GZ, and RM. The other patients with
deficits along only one color axis (GK, RB, and MH) showed normal
performance along the other color axis, so that their average
performance fell within the normal range.
|
|
Color discrimination
Functional color discrimination is a necessary but not a
sufficient requirement for color constancy (Morland et al., 1997 ). If
subjects are unable to discriminate lights along a certain direction in
color space, they cannot reliably control for illumination changes
along that axis either. None of our observers were color-deficient, as
determined by conventional tests for color blindness. Nevertheless, they might have acquired, as a result of their lesions, some central deficit in color discrimination that contributed to their color constancy deficits. Before interpreting the data, we had to first rule
out such effects, for to achieve constancy for lights along a
particular direction in color space, it is necessary to be able to
discriminate changes along that direction. We therefore tested color
discrimination along the same color directions that were used in the
color constancy tests and also along the luminance direction
(light-dark). The results of the discrimination experiments for these
three color directions are shown in the histograms of Figure
6. Contrast at threshold along each color
direction is plotted on the x-axis. For light-dark
discrimination (Fig. 6A), the standard luminance
contrast ( Lum/Lum) is plotted. For red-green discrimination (Fig.
6B), we plot the root mean squared contrast of the
two cone classes modulated along this axis, the
long-wavelength-sensitive (L) and middle-wavelength-sensitive (M)
cones. For blue-yellow discrimination (Fig. 6C), the
contrast of the short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones is plotted,
because only S cones are modulated along this axis.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Histograms of the luminance and color
discrimination thresholds for 27 patients and 9 control subjects. In
each histogram, the number of cases is given as a function of the
discrimination threshold, specified as luminance or cone contrast. The
black line corresponds to the distribution of thresholds
for all unimpaired observers, including the control subjects;
significant deviations of >2.28 SD are indicated by the shaded
area. A, Luminance discrimination thresholds for
stimuli differing along the light-dark axis. The discrimination
threshold is given as the standard luminance contrast ( Lum/Lum) in
percent. Patients MS, KB, and GZ had significant deficits for
discriminating darker or lighter stimuli. B, Color
discrimination thresholds for stimuli differing along the red-green
axis. The discrimination threshold is given as root mean squared L and
M cone contrast in percent. Only patient MH showed a small but
significant deficit for discriminating stimuli along this axis.
C, Color discrimination thresholds for stimuli differing
along the blue-yellow axis. The discrimination threshold is given as S
cone contrast in percent. Patients IL and MS had small but significant
deficits for discriminating stimuli differing along this color axis.
Control subject WR had a strong deficit along that color axis, probably
because of an age-related yellowing of the lens.
|
|
Only a few patients exhibited discrimination deficits. Along the
light-dark discrimination axis, patient MS had a serious deficit. She
required a 75% contrast difference for discrimination, compared with
an average difference of 10% contrast. This was not owing to her
visual field defect (hemianopia), because thresholds were similarly
increased when tested in her functioning visual field only.
Furthermore, her thresholds for discrimination along the red-green and
blue-yellow axes were either unelevated or only mildly elevated. Other
than MS, only two patients, KB and GZ, had mild deficits for
light-dark discrimination.
Along the red-green and blue-yellow axes, no serious deficits were
observed. Interestingly, the oldest control subject (WR, age 70 years)
showed an increase in blue-yellow thresholds. This is most likely
attributable to an age-related yellowing of the lens. Patient MH showed
a mild deficit along the red-green axis, whereas patients MS and IL
showed mild deficits along the blue-yellow axis.
We also analyzed the data with respect to the two hemifields. For
patients with visual field defects, thresholds were generally increased
in the nonfunctioning part of the visual field. Because we did not
control fixation and eye movements in this experiment, patients were
usually still able to perform the task. No hemifield asymmetries were
observed for the patients without visual field defects.
In addition to the subjects presented here, we also tested, as a
control, six congenitally color-deficient observers (dichromats), who
have known deficits along the red-green axis. Both deuteranopes (lacking M cone function) and protanopes (lacking L cone function) showed vastly elevated thresholds along the red-green color axis, thus
confirming the sensitivity of our color discrimination test.
Color constancy related to color discrimination
It is interesting to compare performance in the color constancy
and color discrimination tasks, because discriminability along a color
direction is an essential requirement to achieve color constancy.
Figure 7 presents a scatterplot of a
color constancy index versus a discrimination index. The color
constancy index is the average of the color constancy indices along the
red-green and blue-yellow color axes. The discrimination index is the
average of the standardized discrimination thresholds along the
red-green and blue-yellow axes, arbitrarily normalized to a mean of
50 and an SD of 25. There was no correlation between performance in the two tasks ( = 0.166; p > 0.1). The shaded
areas indicate deficits in each one of these two tasks. As
mentioned before, only very few patients showed reliable color
discrimination deficits. Patient MS is the only patient with a strong
deficit, and patients MH and IL had slightly elevated thresholds. Most
notably, the performance of the patients with color constancy deficits
was not impaired in the color discrimination task. Two of the patients
with color constancy deficits, GZ and RM, showed excellent color
discrimination, whereas the three remaining patients showed only
moderately elevated discrimination thresholds.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Scatterplot of the average color constancy index
versus the average color discrimination index. The
x-axis gives the average of the color constancy indices
for the red-green and blue-yellow axes; the y-axis
gives the average normalized (mean = 50; SD = 25)
discrimination thresholds for the red-green and blue-yellow axes (the
lower the index, the better the discrimination). The shaded
area indicates deficits in each one of these two tasks. The
five patients with deficits in color constancy (AK, AS, HR, GZ, and RM)
showed normal color discrimination.
|
|
Color association
The lack of color constancy in these five patients would imply
that for them objects do change in color when the illumination changes,
potentially a serious problem for their vision in an ever-changing
world. However, none of the five patients reported any significant
deficits in everyday life. When we tested our patients in several other
higher-level visuo-cognitive tasks, such as object naming, color
naming, or color-object association, most performed well in the color
and object naming tasks (for exceptions, see Table 2). Because the
control group was able to perform the naming and association tasks
without error, the statistical analysis was not applicable to the
results of these tasks. Outright deficits in color naming occurred with
patients MM, RF, and IL, and marginal deficits occurred with patients
HR and MH. Outright deficits in object naming occurred with patients MM, KB, and IL, and marginal deficits occurred with patients HR, RF,
and EL. Outright deficits in assigning typical colors to objects occurred with patients RF and IL, and marginal deficits occurred with
patients HR and MM. All these patients had left-sided brain lesions.
Because some of the patients with deficits in the above tasks showed
signs of mild aphasia, it is instructive to look at the results of the
color association task. Here, all subjects were >75% correct, and
only subjects MM, RF, MH, KB, and EL were <90% correct. It seems that
the deficits of subjects HR (94% correct in color association) and IL
(91% correct in color association) in the color- and object-naming
tasks are attributable mostly to their aphasic disorders. Subjects MM
and RF showed serious deficits in all tasks, and subject KB had
problems with the object-naming task only.
Anatomical data
For 22 of the 27 patients, we could determine the location and
extent of the lesion, the details of which are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 8 shows the lesion locations of
the five patients with color constancy deficits. Although the lesions
of three of these patients (AK, AS, and HR) were quite extensive and
covered large parts of fronto-parieto-temporal cortex, those of the
other two (GZ and RM) were relatively small. Interestingly, the two patients with small lesions showed excellent color discrimination and
were considerably different from the other three patients in the nature
of their color vision deficits (see Fig. 7). The lesion of patient GZ
is difficult to interpret, but there is some evidence that extensive
damage to nerve fibers in the inner capsule might have occurred. His
lesion will, therefore, not be considered in the subsequent anatomical
evaluation.

View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Axial lesion template reconstructions and tilt
planes of the five patients with color constancy deficits: AK, AS, HR,
GZ, and RM. The chosen tilt plane is indicated above each row. The
templates are shown from the top (left) to the bottom
(right) of the brain. The lesioned brain tissue is
depicted in black. Note that according to current
convention in neuroradiology, the left brain hemisphere is plotted on
the right.
|
|
Figure 9 shows the superimposed lesions
of patients AK, AS, and HR (magenta) and the lesion of RM
(yellow), who all had selective deficits in color
constancy. Because we did not find any evidence for a hemispheric
specificity of color constancy, we mirrored the lesions of patient ASK
to the left hemisphere. The lesion of patient GZ is not shown for the
reasons given above. Also indicated in Figure 9 in red is
the region near the fusiform and lingual gyri (human V4) that is
frequently identified with cerebral achromatopsia in humans (Damasio et
al., 1980 ; Lueck et al., 1989 ; Zeki, 1990 ; Heywood et al., 1995 ). The
lesion of patient RM (yellow) was quite close to that
region, although he had excellent color discrimination. The other three
patients (AK, AS, and HR) had overlapping lesions mainly in
fronto-parieto-temporal cortex. The region of overlap (magenta) included parts of the superior temporal gyrus and
the medial temporal gyrus, which contain higher-order visual
association areas (Brodman area 21). Five of the other 22 patients
without color constancy deficits (MM, RF, WD, GK, and IH) had lesions covering part but not all of this intersection area. Of these 22 patients without color constancy deficits, 3 (MS, KH, and KB) had
lesions completely covering V4, and 2 other patients (MM and MH) had
lesions including at least parts of area V4. Interestingly, MS did have
some color discrimination problems (see Figs. 6, 7), but her most
pronounced deficit was clearly in luminance discrimination (Fig.
6A).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Comparison of the lesion locations (overlap) of
patients AK, AS, and HR (magenta) and RM
(yellow) with the approximate location of lesions
reported to cause achromatopsia (red squares). Sagittal,
axial, and coronal views are shown in a Talairach coordinate frame
(Talairach and Tournoux, 1988 ). The large, green
area indicates the union of the lesions of patients AK, AS, and
HR after lateralizing them all to the left hemisphere;
blue, overlap of the lesions for any two of the
patients; magenta, intersection of the lesions of all
three, centered at Talairach coordinates ±c, E1, and 9 (±50, 7, and
8 mm for the standard Talairach brain). The yellow
region occipitally shows the lesion of patient RM, which was
centered on area V2. The red regions associated with
achromatopsia have been termed the "color center" of the brain
(Lueck et al., 1989 ). Most likely, they correspond to area TEO
in monkeys (Heywood and Cowey, 1998 ).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Deficits of color perception after cortical lesions, with
preservation of primary visual function, are rare and are mainly described after bilateral lesions (for review, see Zeki, 1990 ). In our
clinical study we found that color constancy can be selectively impaired after circumscribed unilateral cortical lesions. Of the 27 patients that we investigated, 5 exhibited significant deficits in a
color constancy task. None of these five showed deficits in color
discrimination, and only one of them (HR) had deficits in another
higher-level visual task, the association of colors with familiar
objects. Therefore it seems likely that, in addition to retinal gain
control mechanisms (von Kries, 1902 ; Pöppel, 1986 ; Foster and
Nascimento, 1994 ), specific cortical circuitry is essential for the
computations necessary to achieve color constancy.
Evaluating color constancy poses some difficult problems. We
deliberately used a task, achromatic matching, that had been widely
used in psychophysics with healthy subjects (Helson and Michels, 1948 ;
Arend, 1993 ; Bäuml, 1994 ; Brainard, 1998 ). The average value of
color constancy that we observed in our normal group fell within the
range of values observed in these other studies, in which values of
40-60% have been reported for surface matches. When observers are
instructed to make "appearance matches," or if adaptation is
insufficient, then much lower values of color constancy (at ~20%)
can be observed (Arend and Reeves, 1986 ; Bäuml, 1994 ). However,
even these values are clearly above the color constancy indices we
observed for the five patients who had deficiencies. Therefore, we are
quite confident that the lack of color constancy for these patients was
not attributable to insufficient adaptation and/or the wrong matching
strategy of the observers (surface vs appearance match).
Partial or "complete" loss of the sensation of color,
achromatopsia, is often reported in humans after (bilateral) damage to
the area of the fusiform and lingual gyri. The exact locus of the
cortical damage producing cerebral achromatopsia remains unknown, but
there is agreement that it is generally localized on the ventro-medial
part of the occipital cortex within the lingual and fusiform
(occipito-temporal) gyri. In all cases reported so far, there is
probably damage to part of Brodman's areas 19, 21, 36, and 37 (for
review, see Critchley, 1965 ; Meadows, 1974 ; Damasio et al., 1980 ;
Dubois-Poulsen, 1982 ). However, the visual deficits occurring in these
patients are not as color-selective as is frequently assumed, because
cerebral achromatopsia is usually associated with severe object and
pattern recognition disorders.
One of our five patients with color constancy deficits, patient RM, had
a lesion that was close to the fusiform and lingual gyri. In this
respect, our study confirms the single case study by Kennard et al.
(1995) reporting color constancy deficits. The color vision deficits of
their subject B.L. were caused by a viral encephalic illness resulting
in macroscopic bilateral infarctions predominantly involving the
fusiform gyrus, parts of the lingual gyrus, and the parahippocampal
gyrus in addition to multiple small lesions. Although the color
perception of this patient recovered slightly over time, his color
discrimination for differences in hue and saturation and his color
naming remained impaired. Color constancy was tested by asking the
patient to name the color of eight test samples at the center of a
Mondrian display, alternately illuminated by white, red, green, and
blue light. In contrast to control subjects, this patient changed the
naming categories of eight test samples with the change of the
illuminant. Eight of the 16 changes in color names were consistent with
the changes in the chromaticity coordinates of the test colors under
the new illuminant. Another seven changes corresponded to an
intermediate chromaticity change, suggesting that a color constancy
deficit might have led to the color-naming problems.
Little is known about the function of other cortical areas with regard
to higher-order tasks such as color constancy. Three of our patients,
who displayed deficits in color constancy, had circumscribed unilateral
lesions located significantly anterior and temporal to the fusiform and
lingual gyri. Although the intersection of their lesions was relatively
large and included nonvisual areas, it also included parts of the
superior temporal gyrus and the medial temporal gyrus, which contain
higher-order visual association areas (Brodman area 21). This is most
likely responsible for their color constancy deficits. Patients with
deficits in color constancy had lesions in the right (AK) or left (AS
and AR) hemisphere. Therefore, our results do not indicate a
hemispheric specificity for color constancy.
None of our 27 patients with unilateral lesions showed a severe loss of
color discriminability, indicating that the intact hemisphere might
enable full color discrimination. Why then is color constancy impaired
after unilateral lesions? The answer may lie in the fact that, to
achieve color constancy, information needs to be integrated over large
regions of the visual field. This might only be possible when both
hemispheres interact (Land et al., 1983 ).
It is remarkable that none of the five patients reported any
significant deficits in everyday life. They did not seem to have any
obvious disadvantage in the higher-level visuo-cognitive tasks we
tested, such as object naming, color naming, or color-object association. Thus, it seems that patients can circumvent their deficits
in their natural environments by using other cues to color constancy
such as color-object associations. In the laboratory paradigm that we
used to measure color constancy, the achromatic matching task, these
cognitive cues are unavailable.
The earliest evidence for a specialized area associated with color in
primate cortex derives from single-cell electrophysiological recordings
in primate monkey. In monkey cortex, cells tuned to wavelength are
found in V1, V2, V3, VP, and V4 as well as in areas of infero-temporal
cortex (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991 ). The postulation of a central
role of monkey area V4 in color processing, and in particular in color
constancy, originates from the electrophysiological recordings made by
Zeki (1973 , 1977 , 1978b ). He argued that many more neurons in area V4
are tuned to color than in any other cortical area. Furthermore, he
claimed that the wavelength tuning of V4 cells is narrower than in
other visual areas and that a substantial proportion of V4 neurons are
sensitive to perceived color (as judged by human observers) rather than
to a fixed band of wavelengths (Zeki, 1980 , 1983a ,b ). He inferred,
therefore, that monkey area V4 is the "color center" of the brain,
being important not only for color discrimination but also for color constancy.
In principle, area V4, with its large receptive fields and long-range
interactions, has all the features necessary to support the
computations underlying color constancy (Schein and Desimone, 1990 ;
Desimone et al., 1993 ). In partial support of this interpretation, Wild
et al. (1985) and Walsh et al. (1992) , who tested color constancy in
monkeys, found mild impairments after lesions to area V4. However, both
of the monkeys in the study by Wild et al. (1985) were inferior in hue
discrimination to control animals, and one of them was also inferior in
a range of other tasks such as shape discrimination. Moreover, in both
of these studies color constancy was evaluated using a color
discrimination task. Monkeys with V4 lesions had an elevated error
score when making color discriminations under different illuminants.
Although this task undoubtedly taps certain adaptation mechanisms that
might be important for color constancy, it gives, at best, a very
indirect measure of color constancy.
The hypothesis of the central role of V4 in color processing has also
been challenged by more recent lesion studies. Heywood et al. (1992)
reported that in macaque monkeys color discrimination was only mildly
affected after bilateral ablation of area V4, whereas their perceptual
abilities to recognize forms were severely impaired. Schiller and Lee
(1991) and Schiller (1993 , 1995 ) found that, in monkeys, lesions of
area V4 seem to affect high-level visual analysis such as object
recognition, visual learning, image segmentation, and recognition of
transformed objects rather than color perception. Unfortunately, the
effect of bilateral V4 lesions on color constancy in monkeys was not
tested by these authors. Deficits of color vision similar to those
reported in human cerebral achromatopsia, however, were observed in
monkeys after ablations in the temporal lobe anterior to area V4
(Heywood et al., 1995 ). This finding is consistent with older reports
of impaired color vision in monkeys after infero-temporal lesions
(Gross et al., 1971 ; Aggleton and Mishkin, 1990 ). Such results suggest
that areas in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) of macaque monkeys,
which are known to have large proportions of color-selective neurons (Zeki, 1977 ; Komatsu et al., 1992 ), are as important, or even more
important, than V4 in determining color appearance. The lesions of our
patients AK, AS, and HR almost certainly contained parts of the STS.
On the basis of human brain-imaging work, a different area has been
argued to be the cortical region primarily responsible for color
perception (Lueck et al., 1989 ). Using positron emission tomography
(PET), Lueck et al. (1989) identified a color-sensitive area near the
human fusiform and lingual gyri. They reported that this region was the
only extrastriate area that consistently showed a significant
(12-14%) increase in activity during the presentation of colored
stimuli but not during the presentation of luminance stimuli. One of
the underlying assumptions of the study by Lueck et al. (1989) , and of
many of the single-cell recordings referred to above, is that color is
being processed independently of luminance (Zeki, 1978a ,b ; Livingstone
and Hubel, 1984 ). Therefore, the cortical areas underlying color
perception should give a large response to colored stimuli and not
respond to luminance stimuli. Based on recent, quantitative single-unit
recording studies, this assumption does not seem tenable anymore
(Lennie et al., 1990 ; Gegenfurtner et al., 1996 , 1997 ; Kiper et al.,
1997 ). Most importantly, with respect to color constancy, it is hard to
imagine that the computations necessary to achieve color constancy
could be executed completely segregated from the same computations
necessary to achieve lightness constancy, because most naturally
occurring illuminant changes include both changes in color and
luminance (Judd et al., 1964 ). We would expect, therefore, that the
regions underlying color constancy should respond equally well to
colored and luminance stimuli. Recent, more sensitive PET and
functional MRI studies have revealed several cortical visual areas the
region near the fusiform and lingual gyri being just one of them with
such properties (Corbetta et al., 1991 ; Gulyas et al., 1994 ;
Kleinschmidt et al., 1996 ; Engel et al., 1997 ; Wandell et al.,
1999 ).
In summary, much controversy exists about all aspects of the human
color pathways beyond the retina. Our data for the first time provide
evidence for a selective impairment of color constancy, which may be
the most important property of color vision involving the cortex,
without any other color vision deficits. They indicate that the
computations necessary to achieve color constancy are mediated by
specialized cortical circuitry, which is independent of the neural
substrate for color discrimination and for assigning colors to objects.
In particular, color constancy may require specific cortical circuitry
other than that underlying the presumed homolog of monkey area V4.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Nov. 30, 1998; revised Feb. 1, 1999; accepted Feb. 3, 1999.
This work was supported by fortüne Program Grant
F.1222104 (Universitätsklinikum Tübingen) and a
Hermann-und-Lilly-Schilling Professur awarded to L.T.S. K.R.G. was
supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Heisenberg Fellowship Ge
879/4-1. We thank Dorothea Welte for help with the analysis of the
anatomical data, Bill Merigan and Heinz Bäuml for valuable
comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and all our subjects
for their patience, interest, and support.
Correspondence should be addressed to Karl R. Gegenfurtner,
Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Dr. Rüttiger's present address: Max-Planck-Institut für
Biophysikalische Chemie, Am Fa berg, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Aggleton JP,
Mishkin M
(1990)
Visual impairments in macaques following inferior temporal lesions are exacerbated selectively by additional damage to superior temporal sulcus.
Behav Brain Res
39:262-274.
-
Arend Jr LE
(1993)
How much does illuminant color affect unattributed colors?
J Opt Soc Am A
10:2134-2147.
-
Arend LE,
Reeves A
(1986)
Simultaneous color constancy.
J Opt Soc Am A
3:1743-1751.
-
Bäuml KH
(1994)
Color appearance: effects of illuminant changes under different surface collections.
J Opt Soc Am A
12:531-542.
-
Brainard DH
(1998)
Color constancy in the nearly natural image. 2. Achromatic loci.
J Opt Soc Am A
15:307-325.
-
Brainard DH,
Wandell BA
(1991)
A bilinear model of the illuminant's effect on color appearance.
In: Computational models of visual processing (Landy MS,
Movshon JA,
eds), pp 171-186. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Brainard DH,
Wandell BA
(1992)
Asymmetric color matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant.
J Opt Soc Am A
9:1433-1448.
-
Bramwell DI,
Cowey A,
Heywood CA,
Kentridge R,
Hurlbert AC
(1997)
Cone ratios, colour constancy, and cerebral achromatopsia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
38:S475.
-
Cohen J
(1964)
Dependency of the spectral reflectance curves of the Munsell color chips.
Psychon Sci
1:369-370.
-
Corbetta M,
Miezin FM,
Dobmeyer S,
Shulman GL,
Petersen SE
(1991)
Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.
J Neurosci
11:2382-2402.
-
Cowey A,
Heywood CA
(1997)
Cerebral achromatopsia.
Trends Cognit Sci
1:133-139.
-
Critchley M
(1965)
Acquired anomalies of colour perception of central origin.
Brain
88:711-724.
-
Damasio A,
Yamada MDT,
Damasio H,
Corbett J,
McKee J
(1980)
Central achromatopsia: behavioral, anatomic, and physiologic aspects.
Neurology
30:1064-1071.
-
D'Zmura M,
Lennie P
(1986)
Mechanisms of color constancy.
J Opt Soc Am A
3:1662-1672.
-
D'Zmura M,
Knoblauch K,
Henaff M-A,
Michel F
(1998)
Dependence of color on context in a case of cortical color vision deficiency.
Vision Res
38:3455-3459.
-
Derrington AM,
Krauskopf J,
Lennie P
(1984)
Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque.
J Physiol (Lond)
357:241-265.
-
Desimone R,
Moran J,
Schein SJ,
Mishkin M
(1993)
A role for the corpus callosum in visual area V4 of the macaque.
Vis Neurosci
10:159-171.
-
Dubois-Poulsen A
(1982)
Colour vision in brain lesions.
Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser
33:420-439.
-
Engel SA,
Zhang X,
Wandell BA
(1997)
Color tuning in human visual cortex measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Nature
388:68-71.
-
Felleman DJ,
Van Essen DC
(1991)
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.
Cereb Cortex
1:1-47.
-
Foster DH,
Nascimento SMC
(1994)
Relational color constancy from invariant cone excitation ratios.
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
257:115-121.
-
Gegenfurtner KR,
Kiper DC,
Fenstemaker SB
(1996)
Processing of color, form and motion in macaque area V2.
Vis Neurosci
13:161-172.
-
Gegenfurtner KR,
Kiper DC,
Levitt J
(1997)
Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3.
J Neurophysiol
77:1906-1923.
-
Green GL,
Lessel S
(1977)
Acquired cerebral dyschromatopsia.
Arch Ophthalmol
95:121-128.
-
Gross CG,
Cowey A,
Manning FJ
(1971)
Further analysis of visual discrimination deficits following foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions in rhesus monkeys.
J Comp Physiol Psychol
76:1-7.
-
Gulyas B,
Heywood CA,
Popplewell DA,
Roland PE,
Cowey A
(1994)
Visual form discrimination from color or motion cues: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:9965-9969.
-
Hadjikani N,
Liu AK,
Dale AM,
Cavanagh P,
Tootell RBH
(1998)
Retinotopy and color sensitivity in human visual cortical area V8.
Nat Neurosci
1:235-241.
-
Helson H,
Michels WC
(1948)
The effect of chromatic adaptation on achromaticity.
J Opt Soc Am A
38:1025-1032.
-
Heywood CA,
Cowey A
(1987)
On the role of cortical visual area V4 in the discrimination of hue and pattern in macaque monkeys.
J Neurosci
7:2601-2616.
-
Heywood CA,
Cowey A
(1998)
With color in mind.
Nat Neurosci
1:171-173.
-
Heywood CA,
Gadotti A,
Cowey A
(1992)
Cortical area V4 and its role in the perception of color.
J Neurosci
12:4056-4065.
-
Heywood CA,
Gaffan D,
Cowey A
(1995)
Cerebral achromatopsia in monkeys.
Eur J Neurosci
7:1064-1073.
-
Hurlbert A
(1996)
Colour vision: putting it in context.
Curr Biol
6:1381-1384.
-
Hurlbert A
(1998)
Computational models of color constancy.
In: Perceptual constancy (Walsh V,
Kulikowski J,
eds), pp 283-322. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
-
Ishihara S
(1962)
In: Tests for colour-blindness, 16 plates ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan.
-
Ives HE
(1912)
The relation between the color of the illuminant and the color of the illuminated object.
Trans Illum Engineer Soc
7:62-72.
-
Judd DB,
MacAdam DL,
Wyszecki G
(1964)
Spectral distribution of typical daylights as a function of correlated color temperature.
J Opt Soc Am A
54:1031-1040.
-
Kennard C,
Lawden M,
Morland AB,
Ruddock KH
(1995)
Colour identification and colour constancy are impaired in a patient with incomplete achromatopsia associated with prestriate cortical lesions.
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
260:169-175.
-
Kiper DC,
Fens
|