 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 2001, 21(16):6115-6124
Regulation of Dendritic Spine Motility in Cultured
Hippocampal Neurons
Eduard
Korkotian and
Menahem
Segal
Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot 76100, Israel
 |
ABSTRACT |
Regulation of dendritic spine motility was studied in dissociated
cultures of the rat and mouse hippocampus, using green fluorescent protein-labeled neurons or neurons loaded with the calcium-sensitive dye Oregon Green-1. Cells were time-lapse-photographed on a
confocal laser-scanning microscope at high resolution to detect
movements as well as spontaneous fluctuations of intracellular calcium
concentrations in their dendritic spines. Active presynaptic terminals
attached to the spines were labeled with FM4-64, which marks a
subset of synaptophysin-labeled terminals. Dendritic spines were highly motile in young, 4- to 7-d-old cells. At this age, neurons had little
spontaneous calcium fluctuation or FM4-64 labeling. Within 2-3 weeks
in culture, dendritic spines were much less motile, they were
associated with active presynaptic terminals, and they expressed high
rates of spontaneous calcium fluctuations. Irrespective of age, and
even on the same dendrite, there was an inverse relationship between
spine motility and presence of FM4-64-labeled terminals in contact with
the imaged spines. Spine motility was blocked by latrunculin, which
prevents actin polymerization, and was disinhibited by blockade of
action potential discharges with tetrodotoxin. It is proposed that an
active presynaptic terminal restricts motility of dendritic spines.
Key words:
dendritic spines; confocal microscope; EGFP; FM4-64; calcium; actin; latrunculin
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The analysis of the rules that
govern the development of dendritic spines may provide important clues
concerning the role of dendritic spines in neuronal integration, which
has been the focus of numerous studies in recent years. Major issues,
including the role of presynaptic or postsynaptic activity in formation and stabilization of the synapse and the spine are still unsettled. Also, it is not entirely clear if spines are formed first as filopodia and search for a presynaptic partner, followed by formation of synapses
(Jontes and Smith, 2000 ), or if spines are formed from shaft synapses
by emerging after formation of a functional connection (Fiala et al.,
1998 ). In that context, the conditions leading the transformation of a
shaft synapse to a spine synapse are not entirely clear. Recently,
dendritic spines have been shown to express a surprising amount of
actin-dependent local motility not necessarily related to formation or
growth of synapses, or their functioning (Fischer et al., 1998 , 2000 ).
This local motility has been found in different cell types (Dunaevsky
et al., 1999 ) in vitro as well as in vivo
(Lendvai et al. 2000 ). Still, it is not known what regulates this fine
motility or how motility relates to synaptic function. We have analyzed
age-dependent spine motility in dissociated cultured hippocampal
neurons, attempted to correlate it with transient postsynaptic calcium
variations, and with presence of a presynaptic terminal on the imaged
spine. We conclude that spine motility is governed by presynaptic
activity in the developing neuron.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Tissue culture. Prenatal embryonic day 19 (E19) rat
hippocampal neurons were dissociated and plated on polylysine-coated
glass coverslips as described elsewhere (Papa et al., 1995 ; Murphy and Segal, 1996 ). In some experiments, neurons were cultured from the
hippocampus of newborn transgenic mice, expressing enhanced green
fluorescent protein (B5/EGFP; courtesy of J. Pickel, National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD) (Hadjantonakis et al. 1998 ), as described earlier (Goldin
et al. 2001 ). These cells were plated on glia bed and mixed at a ratio
of 1:20 with nonfluorescent rat postnatal day 1 (P1) hippocampal
neurons. Imaging experiments were conducted with 4- to 25-d-old
cultures. A coverslip was transferred from the 24 well plate into the
recording chamber, where it was perfused with recording medium
containing (in mM): NaCl 129, KCl 4, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 2, glucose
4.2, and HEPES 10, pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH, and osmolarity to
320 mOsm with sucrose. The recording chamber was placed on the stage of
an inverted confocal laser-scanning microscope (CLSM 510; Zeiss,
Oberkochen, Germany). Individual pyramidal neurons were impaled
with a micropipette containing Oregon Green (OG)-1 or calcein
(Molecular Probes, Eugene OR; 10 mM stock
solutions) that was iontophoresed into the cell. The pipette was
withdrawn, and the dyes were allowed to equilibrate in the cell for
10-20 min. In the GFP cultures, spiny fluorescent cells were selected
for observation, without their impalement with a micropipette.
Individual dendritic spines were visualized at high power (Zeiss
Plan-apocromat 100×, NA 1.4, or acroplan 63×, NA 0.9), and a
subsection of the image, containing the region of interest of ~5 × 5 µm was imaged at a rate of 5-20 frames/sec. At the end of the
experiment the culture was exposed for 45 sec to a medium containing 90 mM K+ (replacing
equimolar amounts of Na+) and 10 µM FM4-64, and washed thereafter for 15 min with the standard recording medium, which did not contain
Ca2+, to allow the dye to be trapped in
the presynaptic terminals and not be released by spontaneous activity
in the culture. The dendrite-spine segment was imaged again
with two excitation wavelengths, to examine if a presynaptic terminal
is attached to the imaged spine (Ziv and Smith, 1996 ). The presence of
the FM dye in nerve terminals was verified by the observation that
after replacement of the normal medium, trapped FM was released, and
the label disappeared from the terminals within minutes. The two dyes
were excited with two different wavelengths, 488 and 543, respectively,
and care was taken to avoid "bleeding" of fluorescence from one
channel to the other. The two lasers, argon and helium neon,
respectively, were set at a low intensity, 0.1-0.2% of nominal
intensity, to avoid photodynamic damage or bleaching. For that reason,
most of the experiments were conducted at a single image plane.
In some experiments, the culture was fixed with paraformaldehyde (4%)
and immunostained for detection of synaptophysin. The previously
studied, EGFP-labeled neuron was identified, and
synaptophysin-containing puncta were imaged using Alexa 546 nm dye. The
number of FM4-64 terminals was compared with the number of
synaptophysin-containing terminals on the same dendritic branches.
Analysis. Spine motility was quantified by comparing the
position of the spine in space over successive images. Spines could, in
general, elongate, shrink, change diameter, or change position in space
relative to the spine neck-dendrite. To simplify the quantification,
the largest absolute disparity between two images, reflecting the
change in position of the spine in space, was estimated by subtraction
of one image from another. The maximum deflection in 100 sec of
observation was measured for each spine and was expressed in
micrometers per 100 sec. Zeiss-based Image software was used to
standardize the quantification of shape changes. Likewise, the presence
of calcium transients was quantified, counting significant deviations
of fluorescence ( F/F) in the spine and its parent dendrite. Although fluorescence levels were higher during a calcium event, that did not affect the estimation of spine motility, as seen
below. Movements of all the spines of the same age group were averaged.
 |
RESULTS |
EGFP-labeled cells
EGFP-labeled neurons were imaged at 1, 2, and 5 weeks in culture.
The youngest cells had a characteristic simple dendritic tree, with few
secondary dendrites, on which there was a wide range of different
dendritic appendages, from short dendritic spines, to very long, highly
motile dendritic filopodia. A filopodium occasionally ended with a
growth cone-like structure at its tip, which exhibited long movements
including extension and retraction over several minutes of observation.
In the same neurons, dendritic spines, seen as short, 1-2 µm in
length, thick, occasionally with a distinct head, were also highly
motile, expressing pivotal rotations, as well as rapid changes in the
volume of their spine heads (Fig. 1A). These changes in
position of the spine in space were evaluated by subtracting successive
images from each other (Fig. 1A3). Further quantification was conducted with the individually labeled cells (below).

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Age-dependent motility in GFP-containing neurons.
A, P1 cell grown in culture for 6 d expresses
considerable spine motility. Two images on the left are
successive, taken 5 sec apart, showing several dendrites, and spines in
focus on one of them. On the right is a subtracted
image, showing in black and white a
disparity between the two left images, with
gray showing the same position of the dendrite in the
two images. Note that most of the spines stain black or
white and that the parent dendrite is primarily
gray. B, GFP-containing cell, grown for 2 weeks in culture, same series of images as in A. Much
less motility is detected in the subtraction image on the
right. C, Same conditions, 30-d-old
culture, showing mature dendritic spines, expressing little or no
distinct motility. Below, computer-generated contour frames taken from
successive images of the spine shown in C with
arrow, to illustrate little or no lateral motility of
the spine. Scale bars: A-C, 3 µm; C,
bottom, 1 µm.
|
|
Most of the extensive movements subsided in the 2-week-old neurons. At
this age group, there were fewer filopodia, and most of the spines
expressed only subtle vibration-like fast variations in size or
position in space. Little motility of any kind was detected in the 4- to 5-week-old cultures. Thus, even for the same size of spines, they
were far more motile in the 1-week-old cells than in the older ones.
The factors that control spine motility at the different age groups was
further studied in cells injected individually with a fluorescent dye,
as follows.
Age and motility
As seen with the GFP-labeled neurons, cells injected with OG-1
were highly motile in the young cultures compared with their older
counterparts (Fig. 2A).
The magnitude of movement decayed exponentially with time in culture
(Fig. 3A). Because spines were also longer in the younger cultures, this age-dependent motility could
be correlated with the initial size of the spines (Fig. 3B),
thus, the longer the spine, the larger were its movements, and the
relation to age by itself may be trivial. Still, even in the same cell
(Figs. 1, 2A1), short spines could be as motile as
long ones, indicating that size by itself does not determine spine
motility.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Lack of correlation between spine
motility, calcium variations, and afferent innervation. Cells were
loaded individually with a calcium dye, OG-1. At the end of the
observation time, cultures were exposed to the membrane dye FM4-64 to
identify presynaptic terminals. A, Low-power view of a
cell taken from a 2-week-old culture, showing in green
the dendritic field of the cell, soma on the right edge, and in
red, FM4-64 puncta. Scale bar, 10 µm. A1,
A2, High-power images of dendritic segments taken from
A, indicated by arrows (1,
2). Each image is a composite picture taken at two time points,
at which the dendritic spines are at their farthest spatial positions
within the 100 sec of observation. Red indicates one
position, green indicates the other position, and
yellow denotes overlap in the two positions. The
main difference between A1 and A2 is in
the presence of FM4-64 dots in A2 and
absence of dots in A1. A3,
A4, Three-week-old culture, showing different images on
top and the same images counterstained with FM4-64 at
the bottom. A large FM particle is seen adjacent
to the short spine on the left, and a small
dot is seen adjacent to the long spine on the right. The
difference image on top shows little movement of
the left spine and a large movement of the right spine.
A4, High-power image of a medium-sized spine, adjacent
to an FM dot to show little disparity in position of the
spine in space over time. Scale bars: A1-A4, 1 µm.
B1-B4, Correlating movement and calcium transients over
time. Spines correspond to those shown in A1-A4, with
the notations S for spine, D for
dendrite, S1 for spine 1, and S2
for spine 2. Overlapped are the calcium transients, in
continuous lines, quantified as F/F, and
the movement is indicated with dotted lines. A
clear lack of correlation between the calcium transients and local
motility is seen. In general, calcium transients in the spine head and
the parent dendrites are correlated, with notable exceptions. Larger
variations in calcium transients are seen in B2 compared
with B1, as well as a large disparity between adjacent
spines. In B3, a comparison between the mobile and the
immobile spines indicates that although both can express simultaneous
calcium transients, the long spine is more independent from the parent
dendrite than the short one. B4, At a high
temporal resolution, large dendritic calcium events are always seen
also in the spine, whereas the opposite is not always true, and
independent calcium transients can be seen in the spine. Altogether,
the spine expresses little motility compared with the other ones.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Motility, length, and frequency of calcium
transients as a function of age in culture. A, Maximal
motility over 100 sec of observation, as a function of days in culture;
n = 293 spines grouped in single days in
vitro. B, Spines are longer in young cells than
in older ones. The total population of spines was divided into two age
groups, older and younger than 2 weeks in vitro.
C, Frequency of calcium transients in 100 sec of
observation time in the two age groups. n = 157 spines in the young group and 107 spines in the older group.
|
|
Because spines could vary in motility even in a single neuron (Fig. 2,
compare A1, A2), it is apparent that age by itself is not
critical for spine motility. Two other factors can contribute to this,
presynaptic and/or postsynaptic activity. Both were examined herein. To
study the role of active presynaptic terminals, we stained the culture
with FM4-64 and reanalyzed spine motility (Figs. 2,
4). In general, fewer FM-labeled
terminals were associated with spines in the younger cultures than in
the older ones. Spine motility was inversely related to presence of FM
puncta (Fig. 4). Both the magnitude of movement and the proportion of
motile spines were markedly reduced by the presence of an active
terminal (Fig. 4A, compare FM and FM+). In that
context, the length of spines was not correlated with presence of FM
labeling (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Relationship between FM4-64 puncta, calcium
transients, and motility. Calcium transients were divided into three
categories: low, 0-1 events per 100 sec;
medium, 2-6 events per 100 sec; and
high, >6 calcium transients in 100 sec.
A, Both in the absence of FM4-64 (left
column) and in its presence (right column), the
largest movements are exerted by spines with a moderate number of
calcium transients, whereas higher and lower rates of calcium
transients are associated with relatively smaller movements of the
spines. Note, however, that the presence of FM particles was associated
with a reduction in the magnitude of movements by a factor of 10. B, By comparison, the initial length of spine is not
correlated with the presence or absence of FM particles, nor with the
frequency of calcium transients. n = 62, 23, and 15 spines for the FM , low, medium, and high calcium transients,
respectively. n = 42, 28, and 28 spines for the FM+
group, for the low, medium, and high rates of calcium transients,
respectively. C, Same as in A, but when
only of the subpopulation of the adult spines is analyzed (>14 d
in vitro).
|
|
For analysis, we grouped the spines into three ages, 5-8, 9-14, and
16-25 d in vitro. Only 31% of the young spines (26 measured) were associated with an FM puncta, and most of them (81%)
were motile. Of the stationary spines, 80% had FM puncta attached. Most of the spines of the middle age group, (62% of 58 analyzed spines), were associated with a presynaptic terminal, and only a third
of them (34%) were motile. Most of the stationary spines were
associated with FM puncta (87%). A similar result was obtained with
the older cells (58 spines analyzed, 74% touching FM puncta, 28%
motile, most of the stationary ones were touched by FM puncta). These
results indicate that under our testing conditions, spine movements are
negatively correlated with the presence of an active presynaptic terminal.
Because FM staining varied in size even within the same field, we
attempted to correlate the size of FM puncta with spine motility. There
was a clear relationship between the two parameters, with the spine
more likely to move if the FM puncta were small (<0.3 µm in
diameter) (Figs. 2A3,
5A,C). However, if the spine did move, there was no difference in the magnitude of the movement between small and large FM-associated spines (Fig. 5B), but
in either case the extent of movement was one-third of that seen in the
FM-negative spines.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
The size of the FM particle affects spine
motility. The FM particles touching the spines were divided into small
(<0.3 µm in diameter) and large (>0.3 µm in diameter). A marked
difference was found between the two groups in the percentage of motile
spine (A), with far fewer motile spines
associated with the large FM particle than with the small one. The
magnitude of the movement, however, was not correlated with the size of
the particle (B). Altogether, when the spines
were divided into motile and stable groups (C), the size
of FM particles was larger in the stable spines than in the motile
ones.
|
|
FM and synaptophysin staining
In a previous study, Fischer et al. (1998) assert that motility is
recorded also in spines that are contacted by a terminal immunostained
retrospectively with an anti-synaptotagmin antibody, indicating that
spines can be innervated by presynaptic terminals and still maintain
motility. We therefore analyzed the relations between FM labeling and
presence of presynaptic terminals stained with an anti-synaptophysin
antibody. In a study of 473 spines (on 58 dendritic segments) (Fig.
6) we found that FM labeling comprises
only a subset of synaptophysin-labeled terminals. Whereas 78.25 ± 3.3% of all the spines were contacted by synaptophysin-labeled terminals, only 54.9 ± 3.7% of these identified spines were also contacted by FM puncta. The fact that a substantial proportion of the
terminals do not take up the dye is likely to indicate that they are
not active. This may reflect the difference in motility scores between
the two studies.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
FM puncta constitute a subgroup of
synaptophysin-labeled terminals. EGFP-containing neurons were imaged,
followed by staining for FM4-64 (red puncta in
A). At the end of the experiment, the same culture was
fixed and stained for synaptophysin (Sf)
(red puncta in B). As seen in the two
images, all of the FM puncta have a corresponding Sf-labeled terminal,
but some terminals do not stain for FM. Arrows show an
example of spine with Sf, but without FM, and arrowheads
show an example of a naked spine. Scale bar, 3 µm. C,
Summary diagram of 473 spines counted on 58 20 µm dendritic segments.
The difference between the number of Sf terminals and FM puncta is
highly significant (p < 0.01).
|
|
Calcium and motility
The role of postsynaptic activity in spine motility was examined
in the different age groups. Calcium transients, resulting from either
synaptic activity or backpropagating action potentials were recorded in
nearly all the spines. Calcium transients were more frequent in the
older cultures (10-25 d in vitro) than in the young ones
(Fig. 3C). Altogether, calcium events were more numerous in
spines touched by an FM puncta than in "naked" spines (Fig.
4A). Thus, calcium transients were more numerous in
stationary spines than in motile ones. Still, for the same neurons
(Fig. 2) in which backpropagating action potentials should in principle be the same at all branches, the innervated spines expressed more calcium transients than the non-innervated ones. This is likely to be
attributable to the added synaptically evoked calcium events in the
innervated (i.e., the FM-attached) spines. This can be estimated from
the comparison of spine and dendritic-recorded calcium events. In the
noninnervated spines all the calcium events are correlated with the
dendritic events, whereas the innervated spines exhibited numerous
events that were not paralleled by a calcium change in the dendrite
(Fig. 2). Interestingly, spines expressing moderate amounts of calcium
transients exerted the largest movements, whereas spines with few or
many calcium transients were more stable (Fig. 4A).
In none of these cases was there a direct correlation between presence
of a calcium transient and spine movement.
Motility and actin
To examine the role of actin in spine motility, cultures were
exposed, after initial imaging, to the actin polymerization blocker
latrunculin (Allison et al., 1998 ). Within 3-5 min of application of
the drug, spine motility ceased, whereas calcium events continued as
before, both in the spine head and the dendritic shaft (Fig.
7). The effects of latrunculin were not
washed out for the duration of the observation period, up to 30 min of
observation time. Although gross spine motility stopped, the shape of
the spine underwent a continuous shrinkage, to become shorter and more
round (Fig. 7A).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Blockade of actin polymerization reduces spine
motility but does not affect spontaneous calcium transients.
A, Tracing of spine size by a thresholding procedure and
overlapping spine sizes in the two extreme positions across 1 min of
observation before (1), 1 min
(2), and 20 min (3) after
exposure of the cell to 2 µM latrunculin. Note that the
disparity between the two positions of the spine disappear at 20 min.
Note also the change in spine shape after latrunculin.
B, Spines cease to move, but continue to express calcium
transients after exposure to latrunculin. Before (B1)
and 15 min after (B2) onset of exposure of the culture
to latrunculin. Same scheme as in Figure 2; continuous
and dotted lines denote calcium transients in the spine
and the parent dendrite, and broken line denotes
measurement of maximal disparity in spatial location of the spine.
Scale bar, 0.5 µm.
|
|
The role of ambient temperature in spine motility was measured in
EGFP-labeled cells. The same set of spines was imaged at 24, 30, and
36°C. In five cases studied (Fig. 8)
spine motility was not affected much by ambient temperature. Once
again, in the same cultures, spines that were not touched by FM puncta
exhibited higher motility than the ones that were (Fig. 8).

View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Lack of temperature effects on spine motility.
Five-week-old GFP-labeled cell was imaged at room temperature
(A), warmed to 30°C
(B) and to 36°C (C), and
imaged for 1-5 min in each of the temperatures. At the end of the
imaging session, the cell was counterstained with FM4-64 to identify
presynaptic terminals. The two left columns indicate the
images that were taken 15 sec apart, and the image column on the
right is a subtraction image of the two
left ones. Only a minor movement is seen with the top
left spine, whereas the other ones were stable. Interestingly,
the top left spine is the only one not associated with a
presynaptic terminal.
|
|
Finally, although there is no correlation between spontaneous activity
and spine motility on a continuous basis, it is possible that ongoing
spontaneous network activity reduces spine motility. Cultures were
therefore exposed to tetrodotoxin (TTX), and the same spines were
monitored before and during exposure to the drug. In three experiments,
TTX caused a significant enhancement of dendritic spine motility (Fig.
9), irrespective of the presence of FM
puncta near the imaged spines. This indicates that the presence of FM
puncta suppresses spine motility only if ongoing synaptic activity is
maintained.

View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Blockade of spontaneous electrical activity
enables spine motility. Three-week-old cell in culture, labeled with
calcein was studied herein. A dendrite containing several spines was
imaged (A), as before, in control
(B), after exposure to TTX for 1 hr
(C), and after wash (D). In
each of these three cases, a subtraction of two images, 20 sec apart,
is shown. No spontaneous motility is seen in the normal conditions,
whereas blockade of spontaneous activity enabled this motility as in
B. Scale bar, 3 µm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present experiments were designed to analyze the factors
that regulate dendritic spine motility in cultured hippocampal neurons
and to relate them to formation of synaptic connections. The main
parameters studied include age in culture, presence of presynaptic
terminals, and spontaneous variations in
[Ca2+]i, as imaged in living neurons
with time lapse photography in a confocal laser-scanning microscope. As
observed in previous studies (Papa et al., 1995 ; Ziv and Smith, 1996 ;
Dunaevsky et al., 1999 ), dendritic spines are more motile in the
younger cells, when they are also less innervated by afferent fibers
than the more mature ones. Likewise, spontaneous electrical activity,
nearly absent in the very young cells, developed over 2-3 weeks in
culture. In the present studies we extended these observations, to
assert that the major parameter responsible for spontaneous motility of
spines is not age by itself, but that the presence of an active presynaptic terminal, assessed by FM4-64 dye uptake, arrests spine motility.
For sake of simplicity, we lumped together minute, vibration-type
movement, described recently by Fischer et al. (1998 , 2000 ) and the
slower, growth-related larger movements seen before (Ziv and Smith,
1996 ). Because both movement types are likely to be mediated by actin
polymerization and both are blocked by the polymerization-inhibiting agent latrunculin, there is no clear mechanistic distinction between these movements, and thus they seem to constitute two extremes on the
same motility axis. Still, the large, growth-related movement may be
instrumental in searching for available presynaptic terminals, and in
establishing connections, whereas the small vibratory movements may be
relevant to the local regulation of spine-dendrite interactions, as
predicted before (Volfovsky et al., 1999 ) as well as regulation of
trafficking of membrane components (Shi et al., 1999 ).
Variations in [Ca2+]i are related to
spine motility in a complex way. Whereas calcium events do not leave a
lasting impact on spine morphology, long-term reduction in frequency of
calcium transients, resulting from blockade of action potential
discharge, cause the resumption of spine motility. This has been seen
on a slower time scale (Papa and Segal, 1996 ; Collin et al., 1997 ), in
which cells exposed to TTX begin to express filopodia, not seen
normally in older cells in culture. The converse is also true, when
dendritic spines, that normally express high level of motility are
exposed to low concentration of AMPA, they cease to move (Fischer et
al. 2000 ). This latter observation may provide a clue to the difference
between the current observations and those of Fischer et al. (1998) ,
who describe age-independent local motility of dendritic spines.
Because cultures may vary greatly in the amount of spontaneous
activity, it is possible that in their cultures activity level is
rather low and TTX will not have an impact, but when
[Ca2+]i is raised by depolarizing the
cell with AMPA, motility will cease. In our system, spontaneous
activity level is high, spontaneous motility is low, but when activity
is reduced, motility resumes. It is still hard to reconcile the results
of Dunaevsky et al. (1999) with the current results and those of
Fischer et al. (2000) , because they were unable to see an arrest in
spine motility, even in the presence of high concentrations of
glutamate. Others have also seen shrinkage of spines with glutamate
(Halpain et al., 1998 ). Once again, differences in preparation may
account for this difference in results.
Arrest of motility is usually associated with shrinkage of the spines,
as seen after treatment with latrunculin (Fig. 5). A rise of
[Ca2+]i also causes shrinkage of spines
(Segal, 1995 ; Halpain et al., 1998 ). Thus, treatments that cause a rise
of [Ca2+]i will cause shrinkage of
spines and arrest of their activity. This generalization is not
entirely correct, because it has been shown that a small increase in
[Ca2+]i or electrical stimulation
(Maletic-Savatic et al., 1999 ) can sometime cause elongation of spines,
and production of novel ones (Korkotian and Segal, 1999 ), rather than
their shrinkage. However, treatment with tetrodotoxin may in fact cause
an increase in growth of certain spine type (Bravin et al., 1999 ).
Thus, a bimodal relationship between activity,
[Ca2+]i, and spine expansion and
contraction has been proposed (Segal et al. 2000 ) to account for these
differences. The functional correlate of a change in spine dimensions
with respect to calcium handling ability of the spine has been studied
recently (Majewska et al. (2000) .
The apparent lack of correlation between calcium transients and
motility may reflect the fact that these movements are seen close
to the limit of optical resolution. We (Korkotian and Segal, 2001 ) have
recently found that backpropagating action potentials produce a small
and rapid spine twitch that may have an important impact on reactivity
of the spine synapse to afferent stimulation. This twitch is also
sensitive to latrunculin, indicating that actin filaments are involved
in all types of spine motility.
The comparison between the two types of experiments conducted in the
present study yields possibly interesting conclusions. The EGFP-labeled
cells were taken from P1 mouse pups, whereas the OG-1-labeled
cells were taken from E19 rat embryos. Both types of cells expressed an
age-dependent motility of their spines, but the P1 EGFP cells matured
faster and ceased to express motility already at 2 weeks in culture, at
a time when the E19 cells were still active. This indicates that
although both cell types were maintained in vitro for 2 weeks, the age of the cells at plating makes a distinct difference with
respect to the maturation of the cells in culture.
The lack of motility seen here in association with maturation of the
spine and the presence of an active presynaptic terminal contrasts with
results of Fischer et al. (1998 , 2000 ) who demonstrate that even
innervated spines, assessed by the immunostaining with presynaptic
markers, are motile. Our results do agree on the general rule that an
increase in activity, produced in their studies by activation of
glutamate receptors, causes arrest of spine motility. The converse is
seen in our studies; blockade of activity with TTX initiates spine motility.
How reliable is a morphological marker of a presynaptic terminal to
indicate that the synapse is active? In a previous study we
(Vicario-Abejon et al., 1998 ) found that the presence of presynaptic markers does not necessarily mean that the synapse is active; spontaneous synaptic activity was absent under conditions in which the
synaptic machinery was intact. In a more recent study (Collin et al.
2001 ) we found that FM1-43 labeling is a good predictor of synaptic
activity. A similar observation was also reported recently by Renger et
al. (2001) , who found that synapsin-labeled puncta precede by several
days the appearance of FM1-43 puncta. In the current studies, a
disparity between synaptophysin immunoreactivity and FM labeling was
seen, indicating that not all morphologically identified synapses are
in fact active. This, it is likely that a spine may have a presynaptic
marker and not be electrically active, hence, be motile.
Finally, the cultured neurons contain both spine-like and
filopodia-like structures. In the mature neuron the definition of a
spine is simple; it has a distinct morphological identity with a neck,
a head, postsynaptic density, and an attached presynaptic terminal. In
the developing neuron, there is no obvious definition of a spine. Would
the presence of a presynaptic terminal constitute a prerequisite for
the definition of a spine? Obviously not, because the spine was
originally described by Ramon y Cajal (see English translation, 1995)
before presynaptic terminals were known, and irrespective of them.
Also, presynaptic terminals were reported to innervate even filopodia
(Fiala et al., 1998 ), and some spines are known to exist even in
the absence of presynaptic fibers (Bravin et al., 1999 ), and so the
presence of a presynaptic terminal by itself cannot be used as a
criterion for a "spine." Lack of motility by itself cannot define a
spine because motility can increase or decrease in the same spine,
depending on ambient electrical activity, seen here and elsewhere
(Fischer et al., 1998 , 2000 ). The situation may be simpler if
one conducts retrospective immunocytochemistry and identifies a spine
as one containing spine-specific or synapse-specific immunogenes, e.g.,
spinophyllin (Feng et al. 2000 ) or PSD-95 (Friedman et al. 2000 ), but
these may also mark immature spines. Thus, although a
distinction between a spine and a filopodium is intuitive, more subtle
variations among small protrusions that do not conform to a traditional
definition of a spine may cause unjustified generalizations with
respect to properties of spines, e.g., motility. Thus, although a
formal definition of a spine at the light microscope resolution is
called for, a tentative working definition of a spine as a short, up to
2-3 µm, relatively thick protrusion, which is relatively stable in
space and does not exert long growth-related motility, is a good
approximation of the ultimate spine and can be used for the study of
properties of spines in general.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Nov. 27, 2000; revised May 11, 2001; accepted May 18, 2001.
This work was supported by Grant 97/230 from the United States-Israel
Binational Science Foundation and by Grant 1/76/691 from the Volkswagen
Stiftung (Germany). We thank V. Greenberger for the production and
maintenance of the cultures, Dr. J. Pickel (National Institutes of
Health) for the GFP mice, and Dr. A. Bershadsky (The Weizmann
Institute) for the gift of Latrunculin-B.
Correspondence should be addressed to Menahem Segal, Department of
Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot 76100, Israel. E-mail:
menahem.segal{at}weizmann.ac.il.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Allison DW,
Gelfand VI,
Spector I,
Craig AM
(1998)
Role of actin in anchoring postsynaptic receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons: differential attachment of NMDA versus AMPA receptors.
J Neurosci
18:2423-2436[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bravin M,
Morando L,
Vercelli A,
Rossi F,
Strata P
(1999)
Control of spine formation by electrical activity in the adult rat cerebellum.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:1704-1709[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Collin C,
Miyaguchi K,
Segal M
(1997)
Dendritic spine density and LTP induction in cultured hippocampal slices.
J Neurophysiol
77:1614-1623[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Collin C,
Vicario-Abejon C,
Rubio ME,
Wenthold RJ,
McKay RDG,
Segal M
(2001)
Neurotrophins act at pre-synaptic terminals to activate synapses among cultured hippocampal neurons.
Eur J Neurosci
13:1273-1282[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dunaevsky A,
Tashiro A,
Majewska A,
Mason C,
Yuste R
(1999)
Developmental regulation of spine motility in the mammalian central nervous system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:13438-13443[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Feng J,
Yan Z,
Ferreira A,
Tomizawa K,
Liauw JA,
Zhuo M,
Allen PB,
Ouimet CC,
Greengard P
(2000)
Spinophilin regulates the formation and function of dendritic spines.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97:9287-9292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Fiala JC,
Feinberg M,
Popov V,
Harris KM
(1998)
Synaptogenesis via dendritic filopodia in developing hippocampal area CA1.
J Neurosci
18:8900-8911[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Fischer M,
Kaech S,
Knutti D,
Matus A
(1998)
Rapid actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines.
Neuron
20:847-854[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Fischer M,
Kaech S,
Wagner U,
Brinkhous H,
Matus A
(2000)
Glutamate receptors regulate actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines.
Nat Neurosci
3:887-894[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Friedman HV,
Bresler T,
Garner CC,
Ziv NE
(2000)
Assembly of new individual excitatory synapses: time course and temporal order of synaptic molecule recruitment.
Neuron
27:57-69[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Goldin M,
Segal M,
Avignone E
(2001)
Functional plasticity triggers formation and pruning of dendritic spines in cultured hippocampal networks
J Neurosci
21:186-193[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hadjantonakis AK,
Gertsenstein M,
Ikawa M,
Okabe M,
Nagy A
(1998)
Generating green fluorescent mice by germline transmission of green fluorescent ES cells.
Mech Dev
76:79-90[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Halpain S,
Hipolito A,
Saffer L
(1998)
Regulation of F-actin stability in dendritic spines by glutamate receptors and calcineurin.
J Neurosci
18:9835-9844[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Jontes JD,
Smith SJ
(2000)
Filopodia, spines, and the generation of synaptic diversity.
Neuron
27:11-14[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Korkotian E,
Segal M
(1999)
Release of calcium from stores alters the morphology of dendritic spines in cultured hippocampal neurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:12068-12072[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Korkotian E,
Segal M
(2001)
Spike-associated fast twitches of dendritic spines in cultured hippocampal neurons.
Neuron
30:751-758[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lendvai B,
Stern EA,
Chen B,
Svoboda K
(2000)
Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo.
Nature
404:876-881[Medline].
-
Majewska A,
Tashiro A,
Yuste R
(2000)
Regulation of spine calcium compartmentalization by rapid spine motility.
J Neurosci
20:8262-8268[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Maletic-Savatic M,
Malinow R,
Svoboda K
(1999)
Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity.
Science
283:1923-1927[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Murphy DD,
Segal M
(1996)
Regulation of dendritic spine density in cultured rat hippocampal neurons by steroid hormones.
J Neurosci
16:4059-4068[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Papa M,
Segal M
(1996)
Morphological plasticity in dendritic spines of cultured hippocampal neurons.
Neuroscience
71:1005-1011[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Papa M,
Bundman MC,
Greenberger V,
Segal M
(1995)
Morphological analysis of the development of dendritic spines in primary cultures of hippocampal neurons.
J Neurosci
15:1-11[Abstract].
-
Ramon y Cajal S
(1995)
In: Histology of the nervous system of man and vertebrates, Vol 1. Oxford: Oxford UP.
-
Renger JJ,
Egles C,
Liu G
(2001)
A developmental switch in neurotransmitter flux enhances synaptic efficacy by affecting AMPA receptor activation.
Neuron
29:469-484[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Segal M
(1995)
Morphological alterations in dendritic spines of rat hippocampal neurons exposed to NMDA.
Neurosci Lett
193:73-75[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Segal M,
Korkotian E,
Murphy DD
(2000)
Dendritic spine induction and pruning-common cellular mechanisms?
Trends Neurosci
23:53-57[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Shi SH,
Hayashi Y,
Petralia RS,
Zaman SH,
Wenthold RJ,
Svoboda K,
Malinow R
(1999)
Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation.
Science
284:1811-1816[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Vicario-Abejon C,
Collin C,
McKay RD,
Segal M
(1998)
Neurotrophins induce formation of functional excitatory and inhibitory synapses between cultured hippocampal neurons.
J Neurosci
18:7256-7271[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Volfovsky N,
Parnas H,
Segal M,
Korkotian E
(1999)
Geometry of dendritic spines affects calcium dynamics In hippocampal neurons: theory and experiments.
J Neurophysiol
82:450-462[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ziv NE,
Smith SJ
(1996)
Evidence for a role of dendritic filopodia in synaptogenesis and spine formation.
Neuron
17:91-102[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/01/21166115-10$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Wefelmeyer
The Influence of GABA on Dendritic Development In Vivo
J. Neurosci.,
October 3, 2007;
27(40):
10649 - 10650.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Mateos, A. Luthi, N. Savic, B. Stierli, P. Streit, B. H. Gahwiler, and R. A. McKinney
Synaptic modifications at the CA3 CA1 synapse after chronic AMPA receptor blockade in rat hippocampal slices
J. Physiol.,
May 15, 2007;
581(1):
129 - 138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Krueger and R. M. Fitzsimonds
Remodeling the plasticity debate: the presynaptic locus revisited.
Physiology,
October 1, 2006;
21:
346 - 351.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Oray, A. Majewska, and M. Sur
Effects of Synaptic Activity on Dendritic Spine Motility of Developing Cortical Layer V Pyramidal Neurons
Cereb Cortex,
May 1, 2006;
16(5):
730 - 741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Majewska, J. R. Newton, and M. Sur
Remodeling of synaptic structure in sensory cortical areas in vivo.
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 2006;
26(11):
3021 - 3029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Schubert, J. S. Da Silva, and C. G. Dotti
Localized recruitment and activation of RhoA underlies dendritic spine morphology in a glutamate receptor-dependent manner
J. Cell Biol.,
January 30, 2006;
172(3):
453 - 467.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Colonnese, J.-P. Zhao, and M. Constantine-Paton
NMDA Receptor Currents Suppress Synapse Formation on Sprouting Axons In Vivo
J. Neurosci.,
February 2, 2005;
25(5):
1291 - 1303.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Segal
So, why do they dance, after all?
J. Physiol.,
July 15, 2004;
558(2):
367 - 367.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Majewska and M. Sur
Motility of dendritic spines in visual cortex in vivo: Changes during the critical period and effects of visual deprivation
PNAS,
December 23, 2003;
100(26):
16024 - 16029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hering and M. Sheng
Activity-Dependent Redistribution and Essential Role of Cortactin in Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis
J. Neurosci.,
December 17, 2003;
23(37):
11759 - 11769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Sekerkova, P. A. Loomis, B. Changyaleket, L. Zheng, R. Eytan, B. Chen, E. Mugnaini, and J. R. Bartles
Novel Espin Actin-Bundling Proteins Are Localized to Purkinje Cell Dendritic Spines and Bind the Src Homology 3 Adapter Protein Insulin Receptor Substrate p53
J. Neurosci.,
February 15, 2003;
23(4):
1310 - 1319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Grimpe, S. Dong, C. Doller, K. Temple, A. T. Malouf, and J. Silver
The Critical Role of Basement Membrane-Independent Laminin gamma 1 Chain during Axon Regeneration in the CNS
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 2002;
22(8):
3144 - 3160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|