WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (76)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 2001, 21(8):2687-2698

Rapid Signaling at Inhibitory Synapses in a Dentate Gyrus Interneuron Network

Marlene Bartos1, Imre Vida2, Michael Frotscher2, Jörg R. P. Geiger1, and Peter Jonas1

1 Physiologisches Institut and 2 Anatomisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mutual synaptic interactions between GABAergic interneurons are thought to be of critical importance for the generation of network oscillations and for temporal encoding of information in the hippocampus. However, the functional properties of synaptic transmission between hippocampal interneurons are largely unknown. We have made paired recordings from basket cells (BCs) in the dentate gyrus of rat hippocampal slices, followed by correlated light and electron microscopical analysis. Unitary GABAA receptor-mediated IPSCs at BC-BC synapses recorded at the soma showed a fast rise and decay, with a mean decay time constant of 2.5 ± 0.2 msec (32°C). Synaptic transmission at BC-BC synapses showed paired-pulse depression (PPD) (32 ± 5% for 10 msec interpulse intervals) and multiple-pulse depression during repetitive stimulation. Detailed passive cable model simulations based on somatodendritic morphology and localization of synaptic contacts further indicated that the conductance change at the postsynaptic site was even faster, decaying with a mean time constant of 1.8 ± 0.6 msec. Sequential triple recordings revealed that the decay time course of IPSCs at BC-BC synapses was approximately twofold faster than that at BC-granule cell synapses, whereas the extent of PPD was comparable. To examine the consequences of the fast postsynaptic conductance change for the generation of oscillatory activity, we developed a computational model of an interneuron network. The model showed robust oscillations at frequencies >60 Hz if the excitatory drive was sufficiently large. Thus the fast conductance change at interneuron-interneuron synapses may promote the generation of high-frequency oscillations observed in the dentate gyrus in vivo.

Key words: GABAergic interneurons; basket cells; dentate gyrus; unitary IPSCs; paired-pulse depression; paired recording; interneuron networks; gamma oscillations; computational model


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The neuronal network of the hippocampus consists of glutamatergic principal neurons (granule cells and pyramidal neurons) and GABAergic interneurons (for review, see Freund and Buzsáki, 1996). Inhibitory interneurons that innervate the perisomatic domain of principal neurons, referred to as basket cells (BCs), have a particularly powerful influence on their postsynaptic target cells, controlling the electrical activity of the principal neuron ensemble (Cobb et al., 1995; Miles et al., 1996; Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000). Several lines of evidence indicate that GABAergic interneurons in general, and BCs in particular, also interact with each other, forming a synaptic network of inhibitory cells. First, spontaneous IPSCs have been observed in interneurons in the hippocampal CA1 region (Hájos and Mody, 1997). Second, paired recordings have demonstrated a few examples of inhibitory coupling between hippocampal interneurons (Lacaille and Schwartzkroin, 1988; Cobb et al., 1997). Finally, immunocytochemical studies have indicated a high degree of synaptic connectivity among BCs in the CA1 area and the dentate gyrus (Sik et al., 1995; Gulyás et al., 1999; Acsády et al., 2000).

In the hippocampus of the behaving rat, oscillations in the theta (3-12 Hz) and gamma (40-100 Hz) frequency range occur during exploration (Bragin et al., 1995). These oscillations are thought to provide temporally and spatially coherent clock signals for temporal encoding of information in principal neuron ensembles (for review, see Buzsáki and Chrobak, 1995; Ritz and Sejnowski, 1997; Traub et al., 1999). Although theta frequency oscillations are driven by septal and entorhinal inputs, gamma oscillations are thought to be generated intrinsically. In vivo recordings revealed that interneurons discharge at high frequencies during epochs of gamma activity, with individual spikes time-locked to the oscillations of the field potential (Bragin et al., 1995; Penttonen et al., 1998). These results imply that interneurons have a critical role in the generation of fast oscillations. In the in vitro slice preparation, gamma oscillations in the CA1 region can be elicited in the presence of antagonists of ionotropic glutamate receptors (Whittington et al., 1995), suggesting that they are generated by inhibitory synaptic interactions between interneurons. However, simulations of interneuron network activity revealed that several conditions have to be satisfied if interneuron networks are the substrates of coherent gamma oscillations (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996; White et al., 1998; Tiesinga and José, 2000): (1) inhibitory events must be hyperpolarizing, (2) the decay time constant of the postsynaptic conductance change has to be sufficiently large (e.g., 10 msec), (3) the synaptic strength should be intermediate (e.g., 0.1 mS/cm2 total), (4) connectivity must be sufficiently high, and (5) heterogeneity of excitatory drive has to be small. Whether the properties of synaptic connections between interneurons are compatible with these constraints, however, has remained unknown.

The goal of this study was to test the implications of the network models directly by recording from pairs of synaptically connected basket cells in the dentate gyrus of rat hippocampal slices. This region shows gamma oscillations with the highest frequency and power in the entire hippocampus (Bragin et al., 1995). We found that the time course of unitary IPSCs at BC-BC synapses is rapid, faster than that of IPSCs at BC-granule cell (GC) synapses in the same microcircuit. These results further define the constraints for the generation of synchronized high-frequency oscillations in the interneuron network of the dentate gyrus.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Paired recordings from synaptically connected interneurons. Transverse hippocampal slices (300 µm thickness) were cut from brains of 18- to 25-d-old Wistar rats using a Vibratome (DTK-1000, Dosaka). Animals were killed by decapitation, in accordance with national and institutional guidelines. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass tubing (2 mm outer diameter, 1 mm wall thickness). When filled with intracellular solution, the resistance was 1.4-2.2 MOmega for recordings from BCs and 2.0-2.5 MOmega for recordings from GCs. Recordings were obtained from synaptically connected BC-BC and BC-GC pairs in the dentate gyrus under visual control using infrared differential interference contrast videomicroscopy (Stuart et al., 1993; Koh et al., 1995). Selected BCs had somata located at the granule cell layer-hilus border. To obtain sequential triple recordings, a paired recording was first obtained from a putative BC-BC pair. While the recording from the presynaptic BC was maintained, the patch pipette was withdrawn from the postsynaptic BC, and a recording was made from a postsynaptic GC. The maximal time elapsed between the two paired recordings was 20 min. Selected GCs had somata located in the outer third of the granule cell layer. For both BC-BC and BC-GC pairs, the distance between the somata of presynaptic and postsynaptic neuron was typically <200 µm. BC recordings with initial resting potentials more positive than -55 mV and GC recordings with initial resting potentials more positive than -65 mV were discarded. The recording temperature was 31-33°C.

Two Axopatch 200B amplifiers (Axon Instruments) were used for recording. The presynaptic neuron was held in the current-clamp mode and stimulated at a frequency of 0.1-0.3 Hz, unless specified differently. Action potentials were initiated by brief current pulses (duration 2 msec, amplitude 1-1.4 nA). The postsynaptic cell was held in the voltage-clamp mode (holding potential -70 mV) with series resistance (RS) compensation (~65-90%; lag ~10-35 µsec; RS before compensation 5-10 MOmega ). The stationarity of the series resistance in the postsynaptic neuron was assessed from the amplitude of the capacitive current in response to a 5 mV pulse, and the compensation was readjusted during the experiment when necessary. Presynaptic action potentials and IPSCs were filtered at 5 kHz using the four-pole low-pass Bessel filter of the amplifiers and were digitized at 10 kHz using a 1401plus laboratory interface [Cambridge Electronic Design (CED)] interfaced to a Pentium-PC. Commercial programs from CED or homemade programs were used for stimulus generation and data acquisition.

Solutions. The physiological extracellular solution contained (in mM): 125 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, and 1 MgCl2 (bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2 gas mixture). In some experiments, slices were stored in a solution containing (in mM): 87 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgCl2, 25 glucose, and 75 sucrose. 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (5-10 µM) was added to the bath solution to block EPSCs. The intracellular solution contained K-gluconate and KCl (at concentrations of either 110 and 40 mM, or 70 and 70 mM, respectively), 0.1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM Na2ATP, and 10 mM HEPES; the pH was adjusted to 7.2 with KOH, and the osmolarity was 310-315 mOsm. Bicuculline methiodide was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); CNQX was purchased from Tocris (stock solutions in either distilled water or 0.1 M NaOH). Other chemicals were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), Sigma, Riedel-de Haën, or Gerbu.

Data analysis. The rise time of evoked IPSCs was determined as the time interval between the points corresponding to 20 and 80% of the peak amplitude, respectively. The peak current was determined as the maximum within a window of 2-4 msec duration after the presynaptic action potential. The synaptic latency was determined as the time interval between the maximum of the first derivative of the presynaptic action potential and the onset of the IPSC; the onset point was determined from the intersection of a line through the 20 and 80% points with the baseline. The decay phase of the IPSCs was fitted with a single exponential [A exp(-t/tau m)] or with the sum of two exponentials [A exp(-t/tau 1) B exp(-t/tau 2)], using a nonlinear least-squares fit algorithm; time constants are reported either separately or as an amplitude-weighted mean [tau w = (A tau 1 + B tau 2)/(A + B)]. Amplitudes of electrical responses (see Fig. 6) were measured from onset to peak of the fast current components evoked by presynaptic action potentials. A trace was classified as a failure when the amplitude was less than three times the SD of the baseline (determined in a ~5 msec window preceding the IPSC). In a few cases, traces were passed through a digital filter before display (3 kHz). Coefficients of variation (CV; SD/mean) of unitary IPSC peak amplitudes were calculated from 30-100 traces during stationary periods. CV values were not corrected for baseline noise, because the influence of a correction was very small. Values are given as mean ± SEM. Error bars in the Figures also indicate SEMs. Membrane potentials reported in the text were not corrected for junction potentials. Significance of differences was assessed by a two-tailed t test at the significance level (p) indicated.

Morphological reconstruction and analysis. Morphological methods were similar to those reported previously (Martina et al., 2000). Presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons were filled with biocytin (0.1-0.2%) during recording. After withdrawal of the pipettes, slices were fixed in (1) 2.5% paraformaldehyde, 1.25% glutaraldehyde, 15% picric acid in 100 mM phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4, or (2) 1% paraformaldehyde, 0.5 or 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 50 mM PB (12 hr, 4°C). After fixation, slices were treated with hydrogen peroxide (1%, 10 min) and rinsed in PB several times. After incubation in 10 and 20% sucrose solution, slices were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed to room temperature. The slices were then transferred to a phosphate-buffered solution containing 1% avidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (ABC; Vector Laboratories, Camon, Wiesbaden, Germany) for ~12 hr. Excess ABC was removed by several rinses in PB, and the slices were developed with 0.05% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride and 0.01% hydrogen peroxide. Subsequently, slices were rinsed in PB several times and embedded in 5% agar for resectioning on a Vibratome (80-100 µm thickness). The sections were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in PB for 30 min and rinsed in PB, followed by three 10 min rinses in distilled water and block staining with a 1% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate for 30 min. The sections were washed briefly in distilled water, dehydrated between coverslips in an ascending series of ethanol, and transferred to propylene oxide two times for 10 min. Finally, the sections were embedded in Durcupan (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) overnight, mounted under coverslips, and left to polymerize at 56°C for 48 hr. Alternatively, some slices were not resectioned and were embedded in Mowiol (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany).

Axons and dendrites of the presynaptic and postsynaptic neuron were examined by light microscope using a 100× oil immersion objective. Putative synaptic contacts were identified as close appositions of a bouton and a dendrite in the same focal plane. In selected pairs, the morphology of presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons was reconstructed with the aid of a camera lucida. In two pairs, the contacts suggested by light microscopy (LM) were examined by electron microscopy (EM) of serial sections. In one pair, five contacts were suggested by LM, and three contacts were revealed by EM (two false positive contacts). In another pair, six contacts were suggested by LM, and seven contacts were revealed by EM (one additional contact found).

In a subset of pairs examined (14 IPSCs, 1 electrical coupling), both the presynaptic and the postsynaptic interneurons were identified morphologically as BCs. The main criteria were (1) the primary location of the axonal arborization in the granule cell layer (light microscopy) and (2) the preferential location of the synapses on somata and proximal dendrites of the target cells (electron microscopy; two BC-BC pairs) (Han et al., 1993; Buhl et al., 1994). These BC-BC pairs, referred to as "rigorously identified" in the text, were used for determining the basic properties of synaptic transmission (see Figs. 1, 5). In another subset of pairs, only one (the presynaptic) neuron was stained sufficiently (16 pairs), or the identification of the interneurons as BCs relied only on their ability to generate high-frequency trains of action potentials during sustained current injections (>= 250 Hz during the first 100 msec of a depolarizing pulse; 18 pairs). These BC-BC pairs, referred to as "tentatively identified" in the text, were used together with the rigorously identified pairs in Figures 2, 6, and 7. Basic properties of synaptic transmission (latency, rise time, amplitude, and decay time constant) in rigorously and tentatively identified BC-BC pairs were not significantly different (p > 0.5 for all parameters).

Detailed passive cable simulations. Detailed passive cable modeling was performed using three biocytin-filled BC-BC pairs (Major et al., 1994; Geiger et al., 1997). The diameters and three-dimensional coordinates of all dendritic segments and the main axon of the postsynaptic BCs were reconstructed using Neurolucida (MicroBrightField, Colchester, VT). No correction was made for tissue shrinkage. Spines were largely absent on interneuron dendrites and thus were not considered in the cable model. The axonal arborization was approximated by connecting 150 cylinders (0.9 µm diameter, 42 µm length) to the main axon collaterals (Geiger et al., 1997). The electrotonic length of segments was calculated from their physical length (l) as L = l/lambda , with the space constant lambda  = radical  (Rm d/4 Ri), where Rm is the specific membrane resistance, d is the diameter of the segment, and Ri is the cytoplasmic resistivity.

IPSCs were simulated using NEURON version 4.2.3 or 4.3.1 (Hines and Carnevale, 1997) running on a PC under Debian Linux. The electrical properties of the interneuron were assumed to be uniform. The specific membrane capacitance Cm was assumed to be 0.8 µF/cm2, Ri was 100 Omega  cm, and Rm was 5500, 10750, and 11150 Omega  cm2, respectively (adjusted to match the input resistance of the postsynaptic BC, measured at the soma). Because initial seal resistances were >1 GOmega and pipette withdrawal resulted in formation of outside-out patches (suggesting that the seal remained intact), shunts at the recording electrode were not considered in the model. The resting potential was set to -70 mV. The residual uncompensated RS was calculated as RS (100% - percentage of compensation) and was 2-3 MOmega . The maximum segment length was 6 µm, and the time step was 10 µsec in all simulations. The postsynaptic conductance change was represented by the function y(t) = -exp(-t/tau rise) + exp(-t/tau decay), which was divided by the maximum amplitude and multiplied by a peak conductance value gmax.

To infer the time course of the inhibitory conductance change at the postsynaptic site, conductances were simulated at the morphologically identified contacts, and tau rise, tau decay, and gmax were varied to minimize the sum of squares of differences between the simulated IPSCs and the measured average unitary IPSCs in the same pair (see Fig. 5B). Synaptic current reversal potentials were assumed to be -45 or -25 mV, similar to experimentally determined mean reversal potentials (measured in three BCs each). Minimization was made using the internal fitpraxis routine of NEURON. Different starting values gave similar results, suggesting convergence to a global minimum.

Network simulations. The activity of networks of fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons was simulated using NEURON 4.3.1 running on a PC, following closely the procedures of Wang and Buzsáki (1996), referred to as the WB model. Neurons were represented as single compartments. Specific leak conductance was assumed to be 0.1 mS/cm2, identical to the value in the WB model. With the estimated somatodendritic surface area (12082 µm2; three reconstructed neurons), this gives an input resistance of 83 MOmega , comparable to experimentally observed values. Active conductances were modeled using the equations of Hodgkin and Huxley (1952) with the modifications of the WB model. Postsynaptic conductances were simulated using the NEURON class Exp2Syn, which represents conductance as the sum of two exponentials after the presynaptic action potential with a delay. Synaptic delay was set to 0.8 msec (from 0 mV crossing of the presynaptic spike), rise time constant was set to 0.16 msec, and decay time constant was set to 1.8 msec (similar to measured values; see Table 1). Synaptic peak conductance change was assumed to be 0.02 mS/cm2 per input, and synaptic reversal potential was assumed to be -75 mV. The conductance value was obtained from the experimentally determined mean unitary postsynaptic conductance change (7.6 nS) (see Table 1) and the somatodendritic surface area, which gave a specific synaptic conductance of 0.063 mS/cm2. However, a reduction in conductance caused by both low physiological Cl- concentrations (to ~0.6 at 7.9 mM Cl-, which corresponds to the reversal potential chosen in the model) and synaptic depression (to ~0.4 during 500 msec in 50 Hz trains) (see Fig. 2F) have to be considered. Thus a specific conductance of 0.02 mS/cm2 appears to be a realistic value (also considering the perisomatic location of synapses). Thus the main differences to the WB model were the inclusion of a synaptic delay, the faster decay of the postsynaptic conductance change, and the larger peak amplitude (Msyn × 0.02 mS/cm2 vs 0.1 mS/cm2 total). The number of neurons in the network was typically 100, and neurons were connected randomly by inhibitory synapses, with MSyn representing the mean number of synaptic inputs per neuron. The time step in the simulations was 12.5 µsec. As initial conditions, the membrane potentials were randomly chosen from a uniform distribution (-70 to -50 mV), and gating variables were set to the corresponding steady-state values. Driving currents to individual neurons were randomly chosen from a normal distribution (with mean Iµ and SD Isigma ).

Average firing frequency (fµ) was determined from the mean interspike interval for the entire simulation period. Action potential patterns were represented in a binary format (with 0 when no action potential occurred and 1 if one or more than one action potential occurred in a given time interval tau ). The population coherence measure kappa  was calculated as the mean of the coherence in all pairs of interneurons defined by the following equation:
&kgr;<SUB>ij</SUB>(&tgr;)=<FR><NU><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>l=1</LL><UL>K</UL></LIM> X(l)Y(l)</NU><DE><RAD><RCD><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>l=1</LL><UL>K</UL></LIM> X(l) <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>l=1</LL><UL>K</UL></LIM> Y(l)</RCD></RAD></DE></FR>, (1)
where i and j denote the two interneurons, X (l) and Y (l) are the binary action potential patterns, and K is the number of time bins. kappa  was determined for time intervals 400-500 msec after onset of simulations, using tau  = 0.1/fµ (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996). Simulation results shown in Figure 8B-E are averages of 10-20 individual runs. Control simulations with the default parameters in the WB model (e.g., decay time constant 10 msec, no synaptic delay) were also performed and gave very similar results to those described by Wang and Buzsáki (1996).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Functional properties of unitary IPSCs at BC-BC synapses

To determine the functional properties of inhibitory synapses between hippocampal interneurons, we recorded from pairs of monosynaptically connected dentate gyrus BCs in rat brain slices at near-physiological temperatures (Fig. 1). A representative example of a recording from a BC-BC pair is shown in Figure 1A. Figure 1B shows histograms summarizing the basic properties of synaptic transmission from 14 BC-BC pairs in which the presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons were identified rigorously by light microscopy. The mean latency of unitary IPSCs, measured from the steepest point in the rise of the presynaptic action potential to the onset of the IPSC, was 0.8 ± 0.05 msec. The mean 20-80% rise time was 0.3 ± 0.02 msec, and the mean peak amplitude including failures was 110 ± 19 pA at -70 mV. The decay of unitary IPSCs could be better fitted with the sum of two exponentials in the majority of BC-BC pairs, with mean decay time constants of 1.6 ± 0.1 msec (76.8% amplitude contribution) and 11 ± 2.3 msec. The mean value of the decay time constant of the unitary IPSCs from all 14 BC-BC pairs, determined either as the weighted decay time constant tau w (biexponential fit) or as the time constant tau m (monoexponential fit), was 2.5 ± 0.2 msec. Synaptic transmission was very reliable; the mean percentage of failures was 10 ± 5%. Finally, unitary IPSCs were blocked by bath application of bicuculline (94 ± 1% block by 20 µM bicuculline methiodide after 10 min; four pairs; data not shown), indicating that they were mediated by GABAA receptors (GABAARs). Thus mutual inhibition in BC-BC pairs shows short latency, rapid onset, large peak conductance change, high reliability, and an extremely fast decay of unitary IPSCs (Table 1).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Fast unitary IPSCs in synaptically connected BC-BC pairs. A, Presynaptic action potential (top), single unitary IPSCs (6 sweeps superimposed, center), and average IPSC (from 38 sweeps, bottom) at -70 mV are depicted. The schematic illustration on top illustrates the recording configuration. B, Histograms of latencies, 20-80% rise times, peak amplitudes of average unitary IPSCs (including failures), and decay time constants [amplitude-weighted mean decay time constant tau w (biexponential fit) in 11 pairs and tau m (monoexponential fit) in 3 pairs]. Values of latencies, rise times, amplitudes, and decay time constants were determined from average IPSCs (including >10 individual traces). For latency measurements, one pair was excluded because of high presynaptic series resistance. Shown are summary graphs of data from 14 rigorously identified BC-BC pairs.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Summary of functional properties of unitary IPSCs generated at the BC-BC synapse

We next examined the dynamics of transmission at BC-BC synapses during repetitive presynaptic activity (Fig. 2). As the simplest paradigm, we studied paired-pulse modulation. When two action potentials were elicited in the presynaptic BC, separated by intervals of variable duration, the amplitude of the second IPSC in the postsynaptic BC was on average smaller than that of the first (Fig. 2A). The maximal paired-pulse depression (PPD), measured for 10 msec interpulse intervals, was 32 ± 4.6% (6 rigorously and 11 tentatively identified BC-BC pairs).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Dynamics of transmission at inhibitory BC-BC synapses. A, PPD of IPSCs. IPSCs were evoked by two action potentials in the presynaptic BC, separated by a 20 msec interval. IPSCs shown are averages from 30 single traces (failures included). A1 and A2 were measured from the preceding baseline. B, Coefficient-of-variation analysis of PPD. The inverse of the square of the coefficient of variation (CV-2) of the amplitude of the second IPSC (A2) was plotted against the mean peak amplitude; data were normalized by the CV-2 and mean, respectively, of the amplitude of the first IPSC (A1). Interpulse interval was 20 msec (triangle ) or 50 msec (open circle ). Dotted line indicates identity line. Data are from 17 pairs. C, Time course of recovery from PPD. Amplitude ratio A2/A1 of unitary IPSC was plotted against the interpulse interval. The curve represents a fitted monoexponential function with a time constant of 0.63 sec. Data are from 17 pairs. D, Multiple-pulse depression of IPSCs. The bottom trace to the left of the double slash is an average of 10 single sweeps recorded with a stimulation frequency of 0.2 Hz; the traces to the right of the double slash are single sweeps (20 events at the onset, 20 events 1 sec after the onset of a 50 Hz train). E, Unitary IPSCs at an expanded time scale from the same pair as shown in D. Five consecutive IPSCs from different times (as indicated by brackets) are shown superimposed. F, Onset of depression during a 50 Hz train. Each data point represents the mean IPSC peak amplitude in three pairs, normalized to the mean peak amplitude at 0.2 Hz (479 pA on average) before the train. Each data point represents a single peak amplitude (first 10 points) or the mean of four amplitudes (all subsequent points). The curve represents the sum of two exponential components and a constant fitted to the data points, with tau 1 = 25 msec (A = 0.42), tau 2 = 5.1 sec (B = 0.37), and a constant component amplitude of 0.06.

To determine whether PPD was generated by presynaptic factors [such as depletion of the vesicular pool (Stevens and Tsujimoto, 1995)] or by postsynaptic mechanisms [such as GABAAR desensitization (Jones and Westbrook, 1995)], a coefficient-of-variation analysis of PPD was performed (Malinow and Tsien, 1990). The inverse of the square of the coefficient of variation for the second IPSC was plotted against the mean; both were normalized to the respective values of the first IPSC. Data points were located below the identity line, suggesting that PPD was caused mainly by presynaptic changes (Fig. 2B) (17 pairs). Consistent with a presynaptic locus of PPD, the percentage of failures was 1.9-fold larger for the second than for the first IPSC (p < 0.01). Thus synaptic signaling at the BC-BC synapse showed marked PPD, which appeared to be expressed presynaptically. Recovery from PPD was complete after 5 sec; when fitted with a single exponential function, the time constant of recovery was 0.63 sec (Fig. 2C) (17 pairs).

In the intact hippocampal network, interneurons can generate high-frequency trains of action potentials during gamma oscillatory periods (Bragin et al., 1995). We therefore examined the stability of transmission at BC-BC pairs during 50 Hz trains of action potentials (Fig. 2D). The onset of train-induced depression was biexponential, with time constants of 25 msec and 5.1 sec at this stimulation frequency (Fig. 2D-F). After 1000 action potentials, the IPSC amplitude decayed to an asymptotic value, which was 6.0% of the control value. Thus, synaptic transmission at the BC-BC synapse showed marked depression in the early phase of a train but stabilized during the later phase of the train, as reported previously for the BC-GC synapse (Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000).

Morphological properties of BC-BC synaptic connections

Unitary IPSCs recorded at the soma decayed very rapidly. However, the time course of the real conductance change at the site of transmission is likely to be faster, because of imperfect voltage clamp and cable filtering. To infer the time course of the inhibitory conductance change at the site of generation, we first determined the location of the synaptic contacts. Presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons were filled with biocytin during recording and processed subsequently for light and electron microscopy. Figure 3 shows a camera lucida reconstruction of a representative synaptically coupled BC-BC pair. For both the presynaptic and the postsynaptic neurons, the axonal arborization was largely confined to the granule cell layer. This identifies the interneurons as BCs (Han et al., 1993; Buhl et al., 1994). In this pair, the axon of the presynaptic BC formed three synaptic contacts on the apical dendrites of the postsynaptic BC, as confirmed by subsequent electron microscopic analysis (Fig. 4). In three reconstructed BC-BC pairs, three to seven synaptic contacts were identified, which were located on the apical dendrite at distances of 0-133 µm from the center of the soma of the postsynaptic interneuron.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.   Camera lucida reconstruction of a synaptically connected BC-BC pair. Soma and dendrites of the presynaptic BC are drawn in green. Axonal arborization of the presynaptic BC is drawn in red. Soma and dendrites of the postsynaptic BC are drawn in black. Axonal arborization of the postsynaptic BC is drawn in blue. Only the portions of the axons that could be unequivocally traced back to the soma are depicted. Synaptic contacts (confirmed by subsequent electron microscopy; see Fig. 4) are indicated by arrowheads. Additionally, the postsynaptic BC showed three autaptic contacts (confirmed by electron microscopy; data not shown). Note that the axonal arborization of both BCs was largely confined to the granule cell layer, identifying them as BCs. ml, Molecular layer; gcl, granule cell layer.



View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.   Light and correlated electron microscopical analysis of synaptic contacts in a synaptically connected BC-BC pair. A, Low-power light micrograph of the same pair shown in Figure 3. ml, Molecular layer; gcl, granule cell layer; h, hilus. Scale bar, 50 µm. B, High-power light micrograph of the soma and apical dendrite of the postsynaptic BC. Two of the three synaptic contacts in this BC-BC pair are indicated by arrow and open arrow. Scale bar, 10 µm. C, Low-power electron micrograph of the proximal synaptic contact (open arrow). Scale bar, 2.5 µm. D, E, High-power electron micrographs of the two distal contacts (arrow and arrowhead). Contacts indicated by open arrow and arrow in C and D are also visible in the micrograph in B (same symbolic code; contact in E indicated by arrowhead is not shown in B). Scale bar, 0.25 µm.

The time course of the inhibitory conductance change at the postsynaptic sites

To determine the time course of the postsynaptic conductance change at the BC-BC synapse, the somatodendritic domain and the main axon of the postsynaptic BC were reconstructed and converted into a detailed passive cable conductor model. Figure 5A shows an electrotonic dendrogram of the postsynaptic BC shown in Figures 3 and 4. In this cell, the synaptic BC-BC contacts were located at electrotonic distances of 0.03, 0.14, and 0.20 lambda  from the soma. In three reconstructed BCs, the average electrotonic distance was 0.08 lambda  (range, 0-0.21 lambda ). Somatic IPSCs (Fig. 5Bb) decayed more slowly than the underlying postsynaptic conductance changes (Fig. 5Ba) (0.5-3 msec decay time constant), in agreement with previous results for other types of neurons (Major et al., 1994; Spruston et al., 1994).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.   Estimation of the time course of the postsynaptic conductance change at the synaptic contacts. A, Electrotonic dendrogram of a postsynaptic BC (same cell as shown in Figs. 3, 4). Apical dendrites are represented in the center; basal dendrites are shown laterally in the dendrogram. The axon (shown truncated) is indicated by the asterisk; 150 schematic collaterals were attached to the main axon in a distributed manner (not shown). The locations of the synaptic contacts are shown by arrowheads (a, b, c). The physical and electrotonic distances of the three synaptic contacts from the soma were 17, 108, and 133 µm, and 0.03, 0.14, and 0.20 lambda , respectively. B, Simulation of IPSCs in voltage-clamp mode. a, Postsynaptic conductance changes, with tau rise = 0.2 msec, tau decay = 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 msec, and gmax = 15.8 nS (total conductance change for all sites). b, Resulting simulated IPSCs in the pipette compartment. Conductance changes were generated simultaneously and were assumed to have the same amplitude at all sites. c, Simulated IPSC in the pipette compartment, superimposed with the recorded average unitary IPSC in the same BC-BC pair. The postsynaptic conductance change had a tau rise = 0.2 msec, tau decay = 1.02 msec, and gmax = 15.8 nS (total conductance change for all sites), which represent the results of a minimization of the sum of squares of differences between simulated and measured IPSCs. d, Quantal components of the fitted IPSCs in the pipette compartment; same parameters as in c. Note that attenuation and filtering is more pronounced for distal than for proximal sites. C, Exploration of the dependence of the fit results on the parameters of the cable model. The obtained decay time constants (tau d) of the conductance change at the postsynaptic site is plotted versus Rm, Ri, Cm, and tissue shrinkage correction factor. tau d was normalized to the respective value for default parameters (Rm determined individually, Ri = 100 Omega  cm, and Cm = 0.8 µF/cm2).

To infer the rise time, decay time constant, and amplitude of the postsynaptic conductance change, simultaneous synaptic events were simulated at all morphologically identified transmission sites, and their kinetic parameters and amplitude were varied to describe the experimentally observed average unitary IPSC in the same pair (Fig. 5Bc). In the pair shown, the inferred rise and decay time constants of the conductance change at the postsynaptic site were 0.20 and 1.02 msec, respectively. In three fully analyzed pairs, the mean values of the time constants were 0.17 ± 0.04 msec (rise, corresponding to mean 20-80% rise time of 0.14 msec) and 1.8 ± 0.6 msec (decay) (Table 1). Exploration of the parameter space indicates that these estimates are relatively insensitive to the assumptions of the cable model (Fig. 5C).

Electrical coupling between hippocampal interneurons

Electrical synapses between hippocampal interneurons were suggested previously on the basis of dye coupling (Michelson and Wong, 1994) and electron microscopic analysis (Kosaka and Hama, 1985) but have not yet been demonstrated directly. In a subset of BC-BC pairs (14 of 49 pairs), electrical coupling appeared to be present (Fig. 6). Both presynaptic action potentials (Fig. 6A) and voltage changes elicited by long current pulses (Fig. 6B) evoked postsynaptic currents that were approximate mirror images of the presynaptic signal. The mean amplitude of the electrical PSC evoked by presynaptic action potentials was 35.7 ± 5 pA (range 14-62 pA). Unlike GABAAR-mediated currents, electrical PSCs showed little amplitude fluctuation from trial to trial and had almost constant amplitude during trains (Fig. 6A). Electrical coupling occurred both in isolation (Fig. 6A) (7 of 49 pairs) and in conjunction with chemical transmission (Fig. 6C) (7 of 49 pairs). These results demonstrate that electrical coupling between BCs occurs in the hippocampus but may be less abundant than in the neocortex (Galarreta and Hestrin, 1999; Gibson et al., 1999; Tamás et al., 2000).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.   Electrical coupling in a subset of BC-BC pairs. A, Top panel, Electrical PSCs evoked by single presynaptic action potentials in a tentatively identified BC-BC pair. Presynaptic action potential is shown at top; single electrical PSCs are shown at bottom; six sweeps are superimposed. A, Bottom panel, Electrical PSCs evoked by a train of five presynaptic action potentials evoked with a frequency of 100 Hz (average from 15 sweeps). Note that the amplitude of the electrical PSCs is approximately constant and that the electrical PSCs are mirror images of the presynaptic action potentials. B, Postsynaptic voltage changes evoked by long depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses (0.4, -0.4, and -1 nA) applied to the presynaptic interneuron. Presynaptic voltage (top), corresponding postsynaptic current (center), and pulse protocol (bottom) are depicted. Note that the current-response in the postsynaptic cell is an approximate mirror image of the voltage change in the presynaptic neuron. Same pair as in A is shown. C, Combined electrical and chemical transmission in another tentatively identified BC-BC pair. Presynaptic action potential (top), single electrical and chemical PSC traces (5 sweeps superimposed), average (from 15 sweeps), and average in the presence of 10 µM bicuculline methiodide (from 25 sweeps; bottom) are illustrated.

Target-cell specificity in the decay time course of the unitary IPSC

The present results suggest that the measured IPSC at BC-BC synapses decays faster than that at the BC-GC synapse in the same microcircuit [amplitude-weighted decay time constant 2.5 msec (this paper) and 6.5 msec (Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000), respectively]. To rule out differences in the experimental conditions as an explanation, we compared IPSCs at BC-BC and BC-GC synapses by sequential triple recordings from a single presynaptic BC and different postsynaptic target cells in the same slice (Fig. 7). In seven sequential triple recordings, both the 20-80% rise time and the synaptic latency were not significantly different between BC-BC and BC-GC synapses (p > 0.5) (Fig. 7A,C). However, the decay time constant was 2.2-fold faster for BC-BC synapses (2.4 msec) than for BC-GC synapses (5.2 msec; p <=  0.006) (Fig. 7A,C). Furthermore, the peak amplitude of the IPSC was slightly, but not significantly, larger (p > 0.2) (Fig. 7D). Finally, the paired-pulse ratio (10 msec interval) was not significantly different (p > 0.2) (Fig. 7B,D). These results indicate significant differences in the time course of the inhibitory postsynaptic conductance change that are determined by the nature of the postsynaptic target cell.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7.   IPSC decay time constant is determined by the type of the postsynaptic target cell. A, B, Sequential triple recording from a presynaptic BC and a postsynaptic BC (left traces, first pair) and the same presynaptic BC and a postsynaptic GC (right traces, second pair obtained subsequently after pipette removal from the postsynaptic BC). Presynaptic action potential (top), single unitary IPSCs (6 sweeps superimposed, center), and average IPSC (from 22 sweeps, bottom) are depicted. Shown are single action potential in A and pair of two action potentials in B (10 msec interpulse interval). Note the difference in decay time constants but the comparable paired-pulse ratio. The fast inward current preceding the IPSC in the BC-BC traces represents putative electrical coupling. C, Summary bar graphs of 20-80% rise time, latency, and amplitude-weighted average decay time constant. D, Summary bar graphs of peak IPSC amplitude (left) and paired-pulse ratio (A2/A1, 10 msec interval, right). Bars indicate means (with SEMs). Data from seven sequential triple recordings; circles connected by lines represent data from the same triple recording. Note a significant difference in the decay time constant (**p <=  0.006), determined by the type of the postsynaptic target cell.

Rapid conductance changes support fast coherent network oscillations

Previous simulations indicated that gamma frequency oscillations emerge in networks of synaptically coupled inhibitory interneurons, emphasizing the importance of the time course of the postsynaptic conductance change [Wang and Buzsáki, (1996); which is referred to as WB model]. However, the properties of unitary connections determined in this paper differed from the assumptions of the WB model: first, the peak conductance change was larger (0.02 mS/cm2 vs 0.1 mS/cm2/60), and second, the decay time constant was faster (1.8 vs 10 msec). We therefore examined whether a network model of inhibitory neurons with realistic synaptic properties was able to generate oscillations (Fig. 8). Assuming MSyn = 60, Iµ = 3 µA/cm2, and mild heterogeneity (Isigma /Iµ = 0.03), fast and synchronized oscillations were generated (Fig. 8Aa,b) (fµ = 87 Hz, kappa  = 0.73). With a slower postsynaptic conductance change (as observed at the BC-GC synapse), the frequency of the oscillations was slower (fµ = 52 Hz), and the coherence was reduced (Fig. 8Ac) (kappa  = 0.51).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8.   Simulation of oscillatory activity in the gamma frequency range in a network of interneurons coupled by fast inhibitory synapses. Aa, Ab, Simulated voltage traces of 15 neurons and rastergram representation of the activity of a network of 100 neurons connected randomly by rapid synapses (synaptic delay 0.8 msec; tau d = 1.8 msec; gSyn = 0.02 mS/cm2; MSyn = 60). The excitatory driving current was heterogeneously distributed with Iµ = 3 µA/cm2 and Isigma  = 0.09 µA/cm2. Ac, Rastergram of the activity of a network coupled by slow inhibitory synapses (tau d = 5.2 msec), as observed at the BC-GC synapse. Note the lower network frequency. Also note that the activity of 13 neurons is suppressed. B, C, Mean network frequency (fµ, B) and coherence (kappa , C), plotted against the mean current drive (Iµ, Isigma /Iµ = 0.03) for fast (tau d = 1.8 msec, ) and slow decay time constant of the inhibitory postsynaptic conductance change (tau d = 5.2 msec, open circle ). Arrows indicate data points corresponding to the rastergrams shown in Ab and Ac. D, Coherence kappa  plotted against the heterogeneity measure Isigma /Iµ of the current drive for Iµ = 1, 2, 3, and 5 µA/cm2 (black-square, , black-triangle, and black-diamond , respectively). E, Plot of network coherence kappa  versus MSyn and Iµ. Coherence kappa  increases with both MSyn and Iµ. Note that critical values of the two parameters for the generation of coherent oscillations are interdependent.

We next analyzed the dependence of mean frequency and coherence on the mean driving current (Fig. 8B,C). Simulations with the fast postsynaptic conductance change revealed that coherent oscillations emerge above a threshold (~2 µA/cm2 assuming MSyn = 60 and Isigma /Iµ = 0.03). As coherence emerges, the frequency shows a sharp increase. Simulations with slower postsynaptic conductance changes revealed that the maximal coherence is reduced, and the frequency stays markedly below that obtained with the fast conductance change.

We further analyzed the tolerance of the oscillatory activity against heterogeneity of the excitatory drive (Fig. 8D). In the absence of heterogeneity, population coherence is close to 1 once a threshold is exceeded (Iµ = 3 µA/cm2). If heterogeneity is included, coherence declines, with an e-fold decline at a relative heterogeneity Isigma /Iµ = 0.12. We finally determined the requirements for connectivity (Fig. 8E). Depending on the value of the mean driving current, the threshold for the generation of coherent oscillations was between MSyn = 20 and MSyn = 100 (with mild heterogeneity). These critical values of MSyn appeared to be relatively independent of the total number of neurons in the network (100-500 neurons; data not shown).

Thus, in comparison to the WB network model, our model based on experimentally determined parameter values generates synchronized oscillations at higher frequencies and demonstrates a higher degree of tolerance against heterogeneity but requires larger driving currents.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To determine the functional properties of inhibitory synaptic transmission between interneurons and to examine the factors involved in the generation of fast network oscillations in the hippocampus, we combined paired recordings, morphological analysis, and simulations. We focused on the dentate gyrus for two reasons. First, in the behaving rat, gamma oscillations in the dentate gyrus show a markedly higher power and coherence than in hippocampal CA3 or CA1 regions (Bragin et al., 1995). Second, the intrinsic electrical properties of BCs (Martina et al., 1998) and the functional characteristics of input and output synapses in this microcircuit [GC-BC synapses (Geiger et al., 1997); BC-GC synapses (Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000)] are well known. The major finding of this paper is that the time course of the postsynaptic conductance change at the BC-BC synapse is fast (1.8 msec decay time constant at 32°C). We show further that the rapid time course and the large amplitude of the postsynaptic conductance change result in the emergence of robust high-frequency oscillatory activity in interneuron networks if the driving current is sufficiently large.

Interneurons as fast signaling devices

Previous studies showed that interneurons differ from principal cells in several functional and molecular properties, which converge on a faster signaling time course in interneurons. BCs show a fast membrane time constant (~10 msec) (Geiger et al., 1997), presumably because of the expression of a high density of leak channels. BCs have action potentials that are shorter than those in pyramidal cells and are able to generate high-frequency trains of spikes both in vitro (McCormick et al., 1985; Martina et al., 1998) and in vivo (Bragin et al., 1995; Csicsvari et al., 1999). These specific electrical properties appear to be generated by the expression of a molecularly distinct set of voltage-gated K+ channels (Martina et al., 1998). Furthermore, BCs receive extremely rapid synaptic excitation, which is caused by the expression of distinct AMPA receptor subunits (for review, see Geiger et al., 1999). The fast time course of inhibition observed here suggests that interneurons operate as coincidence detectors not only for excitation (Geiger et al., 1997) but also for inhibition. The observation of electrical coupling between interneurons, presumably via gap junction channels (Dermietzel and Spray, 1993), lends further support to the hypothesis of coincidence detection in interneurons, mediating the fastest possible form of intercellular signaling.

Target cell-specific differences in IPSC time course

The major difference between BC-BC synapses and BC-GC synapses is the time course of the postsynaptic conductance change. The mean decay time constant of the IPSC at the BC-BC synapse is approximately two-fold faster than that at the BC-GC synapse (Otis and Mody, 1992; Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000; this paper).

One possibility to explain the differences in the kinetics of IPSCs is the differential expression of GABAAR subunits in different types of postsynaptic target cells. Analysis of recombinant GABAARs revealed that alpha 1beta 1gamma 2 channels deactivate markedly faster than alpha 2beta 1gamma 2 channels (Lavoie et al., 1997). Indeed, parvalbumin-positive interneurons express the alpha 1 GABAAR subunit at higher levels than principal cells (Gao and Fritschy, 1994; Fritschy and Mohler, 1995; Nusser et al., 1995).

Alternatively, the differences in IPSC kinetics may be caused by differential modulation, dependent on the type of the postsynaptic target cell. Immunocytochemical evidence suggests that interneurons, unlike principal cells, do not express calcineurin (Sík et al., 1998). In cultured neurons, inhibitors of calcineurin were shown to accelerate the decay of autaptic IPSCs and the deactivation of GABAARs (Jones and Westbrook, 1997). Although the relation between these inhibitory neurons in culture (Jones and Westbrook, 1997) and the BCs in slices (this paper) is unclear, the results suggest the possibility that a lack of calcineurin expression may underlie the fast decay of IPSCs.

Differences in IPSC kinetics will also have direct implications for network function in vivo. Because putative BCs generate action potentials at high frequency during exploratory activity (Bragin et al., 1995; Penttonen et al., 1998), their output will lead to phasic, precisely timed inhibition of other interneurons but more tonic inhibition of principal cells under these conditions.

Presynaptic homogeneity of BC output synapses

BC-BC and BC-GC synapses show similarities in several properties that are thought to be indicators of presynaptic function. First, the reliability of transmission, as assessed by the percentage of failures, is very similar at the two synapses, implying a high release probability and the presence of multiple release sites. Second, both synapses show paired-pulse and multiple-pulse depression, with similar extent and time course (Kraushaar and Jonas, 2000; this paper). This implies that the presynaptic mechanisms underlying PPD and multiple-pulse depression are expressed homogeneously, independent of the identity of the postsynaptic target cell. One factor that could contribute to this homogeneity is the expression of the Ca2+-binding protein parvalbumin in basket cell presynaptic elements, which shapes short-term plasticity at inhibitory synapses (Caillard et al., 2000).

A functional implication of presynaptic homogeneity is that the balance between excitation and inhibition is maintained during in vivo activity patterns, where GABAergic interneurons generate action potentials over a wide range of frequencies with mean values of 10-20 Hz (Penttonen et al., 1998; Csicsvari et al., 1999). Under these conditions the strength of inhibition of interneurons and principal neurons will be modulated in a parallel manner.

Comparison with other brain regions

The difference in the IPSC decay time constant between BCs and GCs in the hippocampus resembles a previously reported difference between Purkinje and granule cells in the cerebellum (Puia et al., 1994). However, an opposite difference was suggested between stratum radiatum interneurons and pyramidal cells of the hippocampal CA1 region, based on recordings of spontaneous IPSCs (Hájos and Mody, 1997). In the somatosensory cortex, the IPSC decay time course at morphologically identified interneuron-interneuron synapses is comparable to that at interneuron-pyramidal cell synapses (decay time constant 8 msec) (Gupta et al., 2000; Tamás et al., 2000). Although the voltage-clamp conditions have remained undefined, the latter studies suggest that regional differences in target-cell specificity may exist.

Functional significance of fast IPSCs for the generation of network oscillations

Previous theoretical studies showed that networks of synaptically coupled inhibitory neurons can produce oscillations in the gamma frequency range (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996). Although the functional properties of BC-BC synapses reported here are generally consistent with the assumptions of the WB model, two major differences emerge. First, we find that the decay time course of the postsynaptic conductance change is 1.8 msec, which is at the limits of the range in which stable coherent oscillations are generated in the WB model (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996, their Fig. 10C). Second, we estimate that the unitary postsynaptic conductance change at BC-BC synapses is 0.02 mS/cm2 (see Materials and Methods). In contrast, the unitary postsynaptic conductance change in the WB model is only 0.002 mS/cm2 for MSyn = 60 (0.1 mS/cm2/MSyn).

Given these differences between experimental observations and the WB model, we have simulated the activity of an inhibitory interneuron network model with fast conductance change and high coupling strength (Fig. 8). A model based on these assumptions was able to generate coherent oscillations with high frequency (>60 Hz) but required a strong excitatory drive, resembling the scenario in the "strong coupling regime" (Neltner et al., 2000). Replacing the fast conductance change of BC-BC synapses by the slower conductance change at BC-GC synapses reduced both coherence and frequency, indicating that the fast conductance change at GABAergic synapses has a critical role in the generation of high-frequency oscillations.

Our interneuron model shows higher tolerance against heterogeneity than the WB model. An e-fold decrease in coherence corresponds to a heterogeneity of Isigma /Iµ = 0.12 in our model, but to <0.05 in the WB model (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996, their Fig. 5A). Furthermore, the connectivity requirements in our simulations appear to be less strict than in the WB model; with a large excitatory drive, an MSyn of 20 is sufficient to produce coherent oscillations. Synchronized activity may be promoted by electrical coupling (Fig. 6) (Draguhn et al., 1998; P. Jonas, unpublished data) and fast synaptic excitation of interneurons (Geiger et al., 1997; Pauluis et al., 1999), but additional simulations are required to examine the quantitative influence of these factors on frequency and coherence.

Fast inhibition: the synaptic basis for gamma oscillations in the dentate gyrus in vivo?

Could our model of inhibitory interneurons be a substrate of the generation of gamma frequency oscillations in the dentate gyrus in vivo? Three lines of evidence may support this view. First, the high oscillation frequency in the model is in good agreement with that observed in the dentate gyrus in vivo (80 Hz) (Bragin et al., 1995). Second, the requirement for a strong excitatory drive may explain the disappearance of gamma oscillations after lesioning of the entorhinal input (Bragin et al., 1995, their Fig. 8). Third, synchronization develops rapidly from a perturbed state of the network, within a few cycles (Fig. 8A), suggesting that synchronization takes place in vivo under conditions in which the excitatory drive varies in a theta-modulated manner. Thus an interneuron network based on fast conductance changes, which oscillates with high frequency and coherence, may represent a clock signal for efficient and reliable temporal encoding of information in the dentate gyrus-CA3 network.


    FOOTNOTES

Received Oct. 2, 2000; revised Jan. 26, 2001; accepted Jan. 31, 2001.

This work was supported by grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 505/C6) and the Human Frontiers Science Program Organization (RG0017/1998-B). We thank Drs. M. V. Jones, J. Bischofberger, and U. Kraushaar for critically reading this manuscript. We also thank B. Taskin and A. Roth for advice in the use of reconstruction and modeling software, and S. Nestel, M. Winter, and A. Blomenkamp for technical assistance.

M.B. and I.V. contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. P. Jonas, Physiologisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Strasse 7, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany. E-mail: jonasp{at}uni-freiburg.de.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

  • Acsády L, Katona I, Martínez-Guijarro FJ, Buzsáki G, Freund TF (2000) Unusual target selectivity of perisomatic inhibitory cells in the hilar region of the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 20:6907-6919[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Bragin A, Jandó G, Nádasdy Z, Hetke J, Wise K, Buzsáki G (1995) Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. J Neurosci 15:47-60[Abstract].
  • Buhl EH, Halasy K, Somogyi P (1994) Diverse sources of hippocampal unitary inhibitory postsynaptic potentials and the number of synaptic release sites. Nature 368:823-828[Medline].
  • Buzsáki G, Chrobak JJ (1995) Temporal structure in spatially organized neuronal ensembles: a role for interneuronal networks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:504-510[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Caillard O, Moreno H, Schwaller B, Llano I, Celio MR, Marty A (2000) Role of the calcium-binding protein parvalbumin in short-term synaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13372-13377[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Cobb SR, Buhl EH, Halasy K, Paulsen O, Somogyi P (1995) Synchronization of neuronal activity in hippocampus by individual GABAergic interneurons. Nature 378:75-78[Medline].
  • Cobb SR, Halasy K, Vida I, Nyiri G, Tamás G, Buhl EH, Somogyi P (1997) Synaptic effects of identified interneurons innervating both interneurons and pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 79:629-648[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Czurkó A, Mamiya A, Buzsáki G (1999) Oscillatory coupling of hippocampal pyramidal cells and interneurons in the behaving rat. J Neurosci 19:274-287[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Dermietzel R, Spray DC (1993) Gap junctions in the brain: where, what type, how many and why? Trends Neurosci 16:186-192[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Draguhn A, Traub RD, Schmitz D, Jefferys JGR (1998) Electrical coupling underlies high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Nature 394:189-192[Medline].
  • Freund TF, Buzsáki G (1996) Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 6:347-470[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Fritschy J-M, Mohler H (1995) GABAA-receptor heterogeneity in the adult rat brain: differential regional and cellular distribution of seven major subunits. J Comp Neurol 359:154-194[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Galarreta M, Hestrin S (1999) A network of fast-spiking cells in the neocortex connected by electrical synapses. Nature 402:72-75[Medline].
  • Gao B, Fritschy JM (1994) Selective allocation of GABAA receptors containing the alpha 1 subunit to neurochemically distinct subpopulations of rat hippocampal interneurons. Eur J Neurosci 6:837-853[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Geiger JRP, Lübke J, Roth A, Frotscher M, Jonas P (1997) Submillisecond AMPA receptor-mediated signaling at a principal neuron-interneuron synapse. Neuron 18:1009-1023[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Geiger JRP, Roth A, Taskin B, Jonas P (1999) Glutamate-mediated synaptic excitation of cortical interneurons. In: Ionotropic glutamate receptors in the CNS, handbook of experimental pharmacology 141 (Jonas P, Monyer H, eds), pp 363-398. Berlin: Springer.
  • Gibson JR, Beierlein M, Connors BW (1999) Two networks of electrically coupled inhibitory neurons in neocortex. Nature 402:75-79[Medline].
  • Gulyás AI, Megías M, Emri Z, Freund TF (1999) Total number and ratio of excitatory and inhibitory synapses converging onto single interneurons of different types in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 19:10082-10097[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Gupta A, Wang Y, Markram H (2000) Organizing principles for a diversity of GABAergic interneurons and synapses in the neocortex. Science 287:273-278[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Hájos N, Mody I (1997) Synaptic communication among hippocampal interneurons: properties of spontaneous IPSCs in morphologically identified cells. J Neurosci 17:8427-8442[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Han Z-S, Buhl EH, Lörinczi Z, Somogyi P (1993) A high degree of spatial selectivity in the axonal and dendritic domains of physiologically identified local-circuit neurons in the dentate gyrus of the rat hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 5:395-410[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Hines ML, Carnevale NT (1997) The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput 9:1179-1209[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol (Lond) 117:500-544.
  • Jones MV, Westbrook GL (1995) Desensitized states prolong GABAA channel responses to brief agonist pulses. Neuron 15:181-191[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Jones MV, Westbrook GL (1997) Shaping of IPSCs by endogenous calcineurin activity. J Neurosci 17:7626-7633[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Koh D-S, Geiger JRP, Jonas P, Sakmann B (1995) Ca2+- permeable AMPA and NMDA receptor channels in basket cells of rat hippocampal dentate gyrus. J Physiol (Lond) 485:383-402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Kosaka T, Hama K (1985) Gap junctions between non-pyramidal cell dendrites in the rat hippocampus (CA1 and CA3 regions): a combined Golgi-electron microscopy study. J Comp Neurol 231:150-161[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Kraushaar U, Jonas P (2000) Efficacy and stability of quantal GABA release at a hippocampal interneuron-principal neuron synapse. J Neurosci 20:5594-5607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Lacaille J-C, Schwartzkroin PA (1988) Stratum lacunosum-moleculare interneurons of hippocampal CA1 region. II. Intrasomatic and intradendritic recordings of local circuit synaptic interactions. J Neurosci 8:1411-1424[Abstract].
  • Lavoie AM, Tingey JJ, Harrison NL, Pritchett DB, Twyman RE (1997) Activation and deactivation rates of recombinant GABAA receptor channels are dependent on alpha -subunit isoform. Biophys J 73:2518-2526[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Major G, Larkman AU, Jonas P, Sakmann B, Jack JJB (1994) Detailed passive cable models of whole-cell recorded CA3 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurosci 14:4613-4638[Abstract].
  • Malinow R, Tsien RW (1990) Presynaptic enhancement shown by whole-cell recordings of long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices. Nature 346:177-180[Medline].
  • Martina M, Schultz JH, Ehmke H, Monyer H, Jonas P (1998) Functional and molecular differences between voltage-gated K+ channels of fast-spiking interneurons and pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 18:8111-8125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Martina M, Vida I, Jonas P (2000) Distal initiation and active propagation of action potentials in interneuron dendrites. Science 287:295-300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • McCormick DA, Connors BW, Lighthall JW, Prince DA (1985) Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. J Neurophysiol 54:782-806[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Michelson HB, Wong RKS (1994) Synchronization of inhibitory neurones in the guinea-pig hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 477:35-45[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Miles R, Tóth K, Gulyás AI, Hájos N, Freund TF (1996) Differences between somatic and dendritic inhibition in the hippocampus. Neuron 16:815-823[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Neltner L, Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C (2000) Synchrony in heterogeneous networks of spiking neurons. Neural Comput 12:1607-1641[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Nusser Z, Roberts JDB, Baude A, Richards JG, Sieghart W, Somogyi P (1995) Immunocytochemical localization of the alpha 1 and beta 2/3 subunits of the GABAA receptor in relation to specific GABAergic synapses in the dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci 7:630-646[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Otis TS, Mody I (1992) Modulation of decay kinetics and frequency of GABAA receptor-mediated spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience 49:13-32[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Pauluis Q, Baker SN, Olivier E (1999) Emergent oscillations in a realistic network: the role of inhibition and the effect of the spatiotemporal distribution of the input. J Comput Neurosci 6:27-48[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Penttonen M, Kamondi A, Acsády L, Buzsáki G (1998) Gamma frequency oscillation in the hippocampus of the rat: intracellular analysis in vivo. Eur J Neurosci 10:718-728[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Puia G, Costa E, Vicini S (1994) Functional diversity of GABA-activated Cl- currents in Purkinje versus granule neurons in rat cerebellar slices. Neuron 12:117-126[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Ritz R, Sejnowski TJ (1997) Synchronous oscillatory activity in sensory systems: new vistas on mechanisms. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:536-546[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Sik A, Penttonen M, Ylinen A, Buzsáki G (1995) Hippocampal CA1 interneurons: an in vivo intracellular labeling study. J Neurosci 15:6651-6665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Sík A, Hájos N, Gulácsi A, Mody I, Freund TF (1998) The absence of a major Ca2+ signaling pathway in GABAergic neurons of the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3245-3250[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Spruston N, Jaffe DB, Johnston D (1994) Dendritic attenuation of synaptic potentials and currents: the role of passive membrane properties. Trends Neurosci 17:161-166[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Stevens CF, Tsujimoto T (1995) Estimates for the pool size of releasable quanta at a single central synapse and for the time required to refill the pool. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:846-849[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • Stuart GJ, Dodt H-U, Sakmann B (1993) Patch-clamp recordings from the soma and dendrites of neurons in brain slices using infrared video microscopy. Pflügers Arch 423:511-518[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Tamás G, Buhl EH, Lörincz A, Somogyi P (2000) Proximally targeted GABAergic synapses and gap junctions synchronize cortical interneurons. Nat Neurosci 3:366-371[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Tiesinga PHE, José JV (2000) Robust gamma oscillations in networks of inhibitory hippocampal interneurons. Network: Comput Neural Syst 11:1-23.
  • Traub RD, Jefferys JGR, Whittington MA (1999) In: Fast oscillations in cortical circuits. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Wang X-J, Buzsáki G (1996) Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J Neurosci 16:6402-6413[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  • White JA, Chow CC, Ritt J, Soto-Treviño C, Kopell N (1998) Synchronization and oscillatory dynamics in heterogeneous, mutually inhibited neurons. J Comput Neurosci 5:5-16[Web of Science][Medline].
  • Whittington MA, Traub RD, Jefferys JGR (1995) Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature 373:612-615[Medline].


Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/01/2182687-12$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Li, U. Rudolph, and M. M. Huntsman
Long-term sensory deprivation selectively rearranges functional inhibitory circuits in mouse barrel cortex
PNAS, July 21, 2009; 106(29): 12156 - 12161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. Zhang and P. S. Buckmaster
Dysfunction of the Dentate Basket Cell Circuit in a Rat Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7846 - 7856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Achuthan and C. C. Canavier
Phase-Resetting Curves Determine Synchronization, Phase Locking, and Clustering in Networks of Neural Oscillators
J. Neurosci., April 22, 2009; 29(16): 5218 - 5233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Doischer, J. Aurel Hosp, Y. Yanagawa, K. Obata, P. Jonas, I. Vida, and M. Bartos
Postnatal Differentiation of Basket Cells from Slow to Fast Signaling Devices
J. Neurosci., November 26, 2008; 28(48): 12956 - 12968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Galarreta, F. Erdelyi, G. Szabo, and S. Hestrin
Cannabinoid Sensitivity and Synaptic Properties of 2 GABAergic Networks in the Neocortex
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2296 - 2305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. J. Urbano, E. Leznik, and R. R. Llinas
Modafinil enhances thalamocortical activity by increasing neuronal electrotonic coupling
PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12554 - 12559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, V. Santhakumar, R. J. Morgan, R. Huerta, L. Tsimring, and I. Soltesz
Topological Determinants of Epileptogenesis in Large-Scale Structural and Functional Models of the Dentate Gyrus Derived From Experimental Data
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1566 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. R. Woodruff and P. Sah
Networks of Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons in the Basolateral Amygdala
J. Neurosci., January 17, 2007; 27(3): 553 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Kerr and M. Capogna
Unitary IPSPs enhance hilar mossy cell gain in the rat hippocampus
J. Physiol., January 15, 2007; 578(2): 451 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
V. Zsiros, I. Aradi, and G. Maccaferri
Propagation of postsynaptic currents and potentials via gap junctions in GABAergic networks of the rat hippocampus
J. Physiol., January 15, 2007; 578(2): 527 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Halabisky, F. Shen, J. R. Huguenard, and D. A. Prince
Electrophysiological Classification of Somatostatin-Positive Interneurons in Mouse Sensorimotor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 834 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. M. Huntsman and J. R. Huguenard
Fast IPSCs in rat thalamic reticular nucleus require the GABAA receptor {beta}1 subunit
J. Physiol., April 15, 2006; 572(2): 459 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. F. Safiulina, G. Fattorini, F. Conti, and E. Cherubini
GABAergic Signaling at Mossy Fiber Synapses in Neonatal Rat Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., January 11, 2006; 26(2): 597 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Geisler, N. Brunel, and X.-J. Wang
Contributions of Intrinsic Membrane Dynamics to Fast Network Oscillations With Irregular Neuronal Discharges
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4344 - 4361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Zsiros and G. Maccaferri
Electrical Coupling between Interneurons with Different Excitable Properties in the Stratum Lacunosum-Moleculare of the Juvenile CA1 Rat Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., September 21, 2005; 25(38): 8686 - 8695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. K. Skinner, J.Y.J. Chung, I. Ncube, P. A. Murray, and S. A. Campbell
Using Heterogeneity to Predict Inhibitory Network Model Characteristics
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1898 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. D. Traub, D. Contreras, M. O. Cunningham, H. Murray, F. E. N. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. B. Wilent, M. J. Higley, and M. A. Whittington
Single-Column Thalamocortical Network Model Exhibiting Gamma Oscillations, Sleep Spindles, and Epileptogenic Bursts
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2194 - 2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H. L Garner, M. A Whittington, and Z. Henderson
Induction by kainate of theta frequency rhythmic activity in the rat medial septum-diagonal band complex in vitro
J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 83 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Santhakumar, I. Aradi, and I. Soltesz
Role of Mossy Fiber Sprouting and Mossy Cell Loss in Hyperexcitability: A Network Model of the Dentate Gyrus Incorporating Cell Types and Axonal Topography
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. Venance, J. Glowinski, and C. Giaume
Electrical and chemical transmission between striatal GABAergic output neurones in rat brain slices
J. Physiol., August 15, 2004; 559(1): 215 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Aradi, V. Santhakumar, and I. Soltesz
Impact of Heterogeneous Perisomatic IPSC Populations on Pyramidal Cell Firing Rates
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
N Rouach, M Segal, A Koulakoff, C Giaume, and E Avignone
Carbenoxolone blockade of neuronal network activity in culture is not mediated by an action on gap junctions
J. Physiol., December 15, 2003; 553(3): 729 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Kulik, I. Vida, R. Lujan, C. A. Haas, G. Lopez-Bendito, R. Shigemoto, and M. Frotscher
Subcellular Localization of Metabotropic GABAB Receptor Subunits GABAB1a/b and GABAB2 in the Rat Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., December 3, 2003; 23(35): 11026 - 11035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Maex and E. De Schutter
Resonant Synchronization in Heterogeneous Networks of Inhibitory Neurons
J. Neurosci., November 19, 2003; 23(33): 10503 - 10514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Bacci, U. Rudolph, J. R. Huguenard, and D. A. Prince
Major Differences in Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission onto Two Neocortical Interneuron Subclasses
J. Neurosci., October 22, 2003; 23(29): 9664 - 9674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Brunel and X.-J. Wang
What Determines the Frequency of Fast Network Oscillations With Irregular Neural Discharges? I. Synaptic Dynamics and Excitation-Inhibition Balance
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 415 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C.-C. Lien and P. Jonas
Kv3 Potassium Conductance is Necessary and Kinetically Optimized for High-Frequency Action Potential Generation in Hippocampal Interneurons
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2058 - 2068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. M. Baker, P. S. Pennefather, B. A. Orser, and F. K. Skinner
Disruption of Coherent Oscillations in Inhibitory Networks With Anesthetics: Role of GABAA Receptor Desensitization
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2821 - 2833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. T Bianchi and R. L Macdonald
Slow phases of GABAA receptor desensitization: structural determinants and possible relevance for synaptic function
J. Physiol., October 1, 2002; 544(1): 3 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Bartos, I. Vida, M. Frotscher, A. Meyer, H. Monyer, J. R. P. Geiger, and P. Jonas
Fast synaptic inhibition promotes synchronized gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks
PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13222 - 13227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Galarreta and S. Hestrin
Electrical and chemical synapses among parvalbumin fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons in adult mouse neocortex
PNAS, September 17, 2002; 99(19): 12438 - 12443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Klausberger, J. D. B. Roberts, and P. Somogyi
Cell Type- and Input-Specific Differences in the Number and Subtypes of Synaptic GABAA Receptors in the Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2513 - 2521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Hefft, U. Kraushaar, J. R P Geiger, and P. Jonas
Presynaptic short-term depression is maintained during regulation of transmitter release at a GABAergic synapse in rat hippocampus
J. Physiol., February 15, 2002; 539(1): 201 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. D. Traub, N. Kopell, A. Bibbig, E. H. Buhl, F. E. N. LeBeau, and M. A. Whittington
Gap Junctions between Interneuron Dendrites Can Enhance Synchrony of Gamma Oscillations in Distributed Networks
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 9478 - 9486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (76)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartos, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, P.

-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-