 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2001, 21(5):1501-1509
Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity Involves Competition between
Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II and
Postsynaptic Density 95 for Binding to the NR2A Subunit of the NMDA
Receptor
F.
Gardoni1,
L. H.
Schrama2,
A.
Kamal2,
W. H.
Gispen2,
F.
Cattabeni1, and
M.
Di
Luca1
1 Institute of Pharmacological Sciences, University of
Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy, and 2 Medical Pharmacology,
Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University of
Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
 |
ABSTRACT |
NMDA receptor, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II ( CaMKII), and postsynaptic density 95 (PSD-95) are
three major components of the PSD fraction. Both CaMKII and PSD-95
have been shown previously to bind NR2 subunits of the NMDA receptor
complex. The nature and mechanisms of targeting to the NMDA receptor
subunits are, however, not completely understood. Here we report that
the C-terminal NR2A(S1389-V1464) sequence was sufficient to guarantee
the association of both native and recombinant CaMKII and PSD-95.
PSD-95(54-256) was able to compete with the binding of both native and
recombinant CaMKII to the NR2A C-tail. Accordingly,
CaMKII(1-325) competes with both the native PSD-95 and the native
kinase itself for the binding to NR2A. In addition, Ser/Ala1289 and
Ser/Asp1289 point mutations on the unique CaMKII phosphosite of NR2A
did not significantly influence the binding of native CaMKII and
PSD-95 to the NR2A C-tail. Finally, the association-dissociation of
CaMKII and PSD-95 to and from the NR2A C-tail was significantly
modulated by activation of NMDA receptor achieved by either
pharmacological tools or long-term potentiation induction, underlining
the importance of dynamic and reciprocal interactions of NMDA receptor,
CaMKII, and PSD-95 in hippocampal synaptic plasticity.
Key words:
CaMKII; LTP; NMDA; postsynaptic density; PSD-95; synaptic plasticity
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A mature synapse is capable of
modulating its efficacy by means of activity-dependent plasticity
events. Such a process might in turn modulate the structural
organization of specific synaptic compartment, i.e., the postsynaptic
density (PSD), in which clustering of ligand-gated receptors to
scaffolding proteins and to enzymes can be dynamically regulated (Ziff,
1997 ). PSD consists of a complex network of interacting proteins
involved in the regulation of synaptic function and modulation of
postsynaptic responses. PSDs are enriched in ionotropic AMPA and NMDA
glutamate receptors (Ehlers et al., 1996 ; Kennedy, 1997 , 1998 ). NMDA
receptors are of major interest because they are involved in
synaptogenesis, neuronal circuitry formation, synaptic plasticity, and
learning and memory, as well as in the molecular pathogenesis of
neurological disorders (Hollmann and Heinemann, 1994 ; During et al.,
2000 ). NMDA receptors are oligomeric complexes formed by the coassembly
of members of three receptor subunit families: NR1, NR2 subfamily
(NR2A-D; Hollmann and Heinemann, 1994 ), and NR3A (Das et al., 1998 ).
Among NR2 subunits, whose expression is developmentally regulated, NR2A
is expressed in the adult rat brain in the large majority of synapses
(Monyer et al., 1994 ). Because of its anatomical localization
and expression onset, NR2A is likely to play a major role in synaptic
plasticity modulating long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term
depression. In fact, animals with C-terminal truncation of
postnatally expressed NR1/NR2A heteromeric receptors, but with an
intact NR1/NR2B complex, exhibit impaired hippocampal LTP (Sprengel et
al., 1998 ). In PSD, NR2A and NR2B subunits directly interact with
PSD-95 (Kornau et al., 1995 ), chapsyn-110/PSD-93 (Kim et al., 1996 ),
and other members of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase family
(Lau et al., 1996 ) through their intracellular extended COOH sequence.
In particular, NR2A C-terminal motif tSDV is mandatory for
efficient binding to PSD-95 and synapse-associated protein 97 PDZ (PSD-95/Discs large/zona occludens 1) domains (Bassand et
al., 1999 ). The interaction with the PSD-95 protein family induces the
clustering of the channel proteins (Kim et al., 1996 ), thus playing an
important role in the molecular organization of NMDA receptors,
although more recent findings demonstrate that postsynaptic NMDA
receptor clustering does not solely depend on the PSD-95 family (Migaud
et al., 1998 ; Passafaro et al., 1999 ). In addition, PSD-95 appears to
be important in coupling NMDA receptor to biochemical intracellular
pathways controlling bidirectional synaptic plasticity (Tezuka et al., 1999 ; Yamada et al., 1999 ). Nevertheless, although it has been reported
that the molecular interactions involving PSD-95 and the NMDA receptor
are modified by pathological insults such as an ischemic challenge
(Takagi et al., 2000 ), the physiological conditions influencing
association-dissociation of specific proteins to and from NMDA
receptor are not yet fully understood.
NR2 subunits are not solely associated to PSD-95; indeed, the NMDA
receptor complex has been also shown to bind
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
II ( CaMKII) (Gardoni et al., 1998 ; Strack and Colbran, 1998 ; Leonard
et al., 1999 ). We have demonstrated recently that the C-terminal domain
1349-1464 of NR2A subunit of NMDA receptor complex interacts with
both PSD-95 and native CaMKII and that receptor-kinase
interaction occurs with unphosphorylated CaMKII, but it is
strengthened by kinase autophosphorylation (Gardoni et al., 1999 ).
Although all of these observations identify NMDA receptor subunits as a
target for both PSD-95 and CaMKII in PSD, the exact nature of these
interactions requires further elucidation. In the present study, we
address therefore the following questions: (1) is CaMKII binding to
NR2A directly and specifically antagonized by PSD-95?; and (2) can
activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, i.e., LTP induction, modulate
both CaMKII and PSD-95 association to NMDA receptor complex?
Answering these questions will help clarify the importance of the
reciprocal interaction of these three major components of PSD in
synaptic function and synaptic plasticity.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
PSD preparation. To isolate PSD from rat hippocampus,
a modification of the method by Carlin et al. (1980) was used as
described by Gardoni et al. (1998 , 1999 ).
Cloning, expression, and purification of glutathione
S-transferase fusion proteins. NR2A, CaMKII, and PSD 95
fragments were subcloned downstream of glutathione
S-transferase (GST) in the BamHI and
HindIII site of the expression plasmid pGEX-KG by PCR using the Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) on a cDNA containing plasmids forNR2A (kind gift from S. Nakanishi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), CaMKII (kind gift from H. Schulman, Stanford University, CA) or PSD 95 cDNA (kind gift from M. Sheng, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA). The inserts were fully sequenced with ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyser (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
GST-NR2A(1244-1464), GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Asp],
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Ala], GST-NR2A(1349-1464),
GST-NR2A(1244-1389), GST-NR2A(1244-1461),
GST- CaMKII(315 478), and GST-PSD-95(54-256) fusion constructs were
expressed in Escherichia coli and purified on glutathione
agarose beads as described previously (Gardoni et al., 1999 ). GST
fusion proteins were eluted with PBS, reduced 20 mM glutathione, 1% Triton X-100, and 0.1 mM PMSF overnight at 4°C. When indicated in the
text, purified fusion proteins were incubated for protease cleavage, to
cut the GST tags, for 1 hr at 25°C with 100 ng of human thrombin
(Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) in elution buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM
CaCl2. GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Ala] and
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Asp] were produced by using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).
"Pull-out" assay. Aliquots containing 5 µg of
hippocampal PSD were diluted with PBS and 0.1 or 1% SDS to a final
volume of 1 ml and incubated (1 hr, 37°C) with glutathione agarose
beads saturated with GST fusion proteins or GST alone. After an
incubation period, the beads were extensively washed with PBS and 0.1%
Triton X-100. Bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to
immunoblot analysis with a monoclonal anti-PSD-95 antibody, a
monoclonal anti- CaMKII antibody, and a polyclonal anti-GluR2/3 antibody.
GST-NR2A fusion protein phosphorylation. For
CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of NR2A, GST-NR2A purified fusion
proteins were incubated with 50 U of CaMKII(1-325) (New England
Biolabs, Beverly, MA) for 30 min at 37°C, in the presence of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2.4 µM
calmodulin, 2 mM CaCl2, and
100 µM ATP (2 µCi/tube
[ -32P]ATP; 5000Ci/mmol; Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK). The reaction was
stopped by the addition of electrophoresis sample buffer (2% SDS, 10%
glycerol, 5% -mercaptoethanol, and 62.5 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.8). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (running gel,
acrylamide 11%), and phosphoproteins were revealed by autoradiography.
Preparation of hippocampal slices. Hippocampal slices were
obtained as described previously (Caputi et al., 1997 ). Briefly, brains
were removed and placed into chilled (4°C) oxygenated Krebs' buffer.
After removal of meninges, hippocampal slices were prepared quickly
with a McIlwain tissue chopper and placed in custom-made chambers
equilibrated continuously with O2
95%-CO2 5% (v/v). Slices were then
equilibrated at 37°C (O2
95%-CO2 5%) for 30 min. After the
equilibration period, slices were incubated for 5 min in the absence
or presence of 100 µM glutamate-1
µM glycine. KN-93
10 5 M was applied
simultaneously to Glu/Gly, and the incubation was stopped after 5 min.
After incubation, slices were transferred in <1 min (Suzuki et al.,
1994 ) in the homogenization chamber and rapidly homogenized in 0.32 M cold sucrose containing 1 mM HEPES, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM
NaHCO3, and 0.1 mM PMSF, pH
7.4 in the presence of a complete sets of proteases inhibitors
(Complete; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) and phosphatase
inhibitors. The homogenized tissue was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at
3000 × g for 15 min to obtain a fraction of
mitochondria and synaptosomes. The pellet was resuspended in hypotonic
buffer (in the presence of proteases inhibitors) in a glass-glass
potter and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 hr. The
pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of buffer containing 75 mM KCl and 1% Triton X-100 and centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 1 hr. The final pellet was homogenized
by 10 strokes in a glass-glass potter in 20 mM
HEPES. An equal volume of glycerol was added and stored at 80°C.
This fraction is referred to as "Triton-insoluble fraction" (TIF).
Slice electrophysiology. Male Wistar rats, age of ~2
months (250-300 gm), were used. The animals were kept under a 12 hr
light/dark regimen, with lights on at 7:00 A.M. The rats were
decapitated after short period of inhalation anesthesia with
isoflurane. The brains were rapidly removed and placed in ice-cold
medium, and hippocampal slices of 450 µm were prepared. The slices
were stored in artificial CSF (ACSF) of the following composition (in
mM): 124 NaCl, 3.3 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1.3 MgSO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 20 NaHCO3, and 10.0 glucose. After 1 hr at room
temperature, the slices were transferred to the recording chamber and
perfused with ACSF at a rate of 2 ml/min and at 30°C. Bipolar
stainless steel electrodes of 100 µm placed on Schaffer collateral
fibers of CA1 area were used as stimulation electrodes. Activity in the
dendritic layer in the stratum radiatum was recorded by means of glass
microelectrodes of 3-5 µm tip diameter and 0.5 M resistance
filled with ACSF.
A stimulus intensity that evoked half-maximum amplitude field
EPSPs (fEPSPs), typically between 65 and 125 µA, was used.
Only slices that displayed maximal fEPSP responses of >1 mV amplitude were included in the study. Baseline responses were recorded for at
least 15 min with test stimuli given at a rate of 0.05 Hz. Only slices
that showed stable baseline responses were used in the experiment.
Three animals per group were used. From each animal, seven slices were
included in the study. After 15 min of baseline recording, LTP was
induced by a train of high-frequency stimulation (HFS) composed of 100 pulses given in 1 sec (100 Hz). The responses were then recorded for
other 15 min using the test stimulation frequency of 0.05 Hz. The
slices were then immediately frozen and stored in 80°C until use.
For biochemical experiments, slices were thawed directly into
homogenization chambers and immediately homogenized.
Immunoprecipitation. Triton-insoluble fraction proteins (50 µg) were incubated in buffer A containing: 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM
Na2HPO4, 0.5% NP-40, and
0.1% SDS in a final volume of 200 µl with antibodies against NR2A/B
as indicated in the text (dilution of 1:50) overnight at 4°C. Protein
A agarose beads (5 mg/tube) or Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I
cells (0.5%) washed in the same buffer were added, and incubation was
continued for 2 hr. The beads were collected by centrifugation and
washed three times with buffer A. Sample buffer for SDS-PAGE was added,
and the mixture was boiled for 3 min. Beads were pelleted by
centrifugation, and a volume of supernatants was applied to 6%
SDS-PAGE.
CaMKII assay. For assay of CaMKII-dependent activity,
Triton-insoluble fraction proteins were incubated in a medium
containing: 50 mM HEPES, 10 mM Mg acetate, 100 µM
[ -32P]ATP, 40 µM syntide-2, 1 mM
CaCl2, and 2.4 µM calmodulin, in a final volume of 30 µl.
The reaction was stopped by spotting on phosphocellulose paper.
Antibodies. Monoclonal CaMKII antibody was purchased from
Boehringer Mannheim. Polyclonal antibodies against GluR2/3 and NR2A/B
were purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA). A polyclonal antibody
against GST was produced in rabbits using recombinant GST. Monoclonal
antibody against PSD-95 was purchased from Affinity BioReagents Inc.
Polyclonal antibody against p286-anti-active CaMKII was purchased
from Promega (Madison, WI).
 |
RESULTS |
Pull-out of CaMKII and PSD-95 from purified hippocampal
PSD by NR2A C-terminal domain
We have demonstrated previously that the C-terminal region
1349-1464 of NR2A subunit of NMDA receptor complex interacts with both
native CaMKII and PSD-95 from rat hippocampal PSD (Gardoni et al.,
1999 ). To further confirm the specific and direct association of
CaMKII and PSD-95 to NR2A, fusion proteins between GST and different
amino acid stretches of NR2A cytoplasmic C-tail partially overlapping
each other were prepared, immobilized on a glutathione affinity matrix,
and used for a pull-out assay. The NR2A C-terminal region different
fragments used were as follows: L1244-V1464, S1349-V1464, L1244-G1461,
and L1244-V1389 (Fig.
1A). Solubilized PSD
proteins purified from rat hippocampus were applied in native form
batchwise to the affinity beads; the beads were extensively washed, and
the bound material was resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblot
analysis with antibodies raised against CaMKII and PSD-95. GluR2/3,
present in PSD preparation as described previously (Gardoni et al.,
1998 ) and as shown by Western blot analysis performed in native
solubilized PSD proteins (Fig. 1B, Input),
was used as a negative control. Figure 1B shows that
both CaMKII and PSD-95 can associate with the C-terminal NR2A
domains L1244-V1464 and S1349-V1464, confirming previous results
(Gardoni et al., 1999 ) indicating that NR2A(1349-1464) was indeed
sufficient to guarantee the association of both proteins. Deletion of
75 amino acids from the NR2A C-terminal side prevents the binding of
both CaMKII and PSD-95 to NR2A(L1244-V1389); in addition, the
L1244-G1461 fusion protein that does not contain the NR2A C-terminal
PDZ-binding domain tSDV binds CaMKII but not PSD-95, indicating the
region NR2A(1389-1461) as necessary for binding CaMKII and that the tSDV binds PSD-95. The binding is specific because no CaMKII and
PSD-95 are pulled out using GST alone. Furthermore, the association of
CaMKII and PSD-95 to NR2A fusion proteins was not attributable to
incomplete solubilization of the PSD offered to the beads, because
another PSD protein (i.e., GluR2/3) (Fig. 1B,
top panel) remained in the supernatant after
the pull-out assay. Furthermore, the use of 1% SDS, a concentration
detergent known to guarantee a higher PSD solubilization
(McGlade-McCulloh et al., 1993 ), does not influence both CaMKII and
PSD-95 binding to NR2A (Fig. 1B, rightmost
lane). These results demonstrate that both CaMKII and PSD-95
binding sites reside in the NR2A(1389-1464) region but did not exclude
that CaMKII could be associated to the NMDA receptor complex through
a previous binding with PSD-95. To exclude the hypothesis of a direct
association between native CaMKII and PSD-95, GST-PSD-95(54-256)
fusion protein (Fig. 1C), containing the PDZ1 and PDZ2
domains ( known to be responsible for NR2 binding) was prepared,
immobilized on a glutathione affinity matrix, and used for pull-out
assay with solubilized hippocampal PSD proteins. Figure 1C
shows that native NR2A/B subunits bind to PSD-95(54-256), as expected
(Kornau et al., 1995 ; Bassand et al., 1999 ), whereas no signal is
detectable for native CaMKII in the bound material (bottom
panel), indicating no direct interaction between CaMKII and PSD-95(54-256). To further support this hypothesis, recombinant CaMKII did not bind PSD-95 in an overlay assay (data not shown), thus excluding that CaMKII can bind to a PSD-95 domain other than
PSD-95(54-256).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
CaMKII and PSD-95 bind NR2A C-terminal domain.
A, Fusion proteins of GST with different
fragments of the NR2A C-terminal domain, partially overlapping each
other, were prepared. B, Pull-out of CaMKII, PSD-95,
and GluR2/3 from hippocampal PSD by GST, GST-NR2A(1244-1389),
GST-NR2A(1244-1464), GST-NR2A(1349-1464), and GST-NR2A(1244-1461).
Input (hippocampal PSD) is 20%. Fusion proteins were
purified from bacterial extracts on glutathione agarose beads and
incubated for 1 hr at 37°C with purified hippocampal PSD previously
solubilized in 0.1 or 1% SDS 1 (rightmost lane); after
extensive washes, the bound proteins were eluted from the beads with
SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western
blotting. Data are representative of three independent experiments
performed on different PSD preparations and replicated three times in
each PSD preparation. C, PSD-95(54-256) directly binds
to PSD-associated NR2A but not to CaMKII; pull-out of CaMKII and
NR2A/B from hippocampal PSD by GST and GST-PSD-95(54-256) purified
fusion proteins. Data are representative of three independent
experiments performed on different PSD preparations and replicated four
times in each PSD preparation.
|
|
PSD-95 and CaMKII compete for NR2A binding
Because the CaMKII binding domain resides in the
NR2A(1389-1461) region, very close to the C-terminal tSDV domain of
NR2A C-tail known to link specifically the PDZ2 domain of PSD-95
(Kornau et al., 1995 ; Bassand et al., 1999 ), one intriguing hypothesis was to study the possible CaMKII/PSD-95 competition in the binding with the NR2A subunit of NMDA receptor complex.
To test this hypothesis, GST-NR2A(1244-1464) bound to glutathione
agarose beads was incubated in an in vitro competition assay with a fixed concentration of recombinant CaMKII(1-325) and
increasing concentrations of PSD-95(54-256) fragment obtained by
elution from glutathione beads by either reduced glutathione or
thrombin cleavage (see Materials and Methods). After extensive washes, the association of CaMKII(1-325) to NR2A C-tail was then evaluated in the bound material by immunoblot analysis with a monoclonal antibody
raised against CaMKII. Figure
2A shows that eluted
GST-PSD-95(54-256) competes in a concentration dependent manner, in a
range from 1 to 50 nM, for the binding of 10 nM CaMKII(1-325) to NR2A. To verify whether
the competition observed between the two proteins was not attributable
to GST tags that might compete for binding sites, in a second set of
experiments (Fig. 2B), the assay was performed using
PSD-95(54-256) previously cut from GST tags by means of human thrombin
(Smith and Johnson, 1988 ).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Competition between recombinant CaMKII(1-325)
and PSD-95(54-256) for binding to the NR2A C-terminal tail.
A, GST-NR2A(1244-1464) fusion proteins (5 µg) bound
to glutathione agarose beads were incubated with a fixed amount of
recombinant CaMKII(1-325) (10 nM) (New England Biolabs)
and increasing concentrations (0-50 nM) of eluted
GST-PSD-95(54-256). Bound proteins were eluted and immunoblotted for
CaMKII using a monoclonal anti- CaMKII antibody. B,
GST-NR2A(1244-1464) fusion proteins (5 µg) bound to glutathione
agarose beads were incubated with a fixed amount of recombinant
CaMKII(1-325) (10 nM) and increasing concentrations
(0-50 nM) of thrombin-cut PSD-95(54-256).
C, GST-NR2A(1244-1464) and GST-NR2A(1244-1461), not
containing the tSDV domain ( tSDV), bound to
glutathione agarose beads (5 µg), were incubated in a pull-out assay
with a fixed amount of hippocampal PSD (5 µg) in the absence or
presence of PSD-95(54-256) (10 nM) or anti-NR2A/B
polyclonal antibody (Chemicon). D, GST-NR2A(1244-1464)
was incubated in a pull-out assay with a fixed amount of cold
phosphorylated hippocampal PSD (5 µg) in the absence or presence of
PSD-95(54-256) (10 nM) or anti-NR2A/B polyclonal antibody.
E, Western blotting analysis performed with
anti-p286- CaMKII in native [ATP (100 µM); indicated
by ] or in vitro phosphorylated PSD [ATP (100 µM); indicated by +]. Data are representative of three
independent experiments performed on different PSD preparations and
replicated four times in each PSD preparation.
|
|
To test and confirm the specificity of PSD-95 competition on
CaMKII(1-325)/NR2A(1244-1464) binding, the experiment was repeated using solubilized PSD proteins (5 µg), containing a high amount of
native CaMKII (Kennedy, 1997 ) instead of recombinant
CaMKII(1-325). Figure 2C shows that native
PSD-associated CaMKII is also competed by PSD-95(54-256) (10 nM) on NR2A binding (Fig. 2C,
left panel); a similar result was obtained incubating
solubilized PSD in the presence of a monoclonal anti-NR2A/B antibody
recognizing the last 20 amino acids of the NR2A C-terminal tail, thus
occluding the PSD-95 binding site (Kornau et al., 1995 ). The same
results were obtained when PSD proteins were cold-phosphorylated before the pull-out experiment in conditions known to promote CaMKII autophosphorylation (Gardoni et al., 1998 ), thus suggesting that PSD-95(54-256) in vitro competes also with
autophosphorylated CaMKII (Fig. 2D). In parallel
samples, CaMKII autophosphorylation degree was tested by means of
anti-p286- CaMKII antibody in phosphorylated PSD when compared with
native PSD not in vitro phosphorylated (Fig.
2E). As a further demonstration of the specificity of
PSD-95/ CaMKII competition on NR2A C-tail binding, the pull-out assay
was performed also on truncated GST-NR2A(1244-1461) fusion protein,
not containing the tSDV domain and so not able to directly bind to
native PSD-95 (Fig. 1B). Under these
experimental conditions, no significant competition between
PSD-associated CaMKII and PSD-95(54-256) (10 nM) was observed (Fig. 2C, right
panel), indicating that the association of PSD-95 to the
three last amino acid tSDV of NR2A C-tail is necessary to directly
antagonize the association of CaMKII to NR2A. Similar results have
been obtained with GST-NR2A(1349-1464) instead of
GST-NR2A(1244-1464), further indicating that the region 1244-1348 is
not essential for both CaMKII and PSD-95 binding (data not shown).
We have demonstrated previously that recombinant CaMKII(1-325)
catalytic domain but not CaMKII(315-478) associative domain is able
to directly associate to NR2A C-tail and to compete for the binding
with the native PSD-associated kinase in a pull-out assay (Gardoni et
al., 1999 ). As a direct consequence of these results, we investigated
which CaMKII domain was able to antagonize the binding of native
PSD-95 to NR2A C-terminal tSDV domain. To answer this question,
GST-NR2A(1244-1464) was incubated in a pull-out assay with a fixed
amount of solubilized PSD proteins (5 µg) in the absence or presence
of the same concentration of recombinant CaMKII(1-325) catalytic
domain (10 nM) or CaMKII(315-478) associative domain
(10 nM). Using these experimental conditions, in the
presence of CaMKII(1-325), the amount of native CaMKII
( 72.2 ± 5.4%; p < 0.01 vs control)
bound to NR2A(1244-1464) was significantly lower. On the other hand,
incubation with 10 nM CaMKII(315-478) did not
significantly influence the amount of native CaMKII associated, further indicating that CaMKII(1-325) but not CaMKII(315-478) was capable of binding NR2A. Furthermore, preincubation with
CaMKII(1-325) significantly decreased the amount of native
PSD-95 bound to NR2A ( 86.6 ± 6.3%; p < 0.01 vs control), thus indicating that the exogenously added
CaMKII(1-325) competed with PSD-95 for NR2A binding (Fig.
3, left panel).
Experiments performed with CaMKII(315-478) associative domain
did not significantly affect the binding of native kinase but also of
PSD-95 to the NMDA receptor subunit (Fig. 3, right
panel).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
CaMKII(1-325) competition with both native
CaMKII and PSD-95 for NR2A binding. GST-NR2A(1244-1464) fusion
proteins bound to glutathione agarose beads were incubated in a
pull-out assay with a fixed amount of hippocampal PSD (5 µg) in the
absence or presence of 10 nM CaMKII(1-325) or 10 nM CaMKII(315-478); after extensive washes, the bound
proteins were eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed on Western
blotting with monoclonal anti- CaMKII and monoclonal anti-PSD-95
antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments
performed on different PSD preparations and replicated four times in
each PSD preparation.
|
|
Phosphorylation of NR2A (Ser1289) does not affect either CaMKII
or PSD-95 binding
NR2A and NR2B subunits have been shown to be substrates for
different protein kinases (Moon et al., 1994 ; Omkumar et al., 1996 ;
Strack and Colbran, 1998 ; Gardoni et al., 1999 ), playing a significant
role in modulating channel activity and in synaptic plasticity
processes (Yu et al., 1997 ). Accordingly, it was of interest to
determine whether CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of NR2A Ser1289
(Gardoni et al., 1999 ) might influence the interaction of the kinase
itself and/or of PSD-95 to the NMDA receptor subunit. To study the
direct effects of NR2A CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation, a point
mutation on Ser1289 was introduced to produce
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Asp] and
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Ala], and subsequently control and
mutated fusion proteins were phosphorylated by recombinant kinase in
the presence of [ -32P]ATP as
phosphate donor. Figure
4A shows a
representative autoradiograph of in vitro CaMKII-dependent
phosphorylation of GST-NR2A fusion proteins; a radioactive band at 50 kDa corresponding to native NR2A(1244-1464) GST fusion protein is
clearly visible (right lane). The phosphorylated
bottom bands correspond to degradation products of the
primary fragment because they are recognized by the anti-GST antibody
(data not shown). Both GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Asp] and
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Ala] did not show any phosphorylation, thus confirming the presence in Ser1289 of a unique CaMKII phosphosite in the NR2A region comprised between 1244 and 1464 (Strack and Colbran,
1998 ; Gardoni et al., 1999 ).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Influence of NR2A(Ser1289) in
vitro CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation on CaMKII/PSD-95
binding to the NR2A C-terminal tail. A, In
vitro CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of GST-NR2A fusion
proteins. GST-NR2A(1244-1464), GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Asp],
and GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Ala] purified fusion proteins were
incubated with 50 U of CaMKII(1-325) (New England Biolabs)
for 30 min at 37°C. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (running gel,
acrylamide 11%), and phosphoproteins were revealed by
autoradiography. B, GST-NR2A(1244-1464),
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Asp], and
GST-NR2A[(1244-1464)Ser1289/Ala] purified fusion proteins were
incubated in a pull-out assay with a fixed amount of hippocampal PSD (5 µg); after extensive washes, the bound proteins were eluted,
separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western blotting with monoclonal
anti- CaMKII and monoclonal anti-PSD-95 antibodies. Data are
representative of three independent experiments performed on different
PSD preparations and replicated four times in each PSD
preparation.
|
|
To test the influence of Ser1289 phosphorylation on CaMKII and
PSD-95 association, the same amount of control and mutated GST-NR2A(1244-1464) fusion proteins were subjected to pull-out experiments with hippocampal PSD, and bound proteins were eluted and
immunoblotted for CaMKII and PSD-95. Figure 4B
shows that both Ala1289 and Asp1289 mutation in NR2A C-terminal tail do
not significantly influence the interaction of the NR2A fusion proteins to both native CaMKII and PSD-95.
Modulation of CaMKII/PSD-95 binding to NMDA receptor complex in
acute hippocampal slices
It has been shown that interaction between the NR2 C-terminal tail
and native PSD-associated CaMKII occurs with unphosphorylated CaMKII but is strengthened by kinase autophosphorylation (Strack and
Colbran, 1998 ; Gardoni et al., 1999 ; Leonard et al., 1999 ). However,
the mechanism(s) that regulate targeting of CaMKII to NMDA in
physiological conditions are not yet fully understood. To further
investigate the modulation of CaMKII-NR2A/B association mediated by
CaMKII activation, we used hippocampal slices as described previously
(Caputi et al., 1997 ); slices were incubated with 100 µM
glutamate-1 µM glycine in the absence or presence of the
specific CaMKII inhibitor KN-93 (10 5
M) or with vehicle alone. After incubation, a TIF was
obtained, and CaMKII-activity and NMDA receptor coprecipitation studies were performed. The TIF had to be used in these experiments instead of
the classical PSD preparation because the amount of the starting material from hippocampal slices was very limited (15 mg wet weight). Nevertheless, the protein composition of this preparation was carefully
tested for the absence of presynaptic markers (i.e., synaptophysin and
synaptotagmin were absent) and for the enrichment in the PSD proteins
( CaMKII, PSD-95, NMDA, and AMPA receptor subunits) (Caputi et al.,
1999 ). Figure 5A shows that
CaMKII activity, measured as phosphorylation of syntide-2, is highly
increased (+252.7 ± 21.7% of control value; *p < 0.01 vs control value) after treatment of hippocampal slices with
100 µM glutamate-1 µM
glycine, whereas concomitant treatment with the CaMKII-specific inhibitor KN-93 (10 5
M) in the presence of 100 µM glutamate-1 µM
glycine is able to reduce kinase activity to values even lower than
control [ 28.7 ± 5.6% of control value; **p < 0.01 glutamate-glycine versus glutamate-glycine plus KN-93
(10 5 M)]. In
parallel, glutamate-glycine and KN-93 treatment is able to similarly
modulate CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of NR2A/B (data not shown).
Western blotting analysis performed in the TIF fraction with
anti- CaMKII and anti-PSD-95 (Fig. 5B) monoclonal antibodies shows that the incubation with 100 µM glutamate-1 µM glycine in the absence or presence of KN-93
(10 5 M) does not
influence the concentration of both CaMKII and PSD-95 in the TIF
compartment. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments were then performed in
the same slices with a polyclonal anti-NR2A/B, and the presence of
CaMKII, PSD-95, and NR2A/B was evaluated in the immunoprecipitated
material by Western blotting (Fig. 5C,D). In
basal conditions, both CaMKII and PSD-95 coimmunoprecipitate with
the NMDA receptor complex; 100 µM glutamate-1
µM glycine, a treatment that activates CaMKII,
induced a significant increase of CaMKII coprecipitation with NMDA
receptor complex and a parallel decrease in PSD-95 coprecipitation
(data are expressed as the ratio of the relative amount of CaMKII
and PSD-95 present in the immunocomplex: ratio CaMKII/PSD-95,
+173.5 ± 18.3% of control value; *p < 0.05 glutamate-glycine versus control). Treatment with KN-93, able to
abolish CaMKII activation, restores both CaMKII and PSD-95
coprecipitation with NMDA receptor complex to values not significantly
different from control slices [ratio CaMKII/PSD-95, 28.4 ± 19.1%; 100 µM glutamate-1
µM glycine plus KN-93
(10 5 M) compared
with untreated control slices; **p < 0.05 100 µM glutamate-1 µM
glycine plus KN-93 (10 5
M) versus 100 µM
glutamate-1 µM glycine]. In the presence of KN-93 (10 5 M),
there is a nonsignificant decrease of CaMKII and a parallel increase of
PSD-95 coprecipitation with NMDA receptor complex, probably because of
the inhibition of CaMKII basal activity (Fig. 5A) in
KN-93-treated slices. In all of the experiments, the NMDA receptor
immunoprecipitation was quantitative, because no signal for both NR1
and NR2A/B subunits was found in the supernatant after
immunoprecipitation reaction.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Modulation of CaMKII/PSD-95 binding to NMDA
receptor complex in acute hippocampal slices. A, CaMKII
activity in TIF obtained from hippocampal slices treated in the absence
or presence of 100 µM glutamate-1
µM glycine and KN-93 (10 5
M) [*p < 0.01 100 µM
glutamate-1 µM glycine vs control slices;
**p < 0.01 100 µM
glutamate-1 µM glycine vs 100 µM glutamate-1 µM glycine plus
KN-93(10 5 M)]. B,
Western blotting analysis performed in the TIF fraction with
anti- CaMKII and anti-PSD-95 monoclonal antibodies. C, Proteins from
TIF were immunoprecipitated with a polyclonal antibody raised against
NR2A/B subunits of NMDA receptor complex; Western blot analysis was
performed in the immunoprecipitated material with anti-NR2A/B,
anti- CaMKII, and anti-PSD-95. D, Diagram illustrating
statistical analysis of Western blotting experiments performed on
immunoprecipitated material. Data are expressed as the ratio
CaMKII/PSD-95 ± SEM of three independent experiments performed
on different TIF preparations and replicated four times in each TIF
preparation.
|
|
In a second set of experiments, LTP was induced in hippocampal slices
by HFS on Schaffer collateral fibers of CA1 area (Fig. 6). After 15 min of LTP induction, CaMKII
activity as well as the relative concentration of CaMKII and PSD-95
associated to NMDA receptor complex were evaluated in a
coimmunoprecipitation assay (anti NR2A/B), as described above. The
amount of LTP achieved by HFS is reported in Figure
6A, being that the average fEPSP slope in HFS slices
was +70% compared with control stimulated slices. Figure
6B shows results of CaMKII activity measured in tetanized hippocampal slices and in control slices subjected to low-frequency stimulation (LFS). In LTP-potentiated slices, CaMKII activity was increased +78.2 ± 12.1% (*p < 0.05, HFS vs LFS slice) when compared with LFS slices, as expected and
previously described by others (Liu et al., 1999 ). Fifteen minutes
after LTP induction, slices were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and
Western blotting analysis was performed in the TIF fraction with
anti- CaMKII and anti-PSD-95 (Fig. 6C). Representative
Western blotting in Figure 6C shows a slight but not
significant increase of CaMKII concentration in the TIF pool in
LTP-potentiated slices (+26.4 ± 10.3%; p > 0.05 LTP-established slices vs control LFS slices); furthermore, no
differences are observed in the concentration of PSD-95 in the TIF
compartment. In the same slices, NMDA receptor complex and associated
proteins were coimmunoprecipitated from TIF with anti-NR2A/B. Figure
6D shows a representative Western blot analysis of
NR2A/B, CaMKII, and PSD-95 present in the immunocomplex after precipitation with an anti-NR2A/B antibody in LFS slices (left lane) and in LTP-potentiated slices (right lane); LTP
increased the association of CaMKII to NR2A/B subunit and
concomitantly decreased the association of PSD-95 [ratio
CaMKII/PSD-95, +102.2 ± 29.1% of LFS slices;
*p < 0.05 LTP-established slices versus control LFS
slices] (Fig. 6E), confirming results obtained by chemical stimulation of NMDA receptor in hippocampal slices shown above
(Fig. 5D).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Modulation of CaMKII/PSD-95 binding to NMDA
receptor complex is mediated by LTP induction. A,
Long-term potentiation in the CA1 field of the hippocampus. HFS
(open arrow) significantly potentiated the fEPSP slopes
in 21 slices taken from three animals (filled
circles; Wilcoxon match pair-pairs signed test;
p < 0.05). Three control slices taken from three
animals (open circles) were not subjected to the
conditioning stimulation. Data are mean ± SEM.
Inset, Left, Control slices;
traces represent 15 averaged fEPSPs recorded at the
beginning (1) and the end
(2) of the experiment. Right,
Tetanized slices; traces represent 15 averaged fEPSPs
recorded before (1) and 15 min after
(2) HFS. Calibration: 5 min, 1 mV.
B, CaMKII activity in TIF in control and HFS slices.
C, Western blotting analysis performed in the TIF
fraction with anti- CaMKII and anti-PSD-95 monoclonal antibodies.
D, proteins from TIF were immunoprecipitated with a
polyclonal antibody raised against NR2A/B subunits of NMDA receptor
complex; Western blot analysis was performed in the immunoprecipitated
material with anti-NR2A/B, anti- CaMKII, and anti-PSD-95.
E, Quantitative analysis of Western blotting experiments
performed on immunoprecipitated material. Data are expressed as the
ratio CaMKII/PSD-95 ± SEM of three independent experiments
performed on different TIF preparations and replicated four times in
each TIF preparation.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the last few years, binding of various PSD proteins to NMDA
receptor subunits has been extensively described (Lau et al., 1996 ;
Wyszynski et al., 1997 ; Gardoni et al., 1998 ; Wechsler and Teichberg, 1998 ). In particular, a large number of studies
identified the NMDA receptor complex as a target for specific enzymes,
i.e., CaMKII (Gardoni et al., 1998 , 1999 ; Strack and Colbran, 1998 ; Leonard et al., 1999 ) and for scaffolding proteins, i.e., the PSD-95
family (Kornau et al., 1995 ; Kim et al., 1996 ; Lau et al., 1996 ;
Bassand et al., 1999 ), underlining the crucial role played by NMDA
receptor in building up the complex network of PSD proteins.
The results reported here demonstrate that both CaMKII and PSD-95
are associated to the NR2A C-terminal region in amino acid domains
comprised between 1389 and 1464. Furthermore, CaMKII association to
NR2A 1389-1464 can be affected by activation of the NMDA receptor
in vitro by either pharmacological tools or induction of
LTP. The increased CaMKII binding to the receptor entails the
detachment of PSD-95 from tSDV-NR2A both in vitro (Figs. 2,
3), using purified and recombinant proteins, and ex vivo in
chemically and electrically stimulated hippocampal slices (Figs. 5,6).
In fact, we show here that PSD-95(54-256) competes with both native
and recombinant CaMKII(1-325) on the binding to the NR2A C-tail.
The displacement is specific because, using an NR2A truncated protein
lacking the tSDV region [NR2A(1244-1461)], we completely abolished
the competition (Fig. 2C). CaMKII can bind the NR2A
subunit C-tail also in the absence of the tSDV domain (Fig.
1B). These data support the hypothesis that the tSDV
domain of NR2A is mandatory but not sufficient for interacting with
PSD-95, suggesting a more complex regulation of PSD-95/NR2A anchoring, involving perhaps domains upstream to the NR2A tSDV motif (Bassand et
al., 1999 ). Moreover, the interaction observed between CaMKII/PSD-95 and NR2A was found not to be correlated with CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of the NR2A subunit on Ser1289, because Ser/Ala1289 and
Ser/Asp1289 point mutations did not significantly influence the binding
of both proteins to the NR2A C terminus.
It is becoming increasingly evident that targeting of CaMKII in
specific subcellular structures is likely to play an important role in
defining specific physiological roles of the kinase. Our data showing
that LTP can foster higher association of CaMKII to NMDA receptor
complex adds further value to previous observations reported by us and
others, suggesting a role of NMDA receptor activation in promoting
CaMKII translocation in the postsynaptic compartment (Strack et al.,
1997 ; Gardoni et al., 1998 ; Strack and Colbran, 1998 ; Shen and Meyer,
1999 ). In addition, we provide here direct evidence that CaMKII
recruitment during activity-dependent synaptic plasticity entails
partial dissociation of PSD-95 from NMDA receptor complex. This
observation further expands our knowledge on the molecular mechanism(s)
underlying synaptic plasticity because it suggests that not only
modulation of glutamate receptor distribution in PSD but also the
dynamic regulation of proteins clustered to ionotropic glutamate
receptors in PSD is critical for regulating synaptic efficacy.
The association of PSD-95 to and the dissociation from the NR2A C
terminus mediated by CaMKII is particularly relevant in a
physiological context because it enables NMDA receptors to couple to
different signal transduction proteins. Indeed, it has been reported
that the PSD-95 family is not solely implicated in NMDA receptor
anchoring and localization (Kornau et al., 1995 ; Lau et al., 1996 ), but
it is capable of binding different signaling proteins (Migaud et al.,
1998 ; Yamada et al., 1999 ), i.e., nonreceptor tyrosine kinases
(Tezuka et al., 1999 ). Therefore, a dissociation of PSD-95 from the
NR2A C terminus might separate nonreceptor tyrosine kinases from NMDA
receptors, making them available for phosphorylating other substrates
differentially located in the postsynaptic compartment. It is known
that both CaMKII and Src family enzymes play a fundamental role in LTP
expression. However, they might intervene in temporally and spatially
distinct phases of the process, thus mediating a different biochemical
cascade. In our experiments, we choose a relatively short time interval after LTP induction to evaluate CaMKII recruitment to NMDA receptor complex. The rationale for this time schedule is based on previous observations by Barria et al. (1997) who observed an increased CaMKII
activity in the early stages after LTP induction and CaMKII-dependent AMPA subunits phosphorylation after 25 min of LTP induction. Our data
suggest that, in the very early stage of LTP, CaMKII first gets
autophosphorylated, as reported by other authors (Fukunaga et al.,
1995 ), and it is then recruited to and phosphorylates NMDA receptor
subunits, triggering a biochemical event that further sustains synaptic activity.
Based on these observations, it appears clear that a shuttling of
CaMKII and PSD-95 to and from the NMDA receptor complex might be of
great relevance for coupling NMDA receptor to different signal
transduction pathways. On this line, emerging evidence suggests that
phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunits by specific kinases as well
as association of specific proteins to NMDA receptor complex are
altered in an animal model of neurological disorders (Di Luca et al.,
1999 ; During et al., 2000 ). For instance, CaMKII has been shown to
translocate toward the PSD very rapidly after ischemia (Aronowski and
Grotta, 1996 ; Domanska-Janik et al., 1999 ). On the other hand,
coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated an ischemia-induced
decrease in the association between PSD-95 and NR2A/B (Takagi et al.,
2000 ), probably because of the interaction of NMDA receptor complex
with a different interacting proteins present in the PSD fraction.
In conclusion, dynamic interactions between three of the major
components of the PSD in the mature synapse ( CaMKII, PSD-95, and
NR2A) could represent a molecular mechanism involved in the regulation
of postsynaptic function in response to NMDA receptor channel
activation. Our data demonstrating a functional CaMKII/PSD-95 competition on NR2A C-tail both in vitro and in hippocampal
slices after LTP induction add a tile on the knowledge of the molecular changes occurring in the postsynaptic compartment during
activity-dependent synaptic plasticity.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received May 10, 2000; revised Dec. 7, 2000; accepted Dec. 12, 2000.
This work has been supported in part by Telethon Grant 946 and
Ministero dell'Universitá e della Ricerca Scientifica e
Tecnologica (MURST) 40% and 60% to M.D.L., MURST 60%, and Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche Grant 96.02075.PS04 to F.C. We are grateful to S. Nakanishi for kindly providing NR2A cDNA, to H. Schulman for kindly
providing CaMKII cDNA, and to M. Sheng for kindly providing PSD-95
cDNA. We are particularly grateful to M. Salter for useful discussion.
Correspondence should be addressed to Fabrizio Gardoni, Institute of
Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy. E-mail: fabrizio.gardoni{at}unimi.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Aronowski J,
Grotta JC
(1996)
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in postsynaptic densities after reversible cerebral ischemia in rats.
Brain Res
709:103-110[ISI][Medline].
-
Barria A,
Muller D,
Derkach V,
Griffith LC,
Soderling TR
(1997)
Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-KII during long-term potentiation.
Science
276:2042-2045[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bassand P,
Bernard A,
Rafiki A,
Gayet D,
Khrestchatisky M
(1999)
Differential interaction of the tSXV motifs of the NR1 and NR2A NMDA receptor subunits with PSD-95 and SAP-97.
Eur J Neurosci
11:2031-2043[ISI][Medline].
-
Caputi A,
Barindelli S,
Pastorino L,
Cimino M,
Buxbaum JD,
Cattabeni F,
Di Luca M
(1997)
Increased secretion of the amino-terminal fragment of amyloid precursor protein in brains of rats with a constitutive up-regulation of protein kinase C.
J Neurochem
68:2523-2529[ISI][Medline].
-
Caputi A,
Gardoni F,
Cimino M,
Pastorino L,
Cattabeni F,
Di Luca M
(1999)
CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of NR2A and NR2B is decreased in animals characterized by hippocampal damage and impaired LTP.
Eur J Neurosci
11:141-148[ISI][Medline].
-
Carlin RK,
Grab DJ,
Cohen RS,
Siekevitz P
(1980)
Isolation and characterization of post synaptic densities from various brain regions: enrichment of different types of post synaptic densities.
J Cell Biol
86:831-843[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Das S,
Sasaki YF,
Rothe T,
Premkumar LS,
Takasu M,
Crandall JE,
Dikkes P,
Conner DA,
Rayudu PV,
Cheung W,
Chen HSV,
Lipton SA,
Nakanishi N
(1998)
Increased NMDA current and spine density in mice lacking the NMDA receptor subunit NR3A.
Nature
393:377-381[Medline].
-
Di Luca M,
Ruts L,
Gardoni F,
Cattabeni F,
Biessels GJ,
Gispen WH
(1999)
NMDA receptor subunits are modified transcriptionally and post-translationally in the brain of streptozotocin-diabetic rats.
Diabetologia
42:693-701[ISI][Medline].
-
Domanska-Janik K,
Zalewska T,
Zablocka B,
Ostrowski J
(1999)
Ischemia-induced modifications of protein components of rat brain postsynaptic densities.
Neurochem Int
34:329-336[ISI][Medline].
-
During MJ,
Symes CW,
Lawlor PA,
Lin J,
Dunning J,
Fitzsimons HL,
Poulsen D,
Leone P,
Xu R,
Dicker BL,
Lipski J,
Young D
(2000)
An oral vaccine against NMDAR1 with efficacy in experimental stroke and epilepsy.
Science
287:1453-1460[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ehlers MD,
Mammen AL,
Lau LF,
Huganir RL
(1996)
Synaptic targeting of glutamate receptors.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
8:484-489[ISI][Medline].
-
Fukunaga K,
Muller D,
Miyamoto E
(1995)
Increased phosphorylation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and its endogenous substrates in the induction of long-term potentiation.
J Biol Chem
270:6119-6124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gardoni F,
Caputi A,
Cimino M,
Pastorino L,
Cattabeni F,
Di Luca M
(1998)
NR2A/B subunits of NMDA receptor as anchors for CaMKII in post synaptic densities.
J Neurochem
71:1733-1741[ISI][Medline].
-
Gardoni F,
Schrama LH,
van Dalen JJW,
Gispen WH,
Cattabeni F,
Di Luca M
(1999)
CaMKII binding to the C-terminal tail of NMDA receptor subunit NR2A and its modulation by autophosphorylation.
FEBS Lett
456:394-399[ISI][Medline]. -
Hollmann M,
Heinemann S
(1994)
Cloned glutamate receptors.
Annu Rev Neurosci
17:31-108[ISI][Medline].
-
Kennedy MB
(1997)
The postsynaptic densities at glutamatergic synapses.
Trends Neurosci
20:264-268[ISI][Medline].
-
Kennedy MB
(1998)
Signal transduction molecules at the glutamatergic postsynaptic membrane.
Brain Res Brain Res Rev
26:243-257[Medline].
-
Kim E,
Cho KO,
Rothschild A,
Sheng M
(1996)
Heteromultimerization and NMDA receptor-clustering activity of chapsyn-110, a member of the PSD-95 family of proteins.
Neuron
17:103-113[ISI][Medline].
-
Kornau HC,
Schenker LT,
Kennedy MB,
Seeburg PH
(1995)
Domain interaction between NMDA receptor subunits and the post synaptic density protein PSD-95.
Science
269:1737-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lau LF,
Mammen A,
Ehlers MD,
Kindler S,
Chung WJ,
Garner CC,
Huganir RL
(1996)
Interaction of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex with a novel synapse-associated protein, SAP-102.
J Biol Chem
271:21622-21628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Leonard S,
Lim IA,
Hemsworth DE,
Horne MC,
Hell D
(1999)
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:3239-3244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Liu J,
Fukunaga K,
Yamamoto H,
Nishi K,
Miyamoto E
(1999)
Differential roles of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in hippocampal long-term potentiation.
J Neurosci
19:8292-8299[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
McGlade-McCulloh E,
Yamamoto H,
Tan SE,
Brickey DA,
Soderling TR
(1993)
Phosphorylation and regulation of glutamate receptors by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II.
Nature
362:640-642[Medline].
-
Migaud M,
Charlesworth P,
Dempster M,
Webster LC,
Watabe AM,
Makhinson M,
He Y,
Ramsay MF,
Morris RG,
Morrison JH,
O'Dell TJ,
Grant SG
(1998)
Enhanced long-term potentiation and impaired learning in mice with mutant postsynaptic density-95 protein.
Nature
396:433-439[Medline].
-
Monyer H,
Burnashev N,
Laurie DJ,
Sakmann B,
Seeburg PH
(1994)
Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors.
Neuron
12:529-540[ISI][Medline].
-
Moon IS,
Apperson ML,
Kennedy MB
(1994)
The major tyrosine phosphorylated protein in the post synaptic density fraction is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2B.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:3954-3958[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Omkumar RV,
Kiely MJ,
Rosenstein AJ,
Min KT,
Kennedy MB
(1996)
Identification of a phosphorylation site for calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II in the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.
J Biol Chem
271:31670-31678[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Passafaro M,
Sala C,
Niethammer M,
Sheng M
(1999)
Microtubule binding by CRIPT and its potential role in the synaptic clustering of PSD-95.
Nat Neurosci
2:1063-1070[ISI][Medline].
-
Shen K,
Meyer T
(1999)
Dynamic control of CaMKII translocation and localization in hippocampal neurons by NMDA receptor stimulation.
Science
284:162-166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Smith DB,
Johnson KS
(1988)
Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in E. coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase.
Gene
67:31-40[ISI][Medline].
-
Sprengel R,
Suchanek B,
Amico C,
Brusa R,
Burnashev N,
Rozov A,
Hvalby O,
Jensen V,
Paulsen O,
Andersen P,
Kim JJ,
Thompson RF,
Sun W,
Webster LC,
Grant SGN,
Eilers J,
Konnerth A,
Li JY,
Mcnamara JO,
Seeburg PH
(1998)
Importance of the intracellular domain of NR2 subunits for NMDA receptor function in vivo.
Cell
92:279-289[ISI][Medline].
-
Strack S,
Colbran RJ
(1998)
Autophosphorylation-dependent targeting of calcium calmodulin kinase II by the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.
J Biol Chem
273:20689-20692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Strack S,
Choi S,
Lovinger DM,
Colbran RJ
(1997)
Translocation of autophosphorylated calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to the postsynaptic density.
J Biol Chem
272:13467-13470[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Suzuki T,
Okumura-Noji K,
Tanaka R,
Tada T
(1994)
Rapid translocation of cytosolic Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II into postsynaptic density after decapitation.
J Neurochem
63:1529-1537[ISI][Medline].
-
Takagi N,
Logan R,
Teves L,
Wallace MC,
Gurd JW
(2000)
Altered interaction between PSD-95 and the NMDA receptor following transient global ischemia
J Neurochem
74:169-178[ISI][Medline].
-
Tezuka T,
Umemori H,
Akiyama T,
Nakanishi S,
Yamamoto T
(1999)
PSD-95 promotes Fyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR2A.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:435-440[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wechsler A,
Teichberg VI
(1998)
Brain spectrin binding to the NMDA receptor is regulated by phosphorylation, calcium and calmodulin.
EMBO J
17:3931-3939[ISI][Medline].
-
Wyszynski MJ,
Lin J,
Rao A,
Nigh E,
Beggs HA,
Craig AM,
Sheng M
(1997)
Competitive binding of alpha-actinin and calmodulin to the NMDA receptor.
Nature
385:439-442[Medline].
-
Yamada Y,
Chochi Y,
Takamiya K,
Sobue K,
Inui M
(1999)
Modulation of the channel activity of the
2/ 1-subtype N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor by PSD-95.
J Biol Chem
274:6647-6652[Abstract/Free&nb |