 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1, 2002, 22(11):4540-4549
Slit2, a Branching-Arborization Factor for Sensory Axons in the
Mammalian CNS
P. Hande
Özdinler and
Reha S.
Erzurumlu
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University
Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
 |
ABSTRACT |
Axons that carry information from the sensory periphery first
elongate unbranched and form precisely ordered tracts within the CNS.
Later, they begin collateralizing into their proper targets and form
terminal arbors. Target-derived factors that govern sensory axon
elongation and branching-arborization are not well understood. Here we report that Slit2 is a major player in branching-arborization of central trigeminal axons in the brainstem. Embryonic trigeminal axons initially develop unbranched as they form the trigeminal tract
within the lateral brainstem; later, they emit collateral branches into
the brainstem trigeminal nuclei and form terminal arbors therein. In
whole-mount explant cultures of this pathway, embryonic day 15 (E15)
rat central trigeminal axons retain their unbranched growth within the
tract, whereas E17 trigeminal axons show branching and arborization in
the brainstem trigeminal nuclei, much like that seen in
vivo. Similar observations were made in E13 and E15 mouse
embryos. We cocultured Slit2-expressing tissues or cells with the
whole-mount explant cultures of the central trigeminal pathway derived
from embryonic rats or mice. When central trigeminal axons are exposed
to ectopic Slit2 during their elongation phase, they show robust and
premature branching and arborization. Blocking available Slit2 reverses
this effect on axon growth. Spatiotemporal expression of Slit2 and Robo
receptor mRNAs within the brainstem trigeminal nuclei and the
trigeminal ganglion during elongation and branching-arborization
further corroborates our experimental results.
Key words:
Slits; Robos; trigeminal ganglion; trigeminal system; choroid plexus; explant cocultures; axon branching; axon
arborization
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Slit proteins, which bind Robo
receptors, were identified as repellent guidance cues that regulate
midline crossing behavior of axons in Drosophila (Seeger et
al., 1993 ; Kidd et al., 1998 ; Brose et al., 1999 ; Simpson et al., 2000 )
(for review, see Chisholm and Tessier-Lavigne, 1999 ; Guthrie, 1999 ;
Harris and Holt, 1999 ; Van Vactor and Flanagan, 1999 ; Brose and
Tessier-Lavigne, 2000 ). Subsequent experiments showed that the Slit
family of proteins are conserved across species and play a major role
in repulsive axon guidance, as well as in guiding migrating cells by
repulsion (Brose et al., 1999 ; Hu, 1999 ; Kidd et al., 1999 ; Li et al.,
1999 ; Nguyen Ba-Charvet et al., 1999 ; Wu et al., 1999 , 2001 ; Erskine et
al., 2000 ; Ringstedt et al., 2000 ; Kramer et al., 2001 ). A novel
function for one of the members of the Slit family has been identified
in axon branching. Wang et al. (1999) devised a biochemical assay to
detect activities in brain extracts that could induce branching of
dissociated dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cell axons. Purification assays
led to the identification of a 140 kDa protein, which turned out to be
the N-terminal portion of Slit2. Slit2 gene encodes a large
(190-200 kDa) secreted protein that is cleaved into two fragments, the
140 kDa N terminus and the smaller C terminus. It was found that the
140 kDa fragment promotes axon branching in dissociated DRG cells but
not the full-length Slit2 protein (Wang et al., 1999 ). We tested the
role of Slit2 in branching behavior of trigeminal axons in the
brainstem and provide direct evidence that Slit2 induces axon
branching-arborization in the CNS.
During embryonic development, central trigeminal axons enter the
brainstem at embryonic day 12 (E12) in rats. They bifurcate to lay down
the ascending and descending components of the trigeminal tract and
grow unbranched in the elongation phase until E17. At E17, they emit
radially oriented collaterals into the brainstem trigeminal complex
(BSTC) (see Fig. 1A-C)
in which they form terminal arbors that replicate the patterned array
of whiskers on the snout (Erzurumlu and Killackey, 1983 ; Erzurumlu and
Jhaveri, 1992 ; Waite et al., 2000 ). To investigate the role of Slit2
and Robo receptors (Robo1 and Robo2) in axonal arborization and
branching at critical time points in development, we used whole-mount
explant cultures of the trigeminal ganglion (TG) and brainstem derived
from embryonic rats (see Fig. 1). Brainstem-TG intact whole-mount
preparations do not require exogenous neurotrophin supply for survival
and many aspects of trigeminal tract development mimic in
vivo conditions (Ulupinar et al., 2000 ; Özdinler and
Erzurumlu, 2001 ). This in vitro model is well suited for
testing the role of a variety of molecules on axon growth behaviors. We
show that ectopic Slit2 expression along the trigeminal tract during
the axon elongation phase abruptly induces axon
branching-arborization. Furthermore, expression of Slit2 mRNA in the
BSTC during trigeminal axon branching-arborization and Robo receptor
mRNAs in the TG suggest that Slit-Robo interactions might play a key
role in the developmental regulation of central trigeminal axon
branching and arborization.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Brainstem-TG intact whole-mount pathway and axon
outgrowth patterns of central trigeminal tract axons at different
developmental stages. A, Schematic representation of
brainstem-TG whole-mount preparation and the central trigeminal tract
during elongation, collateralization, and arborization phases. In our
cultures, the whisker pad (WP) portion of the pathway
was left out (dashed lines). Previous work in our
laboratory showed that absence of this peripheral target does not
influence central trigeminal axon behavior in vitro.
B, DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons during the
elongation phase (E15r). C, DiI-labeled
trigeminal tract at the time of collateralization-arborization phase
(E17r). The same type of axon growth is seen in mice at
E13 (E13m) and E15 (E15m) preparations as
well (data not shown). For all figures, right is
lateral, and top is rostral. ATr,
Ascending trigeminal tract; DTr, descending trigeminal
tract. Scale bars, 100 µm.
|
|
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation of whole-mount cultures. All of the
protocols used were approved by the Louisiana State University Health
Sciences Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and
conformed to the National Institutes of Health guidelines for use of
animals. Day of sperm positivity (or presence of vaginal plug) was
designated as E0. Embryos from timed pregnant mice and rats were
removed by Cesarean section after killing the dam. Preparation
of whole-mount cultures of the trigeminal pathway was detailed
previously (Ulupinar et al., 2000 ; Özdinler and Erzurumlu, 2001 ).
Choroid plexus (CP) was isolated from the lateral ventricles of adult
rat or mouse brains and cut into smaller pieces. A single piece of CP
was placed lateral to the central trigeminal tract in the TG brainstem
intact whole-mount culture preparations (n = 22). As a
negative control, a piece of skin tissue (Slit2-negative tissue) (Yuan
et al., 1999 ) (our unpublished observations) isolated from E15 rats was
used instead of CP (n = 10). Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293T) cells were lipofected (Lipofectamine;
Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the protocol of the
manufacturer. Robo1-Fc and Robo2-Fc cotransfected HEK293T cells
(hereafter referred to as Robo-Fc-transfected cells) were trypsinized
and embedded in collagen matrix [220 µl of collagen (3 mg/ml; Sigma,
St. Louis, MO), 200 µl of DMEM-F-12, 50 µl of 10× MEM
(Invitrogen), and 3 µl of 0.8 M
NaCO3, pH 7.4] the day after the lipofection.
Collagen matrix containing either untransfected HEK293T cells or
Robo-Fc-transfected cells were cut into pieces. CP and collagen matrix
were placed lateral to the central trigeminal tract of the brainstem TG
intact whole-mount preparations (see Fig. 3B-D). Cultures
were incubated in DMEM-F-12 (Invitrogen) for 3 d in a humidified
chamber (33°C) in the presence of 5% CO2.
In a separate series of experiments, HEK293T cells, transfected with
human Slit2 (hSlit2) expression vector, were plated into six-well plates. Brainstem-TG intact whole mounts were placed on
Millicell membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and the membranes were
overlaid on the transfected HEK293T cells (see Fig.
4A). In some experiments, Robo-Fc conditioned medium
(obtained from Robo-Fc-transfected HEK293T cells) was added to the
cocultures with hSlit2-transfected HEK293T cells. As a negative
control, untransfected HEK293T cells were used with the same
experimental set up. All preparations were kept in culture for 3 d. Cocultures were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight
and labeled by inserting small crystals of the fluorescent lipophilic
tracer 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine
perchlorate (DiI) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) into the TG. Most of
the experiments reported below were performed in rat embryos and a few
in mouse embryos. The development and differentiation of the rat and
mouse trigeminal pathway are strikingly similar, with a slight shift in
the timing of events. For trigeminal tract development, E13 in the
mouse corresponds to E15 in the rat (trigeminal axon elongation) and
E15 in the mouse to E17 in the rat (trigeminal axon
branching-arborization) (Erzurumlu and Killackey, 1983 ; Erzurumlu and
Jhaveri, 1992 ; Stainier and Gilbert, 1990 , 1991 ; Waite et al., 2000 ).
The results obtained from the rat and mouse embryos were
indistinguishable. Our n for each experiment was much higher for the rat embryos; thus, we report here results from these
experiments and their quantification.
Quantification of axon branching-arborization. In the first
series of experiments, we observed localized axon branching only in the
vicinity of the CP explants and none in the control or skin explant
cases. The number of branch points of single, clearly visible axons
along the lateral edge of the trigeminal tract facing the CP was
counted at different focal planes. Results were classified according to
the number of branch points observed. For each condition, axons were
classified, based on the number of branches per axon, and counted (see
Fig. 3F). For example, if three cases had an average
of five branch points per axon, 3 is listed under the column corresponding to five branch points. The weighted
average for each condition is presented as a bar graph in Figure
3G.
In the second series of experiments with hSlit2 secreting HEK293T
cells, branching and arborization was profuse both within and along the
lateral and medial edges of the tract. In control cases, there were no
axons leaving the tract laterally or medially or branching. Rarely,
budding branches were seen within the tract (see Fig. 5B).
In these cocultures, a rectangular window (150 × 75 µm) in the
ocular piece of the microscope was used as a unit area to sample branch
points in the representative areas. For each condition, two similar
locations (one rostral and the other caudal) were selected, and the
number of branch points was counted. The average + SD number of
branch points in the experimental and control cases was calculated with
the help of the Excel program (Microsoft, Seattle, WA).
One-tailed t test was used for statistical analysis (see
Fig. 4J). Error bars in the graph represent one SD.
Immunohistochemistry. hSlit2 has a c-myc tag at the C
terminus (Brose et al., 1999 ). HEK293T cells plated into six-well
plates and transfected with hSlit2 were fixed with 2% PFA overnight. On the next day, the cells were washed with PBS and blocked for 30 min
in blocking solution composed of 10% normal goat serum in 0.3%
Triton X-100 dissolved in PBS. Primary antibody (anti-c-myc, 1:200;
gift from Dr. P. Cserjesi, Louisiana State University Health Sciences
Center, New Orleans, LA) in blocking solution was applied overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBS and blocked for 30 min
in blocking solution. Secondary antibody (FITC-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit, 1:200 in blocking solution; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) was
then applied for 2 hr at room temperature in the dark. Cells were
washed with PBS and mounted on slides. For heparin-treated cells, 2 µg/ml heparin was added to the culture medium 2 hr before the removal
of the conditioned medium and cell fixation. These cells were then
processed for immunohistochemistry.
Western blot. Twenty-four hours after lipofection, cells
were incubated for 2 more days in the presence of Optimem
(Invitrogen), and heparin treatment was done as described above. After
2 d, the conditioned medium was collected, separated on SDS-PAGE
(8.8%) gel, and blotted on nylon membranes. After blocking for 30 min (5% milk in TBS), the membrane was incubated with anti-c-myc primary antibody (1:1000, in blocking solution) overnight at 4°C. On the next
day, the membrane was washed with Tris buffer, and secondary antibody
was applied (HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1:2000; Pierce,
Rockford, IL) for 1 hr. Color development was performed with Flour
S-Max phosphoimager system. To detect Robo-Fc, conditioned medium was
collected and blotted as described. The membrane was blocked for 30 min, and then HRP-conjugated anti-human Fc, the secondary antibody
(1:2500; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), was applied for 1 hr.
Color was developed as above.
In situ hybridization. CP and brainstem-TG intact explants
were removed in an RNase-free environment. They were fixed in 4% PFA
and processed for in situ hybridization on tissue
sections. Mouse Slit1 (mSlit1), mSlit2, and mSlit3 vector constructs
(gift from D. Ornitz, Washington University, St. Louis, MO) and
Robo1 and Robo2 containing vectors (gift from M. Tessier-Lavigne,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA) were used for DIG-labeled
probe preparation according to the protocol of the manufacturer
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). In situ
hybridization for Slit1, Slit2, and Slit3 probes were performed at
55°C overnight, and, for Robo probes, hybridization temperature was
set to 60°C. After hybridization, unbound probe was removed by RNase
treatment and with stringent washes. The bound probe was detected by
alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated anti-DIG Fab fragments, and
color reaction was developed by BM purple AP substrate (Boehringer Mannheim).
 |
RESULTS |
Slit2-rich choroid plexus induces trigeminal axon branching
We first tested trigeminal axon growth patterns in cocultures with
Slit2-rich tissue pieces. Previously, Hu (1999) reported that choroid
plexus of embryonic, neonatal, and adult mice and rats expresses high
levels of Slit2 and might play a role in repelling migrating forebrain
neurons away from the ventricular zone. Thus, we used adult CP pieces
to ectopically provide elongating central trigeminal axons with
a focalized, rich source of Slit2. We verified Slit2 expression in CP
by in situ hybridization (Fig.
2A). We then prepared
whole-mount explant cultures of the TG and brainstem from E13-E15 rat
embryos. We placed a small piece of CP (taken from the lateral
ventricle of an adult rat) next to the descending trigeminal tract. In
these experiments, CP explant was placed unilaterally, and the
contralateral trigeminal tract was used as a control (n = 22) (Fig. 2B,C). After 3 d
in vitro, labeling of the TG axons with the lipophilic
tracer DiI revealed the central trigeminal tract on both sides of the
whole-mount cultures. On the control side, the trigeminal tract axons
were unbranched and restricted to the tract (Fig.
2D). In striking contrast, there was distinct axon
growth and arborization outside the tract, within the vicinity of the
CP on the experimental side (Fig. 2E). In a separate
series of experiments, we used embryonic dorsal skin explants, a tissue
with no known Slit expression (Yuan et al., 1999 ) (our unpublished
observations). In such cocultures (n = 10), there was
no axon branching from the central trigeminal tract (Fig.
2F,G). The experimental sides were
indistinguishable from the control sides. It is also noteworthy that a
previous study showed that embryonic brainstem explants (at times
when Slit2 mRNA is not expressed, E15 rat) do not promote arborization
of TG axons, whereas older brainstem tissue (at times when Slit2 mRNA
is expressed at high levels; E17-E19 rat) does induce branching and
arborization of TG axons (Erzurumlu and Jhaveri, 1995 ).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Effect of CP in branching and arborization of
central trigeminal tract axons. A, Slit2 mRNA expression
in adult mouse CP. B, E15 rat brainstem-TG whole-mount
preparation (control, left side). C,
Brainstem-TG whole mount cocultured with CP (experimental right side
of the whole-mount preparation). D, High-power
photomicrograph of DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons in the control
side as shown in B. E, High-power
photomicrograph of DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons next to CP
explant in the experimental side as shown in C.
F, Brainstem-TG whole mount cocultured with skin.
G, DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons next to skin
explant. DTr, Descending trigeminal tract (indicated by
the dashed lines in B-D). Note that, as
a result of flattening of the whole-mount tissue in culture, the
trigeminal tract has moved medially compared with its normal location
in vivo. Scale bars, 50 µm.
|
|
Verification of choroid plexus induced arborization is
attributable to Slit2 effect
Our in situ hybridization results verified the previous
documentation by Hu (1999) that CP is a rich source of Slit2 (Fig. 2A). However, this tissue could also express other
molecules that might participate in the branching and arborization
effect we obtained. To confirm that Slit2 secretion from the CP is
indeed the major cause of the effects obtained, we transiently
cotransfected HEK293T cells with both Robo1-Fc and Robo2-Fc expression
constructs (Robo-Fc). In this study, we did not attempt to investigate
effects of Robo1 or Robo2 alone, with the reasoning that both Robos
bind Slit2 (Brose et al., 1999 ; Simpson et al., 2000a ). Robo1-Fc and Robo2-Fc have a Slit-binding domain and are fused to the constant region (Fc) of the human Ig molecule. They bind to Slit but lack a functional cytoplasmic domain (Brose et al., 1999 ). Robo-Fc (Robo1-Fc
plus Robo2-Fc) binds extracellular Slit2, and thus it can be used as a
competitive inhibitor of ligand activity. To test whether the
CP-induced arborization is mediated via Slit2, we repeated the
coculture experiments with CP explants and brainstem-TG whole mounts
with Robo-Fc expressing HEK293T cells placed next to the CP explants.
We verified Robo secretion from transfected HEK293T cells by performing
Western blot, using conditioned media obtained from HEK293T cells
transfected with Robo-Fc. We detected Robo-Fc in the conditioned medium
but not in medium obtained from untransfected (control) HEK293T cell
cultures (Fig. 3A). In the presence of Robo-Fc, CP-induced branching and arborization was completely blocked (n = 20) (Fig.
3B,C). On the other hand,
untransfected HEK293T cells (controls) did not block CP-induced
arborization of central trigeminal axons (n = 18) (Fig.
3D,E). Results are classified
according to the branch points per axon for each case (Fig.
3F) (for details, see Materials and Methods) and
summarized with a bar graph (Fig. 3G).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Robo-Fc blocks CP-induced branching and
arborization. A, Western blot of medium obtained from
Robo-Fc-transfected cells and control untransfected cells.
B, Brainstem-TG whole mount cocultured with CP and
Robo-Fc-transfected HEK293T cells. C, DiI-labeled
trigeminal tract axons next to CP and Robo-Fc-transfected HEK293T
cells. D, Brainstem-TG whole mount cocultured with CP
and untransfected HEK293T cells (control). E,
DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons next to CP and untransfected HEK293T
cells. F, Classification according to branch points (see
Materials and Methods). G, Bar graph showing average
number of branch points for each condition. DTr,
Descending trigeminal tract. Scale bars, 50 µm.
|
|
Effect of hSlit2 on central trigeminal tract axons
To further confirm the role of Slit2 in trigeminal axon branching
and arborization, we transiently transfected HEK293T cells with a
hSlit2 expression vector. We then embedded them in collagen and
cocultured with brainstem-TG intact whole-mount preparations. In these
experiments, we did not observe axon branching at the site of the
hSlit2-transfected cells (data not shown). We reasoned that this might
be attributable to accessibility of hSlit2. It has been reported
previously that efficient Slit2 isolation from transfected cells
requires heparin treatment because the majority of secreted Slit2 is
trapped on the cell membrane (Brose et al., 1999 ). We felt that heparin
addition might introduce a confounding variable. Thus, we adopted a
different approach. We first cultured hSlit2-transfected HEK293T cells
in six-well culture plates, and then we placed Millicell membranes with
brainstem-TG intact whole mounts over the transfected HEK293T cells
(Fig. 4A) and
cocultured the two preparations.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Effect of Slit2 on central trigeminal tract axons.
A, Diagram of the culture setup. Explants are
schematized within the center of the well; blue circles
depict HEK293Tcells, which are just below and around the membrane with
the whole-mount preparation. B, HEK293T cells
transfected with hSlit2. C, c-Myc immunohistochemistry
of cells shown in B (arrows in both
micrographs point to the same cells). D, HEK293T cells
transfected with hSlit2. E, c-Myc immunohistochemistry
of cells shown in D after heparin treatment
(arrow points to the same cell group in both
micrographs). F, Western blot of the medium from
hSlit-2-transfected cells and untransfected (control) cells.
G, Low-magnification view of DiI-labeled trigeminal
tract axons in a brainstem-TG intact whole-mount preparation grown in
the presence of untransfected HEK293T cells (control).
H, DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons in a brainstem-TG
intact whole-mount preparation grown in the presence of HEK293T cells
transfected with hSlit2. I, DiI-labeled trigeminal tract axons in a brainstem-TG
intact whole-mount preparation grown in the presence of HEK293T cells
transfected with hSlit2 and Robo-Fc conditioned medium.
J, Bar graph representation of the number of branch
points per unit area for each case (see Materials and Methods). In the
presence of Slit2, the number of branch points per unit area shows a
highly significant increase (p < 0.0005).
Addition of Robo-Fc conditioned medium causes a statistically
significant reduction (p < 0.001) in the
number of branch points per unit area. Error bars represent one SD.
Scale bars: B-E, 30 µm; G-I, 100 µm.
|
|
hSlit2 has a c-myc tag at the C terminus (Brose et al., 1999 ). To
verify that transfected cells express Slit2, we performed c-myc
immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis of the conditioned medium
to verify that they secrete Slit2 (Fig.
4B-F). The vast majority of the Slit2 protein
was present on HEK293T cells (Fig. 4B,C), and the Slit2 protein level
in the conditioned medium was low (Fig.
4B,C,F),
suggesting that Slit2 was mainly trapped in the cell membranes and not
secreted into the medium. To increase the levels of Slit2 in the medium
and to detect the cleavage product, we treated hSlit2-transfected
HEK293T cells with heparin at the end of the culture period and
processed for immunohistochemistry and Western blot as described above.
During treatment, we observed a drastic reduction in Slit2 levels on
HEK293T cells, indicating secretion to the medium (Fig.
4D,E). Western blot analysis
confirmed high levels of Slit2 in the heparin-extracted conditioned
medium, as well as the presence of the 55-60 kDa cleavage product, the C-terminal fragment of Slit2 (Fig. 4F). We do not
have direct evidence for the presence of the N-terminal fragment of
Slit2 in the medium. However, detection of the 55-60 kDa C-terminal fragment in the medium indicates the presence of the N-terminal fragment of Slit2, because it would be available only after proteolytic cleavage. As a negative control, we collected conditioned medium from
untransfected HEK293T cells (Brose et al., 1999 ; Ba-Charvet et al.,
2001 ).
In the culture setup described above, the cells are attached to the
well, and the Millicell membrane with the explants is gently overlaid
on the transfected HEK293T cells, with the trigeminal tract side
(ventral surface) of the explant resting on the membrane. Thus,
brainstem-TG intact whole-mount preparations are subject to both
secreted Slit2 and Slit2 present on the cell membranes. The culture
setup is illustrated in Figure 4A. As a negative
control, we cocultured brainstem-TG whole mounts with untransfected
HEK293T cells. After 3 d in culture, we labeled the TG with DiI
and visualized the central trigeminal axons. In all cultures containing
the Slit2-expressing cells (n = 20), we observed
profuse branching and arborization within the central trigeminal tract
(Figs. 4H,
5C,D). We
quantified the branching by sampling two unit areas from each case (for
details, see Materials and Methods). The increase in the number of
branch points per unit area was highly significant
(p < 0.0005) in the presence of
Slit2-transfected HEK293T cells. In contrast, none of the control
cultures with untransfected HEK293T cells (n = 20)
showed any branching along the trigeminal tract (Figs.
4G,J, 5A,B). For additional controls, we
repeated the same experiment with hSlit2-secreting HEK293T cells but
also added culture medium collected from Robo-Fc-secreting HEK293T
cells. In such cultures, branching effect was still observed, but there
was a statistically significant (p < 0.001)
reduction in the number of branch points per unit area compared with
thecocultures of brainstem-TG whole mounts with
hSlit2-secreting cells (Figs. 4I,J,
5E,F). In cocultures supplemented with Robo-Fc-conditioned medium, there was sporadic branching and arborization of the trigeminal tract axons. Often, axons
within the tract were seen to fasciculate, leave the tract, and form
arbors with lesser number of branches compared with cultures grown with
hSlit2-secreting cells (compare Figs. 4H,
5C,D with 4I,
5E,F). In Figure 5,
E and F, we only show branching axons from these
cases. Quantitative analysis of branching under these conditions is
presented in Figure 4J.

View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Role of Slit2 in branching and arborization of
central trigeminal tract axons. A, B,
High-power view of DiI-labeled central trigeminal tract axons grown in
cocultures with untransfected HEK293T cells (control).
Arrow in B points to a small budding
branch-like process from one single axon. C,
D, DiI-labeled central trigeminal tract axons grown in
cocultures with hSlit2-transfected HEK293T cells. Note the density of
branching, each branch tipped with large growth cones.
Arrows indicate branch points. E,
F, DiI-labeled central trigeminal tract axons grown with
hSlit2-transfected HEK293T cells in the presence of Robo-Fc conditioned
medium. Arrows indicate branch points. These two
photomicrographs were taken in regions of branching, which was not
uniform all along the trigeminal tract. Note that
branching-arborization in these cases is significantly reduced. Scale
bar, 20 µm.
|
|
Slits and Robos are developmentally regulated during the elongation
and branching-arborization phases of central trigeminal axons
The effects we obtained with Slit2-secreting CP explants and with
hSlit2-secreting HEK293T cells were dramatic, suggesting that Slit2
might be a key player in inducing branching of the central trigeminal
axons in vivo. Currently, there are no reliable antibodies
available to detect the expression of Slit proteins within the nervous
system. Thus, we performed in situ hybridization studies to
visualize Slit and Robo mRNA expression during the elongation and
branching-arborization phases of the central trigeminal tract in mouse
and rat embryos. The Slit probes that we used are specific for
mice and Robo probes are more specific for rat tissues. We used both
rat and mouse trigeminal pathway derived from equivalent ages. As noted
in Materials and Methods, development of the mouse and rat trigeminal
pathways are very similar, and our culture results from both species
were indistinguishable.
Slit expression in the developing mouse has been documented previously
(Yuan et al., 1999 ). We examined Slit (Slit1, Slit2, and Slit3) and
Robo (Robo1 and Robo2) mRNA expression during trigeminal axon
elongation and arborization in E13-E15
mouse (m) and E15-E17 rat (r), respectively
(Figs. 6, 7). Our results revealed a
spatiotemporal regulation of Slit and Robo mRNA expression in the
developing brainstem and TG. All Slit mRNAs are highly expressed in the
brainstem midline (floor plate) at both stages (Fig. 6,
asterisks). This is in accordance with previously published
results (Yuan et al., 1999 ; Wang et al., 1999 ). Slit mRNAs are not
detectable in the BSTC during axon elongation, and only Slit2 mRNA
expression becomes distinct during the axon branching-arborization
phase (Fig. 6D). All Slit mRNAs are also present in
the TG with varying levels (Fig. 6). Whereas Slit1 and Slit3 mRNA
levels are very high, Slit2 mRNA level is low in the ganglion.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Slit mRNA expression patterns during elongation
and arborization phases of trigeminal tract development in sections
through brainstem-TG whole-mount preparations. A, Slit1
expression in mouse at E13 (E13m). B,
Slit1 expression in mouse at E15 (E15m).
C, Slit2 expression in mouse at E13. D,
Slit2 expression in mouse at E15. E, Slit3 expression in
mouse at E13. F, Slit3 expression in mouse at E15. Note
that all Slit mRNAs are very low or absent in the BSTC compared with
high levels in the midline (floor plate). Slit2 mRNA is absent at E13
but becomes very high within the BSTC on E15, when central TG
axons are normally branching and arborizing within this region. Slit1
and Slit3 mRNA expression is also high within the TG.
Asterisks mark the brainstem midline (floor plate).
Scale bar, 500 µm.
|
|

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Robo mRNA expression during the elongation and
arborization phases of trigeminal tract development in sections through
brainstem-TG whole mounts. A, Robo1 expression in rat
at E15 (E15r). B, Robo1 expression in rat
at E17 (E17r). C, Robo2 expression in rat
at E15. D, Robo2 expression in rat at E17. Note that the
TG expresses high levels of both Robo mRNAs. In addition, there is a
notable increase in the levels of Robo mRNA expression at E17. Moderate
levels of Robo1 and Robo2 mRNA expression in the rat BSTC at E17 might
be related to guidance and lateralization of axons from these nuclei
destined for other brainstem and thalamic nuclei.
Asterisks mark the brainstem midline (floor plate).
Scale bar, 500 µm.
|
|
Along with Slit mRNAs, TG cells express high levels of Robo1 and Robo2
mRNAs during axon elongation and arborization phases (Fig. 7).
Coexpression of Slit and Robo mRNAs has been noted previously for the
dorsal root ganglia and TG (Yuan et al., 1999 ; Wang et al., 1999 ). We
also observed Robo mRNA expression in the BSTC along sensory and motor
nuclei at later stages and along the midline (floor plate) at earlier
stages. Robo mRNA expression within the BSTC corresponds to the
development of axonal projections from these sensory nuclei to a
variety of target regions in the brainstem and thalamus.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Most long-distance projection neurons follow distinct trajectories
as they start their journey toward their targets. During this phase of
development, axons grow unbranched at a rapid rate and lay down their
characteristic pathways. Once they reach their targets, another
characteristic phase in axon development is seen, that of interstitial
branching to other targets or branching and arborization within the
primary targets (Nakamura and O'Leary, 1989 ; Bhide and Frost, 1991 ;
Jhaveri et al., 1991 ; Kuang and Kalil, 1994 ; Kalil et al., 2000 ).
Molecular signals that direct these different phases of axon growth are
primarily unknown. Some of these signals may be intrinsically
programmed in the neuron, sending its axon to distant targets (Moya et
al., 1988 ; Confaloni et al., 1997 ; Bhide and Frost, 1999 ), or derived
from target tissues (Sato et al., 1994 ; Bastmeyer and O'Leary, 1996 ;
Richards et al., 1997 ; Bastmeyer et al., 1998 ; Kalil et al., 2000 ). In
recent years, several candidate molecules and their roles in axon
elongation and branching have been tested. Most notably, the NGF family
of neurotrophins attracts developing sensory axons in the periphery (O'Connor and Tessier-Lavigne, 1999 ; Tucker et al., 2001 ) and exerts
distinct and differential effects on axonal morphology. For example, in
dissociated sensory neuron cell cultures and in whole-mount explant
cultures of the trigeminal pathway, high doses of NGF and
neurotrophin-3 induce dramatic axon elongation and branching,
respectively (Gallo et al., 1997 ; Gallo and Letourneau, 1998 ; Lentz et
al., 1999 ; Ulupinar et al., 2000 ). We showed recently that the Rho
family of GTPases mediate neurotrophin effects on axonal growth
(Özdinler and Erzurumlu, 2001 ). Whether neurotrophins regulate
axonal branching and arborization in vivo has not been resolved. Various mouse models with targeted deletion of Trk receptors or neurotrophins do not show specific branching-arborization defects in the CNS (Patel et al., 2000 ). Although it is still not clear to what extent NGF family of neurotrophins are involved in regulating branching and arborization behavior of axons in the CNS, other target-derived molecules could also play a major role in this process.
In the present study, we found that a member of the Slit family of
proteins, Slit2, induces premature branching-arborization of
trigeminal axons in the brainstem. Increasing numbers of reports have
underscored the role of Slit family of proteins and their receptors in
axon guidance and cell migration in invertebrates and vertebrates
(Brose et al., 1999 ; Hu, 1999 ; Kidd et al., 1999 ; Li et al., 1999 ;
Nguyen Ba-Charvet et al., 1999 ; Wu et al., 1999 ; Erskine et al., 2000 ;
Rajagopalan et al., 2000 ; Ringstedt et al., 2000 ; Simpson et al., 2000 ;
Ba-Charvet et al., 2001 ; Chen et al., 2001 ; Kramer et al., 2001 ). A
recent extensive study on Slit and Robo mRNA expression in the
developing and adult rat brain has suggested the importance of Slits
not only in axonal pathfinding and neural migration but also in
synaptic plasticity (Marillat et al. 2002 ). In dissociated cortical
neuron cultures, a role for Slit1 in dendritic growth and branching has
been noted (Whitford et al., 2002 ). However, so far only one report
documented axon branching effects of Slit2 in dissociated rat DRG cells
cultured in the presence of exogenously added neurotrophins (Wang et
al., 1999 ). In such cultures of bipolar sensory neurons, it is not possible to discern whether branching effect of Slit2
(or any other molecule) is on the peripheral or central processes or
both. These authors also added NGF to their DRG cell cultures to
prevent cell loss and most likely selected for only NGF-dependent
small, nociceptive neurons. As mentioned previously, under certain
culture conditions, neurotrophins can attract axons and promote axonal branching and arborization (Gallo et al., 1997 ; Gallo and Letourneau, 1998 ; Lentz et al., 1999 ; Ulupinar et al., 2000 ; Özdinler and Erzurumlu, 2001 ). It is important to note that dissociated cells do not
always reflect in vivo conditions. Several studies indicate that dissociated neurons can dramatically change their gene expression and requirements for survival (Moshnyakov et al., 1996 ; Friedel et al.,
1997 ; Genc and Erzurumlu, 2000 ). The present study corroborates the
previous findings of Wang et al. (1999) on branch-inducing effects of
Slit2 on primary sensory neurons. This study also documents for the
first time the branching-arborization effects of Slit2 in an intact,
CNS pathway grown in vitro without any neurotrophins.
In brainstem-TG intact whole-mount preparations, the trigeminal
pathway retains its characteristics of the day it is isolated from the
embryo. The maturation and differentiation of the trigeminal pathway is
considerably slowed down compared with in vivo development that proceeds at a rapid pace. For example, E15 rat explants do not
show central trigeminal tract branching and arborization up to 5 d
in culture. While keeping this caveat in mind, the brainstem-TG intact
whole-mount preparations we used have several advantages. These
whole-mount explants can be prepared such that the entire peripheral
and central projection fields of the TG can be isolated intact at
almost any developmental stage. In whole-mount cultures, many
tissue-specific characteristics of the TG and the brainstem are
retained. Different cell types within the TG survive, express Trk and
p75 receptors, calcium binding proteins, and axonal growth and
integrity, and electrophysiological characteristics closely match
in vivo counterparts of the age the explant is isolated (Ulupinar and Erzurumlu, 1998 ; Ulupinar et al., 2000 ) (F.-S. Lo and
R. S. Erzurumlu, unpublished observations). A major advantage of
this culture model is the ease with which it is possible to assay the
role of a variety of axon guidance or growth-promoting molecules under
conditions that are far closer to in vivo conditions than in
dissociated cell or sensory ganglion explant cultures. Another
advantage of using an intact whole-mount preparation is the possibility
of doing coculture experiments. Sometimes the molecules of interest
could be unavailable as a soluble product that can be directly added to
the culture medium. In such cases, tissues known to express and secrete
that particular molecule could be cocultured with or transplanted into
the intact whole-mount preparation. Effect of local application of this
source could be easily assayed on axon outgrowth of central trigeminal
tract axons.
Studies described in this report show that Slit2 is a branch-inducing
factor for central trigeminal tract axons in an intact in
vitro model. In situ hybridization studies further
corroborate our experimental findings. Developing TG cells express both
Robo1 and Robo2, and, of the three members of the Slit family examined, Slit2 mRNA becomes abundant in the BSTC right at the time of central trigeminal tract branching-arborization. At earlier times during the
elongation phase of the central trigeminal tract axons, Slit2 mRNA is
conspicuously absent in this region but is expressed at high levels
along the brainstem midline structures together with other members of
the Slit family.
Coexpression of Slit and Robo mRNAs in the TG is difficult to explain,
because these cells do not receive any input on their soma. Curiously,
the peripheral targets of most TG cells, the whisker follicles, also
coexpress Slit and Robo mRNAs (Yuan et al., 1999 ; Özdinler and
Erzurumlu, 2000 ). Slit2 and Slit3 expression is localized to the outer
root sheath and surrounding the bulb of the follicles, whereas Robo1
expression is predominantly in the bulb and hair root. Thus,
differential expression of Slit and Robos in the hair follicle complex
and expression of both Slit and Robo mRNAs in the TG might be important
in guiding specific innervation patterns in the periphery. Additional
studies are needed to test this possibility.
Coexpression of Slit2 and Robo receptors in the BSTC during central
trigeminal tract branching-arborization suggests that, while BSTC
neurons are signaling incoming TG axons to branch, their own axonal
projections to distant targets might be using similar cues for
guidance. There is no direct evidence to support this scenario.
However, previous studies in Drosophila (Rajagopalan et al.,
2000 ; Simpson et al., 2000a ) and recent studies on Slit1 and Slit2
knock-out mice (Bagri et al., 2002 ; Plump et al., 2002 ) indicate that
Slits guide many axonal projection systems by repulsion. Studies in
Drosophila suggest that differential and overlapping expression of Slits and Robos might play a role in not only midline crossing of some axons but also varying degrees of lateralization of
different fiber pathways (Simpson et al., 2000b ). Recent observations on Slit2 and Slit1 and Slit2 double knock-out mice have revealed serious axonal projection defects along the optic chiasm and many forebrain pathways (Bagri et al., 2002 ; Plump et al., 2002 ). It would
be highly interesting to examine projections within the brainstem and
any alterations in axonal branching and arborization timing and
patterns for the central trigeminal tract axons in these mice.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Aug. 16, 2001; revised March 13, 2002; accepted March 22, 2002.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health. We thank
K. Brose and M. Tessier-Lavigne for generous supply of Robo1 and Robo2
cDNA, as well as the hSlit2, Robo1-Fc, Robo2-Fc expression vectors, D. Ornitz for mSlit1, mSlit2, and mSlit3 cDNA, P. Cserjesi for anti-c-myc
antibody, A. K. Dubey for help with Western Blot, and P. Bark for
help with the figures and manuscript preparation.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Reha S. Erzurumlu, Department
of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences
Center, 1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail:
rerzur{at}lsuhsc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Ba-Charvet KT,
Brose K,
Ma L,
Wang KH,
Marillat V,
Sotelo C,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Chedotal A
(2001)
Diversity and specificity of actions of Slit2 proteolytic fragments in axon guidance.
J Neurosci
21:4281-4289[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bagri A,
Marin O,
Plump AS,
Mak J,
Pleasure SJ,
Rubenstein JLR,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(2002)
Slit proteins prevent midline crossing and determine the dorsoventral position of major axonal pathways in the mammalian forebrain.
Neuron
33:233-248[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bastmeyer M,
O'Leary DDM
(1996)
Dynamics of target recognition by interstitial axon branching along developing cortical axons.
J Neurosci
16:1450-1459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bastmeyer M,
Daston MM,
Possel H,
O'Leary DDM
(1998)
Collateral branch formation related to cellular structures in the axon tract during corticopontine target recognition.
J Comp Neurol
392:1-18[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bhide PG,
Frost DO
(1991)
Stages of growth of hamster retinofugal axons: implications for developing axonal pathways with multiple targets.
J Neurosci
11:485-504[Abstract].
-
Bhide PG,
Frost DO
(1999)
Intrinsic determinants of retinal axon collateralization and arborization patterns.
J Comp Neurol
411:119-129[Medline].
-
Brose K,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(2000)
Slit proteins: key regulators of axon guidance, axonal branching, and cell migration.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
10:95-102[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Brose K,
Bland KS,
Wang KH,
Arnott D,
Henzel W,
Goodman CS,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Kidd T
(1999)
Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionary conserved role in repulsive axon guidance.
Cell
96:795-806[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Chen JH,
Wen L,
Dupuis S,
Wu JY,
Rao Y
(2001)
The N-terminal leucine-rich regions in Slit are sufficient to repel olfactory bulb axons and subventricular zone neurons.
J Neurosci
21:1548-1556[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Chisholm A,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1999)
Conservation and divergence of axon guidance mechanisms.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
9:603-615[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Confaloni A,
Lyckman AW,
Moya KL
(1997)
Developmental shift of synaptic vesicle protein 2 from axons to terminals in the primary visual projection of the hamster.
Neuroscience
77:1225-1236[Medline].
-
Erskine L,
Williams SE,
Brose K,
Kidd T,
Rachel RA,
Goodman CS,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Mason CA
(2000)
Retinal ganglion cell axon guidance in the mouse optic chiasm: expression and function of robos and slits.
J Neurosci
20:4975-4982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Erzurumlu RS,
Killackey HP
(1983)
Development of order in the rat trigeminal system.
J Comp Neurol
213:365-380[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Erzurumlu RS,
Jhaveri S
(1992)
Trigeminal cell processes are spatially ordered prior to the differentiation of the vibrissa pad.
J Neurosci
12:3946-3955[Abstract].
-
Erzurumlu RS,
Jhaveri S
(1995)
Target influences on the morphology of trigeminal axons.
Exp Neurol
135:1-16[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Friedel RH,
Schnurch H,
Stubbusch J,
Barde YA
(1997)
Identification of genes differentially expressed by nerve growth factor- and neurotrophin-3-dependent sensory neurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:12670-12675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gallo G,
Letourneau PC
(1998)
Localized sources of neurotrophins initiate axon collateral sprouting.
J Neurosci
18:5403-5414[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gallo G,
Lefcort FB,
Letourneau PC
(1997)
The trkA receptor mediates growth cone turning toward a localized source of nerve growth factor.
J Neurosci
17:5445-5454[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Genc B,
Erzurumlu RS
(2000)
TrkA and TrkC co-expression in dissociated trigeminal ganglion cell cultures and axonal responses to NGF, NT-3.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
26:319.
-
Guthrie S
(1999)
Axon guidance: starting and stopping with slit.
Curr Biol
9:R432-R435[Medline].
-
Harris WA,
Holt CE
(1999)
Slit, the midline repellent.
Nature
398:462-463[Medline].
-
Hu H
(1999)
Chemorepulsion of neuronal migration by Slit2 in the developing mammalian forebrain.
Neuron
23:703-711[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Jhaveri S,
Edwards MA,
Schneider GE
(1991)
Initial stages of retinofugal axon development in the hamster: evidence for two distinct modes of growth.
Exp Brain Res
87:371-382[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kalil K,
Szebenyi G,
Dent EW
(2000)
Common mechanisms underlying growth cone guidance and axon branching.
J Neurobiol
44:145-158[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kidd T,
Brose K,
Mitchell KJ,
Fetter RD,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Goodman CS,
Tear G
(1998)
Roundabout controls axon crossing of the CNS midline and defines a novel subfamily of evolutionarily conserved guidance receptors.
Cell
92:205-215[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kidd T,
Bland KS,
Goodman CS
(1999)
Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila.
Cell
96:785-794[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kramer SG,
Kidd T,
Simpson JH,
Goodman CS
(2001)
Switching repulsion to attraction: changing responses to slit during transition in mesoderm migration.
Science
292:737-740[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kuang RZ,
Kalil K
(1994)
Development of specificity in corticospinal connections by axon collaterals branching selectively into appropriate spinal targets.
J Comp Neurol
344:270-282[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lentz SI,
Knudson CM,
Korsmeyer SJ,
Snider WD
(1999)
Neurotrophins support the development of diverse sensory axon morphologies.
J Neurosci
19:1038-1048[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Li HS,
Chen JH,
Wu W,
Fagaly T,
Zhou L,
Yuan W,
Dupuis S,
Jiang ZH,
Nash W,
Gick C,
Ornitz DM,
Wu JY,
Rao Y
(1999)
Vertebrate Slit, a secreted ligand for the transmembrane protein Roundabout, is a repellent for olfactory bulb axons.
Cell
96:807-818[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Marillat V,
Cases O,
Nguyen Ba-Charvet KT,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Sotelo C,
Chedotal A
(2002)
Spatiotemporal expression patterns of slit and robo genes in the rat brain.
J Comp Neurol
442:130-155[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Moshnyakov M,
Arumae U,
Saarma M
(1996)
mRNAS for one, two or three members of trk receptor family are expressed in single rat trigeminal ganglion neurons.
Mol Brain Res
43:141-148[Medline].
-
Moya KL,
Benowitz LI,
Jhaveri S,
Schneider GE
(1988)
Changes in rapidly transported proteins in developing hamster retinofugal axons.
J Neurosci
8:4445-4454[Abstract].
-
Nakamura H,
O'Leary DDM
(1989)
Inaccuracies in initial growth and arborization of chick retinotectal axons followed by course corrections and axon remodeling to develop topographic order.
J Neurosci
9:3776-3795[Abstract].
-
Nguyen Ba-Charvet KT,
Brose K,
Marillat V,
Kidd T,
Goodman CS,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Sotelo C,
Chedotal A
(1999)
Slit2 mediated chemorepulsion and collapse of developing forebrain axons.
Neuron
22:463-473[Web of Science][Medline].
-
O'Connor R,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1999)
Identification of maxillary factor, a maxillary process-derived chemoattractant for developing trigeminal sensory axons.
Neuron
24:165-178[Medline].
-
Özdinler PH,
Erzurumlu RS
(2000)
Slit gene expression in the developing trigeminal pathway.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
26:1357.
-
Özdinler PH,
Erzurumlu RS
(2001)
Regulation of neurotrophin-induced axonal responses via Rho GTPases.
J Comp Neurol
438:377-387[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Patel TD,
Jackman A,
Rice FL,
Kucera J,
Snider WD
(2000)
Development of sensory neurons in the absence of NGF/TrkA signaling in vivo.
Neuron
25:345-357[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Plump AS,
Erskine L,
Sabatier C,
Brose K,
Epstein CJ,
Goodman CS,
Mason CA,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(2002)
Slit1 and Slit2 cooperate to prevent premature midline crossing of retinal axons in the mouse visual system.
Neuron
33:219-232[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rajagopalan S,
Nicolas E,
Vivancos V,
Berger J,
Dickson BJ
(2000)
Crossing the midline: roles and regulation of Robo receptors.
Neuron
28:767-777[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Richards LJ,
Koester SE,
Tuttle R,
O'Leary DDM
(1997)
Directed growth of early cortical axons is influenced by a chemoattractant released from an intermediate target.
J Neurosci
17:2445-2458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Ringstedt T,
Braisted JE,
Brose K,
Kidd T,
Goodman C,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
O'Leary DDM
(2000)
Slit inhibition of retinal axon growth and its role in retinal axon pathfinding and innervation patterns in the diencephalon.
J Neurosci
20:4983-4991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sato M,
Lopez-Mascaraque L,
Heffner CD,
O'Leary DDM
(1994)
Action of a diffusible target-derived chemoattractant on cortical axon branch induction and directed growth.
Neuron
13:791-803[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Seeger M,
Tear G,
Ferres-Marco D,
Goodman CS
(1993)
Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline.
Neuron
10:409-426[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Simpson JH,
Bland KS,
Fetter RD,
Goodman CS
(2000a)
Short-range and long-range guidance by Slit and its Robo receptors: a combinatorial code of Robo receptors controls lateral position.
Cell
103:1019-1032[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Simpson JH,
Kidd T,
Bland KS,
Goodman CS
(2000b)
Short-range and long-range guidance by slit and its Robo receptors. Robo and Robo2 play distinct roles in midline guidance.
Neuron
28:753-766[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stainier DY,
Gilbert W
(1990)
Pioneer neurons in the mouse trigeminal sensory system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:923-927[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Stainier DY,
Gilbert W
(1991)
Neuronal differentiation and maturation in the mouse trigeminal sensory system, in vivo and in vitro.
J Comp Neurol
311:300-312[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Tucker KL,
Meyer M,
Barde YA
(2001)
Neurotrophins are required for nerve growth during development.
Nat Neurosci
4:29-37[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Ulupinar E,
Erzurumlu RS
(1998)
Peripheral target-specific influences on embryonic neurite growth vigor and patterns.
J Comp Neurol
399:427-439[Medline].
-
Ulupinar E,
Jacquin MF,
Erzurumlu RS
(2000)
Differential effects of NGF, NT-3 on embryonic trigeminal axon growth patterns.
J Comp Neurol
425:202-218[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Van Vactor D,
Flanagan JG
(1999)
The midline and the end: Slit brings guidance and branching together in axon pathway selection.
Neuron
22:649-652[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Waite PM,
Ho SM,
Henderson A
(2000)
Afferent ingrowth and onset of activity in the rat trigeminal nucleus.
Eur J Neurosci
12:2781-2792[Medline].
-
Wang KH,
Brose K,
Arnott D,
Kidd T,
Goodman CS,
Henzel W,
Tessier-Lavigne M
(1999)
Biochemical purification of a mammalian slit protein as a positive regulator of sensory axon elongation and branching.
Cell
96:771-784[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Whitford KL,
Marillat V,
Stein E,
Goodman CS,
Tessier-Lavigne M,
Chedotal A,
Ghosh A
(2002)
Regulation of cortical dendrite development by slit-robo interactions.
Neuron
33:47-61[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Wu JY,
Feng L,
Park HT,
Havlioglu N,
Wen L,
Tang H,
Bacon KB,
Jiang ZH,
Zhang XC,
Rao Y
(2001)
The neuronal repellent Slit inhibits leukocyte chemotaxis induced by chemotactic factors.
Nature
410:948-952[Medline].
-
Wu W,
Wong K,
Chen J,
Jiang Z,
Dupuis S,
Wu JY,
Rao Y
(1999)
Directional guidance by neuronal migration in the olfactory system by the protein Slit.
Nature
400:331-336[Medline].
-
Yuan W,
Zhou L,
Chen J,
Wu JY,
Rao Y,
Ornitz DM
(1999)
The mouse Slit family: secreted ligands for ROBO expressed in patterns that suggest a role in morphogenesis and axon guidance.
Dev Biol
212:290-306[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/22114540-10$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Barber, T. Di Meglio, W. D. Andrews, L. R. Hernandez-Miranda, F. Murakami, A. Chedotal, and J. G. Parnavelas
The Role of Robo3 in the Development of Cortical Interneurons
Cereb Cortex,
July 1, 2009;
19(suppl_1):
i22 - i31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ohnami, M. Endo, S. Hirai, N. Uesaka, Y. Hatanaka, T. Yamashita, and N. Yamamoto
Role of RhoA in Activity-Dependent Cortical Axon Branching
J. Neurosci.,
September 10, 2008;
28(37):
9117 - 9121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Hayano and N. Yamamoto
Activity-Dependent Thalamocortical Axon Branching
Neuroscientist,
August 1, 2008;
14(4):
359 - 368.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-P. Furrer, I. Vasenkova, D. Kamiyama, Y. Rosado, and A. Chiba
Slit and Robo control the development of dendrites in Drosophila CNS
Development,
November 1, 2007;
134(21):
3795 - 3804.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Ma and M. Tessier-Lavigne
Dual Branch-Promoting and Branch-Repelling Actions of Slit/Robo Signaling on Peripheral and Central Branches of Developing Sensory Axons
J. Neurosci.,
June 20, 2007;
27(25):
6843 - 6851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Oury, Y. Murakami, J.-S. Renaud, M. Pasqualetti, P. Charnay, S.-Y. Ren, and F. M. Rijli
Hoxa2- and Rhombomere-Dependent Development of the Mouse Facial Somatosensory Map
Science,
September 8, 2006;
313(5792):
1408 - 1413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Molendi-Coste, L. Grumolato, C. Laborie, J. Lesage, E. Maubert, H. Ghzili, H. Vaudry, Y. Anouar, C. Breton, and D. Vieau
Maternal Perinatal Undernutrition Alters Neuronal and Neuroendocrine Differentiation in the Rat Adrenal Medulla at Weaning
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2006;
147(6):
3050 - 3059.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Andrews, A. Liapi, C. Plachez, L. Camurri, J. Zhang, S. Mori, F. Murakami, J. G. Parnavelas, V. Sundaresan, and L. J. Richards
Robo1 regulates the development of major axon tracts and interneuron migration in the forebrain
Development,
June 1, 2006;
133(11):
2243 - 2252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. De Bellard, Y. Rao, and M. Bronner-Fraser
Dual function of Slit2 in repulsion and enhanced migration of trunk, but not vagal, neural crest cells
J. Cell Biol.,
July 21, 2003;
162(2):
269 - 279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gianola, T. Savio, M. E. Schwab, and F. Rossi
Cell-Autonomous Mechanisms and Myelin-Associated Factors Contribute to the Development of Purkinje Axon Intracortical Plexus in the Rat Cerebellum
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2003;
23(11):
4613 - 4624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Poskanzer, L. A. Needleman, O. Bozdagi, and G. W. Huntley
N-Cadherin Regulates Ingrowth and Laminar Targeting of Thalamocortical Axons
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 2003;
23(6):
2294 - 2305.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|