 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2001, 21(18):7340-7348
Spatial Long-Term Memory Is Related to Mossy Fiber
Synaptogenesis
Victor
Ramírez-Amaya,
Israela
Balderas,
Jimena
Sandoval,
Martha L.
Escobar, and
Federico
Bermúdez-Rattoni
Departamento de Neurociencias, Instituto de Fisiología
Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
04510 México
 |
ABSTRACT |
Structural synaptic changes have been suggested to underlie
long-term memory formation. In this work, we investigate if hippocampal mossy fiber synaptogenesis induced by water maze overtraining can be
related with long-term spatial memory performance. Rats were trained in
a Morris water maze for one to five identical daily sessions and tested
for memory retrieval 1 week and 1 month after training. After the last
test session, the rat brains were obtained and processed for Timm's
staining to analyze mossy fiber projection. The behavioral results
showed that with more training, animals showed a better performance in
the memory tests, and this performance positively correlates with
Timm's staining in the stratum oriens. Furthermore, with the use of
the NMDA antagonist MK801 before, but not after acquisition, water maze
spatial memory was impaired. Increased Timm's staining in the stratum
oriens was observed in the animals treated with MK801 after acquisition but not in those treated before. Finally, we observed that mossy fiber
synaptogenesis occurs mainly in the septal region of the dorsal
hippocampus, supporting the idea that this anterior region is important
for spatial memory. Altogether, these results suggest that mossy fiber
synaptogenesis can be related with spatial long-term memory formation.
Key words:
mossy fiber sprouting; structural changes; hippocampus; long-term memory; dizocilpine; synaptogenesis; CA3; spatial
learning
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Learning and memory result from
changes in the neural representation of stimuli (Dudai, 1989 ) through
plastic events that modify the way neurons communicate with each other
(Bear, 1996 ). Plastic events can include changes in the structure,
distribution and number of synapses, and it has been suggested that
these morphological changes underlie memory formation (Rusakov et al.,
1997 ; Woolf, 1998 ; Klintsova and Greenough, 1999 ).
The hippocampus plays a crucial role in the performance of spatial
tasks, and the activity of its cells has been suggested to be related
with spatial representation (Nadel and Eichenbaum, 1999 ). This
structure is particularly plastic, where morphological changes such as
synaptogenesis and neurogenesis occur in the adult brain (Ben-Ari and
Represa 1990 ; Derrick et al., 2000 ). For example, mossy fiber
synaptogenesis has been observed after kainate-induced epilepsy (Wuarin
and Dudek, 1996 ) and kindling (Van-der-Zee et al., 1995 ). Moreover, it
has been observed that high-frequency stimulation-inducing LTP produce
mossy fiber synaptogenesis (Adams et al., 1997 ; Escobar et al., 1997 ).
There is evidence suggesting that hippocampal synaptogenesis might
occur in association with spatial memory formation. Becker et
al. (1996) demonstrated that neural cell adhesion molecule
polysialylation (NCAM-PSA), which allows structural plasticity,
is necessary to improve performance of water maze task; also, changes
in the distribution of synapses were demonstrated in CA1 after the
animals underwent Morris water maze training (Rusakov et al.,
1997 ).
Recently, we found evidence suggesting that overtraining animals in a
Morris water maze task induces mossy fiber synaptogenesis in CA3
stratum oriens using Timm's staining (Ramírez-Amaya et al.,
1999 ). Timm's staining reveals the presence of zinc, and because this
metal is highly concentrated in the mossy fiber boutons, the
distribution of mossy fiber contacts can be observed by Timm's-stained granules using the light microscope. Mossy fiber projections to the CA3
region regularly establish their synaptic contacts in the stratum
lucidum located in the apical region of the pyramidal cell layer. In
the stratum oriens (basal region of the pyramidal cell layer) scarce
mossy fiber synaptic contacts are found, so substantial increments of
mossy fiber boutons to the stratum oriens can be considered as
synaptogenesis (Ben-Ari and Represa, 1990 ). Furthermore, the induction
of new synapses is observed mainly in animals that underwent several
training sessions, suggesting that mossy fiber synaptogenesis could be
related with spatial memory.
To establish the relevance of mossy fiber synaptogenesis for spatial
memory, we evaluate long-term spatial memory performance of water
maze-trained animals by testing them at 7 and 30 d after training.
The performance of the animals in the memory test was correlated with
Timm's staining observed in CA3 stratum oriens. To produce a
pharmacological blockade of the spatial learning, the NMDA antagonist
MK801 was applied before acquisition of water maze and immediately
after, to test the possible effects of this drug on mossy fiber
synaptogenesis using Timm's staining analysis. Furthermore, mossy
fiber synaptogenesis distribution throughout the septotemporal axis of
dorsal hippocampus was studied in serial hippocampal sections.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Subjects. Fifty-one Male Wistar Rats obtained from
the "vivarium" of our Institute were individually caged in standard
rat acrylic boxes and used for the experiment when within a weight range of 250-300 gm. All animals were kept in the same room with an
average temperature of 22°C, food and water was provided ad libitum, and animals were maintained under a inverted 12 hr
light/dark cycle, with lights on at 8:00 A.M.
Experimental groups. The animals were separated into five
groups that underwent water maze training, and the last two were kept
as controls. The first five groups of animals received one (WM1;
n = 5), two (WM2; n = 5), three (WM3;
n = 5), four (WM4; n = 5), and five
(WM5; n = 6) days of training. One group of swimming control was used (SC; n = 5), in which the animals were
introduced into the tank containing no platform, without illumination
and with all spatial cues removed. The animals in this group were allowed to swim for 1 min and were introduced three times a day. This
procedure was repeated for 5 d, allowing them to swim a similar average distance as that of the trained animals. In the last group, the
intact control (IC; n = 6) animals remained in their
home cages for the entire experiment.
To evaluate the effects of intraperitoneal administration of the NMDA
antagonist MK801 during and after acquisition of spatial learning as
well as on mossy fiber synaptogenesis, two additional groups were used.
These groups of animals underwent 5 d of training and received
intraperitoneal injections of MK801 (0.05 mg/kg, diluted in 500 µl of distillated water; Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA) either 15 min before (MKB; n = 7) or immediately after (MKA;
n = 7) water maze training each day. One animal that
presented motor problems (hyperactivity) during water maze task was
discarded from the study of the group MKB. The WM5 animals from the
first experiment were used for comparison analysis.
Water maze training. The behavioral task was performed in a
water maze consisting of a circular pool tank measuring 1.50 m in
diameter and 1.0 m high with a black floor and walls with a transparent acrylic platform located in a fixed position and submerged 1 cm under the water. The water maze tank is located in a separate dark
room, illuminated by dim light, and surrounded by several spatial cues.
The swimming paths of the animals were recorded by using a chromotrack
system (San Diego Instruments). The training of the animals in the
water maze consisted of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 identical daily sessions of 10 trials each. In each trial, the animal was introduced into the pool at
different starting points for each trial up to a total of 10 trials per
day (Nerad et al., 1996 ). The animal was allowed to swim for a maximum
of 60 sec or until it located the platform and was allowed to stand on
the platform for 30 sec, after which the animal was placed in a waiting cage for 30 sec. If the animal did not find the platform within the
time limit, it was led to it by hand. Most of the animals learned well
in the first training session, but the asymptotic level for the
variable (latency to the target) was not obtained until the third or
fourth day session. Thus, any further training after the asymptotic
level for latency scores was reached was considered as overtraining.
Trained animals were tested in the tank 7 and 30 d after training;
the test consisted of introducing the animals in to the tank using the
first release point, with the platform removed. The animals were
allowed to swim for 2 min. The path swum by the animals was recorded as
described above, and the latency to the target, as well as the number
of crossings over the target area, were used as dependent variables for analysis.
Timm staining. All animals were killed the next day after
the last test session. The animals were put to sleep with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (Sedal-Vet TM). Sodium sulfide solution (5.85 gm of NaS and 5.95 gm of
NaH2PO4 in 500 ml of
distillated water) was used as the first perfusion solution to remove
blood (~100-150 ml/animal). Paraformaldehyde solution at 4% with
1% glutaraldehyde, pH 7.4, was used as the fixative (two animals were
lost because of bad sulfide solution perfusion; one from group WM1 and
one from IC). The brains were removed from the skull and immersed in
the fixative for 5-10 hr, after which the brains were immersed in 30%
sucrose solution (diluted in PB, pH 7.4). Several days later, when the
brains sank into the sucrose solution, 40-µm-thick slices of the
completely dorsal hippocampus were serially obtained using a cryostat
microtome. Timm's revealing method consists of submerging the tissue
in a dense solution made of Arabic gum (60% diluted 1:2 in distillated
water), hydroquinone (30% diluted 5.67 gm/100 ml in distillated
water), and silver nitrate (1%, 170 mg/ml in distillated water) in a
4.0 pH (9% of citrate buffer 12.75 gm of
C6H8O7
and 11.75 gm of
C6H5O7Na3
in 50 ml of distilled water). The tissue was exposed for ~1 hr (± 15 min). After the exposure, the tissue was run into an alcohol train (50, 70, 80, 90, 100% diluted in distilled water) and isopropanol,
terpineol, and xilol. The brain tissues were covered with crystal
sheets using Canadian balsam. The presence of Timm's-stained granules in the stratum oriens was evaluated using image densitometry. The
slices were carefully examined under light microscopy and classified
into five different levels, ranging from the most anterior (1) to the
most posterior (5) dorsal hippocampus using the morphological features
of the dentate gyrus as reference (see Fig. 6). Six coronal sections
from the dorsal hippocampus were selected: three from level 2, and
three from level 3 (see Figs. 6 and 10). The stratum oriens of this
section was digitized by a camera (model c2400; Hamamatsu, Tokyo,
Japan) connected to an optical microscope (labophot-2; Nikon, Tokyo,
Japan), after which they were equalized by the application of the same
contrast and brightness parameters (Adobe Photoshop 5.0), and then
analyzed by using image analysis software (Scion Image; Scion
Corporation, Frederick, MD). The surface area with an optical density
range between 120 and 255 points in a black and white scale (the same
range of Timm's staining in the stratum lucidum) occupied by Timm's
granules in the stratum oriens, was measured in each image,
so each animal brain obtained six right and six left measures. The mean
area from these 12 measures was obtained for each animal to compare the
different groups.
Statistical analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA, one-way ANOVA
with Fisher post hoc, and Pearson's correlation were used
as appropriate.
 |
RESULTS |
Overtrained animals performed better in memory test
Repeated measures ANOVA of the latency to reach the platform
during water maze acquisition showed significant differences through
trials in day 1 (F(9,36) = 23.443;
p < 0.001), day 2 (F(9,27) = 18.259;
p < 0.001), and day 3 (F(9,18) = 6.802; p < 0.01) and no significant difference among groups with no interaction in all trained groups. Finally, there were no differences through trials
for the last two days (days 4 and 5) with no group differences and no
interaction. Differences through trials are considered as the learning
curve and imply that trained animals improve performance in that
session. When performance of the animals is stabilized in the
asymptotic level, further training is considered as overtraining, so
WM4 and WM5 animals are the overtrained groups (Fig.
1).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Water maze performance during acquisition of
animals that received 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 d of training. Each point
is the average latency to the target for two consecutive trials that
have the same average distance to the target area than any other
pair of trials. Each day presents five pairs of trials.
|
|
Water maze test results showed that there were significant differences
between groups in the latency (F(5,25) = 9.750; p < 0.01) as well as in the number of
crossings through the target area at 7 d after training
(F(5,25) = 16.616; p < 0.01), revealing that the amount of training is an important factor
determining memory performance 7 d after acquisition (Fig.
2). Post hoc Fisher analysis
of the latency to reach the target showed significant differences in
WM4 and WM5 when compared with the rest of the groups in the test done
7 d after training (p values < 0.01), and
the group trained for 2 d showed significant differences when compared with the SCs (p values < 0.05). For
the number of crossings, post hoc analysis revealed that WM5
and WM4 groups crossed the target area significantly more than the rest
of the groups (p values < 0.01). When the
animals were tested 30 d after training (Fig.
3), simple ANOVA revealed significant
differences between groups in the latency
(F(5,25) = 2.805; p < 0.05) and in the number of crossing to the target area
(F(5,25) = 6.170; p < 0.01). Post hoc analysis on the latency revealed that only
WM4 presented differences when compared with the SC, WM1, and WM2
groups (p values < 0.05). For the number of
crossings, WM5 and WM4 showed significant differences compared with the
SC (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). This data reveals that animals trained for 4 and 5 d recall the spatial location of the platform significantly better than
the rest of the groups.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Memory test scores at 7 d after acquisition.
The top of the figure shows latency to the target of
trained animals for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 d (WM)
and swimming control animals (SC). The
middle shows representative swimming paths during 1 min
test without the platform. Bottom, The number of
crossings over the target are during 1 min test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with the SC.
|
|

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Memory test scores at 30 d after acquisition.
The top of the figure shows latency to the target of
trained animals for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 d (WM)
and swimming control animals (SC). The
middle shows representative swimming paths during 1 min
test without the platform. Bottom, The number of
crossings over the target are during 1 min test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with the SC.
|
|
NMDA antagonist blocked acquisition of spatial task
As can be seen in Figure 4, repeated
measures ANOVA done on latency to the target during water maze
acquisition of MK801-treated animals showed significant group
differences during the first 4 d; day 1 (F(2,17) = 20.922; p < 0.01), day 2 (F(2,17) = 6.103; p < 0.05), day 3 (F(2,17) = 14.407;
p < 0.01), and day 4 (F(2,17) = 19.795; p < 0.01). Also, there were differences through trials for all the days;
day 1 (F(9,18) = 8.999;
p < 0.01), day 2 (F(9,18) = 7.226; p < 0.01), day 3 (F(9,18) = 4.519;
p < 0.01), day 4 (F(9,18) = 3.946; p < 0.01), and day 5 (F(9,18) = 2.441;
p < 0.05) with no significant interaction. The animals
in which MK801 was administered before acquisition (MKB) presented an
impaired acquisition during the first 2 d because there were no
significant learning curves at day 1 (F(6,9) = 1.051; p = 0.4134) and day 2 (F(6,9) = 1.779; p = 0.0938). At days 3 and 4, the latency to the target
showed statistical differences through trials
(F(6,9) = 2.560; p < 0.05 and F(6,9) = 3.237;
p < 0.01, respectively), indicating that in those days
learning occurred in MKB animals. Nevertheless, the group differences
remained, revealing a disrupted performance on water maze training by
the administration of MK801 before acquisition. At day 5, there were no
more group differences (F(2,17) = 2.276; p = 0.13), and MKB animals reached the
asymptotic level of performance in the water maze task. Conversely,
MK801 administered after acquisition (MKA) did not affect consolidation
of the spatial task. MKA animals showed significant decreased latencies
to reach the target through trials at day 1 (F(6,9) = 5.445; p < 0.01) and day 2 (F(6,9) = 5.288;
p < 0.01); no differences were found from days 3-5.
This indicates that the MKA animals reach the asymptotic level of
performance at day 3, showing no effect of MK801 administration in
spatial memory consolidation.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Water maze performance during acquisition of
animals that received 5 d of training (WM5) and
animals with the same amount of trained but treated 15 min before
(MKB) or immediately after (MKA) with
0.05 mg/kg of MK801. Each point is the average latency to the target
for two consecutive trials that have the same average distance to the
target area than any other pair of trials. Each day presents five pairs
of trials. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with WM5.
|
|
In the memory test done 7 d after training, (Fig.
5) simple ANOVA showed significant group
differences in the latency (F(2,17) = 6.185; p < 0.01) and the number of crossings to the
target area (F(2,17) = 10.748;
p < 0.01). At 30 d after training significant differences were found in the latency
(F(2,17) = 7.518; p < 0.01) and the number of crossing to the target area
(F(2,17) = 18.026; p < 0.01). The MK801 applied before the acquisition clearly disrupts water maze memory test (Fig. 5). The animals from MKB group showed significantly less crossings and longer latency to the target area at 7 or 30 d after training compared with MKA and WM5 groups (p values < 0.01). This evidence revealed that
MK801 administration disrupts acquisition and retention of the water
maze task. Finally, when MK801 was applied after the learning trials,
the memory scores remained intact indicating that MK801 applied after
acquisition did not affect retention of the spatial task.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Memory test scores at 7 (left) and
30 (right) d after acquisition. The top
of the figure shows latency to the target from 5 d-trained animals
(WM5) and 5 d-trained animals receiving MK801, 15 min
before (MKB) or immediately after (MKA)
water maze training. The middle shows representative
swimming paths during 1 min test without the platform. The
bottom shows the number of crossings over the target are
during 1 min test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with WM5.
|
|
Mossy fiber synaptogenesis correlates with spatial
memory performance
As previously reported, Timm's staining revealed mossy fiber
synaptogenesis in the stratum oriens of animals that were overtrained in the Morris water maze, whereas the stratum oriens of swimming and
intact control animals presented scarce Timm's-stained granules (Fig.
6). Simple ANOVA on the average of
Timm's-positive surface area determined by quantitative densitometry
analysis (Fig. 7) revealed significant
differences between groups (F(6.28) = 8.031; p < 0.01). Animals in groups WM4 and WM5
presented significantly more stained area in the stratum oriens when
compared with controls (IC, SC, p values < 0.01) and
when compared with the other trained groups (WM1, WM2, p
values < 0.01; WM3, p < 0.05, respectively). No
statistical difference was observed between WM4 and WM5. This data
suggest that mossy fiber synaptogenesis occurred mainly in the animals
that were overtrained in the Morris water maze for 4 or 5 d and
not in animals that received less training (WM3, WM2, and WM1) or no
spatial training at all (SC and IC).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
A, Schematic representation of the
left hippocampus showing in the gray subdivisions, the
area obtained for Timm's staining. Regions 1, 4, and 5 (clear
gray) were stained for Timm's but not used for density
analysis, the first three brain slices from region 2 and the first
three from region 3 (dark gray) were used for the
computer-assisted Timm's-stained analysis in the stratum oriens.
Photomicrographs taken at 4× from region 2 of CA3 hippocampus stained
for Timm's of representative swimming control animal
(SC) (B), 5 d water
maze-trained (WM5) (C), 5 d-trained treated with MK801 before (MKB)
(D), and trained treated with MK801 after
(MKA) (E).
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
A, Average Timm's-stained area in
the stratum oriens of animals trained for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 d
(WM1, WM2, WM3, WM4, and WM5,
respectively), swimming controls (SC), and intact
control animals (IC). **p < 0.01 compared with SC. B, Scattergram plot between
synaptogenesis and memory performance at 7 and 30 d after
training. All groups included in the correlation except SC and
IC.
|
|
To establish if mossy fiber synaptogenesis can be related with memory
performance, Pearson's correlation was performed between the average
of Timm's-stained area and the latency, or the number of crossings
over the target area during the test days. Only the trained animals
were included in this analysis (WM1, WM2, WM3, WM4, and WM5). The
analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between the
latency to the target and Timm's staining area in the stratum oriens
in the test done at 7 d ( 0.617; p < 0.01) but
not at 30 d after training. Furthermore, the number of crossings to the target area and the Timm's-stained area showed positive correlation for the test done at 7 d (C = 0.566;
p < 0.01) and 30 d (C = 0.564;
p < 0.01) after training. This evidence suggests a
functional relation between mossy fiber synaptogenesis and spatial memory performance.
NMDA antagonists blocked synaptogenesis
Simple ANOVA on mossy fiber staining analysis revealed significant
differences between groups (F(4,24) = 7.392; p < 0.01). Post hoc Fisher analysis
showed that MKB animals presented significantly less mossy fiber
stained area in the stratum oriens when compared with WM5 group
(p < 0.01), and no significant differences were found with SC or IC groups (Fig. 8). The
analysis of the mossy fiber-stained area from MKA animals showed
significant differences compared with SC and IC groups
(p values < 0.01, respectively) and not with
WM5 group. Pearson's correlation analysis using WM5, MKB, and MKA
groups showed a significant negative correlation between
Timm's-stained area in the stratum oriens and the latency to the
target in the test done at 7 d (C = 0.533;
p < 0.05) but not at 30 d after training.
Significant correlation was also found with the number of crossings in
the test done 1 week (C = 0.639; p < 0.01) and 1 month after training (C = 0.530;
p < 0.05). These results indicate that pharmacological
blockade of learning affects the behavioral induction of mossy fiber
synaptogenesis in CA3 stratum oriens, as well as memory performance.
These findings further support the idea that this morphological change
may be related to spatial memory.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
A, Average Timm's-stained area in
the stratum oriens of animals trained for 5 d
(WM5), animals trained for 5 d and treated with
MK801 before (MKB) and after acquisition
(MKA), swimming controls (SC), and intact
control animals (IC). **p < 0.01 compared with SC. B, Scattergram plot between
synaptogenesis and memory performance at 7 and 30 d after
training. All groups included in the correlation except SC and
IC.
|
|
Synaptogenesis is observed mainly in the more septal area of
dorsal hippocampus
To understand the distribution of mossy fiber synaptogenesis
throughout the rat hippocampus, the Timm's-stained area was analyzed by the septotemporal axis from which the image was taken. Repeated measures ANOVA of the Timm's-stained area was done in SC, MKB, MKA,
WM1, WM3, and WM5 groups. Because no significant differences were found
between left and right stratum oriens, the mean of right and left
stratum oriens was used for this analysis. The analysis revealed
significant differences among groups
(F(5,27) = 5.606; p < 0.01), between septotemporal measures
(F(11,55) = 5.766; p < 0.01) with no significant interaction. This indicates that the
Timm's-stained area in the stratum oriens decrease throughout the
septotemporal measures (Fig. 9) and that
the animals that underwent water maze overtraining presented more
Timm's-stained granules than the control groups, so the presumed
synaptogenesis is observed mainly in the septal portion of dorsal
hippocampus and gradually decrease toward the temporal pole. Also, as
can be seen in Figure 9, the animals administered with MK801 before acquisition clearly showed poor Timm's staining in the stratum oriens
throughout the hippocampal septotemporal axis, whereas the animals
administered with MK801 after acquisition still showed Timm's staining
in a similar portion and in a similar extent of dorsal hippocampus than
the overtrained animals.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Average Timm's-stained area in the stratum oriens
throughout the septotemporal axis of regions 2 (r2) and
3 (r3) with the tissues taken for analysis
(t1-3) of animals trained for 1, 3, and 5 d
(WM), trained animals for 5 d treated with
MK801 before (MKB) and after acquisition
(MKA), and the swimming controls
(SC).
|
|
The Timm's staining results can be observed in more detail in Figure
10, where Adobe Photoshop-processed
photomicrographs of representative control and overtrained animals are
shown throughout the septotemporal axis of dorsal CA3 hippocampus
stained by Timm's. It is clear that in the control animal scarce
staining is observed in the stratum oriens, whereas in the overtrained
animal staining is evident in this region, abundantly at level 2 and
decreased at level 3, with scarce staining at level 4, and almost
absent at level 5 (Fig. 10). In summary, the largest area stained by
Timm's in CA3 stratum oriens is observed in the more septal region of the dorsal hippocampus, and the staining decreased gradually toward the
temporal region selected for the analysis, suggesting that this
morphological change occurs in the more septal region of hippocampal
CA3 stratum oriens.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Adobe Photoshop-processed photomicrographs of
dorsal hippocampus from regions 2, 3, 4, and 5 throughout the
septo(anterior)-temporal- (posterior) axis, showing Timm's staining
of the stratum lucidum and the stratum oriens of dorsal hippocampus.
Top, A representative swimming control
(SC); bottom, a 5 d water
maze-trained animal (WM5). Coordinates in the base of
the figure are from bregma according to Paxinos and Watson (1986) .
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Is mossy fiber synaptogenesis related to spatial
memory formation?
The results from these experiments revealed that water
maze overtraining produces a remarkable improvement in a memory test done 1 week and 1 month after training. In a previous report we showed
that spatial overtraining could induce synaptogenesis in CA3 stratum
oriens (Ramírez-Amaya et al., 1999 ). In the present experiments, we found a substantial increase of mossy fiber projection to the stratum oriens in animals that received overtraining in the
Morris water maze, and their performance in the memory tests positively
correlates with this, suggesting a functional correlation between
synaptogenesis and spatial memory formation.
It has been proposed that the mossy fiber system modulates the activity
of CA3 cells in which plastic events will allow information to be
encoded (McClelland and Goddard, 1996 ). In accordance with this idea,
destruction of dentate gyrus cells, and hence mossy fiber projections,
disrupts acquisition and retention of water maze task (McNaughton et
al., 1989 ; Xavier et al., 1999 ). Mizumori et al. (1999) proposed that
the specific contribution of the hilar/CA3 region is to compare the
expected spatial context with that currently being experienced,
supporting the idea that synaptic plasticity in the mossy fiber
projection to CA3 may be involved in the storage of spatial
representations (McNaughton and Morris 1987 ; McClelland and Goddard,
1996 ). Mossy fiber projections regularly reach the stratum lucidum and
the newly formed mossy fibers project to the stratum oriens. Although
we found evidence of synaptogenesis in the stratum oriens, stratum
lucidum synaptogenesis cannot be discarded. The functional significance
of mossy fiber projections to the stratum oriens is currently unknown.
However, it is possible that these projections have a stronger
influence over pyramidal cell firing because of their proximity to the
axon hillock, or it can modulate CA3 by establishing synaptic contacts
with inhibitory cells located in the stratum oriens (Oliva et al.,
2000 ; Poncer et al. 2000 ).
An increased survival of new neurons in the dentate gyrus that are
likely to project to CA3 cells has been demonstrated after spatial
training (Kuhn et al., 1996 ; Kempermann et al., 1997 ; Hastings and
Gould, 1999 ). Recently, Elizabeth Gould's group (Shors et al., 2001 )
showed that inhibition of neurogenesis in the rat impairs hippocampal
trace conditioning. Thus, it is plausible to think that neurogenesis in
the dentate gyrus may be related to the storage of spatial
representations and perhaps to synaptogenesis in CA3. Preliminary
results in our laboratory showed that specific lesions of CA3 region
disrupt acquisition of water maze and clearly impair memory performance
even when lesions were made 2 weeks after acquisition. This evidence
suggests that CA3 might be necessary for long-term spatial information
storage in which synaptic plasticity, including morphological changes
in the dentate gyrus projection to CA3, may underlie memory formation.
Further research should be conducted to establish if mossy fiber
synaptogenesis is reversible and if this reversibility might or not
might be correlated with forgetting.
Another possibility is that these new mossy fiber projections are
responsible for improving the overall spatial abilities of rats. Moser
et al. (1994) observed that dendrite branching induced by a complex
environment correlates with improved water maze performance. Previous
studies using Timm's staining analysis have suggested the relevance of
mossy fiber projection to CA3 infrapyramidal layer for spatial learned
behaviors. It has been observed that animals from different strains or
close species occupying different habitats presented different mossy
fiber projections to the infrapyramidal layer, and the animals with
more abundant mossy fibers projections to the infrapyramidal layer
presented a better performance on spatial-related tasks (Schwegler et
al., 1993 ; Bernasconi-Guastalla et al., 1994 ; Pleskacheva et al.,
2000 ). They propose that genetic differences might account for the
anatomical and behavioral variability, however, the observation that
close species occupying different habitats also present such anatomical and behavioral differences suggest that the environment may also be a
very important factor for inducing the morphological differences in
mossy fiber projection. In this regard, the differences in mossy fiber
projection found in these works should not only be attributed to
inherited variables, but to how experience can promote plastic events
in the hippocampus of the different species (Schwegler et al., 1993 ;
Bernasconi-Guastalla et al., 1994 ). Because experience induces
morphological changes, animals living in enriched conditions (Moser et
al., 1994 ) or a favorable environment (Pleskacheva et al., 2000 ) will
present different anatomical and behavioral abilities when compared
with animals living in a restricted environment as laboratory rats. In
the case of laboratory rats, it is possible that the mossy fiber
pathway is underutilized because the stimulation is restricted, and
when confronted with any spatial behavioral challenge, the modulatory
capacity of the mossy fiber pathway may be modified through synaptogenesis.
Pharmacological blockade of learning blocks mossy
fiber synaptogenesis
The data obtained herein showed that administration of
0.05 mg/kg of MK801 before training clearly disrupts performance of water maze acquisition, as has been observed previously (Åhlander et
al., 1999 ). Although the animals overcome the impairing effect of MK801
after 4 d of training, these animals cannot be considered overtrained, and accordingly, their performance in the memory tests was
very poor at 7 and 30 d after training, which is consistent with
the idea that overtraining is responsible for improving performance in
the memory test. Moreover, the animals treated with MK801 before acquisition did not show an increase of mossy fiber projections to the
stratum oriens, even though these animals underwent the same
training conditions as the animals in WM5 group, supporting the idea
that overtraining is the factor responsible for the induction of
synaptogenesis. Conversely, the administration of MK801 after acquisition did not affect spatial learning consolidation as observed previously (McLamb et al., 1990 ). Thus, no effects were observed in the
memory test done 7 and 30 d after training, indicating that
animals administered with MK801 after acquisition consolidate normally.
Furthermore, mossy fiber synaptogenesis was observed in these animals,
even under the effects of NMDA receptor antagonist.
The involvement of NMDA receptors in learning and memory has long been
suggested by their role in LTD, LTP (Malenka, 1994 ; Malenka and Nicoll,
1999 ), and in spatial learning (Martinez and Derrick, 1996 ). The
evidence obtained here is consistent with previous literature,
suggesting the involvement of glutamatergic neurotransmission in
spatial learning, underlying plastic events such as LTP, and probably
synaptogenesis (Butler et al., 1999 ). In this regard, NMDA receptors
have also been implicated in the establishment of new synapses
(Friedman et al., 2000 ). Although the MK801 dosage used in this
experiment did not produce important motor effects to explain NMDA
blockade of spatial learning (Åhlander et al., 1999 ), it cannot be
certainly established if mossy fiber synaptogenesis is dependent on
NMDA-related mechanisms.
The proper characterization of the molecular mechanisms involved in
mossy fiber synaptogenesis might require a broader study of the effects
of different receptor antagonists, as well as the expression of
different molecules involved in the induction, guidance, and
stabilization of mossy fiber synapses. In this work, the purpose of
inactivating NMDA receptors was to understand if a pharmacological blockade of learning was enough to disrupt synaptogenesis. The main
differences between MKA and MKB are that learning was allowed to occur
in MKA group, whereas the learning ability of MKB animals was impaired.
Accordingly, memory performance was impaired in MKB animals, but not in
MKA group, further supporting the idea that overtraining improves
spatial memory performance, which might be related to mossy fiber synaptogenesis.
Synaptogenesis occurs in the more septal area of the
dorsal hippocampus
In this experiment we also found evidence suggesting that
increased mossy fiber projection to CA3 occurs mainly in the more septal region of the dorsal hippocampus. The lamellar hypothesis of
hippocampal organization is no longer accepted, instead a more complex
organization with differences throughout the septotemporal and
proximodistal axis of hippocampus is now evident (Amaral and Witter,
1989 ). Ishizuka et al. (1990) found that projections from CA3 that
innervates CA3 and CA1 are different throughout the septotemporal poles
and also throughout the proximodistal axis. The bidirectional projections of hippocampus with the septum is well known to be different throughout the septal and temporal poles (Nyakas et al.,
1987 ; Gaykema et al., 1991 ). Also, it has been demonstrated that the
entorhinal cortex and amygdala projects differently through this axis
(Ino et al., 1998 ; Pikkarainen et al., 1999 ).
These anatomical differences might have functional implications for the
different regions of the hippocampus. Accordingly, it has been
established that only dorsal but not ventral hippocampal lesions
produce behavioral impairment of spatial-related tasks (Moser and
Moser, 1998 ; Bannerman et al., 1999 ). Operant behavior-induced c-Fos
expression has been observed to occur mainly in the dorsal hippocampus
(Bertaina-Anglade et al., 2000 ). Rapp et al. (1999) studied the
hippocampal projections between young and aged animals, observing that
the septal region of mossy fiber projection was altered in senescent
animals, presenting deficits in performance of spatial-related tasks.
Our data are consistent with these observations; because our analysis
was made only in the dorsal hippocampus, we cannot be certain if
similar synaptogenesis is occurring in the ventral hippocampus.
However, the evidence presented here might suggest different roles of
the septal and temporal parts of the dorsal hippocampus in which the
septal pole is suggested to be of great relevance for spatial memory formation.
Conclusions
The data obtained here support the idea that learning may
promote morphological plastic events in the CNS, particularly
synaptogenesis, which in the hippocampus can be observed after spatial
overtraining in the mossy fiber projection to CA3. Although the
functional significance of the new mossy fibers is not yet clear, the
data obtained here suggest that these new mossy fibers may be related with memory formation, which is consistent with the idea that CA3
hippocampus is important for storing spatial representations. In this
regard, we hypothesize that synaptogenesis might be responsible for
producing long-lasting changes in the representation of spatial stimuli. Furthermore, NMDA dependent mechanisms are responsible for
spatial memory formation and perhaps might be related to
synaptogenesis. Because this form of morphological plasticity was
observed mainly in the septal side of the dorsal hippocampus, it is
possible that in this particular region, long-lasting plastic changes
may underlie the establishment of long-term spatial memory.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received May 7, 2001; revised June 27, 2001; accepted June 27, 2001.
This work was supported by Milenio-CONACyT Grant 2000-2001
35806-N and DGAPA IN-214399. We acknowledge the technical
assistance of Oreste Carbajal and Federico Jandete, and we give thanks
to Shaun Harris and Dr. Guillaume Ferreira for the text review and to
Yolanda Díaz de Castro for the preparation of this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni,
Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-253, 04510 México D. F., México. E-mail:
fbermude{at}ifisiol.unam.mx.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Åhlander M,
Misane I,
Schöt PA,
Ögren SO
(1999)
A behavioural analysis of the spatial learning deficit induced by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK801 (dizocilpine) in the rat.
Neuropsychopharmacology
21:414-426[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Adams B,
Lee M,
Fahnestock M,
Racine RJ
(1997)
Long-term potentiation trains induce mossy fiber sprouting.
Brain Res
775:193-197[Medline].
-
Amaral DG,
Witter MP
(1989)
The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data.
Neuroscience
31:571-591[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bannerman DM,
Yee BK,
Good MA,
Heupel MJ,
Iversen SD,
Rawlins JN
(1999)
Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: a comparison of dorsal, ventral, and complete hippocampal cytotoxic lesions.
Behav Neurosci
113:1170-1188[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bear MF
(1996)
A synaptic basis for memory storage in the cerebral cortex.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:13453-13459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Becker CG,
Artola A,
Gerardy-Schahn R,
Becker T,
Welzl H,
Schachner M
(1996)
The polysialic acid modification of the neural cell adhesion molecules is involved in spatial learning and hippocampal long-term potentiation.
J Neurosci Res
45:143-152[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ben-Ari Y,
Represa A
(1990)
Brief seizures episodes induce long-term potentiation and mossy fiber sprouting in the hippocampus.
Trends Neurosci
13:312-318[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bernasconi-Guastalla S,
Wolfer DP,
Lipp HP
(1994)
Hippocampal mossy fibers and swimming navigation in mice: correlations with size and left-right asymmetries.
Hippocampus
4:53-64[Medline].
-
Bertaina-Anglade V,
Tramu G,
Destrade C
(2000)
Differential learning-stage dependent patterns of c-Fos protein expression in brain regions during the acquisition and memory consolidation of an operant task in mice.
Eur J Neurosci
12:3803-3812[Medline].
-
Butler AK,
Uryu K,
Rougon G,
Chesselet MF
(1999)
N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor blockade affects polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule expression and synaptic density during striatal development.
Neurosci
89:1169-1181[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Derrick BE,
York AD,
Martinez JL
(2000)
Increased granule cell neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus following mossy fiber stimulation induce long-term potentiation.
Brain Res
857:300-307[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dudai Y
(1989)
Some basic notions and their ontogenesis.
In: The neurobiology of memory: concepts, findings, trends, Chap 1, pp 3-18 New York: Oxford UP.
-
Escobar ML,
Barea-Rodriguez EJ,
Derrick BE,
Reyes JA,
Martinez JL
(1997)
Opioid receptor modulation of mossy fiber synaptogenesis: independence from long-term potentiation.
Brain Res
751:330-335[Medline].
-
Friedman HV,
Bresier T,
Garner CC,
Ziv NE
(2000)
Assembly of new individual excitatory synapses: time course and temporal order of synaptic molecule recruitment.
Neuron
27:57-69[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gaykema RP,
van der Kuil J,
Hersh LB,
Luiten PG
(1991)
Patterns of direct projections from the hippocampus to the medial septum-diagonal band complex: anterograde tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin combined with immunohistochemistry of choline acetyltransferase.
Neuroscience
43:349-360[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hastings NB,
Gould E
(1999)
Rapid extension of axons into the CA3 region by adult-generated granule cells.
J Comp Neurol
413:146-154[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ino T,
Kaneko T,
Mizuno N
(1998)
Direct projections from the entorhinal cortical layers to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subicular complex in the cat.
Neurosci Res
32:241-265[Medline].
-
Ishizuka N,
Weber J,
Amaral DG
(1990)
Organization of intrahippocampal projections originating from CA3 pyramidal cells in the rat.
J Comp Neurol
295:580-623[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kempermann G,
Kuhn HG,
Gage FH
(1997)
More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment.
Nature
386:493-495[Medline].
-
Klintsova AY,
Greenough WT
(1999)
Synaptic plasticity in cortical systems.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
9:203-208[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kuhn HG,
Dickinson-Anson H,
Gage FH
(1996)
Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: Age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation.
J Neurosci
16:2027-2033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Malenka RC
(1994)
Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus LTP and LTD.
Cell
78:535-538[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Malenka RC,
Nicoll RA
(1999)
Long-term potentiation-a decade of progress.
Science
285:1870-1874[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Martinez Jr JL,
Derrick BE
(1996)
Long-term potentiation and learning.
Annu Rev Psychol
47:173-203[Web of Science][Medline].
-
McClelland JL,
Goddard NH
(1996)
Considerations arising from a complementary learning systems perspective on hippocampus and neocortex.
Hippocampus
6:654-665[Web of Science][Medline].
-
McLamb RL,
Williams LR,
Nanry KP,
Wilson WA,
Tilson HA
(1990)
MK801 impedes the acquisition of spatial memory task in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
37:41-45[Medline].
-
McNaughton BL,
Morris RG
(1987)
Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system.
Trends Neurosci
10:408-415[Web of Science].
-
McNaughton BL,
Barnes CA,
Meltzer J,
Sutherland RJ
(1989)
Hippocampal granule cells are necessary for normal spatial learning but not for spatially-selective pyramidal cell discharge.
Exp Brain Res
76:485-496[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mizumori SJ,
Ragozzino KE,
Cooper BG,
Leutgeb S
(1999)
Hippocampal representational organization and spatial context.
Hippocampus
9:444-451[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Moser MB,
Moser EI
(1998)
Distributed encoding and retrieval of spatial memory in the hippocampus.
J Neurosci
18:7535-7542[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Moser M,
Trommald M,
Andersen P
(1994)
An increase in dendritic spine density on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells following spatial learning in adult rats suggest the formation of new synapses.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:12673-12675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Nadel L,
Eichenbaum H
(1999)
Introduction to the special issue on place cells.
Hippocampus
9:341-345[Medline].
-
Nerad L,
Ramirez-Amaya V,
Ormsby CE,
Bermudez-Rattoni F
(1996)
Differential effects of anterior and posterior insular cortex lesions on the acquisition of conditioned taste aversion and spatial learning.
Neurobiol Learn Mem
66:44-50[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nyakas C,
Luiten PG,
Spencer DG,
Traber J
(1987)
Detailed projection patterns of septal and diagonal band efferents to the hippocampus in the rat with emphasis on innervation of CA1 and dentate gyrus.
Brain Res Bull
18:533-545[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Oliva Jr AA,
Jiang M,
Lam T,
Smith KL,
Swann JW
(2000)
Novel hippocampal interneuronal subtypes identified using transgenic mice that express green fluorescent protein in GABAergic interneurons.
J Neurosci
20:3354-3368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Paxinos G,
Watson C
(1986)
In: The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Orlando, FL: Academic.
-
Pikkarainen M,
Ronkko S,
Savander V,
Insausti R,
Pitkanen A
(1999)
Projections from the lateral, basal, and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala to the hippocampal formation in rat.
J Comp Neurol
403:229-260[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Poncer JC,
McKinney RA,
Gahwiler BH,
Thompson SM
(2000)
Differential control of GABA release at synapses from distinct interneurons in rat hippocampus.
J Physiol (Lond)
528:123-130[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pleskacheva MG,
Wolfer DP,
Kupriyanova IF,
Nikolenko DL,
Scheffrahn H,
Dell'Omo G,
Lipp HP
(2000)
Hippocampal mossy fibers and swimming navigation learning in two vole species occupying different habitats.
Hippocampus
10:17-30[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ramírez-Amaya V,
Escobar ML,
Chao V,
Bermúdez-Rattoni F
(1999)
Synaptogenesis of Mossy fibers induced by spatial water maze overtraining.
Hippocampus
9:631-636[Medline].
-
Rapp PR,
Stack EC,
Gallagher M
(1999)
Morphometric studies of the aged hippocampus: I. Volumetric analysis in behavioral characterized rats.
J Comp Neurol
403:459-470[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rusakov DA,
Davies HA,
Harrison E,
Diana G,
Richter-Levin G,
Bliss TVP,
Stewart MG
(1997)
Ultrastructural synaptic correlates of spatial learning in rat hippocampus.
Neuroscience
80:69-77[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schwegler H,
Mueller GG,
Crusio WE,
Szemes L,
Seress L
(1993)
Hippocampal morphology and spatially related behavior in Long-Evans and CFY rats.
Hippocampus
3:1-8[Medline].
-
Shors TJ,
Miesegaes G,
Beylin A,
Zhao M,
Rydel T,
Gould E
(2001)
Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories.
Nature
410:372-376[Medline].
-
Van-der-Zee CE,
Rashid K,
Le K,
Moore KA,
Stanisz J,
Diamond J,
Racine RJ,
Fahnestock M
(1995)
Intraventricular administration of antibodies to nerve growth factor retards kindling and blocks mossy fiber sprouting in the adult rats.
J Neurosci
15:5316-5323[Abstract].
-
Woolf NJ
(1998)
A structural basis for memory storage in mammals.
Prog Neurobiol
55:59-77[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wuarin JP,
Dudek FE
(1996)
Electrographic seizures and new recurrent excitatory circuits in the dentate gyrus of hippocampal slices from kainate-treated epileptic rats.
J Neurosci
16:4436-4448.
-
Xavier GF,
Oliveira-Filho FJB,
Santos AMG
(1999)
Dentate gyrus-selective colchicine lesion and disruption of performance in spatial tasks: difficulties in place strategy because of a lack of flexibility in the use of environmental cues?
Hippocampus
9:668-681[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/01/21187340-09$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Berbel, D. Navarro, E. Auso, E. Varea, A. E. Rodriguez, J. J. Ballesta, M. Salinas, E. Flores, C. C. Faura, and G. Morreale de Escobar
Role of Late Maternal Thyroid Hormones in Cerebral Cortex Development: An Experimental Model for Human Prematurity
Cereb Cortex,
October 28, 2009;
(2009)
bhp212v2.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ding, A. Qiao, Z. Wang, J. S. Goodwin, E.-S. Lee, M. L. Block, M. Allsbrook, M. P. McDonald, and G.-H. Fan
Retinoic Acid Attenuates {beta}-Amyloid Deposition and Rescues Memory Deficits in an Alzheimer's Disease Transgenic Mouse Model
J. Neurosci.,
November 5, 2008;
28(45):
11622 - 11634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Niyuhire, S. A. Varvel, B. R. Martin, and A. H. Lichtman
Exposure to Marijuana Smoke Impairs Memory Retrieval in Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
September 1, 2007;
322(3):
1067 - 1075.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Rekart, C. J. Sandoval, F. Bermudez-Rattoni, and A. Routtenberg
Remodeling of hippocampal mossy fibers is selectively induced seven days after the acquisition of a spatial but not a cued reference memory task
Learn. Mem.,
June 6, 2007;
14(6):
416 - 421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. I. Colon-Cesario, M. M. Martinez-Montemayor, S. Morales, J. Felix, J. Cruz, M. Adorno, L. Pereira, N. Colon, C. S. Maldonado-Vlaar, and S. Pena de Ortiz
Knockdown of Nurr1 in the rat hippocampus: Implications to spatial discrimination learning and memory
Learn. Mem.,
November 1, 2006;
13(6):
734 - 744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Gusev, C. Cui, D. L. Alkon, and A. N. Gubin
Topography of Arc/Arg3.1 mRNA Expression in the Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus Induced by Recent and Remote Spatial Memory Recall: Dissociation of CA3 and CA1 Activation
J. Neurosci.,
October 12, 2005;
25(41):
9384 - 9397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K. Hebda-Bauer, S. J. Watson, and H. Akil
Cognitive performance is highly sensitive to prior experience in mice with a learning and memory deficit: Failure leads to more failure
Learn. Mem.,
September 1, 2005;
12(5):
461 - 471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. N. Abrous, M. Koehl, and M. Le Moal
Adult Neurogenesis: From Precursors to Network and Physiology
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2005;
85(2):
523 - 569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Fonseca, J. Zhou, M. Botto, and A. J. Tenner
Absence of C1q Leads to Less Neuropathology in Transgenic Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease
J. Neurosci.,
July 21, 2004;
24(29):
6457 - 6465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-X. Yan, T. Li, C. M. Rominger, S. R. Prakash, P. C. Wong, R. E. Olson, R. Zaczek, and Y.-W. Li
Binding Sites of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors in Rodent Brain: Distribution, Postnatal Development, and Effect of Deafferentation
J. Neurosci.,
March 24, 2004;
24(12):
2942 - 2952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mizuno, K. Yamada, J. He, A. Nakajima, and T. Nabeshima
Involvement of BDNF Receptor TrkB in Spatial Memory Formation
Learn. Mem.,
March 1, 2003;
10(2):
108 - 115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|