 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 15, 2002, 22(24):10790-10800
Highly Variable Spike Trains Underlie Reproducible Sensorimotor
Responses in the Medicinal Leech
Davide
Zoccolan,
Giulietta
Pinato, and
Vincent
Torre
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati and Istituto
Nazionale di Fisica della Materia, 34014 Trieste, Italy
 |
ABSTRACT |
The nervous system of the leech is a particularly
suitable model to investigate neural coding of sensorimotor responses
because it allows both observation of behavior and the simultaneous
measurement of a large fraction of its underlying neuronal activity. In
this study, we used a combination of multielectrode recordings,
videomicroscopy, and computation of the optical flow to investigate the
reproducibility of the motor response caused by local mechanical
stimulation of the leech skin. We analyzed variability at
different levels of processing: mechanosensory neurons, motoneurons,
muscle activation, and behavior. Spike trains in mechanosensory neurons
were very reproducible, unlike those in motoneurons. The motor
response, however, was reproducible because of two distinct biophysical mechanisms. First, leech muscles contract slowly and therefore are
poorly sensitive to the jitter of motoneuron spikes. Second, the motor
response results from the coactivation of a population of motoneurons
firing in a statistically independent way, which reduces the
variability of the population firing. These data show that reproducible
spike trains are not required to sustain reproducible behaviors and
illustrate how the nervous system can cope with unreliable components
to produce reliable action.
Key words:
sensorimotor responses; optical flow; statistical
independence; pooling variability; population coding; reproducibility
of muscle contraction
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Understanding the neural code by
identifying the relevant features of the neural activity that are
reproducible from trial to trial during the execution of a repeated
behavior (Bialek and Rieke, 1992 ; Mainen and Sejnowski, 1995 ; Gerstner
et al., 1997 ; Shadlen and Newsome, 1998 ; Stevens and Zador, 1998 ;
Lestienne, 2001 ) requires both quantitative observation of the behavior
and the simultaneous measurement of a large fraction of its underlying neural activity. Nervous systems of invertebrates, such as the leech
(Muller et al., 1981 ), are particularly suitable models for such an investigation.
The CNS of the leech Hirudo medicinalis is composed of a
chain of 21 segmental ganglia, each consisting of ~400 neurons
(Nicholls and Baylor, 1968 ; Muller et al., 1981 ). Two pairs of roots,
formed by the axons of mechanosensory neurons and motoneurons, emerge from each ganglion and innervate the corresponding body segment. Mechanosensory neurons have all been identified and
electrophysiologically characterized (Muller et al., 1981 ). Most
motoneurons have also been identified, and their role in mediating
leech motor responses has been extensively studied (Stuart, 1970 ;
Kristan, 1982 ; Lockery and Kristan, 1990a ).
When the skin of the leech is touched, the animal bends its body to
withdraw from the stimulus (Kristan, 1982 ; Lockery and Kristan, 1990a ). This simple response, referred to as local bending, is
initiated by a moderate mechanical stimulation and is primarily mediated by mechanosensory pressure (P) cells (Kristan, 1982 ; Lewis and
Kristan, 1998a ,b ; Zoccolan and Torre, 2002 ), whose firing is highly
reproducible (Pinato and Torre, 2000 ). The purpose of this work was to
investigate (1) the reproducibility of the local bending and (2) the
reproducibility of the neural coding of the local bending in the output
stage (motoneurons) of the leech CNS.
The local bending was quantitatively characterized by computing the
optical flow, whose usefulness in neurobiology we have demonstrated
recently (Zoccolan et al., 2001 ). The firing activity of a large
fraction of motoneurons involved in the behavior was measured by
combining parallel extracellular recordings from the roots and spike
sorting techniques (Ort et al., 1974 ; Pinato and Torre, 2000 ; Pinato et
al., 2000 ; Arisi et al., 2001 ).
Our results show that the firing pattern of individual
motoneurons is highly variable from trial to trial and that local
bending is mediated by the coactivation of a population of motoneurons firing in a statistically independent way. Because of statistical independence, the electrical activity of the motoneuron population becomes less variable. In addition, the time course of muscle contraction primarily depends on the number of incoming motoneuron spikes and not on their exact timing. These mechanisms are the basis of
motor output reproducibility in leech local bending.
We show here that reproducible motor output does not require
reproducible firing of individual motoneurons and illustrate the
biophysical mechanisms that allow a reproducible motor output to be
driven by highly variable spike trains. Similar properties are likely
to be general features of neural computation and widely present across
nervous systems.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation and electrical recordings. Two
preparations were used: the first to quantify skin deformation and the
second to analyze motoneuron firing during local bending. Both
preparations were kept in a Sylgard-coated dish at room temperature
(20-24°C) and bathed in Ringer's solution (in mM: 115 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 4 KCl, 12 glucose, and 10 Tris
maleate buffered to pH 7.4 with NaOH) (Muller et al., 1981 ).
The first preparation consisted of a hemisection of leech skin
approximately three segments in length, isolated from the rest of the
body (Zoccolan et al., 2001 ). The skin was flattened and fixed with
pins to the bottom of the recording chamber but was allowed to deform
during muscle contraction. The middle segment was kept innervated by
its ganglion.
The second preparation was an isolated leech segmental ganglion with
exposed nerve roots. Five suction pipettes were used to perform
parallel extracellular recordings from the anterior-anterior (AA),
anterior-medial (MA), and posterior-posterior (PP) roots and from the
two bifurcations of the dorsal posterior root (DP:B1 and DP:B2) (Stent
et al., 1978 ; Pinato et al., 2000 ; Arisi et al., 2001 ). Spikes recorded
from these roots were classified according to dimension and shape and
were identified by impaling each motoneuron with a sharp intracellular
microelectrode (input resistance, 30 M ; filled with 4 M
potassium acetate), as described previously (Pinato et al., 2000 ; Arisi
et al., 2001 ). In this way, it was possible to characterize the firing
activity of a large fraction of all leech motoneurons: the excitatory
motoneurons of longitudinal muscles (cells 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 107, 108, and
L), the excitor of flattener muscles (cell 109), the annulus erector,
and two inhibitory motoneurons of longitudinal muscles (cells 102 and
119) (Ort et al., 1974 ; Stent et al., 1978 ; Arisi et al., 2001 ). All
but one of the voltage signals of excitatory motoneurons of circular
muscles were not identifiable in the extracellular recordings from the nerve roots. It was possible to monitor the activity of only one circular excitor: cell CiV.
In both preparations, local bending was initiated by intracellular
stimulation of mechanosensory dorsal or ventral P cells, ipsilateral to
the recorded roots. In some experiments, a mechanical stimulus was
delivered to the first preparation by rapidly pressing a nylon filament
driven by a solenoid on the skin, as described previously (Pinato and
Torre, 2000 ).
Stimulation of individual motoneurons. Simultaneous
extracellular recordings from the roots were also used to verify that electrical coupling between pairs of motoneurons (Ort et al., 1974 ) is
not strong enough to induce a sustained firing in other motoneurons
while stimulating a specific one. Seventy-seven intracellular stimulations of individual motoneurons were performed in five different
preparations (~15 motoneurons impaled in each experiment). Low-frequency (10-15 Hz) bursts in stimulated motoneurons were always
unable to affect the spontaneous firing pattern of other simultaneously
recorded motoneurons. Higher-frequency (20-40 Hz) and long-lasting (up
to 1 sec) bursts in stimulated motoneurons generally evoked only a few
spikes in other recorded motoneurons, in some cases transiently
increasing their spontaneous firing rate 2 or 4 Hz, although in 2 of
the 77 cases, a high-frequency burst (>40 Hz) in the stimulated
motoneuron increased the firing rate of a motoneuron coupled to it up
to ~15 Hz. These data indicate that, in experiments in which skin
deformations were evoked by stimulating an individual motoneuron (see
Figs. 3, 5, 9), the contribution to the response by other motoneurons
is minimal.
Imaging and behavior analysis. Skin deformations were
quantified by computing the optical flows (see Fig.
1B) from image sequences of the contracting leech
skin. Images were acquired at 5 or 8.3 Hz by a standard CCD camera
mounted on a dissecting microscope and were then digitized and stored
on a personal computer. The method for computing the optical flow is
based on finding the best correlation between patches of successive
images and is fully described in a previous work (Zoccolan et al.,
2001 ). The same technique was used to follow the displacement of a
specific point of the leech skin, as in Figure 1D.
The optical flow is decomposed to its elementary components (see Fig.
1C) in two steps. First, the optical flow in a given window
is approximated by a linear vector field; second, from this linear
approximation, the elementary deformations are obtained (Zoccolan et
al., 2001 ). The coefficient of variation (CV) of the significant
elementary deformations (see Fig. 1C) provides a compact and
precise measure of the reproducibility of the pattern of skin deformation.
Spike train analysis. The variability of spikes fired by
individual motoneurons was characterized by computing the CV of their firing rate over the number of trials of a repeated stimulation, in a
given time window t. t was chosen equal to
200 msec, because in this time window leech muscles integrate
motoneuron spikes, and a noticeable skin contraction can be observed
(Arisi et al., 2001 ). The spike variability of the population of
coactivated motoneurons was quantified by computing the CV of the
population firing rate, i.e., the sum of individual motoneuron firing
rates. When motoneurons in the population fire in a statistically
independent way, the CV of the population firing is significantly lower
than the CV of individual motoneurons (Pinato et al., 2000 ; Arisi et al., 2001 ).
Statistical independence in motoneuron firing was measured by
computing, for each pair of coactivated motoneurons i and
j, the following quantities: (1) the probability,
pi, that motoneuron i fires at least one
spike in a given time interval t; (2) the joint
probability, pij that both motoneurons i
and j fire at least one spike in the same t;
(3) the entropy for the activity of motoneuron i, defined as
Hi =  mP log2P , where P is the
probability that motoneuron i fires m spikes in
t; and (4) the joint entropy, Hij =  mnP log2P , where
P
gives the probability that motoneuron i fires m
spikes and motoneuron j fires n spikes in
t. When the joint probability of firing
Pij is equal to the product
Pi/Pj, and the joint entropy Hij is equal to the sum Hi + Hj, the firing of the two neurons is statistically
independent (Pinato et al., 2000 ). Notice that entropy offers a more
complete way to evaluate statistical independence than does joint
probability, in that entropy takes into account all possible firing
states (neuron i firing 0, 1, 2, ... , m
spikes) of the neuron, whereas P1 only gives the
probability that the neuron fired. Nevertheless, Pi
can be used to evaluate statistical independence if the probability for
the neuron to fire more than one spike in t is very low.
For this reason, probabilities were computed for a time window of 20 msec, chosen for a low probability of firing more than one spike.
 |
RESULTS |
Reproducibility of the local bending
The firing pattern of mechanosensory neurons and the
reproducibility of the local bending were studied using a leech skin preparation, in which a leech body wall segment was flattened over a
piece of Sylgard while ganglion innervation was maintained (Nicholls
and Baylor, 1968 ; Stuart, 1970 ; Kristan, 1982 ; Zoccolan et al., 2001 ;
Zoccolan and Torre, 2002 ).
Figure 1A shows the
typical firing pattern of a dorsal P cell (Pd)
after mechanical stimulation of the dorsal body wall. When the skin was
touched with a nylon filament, the cell Pd
quickly responded with highly reproducible firing. In fact, both the
number of spikes and their timing were highly reproducible, with a
jitter ranging from <100 µsec to <4 msec for the first four spikes
fired by the neuron (Pinato and Torre, 2000 ).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Reproducibility of local bending.
A, Four superimposed intracellular recordings from a
dorsal P cell after identical mechanical stimulation (20 mN) of the
dorsal leech skin. The thick bar indicates the stimulus
duration (200 msec). The number above each action
potential is the jitter (i.e., the SD of latency from the stimulus
onset) of that action potential in milliseconds. B,
Optical flow describing the maximal skin deformation induced by evoking
two action potentials in a dorsal P cell. The optical flow is computed
on a grid of 30 × 20 points. The gray background
shows the annular margins of the leech skin preparation. The central
annulus of the innervated segment is indicated by the white
arrow. The × indicates the stationary point, i.e., the point
that stays at rest during the contraction. The region framed by the
box was used to compute the linear approximation of the
optical flow, from which the elementary deformations shown in
C were computed. To make the direction of the movement
more clear, the field is drawn with a magnification of 3×.
C, Decomposition of the optical flow in the
box of B into the four elementary
deformations: E, ,
S1, and
S2. The mean values of the elementary
deformations over 12 trials of the same stimulation are drawn. Their CV
is shown at the bottom. D, Time evolution
of the displacement (solid line) and the corresponding
CV (dotted line) of a representative point on the leech
skin during the same trials of C.
|
|
The firing of mechanosensory neurons made muscle fibers contract and
initiate local bending. The intensity and shape of local bending are
almost completely determined by the P cells (Kristan, 1982 ; Zoccolan
and Torre, 2002 ). Therefore, the motor response evoked by a controlled
number of spikes in one of the P cells was studied. The associated
maximal skin deformation was quantitatively characterized by computing
the optical flow, which is a two-dimensional vector field that
describes the point displacements on the skin and provides a complete
characterization of the motor response (Zoccolan et al., 2001 ). The
optical flow is obtained from image sequences of the contracting leech
skin taken by a CCD camera, and the method to compute it has been fully
described in a previous work (Zoccolan et al., 2001 ).
Figure 1B shows the optical flow induced on the leech
skin by evoking two spikes in the cell Pd. The
flow is drawn on a gray background, showing the annular margins of the
imaged skin preparation. The local structure of the optical flow can be
analyzed by computing its best linear approximation in a region (Fig.
1B, box) around its stationary point (Fig.
1B, ×). The linear approximation is completely
characterized by six parameters: the coordinates of the stationary
point and the four elementary deformations: rotation ( ), expansion
(E), horizontal shear
(S1), and oblique shear
(S2) (Zoccolan et al., 2001 ). The flow
shown in Figure 1B is a dorsal compression, sustained
by coactivation of longitudinal and circular muscles (Zoccolan and
Torre, 2002 ) and characterized by a high negative expansion
(E) and a significant positive shear
(S1; Fig. 1C). The
reproducibility of this motor response was quantified by computing the
CV of its significant elementary deformations (E and
S1), which was ~0.3 (Fig.
1C, bottom). The variability of the motor
response was also quantified by measuring the displacement of selected
points on the leech skin and by measuring their CV (Fig.
1D). These points were usually selected at the edge
of the region chosen to compute the linearization (Fig.
1B, box). On average, the CV of the point
displacements was between 0.2 and 0.3. These results were confirmed by
experiments repeated on seven different preparations, in which the
dorsal and the ventral P cells were alternatively stimulated and the
skin was touched. All these experiments showed that the pattern of skin
deformation during local bending is characterized by a CV between 0.2 and 0.3 in both its global shape and the displacement of single points on the skin surface.
Timing of motoneuron spike trains and low-pass filter properties of
muscle fibers
Having assessed the reproducibility of the local bending (Fig.
1C,D) and of its coding at the level of mechanosensory
neurons (Fig. 1A) (Pinato and Torre, 2000 ), the next
step of our analysis was to investigate the reproducibility of spike
trains in motoneurons, i.e., in the ganglion output.
The firing pattern of motoneurons after P cell stimulation was studied
in the isolated leech ganglion. By using extracellular suction
pipettes, it was possible to record voltage signals from fine roots
ipsilateral to the stimulated P cell and to precisely characterize the
variability of motoneuron spike trains involved in local bending (see
Materials and Methods).
Figure 2A shows three
extracellular recordings from the DP:B2 bifurcation, obtained during
identical repeated stimulation of the dorsal P cell (intracellular
recording from P cell shown in Fig. 2A,
bottom). Spikes fired by three identified motoneurons are
indicated by rows of dots of different colors (green,
motoneuron 6; blue, motoneuron L; red, motoneuron
3). These are all excitatory motoneurons innervating longitudinal
muscle fiber, responsible for the shortening of the leech body during
local bending. These motoneurons fired in a rather irregular way among
different trials, and this result is emphasized by the comparison with
the precise timing of the spikes fired by P cell (black
dots). Figure 2B shows the jitter of the first
spike evoked in these motoneurons and in other five longitudinal
excitatory motoneurons (blue circles), simultaneously
recorded from the other roots. Data from similar experiments performed
on two other preparations are also shown (red squares,
green triangles). In every experiment, the firing pattern of
all coactivated motoneurons was much more variable than the firing
activity of mechanosensory neurons (compare Fig. 1A).
The first spikes occurred with a jitter usually higher than 10 msec
(second experiment: motoneuron 5, ~6 msec; motoneuron 107, ~8 msec;
first and second experiments: motoneuron 3, ~19 msec; motoneuron 6, ~12 msec) and often of the order of 50-100 msec. For some
motoneurons, the jitter was >200 msec (first experiment: motoneurons 4 and 8, data not shown). The second spikes had a still higher jitter,
whereas the third, fourth, and fifth spikes had jitters ranging from
several hundred milliseconds to >1000 msec (data not shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Variability of motoneuron spike trains during
local bending. A, Three extracellular voltage recordings
from the DP:B2 root during identical intracellular stimulation of a P
cell with two spikes (bottom trace). In the
extracellular recordings, the spikes from a P cell and from motoneurons
3, L, and 6 are indicated by black, red,
blue, and green dots, respectively.
B, Blue circles, Jitter of the first
spike of the motoneurons shown in A and five other
motoneurons simultaneously recorded from the AA, MA, PP, and DP:B1
roots. Red squares, green triangles,
Similar data obtained from identical experiments repeated in two other
preparations. In all three experiments considered, spike discharges in
motoneurons were evoked by intracellular stimulation of a dorsal P cell
with two spikes. Jitter was computed from 76, 85, and 44 repetitions of
the same stimulation for experiments 1 (blue circles), 2 (red squares), and 3 (green
triangles), respectively. Motoneurons 4, 5, 8, L, 3, 6, 107, and 108 are all excitors of longitudinal muscles.
|
|
These experiments were repeated in five different preparations (data
from three shown in Fig. 2B), in which the dorsal and the ventral P cells were alternatively stimulated. As shown in Figure
2B, for some motoneurons the value of the jitter of
the first and consecutive spikes had a large variability from
preparation to preparation. In summary, all these experiments clearly
showed that the precise time coding of the stimulus in mechanosensory neurons is not preserved at the level of the motoneurons. Nevertheless, the motor response elicited by local mechanical stimulation of the
leech skin is significantly reproducible (Fig. 1C,D). One of
the biophysical mechanisms that can account for the reproducibility of
the local bending is the low-pass-filtering property of the muscles.
Leech muscles (Mason and Kristan, 1982 ; Arisi et al., 2001 ; Zoccolan
and Torre, 2002 ), as some muscles of other invertebrates and lower
vertebrates (Morris and Hooper, 1997 ; Morris and Hooper, 1998 ),
contract very slowly and integrate the incoming spike trains over a
very long time window (several hundred milliseconds). This suggests
that the time course of the muscle contraction primarily depends on the
number of spikes fired by the activated motoneurons (Mason and Kristan,
1982 ; Morris and Hooper, 1997 , 1998 ) and not on their exact timing of
firing rate.
This integration property of the leech muscles was verified in a series
of experiments in which the spike timing of a single motoneuron was
changed by applying depolarizing current steps of different durations
and intensities but that all evoked the same total number of action
potentials. Figure 3A shows
the time course of the displacement of a selected point on the leech
skin, when spike trains of different durations and frequencies were evoked in motoneuron 3, an excitor of longitudinal muscles. The displacements indicated in Figure 3A (dotted
traces, solid traces) were induced by the spike
discharges shown respectively in the top (first stimulation protocol)
and the bottom (second stimulation protocol) of Figure 3B.
The total number of spikes evoked by these two intracellular stimuli
was the same (37), but their time distributions were completely
different. Nevertheless, the resulting displacements were almost
identical. Note that muscle contraction has an intrinsic high
variability, so that, when a spike train identical to that shown in
Figure 3B, top, was again evoked, the
corresponding displacement (Fig. 3A, dashed line)
differed from the dotted trace more than the solid trace did (this
property will be discussed in the next section). Data presented in
Figure 3 show that contractions induced by the second protocols do not
differ from contractions induced by the first more than what would be
expected from the natural variability of muscle contraction evoked by a
fixed number of spikes (see Fig. 5). Similar stimulation protocols,
applied to five different motoneurons in three different preparations,
confirmed the results shown in Figure 3. In all experiments, skin
displacements evoked by the second protocol were always statistically
indistinguishable by those evoked by the first one: (1) the second
protocol produced displacements that were always within 1 SD from the
mean displacement induced by the first stimulation protocol; and (2)
including data from the second protocol in the computation of mean and
SD for the first did not significantly change the value of the mean or increase the SD.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Low-pass filter properties of muscle fibers.
A, Time course of the displacement of a selected point
on the leech skin, when motoneuron 3 was forced to fire a controlled
number of spikes (37) in three different stimulations. The
displacements indicated by the dotted and solid
traces were induced by the spike discharges shown respectively
at the top and bottom of
B. The displacement indicated by the dashed
trace was evoked by a spike discharge similar to that shown in
the top of B. B, Top,
Spike train evoked in motoneuron 3 by a single depolarizing current
step of 0.7 nA lasting 1 sec (total number of evoked spikes, 37).
Bottom, Spike train evoked in motoneuron 3 by two
consecutive depolarizing current steps of 1 nA lasting 350 msec each
(total number of evoked spikes, 37).
|
|
Reproducibility of motoneuron firing
Having assessed that muscle contraction primarily depends on the
number of spikes fired by activated motoneurons, the reproducibility of
motoneuron firing after mechanical stimulation was investigated. As
shown in Figure 3, the contraction of leech muscles is not sensitive to
the jitter of the motoneuron spikes, but muscle contraction may be
sensitive to the number of the incoming spikes in the time window over
which spikes are integrated. In fact, Figure 2A shows that not only is the spike timing of coactivated motoneurons
significantly variable, but the spike number is, too.
The statistical properties of motoneuron firing were quantified by
computing the average firing rate (AFR) and its CV for all identified
motoneurons coactivated during local bending. A 200 msec time bin was
used, because this is large enough to observe a noticeable skin
contraction when single motoneurons are induced to fire at a
physiological rate (Arisi et al., 2001 ). Moreover, in the experiments
performed to study local bending, muscle contraction developed 200 msec
after mechanosensory stimulation and reached its peak in ~1 sec (Fig.
1D). Therefore, muscle fibers integrate motoneuron
spikes over an effective time window of ~200-400 msec.
Figure 4 shows the AFR (solid
line) and the CV (dashed line) for all identified
motoneurons from the experiment already shown in Figure 2, A
and B (blue circles). In the experiment, two
spikes were evoked in the cell Pd. All motoneuron
bursts were recorded from roots ipsilateral to the stimulated cell
Pd. This means that the innervation fields of the
recorded motoneurons were all ipsilateral to the receptive field of the
cell Pd (contralateral motoneurons were not
recorded in the present study). As expected (Lockery and Kristan,
1990a ; Zoccolan and Torre, 2002 ), all the identified dorsal excitors
(DEs), i.e., the excitatory motoneurons of dorsal longitudinal muscles,
were activated by the stimulus. The firing rate of these motoneurons
(cells 6, 5, 107, and 3) increased to 15-30 Hz after 30-60 msec (mean
latency of the first spike) from the stimulus onset, with a CV
transiently decreasing from ~1 to a value between 0.3 and 0.5 at the
peak of the response. Other identified motoneurons were coactivated by
the stimulus: cell L, excitor of all longitudinal muscles; cells 4 and
8, ventral excitors (VEs); cell CiV, an excitor of ventral circular
muscles; cell 109, an excitor of flattener muscles (FEs); and cell 119, a ventral inhibitor (VI). These neurons were activated at lower rate
(5-10 Hz) with a CV at the peak of the response just <1 for most of
them. Other motoneurons were inhibited: cell 108, a VE; cell 102, a
dorsal inhibitor (DI).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
First-order statistics of motoneuron spike trains.
Average firing rate (solid lines) and coefficient of
variation (dashed lines) of the activity of 12 coactivated motoneurons during local bending are shown. Motoneurons are
from the same experiment analyzed in Figure 2, A and
B (blue circles). Local bending was
elicited by inducing a dorsal P cell to fire two spikes. Data were
obtained from 76 different trials. Bin width, 200 msec.
|
|
This pattern of activation of motoneurons is consistent with the
classical description of dorsal local bending: activation of all DEs
and cell L, activation of VI, and inhibition of DI and VE (Lockery and
Kristan, 1990a ). It also confirms the involvement of motoneurons
inducing transverse contractions (CiV and FE) in the local bending
(Zoccolan and Torre, 2002 ). Figure 4 shows also that some VEs, such as
cells 4 and 8, were excited. These neurons were activated at a low rate
by the Pd firing (5-10 Hz), whereas ventral P
cell (Pv) firing activated them at a much
higher rate (20-30 Hz; data not shown). As a general trend, in all
experiments performed (five), we observed that (1) DEs and VEs were
always strongly activated by, respectively, Pd
and Pv firing, and (2) some VEs and some DEs
could be activated at a low rate by, respectively, Pd and Pv firing. These
results suggest that some VEs and some DEs can be recruited during the
stimulation of, respectively, dorsal and ventral P cells in a rather
variable way from preparation to preparation. This is consistent with
the execution of lateral bending, which is usually elicited by
simultaneous activation of both dorsal and ventral P cells on the same
side of the ganglion (Lockery and Kristan, 1990a ,b ; Kristan et al.,
1995 ).
Figure 4 shows that the CV of the firing activity of individual
motoneurons coactivated during local bending is rather high. All
activated motoneurons have a CV between 0.4 and 1 at the peak of the
response, with the only exception being cell 6 (CV ~0.3). Similar
results were obtained in all five tested preparations, in which the
dorsal and ventral P cells were alternatively stimulated. In every
experiment, between 8 and 12 motoneurons were simultaneously recorded
and identified, and their AFR and CV were computed. Almost all recorded
motoneurons had a CV between 0.4 and 1 at the peak of the AFR. No more
than one dorsal or ventral excitor per experiment had a CV of ~0.3
after stimulation, respectively, of the dorsal or ventral P cell. To
test whether such variable firing rates in individual motoneurons can
sustain the reproducible motor responses observed during local bending
(Fig. 1C,D), we investigated the reproducibility of the
contractions induced by single-motoneuron firing.
Variability of muscle contraction
The variability of the motor response depends on the variability
of the motoneuron firing pattern as well as on the variability of the
muscle contraction (see Discussion; Stuart, 1970 ; Hoover et al., 2002 ).
The variability of muscle contraction was studied by impaling
individual motoneurons with a sharp intracellular electrode and by
evoking a controlled number of spikes. The displacement of a
representative point on the skin was followed when 14 (Fig. 5A, black traces),
17 (red traces), or 20 (blue traces) spikes were
evoked within 400 msec in motoneuron 107 by depolarizing current steps
of increasing size. The CV of the associated displacement for a fixed
number of spikes was ~0.4 for 17 spikes and decreased to ~0.2 for
20 or more spikes (Fig. 5B). When the number of spikes of
the motoneuron was allowed to vary, the CV of the skin displacement increased almost linearly with the CV of the motoneuron firing, as
shown in Figure 5C (black line). Figure
5C also shows a similar trend for three other motoneurons in
three different preparations: cell 5 (red line), cell 8 (green line), and cell CiV (blue line). These results, repeated in four different preparations, show that the
CV measured for the local bending, between 0.2 and 0.3 (Fig. 1C,D), is just larger than the CV of the skin deformation
evoked by a single motoneuron firing with a CV of almost 0, i.e., with almost perfect reproducibility (Fig. 5B). From the data
shown in Figure 5C, we expect that a CV of the skin
displacement between 0.2 and 0.5 should be produced by a single
motoneuron firing with a CV varying between 0.1 and 0.2. Single
motoneurons whose firing rate has a CV of 0.3 cannot induce skin
deformations with a CV of <0.5.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Variability of muscle contraction.
A, Displacement of a selected point on the leech skin
during the repetitive stimulation of motoneuron 107 with depolarizing
current steps of increasing size, lasting 400 msec and evoking a
controlled number of spikes in the neuron. Eleven trials (black
lines) with 14 spikes, 12 trials (red lines)
with 17 spikes, and 11 trials (blue lines) with 20 spikes were recorded. B, Mean CV of the maximal
displacement of 6 selected points, when a fixed number of spikes were
evoked in motoneuron 107 in different repetitions. Eleven, 12, and 11 repetitions with 14, 17, and 20 spikes, respectively, were considered.
C, Relationship between the mean CV of the maximal
displacement of 6 selected points and the CV of the spike number for
motoneurons 107 (black diamonds), 5 (red
squares), 8 (green circles), and CiV
(blue triangles) impaled in four different
preparations.
|
|
Figure 4 suggests that the CV of the firing rate of coactivated
motoneurons, at the peak of the response, is too high to account for
the reproducibility of local bending. However, for slow-contracting, nonspiking muscles, such as those of the leech, the contraction amplitude primarily depends on the number of spikes in the motoneuron burst induced by mechanosensory stimulation rather than on the firing
frequency of motoneurons (Morris and Hooper, 1997 ). Figure 6 shows the CV of the spike number, in
time bins of increasing size after Pd firing, for
the first eight motoneurons analyzed in Figure 4. The time bin varies
from 200 msec (the same as Fig. 4) to 1 sec, because local bending
reached its peak in ~1 sec by the onset of the P cell stimulation
(Fig. 1D), and the more active motoneurons (Fig. 4,
first four panels) fired at sustained rate for ~1-1.2
sec. Counting spikes in time windows of increasing size slightly
reduced the variability in the number of spikes fired by activated
motoneurons (Fig. 6). Nevertheless, even when very long time windows (1 sec) were taken into account, the CV of the spike number of just one
motoneuron (cell 6) reached a value as low as 0.2. All other motoneuron
bursts had a CV of 0.3: cells 3 and L, ~0.3; cell 5, ~0.35; cell
4, ~0.5; and cells 108, 107, and 8, >0.7.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Variability of spike number in motoneuron bursts.
Coefficients of variation of the spike number, in time bins of
increasing size after Pd firing, are shown for motoneurons
6 (circles), 3 (asterisks), L (×), 5 (squares), 4 (diamonds), 108 (+), 107 ( ) and 8 (triangles) (same data as in Fig. 4).
|
|
Data presented in Figures 4-6 clearly show that the reproducibility of
the local bending cannot be exclusively explained by the
low-pass-filtering properties of the leech muscles (Fig. 3). Although
muscle fibers are not sensitive to the timing of the incoming spikes,
muscle contractions are rather sensitive to variations in the spike
number (Fig. 5C). The AFR of individual motoneurons, coactivated during local bending (Fig. 4), is definitely too variable to account for this reproducible behavior. Moreover, the number of
spikes in motoneuron bursts lasting up to 1 sec, is also too variable
to explain the reproducibility of the local bending (Fig. 6). Some
other mechanism should take place to reduce variability of the motor output.
Distributed organization of the motor output
A biophysical mechanism that can explain such a low variability of
the local bending is the distributed organization of the firing
activity sustaining it at the level of the motoneurons. Figure
7 shows the analysis of statistical
independence for the activity of some motoneurons whose AFR and CV were
reported in Figure 4. The statistical independence of motoneuron firing
was characterized by computing, for each pair of coactivated
motoneurons, the joint probability, pij that both
motoneurons fire one spike, and Hij, the joint
entropy of their firing activity (Pinato et al., 2000 ). For all pairs
of motoneurons shown in Figure 7 (the most strongly activated during
local bending) (Fig. 4); pij was almost equal to
pi/pj and Hij
was identical to Hi + Hj (see Materials and Methods). Thus, the firing of these motoneurons, coactivated during local bending, was pair-wise statistically independent. We found similar results for every pair of motoneurons shown in Figure 4 and for every pair of motoneurons recorded in all
five experiments we performed.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Statistical independence of motoneuron
firing. Joint probabilities and joint entropies are shown for all
possible pair-wise combinations of motoneurons 6, 5, 3, 107, and 4, whose AFR and CV are shown in Figure 4. Top right
panels, For each pair of motoneurons i and
j, the joint probability of firing
pij (red line) is compared with
the product of individual probabilities
pi/pj (black dashed
line). Bottom left panels, The joint entropy
Hij (red line) is compared with
the sum of individual entropies Hi + Hj (black dashed line). Bin
width, 20 msec.
|
|
These observations suggest that the motor response analyzed in Figure 1
has a distributed organization (Tsau et al., 1994 ; Wu et al., 1994 ;
Lewis and Kristan, 1998a ; Pinato et al., 2000 ; Arisi et al., 2001 ); it
is produced by the coactivation of a population of motoneurons, and its
low variability is the result of the underlying neuron pooling. This is
supported by Figure 8A,
in which the CVs of the firing rates of all identified longitudinal
motoneurons activated during local bending (first eight neurons of Fig.
4) are drawn (dashed lined) together with the CV of their
ensemble activity (solid line). Figure 8A
clearly shows that the CV of each individual motoneuron in the pool is
significantly higher than that of the pooled activity, which is rarely
>0.5 and has a minimum close to 0.2 at the peak of the response. A
similar result was obtained when the number of spikes in motoneuron
bursts was counted and its CV was computed (Fig. 6). The number of
spikes of the population of coactivated motoneurons had a CV always
close to 0.2 for every selected time window (from 200 msec up to 1 sec after Pd firing, in steps of 200 msec). This
increase in reproducibility of the population firing is a consequence
of the statistical independence illustrated in Figure 7 (Pinato et al.,
2000 ). The pattern of activation of motoneurons after dorsal and
ventral P cell firing was analyzed in five different preparations. All
these experiments gave results similar to those shown in Figures 4, 7,
and 8A; motoneurons fired quite irregularly from
trial to trial, but the CV of their pooled activity had a minimum <0.2
because of their statistical independence. On the basis of data shown
in Figure 5, this CV is small enough to guarantee a motor response as
reproducible as that shown in Figure 1D.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Pooling variability of coactivated
motoneurons. A, The CV of eight longitudinal motoneurons
(cells 6, 5, 107, 3, L, 4, 108, and 8) coactivated during local bending
(dashed lines) is compared with the CV (solid
line) of their pooled activity. Motoneurons are from the same
experiment analyzed in Figures 2, 4, and 6. B, The CV of
the pooled activity of the same motoneurons is computed by removing
individual motoneurons one at the time from the pool. The bottom
trace (a) is the CV computed for the
whole population of motoneurons (cells 6, 5, 107, 3, L, 4, 108, and 8)
and corresponds to the solid line in A.
The other traces are the CVs obtained by removing the
following motoneurons from the starting population: cell 6 (b); cells 6 and 3 (c);
cells 6, 3, and 5 (d); cells 6, 3, 5, and 4 (e); cells 6, 3, 5, 4, and L
(f); and cells 6, 3, 5, 4, L, and 107 (g).
|
|
This distributed coding across a population of independent motoneurons
not only assures reliability of the motor response but also allows
graceful degradation of performance with damage to individual
motoneurons. We tested the robustness of population coding by computing
the CV of the pooled activity of the motoneuron population from which
data of single motoneurons were removed one at the time. The result is
shown in Figure 8B. The CV increased in little steps
while individual motoneurons were removed from the pool. This
guarantees a gradual decrease in the reliability of motor output in
case of damage to individual motoneurons. Note in particular that even
when we removed the motoneurons with more reproducible firing (cells 6 and 3) from pooling, the variability of the population firing did not
significantly increase and still had a CV with a minimum of <0.25 (for
details, see legend to Fig. 8).
Local bending is sustained by the coactivation of
several motoneurons
Given that local bending is sustained by the coactivation of a
population of motoneurons (Fig. 4), and that skin deformations induced
by pairs of motoneurons superimpose linearly (Zoccolan and Torre,
2002 ), we tested whether local bending can be approximated by the
linear sum of an ensemble of skin deformations induced by individual
motoneurons. We addressed this issue in a series of experiments in
which we impaled and stimulated the P cells and as many motoneurons as
possible in the same skin preparation.
Figure 9 summarizes the results of one of
these experiments. Figure 9A shows the optical flow induced
by firing two spikes in a dorsal P cell. In the same preparation,
motoneurons L, 3, 5, 112, and 107 were impaled. The corresponding
optical flows are drawn in Figure 9B-E (optical flow of
cell 107 not shown). These optical flows were obtained by inducing the
impaled motoneurons to fire a burst of action potentials at 15-20 Hz
for 400 msec to evoke firing patterns similar to those recorded during
Pd stimulation (Fig. 4). Figure 9F
shows the linear superposition of these optical flows induced by
individual motoneurons. Because most excitors of longitudinal muscles
were included in the sum, a marked similarity between the intensity and
shape of the local bending (Fig. 9A) and those of the linear
sum of the impaled motoneurons (Fig. 9F) is apparent.
This was confirmed by calculating the elementary deformations of the
two fields drawn in Figure 9, A and F. As shown
in Figure 10, the main elementary
deformations (E and S1) of
these two optical flows differ for <5%. These results confirm that
the local bending cannot be accounted for by the activation of just one
motoneuron; it is necessary to consider the optical flows associated
with a large number of motoneurons to obtain a good approximation of
its shape and intensity. Specifically, Figure 9 shows that the
coactivation of several motoneurons assures not only the
reproducibility of the local bending (Fig. 8) but also its strength
(note that the optical flows induced by motoneurons are shown with a
magnification four times higher than the optical flow associated with
the local bending). These results were confirmed in two other
experiments in which a P cell and three or four motoneurons were
impaled in the same preparation.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Distributed motor output.
A, Optical flow describing the maximal skin contraction
evoked by the firing of two spikes by a dorsal P cell.
B-E, Optical flows describing the maximal skin
contractions induced by the firing of motoneurons L, 3, 5, and 112, respectively, at ~10-20 Hz in the same preparation.
F, Linear superposition of the optical flows in
B-E. The gain of the optical flow in A
and F is 1; otherwise it is 4. The boxes
in A and F are the linearization regions
used to compute the stationary point position (×) and the elementary
deformations shown in Figure 10.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
Accuracy of the linear superposition. Elementary
deformations are shown for the optical flows shown in Figures 9, A
(gray bars) and F (white
bars).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data presented here show that local bending (a simple
sensorimotor response of the leech) is rather reproducible (Fig. 1),
but the firing of the motoneurons that sustains it is much more
variable (Figs. 2, 4). Because it was possible to record simultaneously
from the majority of motoneurons involved in the motor response (Fig.
4), the existence of hidden motoneurons firing in a highly reproducible
way is unlikely. We therefore conclude that highly reproducible spike
trains are not necessary for highly reproducible motor responses.
Temporal averaging
Reliability of the behavior is obtained by temporal and ensemble
averaging. Temporal averaging is guaranteed by the low-pass-filtering properties of the leech muscle fibers, which integrate motoneuron spikes within an effective time window of ~200 msec (Arisi et al.,
2001 ) and make the time course of a contraction relatively insensitive
to the jitter of motoneuron spikes.
Muscle contractions produced by individual motoneurons show significant
variability even when driven by perfectly reliable spike trains (Fig.
5B). When spike trains in a motoneuron have a CV of ~0.25,
the resulting muscle contraction has a CV of approximately or >0.5,
i.e., significantly higher than the CV of the movements observed during
local bending (compare Figs. 1, 5). Therefore, the reliability of local
bending cannot be accounted only by the low-pass properties of muscle contraction.
Ensemble averaging
The motor response is mediated by coactivation of an ensemble of
distinct motoneurons (Figs. 4, 7, 8) that fire in an almost statistically independent way (Fig. 7). Statistical independence compensates for the fluctuations (Figs. 4, 6) in the firing of individual motoneurons; thus the ensemble firing of the motoneuron population becomes less variable (Fig. 8A). In
addition, fluctuations of muscle contraction evoked by individual
motoneurons (Fig. 5) will probably be compensated and averaged by
statistical independence (Hoover et al., 2002 ).
Figure 11 shows a simple scheme,
indicating where, in the reflex pathway, variability is introduced and
which biophysical mechanisms counteract it. The first spikes in the
mechanosensory P cell are remarkably reproducible (Fig.
1A), often with a jitter of <100 µsec (Pinato and
Torre, 2000 ). In a leech ganglion, neural signals from sensory neurons
reach motoneurons through monosynaptic and polysynaptic pathways
(Muller et al., 1981 ; Lockery and Kristan, 1990b ; Wittenberg and
Kristan, 1992 ). Polysynaptic pathways introduce significant
variability, and the first spikes in motoneurons occur with a jitter of
>10 msec and often on the order of 100 msec (1000 times larger than in
mechanosensory neurons). Given these biophysical constraints,
reliability of the motor response in the leech is achieved by
integrating spikes over a time window of several hundreds of
milliseconds and over a population of some dozens of motoneurons. Therefore, population coding in the leech is used not only for interpolation between neurons with different receptive fields (Lewis
and Kristan, 1998a ) or population vector codes (Georgopoulos et al.,
1986 ; Lewis and Kristan, 1998a ; Georgopoulos, 2000 ) but also for
increasing the reliability of the behavior. Indeed, if local bending
were not mediated by a motoneuron population but only by a single
motoneuron, given the high variability of individual motoneuron firing
(Fig. 4) and the variability of muscle contraction (Fig. 5), the
resulting motor response would have a CV of ~0.6-0.7, approximately
three times that observed (Fig. 1). Because we are recording from the
majority of leech motoneurons, it is highly unlikely that there is an
undetected mechanism with more precise spikes.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
Proposed scheme of the neuronal network mediating
local bending reflex. Mechanosensory stimuli (S)
are coded by precise firing of a pressure P cell (black
unit). Then, neural signals cross some layers of interneurons
(gray units) to reach motoneurons (white
units) that, in turn, innervate muscle fibers. The typical
jitter of the first spike for P cells and motoneurons is shown at the
bottom together with the CV of P cell firing, the
typical CV of individual motoneuron firing, and the CV of the amplitude
of the motor response. Reliability of the motor response is
achieved by integrating spikes over a population of some dozens of
motoneurons and over a time window of several hundred
milliseconds.
|
|
Comparison with previous studies
A number of studies focused on reliability of neural firing in
invertebrate (Bialek and Rieke, 1992 ; de Ruyter van Steveninck et al.,
1997 ; Warzecha and Egelhaaf, 1999 ; Warzecha et al., 2000 ; Hoover et
al., 2002 ) and mammalian (Shadlen and Newsome, 1994 , 1998 ; Mainen and
Sejnowski, 1995 ; Stevens and Zador, 1998 ; Kara et al., 2000 ; Lestienne,
2001 ) nervous systems, as well as on population coding (Georgopoulos et
al., 1986 ; Lewis and Kristan, 1998a ; Georgopoulos, 2000 ), correlated
and uncorrelated firing (Zohary et al., 1994 ; Alonso et al., 1996 ; Raz
et al., 1996 ; Bergman et al., 1998 ; Bair et al., 2001 ; Goldberg et al.,
2002 ), and distributed organization of the neural response (Tsau et
al., 1994 ; Wu et al., 1994 ; Middlebrooks et al., 1998 ). The present
work describes, for the first time to our knowledge, how the
reliability of the spike trains degrades, crossing consecutive stages
of a nervous system during the execution of a simple behavior, and
which biophysical mechanisms the nervous system uses to obtain global
reliability with unreliable components. The stimulus is coded by
precisely timed spikes in sensory neurons of the input stage, but the
associated motor response is mediated by a rate code distributed across
a population of statistically independent output units. This
distributed rate code not only increases reliability of the behavior
but also stabilizes the dynamics of the motor response, assures its
robustness, and allows graceful degradation of performance with damage
to individual motoneurons (Fig. 8B).
The cat visual system
A similar attempt to track variability at different neural stages
has been performed recently in the cat visual system by Kara et al.
(2000) . They recorded simultaneously from three different stages of the
cat nervous system and showed that trial-by-trial response variability
of visual cells becomes higher at each consecutive visual stage. The
present work and that of Kara et al. (2000) substantially differ in the
choice of the model nervous system studied (invertebrate vs mammal) and
of the investigated neural process (coding of sensorimotor responses
versus representation of visual stimuli). Nevertheless, the results
reported in the two studies are in general agreement, because both
works show that neural responses become more variable as they cross
consecutive synaptic levels.
The stomatogastric neuromuscular system of the lobster
A recent article by Hoover et al. (2002) was more strictly related
to the present work. They recorded simultaneously (1) the extrajunctional potentials (EJPs) evoked in the pyloric muscles of the
lobster stomatogastric neuromuscular system by motor nerve stimulation
and (2) the amplitude of the pyloric muscle contraction. They found
high variability in EJP amplitude, whereas the contraction of the
corresponding pyloric muscle was highly deterministic. The issue they
investigated, i.e., how electrical responses with large amplitude
variation give rise to deterministic muscle output, is clearly related
to the present work. However, several points make the present work and
that of Hoover et al. (2002) significantly different. They studied the
contraction of an individual muscle induced by stimulation of an
individual motor nerve, whereas we investigated neural coding of a
sensorimotor response by a population of coactivated sensory and motor
neurons. The electrical responses they measured were EJPs in an
activated muscle, whereas we recorded the firing pattern of tens of
coactivated motoneurons, each innervating specific muscle fibers. In
brief, the results obtained by Hoover et al. (2002) can be properly
compared only with the results showing variability of the contraction
induced by single-leech motoneuron firing, as reported in Figure 5 of
this work. This comparison suggests that variability in the amplitude
of EJPs could play similar roles in leech (Stuart, 1970 ) and lobster
pyloric muscles and could be responsible for the variability of the
contraction produced by reliable firing of single leech motoneurons
(Fig. 5). Another mechanism proposed by Hoover et al. (2002) to reduce pyloric contraction variability, combinatorial averaging of EJPs in
individual muscle fibers, could play a similar role in the leech
muscles. This is suggested by the reduction in variability we observed
when the number of spikes in the burst fired by a single motoneuron was
increased (Fig. 5B). Finally, averaging across muscle fibers
whose electrical responses are uncorrelated, the second mechanism
proposed by Hoover et al. (2002) to reduce pyloric contraction
variability, supports the idea that statistical independence in the
electrical response of coactivated motoneurons (present work),
individual muscle fibers (Hoover et al., 2002 ), or both is a powerful
means to enhance reliability and stability of muscle contraction.
Conclusions
Averaging action potentials over an ensemble of neurons and over
an appropriate time window is a likely mechanism for nervous systems to
achieve high reproducibility despite using poorly reliable components
such as neurons, synapses, and muscles. The extent of ensemble and time
averaging, however, will be constrained by the task to be performed and
by the biophysical properties of the specific neurons involved. The
precision of spike occurrence depends on the requirements of the action
or output: in the present case, a significant jitter (even of ~100
msec) and a CV of ~0.4 in individual motoneurons were tolerated.
Several tasks performed by the auditory system (Heil, 1997 ; Heil and
Irvine, 1997 ; Middlebrooks et al., 1998 ; Furukawa and Middlebrooks,
2002 ) require very precise timing among spikes with a jitter of <100
µsec. These data suggest that neurons are reliable on the time scale
needed to attain the observed behavioral criteria. Therefore, any
analysis of reliability of spike trains in a neuron or a population of
neurons has to take into account the precision requirements imposed by
the action or output to be produced.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received July 3, 2002; revised Sept. 13, 2002; accepted Sept. 18, 2002.
This work was funded by European Union Grant Parallel 960211. We thank
Dr. Hugh Robinson for valuable scientific suggestions and helpful
comments on this manuscript and Manuela Schipizza Lough and Dylan Dean
for editing the text.
Correspondence should be addressed to Vincent Torre, Scuola
Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Via Beirut 2, 34014 Trieste, Italy. E-mail: torre{at}sissa.it.
G. Pinato's present address: Department of Medical Physiology,
University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Alonso JM,
Usrey WM,
Reid RC
(1996)
Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus.
Nature
383:815-819[Medline].
-
Arisi I,
Zoccolan D,
Torre V
(2001)
Distributed motor pattern underlying whole-body shortening in the medicinal leech.
J Neurophysiol
86:2475-2488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bair W,
Zohary E,
Newsome WT
(2001)
Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: time scales and relationship to behavior.
J Neurosci
21:1676-1697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Bergman H,
Feingold A,
Nini A,
Raz A,
Slovin H,
Abeles M,
Vaadia E
(1998)
Physiological aspects of information processing in the basal ganglia of normal and parkinsonian primates.
Trends Neurosci
21:32-38[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Bialek W,
Rieke F
(1992)
Reliability and information transmission in spiking neurons.
Trends Neurosci
15:428-434[Web of Science][Medline].
-
de Ruyter van Steveninck RR,
Lewen GD,
Strong SP,
Koberle R,
Bialek W
(1997)
Reproducibility and variability in neural spike trains.
Science
275:1805-1808[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Furukawa S,
Middlebrooks JC
(2002)
Cortical representation of auditory space: information-bearing features of spike patterns.
J Neurophysiol
87:1749-1762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Georgopoulos AP
(2000)
Neural aspects of cognitive motor control.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
10:238-241[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Georgopoulos AP,
Schwartz AB,
Kettner RE
(1986)
Neuronal population coding of movement direction.
Science
233:1416-1419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Gerstner W,
Kreiter AK,
Markram H,
Herz AV
(1997)
Neural codes: firing rates and beyond.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:12740-12741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Goldberg JA,
Boraud T,
Maraton S,
Haber SN,
Vaadia E,
Bergman H
(2002)
Enhanced synchrony among primary motor cortex neurons in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine primate model of Parkinson's disease.
J Neurosci
22:4639-4653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Heil P
(1997)
Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing.
J Neurophysiol
77:2616-2641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Heil P,
Irvine DR
(1997)
First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex.
J Neurophysiol
78:2438-2454[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hoover NJ,
Weaver AL,
Harness PI,
Hooper SL
(2002)
Combinatorial and cross-fiber averaging transform muscle electrical responses with a large stochastic component into deterministic contractions.
J Neurosci
22:1895-1904[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kara P,
Reinagel P,
Reid RC
(2000)
Low response variability in simultaneously recorded retinal, thalamic, and cortical neurons.
Neuron
27:635-646[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kristan Jr WB
(1982)
Sensory and motor neurones responsible for the local bending response in leeches.
J Exp Biol
96:161-180[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kristan Jr WB,
Lockery SR,
Lewis JE
(1995)
Using reflexive behaviors of the medicinal leech to study information processing.
J Neurobiol
27:380-389[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lestienne R
(2001)
Spike timing, synchronization and information processing on the sensory side of the central nervous system.
Prog Neurobiol
65:545-591[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lewis JE,
Kristan Jr WB
(1998a)
A neuronal network for computing population vectors in the leech.
Nature
391:76-79[Medline].
-
Lewis JE,
Kristan Jr WB
(1998b)
Representation of touch location by a population of leech sensory neurons.
J Neurophysiol
80:2584-2592[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Lockery SR,
Kristan Jr WB
(1990a)
Distributed processing of sensory information in the leech. I. Input-output relations of the local bending reflex.
J Neurosci
10:1811-1815[Abstract].
-
Lockery SR,
Kristan Jr WB
(1990b)
Distributed processing of sensory information in the leech. II. Identification of interneurons contributing to the local bending reflex.
J Neurosci
10:1816-1829[Abstract].
-
Mainen ZF,
Sejnowski TJ
(1995)
Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons.
Science
268:1503-1506[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Mason A,
Kristan Jr WB
(1982)
Neuronal excitation, inhibition and modulation of leech longitudinal muscle.
J Comp Physiol
146:527-536.
-
Middlebrooks JC,
Xu L,
Eddins AC,
Green DM
(1998)
Codes for sound-source location in nontonotopic auditory cortex.
J Neurophysiol
80:863-881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Morris LG,
Hooper SL
(1997)
Muscle response to changing neuronal input in the lobster (Panulirus interruptus) stomatogastric system: spike number- versus spike frequency-dependent domains.
J Neurosci
17:5956-5971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Morris LG,
Hooper SL
(1998)
Muscle response to changing neuronal input in the lobster (Panulirus interruptus) stomatogastric system: slow muscle properties can transform rhythmic input into tonic output.
J Neurosci
18:3433-3442[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Muller KJ,
Nicholls JG,
Stent GS
(1981)
In: Neurobiology of the leech. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
-
Nicholls JG,
Baylor DA
(1968)
Specific modalities and receptive fields of sensory neurons in CNS of the leech.
J Neurophysiol
31:740-756[Free Full Text].
-
Ort CA,
Kristan Jr WB,
Stent GS
(1974)
Neuronal control of swimming in the medicinal leech II. Identification and connections of motor neurons.
J Comp Physiol [A]
94:121-154.
-
Pinato G,
Torre V
(2000)
Coding and adaptation during mechanical stimulation in the leech nervous system.
J Physiol (Lond)
529:747-762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Pinato G,
Battiston S,
Torre V
(2000)
Statistical independence and neural computation in the leech ganglion.
Biol Cybern
83:119-130[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Raz A,
Feingold A,
Zelanskaya V,
Vaadia E,
Bergman H
(1996)
Neuronal synchronization of tonically active neurons in the striatum of normal and parkinsonian primates.
J Neurophysiol
76:2083-2088[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Shadlen MN,
Newsome WT
(1994)
Noise, neural codes and cortical organization.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
4:569-579[Medline].
-
Shadlen MN,
Newsome WT
(1998)
The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding.
J Neurosci
18:3870-3896[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Stent GS,
Kristan Jr WB,
Friesen WO,
Ort CA,
Poon M,
Calabrese RL
(1978)
Neuronal generation of the leech swimming movement.
Science
200:1348-1357[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Stevens CF,
Zador AM
(1998)
Input synchrony and the irregular firing of cortical neurons.
Nat Neurosci
1:210-217[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Stuart AE
(1970)
Physiological and morphological properties of motoneurones in the central nervous system of the leech.
J Physiol (Lond)
209:627-646[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Tsau Y,
Wu JY,
Hopp HP,
Cohen LB,
Schiminovich D,
Falk CX
(1994)
Distributed aspects of the response to siphon touch in Aplysia: spread of stimulus information and cross-correlation analysis.
J Neurosci
14:4167-4184[Abstract].
-
Warzecha AK,
Egelhaaf M
(1999)
Variability in spike trains during constant and dynamic stimulation.
Science
283:1927-1930[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Warzecha AK,
Kretzberg J,
Egelhaaf M
(2000)
Reliability of a fly motion-sensitive neuron depends on stimulus parameters.
J Neurosci
20:8886-8896[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wittenberg G,
Kristan Jr WB
(1992)
Analysis and modeling of the multisegmental coordination of shortening behavior in the medicinal leech. II. Role of identified interneurons.
J Neurophysiol
68:1693-1707[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Wu JY,
Cohen LB,
Falk CX
(1994)
Neuronal activity during different behaviors in Aplysia: a distributed organization?
Science
263:820-823[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zoccolan D,
Torre V
(2002)
Using optical flow to characterize sensory-motor interactions in a segment of the medicinal leech.
J Neurosci
22:2283-2298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Zoccolan D,
Giachetti A,
Torre V
(2001)
The use of optical flow to characterize muscle contraction.
J Neurosci Methods
110:65-80[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Zohary E,
Shadlen MN,
Newsome WT
(1994)
Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance.
Nature
370:140-143[Medline].
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/222410790-11$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ban, P. Bonifazi, G. Pinato, F. D. Broccard, L. Studer, V. Torre, and M. E. Ruaro
Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Neurons Form Functional Networks In Vitro
Stem Cells,
March 1, 2007;
25(3):
738 - 749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Karmeier, J. H. van Hateren, R. Kern, and M. Egelhaaf
Encoding of Naturalistic Optic Flow by a Population of Blowfly Motion-Sensitive Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2006;
96(3):
1602 - 1614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Thomson and W. B. Kristan
Encoding and decoding touch location in the leech CNS.
J. Neurosci.,
July 26, 2006;
26(30):
8009 - 8016.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhurov and V. Brezina
Variability of motor neuron spike timing maintains and shapes contractions of the accessory radula closer muscle of Aplysia.
J. Neurosci.,
June 28, 2006;
26(26):
7056 - 7070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Lum, Y. Zhurov, E. C. Cropper, K. R. Weiss, and V. Brezina
Variability of Swallowing Performance in Intact, Freely Feeding Aplysia
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2005;
94(4):
2427 - 2446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Baca, E. E. Thomson, and W. B. Kristan Jr.
Location and Intensity Discrimination in the Leech Local Bend Response Quantified Using Optic Flow and Principal Components Analysis
J Neurophysiol,
June 1, 2005;
93(6):
3560 - 3572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. N. Aldworth, J. P. Miller, T. Gedeon, G. I. Cummins, and A. G. Dimitrov
Dejittered Spike-Conditioned Stimulus Waveforms Yield Improved Estimates of Neuronal Feature Selectivity and Spike-Timing Precision of Sensory Interneurons
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2005;
25(22):
5323 - 5332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Garcia-Perez, D. Zoccolan, G. Pinato, and V. Torre
Dynamics and Reproducibility of a Moderately Complex Sensory-Motor Response in the Medicinal Leech
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2004;
92(3):
1783 - 1795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Horn, Y. Zhurov, I. V. Orekhova, A. Proekt, I. Kupfermann, K. R. Weiss, and V. Brezina
Cycle-to-Cycle Variability of Neuromuscular Activity in Aplysia Feeding Behavior
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2004;
92(1):
157 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|