 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2000, 20(18):6781-6788
Vascular Endothelial Cell Growth Factors Promote the In Vitro Development of Rat Photoreceptor Cells
Pamela A. Yourey1, Shiva Gohari1, Jeffery L. Su2, and Ralph F. Alderson1 Departments of 1 Pharmacology and 2 Protein Expression, Human Genome Sciences, Rockville, Maryland 20850
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
We have identified and characterized a novel trophic effect of vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) on photoreceptor cells. Treatment of retinal cultures, derived from postnatal day 1 (P1) rats, with VEGF-2 resulted in a dose- and time-dependent increase in the level of rhodopsin protein, as determined by ELISA assay. After 7-9 d of treatment the VEGF-1 or VEGF-2, at a concentration of 10 ng/ml, induced a 200-300% increase in rhodopsin protein and a 220% increase in the number of rhodopsin-immunopositive cells. Treatment with VEGF-2 induced a 250% increase in the number of syntaxin-immunopositive cells and a 67% increase in high-affinity GABA uptake, both markers for amacrine cells. In contrast, there was no increase in the non-neuronal cell populations. VEGF-2 induced an ~300% increase in the number of bromodeoxyuridine-labeled (BrdU) retinal cells within 48 hr of treatment. After 3 d in culture both the basal and stimulated levels of BrdU incorporation were reduced, suggesting that the proliferative effect of VEGF was restricted developmentally. Furthermore, there was a developmentally dependent increase in the mitogenic response to VEGF-2, with retinal cultures derived from E15, E20, or P1 animals demonstrating a 50, 100, and 300% increase in thymidine incorporation, respectively. However, VEGF treatment resulted in an increase in the number of rhodopsin-immunopositive cells only when the cultures were derived from P1 animals. Therefore, retinal progenitor cells appear to be targets for VEGF, and thus VEGF may be involved in the regulation of the early developmental program of retinal neurogenesis.
Key words: retina; rhodopsin; CNTF; amacrine cells; photoreceptor progenitor cell; vascular endothelial cell growth factors
INTRODUCTION
The retina has proven to be an advantageous experimental model for studying the role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in the regulation of the development of neuronal and non-neuronal cell types from a more primitive neuroepithelial cell. The differentiated retina is composed of at least seven cell types: sensory (rod and cone photoreceptors), glia (Müller cells), and two types of neurons, interneurons (horizontal, bipolar, and amacrine) and projection neurons (ganglion cells) (for review, see Dowling, 1987
). The development of the various cell types in the retina does not occur synchronously with the majority of the cones and ganglion and horizontal cells developing before birth (for review, see Altshuler et al., 1991
In vitro, retinal cell proliferation and differentiation are regulated by a variety of factors
for example, basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2; Hicks and Courtois, 1992
(TGF
We are interested in determining what biological significance the VEGF receptors have in regulating the development and homeostasis of retinal cells. We determined that VEGF is mitogenic for retinal progenitor cells. The proliferative response increases with age from E15 to postnatal day 1 (P1). In retinal cultures that are derived from P1 animals, VEGF treatment increases the number of rhodopsin- and syntaxin-immunopositive cells. Results from double-labeling immunohistochemical studies for rhodopsin and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) suggest that VEGF-2 also enhances the survival of photoreceptor cells. Furthermore, CNTF inhibits the VEGF-2 induced increase in the level of rhodopsin protein, but not the early proliferative response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals. Timed pregnant animals were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, IN). All animal-related procedures were conducted in strict compliance with approved institutional protocols and in accordance with provisions for animal care and use as described in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health publication 86-23, 1985).
Retinal cultures. The retinal tissue was obtained from either embryonic or neonatal rats. The dissociated primary cells were prepared by incubating the tissue in 0.25% trypsin for 6 min at 37°C. After the inactivation of the trypsin by a 5 min incubation in growth medium [F12: DMEM containing 1% fetal bovine serum, 1% hormonal supplements (N2; Bottenstein, 1983
Rhodopsin, syntaxin immunohistochemical staining, and cell-counting procedures. For the immunohistochemical staining the cultures were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde containing 4% sucrose. For rhodopsin and syntaxin staining the cultures were permeabilized with 0.05% saponin in PBS for 30 min. The nonspecific IgG binding was inhibited by incubating the cells in PBS containing 5% horse serum and 2% BSA for 3 hr at room temperature. Then the cultures were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-rhodopsin (1:10,000, Rho 4D2; obtained from Dr. Molday, University of British Columbia) or anti-syntaxin (1:10,000; Sigma) diluted in PBS containing 5% horse serum and 2% BSA (Molday, 1989
Rhodopsin-BrdU double-labeling immunohistochemistry. After various treatment paradigms the retinal cells were incubated with BrdU for 4 hr and, subsequently, were washed twice with PBS. Growth medium was added back to the cultures, which then were maintained in vitro for various time intervals. For the rhodopsin-BrdU double-labeling studies the cultures were fixed in 70% ETOH at
20°C for 18 hr. Then the cultures were permeabilized, and the nonspecific IgG binding was inhibited as described above. Subsequently, they were incubated with the anti-rhodopsin antibody (1:2500) for 3 hr at room temperature. After the removal of the primary antibody the cultures were incubated with a biotinylated anti-mouse antibody (1:1000; Vector Laboratories) for 60 min at room temperature and then subsequently with fluorescein-avidin (30 µg/ml; Vector Laboratories) for 1 hr. Next the cultures were post-fixed with 70% ETOH containing 20% glacial acetic acid for 20 min at room temperature and incubated with the anti-BrdU antibody (1:10) for 30 min 37°C per the manufacturer's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). The anti-BrdU was detected with an anti-mouse antibody labeled with rhodamine (30 µg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim). In the experiments in which the cultures were stained only immunohistochemically for BrdU, the staining was conducted per the manufacturer's instructions. In experiments in which the cultures were double-labeled for rhodopsin and with propidium iodide, the photoreceptor cells first were labeled for rhodopsin by using the method described above. To determine the total number of cells, we then incubated the cultures for 1 min in PBS containing 1 µg/ml of propidium iodide and subsequently rinsed them twice with PBS.
Rhodopsin, vimentin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) ELISAs. For the rhodopsin ELISAs the cultures were rinsed with PBS and fixed overnight with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 4% sucrose. Then the cultures were rinsed with PBS and permeabilized with 0.05% saponin in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The nonspecific protein-binding sites were suppressed by incubating the cells in PBS containing 5% horse serum and 2% BSA (blocking buffer) for at least 3 hr. The cultures were incubated overnight with the mouse anti-rhodopsin antibody (diluted 1:5000 in blocking buffer) or for 3 hr with anti-vimentin (1 µg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim) and subsequently with goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (diluted 1:2500) in blocking solution. The cultures were washed extensively with PBS; then the substrate (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine) was added to the wells, and the plates were incubated in the dark for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 2 M H2SO4, and the amount of product formed was quantitated by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm. The absorption of the reagent blank ranged from 0.1 to 0.15 and was not subtracted from the indicated values.
The GFAP ELISA was conducted essentially as previously described (Greene et al., 1998
High-affinity GABA uptake and calcein AM assay. The level of high-affinity GABA uptake was determined as previously described (Greene et al., 1998
[3H]thymidine incorporation. After treatment with factors the cells were labeled for 6 hr with [3H]thymidine at a final concentration of 0.33 µM (25 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). The incorporated [3H]thymidine was precipitated with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid for 24 hr. Subsequently, the cells were rinsed with ice-cold water. After lysis in 0.5 M NaOH the lysates and PBS rinses (500 µl) were pooled and counted.
RESULTS
VEGF-2 treatment increases the level of rhodopsin protein and the number of photoreceptor cells
The regulatory role of VEGFs on photoreceptor cell development initially was investigated by using cultures derived from P1 animals. Previous reports have demonstrated that multipotent progenitors are present during this developmental period and retain their capacity to differentiate into photoreceptor cells as well as other retinal cell types in vitro (Morrow et al., 1998
View larger version (33K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Treatment with VEGF increases the number of cells and the level of rhodopsin protein in the retinal cultures. Dissociated retinal cells were prepared from P1 animals, plated at a density of 425 cells/mm2, and treated with VEGF-2 (A, B) or VEGF-1 (C, D). After 2 d (open squares), 5 d (filled squares), 7 d (open circles), or 9 d (filled circles) the total number of cells in the cultures was estimated by measuring the calcein emission. Then the cultures were fixed, and the levels of rhodopsin protein were quantitated by ELISA and expressed in terms of optical density. The experiment that is shown is representative of three to four independent experiments. The data points are the mean of five to six determinations ± SEM.
To determine whether the increase in rhodopsin content reflected an increase in the number of photoreceptor cells, we treated cultures with VEGF-1 or VEGF-2 for 8 d and then immunohistochemically stained them for rhodopsin. The morphology of the photoreceptor cells at this in vitro developmental stage is depicted in the photomicrographs in Figure 2A-C. To quantitate the effects of VEGF treatment, we made cell counts. The number of rhodopsin-immunopositive cells increased as a function of concentration, with the response having an EC50 value of 0.25 and 1.5 ng/ml for VEGF-1 and VEGF-2, respectively (Fig. 3). At a saturating concentration of VEGF-2, a 2.4-fold increase in the number of rods was observed. Furthermore, the response was stable in the presence of concentrations of VEGF-2 as high as 100 ng/ml, suggesting that VEGF-2 does not readily induce a desensitization of the biological response. When the cultures were treated on the day of plating and then maintained in the presence of VEGF-2 (100 ng/ml) for 8 d, the number of rhodopsin-immunopositive cells represented 15% of the total number of propidium iodide-positive retinal cells.
View larger version (87K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of immunohistochemically stained retinal cultures. The cultures were derived from P1 animals and maintained in vitro for a period of 8 d in the presence of 100 ng/ml of VEGF-2. Then the cells were fixed and immunohistochemically stained for rhodopsin (A-C) or syntaxin (D-F). Scale bars: A, D, 25 µm; B, C, E, F, 50 µm.
View larger version (25K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. The number of rhodopsin-immunopositive cells is increased after treatment with VEGF. The retinal cells were maintained in vitro for 8 d in the presence of either VEGF-1 or VEGF-2. Then the cultures were fixed and immunohistochemically stained for rhodopsin. The experiment that is shown is representative of the three experiments that were conducted, and the data points are the mean of five to six determinations ± SEM.
Proliferative and survival effects of VEGF
The mechanism by which VEGF-2 induces an increase in photoreceptor cell number may involve an increase in the proliferation of precursor cells, enhanced survival of differentiated photoreceptor cells, and/or the redirection of the rod lineage pathway. To investigate whether VEGF-2 is mitogenic for retinal cells, we treated the cultures with factors 4 hr after plating and subsequently labeled them with BrdU after 24, 48, or 72 hr. At the end of the final labeling period (72 hr) the cultures were fixed, and the incorporated BrdU was detected immunohistochemically. A significant increase in the number of BrdU-labeled cells was observed after 48 hr of treatment, when 10 ng/ml of VEGF-2 or VEGF-1 induced a two- to threefold increase (Fig. 4A,B, respectively). The EC50 value for the response was calculated as 1 ng/ml. The 48 hr time point appeared near-maximal because, after an incubation of 72 hr, the level of BrdU incorporation had declined in the VEGF-treated cultures regardless of concentration. However, a decrease in the number of immunopositive cells also was observed in the vehicle-treated wells. Similar results were observed in studies in which [3H]thymidine incorporation was used as an endpoint (Fig. 4C).
View larger version (18K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Treatment with VEGF increases the number of BrdU-immunopositive cells and [3H]thymidine incorporation in retinal cultures. The cells were isolated from P1 animals and plated at a density of 425 cells/mm2. The cultures were treated initially at 4 hr after plating with either VEGF-2 (A) or VEGF-1 (B). After 1, 2, or 3 d the cultures were labeled for 4 hr with BrdU. Then the cells were fixed and processed for BrdU immunohistochemistry. C, The cultures were treated with the factors as described above for the BrdU labeling. After the appropriate time interval the cells were labeled with [3H]thymidine for 6 hr. The experiment shown is representative of the three experiments that were conducted, and the data points are the mean of five to six determinations ± SEM.
The effect of VEGF treatment on the number of rhodopsin and BrdU double-labeled cells was investigated. The retinal cultures were treated 2-4 hr after plating with VEGF-2 (100 ng/ml) and subsequently were labeled with BrdU after 48 hr. Then the cultures were maintained in the presence of VEGF-2 for 7 d. Although VEGF-2 treatment induced a threefold increase in the number of double-immunopositive cells, this population was only 3% of the total rhodopsin-immunopositive cells. Thus it appears that the major effect of VEGF on photoreceptor cells under the culture conditions used in this study may be the enhancement of their survival or the level of differentiation.
The potential role of VEGF-2 in regulating the survival of retinal cells early in the in vitro culture period was investigated by treating the cells at the time of plating with VEGF-2 and then after the cell survival by taking calcein AM measurements at 0, 6, 18, 24, or 48 hr after plating (Table 1). After 6 hr in culture in the vehicle-treated wells the level of calcein AM emission was unchanged from the level noted at the time of plating. This was followed by a gradual rise in the level of calcein AM from 18 to 48 hr. In the presence of VEGF-2 the profile of calcein AM emission was similar to that observed for the vehicle-treated controls, with the exception of a somewhat greater increase at the 48 hr time point.
View this table: [in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Retinal cell survival in the presence or absence of VEGF-2 during the first 48 hr in culture To characterize further a role for VEGF during the early in vitro culture period, we examined the effect that delaying the addition of the factor to the cultures had on the level of rhodopsin protein. The initial addition of VEGF was made 4, 24, or 48 hr after plating, and the cultures subsequently were maintained for 9 d and then prepared for the rhodopsin ELISA. The loss of the response to VEGF-2 or VEGF-1, as a function of the time that lapsed between the isolation of the cells and the initial addition of the factors, is depicted in Figure 5, A and B, respectively. The addition of factors within 4 hr of the plating of the cells resulted in a threefold increase in the level of rhodopsin. However, delaying the initial treatment with VEGF by 24 or 48 hr resulted in a reduction of the maximal response by 28 and 43%, respectively. Furthermore, after a delay of 48 hr, only treatment with 100 ng/ml of VEGF-2 induced a significant increase in rhodopsin content, thus suggesting that the VEGFs are mitogenic for retinal progenitor cells and that the proliferative response is restricted developmentally.
View larger version (20K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Delaying the addition of VEGF-2 to retinal cultures results in a time-dependent decrease of the VEGF-induced response. The retinal cultures were prepared as previously described in Figure 1. One set of cultures was treated initially with factors at 4 hr after plating (9/0); subsequently, additional sets were treated after 24 or 48 hr (8/1 or 7/2, respectively). After 9 d in culture the cells were fixed, and the level of rhodopsin protein was quantitated by ELISA assay.
Treatment with VEGF increases the number of amacrine cells, but not Müller cells, astrocytes, or endothelial cells
The possibility that VEGF affects other retinal cell types that are born postnatally, e.g., amacrine and Müller cells, also was investigated. The morphology of amacrine cells, identified on the basis of their expression of syntaxin, is depicted in the photomicrographs shown in Figure 2D-F. Treatment with either VEGF induced a dose-dependent increase in the number of syntaxin-immunopositive cells, with 10 ng/ml inducing a maximal increase of ~2.4-fold as compared with the vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 6A). In contrast to the results with the rhodopsin ELISA and cell counts, 100 ng/ml of VEGF-1 or VEGF-2 induced a smaller increase in the number of syntaxin-immunopositive cells than was observed with 10 ng/ml. To characterize further the effect of VEGF-2 treatment on the phenotype of amacrine cells, we measured the level of high-affinity GABA uptake. Figure 6B depicts the dose-dependent increase in GABA uptake induced by VEGF. The dose-response curve is similar to that observed when the number of immunopositive syntaxin cells is used as the endpoint, with a significant increase and saturation in GABA uptake occurring with 1 and 10 ng/ml of VEGF-2, respectively.
View larger version (14K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 6. VEGF treatment increases the number of amacrine cells and the level of high-affinity GABA uptake, but not the level of GFAP protein. Retinal cells were treated for 8 d with the indicated concentrations of VEGF-2. Then the cells were fixed, immunohistochemically stained for syntaxin, and counted (A), analyzed for the level of high-affinity GABA uptake (B), or analyzed for GFAP protein (C). The data that are shown are representative of three to four experiments and are the mean of five to six determinations ± SEM.
Müller glial cells were identified on the basis of their expression of vimentin. After an 8 d treatment with VEGF-2 at a concentration of 100 ng/ml, the level of vimentin protein was 93 ± 2% of the level observed in the vehicle-treated controls. Similarly, VEGF-2 treatment resulted in a small decrease in the number of vimentin-immunopositive cells (data not shown). To determine whether VEGF-2 has an effect on the number of astrocytes or on the level of astrocyte differentiation, we measured the amount of GFAP protein by ELISA. After 7 d in culture, treatment with VEGF-2 or FGF-2 did not change the level of GFAP significantly as compared with the vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, treatment with VEGF-2 did not increase the number of endothelial cells, PECAM-1-immunopositive cells, in the retinal cultures (data not shown).
Effect of developmental age on the response to VEGF-2
To characterize further the developmental pattern of the VEGF response, we isolated retinal cells at different developmental stages, and we quantitated the mitogenic response to VEGF-2 after 48 hr by labeling the cultures with [3H]thymidine. In addition, because it has been noted previously that the differentiation of photoreceptor cells in vitro is density-dependent, the effect that plating density has on the response to VEGF also was investigated (Sparrow et al., 1990
When the cultures were derived from E15 animals and plated at a density of 212 cells/mm2, the basal level of [3H]thymidine incorporation was 1589 ± 94 dpm/well, and treatment with VEGF-2 induced a maximal increase of 50% (Fig. 7A). In contrast to the dose-response that was observed with P1 cultures in which saturation occurs at 10 ng/ml, the proliferative response in the E15 cultures saturates at a concentration of 1 ng/ml. Furthermore, there was an inverse relationship between the plating density and the mitogenic response to VEGF-2. At a density of 318 cells/mm2 a leftward shift in the dose-response curve was noted, with concentrations higher than 1 ng/ml causing a desensitization of the response. At the highest density that was tested (425 cells/mm2), the retinal cells were unresponsive to VEGF-2. It is interesting to note that FGF-2 (10 ng/ml), which has a biological activity similar to VEGF-2 in the P1 cultures (see below), inhibited proliferation in the higher-density E15 cultures by as much as 62% (data not shown).
View larger version (14K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 7. Effect of developmental age on the response of retinal cells to VEGF. Retinal cells derived from E15 (A), E20 (B), or P1 (C) animals were plated at a density of 212 (open squares), 318 (filled squares), or 425 cells/mm2 (open circles). At 4 hr after plating the cultures were treated with the indicated concentrations of VEGF-2. After 24 hr the cultures were switched to serum-free medium, and the factors were added again. Then the cultures were labeled with [3H]thymidine after 24 hr. The data points are the mean of five to six determinations ± SEM. At the density of 212, 318, or 425 cells/mm2 the basal values (dpm/well) for [3H]thymidine incorporation at E15 were 1599.7 ± 95.3, 4133.9 ± 409.2, and 6315.6 ± 154.7; at E20 they had risen to 3361 ± 192.8, 4936 ± 271.9, and 6377.5 ± 313.9, respectively. At P1 the basal values were 479.7 ± 33.3, 754.7 ± 70, and 744.7 ± 11.7, respectively.
In cultures that were derived from E20 animals, the basal level of [3H]thymidine incorporation at a plating density of 212 cells/mm2 was 3361 ± 192 dpm/well. The level of stimulation of [3H]thymidine incorporation with VEGF-2 treatment was generally greater, ranging up to 180-200%, as compared with the vehicle-treated controls. Furthermore, the overall level of stimulation was greater than that observed in E15 cultures (Fig. 7B). There was still a trend toward VEGF-2 having less of an effect in cultures plated at the highest density. However, the inhibitory effect was much less pronounced. By P1, when the basal level of [3H]thymidine incorporation was 478 ± 33 dpm/well at a density of 212 cells/mm2, there was a leftward shift in the dose-response with saturation occurring at 10 ng/ml, and the extent of the maximal increase was greater, in the range of 300% (Fig. 7C). Furthermore, there was no discernible effect of plating density on the response to VEGF-2.
Comparison of the response of retinal cells to VEGF-2 and other factors
To characterize more fully the responsiveness of the rod or retinal progenitor cells, we compared the effect that EGF, FGF-2, or TGF
View larger version (20K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 8. The response profile of P1 retinal cells to VEGF-2 as compared with EGF, FGF-2, or TGF
CNTF inhibits the response of photoreceptor cell progenitors to VEGF-2
The results from the BrdU-labeling experiments demonstrate that VEGF-2 enhances the rate of proliferation of retinal progenitor cells. Because the developmental pathway of photoreceptor cells is thought to be lineage-independent and thus under the regulation of environmental factors (Ezzeddine et al., 1997
View larger version (19K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 9. CNTF inhibits the VEGF-induced increase in rhodopsin, but not the early proliferative response. Retinal cultures were treated 24 hr after plating with the indicated concentrations of CNTF in the presence or absence of 150 ng/ml of VEGF-2. After 8 d in vitro the amount of rhodopsin was quantitated (A), and the total number of cells in the cultures was determined (B). C, To determine the effect of CNTF treatment on the early proliferative response induced by VEGF, we treated the cultures with the indicated concentrations of VEGF-2 in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml of CNTF. After 48 hr the cultures were labeled for 6 hr with [3H]thymidine.
DISCUSSION
We have identified and characterized the effect of VEGF-1 and VEGF-2 on retinal cells in vitro. Treatment with VEGF in the sub-nanomolar range induces an increase in the number of photoreceptor and amacrine cells and increases the level of rhodopsin protein and high-affinity GABA uptake. Time course studies demonstrate that VEGF induces a maximal increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation within 48 hr of its addition, and delaying the treatment of the cultures by 24-48 hr results in the loss of the proliferative and differentiation responses. The mitogenic response was regulated developmentally, with VEGF-2 inducing an increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation with cells derived from E15, E20, and P1 animals. When BrdU was added to the cultures 48 hr after the addition of VEGF-2, a minority of the rhodopsin-immunopositive cells were double-labeled. These results suggest that VEGF-2 also may affect the survival of photoreceptor cells. In comparison with members of other trophic factor families, the responses to treatment with VEGF-2 and FGF-2 were similar in that both factors increased the level of rhodopsin protein without inducing an increase in the total number of cells after 9 d in culture. The coadministration of CNTF with VEGF-2 resulted in the inhibition of the VEGF-induced increase in the level of rhodopsin, but not in the proliferative response.
The VEGF receptor family currently is composed of four members (for review, see Klagsbrun and D'Amore, 1996
The effect of developmental age on the response of the retinal progenitor cells to VEGF is consistent with the developmental expression pattern of the receptor (Yang and Cepko, 1996
Previous studies in goldfish and frog have suggested that amacrine cell development is regulated by cell-cell contact (Negishi et al., 1982
Comparing the time course of the VEGF-induced proliferation with the developmental time course of the appearance of rhodopsin protein indicates that there is an ~5 d lag between the two events. The appearance of rhodopsin protein likely reflects the induction of gene transcription, because the two events have been shown to be closely correlated (Treisman et al., 1988
In comparison to members of other trophic factor families, the response to VEGF-2 resembled that of FGF-2 in that both factors increased the level of rhodopsin protein while inducing relatively small increases in the total number of retinal cells after 9 d in vitro. In addition, a proliferative response, based on [3H]thymidine incorporation and cell counts, to FGF-2 was noted by Lillien and Cepko (1992)
CNTF, a member of the neuropoietic family of cytokines, is known to affect the development of photoreceptor cells in vitro and in vivo and to enhance the survival of photoreceptor cells after light-induced damage (Unoki and LaVail, 1994
During the course of development in the retina, oxygen levels control the microarchitecture of retinal vessels that in turn matches the pattern of differentiation of retinal neurons (Chan-Ling et al., 1990
FOOTNOTES Received Dec. 23, 1999; revised June 22, 2000; accepted June 26, 2000.
We acknowledge the work of Drs. J-S. Hu and S. Ruben in the cloning of the VEGF-2 gene and Drs. T. A. Coleman and R. Gentz in the production of purified protein.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Ralph Alderson, Human Genome Sciences, Incorporated, 9410 Key West Avenue, Rockville, MD 20850. E-mail: ralph_alderson{at}hgsi.com.
REFERENCES
- Altshuler D, Cepko C (1992) A temporally regulated, diffusible activity is required for rod photoreceptor development in vitro. Development 114:947-957[Abstract].
- Altshuler DM, Turner DL, Cepko CL (1991) Specification of cell type in the vertebrate retina. In: Development of the visual system (Lam M-K, Shatz CJ, eds), pp 37-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Anchan RM, Reh TA, Angello J, Balliet A, Walker M (1991) EGF and TGF-
stimulate retinal neuroepithelial cell proliferation in vitro. Neuron 6:923-936[Web of Science][Medline].
- Bottenstein JE (1983) Growth requirements of neural crest cells in vitro. In: Advances in cellular neurobiology (Federoff S, Hertz L, eds), pp 4333-4379. New York: Academic.
- Cayouette M, Darren B, Sendtner M, Lachapele P, Gravel C (1998) Intraocular gene transfer of ciliary neurotrophic factor prevents death and increases responsiveness of rod photoreceptors in the retinal degeneration slow mouse. J Neurosci 18:9282-9293
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Chan-Ling T, Halasz P, Stone J (1990) Development of retinal vasculature in the cat: processes and mechanisms. Curr Eye Res 9:459-478[Web of Science][Medline].
- Dowling JE (1987) In: The retina
- Ezzeddine ZD, Yang X, DeChiara T, Yancopoulos G, Cepko CL (1997) Postmitotic cells fated to become rod photoreceptors can be respecified by CNTF treatment on the retina. Development 124:1055-1067[Abstract].
- Fontaine V, Kinkl N, Sahel J, Dreyfus H, Hicks D (1998) Survival of purified rat photoreceptors is stimulated directly by fibroblast growth factor-2. J Neurosci 18:9662-9672
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Fuhrmann S, Kirsch M, Hofmann HD (1995) Ciliary neurotrophic factor promotes chick photoreceptor development in vitro. Development 121:2695-2706[Abstract].
- Greene JM, Li YL, Yourey PA, Gruber J, Carter KC, Shell BK, Dillon PA, Florence C, Duan DR, Blunt A, Ornitz DM, Ruben SM, Alderson RF (1998) Identification and characterization of a novel member of the fibroblast growth factor family. Eur J Neurosci 10:1911-1925[Medline].
- Harris WA (1991) Neurogenesis and determination in the Xenopus retina. In: Development of the visual system (Lam M-K, Shatz CJ, eds), pp 95-108. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Harris WA, Hartenstein V (1991) Neuronal determination without cell division in Xenopus embryos. Neuron 6:499-515[Web of Science][Medline].
- Hicks D, Courtois Y (1992) Fibroblast growth factor stimulates photoreceptor differentiation in vitro. J Neurosci 12:2022-2033[Abstract].
- Hu JS, Hastings GA, Cherry S, Gentz R, Ruben S, Coleman TA (1997) A novel regulatory function of proteolytically cleaved VEGF-2 for vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. FASEB J 11:498-504[Abstract].
- Joukov V, Kumar V, Sorsa T, Arighi E, Weich H, Saksela O, Alitalo K (1998) A recombinant mutant vascular endothelial growth factor-C that has lost vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 binding, activation, and vascular permeability activities. J Biol Chem 273:6599-6602
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Kelley MW, Turner JK, Reh TA (1994) Retinoic acid promotes differentiation of photoreceptors in vitro. Development 120:2091-2102[Abstract].
- Kimchi A, Wang X-F, Weinberg RA, Cheifetz S, Massague J (1988) The absence of TGF
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Klagsbrun M, D'Amore PA (1996) Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 7:259-270[Medline].
- LaVail MM, Rapaport DH, Rakic P (1991) Cytogenesis in the monkey retina. J Comp Anat 309:86-114.
- LaVail MM, Unoki K, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, Yancopulos GD, Steinberg RH (1992) Multiple growth factors, cytokines, and neurotrophins rescue photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11249-11253
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Lillien L (1995) Changes in retinal cell fate induced by over-expression of EGF receptor. Nature 377:158-162[Medline].
- Lillien L, Cepko C (1992) Control of proliferation in the retina: temporal changes in responsiveness to FGF and TGF-
- Molday RS (1989) Monoclonal antibodies to rhodopsin and other proteins of rod outer segments. Prog Retin Eye Res 8:173-209.
- Morrow EM, Belliveau MJ, Cepko CL (1998) Two phases of rod photoreceptor differentiation during rat retinal development. J Neurosci 18:3738-3748
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Negishi K, Teranishi T, Kato S (1982) New dopaminergic and indolamine-accumulating cells in the growth zone of goldfish retinas after neurotoxic destruction. Science 216:747-749
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Phelps DL (1990) Oxygen and developmental retinal capillary remodeling in the kitten. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:2194-2200
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Reh TA (1991) Determination of cell fate during retinal histogenesis: intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. In: Development of the visual system (Lam M-K, Shatz CJ, eds), pp 79-94. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Reh TA, Tully T (1986) Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase containing amacrine cell number in larval frog retina. Dev Biol 114:463-469[Web of Science][Medline].
- Sparrow JR, Hicks D, Barnstable CJ (1990) Cell commitment and differentiation in explants of embryonic rat neural retina. Comparison with the development potential of dissociated retina. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 51:69-84[Medline].
- Stone J, Itin A, Alon T, Pe'er J, Gnessin H, Chan-Ling T, Keshet E (1995) Development of retinal vasculature is mediated by hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression by neuroglia. J Neurosci 15:4738-4747[Abstract].
- Treisman J, Morabito MA, Barnstable C (1988) Opsin expression in the rat retina is developmentally regulated by transcription activation. Mol Cell Biol 8:1570-1579
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Turner DL, Cepko CL (1987) A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development. Nature 328:131-136[Medline].
- Turner DL, Snyder EY, Cepko CL (1990) Lineage-independent determination of cell type in the embryonic mouse retina. Neuron 4:833-845[Web of Science][Medline].
- Unoki K, LaVail MM (1994) Protection of the retina from ischemic injury by brain-derived neurotrophic factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:907-915
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Watanabe T, Raff MC (1990) Rod photoreceptor development in vitro: intrinsic properties of proliferating neuroepithelial cells change as development proceeds in the rat retina. Neuron 4:461-467[Web of Science][Medline].
- Watanabe T, Raff MC (1992) Diffusible rod-promoting signals in the developing rat retina. Development 114:899-906[Abstract].
- Wen R, Song Y, Cheng T, Matthes MT, Yasumura D, LaVail MM, Steinberg RH (1995) Injury-induced upregulation of bFGF and CNTF mRNAs in the rat retina. J Neurosci 15:7377-7385[Abstract].
- Wen Y, Edelman JL, Kang T, Zeng N, Sachs G (1998) Two functional forms of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2/Flk-1 mRNA are expressed in normal rat retina. J Biol Chem 273:2090-2097
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Wetts R, Fraser SE (1988) Multipotent precursors can give rise to all major cell types of the frog retina. Science 239:1142-1145
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Yang X, Cepko CL (1996) Flk-1, a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is expressed by retinal progenitor cells. J Neurosci 16:6089-6099
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Young RW (1985) Cell differentiation in the retina of the mouse. Anat Rec 212:199-205[Medline].
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/20186781-08$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
G. H. Kim, D. K. Hahn, C. P. Kellner, Z. L. Hickman, R. J. Komotar, R. M. Starke, W. J. Mack, J. Mocco, R. A. Solomon, and E. S. Connolly Jr
Plasma Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor After Treatment for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2274 - 2279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. M. Nishiguchi, M. Nakamura, H. Kaneko, S. Kachi, and H. Terasaki
The Role of VEGF and VEGFR2/Flk1 in Proliferation of Retinal Progenitor Cells in Murine Retinal Degeneration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4315 - 4320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. D. Akula, R. M. Hansen, M. E. Martinez-Perez, and A. B. Fulton
Rod Photoreceptor Function Predicts Blood Vessel Abnormality in Retinopathy of Prematurity
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4351 - 4359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. A. D'Amore
Vascular Endothelial Cell Growth Factor-A: Not Just for Endothelial Cells Anymore
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2007; 171(1): 14 - 18.
[Full Text] [PDF]
M. C. Gillies
What We Don't Know About Avastin Might Hurt Us
Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 2006; 124(10): 1478 - 1479.
[Full Text] [PDF]
T. Hashimoto, X.-M. Zhang, B. Y.-k. Chen, and X.-J. Yang
VEGF activates divergent intracellular signaling components to regulate retinal progenitor cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation
Development, June 1, 2006; 133(11): 2201 - 2210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. Notari, A. Miller, A. Martinez, J. Amaral, M. Ju, G. Robinson, L. E. H. Smith, and S. P. Becerra
Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor Is a Substrate for Matrix Metalloproteinase Type 2 and Type 9: Implications for Downregulation in Hypoxia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2736 - 2747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. van Wijngaarden, D. J. Coster, and K. A. Williams
Inhibitors of Ocular Neovascularization: Promises and Potential Problems
JAMA, March 23, 2005; 293(12): 1509 - 1513.
[Full Text] [PDF]
A. Ohlmann, M. Scholz, A. Goldwich, B. K. Chauhan, K. Hudl, A. V. Ohlmann, E. Zrenner, W. Berger, A. Cvekl, M. W. Seeliger, et al.
Ectopic Norrin Induces Growth of Ocular Capillaries and Restores Normal Retinal Angiogenesis in Norrie Disease Mutant Mice
J. Neurosci., February 16, 2005; 25(7): 1701 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. Watanabe, H. Takagi, K. Suzuma, I. Suzuma, H. Oh, H. Ohashi, S. Kemmochi, A. Uemura, T. Ojima, E. Suganami, et al.
Transcription Factor Ets-1 Mediates Ischemia- and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Dependent Retinal Neovascularization
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 164(5): 1827 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. F. Insua, A. Garelli, N. P. Rotstein, O. L. German, A. Arias, and L. E. Politi
Cell Cycle Regulation in Retinal Progenitors by Glia-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Docosahexaenoic Acid
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 2235 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Y. ZHU, K. JIN, X. O. MAO, and D. A. GREENBERG
Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes proliferation of cortical neuron precursors by regulating E2F expression
FASEB J, February 1, 2003; 17(2): 186 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. Jin, Y. Zhu, Y. Sun, X. O. Mao, L. Xie, and D. A. Greenberg
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo
PNAS, September 3, 2002; 99(18): 11946 - 11950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Y. Li, J. Chen, X. G. Chen, L. Wang, S. C. Gautam, Y. X. Xu, M. Katakowski, L. J. Zhang, M. Lu, N. Janakiraman, et al.
Human marrow stromal cell therapy for stroke in rat: Neurotrophins and functional recovery
Neurology, August 27, 2002; 59(4): 514 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
O. O. Ogunshola, A. Antic, M. J. Donoghue, S.-Y. Fan, H. Kim, W. B. Stewart, J. A. Madri, and L. R. Ment
Paracrine and Autocrine Functions of Neuronal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in the Central Nervous System
J. Biol. Chem., March 22, 2002; 277(13): 11410 - 11415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
X. Zhang and X. Yang
Regulation of retinal ganglion cell production by Sonic hedgehog
Development, January 3, 2001; 128(6): 943 - 957.
[Abstract] [PDF]
This Article Abstract 
Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager 
Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (59) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yourey, P. A. Articles by Alderson, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yourey, P. A. Articles by Alderson, R. F.
|
|
|
|
 |
|