 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 15, 2002, 22(10):4229-4240
Sensory Activation and Role of Inhibitory Reticulospinal Neurons
that Stop Swimming in Hatchling Frog Tadpoles
Ray
Perrins,
Alison
Walford, and
Alan
Roberts
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8
1UG, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activity in neuronal networks underlying locomotion and other
rhythmic actions can start and stop in response to specific sensory
stimuli. In vertebrate locomotion, some reticulospinal neurons such as
Mauthner neurons can initiate activity, but the neurons controlling
stopping are not defined. We have studied swimming in tadpoles of the
frog, Xenopus, which is started by touching the skin and
stops when the head contacts a solid surface. Using an immobilized
tadpole preparation, the same stimuli control fictive swimming. When
head contact is imitated by pressure to the head skin sensory neurons
in the trigeminal ganglion are active, spinal neurons receive GABAergic
inhibition, and swimming stops. Here we record intracellularly from
neurons in the hindbrain that are excited by pressure or electrical
stimulation to the head skin. By intracellular filling with
neurobiotin, we identify these anatomically as mid-hindbrain
reticulospinal neurons (MHRs). These have contralateral descending
projections to the spinal cord and GABA-like immunoreactivity. They are
rhythmically inhibited during fictive swimming. Individual MHRs
reliably stopped ongoing swimming when brief firing was
induced by intracellular current injection. The ability of individual
MHRs to stop swimming was blocked by the GABAA antagonist
bicuculline. Our evidence indicates that MHRs receive direct excitation
from trigeminal sensory neurons and in turn release GABA to directly
inhibit spinal neurons and turn off the swimming central pattern generator.
Key words:
locomotion; central pattern generator; trigeminal; GABA; Xenopus; brainstem
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Locomotion needs to be started and
stopped in response to specific behavioral cues. It is known that
specific stimuli can stop locomotion in a range of animals (dogfish:
Gray and Sand, 1936 ; insects: Fraenkel, 1932 ; Pringle, 1974 ; molluscs:
Satterlie et al., 1985 ), but the pathways have not been defined at the
neuronal level. It is especially difficult to investigate natural
stopping pathways in the case of vertebrates. GABAergic reticulospinal neurons have been shown to project to the spinal cord in the rat (Holstege, 1991 ). In the cat, inhibitory connections have been found
between brainstem and spinal neurons (Magoun and Rhines, 1946 ; Llinas
and Terzuolo, 1964 ). Brainstem stimulation in freely behaving cats is
thought to stop walking by exciting spinal inhibitory neurons (Mori,
1987 ). However, detailed analysis of the pathways requires immobilized
preparations where continuous artificial stimulation (either electrical
or via excitatory agonists) is generally needed to activate the
locomotor central pattern generators (CPGs) (Stein et al., 1997 ).
Such reliance on continual stimulation makes it
particularly difficult to study pathways that naturally stop
locomotion. In contrast, in immobilized Xenopus tadpoles, fictive swimming activity can be initiated by brief touch and is then
maintained for many seconds without further input (Roberts et al.,
1997 ). The tadpole nervous system is relatively simple, and access to
the CNS requires minimal dissection (Fig.
1). This means that sensory pathways can
be stimulated mechanically or electrically in immobilized
preparations.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
The preparation used for studying hindbrain
neurons and their spinal targets. A, The immobilized
tadpole is pinned on its right side. Swimming is started using a
stimulating electrode on the tail skin and motor output monitored using
a suction ventral root (VR) electrode. Intracellular
recordings can be made from the hindbrain (as illustrated) or the
spinal cord. Drugs are applied to neurons via a microperfusion system.
Pressure is applied to the head using a glass probe. B,
The glass probe is attached to a loudspeaker via a lever pivoting about
the point indicated. The half-sinusoid shape of the input to the
loudspeaker is shown.
|
|
In Xenopus tadpoles swimming normally stops when the
tadpole contacts an object or the water surface with its head
(Roberts and Blight, 1975 ; Roberts et al., 2000 ). The tadpole then
sticks to the surface with mucous secreted by its cement gland (Fig. 1). The head and cement gland are innervated by free nerve endings from
primary trigeminal afferent neurons with central axons that project to
the caudal hindbrain (Roberts and Blight, 1975 ; Roberts, 1980 ; Hayes
and Roberts, 1983 ). Slowly pressing a probe against the head or cement
gland excites one class of these trigeminal afferents (Roberts and
Blight, 1975 ; Roberts 1998 ) and also reliably stops fictive swimming in
immobilized Xenopus tadpoles (Boothby and Roberts, 1992a ).
This stopping response was blocked by the GABAA
antagonist bicuculline, and when spinal neurons active during swimming
were recorded intracellularly, they were found to receive GABAA-mediated inhibition after a press to the
cement gland (Boothby and Roberts, 1992b ). This led to the proposal
that GABAergic reticulospinal neurons, found in the Xenopus
tadpole using GABA immunocytochemistry (Roberts et al., 1987 ), could
inhibit spinal neurons that normally drive swimming. Boothby and
Roberts (1992b) therefore made intracellular recordings from the
hindbrain to search for neurons excited by pressing the head. Some were
found, but their outputs and anatomy were not characterized.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the anatomy and
physiology of reticulospinal neurons excited by pressing the head skin
and to obtain evidence for their role in stopping swimming. For the
first time in any system, we have defined the role of a class of
inhibitory reticulospinal neuron.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Recordings were made from 78 hatchling tadpoles of
Xenopus laevis (developmental stage 37-38; Nieuwkoop and
Faber, 1956 ). Experiments were performed at 18-22°C in a saline of
composition (in mM): NaCl, 115; KCl, 3;
CaCl2, 4; MgCl2, 1;
NaHCO3, 2.4; HEPES, 10, at pH 7.4. Animals were anesthetized in a 0.1% solution of MS-222 (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) in saline and the dorsal fin slit to allow access of the
neuromuscular blocker -bungarotoxin (10 µM).
The tadpoles were left in -bungarotoxin until they no longer swam in
response to normally effective stimuli. The tadpoles were then pinned
to a rotatable Sylgard (Dow Corning, Wiesbaden, Germany) block in a
bath continually perfused with saline (see Fig. 1 for the basic
experimental set up). The skin from the otic capsule to the 12th
post-otic myotome on the left side of the tadpole was removed with
finely etched tungsten microneedles. Extracellular recordings were made
from the ventral roots using suction electrodes placed on the
intermyotomal clefts exposed by this procedure. The dorsal parts of the
myotomes were removed to expose the rostral spinal cord and hindbrain.
Intracellular recordings were made by inserting glass microelectrodes
into the spinal cord or hindbrain. Fictive swimming was evoked by a 0.5 msec electric current pulse applied to the trunk skin at the level of
the anus via a suction electrode. Drugs were then applied via a
multibarreled microperfusion system with an opening of 60 µm placed
100 µm from the CNS.
Microelectrodes with DC resistances of 150-250 M were pulled on a
Sutter P-97 microelectrode puller and filled with 3 M
potassium acetate or 2 M potassium acetate with 1%
Neurobiotin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Neurons were impaled using
a Burleigh PZ-100 piezoelectric step driver and using capacitance
overcompensation. Neurons were used if they had a stable resting
potential more negative than 50 mV and showed clear rhythmic synaptic
input during fictive swimming (Boothby and Roberts, 1992b ).
After testing their physiological responses, neurobiotin (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was injected into the neurons using
positive 0.5 sec duration current pulses of 0.1-0.3nA applied once per
second for 5-10 min. The electrode was then withdrawn, and the animals
were left for 30-60 min for the dye to spread throughout the
neuron, before being fixed in 2% gluteraldehyde in phosphate buffer
(PB; 0.08 M
Na2HPO4 and 0.02 M NaH2PO4, pH 7.4) for 2 hr at room temperature. After fixation the dorsal parts of
the axial muscles were removed from the right side of the animal to
facilitate later processing. The preparation was washed in PBS
(120 mM NaCl in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) for 1 hr with two changes of solution. The preparation was then washed in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 for 1 hr with two changes of solution and then incubated for 3 hr in a solution of PBS containing 0.5% Triton and a
1:200 dilution of ExtrAvidin (Sigma). After washing with three changes
of PBS for 1 hr, the preparation was placed in 0.05% diaminobenzidine
(DAB) in PBS for 5 min, and then into a solution of 0.05 DAB 0.03%
hydrogen peroxide for 2-5 min. When the neurons became visible, the
reaction was stopped by transferring to PBS. The CNS, with notochord
and ventral axial muscles attached, was then dissected out of the
preparation and dehydrated, cleared in methyl benzoate and xylene, and
mounted on its side in DePeX between coverslips so that it could be
examined from both sides. Neurons were drawn using a camera lucida and
photographed using a Nikon Coolpix 990 digital camera. Because the
mid-hindbrain reticulospinal neurons (MHRs) filled had a contralateral
axon, photos were taken at several different focal planes, and then the
images were processed and stacked using Adobe Photoshop software. Because specimens shrink by ~22% during dehydration (Li et al., 2001 ), we have compensated for this shrinkage by multiplying all anatomical measures in this paper by 1.28.
In immobilized animals, the stopping pathway was stimulated by pressing
the head skin at the region of the cement gland using a 0.5 mm diameter
rounded glass probe (Fig. 1). The probe was attached, via a lever, to a
loudspeaker (Roberts and Blight, 1975 ), which was driven by a
sinusoidal voltage generated by Signal software and a
Cambridge Electronics Design (Cambridge, UK) 1401 computer interface.
The monitor trace on records represents the output voltage to the
speaker, rather than directly measuring probe movement. At rest the
probe was lightly touching the skin of the cement gland. A downward
deflection of the trace represents the probe pressing inwards into the
cement gland.
Data were stored using Signal software in conjunction with
a Cambridge Electronic Design 1401 computer interface. Current was
injected into neurons via the recording electrode. All measures are
mean ± SD.
Drugs used: -bungarotoxin 10 µM, strychnine sulfate 1 µM, bicuculline methiodide 10-20 µM,
kynurenate 1 mM (all Sigma).
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of hindbrain neurons responding to pressing the
cement gland
Morphology
Ten neurons that responded to pressing the cement gland (see
below) were filled successfully with neurobiotin. Figure
2 shows a composite photograph of a
typical filled neuron. Figure 3 shows drawings of three examples at both low and high power, whereas Figure
4 shows all 10 neurons schematically. In
a further two cases partial fills were achieved (with only cell body
and part of the initial axon segment visible). The cell bodies of the
neurons were situated near the dorsoventral midline, in the caudal
hindbrain, in the region adjacent to the first and second post-otic
myotomes (400-550 µm from the midbrain, approximately equivalent to
the sixth to eighth rhombomeres) (Fig. 3). The somata were
dorsoventrally elongated (mean height, 28 ± 3 µm; mean width,
17 ± 4 µm; n = 9). All neurons were multipolar,
usually with a few, short dorsally projecting dendrites and several
elongated, ventral dendrites. All neurons had a contralateral,
descending axon between 800- and 1700-µm-long (mean, 1180 ± 350 µm; n = 8) (Fig. 4). In addition to this, two
examples had ipsilateral descending axons (1140 and 1240 µm long) and
two had shorter contralateral ascending axons (20 and 280 µm in
length). Some lengths may be underestimates where axons did not show a
distinct end-bulb and may therefore be incompletely filled.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Photomontage of an MHR neuron filled with
neurobiotin and also shown in Figure 3, A and
D. Part of the hindbrain near its border with the spinal
cord (*) is shown viewed from the left side in a whole mount of the
CNS. Rostral is to the left. The pear-shaped MHR soma
has a ventral principal process with dendrites (e.g., relatively long
ventral dendrite at arrowhead) and an axon that crosses ventrally and
then descends on the opposite side (arrow).
Short, thick arrows indicate the dorsal and ventral
edges of the hindbrain.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Anatomy of MHR neurons. A-C, Scale
drawings of a lateral view of the CNS showing the overall anatomy of
three neurobiotin filled MHRs. P, Pineal gland;
Trig, trigeminal nerve; f, forebrain;
m, midbrain; h, hindbrain.
Asterisk indicates border of hindbrain and spinal cord.
Post-otic myotomes are numbered. D-F, The region of the
soma in lateral view of the same three neurons. Rostral is to the
left. Note the relatively long ventral dendrites
(arrowheads) and crossed, descending axon.
Arrows indicate the point where the axon crosses the
ventral midline of the CNS. c, Contralateral axon;
i, ipsilateral axon.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Schematic representation of the 10 MHR neurons
filled by intracellular injection of neurobiotin. The top neuron is
superimposed on a diagram of the CNS (viewed dorsally) showing
hindbrain, spinal cord, trigeminal nerve (Trig.), otic
capsule and numbered myotomes. The remaining neurons are shown to the
same scale, and the distance in millimeters from the mid-hindbrain
boundary is shown at the bottom. A dashed
line shows the nominal boundary between the hindbrain and
spinal cord. Most axons faded at their distal end, but four ended in
growth cones, shown by small, black rectangles. Note the
limited rostrocaudal distribution of somata.
|
|
The neurons share the following features with GABA-immunopositive MHRs,
as described in Roberts et al. (1987) : (1) somata in the hindbrain,
350-550 µm from the midbrain-hindbrain border and around the
dorsoventral midline, (2) dorsoventrally elongated soma, (3) multipolar
soma, with mainly ventrally projecting dendrites, and (4) a ventral
principal process that crosses to the contralateral side of the
hindbrain then descends into the spinal cord, at least some with an
additional ipsilateral descending axon. For simplicity we will now
refer to these cells as MHRs.
Neuronal properties
The mean resting potential for MHRs was 68 ± 3 mV
(n = 12) with an input resistance of 262 ± 78 M (n = 12). The firing properties of MHR neurons
were tested by injecting depolarizing current pulses of 100 msec
duration in 0.05 nA steps through the recording electrode (Fig.
5A,B). The threshold current
for the firing was 0.17 ± 0.06 nA (n = 8), and
the threshold voltage above the resting potential was 21.6 ± 3.8 mV (n = 8). In response to suprathreshold current, MHR
neurons fired multiple action potentials. This is similar to sensory
interneurons in the Xenopus spinal cord (Roberts and Sillar,
1990 ) but is in contrast with motoneurons which usually only fire one
action potential, regardless of current (Soffe, 1990 ; Soffe and
Perrins, 1997 ). Firing frequency was measured as instantaneous firing
frequency (from the first two spikes in a train) and over the whole
current pulse. Both these measures increased with higher current levels
and could be fitted with a single exponential (Fig. 5C).
Firing frequency also adapted with time during these current pulses
(Fig. 5) (n = 8).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Firing properties of MHRs. A,
B, Firing responses of two neurons to current pulses
from 0.1 to 0.35 nA in 0.05 nA steps. C, Graph showing
firing frequency against injected current for eight MHRs. Closed
circles are instantaneous firing frequency for the first two
spikes. Open circles are frequency measured over the
whole 100 msec current pulse. Both are fitted with exponential
curves.
|
|
Responses of MHRs to activation of pathways that start
fictive swimming
We investigated the responses of MHRs to two different types of
input that can start swimming in Xenopus tadpoles. The first of these involves the pineal eye, which is excited by light dimming and
can initiate swimming (Foster and Roberts, 1982 ; Jamieson and Roberts,
2000 ). Dimming the illumination produced no short- or long-latency
EPSPs in the MHRs. The only input was the midcycle glycinergic IPSPs
seen once swimming activity started (Fig.
6).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Response of MHR to light dimming over pineal eye.
When the light level drops, swimming is initiated and
recorded as rhythmic ventral root (VR) bursts. In
intracellular record from MHR (MHR) no
excitation is seen, but midcycle IPSPs are present on every cycle
during swimming.
|
|
The second type of input investigated was electrical stimulation of the
trunk skin, which stimulates the touch pathway to initiate swimming.
The stimulating electrode was placed on the skin at the level of the
anus, and after a 0.5 msec stimulus above the threshold for swimming,
several distinct types of input to MHRs were observed (Fig.
7A,C): (1) An EPSP with a
short, fixed latency. This was revealed more clearly when glycinergic
inhibition was blocked by strychnine (Fig. 7C). The overall
latency of this EPSP was 10.8 ± 1.6 msec (n = 81 EPSPs from five preparations). However, the variance of the delay in
each preparation was very small (~0.1 msec) (Table
1) and was consistent with a monosynaptic connection (see Discussion). In 2 of 12 cases there were also indications of a short-latency IPSP remaining in strychnine, indicated by a sharp cutoff to the EPSP and the membrane potential going below
the resting potential (seen in Fig. 7A but not in
7C). Because this strychnine-resistant IPSP was not a
reliable input, it was not investigated further. (2) EPSPs with long,
variable latencies. These were observed in seven of eight neurons
tested. The EPSPs occurred during swimming between 100 msec and 1 sec
after the stimulus. They occurred at all phases of swimming, apparently at random (compared with ipsilateral ventral root discharge) (Fig. 7B). The total number of these EPSPs did seem to increase
with increasing stimulus intensity, but we have not investigated these EPSPs further in this study. (3) Reliable, midcycle IPSPs. These were
seen throughout swimming episodes (Figs. 6, 7A). The IPSPs were only seen at midcycle, compared with ipsilateral ventral root
discharge, and were reversibly blocked by the glycine antagonist strychnine (1 µM; n = 6) (Fig.
7A). The midcycle IPSPs were very reliable, occurring on
100% of cycles (measured on 100 cycles each from six MHRs). This is in
contrast to IPSPs in spinal sensory dorsolateral commissural
interneurons that tend to fail on some cycles as swimming progresses
(Sillar and Roberts, 1992 ).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
MHR neurons receive excitation after trunk skin
stimulation. A, In control, two types of excitation can
be seen when the stimulus (at artifact, asterisk)
initiates fictive swimming (seen in ventral root record,
VR), a short-latency EPSP (arrows) and
longer, variable, latency EPSPs (arrowheads). The
inhibition consists of reliable, midcycle IPSPs (dashed
lines). Strychnine reversibly blocks the midcycle IPSPs and
reveals the excitation more clearly. Note that in strychnine the
short-latency EPSP is cut off, and there is a subsequent undershoot
below the resting potential, indicating a short-latency IPSP
(open arrow). This was only seen in 2 of 12 preparations
(compare with C, from another preparation).
Bi, The number of long-latency EPSPs occurring at
different phases of the swimming cycle. No phasic relationship can be
seen. Bii, In contrast, the IPSPs during swimming are
centered around 0.5 phase (midcycle). C, Five traces in
control and five in strychnine reveal the short-latency EPSP in
response to tail skin stimulation. Note the low variability of the
delay to the onset of the EPSP.
|
|
Responses of MHRs on activation of the
stopping pathway
When the head skin was pressed to stop fictive swimming, MHRs
received excitation and usually fired one or more action potentials (Fig. 8). MHRs also received excitation
(a barrage of EPSPs) when the cement gland was pressed in the absence
of swimming (Fig. 9A). The
excitation was graded with stimulus intensity (n = 6) (Fig. 9A), and if the stimulation was strong enough,
resulted in firing. Instantaneous firing frequencies in response to
pressing the cement gland could reach >100 Hz, approximately
equivalent to 0.35 nA injected current (twice the threshold current)
(Fig. 5). The excitation was reversibly blocked by the broad spectrum excitatory amino acid (EAA) antagonist kynurenate (1 mM; n = 6) (Fig. 9A).
Repeated pressing of the cement gland resulted in responses that
steadily reduced in both duration and amplitude (n = 4)
(Fig. 9B).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
MHR activity during swimming and head press.
A, Examples from two preparations. In each case swimming
is started by a 1 msec duration electrical stimulus to the trunk skin
(at asterisk) and is monitored from the ventral roots
(VR). During swimming MHRs receive rhythmic, reliable
IPSPs. Swimming is stopped by pressing the head skin (cement gland),
when the MHRs receive excitation and fire action potentials. The
anatomy of the first neuron is shown in Figure 2, A and
D, the second in Figure 2, B and
E. B, The input to the lower MHR shown at
an expanded scale to clearly show individual EPSPs and spikes.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Responses of MHR neurons and motoneurons to
pressing the head. A, Graded presses result in a graded
barrage of EPSPs and firing at the highest intensity. This is
reversibly blocked by 1 mM kynurenate. B,
The excitatory response in MHR neurons reduces when presses are
repeated every second. C, The barrage of IPSPs in a
ventral, rhythmically active, neuron (VN) also
reduces during repeated presses.
|
|
To discover if the MHR neurons were directly excited by
trigeminal sensory neurons, we investigated their response to
electrical stimulation of the cement gland (n = 5)
(Fig. 10). In this region of the head
there are two types of sensory nerve endings (Roberts, 1980 ): those
that respond to slow pressing and have an inhibitory effect on swimming
and those that respond to touch and have excitatory effects. For
reasons detailed below we are confident that electrical stimulation
using a suction electrode applied to the side of the gland (Fig.
10A) excited afferents sensitive to slow pressing
almost exclusively. MHR neurons received EPSPs in response to
electrical stimulation, which were graded with stimulus intensity
(n = 5) (Fig. 10B) and fully blocked
by 1 mM kynurenate (n = 5) (Fig.
10C). The delay to these EPSPs was very brief and had low
variability within each preparation (see individual variances in Table
1). The mean delay was 5.9 msec ± 0.6 SD (n = 25 EPSPs each from five preparations). The value of the delay and its low
variance are consistent with a monosynaptic connection between the
trigeminal sensory neurons and the MHR neurons. The delays and their
variances are very similar to those found in the known monosynaptic
pathway where Rohon-Beard neurons innervating the trunk skin excite
spinal sensory interneurons (delay, 6.26 msec ± 0.16;
n = 71) (Roberts and Sillar, 1990 ). In one MHR the
EPSPs occasionally gave rise to a spike (Figs. 10B,
11A). The latency to
this spike was longer and more variable because of differences in the
rise time of the EPSP (mean delay, 12.9 msec ± 1.9 SD; variance,
1.7; n = 25 spikes) (Table 1).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Responses of MHRs and ventral spinal neurons
(VNs) to electrical stimulation of the cement gland.
A, The preparation used. Microelectrodes could record
from either MHRs or rostral VNs. Drugs were locally applied via a
microperfusion system. B, As stimulus intensity is
increased, the short-latency EPSP in an MHR increases in amplitude
until a spike is evoked. C, The EPSP in MHRs is blocked
by kynurenate. Each trace is an average of eight responses.
D, The IPSP in a spinal neuron is blocked by
bicuculline. Averages of eight responses. Stimulus indicated by
asterisk.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
Latencies of responses of MHRs and VRs to
electrical stimulation of the cement gland. A, EPSPs and
spikes in an MHR (6 traces overlaid). The latency to the start of the
EPSP (arrows) has a smaller variance than the latency to
the spike (arrowheads). IPSPs in a ventral spinal neuron (VN) have a
long and variable latency (arrows). MHR and VN recorded
from two different animals. Stimulus at asterisk.
B, Plot of latencies to EPSPs in MHRs and IPSPs in VNs
shows the clear difference in timing and variability in delays. Also
shown is the delay to the spike in the one MHR in which this could be
evoked. Twenty-five latencies were measured in each neuron.
|
|
Responses of spinal neurons to activation of the
stopping pathway
Because electrical stimulation of the cement gland excited the
MHRs and we propose that MHRs inhibit spinal neurons, we also looked at
responses to cement gland stimulation in rhythmically active, ventral
spinal neurons (presumed motoneurons). In five of six spinal neurons in
six separate preparations the response was purely inhibitory (Figs.
10D, 11A) and was fully blocked by bicuculline (Fig. 10D). In one case an excitatory
response was also observed at a similar latency. This was presumably
because of the activation of fast transient (touch) receptors, but in general it appears that electrical stimulation near the cement gland
primarily activated the pressure sensitive afferents.
In each preparation tested, the delay to the start of the IPSPs in
ventral neurons was longer and the variation larger than for the EPSPs
in MHRs (Fig. 11, Table 1) (mean delay, 12.8 msec ± 1.9 SD;
variance, 3.6; n = 25 IPSPs each from six
preparations). For individual variances, see Table 1. The latencies of
the EPSPs in MHRs and the IPSPs in ventral spinal neurons are compared
in Figure 11B. The increased latency and variance for
the IPSPs is compatible with a disynaptic pathway from trigeminal
sensory neurons, via MHR interneurons (see Discussion).
When the head skin was pressed, ventral spinal neurons that were
rhythmically active during swimming received a barrage of IPSPs
(n = 8). As has been shown previously (Boothby and
Roberts, 1992b ) these IPSPs were blocked by bicuculline, so are
presumably GABAergic. When the head skin was pressed repeatedly the
amplitude and duration of this IPSP barrage decreased
(n = 4) (Fig. 9C), like the excitatory
response in MHRs (Fig. 9B).
Firing in individual MHRs stops swimming
In seven of nine neurons tested, firing individual MHRs
using positive current injection reliably stopped ongoing fictive swimming (Fig. 12). The protocol was to
initiate swimming using a brief electrical stimulus to the trunk skin
then inject 5-20 positive current pulses 2.4 sec later. This gave rise
to between 5 and 40 spikes in the MHR, depending on the amplitude and
number of current pulses used. Two MHR neurons had no apparent effect on swimming, however many action potentials were evoked. To assess the
number of MHR impulses necessary to stop swimming, the number of MHR
impulses that occurred before the last swimming cycle was counted. The
number of impulses ranged from 1 to 23 (mean, 4.6 ± 4.4 spikes;
n = 7 tadpoles). Without such induced MHR activity, swimming always continued for many seconds before slowing and terminating spontaneously. To quantify this we counted the number of
cycles before swimming stopped. Swimming continued for 239 ± 171 cycles (n = 15 responses from 5 tadpoles) with no MHR
spikes. After the MHRs were induced to fire swimming then continued for only 2 ± 1 cycles (n = 75 responses from seven
tadpoles). In these 75 responses there were 13 in which evoking MHR
spikes failed to stop swimming so the stopping effect of MHR spikes was
86% reliable.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 12.
Stimulation of individual MHR neurons can stop
ongoing swimming. In three trials in control, swimming (recorded in
ventral root, VR) is started using a brief electrical
stimulus to the skin (at asterisk). After 2.4 sec five
current pulses (solid bar) are injected into the MHR
neuron, each resulting in two spikes (inset box shows
the end of swimming at a slower time base). This stops swimming on
every trial. In bicuculline, firing in the MHR neuron no longer stops
swimming (2 trials shown). The second series of current pulses in the
MHR neuron consists of 15 pulses, each giving rise to between two and
four spikes (inset shows the start of this train).
Swimming carried on for at least another 6 sec after end of the trace
shown. After 90 sec in wash, activity in the MHR neuron can again stop
swimming.
|
|
In three experiments the GABAA antagonist
bicuculline (20 µM) was applied to the rostral spinal
cord. This had no apparent effect on fictive swimming but reversibly
blocked the ability of MHR neurons to terminate swimming, even when a
larger number of action potentials were evoked (Fig. 12, tested at
least six times in each animal). In wash, firing individual MHRs could
again reliably stop swimming when tested at least five times in each animal. This shows that the ability of MHRs to stop swimming relies on
GABAA-mediated inhibition, as does the normal
stopping response (Boothby and Roberts, 1992a ).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Are reticulospinal neurons (MHRs) involved in the natural
stopping pathway?
When the head skin is pressed to stop swimming it is known that
sensory neurons in the trigeminal are excited to fire action potentials
(Roberts and Blight, 1975 ), hindbrain neurons are excited, and
rhythmically active spinal neurons receive GABAergic IPSPs (Boothby and
Roberts, 1992b ). The simplest proposal for this stopping response is
that interneurons in the hindbrain receive direct excitation from the
trigeminal afferent neurons and in turn directly inhibit rhythmic
spinal neurons, through the release of GABA. There are several lines of
evidence that the MHRs, defined by GABA immunoreactivity by Roberts et
al. (1987) , are the interneurons recorded in this study.
Neurons filled in this study share many anatomical features with MHRs
(see Results) and can therefore be identified with some confidence as
MHRs. Roberts et al. (1987) revealed 15-20 GABA-immunopositive MHR
neurons on each side of the hindbrain at stage 37-38. Many of the
other reticulospinal neurons in the young Xenopus tadpole have ipsilateral descending projections (van Mier and ten Donkelaar, 1984 ).
The MHRs in this study were excited by pressing the cement gland, as
would be expected if the MHRs are involved in the stopping pathway.
Boothby and Roberts (1992b) used extracellular recordings to show that
the normal stopping response could be blocked by kynurenate, indicating
that EAA-mediated excitation is important at some point in the pathway.
We have shown that the excitation in MHRs was also blocked by kynurenate.
The best evidence that MHRs are involved in the normal stopping pathway
is that firing in individual MHRs could reliably stop swimming.
Additionally, the ability of individual MHRs to stop swimming was
blocked by bicuculline, showing that it relies on the activation of
GABAA receptors. The natural stopping response is
also blocked by bicuculline and when the head skin is pressed GABAergic
IPSPs are evoked in rhythmic spinal neurons (Boothby and Roberts,
1992b ).
If most MHRs can stop swimming individually, as a population they must
have a very powerful influence on the CPG. This may be to get the very
reliable termination of swimming, which is seen when swimming tadpoles
bumps into solid objects. Stopping is also very reliable when tested
under experimental conditions by pressing on the head skin of tadpoles
(80% in restrained tadpoles, 97% in immobilized tadpoles) (Boothby
and Roberts 1992a ). It is quite rare to find individual neurons in
vertebrates that have such a dramatic effect on behavior. The Mauthner
neuron is found in the hindbrains of lampreys, sharks, teleost fish,
and amphibians (Zottoli, 1978 ). When fired experimentally it can
initiate behavior similar to a weakened escape C-flexion in fish (for
review, see Eaton et al., 2001 ). Stimulating single Müller cells
in the lamprey hindbrain at high frequency can also influence fictive
swimming via their excitatory synapses in the spinal cord, although the results are variable (for review, see Buchanan 2001 ). In some cases,
body or fin movements are initiated, whereas in others ongoing fictive
swimming bursts can be altered in intensity or cycle period. These
responses may be involved in steering. Recent work has shown that
specific groups of reticulospinal neurons in the lamprey can respond to
tactile stimulation by generating a plateau potential that may turn on
swimming (Viana Di Prisco et al., 2000 ). Other reticulospinal neurons
have a variety of excitatory and inhibitory effects on motoneurons
firing during swimming (Zelenin et al., 2001 ). In the cat,
reticulospinal neurons have also been shown to have inhibitory effects
(Takakusaki et al., 2001 ). In both the lamprey and the cat the
inhibition may be indirect and mediated by spinal inhibitory neurons.
The source of the midcycle IPSPs seen in MHRs during swimming is
likely to be spinal commissural interneurons, which have axons
projecting through the hindbrain (Yoshida et al., 1998 ) and are the
only glycine-immunopositive neurons at this developmental stage (Dale
et al., 1986 ). The function of these IPSPs during swimming is unclear.
It is unlikely to be a phase-dependent sensory gating
phenomenon (cf. Sillar and Roberts, 1988 ), because the stopping
response is bilateral. We expect the IPSPs to lower the likelihood of
activity in MHRs during swimming, although a strong enough stimulus is
still able to excite the MHRs to fire impulses and therefore stop
swimming. Conversely, at rest, the MHRs without IPSPs may be more easy
to excite and have a higher probability of spontaneous activity. We are
currently investigating the possibility that low-level activity in MHRs
could decrease tadpole responsiveness during periods when they hang
from a mucus strand secreted by the cement gland on the head (Lambert
and Roberts, 2000 ).
Is the stopping pathway disynaptic?
Various possibilities have been put forward to define the stopping
pathway in Xenopus, after studies involving various lesions to the CNS (Boothby and Roberts, 1992a ). The short delay to, and small
variance of, EPSPs in MHRs after electrical stimulation of the cement
gland suggests that the connection from trigeminal sensory neurons is
direct and monosynaptic. In contrast, the delay to the IPSPs in ventral
spinal neurons is much longer and has a larger variance, which would
result from the variable spike times in MHRs. This explanation is
supported by the one case in which an MHR could be induced to spike, in
which the latencies to the spike were more variable and in the same
range as the IPSPs in ventral spinal neurons (Fig. 11). The variance of
3.6 msec in delay to the start of the IPSP is similar to that of 3.044 msec in another possibly disynaptic pathway in the Xenopus
tadpole, the contralateral EPSP evoked in motoneurons by skin
stimulation (Roberts and Sillar, 1990 ).
The neuronal pathway that we propose for stopping swimming in
Xenopus tadpoles is shown in Figure
13. Trigeminal sensory neurons innervate both the cement gland and the head skin. Slow pressure to
either of these leads to multiple action potentials in a number of
trigeminal afferent neurons. Their central caudally directed axons
project through the hindbrain and release an EAA to excite MHR neurons.
If the stimulus is sufficient, one or more MHR neurons will fire action
potentials that will propagate into the spinal cord in the caudally
directed axons of the MHRs. All MHRs have a commissural axon, but some
also have an ipsilateral descending axon, so the action might be
bilateral. The axons are presumed to make en passant synapses with
neurons that they pass in the caudal hindbrain and spinal cord. At
these synapses GABA is released to activate GABAA
receptors and terminate swimming activity. Is this simple pathway the
only one? The lesion experiments of Boothby and Roberts (1992a) suggest
that there may be another commissural pathway in the rostral hindbrain
that also allows trigeminal neurons to excite MHRs on the contralateral
side. This would provide a second mechanism to ensure that the action
of MHRs was bilateral, stopping spinal CPG neurons on both sides of the
spinal cord. The delays to the start of the short-latency EPSP in MHRs
supports the simplest, monosynaptic pathway. Without further evidence, for example, from paired recording from MHRs and spinal neurons, we
cannot rule out less direct pathways, but at present the proposal that
MHRs are excitatory and produce spinal inhibition via spinal GABAergic
neurons is unlikely.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 13.
The proposed neuronal pathway involved in
stopping swimming in Xenopus tadpoles when the head skin
is pressed. This schematic diagram shows the nervous system as viewed
from above (see Fig. 3). Trigeminal sensory neurons
(white) have processes in the skin of the head and
cement gland and an axon descending to the caudal hindbrain where
synapses are made with MHRs (black). When activated the
trigeminal neurons excite the MHRs by releasing an EAA. MHRs all have a
contralateral descending axon (solid line), and some
have an additional ipsilateral descending axon (dashed
line). These axons make en passant synapses with rhythmic
spinal neurons (hatching). If the stimulus intensity is sufficient, the
MHRs fire action potentials that result in the release of GABA, which
activates GABAA receptors and hyperpolarizes the spinal
neurons to stop activity in the swimming CPG. Note that Boothby and
Roberts (1992a) also proposed an additional excitatory crossing pathway
in the rostral hindbrain (data not shown here).
|
|
Interactions with other sensory pathways
There are four main pathways that can initiate swimming in
Xenopus tadpoles (Roberts, 1998 ): (1) light dimming
(Roberts, 1978 ; Jamieson and Roberts, 2000 ). This provided no obvious
input to MHRs. (2) Skin impulses (Roberts and Stirling, 1971 ; Roberts
1975 ). Increasing skin stimulation intensity until a skin impulse was initiated produced no obvious response in MHRs. (3) Touch-sensitive receptors in the head skin. This pathway was not investigated in this
study, because it is difficult to test specifically, without also
stimulating receptors sensitive to pressing the head skin. (4) Touch to
the trunk skin. When this pathway is activated, it gives rise to EPSP
in MHRs. Clarke et al. (1984) calculated conduction speeds in the
afferent axons from the tail skin of 0.05-0.2
msec 1 and in central axons of 0.15-0.4
msec 1. Because the stimulating electrode
was ~2 mm from the recording site, this would lead to theoretical
conduction times of ~10 msec. The latencies of these EPSPs (~11
msec) are therefore compatible with monosynaptic connections from the
skin afferents. In corroboration, the EPSP latency has a low variance
similar to that in other monosynaptic pathways (Roberts and Sillar,
1990 ). Trunk skin stimulation excites sensory neurons in the spinal
cord (Rohon-Beard neurons), which have ascending and descending
central axons. These axons can extend into the hindbrain (Roberts and
Clarke, 1982 ) and are in a position to synapse with the dorsal
processes of MHRs. Rohon-Beard neurons are therefore likely to be the
source of the short-latency EPSPs. At higher stimulus intensities, the
short-latency EPSP is followed by more variable, longer latency
excitation. The source of the longer latency EPSPs and the function of
either type of excitation is not clear as yet.
These inputs from the pathway that initiates swimming onto
neurons involved in stopping swimming mean that the MHRs are a place
where the two pathways could interact. Interactions between sensory
pathways at the interneuronal level could help to explain some
behavioral phenomena such as reduced responsiveness during attachment
(discussed above; Lambert and Roberts, 2000 ).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Jan. 9, 2002; revised March 5, 2002; accepted March 6, 2002.
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. We thank Derek Dunn,
Julie Hansen, Tim Colburn, and Linda Teagle for technical assistance
and Steve Soffe for advice and comments on this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Prof. Alan Roberts, School of
Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8
1UG, UK. E-mail: A.Roberts{at}bristol.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Boothby KM,
Roberts A
(1992a)
The stopping response of Xenopus laevis tadpoles: behavior, development and physiology.
J Comp Physiol [A]
170:171-180[Medline].
-
Boothby KM,
Roberts A
(1992b)
The stopping response of Xenopus laevis tadpoles: pharmacology and intracellular physiology of rhythmic spinal neurones and hindbrain neurones.
J Exp Biol
169:65-86[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Buchanan JT
(2001)
Contributions of identifiable neurons and neuron classes to lamprey vertebrate neurobiology.
Prog Neurobiol
63:441-466[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Clarke JDW,
Hayes BP,
Hunt SP,
Roberts A
(1984)
Sensory physiology, anatomy and immunohistochemistry of Rohon-Beard neurones in embryos of Xenopus laevis.
J Physiol (Lond)
348:511-525[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Dale N,
Ottersen OP,
Roberts A,
Storm-Mathisen J
(1986)
Inhibitory neurones of a motor pattern generator in Xenopus revealed by antibodies to glycine.
Nature
324:255-257[Medline].
-
Eaton RC,
Lee RKK,
Foreman MB
(2001)
The Mauthner cell and other identified neurons of the brainstem escape network of fish.
Prog Neurobiol
63:467-485[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Foster RG,
Roberts A
(1982)
the pineal eye in Xenopus laevis embryos and larvae: a photoreceptor with a direct excitatory effect on behavior.
J Comp Physiol [A]
145:413-419.
-
Fraenkel G
(1932)
Untersuchungen über die koordination von reflexen und automatisch-nervösen rhythmen bei insekten. I. Die flungreflexe der insecten und ihre koordination.
Z Vergl Physiol
16:371-393.
-
Gray J,
Sand A
(1936)
The locomotory rhythm of the dogfish.
J Exp Biol
13:200-209[Abstract].
-
Hayes BP,
Roberts A
(1983)
The anatomy of two functional types of mechanoreceptive "free" nerve ending in the head skin of Xenopus tadpoles.
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
218:61-76[Medline].
-
Holstege JC
(1991)
Ultrastructural evidence for GABAergic brainstem projections to spinal motoneurons in the rat.
J Neurosci
11:159-167[Abstract].
-
Jamieson D,
Roberts A
(2000)
Responses of young Xenopus laevis tadpoles to light dimming: possible roles for the pineal eye.
J Exp Biol
203:1857-1867[Abstract].
-
Lambert TD,
Roberts A
(2000)
Tonic activity of trigeminal sensory neurons and reduced responsiveness during cement gland attachment in hatchling Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
J Physiol (Lond)
523:272.P.
-
Li W-C,
Perrins R,
Soffe SR,
Yoshida M,
Walford A,
Roberts A
(2001)
Discriminating classes of spinal interneuron in Xenopus tadpoles.
J Comp Neurol
441:248-265[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Llinas R,
Terzuolo CA
(1964)
Mechanisms of supraspinal actions upon spinal cord activities. Reticular inhibitory mechanisms on alpha-extensor motoneurons.
J Neurophysiol
27:579-591[Free Full Text].
-
Magoun HW,
Rhines R
(1946)
An inhibitory mechanism in the bulbar reticular formation.
J Neurophysiol
9:165-171[Free Full Text].
-
Mori S
(1987)
Integration of posture and locomotion in acute decerebrate cats and in awake, freely moving cats.
Prog Neurobiol
28:161-196[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Nieuwkoop PD,
Faber J
(1956)
In: Normal tables of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
-
Pringle JWS
(1974)
Locomotion: flight.
In: The physiology of the Insecta, Vol 3 (Rockstein M,
ed), pp 433-476. London: Academic.
-
Roberts A
(1975)
Mechanisms for the excitation of "free nerve endings".
Nature
253:737-738[Medline].
-
Roberts A
(1978)
Pineal eye and behavior in Xenopus tadpoles.
Nature
273:774-775[Medline].
-
Roberts A
(1980)
The function and role of two types of mechanoreceptive "free" nerve endings in the head skin of amphibian tadpoles.
J Comp Physiol [A]
135:341-348.
-
Roberts A
(1998)
Skin sensory systems of amphibian embryos and young larvae.
In: Amphibian biology, Vol 3, "Sensory perception" (Heatwole H,
ed), pp 923-935. Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons.
-
Roberts A,
Blight AR
(1975)
Anatomy, physiology and behavioural role of sensory nerve endings in the cement gland of embryonic Xenopus.
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
192:111-127[Medline].
-
Roberts A,
Clarke JDW
(1982)
The neuroanatomy of an amphibian spinal cord.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
296:195-212[Medline].
-
Roberts A,
Sillar KT
(1990)
Characterization and function of spinal excitatory interneurons with commissural projections in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
Eur J Neurosci
2:1051-1062[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Roberts A,
Stirling CA
(1971)
The properties and propagation of a cardiac-like impulse in the skin of young tadpoles.
Z Vergl Physiol
71:295-310.
-
Roberts A,
Dale N,
Ottersen OP,
Storm-Mathisen J
(1987)
The early development of neurons with GABA immunoreactivity in the CNS of Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
J Comp Neurol
261:435-449[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Roberts A,
Soffe SR,
Perrins R
(1997)
Spinal Networks controlling swimming in hatchling Xenopus tadpoles.
In: Neurons, networks and motor behavior (Stein PSG,
Grillner S,
Selverton AI,
Stuart DG,
eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Roberts A,
Hill NA,
Hicks R
(2000)
Simple mechanisms organise orientation of escape swimming in embryos and hatchling tadpoles of Xenopus laevis.
J Exp Biol
203:69-85.
-
Satterlie RA,
LaBarbera M,
Spencer AN
(1985)
Swimming in the pterpod mollusc, Clione limacina. I. Behavior and morphology.
J Exp Biol
166:189-204.
-
Sillar KT,
Roberts A
(1988)
A neuronal mechanism for sensory gating during locomotion in a vertebrate.
Nature
331:262-265[Medline].
-
Sillar KT,
Roberts A
(1992)
Phase-dependent modulation of a cutaneous sensory pathway by glycinergic inhibition from the locomotor rhythm generator in Xenopus embryos.
Eur J Neurosci
4:1022-1034[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Soffe SR
(1990)
Active and passive membrane properties of spinal cord neurons which are rhythmically active during swimming in Xenopus embryos.
Eur J Neurosci
2:1-10[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Soffe SR,
Perrins R
(1997)
Neuronal firing properties and swimming motor patterns in four amphibian embryos: Xenopus, Rana, Bufo and Triturus.
J Comp Physiol
181:71-81.
-
Stein PSG,
Grillner S,
Selverston AI,
Stuart DG
(1997)
In: Neurons, networks and motor behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
-
Takakusaki K,
Kohyama J,
Matsuyama K,
Mori S
(2001)
Medullary reticulospinal tract mediating generalised motor inhibition in cats: parallel inhibitory mechanisms acting on motoneurons and on interneuronal transmission in reflex pathways.
Neuroscience
103:511-527[Web of Science][Medline].
-
van Mier P,
ten Donkelaar HJ
(1984)
Early development of descending pathways from the brain stem to the spinal cord in Xenopus laevis.
Anat Embryol
170:295-306[Medline].
-
Viana Di Prisco G,
Pearlstein E,
Le Ray D,
Robitaille R,
Dubuc R
(2000)
A cellular mechanism for the transformation of a sensory input into a motor command.
J Neurosci
20:8169-8176[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Yoshida M,
Roberts A,
Soffe SR
(1998)
Axon projections of reciprocal inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord of young Xenopus tadpoles and implications for the pattern of inhibition during swimming and struggling.
J Comp Neurol
400:504-518[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zelenin PV,
Grillner S,
Orlovsky GN,
Deliagina TG
(2001)
Heterogeniety of the population of command neurons in the lamprey.
J Neurosci
21:7793-7803[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zottoli SJ
(1978)
Comparative morphology of the Mauthner cell in fish and amphibians.
In: Neurobiology of the Mauthner cell (Faber DS,
Korn H,
eds), pp 13-45. New York: Raven.
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/22104229-12$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. B. S. Hedrich and W. Stein
Characterization of a descending pathway: activation and effects on motor patterns in the brachyuran crustacean stomatogastric nervous system
J. Exp. Biol.,
August 15, 2008;
211(16):
2624 - 2637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Beenhakker, M. S. Kirby, and M. P. Nusbaum
Mechanosensory Gating of Proprioceptor Input to Modulatory Projection Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
December 26, 2007;
27(52):
14308 - 14316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Smarandache and W. Stein
Sensory-induced modification of two motor patterns in the crab, Cancer pagurus
J. Exp. Biol.,
August 15, 2007;
210(16):
2912 - 2922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Rossignol, R. Dubuc, and J.-P. Gossard
Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2006;
86(1):
89 - 154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Beenhakker, N. D. DeLong, S. R. Saideman, F. Nadim, and M. P. Nusbaum
Proprioceptor Regulation of Motor Circuit Activity by Presynaptic Inhibition of a Modulatory Projection Neuron
J. Neurosci.,
September 21, 2005;
25(38):
8794 - 8806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Blitz, M. P. Beenhakker, and M. P. Nusbaum
Different Sensory Systems Share Projection Neurons But Elicit Distinct Motor Patterns
J. Neurosci.,
December 15, 2004;
24(50):
11381 - 11390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. McLean and K. T. Sillar
Metamodulation of a Spinal Locomotor Network by Nitric Oxide
J. Neurosci.,
October 27, 2004;
24(43):
9561 - 9571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. D. Lambert, J. Howard, A. Plant, S. Soffe, and A. Roberts
Mechanisms and significance of reduced activity and responsiveness in resting frog tadpoles
J. Exp. Biol.,
March 1, 2004;
207(7):
1113 - 1125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Beenhakker, D. M. Blitz, and M. P. Nusbaum
Long-Lasting Activation of Rhythmic Neuronal Activity by a Novel Mechanosensory System in the Crustacean Stomatogastric Nervous System
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2004;
91(1):
78 - 91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Taylor, G. W. Cottrell, D. Kleinfeld, and W. B. Kristan Jr
Imaging Reveals Synaptic Targets of a Swim-Terminating Neuron in the Leech CNS
J. Neurosci.,
December 10, 2003;
23(36):
11402 - 11410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Alford, E. Schwartz, and G. V. Di Prisco
The Pharmacology of Vertebrate Spinal Central Pattern Generators
Neuroscientist,
June 1, 2003;
9(3):
217 - 228.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|