 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 2001, 21(9):3113-3125
A Novel Member of the Ig Superfamily,
turtle, is a CNS-Specific Protein Required for
Coordinated Motor Control
Kale D.
Bodily,
Clayton M.
Morrison,
Robert B.
Renden, and
Kendal
Broadie
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
84112-0840
 |
ABSTRACT |
We describe here the cloning and functional characterization of a
neural-specific novel member of the Ig superfamily,
turtle (tutl), with a structure of five
Ig C2-type domains, two fibronectin type III domains, and one
transmembrane region. Alternative splicing of the tutl
gene produces at least four Tutl isoforms, including two transmembrane
proteins and two secreted proteins, with primary structures closely
related to a human brain protein (KIAA1355), the Deleted in Colorectal
Cancer/Neogenin/Frazzled receptor family, and the
Roundabout/Dutt1 receptor family. An allelic series of tutl gene mutations resulted in recessive lethality to
semilethality, indicating that the gene is essential. In contrast to
other family members, tutl does not play a detectable
role in axon pathfinding or nervous system morphogenesis. Likewise,
basal synaptic transmission and locomotory movement are unaffected.
However, tutl mutations cause striking movement defects
exhibited in specific types of highly coordinated behavior.
Specifically, tutl mutants display an abnormal response
to tactile stimulation, the inability to regain an upright position
from an inverted position (hence, "turtle"), and the inability to
fly in adulthood. These phenotypes demonstrate that tutl
plays an essential role in establishing a nervous system capable of
executing coordinated motor output in complex behaviors.
Key words:
Drosophila; Ig superfamily; coordination; motor control; behavior; cell adhesion; motor neuropathy
 |
INTRODUCTION |
An integrated nervous system
requires the establishment of complex neural connections that are made
possible through elaborate signaling and adhesion pathways involving
cell-surface, extracellular matrix, and chemotrophic molecules as
attractive or repulsive guidance cues (Tessier-Lavigne, 1994 ; Goodman,
1996 ; Dickson, 1998 ; Cooper et al., 1999 ; Wright et al., 1999 ). One
subfamily of the Ig superfamily (IgSF) is a conserved class of
cell-surface receptors that mediate axon guidance and target
recognition in vertebrate and invertebrate systems. Examples include
the Drosophila/grasshopper Fasciclin adhesion molecules
(Harrelson and Goodman, 1988 ; Wright et al., 1999 ), the
Drosophila/mouse Roundabout (Robo)/Dutt1 receptors (Kidd et al., 1998 ; Sundaresan et al., 1998 ), the
mammalian/Drosophila Neogenin (Neo)/Deleted in Colorectal
Cancer (DCC)/Frazzled (Fra) receptors (Kolodziej et al., 1996 ;
Cooper et al., 1999 ), and the vertebrate neural cell adhesion
molecule/L1/Axonin adhesion molecules (Barthels et al., 1987 ;
Kohl et al., 1992 ; Kunz et al., 1998 ).
IgSF members function in neural development in many different ways.
Some function as cell-surface chemorepellant or chemoattractant receptors, such as the Robo/Dutt1 (Kidd et al., 1998 ; Sundaresan et
al., 1998 ) and Neo/DCC/Fra (Keino-Masu et al., 1996 ; Kolodziej et al.,
1996 ; Cooper et al., 1999 ) proteins, respectively. Others function as
cell-surface adhesion molecules in homophilic or heterophilic interactions, such as the Fasciclin proteins (Harrelson et al., 1988 ). In addition, other family members exist as both
membrane-bound and secreted forms, such as the Axonin-1 proteins
(Stoeckli et al., 1991 ). The functional repertoire of this extensive
family is further increased through alternative splicing of primary
transcripts (Schmucker et al., 2000 ) and by post-translational
modifications such as glycosylation (Huang et al., 1997 ).
Analysis of the Drosophila genome sequence reveals a total
of 153 Ig domain proteins and 46 proteins containing fibronectin (Fn)
domains (Adams et al., 2000 ). It is probable that only a subset of
these genes play roles in nervous system development and/or function,
yet genomic analysis suggests that numerous important neural receptors
have not been characterized. In Caenorhabditis elegans, 19 of the total 64 Ig domain proteins appear to function in neural
development (defined by similarity to characterized homologs), a
surprising number considering the extreme simplicity of the nervous
system of the nematode (Teichmann and Chothia, 2000 ). In light of the
potential size and diversity of the neural IgSF, coupled with the
complexity of nervous system development, it is likely that numerous
IgSF members play roles in neural development and function via novel mechanisms.
In this study, we report the cloning and functional characterization of
Drosophila turtle (tutl), a novel member
of the IgSF that is expressed in the CNS and in a small, defined
subset of the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Alternative splicing of
the primary transcript results in membrane-bound and secreted Tutl isoforms that are essential for development and adult viability. tutl function is required for establishing a nervous system
capable of executing complex forms of coordinated movement such as
tactile escape response, coordinated righting behavior in larval and
adult stages, and flight in adulthood. The characteristic inability of
a tutl mutant to turn over when flipped on its back gave
rise to the gene name.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Genomic analysis. A genomic nucleotide sequence from
P1 and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones obtained from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP) database
(www.fruitfly.org) was analyzed using Computational Genomics
Group nucleotide analysis software
(http://genomic.sanger.ac.uk/gf/gfb.html). Gene structure analysis was
performed using BLASTP software available at the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Advanced Blast Search website
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/blast.cgi?Jform = 1). A genomic
sequence containing the predicted gene locus was compared with the
expression sequence tag (EST) sequence also using the NCBI
Advanced Blast Search. Four cDNA clots (7979, 14288, 6591, and 6419)
were identified on the BDGP database
(www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/bfd/clonereport.pl) from EST nucleotide
sequence homology to the region of the predicted gene.
Gene structure analysis. All available cDNA clones from
clots 7979, 14288, 6591, and 6419 were obtained and sequenced. Sequence data were compared with the genomic sequence to identify intron-exon structure as well as to predict alternative splicing in the gene. Nucleotide sequence data were used to predict the amino acid sequence of protein products for each of the four identified Tutl isoforms as
well as the longest possible derived isoform. The protein sequence was
analyzed for functional domain structure using InterProScan software
(www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/interproscan/ipsearch.html). Transmembrane (TM)
domains were predicted using Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer
Research Tmpred software (www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPREDform.html).
mRNA expression studies. Digoxygenin-labeled DNA probes were
made by PCR using the a PCR DIG Probe synthesis kit
(catalog no. 1636 090; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Using a cDNA template (clone I.D. number GH16705), primers
5'-ATACAGGTGCTCCAGTTCGT-3' and 5'-TCCTCTGGCGTAACACTAAA-3' as well as
digoxygenin-11-dUTP, a 451 nt probe complimentary to a region of exon
3-4, were synthesized. Whole-mount in situ hybridization
was conducted on Drosophila embryos according to the method
of Tautz and Pfeifle (1989) . Probes against the AP-50 mRNA were
used as a positive control (Zhang and Broadie, 1999 ).
Mutagenesis and mutant characterization. A BLAST search
identified a complementation group in the predicted gene region
containing P-element inserts l(2)01085 and l(2)k14703 as well as the
24E deficiency (Df(2L)ed-dp). The l(2)01085, l(2)k14703, and
Df(2L)ed-dp stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center
(Bloomington, IN). The location of P-element insert l(2)01085 was
identified to be within tutl exon 4 at the 24E1-E2 region.
P-element insert l(2)k14703 was localized by PCR to the
genomic region spanning between the 3' border of exon 8 and the 5'
border of exon 11 using primers 5'-CCAAAAACCCCGCCCCTGTACCTAT-3' and
5'-ACAAAGCGTCCATCGAGGCTCCGTT-3' as well as Herculase Enhanced DNA
Polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), confirming that both inserts
localized to the coding region of tutl.
A P-element mobilization strategy was used to generate deletions that
remove portions of the tutl gene. We mobilized l(2)k14703 via transient introduction of transposase ( 2-3) and created stocks of each excision event balanced over the Curly of Oster (CyO) balancer chromosome (Oster, 1956 ). Lethal lines that failed to complement the 24E deficiency (Df(2L)ed-dp) comprised a single complementation group: turtle. Four of these deletions
(tutl1, tutl2, tutl3, and
tutl4) were analyzed by PCR. DNA from homozygous animals was
extracted using a Puregene DNA isolation kit (catalog #D
5000A; Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and used in PCRs with the
following primer sets to map chromosomal end points for each deficiency
(Df): 1A, 5'-GAAATCCGTAGAGTCCAAAG-3'; 1B,
5'-GATCCTTTGGGAAACTGGAA-3'; 2A, 5'-CCACGTAAAAGTCAACGGTT-3'; 2B,
5'-CGCAACCGCACTTATTTACA-3'; 3A, 5'-ATACAGGTGCTCCAGTTCGT-3'; 3B,
5'-CAAGAGGCCTAAACAAAAGC-3'; 4A, 5'-GCGACTCATAAACCGAATCA-3'; 4B,
5'-TCCTCTGGCGTAACACTAAA-3'; 5A, 5'-ATCCCATTTTCCCATACCCA-3'; 5B,
5'-CCCTGGTGTTCCTCATTGAC-3'; 6A, 5'-TCTTTCAGCTAATGCCAGAC-3'; 6B,
5'-GGTTTGCAATGTGCTTTCGA-3'; 7A, 5'-GTACCTACATTCCGAGTTTC-3'; 7B,
5'-CGGGTTAAAGAGAAACTCAG-3'; 8A, 5'-CATTCTCATTGCCATACTCC-3'; 8B,
5'-GCCATACAGATTATTGCTGC-3'; 9A, 5'-CATTCAGTAGCGCTTCTCCA-3'; 9B,
5'-GTAGCAGTTGAAGACCACGT-3'
Genetic rescues of the l(2)k14703 tutl mutation were
achieved by mobilization of the P-element as described to generate
precise excision events. Precise excision was identified by rescue of the semilethal phenotype exhibited by l(2)k14703 mutants. We conducted all behavioral assays described in this paper on homozygous revertant animals and found that the precise excision of the l(2)k14703 P-element
rescued all behavioral phenotypes exhibited by tutl mutants
(the escape response, the larval roll-over response, the adult
roll-over response, and flight capability).
Behavioral assays. Canton-S (CS) larvae were used as
controls in all assays. Mutant tutl chromosomes were
balanced over the CyO [ubiquitin green fluorescent
protein (GFP)] balancer chromosome to establish stocks
containing an in vivo chromosome marker. All heterozygous
tutl mutants were identified by the presence of GFP expression, and all homozygous tutl mutants used in the
behavioral assays were identified by the absence of GFP expression.
Embryos were selected from 3 hr laying periods on agar plates.
Genotyped embryos were transferred to fresh agar plates containing
equal portions of live yeast in aliquots of 15-25 embryos per plate within 12 hr of laying time. Embryo aliquots were then raised at 25°C
in a temperature- and humidity-controlled incubator. All larval assays
were conducted on L3 larvae 90-102 hr after fertilization. All adult
assays were conducted on flies 12-24 hr after eclosion.
The locomotion assay in L3 larvae was conducted by placing a single
larva on a fresh, room temperature agar plate. Three peristaltic contraction wave measurements were recorded for each animal and then
averaged to produce one data point. The escape response was elicited by
cephalic tactile stimulation using a 25 gauge hypodermic needle. Touch
stimulation was made at the anteriormost portion of the animal holding
the needle in-line with the anteroposterior axis of the larva. The
larval response was observed for 5-15 sec after stimulation.
The L3 larval roll-over assay was conducted on isolated individuals on
a fresh, room temperature agar plate. Using forceps, the animals were
rolled over to an inverted position as defined by the ventral midline.
On release of the animal, a timer was started; the timer was stopped
when the animal had completely righted itself, as defined by the dorsal
midline being completely vertical. Three roll-over time measurements
were recorded for each animal and then averaged to produce one data point.
The adult roll-over assay was conducted on individuals at room
temperature on a standard laboratory work bench. Because of their inability to fly, tutl1, tutl2, and
l(2)k14703 flies were easily contained in an open environment. CS and
revertant flies, however, had to be caught within a glass tube and
handled individually. Using forceps, the flies were flipped over on
their backs, and a timer set to 60 sec was started. Five groups of 10 adults were assayed individually in this manner, and the percentage of
adults that could right in 60 sec was calculated. All statistical
analyses (Mann-Whitney U tests) were performed using Instat
software (Graph Pad, San Diego, CA).
Histology, immunocytochemistry, and confocal microscopy. All
immunocytochemistry and histological staining was performed on tutl mutant stocks balanced over the CyO [fushi
tarazu LacZ] balancer for genotyping purposes. Embryonic
studies were conducted on staged embryos raised at 25°C, fixed for 20 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (0.02 M
phosphate buffer and 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7), and then washed in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBS-TX) several times over a
period of 1 hr. Whole-mount preparations were incubated overnight at
4°C with rabbit monoclonal antisera raised against -galactosidase ( -gal) in PBS (1:1000; Cappel, Durham, NC) and mouse
monoclonal antibody (mAb) BP102 (1:500; developed by C. S. Goodman, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA,
obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridomae Bank at the
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa), with mAb ID4 against
Fasciclin II (FasII) (1:5; developed by C. S. Goodman, obtained
from G. Tear, King's College, London, UK), or with mAb 22C10 against
Futsch (1:500; developed by S. Benzer, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, CA, obtained from the Developmental
Studies Hybridoma Bank at the University of Iowa).
Larval immunocytochemical studies were conducted on L3 larvae (90-102
hr, 25°C) reared in normalized conditions as described for behavioral
assays. Larvae were dissected along the dorsal midline, fixed for 45 min in 4% paraformaldehyde, and washed as described above.
Preparations were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-synaptotagmin
(1:500; Littleton et al., 1993 ) and mAb ID4 (1:5, gift from G. Tear) as
described above.
Adult fly heads from 2- to 7-d-old animals (25°C) were fixed and
mounted in paraffin wax; next, 7 µm histological slices were made
through the head according to Protocol 112 in Ashburner (1989) . Preparations were washed in PBS-TX with BSA several times over a period
of 1 hr. Preparations were incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit
monoclonal antisera raised against -galactosidase in PBS (1:1000;
Cappel) and mouse mAb BP102 (1:500; Developmental Studies Hybridoma
Bank) as described above.
All preparations were incubated in either Alexa Red anti-rabbit or
Alexa Green anti-mouse secondary antibodies (1:500; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 2 hr at 25°C and washed as
described above. Preparations were mounted in glycerol, and fluorescent images were acquired on a Radiance 2000 confocal microscope
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Images were presented using Adobe Photoshop
5.0 and Claris Draw 1.0.2 software.
Electrophysiology: two-electrode voltage-clamp.
Two-electrode voltage-clamp (TEVC) recordings were performed on muscle
6 in anterior abdominal segments (A2-A4) of L3 larva, according to previously published methods (Rohrbough et al., 2000 ). Briefly, dissected larvae were placed in a Plexiglas recording chamber and
viewed in transmitted light using a compound microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) fitted with Differential Interference
Contrast (Nomarski) optics and a 40× water-immersion lens.
Recordings were made at 18°C with sharp glass electrodes pulled from
fiber-filled borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota,
FL) to resistances of 10-25 M and filled with a solution of a 3:1 mixture of 3 M KAc/KCl. Stimulation of the motor nerve was achieved by
brief (0.5-0.8 msec) positive current stimulation of a loop of motor
nerve in a suction electrode, using a Grass S88 Simulator (Grass
Instruments, Warwick, RI). The nerve was stimulated at 0.5 Hz. Suction
electrodes were made using pulled electrodes of fiber-filled
borosilicate glass that were heat-polished to final inner
diameter of 10-12 µm and filled with bath saline. Recording bath solution was a modified standard saline, consisting of (in mM): 128 NaCl, 2 KCl, 4 MgCl, 70 sucrose, and 5 HEPES. CaCl was added to solutions with a pH of 7.2, to bring the final
[Ca2+] to 0.4 mM.
Current recordings were from voltage-clamped ( 60 mV) cells using
standard voltage-clamp techniques and an Axoclamp 2B patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). The signal was filtered
at 0.5 kHz online, converted to a digital signal using a DigiData 1200 analog-to-digital interface (Axon Instruments), and stored on computer
(Gateway P5-166 mHz) for later analysis. All analysis was done
offline, using the pClamp6 program suite (Axon Instruments). Forty
responses were recorded per larva and then averaged to give each data point.
 |
RESULTS |
The turtle gene encodes a novel member of the
Ig superfamily
We designed a systematic analysis of sequenced P1 and BAC clones
beginning on the left arm of Drosophila chromosome 2 in an attempt to locate genes essential for neural development. In this search, we identified a hypothetical gene in the 24E1-24E3 cytological region that appeared to encode a novel IgSF protein (Fig.
1C). We identified five
distinct EST clots in the genomic region containing the predicted gene
(Fig. 1B), suggesting the possibility of five separate transcriptional units. Annotation of the recently compiled Drosophila genome (www.fruitfly.org/annot/bands/band24.html)
suggested the presence of three distinct transcriptional units
(CG15426, CG15427, and CG15427). We obtained all available cDNA clones
and completely sequenced each clone. Analysis of sequence data
indicated that the predicted genes CG15426, CG15427, and CG15427 are in fact portions of a single transcription unit (Fig.
1A). The predicted gene product is an integral
membrane protein that is 1531 amino acids (aa) in size with an
extracellular domain that contains a possible signal sequence for
cell-surface localization, five Ig C2 type repeats, two Fn type III
repeats, a TM region, and a sizable intracellular domain containing a
cytochrome C heme-type binding site (Fig. 1C). Additional
analysis of cDNA and the genomic nucleotide sequence revealed that
alternative splicing produces at least four protein isoforms, which
represent two transmembrane and two secreted proteins (Fig.
1B,C). We designated this gene turtle
based on its distinctive mutant behavioral phenotype (see below).

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
turtle gene structure and its
predicted protein product. A, Genomic intron-exon
structure of the tutl region. A 40 kb genomic fragment
is depicted showing the structure of the tutl gene
including exons, introns, stop codons, and untranslated transcribed
regions. Note that the transcription start site of the BcDNA GH11322
gene is at the 3' end of the genomic diagram. B, Splice
variants of the tutl gene. One full-length cDNA was
identified (GH15753) and partial-length clones (GH16705, GH08133, and
LD28224/LP03459) identify three other distinct splice variants of the
tutl gene, each demonstrating unique 3' structures.
C, Protein structure for the Tutl isoforms including
type and location of functional domains and transmembrane regions.
D, Amino acid sequence of the Tutl protein.
Italic text indicates the putative signal sequence
(first) and the putative transmembrane region (second).
Underlined text indicates Ig domains. Bold
text indicates Fn domains. Lowercase text
indicates a cytochrome c heme binding site.
|
|
Sequence analysis of the primary structure of the tutl
protein showed that it is most similar (~31% identity/49% similar) to a 1189 aa predicted human protein (KIAA1355) that also contains five
Ig domains, two Fn domains, and one predicted TM region (Fig. 2). This protein was identified in a
large-scale human cDNA cloning project in which cDNAs were constructed
from an RNA template that was extracted from specific human tissues
(Nagase et al., 1999 ). The KIAA1355 transcript is expressed at
high levels in fetal brain tissue (Nagase et al., 1999 ). Significant
global amino acid homology also exists between Tutl and Neo
from several phyla (26% identity/39% similarity to rat Neogenin) as
well as to Robo from several phyla (25% identity/40% similarity to
Drosophila Roundabout I; Fig. 2). However, the functional
domain structures of the Neo and Robo subfamilies are significantly
different from Tutl, with four Ig domains and six Fn domains
(Vielmetter et al., 1994 ) and five Ig domains and three Fn domains
(Kidd et al., 1998 ), respectively. We conclude that Tutl is related to
the Neo and Robo families of receptors but is significantly divergent
from either in both primary sequence and domain structure. In addition,
Tutl is identical to the FasII protein in its domain structure
(five Ig domains followed by two Fn domains), but the primary structure
of these two proteins is highly divergent. The FasII protein is not
retrieved in the top 100 most similar proteins in a sequence alignment
search, suggesting that the similar domain structure arose through
convergent evolution rather than divergence from a recent common
ancestor. Thus, Turtle represents a novel Ig family within the Ig
transmembrane receptor superfamily.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Closest known relatives of the Tutl protein.
A, The structure of the Tutl protein (see Fig. 1 for
symbol legend). B, Similarity between the Tutl protein
and its closest known relatives as defined by amino acid sequence
similarity. KIAA1355 is a predicted human protein expressed in the
fetal brain. BcDNA GH11322 is a relative of the tutl
gene located adjacent to the tutl locus. Neogenin is a
conserved, cell-surface chemoattractant receptor that functions in axon
guidance in the CNS. Roundabout is a conserved, cell-surface
chemorepellant receptor that functions in axon guidance in the CNS.
Dutt1 is the mouse homolog of Roundabout.
|
|
The tutl gene has an analog adjacent on
chromosome 2
The closest relative of the tutl gene within the
Drosophila genome is the Berkeley cDNA (BcDNA)
GH11322 gene located adjacent to the tutl locus, with its
primary transcription start site located 1.2 kb downstream of
tutl (see Figs.
1A,4A). This arrangement suggests that the paired genes may have arisen from a tandem
duplication event. The full-length cDNA sequence of BcDNA GH11322 was
analyzed for structural similarity to tutl. BcDNA GH11322
produces a 719 aa protein product that contains four Ig domains, two Fn
domains, and one TM region with similar domain structure and
orientation to tutl Ig domains (1-3 and 5), Fn domains
(1-2) and the TM region. The BcDNA GH11322 protein, however, is quite
divergent from Tutl in primary structure (32% identity/50 similarity;
Fig. 2B). BLASTP scores comparing Tutl with the BcDNA
GH11322 protein were slightly lower than scores comparing Tutl and the
human brain protein KIAA1355 (Fig. 2B). The divergent
nature of tutl and BcDNA GH11322 suggests that the
spatial relationship could be coincidental. If a duplication event gave
rise to the two genes, it likely occurred >600 million years ago,
before the evolutionary divergence of Drosophila and Homo sapiens (Rodakis et al., 1984 ).
Despite the protracted divergence of tutl and BcDNA GH11322
genes, the similar domain structure and possible common evolutionary origin suggest that some functional redundancy may exist between their
protein products. To investigate this possibility, we included the
tutl4 mutant allele in all experiments described below;
tutl4 is a chromosomal deficiency that removes both
tutl and BcDNA GH11322 genes (see Fig.
4A). As will be described in detail below, we found
that tutl4 mutants do not exhibit any phenotypes that are not present in mutations specific to the tutl gene. This
analysis provides genetic evidence that the BcDNA GH11322 gene is not
masking any functional roles or mutant phenotypes of
tutl.
turtle is expressed exclusively in the
nervous system
In situ hybridization studies using digoxygenin-labeled
DNA probes complimentary to both exons 1-4 and exon 6 were conducted to determine the temporal and spatial profile of tutl
expression. The expression of tutl is restricted to the
nervous system during all stages of development (Fig.
3). tutl mRNA expression
begins at embryo stage 9 in midline neuroblasts that have recently
delaminated from the neuroectoderm (Fig. 3A,B,D). From stage
10 to the end of embryogenesis, tutl mRNA is detected in a
pan-neural pattern throughout the CNS (Fig. 3C,E). Beginning
at stage 13, four clusters of cells representing cephalic sensory
structures (CSS) at the extreme anterior portion of the animal begin to
express the tutl transcript and continue to do so throughout
embryogenesis (Fig. 3C,F). tutl expression
in this very small, defined subset of the sensory PNS was the only
detectable expression outside of the CNS. There was no detectable
tutl expression before stage 9, and no tutl
expression was detected in any non-neural tissues or cell types during
embryogenesis. We conclude, therefore, that tutl is
expressed throughout the CNS from segregation of neuronal precursors through the end of development and serves in functions specific to the
CNS and a small subset of sensory neurons in the head.

View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Expression of tutl
during embryonic development. A-F, Developmental
progression of staged Drosophila embryos stained to
reveal tutl mRNA expression. Embryos are oriented with
anterior to the left (A-E,
G, H) or top
(F); dorsal at top
(A, E, G), facing out
(B-D, F), or facing in
(H). A, Stage 9, onset of
tutl expression in neuroblasts recently delaminated from
neuroectoderm. B, Stage 9 embryo showing expression
along developing CNS midline. C, Stage 16, tutl expression is limited to the CNS and the
CSS. D, Enlargement of the neuroblast expression
indicated by an arrow in B.
E, Stage 16, strong tutl expression
throughout the brain and ventral nerve cord. No detectable expression
in non-neuronal tissues was observed. F, Enlargement of
cephalic sensory structures shown with arrow in
C. G-H, Expression of a
tutl-specific reporter gene. G, Stage 16, l(2)01085 -gal expression (red) driven by the
endogenous tutl enhancer. The CNS was stained with mAb
BP102 for reference purposes (green).
H, Tutl reporter expression is confined to the CNS with
high-level expression in the MP1 interneurons and a cluster of cell
bodies at the anterior portion of the ventral nerve cord
(arrowhead). BR, Brain;
NB, neuroblast(s); VNC, ventral nerve
cord. Scale bars: A, C, E,
G, 90 µm; B, H, 60 µm;
D, 20 µm; F, 35 µm.
|
|
In addition to tutl neural expression during embryogenesis,
we found that the tutl transcript continues to be expressed
through larval, pupal, and adult stages. cDNA clones specific to
tutl were present in mRNA isolated from embryos (clone
LD28224), larvae and early pupae (LP03459), and adult head (clones
GH15753, GH16705, GH08133, and HL01565), confirming that the gene is
expressed in all stages of development and maturity. In addition, a
lacZ reporter gene that is present in the tutl
l(2)01085 P-element insertion (see below) is expressed from
embryogenesis (beginning in stage 12) to adult stages (Fig.
3G,H). The spatial expression of the tutl
reporter is identical to tutl mRNA expression, both confined to the CNS and a small subset of head PNS from embryonic through larval
stages. However, the reporter expression more sensitively detects
differences in tutl expression levels within the CNS (Fig. 3G,H). Particularly high levels of tutl
expression are found in the MP1 interneurons, which cross the midline
and project posteriorly, as well as in a group of unidentified neurons
at the anterior border of the ventral nerve cord late in embryogenesis
(Goodman et al., 1984 ) (Fig. 3G,H). This CNS-specific
expression continues into adult stages, which suggests a functional
role for tutl that begins in embryogenesis but continues to
play an essential role in maintaining a normal mature nervous system
(Mollereau et al., 2000 ).
turtle function is essential in
Drosophila
We identified two recessive lethal P-lacZ insertions
(l(2)01085 and l(2)k14703) at 24E1-3. These two inserts fail to
complement one another in lethal complementation tests, and both are
inserted in the tutl coding region (Fig.
4A). The l(2)01085
P-element is inserted within the boundaries of exon 4 (Fig. 4) and
disrupts translation of the tutl transcript downstream of
exon 4, possibly silencing the entire gene. The l(2)k14703 insert is
located between exon 8 and exon 11 and produces a mutation similar to
the l(2)01085 as defined by similarity in the types and severity of the
mutant phenotypes (see below).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Characterization of mutations in the
tutl gene. A, Genomic structure of the
tutl gene and location of tutl mutations
(see Fig. 1 for symbol legend). Asterisks indicate
locations of primer sets (#6, #7, #8, and #9) used for PCR mapping of
deletion breakpoints in tutl1, tutl2,
tutl3, and tutl4 mutations. Note that the
tutl4 deletion extends 3' to remove the transcriptional
region of the BcDNA GH11322 gene. Vertical
arrowheads indicate insertion sites of P-elements that
generated l(2)01085 and l(2)k14703 mutations. B, The six
tutl mutations generated in this study and the genetic
rescue (revertant) with details about mutation type, lethal stage of
homozygous mutants, general morphology of larvae (and adults for
semiviable mutants), and movement and behavioral phenotypes. (See
Results for details.)
|
|
The l(2)k14703 P-element was mobilized to produce both precise and
imprecise excision events (see Materials and Methods). Precise excision
events (revertants) were isolated and were shown to completely rescue
the lethal phenotype associated with this mutation (Fig.
4B) as well as all other phenotypes characterized here. Precise excision of this P-element accomplishes genetic rescue of
the tutl gene and confirms that insertional mutations in the
tutl gene are responsible for the lethal phenotypes
described below. In addition, four imprecise excision events were
isolated (tutl1-4) that contain Dfs of varying lengths;
these Dfs produce phenotypes of increasing severity in the
tutl gene. The extent of each deficiency (Fig.
4A) and the relative severity of associated phenotypes (Fig. 4B) are shown.
In total, six recessive lethal mutations of the tutl gene
were isolated and characterized in this study (Fig. 4). Most animals homozygous for the tutl1, tutl2, or l(2)k14703
mutations are able to survive to adulthood if competition with
heterozygous siblings is eliminated by isolated rearing of isogenic
mutants. However, pressure from siblings carrying one wild-type copy of
tutl results in the death of the homozygous animals
(85-100% lethality) before adulthood. The l(2)01085,
tutl3, and tutl4 mutants, even in the absence of
competition with siblings carrying wild-type tutl, die 100%
of the time during late pupation shortly before or during hatching from
their pupal cases. These studies show that tutl is
absolutely required for nervous system development and adult viability.
turtle is required for specific types of
coordinated movement
Mutations in the turtle gene produce obvious, profound
defects in several behaviors. We assayed coordinated movement using a
variety of paradigms from stage L1 through adulthood (Fig.
5). We initially observed that
tutl mutants react abnormally to tactile stimulation. When
wild-type larvae are touched at their anterior end, they respond by
executing a characteristic tight reverse-and-turn escape response. This
escape behavior is characterized by one to three reverse peristalsis
movements followed by a lateral turning behavior. Escape behaviors such
as this are robust and reliable to the extent that investigators have
successfully conducted genetic screens based on variations in this
mechanosensory response (Kernan et al., 1994 ). l(2)01085,
tutl3, and tutl4 mutant larvae react to this
stimulus test abnormally. Mutant animals always respond to tactile
stimulation by contracting at both ends and rocking back and forth in
place, which results in little or no net displacement of the animal.
After a few seconds of this behavior, the larvae will cease this
abnormal movement and return to a normal forward-crawling motion,
failing to execute any escape behavior. This profound behavioral defect
is absent in revertant larvae and therefore is a result of a mutation
in the tutl gene. This response defect demonstrates an
inability of tutl mutants to coordinate the specific sequence of motor outputs required for coordinated, bilateral behavior.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Behavioral assays of tutl
mutants. A, Time required for L3 larvae to roll from an
inverted to an upright position (in seconds) for CS (wild-type
control), tutl Df mutants (tutl1,
tutl2, tutl3, tutl4), and
P-element tutl mutants (l(2)k14703, l(2)01085).
B, Percentage of adult flies that can roll from an
inverted to an upright position in a 60 sec time period.
C, The number of peristalsis contraction waves during
normal locomotion executed by L3 larvae in a 60 sec time period.
n = 15 for all lines in A and
C; n = 5 groups of 10 adults in
B. Error bars indicate the SEM. Asterisks
indicate the degree of significance relative to wild type in degrees of
magnitude of the p value.
|
|
We followed this qualitative observation with quantitative studies
designed to reveal the severity of behavioral defects. Wild-type larvae
placed in an inverted position will always respond by executing a
twist-and-roll behavior that will enable the animal to rapidly right
itself. This response clearly requires coordinated bilateral motor
control, allowing the animal to contract muscles on one side while
relaxing contralateral muscles. We analyzed this larval behavior in
homozygous tutl mutants to determine whether the larvae
exhibited defects in this type of complex coordinated movement.
We found that tutl mutants exhibit a severely compromised ability to execute the coordinated motor output necessary to roll over
from an inverted position (Fig. 5A). Wild-type controls
always completed the maneuver in <5 sec, and all tutl
mutants were significantly delayed (>10 sec). Each of the six
tutl mutants exhibits this phenotype to a different degree:
tutl3 increases roll-over time by ~10-fold (31 sec),
whereas tutl4 as well as tutl4/Df(2L)ed-dp flies
delay this behavior by nearly 20-fold (55 sec) (Fig. 5A). The identical phenotype of tutl4/tutl4 and
tutl4/Df demonstrates that tutl4 is a null
mutation by genetic criteria. The other tutl alleles, with
weaker phenotypes, represent hypomorphic partial loss of function
mutations. Importantly, precise excision of the l(2)k14703 P-element
insertion completely rescues this phenotype to wild-type levels (Fig.
5A).
To determine whether defects in these complex behaviors are secondary
to a more general problem, such as a severe lack of energy or severe
sluggishness, lethal mutants were analyzed for basal movement and
locomotion behavior. We found that tutl mutant larvae
executed peristalsis waves during crawling locomotion at only slightly
reduced rates relative to wild type (Fig. 5C). Indeed, the
tutl genetic null mutant (tutl4), which rolls
>20-fold slower than wild type, is only slightly hindered (<15%) in
its rate of executing peristalsis contraction waves during normal
locomotion (Fig. 5, compare A with C). Although
normal movement is comparable between mutant and control animals, more
complex migratory behavior is again markedly abnormal. Whereas
wild-type larvae move in a continuous, linear direction when exploring
a clean agar plate, tutl mutants stop and turn constantly
and so fail to move significantly in any given direction. These data
again demonstrate that tutl mutant larvae are able to
execute basal, locomotory movement similar to wild type but are
severely impaired in their ability to execute complex types of
coordinated behavior.
Isogenic homozygous tutl1, tutl2, and
l(2)k14703 mutants, the only mutants that can survive to adult stages,
are also drastically impaired in their ability to execute specific
types of adult coordinated movement. Most strikingly, these adult
animals are completely unable to perform flight of any kind, although
the animals walk normally and energetically on a level surface. In
addition, the jump response of these adults is intact and robust, but
uncoordinated attempts at flight result in the flies flipping
themselves onto their backs, where continued efforts to fly are
exhibited by adults flapping their wings at high speeds. These efforts,
however, only result in the flies spinning frantically in circles on
the table top. This behavior demonstrates well developed and well
innervated flight muscles in tutl mutants but the
inability to coordinate the motor control required for this complex
behavior. In addition, tutl mutant adults that become
inverted are rarely able to right themselves despite what appears to be
an intense effort to roll over. This behavior was quantified by
manually inverting individuals and assaying righting behavior for 60 sec. As you might expect, wild-type flies always roll over and escape
immediately, almost always in <1 sec. In sharp contrast, only 12-36%
of tutl1, tutl2, and l(2)k14703 adults are able
to roll over after a full 60 sec, whereas revertant adults are
indistinguishable from wild type, usually escaping in <1 sec (Fig.
5B). Thus, as in the larvae, righting behavior is severely
compromised in tutl adult mutants. The inability to fly and
roll over in adulthood appears to result from a compromised ability to
execute specific kinds of bilateral, coordinated movement. This
striking phenotype gave rise to the mutant name, "turtle".
Turtle does not detectably mediate neuronal morphogenesis
Because of the similarity between the primary structure of Tutl
and the Neo/Fra and Robo/Dutt1 protein families, we suspected that Tutl
might function in a similar mannor to mediate growth cone guidance and
neuronal pathfinding. Specifically, Tutl is structurally similar to
chemotrophic receptors known to be present on the surface of growth
cones that navigate midline crossing in the CNS (for review,
see Tear et al., 1993 ; Hummel et al., 1999 ). Such a midline
guidance function for Tutl would be consistent with the observed
profound defects in bilateral motor control.
We used multiple probes for immunocytochemistry and confocal
laser-scanning microscopy to image the developing CNS in mutant embryos
and larvae for pathfinding or neuronal wiring defects (Fig.
6). We first analyzed the axon scaffold
in the embryonic CNS of severe hypomorphic tutl3 and
tutl4 genetic null mutants stained with mAb BP102 (Seeger et
al., 1993 ), which recognizes an unknown epitope present at the axon
scaffold of the CNS (Fig. 6A). We detected no
abnormalities in the morphology of the longitudinal tracts or the
anterior and posterior commissures in the axon scaffold (Fig.
7A). Analyses at different
stages (stage 9-17) of neuronal development throughout embryogenesis
similarly failed to detect any transient defects in axonal patterning.
Overall embryonic CNS structure stained with mAb BP102 was also
visualized to analyze brain morphology, axon scaffold segment size, and
axon scaffold segment shape, but no variation from wild type was
detected.

View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
No morphological defects detected in the embryonic
nervous system of tutl mutants. A,
Confocal images of the ventral nerve cord in the CNS of CS wild-type
(wt), strong hypomorph tutl3, and null
tutl4 mutants. Anti-FasII, The three
longitudinal axon tracts on each side of the midline of stage 16 embryos visualized with mAb 1D4. No abnormalities were detected in
these structures. mAb BP102a, Commissural and
longitudinal axons in the CNS of stage 14 embryos visualized with mAb
BP102. No disruption of axon scaffold segments was found. mAb
BP102b, Commissural and longitudinal axons in the CNS of stage
16 embryos visualized with mAb BP102. Development of the CNS appears to
progress normally in tutl mutants throughout
embryogenesis. Anti-Futsch, Motor neuron axon tracts
including VUM axons, segmental nerves, and intersegmental nerves
visualized with mAb 22C10. No abnormalities were detected in these
pathways. B, Confocal images of the CSS in which
tutl mRNA is expressed (Fig.
3C,F). The CSS of wild-type (wt) and
tutl4 stage 16 embryos are visualized with mAb 22C10
(anti-Futsch). The morphology of these structures is normal.
|
|

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
No morphological defects were detected in the
larval CNS. The structure and function of the NMJ is also normal.
A, The CNS in L3 wild-type and tutl4
larvae visualized with mAb 1D4 (anti-FasII). The three longitudinal
axon tracts of the CNS on each side of the midline are shown. No
discontinuity or abnormality was found in these structures in null
tutl4 larvae. B, The NMJ of muscle
12 in L3 wild-type and tutl4 larvae visualized with
anti-synaptotagmin. Presynaptic morphology appears to be normal.
C, EJC amplitude and response kinetics are unaffected by
tutl. Each trace represents an average of
individual responses from control (7 traces), mutant (8 traces), and
revertant (10 traces). D, Basal EJC fidelity and
amplitude are unaffected by mutations in tutl.
Left, EJC amplitude at 0.5 Hz, 0.4 mM bath
[Ca2+]. Right, fidelity of response
measures variability of response within the individual muscle and is
unchanged by tutl mutation. For each line,
n = 9. Error bars indicate the SEM. Categories were
compared by nonparametric ANOVA and differences were not significant
(left, p > 0.6821;
right, p > 0.8412). Scale bars:
A, 35 µm; B, 30 µm.
|
|
We subsequently analyzed CNS structure using mAb 1D4, which recognizes
the FasII protein (Vactor et al., 1993 ), and mAb 22C10, which
recognizes the Futsch protein (Fujita et al., 1982 ; Hummel et al.,
2000 ), to visualize subsets of axon tracts in the CNS that were not
distinguishable using mAb BP102. We found no abnormalities in the three
FasII-positive longitudinal fascicles on either side of the midline or
in the motor axon pathways that exit the CNS to innervate the
musculature (Fig. 6A). Using mAb 22C10, we
visualized the ventral unpaired median (VUM) axons, which
originate in the midline, project through the posterior commissure to
the anterior commissure, and then bifurcate and turn to leave the CNS.
We also visualized the morphology of the segmental and intersegmental nerves from which axon bundles exit the CNS, providing pathways for
motor axons including VUM axons (Goodman et al., 1984 ). No disruption
or abnormality of the axon tracts, segmental nerves, or intersegmental
nerves in the CNS was detected in tutl mutants (Fig.
6A). From these analyses, we conclude
that the Tutl protein does not play a major role in axon
pathfinding, either across the midline of the CNS or between neuromeres
in the CNS, or in regulating motor neuron projections from the CNS.
Because of the tutl expression detected in a limited subset
of head PNS (Fig. 3C,F-H), we investigated the
morphology of these tutl-positive cells that we call CSS
using mAb 22C10 (Fig. 6B). We found no morphological
abnormalities in these structures in tutl3 or
tutl4 mutants, suggesting that the tutl protein
does not play a detectable role in the morphological development of the
CSS. The remainder of the PNS was also analyzed for morphogenic abnormalities, but none were detected; images that illustrate these
analyses are not included because tutl is not expressed in
these structures. Thus, at this high level of resolution, Turtle does
not appear to play a role in the embryonic morphogenesis of either the
CNS or PNS and, specifically, does not cause detectable structural
defects in neurons known to express a high level of tutl. We
cannot, of course, exclude the possibility the tutl plays a
pathfinding role in a small subset of essential neurons not detectable
with these techniques.
Mutations in turtle result in postembryonic lethality.
Therefore, we investigated the possibility that morphological defects might arise only postembryonically in the CNS of tutl mutant
larvae. We found that the gross morphology of the brain, ventral nerve cord, and motor nerves in tutl4 L3 larvae was normal. To
investigate axon tracts at the L3 larval stage, we used mAb 1D4 to
stain the FasII-positive longitudinal axon tracts of the ventral nerve
cord in tutl4 larvae (Fig. 7A). We found that
these structures similarly exhibit no abnormalities or defects.
Therefore, we conclude that tutl does not play a detectable
role in neuronal pathfinding or morphogenesis during postembryonic
larval development. To be comprehensive, we extended our analyses to
investigate the morphology of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) by
visualizing the neuromusculature of dissected L3 tutl4
larvae. We stained NMJs with anti-synaptotagmin antibody that
recognizes a TM protein in synaptic vesicles (Littleton et al., 1993 )
and then analyzed type-I and type-II bouton morphology on muscle 12 (Fig. 7B). These analyses revealed no abnormalities in
muscle innervation or presynaptic NMJ morphology in tutl
mutants. We conclude that tutl does not play a detectable
role in the elaboration of peripheral synaptic terminals used in
movement regulation.
turtle mutants have normal basal
synaptic function
Movement or behavioral defects can result from abnormal synaptic
transmission. CNS synapses in Drosophila are, as yet,
inaccessible to electrophysiology experiments, but the NMJ has been
used extensively as a functional model for studying synaptic physiology
(Littleton et al., 1999 ). Because of the severe behavioral phenotypes
that are exhibited by tutl mutants, we suspected that a
possible defect in synaptic transmission might contribute to the
behavioral phenotypes exhibited by these mutants. We investigated this
possibility by conducting electrophysiology assays to measure synaptic
transmission at the larval NMJ.
Using TEVC configuration, we recorded evoked synaptic currents in
control and tutl4 genetic null L3 larvae (Fig.
7C,D). The motor nerve was stimulated with a suction
electrode, and synaptic excitatory junctional currents (EJCs) were
recorded in the muscle. Qualitatively, we could detect no differences
in synaptic transmission between mutants and controls (Fig.
7C). We found that the kinetics as well as the amplitude of
EJCs at the NMJ are not significantly different from wild type (Fig.
7D). We conclude from these data that tutl is not
essential for basal excitatory synaptic communication.
turtle is expressed in localized regions of the
adult brain
turtle genetic null mutants die at the end of pupal
development, suggesting that the essential function of the gene is not manifested until adult stages. Therefore, we examined the expression and function of tutl in the adult brain. Both
tutl mRNA and a tutl lacZ reporter
gene are expressed in similar patterns in the adult brain (Fig.
8A-D). High levels of
tutl expression are observed only in highly localized
subsets of neurons in the adult brain, in contrast to the more global
expression observed in the embryonic CNS. One area of particularly high
expression is in the region of the superior lateral protocerebrum
(slpr), a brain region whose function has not yet been elucidated (Fig.
8A,C). In situ hybridization against
tutl in adult frontal brain slices confirms this relatively confined expression pattern for tutl (Fig.
8D). Therefore, tutl expression is
maintained in the adult brain, which suggests a functional role for
tutl in maintaining a normal mature nervous system.

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
tutl is expressed in the
larval and adult CNS, but no morphological defects were detected in
these structures. A,B, tutl reporter gene
expression in the adult brain and the larval brain represented by
-gal expression from the lacZ gene on the l(2)01085
P-element (red). The CNS was stained with mAb BP102 for
reference purposes (green). Oriented dorsal out
of the page and anterior up (A) or
to the left (B). C,
Frontal schematic of an adult Drosophila brain from the
Flybrain website (www.flybrain.org). ped, Pedunculus;
fb, fan-shaped body; vbo, ventral body;
smpr, superior medial protocerebrum;
trito, tritocerebrum; sa, superior arch,
eb, ellipsoid body; no, nodulus;
ild, inferior lateral deutocerebrum; igt,
antennoglomerular tract; vbo, ventral body.
D, DNA in situ hybridization of a frontal
adult brain histology slice demonstrating confined tutl
expression in the adult brain to the region of the superior lateral
protocerebrum. Note that this expression is consistent with that seen
in A. E, Wild-type adult brain frontal
slice stained with mAb BP102 to visualize structures labeled in
C. F, Wild-type adult brain frontal slice
stained with mAb BP102 to visualize the and lobes of the
mushroom bodies. G, tutl2 adult brain
frontal slice stained with mAb BP102 to visualize structures labeled in
C. No morphological abnormalities were found.
H, tutl2 adult brain frontal histology
slice stained with mAb BP102 to visualize the and lobes of the
mushroom bodies. No morphological abnormalities were found in any of
the lobes of the mushroom bodies. Scale bars: A, 100 µm; B, 90 µm; C-E, G,
60 µm; F, H, 30 µm.
|
|
Because pronounced tutl expression is observed in specific
brain regions (Fig. 8A-D) and profound behavioral
defects continue to be exhibited in viable adult mutant animals (Fig.
5B), we investigated the morphological integrity of the
adult CNS by staining sequential 7 µm slices of the adult brain with
mAb BP102. This antibody nicely reveals the architecture of the adult
brain and specifically highlights regions with known tutl
expression (Fig. 8E-H). First, we analyzed the gross morphology of all of the major adult brain regions (Fig. 8C,E,G). Figure 8, E and G, represents
a sample of frontal brain histology slices used to analyze adult brain
structure; however, sequential slices through the entire brain were
used in our investigation. We detected no alterations in brain
morphology in the viable tutl mutants. Second, we focused on
structures that highly express tutl, including the superior
lateral protocerebrum and regions associated with the mushroom bodies.
However, we similarly observed no detectable alteration in neuronal
architecture in these regions (Fig. 8F,H).
Together, these results show that turtle plays an essential
role that is required for the manifestation of complex behaviors but
that this defect is not associated with detectable alterations in
neuronal morphology. We conclude that turtle is the founding
member of a neural-specific Ig family that plays a novel role in
neuronal mechanisms.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have identified and characterized a novel Drosophila
gene, turtle, that is a member of the IgSF. The Turtle
protein is most highly related to IgSF members Neogenin and Roundabout
based on sequence homology and most related to IgSF member Fasciclin II
based on Ig and fibronectin domain structure. The turtle
gene produces at least four transcripts, including two transmembrane and two secreted isoforms. This molecular analysis suggested that Turtle may act as a cell-surface receptor, similar to other family members, but might have additional functions mediated through secretion.
We have shown that the turtle transcript is expressed
exclusively, and at high levels, in the CNS and in a small subset of PNS sensory structures in the head. The expression of turtle
begins in early embryonic neurogenesis, soon after neuroblasts
delaminate from the neuroectoderm, and extends throughout the lifespan
of the animal. The gene is widely expressed throughout the CNS but shows elevated levels of expression in a small subset of neurons in the
embryonic nervous system and small regions of neurons in the larval and
adult brain.
To investigate turtle function in the nervous system, we
created an allelic series of mutants with P-element insertion and imprecise excision. We discovered that turtle is essential
for viability, with genetic null mutants dying at the end of
development before adult eclosion. The series of six turtle
mutants all profoundly influence a number of complex behaviors
requiring bilateral motor control. Mutants show defective exploratory
behavior, escape response to tactile stimulation, and righting
behavior, as well as an inability to coordinate flight. All behavioral
defects were completely rescued in a P-element revertant, confirming
the specificity of these turtle phenotypes. These behavioral
defects do not occur because of a general problem, but rather appear
specific for a number of complex behaviors requiring fine bilateral
motor control.
Given the known function of related IgSF members, we focused our
investigation based on the hypothesis that Turtle would have a function
in axonal pathfinding during neuronal development. However, we found no
axonal pathfinding or other neuronal morphogenic defects in any of the
six turtle mutants in the embryonic, larval, or adult
nervous systems. In these analyses, we used a number of immunological
markers that reveal defects down to the single axonal level and have
been used extensively in similar analyses to characterize pathfinding
defects in related IgSF members. Nevertheless, it is possible that we
missed a pathfinding function manifest in a small number of essential
neurons or a small subset of neurons not revealed with any of our
immunocytochemical markers. To be as comprehensive as possible, we also
assayed synaptic structure and transmission properties in
turtle genetic null mutants. However, turtle
plays no detectable functional role in establishing synaptic morphology
or mediating basal synaptic transmission, at least at the neuromuscular
synapse, the only synapse currently available for analyses.
The lack of morphological defects in turtle mutants was
surprising given the known function of its IgSF relatives, the
Neogenin/Frazzled and the Roundabout/Dutt1 families. Both of these
protein families have been found to function as cell-surface receptors
that play critical roles in chemotrophic axon guidance mechanisms in
the CNS (for review, see Tear et al., 1993 ; Kolodziej et al., 1996 ; Kidd et al., 1998 ; Hummel et al., 1999 ). In the absence of Fra or Robo
in flies, striking axon pathfinding defects are apparent, especially in
the axon scaffold of the ventral nerve cord and axonal midline crossing
in the CNS (Kolodziej et al., 1996 ; Kidd et al., 1998 ; Sundaresan et
al., 1998 ; Cooper et al., 1999 ). We conclude that Turtle, although a
relative of known pathfinding receptors, plays a distinctive neuronal
role. Although its mechanism of action remains unknown, Turtle is
essential for viability and plays an essential role in mediating
complex coordinated behavior that is independent of any detectable
morphological wiring function in the CNS.
turtle defines a novel family of the
Ig superfamily
The closest known relative of the turtle gene is the
human gene KIAA1355 on chromosome 1, which was only recently identified based on mRNA isolated from fetal brain tissue (Nagase et al., 1999 ).
This similarity is greater than that of turtle with its nearest relative in the Drosophila genome, an adjacent gene
(BcDNA GH11322) predicted to have arisen from a duplication event
before the divergence of Drosophila and human lineages. The
fact that the closest known turtle relative exists in the
evolutionarily distant human suggests that turtle and
KIAA1355 define a completely novel subfamily of the IgSF that has not
been studied previously. Although the turtle/KIAA1355
subfamily is identical to the Fasciclin II proteins in its domain
structure, primary amino acid structure is very divergent. Thus, Turtle
family members are likely to have functions distinct from the known
Fasciclin II, Neogenin/Frazzled, and Roundabout/Dutt1 families.
Does turtle have a novel function?
Extensive investigation of an allelic series of turtle
mutants involving assays of neuronal morphology, axon fascicle tracts, and domain structure in the embryonic through the adult nervous system
has failed to reveal a detectable role in axon guidance. Therefore,
based on the data presented here, we conclude that Turtle does not
function by a developmental mechanism similar to its characterized
relatives, but rather has a novel function that has not yet been
resolved. We present evidence that turtle is required for
specific kinds of complex behavior starting in the immediate
postembryonic L1 stage and extending through adulthood. We found that
certain types of complex, coordinated movements are severely hindered,
whereas basal locomotion and behavior are only slightly altered or are
completely unaffected. The specificity of these defects suggests that
abnormalities exhibited in turtle mutants are not in the
general machinery that mediates basic motor control; rather, the
molecular defect most likely lies within a mechanism that enables
Drosophila to execute complex coordinated behaviors.
Although we have yet to uncover the mechanism by which Turtle mediates
complex behaviors, we feel that two possibilities are most likely.
First, Turtle may play a role in axon pathfinding of a very small
subset of neurons. The limited number, location, or uncharacterized
function of this subset of neurons may have rendered them undetectable
to us using current experimental techniques. Second, Turtle may
function in a novel neuronal mechanism unrelated to other IgSF members.
For example, given the known function of the structurally related
Fasciclin II in mediating synaptic mechanisms, it is possible that
Turtle function is essential to synaptic transmission in some neurons
of the CNS. Investigation of this possibility is currently beyond the
scope of available techniques. Additional analyses of turtle
mutants in the fly as well as turtle homologs in other model
organisms are required to reveal the mechanism by which this novel
family mediates viability and behavioral regulation.
One exciting possibility is that turtle may be linked to an
inherited human disorder that impairs coordinated behavior (Harding and
Thomas, 1980 ). Several such inherited disorders have been defined only
recently, and their mechanisms and genetic loci are not yet known
(Koskinen et al., 1994 ; Fukuhara et al., 1995 ; Eckhardt et al., 1998 ).
Model genetic systems in which we can study these human neurological
disorders are invaluable and will likely contribute to our
understanding of their pathologies and to the subsequent development of
clinical therapeutics.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Nov. 27, 2000; revised Jan. 29, 2001; accepted Feb. 22, 2001.
This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grant GM54544
and by a Muscular Dystrophy Association grant to K.B. K.D.B. received support from the Bioscience Undergraduate Research Program, the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program at the University of Utah, and the Arnold and Mable Beckman Scholars Fellowship. We thank Guy Tear for advice and Fasciclin II antibody (mAb
1D4), Kelly Beumer for assistance with immunohistochemistry, Emma
Rushton for assistance with genetics, and Michael Bastiani for
assistance with and use of his confocal microscope. We are grateful to
the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for fly stocks and to the Berkeley Drosophila EST project led by Gerry
Rubin for generating and distributing the EST clones used in this study.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Kendal S. Broadie, Department
of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT
84112-0840. E-mail: broadie{at}biology.utah.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Adams MD,
Celniker SE,
Holt RA,
Evans CA,
Gocayne JD,
Amanatides PG,
Scherer SE,
Li PW,
Hoskins RA,
Galle RF,
George RA,
Lewis SE,
Richards S,
Ashburner M,
Henderson SN,
Sutton GG,
Wortman JR,
Yandell MD,
Zhang Q,
Chen LX,
Brandon RC,
Rogers YH,
Blazej RG,
Champe M,
Pfeiffer BD,
Wan KH,
Doyle C,
Baxter EG,
Helt G,
Nelson CR,
Gabor GL,
Abril JF,
Agbayani A,
An HJ,
Andrews-Pfannkoch C,
Baldwin D,
Ballew RM,
Basu A,
Baxendale J,
Bayraktaroglu L,
Beasley EM,
Beeson KY,
Benos PV,
Berman BP,
Bhandari D,
Bolshakov S,
Borkova D,
Botchan MR,
Bouck J
(2000)
The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.
Science
287:2185-2195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ashburner M
(1989)
Mass histology of adult heads.
In: Drosophila, a laboratory manual (Ashburner M,
ed), pp 254-259. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
-
Barthels D,
Santoni MJ,
Wille W,
Ruppert C,
Chaix JC,
Hirsch MR,
Fontecilla-Camps JC,
Goridis C
(1987)
Isolation and nucleotide sequence of mouse NCAM cDNA that codes for a Mr 79,000 polypeptide without a membrane-spanning region.
EMBO J
6:907-914[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Cooper HM,
Gad JM,
Keeling SL
(1999)
The Deleted in Colorectal Cancer netrin guidance system: a molecular strategy for neuronal navigation.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
26:749-751[Medline].
-
Dickson B
(1998)
Axon guidance: a Roundabout way of avoiding the midline.
Nature
391:442-443[Medline].
-
Eckhardt SM,
Hicks EM,
Herron B,
Morrison PJ,
Aicardi J
(1998)
New form of autosomal-recessive axonal hereditary sensory motor neuropathy.
Pediatr Neurol
19:234-235[Medline].
-
Fujita SC,
Zipursky SL,
Benzer S,
Ferrus A,
Shotwell SL
(1982)
Monoclonal antibodies against the Drosophila nervous system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
79:7929-7933[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Fukuhara N,
Nakajima T,
Sakajiri K,
Matsubara N,
Fujita M
(1995)
Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy associated with cerebellar atrophy (HMSNCA): a new disease.
J Neurol Sci
133:140-151[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Goodman CS
(1996)
Mechanisms and molecules that control growth cone guidance.
Annu Rev Neurosci
19:341-377[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Goodman CS,
Bastiani MJ,
Doe CQ,
du Lac S,
Helfand SL,
Kuwada JY,
Thomas JB
(1984)
Cell recognition during neuronal development.
Science
225:1271-1279[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Harding AE,
Thomas PK
(1980)
Autosomal recessive forms of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
43:669-678[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Harrelson AL,
Goodman CS
(1988)
Growth cone guidance in insects: fasciclin II is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.
Science
242:700-708[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Huang Y,
Jellies J,
Johansen KM,
Johansen J
(1997)
Differential glycosylation of tractin and LeechCAM, two novel Ig superfamily members, regulates neurite extension and fascicle formation.
Cell Biol
138:143-157.
-
Hummel T,
Schimmelpfeng K,
Klambt C
(1999)
Commissure formation in the embryonic CNS of Drosophila.
Dev Biol
209:381-398[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Hummel T,
Krukkert K,
Roos J,
Davis G,
Klambt C
(2000)
Drosophila Futsch/22C10 is a MAP1B-like protein required for dendritic and axonal development.
Neuron
26:357-370[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Keino-Masu K,
Masu M,
Hinck L,
Leonardo ED,
Chan SS,
Culotti JG,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1996)
Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) encodes a netrin receptor.
Cell
87:175-185[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kernan M,
Cowan D,
Zuker C
(1994)
Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction: mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila.
Neuron
12:1195-1206[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kidd T,
Brose K,
Mitchell KJ,
Fetter RD,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Goodman CS,
Tear G
(1998)
Roundabout controls axon crossing of the CNS midline and defines a novel subfamily of evolutionarily conserved guidance receptors.
Cell
92:205-215[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kohl A,
Giese KP,
Mohajeri MH,
Montag D,
Moos M,
Schachner M
(1992)
Analysis of promoter activity and 5' genomic structure of the neural cell adhesion molecule L1.
J Neurosci Res
32:167-177[Medline].
-
Kolodziej PA,
Timpe LC,
Mitchell KJ,
Fried SR,
Goodman CS,
Jan LY,
Jan YN
(1996)
frazzled encodes a Drosophila member of the DCC immunoglobulin subfamily and is required for CNS and motor axon guidance.
Cell
87:197-204[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Koskinen T,
Santavuori P,
Sainio K,
Lappi M,
Kallio AK,
Pihko H
(1994)
Infantile onset spinocerebellar ataxia with sensory neuropathy: a new inherited disease.
J Neurol Sci
121:50-56[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kunz S,
Spirig M,
Ginsburg C,
Buchstaller A,
Berger P,
Lanz R,
Rader C,
Vogt L,
Kunz B,
Sonderegger P
(1998)
Neurite fasciculation mediated by complexes of axonin-1 and Ng cell adhesion molecule.
J Cell Biol
143:1673-1690[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Littleton JT,
Bellen HJ,
Perin MS
(1993)
Expression of synaptotagmin in Drosophila reveals transport and localization of synaptic vesicles to the synapse.
Development
118:1077-1088[Abstract].
-
Littleton JT,
Pallank L,
Ganetzky B
(1999)
Mechanisms of neurotransmitter release.
In: Neuromuscular junctions in Drosophila (Budnik V,
ed), pp 139-162. San Diego: Academic.
-
Mollereau B,
Wernet MF,
Beaufils P,
Killian D,
Pichaud F,
Kuhnlein R,
Desplan C
(2000)
A green fluorescent protein enhancer trap screen in Drosophila photoreceptor cells.
Mech Dev
93:151-160[Medline].
-
Nagase T,
Ishikawa K,
Kikuno R,
Hirosawa M,
Nomura N,
Ohara O
(1999)
Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XV. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro.
DNA Res
6:337-345[Abstract].
-
Oster LL
(1956)
A new crossing-over suppressor in chromosome 2 effective in the presence of heterologous inversions.
Drosophila Information Service
30:145.
-
Rodakis GC,
Lecanidou R,
Eickbush TH
(1984)
Diversity in a chorion multigene family created by tandem duplications and a putative gene-conversion event.
J Mol Evol
20:265-273[Medline].
-
Rohrbough J,
Grotewiel MS,
Davis RL,
Broadie K
(2000)
Integrin-mediated regulation of synaptic morphology, transmission, and plasticity.
J Neurosci
20:6868-6878[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Schmucker D,
Clemens J,
Shu H,
Worby C,
Xiao J,
Muda M,
Dixon J,
Zipursky S
(2000)
Drosophila Dscam is an axon guidance receptor exhibiting extraordinary molecular diversity.
Cell
101:671-684[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Seeger M,
Tear G,
Ferres-Marco D,
Goodman CS
(1993)
Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline.
Neuron
10:409-426[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stoeckli ET,
Kuhn TB,
Duc CO,
Ruegg MA,
Sonderegger P
(1991)
The axonally secreted protein axonin-1 is a potent substratum for neurite growth.
J Cell Biol
112:449-455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sundaresan V,
Roberts I,
Bateman A,
Bankier A,
Sheppard M,
Hobbs C,
Xiong J,
Minna J,
Latif F,
Lerman M,
Rabbitts P
(1998)
The DUTT1 gene, a novel NCAM family member, is expressed in developing murine neural tissues and has an unusually broad pattern of expression.
Mol Cell Neurosci
11:29-35[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Tautz D,
Pfeifle C
(1989)
A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback.
Chromosoma
98:81-85[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Tear G,
Seeger M,
Goodman CS
(1993)
To cross or not to cross: a genetic analysis of guidance at the midline.
Perspect Dev Neurobiol
1:183-194[Medline].
-
Teichmann SA,
Chothia C
(2000)
Immunoglobulin superfamily proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans.
J Mol Biol
296:1367-1383[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1994)
Axon guidance by diffusible repellants and attractants.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
4:596-601[Medline].
-
Vactor DV,
Sink H,
Fambrough D,
Tsoo R,
Goodman CS
(1993)
Genes that control neuromuscular specificity in Drosophila.
Cell
73:1137-1153[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Vielmetter J,
Kayyem JF,
Roman JM,
Dreyer WJ
(1994)
Neogenin, an avian cell surface protein expressed during terminal neuronal differentiation, is closely related to the human tumor suppressor molecule deleted in colorectal cancer.
J Cell Biol
127:2009-2020[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wright JW,
Snyder MA,
Schwinof KM,
Combes S,
Copenhaver PF
(1999)
A role for fasciclin II in the guidance of neuronal migration.
Development
126:3217-3228[Abstract].
-
Zhang YQ,
Broadie K
(1999)
Cloning, mapping, and tissue-specific expression of Drosophila clathrin-associated protein AP50 gene.
Gene
233:171-179[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/01/2193113-13$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ferguson, H. Long, S. Cameron, W.-T. Chang, and Y. Rao
The Conserved Ig Superfamily Member Turtle Mediates Axonal Tiling in Drosophila
J. Neurosci.,
November 11, 2009;
29(45):
14151 - 14159.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Long, Y. Ou, Y. Rao, and D. J. van Meyel
Dendrite branching and self-avoidance are controlled by Turtle, a conserved IgSF protein in Drosophila
Development,
October 15, 2009;
136(20):
3475 - 3484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Jin, L. Pan, Z. Liu, Q. Wang, Z. Xu, and Y. Q. Zhang
Drosophila Tubulin-specific chaperone E functions at neuromuscular synapses and is required for microtubule network formation
Development,
May 1, 2009;
136(9):
1571 - 1581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kwon, S. A. Godinho, N. S. Chandhok, N. J. Ganem, A. Azioune, M. Thery, and D. Pellman
Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes
Genes & Dev.,
August 15, 2008;
22(16):
2189 - 2203.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mishra, B. Knerr, S. Paixao, E. R. Kramer, and R. Klein
The Protein Dendrite Arborization and Synapse Maturation 1 (Dasm-1) Is Dispensable for Dendrite Arborization
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 15, 2008;
28(8):
2782 - 2791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Jordan, T. J. Morgan, and T. F. C. Mackay
Quantitative Trait Loci for Locomotor Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics,
September 1, 2006;
174(1):
271 - 284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Shi, D. N. Cox, D. Wang, L. Y. Jan, and Y.-N. Jan
From The Cover: Control of dendrite arborization by an Ig family member, dendrite arborization and synapse maturation 1 (Dasm1)
PNAS,
September 7, 2004;
101(36):
13341 - 13345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|