Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 15, 2001, 21(12):4390-4399
G
olf Levels Are Regulated by Receptor Usage and
Control Dopamine and Adenosine Action in the Striatum
Denis
Hervé1,
Catherine
Le Moine2,
Jean-Christophe
Corvol1,
Leonardo
Belluscio3,
Catherine
Ledent4,
Allen A.
Fienberg5,
Mohamed
Jaber6,
Jeanne-Marie
Studler1, and
Jean-Antoine
Girault1
1 Institut National de la Santé et de la
Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U536, Institut du Fer à Moulin,
75005 Paris, France, 2 Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique Unité Mixte 5541, Laboratoire
d'Histologie-Embryologie, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France, 3 Department of Neurobiology,
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, 4 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie
Humaine et Nucléaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles,
Campus Erasme, B-1070 Bruxelles, Belgium, 5 Laboratory of
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Rockefeller University, New
York, New York 10021, and 6 INSERM U259, Institut
François Magendie, Université Bordeaux II, 33077 Bordeaux
cedex, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
In the striatum, dopamine D1 and adenosine
A2A receptors stimulate the production of cAMP, which is
involved in neuromodulation and long-lasting changes in gene expression
and synaptic function. Positive coupling of receptors to adenylyl
cyclase can be mediated through the ubiquitous GTP-binding protein
G
S subunit or through the olfactory isoform,
G
olf, which predominates in the striatum. In this
study, using double in situ hybridization, we show that virtually all striatal efferent neurons, identified by the expression of preproenkephalin A, substance P, or D1 receptor mRNA,
contained high amounts of G
olf mRNA and undetectable
levels of G
s mRNA. In contrast, the large cholinergic
interneurons contained both G
olf and G
s
transcripts. To assess the functional relationship between dopamine or
adenosine receptors and G-proteins, we examined G-protein levels in the
striatum of D1 and A2A receptor knock-out mice.
A selective increase in G
olf protein was observed in
these animals, without change in mRNA levels. Conversely,
G
olf levels were decreased in animals lacking a
functional dopamine transporter. These results indicate that
G
olf protein levels are regulated through D1
and A2A receptor usage. To determine the functional consequences of changes in G
olf levels, we used
heterozygous G
olf knock-out mice, which possess half of
the normal G
olf levels. In these animals, the locomotor
effects of amphetamine and caffeine, two psychostimulant drugs that
affect dopamine and adenosine signaling, respectively, were markedly
reduced. Together, these results identify G
olf as a
critical and regulated component of both dopamine and adenosine signaling.
Key words:
Golf; Gs; G-protein; D1 receptor; A2A receptor; knock-out mice; striatum; dopamine; adenosine; dopamine transporter; homologous recombination
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The nigrostriatal dopaminergic
neurons are essential for proper motor function in both humans and
rodents. In the dorsal striatum, dopaminergic influence is
predominantly mediated through D1
(D1R) and D2
(D2R) dopamine receptors that stimulate and
inhibit cAMP production, respectively (Sibley and Monsma, 1992
; Jaber
et al., 1996
). cAMP signaling contributes largely to the acute effects of dopamine as well as to long-lasting changes in gene expression and
synaptic plasticity (for review, see Greengard et al., 1999
; Berke and
Hyman, 2000
). In the striatum, D1R and
D2R are enriched in distinct populations of
efferent GABAergic spiny neurons (Gerfen et al., 1990
; Hersch et al.,
1995
; Le Moine and Bloch, 1995
; Yung et al., 1996
), although sensitive
measurements reveal some degree of overlap in receptor distribution
(Surmeier et al., 1996
). The D1R-enriched
population, referred to as striatonigral, projects to the substantia
nigra pars reticulata and to the entopeduncular nucleus and contains
substance P and dynorphin as cotransmitters, whereas the
D2R-enriched population, referred to as
striatopallidal, projects to the external globus pallidus and contains
enkephalins (Beckstead and Cruz, 1986
; Gerfen and Young, 1988
; Gerfen
et al., 1990
; Le Moine et al., 1990
, 1991
; Le Moine and Bloch, 1995
). In the striatopallidal neurons, which possess little or no
D1R, adenosine A2A
receptors (A2ARs) are the main receptor type
stimulating the cAMP production (Premont et al., 1977
; Schiffmann et
al., 1991
; Svenningsson et al., 1997
). Because of this "strategic" location, A2ARs are potential therapeutic targets
for treating psychosis and Parkinson's disease (Ledent et al., 1997
;
Svenningsson et al., 1999
).
In spite of the strong effects of D1R and
A2AR on cAMP production, the striatum contains
small amounts of G
s, the G-protein subunit
responsible for adenylyl cyclase stimulation in most cell types, but
high concentrations of the olfactory isoform
G
olf (Drinnan et al., 1991
; Herve et al.,
1993
). G
olf shares 80% amino acid identity
with G
s and mediates olfactory receptor
signaling in the olfactory epithelium (Jones and Reed, 1989
; Belluscio
et al., 1998
). Cocaine responses are abolished in
G
olf knock-out mice, indicating that
G
olf may be necessary for dopamine action (Zhuang et al., 2000
), and recent data provide strong evidence that
G
olf couples A2AR to
adenylyl cyclase (Kull et al., 2000
). Moreover, we have shown that
D1R- and A2AR-stimulated
cAMP production is blocked in the striatum of
G
olf knock-out mice (Corvol et al., 2001
).
The first aim of the present study was to characterize in detail the
cellular localization of G
s and
G
olf in the striatum using in situ
hybridization. We then examined the functional relationship between
striatal G
olf levels and dopamine or adenosine
transmission, using mutant mice in which the genes for
D1R, A2AR, or dopamine transporter (DAT) are disrupted. Finally, we examined the functional consequences of decreasing G
olf levels, by
measuring the locomotor responses to amphetamine and caffeine in mice,
which have reduced levels of G
olf. Our results
indicate thus that G
olf is a crucial site for
the regulation of D1R and
A2AR efficacy in the striatum and a potential
locus for dysfunction in dopamine and adenosine neurotransmission.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Tissue preparation for in situ
hybridization. Brains from adult male Sprague Dawley rats
(200-280 gm; Centre d'élevage Janvier, Le Genest.
Saint-Isle, France) were dissected out, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sectioned at the level of the striatum following the
atlas of Swanson (1992)
into 10-µm-thick sections that were stored at
80°C until use. All experiments were performed in
accordance with the guidelines of the French Agriculture and Forestry
Ministry for handling animals (decree 87849, license 01499) and with
the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique approval.
Probe synthesis. 35S-labeled or
digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probes were prepared by in vitro
transcription from rat or mouse (G
s) cDNA
clones corresponding to fragments of G
olf,
G
s, preproenkephalin A (Yoshikawa et al.,
1984
), substance P (Bonner et al., 1987
), D1R
(Monsma et al., 1990
), and choline acetyltransferase (Ibanez et al.,
1991
) cDNAs. The G
olf cDNA clone corresponded
to the clone 8 described by Herve et al. (1995)
, and the
G
s cDNA clone corresponded to the most 3' 550 bp fragment of the murine G
s cDNA sequence
(Sullivan et al., 1986
). The sequence identity between G
olf and G
s probes
was <30%. Transcription was performed from 50 ng of linearized
plasmid using either 35S-UTP (>1000
Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science, Paris, France) or digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche
Diagnostic, Meylan, France) and SP6, T3, or T7 RNA polymerases as
described (Le Moine and Bloch, 1995
). After alkaline hydrolysis to
obtain cRNA fragments of ~250 bp, the
35S-labeled probes were purified on
Sephadex-G50. The 35S-labeled purified
probes and the digoxigenin-labeled probes were precipitated in 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5, and absolute ethanol (0.1/2.5 vol).
In situ hybridization: single detection of
G
olf and
G
s mRNAs on cryostat sections.
Cryostat sections were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 5 min at room temperature, rinsed twice in 4× SSC, and placed into
0.25% acetic anhydride with 0.1 M
triethanolamine in 4× SSC, pH 8, for 10 min at room temperature. After
dehydration, the sections were hybridized overnight at 55°C under
coverslips with 106 cpm of
35S-labeled G
olf
or G
s cRNA probes in 50 µl of hybridization
solution (20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 50%
formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1× Denhardt's reagent, 250 µg/ml
yeast tRNA, 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 100 mM
DTT, 0.1% SDS, and 0.1% sodium thiosulfate). Coverslips were removed
by rinsing in 4× SSC. After 20 min of RNase A treatment (20 µg/ml)
at 37°C, the sections were washed sequentially in 2× SSC (5 min,
twice), 1× SSC (5 min), 0.5× SSC (5 min) at room temperature, and
rinsed in 0.1× SSC at 65°C (30 min, twice) before dehydration (the
latter SSC washes contained 1 mM DTT). Sections
were used to expose x-ray films (Kodak Biomax; Eastman Kodak,
Rochester, NY) for 3-6 d, and then dipped into Ilford K5 emulsion
(diluted 1:3 in 1× SSC), which was developed after an 8 week
exposition and stained with toluidine blue.
In situ hybridization: simultaneous detection of two mRNAs on the
same sections. Different combinations of cRNA probes were used for
the simultaneous detection of two mRNAs on the same sections. Cryostat
sections were post-fixed, acetylated, and dehydrated as described
above. Combinations of 35S- and
digoxigenin-labeled probes (106 cpm of
35S-labeled probe plus 10-20 ng of
digoxigenin-labeled probe) were hybridized in the same hybridization
solution as described above. After elimination of coverslips, the
slides were treated with RNase A and washed in decreasing
concentrations of SSC as mentioned above, but without DTT. At the end
of the washes, the slides were cooled in 0.1× SSC at room temperature
and then processed directly for detection of the digoxigenin signal.
The sections were rinsed twice for 5 min in buffer A (1 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris, and 2 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5), and then
for 30 min in buffer A containing 3% normal goat serum and 0.3%
Triton X-100. After a 5 hr incubation at room temperature with alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antiserum (1:1000 in buffer A
containing 3% normal goat serum and 0.3% Triton X-100; Roche
Diagnostic), the sections were rinsed twice 5 min in buffer A, twice 10 min in 1 M STM buffer (1 M
NaCl, 0.1 M Tris, and 5 mM
MgCl2, pH 9.5), and twice for 10 min in 0.1 M STM buffer (0.1 M NaCl,
0.1 M Tris, and 5 mM
MgCl2, pH 9.5). The sections were then incubated
overnight in the dark at room temperature in 0.1 M STM buffer containing 0.34 mg/ml nitroblue tetrazolium and 0.18 mg/ml bromo-chloro-indolylphosphate. The sections
were rinsed briefly in 0.1 M STM buffer and 2 hr
in 1× SSC, dried, and dipped into Ilford K5 emulsion (diluted 1:3 in 1× SSC). After being exposed 10-14 weeks in the dark, the emulsions were developed, and the sections were mounted without counterstaining. Labeled neurons both from single-labeling and double-labeling experiments were counted on sections from three different animals as
previously described on similar material (Le Moine and Bloch, 1995
).
Mutant mice. Pairs of heterozygous mice with a disrupted
gene of G
olf (Belluscio et al., 1998
) and a
hybrid 129 and C57Bl/6 genetic background were crossed. The genomic DNA
of the progeny was extracted from tail tissue, digested by
HindIII, and hybridized with a G
olf
probe corresponding 1.2 kb Pst/Kpn fragment of mouse G
olf gene located 0.5 kb upstream to the ATG
codon translational start site. The probe hybridizes with fragments of
2.8 kb when the gene is mutated or 15 kb fragments in wild-type
(Belluscio et al., 1998
). Pairs of heterozygous mice bearing a null
mutation for D1R or DAT gene and having a hybrid
129 and C57BL/6 genetic background were mated to obtain wild-type and
homozygous mutant mice and were typed by Southern blot, as described by
Drago et al. (1994)
or by Giros et al. (1996)
. Male wild-type controls and homozygous A2AR (Ledent et al., 1997
) or CB1
cannabinoid receptor (Ledent et al., 1999
) knock-out mice used for the
experiments were cousins, and their common grandparents were
heterozygous mutant mice backcrossed on CD1 background for 10 generations. Mice were kept in stable conditions of temperature
(22°C) and humidity (60%) with a constant cycle of 12 hr light and
dark and had ad libitum access to food and water.
G
protein antibodies. Specific antibodies
against G
olf (SL48SP) were obtained by
immunizing a rabbit against a recombinant G
olf
protein and by purifying the obtained serum with
G
olf and G
s columns,
as described previously (Corvol et al., 2001
). Specific antibodies
against G
s (SL22AP) were raised against a
G
s-selective peptide and affinity-purified on
a peptide column (Penit-Soria et al., 1997
). The other antibodies were
mouse monoclonal antibodies from commercial sources against
G
o (clone L5.6; Neomarkers, Union City, CA),
G
i2 (clone 2A.3; Neomarkers), and G
(clone
3, Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY).
Immunoblot analysis. Wild-type and mutant mice (2-10 month
old, age-matched) were killed by decapitation, and their brains were
immediately dissected out from the skull and frozen on dry ice.
Microdiscs of tissue were punched out from frozen slices (500-µm-thick) within the striatum using a stainless steel cylinder (1.4 mm diameter). Samples were homogenized in 1% SDS, equalized for
their content in protein, and analyzed by Western blot as described
previously (Herve et al., 1993
). Antibody dilutions were 1:1000, 1:500,
1:300, 1:600, and 1:1000 for antibodies against G
olf, G
s,
G
i2, G
o, and G
,
respectively. Antibodies were revealed by the
peroxidase-chemiluminescence method (ECL; Amersham, Orsay, France) and
autoradiography. The antibodies were stripped one or two times to
detect other antigens on the same membranes (Erickson et al., 1982
;
Herve et al., 1993
). Quantification was performed by optical density
measurement on autoradiographic films using a computer-assisted
densitometer and the NIH Image software. In each membrane, samples from
control and mutant mice were alternatively loaded, and the results were
normalized as percentage of the mean of controls in each membrane.
cDNA probes and Northern analysis. The
G
olf cDNA probe corresponded to a PCR fragment
containing the 1156 bp of the coding region of rat cDNA clone (Jones
and Reed, 1989
; Herve et al., 1995
) and the G
s
probe was the same as described above. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) probe was a 1.3 kbp full length of rat GAPDH cDNA
(Fort et al., 1985
). Total RNA was extracted by the guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987
)
from tissue microdiscs taken on frozen slices, and Northern blots were
generated as previously described (Herve et al., 1993
). The filters
were hybridized successively with G
olf,
G
s, and GAPDH probes, with a dehybridation
step between two hybridations consisting in the incubation of membrane
in boiling 0.5% SDS. Radioactivity of positive bands was measured
using Instant Imager (Packard, Downers Groves, IL).
G
olf and G
s mRNA
concentrations were expressed as the counts per minute ratio of
G
olf/GAPDH and G
s/GAPDH, respectively.
(3H)SCH23390,
(125I)iodosulpride,
(3H)CGS21680, and
(3H)WIN35428 binding. Twenty
micrometer coronal brain sections from three adult heterozygous
G
olf +/
mice and three wild-type littermates
were thaw-mounted onto SuperFrost microscope slides.
D1R, D2R,
A2AR, and DATs were analyzed by incubating the
tissue sections with 2.5 nM
(3H)SCH23390 (91 Ci/mmol), 0.2 nM
(125I)iodosulpride (2000 Ci/mmol), 5 nM (3H)CGS21680 (47 Ci/mmol,) and 4 nM
(3H)WIN35428 (86 Ci/mmol), respectively,
in conditions as previously described (Bouthenet et al., 1987
; Savasta
et al., 1988
; Jarvis and Williams, 1989
; Herbert et al., 1999
). The
radioligands were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Saclay,
France) or from NEN (Boston, MA). Nonspecific binding was determined
from adjacent brain sections in the presence of 1 µM SCH23390, 10 µM
sulpiride, 10 µM CGS21680, and 30 µM benztropine for blocking
D1R, D2R,
A2AR, and DATs, respectively. After washing in
ice-cold buffer, brain sections were rapidly dried and used to expose
tritium-sensitive film (Hyperfilm 3H;
Amersham). In autoradiographs, the binding in caudate putamen and
nucleus accumbens was evaluated by measuring the optical density with a
computer-assisted image analyzer and the NIH image software, and the
data were expressed in femtomoles of bound ligand per milligram of
tissue using standards (3H-microscales;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Locomotor activity. Male heterozygous
G
olf +/
mice and wild-type littermates were
introduced in a circular corridor (4.5 cm width, 17 cm external
diameter) crossed by four infrared beams (1.5 cm above the base) placed
at every 90° (Imetronic, Pessac, France). The locomotion was counted
when the animals interrupted two successive beams and, thus, had
traveled one-fourth of the circular corridor. In each session, the
spontaneous activity was recorded for 50 min, before the animals were
injected with saline or drugs, and their activity was recorded for an
additional 60 or 120 min period. In the two first sessions, the animals
received saline injections (5 ml/kg, i.p.), and in the third session,
they received amphetamine (1, 2, or 3 mg/kg, i.p) or caffeine (25 mg/kg, i.p.) dissolved in saline. For each session an equal number of heterozygous and wild-type mice was studied, and for each drug treatment, groups of 7-14 animals were compared. The tests were performed between 12:00 and 6:00 P.M. in stable conditions of temperature and humidity.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of striatal neurons expressing G
s
and G
olf mRNAs
As previously reported (Drinnan et al., 1991
; Herve et al., 1993
;
Kull et al., 2000
), the striatum was the brain region in which the
contrast between the levels of G
s and
G
olf mRNAs was the most dramatic (Fig.
1). At low magnification, high levels of
G
olf mRNAs were observed in all the striatal
areas, including caudate putamen (Cp), nucleus accumbens (NA), and
olfactory tubercle (OT) (Fig. 1A,C,E,G), which
appeared almost devoid of G
s mRNAs (Fig.
1D,F). A strong signal for both
G
olf and G
s was
detected in a few regions, including piriform cortex (Pir), islands of Calleja, medial habenula (Hb), and dentate gyrus (DG) (Fig.
1A-H), whereas in most other brain areas an
intense labeling for G
s mRNAs was associated
with low or no labeling for G
olf mRNA (Fig. 1A-H). The use of sense probes showed no
labeling for either G
olf (Fig. 1I)
or G
s (Fig. 1J) mRNAs.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Distribution of G olf and
G s mRNAs in forebrain. Negative of x-ray films exposed
to rat brain adjacent sections hybridized with 35S-labeled
probes for G olf and G s mRNAs.
A, C, E, G,
G olf mRNA was highly expressed in striatal areas,
including caudate putamen, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle
(C, E, G). A signal was
also found in the piriform cortex, the islands of Calleja, the medial
habenula, and the dentate gyrus (A, C,
E, G). All the other areas showed very
low or no labeling for G olf mRNA. B,
D, F, H, On the contrary,
G s mRNA was highly expressed in many brain areas
including all cortical areas, septum, globus pallidus, most of the
hypothalamic and thalamic nuclei, hippocampus, and amygdala
(B, D, F,
H). Caudate putamen, nucleus accumbens, and
olfactory tubercles showed almost no labeling, except for some sparse
neurons (D, F). A total absence of labeling was
observed in control experiments using sense probes for
G olf and G s mRNAs (I,
J). Cp, Caudate putamen;
NA, nucleus accumbens; OT, olfactory
tubercle; GP, globus pallidus; Hb, medial
habenula; DG, dentate gyrus; Pir,
piriform cortex. Scale bar, 5 mm.
|
|
At the cellular level G
olf mRNA was expressed
in 96.5 ± 1.3% (n = 1250) of the striatal
neurons, mostly medium-sized. Conversely, G
s
mRNA-positive neurons were scattered all over the striatal areas,
including 13.4 ± 1.2% (n = 1300) of the caudate
putamen neurons, from which approximately one-third were large-sized. Double-labeling experiments were performed using various combinations of G
olf and G
s probes
labeled with 35S or digoxigenin. Virtually
all G
s mRNA-positive neurons expressed G
olf mRNA levels above background, whereas
G
olf mRNA was present in numerous neurons with
no labeling for G
s mRNA (Fig.
2A,B). In particular,
G
olf mRNA was present in almost all striatal
medium-sized neurons, very few of which also expressed high levels of
G
s mRNA (Fig. 2B, arrow).
Simultaneous detection of G
olf mRNA and
D1R mRNA showed that virtually all cells
expressing D1R mRNA were positive for
G
olf mRNA (Fig. 2C, arrows).
However, approximately half of G
olf-positive
neurons did not contain D1R mRNA (Fig. 2C, white arrowheads). Large-sized neurons were
positive for both G
olf and
G
s (Fig. 2B, arrowhead).
These large neurons, which contained G
olf
mRNA, as well as G
s mRNA, were cholinergic
interneurons, as demonstrated with a digoxigenin-labeled probe for
choline acetyltransferase mRNA (Fig. 2D,E,
arrows).

View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Phenotypical characterization of striatal neurons
expressing G olf and G s mRNAs.
Double-labeling in situ hybridization of rat brain
sections was performed with various combinations of
35S-labeled probes (indicated by asterisks
in the figure) and digoxigenin-labeled probes. In all photomicrographs,
silver grains for 35S-labeling are visualized using
epi-illumination and appear as bright yellow grains,
whereas digoxigenin labeling appears as purple staining.
A, Most G olf-positive neurons
(silver grains) did not contain G s mRNA
(digoxigenin), which was present in only a few large- or medium-sized
neurons (which also contained G olf mRNA;
35S, arrows). B, The reverse
combination of probe labeling showed that G olf mRNA
(digoxigenin) was present in numerous medium-sized neurons, few of
which also expressed significant levels of G s mRNA
(35S, arrow). Most of the large-sized
neurons contained both mRNAs (arrowhead).
C, Simultaneous detection of G olf mRNA
(digoxigenin) and D1R mRNA (silver grains)
showed that G olf mRNA was colocalized with
D1R mRNA (arrows), but approximately half of
G olf mRNA-positive neurons did not contain
D1R mRNA (white arrowheads).
D, E, Double labeling for choline
acetyltransferase mRNA (digoxigenin) and G olf mRNA
(35S; D) or G s mRNA
(35S; E). Both G olf and
G s mRNAs were present in choline
acetyltransferase-positive large neurons (arrows).
Numerous medium-sized neurons expressed only G olf mRNA
(D, white arrowhead), whereas very few expressed
G s mRNA (E, white arrowhead).
F, G, Double labeling for PPA
(digoxigenin) and G olf mRNA (35S;
F) or G s mRNA (35S;
G). H, I, Double labeling
for substance P mRNA (SP; digoxigenin) and G olf mRNA
(35S; H) or G s mRNA
(35S; I). G olf mRNA
was present both in preproenkephalin A-positive (F,
arrows) and substance P-positive (H, arrows)
neurons, as well as in negative cells (F, H, silver
grains). G s mRNA was mainly absent in these
digoxigenin-labeled neurons (G, I, arrows). Scale bar,
12 µm.
|
|
In the dorsal striatum, the striatopallidal and striatonigral
medium-sized spiny neurons were identified using digoxigenin-labeled probes for preproenkephalin A mRNA (PPA) (Fig. 2F,G)
or for substance P mRNA (SP) (Fig. 2H,I),
respectively. G
olf mRNA
(35S-labeled probe) was present in both
preproenkephalin A- and substance P mRNA-containing neurons (Fig.
2F,H, arrows), whereas the levels of silver grains
for G
s mRNA
(35S-labeled probe) in these neurons were
close to background (Fig. 2G,I, arrows).
Alterations of striatal G-protein levels in mice lacking
D1 receptors
Previous studies had shown that destruction of dopamine
neurons resulted in an increase in G
olf
protein levels (Herve et al., 1993
; Marcotte et al., 1994
; Penit-Soria
et al., 1997
). The simplest explanation of these observations was that
the increase in G
olf was the consequence of
the chronic absence of dopamine receptor stimulation. We therefore
examined whether the complete absence of D1R was
able to alter G
olf, using mice in which the D1R gene had been disrupted (Drago et al., 1994
).
As shown in Figure 3, the striatal
G
olf concentrations were higher in mutant mice
than in wild-type littermates, whereas the levels of other G-protein
subunits G
s, G
o,
and G
i2 were not altered (Fig. 3A,B). The levels of G
subunit were also significantly
increased in D1R knock-out animals (Fig.
3A,B), probably reflecting the stoichiometric increase in
G
subunits participating in heterotrimeric complexes with
G
olf. The lower increase in G
(+36 ± 5%) than in G
olf (+80 ± 10%) levels
can be accounted for by the association of G
subunits with other
subunits, which remained unaffected. Interestingly, a slight but
significant increase in G
olf protein was also
detected in the striatum of heterozygous animals having only one null
allele for the D1R gene (116 ± 5% of
wild-type; n = 15; p < 0.05), whereas
G
s protein levels were unchanged in these
animals (103 ± 5% of controls).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Levels of G-proteins in the striatum of
D1 receptor knock-out mice. A, Western blot
analysis of representative striatal homogenates from D1R
knock-out (D1R / ) mice or wild-type controls
(D1R +/+), with antibodies that recognize specifically
G olf, G s,
G i2, and G . B, The optical
density of immunoreactive bands was quantified on films and normalized
taking as 100% of the mean optical density of controls on each film
(see Materials and Methods). Results correspond to the mean ± SEM
of data obtained in 6-16 animals studied in three independent
experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by two-tailed Student's t test.
C, Northern analysis of RNA isolated from the striata of
D1R knock-out (D1R / ) mice and wild-type
control (D1R +/+) mice. In each lane, the amounts of
32P-labeled G olf,
G s, and GAPDH probes bound to the membranes were
measured with an Instant Imager. The levels of G olf and
G s mRNA were normalized to those of GAPDH mRNA and were
expressed as a percentage of mean value measured in wild-type controls
(n = 14-16).
|
|
We examined G
olf mRNA levels by Northern blot
to determine whether the increase in G
olf
protein observed in the striatum of mutant mice resulted from an
increase in the transcription of the G
olf gene
and/or a stabilization of its transcript (Fig. 3C). At least
two species of G
olf mRNA were detected in the
striatum of wild-type and mutant mice resulting from variations in the length of 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions of
G
olf mRNAs, as described previously (Herve et
al., 1995
). When we measured the total amount of radioactive probe
hybridized with all the G
olf mRNA species in
Northern blots, the concentration of G
olf
transcripts was not significantly different in the striatum of
D1R
/
mutant mice or wild-type mice (Fig.
3C). When radioactivity was measured independently for the
two main bands, no significant variation was observed in the striatum
of D1R-deficient mice, suggesting that the size
pattern of G
olf mRNA was unaffected in these
mice (data not shown). Thus, the increase in
G
olf protein observed in the striatum of
D1R
/
mutant mice was not the consequence of
alterations in G
olf mRNA levels.
G
s mRNA concentrations were also not
significantly altered in the striatum of D1R
knock-out mice (Fig. 3C).
Alterations of striatal G
olf protein levels in mice
lacking dopamine transporter
The results obtained in D1R-deficient mice,
as well as previous experiments using dopamine-depleted animals,
indicated that an impairment in dopamine transmission could increase
the levels of G
olf in the striatum. To test if
constitutive upregulation of dopamine neurotransmission could affect
G
olf in the opposite direction, we examined
the striatal concentrations of G
olf in mutant
mice lacking DAT, responsible for the largest part of dopamine clearance from the extracellular space (Giros et al., 1996
). The levels
of G
olf, but not G
s,
were decreased in the striatum of these mice (Fig.
4). Thus, the chronic increase in the
stimulation of D1R on the one hand, and the
absence of D1R or of dopamine stimulation on the
other hand, altered G
olf protein levels in opposite directions.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Levels of G olf and
G s proteins in the striatum of dopamine transporter
knock-out mice. A, Western blot analysis of
representative striatal homogenates from DAT knock-out mice (DAT / )
or wild-type littermates (DAT +/+). Blots were incubated with
antibodies that recognize specifically G olf or
G s. B, The optical density of
immunoreactive bands was quantified on films as in Figure
3B (n = 8; *p < 0.02; two-tailed Student's t test).
|
|
Alterations of striatal G
olf protein levels in mice
lacking A2A receptors
Because G
olf was expressed in neurons
containing A2AR and because the lack of
G
olf abolished the cAMP production induced by
an A2 agonist (Corvol et al., 2001
), we examined whether the absence of
A2AR could alter G
olf
levels in a manner similar to D1R. To evaluate
this possibility, we measured G
olf protein and other G-protein subunits in the striatum of mutant mice lacking A2AR (Ledent et al., 1997
). By comparison to
wild-type controls, an increase in G
olf
protein levels was observed in A2AR knock-out mice, whereas G
s, G
o,
and G
i2 subunits were not significantly altered in the same striatal samples (Fig.
5A,B). In contrast to what was
seen in D1R knock-out mice, no change in striatal concentrations of G
was detected in A2AR
knock-out mice (Fig. 5B). This may be attributable to the
fact that the increase in the concentration of
G
olf was less pronounced than in
D1R
/
mice, and not sufficient to enhance
significantly the total levels of G
. As in the case of
D1R, the total amounts of
G
olf and G
s mRNA
(Fig. 5C) and the expression pattern of the various forms of
G
olf mRNA (data not shown) were not altered in
A2AR knock-out mice.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Levels of G-proteins in striatum of
A2A receptor knock-out mice. A, Western blot
analysis of representative striatal homogenates from A2AR
knock-out mice (A2AR / ) or wild-type controls
(A2AR +/+), with antibodies that recognize specifically
G olf, G s, and
G o. B, The optical density of
immunoreactive bands was quantified on films as in Figure
3B (n = 4-7; *p < 0.01; two-tailed Student's t test).
C, Northern analysis of RNA isolated from the striata of
A2AR knock-out (A2AR / ) mice and wild-type
control (A2AR +/+) mice. Results were obtained as described
in the legend to C (n = 10-11).
|
|
The observed increases in G
olf protein levels
seen in D1R and A2AR
knock-out mice could be an unspecific consequence of the absence of any
G-protein-coupled receptor. To rule out this possibility, we measured
the G-protein subunits levels in knock-out mice lacking CB1 cannabinoid
receptors, which are expressed at very high levels in medium-sized
spiny neurons, but are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase unlike
the D1R and A2AR (Ledent et
al., 1999
). The lack of expression of CB1 receptors in the striatum
induced no significant modification in the striatal concentrations of
G
olf (93 ± 5% of wild-type;
n = 4). The striatal levels of
G
s, G
o,
G
i1, G
i2, and G
subunits were also unchanged in these mice (data not shown). It is
noteworthy that the deficiency in functional D2R
was reported to have no influence on G
olf mRNA
expression in the striatum (Zahniser et al., 2000
).
Locomotor responses to amphetamine and caffeine in mice
heterozygous for a null mutation of G
olf
Because alterations of dopamine or adenosine transmission affected
G
olf levels, we investigated whether changes
in G-protein levels could have functional consequences on behavioral
responses mediated through D1R and
A2AR. In the striatum of mice heterozygous for a
null mutation of G
olf gene
(G
olf +/
), the levels of
G
olf were approximately half of those in
wild-type mice, and the D1R- and
A2AR-stimulated adenylyl cyclase responses were
significantly reduced (Corvol et al., 2001
). Thus, these mice provided
an excellent model to test the effects of reduced amounts of
G
olf, such as those observed in DAT-deficient
mice, without the interference of other alterations of dopamine neurotransmission.
We examined the locomotor activity of G
olf
+/
mice and wild-type littermates in response to
D-amphetamine and caffeine, two drugs whose actions depend
on D1R and A2AR,
respectively (Crawford et al., 1997
; Ledent et al., 1997
). The
locomotor activity of mice was tested in three sessions, in which their
basal activity was first monitored (Fig.
6A). During the second
and third sessions, G
olf +/
mice had a
slightly lower spontaneous activity than wild-type littermates (Fig.
6A). The response to drugs was studied during the
third session. When G
olf +/
mice were
challenged with 1, 2, or 3 mg/kg of D-amphetamine
(Fig. 6B) or with 25 mg/kg of caffeine (Fig.
6C), their locomotor activity was stimulated but remained
significantly lower than that of wild-type mice receiving the same
treatments (Fig. 6B,C). Interestingly, the slight
increase in locomotor activity induced by saline injection was also
decreased in G
olf +/
mice (Fig.
6B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Effects of amphetamine and caffeine on the
locomotor activity of G olf +/ mice. The horizontal
activity of male heterozygous (G olf +/ ) and wild-type
(G olf +/+) mice was measured in three sessions. In each
session, animals were allowed to habituate to the testing apparatus for
50 min and received saline injections in the two first sessions and
amphetamine (1, 2, or 3 mg/kg) or caffeine (25 mg/kg) in the third
session. A, Spontaneous activity of G olf
+/ and G olf +/+ mice during the 50 min habituation
period in the three sessions. Activities were significantly lower in
mutant mice during sessions 2 and 3 (two-way ANOVA;
F(1,260) = 22.3 and
F(1,260) = 33.1, respectively;
p < 0.001). B, Effects of
amphetamine or saline injections on the locomotor activity of
G olf +/ mice. Data for saline correspond to the
results obtained in the second session. C, Effects of
caffeine on the locomotor activity of G olf +/ mice.
The results are the mean ± SEM of data obtained with 7-14
animals. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, significantly different from wild-type controls with the same
treatment.
|
|
In G
olf +/
mice, the alterations in
responses to amphetamine and caffeine were not caused by changes in
D1R, D2R, or
A2AR levels in the caudate putamen or nucleus
accumbens because the binding of
(3H)SCH23390,
(125I)iodosulpride, and
(3H)CGS21680 was unchanged in these brain
regions (Fig. 7). The measurements of the
(3H)WIN35428 binding in the caudate
putamen and nucleus accumbens of G
olf +/
mice (Fig. 7) indicated also a normal density of DAT, which is known to
be crucial for the psychostimulant effect of D-amphetamine
in mouse (Giros et al., 1996
).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Lack of change in D1,
D2, and A2A receptors and
in dopamine transporter in the caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens of
heterozygous G olf knock-out mice. Coronal
brain sections at the level of the striatum were incubated with
(3H)SCH23390,
(125I)iodosulpride,
(3H)CGS21680, or
(3H)WIN35428 to analyze the
D1R, D2R,
A2AR, and DAT, respectively. The optical
densities in the caudate putamen and the nucleus accumbens were
measured in at least six different sections in each mouse and compared
with standards. The results correspond to the mean ± SEM of data
obtained in three mutant mice and three wild-type
littermates. Scale bar, 5 mm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Neuronal expression of G
olf and G
s in
the striatum
Receptor-regulated production of cAMP in the striatum plays a
central role in the physiology of the basal ganglia as well as in the
long-term modifications that take place after repeated administration
of drugs of abuse (for review, see Greengard et al., 1999
; Berke and
Hyman, 2000
). The striatum contains high levels of
G
olf and very low levels of
G
s (Drinnan et al., 1991
; Herve et al., 1993
).
Recent studies have demonstrated the role of
G
olf in receptor-regulated cAMP production of
the striatum and its functional consequences (Zhuang et al., 2000
;
Corvol et al., 2001
). We confirm here that most medium-sized neurons,
which correspond to GABAergic output spiny neurons and represent the vast majority of striatal neurons (Kemp and Powell, 1971
), express G
olf and very little or no
G
s transcripts (Kull et al., 2000
). In the rat
dorsal striatum these output neurons are divided in two
populations identified on the basis of the neuropeptides they express
(Gerfen and Young, 1988
). We found that G
olf
mRNA was expressed in both types of neurons, which did not contain
significant amounts of G
s mRNA. Moreover,
D1R-positive neurons expressed G
olf transcripts, but no detectable
G
s. The rare medium-sized neurons containing
G
s mRNA also expressed
G
olf in double-labeling experiments. Because
substance P- or preproenkephalin A-positive neurons did not express
G
s, the medium-sized neurons containing both
G
s and G
olf mRNA are
likely to be aspiny interneurons (Kawaguchi et al., 1995
).
Interestingly, we show here that large-sized cholinergic interneurons,
identified by the presence of choline acetyltransferase mRNAs,
expressed both G
olf and
G
s mRNAs. Striatal cholinergic neurons contain
no A2AR (Svenningsson et al., 1997
), but a few express low amounts of D1R (Le Moine et al.,
1991
; Surmeier et al., 1996
). Recent experiments using in
situ hybridization have also confirmed the presence of
D5 receptor mRNA in these neurons (C. Le
Moine, unpublished data), as previously indicated by single-cell RT-PCR experiments (Yan and Surmeier, 1997
) and an immunohistochemical study in primate (Bergson et al., 1995
). Our results indicate that both
G
olf and G
s may
couple D1R and D5 receptors
to adenylyl cyclase in striatal cholinergic neurons. Thus, it appears
that virtually all the striatal output neurons express only
G
olf, whereas interneurons express both
G
olf and G
s. The
presence of G
olf transcripts, but not of
G
s, in D1R- and
A2AR-rich output neurons, accounts for the fact
that cAMP formation by stimulation of these receptors was virtually
abolished in G
olf mutant mice (Corvol et al.,
2001
).
Regulation of G
olf levels in mice with genetically
altered D1 or A2A signaling
In a previous study we have shown that the disappearance of
striatal dopamine increased G
olf levels by
40-50% (Herve et al., 1993
; Penit-Soria et al., 1997
). In mutant mice
lacking either D1R or A2AR
we found a selective increase in G
olf protein.
Together these observations reveal that a lack of stimulation of
D1R, as well as the absence of either
D1R or A2AR, result in an
upregulation of G
olf levels, suggesting that
receptor usage may control G
olf levels. This
hypothesis is corroborated by the study of DAT
/
mice, which
provide a model of chronic hyperstimulation of dopamine receptors
in vivo (Giros et al., 1996
). In these mice the levels of
G
olf protein were decreased in the striatum.
These variations are reminiscent, at the level of a G-protein, of the
classical "denervation hypersensitivity" and "agonist-induced
desensitization," well characterized at the level of receptors
(Freedman and Lefkowitz, 1996
; Bloch et al., 1999
).
Our results show that in A2AR and
D1R mutant mice, the changes in
G
olf occur at a post-transcriptional level and
do not result from a change in gene expression. Preliminary evidence
suggests that regulation of G
olf levels may
also be independent of cAMP-regulated protein phosphorylation pathways,
because these levels were unchanged in mice lacking functional DARPP-32
(D. Herve, A. Fienberg, and J. A. Girault, unpublished
observations), a key mediator in striatal cAMP-dependent protein
phosphorylation (Fienberg et al., 1998
). A more attractive possibility
is that alterations in G
olf protein levels
result directly from changes in its rate of activation. This hypothesis
is supported by several cell culture studies on G
s. In NG108-15 cells, stimulation of
receptors activating adenylyl cyclase induced a downregulation of
G
s at a post-translational level, which was
independent of cAMP production (McKenzie and Milligan, 1990
; Adie and
Milligan, 1994
). Similarly, strong activation of
G
s by cholera toxin or by an activating
mutation dramatically decreased its cellular concentration, possibly by
an increased degradation (Levis and Bourne, 1992
; Milligan, 1993
). We
suggest that analogous changes in G
olf
degradation rate may account for the changes in its levels observed
here in vivo. Normal stimulation of
D1R and A2AR by endogenous
dopamine and adenosine would result in a basal rate of
G
olf degradation, which is reduced in mice lacking dopamine or functional D1R or
A2AR. Conversely, in mice lacking DAT,
overstimulation of D1R would increase
G
olf rate of degradation. According to this
hypothesis, the changes in G
olf concentration
are expected to occur only in the striatal cells affected by the
mutation, i.e., striatonigral cells in mice lacking functional
D1R or DAT or striatopallidal cells in mice
lacking functional A2AR.
Role of G
olf in locomotor activity
We have recently shown that reduced levels of
G
olf in heterozygous mutant mice
(G
olf +/
) resulted in a reduced stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by D1R and
A2AR in the striatum (Corvol et al., 2001
). The
present study demonstrates that reduced availability of
G
olf in these mice has also important
functional consequences on spontaneous and drug-stimulated locomotor
activity, revealing a novel phenotype of haplo-insufficiency.
The ventral striatum, including the nucleus accumbens, is involved in
spontaneous and drug-stimulated motor activity (Pennartz et al., 1994
).
A role for D1R in the control of locomotor
activity is supported by several studies. Microinjection of
D1R antagonist in the ventral striatum of rats
reduces their locomotor activity, whereas D1R
agonists have the opposite effect (Meyer, 1993
). Accordingly, the
decreased coupling of D1R to adenylyl cyclase in
the ventral striatum of G
olf +/
mice could
account for their slightly lower locomotor activity. By contrast it
should be noted that an increase in basal activity has been reported in
G
olf
/
mice (Belluscio et al., 1998
;
Zhuang et al., 2000
) and D1R
/
mice (Xu et
al., 1994
). These surprising observations contrasted with the
pharmacological evidence for a stimulatory role on motor activity of
D1R in the nucleus accumbens (Meyer, 1993
; Vezina
et al., 1994
). These paradoxical behavioral effects in
G
olf
/
and D1R
/
mice could be caused by differences in the methods used for measuring
locomotor activity or alternatively may be the consequences of
developmental changes and/or compensatory actions of other
neuromodulatory systems such as serotoninergic or noradrenergic
systems (Tassin et al., 1992
; Trovero et al., 1992
; Gainetdinov
et al., 1999
). Nevertheless, in both G
olf
/
and D1R
/
mice, the locomotor responses
to cocaine or amphetamine are lost, unambiguously showing that both G
olf and D1R are
necessary for the locomotor responses induced by these psychostimulants
(Xu et al., 1994
; Crawford et al., 1997
; Zhuang et al., 2000
).
Interestingly, the acute effects of D-amphetamine on motor
activity diminished in G
olf +/
mice, further
demonstrating that G
olf levels determine the
amplitude of D1R-mediated responses.
In G
olf +/
mice, the effects of caffeine on
motor activity were reduced, indicating that
G
olf levels are an important factor for
caffeine-induced behavioral response. The psychostimulant effects of
caffeine are mediated through A2AR and are absent
in mutant mice lacking these receptors (El Yacoubi et al., 2000
). Caffeine is a nonselective antagonist of A2AR,
and caffeine could have a reduced effect in
G
olf +/
mice because the ongoing
A2AR signaling, which is produced by endogenous
adenosine, is blunted in these mice. This explanation is likely because
endogenous levels of adenosine are sufficient to cause the activation
of adenosine receptors in brain (for review, see Svenningsson et al.,
1999
). However, D1R activity is required for
caffeine-induced motor effect (Garrett and Holtzman, 1994
), and the
lower D1R signaling in
G
olf +/
mice could also contribute to the
attenuation of caffeine effects. Further experiments are needed to
explore the respective contribution of these two mechanisms, both
leading to a diminished effect of caffeine.
Functional implications
The present study demonstrates that experimental alterations in
G
olf concentrations affect two important types
of neurotransmission in basal ganglia and provides strong evidence that
G
olf levels in striatal neurons are regulated
in vivo by its use. Whereas much effort has been devoted to
understand desensitization and downregulation of G-protein-coupled
receptors in vitro and in vivo (Freedman and
Lefkowitz, 1996
; Bloch et al., 1999
), little is known about the
regulations that take place at the level of G-proteins. Our previous
results in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, as well as the present
results in mice with genetically altered neurotransmission, show that a
loss of D1R activation or the absence of
D1R or A2AR result in an
upregulation of G
olf. Thus,
G
olf constitutes an attractive locus for the
regulation of D1R and A2AR
signaling in the striatum, either by modulation of its levels, or,
possibly, by functionally relevant post-translational modifications.
Alterations in G
olf levels and/or activity are parameters that will have to be carefully considered in the function of
the basal ganglia in physiological and pathological conditions. In this
respect, our results introduce G
olf
heterozygous mutant mice as a potential animal model for studying
striatum-dependent behavioral dysfunctions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Jan. 29, 2001; revised March 20, 2001; accepted March 27, 2001.
This work has been supported by Institut National de la Santé et
de la Recherche Médicale, by a grant from Mission
Interministérielle de lutte contre la Drogue et la
Toxicomanie addiction program, and by Grant 97H0003 from
Ministère de Education Nationale de l'Enseignement
Supérieur et de la Recherche. We thank F. Laujay for his
help with in situ hybridization experiments, R. Axel, J. Drago, M. Parmentier, B. Giros, and M. Caron for kindly allowing the
use of G
olf, D1R, A2AR,
and DAT mutant mice, respectively, F. Gonon and E. Borrelli for
providing us with some mutant mice, P. Ingrassia, R. Urbe, and H. Ibrahim for their help with animal breeding, and C. Drouin and J. P. Tassin for their advice about the measure of locomotor activity. We
thank J. Glowinski and his colleagues of INSERM U114 for their support.
Correspondence should be addressed to D. Hervé, INSERM U536,
Collège de France, 11, place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris, France. E-mail: denis.herve{at}infobiogen.fr.