 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2000, 20(5):1780-1790
Tachykinin-Related Peptide and GABA-Mediated Presynaptic
Inhibition of Crayfish Photoreceptors
Raymon M.
Glantz1,
Clyde S.
Miller1, and
Dick
R.
Nässel2
1 Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice
University, Houston, Texas 77251, and 2 Department of
Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
 |
ABSTRACT |
Off-axis illumination elicits lateral inhibition at the primary
visual synapse in crustacea and insects. The evidence suggests that the
inhibitory action is presynaptic (i.e., on the photoreceptor terminal)
and that the amacrine neurons of the lamina ganglionaris (the first
synaptic layer) may be part of the inhibitory pathway. The
neurotransmitters and the synaptic mechanisms are unknown. We show by
immunocytochemistry that GABA and a tachykinin-related peptide (TRP)
are localized in the amacrine neurons of the crayfish lamina
ganglionaris. Indirect evidence suggests that GABA and TRP may be
colocalized in these neurons. The extensive processes of the amacrine
neurons occupy lamina layers containing the terminals of
photoreceptors. Application of exogenous GABA and TRP to photoreceptor terminals produces a short-latency, dose-dependent hyperpolarization with a decay time constant on the order of a few seconds. TRP also
exhibits actions that evolve over several minutes. These include a
reduction of the receptor potential (and the light-elicited current) by
~40% and potentiation of the action of GABA by ~100%. The
mechanisms of TRP action in crayfish are not known, but a plausible
pathway is a TRP-dependent elevation of intracellular Ca2+ that reduces photoreceptor sensitivity in
arthropods. Although the mechanisms are not established, the results
indicate that in crayfish photoreceptors TRP displays actions on two
time scales and can exert profound modulatory control over cell function.
Key words:
tachykinin; photoreceptor; lateral inhibition; GABA; visual transduction; presynaptic inhibition; crayfish; invertebrate
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lateral inhibition is a prominent
feature of the peripheral visual circuits of both vertebrates and
arthropods in which it functions in both contrast enhancement and gain
control. In vertebrate retina, lateral inhibition is mediated by
horizontal cells that feedback a sign-inverted signal to receptor
terminals (Attwell et al., 1983 ). In arthropods the mechanisms of
lateral inhibition are still unresolved, but the inhibitory action
seems to be on the presynaptic side of the primary synapse
(photoreceptor to monopolar cell) (Wang-Bennett and Glantz, 1987 ;
Laughlin and Osorio, 1989 ). In crayfish monopolar cells subjected to
inhibitory visual stimuli, the light response and the input conductance
decline in parallel. Furthermore, there is suggestive evidence that the amacrine neurons of the first synaptic region, the lamina, may be part
of the inhibitory feedback pathway (Hamori and Horridge, 1966 ;
Strausfeld and Campos-Ortega, 1977 ; Glantz and Bartels, 1994 ).
To identify the neurotransmitters that mediate lateral inhibition, we
examined the cellular localization of GABA and a tachykinin-related peptide (TRP) and tested their actions on photoreceptor terminals. GABA
is an obvious transmitter candidate because of its ubiquitous role in
presynaptic inhibition in the crayfish nervous system (Takeuchi and
Takeuchi, 1966 ; Kennedy et al., 1980 ; Glantz et al., 1985 ; Cattaert et
al., 1994 ). TRP is considered because a substance P-like peptide is
present in amacrine neurons of lobster lamina (Mancillas et al., 1981 ).
Furthermore, substance P functions in visual processing in vertebrate
retina (see Karten and Brecha, 1980 ; Zalutsky and Miller, 1990 ; Casini
et al., 1997 ; Cuenca and Kolb, 1998 ) where it is localized to specific
types of amacrine and ganglion cells.
Peptides with resemblance to tachykinins, TRPs, have been isolated from
insects (see Schoofs et al., 1993 ; Nässel, 1999 ) and more
recently from two crustaceans, the crab Cancer borealis and
the shrimp Penaeus vannmei (Christie et al., 1997 ; Nieto et al., 1998 ). The presence of endogenous TRPs in the brain of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus used in the present study
has been indicated previously by immunocytochemistry and analysis of
tissue extract by HPLC combined with radioimmunoassay using an
antiserum to a locust TRP (Johansson et al., 1999 ). Because we now know
that the TRP antiserum and monoclonal antibodies to substance P label
the same neurons in crustaceans (Blitz et al., 1995 ; Johansson et al.,
1999 ), it is suggestive that the substance P-like immunoreactivity
described previously in lobster amacrine neurons (Mancillas et al.,
1981 ; Fingerman et al., 1985 ) represents native TRP.
In this report we show GABA, TRP, and substance P immunoreactivity in
amacrine cells of the lamina ganglionaris of the crayfish P. leniusculus. The amacrine cell neurites arborize in lamina regions
containing photoreceptor terminals, as might be expected of a component
of the lateral inhibitory pathway. Furthermore, exogenous GABA and TRP
have functional actions consistent with their possible roles in
presynaptic inhibition of the primary visual synapse. Both agents
produce rapid and dose-dependent hyperpolarizations of photoreceptor
terminals. Additionally, TRP slowly (over several minutes) diminishes
the photoreceptor's light-activated current and increases the
magnitude of the GABA-elicited response.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals. The crayfish P. leniusculus were
purchased from suppliers in California and Stockholm.
Immunocytochemistry. The production of rabbit antiserum to
the locust tachykinin-related peptide locustatachykinin-I (LomTK-I) has
been described previously (Nässel, 1993 ). The antiserum
specificity was characterized on insect and crustacean tissue
previously (Nässel, 1993 ; Lundquist et al., 1994 ; Blitz et al.,
1995 ; Christie et al., 1997 ; Johansson et al., 1999 ). A rat monoclonal
antibody to the vertebrate tachykinin substance P (see Cuello et al.,
1979 ) was purchased from Accurate Chemicals (Westbury, NY). The
immunoreactive properties of this antibody on crustacean tissue have
been characterized by Goldberg et al. (1988) , Sandeman et al. (1990) ,
and Blitz et al. (1995) . The well characterized rabbit antiserum to
GABA (see Füller et al., 1989 ) was kindly provided by Dr. M. Eckert (University of Jena, Jena, Germany).
For peptide immunocytochemistry (ICC) optic lobes were rapidly
dissected in saline and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer. For GABA ICC the dissected lobes
were fixed in a mixture of 5 ml of glutaraldehyde (25%), 15 ml of
saturated aqueous picric acid, and 0.1 ml of glacial acetic acid (Schot et al., 1981 ). In both cases fixation was for a minimum of 4 hr at 4°C. After fixation, tissues were thoroughly washed in buffer, infiltrated with 20% sucrose for 24 hr, rapidly frozen on a cryostat stage, and then cut into 25-µm-thick sections on a Leitz cryostat 1720 (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) and mounted onto
chrome-alum-coated microscope slides. Tissue sections to be used
for peptide ICC were taken directly to antiserum incubation, whereas
for GABA ICC the best pretreatment was as follows (see Nässel and
Eckström, 1997 ): the sections were incubated with 0.13 M sodium borohydride in 0.05 M Tris HCl (15 min) and then washed in buffer, or they were dehydrated in a graded
ethanol series (50-99.5%) and xylene and then rehydrated.
The antisera were applied on the sections for 48 hr at 4°C in 0.01 M PBS, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 0.25% Triton
X-100 at the following dilutions: anti-LomTK-I at 1:1000,
anti-substance P at 1:250, and anti-GABA at 1:2000. The primary
antisera were detected by peroxidase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit
(LomTK) (from Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark), by goat anti-rat (substance
P) IgGs (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), or by the ABC method (GABA) with
peroxidase-tagged streptavidin using a Vectastain kit (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). As controls, both anti-LomTK (1:1000)
and anti-substance P (1:500) were preabsorbed with LomTK-I
peptide (2 × 10 5 M)
and applied to tissue sections as described above.
The sections were analyzed on either a Zeiss Axioplan II or a Zeiss
Axiophot microscope equipped with interference contrast optics and
epifluorescence. Images were either obtained as photographic slides
(Kodak Ektachrome 100 or 400) or captured by an integrated chilled
color CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan). In both cases the
images were edited in Adobe Photoshop 4.0 (photographic slides were
digitized by means of a flatbed scanner, Umax PowerLook II; Umax Data
Systems, Fremont, CA).
The physiological preparation. Crayfish of 7-10 cm in
length and of both sexes were prepared as described by Glantz and
Bartels (1994) . The rostrum was removed, and the eyestalks were glued to the cephalic carapace with cyanoacrylate adhesive (Superglue). The
lamina and receptor layer were exposed by excision of the dorsal
cuticle of the eyestalk and the dorsal cornea. The animals were
exsanguinated by perfusion with oxygenated crayfish saline at 10°C to
prevent the formation of blood clots around the dissected area of
tissue. Recordings were made with the eyecup in situ or with
an isolated eyecup and brain preparation. The recording chamber consisted of a Plexiglas dish in which one wall contained a frosted glass plate to image the visual stimulus. The eye was ~1.0 cm from
the glass plate. After the dissection, the saline solution over the
lamina was lowered to ~0.5 mm above the tissue.
The visual stimulus. Visual stimuli were delivered by a 7.0 mW He-Ne laser beam directed to the eye by galvanometer-controlled mirrors. Intensity was controlled by a 6.0 log unit neutral density wedge, and stimulus presentation was controlled by an electromagnetic shutter and pulse generator. The maximum intensity at the eye was 3.0 mW/mm2. To minimize adaptation, stimuli
were presented no more frequently than 1 stimulus/5 sec. For prolonged
repeated stimulus sequences, intensity was set to <1.0% of the
saturating intensity, stimulus duration was set to 0.2-0.5 sec, and
the interstimulus interval was 8-10 sec.
Perfusion and ligand injection. As a TRP ligand, the
cockroach peptide LemTRP-4, which differs from CabTRP-Ia by only one amino acid residue (a Met6 to Leu6 change) in a region likely to be
unimportant for receptor binding and activation (Nässel, 1999 ),
was used. During ligand injection the lamina and photoreceptors were
perfused with crayfish saline at a rate of 0.1 ml/sec. GABA at 0.1 or
1.0 mM and TRP at 1 or 10 µM were delivered
to photoreceptor terminals in the lamina with pressure injection via
separate capillaries with 10-15 µm tips. Injection volumes of
0.01-1.0 µl were controlled by pulse pressure and duration. To
minimize desensitization, GABA volumes were adjusted to elicit
nonsaturating responses, and injection frequency was set to 1 injection/30 sec. TRP was either injected in nanoliter volumes or
perfused over the lamina via continuous injection at 2-5 µl/min.
Recording procedures and data analysis. Recording electrodes
were filled with 3 M
K+-acetate and selected for resistance
(~100 M ) and speed (time constant <0.1 msec after capacity
compensation). Photoreceptors were typically impaled in the distal
retina in the relatively large soma-rhabdomere region. A few
recordings were made in the axons close to the terminals.
Receptor signals were led to an Axoclamp-2B amplifier (Axon
Instruments, Foster City, CA) that was switched between bridge mode,
discontinuous current clamp, and discontinuous voltage clamp. In
discontinuous modes, current injection and voltage measurements alternated during a 2.0 msec duty cycle (500 Hz sampling rate). Because
the membrane time constant varies between 50 msec (in the dark) and 20 msec (light adapted), the switching period is sufficiently fast to
resolve all photoreceptor signals. The amplifier bandwidth was direct
current to 30 kHz. Input resistance measurements were performed in
discontinuous current clamp with currents of 0.1 to 0.3 nA, and the
light-elicited responses were measured in either bridge mode or
discontinuous voltage-clamp mode.
Responses were digitized at 500 Hz via an analog-to-digital
board and a 486 personal computer. To assess the reliability of the
responses, visual stimuli and ligand applications were typically repeated five times, and the responses to each condition were averaged.
Except where noted, data used in measurements and shown in the figures
represent the averages of five or more responses that were low-pass
filtered at 100 Hz after averaging. The SD of the averaged data
rarely exceeded ±10% of the mean response for visual stimuli and
current pulses and was typically approximately ±20% of the mean for
TRP- and GABA-elicited responses.
 |
RESULTS |
Immunocytochemistry
The antiserum to the locust TRP, LomTK-I, and the monoclonal
antibody to substance P are known to cross-react with the same neurons
in insect and crustacean brains, probably by cross-reacting with the
cognate TRP (see Blitz et al., 1995 ; Johansson et al., 1999 ;
Nässel, 1999 ). In crayfish brain both anti-LomTK and
anti-substance P can be blocked by locust TRP (Johansson et al., 1999 ).
We found that this is also the case in the optic lobes of the crayfish P. leniusculus. We thus refer to the substance P- and
LomTK-immunoreactive neurons as TRP immunoreactive (TRP-IR). In the
lamina the two antisera labeled numerous amacrine cells, the majority
of which had cell bodies below the lamina synaptic layer (Fig.
1A). In each specimen,
however, there were a small number of amacrines with displaced cell
bodies. These are located distal to the lamina synaptic layer in the
outer layer of monopolar cell bodies (see Fig. 1B).
The amacrines form TRP-IR varicose processes that invade the lamina
synaptic layer. At the distal and proximal borders of the neuropil the
amacrine neurons form tangential processes with numerous varicosities
along their length (Fig. 1B,C). Although the number
of TRP-IR amacrines is far below that of synaptic units, cartridges of
the lamina, their processes cover the entire projected retinal mosaic
in the lamina. The amacrine processes are clearly within the domains of
the photoreceptor terminals in the lamina.

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Tachykinin-related peptide in crayfish
(P. leniusculus) optic lobe displayed by
immunocytochemistry on cryostat sections (horizontal sections;
peroxidase method). A,
LomTK-immunoreactive (LTK-IR) neurons in the
La and the Me. Note the cell bodies of
Am cells below the lamina. Some LTK-IR axons are seen
connecting the lamina and the medulla (long
arrow). In the medulla four main layers of LTK-IR
processes can be resolved. The cell bodies of the lamina-medulla
neurons are seen at the short arrow.
B, Labeling with monoclonal antibody to substance P. The
La in higher magnification with cell bodies of
Am and D-Am neurons is shown. Note the
tangential processes running distally and proximally. C,
Detail of substance P-immunoreactive Am neurons in the
lamina. Note the varicose processes in the synaptic neuropil
(arrows). D, LomTK-IR neurons in the
lamina. Ams are seen together with lamina-medulla
neurons (e.g., at arrows). Together they form
superimposed tangential processes. Those of the lamina-medulla neurons
are less prominently immunolabeled. Am, Amacrine;
D-Am, displaced-amacrine; La, lamina;
Me, medulla. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, 50 µm; C, D, 20 µm.
|
|
In addition to the amacrines we also found TRP-IR neurons that
interconnect the lamina and the medulla externa (Fig.
1A,D). These neurons that have their cell bodies in
the medulla cell body layer (in the outer optic chiasm; Fig.
1A) are present in a number substantially smaller
than that of the cartridges and/or ommatidia. The arborizations within
the lamina superimpose those of the amacrines (as shown in Fig.
1D), but because the immunolabeling is weaker in the
lamina-medulla neurons a distinction can be made between the two types
of neurons.
GABA immunoreactivity (GABA-IR) was seen in amacrines of the lamina and
in neurons connecting the lamina and medulla externa (Fig.
2A,B,D). The amacrines
have the same morphology as the TRP-IR ones (as shown in Fig.
2B,C). The lamina-medulla-connecting neurons, however, are distinct from the TRP-IR-interconnecting neurons (they
form processes in a midlayer of the lamina, not seen after TRP
immunocytochemistry; Fig. 2, compare B-D). In addition, the GABA-IR neurons have cells bodies clustered anterior to the medulla (Fig. 2E). The GABA immunocytochemistry required
specific fixation and pretreatment that precluded the possibility of
double labeling with antiserum to substance P or LomTK. Thus we can
only infer by indirect criteria that GABA- and TRP-immunoreactive
material is colocalized in the amacrines. First, the number of
amacrines displayed by each of the two antisera is approximately the
same, and the morphology of the amacrines displayed by each of the two antisera is very similar (Fig. 2B,C). Second, the
amacrines have large nuclei, and counterstaining of the
anti-GABA-labeled sections reveal that there are very few large nuclei
below the lamina that are not in cell bodies that display GABA-IR (Fig.
2A,B).

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Cryostat sections of crayfish lamina
(horizontal sections). A, GABA-immunoreactive neurons in
the lamina of P. leniusculus (ABC method;
counterstaining of nuclei with toluidine blue) are shown.
Am neurons are labeled in addition to neurons connecting
the La and the medulla (not clearly seen here; refer to
D). Note the immunolabeled processes in three layers of
the lamina; the midlayer of tangential processes is most prominent.
B, Detail of the lamina with cell bodies of
GABA-immunoreactive Ams and processes in the synaptic
neuropil in four layers (1-4) is
shown. The processes in layer 2 are derived from the
lamina-medulla-connecting neurons. C, For comparison
substance P-immunoreactive Ams (peroxidase method) are
shown. Layers 1, 3, and
4 are indicated; no processes are seen in layer
2. D, GABA-IR processes of the neurons
connecting the La and the medulla form a tangential
layer in the midregion of the lamina neuropil. One of the
lamina-medulla-interconnecting axons is seen at the
arrow. E, Cb of
lamina-medulla-interconnecting GABA-IR neurons reside adjacent to the
Me neuropil close to the Chi
between the lamina and the medulla. Cb, Cell bodies;
Chi, chiasm. Scale bars: A,
D, E, 50 µm; B, C, 20 µm.
|
|
GABA hyperpolarizes photoreceptor terminals
Previous studies (Wang-Bennett and Glantz, 1987 ; Glantz and
Bartels, 1994 ) have shown that lateral inhibition in lamina monopolar cells is maximized by off-axis or broad-field illumination and appears
to be expressed presynaptically. When photoreceptor responses are
recorded in the soma there is no obvious sign of inhibition in the
response to broad-field illumination (as shown in Fig. 3A). Recordings from
photoreceptor axons, however, often reveal a hyperpolarizing
afterpotential (implying inhibition) in the wake of the excitatory
light response as shown in Figure 3B. At log10 intensity 3, the afterpotential is
approximately 1.0 mV. It increases to 3.0 mV at intermediate
intensities and is replaced with a depolarizing afterpotential at log
intensity 0.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Comparison of the afterpotentials of soma and
axonal photoreceptor responses elicited with broad-field (20° solid
angle) illumination. A, Soma responses to 0.5 sec light
flashes (horizontal bar at
bottom left). Intensity was varied in 0.5 log10 unit steps from 2.0 to 0. Each trace
is the average of five responses. B, Axonal recordings
of responses to 0.55 sec flashes with intensity varied from 3.0 to 0 in 0.5 log10 steps. Each trace is the
average of five responses. The broken
line indicates the membrane resting potential that is
taken as 0 mV. The afterpotentials at log intensity 3 and 0 are
labeled. All other intensities produced similar afterpotentials.
|
|
Because a GABA-activated Cl conductance
appears to mediate presynaptic inhibition at crayfish neuromuscular
junction (Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1966 ) and in primary afferent
terminals (Kennedy et al., 1980 ; Cattaert et al., 1994 ), it is possible
that GABA is responsible for the light-elicited hyperpolarization of
receptor terminals. The application of GABA to the lamina (where
photoreceptor terminals are located) elicits a dose-dependent
hyperpolarization of the photoreceptor terminal (as shown in Fig.
4A). In axonal recordings the largest responses are 5 to 10 mV in amplitude. In
soma recordings however the largest responses are approximately 2 mV.
The GABA-elicited response is relatively resistant to desensitization. An unusual feature of some arthropod chloride channels is that they are
activated by acetylcholine (ACh) in addition to GABA (Zufall et al.,
1988 ). In photoreceptor terminals, ACh elicited dose-dependent
hyperpolarizing responses as shown in Figure 4B. The
sensitivity was similar to that of GABA with half-maximal responses at
~10 µM and saturation at 100 µM.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Receptor responses to GABA and acetylcholine
injections in the lamina. A, Axonal recordings of
receptor responses to 1.0 sec pulses of 1.0 mM GABA
(pipette concentration) at varied injection pressures are shown.
Injection volume was linear with pressure, and 20 psi produced a 100 nl
volume. Each trace is the average of five responses.
B, ACh was injected in 100 nl volumes from a multibarrel
pipette with pipette concentrations of 1.0, 10, 100, and 1000 µM (as indicated above each trace). Each
trace is the average of four responses.
|
|
The GABA-elicited response is associated with an increase in membrane
conductance that reduces the amplitude of both current-elicited (as
shown in Fig. 5) and light-elicited (as
shown in Fig. 6) membrane polarizations.
A typical result from an axonal recording is shown in Figure
5B, in which the initial phase of the GABA-elicited response
(shown in Fig. 5A) is associated with a reduction in the
current-elicited polarization. This reduction indicates an increase in
the receptor's input conductance from 38 to 54 nS. In most of our
recordings the GABA-dependent reduction in the light response was
modest (10-20%) and consistent with a small reduction in input
resistance. The attenuation shown in Figure 6 is ~30%.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
The GABA response is associated with an increase
in membrane conductance. A, Axonal recording of
GABA-elicited hyperpolarization (top
trace). The GABA (0.1 mM) pulse
(bottom trace) was at 20 psi for 0.2 sec.
The volume was ~50 nl. B, Input resistance measurement
during the GABA-elicited response. Stimulus conditions are described in
A but with a 0.2 sec, 0.3 nA current pulse injected
through the electrode at 2 Hz in the discontinuous current-clamp
recording. The GABA injection increases the measured input conductance
from 38 to 54 nS during the early phase of the response, and the
conductance declined to within 10% of the resting value as the
hyperpolarization attained its maximum.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
GABA attenuates the light response. Soma recording
of receptor responses (top trace)
to 0.2 sec light flashes (bottom trace)
at a log10 intensity of 3.5 and a stimulus repetition
rate of 0.4 Hz. Once every 30 sec a 0.1 mM GABA injection
(1.0 sec pulse; 20 psi; middle trace) was
timed to precede a light pulse by 0.5 sec. GABA reduced the light
response from 2.7 to 1.8 mV, and the response recovered by 30% within
3.0 sec after the start of the injection.
|
|
TRP hyperpolarizes the receptor terminal
Nanoliter volumes of 1.0 or 10 µM TRP (LemTRP-4)
elicited dose-dependent hyperpolarizations of 1-3 mV in receptor
terminals as shown in Figure 7. Note that
the numbers above each trace in Figure
7 represent the gram-equivalent dose. The TRP concentration in the
injection pipette was fixed (10 µM), whereas
the injected volume was varied with pressure. The actual concentrations
are unknown, but they are <10 µM and
presumably proportional to the injected dose. The responses typically
peak at 0.5-1.0 sec after the injection and decay to baseline after
another 3-5 sec. Although TRP occasionally produced responses of up to
5 mV, a range of 0.5-3.0 mV was more common. TRP also produced
modest reductions in receptor membrane input resistance as shown in
Figure 8. Typical changes were 10-20%,
indicative of conductance increases of 5-10 nS.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Photoreceptor responses recorded in the axon to
pressure injections of TRP in the lamina. Stimulus duration
(bottom trace) was 100 msec, and the
pressure was varied to produce different injection volumes of a 10 µM TRP solution in the pipette (top
four traces). The numbers
above each trace indicate the gram-equivalent injection
dose in picomolar concentrations. Each trace is the
average of three to five responses. Note that at 0.87 pM,
the response appears to occur in two phases. The second phase (i.e.,
the large delayed hyperpolarization) was commonly observed with large
injection volumes (0.1 µl).
|
|

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
TRP injections produce a small increase in
conductance in the photoreceptor terminal. Current pulses of 0.3 nA
and 0.2 sec duration and at 2 pulses/sec were injected into the
receptor and synchronized to the timing of the TRP injection
(bottom trace). After the TRP injection
the voltage deflection declines from 6.7 to 5.7 mV, indicating a change
in input conductance from 45 to 52 nS. The recordings were made in the
axon in discontinuous current-clamp mode. The top
trace is the average of four responses.
|
|
A voltage-clamp analysis was undertaken in 14 cells to examine the
action of TRP on voltage-dependent conductances. The receptor exhibits
a leakage conductance and a delayed rectifier potassium conductance
similar to those found in other arthropod receptors (Pepose and Lisman,
1978 ). The outward currents were insensitive to TRP (data not shown),
but the leakage conductance exhibited modest increases with TRP
perfusion consistent with the results in Figure 8.
TRP also exhibits two additional actions consistent with a role in
lateral inhibition or light adaptation: (1) a reduction in the
photoreceptor's response to a flash of light that develops over
several minutes and (2) potentiation of the action of GABA that also
evolves on a time scale of minutes.
TRP reduces the receptor potential
If a light flash is presented during or immediately after a single
TRP pulse, the receptor potential is unaffected. Significant modulation
was observed however over a longer time scale and with continuous perfusion.
Figure 9 shows light responses elicited
by flashes of constant intensity in control conditions (Fig.
9A, 0 min perfusion), during a 5 min perfusion of the lamina
with 1.0 µM TRP (Fig. 9A), and after
a wash with saline (Fig. 9B). In this cell the TRP reduced the light response by 40% in 5 min. Similar results were obtained in
19 of 20 cells tested, and these cells exhibited a 37.9 ± 4.3% (± SE) response attenuation in 3-5 min that was associated with a
70% reduction in visual sensitivity. Similar results were obtained with 1 and 10 µM TRP.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
TRP perfusion produces a reversible reduction of
the photoreceptor's light response. A, Light flashes
(0.55 sec duration; log10 intensity = 2.0) were
presented continuously at one flash/8 sec until a stable adaptation
level was achieved. The sample labeled "0" is the average of 10 responses just before the onset of TRP perfusion (1.0 µl/min; 1.0 µM). The remaining four responses show the decline in the
visual response between 1.0 and 5.0 min after the onset of perfusion.
Each response is labeled with the time from perfusion onset to the
beginning of the sample period. At the end of 5 min, the TRP perfusion
was terminated, and after a 1.0 min hiatus, a saline wash was
commenced. B, The 0 response is the average of the first
five responses during the wash. The remaining records are averages of
five successive responses beginning at the times indicated in minutes
at the bottom of each trace.
|
|
Because TRP reduces the receptor potential to a much greater degree
than the input resistance, it is possible that TRP has actions in the
visual transduction pathway or on a voltage-gated inward current
associated with the receptor potential. Figure 10, A and B,
compares receptor potentials elicited at four flash intensities in
control and during TRP perfusion. TRP reduced the receptor potential by
~50% except at the highest intensity at which the reduction is 12%.
Figure 10, C and D, shows the light-activated currents (measured at 60 mV, the membrane resting potential) at the
same intensities and under the same conditions. TRP reduced the
currents at all intensities by ~55%. The attenuations of the voltage
and current responses will not be precisely proportional because of
different effects of the input conductance, reversal potential, and
voltage-dependent outward current on the two measurements. Furthermore,
the measurements in Figure 10 do not distinguish between TRP actions on
the photochemical cascade and actions on the light-activated ion
channels. In four comparable experiments the results indicated that
most or all of the TRP-dependent reduction in receptor potential could
be caused by a corresponding reduction in the light-activated current.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Receptor potentials and light-elicited currents
are diminished by TRP. A, Receptor potential responses
to four flash intensities from log10 4.0 to 2.5 in 0.5 log unit steps in control conditions. The flash duration
(horizontal bar at bottom
left) was 0.55 sec. B, Receptor potential
responses to the flash intensities described in A but
during perfusion of the lamina with 1.0 µM TRP at 5.0 µl/min. C, Receptor currents elicited by the same
stimuli shown in A and measured in voltage clamp at the
membrane resting potential ( 60 mV) in control conditions.
D, Receptor currents as described in C
but during TRP perfusion. Each trace is the average of
three to five responses.
|
|
Because the TRP actions on photocurrent were observed with the
photoreceptors clamped at the membrane resting potential (as shown in
Fig. 10), voltage-gated currents do not contribute to the TRP-dependent
attenuations of the light-elicited current. It is possible however that
TRP might modulate a voltage-gated inward current that contributes to
the receptor potential. Although we have found no convincing evidence
of a voltage-dependent inward current (even with outward currents
partially blocked with tetraethylammonium), we are not prepared to say
that they are absent and that they could not contribute to the TRP
action on the receptor potential.
TRP potentiates the response to GABA
TRP perfusion produces a reversible increase in the response to
GABA, as shown in Figure 11. In soma
recordings the response to GABA increased in six of seven cells tested
from 0.52 ± 0.13 mV (± SE) to 1.26 ± 0.22 mV (± SE).
The enhancement evolved over 2-5 min. The TRP effect was sufficiently
robust that the TRP-dependent potentiation could be repeated in the
same cell after a wash to restore normal GABA responsiveness (Fig. 11,
third, fourth traces). A 50% recovery
typically required ~5 min. The GABA-elicited responses were not
altered by single TRP injections whether the two were simultaneous or
with GABA delayed by up to 10 sec.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
TRP reversibly increases the receptor response to
GABA. The top four traces
show averaged responses to 0.1 mM GABA injections (20 psi
for 1.0 sec; bottom trace) in control
conditions (top trace), during perfusion
with 10 µM TRP (second
trace from the top), at the end of a 20 min saline wash (third trace from the
top), and during a second perfusion with TRP
(fourth trace from the
top). Each trace is the average of five
responses.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our principal findings are that the amacrine neurons of the
crayfish lamina ganglionaris contain TRP and GABA. The neurites of the
amacrine neurons arborize in the lamina layers that contain photoreceptor terminals. Both GABA and TRP produce actions consistent with presynaptic inhibition of the primary visual synapse. These actions include relatively fast, dose-dependent hyperpolarizations of
the photoreceptor terminal associated with small increases in membrane
conductance. Furthermore, TRP produces a slow reduction of the
light-elicited photoreceptor current and reversibly potentiates the
action of GABA. This is the first evidence of peptidergic modulation of
sensory cells in arthropods. The results support inhibitory actions of
TRP in contrast with the commonly reported excitatory action of
vertebrate tachykinins (see Otsuka and Yoshioka, 1993 ).
Colocalization of TRP and GABA
The present results indicate that amacrines of the crayfish lamina
ganglionaris [first described by Strausfeld and Nässel (1981) ]
contain TRP and probably colocalized GABA. It was shown previously that
antisera to FMRFamide and to the octadecapeptide pigment-dispersing hormone were colocalized in neurons likely to
be amacrines of the crayfish lamina ganglionaris (Mangerich et al.,
1988 ). Thus it is possible that the same amacrines colocalize members
of three peptide families and GABA. Because the immunocytochemistry protocols for neuropeptides and neuroactive amino acids are not compatible, we did not obtain clear double-label evidence of the TRP
and GABA colocalization. Only indirect evidence suggests this colocalization; the numbers of TRP- and GABA-immunoreactive amacrines are approximately the same, and the morphology and distributions of the
neurons are very similar. It is also known that GABA and TRPs are
colocalized in neurons of the insect brain (see Nässel, 1999 ) and
that in the vertebrate retina GABA and substance P have been found to
be colocalized in amacrine and ganglion cells (Pourcho and Goebel,
1988 ; Caruso et al., 1990 ; Cuenca and Kolb, 1998 ). Because two
additional types of lamina neurons (connecting to the medulla externa)
contain TRP and GABA, respectively, it is possible that the observed
actions of TRPs and GABA may not depend on the amacrines.
Inhibitory actions of GABA and TRP
The interpretation of the physiological data is based on a working
hypothesis that lamina amacrine neurons are excited (directly or
indirectly) by photoreceptor cells and that the amacrine neurons provide inhibitory feedback to the photoreceptor terminals (Glantz and
Bartels, 1994 ). The hyperpolarization of receptor terminals by
broad-field illumination and by GABA and TRP is consistent with this
hypothesis. Furthermore, GABA is associated with presynaptic inhibition
and increased Cl conductance at both
peripheral and central crustacean synapses (Kennedy et al., 1980 ;
Glantz et al., 1985 ; Finger and Martin, 1989 ; Cattaert et al., 1994 ).
Because the actions of ACh are similar to those of GABA, it is possible
that the photoreceptor's GABA receptor is similar to the nonjunctional
receptors of crustacean muscle (Zufall et al., 1988 ). In the lamina of
flies (Hardie, 1987 ), GABA depolarizes the lamina monopolar cells
(LMCs) and diminishes the cell's input conductance. These actions
mimic the effects of off-axis illumination in both flies (Dubs, 1982 ;
Laughlin and Osorio, 1989 ) and crayfish (Wang-Bennett and Glantz,
1987 ). In preliminary studies of crayfish LMCs, GABA reduced the LMC light response. The size of the GABA-elicited response in photoreceptor terminals implies a capacity for strong inhibition. In crayfish (Glantz, 1991 ) and other arthropods, contrast stimuli elicit
receptor potentials of a few millivolts, comparable with the magnitude of the GABA-elicited response.
The physiological actions of TRP are also consistent with both
short-term and long-term roles in presynaptic inhibition. The TRP-elicited hyperpolarization and modest increase in terminal input
conductance are similar to the actions of GABA and should reduce
transmitter release by the photoreceptor. Previous studies have shown
that substance P can increase the leakage conductance in sympathetic
neurons (Jones and Adams, 1987 ) and increase a Cl conductance (Janssen and Sims, 1994 )
in smooth muscle cells. Either finding could be the basis of the
observations reported here.
The reduction of receptor potential by TRP is opposite to the effects
of substance P on the Limulus photoresponse (Mancillas and
Selverston, 1984 ). Any one of a number of differences between the
studies might account for the different results. These include species
differences or differences in the ligands (substance P vs LemTRP-4),
the site of application (retinula perfusion in Limulus vs
lamina injection in crayfish), or the effective concentration ranges
(1.0-100 nM in Limulus vs 1-10
µM in crayfish). Another important distinction
is that substance P actions in Limulus appear to reflect
principally the migration of shielding pigments and changes in rhabdome
structure that in turn alter the quantum catch. A comparable system in
crayfish (Arechiga et al., 1990 ) responds to serotonin to increase
visual sensitivity. The response has a latency of 20 min and a time to
peak of 40 min. This should be compared with the 3-5 min time course
of sensitivity changes after TRP injection.
Thus we interpret the reduction of the receptor potential by TRP as
principally attributable to an attenuation of the light-elicited current and TRP action on visual transduction. This influence could be
mediated by a TRP-dependent rise in intracellular
Ca2+ (Li et al., 1991 ; Nakanishi, 1991 ).
Intracellular Ca2+ is known to reduce
arthropod light sensitivity during light adaptation (Lisman and Brown,
1972 ), and it is possible that TRP shares a common pathway. In mammals,
tachykinin receptors are coupled to G-proteins and in many cases
activate the phospholipase C pathway. This pathway involves inositol
phospholipid hydrolysis and production of inositol triphosphate and
diacylglycerol that in turn induce a rise in intracellular
Ca2+ and the activation of protein kinase
C, respectively (Guard and Watson, 1991 ; Otsuka and Yoshioka, 1993 ).
When cloned TRP receptors from Drosophila were
heterologously expressed, ligand exposure activated the phospholipase C
pathway and a Ca2+-dependent
Cl conductance (Li et al.,
1991 ; Monnier et al., 1992 ).
The enhancement of the photoreceptor's GABA-elicited response by TRP
suggests a novel action of TRP on GABA receptors, but other
possibilities based on indirect TRP actions (Kouznetsova and
Nistri, 1998 ; Maubach et al., 1998 ) have not been eliminated. There are
a few reports that suggest TRP modulation of ligand-gated conductances
(Otsuka and Yoshioka, 1993 ; Yamada and Akasu, 1996 ; Parker and
Grillner, 1998 ). For example, in avian sympathetic ganglia and bovine
chromaffin cells, substance P increases the rate of desensitization of
the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. This action is probably mediated
by the phospholipase C pathway and the activation of protein kinase C
(Clapham and Neher, 1984 ; Simmons et al., 1990 ).
Morphological evidence suggests that TRP and GABA might have
synergistic actions in some systems. TRP and GABA are colocalized in
locust brain neurons (Vitzthum and Homberg, 1998 ), in cat spinal dorsal
horn neurons (Ma and Ribeiro-da-Silva, 1995 ), in motor neurons
of guinea pig small intestine (Williamson et al., 1996 ), in primate and
rat retinal amacrine cells (Caruso et al., 1990 ; Casini et al., 1997 ;
Cuenca and Kolb, 1998 ), and in primate frontal cortex (Jakab et al.,
1997 ). Our evidence supporting synergistic GABA-TRP inhibitory actions
is generally consistent with observations of inhibitory influences of
substance P in mammalian brain (Kow and Pfaff, 1988 ; Margeta-Mitrovic
et al., 1997 ), in peripheral ganglia (Jones and Adams, 1987 ; Gilbert et
al., 1998 ), in smooth muscle (Sun et al., 1993 ; Janssen and Sims,
1994 ), and in lobster olfactory neurons (Schmidt and Ache, 1994 ). In
this context it is notable that in addition to TRP, crayfish amacrine
neurons contain a FMRFamide-like peptide (Mangerich et al., 1988 ). In the mollusc Aplysia FMRFamide has potent presynaptic
inhibitory effects (Belardetti et al., 1987 ; Sweatt et al., 1989 ;
Dreijer et al., 1995 ; Klein, 1995 ) based on an enhancement of a
K+ current and a reduction of a
Ca2+ current. On the contrary side, much
evidence attests to excitatory effects of TRPs in both vertebrates
(Maggio, 1988 ; Nakanishi, 1991 ) and arthropods (Blitz et al., 1995 ;
Christie et al., 1997 ; Lundquist and Nässel, 1997 ), and there is
also evidence that substance P antagonizes GABA action (Yamada and
Akasu, 1996 ).
The results prompt the question of why two or perhaps three agents
(including FMRFamide) contribute to inhibition of photoreceptor terminals. Although GABA and TRP have some similar actions, the stronger effects of TRP are distinct from the actions of GABA and are
expressed over a longer time scale. As noted previously, lateral
inhibition is the basis of contrast enhancement and contributes to
neural gain control during visual adaptation. Contrast enhancement functions operate over short (millisecond to second) time scales similar to the time course of GABA and the fast TRP actions. Some aspects of light adaptation evolve slowly, and the time course is more
compatible with the slower TRP actions. A related possibility is that
the different substances may be released by amacrine cells under
quantitatively different levels of excitation (Marder et al., 1995 ).
Thus GABA release might be modulated by normal contrast stimuli, and
TRP may be released by more substantial (e.g., order of magnitude)
increases in mean intensity. There is extensive evidence that
neuromodulatory substances may increase photoreceptor sensitivity in
the context of dark adaptation and/or circadian rhythms. In crayfish
(Arechiga et al., 1990 ), flies (Hevers and Hardie, 1995 ), and locust
(Cuttle et al., 1995 ), serotonin increases the receptor potential by
modulating a K+ conductance (in insects).
In Limulus lateral eye, substance P and octopamine increase
retinal sensitivity. Substance P produces alterations in the dioptric
apparatus (Mancillas and Selverston, 1984 ). Octopamine also influences
ommatidial structure (Kass and Barlow, 1984 ) and appears to modulate
voltage-gated currents activated during the light response (Kass et
al., 1988 ; Renninger et al., 1989 ). The modulation is expressed with a
circadian rhythm.
We do not know whether lamina amacrine neurons synapse on photoreceptor
terminals or whether GABA or TRP release is light dependent. The
presence of GABA and TRP in amacrine neurons and the actions of these
ligands on photoreceptor terminals in the lamina are consistent with
their roles in lateral or feedback inhibition of the primary visual
synapse. The pronounced and prolonged effects of TRP on both the visual
response and the actions of GABA indicate that the transduction pathway
that subserves TRP action has broad modulatory control over
photoreceptor function.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Oct. 12, 1999; revised Dec. 8, 1999; accepted Dec. 10, 1999.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant
IBN-9807548 and by the National Library of Medicine Fellowship 1T15LM07093. D.R.N. was supported by the Swedish Natural Science Research Council (NFR). The technical assistance of Anne
Karlsson is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. M. Eckert (University of Jena) for the supply of GABA antiserum. We also thank the Rice University Keck Center for Computational Biology for their support and
the staff of Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, for
their hospitality and material assistance.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. R. M. Glantz, Department
of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251. E-mail: rmg{at}bioc.rice.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Arechiga H,
Banuelos E,
Frixione E,
Picones A,
Rodriguez-Sosa L
(1990)
Modulation of crayfish retinal sensitivity by 5-hydroxytryptamine.
J Exp Biol
150:123-143[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Attwell D,
Werblin FS,
Wilson M,
Wu S
(1983)
A sign-reversing pathway from rods to double and single cones in the retina of the tiger salamander.
J Physiol (Lond)
336:313-333[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Belardetti ER,
Kandel ER,
Siegelbaum SA
(1987)
Neuronal inhibition by the peptide FMRFamide involves opening of S K+ channels.
Nature
325:153-156[Medline].
-
Blitz DM,
Christie AE,
Marder E,
Nusbaum MP
(1995)
Distribution and effects of tachykinin-like peptides in the stomatogastric nervous system of the crab, Cancer borealis.
J Comp Neurol
354:282-294[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Caruso DM,
Owczarzak MT,
Puorcho RG
(1990)
Colocalization of substance P and GABA in retinal ganglion cells: a computer-assisted visualization.
Vis Neurosci
5:389-394[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Casini G,
Rickman DW,
Sternini C,
Brecha NC
(1997)
Neurokinin 1 receptor expression in the rat retina.
J Comp Neurol
389:496-507[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cattaert D,
el Manira A,
Clarac F
(1994)
Chloride conductance produces both presynaptic inhibition and antidromic spikes in primary afferents.
Brain Res
666:109-112[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Christie AE,
Lundquist CT,
Nässel DR,
Nusbaum MP
(1997)
Tachykinin related peptides in the nervous system of the crab, Cancer borealis.
J Exp Biol
200:2279-2294[Abstract].
-
Clapham DE,
Neher E
(1984)
Substance P reduces acetylcholine-induced currents in isolated bovine chromaffin cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
347:255-277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Cuello AC,
Galfre G,
Milstein C
(1979)
Detection of substance P in the central nervous system by a monoclonal antibody.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:3532-3536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Cuenca N,
Kolb H
(1998)
Circuitry and role of substance P-immunoreactive neurons in the primate retina.
J Comp Neurol
393:439-456[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cuttle MF,
Hevers W,
Laughlin SB,
Hardie RC
(1995)
Diurnal modulation of photoreceptor potassium conductance in the locust.
J Comp Physiol [A]
176:307-316[Web of Science].
-
Dreijer AMC,
Verheule S,
Kits KS
(1995)
Inhibition of slowly inactivating high-voltage-activated calcium current by the neuropeptide FMRFa in molluscan neuroendocrine cells.
Invert Neurosci
1:75-86.
-
Dubs A
(1982)
The spatial integration of signals in the retina and lamina of the fly compound eye under different conditions of luminance.
J Comp Physiol [A]
146:321-343.
-
Finger W,
Martin C
(1989)
Presynaptic effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid on the inhibitory nerve and nerve terminals in the crayfish neuromuscular junction.
Neurosci Lett
97:129-134[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Fingerman M,
Hanumante MM,
Kulkarni GK,
Ikeda R,
Vacca L
(1985)
Localization of substance P-like, leucine-enkephalin-like, methionine-enkephalin-like and FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity in the eyestalk of the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator.
Cell Tissue Res
241:473-477[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Füller H,
Eckert M,
Blechschmidt K
(1989)
Distribution of GABA-like immunoreactive neurons in the optic lobes of Periplaneta americana.
Cell Tissue Res
255:225-233[Web of Science].
-
Gilbert R,
Ryan JS,
Horackova M,
Smith FM,
Kelly ME
(1998)
The actions of substance P on membrane potential and ionic currents in guinea pig stellate ganglion neurons.
Am J Physiol
274:C892-C903[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Glantz RM
(1991)
Motion detection and adaptation in crayfish photoreceptors: a spatiotemporal analysis of linear movement sensitivity.
J Gen Physiol
97:777-797[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Glantz RM,
Bartels A
(1994)
The spatiotemporal transfer function of crayfish lamina monopolar neurons.
J Neurophysiol
71:2168-2182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Glantz RM,
Wang-Bennett L,
Waldrop B
(1985)
Presynaptic inhibition in the crayfish brain.
J Comp Physiol [A]
156:477-487[Web of Science].
-
Goldberg D,
Nusbaum MP,
Marder E
(1988)
Substance P-like immunoreactivity in the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab Cancer borealis and the lobsters Panulirus interruptus and Homarus americanus.
Cell Tissue Res
252:515-522[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Guard S,
Watson SP
(1991)
Tachykinin receptor types: classification and membrane signalling mechanisms.
Neurochem Int
18:149-165[Web of Science].
-
Hamori J,
Horridge GA
(1966)
The lobster optic lamina. II. Types of synapses.
J Cell Sci
1:257-270[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hardie RC
(1987)
Is histamine a neurotransmitter in insect photoreceptors?
J Comp Physiol [A]
161:201-213[Medline].
-
Hevers N,
Hardie RC
(1995)
Serotonin modulates the voltage dependence of delayed rectifier and shaker potassium channels in Drosophila photoreceptors.
Neuron
14:845-856[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Jakab RL,
Goldman-Rakic P,
Leranth C
(1997)
Dual role of substance P/GABA axons in cortical neurotransmission: synaptic triads on pyramidal cell spines and basket-like innervation of layer II-III calbindin interneurons in primate prefrontal cortex.
Cereb Cortex
7:359-373[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Janssen LJ,
Sims SM
(1994)
Substance P activates Cl
and K+ conductances in guinea-pig tracheal smooth muscle cells.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
72:705-710[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Johansson KUI,
Lundquist CT,
Hallberg E,
Nässel DR
(1999)
Tachykinin-related neuropeptide in the crayfish olfactory midbrain.
Cell Tissue Res
296:405-415[Web of Science].
-
Jones SW,
Adams PR
(1987)
The M-current and other potassium currents of vertebrate neurons.
In: Neuromodulation (Kaczmarek LC,
Levitan IB,
eds), pp 159-186. Oxford: Oxford UP.
-
Karten HJ,
Brecha N
(1980)
Localization of substance P immunoreactivity in amacrine cells of the retina.
Nature
283:87-88[Medline].
-
Kass L,
Barlow RB
(1984)
Efferent neurotransmission of circadian rhythms in Limulus lateral eye. I. Octopamine-induced changes in retinal sensitivity.
J Neurosci
4:908-917[Abstract].
-
Kass L,
Pelletier JL,
Renninger GH,
Barlow Jr RB
(1988)
Efferent neurotransmission of circadian rhythms in Limulus lateral eye. II. Intracellular recordings in vitro.
J Comp Physiol [A]
164:95-105[Medline].
-
Kennedy D,
McVittie J,
Calabrese R,
Fricke RA,
Craelius W,
Chiapella P
(1980)
Inhibition of mechanosensory interneurons in the crayfish. I. Presynaptic inhibition from giant fibers.
J Neurophysiol
43:1495-1509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Klein M
(1995)
Modulation of ion currents and regulation of transmitter release in short-term synaptic plasticity: the rise and fall of the action potential.
Invert Neurosci
1:15-24[Medline].
-
Kouznetsova M,
Nistri A
(1998)
Modulation by substance P of synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampal slice.
Eur J Neurosci
10:3076-3084[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kow L-M,
Pfaff DW
(1988)
Neuromodulatory actions of peptides.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol
28:163-188[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Laughlin SB,
Osorio D
(1989)
Mechanisms for neural signal enhancement in blowfly compound eye.
J Exp Biol
144:113-146[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Li XJ,
Wolfgang W,
Wu YN,
North RA,
Forte M
(1991)
Cloning and heterologous expression and developmental regulation of a Drosophila receptor for tachykinin-like peptides.
EMBO J
10:3221-3229[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lisman JE,
Brown JE
(1972)
The effects of intracellular iontophoretic injection of calcium and sodium ions on the light response of Limulus ventral photoreceptors.
J Gen Physiol
59:701-719[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lundquist CT,
Nässel DR
(1997)
Peptidergic activation of locust dorsal unpaired median neurons: depolarization induced by locustatachykinins may be mediated by cyclic AMP.
J Neurobiol
33:297-315[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lundquist CT,
Clottens FL,
Holman GM,
Riehm JP,
Bonkale W,
Nässel DR
(1994)
Locustatachykinin immunoreactivity in the blowfly central nervous system and intestine.
J Comp Neurol
341:225-240[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ma W,
Ribeiro-da-Silva A
(1995)
Substance P- and GABA-like immunoreactivities are co-localized in axonal varicosities in the superficial laminae of cat but not rat spinal cord.
Brain Res
692:99-110[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Maggio JE
(1988)
Tachykinins.
Annu Rev Neurosci
11:13-28[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mancillas JR,
Selverston AI
(1984)
Neuropeptide modulation of photosensitivity. II. Physiological and anatomical effects of substance P on the lateral eye of Limulus.
J Neurosci
4:847-859[Abstract].
-
Mancillas JR,
McGinty JF,
Selverston AI,
Karten H,
Bloom FE
(1981)
Immunocytochemical localization of enkephalin and substance P in retina and eyestalk neurones of lobster.
Nature
293:576-578[Medline].
-
Mangerich S,
Keller R,
Dircksen H,
Rao KR,
Riehm JP
(1988)
Immunocytochemical localization of pigment-dispersing hormone and its coexistence with FMRFamide immunoreactive material in the eyestalks of the decapod crustaceans Carcinus maenas and Orconectes limosus.
Cell Tissue Res
250:365-375[Web of Science].
-
Marder E,
Christie AE,
Kilman VL
(1995)
Functional organization of cotransmission systems: lessons from small nervous systems.
Invert Neurosci
1:105-112[Medline].
-
Margeta-Mitrovic M,
Grigg JJ,
Koyano K,
Nakajima Y,
Nakajima S
(1997)
Neurotensin and substance P inhibit low- and high-voltage-activated Ca2+ channels in cultured newborn rat nucleus basalis neurons.
J Neurophysiol
78:1341-1352[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Maubach KA,
Cody C,
Jones RS
(1998)
Tachykinins may modify spontaneous epileptiform activity in the rat entorhinal cortex in vitro by activating GABAergic inhibition.
Neuroscience
83:1047-1062[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Monnier D,
Colas JF,
Rosay P,
Hen R,
Borrelli E,
Maroteaux L
(1992)
NKD, a developmentally regulated tachykinin receptor in Drosophila.
J Biol Chem
267:1298-1302[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Nakanishi S
(1991)
Mammalian tachykinin receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
14:123-136[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nässel DR
(1993)
Insect myotropic peptides: differential distribution of locustatachykinin- and leucokinin-like immunoreactive neurons in the locust brain.
Cell Tissue Res
274:27-40[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nässel DR
(1999)
Tachykinin-related peptides in invertebrates. A review.
Peptides
20:141-158[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nässel DR,
Eckström P
(1997)
Detection of neuropeptides by immunocytochemistry.
In: Methods in molecular biology, Vol 7, Neurotransmitter methods (Rayne RC,
ed), pp 71-101. Totowa, NJ: Humana.
-
Nieto J,
Veelaert D,
Derua R,
Waelkens E,
Cerstiaens A,
Coast G,
Devreese B,
Van Beeumen J,
Calderon J,
De Loof A,
Schoofs L
(1998)
Identification of one tachykinin- and two kinin-related peptides in the brain of the white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
248:406-411[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Otsuka M,
Yoshioka K
(1993)
Neurotransmitter functions of mammalian tachykinins.
Physiol Rev
73:229-308[Free Full Text].
-
Parker D,
Grillner S
(1998)
Cellular and synaptic modulation underlying substance P-mediated plasticity of the lamprey locomotor network.
J Neurosci
18:8095-8110[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pepose JS,
Lisman JE
(1978)
Voltage-sensitive potassium channels in Limulus ventral photoreceptors.
J Gen Physiol
71:101-120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pourcho RG,
Goebel DJ
(1988)
Colocalization of substance P and GABA in amacrine cells of the cat retina.
Brain Res
447:164-168[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Renninger GH,
Schimmel R,
Farrell CA
(1989)
Octopamine modulates photoreceptor function in the Limulus lateral eye.
Vis Neurosci
3:83-94[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Sandeman RE,
Sandeman DC,
Watson A
(1990)
Substance P antibody reveals homologous neurons with axon terminals among somata in the crayfish and crab brain.
J Comp Neurol
294:569-582[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schmidt M,
Ache BW
(1994)
Descending neurons with dopamine-like or with substance P/FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity target somata of olfactory neurons in the brain of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus.
Cell Tissue Res
278:337-352[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schoofs L,
Vanden Broeck J,
De Loof A
(1993)
The myotropic peptides of Locusta migratoria: structures, distribution, functions and receptors.
Insect Biochem Mol Biol
23:859-881[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schot LPC,
Boer MM,
Swaab DF,
van Norden S
(1981)
Immunocytochemical demonstration of peptidergic neurons in the central nervous system of the pond snail Lymnea stagnalis with antisera raised to biologically active peptides of vertebrates.
Cell Tissue Res
216:273-291[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Simmons LK,
Schuetze SM,
Role LW
(1990)
Substance P modulates single-channel properties of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Neuron
4:393-403[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Strausfeld NJ,
Campos-Ortega JA
(1977)
Vision in insects: pathways possibly underlying neural adaptation and lateral inhibition.
Science
195:894-897[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Strausfeld NJ,
Nässel DR
(1981)
Neuroarchitecture of brain regions that subserve the compound eyes of crustacea and insects.
In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol VII/6B (Autrum H,
ed), pp 1-132. Berlin: Springer.
-
Sun XP,
Supplisson S,
Mayer E
(1993)
Chloride channels in myocytes from rabbit colon are regulated by a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein.
Am J Physiol
264:G774-G785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sweatt JD,
Voltera A,
Edmonds B,
Karl KA,
Siegelbaum SA,
Kandel ER
(1989)
FMFRamide reverses protein phosphorylations produced by 5-HT and cAMP in Aplysia sensory neurons.
Nature
342:275-278[Medline].
-
Takeuchi A,
Takeuchi N
(1966)
On the permeability of the presynaptic terminal of the crayfish neuromuscular junction during synaptic inhibition and the action of aminobutyric acid.
J Physiol (Lond)
183:433-449[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vitzthum H,
Homberg U
(1998)
Immunocytochemical demonstration of locustatachykinin-related peptides in the central complex of the locust brain.
J Comp Neurol
390:455-469[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wang-Bennett L,
Glantz RM
(1987)
The functional organization of the crayfish lamina ganglionaris. I. Nonspiking monopolar cells.
J Comp Physiol [A]
161:131-145[Medline].
-
Williamson S,
Pompolo S,
Furness JB
(1996)
GABA and nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivities are colocalized in a subset of inhibitory motor neurons of the guinea-pig small intestine.
Cell Tissue Res
284:29-37[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yamada K,
Akasu T
(1996)
Substance P suppresses GABAA receptor function via protein kinase C in primary sensory neurones of bullfrogs.
J Physiol (Lond)
496:439-449[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zalutsky R,
Miller RF
(1990)
The physiology of substance P in the rabbit retina.
J Neurosci
10:394-402[Abstract].
-
Zufall F,
Franke CH,
Hatt H
(1988)
Acetylcholine activates a chloride channel as well as glutamate and GABA.
J Comp Physiol [A]
163:609-620.
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/2051780-11$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Rajaram, R. L. Scott, and H. A. Nash
Retrograde signaling from the brain to the retina modulates the termination of the light response in Drosophila
PNAS,
December 6, 2005;
102(49):
17840 - 17845.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. I. Messinger, K. K. Kutz, T. Le, D. R. Verley, Y.-W. A. Hsu, C. T. Ngo, S. D. Cain, J. T. Birmingham, L. Li, and A. E. Christie
Identification and characterization of a tachykinin-containing neuroendocrine organ in the commissural ganglion of the crab Cancer productus
J. Exp. Biol.,
September 1, 2005;
208(17):
3303 - 3319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|