 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1, 2000, 20(17):6540-6550
Netrin-G1: a Novel Glycosyl Phosphatidylinositol-Linked Mammalian
Netrin That Is Functionally Divergent from Classical Netrins
Toshiaki
Nakashiba1, 2,
Toshio
Ikeda1,
Sachiko
Nishimura1, 2,
Kei
Tashiro3,
Tasuku
Honjo4,
Joseph G.
Culotti5, and
Shigeyoshi
Itohara1
1 Laboratory for Behavioral Genetics, Brain Science
Institute, RIKEN, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
2 Institute for Virus Research, 3 Center for
Molecular Biology and Genetics, 4 Department of Medical
Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
606-8507, Japan, and 5 Samuel Lunenfeld Research
Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
UNC-6/netrins compose a small phylogenetically conserved family of
proteins that act as axon guidance cues. With a signal sequence trap
method, we isolated a cDNA encoding a novel member of the UNC-6/netrin
family, which we named netrin-G1. Unlike classical netrins, netrin-G1
consists of at least six isoforms of which five were predominantly
anchored to the plasma membrane via glycosyl phosphatidyl-inositol
linkages. Netrin-G1 transcripts were first detected in midbrain and
hindbrain regions by embryonic day 12 and reached highest levels at
perinatal stages in various brain regions, including olfactory bulb
mitral cells, thalamus, and deep cerebellar nuclei. Its expression was
primarily restricted to the CNS. Interestingly, netrin-G1
proteins did not show appreciable affinity to any netrin receptor
examined. Unlike netrin-1, a secreted form of netrin-G1 consistently
failed to attract circumferentially growing axons from the cerebellar
plate. Our findings suggest that netrin-G1 and its putative receptors
have coevolved independently from the classical netrins. The expression
pattern of netrin-G1 and its predicted neuronal membrane localization
suggest it may also have novel signaling functions in nervous system development.
Key words:
netrin; GPI-linkage; glycosyl phosphatidylinositol; axon
guidance; receptor; signal sequence trap; UNC-6; mouse; isoform; alternative splicing; CNS
 |
INTRODUCTION |
During development of the nervous
system, growing axons are appropriately guided to their correct targets
to form the precise wiring of intricate circuits. The molecular
mechanisms of axon guidance are being deciphered by the identification
of several gene families encoding cues for guiding axonal growth cone
and cell migrations. These genes include members of the immunoglobulin superfamily, ephrins, semaphorins, slits, and netrins (Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996 ; Chisholm and Tessier-Lavigne, 1999 ). Some of these
proteins clearly function as contact-mediated short-range attractive or
repulsive guidance cues, whereas others are diffusible and act over
long distances to guide axons toward or away from the sites of their synthesis.
Netrin-1 and -2 are chemoattractive factors first identified by
biochemical purification of molecules that have commissural axon
outgrowth-promoting activity (Kennedy et al., 1994 ; Serafini et al.,
1994 ). UNC-6 is the ortholog of netrins in Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates, netrins play a role in both attracting alar plate axons along the entire rostrocaudal axis toward the ventral
midline or floor plate (Kennedy et al., 1994 ; Shirasaki et al., 1996 )
and repelling trochlear motor axons away from the midline (Colamarino
and Tessier-Lavigne, 1995 ). Genetic analysis in C. elegans
and single cell analysis in Xenopus spinal neurons reached
the conclusion that these dual (attractive and repulsive) effects are
transduced by a single ligand via two distinct receptor subfamilies
that belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily (de la Torre et
al., 1997 ; Hong et al., 1999 ). Attractive effects are transduced via
receptors of the DCC (Deleted in colorectal cancer) subfamily to which
UNC-40 of C. elegans, the Frazzled protein of
Drosophila, and DCC and neogenin of vertebrates belong (Chan
et al., 1996 ; Keino-Masu et al., 1996 ; Kolodziej et al., 1996 ; de la
Torre et al., 1997 ). In contrast, some of the repulsive effects of
netrins require a member of the UNC-5 family in addition to a member of
the UNC-40/DCC family (Hedgecock et al., 1990 ; Hong et al., 1999 ). In
mammals, three UNC-5 receptor family members, UNC5H1, UNC5H2, and
UNC5H3/RCM (rostral cerebellar malformation), have been isolated
(Ackerman et al., 1997 ; Leonardo et al., 1997a ). All members of both
receptor subfamilies bind to netrins.
It has been thought that netrins and UNC-6 constitute a
phylogenetically conserved small protein family (Chisholm and
Tessier-Lavigne, 1999 ). Unlike other axon guidance molecules, i.e.,
semaphorins (Dodd and Schuchardt, 1995 ) and ephrins (Flanagan and
Vanderhaeghen, 1998 ), at most two closely related members of
UNC-6/netrin family have been isolated in each species examined to
date. The high degree of divergence among semaphorins and ephrins might
reflect their contributions to the formation of the complex and highly organized neuronal networks in vertebrates. Thus, it would be interesting to determine how extensively the UNC-6/netrin family has
diverged during evolution.
Here we describe the identification and characterization of a
novel member of the UNC-6/netrin family in mice, namely netrin-G1. Unlike classical netrins, netrin-G1 is predominantly linked to the
plasma membrane by a glycosyl phospatidylinositol (GPI) lipid anchor
and has a large number of isoforms probably generated by alternative
splicing. Moreover, netrin-G1 neither binds receptors for classical
netrins nor shows functional redundancy with netrin-1 in in
vitro assays for axon guidance. The data suggest that netrin-G1 was elaborated in vertebrates. Its unique expression pattern and its
predicted ability to act locally suggest that netrin-G1 plays a role in
nervous system development that differs in detail from the classical netrins.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Signal sequence trap and full-length cDNA cloning.
The day of birth was considered as postnatal day 0 (P0). Total RNA from P21 mouse cerebellum was extracted by the guanidinium thiocyanate method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987 ).
Poly(A+) RNA was selected with the
QuickPrep mRNA Purification kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala,
Sweden). The cDNA library was synthesized from 3 µg of
poly(A+) RNA according to Yabe et al.
(1997) . In brief, first-strand cDNA was primed with 40 pmol of
XhoI unidirectional primer:
5'-GAGACGGTAATACGATCGACAG-TAGCTCGAGNNNNNNNNN-3'. After
deoxy-adenosine tailing, second-strand cDNA was synthesized with
10 pmol of EcoRI-linker primer:
5'-CCGC-GAATTCTGACTAACTGATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTNN-3'. The double-stranded cDNA was size-fractionated (300-800 bp) by agarose
gel electrophoresis and amplified by PCR with external primers:
5'-GACGGT-AATACGATCGACAGTAGC-3' and 5'-CCGCGAATTCTGACTAAC- TGATT-3'. PCR products were digested with EcoRI and
XhoI, size-fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis
again, and ligated unidirectionally to EcoRI and
XhoI sites of pSuc2t7F1ori vector (Yabe et al., 1997 ). In
this vector, cDNA was inserted upstream of the invertase gene lacking
its signal sequence and downstream of the yeast ADH1 promoter for
efficient expression.
For screening of cDNA containing the signal sequence, this library was
introduced into the invertase-deficient yeast strain YT455
(Suc2D9, ade2-101, ura3-52) (Jacobs
et al., 1997 ), which does not normally grow on raffinose. Transformants
capable of secreting invertase, because of its fusion with the signal
encoding sequences derived from the netrin-G1 cDNA, could
grow on these plates. Inserted cDNAs were amplified with a set of
primers, 5'-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCCAAGCATACAAT- CAACTCCAAGCTC-3' and
5'-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTACTCC- TCTGAAATTAATACGACTCAC-3', and the
amplified DNAs were spotted to nylon membranes in duplicate. These
membranes were hybridized with 32P-labeled
cDNA directly synthesized from mRNA samples of either P0 or P21 mouse
cerebellum. The sequences of clones that showed differential
hybridization signals were determined by automated sequencer (ABI Prism
377; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using the BigDye Primer Cycle
Sequencing method (Applied Biosystems).
To obtain full-length cDNA clones, 2.5 × 106 phage plaques of P0 and adult mouse
brain cDNA libraries (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were screened with the
32P-labeled 7D5 cDNA fragment that was
isolated by the signal sequence trap method. Inserts of phages were
excised in vivo following the instructions of the manufacturer.
Northern blot hybridization. An adult mouse tissue Northern
blot was purchased from Clontech (Cambridge, UK).
Poly(A+) RNA of P0 and P21 mouse
cerebellum was extracted as mentioned above. Two micrograms of
poly(A+) RNA was electrophoresed through
1% agarose gel and transferred to Hybond N filters. These filters were
hybridized with 32P-labeled cDNA probes of
the clone 7D5. The filters were washed for 30 min at 65°C twice with
2× SSC and 0.1% SDS and then twice with 0.2× SSC and 0.1% SDS.
Membranes were analyzed using an image analyzer (BAS 5000; Fuji Film,
Tokyo, Japan).
Reverse transcription-PCR analysis. Total RNA from various
mouse brain regions was extracted as above. For reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, 5 µg of DNase I-treated total RNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), and 1:50 volume (100 ng of total RNA) of reaction mixture was subjected to
PCR amplification. To confirm isoform varieties, a primer set of
5'-CCTGTATCCCCAGCATTTCC-3' and 5'-AGCAGCAGTGCTGGGGAGCC-3' was used.
These primers corresponded to nucleotide sequences of LE1 (+1058 to
+1077 nt of netrin-G1a) and domain C' (+1558 to +1577 nt of
netrin-G1a), respectively, resulting in amplification
of isoforms netrin-G1a to netrin-G1e. Reaction
conditions were 96°C for 3 min, then 33 cycles of 96°C for 1 min,
60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and finally 72°C for 7 min.
The isoform specificity of amplified fragments was confirmed by
Southern hybridization using isoform-specific probes. For
netrin-G1a and netrin-G1b, the nucleotide
sequence corresponding to LE2 and 3 (+1087 to +1389 nt of
netrin-G1a) was used as a probe. For netrin-G1d
and netrin-G1e, the fragment containing coding sequence for
the 42 amino acid (aa) insert of netrin-G1d (+1087 to +1212
nt of netrin-G1d) was used. For netrin-G1c, the
internal sequence corresponding to domain C' (+1390 to +1531 nt of
netrin-G1a) was used.
Construction of mammalian expression vectors. Entire coding
sequences of netrin-G1a and netrin-G1d
were ligated into pcDNA4Myc/HisA (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) at
EcoRI and PmeI sites, resulting in synthesis of
intact proteins. The resulting constructs were used for the experiments
of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) treatment.
To maximize extracellular secretion of netrin-G1a, netrin-G1b,
netrin-G1d, and netrin-G1e on mammalian cell lines, coding sequences of
these isoforms, except for their C-terminal sequences, were also
subcloned into pcDNA4Myc/HisA (Invitrogen). In brief, the sequences for
the C-terminal 26 hydrophobic amino acids of netrin-G1 was replaced
with a spacer sequence containing an ApaI site and ligated
into EcoRI/ApaI sites, resulting in C-terminal fusion to Myc/His-tag sequences.
cDNAs of netrin receptors were kind gifts from Dr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne
(University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA)
(Unc5h1, Unc5h2, and DCC;
pCEP4-DCC) and Dr. Susan Ackermann (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor,
ME) (Unc5h3/rcm). cDNA of chicken netrin-1
(pGNet1myc) was also a gift from Dr. Marc
Tessier-Lavigne. Coding sequences for cytoplasmic domains of UNC5H1,
UNC5H2, and UNC5H3/RCM were replaced with enhanced cyan fluorescent
variant of the Aeguorea victoria green fluorescent protein
(ECFP) coding sequences in frame, resulting in fusion proteins
that were composed of extracellular and transmembrane domains from
receptors and cytoplasmic ECFP. To construct expression vectors, 1.7 kb
NaeI fragment of Unc5h1 cDNA, 1.7 kb
Eco47III/SmaI fragment of Unc5h2, and
2.2 kb EcoRI/BalI fragment of
Unc5h3/rcm were subcloned into the SmaI site of
pECFP (Clontech).
PI-PLC treatment and Western blot analysis. HEK293T cells
were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). The cells were seeded at the concentration of
~4 × 106 cells per 10 cm tissue
culture dish. After 24 hr, cells at 80% confluence were transfected
with 20 µg of the expression vectors (without epitope fusion) using
the CellPhect transfection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After 40 hr, transfected cells were incubated in 8 ml of OptiMEM I (Life
Technologies) for 2 hr at 37°C with or without 100 mU/ml PI-PLC
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The culture media (1.5 ml) from PI-PLC-treated
and nontreated cultures were clarified by centrifugation at 2000 × g for 10 min and then at 60,000 × g for
100 min. These supernatants were TCA-precipitated, and pellets were
dissolved with SDS sample buffer. Cells cultured without PI-PLC were
lysed with 750 µl of modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% cholate, 0.1%
SDS, and 20 mM EDTA). These samples were
fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to polyvinyl
difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Recombinant netrin-G1 was
detected with the affinity-purified rabbit anti-netrin-G1 antibody and HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Zymed, San Francisco, CA) as a secondary antibody and visualized using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Antibody preparation. The sequences corresponding to the
domain VI of netrin-G1a (aa 44-259) was cloned into the pGEX-2T
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and fused to glutathione
S-transferase gene. The fusion protein was expressed
in Escherichia coli by the
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside induction
and purified with a glutathione column. Rabbits were immunized several
times with the purified antigens together with Freund's complete and
incomplete adjuvants. Antisera were affinity-purified against the
(His)6-tagged domain VI proteins (aa 66-116). To synthesize the
(His)6-tagged domain VI proteins, the corresponding sequences were
cloned into pET-32a (Novagen, Madison, WI). The fusion protein expressed in E. coli was purified with an Ni-NTA column
(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and coupled to HiTrap NHS-activated affinity columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
In situ hybridization. To make netrin-G1 probes, signal
sequence-trapped cDNA sequences of the 7D5 clone were transferred into
EcoRI and XhoI sites of pSP72 (Promega).
Antisense and sense riboprobes were labeled with digoxigenin-dUTP from
linearized templates using SP6 and T7 RNA polymerases (Boehringer
Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), respectively. In situ
hybridization of whole-mount and frozen sections of mouse brain was
performed according to the procedures described previously (Wilkinson
et al., 1987 ; Conlon and Rossant, 1992 ; Suzuki et al., 1997 ). Vibratome
slices (300-µm-thick) were stained as whole-mount samples. Frozen
sections were made at 20 µm thickness. Hybridization signals were
detected with anti-digoxigenin Fab fragment (Boehringer Mannheim) and
BM purple.
Receptor binding experiments. The recombinant proteins of
myc-tagged netrin-1 and myc-tagged soluble form of netrin-G1a,
netrin-G1c, netrin-G1d, and netrin-G1e were recovered as conditioned
media from stable transformants cultured for several days. Quality and quantity of fusion proteins in the conditioned media were determined by
Western blot analysis using anti-myc antibody (9E10) and HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Relative concentrations of fusion proteins were measured by an image analyzer (LAS100; Fuji). The minimum concentration of netrin-1 to bind to receptors in the experimental conditions was
determined by serial dilution of the conditioned media. For concentrating soluble forms of netrin-G1a, netrin-G1c, netrin-G1d, and
netrin-G1e, Centriprep-30 concentrator (Amicon, Beverly, MA) was used.
This treatment did not cause aggregation of secreted netrin-G1.
Expression vectors for the UNC5 family were transfected into COS7
cells, and pCEP4-DCC was transfected into HEK293EBNA cells (Invitrogen). At 48 hr after transfection, myc-tagged recombinant proteins were added to culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 20 µg/ml heparin (Sigma) and incubated for 90 min at room temperature.
After washing with PBS one or four times, cells were fixed with MeOH
for 5 min, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. In the
case of the UNC5 family, binding of the recombinant proteins was
detected using monoclonal anti-myc antibody (9E10) and Alexa
546-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Cell
surface expression of receptors on transfected cells were visualized by
ECFP fluorescence. In the case of DCC, double staining was performed
using monoclonal anti-DCC antibody (Oncogene Science, Uniondale, NY)
and affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal anti-myc antibody. The binding
of these primary antibodies was visualized by Alexa 488-conjugated
anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes) and Alexa 546-conjugated anti-rabbit
IgG (Molecular Probes), respectively. Fluorescence images were acquired
by a CCD camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ) with MetaMorph
software (Roper Scientific).
Explant culture. Procedures for explant culture in collagen
gel followed those of Shirasaki et al. (1995) . Mouse embryos at embryonic day 12 (E12) were dissected in DMEM-F12 medium (Sigma) supplemented with glucose. Cerebellar plate explants were obtained from
open-book preparations of the hindbrain region. Aggregates of stable
cell lines (HEK293T cells) expressing netrin-1, the secreted form of
netrin-G1a, or netrin-G1d were prepared as described previously
(Kennedy et al., 1994 ). The explants and the aggregates were embedded
in collagen matrix, which were prepared from rat tail tendon. The
culture medium used was DMEM-F12 supplemented with 3.85 mg/ml glucose,
10 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 µg/ml transferrin, 5 µg/ml insulin, 5.29 ng/ml sodium selenite, 16.4 µg/ml putrescine dihydrochloride, 6.29 ng/ml progesterone, 7.40 ng/ml hydrocortisone, and 10% FCS.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of a novel member of the UNC-6/netrin family: netrin-G1
(clone 7D5)
To systematically analyze molecules responsible for intercellular
communication in cerebellar development, we constructed signal sequence
trap cDNA libraries from P21 mouse cerebellum. The signal sequence trap
method, which was aided by the invertase-deficient yeast strain (Jacobs
et al., 1997 ), allowed us to selectively isolate cDNAs encoding both
secreted and membrane proteins (Tashiro et al., 1993 ). We further
predicted that the expression of genes involved in development might
show differential expression during different developmental stages.
Thus, we amplified cDNA inserts from individual clones by PCR, spotted
them onto nylon membranes in duplicate, and then hybridized them with
32P-labeled cDNA probes from either P21 or
P0 mouse cerebellum. Then, we determined the nucleotide sequences of
cDNA clones displaying differential expression. Among these, clone 7D5
showed similarity to UNC-6/netrins.
Figure 1 represents the expression
profile of the clone 7D5. A single band of ~4.5 kb in size was
detected by Northern blot analysis using the trapped fragment as a
probe. The 7D5 transcript was strongly expressed in P0 cerebellum and
downregulated by P21 (Fig. 1A). Northern blot
analysis of adult tissues detected hybridization signals only with
brain (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Expression of 7D5 in the brain. A,
Expression profile of 7D5 during cerebellar development.
Poly(A+) RNAs from P0 and P21 mouse cerebellum were
electrophoresed (2 µg/lane), transferred onto a nylon membrane, and
hybridized with a 32P-labeled cDNA (7D5). The expression of
7D5 was characterized by downregulation in postnatal development. G3PDH
was used as a control for loading of RNA. B, Tissue
distribution of 7D5 in adult mice. An adult mouse multiple tissue
Northern blot (Clontech) was hybridized with the probe mentioned above.
7D5 was specifically expressed in the brain. -actin was used as a
control for loading of RNA. Arrowheads in
A and B indicate 7D5 signals.
|
|
To isolate full-length cDNA clones encoding the 7D5 gene, we screened
oligo-dT-primed cDNA libraries prepared from adult and P0 mouse brains
with the trapped cDNA fragment as a probe. Thirty-nine overlapping
clones were isolated and sequenced. The longest cDNA fragment was 4090 nucleotides in length. A putative open reading frame of this
clone included 539 amino acids (Fig. 2).
As expected, the sequences of trapped cDNA fragment (7D5) corresponded
to sequences of the N-terminal 180 aa (Fig. 2).

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of
netrin-G1a (7D5) with vertebrate netrins. Amino acid residues identical
between netrin-G1a and other netrins are in black.
Hydrophobic stretches (boxed) of netrin-G1a appear to be
signals for secretion and for GPI linkage predicted by the and + 2 rules (Gerber et al., 1992 ; von Heijne, 1996 ), respectively. The
brackets above the sequences indicate domain structures
(domains VI, V-1, V-2, V-3, and C') of netrin-G1a defined by homology
with other netrins. Asterisks indicate the putative
N-glycosylation sites of netrin-G1a. The nucleotide sequences of
netrin-G1a and other isoforms have been submitted to the GenBank
(accession numbers AB038662, AB038663, AB038664, AB038665, AB038666,
and AB038667).
|
|
The deduced amino acid sequence showed a weak similarity to chick
netrin-1, netrin-2, and mouse netrin-1 and netrin-3 (31, 30, 29 and
29% identity, respectively) (Figs. 2,
3A). The predicted domain
structure of this protein resembled that of the UNC-6/netrin family,
i.e., laminin globular domain (domain VI) followed by three laminin
epidermal growth factor-like (LE) repeats (domain V-1 to V-3) (Hutter
et al., 2000 ) (Figs. 2, 3A). The Cys-residues phylogenetically conserved among the UNC-6/netrin family are also conserved in these domains of the 7D5 gene, further supporting structural similarity of 7D5 to UNC-6/netrins. Originally, UNC-6 was
identified as a laminin-related protein, because the N-terminal two-thirds of UNC-6 were homologous to the N-terminal domains (domain
VI and domain V) of laminin and chains, components of large
heterotrimeric extracellular matrix molecules (Ishii et al., 1992 ). The
7D5 gene encodes a protein with these same characteristics. Similar to
UNC-6 and classical vertebrate netrins, 7D5 is more related to the chain than the chain in these domains (32% identical with mouse
chain vs 27% with chain) but has hallmarks of both. Based on
these findings, we concluded that 7D5 is a novel member of the
UNC-6/netrin family and named it netrin-G1. However, it should be noted
that netrin-G1 is the most distant member among this family of proteins
(Fig. 3C).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Structural comparison of netrin-G1 and other
UNC-6/netrins. A, Domain structures of members of the
UNC-6/netrin family are schematically represented. The percent identity
in amino acid sequence between homologous domains is shown. Netrin-G1a
is anchored on cell membrane by a GPI linkage, whereas netrin-1 and
netrin-3 are secreted. The C domains of classical netrins are highly
charged (indicated by ++). The C-terminal sequence of netrin-G1a, named
C', is distinctly different from the C domain of classical netrins.
B, Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity plot of deduced
netrin-G1a and mouse netrin-1 amino acid sequences. Two hydrophobic
stretches were observed at both N and C termini in netrin-G1a. The
latter stretch is unique to netrin-G1 among members of the UNC-6/netrin
family. C, A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on
the amino acid sequences of C. elegans UNC-6 (P34710),
chick netrin-1 (Q90922), chick netrin-2 (Q90923), mouse netrin-1
(AAC52971), mouse netrin-3 (AAD40063), human netrin-1 (NP004813), human
NTN2L (NP006172), zebrafish netrin-1 (AAB70266), zebrafish netrin-1a
(AAC60252), Drosophila netrin-A (Q24567),
Drosophila netrin-B (Q24568), and netrin-G1a (AB038667)
using CLUSTAL X program
(ftp://ftp-igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/pub/ClustalX/). Netrin-G1 is
evolutionarily distant from other members of the family, implying that
the netrin-G1 may serve as a prototype of a novel subfamily.
|
|
The characteristic difference between netrin-G1 and other members was
observed in its C-terminal sequences. Whereas C-terminal sequences
(domain C) of chick netrin-1 and netrin-2 are rich in basic amino
acids, such as lysine residues, the corresponding domain of netrin-G1
is not rich in these amino acids. Furthermore, the C-terminal end
sequences of netrin-G1 are hydrophobic, unlike other members (Fig.
3B). Thus, we termed this domain C'. We predicted that this
C-terminal hydrophobic stretch might play a role as a signal for GPI
linkage to the membrane and expected that netrin-G1 might localize on
cell membranes. The "G" in the name emphasizes the GPI linkage of
this protein.
Isoforms of netrin-G1
Sequence comparison of 39 independent cDNA clones revealed the
existence of six variants presumably generated by alternative splicing.
These variants are schematically represented in Figure 4B. The isoform having
the longest amino acid sequence (netrin-G1a) most resembled the
UNC-6/netrin family in terms of domain structure. Netrin-G1b and
netrin-G1c had a deletion of one or two units of LE repeats (LE2 or LE2
and LE 3), respectively (Fig.
4A,B). Netrin-G1d and netrin-G1e
had either a 42 or 22 aa insertion between domains of LE1 and C',
respectively (Fig. 4A,B). The
insertions in netrin-G1d and netrin-G1e were identical at their
N-terminal halves, but that of netrin-G1d was 20 aa longer than that of
netrin-G1e. GenBank database search did not reveal homology of the
inserted domains to any known proteins. The shortest isoform,
netrin-G1f, was found in only one case and lacked domains LE2, LE3, and
C' (Fig. 4A,B). The human cDNA
clone KIAA0976, with 96% identity throughout the coding region, is
likely the human ortholog of netrin-G1f (Nagase et al., 1999 ). The cDNA
clones encoding netrin-G1a, netrin-G1b, netrin-G1c, netrin-G1d,
netrin-G1e, and netrin-G1f were obtained in 7, 1, 3, 8, 5, and 1 of 25 clones, respectively. The remaining 14 clones had partial coding
sequences, and their isoform could not be determined. In conclusion,
isoforms of netrin-G1 have diversified C-terminal structures, whereas
their N-terminal VI and LE1 domains are more conserved.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Structure and expression of G1 isoforms.
A, Six isoforms are named netrin-G1a to netrin-G1f.
Sequences around and including variable regions of the isoforms are
aligned. Netrin-G1a most resembles mouse netrin-1 and netrin-3 in terms
of modular structure and predicted sequences of LE modules. Netrin-G1b
and netrin-G1c lack domain V-2 (LE2) and domains V-2 and V-3 (LE3),
respectively. Netrin-G1d has an insert of 42 aa, tentatively named Ukd
for "Unknown domain." Sequences are in black,
between domains V-1 (LE1) and C'. Netrin-G1e has a shorter Ukd. All
five of these isoforms (netrin-G1a to netrin-G1e) contain domains VI,
V-1, and C'. Netrin-G1f lacks domains V-2, V-3, and C'. This isoform is
exceptional in that it does not contain the C-terminal hydrophobic
stretch. Dots indicate missing residues.
Hyphens at both ends represent extending sequences.
B, Schematic representation of netrin-G1 isoforms. N-
and C-terminal hydrophobic stretches are indicated as shaded
boxes, and domain Ukd of netrin-G1d and netrin-G1e is indicated
as dotted boxes. C, RT-PCR analysis of
five isoforms in adult whole brain and various regions of P0 brain.
RT-PCR was performed using a set of primers, indicated by
arrows in B, corresponding to nucleotides
of LE1 and domain C', respectively. This set of primers amplified the
fragments of all netrin-G1s, ex-cept
netrin-G1f, with the expected sizes of 520, 352, 217, 343, and 283 bp for netrin-G1a,
netrin-G1b, netrin-G1c,
netrin-G1d, and netrin-G1e, respectively.
To discriminate between these bands, isoform-specific probes indicated
to the left in C were used for Southern
blot hybridization. Isoforms are indicated with
arrowheads at the right.
|
|
Southern blot hybridization of genomic DNA and partial sequencing of
genomic clones suggested that these isoforms were derived from a single
gene and were presumably generated by alternative splicing (data not
shown). To examine their regional and temporal distribution, we
performed RT-PCR using a set of primers corresponding to nucleotides of
LE1 (353-359 aa of netrin-G1a) and domain C' (520-526 aa of
netrin-G1a) (Fig. 4B). This set of primers would produce amplified bands of 520, 352, 217, 343, and 283 bp from netrin-G1a, netrin-G1b, netrin-G1c, netrin-G1d, and netrin-G1e, respectively. To discriminate these products, we performed Southern blot hybridization using variant-specific internal probes (Fig. 4B,C). The probe corresponding to
LE2 and LE3 (363-463 aa of netrin-G1a) confirmed the existence of
netrin-G1a and netrin-G1b. A probe that included coding sequences for
the 42 aa insert of netrin-G1d detected netrin-G1d and netrin-G1e. The
shortest fragment revealed by the C' probe (464-511 aa of netrin-G1a)
was identified as the product of netrin-G1c. Because amplification
efficacy of these isoforms may differ, we were not able to accurately
estimate relative amounts of isoforms. However, the results suggested
that all isoforms were generated at perinatal stages and that
netrin-G1a and netrin-G1d were likely to be the major isoforms in adult
brains (Fig. 4C), consistent with the results of cDNA cloning.
Netrin-G1 is linked to the cell membrane by GPI lipid anchors
Hydrophobicity plots of netrin-G1a revealed two hydrophobic
sequences at both ends, unlike netrin-1 (Fig. 3B). The
predicted N-terminal signal sequence (von Heijne, 1986 ) supported
secretion of invertase in yeast, although this activity remains to be
confirmed in mammalian cells. The signal sequence is consistently
observed in members of the UNC-6/netrin family. However, the C-terminal hydrophobic sequence was unique to netrin-G1 and was likely to be a GPI
lipid anchor.
To confirm these possibilities, we expressed recombinant netrin-G1a and
netrin-G1d in HEK293 cells. Immunoblotting analysis with
affinity-purified antibodies against the common domain (domain VI) of
netrin-G1 detected both isoforms in cell lysates (Fig. 5), indicating successful synthesis of
recombinant proteins. Two hour exposures of transfected cells to
PI-PLC, which specifically cleaves GPI-anchored proteins from the
membrane surface, released the recombinant proteins into the
supernatants (Fig. 5). On the other hand, the same treatment without
PI-PLC did not release substantial amounts of recombinant protein (Fig.
5). These results indicate that at least these isoforms, and perhaps
all but one (netrin-G1f), were predominantly anchored to the cell
membrane via GPI anchors.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
PI-PLC sensitivity of recombinant netrin-G1a and
netrin-G1d. Netrin-G1a and netrin-G1d were transiently expressed in
HEK293T cells. At 60 hr after transfection, transfected HEK293T cells
were incubated with or without 200 mU/ml PI-PLC in OptiMEM at 37°C
for 2 hr. The supernatants were clarified by ultracentrifugation and
TCA-precipitated. The cell lysates were obtained from cells not treated
with PI-PLC. These samples were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and probed
with affinity-purified anti-netrin-G1 polyclonal antibodies against
domain VI. Note that these isoforms were released from transfected
cells by PI-PLC treatment.
|
|
The calculated molecular weights of nascent netrin-G1a and netrin-G1d
were 60.5 and 53.9 kDa, respectively. The cleavage site for GPI
anchoring was predicted from the and + 2 rule (Fig. 2) (Gerber,
1992 ). The calculated molecular weights of these processed proteins
were 55.9 and 49.3 kDa, respectively. The sizes estimated from
immunoblotting analysis were slightly larger than these calculated sizes (Fig. 5), suggesting that these proteins might be subject to
post-translational modification. Putative N-linked glycosylation sites
are depicted in Figure 2. This modification was confirmed by
N-glycosidase F treatment (data not shown). In Figure 5, recombinant proteins released by PI-PLC treatment migrated slower than those from
cell lysates. Perhaps, lipid moieties associated with recombinant proteins might have affected the migration rates of these proteins.
Expression of netrin-G1 in the CNS
To determine the regional distribution of netrin-G1 in
detail, we performed in situ hybridization analysis in mouse
brains using the N-terminal coding sequence as a common probe for all isoforms. In situ hybridization of parasagittal sections of
P0 brain indicated that netrin-G1 was expressed in a
regionally restricted manner (Fig.
6A-F). The
strongest expression was detected in the thalamus (Fig.
6A,D). Moderate expression was
detected in the olfactory bulb, inferior and superior colliculi, red
nucleus, mammillary body, deep cerebellar nuclei, and inferior olive
nuclei (Fig. 6A,D). In vibratome
coronal slices of P2 brain, strong expression was detected in each of
the thalamic nuclei (Fig. 6C), and moderate expression was
seen in the inferior colliculus and deep nuclei of the cerebellum (Fig.
6F). Weak but appreciable expression was further
detected in piriform cortex, retrosplenial granular cortex, and
CA1-CA3 of the hippocampal formation (Fig. 6C).

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Regional distribution of
netrin-G1 transcripts in mouse brain revealed by
in situ hybridization. Parasagittal cuts of the P0 mouse
brain (A, B, D,
E, G, H) and P2
coronal vibratome slices of the P2 mouse brain (C,
F) were hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled
antisense cRNA probes specific for netrin-G1
(A-F, except for B) or
Unc5h3/rcm (G, H). Sense
probe for netrin-G1 showed no signal under the
conditions used (B). In the lateral views of
cerebral hemisphere, distributions of netrin-G1
(E) and Unc5h3/rcm
(H) were complementary and delineated the
boundary (arrowhead) between neocortex and allocortex.
Scale bar: A, B, E,
H, 1 mm ; C, 0.85 mm; F,
0.65 mm; D, G, 0.8 mm.
DCN, Deep cerebellar nuclei; EGL,
external germinal layer; HP, hippocampal formation;
IC, inferior colliculus; IO, inferior
olive; MB, mammillary body; OB, olfactory
bulb; PR, piriform cortex; RN, red
nucleus; RC, retrosplenial cortex; SC,
superior colliculus; TH, thalamus.
|
|
The expression of netrin-G1 showed marked contrast with that
of Unc5h3 in some brain areas (Fig.
6G,H). For instance, Unc5h3 was
strongly expressed in the external germinal cell layer and Purkinje
cell layer of the cerebellum (Fig. 6G) (Ackerman et al., 1997 ), whereas netrin-G1 was found in the deep cerebellar
nuclei (Fig. 6D). Similar to Unc5h3, all
other netrin receptors have been reported to be expressed in the
external germinal cell and internal granule cell layers (Leonardo et
al., 1997b ). Only DCC among the netrin receptors is known to
be expressed in the deep cerebellar nuclei (Livesey and Hunt, 1997 ).
Curiously, in the cerebral cortex, netrin-G1 and
Unc5h3 were expressed in allocortical and neocortical areas
(Fig. 6E,H), respectively,
and delineated the boundary between allocortex and neocortex.
Ontogenic expression of netrin-G1 in representative regions
was examined by in situ hybridization (Fig.
7). The expression of
netrin-G1 was detected in the midbrain and hindbrain regions as early as E12, whereas whole-mount hybridization showed no signals in
any region at E10 (data not shown). In the deep nucleus of the
cerebellum, expression of netrin-G1 was detected at E14
(Fig. 7C), persisted to P0 (Fig. 7F), and
was downregulated by P21 (Fig. 7I), being in good
agreement with the results of the Northern analysis (Fig.
1A). The inferior colliculus followed a similar time
course of netrin-G1 expression at postnatal periods (Fig. 7F,I).

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Ontogenic expression of netrin-G1.
Ontogenic expression of netrin-G1 was examined by
in situ hybridization using frozen parasagittal
sections, except for B. The digoxigenin-labeled
antisense cRNA for netrin-G1 was used as a probe. At E14, expression of
netrin-G1 was initially detected in accessory olfactory bulb
(OB), restricted in mitral cell layers
(ML) and tufted cells (TF) at P0,
and persisted to P21. In thalamus, expression was segmental in dorsal
thalamus (DT) and pretectum
(PT) at E14, peaked at perinatal stages and
downregulated in postnatal development. In cerebellum, expression of
netrin-G1 was also detected at E14, restricted in deep nucleus
(DCN) and downregulated postnatally by P21 in
contrast to olfactory bulb. IC, Inferior colliculus;
TH, thalamus. Scale bar: A, 0.42 mm; B, E, H, 1 mm;
C, 0.5 mm; D, 0.38 mm; F,
0.6 mm; G, 0.27 mm; I, 1.2 mm.
|
|
At E14, expression of netrin-G1 was segmented in dorsal
thalamus and pretectum in the midbrain (Fig. 7B).
Interestingly, its expression was regulated in a layer-specific manner
in the superior colliculus (Figs. 6A, 7E).
The netrin-G1 expression in thalamic regions seemed to take
a time course similar to that in the cerebellum (Fig.
7E,H). In the olfactory
bulb, expression of netrin-G1 was detected at E14 (Fig.
7A), increased by P0 (Fig. 7D), and was maintained at a high level through P21 (Fig. 7G) and into
adulthood (data not shown).
Netrin-G1 does not bind to netrin receptors
All previously identified members of the UNC-6/netrin family bind
to known netrin receptors, i.e., the UNC5 family (UNC5H1, UNC5H2, and
UNC5H3/RCM in mammals) (Leonardo et al., 1997a ) and the UNC40 family
(DCC and neogenin in mammals) (Keino-Masu et al., 1996 ). To examine
whether netrin-G1 has functional redundancy with UNC-6/netrins, we
tested the binding activities of netrin-G1 to netrin receptors.
The extracellular and transmembrane domains of UNC5H3/RCM, UNC5H1, and
UNC5H2 were C-terminally fused with ECFP, a variant of green
fluorescence protein, and transiently expressed in COS7 cells. Membrane
fluorescence allowed us to monitor successful expression of the
receptor molecules. These cells were incubated with myc-tagged
netrin-G1 and myc-tagged chick netrin-1 proteins that were recovered
from the supernatants of stably expressing cells. The hydrophobic
C-terminal tails of netrin-G1 isoforms were deleted to maximize secretion.
In cultures incubated with chick netrin-1, UNC5H3/RCM-expressing cells
reported by ECFP fluorescence were colabeled with anti-myc antibodies
on their cell surfaces (Fig.
8A,B),
consistent with previously reported results (Leonardo et al., 1997a ).
In contrast, no signals were detected in cultures treated with a series
of test ligands (myc-tagged netrin-G1a, netrin-G1b, netrin-G1d, and netrin-G1e) (Fig. 8D,F; and data
not shown). The relative amounts of proteins used for these binding
assays were estimated by immunoblotting with anti-myc antibodies. A
representative result is shown in Figure 8K. These
test ligands at over 100 times higher concentration relative to chick
netrin-1 failed to show binding to UNC5H3/RCM. Thus, netrin-G1 is not
likely to be a ligand for UNC5H3/RCM. Similarly, netrin-G1 did not show
binding to UNC5H1 and UNC5H2 (data not shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Lack of affinity of netrin-G1 to netrin receptors.
UNC5H3/RCM, with its cytoplasmic domain replaced with ECFP, was
transiently expressed in COS7 cells. The receptor protein expression
was detected with ECFP fluorescence (blue;
A, C, E). DCC was
expressed in HEK293EBNA cells and detected using mouse monoclonal
anti-DCC antibody and Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG
(green; G,
I). In the same field, binding of myc-tagged
chick netrin-1 (Netrin-1/Myc) on the cells was detected
by immunocytochemistry using a monoclonal anti-myc antibody (9E10) and
Alexa 546-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (B) in the
case of UNC5H3/RCM, and rabbit polyclonal anti-myc antibody and Alexa
546-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (H) in the
case of DCC (red). However, secreted forms of myc-tagged
netrin-G1a (sNetrin-G1a/Myc) and Netrin-G1d
(sNetrin-G1d/Myc) did not show binding to the cells
expressing both receptors, even at the higher concentrations
(D, F, J). Similar
results were obtained with cells expressing UNC5H1 or UNC5H2 receptors.
sNetrin-G1c and sNetrin-G1e also did not show binding to cells
expressing any type of receptor examined (data not shown).
K represents relative concentrations of test ligands
used in binding experiments, revealed by anti-myc immunoblotting.
Shown are representative results from one of three independent
experiments. Scale bar, 10 µm.
|
|
DCC belonging to another receptor family was also transiently expressed
in HEK293 cells and tested for binding to netrin-G1. In this case, the
expression of DCC was detected by immunocytochemistry using a
DCC-specific monoclonal antibody (Fig.
8G,I). Again, cells expressing DCC showed
binding to chick netrin-1 but not to netrin-G1, even at more than 100 times higher concentrations (Fig.
8H,J).
The detection of bound molecules, as well as determination of their
relative concentrations, were done using anti-myc antibodies, raising
the possibility of pseudonegative results by contamination of excess
amounts of degraded products lacking the myc epitope tag. Thus, we
assessed the quality of the test ligands by Western blot analysis using
polyclonal antibodies against netrin-G1 domain VI and ruled out this possibility.
The results described above demonstrate a possible difference between
netrin-G1 and classical netrins in receptor usage. To further rule out
a functional redundancy between netrin-G1 and netrin-1, we performed
three-dimensional collagen explant coculture experiments using the
dorsal side of spinal cord and cerebellar plate. Netrin-1 secreted from
transformed cells showed outgrowth-promoting and attractive activities
to commissural and cerebellofugal axons (Fig.
9A), as reported previously
(Kennedy et al., 1994 ; Serafini et al., 1994 ; Shirasaki et al., 1995 ).
However, secreted soluble forms of netrin-G1 did not elicit outgrowth
of these axons (Fig. 9B), consistent with the results of the
binding assays. From these experiments, we cannot conclude that
netrin-G1 is a ligand for the known netrin receptors.

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Netrin-G1 cannot compensate for netrin-1 activity
in collagen gel cerebellar plate explant culture. Cerebellar plates
(CP) from E12 mice were cocultured with aggregates of
HEK293T cells expressing either netrin-1 (A) or
secreted forms of netrin-G1a (sNetrin-G1a;
B) in collagen gels. Whereas netrin-1-expressing cells
attracted axons from cerebellar plates (A),
sNetrin-G1a did not elicit neurite outgrowth of cerebellar plate axons
(B) (n = 8). Scale bar:
A, B, 100 µm. C, Diagram
showing a flat whole-mount preparation of embryonic mouse brain and the
area used for explant coculture experiments. CP,
Cerebellar plate. Arrows indicate the axon orientation
in the cerebellar plate. D, The lateral surface of the
cerebellar plate explant was faced with the HEK293T aggregates.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have screened cDNA fragments of putative secreted and membrane
proteins by a signal sequence trap method and identified a novel member
of the UNC-6/netrin family. The new member, netrin-G1, has many
characteristic features different from other members, the so-called
classical netrins, in terms of their isoform diversity, expression, and
relationship to known netrin receptors.
Divergence of the UNC-6/netrin family
Members of the UNC-6/netrin family are laminin-related small
proteins. Laminins are heterotrimeric extracellular matrix proteins of
, , and chains, and the N-terminal portion of each chain consists of one globular domain (domain VI) followed by several LE
repeats (domain V) (Sasaki et al., 1988 ; Beck et al., 1990 ; Timpl and
Brown, 1994 ; Hutter et al., 2000 ). Members of the UNC-6/netrin family
are characterized by their conserved domain structures from domain VI
to the third LE repeat of domain V of laminins (Ishii et al., 1992 ;
Serafini et al., 1994 ; Engvall and Wewer, 1996 ). Although the level of
overall homology of netrin-G1 to any known member of UNC-6/netrin
family is low, its domain organization is essentially identical to the
classical members, providing a molecular basis to include this novel
gene in the UNC-6/netrin family. This conclusion is further supported
by the finding that, like other UNC-6/netrins (Ishii et al., 1992 ;
Serafini et al., 1994 ), the netrin-G1 LE repeats have hallmarks of both
and chains of laminin, but they are more related to the chain than the chain (32% identical with mouse chain vs 27%
with chain). It has been thought that the UNC-6/netrin family is a
small one, because at most only two genes have been isolated in every
species examined so far, such as the chick (Serafini et al., 1994 ), fly (Harris et al., 1996 ; Mitchell et al., 1996 ), mouse (Püschel 1999 ; Wang et al., 1999 ), and human (Van Raay et al., 1997 ). Netrin-G1 appears to be a third member in mouse as well as humans. On the other
hand, the BLAST search for the complete genome sequences of C. elegance and D. melanogaster failed to show orthologs
of netrin-G1 in these species. Netrin-G1 was
likely elaborated within the vertebrate lineage. Phylogenetic analysis
of the gene family (Fig. 3C) suggested that
netrin-G1 has evolved independently from classical netrins,
implying that netrin-G1 may be considered as a prototype of the
subfamily. Indeed, we have evidence that a netrin-G2 candidate might
exist in mouse.
The new netrin family member, netrin-G1, has several characteristics
that differ from other netrins, the so-called classical netrins. One of
these is found in its C-terminal sequences. Domain C of netrin-1 is
rich in basic residues, such as lysine, and serves as a heparin binding
site (Serafini et al., 1994 ). The basic C domain can bind cell surfaces
via negatively charged molecules, such as proteoglycans. Therefore, it
is thought that the range of diffusion of netrins is determined by the
level of expression of netrins relative to the concentration of binding
sites in the environment. The C-terminal sequence (named domain C') of
netrin-G1 is not rich in basic residues but does provide a signal for
GPI linkage (Fig. 3). Transient expression in HEK293T cells and PI-PLC treatment clearly revealed that netrin-G1a and netrin-G1d are predominantly on the cell surface via GPI linkages. Thus, netrin-G1 is
likely to be more specialized as a cue that acts close to the site of
its synthesis. However, we do not rule out the possibility that
netrin-G1 may diffuse far from the source under certain conditions. It
has been suggested that GPI-anchored molecules, such as axonin-1/Tag-1, can be released from the membrane by an endogenously expressed glycosyl
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase D and that the enzyme
activity is detected in dorsal root ganglion neurons and brain
(Lierheimer et al., 1997 ). In any case, a GPI anchor might characterize
the netrin-G subfamily. The association of netrins with cell surface is
a conserved feature of nervous system development but may have been
dealt with differently in invertebrates and vertebrates.
Extensive cDNA analysis revealed that netrin-G1 has at least six
isoforms (Fig. 4). The longest isoform, most resembling classical netrins in terms of domain structure, is named netrin-G1a. Netrin-G1b and netrin-G1c lack one and two of the three LE repeats, respectively. The LE motif is believed to be important for protein-protein
interactions. Thus, these isoforms might have different binding
properties to associated molecule(s). Indeed, a nematode C. elegans mutant strain lacking domain V-2 of UNC-6 shows a
selective loss of UNC-5-mediated repulsive functions. Null mutants of
the UNC-6 exhibit deficits in both dorsal and ventral
guidance for circumferential axons (Hedgecock et al., 1990 ), but the
V-2 deletion mutants show deficits only in dorsal guidance (Wadsworth
et al., 1996 ), suggesting the existence of a critical domain for
certain phenotypes. The insertions in netrin-G1d and netrin-G1e might
further modulate their binding to associated molecule(s).
Interestingly, semiquantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 4C) suggests
that the alternative splicing might be regulated in a region- and
developmental stage-specific manner. Alternative splicing may be a
strategy for creating netrins with divergent functions.
Lack of affinity of netrin-G1 to netrin receptors
UNC5H1, UNC5H2, UNC5H3/RCM, DCC, and neogenin are receptors for
the classical netrins in vertebrates (Keino-Masu et al., 1996 ; Ackerman
et al., 1997 ; Leonardo et al., 1997a ). Classical netrins can bind to
all of these receptors. To explore possible functional redundancy, we
examined the binding ability of netrin-G1a-myc, netrin-G1b-myc,
netrin-G1d-myc, and netrin-G1e-myc to UNC5H3/RCM, as well as other
netrin receptors transiently expressed on the surface of COS7 and
HEK293 cells. Although netrin-1-myc used as a positive control bound to
these receptors, indicating functional expression of receptor
molecules, none of the test ligands showed detectable affinities to
these receptors, even at 100 times higher concentrations relative to
netrin-1-myc. We did not examine netrin-G1c and netrin-G1f. However, it
is unlikely that these isoforms, resembling classical netrins to a
lesser degree, show affinities to these receptors.
To further assess the potential interaction of netrin-G1 to naturally
expressed netrin receptors, we performed in vitro explant coculture experiments using collagen gel matrices. It has been well
established that commissural and cerebellofugal axons express receptors
for netrin-1 and that netrin-1 promotes outgrowth of these axons and
attracts them (Serafini et al., 1994 ; Shirasaki et al., 1995 ). Again,
soluble forms of netrin-G1a did not show any detectable effect on these
axons, unlike netrin-1. Results from the explant coculture experiments,
together with those from receptor binding assays, suggested that
netrin-G1 might have nonredundant functions with classical netrins. We
suggest that netrin-G1 is specialized for receptor(s) different from
known netrin receptors. However, we do not rule out the possibility
that netrin-G1 may interact with known netrin receptors in the presence
of a co-factor(s).
Expression and possible function of netrin-G1
As a putative function of netrin-G1, two possibilities should be
considered. Based on its predicted structural similarity to classical
netrins, it is expected that netrin-G1 may act as a chemoattractive
and/or chemorepulsive cue for axonal growth and migration of cells
expressing putative receptors for netrin-G1. Conversely, GPI-anchored
netrin-G1 may transduce signals from the extracellular milieu, as shown
for the CNTF receptor (Davis et al., 1991 ), and play an autonomous
role. It has been well documented that the engagement of GPI-anchored
molecules triggers cascades involving tyrosine kinases of the src
family in immune cells (Brown, 1993 ). Bidirectional signaling has been
proposed for the ephrin/Eph receptor system, another axon guidance
molecule (Bruckner et al., 1997 ; Araujo et al., 1998 ; Holder and Klein
1999 , Davy et al., 1999 ).
The expression of netrin-G1 was detected in the midbrain and
hindbrain regions by E12 (data not shown). Thereafter,
netrin-G1 was expressed in many discrete regions of the CNS.
The expression of netrin-G1 is most prominent in the
thalamus. Thalamic neurons relay afferents to cerebral cortex from
various regions of the nervous system, including the mammillary body,
which also expresses netrin-G1. Conversely, neocortical
neurons in layer V project axons to thalamic nuclei through
corticothalamic pathways. It is thought that the latter projection is
initially influenced by netrin-1, which is released from an
intermediate target, ganglionic eminence (Métin et al., 1997 ;
Richards et al., 1997 ). Netrin-G1 may influence this projection beyond
the ganglionic eminence toward the thalamic nuclei as an attractive
and/or target selective cue.
The expression of netrin-G1 reached highest levels at
perinatal stages in most brain regions, implying its roles in late
developmental stages of the CNS. However, a high level of expression
persists exceptionally in the olfactory bulb mitral cells into
adulthood. Olfactory receptor neurons start to project to mitral cells
at approximately E14 and are able to regenerate for life. Furthermore, granule cells are continuously recruited from the subventricular zone,
even in adults. Thus, the olfactory bulb needs to continuously renew
structural connections between cells. Continuous expression of
netrin-G1 may support the maintenance of circuitry in olfactory systems.
In the cerebellum, netrin-G1 expression is limited to the
deep nuclei. The deep cerebellar nuclei receive three afferents, i.e.,
mossy fibers, climbing fibers, and Purkinje cell axons, and extend
efferents to the red nucleus and other brain regions (Altman and Bayer,
1997 ). Interestingly, the inferior olive nuclei, origin of climbing
fibers, and the red nuclei, target of deep cerebellar efferents, also
express netrin-G1. Netrin-G1 may play a role in forming
functional circuits for controlling motor activities. It is also
possible that the deep cerebellar nuclei regulate migration or
development of granule cells and Purkinje cells. Thus, the deep
cerebellar nuclei may be one of the ideal sites to assess the
functional importance of netrin-G1 in future work.
Concluding remarks
Although the UNC-6/netrin family has been highly conserved in
evolution, the members of this family in mammals have likely diverged
more than expected. Molecules, such as netrin-G1, that have diverged to
a higher degree from the ancestral UNC-6 might have particularly
important roles for highly organized cytoarchitectures unique to
vertebrates. Mice carrying gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations would help to test the hypothetical roles of netrin-G1 and
would provide insight into candidate receptors.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received March 27, 2000; revised June 9, 2000; accepted June 19, 2000.
This work was partly supported by a Core Research for Evolutional
Science and Technology project grant, Japan Science and Technology
Corporation. We thank Dr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne for providing cDNAs of
Unc5h1, Unc5h2, DCC, and
netrin-1; Dr. Susan Ackerman for cDNA of
Unc5h3/rcm; Drs. Takao Hensch and Alcino Silva for
reading this manuscript and helpful comments; Dr. Fujio Murakami for
his valuable discussions; Sachihiro Suzuki for his advice on in
situ hybridization; Reiko Ando for her excellent technical
assistance; and all members of S.I.'s laboratory for their
stimulating discussions and encouragement. T.N. and S.N. express
special thanks to Dr. Koreaki Ito for his continuous encouragement.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Shigeyoshi Itohara,
Laboratory for Behavioral Genetics, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. E-mail:
sitohara{at}brain.riken.go.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Ackerman SL,
Kozak LP,
Przyborski SA,
Rund LA,
Boyer BB,
Knowles BB
(1997)
The mouse rostral cerebellar malformation gene encodes an UNC-5-like protein.
Nature
386:838-842[Medline].
-
Altman J,
Bayer SA
(1997)
Afferent and efferent connections of the cerebellar deep nuclei.
In: Development of the cerebellar system (Altman J,
Bayer SA,
eds), pp 66-79. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
-
Araujo M,
Piedra ME,
Herrera MT,
Ros MA,
Nieto MA
(1998)
The expression and regulation of chick EphA7 suggests roles in limb patterning and innervation.
Development
125:4195-4204[Abstract].
-
Beck K,
Hunter I,
Engel J
(1990)
Structure and function of laminin: anatomy of a multidomain glycoprotein.
FASEB J
4:148-160[Abstract].
-
Brown D
(1993)
The tyrosine kinase connection: how GPI-anchored proteins activate T cells.
Curr Opin Immunol
5:349-354[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bruckner K,
Pasquale EB,
Klein R
(1997)
Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors.
Science
275:1640-1643[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Chan SS-Y,
Zheng H,
Su M-W,
Wilk R,
Killeen MT,
Hedgecock EM,
Culotti JG
(1996)
UNC-40, a C. elegans homolog of DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Cancer), is required in motile cells responding to UNC-6 netrin cues.
Cell
87:187-195[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Chisholm A,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1999)
Conservation and divergence of axon guidance mechanisms.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
9:603-615[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Chomczynski P,
Sacchi N
(1987)
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:156-159[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Colamarino SA,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1995)
The axonal chemoattractant netrin-1 is also a chemorepellent for trochlear motor axons.
Cell
81:621-629[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Conlon RA,
Rossant J
(1992)
Exogeneous retinoic acid rapidly induces anterior ectopic expression of murine Hox-2 genes in vivo.
Development
116:357-368[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Davis S,
Aldrich TH,
Valenzuela DM,
Wong VV,
Furth ME,
Squinto SP,
Yancopoulos GD
(1991)
The receptor for ciliary neurotrophic factor.
Science
253:59-63[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Davy A,
Gale NW,
Murray EW,
Klinghoffer RA,
Soriano P,
Feuerstein C,
Robbins SM
(1999)
Compartmentalized signaling by GPI-anchored ephrin-A5 requires the Fyn tyrosine kinase to regulate cellular adhesion.
Genes Dev
13:3125-3135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
de la Torre JR,
Höpker VH,
Ming G-L,
Poo M-M,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Hemmati-Brivanlou A,
Holt CE
(1997)
Turning of retinal growth cones in a netrin-1 gradient mediated by the netrin receptor DCC.
Neuron
19:1211-1224[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dodd J,
Schuchardt A
(1995)
Axon guidance: a compelling case for repelling growth cones.
Cell
81:471-474[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Engvall E,
Wewer UM
(1996)
Domains of laminin.
J Cell Biochem
61:493-501[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Flanagan JG,
Vanderhaeghen P
(1998)
The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development.
Annu Rev Neurosci
21:309-345[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gerber LD,
Kodukula K,
Udenfriend S
(1992)
Phosphatidylinositol glycan (PI-G) anchored membrane proteins.
J Biol Chem
267:12168-12173[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Harris R,
Sabatelli LM,
Seeger MA
(1996)
Guidance cues at the Drosophila CNS midline: identification and characterization of two Drosophila netrin/UNC-6 homologs.
Neuron
17:217-228[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hedgecock EM,
Culotti JG,
Hall DH
(1990)
The unc-5, unc-6, and unc-40 genes guide circumferential migrations of pioneer axons and mesodermal cells on the epidermis in C. elegans.
Neuron
2:61-85.
-
Holder N,
Klein R
(1999)
Eph receptors and ephrins: effectors of morphogenesis.
Development
126:2033-2044[Abstract].
-
Hong K,
Hinck L,
Nishiyama M,
Poo M-M,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Stein E
(1999)
A ligand-gated association between cytoplasmic domains of UNC5 and DCC family receptors converts netrin-induced growth cone attraction to repulsion.
Cell
97:927-941[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hutter H,
Vogel BE,
Plenefisch JD,
Norris CR,
Proenca RB,
Spieth J,
Guo C,
Mastwal S,
Zhu X,
Scheel J,
Hedgecock EM
(2000)
Conservation and novelty in the evolution of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix genes.
Science
287:989-994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ishii N,
Wadsworth WG,
Stern BD,
Culotti JG,
Hedgecock EM
(1992)
UNC-6, a laminin-related protein, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans.
Neuron
9:873-881[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Jacobs KA,
Collins-Racie LA,
Colbert M,
Duckett M,
Golden-Fleet M,
Kelleher K,
Kriz R,
LaVallie ER,
Merberg D,
Spaulding V,
Stover J,
Williamson MJ,
McCoy JM
(1997)
A genetic selection for isolating cDNAs encoding secreted proteins.
Gene
198:289-296[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Keino-Masu K,
Masu M,
Hinck L,
Leonardo ED,
Chan S,
Culotti JG,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1996)
Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) encodes a netrin receptor.
Cell
87:175-185[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kennedy TE,
Serafini T,
de la Torre JR,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1994)
Netrins are diffusible chemotropic factors for commissural axons in the embryonic spinal cord.
Cell
78:425-435[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kolodziej PA,
Timpe LC,
Mitchell KJ,
Fried SR,
Goodman CS,
Jan LY,
Jan YN
(1996)
frazzled encodes a Drosophila member of the DCC immunoglobulin subfamily and is required for CNS and motor axon guidance.
Cell
87:197-204[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Leonardo ED,
Hinck L,
Masu M,
Keino-Masu K,
Ackerman SL,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1997a)
Vertebrate homologues of C. elegans UNC-5 are candidate netrin receptors.
Nature
386:833-838[Medline].
-
Leonardo ED,
Hinck L,
Masu M,
Keino-Masu K,
Fazeli A,
Stoeckli ET,
Ackerman SL,
Weinberg RA,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1997b)
Guidance of developing axons by netrin-1 and its receptors.
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
62:467-478[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lierheimer R,
Kunz B,
Vogt L,
Savoca R,
Brodbeck U,
Sonderegger P
(1997)
The neuronal cell-adhesion molecule axonin-1 is specifically released by an endogenous glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase.
Eur J Biochem
243:502-510[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Livesey FJ,
Hunt SP
(1997)
Netrin and netrin receptor expression in the embryonic mammalian nervous system suggests roles in retinal, striatal, nigral, and cerebellar development.
Mol Cell Neurosci
8:417-429[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Métin C,
Deléglise D,
Serafini T,
Kennedy TE,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1997)
A role for netrin-1 in the guidance of cortical efferents.
Development
124:5063-5074[Abstract].
-
Mitchell KJ,
Doyle JL,
Serafini T,
Kennedy TE,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Goodman CS,
Dickson BJ
(1996)
Genetic analysis of netrin genes in Drosophila: netrins guide CNS commissural axons and peripheral motor axons.
Neuron
17:203-215[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nagase T,
Ishikawa K-I,
Suyama M,
Kikuno R,
Hirosawa M,
Miyajima N,
Tanaka A,
Nomura N,
Ohara O
(1999)
Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XIII. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro.
DNA Res
6:63-70[Abstract].
-
Püschel AW
(1999)
Divergent properties of mouse netrins.
Mech Dev
83:65-75[Medline].
-
Richards LJ,
Koester SE,
Tuttle R,
O'Leary DDM
(1997)
Directed growth of early cortical axons is influenced by a chemoattractant released from an intermediate target.
J Neurosci
17:2445-2458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sasaki M,
Kleinman HK,
Huber H,
Deutzmann R,
Yamada Y
(1988)
Laminin, a multidomain protein.
J Biol Chem
263:16536-16544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Serafini T,
Kennedy TE,
Galko MJ,
Mirzayan C,
Jessell TM,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1994)
The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth-promoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6.
Cell
78:409-424[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Shirasaki R,
Tamada A,
Katsumata R,
Murakami F
(1995)
Guidance of cerebellofugal axons in the rat embryo: directed growth toward the floor plate and subsequent elongation along the longitudinal axis.
Neuron
14:961-972[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Shirasaki R,
Mirzayan C,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Murakami F
(1996)
Guidance of circumferentially growing axons by netrin-dependent and -independent floor plate chemotropism in the vertebrate brain.
Neuron
17:1079-1088[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Suzuki SC,
Inoue T,
Kimura Y,
Tanaka T,
Takeichi M
(1997)
Neuronal circuits are subdivided by differential expression of type-II classic cadherins in postnatal mouse brains.
Mol Cell Neurosci
9:433-447[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Tashiro K,
Tada H,
Heilker R,
Shirozu M,
Nakano T,
Honjo T
(1993)
Signal sequence trap: a cloning strategy for secreted proteins and type I membrane proteins.
Science
261:600-603[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Goodman CS
(1996)
The molecular biology of axon guidance.
Science
274:1123-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Timpl R,
Brown JC
(1994)
The laminins.
Matrix Biol
14:275-281[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Van Raay TJ,
Foskett SM,
Connors TD,
Klinger KW,
Landes GM,
Burn TC
(1997)
The NTN2L gene encoding a novel human netrin maps to the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease region on chromosome 16p13.3.
Genomics
41:279-282[Web of Science][Medline].
-
von Heijne G
(1986)
A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites.
Nucleic Acids Res
14:4683-4690[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wadsworth WG,
Bhatt H,
Hedgecock EM
(1996)
Neuroglia and pioneer neurons express UNC-6 to provide global and local netrin cues for guiding migrations in C. elegans.
Neuron
16:35-46[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wang H,
Copeland NG,
Gilbert DJ,
Jenkins NA,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1999)
Netrin-3, a mouse homolog of human NTN2L, is highly expressed in sensory ganglia and shows differential binding to netrin receptors.
J Neurosci
19:4938-4947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wilkinson DG,
Bailes JA,
McMahon AP
(1987)
Expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 is restricted to specific neural cells in the developing mouse embryo.
Cell
50:79-88[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yabe D,
Nakamura T,
Kanazawa N,
Tashiro K,
Honjo T
(1997)
Calumenin, a Ca2+-binding protein retained in the endoplasmic reticulum with a novel carboxy-terminal sequence, HDEF.
J Biol Chem
272:18232-18239[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/20176540-11$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Nishimura-Akiyoshi, K. Niimi, T. Nakashiba, and S. Itohara
Axonal netrin-Gs transneuronally determine lamina-specific subdendritic segments
PNAS,
September 11, 2007;
104(37):
14801 - 14806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. I. Schneiders, B. Maertens, K. Bose, Y. Li, W. J. Brunken, M. Paulsson, N. Smyth, and M. Koch
Binding of Netrin-4 to Laminin Short Arms Regulates Basement Membrane Assembly
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 17, 2007;
282(33):
23750 - 23758.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Saha, P. Hari, D. Huilgol, and S. Tole
Dual Role for LIM-Homeodomain Gene Lhx2 in the Formation of the Lateral Olfactory Tract
J. Neurosci.,
February 28, 2007;
27(9):
2290 - 2297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Kennedy, H. Wang, W. Marshall, and M. Tessier-Lavigne
Axon Guidance by Diffusible Chemoattractants: A Gradient of Netrin Protein in the Developing Spinal Cord.
J. Neurosci.,
August 23, 2006;
26(34):
8866 - 8874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ravasi, H. Suzuki, K. C. Pang, S. Katayama, M. Furuno, R. Okunishi, S. Fukuda, K. Ru, M. C. Frith, M. M. Gongora, et al.
Experimental validation of the regulated expression of large numbers of non-coding RNAs from the mouse genome
Genome Res.,
January 1, 2006;
16(1):
11 - 19.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nomura and N. Osumi
Misrouting of mitral cell progenitors in the Pax6/small eyerat telencephalon
Development,
February 15, 2004;
131(4):
787 - 796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Toda, M. Tsuji, I. Nakano, K. Kobuke, T. Hayashi, H. Kasahara, J. Takahashi, A. Mizoguchi, T. Houtani, T. Sugimoto, et al.
Stem Cell-derived Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Supporting Factor Is an Autocrine/Paracrine Survival Factor for Adult Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2003;
278(37):
35491 - 35500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-s. Lim and W. G. Wadsworth
Identification of Domains of Netrin UNC-6 that Mediate Attractive and Repulsive Guidance and Responses from Cells and Growth Cones
J. Neurosci.,
August 15, 2002;
22(16):
7080 - 7087.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Wang and W. G. Wadsworth
The C Domain of Netrin UNC-6 Silences Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase- and Diacylglycerol-Dependent Axon Branching in Caenorhabditis elegans
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 2002;
22(6):
2274 - 2282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Manitt, M. A. Colicos, K. M. Thompson, E. Rousselle, A. C. Peterson, and T. E. Kennedy
Widespread Expression of Netrin-1 by Neurons and Oligodendrocytes in the Adult Mammalian Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2001;
21(11):
3911 - 3922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|