 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2000, 20(5):1964-1974
Interspike Intervals, Receptive Fields, and Information Encoding
in Primary Visual Cortex
Daniel S.
Reich1, 2,
Ferenc
Mechler2,
Keith P.
Purpura2, and
Jonathan D.
Victor2
1 Laboratory of Biophysics, The Rockefeller University,
New York, New York 10021, and 2 Department of Neurology and
Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York,
New York 10021
 |
ABSTRACT |
In the primate primary visual cortex (V1), the significance
of individual action potentials has been difficult to determine, particularly in light of the considerable trial-to-trial variability of
responses to visual stimuli. We show here that the information conveyed
by an action potential depends on the duration of the immediately
preceding interspike interval (ISI). The interspike intervals can be
grouped into several different classes on the basis of reproducible
features in the interspike interval histograms. Spikes in different
classes bear different relationships to the visual stimulus, both
qualitatively (in terms of the average stimulus preceding each spike)
and quantitatively (in terms of the amount of information encoded per
spike and per second). Spikes preceded by very short intervals (3 msec
or less) convey information most efficiently and contribute
disproportionately to the overall receptive-field properties of the
neuron. Overall, V1 neurons can transmit between 5 and 30 bits of
information per second in response to rapidly varying, pseudorandom
stimuli, with an efficiency of ~25%. Although some (but not all) of
our results would be expected from neurons that use a firing-rate code
to transmit information, the evidence suggests that visual neurons are
well equipped to decode stimulus-related information on the basis of
relative spike timing and ISI duration.
Key words:
spike train; primary visual cortex; V1; information
theory; white noise; receptive field; synaptic depression; synaptic
facilitation; temporal coding; m-sequence; interspike interval
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cortical sensory neurons have high
intrinsic temporal precision (Mainen and Sejnowski, 1995 ; Nowak et al.,
1997 ) and can encode information on the scales of milliseconds and tens
of milliseconds (Bura as and Albright, 1999 ). Three questions
arise immediately. (1) What kinds of stimuli are encoded on the
different time scales in a neuron's response? (2) How much information
is encoded on each time scale? (3) How might this information be
decoded by relatively simple components of neurons and neural circuits?
Here, we answer the first two questions experimentally by measuring the
responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of macaque
monkeys to rapidly varying, pseudorandom ("m-sequence") stimuli.
The interspike intervals (ISIs) of spike trains fired by these neurons
fall into three subsets, distinguished on the basis of ISI duration, in
a stereotyped manner across neurons. We use a reverse-correlation
procedure to generate receptive field (RF) maps from the full responses
as well as from response subsets that only contain spikes that follow
ISIs of particular durations. Finally, we use information theory to
quantify the rate and efficiency with which full responses and response
subsets convey messages about the visual stimulus.
Our results indicate that spikes in different ISI subsets are fired in
response to different visual stimuli. In particular, spikes preceded by
ISIs <3 msec, which occur during periods of very high firing rate,
tend to be evoked by stimuli that have several subregions of opposite
contrast covering the neuron's receptive field. Each of these spikes
also tends to convey more stimulus-related information than the average
spike. On the other hand, spikes preceded by ISIs >38 msec are often
fired in response to spatially uniform stimuli that reverse contrast
over time.
The third question, concerning the ways in which these different
messages are decoded, is not addressed directly by our experiments. We
note at the outset that this question is conceptually independent from
another much-debated question in cortical physiology: whether cortical
neurons encode information through a rate code or a temporal code. In
fact, both types of code can generate receptive-field maps and
information rates similar to what is described here. However, the
existence of stereotyped ISI durations in V1 (described in this paper),
together with recently described synaptic and dendritic machinery (such
as depression, facilitation, and coincidence detection) that can
selectively increase or decrease the importance of particular spikes in
shaping a postsynaptic response, suggests that real-time decoding of
neuronal signals may rely on known biophysical mechanisms specifically
sensitive to ISI duration.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Recording and stimuli. We recorded the responses of
single V1 neurons in opiate-anesthetized macaque monkeys (Reich et al., 1998 ; Victor and Purpura, 1998 ). All experimental procedures complied with the guidelines of the National Eye Institute and our institution. We measured spike times to the nearest 0.1 msec for 135 neurons, and to
the nearest 3.7 msec (one frame of the visual display) for 36 neurons.
We include in our analysis only the 99 neurons [32 simple, 60 complex,
and 7 unclassified (Skottun et al., 1991 )] that responded with firing
rates higher than 3 spikes/sec and that had significantly modulated RF
maps (see below).
Our stimuli look to human observers like random and rapidly flickering
checkerboards. In fact, however, the stimuli are highly structured.
They consist of a grid in which the temporal sequence of the luminance
levels (0 or 300 cd/m2) in each of 249 pixels (typically 16 × 16 arc-min) is determined by a
pseudorandom, binary m-sequence (Sutter, 1992 ; Victor, 1992 ; Reid et
al., 1997 ). The same 4095 step m-sequence is used in each pixel, but
the starting position in the sequence is different. Because the minimum
offset between any pair of pixels is 237 msec, and because an
m-sequence is uncorrelated with temporal shifts of itself, there is
little danger that the same stimulus sequence would simultaneously
affect different parts of the receptive field. The sequence is advanced
simultaneously in all pixels at a stimulus frame rate of 67.58 Hz, so
that the luminance of each stimulus pixel can potentially change once
every four frames of the 270.3 Hz visual display. This stimulus frame
rate has been shown to evoke good receptive-field maps from cortical
neurons (Reid et al., 1997 ). The entire m-sequence is repeated 8-16
times, as is its contrast-inverse, which is presented to eliminate
spurious effects of residual correlations in the stimulus on our
receptive field maps (Sutter, 1992 ).
Receptive field maps. Cross-correlation of an evoked spike
train with the m-sequence stimulus a process also known as
"spike-triggered averaging" yields a detailed map of the neuron's
spatiotemporal receptive field (see Fig. 4). This map essentially
represents the average stimulus preceding each spike, and it is
rendered as a series of contour plots depicting spatial snapshots that are sequential in time. Each map shows the average change in contrast in each of the stimulus pixels that significantly modulated the response for at least two consecutive 3.7 msec time bins
(p < 0.01 in each bin; the estimated impulse
response was at least 2.6 SEs from 0, where standard errors were
determined empirically from multiple trials), as well as in surrounding
pixels. We smooth the contour maps by cubic spline interpolation.
To the degree that the neuron is a linear system, the derived RF map
can also be considered to depict its "spatiotemporal impulse
response" that is, its average response to an incremental flash of
light at each spatial position (Victor, 1992 ). Of course, V1 neurons
are not linear systems, and there are often higher-order components of
the RF map that make the impulse response interpretation imprecise. In
this situation, the RF maps are the linear functions that best fit the
full response, and we retain the spirit of the impulse-response
interpretation in the normalization of our RF maps. Contour heights
represent, at each time frame, the change in firing rate induced by a
luminance step in a particular stimulus pixel averaged over the
displayed time window of 14.8 msec. To obtain absolute firing rates for
the full response, the RF map of which is denoted by f in
Equations 1 and 2 in Results, add these values to the mean firing rates
given in the legend of Figure 4. To obtain absolute firing rates for
the subset responses (s; see Results), multiply the RF map
values by the fraction of spikes in the appropriate subset and add the
product to the subset's mean firing rate.
Information. To measure the information contained in
m-sequence responses, we use a method modified from Strong and
colleagues (de Ruyter van Steveninck et al., 1997 ; Strong et al.,
1998 ). Spike trains are divided into time bins, each of which may be occupied by zero, one, or more than one spike. The possible spike counts in each bin can be thought of as letters in the neuron's response alphabet, with several letters in a row constituting a word.
Each word has a characteristic probability, possibly stimulus dependent, of being "spoken" by the neuron.
To measure the full information in a spike train, we would need to use
a limitless sample of infinitely long words containing infinitesimally
short letters. This is clearly impossible, so we choose our word and
letter lengths according to physiological criteria, taking into account
factors such as integration time and temporal precision, and also
according to the amount of available data, which limits the accuracy
with which the word probabilities can be estimated. We use 14.8 msec
words [the stimulus frame time, but also similar to the time constant
of cortical neurons (Ogawa et al., 1981 ; Shadlen and Newsome, 1998 )]
and 3.7 msec letters (the frame time of the visual display, but also
close to the cutoff time between short and medium ISIs), so that each
word is four letters long. For these word and letter lengths, the 16 repeats of our 60.6 sec stimulus provided more than adequate amounts of data to robustly estimate the information. Other values word lengths ranging from 3.7 to 59.2 msec and letter lengths ranging from 1.8 to
14.8 msec gave qualitatively similar results. In general, information
values were highest when we used the shortest words and letters.
The information that the neuron transmits about a particular stimulus
is defined as the signal entropy, or variability, minus the noise
entropy. The signal entropy is derived from the total set of words
spoken by the neuron during the course of its response. The noise
entropy is derived from the set of the words spoken at each particular
time in the response, and it is averaged across the entire response
duration. The signal entropy is calculated by constructing a
probability table of all words in the response and applying Shannon's
formula, Hs = pjlog2pj
(Cover and Thomas, 1991 ), where pj indicates the
estimated probabilities of occurrence of each word. Because we only
have access to a limited amount of data, this estimate of the signal
entropy is subject to a downward bias, the correction for which is
estimated by (k 1)/2N ln(2), in
bits, where k is the number of possible words and
N is the total number of words observed (Carlton, 1969 ;
Panzeri and Treves, 1996 ). In practice, the average correction to the
signal entropy is 0.01% in our data sets, so including it was
therefore inconsequential.
It is more difficult to obtain an accurate estimate of the noise
entropy because we have access to only 16 trials, at most, for each
neuron. However, we can obtain an upper bound on the noise entropy, and
a lower bound on the transmitted information, by assuming that the
letters in a word are independent of one another, and then adding the
noise entropies letter by letter (Cover and Thomas, 1991 ). In this
case, we do apply the correction for limited data, both because it
represents a significant fraction of the noise entropy (~10%) and
because it ensures that we are calculating a true lower bound on the
transmitted information.
 |
RESULTS |
Interspike intervals
We report on the responses of 99 V1 neurons in anesthetized
macaque monkeys to multiple repeats of pseudorandom (m-sequence) stimuli. These stimuli contain a wide variety of spatial and temporal patterns, none of which dominates the stimulus but some of which are
typically effective stimuli for these neurons. The stimuli are
therefore well suited to probe a neuron's ability to convert spatial
information into spike trains.
Figure 1 shows interspike interval
histograms (ISIHs) constructed from the response of a simple cell to
both the m-sequence stimulus (solid line) and a uniform
field of the same mean luminance (shaded gray region). The
top panel is the standard ISIH, in which ISIs are collected into equal
bins of 1 msec width. For both the m-sequence and uniform-field
responses, the standard ISIH features a prominent peak at very short
ISIs, which decays rapidly. The peak is higher for the m-sequence
response than for the uniform-field response, but it has approximately
the same width. After the initial peak and rapid decay, the m-sequence
ISIH shows a secondary, slower decay that lasts from ~5 msec until 20 msec; this secondary decay is almost entirely absent from the
uniform-field response. Finally, both responses begin a very slow
decline, the "long tail" (Gerstein and Mandelbrot, 1964 ; Smith and
Smith, 1965 ), at ~20 msec.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Construction of the log-interspike interval
histogram (log-ISIH). Each panel shows the ISIHs of the m-sequence
response (solid line) and the response to a uniform
field at the same mean luminance (shaded) of a simple
cell (44/9t) that fired 21.0 spikes/sec, 35,581 ISIs total.
Top, Standard ISIH (1 msec bins); middle,
standard ISIH plotted on a logarithmic time axis;
bottom, log-ISIH consisting of 300 bins spaced
logarithmically between 1 msec and 10 sec, which bracketed the
distribution of ISIHs found in the data. Each bin is 3.1% larger than
the previous one. We obtain a relatively smooth histogram by applying a
uniformly distributed, random timing jitter to each ISI, the magnitude
of which is at most half the data collection resolution of 0.1 msec.
The log-ISIH allows us to easily distinguish three separate ISI peaks,
which are not readily visible in the standard ISIH.
|
|
To more prominently display the short-ISI features, we plot the same
standard ISIH on a logarithmic time scale (Fig. 1, middle panel). The similar shape of the initial peak and the
differential secondary decay are clearly evident in this plot, as well.
However, because the binning is relatively coarse at short ISIs and
relatively fine at high ISIs, which obscures detail on both time
scales, we present the data in yet another way. In the bottom
panel, the histogram is constructed with logarithmic time bins so
that the duration of each successive bin is a fixed multiple of the
previous one. This "log-ISIH," a new way of looking at such data,
highlights features such as prominent peaks or shoulders that are at
best barely visible in the standard ISIH. The log-ISIH of the
m-sequence response has three distinct peaks (corresponding, in the
standard ISIH to the initial rapid peak, the secondary decay, and the
long tail), whereas the log-ISIH of the uniform-field response has only
two peaks (the initial rapid peak and the long tail). The differences
between the log-ISIHs of the m-sequence response and the uniform-field
response indicate that not all of the log-ISIH features are
attributable to m-sequence stimulation. The similarity of the prominent
short-ISI peak suggests that this feature, in particular, is largely
intrinsic to the neuron.
In Figure 2, we replot the log-ISIH of
the m-sequence response from Figure 1 (top panel),
and we add log-ISIHs from three additional neurons. Each log-ISIH is
subdivided, by eye, into its component peaks; the number of peaks
varies from neuron to neuron. Thus, the top neuron has three peaks, the
next two have two peaks (which differ in position), and the fourth
neuron has only a single peak. Peaks are gray scale-coded according to
the relative position of the maximum: black for short, light gray for
medium, and dark gray for long ISIs. The bottom panel is a log-histogram of the estimated boundary between ISI peaks; it summarizes data from 66 neurons and includes 19 short/medium boundary points and 32 medium/long boundary points. Across all 99 neurons, 34 had a single peak, 46 had evidence of two distinct peaks, and 19 had
three peaks. We found no significant difference between simple and
complex cells in terms of the number of log-ISIH peaks ( 2 test).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Division of log-ISIHs into component peaks. The
top four panels are the responses of different neurons
to the m-sequence stimulus. Log-ISIHs consist of 200 bins spaced
logarithmically between 0.1 msec and 2 sec, so that each bin is 5.1%
larger than the previous one. Each log-ISIH is divided, by eye, into
its component peaks, which are then color-coded according to the
position of the maximum (black for <3 msec,
light gray for 3-38 msec, and dark gray
for >38 msec). Top, Same simple cell as in Figure 1;
three peaks. Second panel, Simple cell (38/6), 5.9 spikes/sec, 11,343 ISIs; two peaks (short and long). Third
panel, Simple cell (34/12t), 5.2 spikes/sec, 9,997 ISIs; two
peaks (medium and long). Fourth panel, complex cell,
29.9 spikes/sec, 57,943 ISIs; one peak (medium). The boundary positions
across 66 neurons are collected into a log-ISIH (bottom
panel), which reveals a tightly clustered, bimodal
distribution.
|
|
Two very surprising results emerge from this analysis. First, the
summary histogram is bimodal. This reflects the fact that there are at
most three log-ISIH peaks in any neuron's response. Moreover, neurons
with only two log-ISIH peaks (the majority) have boundary points that
match either the short/medium or medium/long boundary of the three-peak
neurons, rather than some intermediate value. The medians of the two
boundary points are 3.0 msec (90% range: 1.8-3.7 msec) and 38.1 msec
(90% range: 20.3-64.8 msec). The second surprising feature of the
summary histogram is that the two modes are quite sharp, which
indicates that log-ISIH peaks are remarkably consistent across neurons.
Because the boundary points do not correspond to temporal features of
the stimulus, which occur in multiples of 14.8 msec, or to the
frame time of the visual display, which was 3.7 msec, we suspect that
they reflect some aspect of the intrinsic biophysical hardware of
cortical neurons and/or their connections.
The consistency of the boundary points across neurons also raises the
possibility that the subsets delimited by those boundaries play
distinct roles in information encoding. To address this possibility, we
divided the ISIs in each neuron's response into three subsets, applying the median boundary points across neurons regardless of the
number of peaks in the particular neuron's log-ISIH. We considered
ISIs <3 msec to be part of the short-ISI subset, ISIs between 3 and 38 msec to be part of the medium-ISI subset, and ISIs >38 msec to be part
of the long-ISI subset. Averaged across neurons, we found that 10% of
spikes fell into the short-ISI subset, 45% into the medium, and 45%
into the long. Box plots showing the distributions across neurons of
the percentage of spikes in each subset are drawn in Figure 5
(top).
The first step in demonstrating that the individual subsets play
important roles in information encoding is to show that they are not
epiphenomena of the firing rate modulation. To do this, we performed an
"exchange resampling" procedure (Victor and Purpura, 1996 ), which
assigns to each trial in the resampled spike train the same number of
spikes as had occurred in that trial in the real response. The spike
times themselves are drawn at random, without replacement, from the
entire set of actual spikes. Exchange resampling exactly preserves the
firing rate modulation and the number of spikes in each response trial
but randomizes the relationship between consecutive spikes. Log-ISIHs
of exchange-resampled responses are shown as solid lines in
Figure 3, superimposed on the log-ISIHs of real responses. If the ISI structure were completely determined by
fast firing rate modulations and slow variations in responsiveness, the
log-ISIH of real and resampled spike trains would superimpose. In fact,
this superposition test succeeds for the longest ISIs but fails for
short and medium ISIs. One cause of the failure is likely to be the
presence, in real neurons, of a refractory period on the order of 1 msec. However, a refractory period alone cannot account for features
such as a sharp notch between short and medium ISI peaks, or for
amplitude differences such as the one in the top left
panel.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Real versus exchange-resampled log-ISIHs. We
compare the log-ISIHs (same parameters as in Fig. 2) of real spike
trains (shaded) with those obtained from a resampling
procedure that preserves the firing rate modulation and distribution of
spikes per trial from the original data (solid lines).
If the original data were consistent with a modulated Poisson process,
then the original and resampled log-ISIHs in all panels would
superimpose. Top row, left panel
(asterisk), Complex cell (33/1), 31.7 spikes/sec, 61,556 ISIs. Top row, right panel
(plus sign), Simple cell (39/9), 34.7 spikes/sec,
67,269 ISIs. Middle row, left panel,
Simple cell (35/1), 10.0 spikes/sec, 19,283 ISIs. The other three
log-ISIHs are from Figure 2.
|
|
Receptive field maps
For each neuron, we calculated RF maps or spike-triggered average
stimuli (see Materials and Methods) from the full response and from
response subsets, where the spikes in each subset were preceded by ISIs
from a single ISI subset (short, medium, or long). Figure
4 shows example RF maps from two neurons,
depicting representative examples of the changes that we saw across ISI
subsets. RF maps are shown as a series of interpolated contour plots,
each averaged over 14.8 msec of the response, at different time lags;
taken together, they depict the dynamics of the RF. Red signifies
on-subregions of the RF, in which bright stimuli were associated with a
higher firing rate than dark stimuli, and blue signifies
off-subregions. The ratio of the RF map scales of two subsets is equal
to the ratio of the numbers of spikes in the two subsets.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Receptive-field maps. A, Complex
cell (33/1), average firing rate 31.7 spikes/sec, spatial extent
1°22' × 1°22', information rate 25.2 bits/sec or 0.79 bits/spike,
efficiency 17.8%, log-ISIH in Figure 3
(asterisk). Calibration: 4.9 to 4.9 spikes/sec. B, Simple cell (39/9), average firing rate
34.7 spikes/sec, spatial extent 1°22' × 1°39', information rate
31.2 bits/sec or 0.90 bits/spike, efficiency 20.5%, log-ISIH in Figure
3 (plus sign). Calibration: 12.9 to
12.9 spikes/sec. In each panel, the top row is the RF
map of the full response, the second row is the RF map
of the short-ISI subset (10% of spikes in A, 24% in
B), the third row is the RF map of the
medium-ISI subset (68 and 50%), and the bottom row is
the RF map of the long-ISI subset (22 and 26%). Values on the
calibration bar refer to the RF map of the full response only
(f in Eq. 1 and 2); to obtain values for any of the ISI
subsets (s), multiply the full-response values by the
fraction of spikes in that subset.
|
|
In general, we found that RF maps derived from spike subsets differed
from RF maps derived from the full responses, and from each other, in
both shape and amplitude. Figure 4A shows the RF map
of a complex cell that primarily displayed both shape and amplitude
changes. This cell fired an average of 31.7 spikes/sec in response to
our stimulus, and its log-ISIH is shown in Figure 3
(asterisk). The RF map derived from all spikes (top
row) is dominated by the off-subregion, although there is evidence
of a weaker on-subregion. When only short-ISI spikes are considered (second row), however, the on-subregion is selectively
enhanced in two ways: (1) its duration, measured with a resolution
finer than what is shown in Figure 4A, is 42 msec
instead of 19 msec; and (2) its peak amplitude, after correcting for
the different numbers of spikes, is 2.9 times greater than the
corresponding amplitude in the all-spikes RF map. The relative
amplitude of the off-subregion is also enhanced in the short-ISI RF
map, but only by a factor of 1.8 and not at all time lags. The shape of the short-ISI RF map suggests that these spikes may selectively encode
stimuli that are characterized by strong spatial opponency.
A second prominent RF map change in Figure 4A occurs
in the long-ISI subset (bottom row). For this subset, the
single RF subregion has a biphasic time course, changing from off to on
at ~89 msec, even while the RF maps of other subsets are still
dominated by an off-subregion. The time course of the long-ISI RF map,
and the fact that it is for the most part spatially uniform at each time lag, suggests that these spikes may primarily encode temporal features in the stimulus and that they typically follow, by at least 89 msec, a period during which the neuron was inhibited by the stimulus.
Ignoring the ISI structure and treating all spikes equally obscures the
effect of this inhibition.
Figure 4B is the RF map of a simple cell that fired
an average of 34.7 spikes/sec in response to the m-sequence stimulus; the log-ISIH of its response is shown in Figure 3 (plus
sign). The short- and medium-ISI RF maps show evidence of large
amplitude changes but less evidence of large shape changes. In other
words, scaling these subset RF maps by some factor (which we call the "efficacy"; see below) would make them look very similar to the all-spikes RF map. The long-ISI RF map, however, primarily exhibits a
shape change: the off-subregion is relatively diminished between 30 and
59 msec, and the on-subregion is relatively enhanced between 59 and 74 msec.
Two related indices can be used to quantify these shape and amplitude
changes. To obtain these indices, we treat the RF maps as vectors in
space and time, with dimension equal to the product of the number of
stimulus pixels and the number of time bins. We define the
similarity index (DeAngelis et al., 1999 ) to be the
correlation coefficient between vectors derived from two different RF
maps:
|
(1)
|
where f is the vectorized RF map of the full spike
train, s is the vectorized RF map of the subset spike train, <... ,... > denotes the inner product, and ... denotes the norm, or the square root of a vector's inner product with
itself. The similarity index has a value close to 1 for maps that have
similar shapes (e.g., 0.98 for the full- and short-ISI RF maps in Fig. 4B), 0 for maps that are nearly orthogonal, and 1
for maps that have opposite polarities (on-subregions become
off-subregions and vice versa). The similarity index is an omnibus
measure that averages over both space and time and may therefore dilute
the effects of prominent but localized RF map changes. Thus, even a
qualitatively large shape change such as occurs in the short-ISI RF map
of Figure 4A has a similarity index of 0.83, which is
near the 75th percentile of short-ISI similarity indices across neurons (Fig. 5, middle). At the other
extreme, the shape change seen in the long-ISI RF map of Figure
4A, which is among the most dramatic in our sample,
has a similarity index of 0.60.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Across-neuron distributions of RF map indices.
Data from 66 neurons. Box plot whiskers show the 5th and 95th
percentiles, and box boundaries show the 25th and 75th percentiles. The
horizontal line divides each box at the median, and the
square represents the mean. Top,
Percentage of spikes with preceding ISIs <3 msec
(short), 3-38 msec (medium), and >38
msec (long). Middle, Similarity index (or
correlation coefficient) between the subset and full-response RF maps;
values can be between 1 and +1. Bottom, Efficacy, or
average contribution made by spikes in each subset to the overall RF
map properties. An efficacy of 1 means that the spikes in that subset
contribute as much as expected, given their number. See Results for
mathematical definitions of the similarity index and efficacy.
|
|
To measure amplitude changes, we calculate the efficacy, the
factor by which the amplitude of the subset RF map must be scaled to
best match the full RF map in a least-squares sense, after correcting
for differences in the number of spikes. Mathematically:
|
(2)
|
where nf is the number of spikes
in the full spike train, ns is the
number of spikes in the subset spike train, and other variables are as
in Equation 1. An efficacy >1 signifies that subset spikes play a
larger role in the generation of the all-spikes RF map than expected
given the number of spikes in that subset, whereas an efficacy <1
signifies the opposite. An efficacy <0 would indicate that the RF map
polarity must be flipped and then scaled to obtain the best match. The
short-ISI RF map of Figure 4B has a particularly high
efficacy of 1.77, signifying a large contribution from those spikes to
the overall RF properties of that neuron. On the other hand, the
medium-ISI RF map of Figure 4A has an efficacy of
1.02, indicating that those spikes contribute the expected amount to
the overall RF map.
Across all neurons, similarity indices are in the range 0.5-1 (Fig. 5,
middle), meaning that shape changes, although present, are
only moderate. On the other hand, the efficacy distributions of the
three subsets are distinct and largely nonoverlapping (Fig. 5,
bottom), which indicates that short-ISI spikes make the
largest contribution to the all-spikes RF maps, long-ISI spikes make
the smallest contribution, and medium-ISI spikes contribute about as
much as expected given their frequency.
Rate versus temporal encoding
To test whether our findings about shape and amplitude changes of
RF maps are consistent with a rate code model of neuronal firing, we
compared real data with the results of an exchange-resampling procedure. Exchange resampling exactly preserves the firing-rate modulation inherent in the original data, as described above. In fact,
this procedure yields the only ensemble of spike trains that match the
time-varying firing rate of real data and are rigorously consistent
with a firing-rate model. We exchange-resampled each spike train 200 times, and we calculated the similarity indices and efficacies of the
subset RF maps of those resampled spike trains. We used the same ISI
subset definitions for resampled spike trains as we had for the real
spike trains, despite the fact that the log-ISIHs were different (Fig.
3). We then compared the similarity indices and efficacies of the real
responses with the means and distributions obtained from
exchange-resampled responses.
Figure 6 shows a series of scatter plots
that describe the relationship between similarity indices (left
column) and efficacies (right column) for real and
resampled responses. Each point represents a different neuron. The
similarity index or efficacy of that neuron's real RF map is plotted
along the horizontal axis, and the corresponding mean value from 200 exchange resamplings is plotted along the vertical axis. Results from
different subsets are in different rows. In nearly all panels, the
cloud of points lies near the line of equality, where real and
resampled RF maps have the same similarity indices or efficacies. The
major exception is the top right panel, which shows that the
short-ISI efficacies tend to be higher for resampled RF maps than for
real RF maps, indicating that short-ISI spikes play an even larger role
in generating the RF properties of rate-code-generated spike trains
than of real spike trains.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
RF map changes: real versus exchange-resampled. In
each panel, we plot the similarity index (left column)
and efficacy (right column) for real data on the
horizontal axis, and the mean value of the same parameter derived from
200 exchange resamplings of the real data on the vertical axis. Data
are from 66 neurons, and each point represents a different neuron. The
exchange-resampling procedure tests the hypothesis that the observed RF
map changes could have been generated by a neuron that fires spikes
according to a rate code with exactly the same firing rate modulation
as the original response. Filled squares represent
subsets for which the real data were significantly different from the
resampled data, that is, points that fell significantly
(p < 0.05, two-tailed direct comparison)
off the diagonal in each panel.
|
|
On a neuron-by-neuron basis, the similarity indices and efficacies of
the real spike trains tended to fall in the tails of the distributions
of similarity indices and efficacies of resampled spike trains. In
Figure 6, solid points represent cases in which the real
data fell within either 2.5% tail of the distribution of resampled
data. However, the behavior of the two indices was qualitatively, and
for the most part quantitatively, similar for real and resampled RF
maps, suggesting that the rate code model does a reasonable job of
explaining the indices (although not the ISI statistics).
Information
In addition to comparing RF maps, we calculated the
stimulus-related information carried by spikes in the full spike train and in each ISI subset (see Materials and Methods) (de Ruyter van
Steveninck et al., 1997 ; Strong et al., 1998 ). The results are
complementary to the ones obtained by RF map calculation, which
present, quite literally, a qualitative and quantitative picture of the
stimulus-encoding characteristics of spikes in particular subsets.
The results of the information calculation are shown in Figure
7. Not surprisingly, the full spike train
conveys the most stimulus-related information on an absolute scale of
bits per second (top), more than is carried by any subset of
that spike train. Short-ISI spikes, which are rarest, convey the least
information. On a neuron-by-neuron basis, the sum of the transmitted
information across the three ISI subsets is larger than the information
carried by the full spike train. This is perplexing, because the full spike train must contain as much information as the sum of its subsets.
However, there are at least two explanations for this finding. First,
because we calculated the information transmitted via a code consisting
of 14.8 msec words and 3.7 msec letters, and because our method was
designed to give us a lower bound on information in the first place, it
is possible that we systematically underestimate the information in the
full spike train to a greater extent than in the subset spike trains.
Second, the three subset spike trains may contain redundant
information. This is likely because the process of selecting a
particular ISI subset necessarily places constraints on the other,
nonoverlapping subsets. These constraints and redundancies are not
taken into account in the word/letter code.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Across-neuron distributions of transmitted
information values. Data are from 98 neurons. As in Figure 5, box plot
whiskers show the 5th and 95th percentiles, and box boundaries show the
25th and 75th percentiles. The horizontal line divides
each box at the median, and the square represents the
mean. The full response (leftmost distribution in each panel) is
compared with each of the three ISI subset responses.
Top, Transmitted information, measured in units of bits
per second (bits/s). Middle, Transmitted
information, bits per spike (bits/spike).
Bottom, Efficiency, or percentage of the total signal
entropy (see Materials and Methods) that is used to transmit
stimulus-related information.
|
|
On a bits per spike scale (Fig. 7, middle), the short-ISI
spikes, which convey the least information per second, are actually most informative: on average, each short-ISI spike conveys 4.6 bits of
information about the stimulus, corresponding to the high efficacy of
these spikes. Medium- and long-ISI subset spikes convey substantially
less information, not much more than what is conveyed by each spike in
the full spike train. This is also reflected in our measure of
efficiency (de Ruyter van Steveninck et al., 1997 ), which compares the
transmitted information to the total signal entropy: the median
efficiency of short-ISI spikes is 45%, whereas the median efficiencies
of the other spike subsets are near 25%.
Finally, Figure 8 shows the
neuron-by-neuron comparison between real and exchange-resampled
information values, for the full spike train and for the three ISI
subsets. The results are qualitatively similar to the results for the
similarity index and efficacy, which are shown in Figure 6. In general,
whether measured on a bits per second or bits per spike scale, and
regardless of the particular ISI subset, the information in a real
spike train is similar to the information in its exchange-resampled
counterparts: most points lie along the line of equality. This means
that the qualitative differences among subsets would be expected from
neurons that use a rate code. On the other hand, nearly all points fall significantly off the line of equality (p < 0.05, two-tailed direct comparison, vs ), indicating that on a
neuron-by-neuron basis, the results are quantitatively inconsistent
with the predictions of a rate code.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Information: real versus exchange-resampled. In
each panel, we plot the information in bits per second
(bits/s) (left column) and bits per spike
(bits/spike) (right column) for real data
on the horizontal axis, and the mean value of the same parameter
derived from 40 exchange resamplings of the real data on the vertical
axis. Data are from 98 neurons, and each point represents a different
neuron. The exchange resampling procedure tests the hypothesis that the
observed RF map changes could have been generated by a neuron that
fires spikes according to a rate code with exactly the same firing rate
modulation as the original response. Filled symbols
represent subsets for which the real data were significantly different
from the resampled data, that is, points that fell significantly
(p < 0.05, two-tailed direct comparison)
off the diagonal in each panel.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our results provide new evidence that different spikes within a
single response can convey messages about different stimulus features,
a finding that is consistent with earlier reports (McClurkin et al.,
1991 ; Victor and Purpura, 1996 ). Our results advance this work in three
ways. (1) They identify, through the log-ISIH peaks and in the
form of ISI subsets, the time scales that are relevant for V1 neurons
responding to rapidly varying stimuli. (2) They provide, through
the RF maps, a direct picture of the receptive field properties of the
different spikes. (3) They suggest that the information encoded by
individual spikes can be decoded by classifying it on the basis of the
duration of the immediately preceding ISI.
In a pioneering study of the H1 neuron of the blowfly (de Ruyter van
Steveninck and Bialek, 1988 ), a Gaussian white noise stimulus was used
to evaluate the probability distributions of stimuli that typically
preceded arbitrary temporal response patterns consisting of up to three
spikes and two ISIs. The authors showed that the mean stimulus changed
gradually with the duration of the ISI before each spike. In our
experiments, we did not obtain enough data from each neuron to be able
to perform an identical analysis. Although it is likely that the same
result holds in monkey V1, that small changes in ISI boundary points
yield small changes in RF maps, the existence and consistency across
neurons of the three ISI subsets appear novel and lead us to
hypothesize that the grouping of ISIs into subsets similar to the ones
we have described reflects natural modes of information processing. It
is tempting to relate the ISI subsets to phenomena such as oscillatory
responses (Gray et al., 1989 ) the typical interval in the medium-ISI
subset corresponds to a frequency of around 40 Hz but we have no
evidence to indicate that the two findings are related.
Bursts
Our results suggest that short-ISI spikes are especially important
for the transmission of visual information. These short-ISI spikes
likely correspond to the class of spikes known as "bursts" (Connors
and Gutnick, 1990 ), although the correspondence cannot be conclusively
established from extracellular recordings alone. In the thalamus, the
mechanisms of burst production are well known (Jahnsen and
Llinás, 1984 ; Sherman, 1996 ), and the relevance of bursts for
information encoding and transmission in the lateral geniculate
nucleus, in particular, has been studied (Mukherjee and Kaplan, 1995 ;
Reinagel et al., 1999 ; Usrey and Reid, 1999 ). Reinagel et al. (1999)
found that burst spikes convey 1.5 to 3 times as much information as
tonic spikes, a finding that is similar to our own finding about
short-ISI spikes.
In the visual cortex, where the mechanisms of burst production are less
well understood, several lines of evidence suggest that short-ISI
spikes are particularly important for information transmission.
Compared with other spikes, short-ISI spikes are differently tuned to
certain stimulus attributes (Cattaneo et al., 1981 ; Legéndy and
Salcman, 1985 ; Livingstone et al., 1996 ; DeBusk et al., 1997 ) and tend
to be more likely to evoke a postsynaptic response (Alonso et al.,
1996 ; Lisman, 1997 ; Snider et al., 1998 ). In earlier work, we
demonstrated that short-ISI spikes tend to be reliable (Victor et al.,
1998 ) in that they are fired at the same time on multiple repeats of a
stimulus. Here, we have shown that short-ISI spikes are effective, too,
in that they make a larger than expected contribution to a neuron's RF
properties. We have also demonstrated that the RF maps of short-ISI
spikes tend to have regions of stark spatial opponency, suggesting that these spikes may preferentially extract features such as bars and lines
from visual stimuli. Finally, we have shown that short-ISI spikes, in
part because of their relative paucity, convey more information per
spike than spikes in the other ISI subsets and that they do so with
higher efficiency.
Information
We found that most V1 neurons convey between 5 and 30 bits/sec, or
between 1 and 3 bits/spike. This range is consistent with information
rates calculated from responses to similar stimuli in other systems,
ranging from fly to primate (Bura as and Albright, 1999 ). It is,
however, at least an order of magnitude higher than the information
rate in V1 responses to flashed stimuli, which ranges from 0.1 to 0.5 bits/sec (Richmond and Optican, 1990 ; Victor and Purpura, 1996 ; Gershon
et al., 1998 ). A primary cause of this discrepancy may be that V1
neurons very efficiently convey information about stimulus transients,
which occur 64 times/sec in the m-sequence stimulus but only once in
the flashed stimuli. However, this does not rule out the possibility
that these neurons are intrinsically more efficient in conveying
information about elementary stimulus features such as contrast and
orientation when the stimulus is rapidly varying than when it is constant.
Another reason that the information rates are so different for the two
kinds of stimuli is methodological: the "direct method" of
calculating information used here makes no assumptions about the
stimuli, but rather compares the response variability over time with
the response variability across trials. Methods that typically yield
lower information rates, on the other hand, evaluate a neuron's
ability to discriminate between N particular stimuli, which
limits the total amount of information that can be encoded to
log2N. In this regard, it is important to
realize that our stimuli are not optimized to drive V1 neurons to
convey information at a rate close to their channel capacity.
Encoding and decoding
The processes of encoding and decoding information are
logically distinct. It is possible, for example, that V1 neurons encode information into their rapidly modulated firing rates by means of a
Poisson spike generator, consistent with a rate-coding model, even
while they decode information by measuring presynaptic ISI durations.
In this paper, we compare real responses with exchange-resampled responses, which we consider to be rate-coded because the spike times
are determined only from the firing rate. Because exchange-resampling exactly preserves spike times, the firing rate fluctuations occur at
the same rate as they do in real data.
According to one definition (Borst and Théunissen, 1999 ), simply
demonstrating that information is carried on time scales more rapid
than the time scale of stimulus fluctuations, as we do here in our
information calculations with short word and letter lengths,
constitutes a demonstration that information is temporally encoded. By
this criterion, even exchange-resampled spike trains, not to mention
real ones, are temporally encoded (Fig. 8). It is not surprising,
therefore, that the RF maps and information values of
exchange-resampled spike trains are similar to, albeit significantly
different from, the ones derived from real neurons. It is more
surprising that their log-ISIHs are so different (Fig. 3), although
they share some features such as multiple peaks and sometimes even peak
positions. Moreover, another study that used different stimuli and
different analysis methodology has shown that real V1 spike trains are
not fully consistent with the predictions of rate-coding models (Reich
et al., 1998 ).
In our view, the consistent presence of distinct ISI subsets across
neurons, and the different types of visual information that can be
extracted by examining spikes from the various subsets in isolation,
suggest that ISI decoding may be an important feature of V1 neurons,
just as it has been shown to be in much simpler systems such as the
visceral ganglia of Aplysia (Segundo et al., 1963 ). To
accomplish this type of decoding, neurons need not do anything more
sophisticated than be sensitive to the durations of individual ISIs.
This sensitivity can be embodied in a single synapse and does not
require averaging across stimulus repeats, stretches of time that may
be long compared with the time scale of firing rate modulation, or a
large population of neurons that carry similar information.
Although our results provide support for the hypothesis that ISI
decoding plays a role in information transfer in the visual cortex,
they are also consistent with other types of decoding schemes that do
not make use of ISIs. Such a scheme includes, for example, the
estimation of firing rates through averaging across many neurons that
convey similar information (Shadlen and Newsome, 1998 ). Cortical
microstimulation (Salzman et al., 1992 ) influences both rate and ISI
structure and is thus consistent with both views of neural coding. A
direct experimental resolution of the roles of these different kinds of
decoding schemes would require manipulation of the ISI structure of
neural activity without changing the average firing rate, and
observation of the effect of this manipulation on an animal's
behavior. In mammalian cortex, the design and execution of such
experiments are challenges to current techniques, but it is interesting
to note that such manipulations do indeed affect olfactory
discrimination in the locust (Stopfer et al., 1997 ) and gustatory
perception in the rat (Di Lorenzo and Hecht, 1993 ).
Real synapses may accomplish ISI decoding by means of processes such as
short-term, real-time synaptic modification, including synaptic
depression and facilitation (Gerstner et al., 1997 ; Markram et al.,
1998 ; Goldman et al., 1999 ), and dendritic nonlinearities, including
coincidence detection (Abeles, 1982 ; Mel, 1994 ; Margulis and Tang,
1998 ; Yuste et al., 1999 ). These processes can selectively weight
individual spikes based on the durations of single ISIs (Maass and
Zador, 1999 ), and their particular form can depend on the types of
neurons that are connected by each synapse (Thomson, 1997 ; Reyes et
al., 1998 ). Synaptic facilitation tends to enhance the synaptic
efficacy of short-ISI spikes, whereas synaptic depression tends to
diminish it, thereby increasing the relative efficacy of medium- and
long-ISI spikes (Gerstner et al., 1997 ). Thus, we suggest that a
primary role of short-term synaptic modification is to aid in the
decoding of information about multiple stimulus features that would be
missed if all spikes were treated equally.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Sept. 27, 1999; revised Dec. 9, 1999; accepted Dec. 17, 1999.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM07739
and EY07138 (D.S.R.), NS36699 (K.P.), and EY9314 (J.D.V.). We thank
Bruce Knight, David Reich, Jason Eisner, Steve Kalik, and Anne-Marie Canel.
Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel Reich, The
Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 200, New York, NY 10021. E-mail: reichd{at}rockefeller.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Abeles M
(1982)
Role of the cortical neuron: integrator or coincidence detector?
Isr J Med Sci
18:83-92[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Alonso JM,
Usrey WM,
Reid RC
(1996)
Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus.
Nature
383:815-819[Medline].
-
Borst A,
Théunissen FE
(1999)
Information theory and neural coding.
Nat Neurosci
2:947-957[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bura
as GT,
Albright TD
(1999)
Gauging sensory representations in the brain.
Trends Neurosci
22:303-309[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Carlton AG
(1969)
On the bias of information estimates.
Psychol Bull
71:108-109[Web of Science].
-
Cattaneo A,
Maffei L,
Morrone C
(1981)
Patterns in the discharge of simple and complex visual cortical cells.
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
212:279-297[Medline].
-
Connors BW,
Gutnick MJ
(1990)
Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons.
Trends Neurosci
13:99-104[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cover TM,
Thomas JA
(1991)
In: Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley.
-
de Ruyter van Steveninck R,
Bialek W
(1988)
Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences.
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
234:379-414[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
de Ruyter van Steveninck RR,
Lewen GD,
Strong SP,
Koberle R,
Bialek W
(1997)
Reproducibility and variability in neural spike trains.
Science
275:1805-1808[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
DeAngelis GC,
Ghose GM,
Ohzawa I,
Freeman RD
(1999)
Functional micro-organization of primary visual cortex: receptive field analysis of nearby neurons.
J Neurosci
19:4046-4064[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
DeBusk BC,
DeBruyn EJ,
Snider RK,
Kabara JF,
Bonds AB
(1997)
Stimulus-dependent modulation of spike burst length in cat striate cortical cells.
J Neurophysiol
78:199-213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Di Lorenzo PM,
Hecht GS
(1993)
Perceptual consequences of electrical stimulation in the gustatory system.
Behav Neurosci
107:130-138[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gershon ED,
Wiener MC,
Latham PE,
Richmond BJ
(1998)
Coding strategies in monkey V1 and inferior temporal cortices.
J Neurophysiol
79:1135-1144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gerstein GL,
Mandelbrot B
(1964)
Random walk models for the spike activity of a single neuron.
Biophys J
4:41-68.
-
Gerstner W,
Kreiter AK,
Markram H,
Herz AVM
(1997)
Neural codes: firing rates and beyond.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:12740-12741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Goldman MS,
Nelson SB,
Abbott LF
(1999)
Decorrelation of spike trains by synaptic depression.
Neurocomputing
26-27:147-153.
-
Gray CM,
König P,
Engel AK,
Singer W
(1989)
Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties.
Nature
338:334-337[Medline].
-
Jahnsen H,
Llinás R
(1984)
Electrophysiological properties of guinea-pig thalamic neurones: an in vitro study.
J Physiol (Lond)
349:205-226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Legéndy CR,
Salcman M
(1985)
Bursts and recurrences of bursts in the spike trains of spontaneously active striate cortex neurons.
J Neurophysiol
53:926-939[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lisman JE
(1997)
Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable.
Trends Neurosci
20:38-43[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Livingstone MS,
Freeman DC,
Hubel DH
(1996)
Visual responses in V1 of freely viewing monkeys.
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
61:27-37[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Maass W,
Zador A
(1999)
Dynamic stochastic synapses as computational units.
Neural Comput
11:903-917[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mainen ZF,
Sejnowski TJ
(1995)
Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons.
Science
268:1503-1506[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Margulis M,
Tang CM
(1998)
Temporal integration can readily switch between sublinear and supralinear summation.
J Neurophysiol
79:2809-2813[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Markram H,
Gupta A,
Uziel A,
Wang Y,
Tsodyks M
(1998)
Information processing with frequency-dependent synaptic connections.
Neurobiol Learn Mem
70:101-112[Web of Science][Medline].
-
McClurkin JW,
Optican LM,
Richmond BJ,
Gawne TJ
(1991)
Concurrent processing and complexity of temporally encoded neuronal messages in visual perception.
Science
253:675-677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mel BW
(1994)
Information processing in dendritic trees.
Neural Comput
6:1031-1085[Web of Science].
-
Mukherjee P,
Kaplan E
(1995)
Dynamics of neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: in vivo electrophysiology and computational modeling.
J Neurophysiol
74:1222-1243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Nowak LG,
Sanchez-Vives MV,
McCormick DA
(1997)
Influence of low and high frequency inputs on spike timing in visual cortical neurons.
Cereb Cortex
7:487-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ogawa T,
Ito S,
Kato H
(1981)
Membrane characteristics of visual cortical neurons in in vitro slices.
Brain Res
226:315-319[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Panzeri S,
Treves A
(1996)
Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures.
Network
7:87-100.
-
Reich DS,
Victor JD,
Knight BW
(1998)
The power ratio and the interval map: spiking models and extracellular recordings.
J Neurosci
18:10090-10104[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Reid RC,
Victor JD,
Shapley RM
(1997)
The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: linear receptive field properties.
Vis Neurosci
14:1015-1027[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Reinagel P,
Godwin D,
Sherman SM,
Koch C
(1999)
Encoding of visual information by LGN bursts.
J Neurophysiol
81:2558-2569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Reyes A,
Lujan R,
Rozov A,
Burnashev N,
Somogyi P,
Sakmann B
(1998)
Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits.
Nat Neurosci
1:279-285[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Richmond BJ,
Optican LM
(1990)
Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate primary visual cortex. II. Information transmission.
J Neurophysiol
64:370-380[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Salzman CD,
Murasugi CM,
Britten KH,
Newsome WT
(1992)
Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance.
J Neurosci
12:2331-2355[Abstract].
-
Segundo JP,
Moore GP,
Stensaas LJ,
Bullock TH
(1963)
Sensitivity of neurones in Aplysia to temporal patterns of arriving impulses.
J Exp Biol
40:643-667[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Shadlen MN,
Newsome WT
(1998)
The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding.
J Neurosci
18:3870-3896[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sherman SM
(1996)
Dual response modes in lateral geniculate neurons: mechanisms and functions.
Vis Neurosci
13:205-213[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Skottun BC,
De Valois RL,
Grosof DH,
Movshon JA,
Albrecht DG,
Bonds AB
(1991)
Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation.
Vision Res
31:1079-1086[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Smith DR,
Smith GK
(1965)
A statistical analysis of the continual activity of single cortical neurones in the cat unanaesthetized isolated forebrain.
Biophys J
5:47-74.
-
Snider RK,
Kabara JF,
Roig BR,
Bonds AB
(1998)
Burst firing and modulation of functional connectivity in cat striate cortex.
J Neurophysiol
80:730-744[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Stopfer M,
Bhagavan S,
Smith BH,
Laurent G
(1997)
Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies.
Nature
390:70-74[Medline].
-
Strong SP,
Koberle R,
de Ruyter van Steveninck RR,
Bialek W
(1998)
Entropy and information in neural spike trains.
Phys Rev Lett
80:197-200.
-
Sutter EE
(1992)
A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis.
In: Nonlinear vision: determination of neural receptive fields, function, and networks (Pinter RB,
Nabet B,
eds), pp 171-220. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
-
Thomson AM
(1997)
Activity-dependent properties of synaptic transmission at two classes of connections made by rat neocortical pyramidal axons in vitro.
J Physiol (Lond)
502:131-147[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Usrey WM,
Reid RC
(1999)
Synchronous activity in the visual system.
Annu Rev Physiol
61:435-456[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Victor JD
(1992)
Nonlinear systems analysis in vision: overview of kernel methods.
In: Nonlinear vision: determination of neural receptive fields, function, and networks (Pinter RB,
Nabet B,
eds), pp 1-37. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
-
Victor JD,
Purpura KP
(1996)
Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis.
J Neurophysiol
76:1310-1326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Victor JD,
Purpura KP
(1998)
Spatial phase and the temporal structure of the response to gratings in V1.
J Neurophysiol
80:554-571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Victor JD,
Reich DS,
Purpura KP,
Mechler F
(1998)
In: Bursts and "reliable" spikes generated by neurons in V1: relationships and spatiotemporal origins. FASEB: Retinal Neurobiology and Visual Perception.
-
Yuste R,
Majewska A,
Cash SS,
Denk W
(1999)
Mechanisms of calcium influx into hippocampal spines: heterogeneity among spines, coincidence detection by NMDA receptors, and optical quantal analysis.
J Neurosci
19:1976-1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/00/2051964-11$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Stoelzel, Y. Bereshpolova, A. G. Gusev, and H. A. Swadlow
The Impact of an LGNd Impulse on the Awake Visual Cortex: Synaptic Dynamics and the Sustained/Transient Distinction
J. Neurosci.,
May 7, 2008;
28(19):
5018 - 5028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Kumbhani, M. J. Nolt, and L. A. Palmer
Precision, Reliability, and Information-Theoretic Analysis of Visual Thalamocortical Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2007;
98(5):
2647 - 2663.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Atencio, D. T. Blake, F. Strata, S. W. Cheung, M. M. Merzenich, and C. E. Schreiner
Frequency-Modulation Encoding in the Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Owl Monkey
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2007;
98(4):
2182 - 2195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Rathbun, H. J. Alitto, T. G. Weyand, and W. M. Usrey
Interspike Interval Analysis of Retinal Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2007;
98(2):
911 - 919.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-M. M. Oswald, B. Doiron, and L. Maler
Interval Coding. I. Burst Interspike Intervals as Indicators of Stimulus Intensity
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2007;
97(4):
2731 - 2743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Chi, W. Wu, Z. Haga, N. G. Hatsopoulos, and D. Margoliash
Template-Based Spike Pattern Identification With Linear Convolution and Dynamic Time Warping
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2007;
97(2):
1221 - 1235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. N. Lundstrom and A. L. Fairhall
Decoding stimulus variance from a distributional neural code of interspike intervals.
J. Neurosci.,
August 30, 2006;
26(35):
9030 - 9037.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Froemke, I. A. Tsay, M. Raad, J. D. Long, and Y. Dan
Contribution of Individual Spikes in Burst-Induced Long-Term Synaptic Modification
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2006;
95(3):
1620 - 1629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Gutkin, G. B. Ermentrout, and A. D. Reyes
Phase-Response Curves Give the Responses of Neurons to Transient Inputs
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2005;
94(2):
1623 - 1635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Passaglia and J. B. Troy
Information Transmission Rates of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2004;
91(3):
1217 - 1229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lu and X. Wang
Information Content of Auditory Cortical Responses to Time-Varying Acoustic Stimuli
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2004;
91(1):
301 - 313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Escabi, L. M. Miller, H. L. Read, and C. E. Schreiner
Naturalistic Auditory Contrast Improves Spectrotemporal Coding in the Cat Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci.,
December 17, 2003;
23(37):
11489 - 11504.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Schneidman, W. Bialek, and M. J. Berry II
Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes
J. Neurosci.,
December 17, 2003;
23(37):
11539 - 11553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nabatiyan, J.F.A. Poulet, G. G. de Polavieja, and B. Hedwig
Temporal Pattern Recognition Based on Instantaneous Spike Rate Coding in a Simple Auditory System
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2003;
90(4):
2484 - 2493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Samonds, J. D. Allison, H. A. Brown, and A. B. Bonds
Cooperation between Area 17 Neuron Pairs Enhances Fine Discrimination of Orientation
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 2003;
23(6):
2416 - 2425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Swadlow, A. G. Gusev, and T. Bezdudnaya
Activation of a Cortical Column by a Thalamocortical Impulse
J. Neurosci.,
September 1, 2002;
22(17):
7766 - 7773.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Mechler, D. S. Reich, and J. D. Victor
Detection and Discrimination of Relative Spatial Phase by V1 Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 2002;
22(14):
6129 - 6157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Escabi and C. E. Schreiner
Nonlinear Spectrotemporal Sound Analysis by Neurons in the Auditory Midbrain
J. Neurosci.,
May 15, 2002;
22(10):
4114 - 4131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Reich, F. Mechler, and J. D. Victor
Independent and Redundant Information in Nearby Cortical Neurons
Science,
December 21, 2001;
294(5551):
2566 - 2568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Liu, S. Tzonev, S. Rebrik, and K. D. Miller
Variability and Information in a Neural Code of the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2001;
86(6):
2789 - 2806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, and C. E. Schreiner
Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 2001;
21(20):
8136 - 8144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Jenison, J. W. H. Schnupp, R. A. Reale, and J. F. Brugge
Auditory Space-Time Receptive Field Dynamics Revealed by Spherical White-Noise Analysis
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2001;
21(12):
4408 - 4415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Reich, F. Mechler, and J. D. Victor
Temporal Coding of Contrast in Primary Visual Cortex: When, What, and Why
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2001;
85(3):
1039 - 1050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Reich, F. Mechler, and J. D. Victor
Formal and Attribute-Specific Information in Primary Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2001;
85(1):
305 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Reinagel and R. C. Reid
Temporal Coding of Visual Information in the Thalamus
J. Neurosci.,
July 15, 2000;
20(14):
5392 - 5400.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|