 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 2001, 21(23):9499-9505
Absence of -9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Dysphoric Effects in
Dynorphin-Deficient Mice
Andreas
Zimmer1, 2,
Emmanuel
Valjent3,
Monika
König1,
Anne M.
Zimmer1, 2,
Patricia
Robledo3,
Heidi
Hahn1,
Olga
Valverde3, and
Rafael
Maldonado3
1 Laboratory of Genetics, National Institute of Mental
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 2 Psychiatric Clinic,
University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany, and 3 Laboratori
de Neurofarmacologia, Facultat de Ciències de la Salut i de la
Vida, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
 |
ABSTRACT |
The involvement of dynorphin on -9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
and morphine responses has been investigated by using mice with a
targeted inactivation of the prodynorphin (Pdyn) gene. Dynorphin-deficient mice show specific changes in the behavioral effects of THC, including a reduction of spinal THC analgesia and the
absence of THC-induced conditioned place aversion. In contrast, acute
and chronic opioid effects were normal. The lack of negative
motivational effects of THC in the absence of dynorphin demonstrates
that this endogenous opioid peptide mediates the dysphoric effects of marijuana.
Key words:
cannabinoid; opioid; mice; mutation; withdrawal; addiction; place aversion
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Pharmacological and genetic evidence
suggest important functional interactions between the endogenous brain
cannabinoid and opioid systems (Hine et al., 1975 ; Vela et al., 1995 ;
Pugh et al., 1997 ; Tanda et al., 1997 ; Ledent et al., 1999 ; Manzanares et al., 1999 ; Valverde et al., 2000 , 2001 ). Most of the behavioral effects of endogenous cannabinoids (arachidonoyletanolamide,
2-arachidonoylglycerol, and 2-arachidonylglycerol) and
-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are mediated by cannabinoid
CB1 receptors (Ledent et al., 1999 ; Zimmer et
al., 1999 ), whereas opioids (endorphin, enkephalins, and dynorphins)
act on µ, , and receptors (Kieffer, 1999 ). Cannabinoids and
opioids produce similar behavioral and physiological effects, such as
antinociception, hypothermia, and reduced locomotor activity
(Manzanares et al., 1999 ). Both systems seem to be functionally coupled
in drug reward and addiction, because opioid withdrawal symptoms were
alleviated by cannabinoids (Hine et al., 1975 ; Lichtman et al., 2001 ;
Yamaguchi et al., 2001 ) and they were significantly reduced in CB1
receptor knock-out mice (Ledent et al., 1999 ; Lichtman et al., 2001 ).
CB1 receptor antagonists blocked heroin self-administration and
morphine-induced place preference (Mas-Nieto et al., 2001 ; Navarro et
al., 2001 ). Morphine-induced place preference was also abolished in
CB1 receptor knock-outs (Martin et al., 2000 ).
Conversely, THC withdrawal symptoms were significantly reduced in
enkephalin-deficient animals (Valverde et al., 2000 ). The expression of
opioid and cannabinoid receptors overlaps in many brain areas,
including structures of the reward circuitry (Herkenham, 1992 ; Matsuda
et al., 1993 ; Delfs et al., 1994 ; Mansour et al., 1995a ,b ). Although colocalization studies with cellular resolution have not been performed
yet, it has been suggested that both receptor types may interact at the
level of signal transduction (Manzanares et al., 1999 ).
Of particular interest is the potential role of cannabis as a gateway
drug, which has been investigated primarily with epidemiological methods (Watson et al., 2000 ). Although most recreational users of
cannabis experience a state of euphoria (high), some people also report
dysphoria and anxiety after cannabis use (Gregg et al., 1976 ; Thomas,
1993 ; Grinspoon and Bakalar, 1997 ; Williamson and Evans, 2000 ). Both
aspects can be revealed in rodents in which conditioned place aversion
or place preference can be induced through different experimental
protocols (Sanudo-Pena et al., 1997 ; Cheer et al., 2000 ; Valjent and
Maldonado, 2000 ). Compounds that activate the µ- or -opioid
receptors generally have positive motivational effects, whereas
-opioid receptor agonists induce aversive effects (Shippenberg et
al., 1987 ; Bals-Kubik et al., 1993 ). These opposing pharmacological
responses may reflect an opposite modulation of the reward circuits by
the different opioid receptors and could suggest that activation of receptors would counteract opioid rewarding effects. Opioids and
cannabinoids both produce their motivational effects through the
stimulation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system (Koob, 1992 ;
Manzanares et al., 1999 ). The neuronal mechanisms for the aversive
effects of THC have not been ascertained yet. The elucidation of these mechanisms is crucial for a better understanding of the processes involved in the initiation of cannabinoid abuse. THC, but not the
endogenous cannabinoid anandamide, stimulates the release of the
endogenous agonist dynorphin, which may contribute to the
antinociceptive effects of THC (Welch and Eads, 1999 ; Houser et al.,
2000 ). To determine whether dynorphin is also involved in the
regulation of motivational effects of THC and morphine, we investigated
whether the genetic deletion of dynorphin influences several acute and
chronic responses of these two drugs.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mice. A gene targeting vector was constructed in a
pPNT-M1-lox vector using a 7 kb SmaI-XbaI
fragment from a prodynophin genomic BAC clone (Research Genetics)
containing exons 1 and 2 and a PCR-amplified 1.2 kb fragment from a
genomic 129/SV lambda GEM 11 clone containing the 3' end of exon 4. This targeting construct was electroporated into MPIII embryonic stem
(ES) cells (a gift from A. Voss and P. Gruss, Max-Planck-Institute for
Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany). Five ES cell clones
with the expected homologous recombination event were isolated and
injected into C57BL/6J mouse blastocysts. The resulting chimeras were
bred to C57BL/6J mice. Heterozygous offspring were intercrossed to
obtain homozygous mutants. Mice used in behavioral studies were between
10 and 16 weeks old. Animals were housed in groups of four to five
animals per cage. The light cycle was 8:00 A.M. lights on and 8:00 P.M.
lights off. Food and water was provided ad libitum. Both
sexes were equally represented. All animal procedures met the
guidelines of the National Institutes of Health detailed in the
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the
European Communities directive 86/609/EEC regulating animal research
and were approved by the Local Ethical Committees.
Radioimmunoassay. Mouse brains (five for each genotype) were
homogenized in 3 ml of 2N acetic acid at 4°C and clarified at 15,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Duplicate aliquots of
10, 50, and 100 µl were dried under vacuum in polystyrene tubes
(Falcon 35 2052), resuspended in 100 µl of RIA (Peninsula
Laboratories, San Carlos, CA) buffer, and assayed following the
protocol for the RIK 8730 Dynorphin A (Porcine) Radioimmunoassay kit
from Peninsula Laboratories. The range for the standard curve for this
kit was between 0.1 and 64 pg.
Drugs. Morphine-HCl, naloxone-HCl, U50,488H,
nor-binaltorphimine (NBI), and THC were provided by Sigma (St. Louis,
MO). THC was diluted to a working solution in 10% ethanol-10%
cremophor EL-80% distilled water. Morphine, naloxone, NBI, and
U50,488H were dissolved in 0.9% saline. SR141716A was generously
provided by Sanofi Recherche (Libourne, France) and was dissolved in
10% ethanol-10% cremophor EL-80% distilled water. The volume of
injection was 1 ml/100 gm for morphine, naloxone, U50,488H, NBI, and
THC and 1 ml/50 gm for SR141716A.
Nociceptive tests. Basal nociceptive thresholds were
measured using the tail-immersion and the hot-plate tests. In the
tail-immersion test, mice were maintained in a cylinder, and their tail
was immersed in water at 48, 50, and 52°C. Latency to tail withdrawal
was measured with a cutoff period of 15 sec to avoid tissue damage. In
the hot-plate test, the mice were placed on a hot surface heated at 52°C, and the latency for paw licking and jumping was recorded. The
cutoff periods for licking and jumping were 30 and 240 sec, respectively.
Acute drug effects. Locomotor activity responses induced by
acute administration of morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.), the -opioid receptor agonist U50,488H (7.5 mg/kg, s.c.), and THC (20 mg/kg, i.p.)
were evaluated using locomotor activity cages (9 × 20 × 11 cm; Imetronic, Passac, France). The boxes were equipped with one line
of photocells placed 2 cm above the floor to measure horizontal
movements and another line 6 cm above the floor to measure vertical
activity (rears). Mice were habituated to the locomotor cages twice
daily (15 min in the morning and 15 min in the afternoon) on 2 consecutive days. On the third day, mice were placed in the locomotor
cages 15 min after drug injection, and ambulatory activity and total
locomotor activity (ambulatory movements plus small movements) were
recorded for 10 min in a low luminosity environment (20-25 lux).
Antinociceptive responses to acute treatment with morphine (2 and 5 mg/kg, s.c.), U50,488H (7.5 mg/kg, s.c.), and THC (20 mg/kg, i.p.) were
measured 2 min after drug injection in both the tail-immersion (water
temperature at 50°C) and the hot-plate tests. The effects of THC (20 mg/kg, i.p.) on rectal temperature were measured 20 min after drug
injection by using an electronic thermocouple flexible probe (Panlab,
Barcelona, Spain). The probe was placed 3 cm into the rectum of the
mice for 30 sec before the temperature was recorded. Control mice were treated with vehicle under the same conditions in all of the experiments.
THC tolerance and withdrawal. Mice were injected
intraperitoneally twice daily at 9:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. during 5 d with THC (20 mg/kg) or vehicle. On day 6, mice only received the
morning injection. Three different responses were measured during the chronic THC treatment: body weight, rectal temperature, and
antinociception. Body weights were recorded for each animal twice per
day using an electronic balance [Mettler PM 4800 (sensitive to 0.01 gm); Mettler Toledo Inc., Columbus, OH], before all morning and
evening injections. The changes in body weight were calculated by
subtracting each weight value from the precedent value. Effects of THC
on rectal temperature were measured on days 1 and 2, immediately before
and 20 min after each injection. On days 3, 4, 5, and 6, rectal
temperature was evaluated before and 20 min after the morning injection
only. Antinociceptive responses were measured using the tail-immersion
assay (50°C), just after rectal temperature measurement, 20 min after
morning (everyday) and evening (days 1 and 2) injections. On the sixth
day, 4 hr after the last THC or vehicle injections, mice were placed in
a circular clear plastic observation area (30 cm diameter, 80 cm
height) for a 15 min period of observation. SR141716A (10 mg/kg, i.p.)
was administered, and mice were then replaced in the same area and
observed for 45 min. Measurement of somatic signs before and after
SR141716A challenge were divided in 5 min time intervals, as described
previously (Hutcheson et al., 1998 ). The number of bouts of sniffing,
writhing, wet-dog shake, and forepaw tremor were counted. Penile
licking or erection, ataxia, hunched posture, tremor, ptosis, and
piloerection were scored 1 for appearance and 0 for nonappearance
within each 5 min time period. Scores for the level of activity were
made by giving in each 5 min period a value: 0, low activity; 1, normal activity; or 2, increased activity. A quantitative value was calculated in each animal for the different checked signs by adding the scores obtained in each 5 min time period. A global withdrawal score, ranging
from 0 to 100, was calculated for each animal by giving to each
individual sign a relative weight, as described previously (Valverde et
al., 2000 ): 0.9 point for the appearance of each checked sign in each 5 min time period and 0.4 point for each bout of counted sign.
Morphine withdrawal. Opiate dependence was induced by
repeated intraperitoneal injections of morphine at an interval of 12 hr
over 6 d (Valverde et al., 2000 ). The morphine dose was increased progressively as follows: first day, 20 mg/kg; second day, 40 mg/kg;
third day, 60 mg/kg; fourth day, 80 mg/kg; fifth day, and 100 mg/kg;
sixth day (only one injection in the morning), 100 mg/kg. Control mice
were treated with saline under the same conditions. Withdrawal was
precipitated by injecting naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) 2 hr after the last
morphine administration and was evaluated during 30 min as reported
previously (Maldonado et al., 1996 ). The number of bouts of jumping,
wet-dog shakes, forepaw tremor, and sniffing were counted. Body tremor,
ptosis, diarrhea, teeth chattering, and piloerection were scored 1 for
appearance or 0 for nonappearance within each 5 min time. A global
withdrawal score was calculated for each animal by using a range of
possible scores from 0 to 100, as described previously (Koob et al.,
1992 ).
Place conditioning paradigm. An unbiased place conditioning
procedure was used to evaluate the aversive properties of THC (Valjent
and Maldonado, 2000 ) and the rewarding effects of morphine (Maldonado
et al., 1997 ). The apparatus consisted of two main squared conditioning
compartments (15 × 15 × 15 cm) separated by a triangular
central division. The light intensity within the conditioning chambers
was 20 ± 5 lux. The movement and location of the mice were
monitored by computerized monitoring software (Videotrack; View Point,
Lyon, France) with images relayed from a camera placed above the
apparatus. During the preconditioning phase, drug naive mice were
placed in the middle of the central division and had free access to
both compartments of the conditioning apparatus for 20 min, with the
time spent in each compartment being recorded. For morphine
experiments, the conditioning phase consisted of three pairings with
morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) and three pairings with saline for a 30 min
conditioning time (Maldonado et al., 1997 ). For THC experiments, the
conditioning phase consisted of five pairings with THC (5 mg/kg, i.p.)
and five pairings with vehicle for a 45 min period (Valjent and
Maldonado, 2000 ). Mice were injected with vehicle or drug and then
immediately confined to the conditioning compartment. The drug-assigned
compartment could be either the most or the least preferred. Treatments
were counterbalanced as closely as possible between compartments.
Control animals received vehicle every day. The test phase was
conducted exactly as the preconditioning phase, i.e., free access to
each compartment for 20 min. The time in the central area was
proportionally shared and added to the time value of each conditioned
compartment, as described previously (Maldonado et al., 1997 ). A place
conditioning score was calculated for each animal as the difference
between time spent in the drug-paired compartment during the test and preconditioning phases. Experiments with NBI (Sigma) were performed in
CD1 mice (22-24 gm). Ninety minutes after
pretreatment with NBI (0, 5, and 10 mg/kg, s.c.), mice were injected
intraperitoneally with vehicle or THC (5 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed in the
conditioning compartment. Six groups of mice were formed:
saline-vehicle, 5 mg/kg NBI-vehicle, 10 mg/kg NBI-vehicle,
saline-THC, 5 mg/kg NBI-THC, and 10 mg/kg NBI-THC.
Statistical analysis. At least 10 animals were used for each
behavioral test. Acute effects and global withdrawal scores were compared by using two-way ANOVA (genotype and treatment) between subjects, followed by one-way ANOVA for individual differences. Values
of tolerance studies were compared by using three-way ANOVA (genotype
and treatment as between-group factors and day as within-group factor),
followed by corresponding two-way and one-way ANOVA and post
hoc comparisons when required. For place conditioning studies, score values were compared by using two-way ANOVA between subjects (genotype and treatment), followed by one-way ANOVA. Time spent in the
drug-paired compartment during pretest in the different groups was
compared by a one-way ANOVA to ensure use of an unbiased procedure.
Individual comparisons of time spent in the drug-paired compartment
during preconditioning and test phases were made with paired two-tailed
Student's t test.
 |
RESULTS |
We inactivated the prodynorphin gene (Pdyn) by deleting
exon 3 and part of exon 4 (Fig.
1A,B).
This genetic mutation deletes the translation initiation codon of the
dynorphin gene to generate a null allele. Analysis of whole brain
extracts by radioimmunoassays showed that, indeed, mice homozygous for
the Pdyntm1zim mutation (henceforth
referred to as Pdyn / ) did not
produce any dynorphin peptides (Fig. 1C).
Pdyn / mice were obtained with
the expected Mendelian frequency. They did not show any apparent
developmental defects, were fertile, and raised their offspring.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Generation of
Pdyn / mice. A, Map
of the wild-type Pdyn locus, the targeting construct,
and the Pdyn / locus. The 3'
external probe used for Southern blot analysis and the expected
restriction fragments are indicated. K,
KpnI; X, XbaI.
B, Genotyping of offspring from
Pdyn+/+ × Pdyn+/ crosses by Southern blot
analysis of mouse tail DNA. C, Analysis of dynorphin
peptide levels from whole brain extracts of
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice. Shown are the average
values (means ± SEM) from five animals per genotype.
|
|
Locomotor activity of dynorphin-deficient mice was evaluated in an
open-field system. Horizontal and vertical movements were similar in
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice, indicating that
dynorphin is not essential for normal motor functions. As has been
reported previously (Wang et al., 2001 ), we also did not find any
differences between wild-type and dynorphin knock-out mice in tests for
thermal pain sensitivity.
First, we evaluated the responses of dynorphin-deficient mice to
opioids. Injection of the agonist U50,488H (7.5 mg/kg, i.p.)
reduced locomotor activity in both genotypes (Fig.
2A), whereas morphine
(5 mg/kg, s.c.) induced a similar increase in horizontal locomotion in
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice (Fig.
2B) compared with saline injection. Thus, locomotor effects of opioids also appeared to be unchanged in
Pdyn / mice. Injection of
U50,488H (7.5 mg/kg, i.p.) also produced similar analgesia in
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice in the tail-immersion
test (Fig. 2A). In addition, no significant differences between genotypes were observed in this nociceptive assay
after intraperitoneal administration of morphine at the dose of 2 and 5 mg/kg (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that acute antinociceptive responses to opioid ligands are not substantially altered in dynorphin-deficient mice.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Effects of U50,488H and morphine.
A, Acute antinociceptive effects of the -selective
ligand U50,488H and vehicle were determined on the tail-immersion test.
Maximum percentage of analgesia was calculated as [(postinjection
latency baseline latency)/(cutoff time baseline
latency)] × 100. Locomotor effects were evaluated in activity boxes,
by measuring horizontal and vertical beam breaks (rears). No
significant differences were observed in these tests between
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice. B,
Morphine antinociception, also evaluated by determining tail-immersion
analgesia, was not significantly different in
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice at intraperitoneal
doses of 2 and 5 mg/kg. We also found no differences in
morphine-induced hyperactivity or in the conditioned place preference
test. Morphine withdrawal symptoms, elicited in chronically treated
mice through naloxone administration, were also unchanged by the lack
of dynorphin. All values are expressed as means ± SEM.
|
|
The involvement of endogenous dynorphin in the rewarding properties of
morphine (5 mg/kg) was studied by using the conditioned place
preference paradigm (Fig. 2B).
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice displayed a similar
conditioned place preference, indicating that the neuronal mechanisms
that mediate the rewarding effects of morphine are not influenced by
the dynorphin deficiency. In contrast to receptor knock-out mice,
Pdyn / and
Pdyn+/+ mice also showed no
significant differences in morphine abstinence symptoms (Fig.
2B), suggesting that dynorphin does not participate in the development and expression of morphine dependence.
Next, we evaluated the effects of the dynorphin deletion on acute
responses induced by THC (20 mg/kg, i.p.). THC analgesia was similar in
both genotypes in the hot-plate test, but the tail-immersion test
revealed a significantly reduced analgesia in
Pdyn / animals
(p < 0.05) (Fig.
3A). In contrast to THC
analgesia, THC-induced hypoactivity and reduction in body temperature
were not affected by the dynorphin mutation (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
THC acute responses and tolerance.
A, Acute antinociceptive effects of vehicle and THC (20 mg/kg, i.p.) were determined in
Pdyn+/+ and
Pdyn / mice on the tail-immersion
and hot-plate tests. THC effects on locomotor activity were determined
in activity boxes and THC hypothermia using a rectal probe. All values
are expressed as means ± SEM. B, Development of
tolerance to the effects of chronic THC (20 mg/kg, i.p., twice daily)
were evaluated by measuring tail-immersion analgesia and changes in
body temperature. *p < 0.05, comparison between
genotypes; p < 0.05 and
 p < 0.01, comparison with vehicle-treated
animals of the same genotype (one-way ANOVA).
|
|
Recurrent administration of THC reduced its antinociceptive and
hypothermic effects (Hutcheson et al., 1998 ). Both
Pdyn / and
Pdyn+/+ mice developed a similar
degree of tolerance over a period of 6 d of testing (Fig.
3B). Somatic signs of withdrawal can be observed in
chronically THC-treated animals after administration of the cannabinoid
receptor antagonist SR141716A. These symptoms included wet-dog shakes,
hunched posture, ptosis, tremor, piloerection, and mastication. Like
opioid withdrawal, these behaviors are thought to be caused by adaptive
neuronal changes that are revealed by antagonist-induced cessation of
receptor activation (Hutcheson et al., 1998 ). When we injected
SR141716A (10 mg/kg) at the end of the chronic THC treatment, we
observed a tendency for reduced expression of somatic withdrawal
symptoms in Pdyn / animals
(global withdrawal score: Pdyn+/+,
68.5 ± 5.2; Pdyn / ,
52.0 ± 4.2) that did not, however, reach significance
(p = 0.059). On the whole, our results indicate
that the dynorphin deficiency does not substantially influence adaptive
neuronal changes after chronic THC treatment.
We next explored the motivational effects of THC in
Pdyn / mice in a place
conditioning paradigm. THC has dysphoric properties in mice under most
experimental conditions and produces a conditioned place aversion
(Manzanares et al., 1999 ). Accordingly,
Pdyn+/+ mice conditioned with a dose
of 5 mg/kg THC spent significantly (p < 0.01)
less time in the drug-paired compartment and obtained a lower place
conditioning score (p < 0.01) (Fig.
4). In contrast, dynorphin-deficient mice
injected with THC spent the same amount of time in the drug-paired as
in the saline-paired compartment and showed a neutral place
conditioning score. Thus, THC-induced conditioned place aversion was
completely suppressed in Pdyn /
mice.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Lack of THC-induced place aversion in
dynorphin-deficient mice. Place conditioning was induced by vehicle and
THC (5 mg/kg, i.p) administration. A, Time spent in the
drug-paired compartment during preconditioning (white
columns) and testing (black columns) phases.
B, Scores calculated as the difference between test and
preconditioning time spent in the drug-paired compartment. All values
are expressed as means ± SEM. **p < 0.01, comparison between genotypes;  p < 0.01, comparison between treatments (one-way ANOVA).
|
|
To further investigate the role of the dynorphin- -opioid receptor
system in the expression of THC place aversion, mice were treated with
the -specific antagonist NBI before the administration of THC in the
place preference paradigm. As shown in Figure
5, NBI treatment also completely
eliminated the development of THC-induced conditioned place aversion
(p < 0.05).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Lack of THC-induced place aversion in mice
pretreated with NBI. Animals were injected with 0, 5 (NBI5), or 10 (NBI10) mg/kg NBI 90 min
before the injection with saline (SAL) or THC.
p < 0.01, comparison between treatments
(one-way ANOVA)
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we generated mice with a targeted deletion of the
prodynorphin gene and analyzed the effects of this mutation on
opioid and cannabinoid drug responses. The antinociceptive effects of the -selective ligand U50,488H were unaltered. In addition, morphine antinociception, reward, and naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal were also unaffected by the dynorphin mutation. These findings were unexpected because the recent analysis of receptor knock-outs (Simonin et al., 1998 ) suggested an involvement of
the -opioid system in the modulation of morphine dependence, because
mice lacking the receptor displayed an attenuation of naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal. The decreased morphine abstinence in -deficient mice could be attributable to a direct activation of -opioid receptors, considering the high doses of morphine used in this study (Simonin et al., 1998 ) and the lack of
selectivity of this compound. Altogether, our results show that most
pharmacological effects of opioids are unchanged in dynorphin-deficient mice.
In contrast, THC analgesia, as determined in the tail-immersion
test, was significantly reduced in
Pdyn / mice. This result strongly
supports a role of dynorphin, or other opioid peptides generated by the
Pdyn gene, in THC analgesia. It is concordant with findings
that have implicated the activation of µ-opioid and, preferentially,
-opioid receptors in the antinociceptive mechanism of THC (Welch,
1993 ; Reche et al., 1996 ; Pugh et al., 1997 ; Welch and Eads, 1999 ).
However, previous pharmacological studies of opioid-cannabinoid
interactions in nociception were ambiguous. Although the receptor-selective antagonist norbinaltorphimine or dynorphin antisera
could block the antinociceptive effects of intrathecally administered
THC (Welch, 1993 ; Reche et al., 1996 ; Pugh et al., 1997 ; Mason et al.,
1999 ), other studies using opioid antagonists did not support an
involvement of opioid receptors in cannabinoid analgesia (Martin, 1985 ;
Calignano et al., 1998 ; Meng et al., 1998 ). However, other mechanisms
different from -opioid receptors could be also involved in the
decrease of THC antinociception in
Pdyn / mice. Indeed,
pharmacological studies indicate that dynorphin may act not only at the
receptor but also on other receptors, including µ- and -opioid
receptors (Zhang et al., 1998 ) and the NMDA receptor (Bakshi and Faden,
1990 ; Dumont and Lemaire, 1994 ; Shukla et al., 1997 ).
Most strikingly, dynorphin-deficient mice do not show any manifestation
of THC-conditioned place avoidance. Furthermore, pretreatment of mice
with NBI also completely abolished the development of THC place
aversion in wild-type animals. Together, these results strongly
indicate that the dynorphin- -opioid receptor system is crucial for
the manifestation of cannabinoid aversive effects. A mechanism for the
interaction between opioid and cannabinoid systems in motivational drug
effects could involve the increased synthesis and release of opioid
peptides in brain regions that regulate drug reward after THC
treatment. This hypothesis is supported by studies demonstrating the
release of dynorphin after THC administration at the level of the
spinal cord (Mason et al., 1999 ; Houser et al., 2000 ) and the induction
of opioid peptide gene expression in the spinal cord (Corchero et al.,
1997b ), hypothalamus (Kumar and Chen, 1983 ; Corchero et al., 1997a ,
1999 ), and periaqueductal gray (Manzanares et al., 1998 ). However,
recent studies have shown that the aversive effects of the agonist
U50,488H are also blunted in cannabinoid CB1
receptor knock-out mice (Ledent et al., 1999 ), which indicates that
dynorphin is not a simple downstream regulator of the aversive effects
of THC. It rather appears that the cannabinoid- and
dynorphin- -opioid systems act in concert in the modulation of
negative motivational drug effects.
Our findings do not exclude the possibility that other systems, such as
the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), are involved in the
modulation of THC dysphoric effects as well. CRF has been implicated in
THC and stress responses (Weidenfeld et al., 1994 ; Rodriguez de Fonseca
et al., 1996 , 1997 ). CB1 receptors are expressed in CRF-containing neurons in the hypothalamus and limbic structures, including the medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala (Herkenham et al., 1991 ). Long-term cannabinoid administration alters
CRF function in the limbic system (Rodriguez de Fonseca et al.,
1997 ).
The selectivity of the observed THC-motivational effects cannot be
defined in the present study. Indeed, stimulation of -opioid receptors through endogenous dynorphins in response to other
dysphoric-aversive stimuli has been reported (Staley et al., 1997 ;
Hutchinson et al., 2000 ). Additional studies will be performed to
determine whether the motivational responses of other aversive stimulus are also modified in prodynorphin knock-out mice.
In summary, our results demonstrate for the first time that the
endogenous opioid peptides generated from the dynorphin gene are
crucial for the negative motivational effects of THC and participate in
the spinal analgesia induced by this compound. This is in agreement with the idea that the activation of cannabinoid receptors stimulates the production and release of endogenous opioid peptides. The disappearance of the dysphoric effects of THC after repeated exposure to the drug (Valjent and Maldonado, 2000 ) could be essential for the
initiation of cannabinoid abuse. The present results clearly indicate
that endogenous dynorphin controls this important cannabinoid motivational response.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received July 17, 2001; revised Sept. 11, 2001; accepted Sept. 19, 2001.
This work was supported by European Commission BIOMED-2 Grant 98-2227 (R.M.), Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitaria Grant 99/0624 (R.M.), Dr.
Esteve S. A. Laboratories (R.M.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 400), and the Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Innovationsprogramm Forschung) (A.Z.).
Correspondence should be addressed to Andreas Zimmer, Laboratory of
Molecular Neurobiology, Clinic of Psychiatry, University of Bonn,
Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53125 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: neuro{at}uni-bonn.de.
H. Hahn's present address: Institute of Human Genetics, University of
Göttingen, Heinrich-Dücker-Weg 12, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Bakshi R,
Faden AI
(1990)
Competitive and non-competitive NMDA antagonists limit dynorphin A-induced rat hindlimb paralysis.
Brain Res
507:1-5[Medline].
-
Bals-Kubik R,
Ableitner A,
Herz A,
Shippenberg TS
(1993)
Neuroanatomical sites mediating the motivational effects of opioids as mapped by the conditioned place preference paradigm in rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
264:489-495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Calignano A,
La Rana G,
Giuffrida A,
Piomelli D
(1998)
Control of pain initiation by endogenous cannabinoids.
Nature
394:277-281[Medline].
-
Cheer JF,
Kendall DA,
Marsden CA
(2000)
Cannabinoid receptors and reward in the rat: a conditioned place preference study.
Psychopharmacology
151:25-30[Medline].
-
Corchero J,
Fuentes JA,
Manzanares J
(1997a)
delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol increases proopiomelanocortin gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of the rat hypothalamus.
Eur J Pharmacol
323:193-195[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Corchero J,
Avila MA,
Fuentes JA,
Manzanares J
(1997b)
delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol increases prodynorphin and proenkephalin gene expression in the spinal cord of the rat.
Life Sci
61:39-43.
-
Corchero J,
Manzanares J,
Fuentes JA
(1999)
Repeated administration of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol produces a differential time related responsiveness on proenkephalin, proopiomelanocortin and corticotropin releasing factor gene expression in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland of the rat.
Neuropharmacology
38:433-439[Medline].
-
Delfs JM,
Kong H,
Mestek A,
Chen Y,
Yu L,
Reisine T,
Chesselet MF
(1994)
Expression of mu opioid receptor mRNA in rat brain: an in situ hybridization study at the single cell level.
J Comp Neurol
345:46-68[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dumont M,
Lemaire S
(1994)
Dynorphin potentiation of [3H]CGP-39653 binding to rat brain membranes.
Eur J Pharmacol
271:241-244[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Gregg JM,
Small EW,
Moore R,
Raft D,
Toomey TC
(1976)
Emotional response to intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol during oral surgery.
J Oral Surg
34:301-313[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Grinspoon L,
Bakalar JB
(1997)
In: Marihuana, the forbidden medicine, pp 234-252. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.
-
Herkenham M
(1992)
Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain: relationship to motor and reward systems.
Ann NY Acad Sci
654:19-32[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Herkenham M,
Lynn AB,
Johnson MR,
Melvin LS,
de Costa BR,
Rice KC
(1991)
Characterization and localization of cannabinoid receptors in rat brain: a quantitative in vitro autoradiographic study.
J Neurosci
11:563-583[Abstract].
-
Hine B,
Friedman E,
Torrelio M,
Gershon S
(1975)
Morphine-dependent rats: blockade of precipitated abstinence by tetrahydrocannabinol.
Science
187:443-445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Houser SJ,
Eads M,
Embrey JP,
Welch SP
(2000)
Dynorphin B and spinal analgesia: induction of antinociception by the cannabinoids CP55,940, Delta(9)-THC and anandamide.
Brain Res
857:337-342[Medline].
-
Hutcheson DM,
Tzavara ET,
Smadja C,
Valjent E,
Roques BP,
Hanoune J,
Maldonado R
(1998)
Behavioural and biochemical evidence for signs of abstinence in mice chronically treated with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
Br J Pharmacol
125:1567-1577[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hutchinson AC,
Simpson GR,
Randall JF,
Zhang X,
Calderon SN,
Rice KC,
Riley AL
(2000)
Assessment of SNC 80 and naltrindole within a conditioned taste aversion design.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
66:779-787[Medline].
-
Kieffer BL
(1999)
Opioids: first lessons from knockout mice.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
20:19-26[Medline].
-
Koob GF
(1992)
Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
13:177-184[Medline].
-
Koob GF,
Maldonado R,
Stinus L
(1992)
Neural substrates of opiate withdrawal.
Trends Neurosci
15:186-191[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kumar MS,
Chen CL
(1983)
Effect of an acute dose of delta 9-THC on hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone and met-enkephalin content and serum levels of testosterone and corticosterone in rats.
Subst Alcohol Actions Misuse
4:37-43[Medline].
-
Ledent C,
Valverde O,
Cossu G,
Petitet F,
Aubert JF,
Beslot F,
Bohme GA,
Imperato A,
Pedrazzini T,
Roques BP,
Vassart G,
Fratta W,
Parmentier M
(1999)
Unresponsiveness to cannabinoids and reduced addictive effects of opiates in CB1 receptor knockout mice.
Science
283:401-404[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lichtman AH,
Sheikh SM,
Loh HH,
Martin BR
(2001)
Opioid and cannabinoid modulation of precipitated withdrawal in delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and morphine-dependent mice.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
298:1007-1014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Maldonado R,
Blendy JA,
Tzavara E,
Gass P,
Roques BP,
Hanoune J,
Schutz G
(1996)
Reduction of morphine abstinence in mice with a mutation in the gene encoding CREB.
Science
273:657-659[Abstract].
-
Maldonado R,
Saiardi A,
Valverde O,
Samad TA,
Roques BP,
Borrelli E
(1997)
Absence of opiate rewarding effects in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors.
Nature
388:586-589[Medline].
-
Mansour A,
Fox CA,
Akil H,
Watson SJ
(1995a)
Opioid-receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: anatomical and functional implications.
Trends Neurosci
18:22-29[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mansour A,
Fox CA,
Burke S,
Akil H,
Watson SJ
(1995b)
Immunohistochemical localization of the cloned mu opioid receptor in the rat CNS.
J Chem Neuroanat
8:283-305[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Manzanares J,
Corchero J,
Romero J,
Fernandez-Ruiz JJ,
Ramos JA,
Fuentes JA
(1998)
Chronic administration of cannabinoids regulates proenkephalin mRNA levels in selected regions of the rat brain.
Brain Res Mol Brain Res
55:126-132[Medline].
-
Manzanares J,
Corchero J,
Romero J,
Fernandez-Ruiz JJ,
Ramos JA,
Fuentes JA
(1999)
Pharmacological and biochemical interactions between opioids and cannabinoids.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
20:287-294[Medline].
-
Martin BR
(1985)
Structural requirements for cannabinoid-induced antinociceptive activity in mice.
Life Sci
36:1523-1530[Medline].
-
Martin M,
Ledent C,
Parmentier M,
Maldonado R,
Valverde O
(2000)
Cocaine, but not morphine, induces conditioned place preference and sensitization to locomotor responses in CB1 knockout mice.
Eur J Neurosci
12:4038-4046[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mas-Nieto M,
Pommier B,
Tzavara ET,
Caneparo A,
Da Nascimento S,
Le Fur G,
Roques BP,
Noble F
(2001)
Reduction of opioid dependence by the CB(1) antagonist SR141716A in mice: evaluation of the interest in pharmacotherapy of opioid addiction.
Br J Pharmacol
132:1809-1816[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mason Jr DJ,
Lowe J,
Welch SP
(1999)
Cannabinoid modulation of dynorphin A: correlation to cannabinoid-induced antinociception.
Eur J Pharmacol
378:237-248[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Matsuda LA,
Bonner TI,
Lolait SJ
(1993)
Localization of cannabinoid receptor mRNA in rat brain.
J Comp Neurol
327:535-550[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Meng ID,
Manning BH,
Martin WJ,
Fields HL
(1998)
An analgesia circuit activated by cannabinoids.
Nature
395:381-383[Medline].
-
Navarro M,
Carrera MR,
Fratta W,
Valverde O,
Cossu G,
Fattore L,
Chowen JA,
Gomez R,
del Arco I,
Villanua MA,
Maldonado R,
Koob GF,
de Fonseca FR
(2001)
Functional interaction between opioid and cannabinoid receptors in drug self-administration.
J Neurosci
21:5344-5350[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pugh Jr G,
Mason Jr DJ,
Combs V,
Welch SP
(1997)
Involvement of dynorphin B in the antinociceptive effects of the cannabinoid CP55,940 in the spinal cord.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
281:730-737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Reche I,
Fuentes JA,
Ruiz-Gayo M
(1996)
A role for central cannabinoid and opioid systems in peripheral delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced analgesia in mice.
Eur J Pharmacol
301:75-81[Medline]. [Erratum (1996) 312:391]
-
Rodriguez de Fonseca F,
Rubio P,
Menzaghi F,
Merlo-Pich E,
Rivier J,
Koob GF,
Navarro M
(1996)
Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist [D-Phe12,Nle21,38,C alpha MeLeu37]CRF attenuates the acute actions of the highly potent cannabinoid receptor agonist HU-210 on defensive-withdrawal behavior in rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
276:56-64[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Rodriguez de Fonseca F,
Carrera MRA,
Navarro M,
Koob GF,
Weiss F
(1997)
Activation of corticotropin-releasing factor in the limbic system during cannabinoid withdrawal.
Science
276:2050-2054[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sanudo-Pena MC,
Tsou K,
Delay ER,
Hohman AG,
Force M,
Walker JM
(1997)
Endogenous cannabinoids as an aversive or counter-rewarding system in the rat.
Neurosci Lett
223:125-128[Medline].
-
Shippenberg TS,
Bals-Kubic R,
Herz A
(1987)
Motivational properties of opioids: evidence that an activation of
-receptors mediates reinforcement processes.
Brain Res
436:234-239[Web of Science][Medline]. -
Shukla VK,
Prasad JA,
Lemaire S
(1997)
Nonopioid motor effects of dynorphin A and related peptides: structure dependence and role of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
283:604-610[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Simonin F,
Valverde O,
Smadja C,
Slowe S,
Kitchen I,
Dierich A,
Le Meur M,
Roques BP,
Maldonado R,
Kieffer BL
(1998)
Disruption of the kappa-opioid receptor gene in mice enhances sensitivity to chemical visceral pain, impairs pharmacological actions of the selective kappa-agonist U-50,488H and attenuates morphine withdrawal.
EMBO J
17:886-897[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Staley JK,
Rothman RB,
Rice KC,
Partilla J,
Mash DC
(1997)
2 opioid receptors in limbic areas of the human brain are upregulated by cocaine in fatal overdose victims.
J Neurosci
17:8225-8233[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Tanda G,
Pontieri FE,
Di Chiara G
(1997)
Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common mu1 opioid receptor mechanism.
Science
276:2048-2050[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Thomas H
(1993)
Psychiatric symptoms in cannabis users.
Br J Psychiatry
163:141-149[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Valjent E,
Maldonado R
(2000)
A behavioural model to reveal place preference to delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice.
Psychopharmacology
147:436-438[Medline].
-
Valverde O,
Maldonado R,
Valjent E,
Zimmer AM,
Zimmer A
(2000)
Cannabinoid withdrawal syndrome is reduced in pre-proenkephalin knock-out mice.
J Neurosci
20:9284-9289[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Valverde O,
Noble F,
Beslot F,
Dauge V,
Fournie-Zaluski MC,
Roques BP
(2001)
Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol releases and facilitates the effects of endogenous enkephalins: reduction in morphine withdrawal syndrome without change in rewarding effect.
Eur J Neurosci
13:1816-1824[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vela G,
Ruiz-Gayo M,
Fuentes JA
(1995)
Anandamide decreases naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs in mice chronically treated with morphine.
Neuropharmacology
34:665-668[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wang Z,
Gardell LR,
Ossipov MH,
Vanderah TW,
Brennan MB,
Hochgeschwender U,
Hruby VJ,
Malan Jr TP,
Lai J,
Porreca F
(2001)
Pronociceptive actions of dynorphin maintain chronic neuropathic pain.
J Neurosci
21:1779-1786[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Watson SJ,
Benson Jr JA,
Joy JE
(2000)
Marijuana and medicine: assessing the science base: a summary of the 1999 Institute of Medicine report.
Arch Gen Psychiatry
57:547-552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Weidenfeld J,
Feldman S,
Mechoulam R
(1994)
Effect of the brain constituent anandamide, a cannabinoid receptor agonist, on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in the rat.
Neuroendocrinology
59:110-112[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Welch SP
(1993)
Blockade of cannabinoid-induced antinociception by norbinaltorphimine, but not N,N-diallyl-tyrosine-Aib-phenylalanine-leucine, ICI 174,864 or naloxone in mice.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
265:633-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Welch SP,
Eads M
(1999)
Synergistic interactions of endogenous opioids and cannabinoid systems.
Brain Res
848:183-190[Medline].
-
Williamson EM,
Evans FJ
(2000)
Cannabinoids in clinical practice.
Drugs
60:1303-1314[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Yamaguchi T,
Hagiwara Y,
Tanaka H,
Sugiura T,
Waku K,
Shoyama Y,
Watanabe S,
Yamamoto T
(2001)
Endogenous cannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, attenuates naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent mice.
Brain Res
909:121-126[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zhang S,
Tong Y,
Tian M,
Dehaven RN,
Cortesburgos L,
Mansson E,
Simonin F,
Kieffer B,
Yu L
(1998)
Dynorphin A as a potential endogenous ligand for four members of the opioid receptor gene family.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
286:136-141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zimmer A,
Zimmer AM,
Hohmann AG,
Herkenham M,
Bonner TI
(1999)
Increased mortality, hypoactivity, and hypoalgesia in cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:5780-5785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/01/21239499-07$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos
The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacol. Rev.,
September 1, 2006;
58(3):
389 - 462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Maldonado and F. Rodriguez de Fonseca
Cannabinoid Addiction: Behavioral Models and Neural Correlates
J. Neurosci.,
May 1, 2002;
22(9):
3326 - 3331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|