Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 1, 2000, 20(3):1199-1207
Four-Dimensional Neuronal Signaling by Nitric Oxide: A
Computational Analysis
Andrew
Philippides,
Phil
Husbands, and
Michael
O'Shea
Sussex Centre for Neuroscience, School of Biological Sciences,
University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9QG, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
Nitric oxide (NO) is now recognized as a transmitter of neurons
that express the neuronal isoform of the enzyme nitric oxide synthase.
NO, however, violates some of the key tenets of chemical transmission,
which is classically regarded as occurring at points of close
apposition between neurons. It is the ability of NO to diffuse
isotropically in aqueous and lipid environments that has suggested a
radically different form of signaling in which the transmitter acts
four-dimensionally in space and time, affecting volumes of the brain
containing many neurons and synapses. Although "volume signaling"
clearly challenges simple connectionist models of neural processing,
crucial to its understanding are the spatial and temporal dynamics of
the spread of NO within the brain. Existing models of NO diffusion,
however, have serious shortcomings because they represent solutions for
"point-sources," which have no physical dimensions. Methods for
overcoming these difficulties are presented here, and results are
described that show how NO spreads from realistic neural architectures
with both simple symmetrical and irregular shapes. By highlighting the
important influence of the geometry of NO sources, our results provide
insights into the four-dimensional spread of a diffusing messenger. We
show for example that reservoirs of NO that accumulate in volumes of
the nervous system where NO is not synthesized contribute significantly to the temporal and spatial dynamics of NO spread.
Key words:
nitric oxide; diffusion; nitric oxide synthase; computational modeling; volume signaling; guanylyl cyclase
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A role for nitric oxide (NO) as an
intercellular signaling molecule in the nervous system was first
suggested by Garthwaite et al. (1988)
, and this has been confirmed by
numerous subsequent studies, although NO remains an enigmatic
neurotransmitter (for review, see Hölscher, 1997
). Although NO is
now a recognized neurotransmitter, it is the first in an entirely novel
class with properties that have opened new dimensions in our thinking
about how information is transmitted by neurons in both vertebrates and
invertebrates (Gally et al., 1990
; Edelman and Gally, 1992
; Gelperin,
1994
; O'Shea et al., 1998
).
Traditionally neurotransmission is thought to be spatially and
temporally restricted and from the presynaptic to the postsynaptic neuron. In other words, conventional synaptic transmission is essentially two-dimensional. However, because NO is a very small and
nonpolar molecule, it will spread in three dimensions away from a site
of synthesis regardless of intervening cellular or membrane structures
(Lancaster, 1994
; Wood and Garthwaite, 1994
). Another feature of NO
signaling is suggested by the fact that the neuronal isoform of nitric
oxide synthase (nNOS) is a soluble enzyme and thus likely to be
distributed throughout a neuron's cytoplasm. The whole surface of the
neuron is therefore a potential release site for NO, in marked contrast
to conventional transmitter release, which is restricted to the
synaptic zone. These properties allow NO to act without the need for
presynaptic specializations, and its action is not necessarily confined
to the immediate postsynaptic neuron (Bredt and Snyder, 1992
; Hartell,
1996
; Park et al., 1998
). This suggests a radically different form of
signaling in the brain in which NO acts four-dimensionally in space and
time, affecting volumes of the CNS perhaps containing many neurons.
Thus the three-dimensional morphology of the NO source and the presence
of structured NO sinks are likely to have a major influence on the
shape and longevity of an NO "cloud" in the brain (O'Shea et al.,
1998
; Philippides et al., 1998
). An accurate structure-based model of
NO spread is for all these reasons essential in providing a realistic
theoretical framework for evaluating the neuronal signaling capacity of NO.
In this paper we show that modeling continuous structures with
realistic dimensions can provide insights into a number of salient
functional questions that arise in the context of volume signaling. The
most obvious of these is just how large a volume can be affected by a
diffuse signal from a NO-generating neuron or group of neurons. Linked
to this is the question of how long it will take for different parts of
such a region to be affected. In short, how does the morphology of the
source-neurons affect the dynamics of the spread? It is also important
to consider how and to what extent the spread of NO is influenced by
barriers to diffusion as might be represented by a blood vessel, for
example. In addressing these issues we demonstrate how to model
diffusion of NO from any arbitrary structure and in this way provide
new insights into the spatial and temporal properties of the NO
signaling system.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Modeling NO diffusion from a point-source. The
dynamics of diffusion are governed by the modified diffusion
equation:
|
(1)
|
where C is concentration and D is the
diffusion coefficient (Crank, 1980
). The term on the right-hand side is
an inactivation function, used to model the loss of NO through various
oxidation reactions and binding to heme, for example. This has been
taken to be exponential decay because there is no real data to suggest any other function, and the half-life of NO is therefore given by
t1/2 = ln(2/
). To obtain the solution
for an instantaneous burst of synthesis from a point-source positioned
at the origin of some coordinate system, we envision an amount
St = 0 of NO being deposited instantaneously
at the origin at time t = 0. We then solve the
diffusion equation under this initial condition, which gives us the
following equation describing the evolution of the concentration of NO
from a point (Crank, 1980
):
|
(2)
|
where Cinst(r,
,
,
t) is the concentration of NO at time t at a point
(r,
,
), defined in a spherical polar coordinate system (i.e., where r is the distance to the origin,
is
the azimuth, and
is the angle of elevation).
The solution for a point-source that emits NO continuously is derived
from the solution for an instantaneous source in the natural way, via
the principle of superposition of linear solutions (Crank, 1980
). First
we define the "strength" of a source to be its rate of NO
production. Next we define the concentration at time t' and
distance r from the origin, attributable to an instantaneous source of unit strength to be f(r, t'). Thus, if a source
emits NO continuously at a rate governed by S(t), we
have:
|
(3)
|
This can be understood by seeing that the contribution
at time t'
t is attributable to an instantaneous pulse of
NO t' sec previously, with S(t
t') the
amount of NO per second produced at time t
t' (i.e.
t' sec earlier). Thus, in Equation 3, the most recent pulses
of NO are responsible for the lower limit of the integration, whereas
the oldest pulses account for the upper limit. Similarly, we can derive
the solution for times after a point-source that emitted NO
continuously has stopped synthesizing. If the source synthesizes for
T sec and, as before, the instantaneous solution is
f(r, t'), then the concentration at a distance r
from the source, t1 sec after it has stopped
synthesizing is:
|
(4)
|
This approach is valid because the diffusion equation
is linear, and the principle of superposition of linear solutions
therefore applies. The approach, however, relies on symmetry of
the structure for tractability, and generally, radial symmetry is
needed for this technique to be practical. If this is not the case
other techniques must be used, as detailed below.
Modeling NO diffusion from a symmetrical three-dimensional
structure. To model the spread of an amount of NO produced
instantaneously throughout a continuous structure, we use techniques
developed in the field of thermodynamics (Carslaw and Jaeger, 1959
)
that are readily applicable to modeling diffusion. The main technique used in this field is to build up solutions for complicated structures from summation of contributions from point-sources distributed throughout the structure. Of course, we are not implying that there is
an infinite number of NO sources in the structure, but they are small
enough that we are justified in imagining that they are uniformly
distributed throughout the source with some density
. Hence for a
spherical source of radius a, for instance, the method is to
sum the contributions to the concentration at a point in space
P, from all the points within the sphere. A step-by-step description of this process is given in the Appendix (see online version at http://www.jneurosci.org) with the following terms generated for the structures under consideration.
For a solid spherical source of radius a (see note in the
Appendix) the concentration is given by:
|
(5)
|
For a hollow sphere of inner radius a and
outer radius b:
|
(6)
|
In the above equations, Q is the amount of NO
produced per second from a single NO producing unit. Thus
Q
gives the concentration of NO produced per second (in
units of moles per volume per second) and is a parameter that is
independent of the particular shape of the structure being studied and
so can be determined by empirical experiments and used throughout [as
in Wood and Garthwaite (1994)
].
These "instantaneous" solutions can then be integrated over the
appropriate time intervals to get the solutions for the evolution of
concentration of NO synthesized for a finite time interval, in the same
way as for the point-source (as in Eq. 3 and 4). Here, however, because
the volume term has already been implicitly factored into the
integrals, we replace Q
, the concentration/second at each
instant, with
(t), a function that, for each time
t, gives the value of Q
t sec after the start
of synthesis. Traditionally, instantaneous switch on and off of
synthesis has been assumed, meaning that
(t) will be
a square wave with maximum value of Q
. This has the
advantage of simplicity because
(t) is now constant
and can be moved outside the integral in Equations 3 and 4. Obviously,
such a mechanism of release is not strictly biologically plausible, but
in the absence of experimental data on the kinetics of nNOS activation
in vivo, it was thought that this was as good a first
approximation as any other.
However, because we are using numerical integration throughout, it is
no more work to use a more complicated strength function. For instance,
if we were to assume that the amount of NO released were related
closely to the amount of depolarization caused by an action potential,
we could use a strength function with a sigmoidal rise to a peak
synthesis rate of Q
and exponential fall from the peak,
with both rise and fall phases taking the same lengths of time. Such a
function (Spike(t)) is described in the Appendix and
used as
(t) in Results with the duration of the
spike, i.e., the duration of the burst of synthesis (later referred to
as the "burst-length") set to 50 msec. When several spikes are
generated, the function is simply made up of the requisite number of
spikes, generated with the previous function, with a pause of 500 msec between each one.
Modeling diffusion of NO from an irregular three-dimensional
structure. In cases in which the required symmetry does not exist, or when the amount of numerical integration needed is prohibitive, we
can use difference equation techniques. One method recommended for use
in diffusive problems is the Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI)
method for two space dimensions with the Crank-Nicholson (CN)
differencing scheme that, unlike simpler schemes, allows for
examination of the solution at all time-steps (Press et al., 1971
;
Mascagni, 1989
; Ames, 1992
). This method is fast, second-order accurate
in space and time, arbitrarily convergent, and thus unconditionally stable (Ames, 1992
). This means that it is not subject to the stability
limitation of explicit schemes where the maximum allowable time-step is
roughly the diffusion time across a cell (for more detail see the
online Appendix). We implemented this method with a cell size of 0.5 µm, on a square grid of size 1000 × 1000 and time step 1 msec
with the boundary condition that the concentration gradient is flat
(i.e., equal to 0) at the edge of the grid.
The equation to be approximated is:
|
(7)
|
Here Source(
, t) = Q
for points
inside the source during synthesis and is zero otherwise and
Sink(
) =
for points inside sinks and
for all other points where a sink is a local high concentration of
an NO-binding moiety such as a heme-protein.
Parameter values. The value of D in an aqueous
salt solution is given as 3300 µm2/sec
(Malinski et al., 1993
). It is reasonable to assume that it will not be
significantly affected in a lipid or protein aqueous medium because of
the very small molecular dimension and nonpolarity of NO. The value of
the decay rate
= 0.1386 sec
1 gives
a half-life of 5 sec, which is that recorded for dissolved NO perfused
over living tissues in oxygenated saline solution (Moncada et al.,
1989
). Although other rate constants can be used, these are basically
dependent on the oxidizing environment in which NO is diffusing. If
this is anything other than a fairly simple environment, with a
t1/2
5 sec, it should be treated separately,
whereas anything longer has hardly any effect over the spatial and
temporal scales examined here (Wood and Garthwaite, 1994
). We have thus
made the simplifying assumption that the background half-life is 5 sec.
For strong NO sinks we used a decay rate
= 693.15 sec
1 equivalent to a half-life of 1 msec, which
was chosen as a conservative value based on the rate of NO uptake by a
nearby hemoglobin-containing structure such as a blood vessel (Carlsen
and Comroe, 1958
).
The value of the synthesis rate Q
is a more open
question, with several values having been determined with the use of
several different models. Before these are discussed, however, it
should be noted that the effect of this parameter is purely one of
scale because it is a constant that simply multiplies the
concentrations. Thus, whatever the actual value of this parameter, the
qualitative nature of the results is unchanged, and it is easy to see
what effect a different value would have simply by rescaling. There are
two determinations of Q
that have underpinned NO
diffusion modeling to date, both of which are based on the experimental findings of Malinski et al. (1993)
. Vaughn et al. (1998b)
chose to use
the in vivo determination, which is a more complicated situation to model. We, like Wood and Garthwaite (1994)
, base our model
on the in vitro determination. Unlike Wood and Garthwaite (1994)
, however, we have used a true structure-based analysis. For this
task, we used a hollow sphere of inner radius 6, outer radius 10, with
the result that a value for Q
of 1.32 × 10
4
mol · µm
3 · sec
1 is
needed to generate a maximum concentration of 1 µM on the surface of the sphere. Significantly, this result is ~300 times less
than that used previously. Moreover, the peak concentration is attained
after ~14 sec, a result that agrees closely with the empirical data
of Malinski et al. (1993)
but was unexplained when the point-source
model was utilized (Lancaster, 1997
). This value of Q
was
used for all results apart from the first section.
Computational methods. The symmetrical solutions all
required numerical integration [for an introduction, see Press et al. (1971)
]. This was performed by the "quad8" function in Matlab, which uses an adaptive Newton Cotes 8 panel rule (Press et al., 1971
)
to a relative accuracy of 0.1%. Solutions were modified for cases when
the lower limit of integration was <1 msec for the sphere and the
point source. The reasons for this and a detailed description of the
modifications are provided in the Appendix. The difference equation was
written in C.
 |
RESULTS |
Point-source versus structure-based modeling
There are a number of problems associated with attempting to model
the spread of NO that is assumed to be generated at a point-source. It
is not difficult to see intuitively that problems might arise from the
fact that a point-source is by definition singular. This means that it
occupies zero volume, and the concentration of NO at the source during
synthesis is therefore infinite. This represents a fundamental problem
that is carried through to solutions of the equation outside the source
after synthesis.
It could and has been argued that this problem might be avoided if we
ignore solutions to the diffusion equation at or near the source, close
to the time of synthesis. One could assume, for example, that the
source was actually a "virtual sphere" of some volume that could be
treated as if a point-source were located at its center. In this way,
we would have a region inside of which the concentration could be
deemed indeterminate, but we would have a volume for the source to
occupy and thus a source density. This seems to be the style of
reasoning taken by Wood and Garthwaite (1994)
and Lancaster (1994)
and
may be justified because the solution for a sphere can be shown to
reduce to the point-source solution for vanishingly small radii
(Carslaw and Jaeger, 1959
). Thus we may have a good approximation,
provided that the sphere is small enough relative to the speed of
diffusion and provided we do not need to know the concentration of NO
in the interior of the virtual sphere. Such an approach, however,
glosses over the problem because, as the diffusion equation is
continuous in both space and time, we cannot expect its solution simply
to jump from being implausible at the spatiotemporal origin to being
well behaved somewhere else. Nevertheless, because others have used
this type of approach, we present results for the virtual sphere around
a point-source and make a direct comparison with a very different
approach in which the diffusion equation is solved for a source with a
"real" spherical structure.
For a correct and fair comparison, both sources must be equivalent in
strength. Thus, the source strength (St = 0 in
Eq. 2) has been set using:
|
(8)
|
with r being the radius of the virtual sphere under
consideration. It should be noted, however, that there is a problem
inherent with this approach because we have had to assign a volume to a dimensionless entity. Thus modeling two different bodies of equal volume in this manner, for instance a sphere and an ellipsoid, would
yield identical results.
The results of this comparison are presented in Figure
1. Examining Figure 1A
we see that the error in the solution is tolerable for the speed of
diffusion of NO and the size of sphere (0.5 µm) used by Wood and
Garthwaite (1994)
. As we compare the results for larger spheres,
however, we can see that the two solutions look very different from
each other, and radically different results are generated. Importantly,
for larger spherical sources the distance at which the NO concentration
is still potentially effective is much greater for the real spheres.
For example, a real spherical source with radius 25 µm affects ~3.5
times the volume affected by a virtual sphere.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Comparison of real and virtual spheres.
A, Plot of the distance at which the concentration of NO
drops below 0.1 µM (the threshold concentration). This
concentration is about the same as the equilibrium dissociation
constant for soluble guanylyl cyclase (an NO receptor), 0.25 µM (Stone and Marletta, 1996 ). Thus, this distance
defines the area within which NO can have a functional role (Vaughn et
al., 1998a ). Both virtual and real sources have been set to have the
same source strength. The solutions give similar results for
"spheres" of radii <5 µm but diverge for greater radii.
B, Concentration of NO against distance from the center of
virtual and real spheres of radius 20 µm measured at the end of a 10 msec burst of synthesis. Both sources have been set to have the same
strength. Note the very different solutions both inside (where the
point source has infinite concentration at the center) and outside the
sphere. C, Concentration of NO measured at 35 µm from the
center of virtual and real spheres of radius 35 µm for a 10 msec
burst of synthesis. As in B, both sources have been set to
have the same strength. The difference between the two solutions is
clear, with the point-source producing its peak concentration around
time t = 70 msec, well after synthesis has finished.
The square wave shown beneath the figure represents the strength
function.
|
|
Figure 1B highlights another issue associated with
the point-source approach: namely, how can the concentration inside the sphere be determined? During synthesis the concentration is infinite at
the spatial origin (i.e., at the center of the sphere). We cannot
therefore use the concentration at the center, and to pick another
point at which to measure the concentration is arbitrary. We could use
the concentration at the surface of the sphere, but this can be seen to
be lower than that of the interior and hardly answers the question of
what the interior concentration is. We could use an average value over
the interior of the sphere, but this would be infinite because of the
singularity at the center. Thus we have to conclude that the
concentration inside the sphere is indeterminate. Finally, Figure
1C shows that the concentration at the surface of the neuron
attains its maximum value significantly after synthesis has stopped
rather than at or very near the end of synthesis as should be seen, and
indeed is seen in the structure-based model (real sphere).
Diffusion from cell body cytoplasm
The method used in the previous section to generate results
for the solid sphere can be generalized to obtain the solution for
simple symmetrical structures of greater biological interest. For
example, we can solve for structures such as a neuronal cell body in
which NO is synthesized in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus. We
have therefore examined the solution for a hollow spherical source of
inner radius 50 µm (the nucleus) and outer radius 100 µm (cell
body). These dimensions, although large for many neurons especially in
vertebrates, do correspond to the dimensions for some identified giant
molluscan neurons whose cell bodies are known to synthesize NO. In fact
our emphasis on these neurons stems from our empirical in
vitro data showing that such neuronal cell bodies can mediate
volume signaling (Park et al., 1998
). Even allowing for the
shortcomings of the point-source approach, obtaining a meaningful
solution for such a structure using this method would be impossible.
Of course we are not suggesting that neurons are perfectly spherical
but rather that hollow spheres are a useful approximation for neurons.
They can tell us, for example, about the importance of morphological
irregularities. For instance, if one had a cell that was mainly
spherical but had a lot of small-scale variability in its outer
structure, we could use two ideal models, one with the outer radius set
to the minimum radius and the other with the outer radius set to the
maximum. In this way analytical solutions can be used to determine
whether the irregularity has a significant effect. In fact, we have
seen that because of the speed of diffusion of NO, small-scale
irregularities (±2.5% of source size) have a negligible effect. Using
such an approach we can also investigate the sensitivity of the
diffusional process to other parameters, such as boundary conditions
whose complexity makes the analytical solution intractable. Thus, if we
have to make simplifications to a model to render derivation of the
analytical solution tractable, we can tell whether these
simplifications generate gross inaccuracies.
The solution for the hollow sphere was examined for a burst of
synthesis of duration 100 msec, with results shown in Figures 2 and 3.
There are two new points of note to be brought out from these results,
namely the length of time for which the concentration in the center of
the sphere remains high and the significant delay between the start of
synthesis and the rise of concentration for points distant from the
source (Fig. 2).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Concentration of NO plotted against time after
synthesis for a hollow spherical source of inner radius 50 µm and
outer radius 100 µm for a 100 msec burst of synthesis. Here the
solid line depicts the concentration at the center of the
cell (0 µm), whereas the dotted line shows the
concentration at 225 µm from the center. Because the absolute values
attained at the two positions differ from one another markedly, the
concentration is given as a fraction of the peak concentration
attained. These peak values are 7.25 µM
(center) and 0.25 µM at 225 µm. The cell and
the points at which the concentration is measured are depicted to the
left of the main figure. Note the high central
concentration, which persists for a long time (above 1 µM
for ~2 sec). Also, there is a significant delay to a rise in
concentration at distant points, which is more clearly illustrated in
the expanded inset. The square wave shown beneath the
inset represents the strength function.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Concentration of NO plotted against distance from
the center of a hollow spherical source of inner radius 50 µm and
outer radius 100 µm for a 100 msec burst of synthesis starting at
time t = 0. The graphics underneath each plot depict
the structure. A, Concentration of NO at times t = 25, 50, and 100 msec, two time points during and one at the end
of synthesis. B, Concentration of NO after synthesis at
times t = 175, 300, and 1.5 sec. The reservoir effect
after the end of synthesis is clearly seen as the centrally accumulated
NO is trapped by the higher surrounding concentrations (see Diffusion
from cell body cytoplasm in Results).
|
|
The cause of these phenomena can be seen if we examine Figure 3. During
the synthesis phase, we see that the concentration outside the cell
rises very slowly. In the nucleus, however, a "reservoir" of NO
starts to build up (Fig. 3A), albeit relatively slowly when
compared with the rise in the synthesizing area (the cytoplasm). After
the end of synthesis, this reservoir continues to fill up for ~200
msec as the NO in the cytoplasm diffuses away from its point of origin
to points of lower concentration in the nucleus. However, the
concentration outside the cell still rises slowly because of the vastly
bigger volume. Later, the situation changes somewhat, because we are
now in the position at which the concentration in the nucleus is
roughly equal to the concentration in the cytoplasm, giving a wide flat
peak to the concentration profile. Until this point, the NO that had
diffused into the center was "trapped" and could not be dissipated
because of the higher concentration present in the cytoplasm. Now
though, we see this large reservoir spreading away from the cell in a
wave of high concentration that finally starts to raise the distal
concentrations to significant levels. However, the concentration at the
center remains high and does not spread outward very quickly
because here the concentration gradient is virtually flat, meaning
that there is very little diffusive pressure on the NO in this area. It
is this effect that produces the unexpected time delay at distant points.
Examination of the concentration at 225 µm from the center of the
cell (Fig. 2) shows that it remains low until ~400 msec after
synthesis has stopped. It peaks shortly afterward and stays relatively
high for a relatively long period. This has implications for the
temporal dynamics of NO signaling in a neurobiological context. For
example, suppose there was an NO-responsive neuron at a distance of 225 µm from the center of the source neuron. Assuming a threshold
concentration of 0.1 µM (see legend to Fig. 1A), this neuron would not be affected until 600 msec
after the end of synthesis and would continue to be affected for a
period of ~4 sec. Such a process could be used to introduce a time
delay in NO-mediated neural signaling. The high central concentration also has implications for neural signaling because the effect of the NO
synthesizing event remains long after this event has passed.
There is another interesting factor seen in these results, namely the
temporal dynamics of the solution in the cytoplasm during synthesis.
Here it is enough to note that the concentration continues to rise for
a very long time of continuous synthesis before a steady state is
approached. Thus, although much of the work using point-source models
has considered solutions at steady state, such considerations may be
inappropriate in the context of real structures.
Effect of neuron size
The effects reported above are generated by the relatively large
dimensions typical of some molluscan neurons. Questions therefore arise
as to whether similar phenomena are present for smaller neurons such as
those found in mammalian brains. To examine the effect of cell size we
looked at the maximum region around a source that could be affected via
the NO-cGMP signaling pathway during and after the generation of NO
from hollow spherical sources of various sizes. The sources are
directly comparable because they share the same ratio of inner
(nucleus) and outer (cell) radii (Fig.
4). The affected region is defined by the
volume within which the concentration is above the equilibrium
dissociation constant for the NO receptor soluble guanylyl cyclase
(Stone and Marletta, 1996
). For this analysis it is clear that the
relative rather than the absolute affected region is critical. This is because the important comparator is the number of potential neuronal targets within the affected region, and this depends on their size. A
similar argument applies when considering the effect of neuron size on
delay. Clearly, the absolute delays to the threshold distance are
different for each source. Thus the appropriate comparator for delay is
delay relative to the time taken for NO traveling at some
structure-independent constant speed to reach threshold distance, a
variable that is directly proportional to the threshold distance.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Maximum affected region after a 100 msec burst of
synthesis from hollow spherical cells of varying outer radii. The
affected region is defined as that which experiences a concentration of
NO above 0.1 µM: the threshold concentration (see Fig.
1A legend). This region defines a limit outside which
the NO signal has no effect via the NO-cGMP signaling pathway. In all
graphs the radius that is referred to is the outer cell radius, with
the radius of the nucleus being half the cell radius. A,
Maximum affected region for cells of outer radii 5, 15, and 100 µm.
The dotted line denotes the extent of the affected area,
whereas the solid lines show the inner and outer radii of
the cells. For comparison, the cells have all been drawn the same size,
with the affected regions shown in multiples of the source radius. Note
that the 15 µm cell is the one that affects the greatest relative
volume. B, Threshold distance in multiples of the outer
radius plotted against the cell radius. The threshold distance is
defined as the distance from the center of the cell at which the
affected volume is maximized over time. The X shows the data point for
a 100 µm cell. C, Relative delay until the affected region
reaches its maximum extent against the cell radius. The X again denotes
the data point for a 100 µm cell. The relative delay is defined as
being proportional to the time after the start of synthesis at which
the threshold distance (and thus the affected volume) is maximized
relative to this distance. The relative delays are thus in arbitrary
units and shown as a fraction of the maximum value, which is achieved
for the 100 µm cell. Here we see that the shortest delay is generated
by cells (15-20 µm) that have roughly maximal affected regions,
whereas delays for the smallest and largest cells (5 and 100 µm) are
the longest.
|
|
The relationship between neuron size and the volume affected at any one
time was counter-intuitive (Fig.
4A,B). Thus, surprisingly, the
neurons that affect the largest volume are those with outer radii in
the range 15-20 µm and not those with radii of giant molluscan
neurons (~100 µm). In fact, over the wide range of neuron radii
from 5 to 100 µm, the relative affected region, in terms of multiples
of the source radius, changes surprisingly little. Thus a 5 µm neuron
affects 2 times its radius, a 15 µm neuron 3.2 times its radius, and
a 100 µm neuron 2.8 times its radius (Fig.
4A,B). For sources substantially
smaller than 5 µm, the affected region approaches the source size.
Nevertheless, even very small sources may affect larger regions if they
act in concert. This is because small sources acting together in
proximity behave as if they were a single larger source with the
attendant temporal and spatial phenomena associated with a source of
the combined shape and size. An example of this is provided by
endothelial cells that act as a multicellular complex of many very
small cells (Vaughn et al., 1998a
).
The influence of the cell size on the temporal aspects of the NO spread
is approximately the converse of the effect on the spatial dynamics
(Fig. 4C). Here we see that those neurons that affected the
greatest region (15-20 µm radius) generate the shortest relative
delay, whereas the small (~5 µm) and large ones (~100 µm) that
affected relatively smaller regions generate the longest. Indeed, the
smallest delay is only ~35% of the longest, and it is also somewhat
surprising to see the similarity in the delays for the smallest and
largest neurons. Thus the delay between initiation of synthesis and the
maximum affected radius being reached is significant and is influenced
by neuron size in quite a complex manner that is not intuitive.
Coupling NO synthesis to electrical activity in a neuron
In the preceding results on the concentration of NO within the
source (Fig. 1C), it can be seen that there is a very sharp change between synthesis and nonsynthesis of NO that is physically implausible. This is a consequence of using a square wave to represent the synthesis of NO. To counteract this artifact, a smoother strength function (described in Materials and Methods) has been used. This has
the effect of smoothing out the sharp corners of the previous results.
However, if one compares the results with those for a square wave
giving out the same amount of NO per second, one can see that the
results are qualitatively very similar, the only differences being the
slight smoothing at the beginning and end of synthesis, as expected.
Thus, for reasons of simplicity, it can be concluded that use of a
square wave rather than a smoothed square wave does not impair the
performance of the model.
Despite its similarity to the square wave, the smoothed strength
function was used again to generate a series of "spikes" of NO
synthesis, the results of which are seen in Figure
5. Here, it can be seen that the rise in
NO concentration at points distant to the sphere is additive over each
of the spikes. This additive rise mirrors recent experimental findings
in vitro in which summating depolarizations are induced in a
distant NO-responsive neuron during a series of action potentials
generated in a presynaptic NO-producing neuron (Park et al., 1998
). In
particular, if we imagine that there is some threshold above which the
NO concentration must rise before the NO-responsive neuron is
depolarized, the results are very similar indeed to these empirical
data [compare our Fig. 5 with Fig. 7A in Park et al.
(1998)
].

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Concentration of NO plotted against time after
synthesis for a hollow spherical source of inner radius 15 µm and
outer radius 30 µm measured at 150 µm from the center of the
source. The results have been generated using a strength function that
is a concatenation of different numbers of spike functions. Each spike
lasts for 50 msec and is separated by a pause of 500 msec, as described
in Materials and Methods. Both spatial and temporal dimensions have
been chosen to model the in vitro electrophysiological
experiments of Park et al. (1998) . In each figure, the topmost
line indicates the concentration, and the bottom
line shows the strength function responsible for it on the
same time scale. A, Effect of a single spike. B,
Effect of two spikes. C, Effect of three spikes.
D, Effect of four spikes. As in the empirical data, the
effect of each new spike is additive and outlasts the causal signal
[see Fig. 7A in Park et al. (1998) ].
|
|
Irregular sources and sinks
In this section of results, the effect of using an irregular
structure is examined. Here we have used a neuron-like source that is
in close proximity to an NO sink, as shown in Figure
6A. It should be noted,
however, that any structure can be modeled to arbitrary accuracy with
this style of modeling. The rest of Figure 6B-F
shows the evolution of the concentration of NO, where the cloud of NO
synthesized inside the neuron diffuses outward and is inactivated. It
can be seen that the small-scale structure of the source (the
"dendrites") is soon obscured by the large amounts of NO coming
from the main body of the cell. Here, the center effect discussed in
the previous section is clearly visible, with a high concentration
remaining long after synthesis has finished. It is also interesting to
note the effect of the sink (a "blood vessel," for example), which
seems to have a basin of attraction around itself that forms a
semipermeable barrier to the gas. Thus, there appears to be a
"shadow" behind the sink into which NO is unable to diffuse.
However, at later time steps the concentration in the "shadowed"
areas begins to rise. This is mainly attributable to NO that diffused
past the edges of the sink spreading into the area of low concentration
behind it. There is also a small contribution from NO that manages to
diffuse through it.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Diffusion of NO from a fictive neuron being
influenced by an NO sink at several time steps after the initiation of
a 100 msec burst of synthesis. a, Position of the neuron and
sink. The neuron is the large, annular body with several processes. The
sink is the smaller elliptical shape near the cell body. b,
Concentration profile 50 msec after the start of synthesis, i.e.,
during synthesis. c, Concentration profile 100 msec after
the start of synthesis, i.e., at the end of synthesis. d,
Concentration profile 150 msec after the start of synthesis.
e, Concentration profile 250 msec after the start of
synthesis. f, Concentration profile 750 msec after the start
of synthesis. The heights in b-f denote the concentration
and are shown as the fraction of peak concentration attained (6.32 µM). The x- and y-axis scales are
in micrometers. Note the reservoir effect at the center of the large
cell body. The NO sink causes a "shadow" behind it where the
concentration is relatively low (f).
|
|
As an illustrative example of the utility of this approach, we have
included results showing contour plots of the limit of the region where
NO may have an effect via the NO-cGMP signaling pathway, i.e., where
the concentration drops below the threshold of 0.1 µM
(Fig. 7). This region that evolves in
space and time may be regarded as the effective NO "cloud." The
source is of the same shape as that used previously, but is 3.5 times
smaller so that the cell body has a radius of 5 µm. The sink has
maintained an elliptical shape and is intended to approximate a nearby
capillary, for example. Here we can see the affected region (the
effective NO cloud) starting to surround the sink as NO diffuses around it and even through it, with part of the front edge of the sink experiencing a concentration above threshold. In this case the area
directly behind the sink is unaffected, but when other parameters such
as a longer synthesis duration are used, this area can be included in
the affected region. Sinks therefore should not be viewed as
unsurmountable barriers to diffusion, as an alternative one-dimensional
model predicts (Lancaster, 1997
). Despite the smaller size of
the neuron, the effect of the NO in the nucleus can still be seen, with
the threshold contours being roughly centered on the main body. Unlike
the previous instance (Fig. 6), however, we can see that this effect is
deformed after the end of synthesis by the much greater action of the
sink relative to the size of the neuron, which means that the affected
area is displaced significantly off center from the source (Fig.
7).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Contour plot of the threshold concentration for
the NO-cGMP signaling pathway. Various time steps during and after a
100 msec burst of synthesis are illustrated together with source
(black) and sink (gray). For each time
step, the contour defines the region within which the NO signal can
affect the NO receptor soluble guanylyl cyclase. A,
Threshold concentrations contours at times 25 and 50 msec after
initiation of synthesis and at the end of synthesis, 100 msec after the
start. B, Threshold concentrations contours at times 25, 75, and 100 msec after the end of synthesis. In both graphs, the
x- and y-axis scales are in micrometers. Note the
affected area surrounding the sink during and just after synthesis and
the leftward drift of the effective cloud attributable to the action of
the sink in conjunction with the central reservoir formed during
synthesis.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have highlighted the importance of the morphology of
NO-generating structures in determining the dynamics of the spread of
NO in the nervous system. The diffusion of NO differs from the
diffusion of other neurotransmitters or modulators in an important aspect. All transmitters will of course diffuse some distance away from
their sites of release. Thus even in classical neurotransmission, generally regarded as point-to-point, there is an element of volume transmission allowing for the possibility of cross-talk to occur between distinct synapses (Barbour and Häusser, 1997
).
However, because most transmitters are relatively large and polar
molecules, their spread will be slow and more importantly restricted to
the extracellular space near their release site. The accurate modeling of this situation presents formidable problems, not least because details of the morphology of the extracellular space and the nature of
local inhomogeneity will profoundly alter the extent and direction of
migration. The diffusion of NO, however, presents a more tractable problem. Primarily because of its minute size and nonpolarity, it is
able to diffuse freely through physiological barriers to affect target
cells across an extensive volume. Also because the release of NO does
not require presynaptic specialization, the whole surface of an
NO generating neuron is a potential source. Thus in modeling NO
diffusion the morphology of the whole source is crucial, whereas the
surroundings can be regarded as homogeneous. In contrast, when modeling
diffusion of conventional neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, the
morphology of the extracellular space is of primary significance.
That incorporating the morphology of a source into the diffusional
process for NO is important has been recognized by others, and a number
of attempts to do so have been reported, with the majority using a
compartmental model of the body under consideration (Gally et al.,
1990
; Lancaster, 1994
, 1997
). Such models do give valid insights into
the overall role of a diffusing messenger but are hampered by the limit
on the duration of the time step used (Mascagni, 1989
). This limitation
necessitates the use of relatively large compartments leading to rather
gross approximations. In view of this, we believe a more sophisticated
form of numerical approximation, such as the one presented here, should
be used when the complexity of the morphology makes an analytical
solution impractical. In adopting this approach we have avoided the
shortcomings of point-source models and the degree of approximation
associated with compartmental models.
The data presented reveal a number of morphology-driven properties of
NO diffusion that would be difficult to predict using other methods.
First, we identify the central reservoir effect and have quantified its
consequences for the spatial and temporal dynamics of the NO signal
(Figs. 2-4). For example, for a cell body of outer radius 30 µm
(typical of many molluscan neurons) that synthesizes NO for 100 msec,
our model predicts that the volume affected by an above-threshold
concentration has a radius of 96 µm (Fig. 4). This is comparable to
the experimental findings in vitro for the identified NO
synthesizing B2 motoneuron in the mollusc Lymnaea stagnalis.
The cell body of this neuron is ~30 µm in radius and when
stimulated affects a cocultured target neuron at least 70 µm away
(Park et al., 1998
). Although the two situations are not directly
comparable, it is reassuring that the spatial prediction is in close
agreement with the experimental findings. The affect of the central
reservoir on the temporal aspects of the NO signal are summarized in
Figure 2 where we see its contribution to the distance-dependent delay.
For example, in the case of the 30 µm neuron described above, a cell
on the very edge of the affected volume would not receive an
above-threshold NO signal until 145 msec after synthesis had begun.
The reservoir effect is generated in the center of NO sources and is
attributable to the inability of NO to diffuse radially while the
concentration is high in the surrounding NO synthesizing region.
Results are presented for an individual spherical cell, but the
conclusions are equally valid for multicellular structures with
glomerular, barrel-shaped, columnar, or tubular morphologies. As a
consequence of the reservoir effect, relatively stable and high
concentrations of NO can accumulate in the centers of such structures,
even if NO is not synthesized there. An example of a multineuronal
morphology suggesting that this feature of NO diffusion is of
functional significance can be found in the mushroom bodies of an
insect brain (O'Shea et al., 1998
). The bilaterally paired mushroom
bodies are specialized for associative learning (Davis, 1993
), and in
the locust they feature six tubular structures per side (O'Shea et
al., 1998
). Each consists of a central core of neurons surrounded by a
region rich in NO synthesizing tissue forming a cylindrical surround.
Our model as applied to tubular morphologies predicts that the central
neurons will be exposed to high concentrations of NO for a significant
period of time after NO synthesis is finished. Thus in the insect brain
there are tubular compartments containing concentrations of NO
representing a "memory" of past NO synthesis in surrounding
regions. Similar effects are likely to be seen in barrel-shaped or
glomerular structures in which a central core is surrounded by NO
synthesizing cells. So as a consequence of source morphology and
perhaps unexpectedly for a freely diffusing messenger, NO can have a
spatially targeted and persistent influence in the nervous system.
Our model also shows how the size of a source has an unexpected
influence on the dynamics of the diffusing NO cloud. In particular we
have shown that the maximum relative affected volume is related to the
absolute size of the source. Here neurons in the range of 15-20 µm
radius that synthesize NO for 100 msec affect the largest relative
volume. This result is nonintuitive and warrants some discussion. The
explanation lies in the complex dynamical interactions of the spatial
and temporal factors of the governing equations. For smaller neurons
the concentration-time relations suggest that steady state will be
reached before the end of a 100 msec burst of synthesis. Thus the rise
in the NO concentration in a smaller neuron will be complete before the
end of synthesis, leading to a lesser relative volume being affected
than is affected by the 15-20 µm neurons. For the larger neurons,
attributable to the greater volume into which the NO diffuses,
the spatial concentration gradient will be lower, slowing the NO
spread. At the end of synthesis, therefore, the spatial gradient
resembles that of a smaller neuron before the end of synthesis, and we
might envisage that in effect the burst of synthesis has been
shortened. A second factor leading to a reduction in the relative
affected volume that is easier to picture is the greater action of
decay attributable to the increased time taken for the NO signal to reach its limit.
In our examination of the maximum volume affected by a branched
morphology influenced by a nearby sink (Figs. 6, 7), we showed that
even if the sink is a comparable size to the cell body it is not an
insurmountable barrier to diffusion. Although very little NO can
diffuse through it, diffusion occurs in a volume, and therefore NO can
affect regions behind the sink by diffusing around it. Our analysis of
a branched structure also shows that because of the speed of diffusion
of NO, the small-scale branching is soon obscured by the diffusing
cloud, although the aggregate shape can still be seen. It is important
to note that in this example one would not know from which dendrite or
part of a neuron the NO at a given location is emanating. This raises a
significant conceptual point about NO signaling. Namely, in volume
signaling, unlike conventional point-to-point neurotransmission, the
signal has no address. In thinking about the information content of a volume signal, it is therefore important to recognize that the location
or identity of the source cannot be determined unambiguously by the target.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Aug. 9, 1999; revised Nov. 5, 1999; accepted Nov. 8, 1999.
We thank the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for
Grant IR3521-1 and British Telecommunications plc for
sponsorship of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research studentship for A.P.
Correspondence should be addressed to Michael O'Shea at the above
address. E-mail: M.O-Shea{at}sussex.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Ames W
(1992)
In: Numerical methods for partial differential equations, Ed 3. New York: Academic.
-
Barbour B,
Häusser M
(1997)
Intersynaptic diffusion of neurotransmitter.
Trends Neurosci
20:377-384[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bredt D,
Snyder S
(1992)
Nitric oxide, a novel neuronal messenger.
Neuron
8:3-11[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Carlsen E,
Comroe Jr J
(1958)
The rate of uptake of carbon monoxide and of nitric oxide by normal human erythrocytes and experimentally produced spherocytes.
J Gen Physiol
42:83-107[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Carslaw H,
Jaeger J
(1959)
In: Conduction of heat in solids. New York: Oxford UP.
-
Crank J
(1980)
In: The mathematics of diffusion. New York: Oxford UP.
-
Davis R
(1993)
Mushroom bodies and Drosophila learning.
Neuron
11:1-14[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Edelman G,
Gally J
(1992)
Nitric oxide: linking space and time in the brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:11651-11652[Free Full Text].
-
Gally J,
Montague P,
Reeke G,
Edelman G
(1990)
The NO hypothesis: possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development and function of the nervous system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:3547-3551[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Garthwaite J,
Charles S,
Chess-Williams R
(1988)
Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain.
Nature
336:385-388[Medline].
-
Gelperin A
(1994)
Nitric oxide mediates network oscillations of olfactory interneurons in a terrestrial mollusc.
Nature
369:61-63[Medline].
-
Hartell N
(1996)
Strong activation of parallel fibers produces localized calcium transients and a form of LTD that spreads to distant synapses.
Neuron
16:601-610[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hölscher C
(1997)
Nitric oxide, the enigmatic neuronal messenger: its role in synaptic plasticity.
Trends Neurosci
20:298-303[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lancaster J
(1994)
Simulation of the diffusion and reaction of endogenously produced nitric oxide.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
9:8137-8141.
-
Lancaster J
(1997)
A tutorial on the diffusibility and reactivity of free nitric oxide.
Nitric Oxide
1:18-30[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Malinski T,
Taha Z,
Grunfeld S,
Patton S,
Kapturczak M,
Tombouliant P
(1993)
Diffusion of nitric oxide in the aorta wall monitored in situ by porphyrinic microsensors.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
193:1076-1082[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mascagni M
(1989)
Numerical methods for neuronal modeling.
In: Methods in neuronal modeling (Koch C,
Segev I,
eds), pp 439-484. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Moncada S,
Palmer R,
Higgs E
(1989)
Biosynthesis of nitric oxide from L-arginine.
Biochem Pharmacol
38:1709-1715[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Shea M,
Colbert R,
Williams L,
Dunn S
(1998)
Nitric oxide compartments in the mushroom bodies of the locust brain.
NeuroReport
3:333-336.
-
Park J-H,
Straub V,
O'Shea M
(1998)
Anterograde signaling by nitric oxide: characterization and in vitro reconstitution of an identified nitrergic synapse.
J Neurosci
18:5463-5476[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Philippides A,
Husbands P,
O'Shea M
(1998)
Neural signalling: it's a gas!
In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (Niklasson L,
Boden M,
Ziemke T,
eds), pp 979-984. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
-
Press W,
Teukolsky S,
Vetterling W,
Flannery B
(1971)
In: Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
-
Stone J,
Marletta M
(1996)
Spectral and kinetic studies on the activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase by nitric oxide.
Biochemistry
35:1093-1099[Medline].
-
Vaughn M,
Kuo L,
Liao J
(1998a)
Effective diffusion distance of nitric oxide in the microcirculation.
Am J Physiol
274:1705-1714.
-
Vaughn M,
Kuo L,
Liao J
(1998b)
Estimation of nitric oxide production and reaction rates in tissue by use of a mathematical model.
Am J Physiol
274:2163-2176.
-
Wood J,
Garthwaite J
(1994)
Models of the diffusional spread of nitric oxide: implications for neural nitric oxide signalling and its pharmacological properties.
Neuropharmacology
33:1235-1244[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/2031199-09$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Husbands
Never Mind the Iguana, What About the Tortoise? Models in Adaptive Behavior
Adaptive Behavior,
August 1, 2009;
17(4):
320 - 324.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Di, M. M. Maxson, A. Franco, and J. G. Tasker
Glucocorticoids Regulate Glutamate and GABA Synapse-Specific Retrograde Transmission via Divergent Nongenomic Signaling Pathways
J. Neurosci.,
January 14, 2009;
29(2):
393 - 401.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Miersch, M. G. Espey, R. Chaube, A. Akarca, R. Tweten, S. Ananvoranich, and B. Mutus
Plasma Membrane Cholesterol Content Affects Nitric Oxide Diffusion Dynamics and Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 4, 2008;
283(27):
18513 - 18521.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Newland and P. Yates
Nitrergic modulation of an oviposition digging rhythm in locusts
J. Exp. Biol.,
December 15, 2007;
210(24):
4448 - 4456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. N. Hall and J. Garthwaite
Inactivation of nitric oxide by rat cerebellar slices
J. Physiol.,
December 1, 2006;
577(2):
549 - 567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Herman and C. Rivier
Activation of a Neural Brain-Testicular Pathway Rapidly Lowers Leydig Cell Levels of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein and the Peripheral-Type Benzodiazepine Receptor while Increasing Levels of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase
Endocrinology,
January 1, 2006;
147(1):
624 - 633.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Philippides, S. R. Ott, P. Husbands, T. A. Lovick, and M. O'Shea
Modeling Cooperative Volume Signaling in a Plexus of Nitric Oxide Synthase-Expressing Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
July 13, 2005;
25(28):
6520 - 6532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. E. Koliatsos, T. M. Dawson, A. Kecojevic, Y. Zhou, Y.-F. Wang, and K.-X. Huang
Cortical interneurons become activated by deafferentation and instruct the apoptosis of pyramidal neurons
PNAS,
September 28, 2004;
101(39):
14264 - 14269.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Collmann, M. A. Carlsson, B. S. Hansson, and A. Nighorn
Odorant-Evoked Nitric Oxide Signals in the Antennal Lobe of Manduca sexta
J. Neurosci.,
July 7, 2004;
24(27):
6070 - 6077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Cole, A. Mashkournia, S. C. Parries, and J. I. Goldberg
Regulation of early embryonic behavior by nitric oxide in the pond snail Helisoma trivolvis
J. Exp. Biol.,
October 15, 2002;
205(20):
3143 - 3152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Abudara, A. F. Alvarez, M. H. Chase, and F. R. Morales
Nitric Oxide as an Anterograde Neurotransmitter in the Trigeminal Motor Pool
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2002;
88(1):
497 - 506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gelperin, J. P. Y. Kao, and I. R. C. Cooke
Gaseous Oxides and Olfactory Computation
Integr. Comp. Biol.,
April 1, 2001;
41(2):
332 - 345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Aonuma and P. Newland
Opposing actions of nitric oxide on synaptic inputs of identified interneurones in the central nervous system of the crayfish
J. Exp. Biol.,
January 4, 2001;
204(7):
1319 - 1332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|