 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 2000, 20(23):8909-8915
Putative Cortical and Thalamic Inputs Elicit Convergent
Excitation in a Population of GABAergic Interneurons of the Lateral
Amygdala
Csaba
Szinyei,
Thomas
Heinbockel,
Julia
Montagne, and
Hans-Christian
Pape
Institute of Physiology, Medical School, Otto-von-Guericke
University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
Synaptic circuitry in the rat lateral amygdala (AL) was studied in
brain slices using electrophysiological recordings. Electrical stimulation of external and internal capsules evoked an EPSC
followed by a sequence of GABAA and GABAB
receptor-mediated IPSC in principal neurons. Paired stimulation
of either afferents resulted in a significant reduction (~45%) of
the second GABAA receptor-mediated IPSC. A priming
stimulation, consisting of a priming pulse to one pathway followed by a
pulse to the other pathway, resulted in a strong depression of the
second IPSC basically identical to that during paired stimulation.
Paired- and primed-pulse depressions were largely relieved by 10 µM CGP 55845A, indicating regulation through presynaptic
GABAB receptors. Furthermore, putative interneurons responded with EPSCs of constant latencies to minimal stimulation of
both cortical and thalamic fibers, indicating convergent monosynaptic input. At higher stimulation strength, an ~15% reduction of EPSCs occurred in interneurons after paired and primed stimulation, which was
not sensitive to CGP 55845A. These findings indicate that a rather
homogeneous population of interneurons exists in the AL with respect to
their afferent connectivity, in that they receive convergent input
through putative thalamic and cortical fibers, both directly and
indirectly (through principal neurons), and mediate inhibitory control
of postsynaptic principal neurons. This symmetrically built GABAergic
circuitry can be of functional significance, given the distinctive role
of the two afferent input systems for the mediation of different
components of fear responses and the importance of GABAergic mechanisms
for limitation of excessive neuronal activity.
Key words:
lateral amygdala; converging afferent input; inhibition; interneuron; GABAA; GABAB
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The amygdaloid complex is known to
be important for regulation of emotional behavior and learning (LeDoux,
2000 ) and to be critically involved in neurological disorders such as
temporal lobe epilepsy (Gloor, 1992 ). A part of this group of nuclei,
the lateral amygdala (AL), receives the main sensory input from
cortical and subcortical fields. The information is processed through
intra-amygdaloid connections and transferred toward the central
amygdala, the major output station (Pitkänen et al., 1998 ).
Cortical afferents reach the AL laterally from the external capsule.
The other major sensory input reaches the AL medially from the internal
capsule as subcortical thalamic afferents (LeDoux et al., 1991 ;
Romanski and LeDoux, 1993 ). In the AL, as in other brain regions,
principal cells and local interneurons can be classified on their
electrophysiological, neurochemical, and morphological properties
(Rainnie et al., 1991b ; Lang and Paré, 1998 ; Mahanty and Sah,
1998 ). In vivo data demonstrated a powerful control through
GABAergic inhibition over the activity of projecting principal cells
(Lang and Paré, 1997 , 1998 ), which renders a special role to the
GABAergic interneurons in control of excitation in this region. Indeed,
GABAergic interneurons are thought to play a crucial role in
information processing in the amygdala (Lang and Paré, 1998 ;
Mahanty and Sah, 1999 ) and are also thought to underlie the regulation
of epileptiform activity (Callahan et al., 1991 ; Gloor, 1992 ; Washburn
and Moises, 1992a ). It has been suggested that these interneurons
receive excitatory afferent input form cortical (Lang and Paré,
1998 ) as well as thalamic areas (Li et al., 1996a ). It is not known,
however, if these major afferents innervate different populations of
interneurons or if these neurons receive converging inputs as do
principal cells (Li et al., 1996b ). This convergence allows the same
principal cells in the amygdala to integrate information from sensory
channels with different processing capacities.
Therefore, we designed electrophysiological experiments aimed at the
afferent input architecture to GABAergic interneurons in the AL. One
key element of our experimental paradigm was paired-pulse depression, a
mechanism of presumed presynaptic origin that limits transmitter
release if synaptic activation occurs within several hundred
milliseconds after preceding activation (Thompson et al., 1993 ). During GABAergic transmission, GABA acts presynaptically to
regulate further release by binding and activating
GABAB receptors (Misgeld et al.,
1995 ). In the amygdala, paired-pulse depression of NMDA
receptor-mediated responses was shown to be influenced by presynaptic
GABAB receptors (Huang and Gean, 1994 ). In our experiments, we have recorded synaptically evoked
GABAA receptor-mediated IPSPs and IPSCs in
putative principal neurons and studied the nature of paired-pulse
depression of these responses using different activation protocols of
cortical and thalamic afferent fibers. In addition, synaptic responses
were recorded from interneurons that were identified through
morphological and electrophysiological criteria.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Sharp microelectrode recordings. Coronal slices of
500 µm thickness containing the amygdala and related brain areas were
prepared from deeply anesthetized Long-Evans rats (halothane
anesthesia; Zeneca, Plankstadt, Germany) of either sex (postnatal day
30-35), as described recently (Heinbockel and Pape, 2000 ). Slices
were kept at 35°C in an interface type chamber during continuous
superfusion with a solution containing (in mM): NaCl 126, KCl 2.5, MgSO4 2, NaHCO3
26, NaH2PO4 1.25, dextrose
10, and CaCl2 2, buffered to pH 7.4 with 95%
O2 and 5% CO2.
Intracellular recordings were performed with glass microelectrodes
(TW-100F; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) and controlled
with a bridge amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Electrode
DC resistances ranged between 60 and 80 M (filled with 4 M K-acetate). All membrane potential measurements were
corrected for electrode offsets (typically <5 mV). Epi-illumination of
the slices allowed location of the AL and other relevant brain regions.
Principal neurons were identified based on electrophysiological criteria, namely the generation of slow oscillations of the membrane potential (Paré et al., 1995 ; Pape et al.,
1998 ) and spike frequency adaptation (Rainnie et al.,
1991a ,b ; Washburn and Moises, 1992b ). Neurons were considered for
analysis that had a stable resting membrane potential less than
60 mV, input resistances >45 M at resting membrane potential (as
determined from responses to hyperpolarizing current pulses, 0.1 to
0.3 nA), and overshooting action potentials. Data were stored on
videotape for off-line analysis after conversion with Neurocorder
DR-384 unit (Neurodata, New York, NY) and later digitized using a CED
1401 (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK) interface and Spike2 software.
Synaptic responses were evoked with two bipolar tungsten electrodes
placed in the external capsule and in the internal capsule dorsal to
the central nucleus of the amygdala for electrical stimulation (100 µsec pulse duration) of putative cortical and thalamic afferents, respectively (Mahanty and Sah, 1999 ; Weisskopf and LeDoux, 1999 ; Heinbockel and Pape, 2000 ). However, it should be noted that these electrical stimuli likely activated other fiber systems also. For
instance, AL axons to the perirhinal cortex course through the external
capsule. Stimulus intensity was adjusted to produce a synaptic response
30-50% of maximum amplitude without triggering action potentials.
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. Slices containing the
amygdala from Long-Evans rats of either sex (postnatal day 11-16) were prepared, and recordings were performed as previously described (Meis and Pape, 1998 ). Briefly, rats were anesthetized with halothane and killed by decapitation. After preparation and equilibration of
300-µm-thick coronal slices, cells were obtained under visual guidance (Axioskop FS, Achroplan 40/w; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using infrared videomicroscopy (b/w camera, model C-2400; Hamamatsu, Hersching, Germany). Experiments were run at room temperature in a
submerged type chamber. Extracellular solution contained the following
concentration of chemicals (in mM): NaCl 125, KCl 2.5, NaH2PO4 1.25, NaHCO3 22, MgSO4 2, CaCl2 2, and dextrose 20. Acidity was adjusted
with 95% O2 and 5% CO2.
Electrophysiological recordings were performed using the patch-clamp
technique in whole-cell mode. Patch pipettes were pulled from
borosilicate glass (GC150TF-10; Clark Electromedical Instruments,
Pangbourne, UK). The first set of experiments was performed with a
potassium-based internal solution containing the following chemicals
(in mM): K-gluconate 95, K3-citrate 20, NaCl 10, HEPES 10, EGTA 5, MgCl2 1, MgATP 3, NaGTP 0.5, and Br-QX-314 5, and pH was adjusted with 1 M
KOH to 7.25. To improve space clamp and to further reduce
GABAB receptor-coupled postsynaptic K+ channels, the next set of experiments
was performed using an internal solution with the following
concentration of chemicals (in mM): Cs-gluconate 95, Cs3-citrate 20, NaCl 10, HEPES 10, EGTA 5, MgCl2 1, MgATP 3, and NaGTP 0.5, and pH was
adjusted with 1 M CsOH to 7.25. Importantly, the membrane
potential was held near the reversal potential of the excitatory
synaptic currents at +7 or 0 mV, depending on the internal solution
(K+-based or
Cs+-based pipette solution, respectively)
to minimize the contribution of EPSCs to the recorded IPSCs. To
stimulate afferent fibers, bipolar tungsten stimulation electrodes were
placed in the external capsule and in the internal capsule dorsal to
the central nucleus of the amygdala similarly as described before
(Mahanty and Sah, 1999 ; Weisskopf and LeDoux, 1999 ; Heinbockel and
Pape, 2000 ). Thirty to fifty percent of maximum responses were evoked
(100 µsec pulse duration, 0.1-3 mA) to record synaptically evoked
IPSCs with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments). Access
resistance was controlled and ranged between 5-10 M . For
stimulation, membrane potential control, and data acquisition pClamp
8.0 software was used (Axon Instruments). Data were low-pass filtered
at 2 kHz with the integrated Bessel filter of the amplifier and
digitized by a Digidata 1200 unit (Axon Instruments) at 10 kHz.
Additionally, data were stored on videotape after conversion with a
Neurocorder DR-890 unit (Neurodata) for off-line analysis.
Additional experiments were performed to record from interneurons in
the AL using the K-gluconate-based solution described above without
QX-314. Interneurons were identified according to their
electrophysiological properties (Washburn and Moises, 1992b , Rainnie et
al., 1993 ; Mahanty and Sah, 1998 ). After obtaining the
cells in voltage-clamp mode, current-clamp mode was chosen to
characterize firing properties of the interneurons. In cells that
showed high-frequency firing of fast action potentials after injection
of +0.1 nA current with distinct fast afterhyperpolarization after each
spike and no apparent spike frequency adaptation, synaptic currents
were evoked at a membrane potential of 72 mV in voltage-clamp mode.
Liquid junction potentials in all voltage-clamp experiments were
corrected (Neher, 1992 ).
Histological procedures. Biocytin labeling and
light-microscopic morphological analysis were performed as described
previously (Meis and Pape, 1998 ). Briefly, in some experiments 0.1%
biocytin was added to the intracellular solution. After recording,
slices were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After
cryoprotection with a 30% sucrose solution in PBS, slices were
resectioned at 100 µm using a freeze microtome (Leica, Benzheim,
Germany). Sections were treated with avidin-biotin complex horseradish
peroxidase (PK 4000, 1:100; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), then
treated with
(NH4)2Ni(SO4)2.
Finally sections were dehydrated and coverslipped.
Drug application. The following drugs were applied during
the experiments: ( )-bicuculline methiodide or picrotoxin (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) were dissolved directly in the external and QX-314 (bromide
salt; Sigma) in the internal K-gluconate-based solution. CGP 55845 A
was diluted directly in external solution and was provided kindly by Novartis.
Statistical analysis. For statistical analysis, the
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was applied. Populations
were regarded as significantly different if p < 0.0125. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.
 |
RESULTS |
Synaptic responses of principal cells to paired and primed
stimulation of cortical and thalamic afferents
Electrical stimulation of putative cortical or thalamic afferent
inputs evoked a typical triphasic synaptic response in AL principal
neurons recorded at resting potential ( 64.8 ± 0.37 mV;
n = 5). The synaptic response consisted of an
excitatory potential followed by a GABAA and
GABAB receptor-mediated inhibitory potential, as
described earlier (Mahanty and Sah, 1999 ; Weisskopf and LeDoux, 1999 ;
Heinbockel and Pape, 2000 ), and as assessed in the present study using
sharp electrode recordings at 35°C (Fig.
1). Paired stimulation of cortical input
pathways at an interstimulus interval of 0.3 sec resulted in
substantially reduced inhibitory synaptic responses to the second pulse
(paired-pulse depression, Fig. 1A). A very similar
depression of inhibitory synaptic responses was observed after paired
stimulation of thalamic input fibers in the same neuron (Fig.
1B). In a next experimental step, a priming stimulation protocol was applied in the same cells, consisting of a
pulse to one afferent pathway followed by a pulse to the other pathway
(primed-pulse stimulation). Stimulation strengths and the interstimulus
interval were maintained constant as before during the paired-pulse
stimulations. Furthermore, before executing the paired- and
primed-pulse stimulation paradigms, the stimulus strengths were
appropriately adjusted to yield similar amplitudes of fast inhibitory
potentials in response to cortical and thalamic stimulation. In cases
of paired-pulse stimulations, the magnitude of depression was assessed
by dividing the amplitude of the second response by the amplitude of
the first response. The amount of depression in cases involving the
primed-pulse depression paradigms was calculated by dividing the
amplitude of the second inhibitory response by the amplitude of the
first inhibitory response obtained from the corresponding paired-pulse
stimulation sequence. Cortical followed by thalamic stimulation
resulted in a depression of synaptic responses to the second pulse
(primed-pulse depression), very similar to that observed during paired
stimulation of the thalamic pathway (Fig. 1C). Vice versa,
thalamic followed by cortical stimulation resulted in a primed-pulse
depression, the magnitude of which was similar to that during paired
stimulation of the cortical pathway (Fig. 1D). The
paired- and primed-pulse depressions were observed in all tested
principal neurons (n = 5). Excitatory responses also
tended to show paired- and primed-pulse depressions, but at a much
smaller extent compared with that of inhibitory responses (Fig. 1).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Depression of IPSPs after paired stimulation of
cortical and thalamic afferents. Cortical (A, cort/cort)
or thalamic (B, thal/thal) afferents were
stimulated in pairs to evoke postsynaptic responses (paired-pulse
stimulations). Using the same stimulation strengths, cortical or
thalamic priming of afferents was followed by the activation of
thalamic (C, cort/thal) or cortical (D,
thal/cort) pathways, respectively (primed-pulse stimulations).
Stimulus artifacts were removed for clarity, and open
arrowheads indicate the investigated IPSPs. Note the depression
of fast IPSPs after paired and primed stimulation. All recordings were
obtained at 35°C with a sharp microelectrode from the same putative
principal neuron in the AL; an average of three consecutive traces of
pairs is presented in each case.
|
|
Time course of paired-pulse depressions of GABAA
receptor-mediated components
Because our interest was on GABAergic circuitries, paired and
primed depression of GABAergic components were studied in more detail
using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique under voltage-clamp conditions. The contribution of excitatory postsynaptic effects was
minimized by holding the membrane potential close to the reversal potential of excitatory amino acid receptor-mediated responses (see
Materials and Methods). To more quantitatively analyze the time course,
the magnitude and the pharmacological properties of the paired and
primed depression, the fast GABAA
receptor-mediated component was isolated by addition of QX-314 (5 mM) to the K-gluconate based internal solution, which
blocks G-protein-dependent GABAB receptor-mediated K-channel activity (Nathan et al., 1990 ).
Indeed, bath application of picrotoxin (100 µM;
n = 5) or bicuculline (10 µM;
n = 4) under these conditions completely blocked the
IPSCs, indicating meditation via GABAA receptors
(data not shown). Addition of QX-314 by itself had no measurable effect
on the GABAA-mediated IPSCs.
The time course of paired-pulse depression of the
GABAA IPSCs was studied by delivering two stimuli
of constant intensity to either thalamic or cortical input fibers and
varying the interstimulus interval in a range between 16 and 0.3 sec.
Shorter intervals turned out to be not feasible, because of an overlap
between the synaptic currents evoked by the first and second pulses.
Representative traces of responses to paired stimulation of cortical
and thalamic fibers, although for clarity not all of the tested
intervals, are shown in Figure 2,
A and B, top panel. On the
bottom panel, pooled data with all tested intervals are
presented from the seven cells recorded. Cortical and thalamic
paired-pulse depressions were always tested in each cell. Considering
both experimental approaches, the greatest depression occurred at an
interstimulus interval of 0.5 sec. The amplitude of the IPSC evoked by
the second pulse was 55.6 ± 5.3% and 50 ± 6.3% compared
with responses to the first pulse for cortical and thalamic activation,
respectively. It should be noted that the depression at thalamic
afferents at 1 sec (48.8 ± 4.9%) was not significantly different
compared with that at 0.5 sec.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Time course of paired-pulse depressions of fast
IPSCs. A, Top panel shows pairs of IPSCs
evoked by two identical stimuli delivered at different intervals
[interstimulus interval (ISI)] between 0.3 and 16 sec to the cortical
afferents (cort/cort). Bottom panel shows
the average response to the second stimulus calculated from seven
cells. B, Top panel shows pairs of IPSCs
evoked by two identical stimuli delivered between 0.3 and 16 sec to the
thalamic afferents (thal/thal). Bottom
panel shows the average response to the second stimulus
calculated from the same cells as in A
(n = 7). Please note that for clarity not all
intervals are presented on the top panels. Stimulus
artifacts were omitted for clarity, and arrowheads show
the point of stimulation.
|
|
Magnitude and pharmacological properties of paired- and
primed-pulse depressions
During the next experimental steps, the interstimulus interval was
kept constant at 0.5 sec to obtain maximal depressant effects, and
paired and primed stimulation paradigms were systematically tested in
the same cells (n = 12). In addition, to improve space clamp and to further on block postsynaptic GABAB
receptor-mediated outward K+ conductances,
Cs-gluconate-based internal solution was used (see Materials and
Methods). Representative traces and averaged data are shown in Figure
3, A and C
(Control), respectively. There was no significant difference in the
magnitude of the depression (n = 12) that was obtained
with paired stimulation of either cortical (56.6 ± 2.6%) or
thalamic afferent inputs (52.1 ± 2.1%), or with primed
stimulation of cortical followed by thalamic (56.1 ± 3%) or
thalamic followed by cortical input stimulation (53.3 ± 2.9%). Furthermore, we examined in nine of these cells, whether presynaptic GABAB receptors were involved in paired- and
primed-pulse depression by bath applying a specific
GABAB receptor antagonist, CGP 55845 A (Fig.
3B). The appropriate pooled experimental values were
calculated from the experiments in which 10 µM
CGP 55845 A was subsequently applied. These data show that the
depression was significantly and similarly reduced in all experimental
paradigms that were tested (Fig. 3C). The concentration of
CGP 55845 A was chosen to yield maximal effects on the depression, and
experimental values were collected from periods in which a steady-state
level of the drug effect had been reached. During action of CGP 55845 A, depressions reached 81.3 ± 4.5% and 81.7 ± 1.9% during
paired cortical and thalamic stimulation, respectively. Cortical
priming followed by a thalamic stimulus and vice versa resulted in a
depression to 83.9 ± 4.2% and 81.1 ± 4.6%, respectively.
These values are not significantly different from each other, but
significantly different from values of control experiments
(p < 0.0125).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Effect of a specific GABAB receptor
antagonist on paired- and primed-pulse depressions. A,
Pairs of IPSCs were evoked under control conditions with stimuli
delivered at an interval of 0.5 sec either twice to the cortical
(cort/cort) or to the thalamic
(thal/thal) afferents (paired stimulations).
Afterward, using the same stimulation strengths, stimulation involved
cortical followed by thalamic (cort/thal) or
thalamic followed by cortical (thal/cort) afferents
(primed stimulations). B, The same stimulation sequences
were performed under CGP 55845 A (10 µM) treatment.
Stimulus artifacts were omitted for clarity, and
arrowheads show the point of stimulation.
C, Averaged IPSCs in response to the second stimulus
using the above described stimulation sequences either under control
conditions (n = 12) or under a subsequent CGP 55845 A treatment (n = 9). Stimulus artifacts were
omitted for clarity, and arrowheads show the point of
stimulation. Asterisk indicates a significant difference
(p < 0.0125).
|
|
Synaptic responses of identified interneurons in the AL
Firing properties of recorded neurons were tested under
current-clamp conditions after injection of positive current pulses lasting for several hundred milliseconds. Neurons were considered for
further analysis if they showed maintained action potential firing with
little or no spike frequency accommodation during +0.1 nA depolarizing
current injection from resting potential (Fig.
4Aa,Ba; cf. Mahanty and
Sah, 1998 ). Input resistance as measured from the steady-state voltage
response during a 0.05 nA current injection and action potential
duration at half-maximal amplitude (AP50) were
638 ± 73 M and 1.22 ± 0.12 msec, respectively (n = 11). It is important to note that under the
present recording conditions, the AP50 value in
putative interneurons was significantly smaller than that of putative
principal neurons (AP50: 1.71 ± 0.08 msec,
p < 0.0125; n = 38). The increased
spike duration with respect to the published results from interneurons
in the basolateral complex (Mahanty and Sah, 1998 ) is most likely
attributable to differences in recording temperatures (room temperature
vs 28-30°C; cf. Volgushev et al., 2000 ). In any case, all 11 cells
considered to be interneurons based on electrophysiological criteria,
possessed aspiny dendrites emerging from rather heterogeneously
shaped cell bodies, as assessed after biocytin injection, thereby
corroborating the view that they represent GABAergic interneurons (Fig.
4Ac,Bc; cf. McDonald 1982 ). On the contrary, neurons
displaying typical electrophysiological properties of principal cells
had spine-rich dendrites, as exemplified in Figure 4C. Six
of the interneurons were tested for connectivity with thalamic and
cortical input fibers. All cells responded with fast EPSCs of constant
latencies to minimal (high failure rate) and low-strength stimulation
of both cortical and thalamic input fibers, indicating monosynaptic convergent input. Two examples are illustrated in Figure 4,
Ab and Bb.

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Synaptically evoked EPSCs recorded from neurons
identified electrophysiologically and morphologically as interneurons.
Aa, Ba, Depolarizing current injection
(+0.1 nA) and resulting action potential firing at resting membrane
potential recorded from two representative interneurons in
current-clamp mode. Ab, Bb, Individual
EPSCs after stimulation of cortical (cort) and thalamic
(thal) afferents at 72 mV holding potential
using two different stimulation strengths for each pathway in
voltage-clamp mode. Stimulus artifacts were omitted for clarity, and
arrowheads indicate the point of stimulation.
Ac, Bc, Intracellular biocytin staining
of these neurons revealed nonspiny dendrites of putative interneurons
in the AL; regions within a white frame are shown at a
higher magnification. Ca, Train of action potentials
(+0.1 nA current injection) displaying spike frequency adaptation
typical of a principal neuron in the AL. Cb,
Intracellular staining revealed spiny dendrites of a pyramidal-like
neuron (region within white frame is shown at a higher
magnification). Scaling for Aa, Bb, and
Ca (current-clamp mode) and for Ab and
Bb (voltage-clamp mode) is 200 and 10 msec for
horizontal and 20 mV and 50 pA for vertical bars, respectively. Scaling
for Ac, Bc, and Cb (biocytin-filled
cells) is 30 µm for horizontal bars (corresponding magnified regions:
10 µm, vertical bars).
|
|
Paired- and primed-pulse depressions of EPSCs in interneurons
Paired- and primed-pulse depressions of evoked EPSCs were tested
in 5 of the 11 interneurons, similarly as described before for IPSC
recordings in principal cells. The interstimulus interval was kept at
0.5 sec, and K-gluconate based internal solution was used at a holding
potential of 72 mV. Depression of the second EPSC was observed in all
experimental paradigms (Fig.
5A). Averaged amplitudes of
the second response were 83.6 ± 2.9% and 86.9 ± 3.5%
after paired stimulation of cortical and thalamic afferents, respectively, and 93.2 ± 6% and 81.5 ± 9.9% after primed
cortical/thalamic and thalamic/cortical stimulation, respectively (Fig.
5C). Overall, the depression of EPSCs in interneurons was
small compared with the depression of IPSCs in principal cells.
Furthermore, the depression of EPSCs in interneurons was not affected
in any of the experimental paradigms tested during presence of 10 µM CGP 55845 A (Fig. 5B). During
action of CGP 55845 A, the depressions were 85.2 ± 12.2% and
86.7 ± 6.9% during paired cortical and thalamic stimulation, respectively (Fig. 5C). Cortical priming followed by a
thalamic stimulus and vice versa yielded 85.5 ± 6.4% and
82.8 ± 7.2%, respectively. These values are not significantly
different from each other or from values of control experiments (Fig.
5C).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Paired- and primed-pulse depressions of EPSCs in
identified interneurons. A, Pairs of EPSCs were evoked
under control conditions with stimuli delivered at an interval of 0.5 sec either twice to the cortical (cort/cort) or to the
thalamic (thal/thal) afferents (paired
stimulations). Afterward, using the same stimulation strengths
stimulation involved cortical followed by thalamic
(cort/thal) or thalamic followed by cortical
(thal/cort) afferents (primed stimulations).
B, The same stimulation sequences were performed under
CGP 55845 A (10 µM) treatment. Stimulus artifacts were
omitted for clarity, and arrowheads show the point of
stimulation. C, Averaged EPSCs in response to the second
stimulus using the above described stimulation sequences either under
control conditions (n = 5) or under a subsequent
CGP 55845 A treatment (n = 5).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our results show that (1) stimulation of putative cortical and
thalamic afferents to the AL using every stimulation sequence of
paired- and primed-pulses results in an identical and largely GABAB receptor-dependent depression of
GABAA receptor-mediated responses in principal
neurons, (2) AL interneurons generate monosynaptic EPSCs after minimal
stimulation of both afferents, and (3) at higher stimulation strengths,
an ~15% GABAB receptor-independent reduction
of EPSCs occurs in interneurons after paired- and primed-pulse stimulation. In the following, the possibility is discussed that a
rather homogeneous population of interneurons exists in the AL with
respect to their afferent connectivity, in that they receive excitatory
convergent input through thalamic and cortical fibers, both directly
and indirectly (through principal neurons), and mediate inhibitory
control of postsynaptic principal neurons.
Paired and primed depression as a tool for analyzing
synaptic circuitries
To study the nature of intra-amygdaloid GABAergic circuitry, we
used paired and primed activation of cortical and thalamic afferents
and analyzed the GABAA receptor-mediated
responses in principal neurons. The inhibitory component was isolated
with masking excitatory ones by holding the membrane potential close to
the reversal potential of excitatory amino acid receptor-mediated responses. Including QX-314 in the pipette solution (Nathan et al., 1990 ) or using Cs+ as the
main positive charge carrier successfully minimized the postsynaptic
GABAB receptor-mediated outward currents that
could have otherwise interfered with our measurements. Application of GABAA receptor antagonists bicuculline or
picrotoxin completely inhibited the postsynaptic currents, indicating
that they originated from GABAA receptor activation.
Separate activation of putative cortical or thalamic afferents with
paired pulses led to depressions of the second evoked IPSCs or IPSPs.
The depression is thought to be modulated largely by presynaptic
G-protein-coupled GABAB receptors (Misgeld et
al., 1995 ). Application of a specific
GABAB receptor antagonist CGP 55845 A and the
subsequent relief of depressions confirmed GABAB receptor mediation.
Although paired-pulse depression is a widespread phenomenon in the CNS
(Ziakopoulos et al., 2000 ), we used the paired-pulse paradigm to ask a specific question about intra-amygdaloid circuitry. Do thalamic and cortical afferents project to a common population of
inhibitory interneurons in the AL, i.e., do these interneurons receive
convergent excitatory input seen as GABAA IPSCs
in AL principal cells? To answer this question we used an approach
consisting of "classical" paired-pulse stimulation of each pathways
and of primed-pulse paradigm involving the stimulation of one afferent pathways followed by the stimulation of the other. Given that paired-pulse depressions occur in both inputs as described above, we
hypothesized that the primed-pulse depressions should result in the
same depressions as seen with the paired-pulse depressions if one
population of interneurons is activated. Furthermore, the magnitude of
paired-pulse depressions of the two separate afferents should not be
different from each other. Our experimental results validate our
hypothesis. If, by comparison, a different population of interneurons
receiving separate cortical and thalamic input existed or there
were two populations of interneurons receiving convergent and
nonconvergent input, then different experimental results with respect
to the extent of the depressions should be obtained. In the first case
one cannot expect the presence of primed-pulse depressions and in the
second, the extent of primed-pulse depressions should deviate from that
of paired-pulse depressions. Thus, our results show that under
different stimulation conditions the same population of GABAergic
synapses is engaged in inhibitory synaptic transmission. As a
further evidence, the application of the specific
GABAB receptor antagonist CGP 55845 A also had an
identical relieving effect on the depressions in all cases. Thus, these
results indirectly support the scenario that a population of
interneurons exists in the AL, which receives convergent excitatory input from the sensory afferents, thereby being homogeneous with respect to the major afferents. Whether this convergence is
attributable to a direct (feedforward) or indirect (feedback)
mechanism, or both, will be discussed below.
Afferent synaptic connectivity of interneurons
To obtain direct evidence supporting the above described scenario,
recordings from inhibitory interneurons had to be performed. The
majority of neurons in the AL are spiny, often pyramidal-shaped neurons
believed to be principal cells (McDonald, 1982 ). Their response
behavior is characterized by accommodating action potentials to
depolarizing current pulses followed by a large slow
afterhyperpolarization (Sugita et al., 1993 ; Washburn and
Moises, 1992b ; Lang and Paré, 1998 ) and the generation of slow
rhythmic membrane potential oscillations (Paré et al.,
1995 ; Pape et al., 1998 ). The other neuronal class contains
aspiny or sparsely spiny neurons, putative GABAergic interneurons
(McDonald, 1982 ). It is accepted that these neurons in the amygdala are
local-circuit interneurons (Rainnie et al., 1991b ). These
cells respond with regular sustained firing to depolarizing current
pulses, and they possess high resting input resistance and generate
fast spikes compared with those of principal cells (Washburn and
Moises, 1992b ; Sugita et al., 1993 ; Lang and Paré, 1998 ; Mahanty and Sah, 1998 ). These features allowed us to identify neurons in the AL on the basis of their morphological and
electrophysiological characteristics. Furthermore, we should point out,
that the recorded interneurons in our study did not belong to the
intercalated cell masses that are to be found as islands of cells in
the amygdala (McDonald, 1982 ; Royer et al., 1999 ) and that could be
readily identified in our fresh preparations.
Stimulation of either afferents evoked postsynaptic excitatory currents
in all studied interneurons. We did not find any cell that responded to
only one pathway, indicating with a reasonable high probability that a
population of interneurons exists in the AL that receives convergent
excitatory input from the two main sensory afferents and thereby proves
to be homogeneous with respect to their afferent connectivity to the
tested major afferents. The constant latencies of the EPSCs using
minimal stimulation range provide a strong evidence that these
interneurons can be monosynaptically activated through these pathways
in a feedforward manner. In support of this notion is the finding that
cortical axons, although rarely, establish asymmetric synaptic contacts with GABAergic interneurons in the basolateral amygdaloid complex (Smith et al., 2000 ). Furthermore, in vivo data suggest the
presence of feedforward inhibition in the thalamo-amygdala pathway
within the AL (Li et al., 1996a ). However, the testing of paired- and primed-pulse depressions in interneurons at higher stimulus intensities strongly indicated that they also receive indirect (feedback) excitation from principal cells. The rationale is as follows: the
results show an ~15% GABAB
receptor-insensitive reduction of fast EPSCs in interneurons after
paired and primed stimulation, and thus most likely not mediated
through presynaptic GABAB receptors. The
existence of primed-pulse depressions of EPSCs, in particular, points
to an indirect effect mediated through axon collaterals of presynaptic
principal cells receiving convergent thalamic and cortical input. In
support of this are anatomical findings in the basolateral complex
demonstrating that a majority of thalamic and cortical terminals
contact dendritic spines (Carlsen and Heimer, 1988 ; LeDoux et al.,
1991 ; Smith et al., 2000 ) and that intrinsic axon collaterals of
principal cells contribute a significant portion of synaptic contacts
onto interneurons (Smith et al., 2000 ). These indirect (feedback)
effects, however, cannot fully explain alone the paired and primed
depression of IPSCs in principal cells, mainly because the latter are
substantially larger in amplitude and mediated via
GABAB receptors. Therefore it appears that a population of GABAergic interneurons exists in the AL, which receives convergent input from thalamic and cortical fibers through principal neurons both directly and indirectly (in a feedforward and feedback manner, respectively). The lack of CGP 55845 A to fully antagonize the
paired- or primed-pulse depressions of IPSCs in principal cells may
well be explained by the remaining indirect effects on the excitatory
drive of interneurons. In more general terms, the present data indicate
that irrespective of the route of excitation, the interneuronal
population in the AL can be regarded as homogeneous with respect to
their afferent connections considering the two major input pathways.
This conclusion would be valid even if the external capsule stimulation
had backfired some AL principal cells, thereby indirectly evoking
responses in connected interneurons. It is important to note, however,
that antidromic spike initiation was never observed in the present
experiments. This can be attributable to the fact that pathways
different from the output pathways of the principal cells were
activated and/or stimulus intensities were used that were below the
threshold for antidromic spike initiation.
In conclusion, this symmetrically built GABAergic circuitry can be
assumed to be of functional significance, given the distinctive role of
the two input systems for the mediation of different components of fear
responses (LeDoux, 2000 ) and the importance of GABAergic mechanisms for
limitation of excessive neuronal activity (Gloor, 1992 ). The exact
conditions under which feedforward or feedback mechanisms are
preferably activated remain to be evaluated under in vivo
conditions. The predominant inhibitory control of principal cells by
interneurons in the AL (Lang and Paré, 1997 , 1998 ) and the
spatially organized arrangement of intercalated GABAergic neurons
(Royer et al., 1999 , 2000 ) are suggestive of the idea of polarized
inhibitory interactions mediated also by the GABAergic interneurons
within nuclear boundaries of the amygdaloid complex.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received May 23, 2000; revised Sept. 12, 2000; accepted Sept. 15, 2000.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB
426, TP B3) and by the Kultusministerium des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt (FKZ
2278A/0085). Part of this work was done in partial fulfillment of a
doctoral thesis (J.M.). We thank R. Ziegler and A. Reupsch for expert
technical assistance.
Correspondence should be addressed to Hans-Christian Pape, Institute of
Physiology, Medical School, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger
Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail:
Hans-Christian.Pape{at}Medizin.Uni-Magdeburg.de.
Dr. Heinbockel's present address: Department of Anatomy
and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Callahan PM,
Paris JM,
Cunningham KA,
Shinnick-Gallagher P
(1991)
Decrease of GABA-immunoreactive neurons in the amygdala after electrical kindling in the rat.
Brain Res
555:335-339[ISI][Medline].
-
Carlsen J,
Heimer L
(1988)
The basolateral amygdaloid complex as a cortical-like structure.
Brain Res
441:377-380[ISI][Medline].
-
Gloor P
(1992)
Role of the amygdala in temporal lobe epilepsy.
In: The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction (Aggleton JP,
ed), pp 505-538. New York: Wiley-Liss.
-
Heinbockel T,
Pape H-C
(2000)
Input-specific long-term depression in the lateral amygdala evoked by theta frequency stimulation.
J Neurosci
20:RC68.
-
Huang CC,
Gean PW
(1994)
Paired-pulse depression of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated synaptic potentials in the amygdala.
Br J Pharmacol
113:1029-1035[ISI][Medline].
-
Lang EJ,
Paré D
(1997)
Similar inhibitory processes dominate the responses of cat lateral amygdaloid projection neurons to their various afferents.
J Neurophysiol
77:341-352[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lang EJ,
Paré D
(1998)
Synaptic responsiveness of interneurons of the cat lateral amygdaloid nucleus.
Neuroscience
83:877-889[ISI][Medline].
-
LeDoux JE
(2000)
Emotion circuits in the brain.
Annu Rev Neurosci
23:155-184[ISI][Medline].
-
LeDoux JE,
Farb CR,
Milner TA
(1991)
Ultrastructure and synaptic associations of auditory thalamo-amygdala projections in the rat.
Exp Brain Res
85:577-586[Medline].
-
Li XF,
Armony JL,
LeDoux JE
(1996a)
GABAA and GABAB receptors differentially regulate synaptic transmission in the auditory thalamo-amygdala pathway: an in vivo microiontophoretic study and a model.
Synapse
24:115-124[ISI][Medline].
-
Li XF,
Stutzmann GE,
LeDoux JE
(1996b)
Convergent but temporally separated inputs to lateral amygdala neurons from the auditory thalamus and auditory cortex use different postsynaptic receptors: in vivo intracellular and extracellular recordings in fear conditioning pathways.
Learn Mem
3:229-242[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mahanty NK,
Sah P
(1998)
Calcium-permeable AMPA receptors mediate long-term potentiation in interneurons in the amygdala.
Nature
394:683-687[Medline].
-
Mahanty NK,
Sah P
(1999)
Excitatory synaptic inputs to pyramidal neurons of the lateral amygdala.
Eur J Neurosci
11:1217-1222[ISI][Medline].
-
McDonald AJ
(1982)
Neurons of the lateral and basolateral amygdaloid nuclei: a Golgi study in the rat.
J Comp Neurol
212:293-312[ISI][Medline].
-
Meis S,
Pape H-C
(1998)
Postsynaptic mechanisms underlying responsiveness of amygdaloid neurons to nociceptin/orphanin FQ.
J Neurosci
18:8133-8144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Misgeld U,
Bijak M,
Jarolimek W
(1995)
A physiological role for GABAB receptors and the effects of baclofen in the mammalian central nervous system.
Prog Neurobiol
46:423-462[ISI][Medline].
-
Nathan T,
Jensen MS,
Lambert JD
(1990)
The slow inhibitory postsynaptic potential in rat hippocampal CA1 neurones is blocked by intracellular injection of QX-314.
Neurosci Lett
110:309-313[ISI][Medline].
-
Neher E
(1992)
Correction for liquid junction potentials in patch clamp experiments.
Methods Enzymol
207:123-131[ISI][Medline].
-
Pape H-C,
Paré D,
Driesang RB
(1998)
Two types of intrinsic oscillations in neurons of the lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala.
J Neurophysiol
79:205-216[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Paré D,
Pape HC,
Dong J
(1995)
Bursting and oscillating neurons of the cat basolateral amygdaloid complex in vivo: electrophysiological properties and morphological features.
J Neurophysiol
74:1179-1191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pitkänen A,
Savander V,
Le Doux JE
(1998)
Organization of intra-amygdaloid circuitries in the rat: an emerging framework for understanding functions of the amygdala.
Trends Neurosci
20:517-523.
-
Rainnie DG,
Asprodini EK,
Shinnick-Gallagher P
(1991a)
Excitatory transmission in the basolateral amygdala.
J Neurophysiol
66:986-998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Rainnie DG,
Asprodini EK,
Shinnick-Gallagher P
(1991b)
Inhibitory transmission in the basolateral amygdala.
J Neurophysiol
66:999-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Rainnie DG,
Asprodini EK,
Shinnick-Gallagher P
(1993)
Intracellular recordings from morphologically identified neurons of the basolateral amygdala.
J Neurophysiol
69:1350-1362[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Romanski LM,
LeDoux JE
(1993)
Information cascade from primary auditory cortex to the amygdala: corticocortical and corticoamygdaloid projections of temporal cortex in the rat.
Cereb Cortex
3:515-532[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Royer S,
Martina M,
Paré D
(1999)
An inhibitory interface gates impulse traffic between the input and output stations of the amygdala.
J Neurosci
19:10575-10583[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Royer S,
Martina M,
Paré D
(2000)
Polarized synaptic interactions between intercalated neurons of the amygdala.
J Neurophysiol
83:3509-3518[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Smith Y,
Pare JF,
Paré D
(2000)
Differential innervation of parvalbumin-immunoreactive interneurons of the basolateral amygdaloid complex by cortical and intrinsic inputs.
J Comp Neurol
416:496-508[ISI][Medline].
-
Sugita S,
Tanaka E,
North RA
(1993)
Membrane properties and synaptic potentials of three types of neurone in rat lateral amygdala.
J Physiol (Lond)
460:705-718[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Thompson SM,
Capogna M,
Scanziani M
(1993)
Presynaptic inhibition in the hippocampus.
Trends Neurosci
16:222-227[ISI][Medline].
-
Volgushev M,
Vidyasagar TR,
Chistiakova M,
Yousef T,
Eysel UT
(2000)
Membrane properties and spike generation in rat visual cortical cells during reversible cooling.
J Physiol (Lond)
522:59-76[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Washburn MS,
Moises HC
(1992a)
Inhibitory responses of rat basolateral amygdaloid neurons recorded in vitro.
Neuroscience
50:811-830[ISI][Medline].
-
Washburn MS,
Moises HC
(1992b)
Electrophysiological and morphological properties of rat basolateral amygdaloid neurons in vitro.
J Neurosci
12:4066-4079[Abstract].
-
Weisskopf MG,
LeDoux JE
(1999)
Distinct populations of NMDA receptors at subcortical and cortical inputs to principal cells of the lateral amygdala.
J Neurophysiol
81:930-934[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ziakopoulos Z,
Brown MW,
Bashir ZI
(2000)
GABAB receptors mediate frequency-dependent depression of excitatory potentials in rat perirhinal cortex in vitro.
Eur J Neurosci
12:803-809[Medline].
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/20238909-07$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Bergado-Acosta, S. Sangha, R. T. Narayanan, K. Obata, H.-C. Pape, and O. Stork
Critical role of the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase in consolidation and generalization of Pavlovian fear memory
Learn. Mem.,
March 5, 2008;
15(3):
163 - 171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Silberman, L. Shi, J. K. Brunso-Bechtold, and J. L. Weiner
Distinct Mechanisms of Ethanol Potentiation of Local and Paracapsular GABAergic Synapses in the Rat Basolateral Amygdala
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 2008;
324(1):
251 - 260.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Likhtik, J. G. Pelletier, A. T. Popescu, and D. Pare
Identification of Basolateral Amygdala Projection Cells and Interneurons Using Extracellular Recordings
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2006;
96(6):
3257 - 3265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Williams, P. Das, B. J. Liddell, A. H. Kemp, C. J. Rennie, and E. Gordon
Mode of Functional Connectivity in Amygdala Pathways Dissociates Level of Awareness for Signals of Fear
J. Neurosci.,
September 6, 2006;
26(36):
9264 - 9271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Benini and M. Avoli
Altered Inhibition in Lateral Amygdala Networks in a Rat Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2006;
95(4):
2143 - 2154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Zhu, R. R. Stewart, J. M. McIntosh, and F. F. Weight
Activation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Increases the Frequency of Spontaneous GABAergic IPSCs in Rat Basolateral Amygdala Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2005;
94(5):
3081 - 3091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Chhatwal, K. M. Myers, K. J. Ressler, and M. Davis
Regulation of Gephyrin and GABAA Receptor Binding within the Amygdala after Fear Acquisition and Extinction
J. Neurosci.,
January 12, 2005;
25(2):
502 - 506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Bauer and J. E. LeDoux
Heterosynaptic Long-Term Potentiation of Inhibitory Interneurons in the Lateral Amygdala
J. Neurosci.,
October 27, 2004;
24(43):
9507 - 9512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. SAH, E. S. L. FABER, M. LOPEZ DE ARMENTIA, and J. POWER
The Amygdaloid Complex: Anatomy and Physiology
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2003;
83(3):
803 - 834.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. RAINNIE
Inhibitory and Excitatory Circuitries in Amygdala Nuclei: A Synopsis of Session II
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,
April 1, 2003;
985(1):
59 - 66.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. PARE, S. ROYER, Y. SMITH, and E. J. LANG
Contextual Inhibitory Gating of Impulse Traffic in the Intra-amygdaloid Network
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,
April 1, 2003;
985(1):
78 - 91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-C. PAPE and O. STORK
Genes and Mechanisms in the Amygdala Involved in the Formation of Fear Memory
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,
April 1, 2003;
985(1):
92 - 105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Szinyei, O. Stork, and H.-C. Pape
Contribution of NR2B Subunits to Synaptic Transmission in Amygdaloid Interneurons
J. Neurosci.,
April 1, 2003;
23(7):
2549 - 2556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|