 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, 2000, 20:RC81:1-6
RAPID COMMUNICATION
Distinct NMDA Receptor Subpopulations Contribute to
Long-Term Potentiation and Long-Term Depression Induction
Sabina
Hrabetova1,
Peter
Serrano1,
Nancy
Blace1,
Heong W.
Tse2,
Donald A.
Skifter3,
David E.
Jane2,
Daniel T.
Monaghan3, and
Todd Charlton
Sacktor1
1 Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Departments of
Physiology, Pharmacology, and Neurology, State University of New York,
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203, 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Bristol, School
of Medical Sciences, Bristol BS81TD, United Kingdom, and
3 Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198
 |
ABSTRACT |
Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression
(LTD) are persistent modifications of synaptic strength that have been implicated in learning, memory, and neuronal development. Despite their
opposing effects, both forms of plasticity can be triggered by the
activation of NMDA receptors. One mechanism proposed for this
bidirectional response is that the specific patterns of afferent stimulation producing LTP and LTD activate to different degrees a
uniform receptor population. A second possibility is that these patterns activate separate receptor subpopulations composed of different NMDA receptor (NR) subunits. To test this hypothesis we
examined the inhibition of LTP and LTD by a series of competitive NMDA
receptor antagonists that varied in their affinities for NR2A/B and
NR2C/D subunits. The potency for the inhibition of LTP compared
with
inhibition of LTD varied widely among the agents. Antagonists with higher affinity for NR2A/B subunits relative to NRC/D
subunits showed more potent inhibition of LTP than of LTD.
D-3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic
acid, which binds to NR2A/B with very high affinity relative to NR2C/D, showed an ~1000-fold higher potency for LTP than for LTD.
These results show that distinct subpopulations of NMDA receptors
characterized by different NR2 subunits contribute to the induction
mechanisms of potentiation and depression.
Key words:
NMDA; NR2 subunit; long-term potentiation; long-term depression; D-3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic
acid; D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid; (±)-cis-1-(phenanthren-2-yl-carbonyl)piperazine-2,3-dicarboxylic
acid
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the hippocampal CA1 region and
the cerebral cortex, both long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term
depression (LTD) can depend on the activation of NMDA receptors,
because both can be blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonist
D/L-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid
(D/L-AP5) (Collingridge et al., 1983 ; Harris et
al., 1984 ; Dudek and Bear, 1992 ; Mulkey and Malenka, 1992 ; Kirkwood et
al., 1993 ; Christie et al., 1996 ; Cummings et al., 1996 ).
High-frequency stimulation causes strong activation of the ligand- and
voltage-dependent NMDA receptors and a large influx of
Ca2+ into postsynaptic neurons to trigger
potentiation. Low-frequency stimulation results in moderate activation
of NMDA receptors and a moderate influx of
Ca2+, leading to depression. An additional
mechanism participating in this bidirectional response, however, may be
that high- and low-frequency stimulation activate distinct
subpopulations of NMDA receptors (Hrabetova and Sacktor, 1997 ).
NMDA receptors consist of NMDA receptor 1 (NR1) subunits and members of
a family of glutamate-binding NR2 subunits (NR2A-D) (Ikeda et al.,
1992 ; Monyer et al., 1992 ; Ishii et al., 1993 ). Recombinant NMDA
receptors that contain NR1 subunits and subunits NR2A or B require a
strong depolarization to overcome Mg2+
blockade and have high conductances, and those with NR2C or D need only
modest depolarization to overcome Mg2+
blockade and show low conductances (Monyer et al., 1992 , 1994 ). Native
NMDA receptors containing NR2D are estimated to form ~10% of the
NMDA receptor population in the cortex of adult rats (Dunah et al.,
1998 ), and levels of expression of the subunits are higher in juvenile
animals (Dunah et al., 1996 ; Wenzel et al., 1996 ), when LTD can most
efficiently be produced (Dudek and Bear, 1993 ). CA1 pyramidal cells
express mRNA for NR2A, 2B, and 2D in adult humans (Scherzer et al.,
1998 ) and in juvenile rats (Kirson et al., 1999 ). Currents attributable
to NMDA receptors containing NR2D subunits have been observed in
juvenile CA1 pyramidal cells (Kirson et al., 1999 ).
NMDA receptor subpopulations containing these different subunits can be
distinguished by competitive NMDA receptor antagonists with different
affinities to the glutamate-binding site of the various NR2s (Monaghan
et al., 1998 ). Comparisons of LTP and LTD using these antagonists,
however, must take into account the receptor occupancies required for
LTP and LTD induction, which are not known and may not be the same.
LTP, for example, may require the agonist occupation of a high
percentage of receptors for a large increase in postsynaptic
Ca2+, whereas LTD might require occupation
of only a few receptors for a modest rise in
Ca2+ (Lisman, 1989 ; Artola and Singer,
1993 ; Hansel et al., 1997 ; Yang et al., 1999 ). If this were the case,
more receptors would need to be blocked to prevent depression
than potentiation, and all NMDA receptor antagonists would show a
higher IC50 for LTD than for LTP. When comparing
antagonists that vary in their NR2 subunit selectivity, the ratio of
LTD IC50 to LTP IC50 would
be similar for all agents if a single receptor subtype mediated both forms of plasticity but would differ if specific subunits selectively contributed to LTP or LTD.
In this study, we find large differences in the potencies of the
antagonists for inhibition of LTP and LTD, indicating that NMDA
receptors with distinct subunit compositions contribute to the
induction mechanisms of LTP and LTD.
Portions of this paper were published previously in abstract form
(Hrabetova et al., 1998 ).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Immunoblots. Immunoblots of membrane fractions from
rat CA1 regions at different developmental ages were performed as
previously described (Hrabetova and Sacktor, 1996 ). Rabbit antiserum to
NR2A/B (used at 1:1000) was a generous gift from Dr. R. J. Wenthold (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD); rabbit
antiserum to NR2D (1:50) was a generous gift from Dr. B. B. Wolfe
(Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC); rabbit
antisera to NR2C (1:200) was from Chemicon (Temecula, CA). Total
protein per lane was: NR2A/B, 10 µg/lane; 2C, 40 µg/lane for CA1,
50 µg/lane for thalamus, and 30 µg/lane for cerebellum; and 2D, 40 µg/lane.
In situ hybridization. NR2D mRNA was visualized as
previously described (Buller et al., 1994 ). Freshly frozen
Sprague Dawley rat (11-d-old) brains were sectioned (12 µm),
thaw-mounted, and fixed for 5 min in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C.
After ethanol dehydration, a 45 mer
35S-labeled antisense NR2D
(5'-CTCCGAATCCTCGGAGTCCGAAGGCGAAGGCTCGAGGTCCAGGTA-3'), complementary to
sequences encoding amino acids 1067-1081 of the 4 subunit (Ikeda et
al., 1992 ), was dissolved in hybridization buffer (2000 cpm/µl,
~0.2 nM; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) containing 0.2 M dithiothreitol and applied to sections for overnight incubations under Parafilm-sealed coverslips at 42°C and then washed
for 20 min at a final stringency of 1× SSC (0.015 M sodium citrate and 0.15 M NaCl) at 60°C. Sections were air-dried
and exposed to film ( Max; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Probe specificity was confirmed by incubation of the radiolabeled
oligonucleotides with 100 nM unlabeled probe (data not shown).
In vitro transcription and translation in Xenopus
oocytes. RNA translation and transcription in
Xenopus oocytes and electrophysiological recordings were
performed as previously described (Monaghan and Larson, 1997 ). cDNA
encoding the NR1a subunit was a generous gift from Dr. S. Nakanishi
(Kyoto University, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan); NR2A, NR2C, and
NR2D subunits were generous gifts from Dr. P. Seeburg (University of
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany); NR2B was generously provided by Dr.
D. Pritchett and Dr. D. Lynch (University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA). Plasmids were linearized with NotI
(NR1a), EcoRI (NR2A, NR2C, and NR2D), or SalI
(NR2B) and transcribed in vitro using the mMessage mMachine RNA polymerase transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). NR1a was mixed
1:3 with NR2A, NR2B, NR2C, or NR2D RNA, and 2-50 ng of this mixture
was injected into oocytes. Agonist-evoked responses were measured using
a standard two-microelectrode voltage clamp (model OC-725B Oocyte
Clamp; Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) at a holding potential of 60
mV. Glutamate (10 µM) and glycine (10 µM) were applied until stable plateau responses
were obtained;
(±)-cis-1-(phenanthren-2yl-carbonyl)piperazine-2,3-dicarboxylic acid (PPDA) (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, or 30 µM) was then applied until steady-state
blockade was obtained, followed by antagonist washout and full agonist
responses. Current responses were captured and analyzed with AxoData
(Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and GraphPad Prism (ISI Software,
San Diego, CA) software. Ki values were corrected for agonist affinity according to the Cheng-Prusoff equation. Data in Table 1 are expressed
as mean Ki ± SEM.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Ki values for recombinant NMDA
receptors containing NR2 subunits A-D and IC50 values for
LTP and LTD of the NMDA receptor antagonists PPDA, D-AP5,
and D-CPPene
|
|
PPDA was found to have little effect on native non-NMDA glutamate
receptors. Autoradiography, performed as described by Monaghan (1993) ,
showed that at 10 µM, PPDA inhibited 44.6 ± 1.3%
of 100 nM [3H]CNQX binding
to native AMPA receptors and 9.3 ± 6.7% of 25 nM [3H]kainate (n = 3).
Electrophysiology. Transverse hippocampal slices (450 µm)
were prepared as previously described (Hrabetova and Sacktor, 1996 ). Briefly, Sprague Dawley rats (16-21 d) were anesthetized with halothane and decapitated. The hippocampi were dissected, bathed in
cold saline, and sliced with a McIlwain tissue slicer. Slices were
placed in an interface recording chamber and kept for 30 min in a
saline solution containing 125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM
NaH2PO4, 26 mM
NaHCO3, 11 mM glucose, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM
CaCl2, pH 7.4, equilibrated with 95%
O2 and 5% CO2 at 32°C. The slices were then perfused with the saline solution containing 1.2 MgCl2, and 1.7 mM
CaCl2. Test stimuli (100 µsec) were delivered every 15 sec through bipolar tungsten electrodes placed across the
Schaffer collateral-commissural fibers. Field EPSPs were
recorded using glass microelectrodes filled with the saline solution
(resistance, 5-10 M ) and placed in CA1 stratum radiatum. The
current intensity of test stimuli (25-50 µA) was set to produce
half-maximal EPSPs (2-3 mV). The baseline was recorded for at least 10 min to ensure the stability of the response. LTP was induced by a 100 Hz, 1 sec train at a current set to produce 75% of the maximal EPSP response. LTD was induced by 3 Hz stimulation for 5 min at the current
intensity of the test stimulus. Data were collected and analyzed using
Superscope (GW Instrument, Somerville, MA). The slope of the field EPSP
was measured beginning at 10% and ending at 50% of the initial phase
of the EPSP response. PPDA was synthesized by a method that will be
published elsewhere; D-AP5 was obtained from
Tocris Cookson (St. Louis, MO);
D-3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid
(D-CPPene) was a generous gift from Novartis (Berne,
Switzerland). The compounds were added to the bath at least
40 min before the induction of LTP or LTD. Dose-response curves for
the effect of NMDA receptor antagonists on the efficacy of LTP and LTD
were fitted (Mathematica; Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL)
according to the equation E = Emax Emax/[1 + (IC50/A)n], where
E is the efficacy of LTP or LTD in the presence of
antagonist, Emax is the control
efficacy of LTP or LTD in the absence of antagonist, IC50 is the concentration of antagonist half
inhibiting the maximal response, A is the antagonist
concentration, and n is the Hill coefficient.
 |
RESULTS |
To establish the presence of the various NR2 subunits in the CA1
region of the rat hippocampus, we first examined the developmental expression of the subunits by immunoblot. The expression of NR2A/B increased during development from juvenile to adult ages (Fig. 1A). In contrast, NR2D
was maximal at 2 weeks and declined slightly in adulthood (Fig.
1A), a result consistent with other reports of NR2D
protein levels in whole rat brain (Wenzel et al., 1996 ) and
telencephalon (Dunah et al., 1996 ). Low levels of 2C protein were also
found in the CA1 of juvenile animals (Fig. 1A). The expression of the NR2D mRNA was localized to the CA1 pyramidal cell
layer by in situ hybridization (Fig.
1B).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Developmental expression of NR2 subunits in the
CA1 region of the rat hippocampus. A, Immunoblots
showing the developmental time course of NR2A/B, C, and D subunits.
Levels of NR2A/B increase during the first 3 postnatal weeks and are
stable in adulthood. Levels of NR2C can be observed at 2-3 weeks
postnatally. Levels of NR2D are present 1-3 weeks postnatally and then
decline to a lower level in adulthood. The developmental expression of
2C/D correlates well with the efficacy for the induction of LTD (Dudek
and Bear, 1993 ). Expression of 2C is strong in cerebellum
(cbl) and thalamus (th), and
expression of 2D is strong in thalamus (Buller et al., 1994 ; Dunah et
al., 1996 , 1998 ; Wenzel et al., 1996 ). B, In
situ hybridization showing expression of NR2D mRNA in the
pyramidal cell layer of CA1, as well as in CA3 pyramidal and dentate
gyrus (dg) granule cell layers, in 11-d-old rat. High
levels of expression of NR2D mRNA in thalamus and moderate levels in
neocortex can also be observed.
|
|
A series of NMDA receptor antagonists that differ in their binding
affinities for NR2A/B and NR2C/D subunits, PPDA, D-AP-5, and D-CPPene, was then used to examine LTP and LTD
induction (Table 1). LTP was induced by a single train of 100 Hz
lasting 1 sec applied to Schaffer collateral-commissural fibers in the
CA1 region of the hippocampus, and LTD was produced by 3 Hz stimulation
for 5 min (Fig. 2A).
The effect on synaptic transmission was measured as a
change in the initial slope of EPSPs recorded extracellularly in
stratum radiatum. Without antagonists, 30 min after the 100 Hz
stimulation, the synaptic responses were 168.9 ± 7.5% of
baseline (set at 100% ± SEM; Fig. 2A). Thirty
minutes after the 3 Hz stimulation, the synaptic efficacy decreased to
65.5 ± 3.9% of baseline (Fig. 2A). For each
dose of antagonist examined, we demonstrated normal LTP or LTD in
adjacent slices from the same hippocampus in physiological saline, as
controls. Inhibition was determined as the difference in potentiation
or depression at 30 min in the presence and absence of the drug
(n = 4-6 slices for each drug concentration and for paired controls).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Dose responses for LTP and LTD induction of the
NMDA receptor antagonists PPDA, D-AP5, and
D-CPPene. Representative field EPSPs correspond to
numbered points in the time courses (calibration: 1 mV
vertically, 5 msec horizontally). A, LTP (open
circles) is induced by 100 Hz stimulation lasting 1 sec
(arrow). LTD (closed circles) is induced
by 3 Hz stimulation applied for 5 min (short horizontal
bar). B, 0.1 µM PPDA does not
alter LTP or LTD. C, 1 µM PPDA blocks both
LTP and LTD. D, 0.01 µM
D-CPPene does not block the induction of LTP or LTD.
E, 0.1 µM D-CPPene blocks LTP
but has no effect on LTD. F, 200 µM
D-CPPene blocks both LTP and LTD. Field EPSPs are
normalized to baseline set at 100% ± SEM; n = 4-6 for all experiments.
|
|
PPDA is an NMDA receptor antagonist with 3- to 10-fold higher affinity
for recombinant NR2C/D subunits than for NR2A/B subunits (Table 1).
Neither LTP nor LTD was blocked with 0.1 µM PPDA (Figs. 2B, 3A), but both forms of plasticity were
prevented with 1 µM of the agent (Figs.
2C, 3A). The ratio of the LTD
IC50 to the LTP IC50
(LTD/LTP IC50) was ~2 (Fig.
3A, Table 1).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
PPDA, D-AP5, and D-CPPene
have different LTD/LTP IC50 ratios. A, PPDA
shows a similar IC50 for 3 Hz LTD (closed
circles) and 100 Hz LTP (open circles).
B, D-AP5 has a moderately higher
IC50 for LTD than for LTP. C,
D-CPPene shows a ~1000-fold higher IC50 for
LTD than for LTP.
|
|
D-AP5 (Cummings et al., 1996 ), the active isomer of
D/L-AP5, has a modest preference for NR2A/B
over NR2C/D (Table 1). The IC50 of
D-AP5 was 0.014 µM for LTP and 0.45 µM for LTD, a 32-fold difference, thus a 16-fold increase
in LTD/LTP IC50 relative to PPDA (Fig.
3B, Table 1). Previous studies may not have observed the
difference in the effects of D-AP5 on LTP and
LTD, because higher doses of the agent are typically used (Dudek and
Bear, 1992 ; Mulkey and Malenka, 1992 ; Christie et al., 1996 ; Cummings et al., 1996 ).
D-CPPene is an NMDA receptor antagonist with strong binding
to 2A/B but relatively weak affinity to NR2C/D (Table 1). The lowest
concentration of D-CPPene tested, 0.01 µM,
had no effect on either LTP or LTD induction (Figs.
2D, 3C). In contrast, 0.1 µM D-CPPene completely
prevented LTP but did not affect LTD (Figs. 2E,
3C). LTD was partially inhibited with 100 µM, and was completely blocked with 200 µM (Figs. 2F, 3C).
IC50 values were 0.022 µM for LTP and 25 µM
for LTD, a difference of ~1000 and a ~500-fold increase in LTD/LTP
IC50 relative to PPDA (Fig. 3C, Table
1).
The differences in the LTD/LTP IC50
ratios among the antagonists show that the NMDA receptors required for
LTP and LTD are pharmacologically distinct, with receptors containing
NR2C/D subunits critical to LTD. Because these receptors require less
depolarization for activation, they may be activated by the
low-frequency stimulation used to produce LTD, but they
might also be activated by the high-frequency stimulation used to
generate LTP. To examine the effect of the activation of
pharmacologically isolated NR2C/D subunits on synaptic strength during
high-frequency stimulation, slices were incubated with 1 µM D-CPPene, a concentration of the
NR2A/B-selective antagonist that blocked LTP but not LTD. Under these
conditions, 100 Hz stimulation caused a persistent decrease in synaptic
strength (Fig. 4; 85.9 ± 3.1%, 30 min after the tetanus; p < 0.05, Student's paired
t test; n = 8). This depression was blocked
by the higher doses of D-CPPene (100 and 200 µM) that prevented LTD by 3 Hz stimulation (Fig. 3C). Thus both low- and high-frequency stimulation can
activate NR2C/D-containing NMDA receptors,
leading to depression.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
High-frequency, 100 Hz stimulation produces LTD in
the presence of 1 µM D-CPPene (open
diamonds; n = 8), a concentration that
blocks 100 Hz LTP but not 3 Hz LTD. Control LTP in adjacent hippocampal
slices was observed in drug-free saline (open
circles).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our results show that LTP and LTD are mediated by two
pharmacologically distinct NMDA receptor subpopulations. The activation of conventional NR2A/B-containing NMDA receptors, which
require high-frequency stimulation to overcome their high degree of
Mg2+ block, contribute to LTP, whereas
NR2C/D-containing NMDA receptors, which require relatively low
levels of depolarization to overcome their
Mg2+ block (Monyer et al., 1992 , 1994 ),
contribute to LTD. Our results are consistent with earlier observations
that the NMDA receptor antagonists
(5R,10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10-11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine (MK801) and
3-((R,S)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP), both of which have a preference for NR2A/B over NR2C/D subunits (Beaton et al., 1992 ; Buller et al., 1994 ), effectively block
LTP (Abraham and Mason, 1988 ; Mayford et al., 1995 ) but do not
generally block LTD (Mayford et al., 1995 ; Hrabetova and Sacktor, 1997 )
(although see Heynen et al., 1996 ). Because the stoichiometry of
subunits in native NMDA receptors is not yet known, different ratios of
the NR2 subunits may determine the distinct receptor subpopulations
contributing to potentiation and depression.
The differences in LTD/LTP IC50 values among the
series of agents was large. For D-CPPene, the magnitude of
the difference in LTD and LTP IC50 values was
greater than that of the difference in affinities for the recombinantly
expressed receptors (Table 1). This is likely because of a stronger
ability of the agent to distinguish subunits in their native states
compared with subunits that are expressed recombinantly. For example,
the binding of D-CPPene to low-affinity sites in the
cerebellum, attributable to native NR2C-containing receptors, has a
Ki of 14.3 ± 3.6 µM (Buller et al., 1994 ), whereas its binding
to high-affinity native sites, attributable to NR2A-containing
receptors, has a Ki of 0.25 ± 0.06 µM. PPDA has a
Ki of 0.39 µM
to these native 2C receptors and 7.2 µM to the
native 2A receptors (D. T. Monaghan, unpublished observations).
This would result in a 1057-fold difference between D-CPPene and PPDA in the ability to distinguish
these native receptors ([KiD-CPPene2C/KiD-CPPene2A]/[KiPPDA2C/KiPPDA2A]),
comparable with the 575-fold difference in LTD/LTP
IC50 values observed for the two agents. These
differences between native and recombinant receptors, likely to arise
from subunit composition and post-translational modifications (Grimwood
et al., 1993 ), may also contribute to the differences in the absolute values between the Ki values for the
recombinant receptors and the IC50 values of LTD
and LTP.
Although D-CPPene showed orders of magnitude difference in
LTD and LTP potencies, PPDA, the antagonist with the strongest preference for NRC/D subunits tested, still showed a twofold higher IC50 for LTD than for LTP. The absolute
IC50 values, however, may be determined, in part,
by differences in the occupancy of receptor subpopulations required for
LTP and LTD induction, such that a higher percentage of
NR2C/D-containing receptors must be blocked to prevent LTD,
and a lower percentage of NR2A/B-containing receptors must be blocked
to prevent LTP.
The contribution of NR2C/D-containing receptors to synaptic
depression was observed with both low-frequency afferent stimulation and high-frequency stimulation in which LTP was prevented
by the NR2A/B-selective antagonist D-CPPene (Fig. 4). A
nearly identical result has been reported for adult rats injected
with moderate doses of CPP, in which prime-burst, high-frequency
stimulation used to induce in vivo hippocampal LTP was found
to produce in vivo LTD (Kentros et al., 1998 ). A similar
result was also obtained in slices bathed in a moderate dose of
D-AP5, in which tetanic stimulation that normally
produces LTP was found to produce LTD (Cummings et al., 1996 ). These
results are consistent with the interpretation that low-frequency
stimulation initiates the molecular mechanisms only for depression,
whereas high-frequency stimulation activates the mechanisms of both
potentiation and depression, but the former masks or outweighs the latter.
Our results show that the molecular mechanisms of potentiation and
depression diverge at the very beginning of postsynaptic signal
transduction through distinct NMDA subpopulations. Differences in
conductances and the duration of opening between two receptor populations may contribute to the regulation of postsynaptic
Ca2+ influx in the induction of LTP and
LTD (Lisman, 1989 ; Artola and Singer, 1993 ; Malenka, 1994 ; Hansel et
al., 1997 ). The relatively low conductance for cations and the long
duration of opening of the 2D channel (Monyer et al., 1994 ), for
example, may permit the modest but prolonged
Ca2+ influx that has been reported to be
required to trigger the induction of LTD (Yang et al., 1999 ). Our
results do not indicate the mechanism by which distinct NMDA
subpopulations produce particular signal transduction pathways, leading
ultimately to persistent strengthening or weakening of synaptic
efficacy. Two hypotheses offer equally plausible mechanisms.
Ca2+ signals produced by the different
receptor populations may result in different biochemical
pathways based only on their concentration and time course.
Alternatively, these signals may have unique spatiotemporal properties
and preferential access to particular downstream signaling molecules.
NR2C and 2D, for example, possess a proline-rich intracellular
C-terminal domain (Ikeda et al., 1992 ; Ishii et al., 1993 ), which, in
the case of 2D, allows for the selective association with the Src
homology 3 domain of c-ABL kinase (D. Monaghan, personal
communication). By dividing the functions of the NMDA receptor
into two distinct receptor subpopulations, LTP and LTD induction can be
independently regulated, increasing the flexibility of the
bidirectional regulation of synaptic strength.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Feb. 7, 2000; revised March 29, 2000; accepted April 11, 2000.
This research was supported by Grants RO1 57068 and R29/RO1 53576 from
the National Institute of Mental Health (T.C.S.) and Grant 17-94-C-4050
from the US Army Medical Research Division (D.T.M.). We thank Dr. Jan
Hrabe for statistical analysis and Dr. Feng Bihua for assistance with
autoradiograms. We thank Drs. Peter Bergold, Stanley Friedman, Robert
Muller, Wayne Sossin, Keith Williams, and Robert K. S. Wong for
discussion and comments.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Todd C. Sacktor, Laboratory
of Molecular Neuroscience, Box 29, Departments of Physiology, Pharmacology, and Neurology, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203. E-mail: TSACKTOR{at}netmail.hscbkyn.edu.
Dr. Hrabetova's present address: Department of Physiology and
Neuroscience, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New
York, NY 10016.
This article is published in
The Journal of Neuroscience, Rapid Communications Section,
which publishes brief, peer-reviewed papers online, not in print. Rapid
Communications are posted online approximately one month earlier than
they would appear if printed. They are listed in the Table of Contents
of the next open issue of JNeurosci. Cite this article as:
JNeurosci, 2000, 20:RC81 (1-6). The
publication date is the date of posting online at
www.jneurosci.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Abraham WC,
Mason SE
(1988)
Effects of the NMDA receptor/channel antagonists CPP and MK801 on hippocampal field potentials and long-term potentiation in anesthetized rats.
Brain Res
462:40-46.
-
Artola A,
Singer W
(1993)
Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission and its relationship to long-term potentiation.
Trends Neurosci
16:480-487.
-
Beaton JA,
Stemsrud K,
Monaghan DT
(1992)
Identification of a novel N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor population in the rat medial thalamus.
J Neurochem
59:754-757.
-
Buller AL,
Monaghan DT
(1997)
Pharmacological heterogeneity of NMDA receptors: characterization of NR1a/NR2D heteromers expressed in Xenopus oocytes.
Eur J Pharmacol
320:87-94.
-
Buller A,
Larson H,
Schneider B,
Beaton J,
Morrisett R,
Monaghan D
(1994)
The molecular basis of NMDA receptor subtypes: native receptor diversity is predicted by subunit composition.
J Neurosci
14:5471-5484.
-
Christie BR,
Magee JC,
Johnston D
(1996)
The role of dendritic action potentials and Ca2+ influx in the induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.
Learn Mem
3:160-169.
-
Collingridge GL,
Kehl SJ,
McLennan H
(1983)
Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral-commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus.
J Physiol (Lond)
334:34-46.
-
Cummings JA,
Mulkey RM,
Nicoll RA,
Malenka RC
(1996)
Ca2+ signaling requirements for long-term depression in the hippocampus.
Neuron
16:825-833.
-
Dudek SM,
Bear MF
(1992)
Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:4363-4367.
-
Dudek SM,
Bear MF
(1993)
Bidirectional long-term modification of synaptic effectiveness in the adult and immature hippocampus.
J Neurosci
13:2910-2918.
-
Dunah AW,
Yasuda RP,
Wang YH,
Luo J,
Davila-Garcia M,
Gbadegesin M,
Vicini S,
Wolfe BB
(1996)
Regional and ontogenic expression of the NMDA receptor subunit NR2D protein in rat brain using a subunit-specific antibody.
J Neurochem
67:2335-2345.
-
Dunah AW,
Luo J,
Wang YH,
Yasuda RP,
Wolfe BB
(1998)
Subunit composition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the central nervous system that contain the NR2D subunit.
Mol Pharmacol
53:429-437.
-
Grimwood S,
Wilde GJC,
Foster AC
(1993)
Interactions between the glutamate and glycine recognition sites of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor from rat brain, as revealed from radioligand binding studies.
J Neurochem
60:1729-1738.
-
Hansel C,
Artola A,
Singer W
(1997)
Relation between dendritic Ca2+ levels and the polarity of synaptic long-term modifications in rat visual cortex neurons.
Eur J Neurosci
9:2309-2322.
-
Harris EW,
Ganong AH,
Cotman CW
(1984)
Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus involves activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.
Brain Res
323:132-137.
-
Heynen AJ,
Abraham WC,
Bear MF
(1996)
Bidirectional modifications of CA1 synapses in the adult hippocampus in vivo.
Nature
381:163-166.
-
Hrabetova S,
Sacktor TC
(1996)
Bidirectional regulation of protein kinase M
in the maintenance of long-term potentiation and long-term depression.
J Neurosci
16:5324-5333. -
Hrabetova S,
Sacktor TC
(1997)
Long-term potentiation and long-term depression are induced through pharmacologically distinct NMDA receptors.
Neurosci Lett
226:107-110.
-
Hrabetova S,
Monaghan D,
Sacktor TC
(1998)
LTP and LTD are induced through two distinct NMDA-receptor subpopulations.
Eur J Neurosci
10[Suppl 10]:26.
-
Ikeda K,
Nagasawa M,
Mori H,
Araki K,
Sakimura K,
Watanabe M,
Inoue Y,
Mishina M
(1992)
Cloning and expression of the epsilon 4 subunit of the NMDA receptor channel.
FEBS Lett
313:34-38.
-
Ishii T,
Moriyoshi K,
Sugihara H,
Sakurada K,
Kadotani H,
Yokoi M,
Akazawa C,
Shigemoto R,
Mizuno N,
Masu M,
Nakanishi S
(1993)
Molecular characterization of the family of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits.
J Biol Chem
268:2836-2843.
-
Kentros C,
Hargreaves E,
Hawkins RD,
Kandel ER,
Shapiro M,
Muller RV
(1998)
Abolition of long-term stability of new hippocampal place cell maps by NMDA receptor blockade.
Science
280:2121-2126.
-
Kirkwood A,
Dudek SM,
Gold JT,
Aizenman CD,
Bear MF
(1993)
Common forms of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and neocortex in vitro.
Science
260:1518-1521.
-
Kirson ED,
Schirra C,
Konnerth A,
Yaari Y
(1999)
Early postnatal switch in magnesium sensitivity of NMDA receptors in rat CA1 pyramidal cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
521:99-111.
-
Lisman J
(1989)
A mechanism for the Hebb and the non-Hebb processes underlying learning and memory.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
86:9574-9578.
-
Malenka RC
(1994)
Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus: LTP and LTD.
Cell
78:535-538.
-
Mayford M,
Wang J,
Kandel E,
O'Dell T
(1995)
CaMKII regulates the frequency-response function of hippocampal synapses for the production of both LTD and LTP.
Cell
81:891-904.
-
Monyer H,
Sprengel R,
Schoepfer R,
Herb A,
Higuchi M,
Lomeli H,
Burnashev N,
Sakmann B,
Seeburg P
(1992)
Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes.
Science
256:1217-1221.
-
Monyer H,
Burnashev N,
Laurie D,
Sakmann B,
Seeburg P
(1994)
Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors.
Neuron
12:529-540.
-
Monaghan DT
(1993)
Autoradiographic analysis of excitatory amino acid receptors.
In: Receptor autoradiography: principles and practice (Wharton J,
Polak JM,
eds), pp 171-193. New York: Oxford UP.
-
Monaghan DT,
Larson H
(1997)
NR1 and NR2 subunit contributions to NMDA receptor channel blocker pharmacology.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
280:614-620.
-
Monaghan DT,
Andalora VJ,
Skifter D
(1998)
Molecular determinants of NMDA receptor pharmacological diversity.
Prog Brain Res
116:158-177.
-
Mulkey RM,
Malenka RC
(1992)
Mechanisms underlying induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of the hippocampus.
Neuron
9:967-975.
-
Scherzer CR,
Landwehrmeyer GB,
Kerner JA,
Counihan TJ,
Kosinski CM,
Standaert DG,
Daggett LP,
Velicelebi G,
Penney JB,
Young AB
(1998)
Expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit mRNAs in the human brain: hippocampus and cortex.
J Comp Neurol
390:75-90.
-
Wenzel A,
Villa M,
Mohler H,
Benke D
(1996)
Developmental and regional expression of NMDA receptor subtypes containing the NR2D subunit in rat brain.
J Neurochem
66:1240-1248.
-
Yang SN,
Tang YG,
Zucker RS
(1999)
Selective induction of LTP and LTD by postsynaptic [Ca2+]i elevation.
J Neurophysiol
81:781-787.
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kimura and N. Matsuki
Protein kinase CK2 modulates synaptic plasticity by modification of synaptic NMDA receptors in the hippocampus
J. Physiol.,
July 1, 2008;
586(13):
3195 - 3206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. C. Brothwell, J. L. Barber, D. T. Monaghan, D. E. Jane, A. J. Gibb, and S. Jones
NR2B- and NR2D-containing synaptic NMDA receptors in developing rat substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurones
J. Physiol.,
February 1, 2008;
586(3):
739 - 750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Logan, J. G. Partridge, J. A. Matta, A. Buonanno, and S. Vicini
Long-Lasting NMDA Receptor-Mediated EPSCs in Mouse Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2007;
98(5):
2693 - 2704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. de Armentia and P. Sah
Bidirectional synaptic plasticity at nociceptive afferents in the rat central amygdala
J. Physiol.,
June 15, 2007;
581(3):
961 - 970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Qian and J. W. Johnson
Permeant Ion Effects on External Mg2+ Block of NR1/2D NMDA Receptors.
J. Neurosci.,
October 18, 2006;
26(42):
10899 - 10910.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sajikumar, S. Navakkode, T. C. Sacktor, and J. U. Frey
Synaptic Tagging and Cross-Tagging: The Role of Protein Kinase M{zeta} in Maintaining Long-Term Potentiation But Not Long-Term Depression
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2005;
25(24):
5750 - 5756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Erreger, S. M Dravid, T. G Banke, D. J. A Wyllie, and S. F Traynelis
Subunit-specific gating controls rat NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B NMDA channel kinetics and synaptic signalling profiles
J. Physiol.,
March 1, 2005;
563(2):
345 - 358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Qian, A. L. Buller, and J. W. Johnson
NR2 subunit-dependence of NMDA receptor channel block by external Mg2+
J. Physiol.,
January 15, 2005;
562(2):
319 - 331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Hendricson, J. R. Sibbald, and R. A. Morrisett
Ethanol Alters the Frequency, Amplitude, and Decay Kinetics of Sr2+-Supported, Asynchronous NMDAR mEPSCs in Rat Hippocampal Slices
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2004;
91(6):
2568 - 2577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|