 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 15, 2000, 20(6):2131-2141
The Neuronal Monoamine Transporter VMAT2 Is Regulated by the
Trimeric GTPase Go2
Markus
Höltje1,
Burkhard
von Jagow1,
Ingrid
Pahner1,
Marion
Lautenschlager2, 3,
Heide
Hörtnagl2,
Bernd
Nürnberg4,
Reinhard
Jahn5, and
Gudrun
Ahnert-Hilger1
1 Institut für Anatomie, 2 Institut
für Pharmakologie, and 3 Neurologische
Universitätsklinik der Charité, Humboldt-Universität
zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany, 4 Institut für
Pharmakologie der Freien Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin,
Germany, and 5 Max-Planck-Institut für
Biophysikalische Chemie, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
Monoamines such as noradrenaline and serotonin are stored in
secretory vesicles and released by exocytosis. Two related monoamine transporters, VMAT1 and VMAT2, mediate vesicular transmitter uptake. Previously we have reported that in the rat pheochromocytoma cell line
PC 12 VMAT1, localized to peptide-containing secretory granules, is
controlled by the heterotrimeric G-protein Go2. We now show that in BON cells, a human serotonergic neuroendocrine cell line derived from a pancreatic tumor expressing both transporters on large,
dense-core vesicles, VMAT2 is even more sensitive to G-protein regulation than VMAT1. The activity of both transporters is only downregulated by G o2, whereas comparable
concentrations of G o1 are without effect. In
serotonergic raphe neurons in primary culture VMAT2 is also
downregulated by pertussis toxin-sensitive Go2. By electron
microscopic analysis from prefrontal cortex we show that VMAT2 and
G o2 associate preferentially to locally recycling small
synaptic vesicles in serotonergic terminals. In addition, Go2-dependent modulation of VMAT2 also works when using a
crude synaptic vesicle preparation from this brain area. We conclude that regulation of monoamine uptake by the heterotrimeric G proteins is
a general feature of monoaminergic neurons that controls the content of
both large, dense-core and small synaptic vesicles.
Key words:
VMAT2; Go2; neuroendocrine cells; neurons; transmitter uptake; vesicular plasticity
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The neurotransmitter content of
synaptic vesicles is one of the key parameters in determining the
strength of transmission at a given synapse. However, until recently
only little information was available concerning the regulation of
vesicular transmitter content by means of intracellular signaling
pathways not directly linked to synthesis or changes in the proton
gradient. Quantal size is known to be rather variable at least in some
synapses (van der Kloot, 1991 ). Thus, upregulation or downregulation of vesicular transmitter content may constitute one of the elements in
determining synaptic plasticity.
Transmitter loading of synaptic vesicles is mediated by specific
transporters that draw transmitters from cytoplasmic pools and that are
driven by an electrochemical proton gradient across the vesicle
membrane (for review, see Edwards, 1992 ). Two structurally related but
pharmacologically distinct monoamine transporters are known, VMAT1 and
VMAT2 (Liu et al., 1992 , 1994 ), that are responsible for transporting
catecholamines, serotonin, and histamine. Although both VMATs recognize
monoamines such as serotonin, noradrenaline, and dopamine at almost
similar concentrations, VMAT2 can be distinguished from VMAT1 by the
ability to use histamine in submillimolar concentrations as substrate
and by its 10-fold higher sensitivity to tetrabenazine (Peter et al.,
1994 ). Human VMAT1 is almost insensitive to tetrabenazine (Erickson et
al., 1996 ).
In addition to pharmacological differences, VMAT1 and VMAT2 differ in
their tissue distribution. In the rat, VMAT1 is the predominant
transporter of the peripheral nervous system and of neuroendocrine
cells (Liu et al., 1994 ; Peter et al., 1995 ), whereas VMAT2 is
preferentially expressed in the CNS (Liu et al., 1994 ; Peter et al.,
1995 ; Erickson et al., 1996 ) and in enterochromaffin and
enterochromaffin-like cells (Dimaline and Struther, 1995 ; Erickson et
al., 1996 ). In other species, VMAT2 is also expressed outside the CNS
(Krejci et al., 1993 ; Sagne et al., 1997 ; Leitner et al., 1999 ).
More importantly, both transporters are localized to large, dense-core
vesicles (LDCV) as well as to small synaptic vesicles (SSV) within
neurons or neuroendocrine cells (Liu et al., 1994 ; Nirenberg et al.,
1995 ). These vesicles share the basic machinery for exocytosis but
differ with respect to their intracellular trafficking pathways and
with respect to the control of exocytosis. It is not clear at present
at which precise step during biogenesis LDCV are loaded with
transmitter, how uptake is regulated, and if regulation of uptake
resembles that of SSV.
In a previous study we have demonstrated that VMAT1 is downregulated by
Go2 (Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1998a ), a trimeric
G-protein that is associated with both SSV and LDCV (Ahnert-Hilger et
al., 1994 ). In this study, we used the rat pheochromocytoma cell line PC 12, which only contains VMAT1, confined to protein-containing LDCV
(Liu et al., 1994 ; Peter et al., 1995 ). The current study was
undertaken with two aims in mind. First, we wished to clarify whether
regulation by G o2 is a specific feature of
VMAT1 or whether it is also pertinent for the related but
pharmacologically distinct VMAT2. These experiments were performed in
BON cells, a human neuroendocrine cell line derived from a metastasis
of a pancreatic carcinoid tumor (Beauchamp et al., 1991 ; Ahnert-Hilger
et al., 1996 ), which releases serotonin (Evers et al., 1991 ) and, as
shown here, expresses both VMAT1 and VMAT2. Second, we investigated whether regulation by heterotrimeric G-proteins also occurs in neurons
using serotonergic neurons and crude synaptic vesicles where VMAT2
should be predominantly localized to SSV (Liu et al., 1994 ; Peter et
al., 1995 ; Erickson et al., 1996 ). Our results show that
G-protein-induced downregulation of VMATs represents a feature shared
by SSV and LDCV despite their differential trafficking pathways.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials
Antibodies. Rabbit antisera were raised against
glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with the rat
vesicular monoamine transporters VMAT1 (C-terminal, amino acids
468-521) and VMAT2 (N-terminal, amino acids 1-20). When tested
against recombinant proteins, both antisera were specific for VMAT1 and
VMAT2, respectively, with only negligible cross-reactivity toward the
other transporter protein (also see Results). Rabbit and chicken
antisera against serotonin were kindly provided by R. Veh (Institut
für Anatomie der Charité, Humboldt-Universität zu
Berlin). A monoclonal antibody against cytochrome b561 was a gift from
B. Wiedenmann (Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Virchow Klinikum der
Charité, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin). A rabbit
antiserum against chromogranin B (Kroesen et al., 1996 ) was a gift from
R. Fischer-Colbrie (Department of Pharmacology, University of
Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria). The following antibodies were described
previously: monoclonal antibodies against synaptobrevin II (clone 69.1;
Edelmann et al., 1995 ) and synaptophysin (clone 7.2; Jahn et al., 1985 )
and polyclonal antisera against G o1 (AS 248;
Spicher et al., 1992 ) and G o2 (AS 371; Laugwitz et al., 1996 ). Peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG was
obtained from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). Donkey anti-rabbit
and anti-mouse antiserum coupled to Oregon Green or Texas Red,
respectively, were obtained from Molecular Probes (Göttingen, Germany). Donkey anti-chicken IgG coupled to Texas Red was obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA).
3H-Labeled transmitters. 5-Hydroxy
[3H]tryptamine trifluoroacetate
(serotonin; specific activity, 3260 Bq/mmol),
L-[7,8-3H]noradrenaline
(specific activity, 444 Bq/mmol), and
[2,5-3H]histamine dihydrochloride
(specific activity, 1550 Bq/mmol) were obtained from Amersham
(Dreieich, Germany).
Toxins. Streptolysin O (SLO; Weller et al., 1996 ) and
tetanus toxin (TeNT) as well as its light chain (TeNt/LC) were kindly supplied by U. Weller (Institut Ray-Roecky-Weller, Baden-Baden, Germany) and H. Bigalke (Institut für Toxikologie, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany), respectively. Pertussis toxin was
obtained from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (Bad Soden/Taunus, Germany).
G-protein -subunits. Pertussis toxin-sensitive G
isoforms were purified from bovine brain as described elsewhere (Exner et al., 1999 ). Purified G o- and G i-subunits were used in the AlF4 -activated form (also see Ahnert-Hilger et al.,
1998a ).
Other chemicals. Tetrabenazine was a kind gift from Jean
Pierre Henry (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR 9071, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France).
Methods
Cell cultures. BON and PC 12 cells were
cultivated as described (Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1996 , 1998a , respectively).
Primary neuronal cell cultures of the raphe region were prepared from
rats at embryonic day 14 following a recently described protocol for
serum-free cultures (Brewer, 1995 ), which was modified and adapted to
raphe neurons (M. Lautenschlager, M. Höltje, G. Ahnert-Hilger,
and H. Hörtnagl, unpublished procedures). Briefly, after
dissection and dissociation (enzymatically by trypsin and mechanically
by pasteur pipettes), neurons were seeded on 48-well plates (precoated
with poly-L-lysine and a collagen-containing medium) at a
density of 8.5 × 104 cells and were
grown in serum-free neurobosal medium (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with B27 (Life Technologies), 0.5 mM glutamine, and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin at 5%
CO2 in a humidified atmosphere up to 4 weeks.
Monoamine uptake. The medium was removed, and cells
were washed twice with PBS and once with potassium glutamate
buffer (KG buffer) containing (in mM): potassium glutamate
150, 1,4-piperazinediethane-sulfonic acid 20, EGTA 4, and
MgCl2 1, adjusted to pH 7.0 with KOH, before they
were suspended in KG buffer. One volume of this cell suspension (~107 cells) was mixed with 1 volume of
SLO dissolved in KG buffer containing 1 mM dithiothreitol
and incubated for 10 min on ice. Unbound SLO was removed by
centrifugation (1000 × g, 2 min, 4°C). The cell
pellet was resuspended in KG buffer, distributed into individual tubes,
and incubated for 10 min at 37°C to induce permeabilization and
remove cytosolic components. Permeabilized cells were washed by adding
500 µl of ice-cold KG buffer and spun down for 2 min at 4°C. Uptake
was started by adding 100 µl of KG buffer containing 2 mM Mg-ATP supplemented with 1 mM ascorbic acid and 0.5 µCi of [3H]serotonin (90 nM final concentration),
[3H]noradrenaline (120 nM final concentration), or
[3H]histamine (200 nM final concentration). Substances to be tested were usually applied during this step. Incubation was performed for 10 min (raphe neurons and synaptic vesicles) or 25 min (PC 12 and BON
cells) at 37°C and stopped by adding 1 ml of ice-cold KG buffer
followed by a rapid centrifugation. The cell pellet was lysed in 0.4%
Triton-X-100 to determine radioactivity by scintillation counting and
protein content using the bicinchoninic acid method (BCA kit; Pierce,
Rockford, IL).
Incubation of cells with pertussis toxin (100 ng/ml) was performed
overnight. In another series of experiments, the cell pellets, after
incubation with SLO, were resuspended in 20 µl of KG buffer in the
presence or absence of TeNt/LC between 1 µM and 200 nM, which blocked exocytotic events.
Raphe neurons in primary culture were washed once with PBS and
once with KG buffer before they were incubated with KG buffer supplemented with SLO, corresponding to ~1000-2000 hemolytic units for 10 min on ice. This solution was discarded, and the permeabilized neurons were incubated with KG-ATP buffer containing 0.5 µCi of [3H]serotonin (90 nM final
concentration) and the substances to be tested. The reaction was
stopped after 10 min, and the cells were washed twice with KG buffer
before they were lysed with 0.4% Triton-X-100 to determine
radioactivity by scintillation counting and protein content using the
BCA method.
For pertussis toxin treatment cultures were preincubated with 100 ng/ml
for 24-48 hr.
Serotonin secretion. Cultures were preloaded with
[3H]serotonin dissolved in serum-free
DMEM and supplemented with 1 mM ascorbic acid for 4 hr in
the incubator. They were washed three times with Krebs-Ringer-HEPES
buffer containing (in mM): NaCl 130, KCl 4.7, MgSO4 1.2, CaCl2 2.5, glucose 11, and HEPES 10, pH 7.4 (KR-HEPES buffer) and preincubated for
10 min at 37°C in KR-HEPES buffer containing 0.1% BSA. The
preincubation solution was removed, and cultures were stimulated
for 5 min at 37°C by increasing the K+
concentration to 50 mM.
Serotonin was measured in the supernatant and in the cells after
dissolving them in Triton X-100 (0.4%). Release is given as the
percentage of serotonin content present at the beginning of stimulation.
Subcellular fractionation and immunoreplica analysis.
Subcellular fractionation of membranes obtained either from BON cells or primary raphe neuronal cultures was performed on continuous sucrose
gradients as described previously (Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1998b ).
Postnuclear supernatants or fractions from gradients were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using the antibodies indicated.
Synaptic vesicles. Crude synaptic vesicles (lysis pellet 2 fraction) were prepared from rat prefrontal cortex following the procedure described by Huttner et al., (1983) .
The vesicles were resuspended in KG-ATP buffer, divided to individual
tubes, and [3H]serotonin (0.5 µCi, 90 nM final concentration) dissolved in KG/ATP-buffer with or
without additions was added. Samples were incubated for 10 min at
37°C followed by centrifugation (30 min, 80,000 rpm; TLA 100.4;
Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA) and two washes with KG buffer
without ATP. The pellets were lysed with 0.4% Triton X-100 to
determine radioactivity by scintillation counting and protein content
using the BCA method.
Immunofluorescence microscopy. Cells were grown on glass
coverslips, washed twice with PBS, and fixed in 4% formalin in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 1 hr on ice. After three
rinses with PBS, cells were incubated with a blocking solution
containing 5% normal goat serum (Pan System), and 2% BSA (fraction V,
pH 7.0; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) dissolved in PBS supplemented with
0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 hr at room temperature. Incubation with a
mixture of chicken and rabbit antibodies against serotonin and VMAT2,
respectively, diluted in blocking solution was performed overnight at
4°C. Immunofluorescence was detected with Oregon Green-labeled goat
anti-chicken and Texas Red-labeled goat anti-rabbit antibodies.
Electron microscopy. Freshly removed pieces of rat
prefrontal cortex were placed in ice-cold PBS (0.1 M
phosphate, pH 7.4) and cut into small cubes of ~8
mm3. These were immersed in a fixative
containing 4% formalin, 0.05% glutaraldehyde, and 0.2% picric acid
dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 2 hr on
ice and 2 hr at room temperature. The fixed tissue was rinsed for 2 hr
with PBS and then embedded in 3% agarose dissolved in PBS to perform
vibratome sections of 50 µm. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by a
30 min incubation with 0.5%
H2O2, followed by rinsing
with PBS. Pieces were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature
with 0.1% Triton-X-100, 5% normal goat serum (NGS), and 2% BSA
dissolved in PBS. Tissue pieces were incubated for 24 hr at 4°C with
a chicken antiserum against serotonin dissolved in PBS containing NGS,
BSA, and 0.05% sodium azide. Immunoreactive structures were visualized
by a Vectastain elite kit (Vector Laboratories) according to the
manufacturer`s instructions using 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma,
St. Louis, MO) as chromogen. After several washes with PBS the tissue
was incubated for 30 min in 1% OsO4 dissolved in
PBS dehydrated by alcohol and subjected to flat embedding using
araldite. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) mounted on Formvar-coated (Serva,
21740, in 0.3% dichlorethane) nickel grids were etched two times for 7 min with 1% periodic acid followed by rinsing with double-distilled
water and subjected to a postembedding procedure according to the
method of Wenzel et al. (1997) , using rabbit antisera against VMAT2 or G o2. For detection anti-rabbit IgG coupled to
5 nm gold (Amersham) was used.
 |
RESULTS |
BON cells contain both VMAT1 and VMAT2
To find out which of the VMATs is expressed in BON cells, we
performed both immunocytochemistry and immunoblot analyses. As shown in
Figure 1A,
immunoreactive bands of an apparent Mr
of 55,000 were detected with both antisera in membrane extracts, which
correspond to the molecular weight of VMAT proteins (Liu et al., 1994 ;
Peter et al., 1995 ). When using membrane extracts from PC 12 cells, a
protein band of an apparent Mr of
55,000 was recognized by the antiserum against VMAT1, whereas the
antiserum against VMAT2 showed no immunoreactivity at all. The
antiserum against VMAT1 also stained protein bands at ~70 and 110 kDa, probably reflecting differentially glycosylated isoforms of VMAT1
and a dimer, respectively (Liu et al., 1994 ). Double immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that serotonin was present in both VMAT1- and
VMAT2-positive cells. VMAT2 was expressed only in a subpopulation of
cells, whereas VMAT1 was found in virtually all cells (Fig. 1B). The BON cell line is an uncloned cell line,
which may explain the heterogeneity with respect to VMAT expression
(Townsend et al., 1993 ).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
BON cells express both VMAT1 and VMAT2.
A, BON or PC 12 cell membranes were subjected to
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and analyzed by polyclonal
antisera against VMAT1 or VMAT2. Both antisera recognized proteins at
55 kDa. The higher molecular weight bands stained by the anti-VMAT1
antiserum probably represent glycosylated isoforms. Preincubation with
the respective peptide used for immunization abolished the staining
with the antisera (results not shown). Note that the antiserum against
VMAT2 did not recognize any protein in membranes obtained from PC 12 cells. B, C, Immunofluorescence
microscopic analysis revealed that cells contained either VMAT1
(B) or VMAT2 (C), which
mostly colocalized with serotonin, detected by a chicken anti-serotonin
antiserum. Scale bar, 20 µm.
|
|
Next we investigated whether VMAT1 and VMAT2 are localized to LDCV or
SSV or to both types of organelles. For this purpose, a postnuclear
supernatant was separated by density gradient centrifugation on a
continuous sucrose gradient. The distribution of VMAT1 and VMAT2 was
then determined by immunoblot analysis and compared with that of
established markers cytochrome b561 and synaptophysin for LDCV or SSV,
respectively. Both VMATs were found in the LDCV fraction in a
distribution similar to cytochrome b561. SSV analogs, identified by
their synaptophysin content, were largely separated from the LDCV
fractions but contain only minor amounts of both transporters. As
expected, synaptobrevin, which localizes to both types of secretory
vesicles, was found in both parts of the gradient.
G o and G i have been recently shown to localize to LDCV as well as
SSV in neurons and chromaffin cells (Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1994 ). In
addition, G o2 has been shown to regulate
LDCV-located VMAT1 (Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1998a ). We therefore analyzed
the distribution of G o proteins in our gradients. Besides a
distribution in both parts of the gradient, considerable amounts
especially of G o2 associated with the dense
fraction, consistent with a presumed localization to LDCV (Fig.
2).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Localization of VMAT1, VMAT2, and G o-subunits
to subcellular fractions from BON cells. Subcellular fractionation was
performed using a continuous sucrose gradient. Fractions were spun
down, dissolved in Laemmli buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting using the indicated antibodies.
|
|
Monoamine uptake by VMAT1 and VMAT2 can be differentiated in
permeabilized BON cells
For measurement of VMAT activity, BON cells were permeabilized
with SLO according to standard procedures (see Materials and Methods).
When [3H]serotonin was added, an
ATP-dependent and reserpine-sensitive uptake was observed, as expected
for vesicular monoamine transport. Poorly hydrolyzable GTP analogs
significantly inhibited serotonin uptake, and their inhibitory effects
could be prevented by pertussis toxin treatment (Fig.
3A). Purified
G o2 but not heat-denatured G o2 or G o1 also
inhibited serotonin uptake (Fig. 3B). Other purified
G -subunits (G i1 or
G i2) did not specifically interfere with VMAT
activity, because their effects could not be prevented by heat
denaturation and were probably artifacts attributable to detergent
contaminations (Table 1). The effects of
G o2 were insensitive to tetanus toxin
treatment, which strongly excludes exocytotic events and suggests that
G o2 regulates vesicular monoamine transport in
these cells (Fig. 3C,D).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Activators of heterotrimeric G proteins
and G o2 inhibit uptake of
[3H]serotonin by permeabilized BON cells.
A, SLO-treated and washed cells (see Materials and
Methods) were resuspended in KG buffer containing 2 mM
Mg-ATP with additions as indicated and incubated for 25 min at 36°C.
The reserpine-sensitive serotonin uptake was inhibited by addition of
the GTP analogs GMppNp and GTP S each at a final concentration of 50 µM. Their effects were statistically significant,
calculated by Students' t test
(*,**p < 0.003). Preincubating the cells with
pertussis toxin (100 ng/ml) prevented the inhibition of serotonin
uptake by GTP analogs. Values (n = 3 ± SD)
represent the reserpine-sensitive uptake. Unspecific accumulation
(picomoles per milligram of protein) in the presence of 2 µM reserpine was 0.93 ± 0.05 and 0.82 ± 0.08 for untreated and pertussis toxin-treated samples, respectively.
B, Permeabilized cells were incubated as given in
A with purified G o1 (20 nM),
G o2 (10 nM), or G o2 that had
been denatured by heating to 100°C. Only effects of
G o2 were statistically significant
(*p < 0.05). Unspecific accumulation in the
presence of reserpine was 0.83 ± 0.1 pmol/mg of protein.
C, Permeabilized BON cells were preincubated for 20 min
with KG buffer in the absence or presence of TeNt/LC (200 nM final concentration) before uptake was started by
addition of fresh KG buffer plus Mg-ATP supplemented with 10 nM AlF4 -activated or heat-denaturated
G o2. Only effects of G o2 were
statistically significant (*p < 0.02). Values
(n = 3 ± SD) represent reserpine-sensitive
uptake. Uptake in the presence of reserpine (2 µM) was
0.28 ± 0.2 pmol/mg of protein. D, Under the
experimental conditions given in C, addition of TeNt/LC
between 200 nM and 1 µM completely cleaved
synaptobrevin without affecting synaptophysin analyzed for comparison.
n.p., Nonpermeabilized.
|
|
To distinguish between transport activities mediated by VMAT1 and
VMAT2, we exploited pharmacological differences between the two
transporters (see introductory remarks). Because VMAT2 has an
~30-fold higher affinity for histamine than VMAT1, we monitored [3H]serotonin uptake in the presence of
increasing concentrations of histamine. Serotonin uptake into BON cells
can be partially inhibited by 0.5-2 mM histamine, whereas
a complete inhibition was observed with 10 mM histamine
(data not shown). These data are consistent with the presence of both
transporter activities in BON cells, VMAT2 with a
Ki value of ~0.2
mM for histamine and VMAT1, which can be blocked
only by histamine concentrations >5 mM (Erickson
et al., 1996 ).
In the following different approaches were used to selectively measure
VMAT1 and VMAT2 activities. First, using PC 12 cells as a reference for
VMAT1, we confirmed that only serotonin and noradrenaline but not
histamine were taken up in a reserpine-sensitive way under our
experimental conditions (Fig.
4A). Second,
tetrabenazine, which is selective for VMAT2, partially inhibited
serotonin uptake by BON cells but failed to do so when applied to PC 12 cells (Fig. 4B). Third, when measuring serotonin
uptake in the presence of 2 mM histamine, a
reserpine-sensitive uptake was observed, which was no longer affected
by tetrabenazine and thus represents VMAT1 activity (Fig. 4C,
left panel). Conversely
[3H]histamine was taken up in a
reserpine- and tetrabenazine-sensitive manner, which thus reflected
VMAT2 activity (Fig. 4C, right panel). As expected,
histamine uptake was dependent on ATP (data not shown). Histamine
uptake by VMAT2 was less pronounced than serotonin uptake by VMAT1
(Fig. 4C), which is probably attributable to the fact that
fewer BON cells express VMAT2 (see above).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Monoamine uptake by VMAT1 and VMAT2 can be
differentiated in permeabilized cells. A, Monoamine
uptake was performed with permeabilized PC 12 cells using
[3H]serotonin,
[3H]noradrenaline, or
[3H]histamine as substrates. Note that the
serotonin and the noradrenaline uptake was reserpine-sensitive
(*,**p < 0.001 or 0.002, respectively, calculated
by Students' t test), whereas histamine uptake could
not be blocked. B, [3H]Serotonin
uptake into permeabilized BON cells could be partially inhibited by 1 µM tetrabenazine (TBZ)
(*p < 0.04). Tetrabenazine had no effect on
serotonin uptake when using permeabilized PC 12 cells.
C, [3H]Serotonin uptake was
performed in the presence of 2 mM histamine, which is
transported only by VMAT2 and therefore blocks
[3H]serotonin transport by this transporter
activity. The uptake observed under these conditions is consistent to
be exclusively attributable to VMAT1 activity, because it was
reserpine-sensitive but could not be inhibited by tetrabenazine.
Reserpine-sensitive uptake of [3H]histamine into
permeabilized BON cells was inhibited by 1 µM
tetrabenazine to ~80% (*p < 0.04). This uptake
is attributable to VMAT2 activity. Values (n = 3 ± SD) represent the reserpine uptake in picomoles per milligram
of protein. Monoamine uptake in the presence of reserpine (5 µM) was 2.2 ± 1.3 and 1.23 ± 0.006 pmol/mg of
protein for VMAT1 and VMAT2 activity, respectively.
|
|
G o2 inhibits VMAT2 in BON cells more
potently than VMAT1
A pronounced inhibition of monoamine uptake into BON cells by
G o2 was observed when measuring serotonin
uptake by VMAT1 activity or histamine uptake by VMAT2. Again,
heat-denatured G o2 was ineffective, as shown
for histamine uptake (Fig.
5A). The
concentration-response curve revealed that VMAT2 could be inhibited by
subnanomolar concentrations of G o2
(half-maximal effect at ~0.5 nM), whereas for
VMAT1 half-maximal effects were observed at 1.5 nM (Fig. 5B). The different
sensitivities were also reflected when using
5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate (GMppNp), which almost completely
inhibited VMAT2 at 50 µM, a concentration at
which VMAT1 was only partially downregulated (Fig. 5C). For both transporters G o1 as well as
G i1 and G i2 were
ineffective even when a concentration of 10 nM
was applied (Fig. 5B; data not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Inhibition of VMAT1 and VMAT2 activity by
G o2 or GMppNp in permeabilized BON cells.
A, [3H]Serotonin uptake performed
in the presence of 2 mM histamine (VMAT1 condition) was
inhibited by 10 nM
AlF4 -activated G o2 (*,
p < 0.004). [3H] histamine
uptake (200 nM final concentration of histamine) was
inhibited by 10 nM AlF4 -activated
G o2, whereas heat-denaturated protein had no
effect or (*p < 0.02, calculated by Students'
t test). Values (n = 3 ± SD)
represent the reserpine-sensitive uptake. Monoamine uptake in the
presence of reserpine was 0.42 ± 0.035 and 0.33 ± 0.001 pmol/mg of protein for VMAT1 and VMAT2 activity, respectively.
B, Increasing concentrations of
AlF4 -activated G o2 and 10 nM AlF4 -activated G o1 were
applied to permeabilized BON cells measuring either VMAT1 or VMAT2
activity. Note that G o2 downregulates VMATs at
concentrations between 0.2 and 2 nMM whereas
G o1 had no effect on the activity VMAT2. Values
(n = 3 ± SD) are expressed as percent of
control of the reserpine-sensitive monoamine uptake, which was
1.86 ± 0.2 and 0.33 ± 0.033 pmol/mg of protein for VMAT1
and VMAT2, respectively. Note that VMAT2 activity is more affected by
G o2 between 0.7 and 6 nM than VMAT1
(*p < 0.008; **p < 0.02;
***p < 0.04, calculated by students'
t test). C, Increasing concentrations of
GMppNp between 5 and 100 µM were applied to permeabilized
BON cells. VMAT1 or VMAT2 activity was measured. Values
(n = 3 ± SD) are expressed as percent of
control of the reserpine-sensitive monoamine uptake, which was
1.03 ± 0.02 and 0.53 ± 0.01 pmol/mg of protein for VMAT1
and VMAT2, respectively.
|
|
These data show that G o2 downregulates VMAT2
even more efficiently than VMAT1 in these human neuroendocrine cells.
VMAT2 of serotonergic neurons is downregulated
by G o2
The data described above show that in neuroendocrine cells both
VMAT1 and VMAT2 are sensitive to downregulation by the trimeric G-protein G o2. We therefore examined whether a
similar downregulation also occurs in serotonergic neurons.
Rat raphe neurons were grown in primary culture and assayed for their
ability to sequester and release
[3H]serotonin. Depolarization of
preloaded neurons by elevating extracellular potassium resulted in
serotonin release. As expected for exocytotic release, basal as well as
stimulated release was inhibited by pretreating the neurons with 10 nM TeNT for 48 hr (Table
2).
Primary cultures of raphe represent a mixture of different types of
neurons. Therefore, we estimated the proportion of serotonergic neurons
present in our culture system by immunofluorescence microscopy. As
shown in Figure 6, some (~5%) of the
cultivated neurons were positive for both VMAT2 and serotonin.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Immunofluorescence microscopic analysis of
serotonergic neurons in raphe primary culture. Raphe neurons cultivated
for 10 d in vitro were fixed and incubated using a
mixture of chicken anti-serotonin antiserum and rabbit anti-VMAT2
antiserum. Of a couple of neurons shown in C, only one
neuron labeled by an asterisk was positively stained for
serotonin (A) or VMAT2 (B).
Scale bar, 10 µm.
|
|
Because serotonergic neurons predominantly contain SSV besides some
LDCV (Smiley et al., 1996 ), we first analyzed the subcellular distribution of VMAT2 in these cultures using subcellular
fractionation. When separating postnuclear supernatants by density
gradient centrifugation on a continuous sucrose gradient, VMAT2 was
preferentially associated with lighter membrane fractions identified by
their synaptophysin content. LDCV, identified by their chromogranin B
content, were largely separated from the SSV fractions and almost
devoid of VMAT2. As expected, synaptobrevin, which localizes to both
types of secretory vesicles, was found in both parts of the gradient (Fig. 7). These data indicate that VMAT2
preferentially localizes to SSV in these serotonergic neurons and thus
offer the opportunity to investigate whether G-protein-mediated
regulation of transmitter loading is a feature of neuronal SSV.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Localization of VMAT1, VMAT2, and G o subunits
to subcellular fractions from raphe neurons. Raphe neurons were
cultivated for 14 d. Subcellular fractionation was performed using
a continuous sucrose gradient. Fractions were spun down, dissolved in
Laemmli buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using the
indicated antibodies.
|
|
Next we applied our permeabilization technique to these neurons using
various concentrations of SLO. As can been seen in Figure 8, a reserpine-sensitive uptake of
serotonin was observed after permeabilizing the neurons with SLO
concentrations corresponding to 500-2000 hemolytic units
(Ahnert-Hilger and Weller, 1998 ). In the intracellular buffer used for
these kind of experiments, only minute amounts of serotonin uptake were
observed without permeabilization. When GMppNp or guanosine
5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTP S) in micromolar
concentrations were applied to permeabilized neurons, the
reserpine-sensitive serotonin uptake was inhibited by ~40%.
Pretreating the neurons with pertussis toxin overnight abolished the
inhibitory action of the GTP analogs (Fig.
9A). In an experimental design
similar to the one in Table 2, neurons were pretreated with TeNt for 48 hr, which did not influence the inhibition of serotonin uptake by
GMppNp or GTP S, demonstrating that inhibition is not a consequence
of exocytosis (Fig. 9B). When
AlF4 -activated G o2 was
applied to permeabilized neurons an ~40% inhibition of uptake was
observed (Fig. 9C). The data support the idea that in rat
raphe neurons a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein, presumably G o2, regulates vesicular storage of serotonin.
Thus not only monoamine storage of LDCV in neuroendocrine cells but
also transmitter storage of neuronal SSV may be controlled by
G o2 residing on the vesicle surface.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Reserpine-sensitive serotonin uptake into
SLO-permeabilized serotonergic neurons. Raphe neurons cultivated for
10 d in vitro were washed twice with PBS and once
with KG buffer. Cultures were incubated on ice for 10 min with various
dilutions of SLO [between 2000 and 500 hemolytic units
(HU)/ml] dissolved in KG buffer or with KG
buffer alone. The permeabilization solution was replaced by fresh KG
buffer, and neurons were preincubated for 5 min at 37°C. After
removal of this solution, uptake was started by applying
[3H]serotonin dissolved in KG-ATP buffer in the
absence or presence of 2 µM reserpine. The incubation was
stopped after 10 min at 37°C, and cultures were lysed in Triton X-100
for determination of radioactivity and protein content. Values are the
mean of three individual culture wells ± SD. Note that
reserpine-sensitive uptake dramatically increased in SLO-treated
neurons.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
G o2 downregulates monoamine uptake
into permeabilized raphe neurons. A, Raphe neurons
cultivated for 25 d in vitro were treated with
either buffer or pertussis toxin (Ptx; 100 ng/ml) 2 d before the experiment. The experiment followed the protocol described
in Figure 8. GMppNp or GTP S was applied at 50 µM
together with [3H]serotonin, and incubation was
stopped after 10 min (*,**p < 0.04 or 0.05, respectively). B, This experiment followed a similar
experimental design, with the exception that cultures were treated with
TeNt (1 nM) 2 d before the experiment
(*p < 0.02; **p < 0.03;
***p < 0.004; ****p < 0.05, calculated by Students' t test). Values are the mean of
three cultures ± SD. C, The experiment was
performed as stated in A, with the exception that noradrenaline as
substrate and 1 µM tetrabenazine (TBZ)
were used to specifically block VMAT2. G o2 (10 nM final concentration) was applied in the
AlF4 -activated form, and the incubation was stopped
after 10 min (*,**p < 0.003, p < 0.002, respectively). Values represent the mean of three individual
culture wells ± SD. In the experiments given in A,
values were calculated referring to the mean protein content of all
samples.
|
|
VMAT2 of SSV is downregulated by G o2
To get a direct proof for the localization of VMAT2 and
G o2 on SSV, a double immunoelectron
microscopic analysis was performed using a combination of pre- and
postembedding techniques. For this purpose serotonergic terminals in
the rat prefrontal cortex were first labeled by a chicken serotonin
antiserum using the DAB technique and then subjected to postembedding
procedure using rabbit antisera against VMAT2 or
G o2 detected by gold-labeled anti-rabbit IgG.
This technique allows identification of serotonergic terminals with
VMAT2 or G o2 localized to SSV. Serotonin was
found in thin neuronal processes showing terminals typical for
serotonergic neurons processing to the prefrontal cortex (Fig.
10A). The electron microscopic analysis of these terminals revealed that they were filled
exclusively with SSV containing the DAB reaction product and worked by
an antibody against synaptophysin (Fig. 10B).
VMAT2 could be detected almost exclusively in SSV-containing terminals (Fig. 10C,C', arrows); some of them were devoid
of DAB and may originate from dopaminergic neurons (Fig.
10C', arrowheads). The serotonergic terminals
clearly marked by DAB were also decorated with gold particles
indicating G o2 (Fig. 10D,
arrows) on serotonin-containing SSV. As expected,
G o2 was also found on other membranes besides SSV (data not shown) and on SSV from nonserotonergic terminals (Fig.
10D', arrowheads).

View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Immunoelectron microscopic localization of
VMAT2 and G o2 in serotonergic terminals from rat
prefrontal cortex. A, The micrograph shows serotonergic
terminals (arrowheads) labeled by a chicken antiserum
against serotonin and visualized by DAB. From this tissue ultrathin
sections were performed and subjected to postembedding procedures using
antisera against synaptophysin, VMAT2 or G o2 and
anti-rabbit IgG coupled to 5 nm gold particles. B,
Electronmicroscopic details from an area showing two terminals, one of
them being serotonergic, identified by the DAB precipitate.
Synaptophysin is present on SSV of the serotonergic or the other
terminal, as indicated by arrows or
arrowheads, respectively. C,
C', Electronmicroscopic details from two serotonergic
terminals (C, C'), identified by DAB
containing SSV, where VMAT2 is clearly visible on some SSV
(arrows). Arrowheads denote gold
particles on SSV from an adjacent monoaminergic terminal, probably
originating from a dopaminergic neuron. D,
D', In a serotonergic terminal (D)
identified by its DAB content, G o2 is also detected on
SSV (arrows). D', Presence of
G o2 on synaptic vesicles (arrowheads) in
a not further identified synaptic terminal. Scale bar:
A, 1 µm; B-D, 150 nm.
|
|
Using a synaptic vesicle preparation from prefrontal cortex, a
tetrabenazine-sensitive uptake of
[3H]serotonin was observed, which coud
be downregulated by the addition of GMppNp. Again, purified
G o2 but not G o1
inhibited serotonin uptake from this vesicular preparation (Fig.
11). These data strongly support the
idea that VMAT2 residing on SSV is also modulated by
Go2.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
G o2 downregulates monoamine uptake
into synaptic vesicles. A, B, Crude synaptic vesicles
from rat prefrontal cortex were incubated for 10 min at 37°C with
KG-ATP buffer containing [3H]serotonin (90 nM final concentration), supplemented with 10 nM purified AlF4 -activated
G o1 (B), G o2
(A, B), 50 µM GmppNp
(A), or 10 µM tetrabenazine
(TBZ; A, B), as indicated
(*,**,***p < 0.003, p < 0.003, or p < 0.04, respectively, calculated by
Students' t test). Values represent the mean of three
samples ± SD.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study we show that VMAT2 is highly sensitive to
regulation by G o2. These data extend our
previous findings concerning the regulation of VMAT1 in PC 12 cells
(Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1998a ). Together they lend strong support
to the view that vesicular monoamine transporters are regulated by
Go2 in neurons and neuroendocrine cells,
regardless of whether the transporter is localized to LDCV or SSV. The
presence of both VMAT1 and VMAT2 in the neuroendocrine cell line BON
allowed for a direct comparison of the two transporters. Because the
transport activities can be distinguished pharmacologically, we were
able to demonstrate that VMAT2 is even more sensitive to downregulation
than VMAT1. Although representing a valuable model for directly
comparing the regulation of both transporters on dense-core vesicles,
BON cells cannot substitute for neurons. This issue was addressed by
two different neuronal preparations. VMAT2 was also downregulated in
raphe neurons in primary culture, demonstrating that this type of
control is not confined to neuroendocrine cells. Even more, downregulation was also clearly visible when using synaptic vesicles. The reason for the differential sensitivity of the two transporters remains unclear. However, VMAT2 but not VMAT1 is phosphorylated (Krantz
et al., 1997 ) suggesting that the transporters may have more
differences in their regulation. The recently described association of
G o2 with membranes of both LDCV and SSV
(Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1994 ; this paper) favors a role in controlling
neurotransmitter uptake, although we do not know the factors involved
in the upstream regulation. In addition to G -subunits, G
subunits also were found to colocalize with secretory vesicle proteins
(Ahnert-Hilger et al., 1994 ; Brunk et al., 1999 ), assuming a signal
transduction from the luminal site over the vesicle membrane by an
unknown receptor (Nürnberg and Ahnert-Hilger, 1996 ). So far, only
one example of an endomembrane protein with characteristics of
classical G-protein-coupled receptors has been described. This KDEL
receptor locates on Golgi membranes and is involved in the retrograde
transport from Golgi to endoplasmic reticulum (Scheel and Pelham,
1998 ).
Although we do not know how the G-protein is turned on, its general
feature in regulating VMATs allows speculations toward the
physiological relevance of a regulation of transmitter storage by
intracellular signaling pathways.
There is increasing evidence from electrophysiological studies that
vesicular content is variable and may be subject to both short- and
long-term regulation. Overexpression of vesicular acetylcholine transporter resulted in a 10-fold increase of vesicular acetylcholine content (Song et al., 1997 ). Drugs that interfere with acetylcholine metabolism decrease quantal size at the neuromuscular junction (Parsons
et al., 1993 ), whereas -adrenergic stimulation increases quantal
release at least in the frog (van der Kloot 1991 ; Williams, 1997 ). In
this line, it has recently been shown that activation of dopamine D2
autoreceptors reduces quantal release of dopamine from PC 12 cells
(Pothos et al., 1998b ). In addition, the neurotrophic factor
glial-derived neurotrophic factor as well as changes in the metabolism
of dopaminergic neurons affected quantal dopamine release (Pothos et
al., 1998a ). These data support the idea that intracellular signaling
pathways may modulate vesicular storage. The regulation of VMATs by the
heterotrimeric G protein Go2 described here could
be one of the missing links in intracellular signaling pathways
regulating the filling of secretory vesicles and may represent the
contribution of the vesicle to synaptic plasticity. Whether these
regulations could be better explained by a "steady-state" model or
a "set-point" model (Williams, 1997 ) or whether switches between
these two models may be regulated by heterotrimeric G proteins is an
open discussion.
Besides being a regulator of vesicle filling in monoaminergic and
presumably other neurons, regulation by G-proteins may be of additional
pathophysiological relevance specific for monoaminergic neurons.
Monoamine transporters are characterized by a low
Km value quite different from the
higher Km values of vesicular
acetylcholine transporter and the transporters for GABA/glycine and
glutamate (Liu and Edwards, 1997 ). Increasing
Km of the transporter for monoamines
by Go may therefore have two functions. It may enable the cell to
rapidly refill secretory vesicles for another cycle and in addition to
get rid of high amounts of probably toxic monoamines and their
oxidation products in the cytoplasm. The idea that VMATs may help clean
the cell from hazardous compounds is supported by their phylogenetic
relationship with bacterial toxin-extruding transporters (Schuldiner et
al., 1995 ). Furthermore, the absence of VMATs in periglomerular
dopaminergic neurons of the olfactory bulb (Peter et al., 1995 ) makes
these neurons the first affected in the beginning of Parkinson`s
disease (Daniel and Hawkes, 1992 ). On the other hand, elevated VMAT2
and reduced dopamine plasma membrane transporter expression appeared to
decrease the vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons (Uhl et al., 1994 ).
Whether an impaired regulation of VMAT2 by Gao2
is crucial for the development of Parkinson's disease, especially in
the mostly affected large dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra
pars compacta, remains to be found out.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Oct. 22, 1999; revised Dec. 23, 1999; accepted Jan. 4, 2000.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and
Fonds der Chemischen Industrie. We thank Evelyn Heuckendorf for expert
technical assistance and Anja Becher for critically reading this
manuscript. Portions of this work were completed as part of the PhD
thesis of M.H.
Correspondence should be addressed to Gudrun Ahnert-Hilger, Institut
für Anatomie der Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstrasse 12, 10115 Berlin, Germany. E-mail:
gudrun.ahnert{at}charite.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Ahnert-Hilger G, Weller U (1998) Alpha-toxin and
streptolysin O as tools in cell biological research. In: Cell biology,
a laboratory handbook (Celio E, ed), Ed 2, Vol 4, pp 103-110. New
York: Academic.
-
Ahnert-Hilger G,
Schäfer T,
Spicher K,
Grund C,
Schultz G,
Wiedenmann B
(1994)
Detection of G-protein heterotrimers on large dense core and small synaptic vesicles of neuroendocrine and neuronal cells.
Eur J Cell Biol
65:26-28[ISI][Medline].
-
Ahnert-Hilger G,
Stadtbäumer A,
Strübing C,
Scherübl H,
Schultz G,
Riecken EO,
Wiedenmann B
(1996)
-Aminobutyric acid secretion from pancreatic neuroendocrine cells.
Gastroenterology
110:1595-1604[ISI][Medline]. -
Ahnert-Hilger G,
Nürnberg B,
Exner T,
Schäfer T,
Jahn R
(1998a)
The heterotrimeric G protein Go2 regulates catecholamine uptake by secretory vesicles.
EMBO J
17:406-413[ISI][Medline].
-
Ahnert-Hilger G,
John M,
Kistner U,
Wiedenmann B,
Jarry H
(1998b)
Immortalized gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons secrete
-amino acid evidence for an autocrine regulation.
Eur J Neurosci
10:1145-1152[ISI][Medline]. -
Beauchamp DR,
Coffey Jr RJ,
Lyons RM,
Perkett EA,
Townsend Jr CM,
Moses HL
(1991)
Human carcinoid cell production of paracrine growth factors that can stimulate fibroblast and endothelial cell growth.
Cancer Res
51:5253-5260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Brewer GJ
(1995)
Serum-free B27/neurobasal medium supports differentiated growth of neurons from the striatum, substantia nigra, septum, cerebral cortex, cerebellum and dentate gyrus.
J Neurosci Res
42:674-683[ISI][Medline].
-
Brunk I,
Pahner I,
Maier U,
Jenner B,
Veh RW,
Nürnberg B,
Ahnert-Hilger G
(1999)
Differential distribution of G-protein
-subunits in brain: an immunocytochemical analysis.
Eur J Cell Biol
78:311-322[ISI][Medline]. -
Daniel SE,
Hawkes CH
(1992)
Preliminary diagnosis of Parkinson's disease by olfactory bulb pathology.
Lancet
340:186[ISI][Medline].
-
Dimaline R,
Struther J
(1995)
Expression and regulation of a vesicular monoamine transporter in rat stomach: a putative histamine transporter.
J Physiol (Lond)
490.1:249-256[ISI][Medline].
-
Edelmann L,
Hanson PI,
Chapman ER,
Jahn R
(1995)
Synaptobrevin binding to synaptophysin: a potential mechanism for controlling exocytotic fusion machine.
EMBO J
14:224-231[ISI][Medline].
-
Edwards RH
(1992)
The transport of neurotransmitters into synaptic vesicles.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
2:586-594[Medline].
-
Erickson JD,
Schäfer MKH,
Bonner TI,
Eiden LE,
Weihe E
(1996)
Distinct pharmacological properties and distribution in neurons and endocrine cells of two isoforms of the human vesicular monoamine transporter.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:5166-5171[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Evers BM,
Townsend Jr CM,
Upp JR,
Allen E,
Hurlbut SC,
Kim SW,
Rajaraman S,
Singh P,
Reubi JC,
Thompson JC
(1991)
Establishment and characterization of a human carcinoid in nude mice and effects of various agents on tumor growth.
Gastroenterology
101:303-311[ISI][Medline].
-
Exner T,
Jensen ON,
Kleuss C,
Mann M,
Nürnberg B
(1999)
Posttranslational modification of Galphao1 generates Galphao3, an abundant G protein in brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:1327-1332[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Huttner WB,
Schiebler W,
Greengard P,
DeCamilli P
(1983)
Synapsin I (Protein I) a nerve terminal-specific phosphoprotein. III. Its association with synaptic vesicles studied in a highly purified synaptic vesicle preparation.
J Cell Biol
96:1374-1388[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Jahn R,
Schiebler W,
Oimet C,
Greengard P
(1985)
A 38,000 dalton membrane protein (p38) present in synaptic vesicles.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
82:4137-4141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Krantz DE,
Peter D,
Liu Y,
Edwards R
(1997)
Phosphorylation of a vesicular monoamine transporter by casein kinase II.
J Biol Chem
272:6752-6759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Krejci E,
Gasnier B,
Botton D,
Sambert MF,
Sagne C,
Gagnon J,
Massoulie J,
Henry JP
(1993)
Expression and regulation of the bovine vesicular monoamine transporter gene.
FEBS Lett
335:227-232.
-
Kroesen S,
Marksteiner J,
Leitner B,
Hogue-Angeletti R,
Fischer-Colbrie R,
Winkler H
(1996)
Rat brain: distribution of immunoreactivity of Pe-11, a peptide derived from chromogranin B.
Eur J Neurosci
8:2679-2689[ISI][Medline].
-
Laugwitz KL,
Allgeier A,
Offermanns S,
Spicher K,
van Sande J,
Dumont JE,
Schultz G
(1996)
The human thyrotropin receptor: a heptahelical receptor capable of stimulating members of all four G protein families.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:116-120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Leitner B,
Lovisetti-Scamihorn P,
Heilmann J,
Striessnig J,
Blakely RD,
Eiden LE,
Winkler H
(1999)
Subcellular localization of chromogranins, calcium channels, amine carriers, and proteins of the exocytotic machinery in bovine splenic nerve.
J Neurochem
72:1110-1116[ISI][Medline].
-
Liu Y,
Edwards R
(1997)
The role of vesicular transport proteins in synaptic transmission and neural degeneration.
Annu Rev Neurosci
20:125-156[ISI][Medline].
-
Liu Y,
Peter A,
Roghani A,
Schuldiner S,
Prive GG,
Eisenberg D,
Brecha N,
Edwards R
(1992)
A cDNA that suppresses MPP+ toxicity encodes a vesicular amine transporter.
Cell
70:539-551[ISI][Medline].
-
Liu Y,
Schweitzer E,
Nirenberg MJ,
Pickel VM,
Evans CJ,
Edwards RH
(1994)
Preferential localization of a vesicular monoamine transporter to dense core vesicles in PC 12 cells.
J Cell Biol
127:1419-1433[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Nirenberg MJ,
Liu Y,
Peter D,
Edwards RH,
Pickel VM
(1995)
The vesicular monoamine transporter 2 is present in small synaptic vesicles and preferentially localizes to large dense core vesicles in rat solitary tract nuclei.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:8773-8777[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Nürnberg B,
Ahnert-Hilger G
(1996)
Potential roles of heterotrimeric G proteins of the endomembrane system.
FEBS Lett
389:61-65[ISI][Medline].
-
Parsons SM,
Bahr BA,
Rogers GA,
Clarkson ED,
Noremberg K,
Hicks BW
(1993)
Acetylcholine transporter
vesamicol receptor pharmacology and structure.
Prog Brain Res
98:175-181[ISI][Medline]. -
Peter D,
Jiminez J,
Liu Y,
Kim J,
Edwards RH
(1994)
The chromaffin granule and synaptic vesicle amine transporters differ in substrate recognition and sensitivity to inhibitors.
J Biol Chem
269:7231-7237[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Peter D,
Liu Y,
Sternini C,
de Giorgio R,
Brecha N,
Edwards RH
(1995)
Differential expression of twi vesicular monoamine transporters.
J Neurosci
15:6179-6188[Abstract].
-
Pothos EN,
Davial V,
Sulzer D
(1998a)
Presynaptic recording of quantal from midbrain dopamine neurons and modulation of quantal size.
J Neurosci
18:4106-4118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pothos EN,
Przedborski S,
Davila V,
Schmitz Y,
Sulzer D
(1998b)
D2-like dopamine autoreceptor activation reduces quantal size in PC 12 cells.
J Neurosci
18:5575-5585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sagne C,
Isambert M-F,
Vandekerckhove J,
Henry JP,
Gasnier B
(1997)
The photoactive inhibitor 7-azido-8-iodoketanserin labels the N-terminus of the vesicular monoamine transporter from bovine chromaffin granules.
Biochemistry
36:3345-3352[Medline].
-
Scheel AA,
Pelham HR
(1998)
Identification of amino acids in the binding pocket of the human KDEL receptor.
J Biol Chem
273:2467-2472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Schuldiner S,
Shirvan A,
Linial M
(1995)
Vesicular neurotransmitter transporters: from bacteria to humans.
Physiol Rev
75:369-392[Free Full Text].
-
Smiley JF,
Goldman-Rakic PS
(1996)
Serotonergic axons in monkey prefrontal cerebral cortex synapse predominantly on interneurons as demonstrated by serial section electron microscopy. J Comp.
Neurol
367:431-443.
-
Song HJ,
Ming GL,
Fon E,
Bellocchio E,
Edwards RH,
Poo MM
(1997)
Expression of a putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter facilitates quantal transmitter packaging.
Neuron
18:815-826[ISI][Medline].
-
Spicher K,
Nürnberg B,
Jäger B,
Rosenthal W,
Schultz G
(1992)
Heterogeneity of three electrophoretically distinct Go
-subunits in mammalian brain.
FEBS Lett
307:215-218[ISI][Medline]. -
Townsend Jr CM,
Ishizuka J,
Thomplson JC
(1993)
Studies of growth regulation in a neuroendocrine cell line.
Acta Oncol
32:125-130[ISI][Medline].
-
Uhl GR,
Walther D,
Mash D,
Faucheux B,
Javoy-Agid F
(1994)
|